Commons:Requests and votes/Ra'ike

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Ra'ike

Symbol support vote.svg Support = 34; Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = 1; Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral = 0 - 97.1% - Clear consensus to promote. Promoted ++Lar: t/c 16:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Links for Ra'ike: Ra'ike (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Dear community.
Today I would like to suggest you Ra'ike as a new Commons administrator. She has not got the lot of edits (around 1000) but she is member of wikimedia OTRS and also a verry active sysop on german wikipedia. In the time she is sysop on dewiki she deleted the copyvios there nearly all alone, so she has really much experience with free licensing and an accurate knowlege about wikimedia projects, so she would be a great help for all the current sysops and the sysop tools would be a great adding for her dayly work in the sysop-relevant-space where she is jet active.
She accepted her nomination on her talk-page. __ ABF __ ϑ 12:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I accept my nomination here, too. -- Ra'ike T C

Votes

  • strong Symbol support vote.svg Support __ ABF __ ϑ 12:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Abuse is extremely unlikely. --Schwalbe 13:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, Ra'ike does an excellent job on de.WP and has my full trust. --S[1] 13:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom. Long time contributor with plenty of experience. No concerns & thanks for helping --Herby talk thyme 13:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --my name 14:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1. I had 4 (or 5? please help) unfriedly encounters (trying to avoid the ugly word vandalism) with Ra'ike on de.admin(!) discussion pages as this [1]. 2. I suggest, that ABF first "survives" his own admin election in de, before collecting new admins on commons. Thank you. Mutter Erde 14:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support volles Vertrauen Ireas talkdeen 14:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - seems to know what he's she's doing. WjBscribe 16:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I'm a woman ;-) -- Ra'ike T C 17:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    Oops, my apologies. WjBscribe 23:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course, she will be a good admin. ChristianBier 19:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sure. Code·is·poetry 21:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Tsor 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support done. --- Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Verry active, eh? Good.--Londoneye 23:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support has my full trust —YourEyesOnly 05:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support no doubts. Raymond Disc. 10:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ahonc (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Marcus Cyron 02:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - with all these pros from such people, how can I disagree? Cary Bass demandez 04:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Herrick 07:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course! DerHexer 10:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bubo 10:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per myself. --Petar Marjanovic 12:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnu1742 12:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bjoern 12:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Olei 12:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Asio 15:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sure: reliable user, atcs well-thought-out and unagitated, even in difficult situations --:Bdk: 01:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sure. --Complex 10:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Have to support this. Knowing her pretty well from the OTRS I have to point out that she is almost too good for Commons :) Dr. Shaggeman 12:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Contribs look ok. -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support RedCoat 20:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OTRS, admin on de, obviously competent. Good luck :) ~ Riana 04:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support giggy (:O) 04:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as S1 already said. — Manecke 12:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can you validate your email address please, thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    Hello Herbythyme, my preferences said, that I did it. Your e-mail address was authenticated on 13:06, 9 January 2008. -- Ra'ike T C 13:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) (addition) Sorry, I only forgot the checkmark for this function, it's taken, now.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment to Mutter Erde's oppose vote: in the German Wikipedia, Mutter Erde is long time indefinitely blocked, so every edit he makes as an IP is invalid and every user is allowed to remove or revert it. Some edits of ME, hovewer, are being tolerated since they provide some encyclopedic sense, but this diff-link was a clear trollery and Ra'ike was completely right removing it. Therefore, ME's vote has no rational reason. --S[1] 14:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
You think, Mr. Roletschek (and others) are not able to think or even revert by themselves? I can´t believe that :-) Greetings Mutter Erde 14:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Of course they are, and I'm sure they would have done the same. --S[1] 15:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
What was Mutter Erde blocked for on the German Wikipedia (its not entirely clear from the block log)? Is it appropriate for him to be editing Commons? WjBscribe 16:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Currently there is a kind of "riot" of the authors in de,see here. The supporters are even willing to vote for a not really perfect option, only to get a chance to get rid of some bad old admins. Me and around 5 - 10 users are only the most prominent symbols/victims of the old bad days. If you unterstand German, this might be a first introduction [2]. But there are tons of stuff more ... Greetings Mutter Erde 17:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
@WJBscribe: There was a banning poll that you can see here. The reasons were massive offendings, faking of user signatures and putting illegal porn images on user pages. --S[1] 18:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Have I done something to you? And even if I did - but I can´t remember - you should be truthful and you should be more careful with your words. I expect your excuse - here and in de. Have you told them too that Markus Schweiß has brought me to real court because of putting illegal porn images on user pages (that are your words - rubbish as the rest) and that I got a real acquittal that i can show everybody?
Here´s another detail that every German can verify: Why do you think that Unblocking + "Benutzersperrung Mutter Erde"(2) was started? Because "faking of user signatures" (correctly: "faking of one user signature") was a fake accusation of my first block. And now you.... Can´t believe it. Besides: Above, I have shown the link to that story. Here again:[3]. Mutter Erde 20:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I just tried to translate, what is written on Wikipedia:Benutzersperrung/Archiv/Mutter Erde as reason for that poll. If I have to excuse, then only for my bad english. Please EOD here, that has nothing to do with this RFA. Thank you. --S[1] 21:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Linkfixes: Mutter Erde-Sperrung 1 (an embarassing document- but not for me) + introduction in the ME case, part 1. btw.: Here´s another work of S1 [4]. In Germany there´s a classic proverb: "Wer schlampig schreibt, denkt schlampig" Mutter Erde 09:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ra'ike... Please accept the nomination HERE. I don't want to be an unmellow-hardass-stickler about this but for verification purposes, accepting it here means it's in THIS page's history. Again, it's not about not trusting ABF, it's about tracability. Thanks. (Is this not clear enough in the instructions? We can make it clearer I guess?) ++Lar: t/c 16:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
    Ok, no problem. I did it now. -- Ra'ike T C 17:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The first question (after 10 votes) to the candidate: Why did you revert an admin problem from an admin´s discussion page? Has somebody invited you to do that? Mutter Erde 09:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
    First answere: I think, there is nothing more to say than S1 did. Second answere: Your problem in de.wikipedia and my only action against you (if you really were that, because it was an IP. It also could be a normal vandalism or troll edit) has nothing to do with your account here or the evaluation of my admin qualification at commons. -- Ra'ike T C 12:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Proposal: You put this back into the right place so that these both admins can be de-sysopped (the third has retired "voluntary" in the meantime) Mutter Erde 09:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)