Commons:Administratorzy
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Administratorzy in other languages:
Alemannisch | Asturianu | Български | Brezhoneg | Català | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | Молдовеняскэ | Norsk (bokmål) | Nederlands | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Shqip | Türkçe | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
Uprawnienia administratora przyznawane są znanym i zaufanym członkom społeczności, którzy znają politykę Commons. Uprawnienia administratora nie mają sugerować kontroli edytorskiej nad projektem.
Obecnie sysopami są:
| Administrators as of July 2009 [+/−] |
| Listing by language Listing by date |
|
Number of Admins: 272
|
Sysopami posługującymi się językiem polskim są:
Administrator to po prostu zaufany użytkownik, który może:
- zabezpieczać i odbezpieczać strony
- usuwać i przywracać strony
- usuwać grafiki i inne przesłane pliki
- blokować i odblokowywać użytkowników
- edytować wygląd interfejsu i innych zabezpieczonych stron
Możesz poprosić o przyznanie uprawnień administratora na Commons jeśli spełniasz poniższe kryteria:
- Nie jesteś zupełnie nowy w projektach Wikimedia. Jesteś użytkownikiem od co najmniej 2 miesięcy oraz rozumiesz i zgadzasz się z celami projektu
- Posiadasz stronę użytkownika na Commons i jesteś aktywnym (dodającym i modyfikującym zawartość projektu) użytkownikiem
- Zgadzasz się przestrzegać zasad i respektować ustalenia zawarte przez użytkowników Commons
- Użytkownicy projektu zgodzą się przyznanie ci uprawnień administratora
Zgodnie z polityką uprawnień administratorskich na Meta, nieaktywni administratorzy mogą zostać pozbawieni praw.
[edit] Requests for adminship
Create a subpage Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username with the following text:
==[[User:Username|Username]]==
{{custom edit|Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username|text='''Vote'''}}
Reasons why you think you should be an admin. ~~~~
===Votes===
and list it on Administrators/Requests and votes.
This is the Requests and votes page, a centralized place where you can keep track of ongoing user requests, and where you can comment and leave your vote. Any user is welcome to comment on these requests, and any logged in user is welcome to vote.
[edit] How and where to apply for additional user rights on Commons
- Administrator: Commons:Administrators
- Bureaucrat: Commons:Bureaucrats
- Checkuser: Commons:Checkusers
- Oversighter: Commons:Oversighters
- Bots: See Commons:Bots. Request bot permission at Commons:Bots/Requests.
All applications made on the above pages are automatically transcluded onto this page.
[edit] How to comment and vote
Any logged-in user is welcome to vote and to comment on the requests below. Votes from unregistered users are not counted, but comments may still be made. If the nomination is successful, a bureaucrat will grant the relevant rights. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Among other things, the closing bureaucrat may take into account the strength of any arguments presented and the experience and knowledge of the commenting users. For example, the comments and votes of users who have zero or few contributions on Commons may at the bureaucrat's discretion be discounted.
It is preferable if you give reasons both for
Support votes or
Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
[edit] Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote.
[edit] Captain-tucker
Links for Captain-tucker: Captain-tucker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · blocklog)
I would like to expand my ability to contribute to Commons by becoming an admin and therefore submit myself for nomination. I have been editing here for eight months and have 5000+ edits (274 deleted edits). I have rollback and Flickr reviewer rights. For the past month I have been actively speedy tagging test, vandalism and out of scope pages as well as copyvios by monitoring cvn-commons on irc. I would like to be able delete obvious vandalism/test/out of scope pages and work on more Commons maintenance/backlog tasks by having admin rights. An example of a non-admin maintenance task that I am currently working on is trying to contact the Flickr owners of all images in Category:Flickr images not found. I am about 2/3 of the way through the images and have been able to pass five images, sent nine OTRS emails and created five DR's. My other wiki activities consist mainly of editing the English Wikipedia, where I started in March of 2008 and have 13,000+ edits. Over the past few months I have been concentrating the majority of my activity on Commons. I have uploaded 598 personal images and have moved 324 images from the English Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration. Captain-tucker (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Votes
Full support - Just leave enough junk for me and Herby - Huib talk 18:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Support Lycaon (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Support Per work at speedy deletion. Appears solid, at a quick glance. Ceranthor 01:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Support --Foroa (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Support - actually does admin type work tagging junk. Thanks for helping --Herby talk thyme 08:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Support -Chatama (talk) 10:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Support most definitely. Will make an excellent admin. Rocket000 (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Support: I often see him in #cvn-commons, and he's a good guy. --The Evil IP address (talk) 10:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Support –Juliancolton | Talk 14:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Requests for Bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before voting here. Any logged in user may vote.
- No current requests
[edit] Requests for CheckUser
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote.
- No current requests
[edit] Requests for Oversight Rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote.
- No current requests
Requests made on this page are automatically transcluded in Commons:Requests and votes for wider comment.
[edit] Requests for permission to run a bot
NEW: Before making a bot request, please read the new version of the Commons:Bots page. Read Commons:Bots#Information on bots and make sure you have added the required details to the bot's page. A good example can be found here.
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bots/Archive.
Any user may comment on the merits of the request to run a bot. Please give reasons, as that makes it easier for the closing bureaucrat. Read Commons:Bots before commenting.
[edit] DrilBot
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Aiding in the license migration. DrilBot is currently doing this on the English Wikipedia and it will add the migration parameter in the following instances: If the image is tagged as both GFDL and cc-by-3.0 or cc-by-sa-3.0, then migration=redundant. If the image seems to indicate that it is public domain or fair use in addition to GFDL, then migration=needs-review. If the image is tagged with {{GFDL-self}}, and it does not contain a URL, then migration=relicense. The bot can't currently check the upload dates of images in order to tag normal {{GFDL}} and similar tags safely based on upload date, but self-created images should almost all be relicensed (I'm about to request that AWB be enhanced with date-checking functionality). This date issue also means that after August 1 it will not be able to relicense images, just tag them redundant/needs-review.
The RegEx needed to make the bot work is kind of complicated, so it won't really be possible to program it with all the license templates (just the major ones), but this shouldn't be a problem because it will just skip pages with license tags it might not recognize, not change the page incorrectly. I'll get the list of files from various sources, including categories and lists of what pages transclude certain templates.
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic.
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): When I'm around to debug the bot if someone finds an error.
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): On en.wp, the bot's been running at about 10 edits per minute. Depending on where it is in the various lists of images that may need migration, it varies between about 4 and 14 seconds (it just saves about 1 second after finding a file that it will change). I can slow this down if required.
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y
Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser. It uses the advanced find-and-replace features of AWB to do all this, and has worked without any problems to my knowledge on the English Wikipedia.
Drilnoth (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Please don't edit images using {{License migration is redundant}}.
- Fair use? We don't do fair use at Commons
- What's the regex?
- Oh, btw, beware of the original upload log (don't alter it)
Please note that User:BotMultichill, User:BotMultichillT and User:Abibot are currently filtering out the "easy" images in Category:License migration candidates. Multichill (talk) 19:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm... I hadn't known about those bots (the license migration task force page and talk page don't seem to say anything about them, or at least I didn't notice them, and the size of Category:License migration completed compared to en:Category:Wikipedia license migration completed made me think that bots weren't running there, so I thought it had all been manual thus far). Anyway, here are my responses to your other comments; if you think that the bot would be useful after seeing the answers, I'll be happy to run it, but if you think it would be redundant that's okay (sorry for not doing more research!)
- 1: Can do. Things like {{self}} and {{GFDL-self}} still need some work... e.g., if it is tagged only as GFDL (no cc) without a migration parameter, then it can probably be relicensed, and if a cc template is on the same image but for some reason outside of {{self}} or {{GFDL-self}}, then the migration is redundant.
- 2: Well, that's already programmed into the RegEx and might as well be used... if something is mentioned as fair use at Commons then something is really wrong. Here it would more apply to the public domain & GFDL combination.
- 3: en:Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DrilBot 3 has the basic find/replace RegEx that I am using on en.wp (in the collapse box). I've made a number of modifications since then in order to fix some bugs, and on Commons I'd add a few more replacements for other license templates and remove things such as the {{Self}} updating which Commons doesn't need because of {{License migration is redundant}}.
- 4: I think that I can do that. If worse comes to worse, just skip pages with "Original upload log" on them, but I'm pretty sure that that could be coded without too much trouble. --Drilnoth (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Support LiCom needs all the help it can get. Huib talk 19:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] AbiBot
Just a little notice, my bot is currently working for the LiCom and the license migration.
Best regards, Huib talk 18:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
[edit] YarluBot
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: unify file's description (listed below)
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): few times a week
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): about 10 epm
Bot flag requested: (Y/N):Y
Programming Language(s): C# (AutoWikiBrowser)
Yarl ✉ 09:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Example tasks
Yarl ✉ 09:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Could you please make test run for each task (or combined tasks)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here you have, I don't have permission for use AWB on bot's account, so I made several edits on my account. Yarl ✉ 16:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here you have, I don't have permission for use AWB on bot's account, so I made several edits on my account. Yarl ✉ 16:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Amirobot
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:Transfer files from Persian Wikipedia
Automatic or Manually Assisted:Manually
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute):500 edit/week
Bot flag requested: (Y/N):Y
Programming Language(s):pywikipedia
Amir (talk) 02:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
I requested before but I understand pywikipedia bots nowAmir (talk) 02:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Could you please provide details about image review process? Is it possible to ask users of Persian Wikipedia to add translation to other languages (for example, English) before transfer?
- Please also make a test run.
- EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] WikiBotas
Operator: Matasg
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: GFDL-self and PD-self images transfer from lt.wikipedia
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): about 1 per minute
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Bot flags
Programming Language(s): pywikipedia (imagecopy.py)
Matasg 15:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Could you please describe review process for images before moving? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- I use imagecopy.py to search for the last 100 uploaded images at lt.wiki. I review all of them and images with suitable licence, author information and source, I upload here. Matasg 15:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Looks ok, i guess you've read Commons:Moving to Commons already. Nice to see more people running transfer bots. According to my stats, lt wikipedia has about 12.000 images so that should keep you busy for a while. Maybe you should first clean out Category:Files moved from lt.wikipedia to Commons requiring review before doing massive moves. Multichill (talk) 20:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- I use imagecopy.py to search for the last 100 uploaded images at lt.wiki. I review all of them and images with suitable licence, author information and source, I upload here. Matasg 15:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like file description missed in many cases. I think will be good idea to ask original uploaders to add at least Lithuanian description and also ask for translations (may be other users of Lithuanian Wikipedia) on other languages (English, Russian, etc) before moving images to Commons.
- Also many files uploaded without categories, so I think will be good idea to run bot without flag, as result other Commoners will see files in recent changes/new images.
- EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: the "bot flag" line is a question to you to ask if you need a flag here. We sometimes approve bots to run, but run unflagged, because we want them to be able to do their tasks, but we also want folk to see their work in the recent changes log.... so did you want a flag here or no? We can go either way. ++Lar: t/c 23:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I need only a permission to run the bot. Bot works, I think, very rarely and will not cause any problems in the recent changes page. Matasg 09:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think will be good idea to fix issues with description before running bot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] ArthurBot
Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: adding/replacing text
Automatic or Manually Assisted: manually assisted
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time runs
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): approx. 1 edit per 10 seconds
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Not yet on this project. But it is a global interwiki bot with flags on 40+ projects (Wikipedias, Wikiversities, Wikiquotes). It is also used for general maintenance on the Czech Wikipedia and Czech Wikiversity.
Programming Language(s): Python
I'd like to use my bot for mass changes such as adding different templates (Location, PermissionOTRS) or changing categories. Mercy (☎|✍) 11:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
I see you're adding {{Location}}. Are you aware that this template is intented for the photographers location and not the subject location? We have {{Object location}} for that. Multichill (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. Older bot's contributions should be fixed. Also how bot'll handle situations when several objects presented on image? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
-
- @Multichill: For all the edited pictures in Category:Anthropos, the camera's position was nearly the same as the position of the museum objects, therefore there's no need for any corrections. I'll change the added templates in the rest of the edited pictures to "Object location". This is the first time I've heard of this template. Thanks for info.
- @EugeneZelenko: Since the bot runs only on images that I choose, the situations like this will not occur. I'd put the Object location/Location template only to pictures with one object present. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Could you please always add new line character after inserted template? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I've made the requested corrections and several other edits. Please feel free to review them. Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. However sometimes will be good idea to add template with request for camera location when you add {{Object location}}, for example, in File:Faculty of Social Studies 2 - MU Brno.JPG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's good practice to add in comments where you got your location data from. Helps when you want to debug. Multichill (talk) 21:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: That's a little complicated but it is possible too, I think.
- @Multichill: I'm using the geolocator tool. I'll try to do some bot edits with comments on the location data later on. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Hello, sorry for the delay, I've recently been quite busy. I've made several other edits with my bot: [1], [2] or [3]. But I was wondering which template to use for the request for camera location. Is it this one? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, {{Location possible}} is what is needed :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I think that this template requests adding coordinates to the image, not the camera location. Is it really necessary to add it? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 17:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- It just point to Commons:Geocoding where more details about how to add coordinates (camera one) available. Anyway it indicates that further improvements possible. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but the Object location template points to the same page. :-) That's also why I don't think adding this template together with the Object location template is not appropriate. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- However we really need camera location. May be we just should improve text of {{Location possible}}? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree we need the camera location. But then there should be created another template that requires it. {{Location possible}} is rather a general template which requires geocoding to be added to the image. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 19:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- But default geocoding mode for photos is camera location. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, but if I wanted to add the camera location template, I wouldn't use my bot for such action and would do it manually, as this can become quite a tedious job to do. Anyway, I think we got quite far from the original topic of the discussion, didn't we? Are there any other comments to my bot's activity? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, that adding camera location is not trivial. This is reason why I asked you to add {{Location possible}} (somebody could do this later).
- Actually we are discussing bot's activity and possible improvements to it so I don't think that we deviate discussion in unrelated areas.
- EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, but if I wanted to add the camera location template, I wouldn't use my bot for such action and would do it manually, as this can become quite a tedious job to do. Anyway, I think we got quite far from the original topic of the discussion, didn't we? Are there any other comments to my bot's activity? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- But default geocoding mode for photos is camera location. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree we need the camera location. But then there should be created another template that requires it. {{Location possible}} is rather a general template which requires geocoding to be added to the image. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 19:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- However we really need camera location. May be we just should improve text of {{Location possible}}? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but the Object location template points to the same page. :-) That's also why I don't think adding this template together with the Object location template is not appropriate. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- It just point to Commons:Geocoding where more details about how to add coordinates (camera one) available. Anyway it indicates that further improvements possible. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I think that this template requests adding coordinates to the image, not the camera location. Is it really necessary to add it? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 17:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, {{Location possible}} is what is needed :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry for the delay, I've recently been quite busy. I've made several other edits with my bot: [1], [2] or [3]. But I was wondering which template to use for the request for camera location. Is it this one? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
-
[edit] MaximaximaxBot
Operator: MaxiMaxiMax (talk)
The bot uses pywikipedia framework.
I use it for my own tasks (mostly to rename categories and other similar tasks), but if other users ask me to use it for them I will try to help. I'm administrator here, in Commons, and mostly work with Russia-related stuff, so usually I'm asked by Russian-speaking users.
I have a bot account for the same purpose and with the same name in ru-wiki - w:ru:User:MaximaximaxBot.
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Both
Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): I run it sometimes, when I need to perform a repetitive task.
Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): 3-4 edits per minute
Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y
Programming Language(s): Python, Pywikipedia framework.
MaxiMaxiMax (talk) 04:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Looks fine for me. However categories naming may be controversial topic. Which procedure will be used in such cases? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- If somebody thinks that the name which I gave to a category is wrong and he can suggest a better name, we can discuss it and when we find consensus I will rename it without a problem. MaxiMaxiMax (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:Bots#Information on bots and add the requested details to the bot's page. A good example can be found here. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

