Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Attention

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search


Shortcut: COM:AN/A

Administrators' noticeboard sections
Vandalism
post | watch
To report vandalism		 Attention
post | watch
To request administrator attention		 User problems
post | watch
To report problems you are experiencing with other users		 Blocks & protections
post | watch
To discuss blocks and protections		 Other

post | watch
To post messages that do not fit into any other category
Other resources: Need help? Try the FAQ!, or the Help desk! Have an idea or suggestion? Tell us at the Village pump! ! Need a check user? see the CU request page
Navigation
Administrators' Noticeboard
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Vandalism archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Attention archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Disputes archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C K
User problems archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Blocks & protections archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Other links
Talk +/-


Discussion (index)
Important discussion pages
[graph/hist] Toolserver status
Last update 17:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
MySQL zedler up
MySQL yarrow up
Replag s1 0h 0m 8s
Replag s2 0h 0m 8s
Replag s3 3h 32m 10s
More information...


This page is for any user to request administrator attention. Please feel free to post a new request. Remember to sign and date all contributions, using "~~~~", which translates into a signature and a time stamp.

Admins: once you've dealt with a request, please make a note of it to save other admins the time.

Contents


[edit] Change of Image. "Extremes_points_of_Europe.png"

I tried to upload amended version of image "Extreme_points_of_Europe.png" however as a new user was not allowed to change this. I therefore uploaded a changed filename "Extreme_points_Europe.png". Could you please swap the image which shows Slea Head as the most western point of mainland europe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gralt258 (talk • contribs) at 19:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Summary

Saloth Sar (Pol Pot), in Phnom Penh after 1975. Picture of Ung Pech for Ben Kiernan in his work "The Pol Pot Regime, Race, Power and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979", Yale University, Chian Mai, Thailand, 1996, scanned by Albeiro Rodas for wikipedia in Poipet, Cambodia, July 2006.

[edit] Please account my account

Dear Admin:

Is possible to rename my account "Masteruk" to "HernanFernandez", if you can't, please create a new account for me called HernanFernandez

My email: <email removed>

Thanks —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Masteruk (talk • contribs)

[edit] Death of Bara

I work at the Virginia Tech Art and Architecture library, and have been catologing the image for our digital image collection. Today, I ran across the wikipedia link for the file, and after checking five different books, noted that its listed repository was incorrect. How would I change the information accompanying the file?

[edit] Account creation or new password

Hello! I was idiot enough to forget the password of my previous Commons account ( Dipa1965 ) which had a name deliberately identical to that of my Wikipedia account (I use Commons for creating maps for my Wikipedia articles). Unfortunately, I didn't had configure an email address, so I cannot get a new password. So I tried to create a new account under a name Dipa_1965 (because I want it to match my Wikipedia name as much as possible). Of course, it failed because of the similarity with the old name. Could you please create Dipa_1965 for me or (even better) sent a new password for my old account? My email can be reached from my talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dipa1965

[edit] Spanish speaker needed

Unfortunately, my spanish is still really poor. Could someone please respond to that question ? Thanks in advance. →Christian.И 13:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Done Patstuart (talk) 19:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Review of contribs please

Deleting an obvious copyvio led me to these contributions. The "licensed" ones look pretty unlikely to me and the "Source - I don't know what the license is" doesn't fill me with hope either! Can someone else take a look through these - thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Done All tagged as nsd/nld. --GeorgHH • talk   18:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Future Perfect at Sunrise's revenge deletion request of all images (more than 200) uploaded by me User:Moldopodo

I would like to inform whoever is responsible for this that the request made by the User:Future Perfect at Sunrise (the request, which I by the way did not find either here, nor in archives of Wikimedia Commons!!!) is an act of low teenage-style revenge with the banal use of administrator privileges, normally not characteristic of an administrator (or any other reasonable user and simply person) already in dispute with a user on the other project (English Wikipedia)[1]. The FPS (Fut.Perf.Sunr) informed me only of the fact that the request to delete my images was made only after they were effectively deleted. When I asked to give a reason why she/he did not inform me in advance that some problem existed with license, or why all of a sudden FSP got inetrested in my images (right after two notices were put by me against her/him on Wikipedia administratirs' noticeboard) I got NO answer from her/him. This is however characteristic of this user, as when she/he was asked to justify her/his allegations of disruptive editing (himself/herself actually contributing to it) against me, she/he NEVER presented a diff or link or whatsoever. I really don't give a damn, as personally I have no desire to upload them again. Let all those articles by dull grey pages. --Moldopodo 16:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Best I can tell, Future Perfect is acting appropriately. See the deletion discussion. Gray pages are better than illegal pages. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 17:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Moldopoldo, please calm down. To insult Future Perfect at Sunrise does not help your case at all, nor does the spamming of this message across different pages on Commons. According to Commons:Deletion requests/All uploads by Moldopodo, you have been uploading images from a website. If they are your own work, we need proof, if not, we need permission. Please refrain from verbally attacking users, and explain your point of view about the images. Patrícia msg 18:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Revenge for what? I can only agree with Thisisbossi and Patrícia. Please do not attempt to turn a concern about copyright issues into a personal matter and attempt victimise yourself; you stand to gain nothing. Address the facts, not the person. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
I have explained revenge for what above, click on the hyper text. If you are ignorant to know more, that's your problem. Well, you really did not search very far into the matter to say what you said... and the best of it that nobody even contests, it's enough that one person says bullshit and everybody repeats... how smart. I am not ready to lose another couple of hours and change licenses to the proper self-tag or whatever there should be as a matter of principle, because of malicious manipulations of Future Perfect at Sunrise and her disruptive editing. Delete them all, I don't give a damn, poor geeks, but one thing is sure I am not uploading them or modifying the licenses to the ones there should be as a matter of principle. There are ways to explain it politely and to draw one's attention to improve in advance and not like Future Perfect at Sunrise did, by announcing a posteriori "they are deleted" in a revenge style action.--Moldopodo 06:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
If the license placed on the images is incorrect, then it is irrelevant if Future Perfect is taking "revenge" on Moldopodo. Stop trying to deflect and make this about Future Perfect, and defend the claim at the deletion page, and/or get permission as requested. Otherwise I guarantee people will continue to ignore you (seriously, I've been around a while, I notice such patterns)Patstuart (talk) 07:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
And this sort of attitude is not making you look any better. Please remain civil. If you're really not interested in a constructive debate, then by all means stop uploading pictures and find yourself some other thing to do, instead of wearing down our patience here. I'm not always mellow. Patrícia msg 13:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Patricia, try to be more self-critical and rather copy the quote you have left on my talk page which supports the way I I've answered after. This would make it a better picture and will justify my statement of your rudeness.
-Please stop spamming Commons with the same message. I am deleting all of them except the one at COM:AN/A. Patrícia msg 17:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
-Chill out and try to use better language next time. I could not find the deletion request in the first hand (as it is improperly listed even on my talk page), nor did I know where to put the message, you rude person!--Moldopodo 06:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
--Moldopodo 13:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

From the quotes you just provided, Patricia acted appropriately, too. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 16:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Moldopoldo, if everybody tells you that your behaviour is unacceptable, maybe it's because your behaviour is indeed unacceptable. I stand by what I said on my talk page: your behaviour will grant you a block if you insist on it. You chill out and act responsibly, without personal remarks, insults or any type of inappropriate language directed towards any user. Less patient administrators would have given you a 24h block to cool down - I want to avoid that. If you want images back, let's talk about them, the deletion request, and their source and permissions; but if you're here to simply tell us how bad and rude we are and that you don't want to contribute any further on Commons, then don't disrupt this project. Did you come here to ask for help or just complain? Do you want us to recover the images or not? Do you want any help whatsoever or just to annoy? Patrícia msg 16:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spanish speaking help needed

See Image:Teodoro-autorretrato.jpg history, no permission-tag has been removed by ip (uploader I presume) but there no sign uploader has actually understood what the problem was to begin with. Finn Rindahl 17:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The user appears to be an English speaker: User:Peruartevalor. Patstuart (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I need someone to delete some images

i didnt know about all the copyright stuff, so i just want these images gone!

please help! Richmond96 01:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Done --GeorgHH • talk   09:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help!

ResolvedPatstuart (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Can somebody revert the editions of The Ogre in Image:Imperio español.png, Image:Map-Hispanophone World.png, Image:Map-Hispanophone World.PNG, Image:Spanish colonization of the Americas.png, Image:América Hispánica.PNG and Image:Spanish Empire.png?. He uploaded bad versions. The maps are wrong because he eliminated all he want. I want to recover the old versions. Thank you. --Durero 11:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

You can revert yourself - click the "revert" link on the image page, if it's not protected. I don't feel comfortable stepping in when there's discussion taking place...someone more knowledgeable? giggy (:O) 08:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
This is an edit war which really doesn't involve the administrators. In fact, I'm not sure I don't entirely agree with The Ogre, as stated on his page. Patstuart (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Special:Contributions/Jdvillalobos

Please, could someone check the contributions of Jdvillalobos. He has uploaded half a dozen of clear copyvios (book covers), buy I have currently no time to mark them all. Thanks in advance. --jynus (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Done All images marked or nominated for deletion that appeared to violate copyrights. Patstuart (talk) 19:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Review of "out of scope" contributions appreciated

I came across IPs yesterday repeatedly removing deletion tags from pdfs. Looking more closely I found these contributions. I deleted two immediately as "out of scope" afterwards realising one had had a deletion tag removed by an ip which I had missed (comment here). This has since been re-uploaded byt the user.

Personally I still see these contribs as out of scope & would delete them speedily. I would probably block the user (uploading deleted material, probably behind the IP removing the tags etc etc) but I would prefer others to look & comment. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Commented on DR. giggy (:O) 08:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alarming article on infiltration of Wikipedia

I read this article and felt someone at Wikipedia should be aware. I'm hoping you can forward to the appropriate administrator. I'm not sure what can be done about it but the more Wikipedia administrators who are aware, the better.

Thank you, 71.158.243.2 23:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Paz Stein pazstein@yahoo.com

Removed. Thanks for letting us know, I guess. It's a good thing Commons doesn't have any articles then, isn't it :) – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replace Image:Subversion project visualization corrected.svg

I am a new user, please replace Image:Subversion project visualization.svg by renaming Image:Subversion project visualization corrected.svg

[edit] Unresolved 2007 deletion request

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sun Myung Moon 2005.jpg As I understand it, the New World Encyclopedia's assurance of its content being licensed under GFDL terms isn't enough for us to assume this to be true when it doesn't identify the author. Whether I'm right or wrong could someone close this? Anynobody 04:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. giggy (:O) 00:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ineversigninsodonotmessageme

User:Ineversigninsodonotmessageme, a troll to begin with, is now using unblock messages as an excuse to further trolling. Additionally, this user may be a reincarnation of Tarja Lawless brand. Please protect the talk page to prevent further trolling. Patstuart (talk) 05:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Yep agree, Done. I may prod Allie just for info, cheers --Herby talk thyme 07:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Daladier.jpg

This image was nominated for deletion, but a user removed the deletion notice, before it was closed and replaced it with a bogus license template. He claims the source says it is PD, but the part he quotes says the exact opposite, black on white it says : L'iconographie de la rubrique "Histoire" : Agence KEYSTONE : la reproduction n’est pas autorisée. (reproduction is not authorized) ! Jackaranga 13:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Tag re-instated - off to warn the one who removed it - thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Large number of copyvios found

Now that it has been established that the commons does actually enforce the laws of France in respect to the illegality of publishing photos of copyrighted architecture and buildings, I have found a large number of copyvios. (see this recent one and the original one) Category:Skyscrapers in France is almost entirely full of copyright violations, I couldn't see any that had a OTRS ticket from the architects. Please read COM:FOP if you are unfamiliar with freedom of panorama. As these are blatant copyright infringement (it is impossible to have a free picture of skyscrapers in France, as none of the architects of the big glass buildings died more than 70 years ago), should I tag each of them for speedy deletion ? I'm thinking there may be problems for other countries too, I only looked into the French ones for the moment. I find it hard to believe nobody had noticed this before! What is going on, this is hardly new. Should action be taken against the editors who violated copyright in such a way ? What about if I find one uploaded by an admin ? Any help would be appreciated, also I'm not saying all the images should be deleted without forethought, and each should be considered individually. For example a picture of a person in front of a copyrighted building can be released under a free license if it used to illustrate the person and not the building. Jackaranga 12:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

For example Image:Mercuriales 3.JPG was uploaded by an admin! Am I missing something here ? Jackaranga 12:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
For an example of a borderline case see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg which was kept because the picture was of a fountain. Personally I didn't think the arch was "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" (la représentation d'une œuvre située dans un lieu public n'est licite que lorsqu'elle est accessoire par rapport au sujet principal représenté ou traité), so we must exercise caution when reviewing such images, so as not to delete legal ones. Please tell me if I should nominate each one for deletion separately or all in the same request, or speedy deletion ?! Please help. Jackaranga 13:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly disagree with this. French law should not dictate what the rest of the world sees. First, our servers are based in the United States. Second, this is an issue that the French Wikipedia should deal with, not Commons. English language websites, or Vietnamese, or Tagalog, or Portugueuse sites should not have to contend with French law. This is ridiculous. Illegal in France? Fine - don't use them on the French Wikipedia. But France can't go around dictating to the rest of the world its laws, and those deletions should not have been deleted. --David Shankbone 14:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
"Uploads of non-U.S. works are allowed only if the work is covered by a free license valid in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work, or if it is in the public domain in both countries." (Commons:Licensing#Interaction of United States copyright law and foreign copyright law). Jackaranga's concerns look valid. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
No, you are misunderstanding, I am not in anyway related to the French government, it is the commons policy, at Commons:Freedom of panorama that I am talking about. If there is such a long page on freedom of panorama, it makes sense it is applied, otherwise why did people go to the trouble of writing it ? Also the commons has made a commitment to upholding foreign copyrights. What you say makes no sense, you are the one asking that American law apply in France ! Pictures taken in France are subject to French law not American law. This is logical, I don't understand why you think American law should apply in France. I am not talking about the legality of it anyway, you are probably right that the photo could be published in the USA legally, want I am talking about is the policy here on commons that forbids such photos, not out of fear of legal problems, but because of a deliberate choice. Also see this email from Jimbo Wales. I am not speaking of law but of the copyright policy on this website Jackaranga 16:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I agree that many images taken in France do indeed need to go. Commons policy on this has long been clear - it's just that nobody has so far focussed on French pictures in particular. --MichaelMaggs 19:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Agree with MM etc. Significant deletions are in order. giggy (:O) 23:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Account

I came here to create an account, with the username Filll which is my name on English Wikipedia and on Wikiquote and on English Wiktionary and on Wikinews and on Meta-Wiki. Apparently on French Wikipedia there is an editor with the username FILLL and they have an account here on Commons, so I was not able to get an account here on Commons as Filll. Can an administrator help me?--Filll2 20:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

User name changes can be requested at COM:CHU. --rimshottalk 20:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Check 67.79.109.245 edits

Check edits of 67.79.109.245 please --67.170.53.118 00:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

All edits reverted; would a warning or a block be more proper (I don't know the procedure for long term vandalism on commons, as it's less common than on en.wikipedia). Patstuart (talk) 00:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Easily reverted, no need to block. giggy (:O) 01:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree a block for that would be excessive but I think at least place a warning tag so that in future we are alerted to the fact that the IP's behaviour has not been spotless? I confess I rarely bother to warn for what are often genuine "test" edits however for that sort where a block in future is possible (probable?) some warning is better than none - 0.02 --Herby talk thyme 07:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppeter

A sockpuppeter from the English wikipedia has now starting socking and uploading copyvios on the commons. Jvolkblum is an indef blocked user who has used many socks at English wikipedia. Most of the accounts have uploaded copyvios, you can see the problem on the talk page of one of the socks. The sockpuppeter has four accounts at the commons that I know of. Smurfette143 (talk • contribs) and 15ParkRow (talk • contribs), match usernames that were confirmed to be Jvolkblum sock's by a checkuser. Eight of the twelve images Smurfette143 uploaded were speedy deleted as copyvios. 15ParkRow uploaded two images using Flickr upload bot, the images come from the schmaberton flickr account that is being used to flickr wash photos. If admin looks throught my deleted contribs the will see a number a number of images tagged for speedy deletion from that account, sometimes multiple times. The two images 15ParkRow uploaded were previously upoaded directly to the commons by Smurfette143 (Image:BrewsterSchoolhouseNR.JPG Image:ThomasPaineFarmhouse.JPG). KatieGrinn (talk • contribs) is currenly listed in a pending checkuser as a sock of Jvolkblum. I just tagged two of the images KatieGrinn uploaded for speedy deletion. KatieGrinn uploaded Image:NRHSflags.jpg which is in the schmaberton flickr account at [2]. RocketJohnson (talk • contribs) does not have a matching sock account at the English wikipedia account, someone took that name some time ago. RocketJohnson uploaded three images related to Glen Island (Image:GlenIslandPark.JPG Image:GlenIslandFerry.JPG Image:GlenIslandPass.JPG), the last one was uploaded at 12:21 on April 26. Two minutes later 69.86.92.251 added them to a page on the English wikipedia, 69.86.92.251 was blocked as a sock of Jvolkblum. 69.86.92.251 (talk • contribs) has also commented at deletion requests of Smurfette143's images and flickr washed image from the schmaberton flickr account. RocketJohnson uploaded Image:PresbyterianChurchNR.JPG which is in the schmaberton flickr account at [3]. RocketJohnson also commented [4] [5] at the deletion requests of the images uploaded by 15ParkRow, claiming that the versions of those image uploaded by Smurfette143 were most likely copyvios. Could an admin look into this and see if anything can be done. BlueAzure 18:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Taking a look... -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that given the evidence from the English Wikipedia the users are all the same. I have blocked all of them and deleted most images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. BlueAzure 19:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Could someone please take a look at Uyu's uploads - a lot of images from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum tagged as {{PD-USGov}}. They're not (possible with some very few exceptions) works of the US Federal Government, and the copyright notice at the source site does not indicate that images are in the public domain. Because of the volume of images, I'm reluctant to do this myself, as others with more knowledge of US copyright might know something I don't. Cnyborg 22:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't see that you wrote that message here. Uyu obviously is a sockpuppet of Nyo who uploaded exactly the same pictures under exactly the same names in February. They were deleted then because as you stated that page does not show proper sources and authors. Thus they were deleted again and Uyu is blocked indefinite. -- Cecil 12:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion request

Please delete this file, because I protested against publishing this photo (personality rights), and the photographer accepted it. 89.133.16.18 07:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted this old revision of Image:Meetup Budapest 01.03.08 no06.jpg. Lupo 09:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks in advance! 89.133.16.18 09:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USA Number plate uploads

Ok licensing isn't my strongest point. I saw a license plate tagged as a copyvio with the URL it was from & deleted it. I then decided to look at the contribs of the uploader (great user name....). As I didn't know anything about the one who tagged the image I looked at their contributions - what do you know - another license plate uploader who is "releasing theirs into the public domiain". Is it just me or does this look odd? Cheers --Herby talk thyme 07:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

And another uploader - anyone with views on the licensing of such material - thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
copyvios.Geni 14:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
All three uploaders/license plates generally or or...? Thanks --Herby talk thyme 14:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I didn't think that license plates are copyvios per se, only if they have copyrighted images/logos on them, or whatever... but they probably still don't belong here as there are personality rights violation issues, no? ++Lar: t/c 14:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Museum photography

I recently had a heated discussion on the usage of museum photography where the house rules do not allow it, see Category talk:Galleria degli Uffizi. I was not aware of the Commons policy stated here Commons:Image_casebook#Museum_photography. I am however noticing a similar concern for interior images of the Taj Mahal for example, see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:TajCenotaphs.jpg, so apparently I am not the only one. I would like to at least put up a sign on select categories where such a conflict could arise, in order to at least inform users of what they could get themselves into should they wish to upload "forbidden" interior images. This is only fair and should not be a big feat. The notice can be small, it shouldn't take up much space. Gryffindor 10:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

It is not the job of Commons to inform people of the conditions of entry of different venues. That's the responsibility of the owners of such venues. If we do take that task upon ourselves, we risk becoming liable in cases where we get it wrong or neglect to provide information for some venues when we do it for others. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bora Yoon wikipedia image

Hello there,

I am looking to have Bora_Yoon.jpg replaced with newly uploaded Bora_Yoon2.jpg. Except my account is too new to have the changes reflected.

I own the copyright for this photo, and would like to please replace the current image with this one. Can someone at the Help Desk pls replace the image for me?

many thanks in advance,

Foundsound 15:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)foundsound Brooklyn, NY

[edit] Request to delete duplicate

Please delete Image:GG1.jpg (not used outside Commons) - it is a duplicate of Image:PRR GG1 4890 at NRM, Green Bay, 20040426.jpg. (used on 16 pages on 7 projects). Many thanks Iain Bell 16:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Attention"
Personal tools