Commons:Requests and votes/WJBscribe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

WJBscribe

Vote

WJBscribe has been an active user here since January and I think he can now be trusted as a sysop here. He's uploaded lots of images, takes part and lists deletion requests and lots of other mundane stuff like adding categories. From his comments on deletion requests I think he understands copyright well. I've also seen him revert vandalism, so rollback could be helpful. He's also a hardworking admin on English Wikipedia, so I expect that hard work will reflect here with regards to the large backlogs. In all, a very worthy candidate in my opinion. Majorly (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Majorly. I accept this nomination and would be pleased to be able to help out more on Commons. WjBscribe 17:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator. Majorly (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support grr - now that is someone I was wondering about nominating! --Herby talk thyme 18:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support . I don't expect he'll break anything. Cary Bass demandez 21:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Darn it, Herby beat me to supporting this one. Good egg, gets it, and unlikely to go on a rampage. Symbol support vote.svg Support ++Lar: t/c 22:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course! __ ABF __ 15:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - OK. MatthewFenton 17:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /odder 16:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Edits show a good mix of uploading, categorising and deletion comments. Comments on deletion requests show willingness to chase up annoying cases which is always great. --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 17:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not believe this user is objective in their dealings with other users. --Evrik 19:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose candidates behavior on wikpedia leads me to vote no.

--South Philly

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Candidate's behavior on Wikipedia leads me to vote a strong yes - helpful, good knowledge of guidelines, policies, copyright. Frequent and undying contributor. Always there to help if an editor needs a hand. Can't imagine a better admin.--DavidShankbone 01:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - this is the commons not Wikipedia. Lcarsdata 19:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Another moral Symbol support vote.svg Support. Where'd you boys be without me, hmm? ;) riana_dzasta 14:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Adambro 15:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and appointed with 11-2.--Jusjih 08:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)