Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

(Redirected from COM:CID)

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

[edit] Formalidades

[edit] Nominación

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

[edit] Crear una nueva nominación

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

[edit] Para votar

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

{{Support}} ( Support),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info:),
{{Question}} ( Question: ).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

[edit] Reglas

Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
que haya un mínimo de cinco votos a favor
que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)

[edit] Propuestas

[edit] File:Jugo de naranja.svg

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2009 at 01:59:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Danilo94 - uploaded by Danilo94 - nominated by Danilo94 -- Danilo94 (talk) 01:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Danilo94 (talk) 01:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Luca Toni Bayern.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2009 at 18:20:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Tsutomu Takasu - uploaded by Simo82 - nominated by Sidik iz PTU -- Sidik iz PTU (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Sidik iz PTU (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose resolution too low, left hand unsharp --MattiPaavola (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Petra Jordan BW 43.JPG

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2009 at 10:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created - uploaded - nominated -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This crop is much better then the other one! --Leviathan (talk) 10:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- MJJR (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Ceridwen (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Royal Naval college-3.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2009 at 17:26:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Herbythyme - uploaded by Herbythyme - nominated by Herbythyme -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: This images shows the Britannia Royal Naval College in Dartmouth on the River Dart. There has been a training centre for naval officers here since the 1860's but this building was completed in 1905.
Support -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - nice picture --Pudelek (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Sorry, I don't like the composition and the detail could be much better. As a side note, the large size of the thumb fools the reviewer into thinking this is a panorama, which is not. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- I apologise for any apparent "fooling" - it was certainly not my intention. Any larger crop would have brought in unnecessary detail. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great colors, very beautiful scenery, good EV and very good quality.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Not detailed, blurry at the lower left corner and some of the trees, some blue artifacts at the houses in the front. A panorama would have been much better with higher res, more details, corrected levels and sharpness.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral Couldn´t find a decision right now. I like the light + the colors and the composition would be alright with me, but there´s these brightly lit houses in front. Also, level of detail/resolution is ~~low~~ not amazing. Nikopol (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure how far you zoomed it but I can count the sheep in the field to the right and the rear...:) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Better formulation? I think Alvesgaspar was right, you are somehow disappointed when you discover it´s not a panorama. Any chance of taking one? And as I stated, I´m not decided yet. In general, for me technical issues are all in all less important than the overall feeling of a picture and I might well approve in the end Nikopol (talk) 12:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey - one of the reasons for doing this is to get feedback and I appreciate it. I will definitely go for a panorama next time I am that way but it won't be for a while yet. As I said I had no intentions of misleading with this but I had to crop the foreground or I would not have supported it :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Peine del viento de Eduardo Chillida.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2009 at 16:25:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: All Nikopol -- Nikopol (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
The windcombs of Eduardo Chillida are situated at the entrance to the bay of San Sebastian. There, they "comb" the wind before it enters the city.
Support -- Nikopol (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sadly, as it's a lovely composition. But there's a lot of noise, especially on the rocks, and the whole images is suffering from chromatic aberration and a purple tinge. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose as above + subject too dark --Leafnode✉ 10:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2009 at 07:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Mila Zinkova - uploaded by Mbz1 - nominated by Tiptoety -- Tiptoety ^talk 07:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Tiptoety ^talk 07:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
За - WOW! Strong support! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment this one which looks very similar is already featured. /Daniel78 (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Daniel's right, the nomination is here. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - duplicate of an already featured image.--Avala (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Per Avala. —kallerna™ 16:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because The nomination is useless as the same image, with a different name, is already a FP -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

[edit] File:Low pressure system over Iceland.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 23:13:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by NASA - uploaded by Brian0918 - nominated by Ks0stm -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 23:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 23:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
За Nice and rare --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Durova (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Strong support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Fantastic. -- Jovan Cormac 08:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nice how far you can zoom in Nikopol (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Karl Emil Otto Fritsch-Denkmaeler Deutscher Renaissance-1891-Nuernberg-Pellerhaus zu Nuernberg Aegidienplatz 1605 Facade.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 20:43:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by unknown - uploaded by Mylius - nominated by Mylius -- Mylius (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mylius (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Can this image be geocoded? Does the building still exist? If so, I don't think this warrants FP since the composition is not good (cutting the left building in half). If it no longer exists, the historic value brings it up a few notches, perhaps a cropped version would be featurable? --99of9 (talk) 00:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Eilean Donan castle - 95mm.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 20:30:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Eusebius - uploaded by Eusebius - nominated by Eusebius -- Eusebius (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Eusebius (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support very beautiful. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 23:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment nice landscape, but blurred photo IMO --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Impressive landscape, very nice. --Schnobby (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Peripitus (talk) 11:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose blur Support now better :) --Leafnode✉ 11:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Great image but at full res it does lack some sharpness - fixable? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Texture of the castle looks liquified, so only the edges could be improved --Leafnode✉ 12:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  - A quick play would suggest otherwise :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
    - Oh, if so, go ahead :) --Leafnode✉ 12:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Sharpened version by Herby (thanks again). I think it is more interesting, although there is more CA on the mast on the left, and a bit more noise in the trees. --Eusebius (talk) 13:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Re-uploaded. Sharpening reduced, ca fixed? If not preferred the feel free to revert it :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support I guess I ought to :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
За support now and thanks to Herby for improved version --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
За :) --Pudelek (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - You could be a really good paparazzi ;) Great view. Ceridwen (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --MattiPaavola (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Petra Jordan BW 36.JPG

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 15:23:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support "Only the penitent man will pass" -- Jovan Cormac 15:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Afaik this was Al Khazneh

;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

You're right. Though the "inner" part with the two lions doesn't appear to exist at all in reality... -- Jovan Cormac 20:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Sorry, the crop is too tight IMO. —kallerna™ 16:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per Kallerna. Nice picture apart from that. Nikopol (talk) 19:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose tight crop --Leafnode✉ 11:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Avala (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Tight crop. It's a long walk to get up there; the least you could do is show us some of the sky over the building. Daniel Case (talk) 07:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps if you crop it like this? Nikopol (talk) 22:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Even worse. --Leafnode✉ 11:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose --Avala (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Arquebus img 0410.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 15:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Firing of an arquebus during the Geneva Escalade of 2009. The lock has just ignited the power in the touch hole and the shot is about to go off, amidst the smoke caused by neighbouring arquebusers.
Oppose Weak composition and crop. -- Jovan Cormac 15:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose composition, crop, cloud covering most of the picture --Leafnode✉ 11:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not agreed about the smoke: it covers less than half of the photograph, and it is a part of the point.

I would be interested to hear more about the composition. If I had to formulate criticism myself, I would have said that the background is messy and distracting, but I might not use the term "composition" for this. Rama (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

By 'composition' I meant mostly background. About smoke - it would be fine if it didn't cover the shooter, as he is the main object of this photograph. --Leafnode✉ 12:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Blitze IMGP6376 wp.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 12:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by and uploaded by Smial - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment There's not too much I can say about this lovely piece that the picture itself doesn't already say for me. :P
Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great lighting :). --99of9 (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nikopol (talk) 13:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Very good! --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Toll! --Simonizer (talk) 19:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Confused: I wasn't aware there was a fee to nominate an image. When was that introduced? :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- I dream of being able to take pictures like this...excellent lightning picture with great coloring. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 23:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment This is no sorcery. You must be patient. Then patient. And a bit weather proof. Then again patient. And you need a tripod. And a cable release, and a camera, that supports full manual control. And everytime, when you close the shutter, you need to be patient again, as the dark frame substraction needs again 60 seconds (same as the real exposure time), before you can take the next shot. And I grant you: Exactly in these 60 seconds at minimum 10 much better flashes will happen. Then you need some chocolate to calm down. And never point the camera to a different direction. If you turn right, the next gigantic flash will come down to the left and vice versa :-) -- smial (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Of course. An amazing shot. Tiptoety ^talk 07:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
За - Excellent! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --AngMoKio (talk) 09:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Leafnode✉ 11:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Peripitus (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Love the contrast between the sharp, jagged lightning and the smooth, subtle clouds. Daniel Case (talk) 07:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great picture! --Leviathan (talk) 11:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support *g* --Böhringer (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Phellinus igniarius Oak 2009 G2.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 11:50:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: All by George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: False tinder fungus (Phellinus igniarius) on a dead Oak.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, bad light (shades), no wow. —kallerna™ 16:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 19:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me, sorry. --Eusebius (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose bad lighting and a kind of straight forward composition --AngMoKio (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose VI --Leafnode✉ 11:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Flag-map of the world.svg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 05:34:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Transparent 6lue - uploaded by Transparent 6lue - nominated by Transparent 6lue -- Transparent 6lue (talk) 05:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Transparent 6lue (talk) 05:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment I am not so sure Greenland is correct. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This is a great idea, and beautifully executed. Correlations that I wasn't aware of until now can be seen at a glance, e.g. that most African countries have green as the predominant color in their flags. Greenland is formally a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, so it looks OK to me. True, they have their own flag, but so does Alaska which is also shown with the flag of the "parent state". -- Jovan Cormac 10:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Although I agree that the Greenlandic flag shouln't replace the Danish, Alaska's relation to the United States is to my knowledge no different from that of any of the other 50 states - Greenland, however, is far more autonomous than any other area (possibly except for the Faeroes) under the Danish crown. --Aqwis (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I have only shown the national flags here, regardless of how autonomous any of their subdivisions are. --Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Comment, I would suggest replacing the Norwegian flag on Svalbard with a uniform red colour. --Aqwis (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Although this would certainly make it look a lot better, keep in mind that it could be confused with the red of Denmark/Greenland/Faroe Islands. --Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The status of Svalbard is special - not really Norway. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Still, Norway's surely the most accurate national flag that you could apply to it. Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Comment I would prefer the sea to be non-white, because it merges with some of the flags. Perhaps a very pale blue? --99of9 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The black outlines should not make the ocean a problem. However, if anyone wants to change the ocean to very pale blue (or perhaps very pale grey), someone else will have to do it because the finished file makes my computer lag too much. --Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The black outlines aren't enough for my eyes. But I'm an idiot... the sea is transparent in the svg, so I can have whatever background I like - no need for a change.

Support --99of9 (talk) 00:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Support - Clever idea and quality implementation. ~~PS could you make the Finnish flag slightly smaller, the same size as the Swedish flag.~~ --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The Finnish flag is bigger than the Swedish one because if you look up the proportions, the Finnish cross is much more thicker. The shapes of the countries are also a factor in how they turned out. --Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. After checking the sources, I have to shamely admit that I didn't know my and my neighbor's flags. :-) Thanks for the explanation. --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Support Whatever the background colour, it's simply great. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Econt (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral I'm not convinced by this idea --Leafnode✉ 11:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - the map is inconsistent. It shows Alaska and Greenland the same way, it shows Kosovo but doesn't show Palestine, flag proportions are strictly kept for Finland and Greece but not for Japan and South Korea, no clear criteria over which island nations were included and why etc. So even though the idea is fine there is still a lot of work to do.--Avala (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by Alaska and Greenland being "the same way", but I'll answer the other points. I have updated the map to reflect a new criteria, which is the UN member countries plus the Republic of China. As for the proportions, I decided that the designs where the field was distinctly divided into several areas should be kept as close to the original as possible. On the other hand, I decided that the symbol-on-a-background designs could be resized if it would help recognisability. I have added all islands now. Transparent 6lue (talk) 23:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose I agree with Avala. What are the criterias about selected countries? --.ds m. 18:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

The UN member countries plus the Republic of China. Transparent 6lue (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Aloe dichotoma -Keetmanshoop, Namibia-21Aug2009-2.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2009 at 02:46:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Le Grand Portage -modified and uploaded by Fletcher - nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 02:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Technical perfection. -- Jovan Cormac 16:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Ok. —kallerna™ 16:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Peripitus (talk) 03:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Wow, impressive ! Ceridwen (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hoodoos in the Bryce Canyon National Park.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 23:29:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great color changes. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Aqwis (talk) 11:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great capture! When I was there, sadly the phenomenon was not to be witnessed. Looks really ghostly Nikopol (talk) 12:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support —kallerna™ 16:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Beautiful creatures of the nature. BTW, was there some additional artificial lighting used behind the rocks or is this all natural? Support anyway. --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: I took this image without flash or other additional artificial lightning. This is a contre-jour shot. The hoodoos are illuminated by reflected sunlight coming from the hoodoos in front of them. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 23:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Beauty. Tiptoety ^talk 07:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose scenery is great, but image is terribly noisy and unsharp --Leafnode✉ 11:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Leafnode, what happened to you? You gaved today 26 oppose in the time 11:18 - 12:01. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
  - I didn't have time to vote progressively, so I voted en masse for all active FPC votes - that explains amount. And why so many opposes? Well... I just think those images were not good enough. I know my point of view might seem extreme, but recently I've decided not to hesitate to oppose if I see major flaws, even if the image is generally supported. --Leafnode✉ 08:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:A starry sky above Death Valley and Orionid.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 17:52:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: We have no single meteor featured I believe, so here it is: Multicolored w:meteor w:Orionid is exploding over Death Valley National Park
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Amazing. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose It really is much too noisy, consider using lower ISO than 1600. I suppose you used a tripod, why didn´t you take ISO 100 and a long exposure time? Nikopol (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

I guess, you've never taken a picture of a meteor.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn´t realise the meteor is the important thing, must have somehow skipped this part of the explanation. But IMO the capture of the meteor does not quite make up for that amount of noise. Nikopol (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Nikopol, just check the date when this photograph was taken: 22 October 2007. As you can check out from this table, Mbz1 apparently planned this photograph carefully by journeying to the Death valley exactly when an Orionid shower was to be expected and where, given the extremely dry air and the absence of artificial light, you get fine conditions for photographing the night sky. Given the speed of the meteors, the selection of ISO 1600 (at an exposure time of 8s) sounds quite sensible to me. --AFBorchert (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

When I was taking the images I was mostly thinking about capturing as many meteors as possible even very faint ones because the images are used for recerch. I used fisheye in order to capture as much sky as possible. The lens aperture is 3.5. To capture faint meteors with such a lens and such an aperture I should have used ISO 1600. I did not care about noise. My bad, how I forgot about FPC

That's OK I should have learned a long time ago never to nominate for FPC something that is special to me :)--Mbz1 (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Nothing featurable here, either the quality or the rarity -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

That's right, what could be featurable in the only image of a meteor to be present in FP images :) If it is feutered, it will be so lonely :) --Mbz1 (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I withdraw my nomination should have kept it to myself :)

[edit] Edit 1

Support reduced noise and lost some stars in the process :(--Mbz1 (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I withdraw my nomination should have kept it to myself :)

[edit] File:Sergei Rachmaninoff LOC 33968 Cropped.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 16:21:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: Created by the Bain News Service (Original image is located here) - uploaded by Etincelles - nominated by Etincelles - Etincelles (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Cropped version of File:Sergei Rachmaninoff LOC 33968.jpg, digitaly restored to remove scratches and dust by Etincelles.

Support - Etincelles (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Pianoplonkers (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Conditional Oppose. Documentation is essential: please give detailed notes of specific edits performed and please include a link to the unrestored version directly from the nomination. Remember: curators look for good documentation practices when institutions decide whether to digitize. Don't cut corners! Durova (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment LoC does not create images, they just archive them; this is from the en:Bain News Service. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lotus in a garden in Suzhou.JPG

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 10:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 10:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 10:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose -- The composition looks like a snapshot. - Peripitus (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Natural composition works fine for me. --99of9 (talk) 22:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Composition, noisy, too centered, would be better as portrait. —kallerna™ 16:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Nice, natural colors. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 19:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Contrario I like the composition, but it's too noisy... --Phyrexian (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose poor lighting, trivial composition --Leafnode✉ 11:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Nanjing Road, Shanghai.JPG

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 10:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark. —kallerna™ 10:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Nights are dark. Even in Shanghai. Schnobby (talk) 13:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per kallerna. The composition is fine, but you'd need HDR here. Wolf (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral I actually like this picture very much. However, it needs a gentle denoise and also a rotation/perspective correction to fix the skewed looking crop on the left. Do that and I will support. -- Jovan Cormac 16:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose dark, some bushes (?) in the center --Leafnode✉ 11:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Teheran US embassy propaganda grasp.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2009 at 01:56:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: all by Nikopol -- Nikopol (talk) 01:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
As we recently had some propaganda nominated: After the Iranian hostage crisis (1979-1981), the walls of the former US embassy were covered in today infamous anti-US(anti-israeli)-murals. In our guide, the authors wrote about having some problems after taking pictures of the embassy walls, although at other times that didn´t seem to be the case. While I didn´t want to spend much time there, afraid of getting my camera confiscated, I still managed to take some nice pics of the murals. (Here is a shot of the whole scene: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3225/2614920613_defbcf6237.jpg)
Support -- Nikopol (talk) 01:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Any chance of retouching to remove the graffiti? --99of9 (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

I definitly could if everyone here insists, but i´d prefer not to since a) It could be the signature of the artist. Tagging this wall would be insane b) I want to keep it as authentic as possible. Retouching propaganda feels a little awkward... Nikopol (talk) 12:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

In my opinion taggers are insane. If I'm right that this is just a tagger, then to be true to the original work it would be better to restore it (documented of course), but I understand your hesitation (hence my support either way). --99of9 (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Avala (talk) 15:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Conditional ~~Oppose~~. Documentation is essential: the unedited version is not available for comparison. Please upload it and cross-link from each version to the other. Please include a link to the other version directly from the nomination. Remember: curators look for good documentation practices when institutions decide whether to digitize. Don't cut corners! Durova (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Do these remarks refer to my image, or is it a mistake? Since you wrote the same to Etincelles? Nikopol (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Not a cut/paste. Please note the differences; the two nominations had different but related problems. Durova (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Done. Here is the unedited version:

unedited version

Nikopol (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Support. Durova (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete No COM:FOP in Iran as far as I know. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

That discussion should be undertaken in a deletion request IMO. Otherwise people's votes will be a mixture of two different issues. I think we should stick to a FP vote here. --99of9 (talk) 12:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Before uploading my images, I asked at the help desk whether I could, and noone could really tell me how the legal situation is, since there is little factual information available. However, despite my research, I found no evidence that there is no freeedom of panorama in Iran (there is rather a lack of entries regarding Iran). If you are looking for a practical indicator: take a look at the category Iran: If there actually was no freedom of panorama, one third of the photots of Iran we have at commons would be illegal. But regarning these files, noone suggested deletion. I don´t see why my picture should be treated differently. It certainly would be important to find answers considering the legal questions, but I think this is not the right forum to do so. Nikopol (talk) 12:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

If Iranian copyright law does not say anything about FOP exemptions, there is no freedom of panorama in Iran. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Since not only my picture, but a huge part of our stock of pictures from Iran would be concerned in this case, I advocate discussing the legal status of pictures from Iran in an appropriate forum. As we have such a huge amount of images which have not been marked for deletion, perhaps the legal situation is not that clear. I know close to nothing about iranian copyright law, but I oppose to my picture beeing treated differently for whatever reason. Nikopol (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

~~Oh, there was already a response Nikopol (talk) 12:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)~~

A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:The Hazards From Hazards Beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 15:24:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: This is the Hazards from a somewhat different angle. Most people see them from Coles Bay, or perhaps Wineglass Bay. Noodle snacks (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Question: why do you down-sample your landscapes so much? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- In most cases people assume that content found on Wikipedia (where it is usually found) is free as in beer. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
  - Well, it might be the case, but the thing is that in a year or so the size requirement will probably be changed to let's say 3 megapixels and then all your wonderfull landscape will be delested :( If I am not mistaking, it happened to few images by fir0002 on English Wikipedia.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
    - Perhaps, it doesn't bother me though. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Good composition. --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose picture is nice, but nothing outstanding --Leafnode✉ 11:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Portert van twee jonge Balinese danseressen TMnr 10004678b.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 21:51:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by unknown - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Portert van twee jonge Balinese danseressen TMnr 10004678.jpg.-- Durova (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Balinese dancers, 1929.
Support -- Durova (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great work and great picture. Nikopol (talk) 22:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Super. Takabeg (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support GerardM (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Interesting picture but that's all. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Enthusiastic support One of your best restorations! -- Jovan Cormac 10:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore The pic was beautiful, but the restoration is awesome! --Phyrexian (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - What a wonderful restoration. Tiptoety ^talk 07:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Suvanto 2009-10-02 02.JPG

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 19:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by MattiPaavola - uploaded by MattiPaavola - nominated by MattiPaavola -- MattiPaavola (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Suvanto is one of the very few villages in Lapland, Finland that wasn't destroyed during WWII.
Support -- MattiPaavola (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This composition would make a great painting too :). --99of9 (talk) 01:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Hyvää ! Takabeg (talk) 03:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Lovely image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Could be more detailed and crisp but I love minimal compositions -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support I love it. --Eusebius (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lotus in Suzhou.JPG

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 13:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 13:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Weak Support. Lovely resolution, distracting background. Durova (talk) 18:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Noisy, unsharp, distracting background. —kallerna™ 10:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment I agree to the distracting background. Perhaps you like the new photo more? Schnobby (talk) 13:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Background, sorry. --99of9 (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Crop, background -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - per Alvesgaspar --MattiPaavola (talk) 01:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Contrario I don't care about the background, but too noisy... --Phyrexian (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose crop, background --Leafnode✉ 11:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Yu Garden in Shanghai.JPG

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 13:41:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment the idea of showing modern and old culture is really good but there are some technical problems. The foreground is too dark while the background is too bright. Unfortunately you need some kind of HDR technique to make such a pic. --AngMoKio (talk) 13:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, poor quality. —kallerna™ 10:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Multiple issues. --99of9 (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutrale I love it, but poor quality... --Phyrexian (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose messy composition, poor colors --Leafnode✉ 11:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sossusvlei.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 13:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by - uploaded - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support The Tsauchab river ends in the desert. -- Ikiwaner (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
За - Wow! Rare place for me --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - The composition and tones are very good. --MattiPaavola (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Excellent. Durova (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Wonderful location. --99of9 (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Noodle snacks (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Consider changing your licence. —kallerna™ 10:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
За--Avala (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This is how red deserts should look. Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Wonderful --Phyrexian (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Leafnode✉ 11:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gaillardia fanfare centered.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 13:02:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created and uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment It's a simple composition, but the photo is all the better for it. Sometimes, simple just works.
Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Beautiful (although I find the lighter spots/objects on the left and above the flower a bit distracting). Nevertheless great. Nikopol (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Very Sharp, really great.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support per Diaa abdelmoneim. Durova (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Canyonlands National Park, Utah.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 12:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Jim Gordon - uploaded by TWO - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment After this picture was delisted, I decided to hunt around and see if I could find a replacement.
Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Petrified wood! Looks great in situ. Durova (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support —kallerna™ 10:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support /Daniel78 (talk) 12:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nikopol (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Wonderful image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Unrealistic oversaturation. --99of9 (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Even if the colours are natural and don't find the composition, the quality or the theme special enough for FP - Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support 99of9 is right on the saturation front, but at the same time I think it is a well executed shot. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Oversaturation :-) --Phyrexian (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort Lachaux-1 (by).jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 10:44:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, artificial colors, plus composition and scene are not outstanding in my opinion Nikopol (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose -tones, CA --MattiPaavola (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose composition, colors, CA --Leafnode✉ 11:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort Lachaux (by).jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 10:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, artificial colors and image quality issues Nikopol (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Artificial colors and the whole thing looks a bit blurry or grainy. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose -Overexposed or oversaturated, CA --MattiPaavola (talk) 16:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Even if colors weren't wrong, there's just no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose colors, CA, composition --Leafnode✉ 11:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (15) (by).JPG

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 10:40:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Excellent. PS A short English description would be appreciated. --MattiPaavola (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Info: Dew droplets on a died insect. --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Pour Well done photo. Nice! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Sharpness, composition, depth of field. Very good capture. Durova (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Interesting enought. —kallerna™ 10:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Mbz1 (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Böhringer (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose <-- Only until you fix the horribly posterized background. Subject is nice. --99of9 (talk) 23:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Little is clear in the picture -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Oh, wow! --Phyrexian (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:ComputerHotline - Fort du Bois d-Oye (by) (10).jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2009 at 10:38:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me, sorry. --Eusebius (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore I love the composition --Phyrexian (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose flatness, lighting --Leafnode✉ 11:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:El Golfo-Lanzarote.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 22:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by garrondo - uploaded by garrondo - nominated by garrondo -- Garrondo (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Garrondo (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Beautiful place, but overexposed sky. --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I would like to support, as it is really beautiful photo, but it's too noisy and the sky is bit overexposed. —kallerna™ 10:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose overexposed sky, lighting could be better --Leafnode✉ 11:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kingswear and the Dart s1.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 17:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Herbythyme - uploaded by Herbythyme - nominated by Herbythyme -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: This images shows the village of Kingswear which lies opposite the town of Dartmouth across the river Dart. The lowest bridging point on the Dart is some way upstream and without the ferries (on is shown in the image) between Dartmouth and Kingswear there would be a journey of at least thirty minutes to get from one side to the other. Both places have considerable historic interest going back over 1000 years. Both also have castles which were used to defend the river (one can be seen and there is a pointer to the location of the other one). The Pilgrim Fathers put in to Dartmouth before setting sail in 1620. This is a stitched image made up from three individual images.
Support -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment, the image is badly tilted; a ~1.33 deg counter-clockwise rotation is necessary to fix this. --Aqwis (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hopefully fixed (rotated by 1.33 deg). I'll put the notes back on as soon as I can. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Aqwis (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support An amazing scenery with a high EV.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Excellent work. Even the locations of the four boats add to the balance of the composition. --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support, although the image notes seem slightly (substantially?) misplaced? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- They are ok to me? Is it all of them? More info would be good, thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
  - All of them at least with Firefox 3.5.5. -MattiPaavola (talk) 11:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
    - Weird - I am using FF 3.5.5. When I placed them they looked a little odd but show in the right place for me. I think I'll delete them and try again but I'm just going out now so it will be later. And follow up - cache issue maybe. I cleared it and sure enough the notes were very badly placed :(. Anyway - hopefully fixed now. Thanks for the feedback --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:27, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
      - Yep, all in order now. Thanks for taking care of that. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Takabeg (talk) 03:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Avala (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Very good. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Excellent image of English coast. Daniel Case (talk) 06:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Very beautiful --Phyrexian (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cedar Breaks National Monument partially.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 16:29:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support —kallerna™ 10:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose unsharp --Leafnode✉ 11:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Leafnode, what happened to you? You gaved today 26 oppose in the time 11:18 - 12:01.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-e.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 16:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: Created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Statuette of Osiris sitting, Louvre museum, circa 664 - 332 BCE. Bronze with gold incrustations, 17 cm high, access number E3751. Rama (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Replaced the originally nominated File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-c.jpg with the slightly tighted crop File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-d.jpg. Rama (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral Excellent DOF. Excellent lighting. But, I would prefer a slightly different crop regarding the snake on the hat - maybe to cut it away. --MattiPaavola (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

like this ? Rama (talk) 14:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

with snake

without snake

Support Yes, like that! Having DOF reaching only the eyes just rocks in this case IMO. --MattiPaavola (talk) 19:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Info: Replaced again File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-d.jpg with the slightly tighted crop File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-e.jpg. What would I do without MattiPaavola? Rama (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sleepy Bay Sunrise.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 12:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: I think that this place was aptly named - given a bleary eyed 4am start. It is one of the best sunrises that I have seen. I am lucky that I chose to go there that morning, the next one had no colour at all. The previous day I went diving here. It is beautiful under the water too. Noodle snacks (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Gorgeous place with a lovely mood at this time of morning. --99of9 (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support The early bird catches the worm. --MattiPaavola (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful! Jacopo Werther (talk) 07:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
За nice colours --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Expressionism ROOOOLZ! Would make a great desktop, too. Daniel Case (talk) 06:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Rozeta Paryż notre-dame chalger.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 11:03:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Albertus teolog - uploaded by Chalger - nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Excellent photo, but I think the fine details of this difficult subject would require higher resolution for a FP status. --MattiPaavola (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- If the rose has a diameter of 13 meters is the term "detail" is very relative. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support I would argue that seeing the big picture is rather rewarding. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Good - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 13:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Question: Maybe it´s not a problem of resolution, but heavy processing? Do you think there would be more detail left if you processed it a bit less strong? Nikopol (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I see no details. —kallerna™ 10:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Great composition, but I agree with kallerna. --NEURO ^⇌ 22:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Wonderful geometry, but I'm with Matti. --99of9 (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Machliny Małe panorama 2009-05.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 10:38:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created and uploaded by JDavid - nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Question: Nice place! Any chance of fixing the CA on the tree trunk on the left? --99of9 (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral Very beautiful. A little hesitant because of the high JPEG compression and CA. --MattiPaavola (talk) 15:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Just a panorama, nothing special. —kallerna™ 10:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kata-Tjuta.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2009 at 03:50:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view from The Valley of The Winds in Kata Tjuta, central Australia.

Info: all by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 03:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Kata Tjuta means "many heads" in the Aboriginal language of the region, and the huge domes were of importance in their creation myths. This layer of composite rock is the same layer that forms Uluru, approximately 50km away. --99of9 (talk) 08:43, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support as nom -- 99of9 (talk) 03:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support. Interesting landforms, well composed here. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose composition - to present landforms I'd expect wider perspective. --Leafnode✉ 11:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Comment Thanks for your review. The idea is to feel amongst them. This way you see detail of the near one as well as macro-form. --99of9 (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose As above - composition. Karelj

[edit] File:After the war a medal and maybe a job2.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 23:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by John Sloan - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored version of File:After the war a medal and maybe a job.jpg -- Durova (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Antiwar political cartoon, 1914. Durova (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Durova (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- No more war. Takabeg (talk) 04:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
За Excellent restored result. Excellent picture --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
За --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support That´s life. --Karel (talk) 21:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support More excellent work by Durova. Daniel Case (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Isfahan Lotfollah mosque ceiling.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 23:40:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created and uploaded by Phillip Maiwald (Nikopol) - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: The darker parts towards the edges are not caused by vignetting, but by the bulge of the dome. Nikopol (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination! Nikopol (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] edit 1

I just uploaded a slightly rotated and cropped version that is more symmetric.

Support Nikopol (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Support Excellent --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Wonderful. --99of9 (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support amazing. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support incredible. --AM (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Wonderful job! --.ds m. 15:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Spitze! --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Thank you, and thank to their god for inspiring such beauty --Phyrexian (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Leafnode✉ 11:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Support - Nice picture. Ceridwen (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Coulées Basaltiques at Jaujac 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 14:59:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Herbythyme - uploaded by Herbythyme - nominated by Herbythyme -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: The Massif Central in France is a volcanic region with interesting features in many areas. The whole area is roughly a quarter of the area of France. This image is from the Ardèche department and is not as well known as some areas. Basalt columns such as these are a remarkable feature of volcanic activity. Jaujac has one of the youngest extinct volcanos in Europe and the "coupe de Jaujac" is quite well known though all the articles I've found are in French.
Support -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support A great image of the amazing example of Nature at work! Very interesting, thank you for the additional information.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose lighting, sharpness could be better --Leafnode✉ 11:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - external mosaics.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 14:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Basik07 (talk) 16:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose shadows --Leafnode✉ 11:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 01:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Petr Dlouhý - uploaded by Petr Dlouhý - nominated by Petr Dlouhý -- Petr Dlouhý (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Flower of carnivorous Utricularia calycifida (en) from front.
Info: Size of the flower is about 0.5cm (macro)
Support -- Petr Dlouhý (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Hot pixels on the background. Distracting flare on the bottom right corner. Could be sharper. --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Flare and hot pixels can be edited, but did you take into account size of the flower, when talking about sharpness?
Oppose Noisy. —kallerna™ 15:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose both versions. The shoots behind the flower are out of focus. Snowmanradio (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] edit

Neutral Thanks for removing the hot pixels. I would still prefer deeper DOF (which in this difficult tiny case might need special macro equipment, unfortunately). Therefore, neutral. --MattiPaavola (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You could use focus stacking without any special equipment (well except a fixed camera position). /Daniel78 (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Clonfert Cathedral Mermaid 2009 09 17.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2009 at 22:37:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created, uploaded, and nominated by AFBorchert -- AFBorchert (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- AFBorchert (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support It is one of those rare images that are not only of a great quality, but also have a fascinating story to tell. When I first saw the image on QI I was rather surprised that a mermaid (half-naked female :) ) was carved at the chancel arch of the Cathedral. So I asked about the story behind the image, and here is the story. More information could be found in the blog.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support A lovely image and of good value to the project, thanks for offering it. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Correct photo but no more than that -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The image is of a very rare carving with an amazing story behind it. The image is of a great quality and a great EV. That's why may I please ask you to clarify your oppose reason? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose harsh light --Leafnode✉ 11:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lizard in Ibiza.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2009 at 12:26:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Needs a denoise (or maybe those are JPEG artifacts - <1 MB for 4 Mpix is a little low). -- Jovan Cormac 15:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Seal Rock from Cliff House.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2009 at 04:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 04:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 04:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Rocks, rocks, rocks... Would you finally take some photos of airplanes or helicopters or... anything more mobile than rocks? :) Wolf (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support - OK, but I still remove the photographer from the shot . It is not difficult in this case.- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 07:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I prefer this one (yes I know, it's not from the same place), and IMO this bring nothing new to the genre. —kallerna™ 15:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The one you mentioned is not only from the same place, but it shows absolutely different rocks.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Neutral I don´t know... I love the lit rocks and the blurred water in the foreground. Also, the sky is great. But above the center of the image, the water lies in the shadows (of a rock out of view?). It´s somehow deranging me, as if the image was cut in two there. Nikopol (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support I like the colors and for this reason I would prefer this one in comparison to the alternative below. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support, very good. --Aqwis (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nice capture of the waves. --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Alternative

Support--Mbz1 (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose The building is tilted. --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Contrario As MattiPaavola --Phyrexian (talk) 22:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose tilt, composition --Leafnode✉ 11:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Civil War steeplechase2.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2009 at 06:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Edwin Forbes - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Civil War steeplechase.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Steeplechase race in celebration of Saint Patrick's Day among the Irish Brigade of the Army of the Potomac during the American Civil War, 17 March 1863.
Support -- Durova (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment This time I don't think you've chopped enough off! Could you remove the right border, since none of the other borders are showing? --99of9 (talk) 06:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Forgot to hit save before the second upload. Should be fixed now. If the thumbnail hasn't updated, just click in. :) Durova (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  - Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support OK. OK. OK. Takabeg (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 04:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Steeplechase2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2009 at 01:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by US Army Signal Corps - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Steeplechase.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: US Army training exercises at Camp Edwards, Massachusetts, circa 1942.
Support -- Durova (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mer30. Takabeg (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Yay, war propaganda! Wolf (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This is a great one. -- Jovan Cormac 09:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Successful capture of the motion. --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support "Where have you been, soldier?" "Training, sir!" "What kind of training?" "AAAAAAaaaaAAAArmy training, sir!". Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Feaured comment! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore I don't like the subject, but rare and very good shot... --Phyrexian (talk) 22:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Johannes Honterus - Denkmal in Kronstadt.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 21:05:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Quality image, nice statue, but - sorry - not extraordinary IMO. --MattiPaavola (talk) 13:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Dirt road in winter.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 19:27:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: everything by Juliancolton (talk · contributions). –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Quite a lot of chromatic aberration. Could you reduce it? —kallerna™ 12:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support original ... it just looks more realistic than the edit to me. —Ed (talk • contribs) 06:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support This version is fine with me too.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Composition isn't IMO that good. —kallerna™ 15:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain what's wrong with the composition? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Photo just isn't extraordinary IMO. You could have tried some other perspective and it's too centered. For instance, this one is from same kind of place, but the composition is more striking IMO. —kallerna™ 15:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Support Though I like the other one this is good too. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
За nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Having lived through this same weekend storm, in the same region as nominator, I like the mood in this one better. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I thought a long time about it, but in the end I have to agree with Kallerna. I believe that the atmosphere was great, but I think it would have to be a bit more extraordinary for a FP. Sorry. Nikopol (talk) 15:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what more one would want. This is probably the best shot I could have gotten of this scene in its natural state, without trying to achieve some all-too-common artificial composition that reduces the image's educational value. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I agree that I would have been very hard to come up with a better composition for that place. But I´m not shure whether every scene existing, though perhaps atmospheric in real life and of educational value, can be captured in a photo worth beeing elected FP. IMO this is a well-made photo of "a rural dirt road after a bout of snowfall", but lacking a bit on the “wow factor” a FP should have. Nikopol (talk) 17:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Alright, that's fair then. Thanks for participating. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Just a way. --Karel (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry? I don't understand, could you please clarify? (Sorry if this comes across as badgering, I'm just interested in improving for future shots. :)) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Nice, but not enough wow for me. (P.S. I think the previous voter could be translated as "Just a road".) --99of9 (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Good photo, but there needs to be an exceptionally good composition to generate wow on an everyday subject. --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose nothing particularly outstanding --Leafnode✉ 11:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] edit 1

Support Great atmosphere!--Mbz1 (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support edit. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nice image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
За very nice for me --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Composition. —kallerna™ 15:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose – per kallerna. --Ernie (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nice, but not enough wow for me. --99of9 (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per my comment above --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose as with original --Leafnode✉ 11:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sheikh-Lotf-Allah mosque wall and ceiling 2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 17:01:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Nikopol - uploaded by Nikopol - nominated by Nikopol -- Nikopol (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Nikopol (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: The image is a panorama out of two images which I had to take without a tripod, thus I had to correct the result of the photomerge a little. -- Nikopol (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ianaré (talk) 05:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I think it needs a little rotation to make it symmetric. --99of9 (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Nice photo as is --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I love islamic calligraphy, but overall quality just doesn't amaze me here. The image is blurry throughout at full res and there is some CA visible around the windows as well. -- Jovan Cormac 09:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Info: Please note: This is a very large dome. I had to dicide on what spot to focus. If you look at the tilework a bit above the center of the image, you will see it´s perfectly sharp. Given the circumstances, I was very pleased with the level of detail my Pentax k10d produced on the overall image. -- Nikopol (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Great work. Thanks... --.ds m. 21:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Lovely image and certainly featurable to me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Dazzling detail where you would want it. A net plus. Would make a great desktop. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Devil's Golf Course in Death Valley NP.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 16:32:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: The Devil's Golf Course is a large salt pan in Death Valley National Park, with a rough surface formed of large salt crystals. It was named after a line in a 1934 w:National Park Service guide book to Death Valley, which stated that "only the devil could play golf" on its surface.
Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 16:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support. Oppose alternative. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
За -George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing extra, good image, but not for FP. --Karel (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh sure, nothing extra just some salt crystals surrounded by multicolored volcanic hills in natural environment :) --Mbz1 (talk) 21:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Support Ausgezeichnetes Bild! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Unusual and striking scene, well executed. --99of9 (talk) 12:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose unsharp, unpleasant curve of salt field's border --Leafnode✉ 12:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] alternative

Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
За support too --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Support IMO better --Leafnode✉ 12:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Alberi e crocefisso a Dobbiaco.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 14:12:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support I only just noticed, but this is reminiscent of the symmetry and desaturation of Golgotha. Also, nice colours on the tree. --99of9 (talk) 09:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Non mi piace troppo la composizione, ma i colori sono fantastici :-) I don't like so much the compsition, but I love the colours of this pic :-) --Phyrexian (talk) 19:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Composition. If the crucifix is the subject, it is not well exposed. --Leafnode✉ 11:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment The crucifix is only a part of the picture. The subject of this image is the composition of crucifix plus the trees (with beautiful red coulors) immerse in the white novel snow.--Llorenzi (talk) 12:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mongolian Lama.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 09:24:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Schnobby - uploaded by Schnobby - nominated by Schnobby -- Schnobby (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Schnobby (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support A little unsharp at full size, also a little noisy, but I really like it. --Moise Nicu (talk) 10:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Yann (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral – The colors are a bit off. --Ernie (talk) 15:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment No problem. I'll reduce the colors. Schnobby (talk) 13:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --MattiPaavola (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Support great portrait! --Leafnode✉ 11:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Vanity Fair June 1914b.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 04:34:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Ethel McClellen Plummer - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Vanity Fair June 1914.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Info: Cover art for Vanity Fair magazine, June 1914.
Support -- Durova (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- nice GerardM (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Good job. Takabeg (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support well done --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 19:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the fpc category: Historical

[edit] File:Figure-Animation2.gif, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 04:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An rotation about a 3D-Figure showing the difference between motion blur (left) and direct rendering. Modelled and rendered in Blender 2.49. Animated with 25 fps an a stopping sequence to make the difference more visible.

Info: created by Niabot - uploaded by Niabot - nominated by Niabot -- Niabot (talk) 04:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Niabot (talk) 04:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Superb. -- 99of9 (talk) 05:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Very good work. Please keep up.--Korall (talk) 12:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Weak oppose for 2 reasons: First, the side-by-side placement gives the impression that this is a stereogram (which is not the case, therefore one-above-the-other placement would be less confusing); second, I don't see why a scantily-clad anime figure is used here rather than a "blank" human shape (or even an animal). -- Jovan Cormac 12:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I know a Commons' user who'd say: objectification of women :) Indeed, if the images are places one above the other, I'll be happy to support. As for the figure used, I don't really care. Wolf (talk) 12:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  - I wouldn't go so far as to say that this image objectifies women. But the fact is that the "model" seems oddly out of place in an animation designed to illustrate a technical concept. -- Jovan Cormac 09:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
    - No? You'll see for yourself when this gets promoted and you-know-who sees this on the main page. :) Wolf (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment I would love to see this turned into a rotating stereogram (top: blurred, bottom, not blurred) :) G.A.S 13:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Weak Support per the above. Would full support a vertically stacked image and would strong support a hunky guy in Speedos. ;) Durova (talk) 20:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Comment Why does the image stop after full rotation? The motion blur can't be seen if it's a still image... and I don't see any purpose of stopping the rotation. Support --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the fpc category: Animated

[edit] File:Coat of Arms of Nova Scotia.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2009 at 00:01:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Sodacan - uploaded by Sodacan - nominated by Connormah -- Connormah (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Another great work. -- Connormah (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support GerardM (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Support All of Sodacan's work deserves to be Featured. -- Jovan Cormac 12:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
За --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Wolf (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
A favore Really great! --Phyrexian (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the fpc category: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

[edit] File:Lula e operários.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2009 at 17:47:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info: created by Ricardo Stuckert/PR - uploaded by Richard Melo da Silva - nominated by Richard Melo da Silva -- RmSilva ^{pode falar!} 17:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Support -- RmSilva ^{pode falar!} 17:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Support It is an interesting image. It does have some problems like dust spots, some noise, and the composition is not complete IMO, yet tthe image is interesting, and unusual enough to be considered.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose The quality is not very good (noise and CA), the composition does not feel very good either with both the "towers" cut off and part of the bottom banner. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:58, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Per Daniel78 + burnt. —kallerna™ 10:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Lacks that "wow" factor, plus it feels like an advertisement. Tiptoety ^talk 02:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Composition, perspective and CA/oversharpening. --MattiPaavola (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] ALTERNATIVE 1

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Resolution is too low.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. /Wolf (talk) 00:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

[edit] Formalidades

[edit] Nominación

[edit] Crear una nueva nominación

[edit] Para votar

[edit] Reglas

Contents

[edit] Propuestas

[edit] File:Jugo de naranja.svg

[edit] File:Luca Toni Bayern.jpg

[edit] File:Petra Jordan BW 43.JPG

[edit] File:Royal Naval college-3.jpg

[edit] File:Peine del viento de Eduardo Chillida.jpg

[edit] File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg

[edit] File:Low pressure system over Iceland.jpg

[edit] File:Karl Emil Otto Fritsch-Denkmaeler Deutscher Renaissance-1891-Nuernberg-Pellerhaus zu Nuernberg Aegidienplatz 1605 Facade.jpg

[edit] File:Eilean Donan castle - 95mm.jpg

[edit] File:Petra Jordan BW 36.JPG

[edit] File:Arquebus img 0410.jpg

[edit] File:Blitze IMGP6376 wp.jpg

[edit] File:Phellinus igniarius Oak 2009 G2.jpg

[edit] File:Flag-map of the world.svg

[edit] File:Aloe dichotoma -Keetmanshoop, Namibia-21Aug2009-2.jpg

[edit] File:Hoodoos in the Bryce Canyon National Park.jpg

[edit] File:A starry sky above Death Valley and Orionid.jpg

[edit] Edit 1

[edit] File:Sergei Rachmaninoff LOC 33968 Cropped.jpg

[edit] File:Lotus in a garden in Suzhou.JPG

[edit] File:Nanjing Road, Shanghai.JPG

[edit] File:Teheran US embassy propaganda grasp.jpg

[edit] File:The Hazards From Hazards Beach.jpg

[edit] File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Portert van twee jonge Balinese danseressen TMnr 10004678b.jpg

[edit] File:Suvanto 2009-10-02 02.JPG

[edit] File:Lotus in Suzhou.JPG

[edit] File:Yu Garden in Shanghai.JPG

[edit] File:Sossusvlei.jpg

[edit] File:Gaillardia fanfare centered.jpg

[edit] File:Canyonlands National Park, Utah.jpg

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort Lachaux-1 (by).jpg

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort Lachaux (by).jpg

[edit] File:Thomas Bresson - Fort de Roppe (15) (by).JPG

[edit] File:ComputerHotline - Fort du Bois d-Oye (by) (10).jpg

[edit] File:El Golfo-Lanzarote.jpg

[edit] File:Kingswear and the Dart s1.jpg

[edit] File:Cedar Breaks National Monument partially.jpg

[edit] File:Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-e.jpg

[edit] File:Sleepy Bay Sunrise.jpg

[edit] File:Rozeta Paryż notre-dame chalger.jpg

[edit] File:Machliny Małe panorama 2009-05.jpg

[edit] File:Kata-Tjuta.jpg

[edit] File:After the war a medal and maybe a job2.jpg

[edit] File:Isfahan Lotfollah mosque ceiling.jpg

[edit] edit 1

[edit] File:Coulées Basaltiques at Jaujac 3.jpg

[edit] File:Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - external mosaics.jpg

[edit] File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg

[edit] edit

[edit] File:Clonfert Cathedral Mermaid 2009 09 17.jpg

[edit] File:Lizard in Ibiza.jpg

[edit] File:Seal Rock from Cliff House.jpg

[edit] Alternative

[edit] File:Civil War steeplechase2.jpg

[edit] File:Steeplechase2.jpg

[edit] File:Johannes Honterus - Denkmal in Kronstadt.JPG

[edit] File:Dirt road in winter.JPG

[edit] edit 1

[edit] File:Sheikh-Lotf-Allah mosque wall and ceiling 2.jpg

[edit] File:Devil's Golf Course in Death Valley NP.jpg

[edit] alternative

[edit] File:Alberi e crocefisso a Dobbiaco.JPG

[edit] File:Mongolian Lama.JPG

[edit] File:Vanity Fair June 1914b.jpg, featured

[edit] File:Figure-Animation2.gif, featured

[edit] File:Coat of Arms of Nova Scotia.svg, featured

[edit] File:Lula e operários.jpg

[edit] ALTERNATIVE 1

Views

Personal tools

Search