Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Majorly

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Majorly

Candidate withdrew.


Links for Majorly: Majorly (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Hi, I'd like to request bureaucratship. I've noticed that bureaucrat tasks are not being processed particularly as smoothly as they could be, so I figured another bureaucrat would be a good idea. I've been an admin since June, and I'm also a bureaucrat on Meta - I feel I will be able to fill the role well. Thanks for your consideration. Majorly (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Absolutely trustworthy. Giggy\Talk 00:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I dunno. No issues with trust or anything, just may be a little issue with timing. 哦, 是吗?(User:O) 00:35, 17 November 2007 (GMT)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not trust an unstable user to be a bureaucrat [1]. I also do not trust someone who edit wars (see template rfa on the english wikipedia). Your recent attempt to cause drama [2] does not sit well with me either. CO2 04:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
    Who says the EnWP was an attempt to cause drama? Giggy\Talk 07:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
    An argument would be that it was unnecessary to RfA as Majorly could have merely requested the tools back. I'm offline for a while now but will return to vote I'm sure --Herby talk thyme 08:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support proved ability in this area on Meta. --[[Anonymous Dissident]] 04:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Dead Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - like, totally neutral. Good points for and against, I'd say. While Majorly is a trusted and competent Wikimedian I do not feel he is sufficiently involved in Commons process (no slight there Majorly - I'd say the latter of myself). ~ Riana 06:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) edited at 09:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Sorry to do this. We don't see the need for more bureaucrats; I think our bureaucrats are doing a good job. I also think that Majorly acts too immature too often, which makes me think that he is not suitable as bureaucrat. -- Bryan (talk to me) 09:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S[1] 11:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Bryan and Riana. Which task(s) do you think we don't have enough bcrats for? Our bcrats are handling the workload well I think. A couple of RfAs that are not closed on-the-dot is not a big deal IMO. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Withdraw - I requested mainly because Giggy's RFA is still sat here after nearly 2 days, and 2 others yesterday were waiting for a long while as well. But, I think Riana says it best. I'm hardly involved in process at all on Commons. Nevermind, thanks for your constructive comments. Majorly (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments