Category talk:Coats of arms of New Town (Prague)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Rename to Category:Coats of arms of New Town (Prague)[edit]

I don't support this proposal. New Town is a district which have only one coat of arms (which can be modified during the history but its identity is durable. New Town is a district which have no subdivision which can have its own coat of arms. --ŠJů (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Please excuse that I missed this comment. I will move it back. -- User:Docu at 10:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Plural --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 11:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Plural means more things, singular means one thing. Coat of arms of New Town is only one. Prague New Town isn't some region with subdivisions. (Similarly, a category of one church uses the word "church", a category for more churches uses the word "churches".) --ŠJů (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Der Plural bezeichnet mehr Sachen, der Singular bezeichnet eine Sache. Das Wappen der Prager Neustadt ist nur ein. Prager Neustadt ist kein Kreis oder Bezirk and hat keine Bestandteile mit Wappen. Gleicherweise, die Kategorie für eine Kirche heißt "church", dagegen die Kategorie für Kirchen in einem Bereich heißt "churches". --ŠJů (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Category names on commons are plural. There are already two files. --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 05:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Many category names isn't in plural, e. g. category:London, obgleich it includes many files. Images are more, but coat of arms of Prague New Town is only one.
Viele Kategorienamen sind nicht in Plural, z. B. category:London, obwohl sie enthält sehr viel Bilder. Es gibt vile Bilder, aber nur ein Wappen der Prager Neustadt. --ŠJů (talk) 05:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

categories on commons are in plural. If you don't like name rules change rules not one cat. --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Categories involving many subjects are in plural, categories involving one subject are in singular. --ŠJů (talk) 06:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Let's stop playing little games. The standard is plural and if there are two pictures, one could argue that they form "coats of arms". No need for further nitpicking. --Foroa (talk) 06:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
One picture is a 3D relief of the coat of arms, another is a 2D COA drawing. No need for further nitpicking. --Foroa (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Either SJu requests the shift of all categories, for those his argumentation applies or he lets it. But only to shift this category does not make a sense. I will otherwise remove the shift request. --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 12:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

The move request tag {{move}} is there to invite people to discuss it. It shouldn't be removed just because you disagree with it. -- User:Docu at 12:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
@Nachcommonsverschieber: Do you understand the basic distinction between one subject of the category and more subjects appertaining into the category? The basic distinction between singular and plural? We have categories which have the word "church" in its name, and other which have the word "churches" in its name. Do you understand this distinction? Singular don't mean that only one photo is in the category, but that the category is intended only for media related to one subject, one church: although the church was maybe manytimes rebuilded etc. --ŠJů (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)