Commons:Requests and votes/32X

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Symbol support vote.svg Support = 20; Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = 1; Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral = 0 - 95.2% <remarks go here> EugeneZelenko 15:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

32X

Vote

Links for 32X: 32X (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

I would like to nominate 32X for adminship. He is Commons user since june 2006 and made over 3000 edits. He is active managing and maintaining files here and participates in related discussions and requests for deletion. As a sysop on de.wikipedia.org, he has not only experience with those magic buttons but also dealing with all aspects of media uploads in general. He agreed to this nomination via mail. --Polarlys 12:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Since e-mail is not transparent enough: I accept this nomination. --32X 11:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Polarlys 12:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per del-contribs. __ ABF __ ϑ 12:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, I know him as a very responsible user. --TM 13:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful contributions e.g. at Commons:Forum. --Matt314 14:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - everything looks good. - Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Marcus Cyron 15:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Absolutely, excellent participation in relevant areas. Giggy 07:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support EugeneZelenko 16:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Can't see any problems - seems to work hard! --Herby talk thyme 16:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, looks good. Anthøny 23:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - RlevseTalk 01:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - yep :) - Alison 06:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oxam Hartog 23:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support DerHexer 23:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support RedCoat 22:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Eva K. tell me about it 10:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
    • It would be useful to the community if you were able to give reasons for your vote - thanks --Herby talk thyme 10:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
      • I assume that's because I'm going through all of her recent 600 edits to her own images and bring back the original licenses. She has recently changed her licenses from GFDL, CC, CC/GFDL, ... to GFDL-1.2 – here and on de.WP. --32X 11:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
        • That seems to explain it, thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yep :) --Kolossos 17:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  • support--Wiggum 18:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Szczepan talk 23:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cowardly Lion 01:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'd like to see 32X confirm acceptance of this via an edit here, please. Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 04:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
    • To be clear why I asked. Polarlys assertion is perfectly acceptable to ME, I trust Polarlys. But I think it sets a bad precedent if the person nominated doesn't actually accept the nom themselves... we could get all kind of wacky pseudo acceptances which then caused weird discussions and hard feelings and stuff, and that would just be not very mellow, you know? So probably best to actually have an acceptance by the person nominated and that way it's not ambiguous. ++Lar: t/c 03:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)