Commons:Deletion requests/File:Finnish girl in Istria.jpg
File:Finnish_girl_in_Istria.jpg[edit]
This picture shows a person that cannot be veryfied that she wants to heve the picture uploaded here. Also by the look at it it seem unsure if she has turned 18 on the picture, that would also put it into the category of childporn. I say admins should look inte this and think of reporting it to the authorities. Knight of Ni (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to point out that not every image of a child near-naked is child pornography, any more than a picture of an adult naked is necessarily pornography - sometimes nudity is just nudity. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Keep Baseless nomination, not remotely pornographic. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Finnish girl in Istria.jpg[edit]
Per COM:IDENT, there is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place or consented to broad publication of the photo. Pete F (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- My keep vote withdrawn per Conti comments below; unreliable uploader in early 2008. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- To quote the most directly relevant piece of the policy cited:
- "Consent to have one's photograph taken does not permit the photographer to do what they like with the image." -Pete F (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- (Also, while I was unaware of what Istria was, the photo is clearly taken inside an enclosed tent -- and I don't think it matters if that tent was within a public place.) -Pete F (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Worth noting, "inside a tent on a beach" is, coincidentally, the specific example used on COM:IDENT of a private place within a public place, where a higher degree of consent would be required. -Pete F (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete Given the plethora of image issues on the uploader's talk page, I do not have a whole lot of confidence that all necessary steps were taken to ensure that this image meets all the requirements for Commons/a free license. --Conti|✉ 15:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)- Delete, per analysis by Conti (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, not even EXIF data tells us anything about "own work". --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Given that the image is from 1997 there is not much EXIF data to be expected, maybe apart from some scanner data. Looking at the line pattern in the original image (or in File:Sveta from Bobruysk.jpg) I wonder whether it was scanned from a magazine, though. --84.75.61.249 13:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:IDENT. There is no indication the subject of the photo was in a public place. Indeed, it appears she may be in some sort of tent, probably a private place. There is no evidence of any consent. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC) {delf}}
