Commons:特色圖片候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

如果你認為你已經創作或找到了一張可能有價值的圖像，請把它加到“提名”部分。如果在十五天後達成了普遍的共識。圖像就會轉移到特色圖片。請注意這不同於每日圖片。

[edit] 規範

為了改進關於規範的認同。這是一暫時的小規定：

投票週期為二周。如果沒有取得絕大多數的認同，投票週期將延長一周。絕大多數的認同意味著有“特色”。
每個註冊用戶都可以投票。
完成的投票保存在存檔.
這只是一個“試行規定”，請增加反饋意見。

[edit] 提名

提名或投票圖片, 請編輯Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list

[edit] Image:Blue Angels NAS Jacksonville Air Show 2452.JPG

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 16:02:23

Info: created, uploaded, and nominated by Digon3 --Digon3 ^talk 16:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Digon3 ^talk 16:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Struthio camelus (Kunene).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 13:33:08

Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Lycaon (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Mind the dip! Picture taken while driving (don't tell). -- Lycaon (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Funny but nothing for higher encyclopedic use. --Herrick (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Back side of the ostrich and road in bad composition. --Jagro (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bödele Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 12:58:09

Info: created, uploaded and nominated by -- Böhringer (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, lens flare (even *two*) equals obvious non-FP, in my eyes. --Aqwis (talk) 13:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Great panorama. --Kosiarz-PL 14:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support That is one great panorama. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. I like it. – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Georgez (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose The lens flares ruin it for me. Es tut mir leid. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Parthenocissus quinquefolia on wall, November 1, 2008.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 00:56:04

Info: Created and uploaded by Ragesoss - nominated by Ram-Man 00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support I think this is simple, beautiful, and a little different. As a bonus, it nicely illustrates its Wikipedia article. -- Ram-Man 00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support per previous voter. Lighting and color palette are very expressive. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 09:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Elephas Maximus Eye Closeup cropped.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2008 at 22:26:21

Info: taken by AlexanderKlink (cropped by Lycaon) - uploaded by Lycaon - nominated by D-Kuru -- D-Kuru (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support It's very hard to switch to something different if you had a close look at the eye --D-Kuru (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment, "switch to something different"? --Aqwis (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't know that phrase in english. In german it's "die Augen abwenden" but I don't think that "the eyes averted"^{per google translate} is much better than my expression ^^ --D-Kuru (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Support mesmerizing, to say the least. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support DOF seems a bit short; perhaps a crop of the eye would be better. Still, a good picture Muhammad 03:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jovan Kaneo.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2008 at 13:30:53

Info: created by Vanjagenije - uploaded by Ori~ - nominated by Tseno Maximov
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Georgez (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Rather flat, and the pink umbrella distracts. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Neutral is it me, or it is even so slightly out of focus ? --JY Rehby (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Fortress at Veliko Tarnovo.JPG

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2008 at 13:00:45

I withdraw my nomination Tseno Maximov (talk) 17:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Info: created by Psy guy - uploaded by Psy guy - nominated by Tseno Maximov

Support -- Tseno Maximov (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose The whole image is too much gray. --Jagro (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I realise that I am operating as an IP, and I don't normally venture my opinion on these things, but if I remember correctly, an FP should be more than 2MP. This is less than 800KB. The resolution is average, and the subject (at least as this picture portrays it) is uninspiring. Possible FPX? 202.12.233.23 15:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)_{Please login to vote. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)}

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it is too gray. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing FPX to FPX contested and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If no contrary views are expressed within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

[edit] Image:60163 Tornado connecting rods.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 22:20:45

Info: created, uploaded and nominated by -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Nice detail. --Jagro (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Technically nice image, but for FP? It is just part of railway wheel, isn´t it? --Karelj (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- It has a pretty special backstory, see the description. Ultra7 (talk) 19:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Technically illustrative --Twdragon (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Technically very good ; for FP, yes for sure, since there aren't that many technical pictures in there. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:60163 Tornado cylinder rod.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 22:17:50

Info: created, uploaded and nominated by -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Too much inputs at one photo. --Jagro (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Chaotic. --Karelj (talk) 17:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Lens distortion --Twdragon (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I withdraw my nomination Ultra7 (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Václav Havel.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 21:58:16

Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Martin Kozák -- Martin Kozák (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Martin Kozák (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Composition, parts of face missing, especially part if chin. --Karelj (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Oh, i get it, it's not a picture of his features, it's a featured picture... Well, seriously, i don't think it makes the cut. --JY Rehby (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Fagus sylvatica JPG2a.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 20:19:53

Info: created by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - uploaded by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - nominated by Tseno Maximov
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 20:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Not bad. --Karelj (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Not bad, but also not so illustrative for FI --Twdragon (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Not bad, but not astounding either. Maybe the highlights are just a bit too present ; maybe the sharpness is just a bit too low... --JY Rehby (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Support good composition and illustration for autumn. --Herrick (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Inachis io LC0131.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 16:27:57

Info: European Peacock, created, uploaded and nominated by -- LC-de (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- LC-de (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mantis Hymenopus coronatus 4 Luc Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 07:22:34

Info: created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support New proposal more DOF -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I prefer the other shot of the mantis as in this photo the crop is really too tight for me. Sorry... --AngMoKio (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Beautiful --Twdragon (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Biological and technological scales compared-en.svg

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 01:08:00

Info: created by Guillaume Paumier, Philip Ronan, NIH, Artur Jan Fijałkowski, Jerome Walker, Michael David Jones, Tyler Heal, Mariana Ruiz, Science Primer (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Liquid_2003, Arne Nordmann & The Tango! Desktop Project - uploaded by Guillom - nominated by Mdd -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose It is a bit of a mishmash of drawing techniques, but what is worse, there are also spelling mistakes! (e.g. crystalline). Lycaon (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Techniques used for representation are very different. Some very complex and very simple. I do not think that is the best way to represent --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I don't know what is meant by the illustration that says that "electromechanical ... microsystems" are between 2 and 40 micrometres. The text is very unclear. What systems are being referred to? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gustave Doré - Dante Alighieri - Inferno - Plate 9 (Canto III - Charon).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 23:27:17

Info: created by Gustave Doré - uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Info: Charon, in Gustave Doré's illustrations for Dante's Divine Comedy.
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Doesn't get my wow. Diti (talk to the penguin) 06:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support. Has substantial wow factor when you consider the skill of the artist and the high technical quality of the scan. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support ... as well as the dramatic composition. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose As Diti. --Karelj (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Twdragon (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Econt (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Withdraw I just discovered the edition I used just didn't care, and cropped the images. I can't in good conscience nominate a cropped image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Utah State Route 12 MC.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 21:47:08

Info: created by Chmehl - uploaded by Chmehl - nominated by diego_pmc -- diego_pmc (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- diego_pmc (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Beautiful photo, the sky is a bit dark but it doesn't matter. Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Simply a good picture, without much to nitpick on --JY Rehby (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Aqwis (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Thanks for nominating, btw the dark sky is a side effect of the polarization filter which makes also the contrast of the clouds stronger. --Chmehl (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful weather, place, and sky but I don't feel like I'd hang up this picture in my room... Maybe the composition isn't appealing to me. sorry. Benh (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose As Benh. --Karelj (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Composition --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Composition. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Great photo. --Kosiarz-PL 15:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support I like it, even the composition --LC-de (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support I like the radius effect. :)) --Manco Capac (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Support It looks very vell. --Jagro (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Composition -- Lycaon (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Per Benh --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cambronne - buste.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 15:34:44

Info: created by Eusebius - uploaded by Eusebius - nominated by Eusebius -- Eusebius (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Eusebius (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose CA (large bands of magenta around the statue) --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Despite chromatic aberration, the photo is quite clear and gives a nice look of the statue. Diti (talk to the penguin) 19:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support weakly ; no tremendous "wow" factor ; otoh, a large, sharp, well lit, well framed, well backgrounded (is that a verb ?) picture of this statue. And chromatic aberration doesn't ruin it, imho. --JY Rehby (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I haven't look closely, but I don't like the low point of view. IMO it should have been taken from farther with longer focal (to achieve same framing from higher point of view). Benh (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dynamite-5.svg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 02:14:16

Info: created by Pbroks13 - uploaded by Pbroks13 - nominated by Pbroks13 -- Pbroks13 (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Pbroks13 (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- diego_pmc (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Too simple, very low information value. --Karelj (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - A lot more of sophistication is required to reach the present FP bar on this kind of media. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose as Alvesgaspar. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kerkini 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2008 at 21:56:38

Info: created by Evlahos - uploaded by Evlahos - nominated by Multichill -- Multichill (talk) 21:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Multichill (talk) 21:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support it's just so damn pretty -- Duesentrieb ⇌ 22:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, heavily compressed. --Aqwis (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Visible compression after a lossless GEGL modification in GIMP. Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose after swapping RGB channels and applying strong JPEG compression in GIMP, there are visible JPEG artifacts and colors are completely off (on a more serious note, this image has no detail in low-contrast areas, probably due to excessive amount of noise reduction) --che 03:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose strongly. I'll rely on my neighbours over there for the technical stuff ; to me it looks like the saturation is way too high, and the picture has been heavily post-processed, giving it a thick, oily look and feel. --JY Rehby (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose per other opposes --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Support - MartinD (talk) 14:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Power press animation.gif

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2008 at 08:04:13

Info: created by www.osha.gov - uploaded by Archenzo - nominated by Twdragon -- Twdragon (talk) 08:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Twdragon (talk) 08:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - Poor image quality and too small size -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Not really snazzy --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Because of quality (letting size out), doesn't deserve the FP status. Diti (talk to the penguin) 18:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Aqwis (talk) 22:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Per above. Also, the way I decide if animations are important enough to be a FP is if the image could be just as understood if it wasn't an animation. In this case, the animation serves no purpose. Pbroks13 (talk) 00:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Confederate 100 Dollars.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2008 at 04:37:41

Info: created by Swtpc6800 - uploaded by Swtpc6800 - nominated by Swtpc6800 -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Support --Twdragon (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Great detail and resolution, but I strongly dislike the background. It should be completely white without dirt on it. I will change to support if you deal with this. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Support It's good now. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 15:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you on the background. I have cleaned it up on my TIFF master and uploaded a new JPG. I still have access to the bill and can re-scan it if necessary. Swtpc6800 (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose Good image of old banknote, but why for FP? --Karelj (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

During the campaign, President-elect Obama made the point that "he doesn't look like all those other presidents on those dollar bills." This banknote reminds us of a time when blacks were on the currency. Swtpc6800 (talk) 02:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Support because what else will Wikimedia projects use to illustrate Confederate banknotes? I do agree the background should be cropped, but what is it with Commons. Someone takes the best picture that anyone is likely to ever see of a major type of historic document, and half of FPC sits around complaining about them daring to suggest that we feature something that's only a crucial part of the historic record. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment Adam, it is not because an image does not achieve FP status (or whatever other reward for that matter) that it becomes unusable for illustration of an article. If people don't like it on the front page, then so be it! Some don't like naked worms, others don't like old banknotes and some even neither. Well, there is nothing that you or I or anybody else can do about it. De gustibus coloribusque ...Lycaon (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pectinaria koreni (with and without tube).jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2008 at 00:14:22

Info: Pectinaria koreni created, uploaded & nominated by Lycaon (talk) 00:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)