Commons:特色靚相候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣

要知道之前有乜提名,睇睇:Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

Contents

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片,請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前,請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外,您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住,Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫,以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片,因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相,必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持/反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數,即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名,睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished

更新呢一頁:purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Crataegus junges Blatt.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2015 at 18:09:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young leaf of hawthorn (Crateagus)

File:60º Campeonato Mundial de Pentatlo Militar (10925979183).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2015 at 16:21:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

60th World Military Pentathlon Championship: obstacle swimming. Rio de Janeiro - RJ

File:Pht-Vugar Ibadov eurovision (8).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2015 at 14:52:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Azerbaijani traditional dances during Eurovision 2012

File:Ribnica 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2015 at 09:24:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

French bridge over river Bistrica in Ribnica, Slovenia

File:Spiraea japonica 'Goldflame' 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 May 2015 at 04:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spiraea japonica 'Goldflame'

File:Mary Garrity - Ida B. Wells-Barnett - Google Art Project - restoration crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 May 2015 at 14:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ida Bell Wells-Barnett, by Mary Garrity
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mary Garrity, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info African-American journalist, newspaper editor, suffragist, sociologist, and an early leader in the civil rights movement.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nice portrait. Her clothes are blurred, but her face is sharp and I'm fine with the quality given the era. --King of ♠ 23:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with King but I have no idea even an old picture, this kind of image editing like 500px.com (I don’t hate that site.) is suitable acceptable for FP or not. (For modern photos of course not, imo, but this one is an old one...)--Laitche (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
    • There is no special effect here, at least nothing done recently. And she is a famous person. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
      • No, I don't mean digital effect. In this case, have a look at the lower part carefully, in my opinion, the lower part is so blurry(maybe motion blur or out of focus like the top of her hair) and I guess that was one of the reasons they had to apply this effect so I'm Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. --Laitche (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There seems to be a tiny little bit of motion blur on her clothing, but unlike the other case I think that's acceptable here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support in spite of some blurred areas. It's probably impossible to restore it any better. --Tremonist (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:The Shard from the Sky Garden 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2015 at 22:55:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Shard from the Sky Garden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info At 306m, The Shard is the tallest skyscraper in the European Union, and over twice the height of Guy's Hospital hiding behind it (the tallest hospital in the world). The people walking at the bottom of this tower are approximately 170 × smaller than the building. This photo was taken from the balcony of the "Sky Garden" at the top of the "Walkie-Talkie". That viewpoint is approximately half as high as the Shard is tall, and 750m distant. Created, uploaded and nominated by Colin.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The photo wasn't easy to take as the "Sky Garden" balcony is surrounded by glass that a detrimental effect on quality, and tripods are not allowed. What elevates this photo above QI are:
  • The image is a sharp 60MP resolution, which is about 2.8m tall on a standard 100dpi monitor screen.
  • The viewpoint, at mid height and approximately twice as distant as the building is tall, is ideal for photographing skyscrapers since it does not suffer from vertical perspective distortions -- the proportions are true.
  • All 306m of the tower are visible from base to top, which is very unusual in London unless one is standing at the base.
  • A window is open to allow a window-cleaning crane to protrude. Or perhaps to fly a Millennium Falcon inside. -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support convinced ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, although the time of day doesn't seem ideal for photographing the Shard from this angle. This is almost certainly the best publicly accessible vantage point for photographing the Shard. (I know because I had considered it prior to the opening of the Sky Garden!) Diliff (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks Diliff. I would like to go back during the blue-hour when it is lit up, and try to get permission to take a tripod. It wouldn't be possible during normal open-hours as a tripod would obstruct people in the relatively narrow and busy balcony. And I'd need them to turn the lights off, or use some black sheeting/box to avoid reflections. Or buy a really really tall tripod that gets above the glass barrier. Or get a trip in one of those window-cleaning cranes... -- Colin (talk) 08:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support though lighting could be a bit better. --King of ♠ 01:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support amazing work, Colin. --Abd (talk) 01:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you for explaining the issues involved in creating this image in such detail. That level of detail, nonetheless, is dwarfed by what's in that image. In that portal open to tractor-beam in the Millenium Falcon, for instance, we can not only see a sort of wavy-line design (the Imperial logo? Stormtroopers waiting at attention? Face-smile.svg), we can see that the light is on. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the thorough explanation of the circumstances of the shot. And an amazing picture. --Pugilist (talk) 05:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good city view but perhaps you can clone out the disturbing skyscraper in the foreground?--ArildV (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  :-) I'm no fan of it. It looks like someone took the set squares out of their childhood stationary set and spent a few minutes drawing something tall and pointy. Unlike the towers Britain used to build, which reward close examination, when you zoom in to this one you just see flat glass and steel. And compared to other modern skyscrapers even the glass is boring. -- Colin (talk) 08:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 08:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good job. -- -donald- (talk) 10:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support amazing photographic skill, that red cranes are for a building's construction? if so it's a pity this superb view will not be seen in the future. --Laitche (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The only thing that could improve this would be better lighting, imho. The chosen vantage point seems indeed ideal. Congratulations! --El Grafo (talk) 10:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I agree the about the lighting. I should admit that the vantage point is probably best for obtaining the full view of the building from top-to-bottom, but does make it harder to see that the Shard isn't a simple pyramid. If you look at File:Tower Bridge view at dawn crop.jpg, you can see that the side of the building that faces the Walkie-Talkie has a triangular wedge that sticks out. That is less obvious in this photo. However, as Laitche notes, it is possible that someone is building something to obscure the base from this direction too. One can't get all aspects perhaps, unless WMF want to charter a helicopter to take aerial pictures. -- Colin (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You couldn't have taken the picture when the Greenpeace protesters were climbing the building? ;-) -- KTC (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2015 at 19:20:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko

File:Cologne Main Station May 2015.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2015 at 15:33:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cologne Hauptbahnhof as seen from the central platform of the main hall during blue hour.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cologne Hauptbahnhof as seen from the central platform of the main hall during blue hour. Please note that platform and roof (including its electric lighting) are not absolutely perfectly aligned. All by myself --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive.--ArildV (talk) 15:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive.--Laitche (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support718smiley.svg Awesome! --LivioAndronico talk 16:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think if you had taken a photo without the train it would have been just as good by focusing the eye more upon the beauty and symmetry of the station.--Fotoriety (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The hall without a moving train as a main component is less interesting than I'd expected myself. The main problem is that the hall is never really "empty", i.e. there's always some train or another standing or moving somewhere, destroying the symmetry. Another annoying factor: A couple of ugly trash cans on the platform to the left, here perfectly covered by the incoming train. Besides: I'd really miss the dynamic element we have in this picture... ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As I zoomed in I caught myself moving my head to try and see the full advertisement on the rear window. Once that happens, there is no need to add any further technical explanation. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 11.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2015 at 12:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec
Yes Jacek the cross is good now,but can you see my notes,please? thanks (excuse me if I do this)--LivioAndronico talk 17:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Cornice is a horizontally, see my note below yours. In old buildings, often something is crooked and corrects perspective have to choose the lower badness. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me now --LivioAndronico talk 19:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice subject. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose "just" a QI imho, no wow for me. Sorry, --El Grafo (talk) 09:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:RIMPAC 2010 DVIDS299372.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2015 at 20:29:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indonesian Marine blows water out of his nose.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cohen Young - uploaded by -- (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop is too tight. --Laitche (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. A very confusing and awkward photo. Nicely timed but that's about the only thing it has going for it IMO. Diliff (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Vista de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-03, DD 23-31 HDR PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2015 at 12:40:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the former roman city of Sagunto after sunset at the moon light. The picture was taken from the hill where the castle is located. This picture is the result of 9 frames (3 different frames with 3 differnt exposures).
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the former roman city of Sagunto after sunset at the moon light. The picture was taken from the hill where the castle is located. This picture is the result of 9 frames (3 different frames with 3 differnt exposures). Poco2 12:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 12:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great. --Code (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is that the moon? Can you add the camera location? --Laitche (talk) 17:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Geodata added, yes, that's the moon! Poco2 18:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Wow. -- Pofka (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dorieo (talk) 22:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The moon is too bright but nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Even with HDR, the moon is much brighter than the dusk sky. If you want to see details on the moon, you get a black sky, I can tell you. --Kadellar (talk) 23:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, I know that's why I support this and also I know taken at 20:37:41. Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 00:25, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2015 at 09:11:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo
  • This user was blocked by Yann see here , and I'm sorry but I do not consider the vote valid, it has been placed at random.--LivioAndronico talk 12:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kings Cross Railway Station Platforms 5 to 8, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 23:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kings Cross Railway Station
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. I took this architectural image of the interior of London Kings Cross railway station in London recently after a Wiki meet up. You may notice that the viewpoint isn't perfectly aligned with the centre of the ceiling. This was because the central platform itself is not aligned with the ceiling, so I was forced to choose one or the other, and I felt that the platform was more important to keep centred. The building itself dates from 1851 to 1852 and is comprised of two arched sheds. This photo shows the western side of the two sheds, but the eastern shed is visible through the arch on the right side of the frame. Diliff (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support However I would have cut the empty bottom. -- Christian Ferrer 15:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I've cropped it as I think you're right, it doesn't need quite so much empty space. Diliff (talk) 22:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow. Love that infinite DoF. Looks like the sort of place that really could be a gateway to another world. Really great to see you giving the same treatment to a train station that you have brought to so many churches. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 08:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support remember my times there --LivioAndronico talk 19:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support makes me want to visit --Abd (talk) 00:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and useful photo, I wished that the viewpoint was higher up.--ArildV (talk) 08:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Me too, but it's not physically possible, except maybe with a 5 metre high pole attached to my tripod. ;-) There are no publicly accessible positions above the ground. Diliff (talk) 09:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame Basilica Interior, Montreal, Canada - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 23:14:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Notre-Dame Basilica, Montreal
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. This image was probably my first church interior and actually dates way back to 2006. It's not technically as good as my modern stitched interiors but for a 9 year old image, I think it still compares well. The dark ambiance is deliberate. It's quite a dark interior and to preserve the highlight details, I've chosen not to bump the shadows too much. As is often the case, the full size image doesn't look as dark as it does in the thumbnail so please view at 100%. Diliff (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support More churches! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That ceiling looks simply magnificent. -- Pofka (talk) 08:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good image in 2006 and also good repairing technique. --Laitche (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fascinating. Have you considered doing some of your modern church interiors deliberately darker like this? It would be interesting. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Well, I suppose I could but not many are as well-lit as this church. I did give one church a similar treatment as it was also similarly dark, lit only with stained glass. But most churches are not naturally dark. I do try to maintain the original ambience of the interior, except with better clarity of shadow and highlight detail. :-) Diliff (talk) 10:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support gorgeous, luscious --Abd (talk) 00:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kaubalaeva "E. Russ" vrakk.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 18:49:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Underwater shipwreck in Estonia
  • I don't say that isn't available,I said "too much small for me" in my opinion Face-smile.svg --LivioAndronico talk 09:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bojars (talk) 05:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English description, please. --Laitche (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Kruusamägi (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If geocode is added, I would support. --Laitche (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Kruusamägi (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual photo/ Size is good, of course, D kuba (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 01:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 08:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pugilist (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Small size, but given the circumstances I still support. --Pugilist (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Competently done underwater image, QI perhaps, but no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well, wow for me! Maybe I'm a softie and just love life, but ... wow! --Abd (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit small, but interesting subject, nicely framed and well-lit. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Angla Viite talu pukktuulik Saaremaal, suvi 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 14:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Angla Windmills in Saaremaa
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by MinuHiiumaa - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be biger resolustion. Its nice. --Mile (talk) 14:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ohh Estonia... 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Mile --LivioAndronico talk 20:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not bad, but only a very good QI. I don't find anything extraordinary here. I miss something special. Matter of taste ? Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much space at the left side and I'm guessing it's over-downscaling but there's no metadata and camera info... --Laitche (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent lighting and clouds. --King of ♠ 04:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the composition does not works for me: too much space on left. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very good picture but too small for my taste. --Code (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not bad but not enough outstandind -- Christian Ferrer 19:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, about a fourth off of the left, but the right-hand 3/4 is great and cropping it simple. --Abd (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 04:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Messier 101 (M101, also known as NGC 5457 and also nicknamed the Pinwheel Galaxy) lies in the northern circumpolar constellation, Ursa Major (The Great Bear), at a distance of about 21 million light-years from Earth. This is one of the largest and most detailed photo of a spiral galaxy that has been released from Hubble. The galaxy's portrait is actually composed of 51 individual Hubble exposures, in addition to elements from images from ground-based photos."
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by European Space Agency & NASA - uploaded by Tryphon - nominated by Pine -- Pine 04:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine 04:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yes, spectacular space image, the universe is an amazing place, compared to the alternative. --Abd (talk) 01:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose some part are blurry(strange) at full resolution especially upper left, lower left, lower right. --Laitche (talk) 21:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Myioborus torquatus Santa Elena.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2015 at 00:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Collared whitestart

File:Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 18:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima)

File:Golconda Fort 002 - Baradari.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 15:59:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golconda Fort, India
I asked him on his talk page. -- Christian Ferrer 14:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
I have imported a new version. --Bgag (talk) 01:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Bgag, but, to be honest, I cannot perceive much different versus the former one. What did you change? do you have a RAW file (I could give it a try if you like)? Poco2 09:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't have a RAW version of this picture. I will send you the original one anyway. Maybe you could do better than me. --Bgag (talk) 13:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have imported a new version. Thanks to Poco a poco. --Bgag (talk) 23:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose Oversharpening issue mentioned above seems to be resolved now, but the centered composition and low angle don't really wow me. --El Grafo (talk) 09:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
For example, this one looks way more interesting to me composition-wise. --El Grafo (talk) 09:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 09:46:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna. UNESCO Wolrd heritage site.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Baptism of Jesus by Saint John the Baptist with procession of the Apostles around. Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic in Ravenna, Italy. Built 5-6 century A.D. UNESCO World heritage site. All by --Mile (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At first I thought that these corners are too dark. But when I zoomed-in that, it became clear for me that if it would be lighter, it would probably look much worse because these walls seems solidly damaged by time and requires at least minor restoration (especially windows surroundings). Illumination selection is excellent. By the way, love these blue windows. They simply look great with that gold center. -- Pofka (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pofka True you are. Those walls are not helping viewer to concentrate on mosaic (check here), but i did not want to go into sqaure crop to avoid them, because windows breathe some ligth-life into composition. So i used lower ligth gradience. --Mile (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Perfectly done. -- Pofka (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Wouldn't it deserve a slight tilt clockwise ? Gzzz (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Gzzz Not much freedom here, focal 12 mm, cant go further back. Doing rotation would bring you tigth crop bottom-above line. I would leave it as it is. --Mile (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 23:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It needs a tilt in cw direction. Furthermore the overexposed (and with CA) windows spoil the picture. IMHO there is one way, though, to get a FP out of it, look at this. If you make an alternative like that I'd support. Poco2 08:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tilted. --Kadellar (talk) 01:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version, since some dont like previous. Lets try sqaure crop. Check now...Kadellar, Poc. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I am not convinced either, those overexposed and now cropped windows are expoiling it. You should have taken several pictures to increase the dynamic range or opt for something like this: Arian Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna Edit.jpg, that I just uploaded, you can use as alternative if you like it Poco2 09:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No need for HDR. Your version is to much artistic, have in mind its encyclopedia, should depict reality - read Digital manipulation chapter "natural appearance". --Mile (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
As you like. Still, I don't believe that I deceive anybody using a round format. The intention here is not to make it look like the windows are not existing, but rather using this format to concentrate on the dome and not on any surrounding elements. Poco2 09:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Great Egret during mating season at Smith Oaks Sanctuary, High Island.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 09:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative (right)[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info darker(only highlight), denoise. --Laitche (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hey Laitche, I really appreciate your support. For me, the darker version doesn't work. It's not how I saw the bird and doesn't actually resemble the color of great egrets in the field (the way I perceive them). However, I think it's always worth a try and I really like that people here on Commons are so supportive of one another. Thanks a lot, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Okay Frank. Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw this alternative, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 22:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:The windmills of Kinderdijk.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 09:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Tarod - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Excellent composition and nice lighting but the details are lost by processing(sharp, denoise, etc) in my opinion, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Agree with Laitche that this is not the sharpest. But there is so much "wow" in this image that I'm comfortable asking myself, does this look perfectly sharp at 2000 px? Yes it does. --King of ♠ 02:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Per KoH, the cropped Windmill sail at the bottom is also a pity Poco2 09:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The King's comment means this one, but I don't think that one is perfectly sharp(details) and still there are a bit noises on the grasses at the right side + downscaling is a minus factor + this is already downscaled(3901 / 4608 x 3072 = 2601). --Laitche (talk) 09:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disturbing tight crop at top and cut reflection at the bottom. -- Christian Ferrer 16:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the composition but for my taste it's unfortunately not sharp enough to give a support. --Code (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the lighting and the composition is excellent, imho (don't really mind the cut wing). Sharpness is not bad for a kit lens, but a decent prime would probably have yielded a much better result. Sorry, I really can't decide. --El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 07:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tjörnbron (the Tjörn bridge). Tjörnbron is one of three bridges along Tjörnbroleden that connects the islands of Tjörn and Orust to the mainland. Inaugurated in 1981, the bridge was built in record time after its predecessor, the Almö Bridge, which was inaugurated in June 1960, collapsed after the bulk carrier MS Star Clipper collided with its span on 18 January 1980. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice image. IMO white is missing, it's a bit soft. And there are halos (from sharpening). IMO it's fixable.--XRay talk 08:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you for your careful review. New version uploaded based on your proposal. I also did did some local adjustment of sharpness and contrast (photo taken at the sea, and there may be water in the air and therefore a softer images .but also a very beutiful sunny autumn afternoon), and additional cleaning. I appreciate all suggestions for improvement, but please (when reviewing) also remember that it is a uncompressed wide angle image of a very large object. The images is taken with a very sharp prime lens to get the best possible result. Regards--ArildV (talk) 09:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very good, but there's a big dust spot in the sky. --Code (talk) 11:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you Code--ArildV (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. --Code (talk) 07:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit too dark perhaps? --King of ♠ 02:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you--ArildV (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    I think it can also be a bit more contrasty. --King of ♠ 04:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--ArildV (talk) 06:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 23:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject has wow potential but the result is not at FP level to me. The left crop is not convincing and the top crop too tight. Furthermore this kind of pictures demand IMO perspective feeling and the square-like format is not helping for this purpose. Looking into a map it looks like it is possible to get a bit further and capture more on the left, or even create a pano out of several frames Poco2 08:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It was not possible to get a bit further back, it is cliffs and if you go further back you start to climb down. If you go to the left, you will get a very boring car park instead of the sea and get a very boring images. The composition is carefully choiced in order to get the best composition with both the bridge and the sea below. Its not a square-like format, its standard 6x4.--ArildV (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    Ok, thanks for the feedback I believe you, and understand now that there were not so many options, but sorry Arild, I am not convinced about the result Poco2 09:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The brightened version is far much better, however the square-like format and the cut part at left don't help. -- Christian Ferrer 16:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good quality and lighting but need more air on the top and the left, I can't breathe... --Laitche (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2015 at 23:13:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cotatuero Fall in the Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park a National Park located in the Ordesa Valley, Pyrenees of Huesca, Aragón, Spain. The park
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cotatuero Fall in the Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park a National Park located in the Ordesa Valley, Pyrenees of Huesca, Aragón, Spain. All by me, Poco2 23:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 23:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great colors and contrast. --King of ♠ 01:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I feel like it's a bit of an awkward composition. The bottom of the waterfall is cropped too tightly in particular, and the whole view makes me feel like it needs a lot more breathing room. At every edge, there's details that feel obscured by the framing. Diliff (talk) 02:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK. May be it's could be darker, 1/3 stop.--XRay talk 08:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The longer I look at it the more I like it. --Code (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Diliff for composition, on other hand its not so bad. Its a pleasant spot mostly. --Mile (talk) 14:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but per Diliff and I feel the double main subject(the waterfall and the cliff), that is not given an impressive feeling, imo. --Laitche (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral As for the other but the beautiful location and quality prevent me opposing. -- Christian Ferrer 16:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I'll have to agree with Diliff. --El Grafo (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20150428130842 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2015 at 14:04:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Painel Tiradentes of Candido Portinari portrays the Inconfidência Mineira (was an unsuccessful Brazilian separatist movement in 1789), on permanent exposed in the Latin America Memorial, São Paulo - Brazil.
Truth! :D The contrast is weak in original, the paint use tint water based. More info (portuguese) -- Webysther (talk) 00:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I capture using proPhoto RGB color space, but to internet I convert to sRGB. The red change a bit, unfortunally this problem is about color space. Other colors in my monitor (calib.) is faithful to the original. -- Webysther (talk) 00:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO too soft. May be better with more contrast.--XRay talk 08:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    @XRay: ✓ Done. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Webysther I told about copyright violation, I did not get in to this, because I trusted in you to do the right thing, until 2032 this photos are not in public domain, they are not free. -- RTA 10:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment RTA check here, this image is ok. -- Webysther (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, Well done --The Photographer (talk) 19:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2015 at 10:46:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

UNESCO World heritage site Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info UNESCO World heritage site Basilica of San Vitale - triumphal arch mosaics. All by --Mile (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I will not stop me for technical quality analysis because the first thing I thought when I opened the page, it's wow. And I will stay on that. -- Christian Ferrer 11:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support It definitely gave "WOW" when opening the page, but I think that dark right corner is quite problematic as you can barely see anything in that part of the picture. -- Pofka (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support as Pofka --Hubertl (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject has wow to me and the quality is good, but the composition is a bit awkward, it would have probably worked out if there had been a symmetry on both sides but it isn't. The top right area is also too dark Poco2 08:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The shadow area at the upper right ruins the composition. --Laitche (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2015 at 20:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century)
  • Don't lack of symmetry is simpled not regular,anyway I preferred show all the window for not cut it,thanks--LivioAndronico talk 09:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A slight crop on the right and on the top would improve the symmetry. Poco2 09:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco2,thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 19:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • This user was blocked by Yann see here , and I'm sorry but I do not consider the vote valid, it has been placed at random.--LivioAndronico talk 12:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Gliwice (Gleiwitz) - water tower 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2015 at 12:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water tower in Gliwice (Gleiwitz), Silesia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose For me the composition is very poor: the water tower is standing somewhere near a ugly dump field, there are dozens of ugly ruins everywhere as well. I'm sorry but the picture is absolutely not interesting and is nowhere near the FP standards. I tried finding something positive in it, but failed. Maybe only the lighting is fine in it. Though, it probably would suit for QP if that water tower is notable somehow. -- Pofka (talk) 13:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strange composition. --Tremonist (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I find the composition good. It is the subject and colors which are a bit dull. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The composition is interesting. It is a lonely and somehow ugly place and this is what the picture shows. The dull colours underline the repellent nature of the setting. The little child and his mum (?) are contrasting very well and can only be seen by those who look very carefully. The image quality is good, the tower is very sharp and I can't see any other shortcomings. All in all, for me this is certainly one of the finest pictures on Commons. --Code (talk) 17:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Alvesgaspar Poco2 08:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Code. --El Grafo (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see what Code means but the subject is saying nothing to me. --Laitche (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition,not the mum but the tower in the nothing --LivioAndronico talk 19:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as others. Yann (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good light and composition, but the subject is just a bit plain. --King of ♠ 23:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Bluebonnet-8100.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 21:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Texas bluebonnet (Lupinus texensis)

File:Torre Pelli abril 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 19:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Cajasol Tower (or Pelli Tower) of Seville (Spain), photographed in april 2015 from the west extremity of the Cristo de la Expiración bridge.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral as creator-- Gzzz (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment no judgement for the time beeing, its tilted clockwise.. --Hubertl (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Leans a little to the right? --Tremonist (talk) 12:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It's a side view of the tower. As you can see it better on this picture, taken from the same side, the back is more vertical than the front. On my picture, if you look at the middle column of windows, it's (in my opinion) not tilted at all : I checked it with Photoshop and Lightroom... Gzzz (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice light and colours. --Code (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as File:Parque Avenida Building in Paulista Avenue.jpg. What a building! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral yellow van disturb, D kuba (talk) 07:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Do you want me to make it grey ? Gzzz (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
      • You can remove this van, i guess, but i like natural images, not those being result of photoshop works or other computer retouch, which is very common here on commons, coincidentally:-). D kuba (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 15:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info That can be seen on the Google Maps from nearby this camera location. --Laitche (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is a good qi, but the distractions and obstructions on the ground together with the simple composition keep this below FP level in my opinion. — Julian H. 11:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the perspective correcting of this nomination is not enough, it looks similar this angle. When compared with this one, please see lampposts, trees and buildings of both images, that's the reason I think it's not enough. --Laitche (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Julian. --El Grafo (talk) 13:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

The Cajasol Tower (or Pelli Tower) of Seville (Spain), photographed in april 2015 from the west extremity of the Cristo de la Expiración bridge.

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective correcting, Composition adjustment, Rotated counterclockwise 0.3 degrees. @Gzzz: If you mind, I will withdraw the alternative. --Laitche (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No problem for me ! I like it ! -- Gzzz (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Gzzz. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Image:Escudo de Osorno.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 18:28:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coat of arms of Osorno, Chile

File:Iceberg in North Star Bay, Greenland.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 17:45:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iceberg in North Star Bay, Greenland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA - uploaded & nominated by Originalwana (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As nominator Originalwana (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good, but lacks resolution a bit. --Tremonist (talk) 12:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Colors and especially sky are appealing. I don't think more detail is really required when the picture is captured in a such poor lighting. When you zoom-in you can see everything perfectly. The only thing which disturbs me in it is the orange illuminants on ice near the iceberg. I would prefer them being only in the far distance because now it ruins everything a bit, especially when looking into a low resolution picture. -- Pofka (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Resolution is good. Nice sky! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. A bit unsharp/noisy but within the range of acceptability. --King of ♠ 01:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Cool picture. Very detailled despite the circumstances. --Pugilist (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Per King of Hearts. Excellent composition and beautyfull view, but in full size image is unsharp/noisy. D kuba (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 22:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Comma butterfly (Polygonia c-album) close up.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 11:59:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close up of comma butterfly

File:Den Haag Centraal-1589.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 09:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Centraal Den Haag, tram station
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Hubertl -- Hubertl (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tram-viaduct construction, entering the partly open tram station at the Central station of The Hague, Netherland.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition,interesting place --LivioAndronico talk 12:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Artistic composition. Like a painting "blue in green". -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a confusing. What is a featuring subject? composition?, lighting?, objects? I think this is similar case of this nomination. Sorry for opposing your nom again. --Laitche (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I've reconsidered my opinion, the quality is not the FP level but this composition is featuring element. --Laitche (talk) 00:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Laitche. QI probably but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral For me this kind of unusual compositions make excellent FP. However the lack of symmetry caused by the structure at right is too imposing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual but good. --Code (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful,good and especially original --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Kesari bhath.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2015 at 05:27:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South Indian cuisine
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by AntanO
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AntanO 05:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- depth field fail, but don't loss relevant detail. Good sharp, try using self shoot 10 secs or focus remote after 5 secs. :) Webysther (talk) 06:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is unattractively cropped at right and depth of field is too shallow. --Cayambe (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad crop. Yann (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dito. --Tremonist (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As per others. With better crop it could have been FP. -- Pofka (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If needs of better crop including whole dish, I can re-upload. But, I am not sure the reason for opposition. Crop or DoF?--AntanO 15:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would prefer the whole bowl into right. It's content is interesting and colorful and I see no reason cropping a part of it. Though, I'm not sure about the bottom part since it seems this bowl is just some basic white bowl without any interesting decorations we use in microwaves to heat food. If that is true, I would personally prefer bottom-cropped version, but with the full right part. Furthermore, there probably is too much black all around the bowl and I think it should be slightly reduced as well. -- Pofka (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support I actually like the fact that it's not a boring centered composition with the whole bowl being visible. Crop could mabe even be a bit tighter for my taste. A shallow DOF makes sense for this kind of shot as well, we really don't need to have the rim of the bowl in focus. But having a little bit more of the front nut in focus would have been nice. And while I like the lighting in general, having a shadow right on the front edge of the front nut is a bit unfortunate, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also like the off-centered composition, although I personally would have gone even further with the cropping on the right hand side. The cropping is something that you can see a lot in food photography these days. In general, I'd like to see more food photos here on Commons. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well said Frank. It was my intention - off-centered composition with bit of shallow DOF. --AntanO 11:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the crop is more artistic than objectively bad. I can also live with the shallow DOF in an "artsy" photo like this. --King of ♠ 01:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Rahula - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 17:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rāhula, the son of Buddha. Tibetan art, 16th century
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown artist, uploaded by DcoetzeeBot, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rāhula is the son of Buddha. Tibetan art, 16th century. High resolution, high quality reproduction.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 12:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 17:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposePictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tilted ccw and, in my opinion, the works by unknown artist(painter) should not be featured. I think if the quality is outstanding, that is valuable even it was created by unknown painter but that's not suitable for commons FP. --Laitche (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Laitche: The author of Tibetan art work is very rarely known. More generally, before the 20th century, signing an art work is quite a Western tradition. Requiring the artist to be known would prevent almost any work from many places (Tibet, India, etc.) to be FP. Is that what you mean? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
      • @Yann: I investigated about this image before I voted, and I think probably this image is Thangka, but that is not the point and I guess Thangka was a kind of mass-produced popular publications made by craftsmen so that is distinctly different from like this one. As I mentioned above If the quality is outstanding, that is valuable even it was created by unknown painter., that is my opinion but I think that kind of works(products) are not suitable for Commons FP, however if the category is changed to Commons:Featured pictures/Historical, maybe I can support this image as a history of Tibetan art, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Is it an answer to your question? --Laitche (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
@Laitche: I think you are trying to compare apples and oranges. I don't think thangkas were more mass-produced that paintings in Europe at the same period. It is the most common form of Tibetan art which survived and is known to us. So as such, I don't don't see why thangkas are not suitable for FP. I think it is either discrimination or misunderstanding of Tibetan art. We put European paintings of that period in category "Non-photographic media", and I don't see why Tibetan art should be different. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: Oh, no! It's not discrimination of Tibetan art. In my opinion, thangkas are not works, those are products and the artists are not unknown, but the artists do not exist and that's the point thangas are different from European paintings. In this case it's like a kimono, if the quality is outstanding and artistic but that is not suitable for "Non-photographic media" and kimonos are not works, but products and artists don't exist. And about Ukiyo-e which made by woodblocks(some are not) is also mass-produced popular publications but definitely artists exist so that's different. Yes, that's right, apples and oranges that's the same as thangas and European paintings. And that's why thangas are not suitable for "Non-photographic media". But I can be mistaken of course, what do you think about? --Laitche (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Laitche: Thangas are not mass-produced, so your comparaison is wrong. Kimonos are dresses, thangas are not. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: That's not what I meant. The artist, thangas artists are not unknown, but do not exist, that's the point and it's like a kimonos. Yes, mass-produced is too far maybe but the same thangas are made by different craftsmen, right? --Laitche (talk) 10:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Laitche: Of course, thanga artists do exist. What you make less and less sense. Yann (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: But by your theory, kimonos artists exist as well, especially the famous craftsmen... and if you are not convinced, it's okay. That's just my opinion :) --Laitche (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: I've changed my vote to comment, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘

  • @Yann: I think there are two types of thangkas especially in the early stages, that's more like artifact by divided work but there are lots of thangkas like painting as well, that was insufficient investigation and misunderstanding about thangkas so Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media is appropriate, I think, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Blocked for no real reviewing. Yann (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 16:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trindade and Martim Vaz archipelago, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
  • It's always better to work with the RAW. If it exists. --Code (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Code, Laitche: But is only possible to improve the photo if the creator has the RAW file? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I think that depends on the processing skill, anyway are you trying to contact the creator now? --Laitche (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @ArionEstar: We should give it a try. --Code (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @ArionEstar: I uploaded the edited version made from the first version, I think that edit is not the best but rather better. If you'd like to nominate that as an alternative, please do so. But if you get the RAW file, I guess Code's work would be better than mine. --Laitche (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Laitche: ✓ Done a new alternative nominated. And thanks! Clin 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Waiting for changes to be made. --Tremonist (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ArionEstar: I uploaded the new version to this file(the original). If you'd like to revert, please do so. Editing detail is below. --Laitche (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded, +1EV, Fixed the tilte, NR, Removed dust spots, Removed CAs. --Laitche (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Laitche: This version is nice, but it's a little bit underexposed. Look the rocks on water and the water down. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    Maybe but in my opinion for this dynamic range +1EV is limit so I think it's better to waiting for what others would say. --Laitche (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    Or maybe the source image is overprocessing but I don't have the RAW so it's a limit which I could. --Laitche (talk) 21:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    @ArionEstar: I uploaded the new version as your ordered. Maybe rather better. --Laitche (talk) 23:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
    Yes now… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @King of Hearts: This photo is reverted to the first image, so please re-review it, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Laitche: I changed this version to the file below. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    @ArionEstar: OK, That might be better. --Laitche (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Reverted to the first image. --Laitche (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08 edited.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Edited version of the photo, by Laitche. @Webysther, Daniel Case, Code, Tremonist: Now? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I support the new version of the original nomination. --Laitche (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. Thank you, Laitche. --Code (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks much nicer now, thanks a lot. --Tremonist (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Superb. -- Pofka (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 15:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Just enough to make it featurable but it still seems slightly overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Much better than the version above, but still a lot of information lost in blown highlights. There is also a significant amount of CA on the left side. — Julian H. 16:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • and due to NR, Already the source image has CAs, Yes it's not the best edit and don't have the RAW. Seems it doesn't reach your FP bar, it's OK. + If you want to make an other edit, I don't mind. Thanks Julian. --Laitche (talk) 17:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
      • I'm sure I couldn't do anything that you didn't try already. Without the RAW, this is probably as good as it gets, and it's a very nice photo now. Just not quite FP in my opinion, as mentioned. — Julian H. 17:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment New version uploaded, a bit remove CAs, -EV a little. --Laitche (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, this is not a FPC, look the top of the mountains guys, looks like vanished. I like the composition, but the colours, and the amount of details is not enough. -- RTA 19:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • @RTA Simply, you mean it's a bad editing, right? --Laitche (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Laitche, sort of, the shoot was taken in not good camera setup, 1/800 sec, creating a too dark image, and some other small issues, but she could reverted a great part of that in the raw file, this image that you created, with all of the best intentions, is not a FP. Sorry. -- RTA 20:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The new version is uploaded. --Laitche (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ArionEstar: The colors of this version are not natural and just a little bit oversaturated that's why I uploaded that version. But if you like this one, I don't mind. --Laitche (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
@Laitche: In the other version, the cloud at the center of the sky is green. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
@ArionEstar: Those are CAs, still a lot CAs in this image, but that's impossible to remove all CAs, imo. And that is one of the reason I need the RAW file. --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 14:37:33
NYC Public Library Research Room NYC Public Library Research Room

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, Left[edit]

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep -- Claus 14:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Claus Obana, Diliff: I made the sections and moved your vote. If my decision is wrong, please move your vote or all revert what I did. --Laitche (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist this one as well. There's a clear patch on the left wall column/ceiling from fixing of the stitching issue in the original (right) image. -- KTC (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Huh? But instead of just delisting, it could be fixed, either by myself or someone else... No need to delist an image over a very minor stitching issue. Diliff (talk) 17:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Also, could you point out what exactly you mean? The left wall/column looks pretty clean IMO. I don't think even a pixel-peeper would notice any problems with the column unless directly comparing to the version with the stitching problem. Is that really how we should be judging images? Diliff (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
        • It's not a case of minor mis-alignment. There is that, but more importantly, the sharpness is completely different as if the patch was blurred before being applied. I will of course withdraw my vote if that was fixed. (I have added an image note to the iamge) -- KTC (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I know what you mean but sorry, I think you may be too picky to delist :) --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I agree with Laitche, I think you were being a bit picky, but I've uploaded a new version which I think is an improvement. I don't have the original files to re-stitch anymore, so I had to use the clone tool as best I could. It's up in the top corner, not many people would notice it unless they were really looking for faults. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
            • I accept that may well be the case, but since I did notice it, I couldn't ignore it. Either way, thanks, and I've struck my delist vote. -- KTC (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
              • I think we all notice minor faults or things that could have been done better but they don't all result in opposes or delist votes. ;-) Also, we don't usually delist an existing historic FP unless there's a really good reason (like a duplicate, or a serious fault that was missed at the time it became a FP). But anyway, thanks for striking it. Diliff (talk) 12:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. — Julian H. 20:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Diliff (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg, Right[edit]