Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/07/Category:Tadpoles in heraldry
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
- An image of tadpole certainly looks differentkly from an image of frog. :) The iconography is different and blason certainly does not contain the word frog if talking about tadpole. Tadpoles should be a subcategory under Frogs, that seems quite simple solution for me. No need for merger. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- So why the push for merger of other categories on grounds of an image looking identical (goats/ibexes)? :)) If somewhere a tadpole is depicted instead of frog, there must be a profound reason behind. Therefore I see no benefit of complete frogs/tadpoles merger. Anyway, if some figure is so rare, the stronger reason for having a category of its own. As a subcat. within Frogs Tadpoles will be perfectly OK - juat replace Animals with Frogs. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Different appearance. We have a different Category:Tadpoles for the larval form of frog already. -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)