Commons:Кандидаты в ценные изображения

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status, and image sets for valued image set (VIS) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

Как номинировать изображение или набор изображений на получение статуса «ценного»[edit]

Кандидатуры будет оцениваться с использованием критериев, перечисленных на странице Признаки ценных изображений Пожалуйста, прочитайте эти критерии перед номинацией изображения, чтобы среди кандидатов было меньше тех, что имеют мало шансов на успех. Убедитесь, что вы понимаете концепцию предметной области и выбрали правильную предметную область для своего изображения.


Пожалуйста, убедитесь, что предлагаемое вами изображение соответствует всем необходимым критериям до его выдвижения. Например, если нужен шаблон {{location}}, то он должен быть поставлен заранее (студийные работы можно пометить шаблоном {{Studio work}}). Если нет соответствующих категорий, то создайте их заранее перед номинацией. Хотя некоторые отзывы могут помочь устранить погрешности, это ваша ответственность, как номинатора оформить ваше изображение до того, как предоставить его на рассмотрение. Если вы предложили изображение, которое игнорирует один из критериев, не удивляйтесь, если оно не получит статуса ценного изображения.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list, (under the heading "New valued image nominations") as the last parameter in the VICs template: Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Adding a new nomination (set)[edit]

Step 1: Choose a set name, and type that into this box after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname. Then click on the "Create new set nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VISC subpage.

Step 3: Open Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list Click here, and add your set at at the bottom of the page using this format:

 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/A vulca......
 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname}}

and save the set candidate list.

Повторная номинация[edit]

Отклоненные кандидаты в качественные изображения и наборы могут быть повторно выдвинуты любым зарегистрированным участником только после того как одна или несколько основных причин, из-за которых изображение было отклонено будут исправлены. Undecided кандидаты в качественные изображения и наборы могут быть повторно выдвинуты в том же состоянии, хотя рекомендуется рассмотреть и исправить причины, которые, возможно, помешали получению статуса во время предыдущей номинации.

После того, как проблемы исправлены нужно выполнить следующую процедуру повторной номинации:

Шаг 1: Отредактируйте подстраницу кандидата, которого Вы повторно номинировать. Отклоненные заявки находятся в категории [[:Category:Declined valued image candidates}, а заявки, по которым не было принято решение в категории Category:Undecided valued image candidates. Страницы в этих категориях отсортированы по дате предыдущей номинации.

Шаг 2: Замените предыдущие дату и время номинации новыми. Для этого нужно вставить строку

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Шаг 3: Замените статус "undecided" или "declined" на "nominated" (или "discussed", если изображение добавляется в раздел Most Valued Review).

Шаг 4: Если предыдущую номинацию делал другой участник, то нужно заменить имя номинатора. Для этого нужно вставить строку

|nominator=~~~

Шаг 5: Если у кандидата до этого не было архивной ссылки на предыдущее обсуждение, то ещё можно сделать следующим способом:

  • Вырезать текст в предыдущей секции "review section" (нужно оставить закрывающие фигурные скобки "]]")
  • Заменить параметр "review" строкой
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Сохранить страницу
  • Появится красная ссылка на предыдущую номинацию. Кликните на ней и вставьте предыдущий обзор
  • Сохраните эту подстраницу

Шаг 6: Добавить подстраницу в список кандидатов

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
13980 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
11777 (84.2%) 
Undecided
  
855 (6.1%) 
Declined
  
1348 (9.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Calendula officinalis flowerbud 22122014 (1).jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-12-22 10:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Calendula officinalis (Pot marigold) flowerbud

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Loudenvielle 65 la Neste 2009b.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-22 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
The river Neste du Louron (left bank), Loudenvielle, Hautes-Pyrénées, France , S-SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Lądek Zdrój, pl. Staromłyński 5, 02.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Staromłyński Square in Lądek-Zdrój, view from ESE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Nev1 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 05.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope Nev1 (talk) 15:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Fábrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre - Real Casa de la Moneda - 01.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Headquarters of the Royal Mint of Spain, main facade
Used in:
Royal Mint (Spain)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, kościół św. Andrzeja, 02.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, view from NNE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Trzebieszowice, plebiania, 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Misc pollen colorized.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-22 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Electron microscope images of pollen

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Calcasoli.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-22 22:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Calcasoli

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Patella vulgata f. radiata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-22 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Patella vulgata forma radiata (Common Limpet), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Panier à couvercle Warabahu MHNT ETH 2010 24 102.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-23 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Karajá people - Basket with lid "Warabahu"
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
San Moisè (Venice) Interno - Fonte battesimale.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-23 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Church San Moisè (Venice), font

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 09:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sucrose molecule.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-23 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
3D molecule of Sucrose

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The caption of the image is too succinct --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Description revisited and more detailed.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Sucrose to 3D molecule of Sucrose --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 09:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review.
Structure volcano numbered.svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-23 10:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Volcanological diagrams
Open for review.
Juist, Yachthafen -- 2014 -- 3544.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-12-23 10:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Marina at Juist harbour (from promenade), Lower Saxony, Juist

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Juist, Seezeichen (an der Seebrücke) -- 2014 -- 3550.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2014-12-23 11:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Navaid at Juist harbor, Lower Saxony, Germany

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-23 12:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Dańczów

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Term "view from WSW" is unnecessary, because this is a simple belfry, it looks the same from every angle. --Halavar (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jeleniów, kościół, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-23 12:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 03.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-23 12:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Jerzykowice Wielkie

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 1. Look to the notes. 2. Term "view from WSW" is unnecessary, because this is a simple belfry, it looks the same from every angle. --Halavar (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done. Only half done;) --Halavar (talk) 23:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
    Nie widzę żadnych adnotacji na zdjęciu.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lewin, Chopina 4, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-23 12:51 (UTC)
Scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, view from W

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

&Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok. Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lewin, Kościuszki 18, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-23 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, view from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Astrantia major Mitterbach 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-12-23 13:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Astrantia major, top view of florescence
Used in:
de:Große Sterndolde, en:Astrantia major
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Suchum, Ruiny antycznej Dioskurii.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-12-23 14:39 (UTC)
Scope:
The ruins of the ancient Dioscuria in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from N-W.
Used in:
en:Sukhumi, ka:დიოსკურია, pl:Suchumi, pl:Dioskuria, ru:Диоскуриада, uk:Діоскурія
Reason:
The only one on Commons -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be useful to have the direction of the camera in the scope and image description. Nev1 ([[User talk:Nev1|talk

  • ✓ Done Ok. I've added a direction. --Halavar (talk) 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC) ]]) 15:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Excellent! Nev1 (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. Good photo. Nev1 (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rheingauer Dom, Geisenheim, Entry and Nave 20140902 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DXR (talk) on 2014-12-23 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Rheingauer Dom Hl. Kreuz (Geisenheim), Nave
Reason:
Used in several articles, good quality. -- DXR (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and very useful! --P e z i (talk) 17:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Landstrasser Guertel 33 DSC 9043w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-12-23 21:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Landstraßer Gürtel Nr.33, Vienna, SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Support just for info there is an unsharp area on the right of the image -- ChristianFerrer 05:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for supporting and thanks for the info. The mentioned problems are the reason why I bought a Nikkor AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED in the meantime. --P e z i (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Emilei.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-23 21:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Emilei

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
KatrinaKaif.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-23 22:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Katrina Kaif
Reason:
One of the most successful actress of Bollywood (Indian movies). Studio shot, so no geocoding. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Priyanka Chopra at Filmfare Awards 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-23 23:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Priyanka Chopra
Reason:
Another leading actress of Bollywood. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Scope very rich, I trust you're connoisseur. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Deepika endorses Yamaha scooters 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-24 00:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Deepika Padukone
Reason:
Another leading actress of Bollywood -- Yann (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Geocoding needed a long search, but I got it! Yann (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-24 05:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Clitocybe nebularis Teratologie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Motorola Moto E.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-12-24 09:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Motorola Moto E (black) android mobile phone

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Changing composition molten salt reactor numbered.svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-24 10:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Graphic of Molten salt reactors

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Molten salt reactors to Graphic of Molten salt reactors --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 09:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review.
Bacterial Anaerobic Corrosion numbered.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-24 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of Anaerobic corrosion

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope too broad --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done More specific scope.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Corrosion to Anaerobic corrosion --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

It's better I suggest: Diagram of [[:Category:Anaerobic corrosion|Anaerobic corrosion]] --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done Thanks.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 08:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Corrosion to Diagram of Anaerobic corrosion--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 08:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC) {{{3}}}

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review.
2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (13).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-12-24 11:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Railway station in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from North.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope Nev1 (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Castle Ward 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-12-24 12:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Castle Ward House, SW facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
141220 Pegel Biebrich.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-24 14:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Pegel Biebrich, View from South East.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Biebrich Rheinpegel.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-24 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Pegel Biebrich, View from North West.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x4GB, 1866MHz.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-24 14:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Corsair Memory, Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x4GB, 1866MHz in dual channel
Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, zespół dworski, 50.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-24 15:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace annex in Trzebieszowice, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Rynek w Międzylesiu, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-24 15:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Historic centre of Międzylesie, market square, view from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-24 15:13 (UTC)
Scope:
13 Wolności Square in Międzylesie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 14, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-24 15:21 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Wolności Square in Międzylesie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ardvreck Castle Loch Assynt.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nev1 (talk) on 2014-12-24 17:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Ardvreck Castle SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Mazzanti.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-24 19:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Mazzanti

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Patella vulgata f. secernenda 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-24 19:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Patella vulgata forma secernenda (Common Limpet), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
194 OldScotneyCastle.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2014-12-24 20:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Scotney Castle SW view
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Scope must be linked to a category. --P e z i (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
StMichaelsRow Chester.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2014-12-24 21:06 (UTC)
Scope:
St Michaels Row, Chester

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is inappropriate. It points to the category that contains the image, and in this case, give the name of the building which is classified. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)


Pictogram voting info.svg Scope changed from Elizabethan architecture in Chester to St Michaels Row, Chester --Martinvl (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Land van Beveren' (knoppen).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-25 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Land van Beveren' Flower buds.
Open for review.
Agneaux siamois de Berdoulat MHNT ART 98.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-25 08:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Conjoined twins stuffed lambs

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Zaccaria (Bas relief sud).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-25 08:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of San Zaccaria - Venice - South bas-relief on the facade
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 23:50, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Atmosphere structure numbered.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-25 09:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of Earth's atmosphere

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Airolo - connecting corridor numbered.svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-25 09:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of Forte Airolo
Open for review.
휴대용 앙부일구.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— Revi on 2014-12-25 13:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Hand-held Angbuilgu

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-25 18:23 (UTC)
Scope:
15 Wolności Square in Międzylesie

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 16, 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-25 18:35 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Wolności Square in Międzylesie
Open for review.
2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-25 18:46 (UTC)
Scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, view from S

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-25 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, view from S
Open for review.
2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 08.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-25 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, view from E
Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Madonna del Popolo.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-25 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Madonna del Popolo

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Flute de pan MHNT ETH AC NH 31 Savès.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-26 07:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Pan flute, Solomon Islands, nineteenth century

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 09:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Moisè (Venice) Interno - Mosè colpisce la roccia - Soffitto.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-26 07:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of San Moisè (Venice), Fresco on the ceiling of the nave : Moses striking the rock

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tagetes erecta 26122014 (2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-12-26 09:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Yellow Tagetes erecta (French Marigold) flower
Open for review.
2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-26 11:12 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, view from SW

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not a good candidate. I think this one File:2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 01.JPG is better. It precise show us only a church. --Halavar (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-26 11:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, view from SE
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 07.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-26 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, view from NW
Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-26 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, view from W
Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 06.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-26 11:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, view from SE
Open for review.
Tagetes erecta 26122014 (3).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-12-26 12:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Orange Tagetes erecta (French Marigold) flower
Open for review.
Pranzini photo anthropométrique.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-12-26 15:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Henri Pranzini, mug shot
Used in:
fr:Henri Pranzini
Reason:
Extraordinary and rare (in fact: unique and, I think, never published until today) police mugshot of Henri Pranzini, who was a famous french murdered, executed by guillotine in 1887, sentenced to death after a triple murder. This sensational story was known internationaly. Of course alone in scope, it is an original. As the quality was very good, I've slightly "upsampled" the document after a difficult restoration. You'll find the original, broken and unrestored, as first upload. No geocode, it is a studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. Yann (talk) 18:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
LANDRU 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-12-26 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Henri-Désiré Landru. 1909 mugshot.
Used in:
fr:Henri Désiré Landru and others.
Reason:
Landru before Landru, the "french Bluebeard"... Unique mugshot of the famous french serial killer (11 victims between 1915 and 1919), photograph taken in 1909, when he was involved in a embezzlement case. Very difficult restoration, one may find the original picture as first upload. No geocode, it is a studio shot -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. Tu pourrais remplacer l'image principale dans l'article par la vue de face, car l'autre est vraiment mauvaise. Yann (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Oui, mais non. Ma photo date de 1909, il n'avait encore tué personne. La photo "moche" est plus contemporaine semble-t-t'il. Elle est mauvaise, mais a sa valeur.--Jebulon (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Confessional box.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-26 22:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Confessional box
Open for review.
Melanopsis tricarinata 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-26 22:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Melanopsis tricarinata, Shell
Open for review.
2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (07).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-12-27 01:21 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral in Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. View from S-W.
Reason:
The only one in scope -- Halavar (talk)
Open for review.


Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]