Commons:Deletion requests/2009/07/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] July 10

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Marine12

Both images of Marine12 (talk ยท contributions) are out of scope (personal snapshots, not realistically useful for an educational purpose) 92.227.115.81 05:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete Agree with OP. Not useful Corpx (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy deletion --G.Hagedorn (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete The images are so small as to be pratically unusable. Tabercil (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Deleted. Junk is the best I can do, thanks Herby talk thyme 14:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


[edit] File:Mens_IPL4.jpg

And we go into the next round:
This image is made of poor quality which can hardly be used in any article. I would suggest to delete Mens IPL1.jpg, Mens IPL2.jpg and Mens IPL3.jpg as well. All four images are blurred and wiggly. All images can partly be replaced by Haarentfernung IPL ONLYSKIN.jpg. Even these images can't be replaced in every purpose overall we have enough good images of the male genitalia and that lamp does not make it in scope if the quality is not good enough. Moreover the author of Mens IPL3.jpg and Mens IPL4.jpg is "[private person]" which makes me assume that Marc.zuhause is not the author and is furthermore maybe not allowed to publish these images under a free licence.
Even Mens IPL1.jpg, Mens IPL2.jpg and Mens IPL3.jpg are kept I would would delete Mens IPL4.jpg in every case because it's the most blurred and wiggly image of all and can easily replaced by every one of the three other images
--D-Kuru (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Poor quality --Simonxag (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


Deleted. Nilfanion (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Scalplock_Mountain_Fire_Lookout.jpg

Previously tagged for speedy with the reason: "Image inappropriately tagged by NPS as public domainy if it is not PD, who is the author?". The source link is broken, but I'm not sure why the PD status would not be ok, if this is a picture of the National Park Service. Eusebius (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

The picture was taken as part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination, which in this, and most similar cases, means that it was not done by Park Service employees. I originally found this on another portion of the Park Service website and later saw it on the National Register documentation associated with the lookout tower. I have corresponded with the Park Service on other National Register of Historic Places images, and they have stated that the public domain that they assert on their NRHP website is erroneous; all photo ownership remains with the author - in this case, Historical Research Associates of Missoula, Montana. To quote from an email from the NPS:
"We had originally thought this default would be appropriate for photographs but have since found out it is apparently the responsibility of the user to verify whether or not a photograph is in the public domain before using it.
We have never requested releases. This makes it quite difficult on your end to use these images." (emphasis mine)
National Register Information System Reference Desk
National Park Service
Since the image is not public domain, as I had originally thought, I have nominated it for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, then in the light of this information, unless somebody is motivated enough to sought permission from the Historical Research Associates of Missoula, Montana, I guess we should Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. --Eusebius (talk) 07:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm working on getting permission from some of the more centralized and high-quality sources - the Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office for one, but I haven't found a contact for HRA yet - they were active in the 80s - and they're not high on the priority list. I think we'll eventually get a good number of these, but I'm trying to focus my efforts on the most prolific sources and can part with this one for now. Acroterion (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks for your work. --Eusebius (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I've located HRA and will get in contact with them about permissions, but in the meantime I'd prefer to go ahead and delete, as evidence of our good faith in this effort. It's easy enough to re-upload if and when permission is obtained. Acroterion (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
No need to reupload, it can be undeleted by an admin once you get a permission. --Eusebius (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Just so, thanks. Acroterion (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kofferset_A_MK_III_(Marconi).jpg

Is this own work, looks like a scan Huib talk 22:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)