Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2007/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004									09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

——————————————— Archive July 2007 ———————————————

1 July 1
- 1.1 Image:Dartelaar.jpg
- 1.2 Image:RataBlanca2.jpg
- 1.3 Image:Inauguración_Copa_América_2007.jpg
- 1.4 Image:P4040007.JPG
- 1.5 Image:Gedaechtniskirche_Lesepult_Gernot_Stumpf.jpg
- 1.6 Image:Malvernia.pdf
- 1.7 Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg
  - 1.7.1 Please don't delete Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg
- 1.8 Category:Somerville to Category:Somerville, Massachusetts
- 1.9 Flag of Lewis
- 1.10 Image:Derry.Shield.png
- 1.11 Image:299044324_2dcb1e3392.jpg
- 1.12 Image:Terretory_given_away_after_Brest-Litovsk.jpg
- 1.13 All files under Category:Triangle Factory fire
- 1.14 Image:Marcador_cierre_Teletón_2006.jpg
2 July 2
- 2.1 Image:Rue Saint-Paul edit.jpg
- 2.2 Image:Screenshot frau.jpg
- 2.3 Image:Wedekind-Haus_im_Bau_070629_.jpg
- 2.4 Image:StandHuileAix.JPG
- 2.5 Image:Mirador_de_la_code.jpg
- 2.6 Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf
- 2.7 Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf
- 2.8 Image:Butxy´s_life.gif
- 2.9 Image:DSC 0048.JPG
- 2.10 Image:Atomium vue générale.jpg
- 2.11 Image:Atomium gros plan.jpg
- 2.12 Image:BEA 2007 084 John Ringo.jpg
- 2.13 Image:Ringelnatter.jpg
- 2.14 Image:Rraf-logo.svg
- 2.15 Image:SNCF 031-130.png
- 2.16 Image:Rogerio.jpg
- 2.17 Image:Ribeirasacra.jpg
- 2.18 Image:Ritalin photo.jpg
- 2.19 Image:Roma-parco decimamalafede03.jpg
- 2.20 Image:RudbeckiaFulgida.jpg
- 2.21 Image:SDK API Review Flow-MaHu-20061107.jpg
- 2.22 Image:SMDFplan.gif
- 2.23 Image:San Sebastian Escudo.jpg
- 2.24 Image:Oscillographe LC.JPG
- 2.25 Image:RLC entretenu.JPG
- 2.26 Image:RLC entretenu équivalent.JPG
- 2.27 Image:Johnny_Marr.jpg
- 2.28 Image:Rick Mercer cc.jpg
- 2.29 Image:Samsett-bolungarvik-bolafjall2.jpg
- 2.30 Image:Dantsu Flame 20061229P1.jpg
- 2.31 Image:Radio Euskadi feria 1.JPG
- 2.32 Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others
- 2.33 Image:RmB.PNG
- 2.34 All images from user 倶楽部オータム
3 July 3
- 3.1 Image:Reflexion totale interne.svg
- 3.2 Image:Chris Cornell c.jpg
- 3.3 Image:LogoHTNGmini.png
- 3.4 Image:SibeliusMonument.jpg
- 3.5 Image:SibeliusMonumentDetail.jpg
- 3.6 Image:Silverado.Squatters.Henly.jpg
- 3.7 Image:ProfRossa.JPG
- 3.8 Image:Logo copei.GIF
- 3.9 Image:Santaelenadeu.gif
- 3.10 Image:Sciano Federico 02.jpg
- 3.11 Image:Sello de Fernán González.jpg
- 3.12 Image:Silzer Wappen.JPG
- 3.13 Image:Simongallup002.jpg
- 3.14 Image:Shilinmark.JPG
- 3.15 Image:Rees_Stephens.jpg
- 3.16 Image:Anpanman-inflatable.JPG
- 3.17 Image:Retract resistor check valve application .png
- 3.18 Category:Jaguar XK8
- 3.19 Image:Thyra_von_Danemark.jpg
- 3.20 Image:Charles_Napoleon.jpg
- 3.21 Image:Renesansa-skladatelji.JPG
- 3.22 Image:Provincias Unidas de Sud América -1816.png
- 3.23 Image:Slovakia Liptov 800px.gif
- 3.24 Image:RepublicFleet1.jpg
- 3.25 Image:SantaClaraCountyFlag.gif
- 3.26 Image:Sculeni jud Iasi.png
- 3.27 Image:Shinkoro02 1920.jpg
- 3.28 Image:Smartklein2.JPG
- 3.29 Image:SimplexPolish 2.png
- 3.30 Image:SimplxProblem 1.jpg
- 3.31 Image:Slovakia Hont 800px.jpg
- 3.32 Image:Slovakia Komarno 800px.jpg
- 3.33 Image:Popeneedle.jpg
- 3.34 Image:Butterfly.flowers.jpg
- 3.35 Image:Praha, Střížkov, stavba metra II.JPG
- 3.36 Image:Premio torrijos.png
- 3.37 Image:Psi original.svg
- 3.38 Image:QichunCountyMap2.jpg
- 3.39 Image:Red flag waving transparent rev.png
- 3.40 Image:Fajka_budowa.png
- 3.41 Image:Apolloniuscircle.gif
- 3.42 Image:Reichswappen Deutsches Reich 1871.jpg
- 3.43 Image:Reichsadler 1888-1918.jpg
- 3.44 Image:Zadar (grb).gif
- 3.45 Image:MylaporeKapaleeshwararTemple.jpg
- 3.46 Image:Prinsipp armering.jpg
4 July 4
- 4.1 Image:Titanic grand staircase.gif
- 4.2 Image:Telenorte.jpg
- 4.3 Image:Schmitt (Eifel).png
- 4.4 Image:Chicago_sears_Tower_blurred_@_dusk.jpg
- 4.5 Image:Soapykins2.jpg
- 4.6 Image:Lucky-luke-3-gr.jpg
- 4.7 Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg
- 4.8 Image:Soapykins.jpg
- 4.9 Image:Oklahoma State Highway 68.svg
- 4.10 Nagasaki
- 4.11 Image:SolarCell-EquivalentCircuit2.PNG
- 4.12 Category:Longuyan
- 4.13 Image:Bertrand Meyer.jpg
- 4.14 Image:St Jordi's cake.png
- 4.15 Image:Leichter_Kreuzer_Miguel_de_Cervantes_in_El_Ferrol_-_1943.jpg
- 4.16 Image:Sundiata+Tellem+C-Span.jpg
- 4.17 Image:Super yuki 2005 open.JPG
- 4.18 Image:Swedish Measuring Spoon Set.png
- 4.19 Image:SwoopBike1.jpg
- 4.20 Image:SwoopBike2.jpg
- 4.21 Image:Xbox 360 white background.jpg
- 4.22 Image:Technosphere1.jpg
- 4.23 Image:Template-Information.png
- 4.24 Image:Terceira Perimetral-Porto Alegre.jpg
- 4.25 Image:Soireerallye.jpg
- 4.26 Image:Uvsq2.gif
- 4.27 Image:Uvsq4.jpg
- 4.28 Image:Uvsq.jpg
- 4.29 Image:Mysterious_axman.gif
- 4.30 Image:Thatsgold.JPG
- 4.31 Image:Depeche_Mode_-_Touring_The_Angel_-_Praga_-_23.01.06_-_054_-_RD.jpg
- 4.32 Image:Escudo_de_Tabasco.jpeg
- 4.33 Image:Mariah Teleton Mexico.jpg
- 4.34 Image:Cool_Globe_Chicago_Skyline.JPG
- 4.35 Image:Takamatsuzuka tomb mural.gif
- 4.36 Image:Starkbierfest Nockherberg Munich 2006ArM.jpg.jpg
- 4.37 Image:Soldaten rote armee.jpg
- 4.38 Image:Terraconensis SPQR.png
- 4.39 Image:Haliaeetus_leucocephalus_landing_on_nest.jpg
- 4.40 Image:SouthIsland rrMap.svg
- 4.41 Image:Stava2.jpg
- 4.42 Image:Stickstoffumwandlung im Aqu.svg
- 4.43 Image:Scilla bifolia R0015596.JPG
- 4.44 Image:TGFBPathwaystep1.svg
- 4.45 Image:Tabernacolo Orcagna.JPG
- 4.46 Image:Taisanji08s2048.jpg
- 4.47 Image:TartanClanMacAulay.png
- 4.48 Image:Teatrodominguinhos2.jpg
- 4.49 Image:Telemann-Seal.jpg
- 4.50 Image:Termosiphon.png
5 July 5
- 5.1 Image:Shoreditch_roundel_6-6-06.jpg
- 5.2 Image:The Eiffel tower, Paris, 4 août 2006.JPG
- 5.3 Image:Lautrec_the_english_girl_from_the_'star'_at_le_havre_1899.jpg
- 5.4 Image:Carfireterro.jpg
- 5.5 Image:Timbre type.jpg
- 5.6 Image:Torre Europa2.pav.jpg
- 5.7 Image:Series of an ejaculating penis.JPG
- 5.8 Image:Img 0917.jpg
- 5.9 Image:WayneLA2007.jpg
- 5.10 Image:Times new roman.png
- 5.11 Image:Morison.svg
- 5.12 Image:John Prichard.jpg
- 5.13 Image:Image-Barbara Jeppe00.jpg
- 5.14 Image:HorseBot.png
- 5.15 Image:Castro Pretorio - teatro d Opera facciata piacentini 1010030.JPG
- 5.16 Image:La Sapienza - rettorato 2083-4-5st.JPG
- 5.17 Image:Museo Nazionale Reggio Calabria.jpg
- 5.18 Image:Reggio calabria piazza indipendenza e museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg
- 5.19 Image:Roma teatro opera.jpg
- 5.20 Image:Roma-Università la sapienza01.jpg
- 5.21 Image:Q10 - stazione Ostiense cavalli marini 1000528p.JPG
- 5.22 Image:Borgo - monumento a santa Caterina di Francesco Messina 1876.JPG
- 5.23 Image:Roma - Palazzo Civiltà Lavoro01.JPG
- 5.24 Image:Roma - Palazzo Civiltà Lavoro02.JPG
- 5.25 Milano - Piazza Cadorna images
  - 5.25.1 Comments
    - 5.25.1.1 Images nominated by G.dallorto
    - 5.25.1.2 Images nominated by 87.0.123.15
- 5.26 Image:Triangle Factory fire 002.jpg
- 5.27 Image:Test arabe2.png
- 5.28 Image:Test arabe4.png
- 5.29 Image:The german language since 1945.PNG
- 5.30 Image:Tokyo mizube cruising line01 1024.jpg
- 5.31 Image:Tokyo mizube cruising line02 1920.jpg
- 5.32 Image:Tony Stewart IndyCar.jpg
- 5.33 Image:A coruna torre de hercules sunset.jpg
- 5.34 Image:Torre Espacio7.jpg
- 5.35 Image:Tågetöverbält.jpg
- 5.36 Image:Torre Espacio7.jpg
- 5.37 Image:Tågetöverbält.jpg
- 5.38 Images uploaded by Bonjour Quebec (talk • contribs)
- 5.39 Image:Transylvania.png
- 5.40 Image:Poitou-Esel Sam.jpg
- 5.41 File:Poitou-Esel Sam.jpg
- 5.42 Image:Tomir2.jpg
- 5.43 Image:Tommaso Villa iii.jpg
- 5.44 Image:Tommaso Villa iii.jpg
6 July 6
- 6.1 Category:Am I Not A Man and a Brother
- 6.2 Image:Wappen VG-Kirchen.jpg
- 6.3 Image:Vielfliegerkarten.Selektion.JPG
- 6.4 Image:Wartbergturm.jpg
- 6.5 Image:Wiki-de-testing.png
- 6.6 Image:Wiki-es.png
- 6.7 Image:WikiProjektShqip.png
- 6.8 Image:Wikinewsspecialreport.PNG
- 6.9 Image:Written range english horn.jpg
- 6.10 Image:Wst-logo-klein.gif
- 6.11 Image:Zeitprofil.png
- 6.12 Image:Vanessa cardui - Unterseite.jpg
- 6.13 Image:Ventspils.gif
- 6.14 Kochira Katsushika-ku Kameari koenmae HaShutsujo
- 6.15 Image:Vanhankaupunginlahti.jpg
- 6.16 Image:David von Michelangelo1.jpg
- 6.17 Image:Wwwwwwww.jpg
- 6.18 Image:Darna.jpg
- 6.19 Image:Odd-nordstoga.jpg
- 6.20 Image:Sea22.jpg
- 6.21 Image:Arif_solak_HanabatCaravanserai.jpg
- 6.22 Image:US flag 50 stars.svg
- 6.23 Image:Ucen.jpg
- 6.24 Image:Univeristy of oklahoma campus.JPG
- 6.25 Image:Unkeler Wappen.jpg
- 6.26 Image:VSRolle.jpg
- 6.27 Image:Vatnedalsdammen2.jpg
- 6.28 Image:Venezia overview.jpg
- 6.29 Image:Wicksell2.jpg
- 6.30 Image:Game photos 009.jpg
- 6.31 Image:Wikilogo11.jpg
- 6.32 Image:Wscb hafen 0.jpg
- 6.33 Image:Roma-Smcosm_interno.jpg
- 6.34 Image:Mariposa California.jpg
- 6.35 Image:Make way for ducklings statue.jpg
- 6.36 Image:Make_way_for_ducklings_statue.jpg
- 6.37 Image:CIMG0566.JPG
- 6.38 Image:USS Shaw explosion.jpg
- 6.39 Image:WMD-radiation.svg
- 6.40 Image:Xinan China.png
- 6.41 Image:DrSmith.jpg
- 6.42 Image:Zajezdnia PKT.jpg
- 6.43 Image:Zamek w Mosznej.jpg
- 6.44 Image:Zydrunas sawickas.jpg
- 6.45 Image:Świerklaniec - Dom Kawalera.jpg
- 6.46 Image:Flag_of_Chechnya.svg
- 6.47 Image:0.879696035645619.jpg
- 6.48 Asimov portraits
7 July 7
- 7.1 Image:Gobbi Callas Barbiere.jpg
- 7.2 Image:StEXStatueBellecourL.jpg
- 7.3 Image:Ggb reflection in a soap bubble.JPG
- 7.4 Image:Ggb in soap bubble 3.JPG
- 7.5 Image:Ggb)in soap bubble 2.JPG
- 7.6 Image:Ggb in soap bubble 1.jpg
- 7.7 Image:Webdanel.jpg
- 7.8 Category:Merrylands (Sydney, NSW)
- 7.9 Image:Flag-ja.png
- 7.10 Image:Mikhail_Kalashnikov.jpg
- 7.11 Template:GFDL-AerialPhoto-MlitJp
- 7.12 Image:Su-37-Draft.svg
- 7.13 Image:Chris cornell 1.jpg
- 7.14 Image:LaHabanaMalecon.jpg
- 7.15 Image:Ramiroguerra.jpg
- 7.16 Image:Galle-les_coprin.jpg
- 7.17 Image:000 0105.jpg
- 7.18 Image:000 0146.jpg
- 7.19 Image:Soap bubble ggb.jpg
- 7.20 Image:(Bird Dream Sequence -4(72.003).jpg
- 7.21 Image:Kirin_Beer's_Original_Brew.JPG
- 7.22 Image:First Boeing E-3 Sentry rollout.jpg
- 7.23 Image:Malcolmxmartinlutherking.jpg
- 7.24 Image:Linde-verfahren.png
- 7.25 Image:Bosia jud Iasi.png
- 7.26 Image:Mihail Kogalniceanu jud Iasi.png
- 7.27 Image:Klimadiagramm-deutsch-Madang-Papua-Neuguinea.png
- 7.28 Image:Klima tianjin.png
- 7.29 Image:Klima shenzhen.jpg
- 7.30 Images of Canadian coins less than 50 years old
8 July 8
- 8.1 Image:Burgernet.JPG
- 8.2 Image:Sabba_Ştefănescu_.jpg
- 8.3 Image:Liviu_Constantinescu_.png
- 8.4 Image:Sabba_S._Ştefănescu_.jpg
- 8.5 Image:Pohls_Wheel.svg
- 8.6 Image:P1010439.JPG
- 8.7 Image:Euphorbia_franckiana.JPG
- 8.8 Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Paupalaisbeaumont.jpg
- 8.9 Image:The_Little_Mermaid_3.jpg
- 8.10 Image:Paik5.jpg
- 8.11 Image:Timbpt2.jpg
- 8.12 Image:Carlos Maza.sxw
- 8.13 Image:CHT.jpg
- 8.14 Image:Copenhagen_statue_hc_andersen_city_sq.jpg
- 8.15 Image:Yoshiki piano.jpg
- 8.16 Image:Tresgrandes Acho.jpg
- 8.17 Image:EdvardBenes port.jpg
- 8.18 Image:Powiat chelmski.jpg
- 8.19 Image:Negri176.jpg
- 8.20 Image:Ake_green.jpg
- 8.21 Image:J-10-Draft.svg
- 8.22 Image:PKW mit Hänger Zusatzzeichen 1048-11.svg
- 8.23 Image:Soap bubble ggb.jpg
- 8.24 Image:LiviuConstantinescu_600x900.jpg
- 8.25 Image:Stagnes.jpg
- 8.26 Image:Borås_Stad.jpeg
- 8.27 Image:Sheqel_symbols.svg
- 8.28 Images uploaded by Marcelo Mota Valério (talk • contribs)
9 July 9
- 9.1 Image:Florian Michalik Popart.jpg
- 9.2 Image:Perpignanlogedemer.jpg
- 9.3 Image:Strawinski-Brunnen_Paris-1.jpg
- 9.4 Image:Strawinski-Brunnen_Paris-2.jpg
- 9.5 Image:ServantSaber at svWiki.jpg
- 9.6 Category:Zoos of England
- 9.7 Image:Poule_nègre_soie_perdrix.JPG
- 9.8 Image:Trio_de_negres_soie_fauves.JPG
- 9.9 Image:FUQING.JPG
- 9.10 Image:Cadillac DeVille Cabrio 1.JPG
- 9.11 Image:Friedrich_Paulus.jpg
- 9.12 Image:Taipeibridge1927.jpg
- 9.13 Image:Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.png
- 9.14 Image:Goettingen 21 2.jpg
- 9.15 Image:Storm2.jpg
- 9.16 Image:NITK.jpg
- 9.17 Image:CNwik.png
- 9.18 Image:Index.pdf
- 9.19 Image:Miheso $ Mazerere.jpg
- 9.20 Image:Habits.gif
- 9.21 Image:Habit broadplate.jpg
- 9.22 Image:Aceofspadesfl.jpg
- 9.23 Image:Bagaslaviskis.jpg
- 9.24 Image:Comarcas de Granada.png
- 9.25 Image:Flag of Japan (bordered) 2.svg
- 9.26 Image:!!!!高輪海岸の石垣石0306.JPG
- 9.27 Image:Img379 94-01.jpg
- 9.28 Image:Mugshot 50-Cent-a.jpg
- 9.29 Image:BejiCaidEssebsi.jpg
- 9.30 Image:SMS Message.jpg
- 9.31 Image:Usr_wikifairy.png
- 9.32 Image of Tokyo Watcher
- 9.33 Image:NoGod.JPG
- 9.34 Image:NoGod.JPG
- 9.35 Image:Live_Earth.svg
- 9.36 Maps with non-latin filenames
- 9.37 Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpg
- 9.38 Images uploaded by Marcos Vinícius Mota Soares (talk • contribs)
- 9.39 Image:ISK 10 note.jpg
10 July 10
- 10.1 Image:Erik Creugers (himself).JPG
- 10.2 Image:Erik_Creugers_(himself).JPG
- 10.3 Template:PD-manifesto
- 10.4 Image:Церковь Архангела Михаила в Тропарёве4.jpg
- 10.5 Image:Chalmers.jpg
- 10.6 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 10.7 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 10.8 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 10.9 Image:FFmap-ka-_.gif
- 10.10 Image:Washington dc 7th st.png
- 10.11 Category:Hepatopsida
- 10.12 Image:Het1.jpg
- 10.13 Image:Het1.jpg
- 10.14 Image:Het1.jpg
- 10.15 Image:Cancellara_compiegne.jpg
- 10.16 Image:Dillon Montana 1942 LOC 1a35017.jpg
- 10.17 Image:G8 2006 leaders.jpg
- 10.18 Image:永.jpeg
- 10.19 File:2007gaia.mp3.ogg
- 10.20 Image:Vthapsus sheet.JPG
- 10.21 Category:Hepatophyta
- 10.22 Image:Image (mathematics).svg
- 10.23 Image:Burning-cross2.jpg
- 10.24 Image:Gv_19471029_24_04.ogg
- 10.25 Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg
- 10.26 Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg 2
11 July 11
- 11.1 Lepidodendrales
- 11.2 Image:TukandWalter.JPG
- 11.3 Image:Passat.jpg
- 11.4 Image:Ot scheme.png
- 11.5 Image:NormChi.png
- 11.6 Image:Norm Chi.png
- 11.7 Image:748940750_6e3b3eeacd_b.jpg
- 11.8 Image:The_Scream.jpg
- 11.9 Image:Matisse_TheDessert.png
- 11.10 Image:069212resized.jpg and Image:069212.jpg
- 11.11 Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg
- 11.12 Just so circles
- 11.13 Image:Iodinated_Tyrosine-Derivatives.png
- 11.14 Image:LA.gif
- 11.15 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 11.16 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 11.17 Image:Wikipedia.pdf
- 11.18 Image:Henri_matisse1.jpg
- 11.19 Image:Joseph_Conrad.jpg
- 11.20 Image:Eselspinguin.jpg
- 11.21 Image:European Court of Justice logo.svg
- 11.22 Image:Sildenafil citrate.png
- 11.23 Category:Maps of Carteret County, North Carolina
- 11.24 Category:Maps of Craven County, North Carolina
- 11.25 Template:PD-German stamps and all it tags
- 11.26 Image:Parana Municipio Francisco Beltrao.svg
- 11.27 Image:NOMG07TowlieRedRidingHood.jpg
- 11.28 Image:Farah.jpg
- 11.29 Image:Mapa Cortes de Baza.PNG and Image:Mapa Comarca de Baza.PNG
12 July 12
- 12.1 Image:Pasen 2007 045.JPG
- 12.2 Image:069212.jpg
- 12.3 Image:05072007625.jpg
- 12.4 Image:19062007503.jpg
- 12.5 Image:Stitches_the_cat.jpg
- 12.6 Image:Manfred_(1)1.jpg
- 12.7 Image:Manfred_(2).jpg
- 12.8 Image:K2.jpg
- 12.9 Image:Cinta_copy.png
- 12.10 Image:Kelly_Porras.jpg
- 12.11 Image:Us-civil.svg
- 12.12 Image:ANDRES_JIMENEZ_GARCIA.pdf
- 12.13 Image:Nadirnet.pdf
- 12.14 Image:Kwiki2.gif
- 12.15 Image:Marijaserifovic.JPG
- 12.16 Image:Karte Gemeinde Mitloedi.png
- 12.17 Image:Fico d'India - prickly pear.jpg
- 12.18 Image:Janis_Ian.jpg
- 12.19 Image:Coucher du soleil à Agnam Goly.jpg
- 12.20 Image:Grand Baobab de Agnam Goly.jpg
- 12.21 Image:Cheptel de Agnam Goly.jpg
- 12.22 Category:Indoor ice hockey venues in Slovakia
- 12.23 Category:Sport in Slovakia
- 12.24 Image:Lund in Sweden.png
- 12.25 Image:LocationGothenburg.PNG
- 12.26 Image:Trastevere - sant'Onofrio 00673.JPG
- 12.27 Image:Coup_pied.png
- 12.28 Image:Orchid Botanica Logo.jpg
- 12.29 Image:S&H_stamps_and_book.jpg
- 12.30 Image:Map_of_Australia_and_New_Zealand.png
- 12.31 Image:Isl Krone.JPG
- 12.32 Template:Evstafiev Mikhail
13 July 13
- 13.1 Image:JaimeMink.jpg
- 13.2 Image:JaimeMink13mnd.jpg
- 13.3 Image:Spice_Girls_Reunion_In_London.jpg
- 13.4 Image:Sugababes in Glasgow at a concert backstage.jpg
- 13.5 Image:Roberto_sepulveda.jpg
- 13.6 Image:Korolev monumentb.jpg
- 13.7 Image:Orgosolo07.jpg
- 13.8 Image:Sevilla2005July 063.jpg
- 13.9 Image:Sevilla2005July 123.jpg
- 13.10 Image:Sevilla2005July 107.jpg
- 13.11 Image:TTRRcase.jpg
- 13.12 Image:TTRRdust.jpg
- 13.13 Image:Larry wall.jpg
- 13.14 Category:Lokomotives of Romania
- 13.15 Category:Locomotives of the Czech Republic
- 13.16 Image:Edith_stein.jpg
- 13.17 Image:Comarca de Alhama flag.png
- 13.18 Pictures from The Cebu Photo Gallery
- 13.19 Image:Georgescarpentier.jpg
- 13.20 Image:Karlsruhe h99643.jpg
- 13.21 Image:Francoise_Sagan.jpg
- 13.22 Wollongong
- 13.23 Category:Barefoot
- 13.24 Image:Sergey Korolev July 1954.jpg
- 13.25 Image:Sede vacante.png
- 13.26 Image:Squared circle grate.jpg
14 July 14
- 14.1 Category:Auenstein, Germany
- 14.2 Image:NSQNP.jpg
- 14.3 Image:Wappen Munster.png
- 14.4 Image:Symbol of Solidarnosc.png
- 14.5 Image:Milorad Jankovic.jpg
- 14.6 Image:Oskar_Braaten-1.jpg
- 14.7 Image:Iphp.jpg
- 14.8 Image:Nehru_family.jpg
- 14.9 Image:La almudena.jpg
- 14.10 Image:Diego_capusotto.jpg
- 14.11 Image:MooreKucinich.jpg
15 July 15
- 15.1 Image:Gidonkremer.jpg
- 15.2 Image:-1994-04-16 1830-News630-01-2007-07-10 19-00-36.jpg
- 15.3 Image:Sarkozy_G-8.JPG
- 15.4 Image:Sarkozy18.06.JPG
- 15.5 Image:NiverCarolPirenopolis_031.jpg
- 15.6 Image:000 0468.jpg
- 15.7 Image:Vladimir_putin_02.jpg
- 15.8 Image:Gafftopsail catfish.jpg
- 15.9 Image:Spherical mirror2.svg
- 15.10 Image:Limp_bizkit_group.jpg
- 15.11 Image:Fred_durst.jpg
- 15.12 Image:LosAngelesGalaxyLogo.gif
- 15.13 Image:Fünfzig Fabeln für Kinder (Hey).djvu
- 15.14 Image:Hafen-3.ogg
- 15.15 Image:Hagiasophia1.jpg
- 15.16 Image:POL Dalachów map.svg
- 15.17 Category:Rotštejn
- 15.18 Image:Jom kippur war.jpg
- 15.19 Image:Fileprova.ogg
- 15.20 Image:Schneider wappen.jpg
- 15.21 Images by Joymaster IV
- 15.22 Template:PD-UY-Presidency
16 July 16
- 16.1 Image:1297262811.jpg
- 16.2 Image:Wrath_by_kahlen.jpg
- 16.3 Image:Marko_Perkovic_Thompson.jpg
- 16.4 Image:IPhone-docked.jpg
- 16.5 Image:P8200287.jpg
- 16.6 Image:Wheel life 01.jpg
- 16.7 Image:Maccabiah17.JPG
- 16.8 Image:Sibelius_monument_pipes_7235.jpg
- 16.9 Image:Sibelius_monument_7236.jpg
- 16.10 Image:Vinci-boardgame.jpg
- 16.11 Image:Sibelius_monument_pipes_7228.jpg
- 16.12 Image:Sibelius_monument_pipes_7227.jpg
- 16.13 Image:Merkelbeek bord.JPG
- 16.14 Category:Luna programe
- 16.15 Image:Kirka.jpg
- 16.16 Image:Immigrationceremonycanada.jpg
- 16.17 Image:UkrainianPeacekeepers.jpg
- 16.18 Image:Sea Beach Line 1.gif
- 16.19 Image:Wikiversite-banner.jpg
17 July 17
- 17.1 Image:-1994-06-05 1830-News630-ID-2007-07-10 18-53-59.jpg
- 17.2 Image:Newport4News.jpg
- 17.3 Image:Van_persie_feyenoord.jpg
- 17.4 Image:Scialone.jpg
- 17.5 Image:Guatemalacityskyline.jpg
- 17.6 Image:Hiranuma_cabibet_photo_op.jpg
- 17.7 Image:Heterosexual.gif
- 17.8 Image:271_Indianapolis.jpg
- 17.9 Image:WashingtonDCMasonicTemple.jpg
- 17.10 Image:Crosiavalley.jpg
18 July 18
- 18.1 Category:Holy Trinity Church, Fulnek
- 18.2 Image:Mottabanner.jpg
- 18.3 Image:Arkan.jpg
- 18.4 Image:Oerstedpark grinder.jpg
- 18.5 Image:OEmrang-IMG_0615.JPG
- 18.6 Image:ZhongguoRenminYinhang.jpg
- 18.7 Image:Acdclineup1994-now.jpg
- 18.8 Image:Tedheath.jpg
- 18.9 Image:Cal_Poly_Pomona_Eagleview.png
- 18.10 Image:Riyo Mori.jpg
- 18.11 Image:Pink_Floyd_-_Concerto_Estádio_Alvalade_Lisboa_Portugal.jpg
- 18.12 Image:Pjberrio.PNG
- 18.13 Image:Aichi_Ichinomiya_City.png
- 18.14 Image:Championstuska.jpg
- 18.15 Image:ChristianLangner.jpg
- 18.16 Image:Schmerz002.jpg
- 18.17 Image:Johanniskirche Imst.jpg
- 18.18 Image:AnoushehAnsari.jpg
- 18.19 Image:Alex in seersucker.JPG
- 18.20 Image:Mottabanner.jpg
- 18.21 Image:787rollout.jpg
- 18.22 Image:Admin.JPG
- 18.23 Image:Goettingen StPaulus West.jpg
19 July 19
- 19.1 Image:Vlc 086c skins2 cedric.png
- 19.2 Image:Avio tam editado.ogg
- 19.3 Image:Chris_Tomlin.jpg
- 19.4 Image:Hermann-Welsch.jpg
- 19.5 Image:Bactris gasipaes.jpg
- 19.6 Image:Kath_Kirche_Eisenach-nyks.JPG
- 19.7 Image:Guaiacolsulfonate.png
- 19.8 Image:AB_Beslan_Mother.jpg
- 19.9 Image:Utilisateur_Xavier_Nicholas.jpg
- 19.10 Image:Stellarkart.jpg
- 19.11 Image:1914_Postcard-Alligator_Bait_01.jpg
- 19.12 Image:Billboard Milano.jpg
- 19.13 Image:Tatum_narrowweb_200x456.jpg
- 19.14 Image:Thailand Coup 2006 announce.jpg
- 19.15 Image:Thailand_Coup_2006_announce.jpg
- 19.16 Image:Tostal quarter stamp.gif
- 19.17 Image:Queen_Maria_of_Yugoslavia.jpg
- 19.18 Category:HV
- 19.19 Image:Erazem.JPG
- 19.20 Image:Offenbach_jaques_grave_montmartre_paris_01.jpg
- 19.21 Category:Files by Liftarn
20 July 20
- 20.1 Image:COTUCA-unicamp.jpg
- 20.2 Image:Willem van Oldenbarneveldt 1634 anoymousem.jpg
- 20.3 Image:Ssangyong_label.jpg
- 20.4 Image:Guy Lafleur action1.jpg
- 20.5 Image:Larousse.JPG
- 20.6 Image:Larousse2.JPG
- 20.7 Image:Hk1960.jpg
- 20.8 Image:Toquinho.jpg
- 20.9 Image:Santiagofernandez.jpg
- 20.10 Image:Bandera_adolfo_gonzalez_chaves.jpg
- 20.11 Image:126389-3002-f5000.jpg
- 20.12 Image:Episode4.jpg
- 20.13 Image:Canadien vs CSKA 1975.gif
- 20.14 Image:Erebus_360_L257atc-B652R1.jpg
- 20.15 Image:Pancam_Sol1_Postcard_part_th361.jpg
- 20.16 Image:Micanopy Hist Dist Bldg03.jpg, Image:Micanopy Hist Dist Bldg03b.jpg and Image:Micanopy Hist Dist Bldg03c.jpg
- 20.17 Image:LocationEl Temple.png
- 20.18 Image:LocationPoniente Granadino.png
- 20.19 Image:LocationAltiplano Granadino.png
- 20.20 Image:Canal garden04s3872.jpg
- 20.21 Image:Rachel_Larrat_Unlimited_Class_Carrera_Panamericana.jpg
- 20.22 Image:Mercedes-Benz Coupé-Baureihe 140.jpg
- 20.23 Image:RPG-29_USGov.JPG
- 20.24 Image:2006mai_saffig_023.jpg
- 20.25 Image:2006mai_saffig_023.jpg
- 20.26 Image:LocationMarquesado.png
- 20.27 Image:Leb flag1.PNG
- 20.28 Icons mean person with strange head
21 July 21
- 21.1 Image:JackSparrow.jpg
- 21.2 Image:JackSparrow.jpg
- 21.3 Image:Monotube.gif
- 21.4 Image:BMW_Isetta_Logo.jpg
- 21.5 Image:Euro-Banknotenbündel.JPG
- 21.6 Image:Trelock_Schild_Münster.jpg
- 21.7 Image:Rolinck_Schild.jpg
- 21.8 Image:Glas_Logo.jpg
- 21.9 Image:Wiesmann_GT_Logo.jpg
- 21.10 Image:Veritas_Nürburgring_Logo.jpg
- 21.11 Image:Tornax_Motorcycle_Detail.jpg
- 21.12 Image:Heinkel_Roller_Detail.jpg
- 21.13 Image:Dürkopp_Diana_1955_Detail.jpg
- 21.14 Image:Norton_Motorcycle_Detail.jpg
- 21.15 Image:Kienzle_Logo.jpg
- 21.16 Image:-1989-05-25 1830-News630-01-2007-07-10 19-13-05.jpg
- 21.17 Image:Paris_Opera_-Main_Hall.JPG
- 21.18 Image:Coat Of Arms Bernkastel Kues.jpg
- 21.19 Image:Coat Of Arms Bernkastel Kues.jpg
- 21.20 Image:Putin Gorbachev.jpg
- 21.21 Image:Microsoft_Sign_on_German_campus.jpg
- 21.22 Image:MHV Adler Diplomat 3GS Wood-Gazifier 1938 01.jpg
- 21.23 Image:Fruitandveg.png
- 21.24 Image:Flag of Svalbard (local).JPG
- 21.25 Image:Perth_airport_entry_signage.JPG
- 21.26 Image:Barra Ondina Beach of Salvador.jpg
- 21.27 Image:Siameses_aureolados.jpg
- 21.28 Image:Critico_arcaico.jpg
- 21.29 Image:ROK Navy Jack.svg
- 21.30 Image:Chacmool.jpg
- 21.31 Image:Yatsuhashi-makie-raden-suzuribako.jpg
- 21.32 Image:Ferrari_z00.JPG
- 21.33 Chiesa parrocchiale doors
22 July 22
- 22.1 Image:Renée_Zellweger.jpg
- 22.2 Template:PD-USGov-NARA-German
- 22.3 Image:Felipe_Calderon_foto_oficial.jpg
- 22.4 Image:TourT1 Défense 15012007.jpg
- 22.5 Image:TIBE2007Opening-07.jpg
- 22.6 Image:The Map of Guandu Nature Park.png
- 22.7 Image:Nigel tomm.jpg
- 22.8 Image:Edmund Dulac Cinderella1.jpg
- 22.9 Image:Edmund Dulac Cinderella2.jpg
- 22.10 Image:Edmund Dulac Cinderella3.jpg
- 22.11 Image:Renée_Zellweger.jpg
- 22.12 Image:Bergkerk_Deventer.jpg
- 22.13 Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg
- 22.14 Image:Campbell of Argyll or Campbell of Lochawe tartan.png
- 22.15 Image:Blason de Louvres.svg
- 22.16 Image:Playstation.jpg
- 22.17 Image:Tuncay001.jpg
- 22.18 Image:US90A.png
- 22.19 Image:Kosevo4lo9.jpg
- 22.20 Image:Toronto Skyline Photo.jpg
- 22.21 Image:Mapa_Europa_despres_Tractat_Westfalia_1648.jpg
- 22.22 Image:Cubs-Carlos Zambrano2.jpg
- 22.23 Image:Bandera_de_Huécija.jpg
- 22.24 Image:Flag of Culebra (Puerto Rico).png
- 22.25 Image:47488349 337088baca.jpg
- 22.26 Image:Qaboos.jpg
- 22.27 Image:Cytaux.jpg
- 22.28 Image:Cancelos de Baixo.JPG
- 22.29 Image:Chickasaw turnpike.svg, Image:Fort Bend Parkway Toll Road.svg
- 22.30 Image:Melisandre_of_Asshai.jpg
- 22.31 Image:Communauté d'Agglomération de La Rochelle.jpg
- 22.32 Image:Helsinki_Metro_Station_Announcement.ogg
23 July 23
- 23.1 Image:IMG 3748.jpg
- 23.2 Category:Herøy
- 23.3 Category:Sykkulven
- 23.4 Image:Die Windsbraut.jpg
- 23.5 Category:Churces in Norway
- 23.6 Image:Torvikbukt-Nesset.jpg
- 23.7 Image:Gedenktafel_ida_siekmann.jpg
- 23.8 Image:Custom swingline.jpg
- 23.9 Image:Argument.svg
- 23.10 Category:Yamaha R6
- 23.11 Image:Malcolmyoung.jpg
- 23.12 Image:Naval_Ensign_of_Ecuador.svg
- 23.13 Image:SimplexProblem 1.png
- 23.14 Image:Stemma Cairate.gif
- 23.15 Image:FDD with Cables Detail WB.JPG
- 23.16 Image:Gardel Piazzolla.jpg
- 23.17 Image:Buzdovan.JPG
- 23.18 Image:London_2007_floods_manipulated.jpg
- 23.19 Image:Russell_at_USF.jpg
- 23.20 Image:1.jpg
- 23.21 Image:Castellano-Español.png
- 23.22 Martiros Saryan
- 23.23 Decorations by User:Andros64
- 23.24 Image:Rorschach1.jpg
- 23.25 Image:Riga swedish gate brewer street.jpg
- 23.26 Image:George carlin headshot.jpg
- 23.27 Image:Bcg_summer2005_1024x768.jpg
- 23.28 Image:Frauweiler4.jpg
- 23.29 Image:Ehu_logo.svg
- 23.30 Image:Hardenburg.jpg
- 23.31 Image:Inkblot.svg
- 23.32 Image:Rorschach inkblot test.gif
- 23.33 Image:Wfm x51 extraterrestrial highway.jpg
24 July 24
- 24.1 Image:Panorama.jpg
- 24.2 Image:Robert_Surcouf.JPG
- 24.3 Image:Albania123.png
- 24.4 Category:Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow
- 24.5 Image:Sacachispas_escudo.jpg
- 24.6 Image:William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_The_Song_of_the_Nightingale_(1895).reduced.png
- 24.7 Image:William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_The_Broken_Pitcher_(1891).png
- 24.8 Image:Complex.svg
- 24.9 Category:Actor from Israël
- 24.10 Image:Pablo_sebastian_aniceto.jpg
- 24.11 Category:Hindu idols
- 24.12 Image:WhiteHouseCSA1.jpg
- 24.13 Image:Messe-75.JPG
- 24.14 Image:Stemma_marino.gif
- 24.15 Category:Sport flags
- 24.16 Template:Presidencia, Template:FAB, Template:EB
- 24.17 Image:Image6-1.jpg
- 24.18 Image:Viewphoto.jpg44.jpg
- 24.19 Image:Sansinbestia_logo3.gif
25 July 25
- 25.1 Image:Ledzeppelinsuperband.jpg
- 25.2 Image:Milesdavis3.jpg
- 25.3 Image:Assyrian_people.jpg
- 25.4 Image:Lilium candidum.JPG
- 25.5 Image:MEinziger.jpg
- 25.6 Image:FV-DP.pdf
- 25.7 Image:Anti_Japan.svg
- 25.8 Image:Anti_Japan.svg
- 25.9 Image:Châteaudun (Château, Hôtel-Dieu, Église de la Madeleine).jpg
- 25.10 Image:Bandera de Lares.JPG
- 25.11 Image:1001_Ночь.jpg
- 25.12 Category:Olympus E-500
- 25.13 Image:Bonhamjohn.jpg
- 25.14 Category:Gramophone Company
- 25.15 Image:Picsingles.jpg
- 25.16 Image:Tautas padome first session 1918.jpg
- 25.17 Image:Riga alexander gate.jpg
- 25.18 Quran Recitations
- 25.19 Image:814_4.jpg
- 25.20 Image:Pia09344.jpg
- 25.21 Image:Postmeilensäule_3.jpg
- 25.22 Image:Scarlet_pimpernal_macro.JPG
- 25.23 Image:Petrorhagia_saxifraga2.jpg
- 25.24 Spanish municipal flags
26 July 26
- 26.1 Image:Funahashi-makie-suzuribako.jpg
- 26.2 Image:Cruise.PNG
- 26.3 Image:Australis--Eiszeit--RS02.jpg
- 26.4 Image:Australis--Eiszeit+Schelfe--RS01.jpg
- 26.5 Image:Scientist_stub.jpg
- 26.6 Image:Aegina_map.jpg
- 26.7 Image:Af.gif
- 26.8 Image:Ejc-col.gif
- 26.9 Image:Colnavy.gif
- 26.10 Image:Medallacol.jpg
- 26.11 Image:Another shot.jpg
- 26.12 Image:RECO0049.JPG
- 26.13 Image:Dalla_Terra_alla_Luna_-_075_immagine.jpg
- 26.14 Image:Azerbaijani People.jpg
- 26.15 Image:Grabado de La Mota.jpg
- 26.16 Image:Juan Evangelista Venegas.JPG
- 26.17 Image:Saddam_rumsfeld.jpg
- 26.18 Image:Triangolo del fuoco.svg
27 July 27
- 27.1 Image:Diamond_bitch.jpg
- 27.2 Image:Tito.jpg
- 27.3 Image:Albert_Forster.jpg
- 27.4 Image:Fm2005cover.jpg
- 27.5 Image:Apbessa.jpg
- 27.6 Image:Boeing_747_LCF_N740BA.jpg
- 27.7 Image:Herb1.svg
- 27.8 Image:Pack_logo.gif
- 27.9 Image:Boeing_747-4J6LCF_N747BC.jpg
- 27.10 Image:Boeing_747_LCF_N740BA-2.jpg
- 27.11 Image:Marshal Tito.jpg
- 27.12 Image:Marshal_Tito.jpg
- 27.13 Image:Ola_Skinnarmo.jpg
- 27.14 Image:North-Sentinel-Island.jpg
- 27.15 Image:Keba at logo.gif
- 27.16 Image:Dalla_Terra_alla_Luna_-_097t.jpg
- 27.17 Image:Coursepic.jpg
- 27.18 Image:BenKwellerACL2006.jpg
- 27.19 Image:LyleLovett.jpg
- 27.20 Image:JackWhitebySteveHopson.jpg
- 27.21 Image:Escudo_Xelajú.jpg
- 27.22 Image:Richard-Virenque-TdF2004_1.jpg
- 27.23 Image:Mucha window in St Vitus.JPG
- 27.24 Images in Category:Juan Manuel Guiral
- 27.25 Image:Regnum_unforetelling.jpg
- 27.26 Image:Ames room.JPG
- 27.27 Image:CIMG0586.JPG
- 27.28 Image:Alexander wurz.jpg
- 27.29 Image:Max mosley.jpg
- 27.30 Image:Incanto_02-rs.jpg
- 27.31 Repeated nomination
- 27.32 Image:124690670_43a5156644_m.jpg
- 27.33 Image:Bam EVDOPCMCIA.jpg
- 27.34 Image:Ths_coleman_hawkins.png
- 27.35 Image:MarcWallenberg-jr.jpg
- 27.36 Image:Luciele_di_Camargo.jpg
- 27.37 Image:Jackson_Antunes.jpg
- 27.38 Image:VICTOR_WAGNER.jpg
- 27.39 Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png
- 27.40 Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png
- 27.41 Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png
- 27.42 Image:Thehawk.jpg
- 27.43 Image:Yemetz_1931.jpg
- 27.44 Image:Mido-Suji Monument.jpg
- 27.45 Image:Dotonbori-Signboard2.jpg
- 27.46 Image:Kazeno-Haruka5.jpg
- 27.47 YORO CIDER
28 July 28
- 28.1 Andrés de Santa Maria
- 28.2 Image:Huygens_Landing_Site.jpg
- 28.3 Image:YggdrasillUniverseSoul.PNG
- 28.4 Image:Bosem.jpg
- 28.5 Template:Money-EU
- 28.6 Image:Edy Cards.JPG
- 28.7 Image:Mary Kiffmeyer.jpg
- 28.8 Image:FloppyRom Magazine.jpg
  - 28.8.1 Deletion of Image:FloppyRom Magazine.jpg
  - 28.8.2 FloppyRom_Magazine.jpg not a copyright violation
- 28.9 Image:Kennedy_space_center.jpg
- 28.10 Image:School iruca.jpg
- 28.11 Image:Yggdrasil axis mundi 1.PNG
- 28.12 Image:Portopia81-rokkocable-ticket-right.JPG
- 28.13 Image:Portopia81-rokkocable-ticket-back.JPG
- 28.14 Image:Electronic lock yl88 operation.ogg
- 28.15 Category:Edmund Dulac (and its content)
29 July 29
- 29.1 Image:IMG_1242.JPG
- 29.2 Image:Fred_wembley.jpg
- 29.3 Image:Sign of the Deathly Hallows.svg
- 29.4 Image:Bechet.gif
- 29.5 Image:RalphGlomp.JPG
- 29.6 Image:Dolchamar.JPG
- 29.7 Image:Yvart.JPG
- 29.8 Image:Kajtielplu.JPG
- 29.9 Image:Solotronik.JPG
- 29.10 Image:Vinilkomso2.JPG
- 29.11 Image:Christer_Fuglesang_2006_EMU.jpg
- 29.12 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29)
  - 29.12.1 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 30 July 2007
  - 29.12.2 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 31 July 2007
  - 29.12.3 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 31 July 2007 vd
  - 29.12.4 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 1 August 2007
  - 29.12.5 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 3 August 2007
  - 29.12.6 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 4 August 2007
  - 29.12.7 Summary of arguments
  - 29.12.8 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) arbitrary section break - 13 August 2007
  - 29.12.9 Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29) - bringing to a close
- 29.13 Image:205.Ro Pui d'Araguás.JPG
- 29.14 Image:Coracias_abyssinica_0026.jpg
- 29.15 Image:Beslan_school_no_1_victim_photos.jpg
- 29.16 Image:Stadsnetbrugge.JPG
- 29.17 Image:Serbia1918.png
  - 29.17.1 Answer for PANONIAN's claim (Hungary was indeed an internationally recognized country that time)
  - 29.17.2 Compromise?
- 29.18 Image:Balladeus.jpg
- 29.19 Image:Esperantoliteraturo.jpg
- 29.20 Image:Bernard-Challandes.jpg
- 29.21 Image:Microsoft_wordmark.svg
- 29.22 Image:CSK_20_1988_obverse.jpg
30 July 30
- 30.1 Image:Cherryicecream.jpg
- 30.2 Image:Třemešná nádraží.JPG
- 30.3 Image:Langesund church, Bamle, Norway.jpg
- 30.4 Image:Raphael-Young_man-1.jpg
- 30.5 Image:Map_of_HI_Highlighting_Hawaii.png
- 30.6 Image:AntibodyAR.svg
- 30.7 Image:Brega.gif
- 30.8 Image:Frida Kahlo (self portrait).jpg
- 30.9 Image:Aphra-behn-190x287.jpg
- 30.10 Image:Eminemwhite.jpg
- 30.11 Image:CanonF-1System.jpg
- 30.12 Image:!cid pic180407 16.jpg
- 30.13 Image:Castellano-Espanol no legend.png
- 30.14 Image:Cesare Viazzi (1857-1943) La cavalcata delle Valchirie.jpg
- 30.15 Image:Linus Pauling vor Tafel.jpg
- 30.16 Image:Dwighteisenhower.jpg
- 30.17 Image:Lou Gehrig NIH.jpg
- 30.18 Image:Tinfoilhat.jpg
- 30.19 Category:Walloon Region
- 30.20 Image:Ubicación_Coloso.jpg
- 30.21 Image:Swedish_50_Krona.jpg
- 30.22 Image:Doorap.jpg
- 30.23 Image:John Carew Eccles.jpg
- 30.24 Image:International brigade memorial.01.JPG
- 30.25 Image:AlbertSzent-Györgyi Hugginsprostate.jpg and duplicate Image:Hugginsprostate.jpg
- 30.26 Image:Kit body AtleticoAwayKIANEWW.png
- 30.27 Category:Flemish Region
- 30.28 Image:L. Ron Hubbard - crop.jpg
- 30.29 Image:L. Ron Hubbard Life & Death.jpg
- 30.30 Image:DSCF0267.JPG
- 30.31 Image:600px SKONTO su sfondo blu.png
- 30.32 Image:Chem.jpg
- 30.33 Hebridean flags
- 30.34 Category:Created with Inkscape
- 30.35 Image:Louise_Brooks.jpg
- 30.36 Template:Www.folketinget.dk
- 30.37 Image:Robert the Bruce3.jpg
31 July 31
- 31.1 Image:Ocean_Park_old_and_new_1.jpg
- 31.2 Image:Pernilla Emme.jpg
- 31.3 Image:Les Six Tableau.jpg
- 31.4 Image:Tunix.jpg
- 31.5 Lord Voldemort
- 31.6 Image:H. Clinton.jpg
- 31.7 Image:FZA.JPG
- 31.8 Image:FennecFoxWindow.JPG
- 31.9 Image:Quentin Tarantino & Robert Rodriguez.jpg
- 31.10 Image:Rose McGowan 07-22-06.jpg
- 31.11 Image:Quentin Tarantino & Rosario Dawson.JPG
- 31.12 Image:Burt Bacharach 1995.jpg
- 31.13 Image:Coat of arms of Israel.png
- 31.14 Image:FSG Südkreis Match.jpg and Image:FSG Südkreis Match2.jpg
- 31.15 Image:Kazimierzlutoslaw.png
- 31.16 Image:Kslutoslawski.png
- 31.17 Image:Yves_Leterme_campagnefoto.jpg
- 31.18 Image:PNP.logo.gif
- 31.19 Image:LasCaritas02.JPG
- 31.20 Image:LasCaritas04.JPG
- 31.21 Template:PolishPresidentCopyright
- 31.22 Image:Sf 72.JPG
- 31.23 Image:SF O Nummer.JPG
- 31.24 Image:Delmerensmolen.JPG
- 31.25 Image:Mankmill in Manchester.jpg
- 31.26 Image:Rachida_Dati.jpg
- 31.27 Image:Bloch13.jpg
- 31.28 Image:ScenaCultura.jpeg

[edit] July 1

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dartelaar.jpg

It's an image of myself that is outdated and only very few users use their own image in their userpage. Hey, this IP_number is mine, I forgot to login before the deletion request. As far as I am aware of it is/was only used on my own user page on the nl.wikipedia.org. --Dartelaar [schrijf me!] 17:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Siebrand 06:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RataBlanca2.jpg

No source Thanos 20:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. The uploader is a habitual copyright violator. Please use {{copyvio}} for obvious copyright violations and {{nsd}} for other images missing source information. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Inauguración_Copa_América_2007.jpg

Again, my Spanish is a little rusty, but it doesn't look like the author explicitly approved copyrighted free use by anyone for any purpose. The source is still labelled "all rights reserved". —LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep. The problem is that a "normal person" who doesn't know about licenses doesn't explicitly answer with "Yes. I agree that my pictures will be used for any purpose and for anyone." In the first message, I explain him about that and he accepted. Besides, Flickr doesn't allow to licence "Copyrighted but permission to free use", it's a CC licence or "All the rights reserved". And the author has the right to don't licence as CC if he doesn't want. --B1mbo 19:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, then you should write back and explain that they need to explicitly grant permission. If they haven't understood that they need to explicitly state a license, we can't assume that this was their intention or that they have understood the consequences of their response. If they did in fact intend for anyone to be able to use the image for any purpose, including commercial purposes, it should not be that hard to get them to reply with a statement to this effect. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I've done that. I hope he could answer very soon. --B1mbo 20:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I have his answer: Ok, bueno espero que esta vez si funcione, Si autorizo el uso de mis fotografias para cualquier proposito y por cualquier persona, tambien puedes utiliar otras imagenes con las mismas condiciones que la anterior. (I hope this time it works. I authorize the use of my photos for any purpose and by anybody, you could also use other images with the same conditions of the first one) --B1mbo 17:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Good stuff. Please forward that to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org according to the instructions at Commons:OTRS. I'll close the deletion request and change the {{delete}} tag to {{otrs pending}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:P4040007.JPG

An unfocused version of Image:P4040008.JPG by the same author Lokal _Profil 00:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gedaechtniskirche_Lesepult_Gernot_Stumpf.jpg

v、、m；l 24.87.83.61 01:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't think you've provided a proper reason. (Speedy Keep if this is a pure vandalism.) --Moonian 07:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Where is the problem? --Immanuel Giel 08:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept, no valid reason for deletion. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Malvernia.pdf

Out of project scope. Text article with Commons images. Siebrand 12:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg

I can find no verification that the copyright holder has released this image under the GNU Free Documentation License (see the sources at [1] and [2]). Iamunknown 23:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete unless uploader can provide more evidence that the image isn't copyrighted. CLA 02:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Speedy keep. The image description page clearly states that it was uploaded by the author himself (it's licensed under a "Self license"), and looking at the uploader's name on his user page makes this absolutely clear. -- Arvind 18:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I forgot to look at Prokofiev's user page. I am now convinced. --Iamunknown 20:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't delete Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg

I am the uploader and the creator of this image. see history of the image [3], my profile [4] and my site [5] and [6]). This image has been created by myself using Ultrafractal, Terraformer and Terragen. I permit the usage of this image under the Gnu License (note that my site doesn't mention it is copyrighted). It is used in several wikipedias. Prokofiev 10:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about the mix up. --Iamunknown 20:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Withdraw. Sorry about the mix up. All of the facts correlate, and I am convinced that the uploader is, in fact, the copyright holder. --Iamunknown 20:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Somerville to Category:Somerville, Massachusetts

Rename to follow similar municipalities in Category:Cities in Massachusetts. 64.30.66.208 23:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Support. CLA 02:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Done -- Cat ^chi? 21:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Flag of Lewis

This has been demonstrated to not be the flag of Lewis. It is an internet hoax only. Details can be found here. Note, on first glance, the website seems to confirm the authenticity of the flag, but read in full to see it is clearly demonstrating it to be false. -- MacIomhair

¡¡¡!!! Strongly support for above reasons. The fact the images are here are leading people on other language wikis with a lesser grasp of English to conclude the image exists, so the flag is real. I have seen some say they'd accept it as a fake only if removed from commons. MRM 16:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Support I only did the svg version (I think it "is" nice flag), maybe we should use it as example of hoax. -xfi- 19:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

While I think an example of a hoax would be a good idea, you wouldn't believe the bother its presence here has caused in other language Wikis! ;-) Perhaps a single graphic of it and other Hebridean 'flags'?MRM 20:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Support as creator of the second listed image, and as the one who deleted the article on English Wikipedia. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 02:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted, hoax. Thanks but no thanks. -- Cat ^chi? 20:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. :) MRM 21:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Derry.Shield.png

Almost exact copy of non-free image en:Image:Derry arms 2003.png--Garion96 15:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

DUH! It's the same crest. Except this is my own rendition, and that other one is someone elses. They are not the same, as can be seen with anyone who has eyes and a braincell or two. Zoney 21:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep It's the same crest. --Florent.pecassou 18:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes it is, that is why I requested deletion. Garion96 21:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Axed; copyrighted logo (and therefore fair-use). (→O - R L Y?) 22:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:299044324_2dcb1e3392.jpg

La license has been changed in flickr. Now is nd and nc. -- Axxgreazz (talk) 05:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep I believe it has nothing to do with Flickr anymore once it has been uploaded to Commons. See Template:Flickr-change-of-license. --Moonian 08:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment I have posted this comment on the image at Flickr and sent the photographer FlickrMail in the hope that he will revert the licensing change. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 10:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep who cares? The photographer cannot revoke the license grant. -N 14:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to get him to change his mind about his 5,545 current and all future public photos, many of which are excellent and only a few dozen of which are presently on ~~Flickr~~Commons, and I took the first two logical steps along that path. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep the current image and those like it. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyrights are non-revocable; kept. (→O - R L Y?) 19:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Terretory_given_away_after_Brest-Litovsk.jpg

Identical with Image:Armisticebrestlitovsk.jpg Christian Ganzer 22:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Almost identical. And both are used. --ALE! ¿…? 12:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 07:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] All files under Category:Triangle Factory fire

not necessary in PD, there is no statement insist that is in PD. In fact, use rama's formula: 1911 + 90(assume the photo taker dead when he was 100 years old and took this when he was 10) + 70 = 2071, then this photo may be in PD until 2071. Chanueting 11:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC) Chanueting 11:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Also, I have to state that I am not going to request the deletion of this category. Chanueting 11:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment More information (or comment about the lack of information) here: http://teaching.arts.usyd.edu.au/history/hsty3080/3rdYr3080/trianglewebsite/1a.html. It's a pity there's no firm evidence of publication in 1911, or at least before 1923. William Avery 16:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Probably, at least, have to Delete those with the link marked with "Source" (in http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/m_r/pinsky/triangle.htm ) that links to http://newdeal.feri.org , because those photos (this one, for example) are marked with "Permission is not required to copy or print this image for personal or educational use such as school projects, classroom distribution, etc." and request for permission is required if they are used for other uses. --Moonian 05:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Sad. Samulili 13:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Marcador_cierre_Teletón_2006.jpg

My Spanish is a little rusty, but that looks like a Wikipedia-only permission. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

My english is a lot rustier too, but i think it roughly translates as: "Author rights, permision granted by the author for reproduction on Wikimedia Commons, granting use for any purpose". —the preceding unsigned comment is by 200.72.224.21 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Just like in the case of the photo of Copa América. When you ask to a normal person if they want to release the images and you explain to them all about the policies (commercial use, derivative, etc.) they say just "ok". I know I should have say to them about an explictly use... but if you say all the stuff and the answer is "ok", it's because they agree with what you're saying. It's different if you say "could we use your image for Wikipedia" and you don't say anything about commercial use, for example. In any case, I send another mail to the author asking for an explictly answer. --B1mbo 02:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

...or it's because they haven't understood and they think that they are only giving permission to Wikimedia (which is all they're actually doing). Unfortunately, we can't just make up licenses based on what we wish the author intended. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Right, that would be Wikimedia-only. There's no mention that anyone can use it for any purpose. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 09:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rue Saint-Paul edit.jpg

Only an experience, original version available here Image:Rue Saint-Paul.jpg. 17:36, 4 March 2007 User:Alvesgaspar

Thank you for the warning. Please proceed with the deletion process, I've no use for this picture. - Alvesgaspar 14:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted as per uploader approval. --MichaelMaggs 20:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Screenshot frau.jpg

Image:Frau.jpg is to be deleted... --Markus Schweiss 05:56, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Delete Picture will not be used for anything. Deadstar 15:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 22:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wedekind-Haus_im_Bau_070629_.jpg

wrong name. right name: Image:Wedekind-Haus im Bau 070629.jpg Saippuakauppias 01:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Rename. Cla68 02:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Simply just Delete this one. --Moonian 05:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:StandHuileAix.JPG

Blurry out of focus photograph. Siebrand 07:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

kept (image is used), --ALE! ¿…? 12:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mirador_de_la_code.jpg

Own image from Flickr from account with exactly one image. Also the dimensions of the image add to my suspicion: 227*292 isn't that large for own work. Very fishy. Siebrand 09:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

La imagen fue creada por compañeros míos junto con mi ayuda; en el ayuntamiento de Mieza donde trabajamos, esta foto fue elegida una de las más representativas de Castilla y León, no creo que deba borrarse--Sandrahx 20:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC) (copied from User talk:Siebrand by NielsF talk/overleg/discussion/discussione 21:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC))

Rough English translation of Sandrahx's comment, provided by PatriciaR: "the image was made by friends of mine with my help; in the town of Mieza, where we work, this photo was elected as one of the most representatives of the region of Castilla y Leon, I don't think it should be deleted". NielsF talk/overleg/discussion/discussione 21:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Image from http://www.dipsanet.es/turismo/naturaleza/arribes_e.htm --Prevert^(talk) 21:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete per all of the above. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. I like fish but this one stinks copyvio. -- Cat ^chi? 07:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf

Text biography with one image of which the license status is not clear. In this form, out of project scope. Siebrand 07:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf

Out of project scope. Text PDF with one image (CV style?). Siebrand 06:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand on 6 August 2007 "Per previous DR" Rocket000 02:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Butxy´s_life.gif

Appears to be out of project scope. Non-notable text page scan, possibly still copyrighted? Siebrand 09:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Image description in Spanish says it's the person's own work, and examining it, it's not a page scan but rather text converted to graphics. It also doesn't appear to be from anything anyone would bother to publish commercially. It's not used on any of the wikis though. -N 22:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DSC 0048.JPG

I'm the creator. That was a mistake. Sorry KoS 09:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Correctly named file available at Image:Orgue St Germain en Laye.JPG. Deadstar 12:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The author wants its delation. Mistake. --Florent.pecassou 17:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Please use {{bad name}} next time. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Atomium vue générale.jpg

No photo of atomium allowed. 30 June 2007 User:Kilom691

Delete per nom Deadstar 12:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

It must be a joke. Million photos of Atomium are taken and thousands are available in the web. Even the European Central Bank use a derivate see [7]. - —the preceding unsigned comment is by 80.145.19.106 (talk • contribs)

Deleted: copyrighted artwork, no freedom of panorama in Belgium. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Atomium gros plan.jpg

No photo of Atomium allowed. , 30 June 2007 User:Kilom691

Delete per nom Deadstar 12:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted: no FOP in Belgium. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BEA 2007 084 John Ringo.jpg

This is my personal photo and I would like it removed). 2 July 2007 User:LadyGothiq

Same for Image:JOHN Ringo.jpg and Image:BEA07 JOHN Ringo-07.jpg. Deadstar 12:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Personal photo. --Florent.pecassou 17:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Image:BEA 2007 084 John Ringo.jpg as per nom and Image:JOHN Ringo.jpg as a dupe of the third one. Kept Image:BEA07 JOHN Ringo-07.jpg, which does not represent the user. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ringelnatter.jpg

Part of Image:Natrix natrix 0671.jpg. There are more informations in the new version. -- User:Soebe 19:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Deletion fix Deadstar 13:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 15:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rraf-logo.svg

Falsche Version. 4 December 2006 User:Necr0manzer

Deleted by ALE!: uploader request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SNCF 031-130.png

This is a screenshot of a copyrighted computer game or video game, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. User:Captain Scarlet 19:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

And if i gererate the image with my SolidWorks, it is copyrighted by SolidWorks Corporation? And if it is shown via my Microsoft Operating System it is copyrighted by Microsoft? And if it is processed via my Eizo digital flat screen, it copyrighted by Eizo? Wrong, this is work, and it is shown with a tool, thats all. -- Stahlkocher 18:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

You're mising the point. If you create an image, say a Jpeg from Photoshoshop, the image is yours. If you take a screenshot in a game, simulator or in a software, then it isn't. Captain Scarlet 17:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Now i understand your misunderstanding: The user did create the data for displaying the image. Therefor it is his modell, data and his work. There is no doubt. The graphicengine displaying the work must not been considered. Hope this clears the case. Happy Christmas! -- Stahlkocher 14:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm just not sure of it... It smells of 3D. Merry Christmas to you too. Captain Scarlet 15:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

We send 3D models round the world every day. Work is not limited to 2D. The engine did now raise own rights. Data may be transformed. Happy new year to you and your family. -- Stahlkocher 15:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

(Fixed an old request. Notes above from Image talk page. I cannot see that this discussion has been put through the usual deletion process, and as the subpage was not created, I am assuming it wasn't. Please feel free to speedy close if this is old. Thank you.

Same arguments also for:

Image:SNCF 242A1m.png (coupled to this one)
Image:PO 141TA.png (which was mentioned on the log 28 June)

Deadstar 15:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC))

Keep if the uploader asserts he modelled it himself, we should allow the image unless we have proof it came from a copyrighted program. -N 22:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

It is definitly not a screenshot in a copyrighted computer game but a visualization of a personal model dedicated to a computer game : it is different because the visualization is my own in an personal environment and not in the game.--Pantoine 20:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand here. Will ask the uploader in French. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Uploader seems to have fairly good notions of the copyright problem, and I see no reason to doubt his word. And if we accept that the uploader is the author of the model, no problem remains. Rama 21:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rogerio.jpg

doesn't seem to be original image. 19:58, 22 January 2007 User:Zanimum

Also no license. Deadstar 14:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted per no license. (→O - R L Y?) 20:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ribeirasacra.jpg

Deleted copyvio --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 19:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ritalin photo.jpg

Sorry. I was a newbie when I uploaded it and made a mistake. Licence status is unknown. 21 May 2006 User:Octavio L

Delete The image has an unclear copyright status but the method described at Missing legal information can not be used. --Digon3 ^talk 14:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[Speedy] deleted per user request. (→O - R L Y?) 19:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma-parco decimamalafede03.jpg

uploader request. 17 May 2006 User:Mac9

Deleted per uploader request. (→O - R L Y?) 20:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RudbeckiaFulgida.jpg

It was only a temporary upload. There are enough (better) pictures of this flower available. -- Fice 12:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

My statement hasn't changed: I have uploaded this (my) photo only provisionally. It may be deleted. -- Fice 10:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep I think there are very good reasons to keep this image - and no reasons for deletion! It shows the leafs of this plant better than the other images available. So I'd like to encourage you not only to remove the deletion-flagg but also to put the image in the gallery of Rudbeckia fulgida! /Taxelson 22:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, okay, let's keep it. But in a few days the 2007 Rudbeckias will blooming and then I'll try to make a better photo. If that will be successful I'm going to replace the image by another one (showing blooms and leaves, promised!). -- Fice 16:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I put the image in the gallery and removed the deletion request. Taxelson 18:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept; no real reason for deletion. (→O - R L Y?) 21:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SDK API Review Flow-MaHu-20061107.jpg

Author request , wrong WIKIPEDIA DB used 16 November 2006 User:Mahu

Deleted; author request. (→O - R L Y?) 21:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SMDFplan.gif

a new version of this file has been uplaoded - Image:SMDFplan36.gif. User:Sailko, 15 May 2006

Possibly just {{superseded}}? Deadstar 15:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, please yes delete, i forgot to mark for deletion. --Sailko 15:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted; author request. (→O - R L Y?) 22:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:San Sebastian Escudo.jpg

Copyright status unclear (fixed deletion request)--Deadstar 15:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio template put on picture saying: Folleto informativo del Ayuntamiento de San Sebastián - 15:36, 15 April 2007 User:Dodo
Remove of template saying: Nueva versión de la imagen subida, que cumple plenamente con las condiciones de commons y la licencia ShareAlike 2.5) 16:19, 15 April 2007 User:Generalpoteito
Copyvio back on giving same reason as above with in the comment: el diseño del logo pertenece al ayuntamiento de San Sebastián. 17:05, 15 April 2007 User:Alhen
Copyvio replaced with {{delete}}, saying: Sustitución de la plantilla de borrado. 15:37, 16 April 2007 User:Generalpoteito.
I think we can use this image as we use the images of the other shields of other Spanish cities. This version has been made by me. I know that the original version has copyright (his owner is the town hall of San Sebastian), but this one is not an original version. Generalpoteito 18:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
DeleteCopyvio. Altough this version was made from scratch, the design itself belongs to San Sebastían City Hall. Alhen .::··¨ 05:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
In the web page of the City Hall of San Sebastian, there is information about the licence and use of the materials of that webpage. One of these materials is the shield that appears in this image. Here you have the webpage of the copyright and licence information: [8]. It's in Spanish. In English the translation will be: "The owner of the information of this webpage is de City Hall of San Sebastián. The materials of this web page can be used WITHOUT ANY RESTRICTION by the users [...] When you use this materials [...] you have to explain where are they from: Ayuntamiento de Donostia - San Sebastián and the web page www.donostia.org". Well, we can use this material. Or I can upload the shield that appears in the webpage. Generalpoteito 11:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Axed; copyvio, copyright status (commercial use and derivative works) unclear. (→O - R L Y?) 21:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Oscillographe LC.JPG

Exists already at [[9]], and the PNG quality is better --Xzapro4 16:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. howcheng {chat} 17:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RLC entretenu.JPG

Author request : PNG version already exists in a better quality --Xzapro4 20:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. howcheng {chat} 17:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RLC entretenu équivalent.JPG

PNG version already exists in a better quality (author request) --Xzapro4 20:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. howcheng {chat} 17:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Johnny_Marr.jpg

Speedy Keep. See Template:Flickr-change-of-license. --Moonian 05:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I uploaded this. I also found it on flickr when searching for creative commons licenses that allow for redistribution and modification, and at the time I uploaded it, it was under a different license than it is now. -- malo (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept (free licenses can not be revoked) --ALE! ¿…? 07:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rick Mercer cc.jpg

Replaced with Image:Rick mercer on location with troops.jpg. 2 December 2006 (edit) (undo) User:Zanimum

CommentOther version has slightly different crop. Other than that, it's a dupe. Deadstar 13:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted (near duplicate, not used) --ALE! ¿…? 07:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Samsett-bolungarvik-bolafjall2.jpg

(this was a mistake) 8 October 2006 User:Salvor

Delete Stitching of images not right Deadstar 15:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 07:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dantsu Flame 20061229P1.jpg

ファイル名間違い 01:25, 30 June 2007 User:Goki

Which means "wrong file name". I presume this horse isn't called "Dantsu Flame"? Lupo 10:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete No real description. --Florent.pecassou 17:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep unless a duplicate with the correct file name is uploaded. This file had a description and a valid license. --ALE! ¿…? 15:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete This horse's name is Sea Cariotto. See Image:Sea Cariotto 20061229P1.jpg. --Goki 08:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Please use {{rename image}} in theses cases! --ALE! ¿…? 08:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

tagged with {{rename|Sea Cariotto 20061229P2.jpg}} --ALE! ¿…? 10:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Radio Euskadi feria 1.JPG

up date error. Error de subida. 26 June 2007 User:Txo

Delete Mistake. --Florent.pecassou 18:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 13:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others

outside the project scope, specifically "Private image collections and the like are generally not wanted" --Polarlys 21:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

and all subpages. --Polarlys 21:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

So private collections are not of interest, and commercial collections are not legally available. Whats left? All the images are properly labeled and categorized, what difference does it make if it from a private collection? Please provide a link to the specific rule you are citing. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 21:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

See Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys 21:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Again your just saying "its in the bible somewhere, go look it up". The only thing I find is "Commons:Project scope: Wikimedia Commons is not a web host for e.g. private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such. "I don't believe any of the photos are "private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such."

Delete These images are unusable for Commons because these individuals are non-notable. If I uploaded 50 pictures of my neighbor Bob nobody would want to start an article on him on another project. -N 22:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep Well documented lifes of non notable ancient people may be useful as a good example, i.e.: articles about aging, death certificate, clothes circa 1900, family life in the USA and so. All images should be properly categorized (they aren't categorized), and maybe user subpages are not the best place to keep biografies (this biografies are useful for giving context to photos).--Pere prlpz 13:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

That’s Wikimedia Commons, uploading whole family biographies is pure abuse. We are no free web storage. Of course there is always the possibility to add a dubious context: upload some of your family photos, the pyramids of Giza in the background, your family in the foreground and proclaim a use to illustrate an article on holiday culture of American families. --Polarlys 14:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I would agree to you if these photos were easy repoductible present day family photos, or if we had other similar biographies.--Pere prlpz 14:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Parts of this family were already deleted some weeks ago: Mom on sofa; mom and dad; mom, dad and dog, … this is a whole family album and there are millions of similar biographies. --Polarlys 14:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

None of the photos were: "private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such." They all represent a slice of life in the 1960s that can be used to illustrate clothing, and other time dependent lifestyle articles.

Also note that Selma Louise Norton was deleted based on a single vote isn't there a de minimus required for deletion? Consensus is not a single vote. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Note: This is no voting. --Polarlys 19:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

- Comment who took these photos? Who is the copyright owner? If you assert it is you, why do you assert this? Did you inherit the photos in a will? Do you have the negatives? -N 19:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

- I am the copyright inheritor, yes. As you well know, a negative is not required to claim a copyright, although I do have the original slides or negatives. How does any uploader prove ownership of any photo? How does Corbis claim copyright on its historical collection, and the Library of Congress and New York Public Library also claim the same image? Who is the copyright holder of my high school photo? Me, who paid for it? The company that was hired by the school, or the man who composed the image? Whenever you want something deleted, just bring up the smoke and mirrors of this argument and demand proof of copyright, and since no legal document exists like a patent, you delete. How does the owner of any of the featured photos prove they are the copyright owner? If they are professional photographers their employer may also make a claim if they were on company time, or using company equipment. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  - Sometimes people admit they are not the actual heir. I wasn't trying to get smoke and mirrors, merely asking for a reasonable assertion of copyright. Your assertion seems reasonable. -N 16:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep We should allow hosting media content we have not yet thought of a purpose for. This is valid and well documented content. We need much more it that type :) Cheers! Siebrand 23:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

“Private image collections and the like are generally not wanted. Wikimedia Commons is not a web host for e.g. private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such. There are plenty of other projects in the Internet you can use for such a purpose, like Flickr and others. However, uploading images of yourself and others in small quantity is allowed as long they are useful for some Wikimedia project (for example, a Wikipedia article, a Wikinews report, a meta article, a user page). More details on personality rights can be found at Commons:Licensing.” There are enough wikis and websites for private genealogy! --Polarlys 21:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted those which are outside the project scope, specifically "Private image collections and the like are generally not wanted". Samulili 13:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RmB.PNG

erróneo. sustituido por el correcto. 5 September 2006 User:Capra

Comment Other file user refers to very likely Image:RmdB.PNG. Not a duplicate - the other file has cities marked on it, this is the blank map. Deadstar 13:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

---

kept --ALE! ¿…? 07:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] All images from user 倶楽部オータム

All images from user 倶楽部オータム are suspected copyvios. No metadata, some are thumbnails. --PatríciaR ^msg 14:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific and give some examples. If you don't in the next two days, I will close this request as a keep. --ALE! ¿…? 08:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

At the time of this deletion request, this user had uploaded the following pictures:

Naturally, I don't extend the request for all pictures uploaded after these, at least not without a careful evaluation. PatríciaR ^msg 12:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep Image:木苺9cc7.jpg, Image:ピンクパンサー2228.jpg and Image:ナスタチウムのサラダ.JPG (any proof of copyright violation and Assume good faith), but Delete useless thumbnails. --Dezidor 12:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, having analysed part of the user's most recent uploads and per Dezidor's comments, I withdraw the deletion request for the non-thumbnail pictures. However, I'd like to call your attention for the following: this user has been perpetually blocked for sockpuppetry on ja.wikipedia (as far as Babel fish can help me ;)). It would be good if someone from ja.wiki could look into this and tell us if the sockpuppetry had anything to do with copyvio issues, to establish (or not) a confidance basis here. PatríciaR ^msg 13:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, time to close!

/ Fred J 21:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 3

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reflexion totale interne.svg

I created this by mistake , it's not rendering properly. So, it's unneeded. 8 August 2006, User:Drini

Deleted by Drini: '

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chris Cornell c.jpg

Obvious copyvio, not the first time that the original en.wiki uploader made a fraudulent claim of ownership. ˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 22:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LogoHTNGmini.png

duplicate or a scaled down version of Image:LogoHTNG.png --Sat'Rain 19:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:LogoHTNG.png

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SibeliusMonument.jpg

as per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Finland. 25 June 2007 User:Dilaudid

The monument is IMO a work of art, and this law says that it does not extend to works of art. -- Cecil 12:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The article 25a of the Finnish copyright law permits panorama freedom for buildings, both exteriors and interiors. This, however, does not extend to works of art (other than architecture) which are located in public places. They cannot be commercially published when they constitute the central element of the picture.

I think it means that freedom of panorama does not extend to works of art. :-( So, sadly, {{delete}}. Ben Aveling 18:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Ups, just noticed. permits is the opposite of prohibits. Somehow my brain translated that part wrong. So yes, it has to be deleted. -- Cecil 08:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SibeliusMonumentDetail.jpg

as per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Finland. 25 June 2007 User:Dilaudid

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Silverado.Squatters.Henly.jpg

no longer needed, replaced by Image:Silverado.Squatters.William.Henly.jpg, accidentally uploaded! -- User:Stbalbach 04:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete Far better version available at file mentioned. Deadstar 12:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ProfRossa.JPG

This image is copyrihted. 30 January 2007, User:Warko2006

Deleted. Please use {{speedydelete}} next time. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Logo copei.GIF

No GFDL -- 2 July 2007 user:Humberto, Mex. (Talk | contribs) (87 bytes) (delete :), sorry if im wrong

Delete Is not a free image. Logo of political group of Venezuela. Axxgreazz (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Blatantly false licensing tag ({{GFDL-OpenGeoDB}}). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Santaelenadeu.gif

Niederlande. User:85.0.85.82 (Nominating image for deletion)

Comment I don't understand this deletion request --"reason=Netherlands"? Deadstar 08:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe there is no reason, only that it is actually not used in a article. that is because one user in de.wikipedia think that this diagram is not important for the article where it was used before. --BotBln 14:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. No reason provided for the deletion request. Orphanhood is not a reason for deletion. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sciano Federico 02.jpg

is a screenshot of a TV program, can't be released with cc-by-sa-2.5. 22 May 2007 User:81.208.106.70

Delete Unclear copyright status. --Digon3 ^talk 17:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted, {{screenshot}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sello de Fernán González.jpg

copyright correos España. 9 March 2007 User:Truor

Deleted by ALE!: copyvio per Commons:Stamps/Public domain

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Silzer Wappen.JPG

Image:Silzer Wappen.png. 2 May 2006 User:Rp.

Deleted by ALE!: ununsed duplicate

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Simongallup002.jpg

The source is "Released on The Cure web site". 17 May 2006 User:Anna (no verificable origin)

Deleted by ALE!: possible copyvio

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Shilinmark.JPG

Logo and No source no Licenese. 8 May 2007 User:Alexsh

Deleted per Commons:Deletion_guidelines#Missing_legal_information since no license information was added for over a week. Please use {{nld}} to tag images missing licensing information. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rees_Stephens.jpg

There is no evidence that the copyright holder approved the CC-by-sa license. The uploader falsely claims to be the copyright holder whilst providing evidence to the contrary. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

E-mail transmis : Sujet : Re: some photos about South Africa 1906 Date : 03/07/2007 09:39:46 Paris, Madrid De : dai@rugbyrelics.com A : Ddfreedl@aol.com CC : dale@rugbyrelics.com Envoyé via Internet (afficher l'en-tête)

Hi - you can use a maximum of 3 images from my website, I would be grateful if you could add a link to my 1906 Springboks page !

Original Message -----

From: Ddfreedl@aol.com To: world-rugby-museum@rugbyrelics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 2:05 AM Subject: some photos about South Africa 1906

Hello

I am Didier from St Sulpice sur Tarn (81 Tarn - France) and i am contributing on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Dd and specially about rugby union; i want to put your images, bouquins like this one http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rugby_ST.F-ST.T_27022007-4.JPG or that one http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:1906_Springboks.jpg

via Wikipedia.Commons

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Rugby_ST.F-ST.T_27022007-4.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:1906_Springboks.jpg in Wikipedia.fr

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Page d'acceuil/Main Page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Welcome Bienvenue/Welcome explications

Wikimedia Commons is a media repository that is created and maintained not by paid-for artists, but by volunteers. Its name "Wikimedia Commons" is derived from that of the umbrella project "Wikimedia " managing all Wikimedia projects and from the plural noun "commons" as its contents are shared by different language versions and different kinds of Wikimedia projects. Thus it provides a central repository for freely licensed photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text, video clips, and media of all sorts that are useful for any Wikimedia project.

Wikimedia Commons uses the same wiki-technology as Wikipedia and thus everyone can edit it easily and without advanced technical skills directly in the web browser. Unlike media files uploaded on other projects, files uploaded to Wikimedia Commons can be embedded on pages of all Wikimedia projects without the need to separately upload them there.

Launched on September 7, 2004, Wikimedia Commons hit the 1,000,000 uploaded media file milestone on 30 November, 2006 and currently contains 1,575,320 files and 62,606 collections (numbers in English notation). More background information about the Wikimedia Commons project itself can be found in the General disclaimer, at the Wikipedia page about Wikimedia Commons and its page in Meta-wiki.

Unlike traditional media repositories Wikimedia Commons is free. Everyone is allowed to copy, use and modify any files here freely as long the source and the authors are credited and as long as users release their copies/improvements under the same freedom to others. The Wikimedia Commons database itself and the texts in it are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. The license conditions of each individual media file can be found on their description pages. More information on usage conditions...

You can create your account like http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_by_Fabienkhan

If you need some help http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Fabienkhan

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aide:Importer_un_fichier

Aide: importer un fichier

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aide:Importer_sur_Commons_un_fichier_dont_je_suis_l%27auteur

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload

Like

fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Final_top_14_2007-3.jpg " This file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License In short: you are free to distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute its author(s) or licensor(s). "

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fabienkhan is able to help you

Et il a un compte sur www.flickr.com : www.flickr.com/photos/7862936@N08/

We are looking images about rugby union

Look at my work :

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89quipe_d%27Angleterre_de_rugby_%C3%A0_XV

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89quipe_d%27Australie_de_rugby_%C3%A0_XV

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89quipe_d%27Afrique_du_Sud_de_rugby_%C3%A0_XV#Le_d.C3.A9but_de_la_l.C3.A9gende_de_l.27Afrique_du_Sud

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89quipe_du_Pays_de_Galles_de_rugby_%C3%A0_XV

I create 100 or more south african players, welsh players, english players...

and i will like to have some photos about South Africa 1906

I hope you understand my need... I would like to know :

- those images are in the public domain - The rights : no rights ? - the author : death of the author ?

in order tu put those images in Wikipedia Commons

with your work clearly mentioned...

I will post on a regular basis pics from your own collection, as well as nice stuff spotted on the web.

I want to publish you or you can do it yourself

please drop me a mail...

All your comments are welcome... Sincerly yours,

Didier http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Dd

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Dd —the preceding unsigned comment is by Ddfree (talk • contribs) 20:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

"You can use" is not the same as "I hereby license images such-and-such under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license." This also applies to Image:GARETH EDWARDS.jpg (which, however, does not have the false authorship claims). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Also applies to Image:1971-GS.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok You can delete them please

Thanks Ddfree 10:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by request of uploader and per Commons:Deletion guidelines#Missing_legal_information because no evidence was provided within one week to show that the author approved any specific free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Anpanman-inflatable.JPG

derivative work --Lyzzy 20:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This picture should not be deleted. The copyright owners of Anpanman have not cleared any official image for use on websites. Pictures of Anpanman-products (or self-painted images) are the only type of picture that can be added to wikipedia. The image here is therefore as good as it gets. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 194.121.90.163 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted characters are equally copyrighted whether they are represented as flat pictures, figurines, or baloons. Images of non-free copyrighted objects must not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The same applies to "fan-art." Please see Commons:Licensing#Derivative_works. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Derivative of a non-free, copyrighted cartoon character. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Retract resistor check valve application .png

Replaced by Image:Retract resistor check valve application.png -- RainerBi 16:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Deletion fix Deadstar 08:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

tagged as a {{duplicate}} --ALE! ¿…? 22:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Jaguar XK8

no content --MB-one 19:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 22:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Thyra_von_Danemark.jpg

Images in hermitagemuseum.org are not PD. Von Seeckt 06:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep The painter, Lauritz Tuxen, died 1927. The painting itself was done in 1885. I would say the painting is {{PD-old}}. AFAIK, Russian copyright law has always considered only creative works to be eligible to copyright. (The Hermitage is located in St. Petersburg, Russia.) That has been a constant since Tsarist times, throughout the Soviet copyright legislation, and also in the modern Copyright law of the Russian Federation. I don't know for sure, but I would think that this means that a simple photographic reproduction would not be eligible to copyright in Russia, and hence {{PD-Art}} applies to the image. Lupo 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Note that the conditions of use of the Hermitage Museum do place restrictions on their images, though. (Although they do not claim copyright...) Lupo 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Authors or copyright holders shouldn't place restrictions according to Ru-Law (Article 9, point 1), the image is copyrighted as default. They can place restrictions manifestly, but they shouldn't. Alex Spade 16:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep The status of PD-art in Russia is unclear (there aren't any judicial precedents). But until the wikimedia/wikipedia servers will haven't appeared in Russia, this image is PD-art accordind to article 5 of Russian copyright law - Russian law is defend the copyrights in other country if such defend is possible in in accordance with law of respective country only. Alex Spade 11:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment I don't think that reasoning works. The photo was surely taken by a Russian and first published/disclosed in Russia on the web site of the Hermitage, so it would appear to be covered by Russian copyright law, §5.1(1) and §5.1(2)[10]. Paragraphs §5.3 and §5.4 apply only to foreign (i.e., non-Russian) works, but I think this photo is a Russian work. Lupo 11:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Repeat in other words.

This copyright work may be (or may be not) defended at Russia, but not in USA. The US-law and Germany/Austria/Switzerland-law are above Rus-law on respective territories.
For another example...

In Germany all logos are trivial works and uncopyrighted, but not in US. Therefore for de-wiki we must upload such images to de-wiki, not to commons (because, they have got own servers).
In Russia all flags and coats are uncopyrigted, but not in US. Therefore we can upload only Russian flags and coats to commons and cann't upload others as free images to ru-wiki because we haven't own servers.
In some countries the machine works: tomograms, separate sattelite images (until integration), shots from static and automatic (but not automatized) camera are uncopyrighted (they are not creative labour), but not in US. Alex Spade 11:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Alex, we're not trying to circumvent some countries' laws by capitalizing on the server location. COM:L clearly says that works hosted here as PD must be PD in the source country and in the U.S. The source country in this case (of the photo, not the painting) is Russia. I personally think it's reasonable to consider PD-Art applicable in Russia, but it'd be better if we had some basis for this beyond my personal belief. Are you sure there were no "threshold of originality"/"faithful reproduction" cases in Russia (or maybe the Soviet Union)? Does Gavrilov in his commentary on the 1993 law say anything about this? Lupo 12:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

No. We are trying. If we want to follow the condition both source country and the US totally and precisely - the next step must be disscussion about deletion of some of Non-Russian photos of Russian PD-2D-image (image is PD, but its photo isn't). Alex Spade 08:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Why? If it's a non-Russian photo, it was neither taken by a Russian nor first published in Russia. But we'd have to consider whether the Russian 2D painting would also be PD in the other country. Isn't that fun? (*Not*.) Lupo 08:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

You hadn't undertoond me. In Russian Law copyright is being accrued by creating (making), not publishing - see Article 9.1 and 6.1. And it is being accrued regardless of nationality - see Article 5.1.1.

I will try to explain my conception on example.

American have been photographing the Image:Claude Monet 009.jpg at w:Pushkin Museum. This painting is PD. Its photo is PD in American, but it is copyrighted as default in Russia - because it was made in Russia and it is unimportant where it had been or will be published - and the photographer must permit the free use and etc. Alex Spade 12:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. Yes, copyright is vested in the author upon the creation of the photo. But: $5.1(1): a work is subject to Russian law only if published in Russia or existing there in objective form, or if the work was made by a Russian (§5.1(2)). Otherwise, it's a foreign work and copyrighted in Russia according to international treaties (§5.1(3)). According to the Berne Convention, the country of origin is the country of first publication, or, if unpublished, defined by the nationality of the photographer. So, when the American tourist takes the photo, it is subject to Russian law as an unpublished work (Author is American, it's unpublished, and exists in objective form within Russia—§5.1(1).) If the American tourist then publishes his photo in Russia, it becomes a Russian work and Russia is the source country. If he leaves Russia without having published the image, §5.1(1) doesn't apply anymore (the photo doesn't exist in Russia in objective form), only §5.1(3) applies. If he then publishes the photo elsewhere, that country is the source country. If he doesn't publish it at all, the country of origin is the U.S. In the latter two cases, Russian law doesn't enter into consideration, since we look only at the source country of the photo and the U.S., and the painting is PD anyway. Lupo 12:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Let's take this our talk pages, ok :-)? It's becoming off-topic. We both agree to keep the image, and the basic question for this image here is actually whether PD-Art is applicable. Lupo 12:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. (→O - R L Y?) 18:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Charles_Napoleon.jpg

Sorry. I did mistaken identity. Von Seeckt 06:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. howcheng {chat} 17:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Renesansa-skladatelji.JPG

updated and corrected licence, replaced with .PNG: Image:Renesansa-skladatelji.PNG. This image is to delete, after changing links. User:Ziga 22:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom and because I have changed all the remaining links, now that CheckUsage is working again. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. (→O - R L Y?) 18:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Provincias Unidas de Sud América -1816.png

duplicated image with Image:Provincias Unidas de Sud América -1816 (provincias).png --Roblespepe 06:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Other image doesn't seem to exist? Deadstar 15:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

It was deleted for missing license information. --ALE! ¿…? 15:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

closed --ALE! ¿…? 12:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Slovakia Liptov 800px.gif

obsolete - replaced with Image:Slovakia_Liptov.jpg and not used on any wikiproject. 4 June 2006 User:PM

kept, replacing image not found --ALE! ¿…? 18:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RepublicFleet1.jpg

Derivative work. 17 May 2007 User:Raffaello9

Deleted. Samulili 08:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SantaClaraCountyFlag.gif

Santa Clara County is not a state 14 June 2007 User:68.100.255.31

Comment I assume this refers to the fact that the license on it states "This image is a U.S. state, federal district, or insular area flag. Such flags are in the public domain." Deadstar 08:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Interesting claim. I notice that there is no source for this rather bold statement, neither here nor at Template talk:PD-US-flag. Lupo 10:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 08:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sculeni jud Iasi.png

The commune has changed name and the old map showing this is outdated. The same file exist now here: Image:Victoria jud Iasi.png and its name stands for the correct name of the new commune, although the images are identical. Any use of this file must be corrected. 23 June 2007 User:Radufan

Renamed to Image:Image-Victoria jud Iasi, old.png. Althought the information is not current anymore, the image can still be used for historic purposes. Samulili 08:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Shinkoro02 1920.jpg

redundant to Image:Shinkoro03s2240.jpg. It is a wish from a contributor. 22 October 2006, User:663highland

Keep I prefer this one over the other version. If anything, I vote to delete the other one. Deadstar 11:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. I agree with Deadstar. Samulili 08:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Smartklein2.JPG

can be deleted. 8 August 2006 User:Michiel1972

Delete Don't see the point in keeping. Original text on the image refers to maps, not a picture of a car. Deadstar 12:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Pretty unusable. Samulili 07:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SimplexPolish 2.png

Ugly Version --User:Philipendula 20:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment File doesn't open for me. Deadstar 12:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

File has been substituted by [11] --Philipendula 09:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't work. Replaced. Samulili 07:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SimplxProblem 1.jpg

Ugly Version --User:Philipendula 20:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

File has been substituted by [[12]] --Philipendula 09:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Replaced with a superior one. Samulili 07:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Slovakia Hont 800px.jpg

obsolete - replaced with Image:Slovakia_Hont.jpg and not used on any wikiproject. 4 June 2006 User:PM

Deleted. Smaller duplicate. Samulili 12:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Slovakia Komarno 800px.jpg

obsolete - replaced with Image:Slovakia_Komarno.jpg and not used on any wikiproject. 4 June 2006 User:PM

Keep - This "obsolete" picture is of higher quality than Image:Slovakia_Komarno.jpg. If one looks closely at both pictures, specifically the thin lines and the text, JPEG compression artifacts can be seen in Image:Slovakia_Komarno.jpg. They show up as blurry lines and text. Therefore this image should be kept and, rather, Image:Slovakia_Komarno.jpg should be deleted.

Deleted. One can read the text better in the bigger one and the bigger is preferred by projects. Samulili 12:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Popeneedle.jpg

Unfree image of unfree, recent artwork. Seidenstud 13:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete image is on display in California, no FOP in USA. http://www.mjt.org/exhibits/hagop/pope.html -N 23:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 12:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Butterfly.flowers.jpg

Unfree image of unfree, recent artwork. Seidenstud 13:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 12:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Praha, Střížkov, stavba metra II.JPG

too gray. 8 August 2006 User:Aktron (From user's talkpage:) Yes, this image should be deleted. I have uploaded some better of the construction site, so this one is not nescessary :-) --User:Aktron 07:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. It is quite gray but usable. And other images of the metro station aren't from the same angle (even about). Samulili 12:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Premio torrijos.png

No NPOV. 06:20, 29 October 2006 User:Arturus

Deleted. Personal "barnstars" are ok but then they should be used by projects. Samulili 12:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Psi original.svg

Image:Psi.gif needs exporting to svg format. 17 February 2007 User:Niki K

Kept. Good SVG. Samulili 12:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:QichunCountyMap2.jpg

This map copyright by map publishing house , not by Chinese Government--Shizhao 15:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. With the information given, it does not seem plausible that this image may be used freely. Samulili 12:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Red flag waving transparent rev.png

author. file did not upload properly. 23 October 2006 User:The Ministry of Truth

Comment "author" probably means it's the author requesting, and I don't see a properly uploaded version of this file by this user. Deadstar 15:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Seems to work ok, although of low quality. Samulili 12:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fajka_budowa.png

Based on Image:Pipe2.jpg which was deleted for being in category Sxc-warning; no permission Lokal _Profil 15:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The uploader has now replaced the image with a new version so this Deletion requests is no longer relevant (except if someone wants to delete the unfree "02:25, 8 May 2007"-version of the file./Lokal _Profil 16:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept new, deleted old. Samulili 12:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Apolloniuscircle.gif

Probably copyright violation, taken from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ApolloniusCircle.html --Fvlamoen 20:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Ineligible for copyright, based on mathematical formulas with only black and white colouring. Samulili 12:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reichswappen Deutsches Reich 1871.jpg

Redundant: See: de:Liste der Wappen deutscher Länder. 21:46, 23 April 2006 User:N3MO

"redundant" is a bad reason for deletion. Can you specify a little bit more, why this image should be deleted? --ALE! ¿…? 08:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reichsadler 1888-1918.jpg

Correct and better Versions of the German Reichsadler 1888-1918 are available which make this file obsolete. --David Liuzzo 01:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zadar (grb).gif

No source, obvious copyright violation - source: FOTW (uploaded from hr:wiki)–Suradnik13 16:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 08:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MylaporeKapaleeshwararTemple.jpg

the summary says that a certain G V Balasubramanya snapped the photograph. But there is no evidence to suggest that the photographer has released the rights to his work --Sarvagnya 17:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The image has been sourced to Flickr. It would be helpful if you could contact uploaders about doubts such as these before making deletion requests. --Ranveig 09:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep From Flickr, has passed Flickr review. No reason at all to delete -- Arvind 00:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Prinsipp armering.jpg

A failure in the text, i am going to replace it, if that is ok? 19:21, 14 May 2007 User:AnneHu

Delete other image is Image:Prinsipp armering2.jpg Deadstar 14:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 4

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Titanic grand staircase.gif

There is no proper source nor evidence that this was created by the US government. RockMFR 22:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by JeremyA: source given as en.wikipedia--however image was deleted on en for lacking a source

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Telenorte.jpg

Baja Calidad de Imagen, no se sabe el copyright y viola la politica de licencias. 28 June 2007 User:200.28.209.142

Deleted by Siebrand: cv

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Schmitt (Eifel).png

Was used in de:Schmitt (Eifel). Replaced by a template. Not needed any more. --TM 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Notschrei: deprecated, unused

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chicago_sears_Tower_blurred_@_dusk.jpg

Out of focus. Of limited use for Wikimedia projects and therefore outwith the Commons:Project scope. JeremyA 22:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete away. IvoShandor 13:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution and is out of focus. --Digon3 ^talk 14:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted —JeremyA 15:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soapykins2.jpg

useless picture. 18 October 2006 User:Pitert

Delete Also no license or source information. Deadstar 08:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

no license --ALE! ¿…? 19:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lucky-luke-3-gr.jpg

No freedom of panorama for art in Belgium (see Freedom_of_panorama#Belgium) Michiel1972 19:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg

cause Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti.jpg 16 April 2006 User:Kelson

Deleted by ALE!: duplicate or a scaled down version of Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soapykins.jpg

useless picture. 18 October 2006 User:Pitert

Delete Also no license or source information. Deadstar 08:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: out of scope

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Oklahoma State Highway 68.svg

Shield for a highway that doesn't exist. (68 is not currently assigned to a highway in Oklahoma.) —Scott5114 ↗ 12:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: no such highway

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Nagasaki

Image:Vue de Nagasaki1.jpg Image:Vue de Nagasaki depuis Glove Garden.jpg

The two images have User:GrahamHill (probably Graham Hill) as the licensor but Thomas Courtonne as the author. In addition, the images are scanned. So there is either a problem with license or permission or both and these problems should be fixed. Samulili 08:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no permission --Polarlys 16:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SolarCell-EquivalentCircuit2.PNG

bad diode symbol, new file at Image:SolarCell-EquivalentCircuit3.PNG. 16 April 2006 User:S-kei

deleted per nom. NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 23:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Longuyan

The correct spelling is Longuyon. Longuyan does not exist (proper sub-category Longuyon created).

deleted, --Polarlys 16:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bertrand Meyer.jpg

This edit tells us that Bertrand Meyer does not want his image on the wiki. ("Removed picture. This is a gross violation of privacy and I do NOT want my picture published. Please delete the image itself -- don't know how to do this.") Deadstar 09:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Meyer hold a speech on the public, free entry event Wikipedia Day 2006. He is a person of public interest and therefore has an entry on Wikipedia. Given those two facts I see no reason why this photograph would be illegal or against our own rules. There are many other photos with Mr. Meyer on this event Category:Wikipedia Day 2006 --Ikiwaner 18:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep, person of public interest. --Kjetil r 18:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, I agree to Ikiwaners argumentation. Nevertheless “Bertrand Meyer and Wikipedia ” is a sad story about the shady sides of our project. --Polarlys 16:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Addendum: I wrote a nice letter to Mr. Meyer and proposed to replace this image by a better one. I got no reply for the last four days. --Ikiwaner 18:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I keep being appalled by the lack of respect for privacy in this medium. I would never dream of putting up the picture of someone who doesn't want it. Bertrand Meyer

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:St Jordi's cake.png

Very big image, there a jpg version (Image:St Jordi's cake.jpg) 24 April 2007, User:Pedroserafin

Delete The file is redundant through a better image but with a different (better) file format. Nominater is also the uploader. --Digon3 ^talk 17:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Leichter_Kreuzer_Miguel_de_Cervantes_in_El_Ferrol_-_1943.jpg

Image is allgedly created in 1943 by the uploader. That would make him at least about 75 years old (64+11 when he created the image) *and* able to fill out all image requirements in a first upload. I'm having a hard time accepting that. Siebrand 10:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe he is an heir to this photo, but that will have to be proven. I doubt his name is really 'karl doenitz'. Madmax32 12:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Image from http://www.wlb-stuttgart.de/seekrieg/43-05.htm , furthermore after 'Image deletion warning' on Commons (10:46, 4 July 2007) a user called Karl A. Dönitz (created 16:26, 5 July 2007) upload the same image (16:29, 5 July 2007) in the English Wikimedia with the name en:Image:El_Miguel_de_Cervantes_en_Ferrol_1943.jpg to circumvent deletion request here. --Prevert^(talk) 22:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sundiata+Tellem+C-Span.jpg

blatant copyvio. 18 April 2006 User:Jkelly

Looks like TV screenshot. Deadstar 11:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio --Polarlys 16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Super yuki 2005 open.JPG

obvious 28 April 2006 User:Geofrog

Delete Blurry picture of what (according to the text) is a supermarket. Out of scope as will not be used. Deadstar 11:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Swedish Measuring Spoon Set.png

Replaced by another version. 12 April 2006 User:Maggu

Delete The image is redundant through a better file format and has low image quality and resolution. User nominating is also the uploader. --Digon3 ^talk 17:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SwoopBike1.jpg

Derivative work. 17 May 2007 User:Raffaello9

User nominating is also uploader. Deadstar 11:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SwoopBike2.jpg

Derivative work. 17 May 2007 User:Raffaello9

User nominating is also uploader. Deadstar 11:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Xbox 360 white background.jpg

The image Image:Xbox 360 white background 2.jpg is better. ~ bayo or talk 12:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

(Old incomplete deletion request) --ALE! ¿…? 11:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

marked as duplicate for project wide replacement --Polarlys 16:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Technosphere1.jpg

I meant to upload this to Wikipedia, not the commons. Woops! 12 June 2006 User:Rkitko

No license on the file. Deadstar 14:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Definitely delete. Sorry, I had forgotten about this. No license because it would have to be fair use and I had uploaded it to Commons by accident before I really knew what I was doing. Thanks for fixing the deletion request! Cheers, --Rkitko 18:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, fair use--Polarlys 16:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Template-Information.png

This uploading was an error and is now replaced by Image:Info.png. Please delete it. 29 April 2006 User:Roger McLassus

deleted, --Polarlys 16:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Terceira Perimetral-Porto Alegre.jpg

Copyrighted image mistakenly uploaded. 16 January 2007 User:Rhcastilhos

Have left message with user requesting where it is from. Deadstar 14:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soireerallye.jpg

Useless image. Out of project scope. Siebrand 14:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Uvsq2.gif

Tiny little image. Useless. Siebrand 15:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 17:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Uvsq4.jpg

Tiny little image. Useless. Siebrand 15:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 17:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Uvsq.jpg

Tiny little image. Useless. Siebrand 15:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 17:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mysterious_axman.gif

Claims a PD-old type license without any dating. Siebrand 15:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

This is 1919 US sheet music. I am adding that information to the image page. Keep. -- Infrogmation 02:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --Polarlys 16:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Thatsgold.JPG

Extremely small image. Requested a larger version and more info. Siebrand 15:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Depeche_Mode_-_Touring_The_Angel_-_Praga_-_23.01.06_-_054_-_RD.jpg

not clear what the license and/or source are (→zel zany - framed) 18:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

strange, source are very cleare ==> http://www.dmpoznan.terramail.pl/ and licence is to choice by user 'couse author said: GFDL or CC-BY-2.0 - it's hard to understand??? Joymaster (81.190.7.243 20:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC))

deleted, no permission --Polarlys 16:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Escudo_de_Tabasco.jpeg

FOTW copyright license is non-commersial Lokal _Profil 19:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mariah Teleton Mexico.jpg

The image has an unclear copyright status - the link provided ([13]) suggests that Univision Online is the copyright holder - and the uploader, L&D (talk • contribs), has previously uploaded images with inaccurate copyright information on the English Wikipedia ([14]) --Extraordinary Machine 20:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio --Polarlys 16:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cool_Globe_Chicago_Skyline.JPG

This photo is derivative work of a copyrighted sculpture. Such sculptures are not covered by freedom of panorama laws in the US JeremyA 22:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Please explain more about this to a novice user. If the artwork is mounted in public, and part of a public exhibition, then how can photographs taken of it be not be free use. Does the local newspaper have to receive permission to publish a photo? This photo was taken to illustrate the cool globes page on Wikipedia. How could an article about cool globes ever be illustrated by a photo with this restriction? Would this restriction still be in place if more than one globe was in a photo?--I'm nonpartisan 03:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

In many countries, including the US, copyright law covers artworks in public space. You can take pictures, but you cannot publish them. Please read Commons:Freedom of panorama to know more. You might consider using your pictures as Fair Use and upload them on the English-speaking Wikipedia, which allows Fair Use. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Just to expand a little of what Jastrow said. Publication of a photo like this to illustrate a news story would be considered fair use under US copyright law. Likewise the English Wikipedia (and some others) allow the publication of unlicensed copyrighted content under the fair use provisions. However, the images on the commons must be either free from copyright or freely licensed by the copyright holder. In the case of a photograph like this there is more than one copyright holder to consider. You, as the photographer, have agreed to freely license your photograph. But the owner of the copyright of the globe has not agreed to freely licence reproductions of his/her artwork.

Most countries have a provision in copyright law that allows publication of photographs taken in public spaces that include, for example, buildings whose design is copyrighted; and in some countries these laws extend to artworks that are permanently installed in public spaces. However, in the US artworks are not included in these 'freedom of panorama' laws and so artworks that are publicly exhibited are treated exactly the same as those that are privately exhibited.

To see an example of how a Wikipedia article on a sculpture can be illustrate using 'fair use' images see the article w:Spindle (sculpture) that I started working on a few days ago. I have included in this article a photograph that I took, but which I have published under a claim of fair use (click on the image to see the fair use claim). —JeremyA 18:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, as per JeremyA--Polarlys 16:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Takamatsuzuka tomb mural.gif

.gif image duplicate of Image:Takamatsuzuka tomb mural.jpg. 5 May 2007 User:MChew

Deleted. JPG is better in this case. Samulili 10:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Starkbierfest Nockherberg Munich 2006ArM.jpg.jpg

Fehler im Bildtitel. 28 June 2006 User:ArtMechanic

Red cross has been saved over image. Deadstar 10:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (badly named)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soldaten rote armee.jpg

(no reason given) 26 April 2006 User:217.88.144.83

Deletion request was put on in April last year without mention of reason, after that license etc. was added (perhaps that was the issue). The deletion request was never taken off the image. Can an admin check licensing etc. and decide. Thanks. Deadstar 08:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept; no real reason for deletion, licensing is legit. (→O - R L Y?) 21:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Terraconensis SPQR.png

please see the new Image:Tarraconensis SPQR.png. 19 June 2007 User:ThomasPusch

Matt314 (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Terraconensis SPQR.png" (fixed version at Image:Tarraconensis SPQR.png)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Haliaeetus_leucocephalus_landing_on_nest.jpg

When I went to add it to the Haliaeetus leucocephalus page, I discovered another copy of the image already there. Somehow I missed it the first time I checked! MeegsC 18:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Haliaeetus leucocephalus2.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SouthIsland rrMap.svg

Obsolete. Temporarily replaced by File:SouthIsland rrMap wip.svg, will eventually be replaced by a final version, with this filename (which is why it's important to remove this image). 5 November 2006 User:Manu3d

I can not see a use for this image, but the announced image that should replace this one, was never uploaded. What do we do with this then? --ALE! ¿…? 08:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Out of project scope. --Siebrand 13:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stava2.jpg

This image is public domain in Italy, but in other countries it might be considered differently. Please verify if italian public domain is compliant with your country's law before using it. However, this image cannot be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. (22 May 2007 User:84.222.78.152)

No source for image (besides en: wiki) Deadstar 10:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Unsourced. --Siebrand 13:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stickstoffumwandlung im Aqu.svg

It's not longer used by me, or any article. It has been replaced through a better one. User:Metoc

Kept. Please use duplicate or superseded, as we now do not know which image you are referring to. --Siebrand 13:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Scilla bifolia R0015596.JPG

wrong identification. Near identical to Image:Scilla siehei R0015598.JPG. Please delete Image:Scilla bifolia R0015596.JPG. 1 April 2006 User:TeunSpaans

tagged with {{rename image|Scilla siehei R0015596.JPG}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TGFBPathwaystep1.svg

(no reason given) 26 June 2006 User:GAThrawn22

File doesn't open for me. Deadstar 11:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. File does work, just isn't rendered. Maybe someone could correct it. No reason for deletion. --Siebrand 13:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tabernacolo Orcagna.JPG

a new version of this file has been uploaded (Image:Tabernacolo Orcagna2.JPG) 12 May 2006 User:Sailko

Other file is brightened version of this one. Deadstar 14:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has been replaced by a better version. --Digon3 ^talk 14:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. dupe of Image:Tabernacolo Orcagna2.JPG --Siebrand 13:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Taisanji08s2048.jpg

It is a wish from a contributor. Redundant, Image:Taisanji08s3200.jpg. 8 November 2006 User:663highland

Keep Same building, different day? Deadstar 14:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. No reason for deletion. --Siebrand 13:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TartanClanMacAulay.png

This image was based on Image:TartanClanMacAulay.gif, which has been deleted for copyright reasons, see here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Asta#Image_Tagging_Image:TartanClanMacAulay.gif, so i think this image should be deleted just in case. 23 June 2007 User:Celtus

kept, this image is only based on the deleted image. It is presumingly a totaly own work. --ALE! ¿…? 09:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Teatrodominguinhos2.jpg

I uploaded this image, I don't want to use this anymore and incomplete information. 22 June 2007 User:St0rM347

no reason for deletin --ALE! ¿…? 10:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Telemann-Seal.jpg

I had uploaded this image at a time when I didn't know that taking a picture of a three-dimensional work creates a copyright. I don't have the permission from the copyright owner, so this is a copyright violation. --User:Phrood 07:20, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 10:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Termosiphon.png

Replaced By Image:Thermosiphon.png -- RainerBi 18:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 10:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 5

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Shoreditch_roundel_6-6-06.jpg

gyg 82.16.7.63 00:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm confused, what does 'gyg' mean? BillyH 14:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept No valid criteria (or any criteria for that matter) for deletion was given. -- Cat ^chi? 21:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The Eiffel tower, Paris, 4 août 2006.JPG

violation of the © User:Gnagnael 23:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted. Strange as this may sound night photos of the Eiffel tower is indeed copyrighted as per French copyright and court case on the matter. -- Cat ^chi? 21:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lautrec_the_english_girl_from_the_'star'_at_le_havre_1899.jpg

Lower-quality version of Image:Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec 053.jpg grendel|khan 20:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted /duplicate/ please use speedy delete for duplicate. Petrusbarbygere 23:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Carfireterro.jpg

it is an ITN screenshot deleted from english wikipedia for failing fair use requirements Madmax32 10:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Polarlys (9 July 2007 18:51). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Timbre type.jpg

It's ugly !--Pseudomoi 21:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Ugly is a bit POV, I just doubt if it's useful. Deadstar 08:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

delete it isn't use. --

Pseudomoi (to chat on WP) 08:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not relevant for deletion. --FSHL 11:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted (out of scope), --ALE! ¿…? 22:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Torre Europa2.pav.jpg

está horizontal. 11 September 2006 User:Pavlemadrid commons

Delete Rotated image is Image:Torre Europa2..pav.jpg Deadstar 09:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 22:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Series of an ejaculating penis.JPG

Widerlich und in keiner Weise lehrreich. 84.57.110.158 18:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC) --84.57.110.158 18:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not relevant for deletion. --FSHL 10:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
delete this—the preceding unsigned comment is by 71.55.201.169 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 9 July 2007 (CET)
Keep - No reason to delete. Image is in right category and there are no better ones yet. Mathy38 09:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --ALE! ¿…? 22:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Img 0917.jpg

I forgot to change the filename. Reuploaded the file as Image:Taunus-Grosser_Feldberg.jpg. --Warden 17:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Wrong file name. Please use {{badname}} for images uploaded by you that have a bad file name for next time. --Digon3 ^talk 14:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 22:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:WayneLA2007.jpg

Derivative work. I don't believe the statue itself is CC licensed. William Avery 07:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Assuming it was taken at the Staples Center in Downtown Los Angeles, then for the USA for artworks, even if it is permanently installed in public places, any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork. --Digon3 ^talk 00:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a {{derivative}} work. --|EPO| ^da: 14:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Times new roman.png

obsolete: Image:Times New Roman sample.svg. 30 April 2006 User:Atanamir

I believe requests like yours are suspended, see Commons talk:Deletion requests/Superseded. Please tag the image {{SupersededSVG}}. --Digon3 ^talk 14:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep as per above; closing. --|EPO| ^da: 14:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Morison.svg

that was not, what i expected Drahreg01 19:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Corrupted svg, deletion requested by the uploader. --Digon3 ^talk 14:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:John Prichard.jpg

wrong name; duplicate –Kaihsu Tai 22:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

please use {{duplicate|Image:NEW FILE NAME}} --ALE! ¿…? 22:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted - but please use correct template next time. --|EPO| ^da: 14:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Image-Barbara Jeppe00.jpg

The license tag asserts GFDL but the work is attributed to someone else. There's no evidence that the creator has licensed this work. Butseriouslyfolks 20:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete unlikely GFDL. Wooyi 17:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 20:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HorseBot.png

This is not a federal work but a state work and therefore not pd-US. Speedy delete, I am the uploader and it was my a mistaken understanding of the US work-of-govt clause. --Shyamal 10:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Polarlys: no federal work

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Castro Pretorio - teatro d Opera facciata piacentini 1010030.JPG

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --G.dallorto 18:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete Of course and unluckily. --Lucas 20:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:La Sapienza - rettorato 2083-4-5st.JPG

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". Ditto for the statue by Arturo Martini. --G.dallorto 18:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete Of course and unluckily. --Lucas 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Museo Nazionale Reggio Calabria.jpg

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --User:G.dallorto 21:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reggio calabria piazza indipendenza e museo nazionale della magna grecia.jpg

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --User:G.dallorto 21:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete Of course and unluckily. --Lucas 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma teatro opera.jpg

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --G.dallorto 18:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete Of course and unluckily. --Lucas 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma-Università la sapienza01.jpg

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --G.dallorto 18:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete Of course and unluckily. --Lucas 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Q10 - stazione Ostiense cavalli marini 1000528p.JPG

Delete 1957 work, may not still be in the PD (at least 70 years from creation). No FOP in Italy --User:G.dallorto 21:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Borgo - monumento a santa Caterina di Francesco Messina 1876.JPG

Messina died in 1995. No FOP in Italy. --User:G.dallorto 21:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma - Palazzo Civiltà Lavoro01.JPG

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --User:G.dallorto 21:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma - Palazzo Civiltà Lavoro02.JPG

The monument is after a plan by Marcello Piacentini. Since Piacentini died in 1960, his works will not be in the public domain until 2030. Italy has no "freedom of Panorama". --User:G.dallorto 21:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete : no FOP in Italy. Many content of Category:Italian architects not in the Public Domain yet should be deleted as well. Petrusbarbygere 17:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Milano - Piazza Cadorna images

Merged requests:

Nominated by G.dallorto:

Nominated by 87.0.123.15:

Image:IMG 7503 - MI - Stazione Cadorna FN - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto 31-Mar-2007.jpg kept The architecture is not the main subject of the image. --ALE! ¿…? 08:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:IMG 6470 - Milano - Stazione Nord Cadorna - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto - 3-March-2007.jpg kept The architecture is not the main subject of the image.

[edit] Comments

[edit] Images nominated by G.dallorto

Gae Aulenti is a living architect, and FOP does not apply to Italy. --User:G.dallorto 13:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm the author of many of the pictures, and I changed the request into copyviol today (more appropriate, given the case). --User:G.dallorto 15:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images nominated by 87.0.123.15

Gae Aulenti is a living architect, and FOP does not apply to Italy. --87.0.123.15 14:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Although I agree the Cadorna station should go, after Ms Aulenti revamped it, and although I self-nominated scores of pix of mine for deletion, I doubt this particular pic represents a detail that could pass the "threshold of originality" test. This is just an arrival hall, not build by Ms. Aulenti. Of course it's just a piece of my mind. --User:G.dallorto 15:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment To be sincere, I'm not really sure about that... But you could be right indeed (BTW, the IP was mine). --Lucas 19:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

done (the "IP" images were kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Triangle Factory fire 002.jpg

not really in PD. 1 July 2007 User:Chanueting

but out of copyright in the US due to age (March 15, 1911)-- Chris 73 15:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

It seems to me that there's no firm evidence of who the original copyright holder was, or that this picture has ever been formally published with the copyright holder's consent. William Avery 10:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep likely published before 1923, looks like stock photography/news agency photos. Madmax32 03:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete As I've mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Triangle Factory fire, the images under that category with the link marked with "Source" (in http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/m_r/pinsky/triangle.htm ) are actually from http://newdeal.feri.org/ , and are free to use non-commercially only (request for permission is required for any commercial uses. See here for the file Image:Triangle Factory fire 002.jpg.). So, no, the image isn't in PD. --Moonian 15:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

But they don't own the copyright on that image, they say it is from the FDR library, which is a public domain library, besides it was taken in 1911 by a stock photo agency (Brown Brothers founded in 1904 and still exists) and since it was published before 1923 it is public domain. Madmax32 00:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Anyways, we need a firm source to prove that this is a PD image (to be put in the image description page), no matter it really is PD or not. But, unfortunately, I'm unable to find the image out from the Library or the Brown Brothers websites. --Moonian 12:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Samulili: Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Triangle Factory fire

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Test arabe2.png

Copie d'écran d'un mot arabe erroné. 16 February 2006 by User:Ske. user:66.131.194.120 noted "incorrect render of the arabic text" on 15 April 2006.

Fixed deletion request Deadstar 07:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, it's test--OsamaK 21:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, the image is in use --ALE! ¿…? 14:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Test arabe4.png

15 April 2006 User:66.131.194.120 incorrect render of the arabic text

Fixed deletion request Deadstar 07:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, it's test--OsamaK 21:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, the image is in use --ALE! ¿…? 14:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The german language since 1945.PNG

This file classifies Dutch as part of the German language, eventhough it is older than German and has had a standard form for nearly 400 years.It also givesn a false view of the German speakers in eastern Europe making them seem more numerous and dominant that they ever were in reality. 8 August 2006 User:Rex Germanus

Karte wurde durch eine andere ersetzt. Map was replaced by another. Postmann Michael 03:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Fixed deletion request. Deadstar 08:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I would like to add that the map has nonexistant sources. It says it bases itself on a NATIONAL census in the German Empire, yet shows vast amounts of areas oudside Germany. This map cannot be accounted for. Delete.Rex 08:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 14:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tokyo mizube cruising line01 1024.jpg

It is a wish from a contributor. Quality of image is inferior. Redundant---Image:Sumida river03s3200.jpg -- 24 April 2007 User:663highland

Comment The other image is not a duplicate. Deadstar 08:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep The other image is not a duplicate and therefore not valid reason for deletion. --Digon3 ^talk 14:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept: Low quality is no reason for deletion, also the image is not a duplicate. --GeorgHH 19:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tokyo mizube cruising line02 1920.jpg

It is a wish from a contributor. Quality of image is inferior. Redundant---Image:Sumida river03s3200.jpg. 24 April 2007 User:663highland

Keep The other image is not a duplicate at all and therefore not valid reason for deletion.

Kept: Low quality is no reason for deletion, also the image is not a duplicate. --GeorgHH 19:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tony Stewart IndyCar.jpg

Uploaded the wrong file, wanted a cropped version that has now since been uploaded. (Image:Tony Stewart IndyCar Crop.jpg). 3 July 2007 User:The359

Delete The file is redundant through a better but not identical one. --Digon3 ^talk 17:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete As mentioned above, also to remove the people's faces from the photo. Royalbroil 16:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 07:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:A coruna torre de hercules sunset.jpg

this version is tilted. I have fixed it, the better version became "quality image". See Image:A coruna torre de hercules sunset edit.jpg --Alessio Damato 15:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The image is redundant through a better but not identical one. --Digon3 ^talk 14:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept (no need to delete the original) --ALE! ¿…? 09:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Torre Espacio7.jpg

el fichero ya existe con un nombre distinto. 12 September 2006 User:Pavlemadrid commons

Comment I can't find a duplicate image. User does not speak English, perhaps someone can leave a comment in Spanish requesting the name of the other file? Thanks. Deadstar 09:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Español: Traducción del comentario anterior de Deadstar: No encuentro la imagen duplicada (la otra versión de la misma imagen)

--Pere prlpz 13:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, I can not find the duplicate --ALE! ¿…? 13:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tågetöverbält.jpg

24 August 2006 User:Frederico erase this picture! It does allredy exist but a much better one! 24 August 2006 User:EugeneZelenko delete: uploader request

Fix request Deadstar 12:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Can you provide the other image's filename? --ALE! ¿…? 09:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

kept, but tagged with {{superseded}} --ALE! ¿…? 13:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Torre Espacio7.jpg

el fichero ya existe con un nombre distinto. 12 September 2006 User:Pavlemadrid commons

Comment I can't find a duplicate image. User does not speak English, perhaps someone can leave a comment in Spanish requesting the name of the other file? Thanks. Deadstar 09:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Español: Traducción del comentario anterior de Deadstar: No encuentro la imagen duplicada (la otra versión de la misma imagen)

--Pere prlpz 13:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, I can not find the duplicate --ALE! ¿…? 13:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tågetöverbält.jpg

24 August 2006 User:Frederico erase this picture! It does allredy exist but a much better one! 24 August 2006 User:EugeneZelenko delete: uploader request

Fix request Deadstar 12:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Can you provide the other image's filename? --ALE! ¿…? 09:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

kept, but tagged with {{superseded}} --ALE! ¿…? 13:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images uploaded by Bonjour Quebec (talk • contribs)

The user above has uploaded several pictures taken from www.bonjourquebec.com under a {{GFDL}} license. As far as I could check the source has not released its pictures under the informed license (http://www.bonjourquebec.com/qc-fr/creditsphotos.html). Dantadd✉ 15:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Permission has been logged under the OTRS system. The user has permission to upload these photos under whatever license she wishes. Although she has uploaded the pictures under the GFDL, I advised her that Creative Commons was better for pictures, so she will be changing the license.--Shanel 21:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

The OTRS ticket number is 2007071710012519. --Gribeco 02:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

seems to be solved --ALE! ¿…? 07:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Transylvania.png

Map is missleading. The area is stretched over the region of Banat which is not part of Transylvania. Either correct it or delete it. (From the talkpage: This is a false map as it includes the Banat region, which is quite a distinct region. This is part of the Cluj current of thought, which, for political goals, insists that Transylvania includes Banat as well. This current of thought is not recognised as such, especially in Banat, where there is opposition and rage at the continous bias. The regions are both distinct and have had quite a distinct history. There is no scientific ground on which one can allege that Banat is part of Transylvania. To source this statement, it is enough to read the articles about the two. --User:Radufan 14:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Fixed request Deadstar 12:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep map is widely used, plus this is disputed whether it is or not, comments on w:Talk:Transylvania --Astrokey44 15:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

image kept, no copyright issue --ALE! ¿…? 08:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Poitou-Esel Sam.jpg

reason: photo is not needed any more --Holger (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Kept, no reason for deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 12:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] File:Poitou-Esel Sam.jpg

(copyright law, I saw the photo outside Wikipedia /Wikimedia without my permission) --Holger (talk) 11:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Kept. An image released under a free licence can be used by anyone as long as they comply with the terms of the licence. If someone hasn't then it is an issue for the photographer to take up with that individual/organisation. Adambro (talk) 12:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tomir2.jpg

ATENCIÓ: en realitat és el Puig Roig! It is a wrong image. I've uploaded it by error. 07:05, 21 April 2006 User:Paucabot

Comment Image was uploaded on 19th April, and put up for deletion on the same day. On 20 April 2006 User:Socay loaded another picture over the original one (2048×1536 (768,217 bytes) (El Tomir. Escorca. Mallorca.)) - the final edit to the deletion request was on the 21st, but it might actually refer to the previous image. Deadstar 08:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Neither image versions had any copyright information since July in any case. -- Infrogmation 18:36, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tommaso Villa iii.jpg

No reason (author, date of publication) given for its being in the PD. Camera.it does not publish under free lincense, nor gave the requested authorisation do use its images in Wikipedia (please see for this: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni_non_ottenute#Camera.it ). 15 May 2007 User:G.dallorto

(Fixed request. Deadstar 08:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC))

Deleted / Fred J 21:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tommaso Villa iii.jpg

No reason (author, date of publication) given for its being in the PD. Camera.it does not publish under free lincense, nor gave the requested authorisation do use its images in Wikipedia (please see for this: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni_non_ottenute#Camera.it ). 15 May 2007 User:G.dallorto

(Fixed request. Deadstar 08:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC))

Deleted / Fred J 21:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 6

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Am I Not A Man and a Brother

This category is badly named and is not used. I just created it and noticed the error in the naming. --84.20.17.84 10:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Jastrow: renamed Category:Am I Not a Man and a Brother

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wappen VG-Kirchen.jpg

see: Image:Wappen_vgkirchen.gif 12 May 2006 User:Rp.

kept, no reason for deletion --ALE! ¿…? 15:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vielfliegerkarten.Selektion.JPG

Image:Vielfliegerkarten.Selektion-whiteout.JPG is not a duplicate but similar. This picture needs to be deleted because numbers are displayed which may lead to some misuse. Mattes 05:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wartbergturm.jpg

Copyrightvermerk auf dem Bild!!! --User:kandschwar 15:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: copyvio

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wiki-de-testing.png

I don't need it anymore. Thanks.4 September 2006 User:Baumanns

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wiki-es.png

Unused. 24 October 2006 User:Esnou

Keep Not being used in any project is not a valid reason for deletion. --Digon3 ^talk 17:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:WikiProjektShqip.png

error when testing. 6 November 2006 User:Shqiptari

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikinewsspecialreport.PNG

Requested by user. 18 April 2007 User:Thunderhead

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Written range english horn.jpg

JPG is not suitable for this picture, correct version at Image:Written range english horn.png. 7 June 2006 User:PeteCS

Use {{SupersededPNG}} for next time. --Digon3 ^talk 17:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wst-logo-klein.gif

upload of .gif instead of .png file. 2 May 2006 User:Wst.wiki

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zeitprofil.png

this image has never been used and is no longer needed. please delete. thank you. —User:Markus Mueller 17:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as requested

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vanessa cardui - Unterseite.jpg

There is a better one now here: Image:Vanessa cardui Eupatorium.jpg 30 July 2006 User:Hsuepfle

Keep Beautiful shot, not a duplicate, see no reason to delete. Deadstar 10:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree to Deadstar --FSHL 11:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --ALE! ¿…? 21:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ventspils.gif

We don't know, why these images should be PD. -- Breeze 11:54, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Source for supporting PD claim was not specified. --EugeneZelenko 15:31, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Kochira Katsushika-ku Kameari koenmae HaShutsujo

このギャラリーを作成した者ですが、タイトルミスがあった為、本人依頼として即時削除をお願いします。special rapid(会話/talk/対話項/履歴/history/ja/en/zh) 10:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment　ここの「{{bad name}} －不適切なファイル名」の部分をお読みになり、ご自身で即時削除依頼を出せばいいかと思います。--KENPEI 12:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

{{commnet}}{{db}}と入力した結果template:deleteが出てくるモンでコモンズには即時削除が無いのと思い、ここへ依頼しました。ご指摘ありがとうございました。テンプレートを貼り替えて置きます。special rapid(会話/talk/対話項/履歴/history/ja/en/zh) 05:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Herbythyme: content was: '{{speedydelete|Page has wrong name. Correct name at Kochira Katsushika-ku Kameari koenmae Hashutsujo. Deadstar 09:13, 11 July 20...'

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vanhankaupunginlahti.jpg

Sorry I uploaded the wrong picture. Delete this one, please. 1 July 2006 User:Oulal

Delete User uploaded picture by mistake. --Digon3 ^talk 14:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: per uploader request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:David von Michelangelo1.jpg

Work of a notorious vandal on the Polish wikipedia. It uses an outlawed Nazi symbol and equates the Nazis with Polish Police. Al-Bargit 20:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete not on nazi symbol grounds as Poland's banning of the image is not relevant to Commons but on COM:SCOPE grounds. -N 02:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Outside of scope. —Benn Newman 21:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wwwwwwww.jpg

Looks like a case of license laundrying using Flickr. The photo looks suspiciously from some website. PatríciaR ^msg 22:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Its a photograph of a rock band, and very low resolution, and bad filename. Pretty sure its license laundrying. --Digon3 ^talk 16:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Darna.jpg

Picture has very low quality, probably not useful to any Wikimedia project or other educational purpose. --Samulili 08:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 14:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete per above, no use. Wooyi 17:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 20:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Odd-nordstoga.jpg

Derivative work. See the photo here --Kjetil r 09:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Besides being a derivative of a photo with an unclear copyright status, it also has a low image quality and resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 00:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 20:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sea22.jpg

PD-ineligible claimed, but that's clearly inapplicable. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 20:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Arif_solak_HanabatCaravanserai.jpg

not clear what the source was originally, licensing also seems unclear (→zel zany - framed) 02:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Pls take a minute and observe the picture page in wiki EN at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Arif_solak_HanabatCaravanserai.jpg

I'll appreciate it if you guide me about this as I see nothing wrong with original licensing. Cheers, Ori

Sending the permission to OTRS would make the matter more clear. Samulili 12:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, please provide a written permission to OTRS --Polarlys 00:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:US flag 50 stars.svg

Use Image:Flag of the United States.svg. 26 April 2006, User:Jacobolus

Delete Redundant and wrong name. Please use {{badname}} for next time. --Digon3 ^talk 14:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ucen.jpg

False license. 10 September 2006, User:190.46.49.142

Comment Uploader claims copyrighted-free use, image is from University of Chile website [15]. Deadstar 08:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio --Polarlys 00:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Univeristy of oklahoma campus.JPG

Newer version (rotated) at Image:OU_Main_Campus_SEC.JPG4 June 2006 User:Ottergoose

Delete The file/page is redundant through a better but not identical one. --Digon3 ^talk 14:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Redundant Vanheu 12:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Unkeler Wappen.jpg

Same Image in a higher resolution is available here: Image:Wappen Unkel.png --Deadstar 09:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I think this should be suspended, see here Commons talk:Deletion requests/Superseded. --Digon3 ^talk 14:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:VSRolle.jpg

I uploaded much better versions of this file: Image:Vicke Schorler Rolle Blatt 5.jpg and Image:Vicke Schorler Rolle Blatt 6.jpg. 19 August 2006 User:N3MO

deleted, --Polarlys 00:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vatnedalsdammen2.jpg

(no reason given) 28 September 2006 User:Flums

Image doesn't open for me. Deadstar 10:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Deadstar - Image is broken. Half of the picture is simply missing. --FSHL 17:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Venezia overview.jpg

Please delete, wrong image uploaded. 6 December 2006 User:Bogean

Delete Correct image probably Image:Venetian overview.jpg. Deadstar 10:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wicksell2.jpg

No author ame given, hence no reason for PD-old. 1 February 2007 User:AndreasPraefcke

Comment Johan Wicksell (the subject of this painting) lived from 1851 to 1926. Deadstar 13:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Someone fluent in Swedish should ask at the University of Lund. Maybe they know who painted it. Lupo 08:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Further comment: COM:ART says that {{PD-Art}} does not apply in Sweden because "simple photographs" are granted a reduced copyright... Hence the photo would not be PD in its country of origin, even if the painting were PD. Lupo 07:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, 1. we don’t know the author, 2. COM:ART. --Polarlys 00:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Game photos 009.jpg

Although the content on http://www.freshhiphopnews.com is licensed under cc-by-2.0, it seems highly unlikely the photo was taken by someone from the site. --Spellcast 13:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete unless actual image url is provided. -N 02:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikilogo11.jpg

not a WM project 17 January 2007 User:TownCrier

deleted, --Polarlys 00:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wscb hafen 0.jpg

just a marina of a small club, which has been deleted in de:WP, no further use expected --User:Uwe Gille 20:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete The file has a low image quality/resolution. --Digon3 ^talk 13:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Roma-Smcosm_interno.jpg

Based on sv:Bild:Smcosm.jpg which was deleted due to lack of permission. Lokal _Profil 18:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mariposa California.jpg

Duplicate picture, see Mariposa street Ca.jpg req by Mrrxx 22:00, 05 July 2007 (UTC) --Samulili 08:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Duplicate file. Please use {{Duplicate}} for images that are exactly the same for next time. --Digon3 ^talk 14:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Make way for ducklings statue.jpg

Derivitaive work, FU tagged on enwiki. I've contacted the sculptor however, so perhaps we'll have a happy ending. Tag so I don't forget. 28 March 2007 User:Gmaxwell

Fixed request - I left a message for Gmaxwell on his talkpage on 11 June. Deadstar 14:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to go out on a limb and Keep. I know the US doesn't have freedom of panorama, but according to [16] it may be effectively PD. Furthermore the US government installed a replica in Moscow [17]. Also this is a park scene and it isn't a close up of just the ducks. Apparently the fair use justification was added to en.wiki to resolve a copyright dispute. This is often done on en.wiki as a compromise in disputed cases, whether or not it's actually needed. -N 02:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Speculations about the PD nature of the statue is, with the information given, only speculation. Without hard evidence, the image should be deleted. Samulili 10:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted because the PD nature is speculative. (→O - R L Y?) 18:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Make_way_for_ducklings_statue.jpg

Previously deleted because there is no FOP in the USA. Then re-uploaded. I ask that you wait a few days to close this so the local version on en.wiki is undeleted. -N 03:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

undeleted at en.wiki. Delete away here. -N 00:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CIMG0566.JPG

Doublon Pregup 12:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Digon3 (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:CIMG0566.JPG" (incorrectly named duplicate of Image:Statue Frontenac Chateau Quebec.JPG)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:USS Shaw explosion.jpg

The existence of Image:USS SHAW exploding Pearl Harbor Nara 80-G-16871 2.png, the same image stored in .png. 7 December 2006 User:Brandmeister

Deleted. Exact duplicate. Samulili 08:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:WMD-radiation.svg

no more used, another svg symbol is available. 14 March 2007 User:Karelj

Keep It is acually used in several pages in the french wikipedia. --Digon3 ^talk 00:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Kept. Used and no known duplicates. Samulili 08:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Xinan China.png

small mistake --Immanuel Giel 13:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC). ARGUMENTS own work --Immanuel Giel 13:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment the image is used --ALE! ¿…? 15:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Could not locate mistake. Samulili 08:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DrSmith.jpg

DVD screenshot, unclear permission GeorgHH 20:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 08:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zajezdnia PKT.jpg

better version of picture already downoladed (Image:Zajezdnia PKT2.jpg). 14 May 2007 User:M-karpov

How is (Image:Zajezdnia PKT2.jpg) better? It has a lot smaller resolution. Keep for now and please use {{Superseded}} next time. --Digon3 ^talk 16:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 10:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zamek w Mosznej.jpg

Chcę usunąć ten plik. Po za tym jest już wystarczająco zdjęć Moszna. 4 March 2007 User:LUCPOL

Comment Translation: I want to delete this file. There is enought photos of Moszna. Herr Kriss 16:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, no valid reason for deletion --ALE! ¿…? 09:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zydrunas sawickas.jpg

I doubt this picture has been licensed under Creative Commons. 24 May 2007 User:Bender235

Comment looks like a crappy amateur photo to me. -N 02:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 09:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Świerklaniec - Dom Kawalera.jpg

Chcę usunąć ten plik. Po za tym już jest fotka Image:Palac_Kawalera_Swierklaniec.JPG. 4 March 2007 User:LUCPOL

My guess is this means this image is just a low-res duplicate of another image. -N 02:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Nope, it means "I want to delete this file. There is already photo Image:Palac_Kawalera_Swierklaniec.JPG". Herr Kriss 16:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, no valid reason for deletion --ALE! ¿…? 09:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Flag_of_Chechnya.svg

it is not chechen flag 213.184.200.100 22:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

И каков-же есть флаг Чечни? Или Управление делами Президента и Правительства Чеченской Республики не знает флага своей республики [18]? - Urmas 15:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

This is flag of Chechen Republic.

А каков флаг Чечни? - Urmas 08:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Take a look here(Смотрите здесь):http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ru-ce.html#prez

Указанные изображения ([19], [20]) одинаковые. Считаю, что Deletion requests надо убрать, посколько нельзя доказать, что это не флаг Чечни. - Urmas 18:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I have requested translation for this. / Fred J 21:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
After getting reply, I have uploaded the file with a new name: Image:Flag of Chechen Republic since 2004.svg, and will have it replaced by this on all Wikipedias, after which I will Delete it. / Fred J 08:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

tagged with {{bad name}} and CommonsDelinker is running. --ALE! ¿…? 12:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:0.879696035645619.jpg

I think that copyright violation of the sentence.

日本語: 文章の著作権を侵害すると思われます。

--KENPEI 12:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Does Japan has FOP? Wooyi 17:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep This isn't incidental inclusion, so freedom of panorama doesn't come into it. Japan does however exempt artistic works in public places from most copyright protection (art. 46). It also exempts a wide range of government texts from copyright (art. 13), and this plaque was written by the "Tokyo Prefectural Education Committee". Physchim62 22:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment英語を書くのは苦手なので日本語で書きます（Physchim62さんは、日本語がわかるようですので）。日本の著作権法　第46条では、美術の著作物でその原作品については利用が広く認められている（写真などを撮って自由に公開してもよい）。しかし、この説明板の「文章」は美術の著作物ではないので、第46条は適用されない。また、著作権法　第13条では、「国若しくは地方公共団体の機関、独立行政法人が発する告示、訓令、通達その他これらに類するものは、権利の対象とならない」としている。しかし、説明板の「文章」は「告示、訓令、通達その他これらに類するもの」とは言えず、第13条は適用されない。Physchim62 さんの法律解釈は正しくないです。--KENPEI 04:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I requested translation for this. / Fred J 21:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

There's still a long way to go for Japenese-English translation software but Google Translate translates his comment as...

"English writing is so afraid of being written in Japanese (Physchim62 said, you know, it is the Japanese so). Japan's copyright law Chapter 46, the art of copyrighted material for use in Hara Sono work is widely respected (such as photographs taken it is free to publish). However, the description of the board, "writing" is a copyrighted work of art because the 46th row do not apply. Also, the copyright law Article 13, "the country's institutions or local governments, an independent administrative institution to issue a proclamation, instruction, these other similar notice of the rights and be subject to," he said. However, the description of the board, "writing" is a "proclamation, instruction, these other similar notice," and is言EZU the 13th row do not apply. Physchim62's interpretation of the law is incorrect. -- KENPEI 04:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)"

Japanese laws seem pretty lenient, but I'm not clear on the reasons why this may be a copyvio. Rocket000 03:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Giggy\^Talk 09:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Asimov portraits

This is a photo from the LOC's New York World-Telegram & Sun collection; the first version is here, while the source link on the second is broken. The catalog record states "No information on creator or on reproduction rights found with the image, 1995"; the image is not known to be in the public domain. (Also, PD-USGov would be the wrong tag even if we had a valid license for it.) grendel|khan 14:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The Library of Congress is the repository of records for US copyrights. If they can't find "information on creator or on reproduction rights", I assume there was no renewal of copyright. I suggest keeping with a retagging as {{PD-US-no notice}} -- Infrogmation 17:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

That tag is almost certainly not valid for this use; the World-Telegram & Sun collection consists of newspaper photographs; newspapers tend to have copyright notices on their mastheads. Unless you can find the issues where these were originally published, note that they belonged to the newspaper, and show that the newspaper didn't publish a copyright notice in that issue, the tag isn't valid. grendel|khan 02:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Keep the pictures. They are so old... The copyright protection cannot last more than halfcentury. It is part of history of our planet. We should not delete the history. Domitori 23:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Your vote is based on a mistaken assumption. Certainly some copyrights last more than half a century. (Some photographers even live longer than that....) Such are the laws. Please read up at Commons:Licensing. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 23:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright does not work like that; it's irrelevant how much we want to keep the image. It only matters whether or not the image violates the rules. These may be unfortunate rules, but we still have to follow them. grendel|khan 14:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep from the LOC site: "Photographs taken by New York World-Telegram & Sun staff photographers are in the public domain and may be used without restriction. " http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/coll/130_nyw.html#perm Bogdan (talk) 22:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] July 7

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gobbi Callas Barbiere.jpg

Image is incorrectly licensed as free. There is very serious doubt that the author has been deceased for 70 years. 70 years ago would have been 1937, and Ms. Callas would have been 13 years old. She certainly appears older. And that's assuming the author dropped dead right after taking the photograph. 70 years is severely questionable.--64.178.96.168 19:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You are absolutely correct. This was one of my early uploads - I will delete it. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 03:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Lumijaguaari: incorrect licensing info - picture is not old enough

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:StEXStatueBellecourL.jpg

no freedom of panorama in France. According to [21] it was created on year 2000. One needs the authorisation of the sculptor to publish such a photography.--Mathieu 14:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ggb reflection in a soap bubble.JPG

Not used in any projectMbz1 18:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 20:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --Polarlys 18:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ggb in soap bubble 3.JPG

Not used in any project Mbz1 18:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 20:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I like it. Madmax32 09:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep as do I. Not valid reason for deletion. --Digon3 ^talk 15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --Polarlys 18:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ggb)in soap bubble 2.JPG

not used in any project --Mbz1 19:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 20:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I like it Madmax32 01:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --Polarlys 18:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ggb in soap bubble 1.jpg

Not used in any project --Mbz1 19:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 20:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --Polarlys 18:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Webdanel.jpg

Uploading error [22]. Description does not belong to this image by Paleofreak. --Javier ME 21:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 07:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete - Mistake, delete requested by uploader on Commons:Café. Replace by Image:Webdanel2.png. --Prevert^(talk) 20:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Loco085: a petición del autor

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Merrylands (Sydney, NSW)

Obsolete, superceded category. --JROBBO 07:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: empty category

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Flag-ja.png

there also exist more flags with better sizes (SVG instead of PNG), ... --Bangin @de @ku ¤ ρø$τ 20:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 22:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Small and not used + no lack of SVG --Ntrno 12:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mikhail_Kalashnikov.jpg

Image is using obsolete PD tag and there is no reason whatsoever for it being PD given. The author can't be dead for over 70 years. Can't be {{PD-Russia}} either, Kalashnikov is too old on this picture to be taken before January 1st, 1954. Gestumblindi 21:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no source, no author --Polarlys 01:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:GFDL-AerialPhoto-MlitJp

Unused superseded license --Lokal _Profil 03:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete - As not used no reason to keep it. --|EPO| ^da: 14:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Su-37-Draft.svg

if you ask me, copy of this: Su-37_01.jpg, just vectorised and therefore little less details, i can not see a free licence for original source. --D.W. 11:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Redundant and bad quality. Surely a better vector can be made.--Digon3 ^talk 16:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - This is not a derivative work. In case of doubt it's simply inspired. I don't deny that the suchoj image was to a certain extent the starting point for my work, but that's all. Image:Su-37-Draft.svg is absolutely different from Su-37_01.jpg. The fundamental difference between a lossless scalable vector image and a bitmap graphic is IMHO relevant to this relationship. Because totally zero of Su-37_01.jpg is part of my work, it can’t be an edited version of that bitmap graphic. And if it's not an edited version, it’s therefore no copyright violation - that's simply elementary. Threshold of originality is given. --FSHL 16:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If it is different from the other image, then

Keep. --Digon3 ^talk 17:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Digon3 - Redundant? I can't find another 3-view of the Su-37, so how could it be redundant? If you want to add a so-called »better vector« instead of my SVGs to Commons than feel free to do this. --FSHL 17:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought Su-37_01.jpg was a commons file and Image:Su-37-Draft.svg was a low quality copy, sorry about that. --Digon3 ^talk 17:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

But then I couldnt understand why the quality is so bad: blurry lines. If you "zoom in" to the svg, it looks bad, you couldnt even seperate the lines. This could be made a lot better. when you say, that the original file was just the starting point, why you didn´t do it better, this way i couldnt see any improvement to a bitmap. So when delivering drawings, start with a bitmap and then do it better, using all advantages of vector graphic! LOL, the totally zero of your work isn´t Su-37_01.jpg? You just opened the file with inkscape and use a tool to vectorise, that´s it! So there is no real work of your own to produce a image. If you follow such a strange argument you would be able to use any pic from the internet, just vectorising and then its free for all (like you do so often, see your galerie)! Unbelievable.. --D.W. 18:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - So-called quality judgements are as well known always relative and therefore not really relevant for deletion. The reason why the lines are »blurry« (I definitively prefer sketchy) is finally very easy: it was merely my will. More about that context you can read here. I’ll surely not specify my exacting procedures to you but Photoshop of course also participates at this process. But if you can make it better than feel also free to do this and contribute them to Commons. --FSHL 19:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

...maybe they wouldnt be better, but they wouldnt breach any copyright.--D.W. 20:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - Fact is that at the moment you’re just the only one that supposes that Image:Su-37-Draft.svg represents a copyright violation. That’s only possible because you simply compare apples and oranges - and that’s really unbelievable... --FSHL 21:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

okay..., we both can say, that a side, front or top view of a plane could look different, depending on the author (each of them will add a lot detail or just the prominant lines). So now i ask you how it could be possible that there are so many similarities in your blurry svg (lol, you say you want it that way, lächerlich) and a jpg-file. If we could ask the original author, he would say its a copy, whatever type of file it is, thats the point.--D.W. 21:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - The reason is finally incredible trivial and IMHO simply elementary: both illustrate the same airplane. --FSHL 21:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

suching drawings are a kind of art, and therefore it´s not that easy..--D.W. 21:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - Probably that’s the reason why you can’t make them but fortunately that doesn’t have to apply to me. Isn’t? I’d find it very strange if 2 3-view schematics of the same aircraft wouldn’t be similar... BTW: The reason why you can’t »seperate (sic!) the lines« is just as trivially: I simply use for all my vector graphics principally vector surfaces instead of lines. --FSHL 21:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

um ausreden nicht verlegen..when i open the your svg and the original file, they even match perfectly on inkscape-workspace.. and i think a could also make svgs like you (inkscape-tool does a great job)

So thats the way you work (in my opinion): take a picture (no matter where its from, you dont care), in photoshop you remove some detail, which look strange after vectorising and then you take this clear derivate (it is still not a new work from you) and then you just need to do a little work in inkscape. If you ask me, this method could not produce any media for commons. The worst are your works, using photos to create weird svgs (nobody would normally do so, so maybe you should reconsider this approach of delivering material to commons, you are theonly one). In the end, sorry for my bad english, read you tomorrow ;) D.W. 00:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep you can't prove it is a copyright violation, vectorizing a bitmap requires some skill and I think this is made by the author Madmax32 00:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - You call my replies »excuses« (German: »Ausreden«), I just call them the truth and there’s simply no doubt about that. You call my SVGs »weird«, I just call them an artist's impression and concerning to this we could surely endlessly discuss - de gustibus non est disputandum... --FSHL 02:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Bad vectorising (it does NOT require uber skills to do this kind of work) + copyright problems (yes it is SAME imag, just moved views randomly) --Ntrno 11:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Ntrno - Well, if you think that Image:Su-37-Draft.svg »is SAME imag (sic!)« i.e. identical than Su-37_01.jpg than you can surely proof this circumstance by facts. Can you? If it’s identical than it’s absolutely clear that Image:Su-37-Draft.svg represents a copyright violation. But you can’t because they’re ad oculos not identically. If it’s not identical but rather similar than you’ve to proof that Image:Su-37-Draft.svg is a derivative work of Su-37_01.jpg in order to design a case of copyright violation. The reasons why it can’t be de facto and de jure a derivative work is simply the fundamental different nature of lossless scalable vector images and bitmap graphics. Comparing vector images and a bitmap graphics is IMHO simply comparing apples and oranges. They’re both fruits but that’s all... --FSHL 19:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment to D.W. - The plain fact that you think that you must request for assistance doesn’t really speak for you. --FSHL 19:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

No, the fact that I could found other users with bad experiences with you is a fact against you... and it is the same image, open both files with inkscape shows that they totally congruent in all lines, there are only some details deleted in your image (because vectorise the pic with them looks strange). THATS a proof, just a derivative (and so falling under the same licence like the original file--->not free for commons) image could do so. Its no matter if a file is svg or bitmap in this situation. this kind of reasoning would open the floodgates for even more copyright violations. No you are the only user, producing a lot of them. So stop this NOW!--D.W. 19:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to D.W. - Congruence is simply impossible and the reason for this is just as trivially: Image:Su-37-Draft.svg has a base size of 800 × 889 pixels, Su-37_01.jpg of 784 × 433 pixels. So they can be only congruent if you make them congruent by scaling and that’s by definition not a geometric congruence as rather similarity. I never negated that they aren’t similar because they’re the same aircraft. They must be similar otherwise they don’t illustrate the same airplane. Finally that’s just a proof that you didn’t understand the treated subject but nothing more. Furthermore I regard it as considerable supercilious that you really want to prescribe me what I might do. --FSHL 20:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to FSHL Can you produce any reasons why this work should be kept rather than nitpicking the many arguments against you? Just because the format is different does not mean that the work is not clearly derivative. The two works are clearly closely related. Even you cannot refute this. The fact that the other one (i.e. the jpg) came first rather implies that you used it to make the SVG. Just because the pixels do not line up does not mean that the work is not derivative. Would you say that if I increase the hex colour value by one unit for each pixel then the work is not derivate, just because no pixels are the same? no, it is still derivative. It is not about the pixels, it is about the work as a whole. If you would like to clear yourself, present proof that you have never, at any point in the making of this image, used a copyrighted work. And becfore you say it, you DO have to present proof to do so. If I may quote you from a similar argument on your talk page, I could upload then but I'll not. I've my justified reasons for limiting the publication that I'll not explain in public – sorry!. To me this strongly suggests that you are breaching copyright. Now you are accused, you may want to defend yourself with hard proof, if you have it. We are not trying to prescribe what you are doing for the fun of it, we are trying to make Commons a useful, fair, and legal repository of valuable media. You are bringing down the repuatation of the project with your works, which as far as I am concerned are copyvios, poor quality, and useless, making them also out of Commons Scope.Inductiveload 22:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Inductiveload - Dude, I don't know where you come from but in Old Europe, particularly in Germany, it's (still) not necessary to prove one’s innocence... --FSHL 11:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to FSHL - Well no. You can choose to not provide evidence that you are producing legitimate works, but that will not help to show that they are legitimate. If you commit a crime and exercise your right to silence, are you saying that you are therefore above the law? Just the fact that you refuse, out of hand, to present any evidence that this is your work suggests that you are hiding something. If it is legitimate, why are you being so difficult? Inductiveload 20:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Inductiveload - Because it’s just my way and I don’t have any desire to change it? You’re BTW the first that doubts that I’m the author of Image:Su-37-Draft.svg. And to accuse someone of a crime can be punished – so please, choose your words carefully... --FSHL 11:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete This image should be deleted because it is bad vectorised and it seems like if there does exist some copyright problems. --Bangin @de @ku ¤ ρø$τ 15:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Bangin - Show me just one damn single pixel that’s equal in both images. You can’t? Of course not because vector images simply don’t have any damn pixel. So how could there be a damn copyright problem? And if IYO really »seems like if there does exist some copyright problems« why can’t you specify it precisely? Only facts count. Furthermore is »bad vectorised (sic!)« definitively not a valid reason for deletion. If you want to argue with bad quality, then you’ve to give appropriate explanations why this particular image is IYO inferior compared to other ones. --FSHL 17:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment For example, if you vectorise en:Image:PepsiLogo.jpg and change couple pixels (vector lines) and modify color gamut it WILL be copyright violation on commons. Su-37 case is same. Maybe it is acceptable on some other site under fair use or other license, but not Commons surely --Ntrno 20:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Ntrno - Pepsi logo is protected by trademark and not by copyright. Similarity is sufficiently for a trademark violation. Your comparison is flawed. Please think before you post, dude. --FSHL 20:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete This is a clear derivative work and is not apparently useful for any project that I can think of due to massive lack of detail and burryness (except maybe a tutorial how to attempt to evade copyright using Inkscape's auto-trace feature) Inductiveload 22:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC).

Comment to Inductiveload - Image:Su-37-Draft.svg is AFAIK still in use on 13 pages in 11 projects and as an elementary result of this trivial fact definitively not out of scope. »Burryness« is really not a valid reason for deletion and even you know that. »Massive lack of detail« is a comparison, however to what? There’s simply no other 3-view of the Su-37 at Commons. All further arguments were IMHO weakened already because in this special case there’s just no »damn pixel« anymore. There’s absolutely nothing! Nada! Nichts! Rien! Niente! Niets! Ничего! 何も! There’re only vectors. And you can’t BTW prove beyond doubt anyone of your other allegations thus I don’t need to deal with it. I principally don't count the chickens before they’re hatched. Fact is: I share my images but surely not my know-how. Furthermore I don’t have to justify why I don’t want to publish other images... --FSHL 06:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to FSHL - Blurryness is a reason for deletion. It makes it bad quality. If I upload an out-of-focus photograph, is that OK, just because I call it "art"? You cannot expect to turn a JPG/PNG/GIF, etc. into an SVG and get round derivative works rules, which exist for a reason. Just because the image is defined as a set of vectors, rather than pixels does not make it above the rules. You clearly can use Inkscape (especially since you claim that you didn't even use auto-tracing to make it), so whay don't you contribute good work? Inductiveload 20:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Inductiveload - I've got fortunately the autonomy to make my work just like I want it. But If you want to contribute a so-called »good work« instead of Image:Su-37-Draft.svg to Commons than feel free to do this. I don’t have made the rules in Commons however I obey them strictly. If you can’t prove any rule/copyright violation against me, then may be because there’s simply no one. Did you ever think about that? And if »Burryness« really makes it bad quality, compared to what? To your ideal of quality? And if: Do I’ve to obey it? --FSHL 04:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The vectorised version even comes with the small inaccuracies of the original file, see the different spaces between the engines and fuselage or the vertival element in the illustration in the middle turning to the left slighly. One question remains: What about all the other files by this user? Where is the human brain (Image:Brain-Mapping.svg) traced from? Or Image:Jian-6.svg, Image:MiG-31B.svg? Compare Image:Yak-141-Draft.svg with http://www.yak.ru/FIRM/HISTMOD/yak-141.php --Polarlys 00:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Polarlys - I’ve used Su-37_01.jpg at the pre-production as study object in order to analyse its proportions, so the small inaccuracies of the original file could maybe as a result of this slipped in – that’s really probable and I can’t exclude that however I can’t confirm it... --FSHL 08:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

So your files are traced from non-vectorised images generally? --Polarlys 10:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Polarlys - I share as already mentioned solely my images to Commons and definitively not my know-how therefore I’ll not specify my working procedures to anyone – there’s just no discussion about this condition. But I’ve created Image:Su-37-Draft.svg totally independently of Su-37_01.jpg. The only community between Su-37_01.jpg and Image:Su-37-Draft.svg is the fact that it’s the same airplane... --FSHL 11:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to FSHL - Yeah, and I'm polar bear. Stop playing your "pre-production" theory game, we all understand that you've created this and 90% of your images using vectorize option in Inkscape. --Ntrno 14:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Ntrno - I don’t know if you’re a polar bear but if you say so I’d believe it immediately – that would in fact explain a lot... --FSHL 04:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

If you do a three side drawing of the Su-37, it allways will look like the Su-37, whatever you do. And how much labor you ever spend to create such drawings, they will allways look like a Su-37.

This means, all such drawing will have a lack of originality, which makes them not copyrightable at all. I can redraw it by which measure ever, and nobody could ever claim a "copyright infringement" on it.

If any copyrights exist, then the one of the engineers who created the aircraft. But if this is the truth, you will have to accept that everything artificial will be copyrighted somehow and every image showing an artificial thing will be a derivate work. Images showing a car, airplane, mixer, handy, hoover, valves... -- Stahlkocher 18:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: The image at www.suchoj.com is not the original one. You can find drawings in the original data sheets. They were forwarded to the press by Sukhoi. The homepage mentioned here is a privat one and must not be confused with www.sukhoi.org, the manufacturers homepage.

Kept. Not a derivative work. Data cannot be copyrighted and the measures of the aircraft (via a mechanical drawing) is not a copyright violation. -- Cat ^chi? 10:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chris cornell 1.jpg

already uploaded --Alonr 20:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

please tag as {{duplicate}} --ALE! ¿…? 21:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Siebrand (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Chris cornell 1.jpg" (Dupe of Image:Chris Cornell 2007 2.jpg)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LaHabanaMalecon.jpg

This image was previously uploaded under Image:La Habana Malecon.jpg and tagged with {{cc-by-sa}}. However, it did not attribute the author as required by the license, and no other source information (as required by Commons:Licensing to verify the license) was provided. The uploader was notified of this, and I deleted the image after nine days, two more than required by COM:DG. For this, I received wikimail from the uploader threatening to "go to Wikipedia administration to explain to abuse of power". The image has now been re-uploaded outside of process without an undeletion request at COM:UR. This time, it's tagged as a work of the US Government. The incomplete source information, however, credits NuevoHerald, which I believe is a newspaper not connected in any way to the US federal government. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete As above, and suspicious licenses. --Digon3 ^talk 16:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Not delete, this image dont have copyright, was used by diferent newspaper in cuba and in United states. the inexist relation betwen Cuba and United Stated have the posibility of used diferent sources of pictures, because all pictures about cuba are considered in USA information for the american governement, and avalable for the publucation in USA territori, sorry about my english.--Juanca1492 00:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you do indeed want to argue that the image is not protected by copyright for some reason, you need to provide a clear argument with references to applicable statute and/or case law. In any case, you must not claim that it is a work of the US Federal Government if you know that this is false. Making fraudulent statements of authorship is a criminal offense, regardless of whether or not the work is protected by copyright. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Lupo 20:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ramiroguerra.jpg

Previously uploaded as Image:RamiroGuerra.jpg and tagged {{PD-old}}, which clearly does not apply. Because of this, and because no source information was provided for over a week after being requested, I deleted it. For this, the uploader sent wikimail threatening to "go to Wikipedia administration to explain to abuse of power". It has now been re-uploaded and tagged {{GFDL}}. However, there is no evidence that "El Habanero" (which I believe is a newspaper) authorised these licensing terms. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Not delete, This picture have copyright was taked about 60' years, and is liberated about all copyright in cuba and in USA.--Juanca1492 00:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

If you do indeed want to argue that the image is not protected by copyright for some reason, you need to provide a clear argument with references to applicable statute and/or case law. In any case, you must not claim that it is licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License if you know that this is false. Making fraudulent licensing statements is a criminal offense, regardless of whether or not the work is protected by copyright. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Lupo 20:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Galle-les_coprin.jpg

Previously deleted for missing source information. The original uploader has re-uploaded the image with vague and (looking at his other uploads, presumably fraudulent) authorship claims whilst noting that he is actually not providing any source information. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete, This picture come from the ofice os tourism of Nancyville, and font have copyright, this picture was taked for the tourism oficce for do the publicity to Nany city, france.

i,m sorry about the missing of imformation about the pictures. --Juanca1492 01:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

So what's your position within the Office of Tourism of Nancy, since you claim to be the copyright holder of the image? —LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep One can put information later. I have put the location. Romary 10:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

We still need an appropriate and truthful license and a verifiable source to confirm that the legitimate copyright holder approved that license. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

If the licence is not clear (and after looking again at the picture, I believe it is not clear), forget my vote. Romary 07:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Lupo 20:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:000 0105.jpg

Unused, no apparent value. --Conscious 05:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ I don't think you can delete on the basis of no apparent value. Redundant/bad quality and badname, maybe. --Digon3 ^talk 16:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Redundant/bad quality and poor file name. --Digon3 ^talk 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 12:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:000 0146.jpg

Unused, no apparent value. --Conscious 05:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ I don't think you can delete on the basis of no apparent value. Redundant/bad quality and badname, maybe. --Digon3 ^talk 16:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Redundant/bad quality and poor file name. --Digon3 ^talk 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 12:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soap bubble ggb.jpg

The picture was altered in photo shop and does not look as a soap bubble. No reason to keep it.Mbz1 18:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

do you have another picture with the correct file name? --Digon3 ^talk 17:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have many pictures. The thing is I'm not interested in displaying them on Wikipedia--Mbz1 18:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
  - I meant do you have a exact copy of this picture with the correct file name so you can tag it as {badname}}?
    - But what should be the correct name? That picture is a picture of Golden Gate Bridge reflection in a soap bubble, but I cut and pasted the bubble to a black background in photo shop, which made a picture confusing for some. To me it is still Golden Gate Bridge reflection in a soap bubble, but I know what I took a picture of, while some other people cannot believe it was a bubble in the first place. That's why I'm not sure the picture should be shared with the World. I'd better leave it to myself only--14:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
Comment See en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Soap bubble ggb.jpg... Lupo 07:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If I were you, I would rename it Image:Bubble Reflection of Golden Gate Bridge or something like that.It may not be a soap bubble, but it is a Bubble. --Digon3 ^talk 00:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- - - But it is a soap bubble.--Mbz1 04:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

Keep as interesting image. Deletion can't be based on the fact that one person queried whether it was a real photo. --MichaelMaggs 17:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:(Bird Dream Sequence -4(72.003).jpg

Not used anywhere. Description says it's a photo (but it's not) and nothing more, so have no idea what this image is good for. --Conscious 04:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep The fact that it not used anywhere is not a reason for deletion. It needs a better description though. --Digon3 talk 16:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Apparently "self-created artwork without educational purpose". Samulili 11:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kirin_Beer's_Original_Brew.JPG

sorry, this is a duplicate of Image:A can of Kirin Beer's Original Brew.JPG 08pb80 15:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Please use {{Duplicate}} for files that are exactly the same. --Digon3 ^talk 16:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 11:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:First Boeing E-3 Sentry rollout.jpg

Request on behalf of User:Arcturus: No free license. Copied from US Air Force website but creator is Boeing. So no governmental work, not PD. --Polarlys 16:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

"Information presented on Air Force Link is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested." applies here, even if Boeing is the creator. -- 80.145.42.209 06:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

USAF claims this in general for its website. This does not necessarily apply to every single picture presented there. That's why it is bylined with "Courtesy photo" and "Author: Courtesy of Boeing". Therefore not automatically PD. --80.137.8.244 15:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Boeing work, not federal government. Samulili 11:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Malcolmxmartinlutherking.jpg

Incomplete source information. No evidence of who the author is or that they placed the image into the public domain. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I found the picture on the english wikipedia and uploded it to commons in order to use it in a danish article. But I never used it. It's ok with me to delete it. - Apw 11:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, my concern is not with the source information that you provided so much as the fact that the image as uploaded to Wikipedia lacks an original source. Clearly, it was not taken by a Californian high school student. The school site in turn cites a German university site (also clearly not the original source) with an address that doesn't work anymore. In all likelihood, it was taken by a press photographer and still protected by copyright. We'll delete it shortly unless we get information indicating that it's actually free. Thanks for understanding. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The image was published (amongst other places) in the book Malcolm X: the great photographs by Thulani Davis (1993, ISBN 1556703171). I agree that it is most likely a still copyrighted press photo. It was taken on March 26, 1964.[23] Lupo 07:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 11:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Linde-verfahren.png

I uploaded the .svg-version. Image is not used any more. Mkossick 12:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The deletion request process for superseded images such as yours has been temporarily suspended. Please see in the discussion at Commons talk:Deletion requests/Superseded. --Digon3 ^talk 16:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 13:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bosia jud Iasi.png

Old map + wrong name. The new map with the correct name is here --B w raven 07:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep they are not exactly the same. Please upload an exact copy of Image:Bosia jud Iasi.png and then use {{Duplicate}}. --Digon3 ^talk 16:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete The administrative teritories in the Iasi county have changed a lot. This map is out of date. If you're interested and know Romanian I can give you a link to the laws by which some 5-6 new communes were founded in 2004, Image:Costesti_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Ciohorani_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Bals_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Ion_Neculce_jud_Iasi.png,Image:Draguseni_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Fantanele_jud_Iasi.png, and some others. As you can see if you take a look at these maps and compare them to the one I'm asking to delete, these communes do not appear on that map. I edited the map so it would be up to date and updated all the maps in that category. This one is no good. --B w raven 05:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a map of Iasi County as it was, it is an historical map, not an obsolete map. Maybe it requires a new summary and a new category.--Pere prlpz 13:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep Maps that once were correct are quite valuable from a historical perspective. Please change the description and recategorise to Category:Maps of the history of Romania. Cheers! Siebrand 22:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mihail Kogalniceanu jud Iasi.png

Old map + wrong name. The new map with the correct name is here --B w raven 07:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep They are not exactly the same. Please upload an exact copy of Image:Mihail Kogalniceanu jud Iasi.png and then use {{Duplicate}}. --Digon3 ^talk 16:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete The administrative teritories in the Iasi county have changed a lot. This map is out of date. If you're interested and know Romanian I can give you a link to the laws by which some 5-6 new communes were founded in 2004, Image:Costesti_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Ciohorani_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Bals_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Ion_Neculce_jud_Iasi.png,Image:Draguseni_jud_Iasi.png, Image:Fantanele_jud_Iasi.png, and some others. As you can see if you take a look at these maps and compare them to the one I'm asking to delete, these communes do not appear on that map. I edited the map so it would be up to date and updated all the maps in that category. This one is no good. --B w raven 05:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

As user:Pere prlpzIf this is a map of Iasi County as it was, it is an historical map, not an obsolete map. Maybe it requires a new summary and a new category. It shows how the County was, just not its current state. --Digon3 ^talk 14:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Maps that once were correct are quite valuable from a historical perspective. Please change the description and recategorise to Category:Maps of the history of Romania. Cheers! Siebrand 22:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 08:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Klimadiagramm-deutsch-Madang-Papua-Neuguinea.png

Diagram based on the database of GeoKlima which it was created with; data in this database probably old and outdated (based for a lot of data sets on Müller's "Handbuch ausgewählter Klimastationen der Erde" which used a lot of data for the 1931-to-1960 period of time, but does not tell exactly which data is based on which source and period), at least can't be determined to a certain period of time. Meanwhile new diagrams are added (Image:Klimadiagramm-metrisch-deutsch-Madang-PapuaNeuguinea-1961-1990.png and two older periods of time for comparison reasons), replacing this diagram (except in Hedwig's own upload gallery). As Hedwig and I worked together on this climate diagram project (till his sudden disappearance in April), I think he would have no arguments against a deletion. -- JörgM 17:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The diagram don't state what is the period of time for the used data. It is unlikely that the picture can be better sourced. So, it has no usefulness for any Wikipedia project. --Juiced lemon 11:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted per nom. (No usage in Wikimedia projects.) -- 18:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Klima tianjin.png

Diagram based on the database of GeoKlima which it was created with; data in this database probably old and outdated (based for a lot of data sets on Müller's "Handbuch ausgewählter Klimastationen der Erde" which used a lot of data for the 1931-to-1960 period of time, but does not tell exactly which data is based on which source and period), sorry, that's really wrong for this diagram at least can't be determined to a certain period of time. Meanwhile a new diagram is added (Image:Klimadiagramm-metrisch-deutsch-Tianjin-China-1961-1990.png), replacing this diagram. --JörgM 17:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted / Fred J 21:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Klima shenzhen.jpg

Diagram based on the database of GeoKlima which it was created with; data in this database probably old and outdated (based for a lot of data sets on Müller's "Handbuch ausgewählter Klimastationen der Erde" which used a lot of data for the 1931-to-1960 period of time, but does not tell exactly which data is based on which source and period), sorry, that's really wrong for this diagram at least can't be determined to a certain period of time. Meanwhile a new diagram is added (Image:Klimadiagramm-metrisch-deutsch-Shenzhen-China-1961-1990.png), replacing this diagram. --JörgM 17:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The image has been replaced by a better but different image with a better file format, making this redundant. --Digon3 ^talk 13:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment Difference between the both diagrams (especially the difference in precipitation) has been discussed on German Wikipedia (now archived in de:Benutzer Diskussion:Hedwig in Washington/Klimadiagramme/Archiv2#Klimadiagramm für Shenzhen). I really don't know where the difference of about 400 mm is from - perhaps from Hongkong Observatory where they give their own data for that of Shenzhen? It's a real mystery ... User Hph (the original creator) has not answered yet on his German discussion page, but has just been once working under his name during the last two years there, so probably there will be no answer. I saved this diagram - so, if there will be an evaluation of its data, it will be possible to give it back to commons, of course in better resolution. Same applies to the Tianjin diagram. -- JörgM 22:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 13:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Canadian coins less than 50 years old

The Canadian coins would be copyrighted for 50 years since their dates. The Royal Canadian Mint copyrights all coin images. To be deleted are:--Jusjih 15:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I cannot find the date of Image:Maple Leaf 1'20 Unze.JPG, so I am unsure if it should also be deleted.--Jusjih 15:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep or TransWiki. Some or all of images are fair use on the English Wikipedia and necessary for articles on Canadian coinage. Before deleting, copy any in-use images to the English Wikipedia. Davidwr2 21:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep per the standard practice on Commons of allowing such images as mostly pd-ineligible. I admit their actual copyright status is debateable however. -N 23:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

(Note that the complaintant is whining about the photograph of a physical object, not a copy of the object itself. I fail to see how copyright applies.) —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.34.203.227 (talk • contribs)

It's called a derivative work. -N 07:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete per http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/09/0146237. Siebrand 21:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment I don't know. What about U.S., international, and possibly even Canadian copyright laws not supporting this corporation's claims to copyright? The Royal Canadian Mint produces a lot more than Canadian coins, including some for the U.S. which are PD. So it's definitely not all their coins (or maybe they just meant in Canada?) Regarding the interesting article (and this ), copyright claims of obviously PD (ineligible) material (e.g. the words "one cent") are not given any legal power, however, the claims on images may have legal power. Does anyone know the status? Did the city of Toronto end up paying? I can't see that being legally enforced. If it is, delete. Rocket000 07:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

And for what it's worth, Don Wanagas, the Toronto Director of Communications, states in the National Post article (linked above) that "The penny is public domain". Rocket000 07:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Royal Canadian Mint FAQ:

	" Do I need to obtain permission to reproduce coin images? Yes. Please refer to the Mint’s Intellectual Property Policy for more information. "

No consensus - Please restart the discussion if you wish. Giggy\^Talk 09:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Deleting --|EPO| ^da: 19:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] July 8

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Burgernet.JPG

copy of Image:Burgernet.jpg --Spongo 09:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted (please use {{duplicate}} next time), --ALE! ¿…? 12:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sabba_Ştefănescu_.jpg

superseded by Image:Sabba Ştefănescu 480x640.jpg, with higher resolution Victor Blacus 10:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 12:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Liviu_Constantinescu_.png

superseded by Image:LiviuConstantinescu 600x900.jpg, with higher resolution Victor Blacus 10:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 12:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sabba_S._Ştefănescu_.jpg

superseded by Image:Sabba S. Ştefănescu 480x640.jpg, with higher resolution Victor Blacus 10:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 11:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pohls_Wheel.svg

Duplicate of Image:Pohl Wheel.svg. 87.78.218.107 13:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

OK for a speedy deletion, it was a duplicate upload from me. -- Dr. Schorsch 13:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted per uploader request. Was also tagged as {{badname}}. NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 17:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:P1010439.JPG

Image name uncorrect. New file uploaded : Image:DisneyMagic Marseille.jpg. please delete this one. --Gdgourou 15:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Done. Please tag this requests with {{bad name}} Platonides 15:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Euphorbia_franckiana.JPG

Misidentified - filename incorrect Carl M. Anglesea 08:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

No reason for deletion. Please tag {{rename|NewName.ext}} or if you have already uploaded the image again as {{duplicate|NewName.ext}}. Cheers! Siebrand 10:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Corrected image has been uploaded: Image:Euphorbia_lactea_fa_cristata.JPG

kept. Will be deleted as duplicate when replaced. Siebrand 10:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Paupalaisbeaumont.jpg

Page devenue inutile, l'image ayant été supprimée. Unused page because the image has been delated. --Florent.pecassou 21:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: content was: '{{Delete|reason=Page devenue inutile, l'image ayant été supprimée. Unused page because the image has been delated.|subpage=Commons:Deletion reque...' (and the only contributor was User:Florent.pecassou)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The_Little_Mermaid_3.jpg

Edvard Eriksen, who created the sculpture which is the primary subject of this image, died in 1959. Denmark does not have freedom of panorama for statues. See Talk:The_Little_Mermaid. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Paik5.jpg

As far as I know, this sculpture is modern and was exhibited in San Jose Museum of Art (no panorama freedom for sculptures, not permament display). EugeneZelenko 17:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Timbpt2.jpg

French post stamps are not in the public domain. --Yann 11:00, 5 July 2007, as rescued by Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Stamps/Public_domain#France --ALE! ¿…? 21:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

"If French stamps pictures cannot be kept here, then I agree with the deltion. olivier 06:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)"[24]

Delete per all of the above. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 20:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Carlos Maza.sxw

Non viewable. Orphan. What is an sxw file anyway --87.194.116.29 01:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment sxw is an OpenOffice.org 1.x format for text and is a supported file type by the Commons. --Digon3 ^talk 16:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Contained a personal attack on a teacher. Outside Commons:Project scope and defamatory. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CHT.jpg

This is not the uploader's own work, therefore should not be released into the public domain. Keithorz 03:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Fraudulent authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Copenhagen_statue_hc_andersen_city_sq.jpg

Google results for "Henry Lükow-Nielsen" suggest that the statue was unveiled in 1961, making it unlikely that the original work is in the public domain. Denmark does not have freedom of panorama for statues. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yoshiki piano.jpg

Professional/close up photograph of a celebrity, that was added to w:Yoshiki (musician) rather conveniently under a free license, after a copyrighted image had been removed earlier. Given these circumstances and that the new file was uploaded by a new account, I suspect a copyright violation. Free images of the subject, taken during a public appearance are available and were previously used in the Wikipedia article (see Yoshiki). - Cyrus XIII 00:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. The uploader's silence suggests that they're not willing to stand by their claims of authorship. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tresgrandes Acho.jpg

the picture was taken 61 years ago, the licence says, the author is more than 70 years death. I'm not a genius in Mathematics, but... --Marcus Cyron 13:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Inappropriate use of {{PD-Art}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:EdvardBenes port.jpg

not necessary in PD --Chanueting 01:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 07:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep - anonymous PD Madmax32 03:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no reason for public domain given, similar pictures (series?) can be found on the web. This image was scanned from a newspaper (?), without a clear copyright notice it’s neither public domain generally nor an anonymous work. Following this rationale, nearly every print product around me now was an anonymous work, including title pages of magazines and advertising brochures. --Polarlys 00:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Powiat chelmski.jpg

I see nothing on http://www.powiat.chelm.pl/ (source) that indicates this logo may be freely redistributed. License CC-by-SA may be wrong. --— Xavier, 12:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Negri176.jpg

Image is copyrighted, notice is at the bottom of http://silent-movies.com/ -N 15:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC) ---N 15:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

May be PD-US, appears to be from the 20's. -N 15:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Depends on who the photographer was. It seems she worked in Poland and Germany before she moved to the US. So - depending on the nationality of the author - the image might still be copyrighted. --88.134.44.255 00:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no source --Polarlys 00:26, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ake_green.jpg

license is unclear with restriction (http://www.lifesite.net/aboutlifesite/legal.html) Oxam Hartog 22:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete : permission is restrictive and probably don't allow commercial use. And is it text or tex and pic concerned. Is the website really owner of pic? Oxam Hartog 22:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
It's a church website and that looks like the pastor. Pretty sure they own the pic. The only restriction I see is attribution, which is fine, but the license doesn't clearly spell out commercial use and derivative works. -N 01:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
If you look att Google, the image is used on several websites without any copyright notices. To me it seems to be free, but I'm not completely sure. /Leos vän 23:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, insufficient licensing. --Polarlys 00:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:J-10-Draft.svg

vectorised from this file, found here [25] --D.W. 20:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

also take a look here: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Su-37-Draft.svg, same problem--D.W. 20:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Chengdu J-10 3-view.gif is just a derivative work of this one. But Image:J-10-Draft.svg is not a derivative work. In case of doubt it's simply inspired. I don't deny that J-10_line_sketch.jpg was to a certain extent the starting point for my work, but that's all. Image:J-10-Draft.svg is absolutely different from J-10_line_sketch.jpg. The fundamental difference between a lossless scalable vector image and a bitmap graphic is IMHO relevant to this relationship. Because totally zero of J-10_line_sketch.jpg is part of my work, it can’t be an edited version of that bitmap graphic. And if it's not an edited version, it’s therefore no copyright violation - that's simply elementary. Threshold of originality is given. --FSHL 20:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Per above (Su-37) --Ntrno 10:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Ntrno - You simply assume bad faith... --FSHL 21:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Not a derivative work. Data cannot be copyrighted and the measures of the aircraft (via a mechanical drawing) is not a copyright violation. -- Cat ^chi? 10:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PKW mit Hänger Zusatzzeichen 1048-11.svg

(Misspelled name & wrong image uploaded - the image is not used) --Purodha Blissenbach 12:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment the superseeding file is not identical --ALE! ¿…? 21:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, the superseeded files was an accidentally wrong upload. --Purodha Blissenbach 22:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 14:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soap bubble ggb.jpg

The picture was altered in photo shop and does not look as a soap bubble. No reason to keep it.Mbz1 18:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

do you have another picture with the correct file name? --Digon3 ^talk 17:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have many pictures. The thing is I'm not interested in displaying them on Wikipedia--Mbz1 18:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
  - I meant do you have a exact copy of this picture with the correct file name so you can tag it as {badname}}?
    - But what should be the correct name? That picture is a picture of Golden Gate Bridge reflection in a soap bubble, but I cut and pasted the bubble to a black background in photo shop, which made a picture confusing for some. To me it is still Golden Gate Bridge reflection in a soap bubble, but I know what I took a picture of, while some other people cannot believe it was a bubble in the first place. That's why I'm not sure the picture should be shared with the World. I'd better leave it to myself only--14:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
Comment See en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Soap bubble ggb.jpg... Lupo 07:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If I were you, I would rename it Image:Bubble Reflection of Golden Gate Bridge or something like that.It may not be a soap bubble, but it is a Bubble. --Digon3 ^talk 00:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- - - But it is a soap bubble.--Mbz1 04:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1

Keep as interesting image. Deletion can't be based on the fact that one person queried whether it was a real photo. --MichaelMaggs 17:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LiviuConstantinescu_600x900.jpg

uploaded under wrong name (sorry!), identical with Image:Liviu Constantinescu 600x900.jpg which replaces it 217.232.154.247 21:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The deletion request was made by me (it is not signed because I had already logged out and forgotten it -- sorry) and I stand by it.

-- Victor Blacus 16:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete because it is a duplicate image. Please use {{duplicate|Image:example.jpg}} for exact duplicates next time. --Digon3 ^talk 16:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

tagged with {{duplicate}} --ALE! ¿…? 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stagnes.jpg

Deleted. Samulili 11:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Borås_Stad.jpeg

We received a notice on the Swedish Village Pump from Joy Charly Görsch saying that Image:Borås_Stad.jpeg is was not created by Anton Djurberg (who has a number of notices of problematic image licensing on his user talk page to which he has not responded), but by Görsch, who also provides a link to http://www.goersch.se/horred.html from whence the image appears to be taken. In the deleted image description at Swedish Wikipedia, Djurberg did not actually attribute the photo to himself but to "Krister Fors", without any further information as to who that might be or that he approved the GFDL license.

Görsch requests correction of the authorship information but does not explicitly approve the licensing terms. Thus, the problem here is twofold. First, we must answer who we reasonably believe to be the legitimate copyright holder of the image: Görsch, Djurberg or the elusive Fors? Personally, I'm inclined to believe it's Görsch. Secondly, we must obtain a clear licensing statement from the legitimate copyright holder, whomever that may be. The purpose of the discussion here is primarily to establish consensus with respect to the first point.

—LX (talk, contribs) 21:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Your explanation appears reasonable and I have no reason to doubt Mr Görsch. Please endeavor to obtain a OTRS permission for the image. -N 22:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Very well, I've changed the authorship information to what we seem to agree is the more credible version and, after having received informal GFDL approval, requested formal permission to be filed in OTRS. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Permission has been given. Samulili 11:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sheqel_symbols.svg

A more correct version exists at Image:Sheqel signs.svg bdesham ★ 21:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

image kept, but you might want to add your comments of the description or talk page of the image --ALE! ¿…? 08:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images uploaded by Marcelo Mota Valério (talk • contribs)

The user above has uploaded several pictures that, IMHO, are out of the project scope. The pictures are used to illustrate his personal page in pt.wiki and here, in a style "à la MySpace/Orkut". Dantadd✉ 13:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Na verdade, eu nunca tive a intenção te tornar isso um Orkut... eu apenas pensei em fazer uma maneira de deixar meu Usuário da Wikipédia algo mais parecido comigo... E também, todas as imagens que eu coloco são de minha própria autoria e eu disponibilizo todas sem requerer nenhum direito autorial, assim ampliando o acervo de imagens da Wikipédia. Obrigado...—the preceding unsigned comment is by Marcelo Mota Valério (talk • contribs) 18:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

All images are used on the uploader's user page. I urge the uploader to limit the private images to a number of five. However, these images can stay for the moment. --ALE! ¿…? 08:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 9

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Florian Michalik Popart.jpg

No more needed and wrong title. Thanx, 21:07, 5 July 2007 User:Eselsmann

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, we accept a user’s wish to delete photos showing his person. --Polarlys 18:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Perpignanlogedemer.jpg

L'auteur de cette photographie demande sa suppresion rapide (personnes identifiables). Image de surcroit inutilisé.
The author want to delate speedly his photo according to the French law because persons wouldn't like to appear on it. Furthermore, unused image.--Florent.pecassou 17:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Image supprimée.

Deleted by Korrigan (20:45, 9 July 2007). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Strawinski-Brunnen_Paris-1.jpg

No FOP in France, De Saint-Phalle/Tinguely not dead for over 70 years NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Strawinski-Brunnen_Paris-2.jpg

No FOP in France, De Saint-Phalle/Tinguely not dead for over 70 years NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted, as well as most of category:Fontaine Stravinsky. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ServantSaber at svWiki.jpg

Unused picture of myself. --Saya 23:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Zoos of England

superseded by Category:Zoos of United Kingdom --Jack · talk · 02:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete--Florent.pecassou 17:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not relevant for deletion. England != United Kingdom --FSHL 07:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE! (empty category)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Poule_nègre_soie_perdrix.JPG

Uploader has defaced the image beyond usability. Siebrand 08:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

"The quality of files should be as high as possible and should only contain the relevant content." COM:PS

Delete Samulili 10:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Personal advertising --Florent.pecassou 17:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Trio_de_negres_soie_fauves.JPG

Uploader has defaced the image beyond usability. Siebrand 09:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

"The quality of files should be as high as possible and should only contain the relevant content." COM:PS

Delete Samulili 10:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Personal advertising --Florent.pecassou 18:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:FUQING.JPG

Why This map is GFDL? --Shizhao 03:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

It definitely isn't GFDL-self...

Delete Samulili 10:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Idem --Florent.pecassou 17:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE! at 20:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC) giving the reason google earth screenshot. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cadillac DeVille Cabrio 1.JPG

New Picture here: Image:Cadillac_DeVille_260PS_1969_2.jpg. 3 July 2007 User:ChiemseeMan

Keep Not a relevant reason for deletion. Deadstar 09:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree to Deadstar - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree The new Picture i upload is better, you can deleted the old. --ChiemseeMan 17:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --ALE! ¿…? 21:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Friedrich_Paulus.jpg

I doubt that this could be GFDL or PD Leipnizkeks 18:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Taipeibridge1927.jpg

copyvio, author is 李石樵, 1995 die --Shizhao 00:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Samulili 10:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 16:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.png

Reasons for deletion request because it is not a free image and not real coat of arms this is. Uploaded from site http://www.allstates-flag.com/fotw/images/y/yu)1922.gif copyright violation. Snake bgd 13:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 15:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Goettingen 21 2.jpg

Requested by one of the depicted persons. .:. User:Sarazyn 12:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Dschwen: on request by a depicted person

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Storm2.jpg

wrong name Tewfik 02:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Please upload the same image with a better name and tag this one {{bad name}} and use it for future files have you uploaded with incorrect names, and are unused. Thanks. --Digon3 ^talk 16:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry that I wasn't clear. I did reupload it at the time to Image:AILStorm02.jpg, which is the image currently on use at En WP. Cheers, Tewfik 20:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Bad name. Please use {{bad name}} for next time. --Digon3 ^talk 12:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NITK.jpg

deleted in Chinese wikipedia: copyvio --Shizhao 03:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

And Image:NKFUST DOOR1.jpg, Image:NITK1.jpg--Shizhao 03:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CNwik.png

I uploaded this from en: wiki ages ago, but it says "considered public domain" (so that's not a certainty) and I don't know who created it, where exactly it came from. There are a lot more coats of arms of Ireland so perhaps it is a question of having the image created from scratch and replace the current one? Deadstar 07:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Index.pdf

PDF article contaning text and images. As is: out of project scope. Siebrand 08:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Miheso $ Mazerere.jpg

The image isn't within the project scope because the individuals don't seem to be anyone important enough to have an article ("Media files that are not useful for any Wikimedia project are beyond the scope of Wikimedia Commons." "Private image collections and the like are generally not wanted.") and the image isn't used on anyone's user page. --Samulili 08:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, per nominator.--Svetovid 09:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Habits.gif

owner, per my IRC discussion it probably should not had been uploaded. 17 March 2007 User:Pflatau

deleted, just for educational, non-profit purposes --Polarlys 00:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Habit broadplate.jpg

owner, per my IRC discussion it probably should net be uploaded. The file came from COMET site http://meted.ucar.edu/norlat/snow/micro_ice/1.1.crystal_growth.htm

There is follwing desciption on http://meted.ucar.edu/legal.htm

The user is granted the right, without any fee or cost, to access, link to and use, publish, distribute, disseminate, transfer, or in any manner alter, modify, revise, crop, copy (an unlimited number of times), edit, digitize, and authorize such uses for third parties for any non-profit training, research, or educational purpose whatsoever and not for any direct or indirect commercial purpose or advantage.

The source of this material is the Cooperative Program for Operational Meteorology, Education, and Training (COMET®) Website at http://meted.ucar.edu/ of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) pursuant to a Cooperative Agreement with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. ©1997-2005 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All Rights Reserved."

I also contacted COMET and they indicated that use for educational purposes is OK as descibed above. Revision as of 01:25, 8 June 2006. User:Pflatau

This request was hanging around in the incomplete deletion requests. As it states it cannot be used for commercial purposes, I don't think it's for Commons.

[edit] Image:Aceofspadesfl.jpg

Although a license can't generelly be revoked, it's worth noticing that this image is a derivative work.

Delete Samulili 10:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bagaslaviskis.jpg

there is a better one. 6 July 2007 User:Juliux

Comment Very likely to be Image:Bagaslaviskis1.jpg which is a near duplicate. Deadstar 09:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete - there is a duplicate Bagaslaviskis1.jpg --Juliux 05:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep It is not an exact duplicate (and I think Image:Bagaslaviskis.jpg is the better of the two). --Digon3 ^talk 17:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, different perspectives --Polarlys 00:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Comarcas de Granada.png

inservible 7 July 2007 User:Satesclop

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no source, no author --Polarlys 00:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Flag of Japan (bordered) 2.svg

There does already exist two versions of the bordered flag of Japan, Image:Flag of Japan (bordered).svg and Image:Flag of Japan (bordered) 3.svg --Bangin @de @ku ¤ ρø$τ 13:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 14:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, unused duplicate --Polarlys 00:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:!!!!高輪海岸の石垣石0306.JPG

I think that this photograph is copyright violation of the sentence.

日本語: この写真は文章の著作権侵害と思われる。

--KENPEI 13:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Img379 94-01.jpg

I think that this photograph is copyright violation of the sentence.See,also,Commons:Deletion requests/奥崎謙三 photographs.

日本語: 文章の著作権を侵害していると思われます。Commons:Deletion requests/奥崎謙三 photographsも参照。

--KENPEI 14:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mugshot 50-Cent-a.jpg

I question whether this is really U.S. public domain. If it's determined not to be, it should be uploaded under fair use on Wikipedia. --Spellcast 15:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

{{PD-US-mugshot}}is currently a redirect to {{Copyvio}} following this deletion request. Seems mugshots are not PD. --88.134.44.255 20:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BejiCaidEssebsi.jpg

not sure that this photo was taken before 1982 !!! --Moumou82 16:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

A possible copyright violation, as the main page of the source website says:

© 1995-2007 B. Schemmel. Data from this site may be queried and copied on a not-for-profit basis only if the source is accurately credited. All rights are reserved for profit-seeking purposes. This site is designed for purposes of sharing information freely and intended to be a resource for academics and other private users. Unless otherwise specified, the services of this site are for personal and non-commercial use. You may not copy, transmit, transfer, distribute, reproduce, modify, license, display, perform, publish, create derivative works from, or sell any information, software, products, or services derived from this site. Without the advance express written permission of Rulers.org, you may not send, or cause to be sent, any automated queries of any sort to the Rulers.org site, or use the site in any commercial manner.

Moonian 05:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SMS Message.jpg

this screenshot for mobile OS --OsamaK 18:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 21:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I thought this counted as a derivative work of the software? --|EPO| ^da: 08:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to |EPO| - This is still an image and definitively not a copy of the software... --FSHL 11:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I am fully aware of that. But if I take a photograph of something copyrighted it will most likely be considered a derivative work and thus not allowed on Commons. --|EPO| ^da: 11:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to |EPO| - I just can see a standard text, standard icons and a standard cellular – surely nothing of that’s protected... --FSHL 12:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Just because it is standard it is not the same as it is not protected. The text and icons generated on the display are a result of a protected software. --|EPO| ^da: 13:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to |EPO| - Nobody denies that the software isn’t protected - the question is whether the rest is protected... --FSHL 14:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I think this is more of a PD ineligible. Wouldn't it be better for us to create a "fake" cellphone text msg in SVG format? -- Cat ^chi? 09:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted derivative work difficulty and no author (photographer) explicitly stated. @White Cat: I think that’s a nice idea. --Polarlys 00:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Usr_wikifairy.png

No evidence, in the form of an e-mail transcript, OTRS link, or notice at the source, ir provided to back up the claim that this image is, "copyrighted, however the copyright holder has irrevocably released all rightsl." Iamunknown 19:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no permission--Polarlys 00:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image of Tokyo Watcher

I think that these photographs are copyright violation of the sentence.

日本語: これらの写真は文章の著作権を侵害すると思われます。

--KENPEI 14:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Freedom of panorama in Japan is for non-commercial uses only; except for images of buildings. Lupo 10:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, as per Lupo. --Polarlys 00:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NoGod.JPG

according to me it's simply useless--87.6.8.99 00:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

"[F]iles uploaded to the Commons have to be useful for some Wikimedia project. Media files that are not useful for any Wikimedia project are beyond the scope of Wikimedia Commons. -- -- However, uploading images of yourself and others in small quantity is allowed as long they are useful for some Wikimedia project (for example, a Wikipedia article, a Wikinews report, a meta article, a user page)." (from COM:PS, emphasis added) Although not a photo of anyone, this is a "self-created artwork" mentioned in the same paragraph of the policy. Hence,

Keep. Samulili 08:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Typical example of a useless/polarising {{attackimage}}.

Delete Siebrand 09:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't oppose to deleting if this kind of images are forbidden on user pages of most projects (or in many of the biggest). But I was influenced to vote for keeping because the image is used a lot. Samulili 09:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Wikipedia/Wikimedia is not censored, especially if there is nothing polarising here, Siebrand.--Svetovid 09:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 11:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Noreligion.jpg

DeleteOther images can be used to avoid gods' hurting representations : image:Noreligion.jpg, Image:No god.PNG--Florent.pecassou 18:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Florent.pecassou - That’s Gods problem and not ours. --FSHL 21:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

That's not a reason for deletion. And don't forget that blasphemy is a victimless crime.--Svetovid 13:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

image is used and therefore kept (of course!) --ALE! ¿…? 10:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NoGod.JPG

As per Commons:Deletion requests/Image:No Israel.svg O sama K 13:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Keep attacks noone (only god himself, but i do not think he cares) ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 13:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep No reason for deletion. Rama 13:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep Idem. Grasyop ^✉ 15:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment Personally, I'd say we keep them all, including the No Israel image, assuming it was just a crossed-out image of Israel. Either that or delete them all. I just cannot see an adequate standard to differentiate between what, to me, appears to be similar subject & usage among Anti logos. I'd think they could all be handy on Wikinews, which tends to have more use of clip-art-ish images such as these. On another note, I am not particularly fond of OsamaK's apparent disregard for WP:POINT. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 01:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment This is under discussion at the Village pump. We should close this DR and take the discussion there. This sums up well what I think about the matter. Lewis Collard! (talk, contribs, en.wp) 07:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Kept. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 13:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Live_Earth.svg

This is a commercial logo and there is no indication that it could be in commons. Svetovid 09:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Not registered as trademark at WIPO -- 80.145.35.83 12:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

You obviously don't know what trademark and copyright are.--Svetovid 13:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I incline myself to

Keep this image on the grounds of the templates {{PD-ineligible}}, {{PD-textlogo}}, and {{trademarked}} --ALE! ¿…? 15:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete. {{PD-ineligible}} does not apply, because it does not consist entirely of information. {{PD-textlogo}} does not apply because the logotype is not simply text in a general typeface. It is a circle with a colour gradient (the official logotype actually features a skyscape within the circle), a morse code, and a typeface. The relative arrangement and size of these elements and the sizing and colouring of the circle as a whole meet the minimum standards of originality required for copyright protection. ({{Trademarked}} is not a licensing tag.) I previously deleted File:Live Earth Logo.png, which is used under fair use provisions at en:Image:Live Earth Logo.png. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Axed; copyrighted. (→O - R L Y?) 09:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Maps with non-latin filenames

In this series, there are problems in filenames which contain non-latin characters. So I am going to clear these files from here and reupload at Japanese local Wikipedia server. Of course I don't prevent you to copy them and upload here in other name. --User:Lincun 14:48, 25 September 2006

Comment This is a deletion fix - the deletion template is embedded in this template put on about 150 files. Deadstar 10:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

can not see any reason for a deletion request --ALE! ¿…? 08:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mcdonalds_oslo_2.jpg

If I'm correct FOP for anything other than buildings in Norway is only allowed if for non-commercial use, so that would make this picture not allowed on commons NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 23:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Well this is not incidental inclusion, so freedom of panorama doesn't come into it. For the record, Norwegian law allows commercial use of panoramas where the copyrighted work is not "clearly the main motif" (art. 24). This is a picture of the McDonald's "twin arches" trademark: it could have been taken in Oslo or in Hounslow for all that can been seen apart from from the main motif. Physchim62 23:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 08:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images uploaded by Marcos Vinícius Mota Soares (talk • contribs)

The user above has uploaded several pictures that, IMHO, are out of the project scope. One of the pictures shows two girls and I'm not sure about their given consent. 21:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Estas fotos que o Usuário:Marcos Vinícius Mota Soares colocou tem o selo de Copyrigth necessário, então provavelmente ele tem a aprovação dessas duas garotas para colocar a foto... Eu,Marcos Vinícius Mota Soares estou dentro de todos os direitos e normas jurídicas legais,com fotos com selo de Copyrigth e autorização por escrito. —the preceding unsigned comment is by 201.58.80.206 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

three deleted, one kept (was in use on a user page) --ALE! ¿…? 08:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ISK 10 note.jpg

Ég hafði samband við Seðlabanka Íslands og íslenskir peningar falla undir sanngjarna notkun. 29 May 2007 User:Steinninninn

deletion fix Deadstar 10:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Isl Krone.JPG for the discussion. Lupo 19:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Kept; details at linked request. -- Infrogmation 01:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 10

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Erik Creugers (himself).JPG

NO PERMISSION given for transfer from dutch Wikipedia to Commons --Erik Creugers 04:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This is irrelevant. The image has a free license and all relevant information has been retained. Please STOP your vendictive actions and vandalism. Siebrand 06:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree to Siebrand - Not relevant for deletion. --FSHL 08:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep I added a personality rights template, maybe that will keep him happy. Madmax32 08:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, no such permission is needed --Polarlys 18:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Erik_Creugers_(himself).JPG

Orphaned personal photo OsamaK 13:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 14:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:PD-manifesto

We don't assume copyright, we only accept content which is clearly free. Basically the same as Template:PD-LOC -- Prince Kassad 08:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete contradictory and unused Madmax32 09:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 19:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Церковь Архангела Михаила в Тропарёве4.jpg

Bad quality — it's too dark. And there's enough better images of this church --- Vow 04:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, no reason for deletion --ALE! ¿…? 15:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chalmers.jpg

we need permission from the photographer, not from the portrayed person --rtc 15:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, I transfered the image from de.wikipedia.org some time ago using a bot without checking the permission. The argumentation above is valid. --Polarlys 16:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Out of project scope: text description of a website called BigUpsets.com William Avery 16:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. /odder 19:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete You say this is deleted?? Why is it still here?? WayneRay 20:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

Really deleted this time. 22:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Delete You say this is deleted?? Why is it still here?? WayneRay 20:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Outside project scope, source cited is a webpage, making it a potential copyvio too. -N 08:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

deleted Julo 17:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Fuera del Commons:Alcance del proyecto. Text file Out of Commons Scope --WayneRay 20:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:FFmap-ka-_.gif

Sorry, where is image?! OsamaK 19:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, useless 1x1 pixel image. This debate is larger than the file :P -- Cat ^chi? 19:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

kept/restored. It appears yje image is a placeholder on a template in wikibooks: Wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist/Map sklanjati

Indeed it is. Thanks for restoring the file while I was not watching. --Daniel Bunčić (de wiki · talk · contrib.) 08:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Washington dc 7th st.png

Also:

Deleted as copyvios from Microsoft Streets and Trips. Just listing for the record. ~MDD 46 96 00:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Might want to check:

Image:2007 Audi A8.jpg - On US government website, but is it a US government work?
Image:Windows XP Save-as dialog box small.png - Windows GUI
Image:Windows XP Save-as dialog box.png - Windows GUI

~MDD 46 96 01:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Mdd4696: Copyvio of Microsoft Streets and Trips

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Hepatopsida

not a current taxon and not a valid name --EncycloPetey 10:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: empty category

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

inappropriate; distasteful 66.191.161.74 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, biology is really distasteful … --Polarlys 18:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --ALE! ¿…? 21:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

pornographic with no use 70.178.187.98 20:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete It's a modern photo of explicit actual sexual activity. I think it might be seen as porn under US law. If that's the case, then we need legal documentation to show that the participants are not under age. That doesn't mean that such pictures wouldn't be useful if we could get the documents. --Simonxag 13:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Agreeing with the US law concern. Also, don't think that the utility of the image is really there. Currently it is only linked to from userspace on the English wikipedia, for instance. Darkspots 20:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Obviously mature sex organs. It might be useful to show the people the difference between this couple and an under age couple, but this might cause problems with US law. So the younger generation has just to believe this, sorry kids. Mutter Erde 09:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Pornographic? Why? Because of Nudity? Or an erection? No. Marcus Cyron 21:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep not pornographic; just normal sexual actions --91.128.173.49 20:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

delete I hate it, coz i am gay. --91.128.173.49 20:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Gnan garra 12:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

Picture is apparently out of project scope (no serious chance to use it in an article) and not in use. Ra'ike T C 09:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment You should first close correctly the second deletion request before you start a third one.
btw.: commons is not only a repository for interwikis. Example: Nearly nobody on wikipedia would need 10 MB pics and bigger. They are stored for print media.(Source). Mutter Erde (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I closed it. I was thinking there was going to be some response so I left it open, but now we have this page. As a biased and involved party, I support deletion on the grounds that I can not honestly see this being used on any Wikimedia project (in their mainspaces, at least). Rocket000(talk) 10:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unnecessary to me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Herbythyme (talk · contributions). Cirt (talk) 12:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Marcela (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Unless the description is changed, it should be deleted, as "heterosexual sex" is an obviously false description. Fossa_?! 22:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep, could be useful. Herby & Cirt: The Wikimedia Commons has many pictures that aren't necessary to me, but I nevertheless do not want to delete them. --Kjetil_r 14:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep per Kjetil r --Isderion (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Of course, this picture can be interesting for both biology and sexuality. Ajor933 (talk) 15:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Kept as per Kjetil r, Isderion, Ajor933, etc. Third DR.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cancellara_compiegne.jpg

I believe the Flickr user's authorship assertion is false and that they do not have the right to license this image. Most of the user's uploads are family photos taken with a low-end Olympus point and shoot camera. Mixed in with it is this photo with a DOF of which the Olympus is most likely incapable and several other photos clearly lifted from news sources. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid you're right. I think this is not made by de Flickr-user, but he only copied the work... Afhaalchinees 22:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Thanks for understanding; sorry your work was in vain. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dillon Montana 1942 LOC 1a35017.jpg

This is a duplicate image, see Image:Russell Lee street corner Dillon Montana.jpg --Mrrxx 20:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete They are slightly different, but Image:Russell Lee street corner Dillon Montana.jpg is a much better quality image, making Image:Dillon Montana 1942 LOC 1a35017.jpg redundant. --Digon3 ^talk 16:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete No objection from me as uploader. Balcer 17:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Russell Lee street corner Dillon Montana.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:G8 2006 leaders.jpg

the g8russia.ru license isn't free enough. it is to republish only, no mention of derivative works or commercial use ---N 22:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Also

Image:Tony Blair with Romano Prodi at G8.jpg
Image:G8brown.jpg.
This issue has been brought up many times before and always has closed delete. [26] [27] [28] [29] -N 03:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete encore? - Dantadd✉ 12:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, didn't we already delete this? —LX (talk, contribs) 21:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

No proof of permission for commercial use or modification. Images have now been deleted. --|EPO| ^da: 14:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:永.jpeg

Was a test ... 30 June 2007 User:TommyBee

deleted, --Polarlys 00:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] File:2007gaia.mp3.ogg

it's smallest file in commons and it's not playing and "This file may contain malicious code, by executing it your system may be compromised." OsamaK 21:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Now it seems it's deleted by User:White Cat already. --Moonian 05:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vthapsus sheet.JPG

Violates the copyright apparently held by The Linnean Society of London. The original is a scientific plant specimen, not a two-dimensional work of art, so age of the original does not apply. The photograph may be copyrighted since it is not a reproduction. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Source: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/projects/linnaean-typification/detail.dsml?ID=925400

Unfortunately, Image:Vthapsus_sheet.JPG isn't public domain, as it isn't "a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art" - it is a derived work, with copyright dating from the date the photo was taken, and belonging to the NHM photographer. Sorry, but it'll have to be deleted! - MPF 01:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC) copied from User talk:Circeus. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I really don,t think because this is a dried plant, rather than a drawing, it suddenly fails the 2-d criterion. The copyright notice does not, by any mean creates copyright for material in the public domain. Circeus 19:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree with User:MPF, except it would appear that the image copyright holder may be The Linnean Society of London. "Image reproduced by kind permission of The Linnean Society of London."[30] According to Commons:Licensing, "[R]eproductions are usually not eligible to copyright: The creator of a scan of a picture owns no copyright to the resulting digital image, the scan needs no license. The only license important in that case is the one of the original picture." In this case, I don't think a photographic image can be considered a reproduction of a dried plant. Hence, the image may be copyrighted and permission for use must be obtained from the copyright holder. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

The point of the 2-D v 3-D distinction is that a 2D photograph of a 3D work of art necessitates a decision on what angle to view and photograph the artwork from, and is therefore necessarily not a slavish reproduction.

This is a pressed sheet. It may not be strictly two-dimensional, but then again nor are the works of Claude Monet when you see them up close - thick wads of paint are slapped on, creating differences in paint profile of up to half an inch. In both cases, however, these works of art are effectively 2-D because they are intended to be treated as flat objects, and viewed from straight in front; thus there is no decision to be made on what angle to photograph from, and this is simply a slavish reproduction of a public domain creative work. Hesperian 23:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

It has been suggested elsewhere that this image is subject to a copyright claim by the owners of the webiste from which it was taken. This is true, but those qualified to judge of this situation will know that spurious copyright claims are a dime a dozen. It is an undisputed fact that the sheet itself has long since passed into the public domain, and I don't think anybody would argue that the photograph is not a slavish reproduction. Therefore the issue hinges on whether or not the sheet qualifies as a 2D work. If so, then this is in the public domain per Corel v. Bridgeman, irrespective of spurious claims to the contrary.

As I stated above, this sheet is intended to be treated as a flat object viewed from straight in front. To photograph it from any other angle would be ludicrous. It may not be perfectly flat but its profile is no less flat than a typical impressionist painting. Therefore I argue that the sheet itself is a 2D work, so this photograph is in the public domain.

Hesperian 14:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Hesperian's interpretation. There is no reason this shouldn't be treated as a 2 dimensional. Like he said, herbarium sheets are generally flatter than impressionist paintings. Furthermore it's quite clear that such a photograph is not eligible for copyright. If I were to go in and take a photo at the Linnean Society, my photo would be indistinguishable. If the photo perhaps captured the background at a particular angle, then it would no longer be two dimensional and would be copyrightable, but that is not the case. It's in the public domain Djlayton4 15:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Discussion above was copied from Image:Vthapsus sheet.JPG Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

My position is that 2-dimensional works of art don't have to be absolutely flat. Many impressionist artists used to slap on great wads of paint, creating thickness profiles that varied by up to half an inch, but no-one would argue that these are not 2-D works. I think a 2-D work is a work that is intended to be treated as a flat object and viewed from directly in front, irrespective of whether or not it is perfectly flat. In the case of the V. thapsus sheet, it would be ludicrous to photograph it from any other angle, so I think it qualifies as a 2-D art. --Hesperian 23:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to intrude on this discussion but I have to agree with MPF on this one. The website that the image was taken from has a clear statement of copyright; see their terms of use where it states clearly and explicitly:

NHM or its licensors or contributors own the copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the material on the Site. You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit, adapt or otherwise use any material on the Site other than for your own personal non-commercial use.

That seems pretty clear to me. Moreoever, under the image itself is the statement "Image reproduced by kind permission of The Linnean Society of London", suggesting that it came from a third party who probably owns the copyright and was used with permission. If there is any question of copyright violation, and in lieu of explicit permission, an image should not be uploaded to Wikipedia.

I have to question what this image provides to the article in the first place; it's not essential to any information provided, but if it were, it could be listed under "external links". MrDarwin 13:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyright claims are a dime a dozen. Virtually every library in Australia claims copyright over images that everyone knows to be in the public domain. I emailed my state library over this, and they admitted that the images I was querying were in the public domain, but declined to stop falsely copyright tagging them. And this is not by any stretch of the imagination a problem unique to Australia. Hesperian 14:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Discussion above was copied from en:User talk:MPF Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I would contend is not a work of art at all, within the spirit of copyright law. It is a solid object, a scientific museum specimen; the photo is comparable to e.g. a photo of a rock in a geological museum - one could not claim that a photo of a rock is in the public domain merely because the rock is 50 million years old, or was collected 250 years ago. Not even if it was a flat rock. With something like this, the copyright dates from the time of photographing and belongs to the photographer, not the collector of the object photographed. - MPF 16:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

People seem to be relying heavily on a single U.S. court decision that may or may not be applicable here. Is the herbarium specimen itself in the public domain? Probably. Would a court consider this herbarium specimen to be a "two-dimensional work of art"? Maybe, maybe not. How about the photograph taken of that specimen? Maybe, maybe not (did any creativity go into producing the image, e.g., were any special techniques or equipment used to photograph it, color correction or balancing, or other kinds of mage manipulation?). Can the decision be extended in any way to this case? Maybe, maybe not. Does this court ruling have any standing outside the U.S.A.? Maybe, maybe not. The problem is that copyright is being asserted for this image and therefore the onus is on those who claim the material is in the public domain to prove it, and prove it very clearly, otherwise they open Wikipedia to copyright violation charges (and possibly lawsuits). I'm not a lawyer, but I think this is a great big gray area where one should tread very carefully. Legality aside, it's also a matter of common courtesy to ask to use such images, rather than simply taking them and using them without permission. (BTW I think that "fair use" may apply here, but that's a separate issue and I'm not any more familiar with international law than I am with U.S. law.) Finally, why not just link to the photograph in the list of references, rather than uploading it to Wikipedia? I'm still wondering why it's so critical to the article in the first place. 160.111.86.128 17:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete It isn't a work of art and it isn't a reproduction thereof. It is a photograph, apparently recent, and the photographer or his/her assignee holds the copyright. Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment My reading of en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. is that it isn't settled law in the US. The law is unsettled in the UK also. That said, Bridgeman v. Corel applies to copies of original paintings, and does not apply here. Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete for same reasons as Walter. - MPF 16:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Hesperian's interpretation, not to mention that it would never become an issue. Djlayton4 22:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete either a) it's art, in which case we don't know who produced it and when, and it's not strictly 2d, or b) it's not art and the copyright falls on the photographer. -N 22:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- It was produced by Carolus Linnaeus in the late 1700s. Hesperian 23:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep This has nothing to do with rocks. Only creative input is copyrightable, and there is no creative input in the properties of a rock or plant. The creative input in the original sheet lies in the way in which the plant is arranged upon the sheet of paper. This would have been done with great care and skill, and I believe it would be sufficient to establish copyrightability. This is, however, irrelevant, because any copyright on the original sheet, if it ever existed, has long since passed into the public domain. I think most participants here agree with that, and so you should; if you can't comprehend the trivially obvious fact that there is no copyright in something created in the 1700s (as opposed to a recent photograph of it), you shouldn't be participating in this discussion.
I haven't heard anyone argue that the photograph is not a slavish copy. Even if we grant MPF and Walter's positions that the sheet is simply a specimen lacking any creative input (which I don't) there is still no creative input in the photograph. The framing of the photograph is predetermined by the extent of the sheet; the angle of the photograph was necessarily straight in front, because of the essential 2D nature of the work; lighting is necessarily from directly behind the camera, and applied as evenly as possible. So where is the creative input of the photographer? There is none, it is a slavish copy.
I also haven't heard any attempt to repudiate my observation that this is just as much as 2D work as the average impressionist painting, because it is no less flat than an impressionist painting, and it is intended to be treated as a flat object and viewed only from directly in front.
As far as I can see, this is a pretty straightforward case. Hesperian 23:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think anyone is arguing that the herbarium sheet itself is subject to copyright (but see below); the discussion is entirely about the photograph of that herbarium sheet. Do you know for a fact that there was no creative process involved in producing that photograph? If so, how do you know that? Most importantly, do you think a court of law, in any country in the world, would agree with you, and would also agree that the herbarium sheet is a "2-dimensional work of art" for the purposes of applying previous American legal decisions about reproducing images of works of art whose copyrights have expired? Would you be willing to bet your own money on it? If you answered "yes" to these questions, I want to talk to you about investing in the stock market because you're apparently omniscient. But if you answered "no" or "I'm not sure", then uploading and using this image is a very unwise thing to do. The people who are claiming that this image is in the public domain may well be right, but it's not at all clear to me from the evidence I've seen and I think people are being dangerously cavalier with copyright protections and possible violations. 70.108.32.202 01:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep per Hesperian's analysis. With respect to Bridgeman being an American court case, it's not the legal precedent as such that matters, but the elements of law underlying the decision. Copyright law is sufficiently internationally standardised that the relevant elements here, namely that copyright protection presupposes some original, creative work capable of being copyrighted, exist in every jurisdiction. Such work was present in Linnaeus' creation, but is not present in the process of creating copies of his creation. I'm not sure beyond the shadow of a doubt that every court would agree, but I am sure beyond reasonable doubt, which is what Commons effectively operates on every day. (If we had to be omnisciently certain of the status of every work, we couldn't trust anyone's authorship claims for fear that maybe, just maybe, they're lying.) —LX (talk, contribs) 21:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep My analysis is similar to Hesperian's, so the (c) notice has no meaning: you can't copyright something in the public domain, and I utterly fail to see how "artistic expression" can be argued in this case, from either Linnaeus or the NHM.Circeus 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Anyone who has ever worked with herbarium specimens knows that they can be examined at many magnifications and angles, so the implication that the straight-on photo is the only possible one is incorrect. On the other hand, the same could be said of an impressionist painting. An angled view of the brushwork of a public domain painting requires creative judgment of the photographer, as the same would of a herbarium specimen. Nevertheless, this is the one view of the specimen that is rote, and requires no judgment.--Curtis Clark 18:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete Per Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#UK, this is probably copyrightable in the UK. I have never seen a dried specimen myself, so I don't know about whether or not this is 3D. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, someone has to do it. I already worked with dried specimen and you can’t consider such shets as two-dimensional. The plant still has a three-dimensional structure and older paper is often wavy. The photography has to be lit carefully to avoid disturbing little shadows on the one hand and to provide a good quality and enough details regarding the dried specimen on the other hand. Maybe you also have to re-adjust parts of the plant or to fix them separately. Pure mechanical copying is impossible for a herbarium. Regarding to the low level of originality in Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#UK, the character of the work and the clear copyright note: deleted --Polarlys 22:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Hepatophyta

This is not a valid taxon name. The name has been corrected everywhere but Commons and Wikispecies. For confirmation, see Stotler & Stotler's article "Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta", pp.21-70 in "Bryophye Biology" (Cambridge University Press, 2000). The valid names are Marchantiophyta or alternately Hepaticophyta. The name "Hepatophyta" is a common error. (The category is empty, and duplicates Category:Marchantiophyta.) --EncycloPetey 10:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

OK --Pristigaster 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 07:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Image (mathematics).svg

I made a better one -- 21 June 2007 Cronholm144

Could you please provide a link to the better image? --Digon3 ^talk 16:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Samulili 07:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Burning-cross2.jpg

Likely copyvio; source specifies 1921-1930 only. grendel|khan 20:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep the source is being shifty on purpose because they know they can't copyright US images before 1923. (See their TOS, they copyright everything on the site). Searches aren't cached, so follow this sequence. Go to the image then click call number search, then enter the call number "X-21542" and hit Search. Go to the bottom, click "Cross burning Colorado Denver 1920-1930." You then see "Ku Klux Klan members and a burning cross", image "X-21542" plainly dated as 1921. -N 22:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's weird; why wouldn't the date, if known, be on the actual record itself? grendel|khan 15:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  - At a guess so they don't get people like us going "heh heh heh, I'm not buying that, it's PD"? -N 17:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
    - Actually, it looks more like a software limitation, than a sudden admission of an exact date. i.e., the "Call number browse" summary can probably only list a single number, rather than the given range of years. --Davepape 04:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
KEEP. See N. —the preceding unsigned comment is by KAMiKAZOW (talk • contribs)

Kept. Samulili 07:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gv_19471029_24_04.ogg

The recording, and possibly all other similar recordings[31], are most probably copyright protected. The copyrightholder is the one that recorded the speech. The file has the license tag {{PD-Speech}} which was supposed to be deleted (1), but the deletion was reverted without discussion, and I have also seen files carrying {{PD-India}} - a creator has not been mentioned. User:Yann appears to have restored many previously deleted files. The source claims: Our archival material is protected by international copyright law, and exclusively for personal, non-commercial use. Unauthorized copying, public performance, broadcasting, hiring, and rental of the material is strictly prohibited. Siebrand 13:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This is misleading or false. The copyright holder is not the "one that recorded the speech". No such provision exists in any copyright law as I know, and certainly not in India. The speaker may have the copyright of a speech if it was written down before, but that was not what Gandhi used to do. In addition, all sound recordings are public domain 60 years after publication in India, and therefore in all countries which have a "shorter rule" provision. The source (The Gandhiserve Foundation) is notorious for claiming dubious copyright, and certainly doesn't hold the copyright of these files. So I believe that the previous deletions were done without proper procedure, for a dubious reason (file description pages not edited for some time), and the uploader (me) was not informed. Yann 13:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Not all speeches need to be written down. Berne Convention, article 2: "(2) It shall, however, be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to prescribe that works in general or any specified categories of works shall not be protected unless they have been fixed in some material form." I don't what the situation is in India. The term of protection is 60 years p.m.a., in this case until 2008-12-31, if the work is copyrightable. Samulili 17:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I does it really matter what the Indian copyright law says? This speech is clearly in a material fixed form. Samulili 17:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

It seems like Indian copyright law is pretty relevant. Sound recordings and cinematographic films are public domain 60 years after the date of publication (not 60 years pma and not from the following Jan 1). If the date of this speech is considered the publication date, it would be PD at the end of October this year, though technically not right now. Doesn't seem worth deleting for the sake of three months. Carl Lindberg 05:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The text of the speech will probably be public as you say. We do not (yet) know when the audio recordings were first published. Siebrand 08:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Of course Indian copyright law matters, but it doesn't matter whether it requires works to be fixed because in this case the work is fixed.

Furthermore, even if the rights of the audio recording would have been expired, copyright to the speech hasn't. Samulili 11:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The speech may possibly be copyrighted separately in text form (provided Gandhi wrote it down), meaning we very well may not be allowed to transcribe it and post the text, but this recording is a separate copyright and is not a derivative work of the textual speech. It is a "performance" and those copyrights expire 60 years after publication in India. The only question is when it was published (well, that and also that it may not be considered PD inside the United States). Carl Lindberg 03:23, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

You claim again that the speech has to be in text form but you have not shown any proof for that claim. Like I pointed out earlier, whether such fixed form is required is up to the national law. The default, however, is that it is not required.

Rome convention also states that: "Protection granted under this Convention shall leave intact and shall in no way affect the protection of copyright in literary and artistic works. Consequently, no provision of this Convention may be interpreted as prejudicing such protection." So even if the rights of producers of phonograms have expired, that does not affect the rights of the copyright holder. Samulili 08:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

As I already said, Gandhi didn't write down his speeches, and as Carl Lindberg said, the copyright would expire October 2007 if it existed. Yann 09:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

What is the relevance of Gandhi not writing down his speeches? Is it required? Nothing of that sort has been shown to be true. And the date of expiration is 1 January 2009 as Gandhi died 30 January 1948. Samulili 10:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

To be copyrighted, something must be in fixed or tangible form... to be a literary work, it needs to be written. It is possible that if *anyone* writes down the speech, Gandhi would still own copyright on it (not sure about that). The literary copyright lasts until 2009 as you say. However the sound recording is completely separate... the term for recordings is 60 years from publication, not 60 years pma, so that would expire at a different time (and whatever literary copyright is separately held has no bearing on this). If Gandhi had previously written it down, his literary copyright would let him disallow a recording to be made (but if allowed, the term of the recording is still 60 years from then). The performance copyright would have some bearing on the use of the recording, but in India the performer's rights expire after 25 years, so Gandhi would not have any ownership in this recording after 1972 (unless he was also the one to make the recording). Anyone may use or make copies of the recording itself after 60 years, although someone else making the same speech would violate the literary copyright. The situation is similar with old musical recordings in the UK/EU... the songs from 50 years ago are starting to become public domain there. If another artist covers the song they still owe royalties to the song composer (since those rights do not expire), but the actual original recording is public domain. Carl Lindberg 14:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

"To be copyrighted, something must be in fixed or tangible form... to be a literary work, it needs to be written." That simply is not true and I have already quoted the Berne Convention: "It shall, however, be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to prescribe that works in general or any specified categories of works shall not be protected unless they have been fixed in some material form." I'll quote some more: "The expression "literary and artistic works" shall include every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever may be the mode or form of its expression, such as books, pamphlets and other writings; lectures, addresses, sermons and other works of the same nature" etc. Samulili 15:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, but I was reading the Indian copyright law in particular. It is fairly specific about sound recordings; the literary copyright owner can prevent the recording, but if permitted the copyright is 60 years from publication. The performance rights can restrict usage of the recording for 25 years, and the literary rights can prevent transfers to another medium (such as text), but the sound recording itself is PD after 60 years. A sound recording is distinct from a literary work. Carl Lindberg 16:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

On the rights of the producer of phonograms. I have quoted earlier the Rome Convention: "Protection granted under this Convention shall leave intact and shall in no way affect the protection of copyright in literary and artistic works. Consequently, no provision of this Convention may be interpreted as prejudicing such protection."

It would seem from this that we may not use the recording freely while Gandhi's (his heirs) copyright is still valid. I tried to find outside evidence for this, and after some searching, I did. A piece of news by BBC. Regarding publications by Elvis and Beatles, they write: "While copyright in the sound recording itself may be due to expire, copyright in the original work belonging to the songwriter lasts for the length of their lives plus 70 [60 in India] years. For each sale of a Beatles recording, the owner of the copyright in the original work will continue to receive payment until this expires many years from now. What will disappear is the right of individual record companies to maintain a monopoly on release of certain recordings. And this is what worries them."[32] Samulili 17:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's quite correct, unless maybe Indian and British law have drifted a bit. The sound recording copyright (in India) allows the user to "To make any other sound recording embodying it", "To sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire, any copy of the sound recording", and "to communicate the sound recording to the public". The literary copyright allows them to (among other things) "make a cinematograph film or sound recording in respect of the work" and "to perform the work in public". The sound recording copyrights are expiring, so anyone should be able to do those functions, so unless the UK is different it would seem anyone can copy and sell the recordings with no royalties. On the other hand, radio stations playing the songs count as a "performance", so the royalties coming from that have always just gone to the composer, and that will continue even when the sound recordings are PD. It may be that latter part that the article you cite was referring to. So, while the copyright on the recording will expire and I think commons can host it, there are certain uses that would not be OK until Gandhi's literary copyright expires in 2009. Carl Lindberg 23:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think you should have reverted me and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Speech this, especially since you are involved in the matter. Assuming items are in the public domain is not valid. You assume copyrighted until you have a license otherwise, especially if you read the court case presented in that COM:DR as well. If you want to change it mark it "no license" and then wait the 7 days and notify all the uploaders (other than yourself), I'd be fine with that, but using your admin tools as a party in a dispute wasn't cool. MECU≈talk 13:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

For that, I need to be notified. That was not the case. Yann 14:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. However, the uniliteral restoration of PD-Speech should need to be discussion (but not here).

/ Fred J 21:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg

Copyright violation, same case as in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg. Freely licencing a photographic reproduction of a copyrighted logo does not remove the copyright protection of that logo. --Sandstein 22:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg 2

Insufficient source, probable copyvio. This image is from a fridge magnet, not a flag. Hezbollah deserves copyright protection for their logo. This image is also of poor quality (it includes a reflection of the flash or other light source). — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep and ~~tag as pd-ineligible~~. This issue was already hashed out in the previous deletion. The magnet is but a slavish transform, no new copyright. -N 00:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of restoring the vandalized license tag on the image. -N 00:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete with previous Hezbollah logo images. Sorry, I don't understand how 86 kB SVG file Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg was declared as trivial work. Where is objective requirements for triviality? --EugeneZelenko 14:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep The result of the discussion was to keep, are you going to delete the US flag too, because it has been changed less than 70 years ago... Madmax32 21:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete... and I still need someone to explain to me how there is "no original authorship" in this rather elaborate drawing with respect to Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg. Comparisons with national flags are flawed. Countries can legislate against perceived offensive or disrespectful uses of their flags, so that a national flag may be free for copyright and licensing purposes (which we are concerned with), but protected by other means (the responsibility of anyone using works from Commons). Hezbollah, not being a country, has no line of defense in this matter beyond copyright, and I very much doubt Hezbollah would consent to the creation of derivative works which they would perceive as desecrating their symbols. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not so sure, it's never been established who the authors of this flag are so, and it is apparently a derivative work of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps flag, besides as pointed out in the previous deletion request [33] there are many flags which could also be considered to be not PD ineligible but are kept regardless, such as the flag of the UN or NATO for example, I don't foresee hezbollah having much success in stopping abusive use of their flag considering they are a scheduled terrorist group in the US. Madmax32 09:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This is not a flag. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It's used as a flag by Hezbollah and their supporters. Madmax32 11:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

It is de facto used as a national flag in Hezbollah controlled southern Lebanon. Bertilvidet 19:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, and delete the SVG also. There is plenty of original authorship in this logo. The integration of the graphical elements into the Arabic text, at the very least, constitutes a work of art eligible for copyright. Sandstein 05:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep {{PD-ineligible}} Bertilvidet 07:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete as nominator. Also, this is a lower-resolution, poorer-quality, single-color-process version of the non-field portion of Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|Flickr review status nom) 02:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Now you're straddling the fence. You can't claim this photo is illegal, and the flag is too, and then say it should be deleted because it's lower quality than the flag. -N 14:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I never did "claim this photo is illegal, and the flag is too", nor did I express an opinion at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg. There are four items we are dealing with here:

The actual logo of Hezbollah, in green and red on a bright yellow field, probably copyrighted in Lebanon, 1982-1985.
The version of the logo above on the flag of Hezbollah (with a wider yellow field), presented at Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg.
A fridge magnet containing a dark-green-only on mustard-yellow bastardization of the logo which Bertilvidet found and photographed at an undisclosed location and ~~date/~~time.
The resulting photograph Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg.

I have multiple reasons for wanting this image Image:Hezbollahlogo.jpg deleted:

Insufficient source, probable copyvio at the time I made the request (I had not yet read Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg)
Poor quality and lower resolution of the photograph (it includes a reflection of the flash or other light source, and is incompletely focused) - it is not a slavish transformation of the fridge magnet.
Poor quality of the fridge magnet image (it includes less detail than Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg, and is missing the red color) - it is not a slavish transformation of the actual logo.
We already have Image:Flag of Hezbollah.svg, why do we need any other representation of the actual logo of Hezbollah? "There should be only one copy of an image" per {{duplicate}}.

— Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Refusing to discuss comments such as "bastardization" I must say that interpreting {{duplicate}} as a policy prohibiting the same symbol being depicted in various settings is a novelty that radically will change the nature of Commons. We even have a Category:Flags_of_the_United_States, with different flags as well as the Flag of the United States depicted in various settings. I find it useful, and would not suggest to delete all but one photo of the same symbol. For exact date and time of the photo caption please see the relevant page (08:56, 9 August 2006). Bertilvidet 12:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Where was the photo taken, in what country and timezone (thus producing the UTC time)? Did you take it? If not, who did? Whose fridge magnet is or was it? Where did they get it? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I do not see the need for all these details. But if it is relevant I will answer: 1) The photo was taken in my kitchen in Istanbul (Turkey). I took the photo with my own camera. I own the fridge magnet, that I bought as a souvenir in Beirut February 2006. Bertilvidet 08:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted -- Infrogmation 01:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 11

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Lepidodendrales

Created accidentally --EncycloPetey 04:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

done

Julo 07:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TukandWalter.JPG

I was just testing how to upload a file. 10 July 2007 User:Jmfelli

I've added a {{speedydelete}} tag. --rimshot^talk 13:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Passat.jpg

subida 2 veces.8 November 2006 User:Pavlemadrid commons

Comment Deletion fix. User likely refers to Image:Passatsm.jpg, which has the license plate blanked & is smaller than the original image. Deadstar 10:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ot scheme.png

(no reason given) 27 April 2007 - User:Patrick4685

Delete The description states "schematic image of the core of optimality theory" which it clearly is not. I suspect error upload. Delete as I think the current image (text) will not be used. Deadstar 10:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NormChi.png

Exists already as jpg --User:Philipendula 10:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment File doesn't open for me Deadstar 10:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment The file opens at full resolution, but the preview generation has failed. Both jpeg and png are the wrong formats to use for information like this (jpeg more so than png). The most appropriate file type for this type of information is svg. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Norm Chi.png

Exists already as jpg --User:Philipendula 10:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment file doesn't open for me. Deadstar 10:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment The file opens at full resolution, but the preview generation has failed. Both jpeg and png are the wrong formats to use for information like this (jpeg more so than png). The most appropriate file type for this type of information is svg. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 21:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:748940750_6e3b3eeacd_b.jpg

possibly unfree flickr image, license is cc-by-nd-2.0 (→O - v d e) 19:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Flickr images under licenses prohibiting derivative works must not be uploaded to Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The_Scream.jpg

No evidence of US publication prior to 1923. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_1#PD-US William Avery 20:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, delete the picture and I'm sorry. I thought that use on en:Wiki will be enough for Commons, that both projects are much alike. And you're right, I didn't see last sentence in the info text regarding "not using in Commons". It is sad, though. That rule. --Modra 20:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Matisse_TheDessert.png

"Matisse's work is still in copyright, but this painting may have been published in the US prior to 1923". No evidence that it was so published. William Avery 20:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Copyrighted (Matisse died in 1954); {{PD-US}} not applicable since not a U.S. work. BTW, the Hermitage Museum is in St. Petersburg, Russia, not in the UK as stated on the image page. Lupo 06:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 00:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:069212resized.jpg and Image:069212.jpg

In the deletion request on zh wiki in 10th July, we have deleted the article of this person with the guideline: Autobiography. It is sure that we would not use this image anymore. Also, this image have no source information. The same image is tagged with fairuse:zh:Image:069212.jpg(This image is deleted on zh wiki too. However, somebody who want to keep it transfer it over here.) Chanueting 00:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted--Shizhao 03:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg

Seems to be obvious case to me. The painter who created this painting died in 1938, so her works remain copyrighted untill 2009 (she was French, so life+70 years rule applies) Kneiphof 21:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. {{copyvio}}. Inappropriate use of {{PD-art}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Just so circles

The gallery has a strange name, almost no content and the contrent that excists is not representative, and there are (slightly) better galleries covering the theme in circle and plain circles Finn Rindahl 12:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete as per nomination. Note, however, that Circle, as it is now is barely useful. Plain circles was created due to this discussion. --rimshot^talk 12:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 12:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Iodinated_Tyrosine-Derivatives.png

Changed into speedy deletion!

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LA.gif

There already is an official logo sent. This isn't the one. I uploaded this by mistake. --Hachiko (talk • contribs) at 22:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC) as rescued by Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Uploader added "{{flickrreview}}" without info on a source at Flickr. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|Flickr review status nom) 17:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted per uploader's request, and also because it appears to be a copyright violation. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Out of project scope: text description of a website called BigUpsets.com William Avery 16:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. /odder 19:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete You say this is deleted?? Why is it still here?? WayneRay 20:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

Really deleted this time. 22:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Delete You say this is deleted?? Why is it still here?? WayneRay 20:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Outside project scope, source cited is a webpage, making it a potential copyvio too. -N 08:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

deleted Julo 17:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikipedia.pdf

Fuera del Commons:Alcance del proyecto. Text file Out of Commons Scope --WayneRay 20:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Henri_matisse1.jpg

Though this picture was painted in 1904 there is no evidence for US publication prior to 1923. Matisse died only in 1954. William Avery 20:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete still in copyright, along with Image:104 0435 Tanets wiki.jpg --Astrokey44 10:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 07:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Joseph_Conrad.jpg

File not properly sourced, but at http://204.185.19.89/aela/literature/conrad_pictures.htm it says it is a picture of him aged 66. That seems credible to me and would put it in 1923 or 1924. That's too late to be treated as PD without better evidence of authorship or copyright ownership. William Avery 21:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete, per nom. --Boricuaeddie 03:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Keep. The image is widely used. Logologist 06:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleted per nom. Samulili 12:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Eselspinguin.jpg

Filename gives incorrect information (wrong animal) --Pbuergler 18:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Do you have another picture with the correct filename? That way you can tag this one {{Bad name}} if you are the uploader of the images. --Digon3 ^talk 00:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by Cecil: Dupe of Image:Brillenpinguin Zoo Basel.JPG

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:European Court of Justice logo.svg

The copyright does not belong to the uploader, so the PD-self tag is incorrect --ALE! ¿…? 13:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete The file violates the licensing guidelines. --Digon3 ^talk 00:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Samulili 07:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sildenafil citrate.png

the drawing is wrong, please compare with other sildenafil structure available --Leridant 14:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Could you please provide a link to the image to be compared? Thanks. --Digon3 ^talk 00:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Apparently I made an inversion between a carbon atom and a nitrogene atom (cf google image of Sildenafil citrate) . -- Pixeltoo 14:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. According to other sources, this image has an error. Samulili 07:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Maps of Carteret County, North Carolina

typo, proper category is "Category:Maps of Carteret County North Carolina" without comma (fixed request --ALE! ¿…? 10:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC))

Deleted by ALE!: empty category

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Maps of Craven County, North Carolina

typo, proper category is "Category:Maps of Craven County North Carolina" without comma

(fixed request --ALE! ¿…? 10:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: empty category

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:PD-German stamps and all it tags

The licensing restriction "According to german copyright this stamp has to be displayed completely" as translated by Prolineserver in this edit is a "non derivative work" restriction, making any stamp using this tag not free enough for Commons. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Prolineservers translation isn’t adequate and your interpretation is an invalid generalisation. It means that German stamps must be illustrated completely so there is a restriction concerning the PD status but nothing more. --FSHL 11:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep

Deutsch: Mein Englisch ist nicht so gut, deshalb auf deutsch: Deutsche Briefmarken sind amtliche Werke und somit dürfen diese wenn diese komplett, also mit der Zähnung, abgebildet werden. Bei aktuellen Marken, sollte es nach möglichkeit eine gebrauchte Marke mit Stempel, hilfsweise einem schwarzen Balken, oder dem Worten Muster bzw. Specimen sein.

--kandschwar 16:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

English: German stamps are an official work and thus these may be illustrated if they are completely therefore with perforation. With current stamps it should be as far as possible a used postage stamp, alternatively with a black bar or the words sample and/or specimen on it.

P.S.: I don’t know if my translation is really adequate, his sentence structure is a little bit complex and I know entirely nothing about philately... --FSHL 17:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This requirement that the image be of a stamp that is used (canceled) or be defaced with a black bar or the words sample and/or specimen on it (an anti-counterfeiting measure) also makes any stamp tagged with this template not free enough for Commons. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

My reasoning is that the restriction is meant to ensure that the stamps are displayed completely, that the restriction prohibits the "crop" type of derivative work as a subcategory of the "condensation" type of derivative work, and that any restriction of any "condensation" type derivative work for a particular image or class of images means that that particular image or class of images is incompatible with hosting here on Wikimedia Commons, according to the US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 101. Please see Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Licensing#Derivative works for more details. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to Jeff G. - This restriction prohibits IMHO absolutely nothing - it declare that if somebody doesn’t fulfilled this restriction the stamps simply lose then their PD status... --FSHL 17:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

So derivative works are prohibited in other words? -N 18:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment to N - Definitively not! If you don’t fulfil this restriction then you may not publish the stamps as PD because you just hadn’t any right to used them as PD. This restriction becomes effectively just before US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 101 works whereby there aren’t de facto and de jure any conflicting. But if you fulfil this restriction then you may do whatever you want. --FSHL 07:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep, because even with the restriction I'm free to rotate and seperate Image:Briefmarke Internationales Jahr der Senioren.jpg. Furthermore these stamps allow to display a person or object when there's no free image available: w:de:Heinz Rühmann. (In this case one usually wants to show the complete stamp, because the use on an official stamp is some kind of appreciation for the person/object.) --32X 17:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep as 32X. --Kolossos 19:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep --Jodo 00:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

kept, it seems to me that only Jeff is really against keeping the template and the images --ALE! ¿…? 14:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Parana Municipio Francisco Beltrao.svg

The file was diferent from what I see before, it can be erased because i'm not gonna use it, and i'll make another one. User:Squibb 16:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment I could not find the new file user refers to. Deadstar 10:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The new file is Image:Francisco Beltrao Localizacao.svg --ALE! ¿…? 14:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

deleted --ALE! ¿…? 14:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NOMG07TowlieRedRidingHood.jpg

Photo of Mardi Gras costumers in New Orleans, one of whom is in a home made costume of a "South Park" character. This was tagged as a speedy delete as a derivative work. I would like a second opinion; if there is agreement that this is a copyright violation for reason of derivative work I will speedy delete it. -- Infrogmation 15:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep If there are no objections nor further discussion, I will close this as a keep. -- Infrogmation 15:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 15:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Farah.jpg

I'm not sure about its image. Its lack of source info on en.wiki has been questioned. Ultimately its free status seems to turn on whether it is an official photo of the Empress. If so, as it is more than 30 years since publication/presentation the image is free under PD-Iran. The image looks like an official photo to me but we don't have any more precise sourcing. So can we keep this image? WjBscribe 17:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree to WjBscribe - Looks like an official photo to me too... --FSHL 11:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

kept (according to de:Farah Diba the image was taken in 1972 and is therefore PD-Iran) --ALE! ¿…? 15:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mapa Cortes de Baza.PNG and Image:Mapa Comarca de Baza.PNG

trasladado. 31 May 2007 User:83.59.112.221

Comment These are two in a series of maps requested for deletion by User:Granadin, but without a reason given. I have taken the deletion request off the other ones as there was no reason given, and notified Granadin about this, leaving him free to renominate them.(Image:Mapa Freila.PNG, Image:Mapa Cullar.PNG, Image:Mapa Cuevas del Campo.PNG, Image:Mapa Caniles.PNG and Image:Mapa Benamaurel.PNG). These are the only ones that have some type of reason on it (given by IP number, not original nominator (unless they're the same)). "Trasladado" which according to my dictionary means "displace, relocate, transfer, transplant, transpose" etc. Leaving it here to be resolved. Deadstar 12:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Not valid reason for deletion. »Trasladado« meant in general transferred. --FSHL 16:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Trasladado means renamed. But as it doesn't give where it has been reupladed or why the current name is wrong, Keep. Platonides 17:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

kept --ALE! ¿…? 15:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 12

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pasen 2007 045.JPG

image is non-free and used by a vandal on the en-wiki. 12 July 2007 User:217.121.98.69

Delete out of scope Deadstar 13:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Copied from en:wiki:

You can perhaps understand how shocked I was to see myself on the internet; Image:Pasen 2007 045.JPG, is a picture my grandson took from me weeks ago! I don't now how it came on the internet, but what I do know, is that I want it to be removed as quickly as possible. Such things cannot be tolerated! It is a complete violation of personal information I don't want to be within the public domain. I am a amature-sailor and won some sailboat-races, so it is quite possible I am on the internet, but I never gave permition for this to happen. Can you give me the name and some information on the user who uploaded this? Is it used more often? Were else can it be seen? I wanna know! I want it removed completely! -The Bold Guy- 12:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

That picture is not on Wikipedia, but on the Creative Commons, which is a site that holds images for several websites including Wikipedia. The image was upload by someone going by the name H.O - WikiCommonsAccount". It is being used in the following locations: Project talk:Facebook(On this Wikipedia), Simple:User:J. B. A. Evháh, Simple:User:J. B. A. Evháh/J.B.A. Evháh(last two are on the "Simple" Wikipedia).

The uploader of the image claims it is "self-made", I am not sure where the commons goes to challenge copyright. Until(1 == 2) 12:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I also don't know, actually. I'm just new here, and I was stunned, seeing myself here, without me ever given permition to anyone using the image. -The Bold Guy- 12:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I have found the tag that commons uses for copyvios. Go to the image page(commons:Image:Pasen_2007_045.JPG) and add "{{copyvio}}" to the page, then go to the images talk page(Commons:Image talk:Pasen_2007_045.JPG) and explain things. I am sure a commons admin will take care of it in a short while. Until(1 == 2) 12:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It's likely a complicated legal question. Your grandson took the picture so he owns the copyright and might ordinarily be entitled to grant it over your objection or anyone else's. However, he may be a minor, and I don't know how that affects grants. Further, you potentially have a right of privacy not to have your face on the Internet in that way, but once the cat's out of the bag you might lose it so act fast! My guess is that you can probably forget all the legal complexities and just figure out how Wikimedia Commons handles these things. There's probably a layer of super-administrator just like Wikipedia, or someone on staff, who can just make an executive decision to delete the image if you ask nicely and have a valid claim. Wikidemo 14:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It sounds like the -The Bold Guy- in the original post is saying the picture was taken from him, as in the actual paper/file was transferred in possession. To me, it looks like the picture was self-taken. See the lower left corner, the shirt sleeve is close and out of focus. Also, the subject's shoulders are raised, suggesting he is holding something (i.e. the camera). If that is the case, you definitely have a valid copyvio complaint. BigNate37(T) 15:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

If nothing else, reason to delete is "request of person depicted". Deadstar 18:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandal/compromised account upload. Majorly (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:069212.jpg

no use anymore. 12 July 2007 User:Chanueting

Delete Out of scope Deadstar 15:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Deadstar, I have put it together with Image:069212resized.jpg, see the request on July 11 (at the top). Admins, please close this request, thank you very much. Chanueting 16:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted--Shizhao 03:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:05072007625.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:19062007503.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stitches_the_cat.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused and better Cats available). Siebrand 07:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Manfred_(1)1.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Manfred_(2).jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:K2.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cinta_copy.png

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kelly_Porras.jpg

Out of project scope. No relevance to any Wikimedia project (unused). Siebrand 07:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted by ALE!: as per discussion on Commons:Deletion requests (out of scope)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Us-civil.svg

This image is an unreferenced image and is most likely based off a recent commercial product. There is no indication that this image is the one involved in the hoax presented in the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_civil_flag. This flag was created by Flagseek.com and is an item sold under the pretenses as being the "U.S. Sovereign Flag" It was created in 2004 - more than 200 years after the article says it was! The commercial site is found here: http://www.uscivilflags.org/products.html This is immediately obvious since there were not 50 states in 1799 when the "civil flag" was purportedly created. After gaining a better understanding of what Wikimedia is and is not, I realize this request it without merit and withdraw my recommendation of deletion. --Jgassens 19:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep You have presented no valid reason for the deletion of a Commons image. The flag should be kept because:

a) the image is not copyrighted

b) the image is currently being used in more than one article, so it clearly has a use

c) Flagseek.com may sell the flag, but you have provided no evidence that they created it

d) The argument that it isn't a real flag of the United States is completely irrelevant to whether it should be kept

e) Your 50-stars argument doesn't even hold, since obviously the "civil flag" would gain stars just like the "military flag"--obviously it is a representation of what the civil flag with stars for today's number of states would look like. Lexicon 19:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

REPLY It is upon you, the creator of the image, to prove its validity. Not the readers of this encyclopedia. You have failed at that in every regard.

a) So what? I can take a picture of an orange and call it the national flag of the US so long as it isn't copyrighted??

b) This erroneous image is being propagated which gives it all the more imperative that it be removed.

c) Read the uscivilflags.org website, which shows they created it in 2004. Like I said, this burden is on you, the creator, to show it is a valid non-commercial source. Not the readers of the articles you produce.

d) So can I create a flag of my own design and put it in the article? Would that be valid? NO. That argument is garbage.

e) I suppose this argument is valid if you consider that there is no reason to have a relevant image for the article, as you've stated above.

I also question your ability to vote to keep your own image.

It's not a vote, but even if it was, yes, the uploader gets a say
This is not an encyclopedia, it's a repository of media
YES, you can take a picture of an orange and call it a flag, as long as it has SOME use, it has a place on Wikimedia Commons. This is not Wikipedia. Honestly, I don't care if the article on Wikipedia goes, but images that have even a shred of usefulness (and this image has at least a shred) should be available on Commons. Lexicon 20:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I assume the uploader had a say when he/she uploaded it. And this isn't flickr, it's not a place for images with only a "shred" of use. If you want it in the Wikipedia article, then upload it to wikipedia and stop claiming it has amnesty on Wikimedia servers. But as it is used right now, it is a misleading, uncredited and unreferenced image which describes nothing more than a commercial product and it should be deleted from this server for that exact reason. If you aren't concerned about the article, then remove the image from the article and upload it to Wikipedia where, I'm perfectly confident, someone will stick it back in and it will get deleted via deletion requests there. Jgassens 21:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree to Lexicon - Not valid reason for deletion. --FSHL 21:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep per Lexicon 24.11.217.243 17:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ANDRES_JIMENEZ_GARCIA.pdf

Out of project scope. Text PDF contaning one image that was also uploaded seperately by the same user. Siebrand 07:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 22:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Nadirnet.pdf

Out of project scope. PDF containing text only. Siebrand 07:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Agree

Delete Samulili 15:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --ALE! ¿…? 22:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kwiki2.gif

A mistake! I didn't want to upload the disc image -- 8 July 2007 KnightMove

Comment You can always overwrite the image by clicking the "Upload a new version of this file" in the File history section of the image page and then selecting the image you want to upload. That way you don't have to delete it and write a new summery for it. --Digon3 ^talk 16:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Marijaserifovic.JPG

No Licence-photo was taken 10 minutes ago- taken from internet. 12 May 2007 User:80.144.111.205

Comment I had a quick browse around but couldn't find it elsewhere Deadstar 14:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Probably same photo that was deleted from en:, see Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_March_22#Image:Marija_serifovic.jpg. Thuresson 20:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Karte Gemeinde Mitloedi.png

Durch Mitlödi.png ersetzt. 20 July 2006 User:Tschubby

Comment Presumable Image:Karte Gemeinde Mitlödi.png, which is a near duplicate (a few extra places marked). Deadstar 15:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Unless the extra places marked in Image:Karte Gemeinde Mitloedi.png are not actually there or there are map errors, I think it is the better of the two (it has more places and the writing is sharper). --Digon3 ^talk 16:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, it’s the user’s work and I am sure there are administrative reasons (see the places) for this request. --Polarlys 23:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fico d'India - prickly pear.jpg

Low quality and resolution. ----Digon3 ^talk 17:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, really bad quality. --Polarlys 23:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Janis_Ian.jpg

Unclear license (Creative Commons, but permission notes use on Wikipedia (only?)), uploader didn't use OTRS permission system Rkitko 19:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep CC-by 2.0 ,which this is under, gives attribution as the only condition, and is acceptable to the Commons. Permission notes do not say "use on Wikipedia only" and I don't think it matters anyway, since it is under the CC-by 2.0. --Digon3 ^talk 12:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Right, but on the second point; if the uploader didn't use the permissions OTRS system, we can't verify that the copyright holder did indeed give permission. --Rkitko 15:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, no permission. --Polarlys 23:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coucher du soleil à Agnam Goly.jpg

This picture was taken by Edith Lettner and was uploaded by Adama who didn't know yet rules about copyrights. I've sent a mail to E. Lettner but no answers... --Patricia.fidi 22:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Grand Baobab de Agnam Goly.jpg

This picture was taken by Edith Lettner and was uploaded by Adama who didn't know yet rules about copyrights. I've sent a mail to E. Lettner but no answers... --Patricia.fidi 23:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cheptel de Agnam Goly.jpg

This picture was taken by Edith Lettner and was uploaded by Adama who didn't know yet rules about copyrights. I've sent a mail to E. Lettner but no answers... --Patricia.fidi 23:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Indoor ice hockey venues in Slovakia

please delete, since its a double cat to the one mentioned there --Xgeorg 12:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete A category with no content and has no significant history and has a almost identical catagory Category:Ice hockey venues in Slovakia. --Digon3 ^talk 16:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted --GeorgHH 19:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Sport in Slovakia

doubled to Category:Sports in Slovakia and bad naming (plural) --Xgeorg 12:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete empty catagory, and next time tag misspelled categories with {{bad name|correct category name}}. --Digon3 ^talk 13:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted, see Category:Sports in Slovakia. --GeorgHH 19:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lund in Sweden.png

this image is used only in one article per LANG.wikipedia and due to its localized nature it can hardly be used somewhere else;
there is a template en:Template:Location map|Sweden that can do easier and better for all swedish locations.

--84.141.81.74 09:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep That kind of templates have serious accessibility issues and if something should be deleted, it's those templates. Samulili 15:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... Serious accessibility issues? My box is from 2003 and I use FreeBSD and Firefox... I dont know if there can be a more weird installment... --84.141.81.74 16:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Personally I think the map has several features that the template doesn't have. One can compare the image with the one on the article en:Lund. Keep / Fred J 16:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

- The red dot is nearly the same... Of course that CIA World Fact Book map could be used in the template, too, but who knows the coordinates? But surely the red dot in the image makes it unusable for the template, so that we would need a fresh copy from the CIA (do they say coordinates maybe?)... --84.141.81.74 16:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

- I can see here (over an encrypted http link) [34] some marks, that look like longitude/latitude numbers... So we could use that image in the template with automatic red-dot-setting, if the projection was orthogonal (we need something like w:en:Mercator projection so near at a pole, I would guess...)... --84.141.81.74 16:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. There are more projects than Wikipedia and InstantCommons in the future. No reason for deletion. --Siebrand 13:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LocationGothenburg.PNG

this image is used only in one article per LANG.wikipedia and düe to its localized nature it can hardly be used somewhere else;
there is a template en:Template:Location map|Sweden that can do easier and better for all swedish locations.

--84.141.81.74 10:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep That kind of templates have serious accessibility issues and if something should be deleted, it's those templates. Samulili 15:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... Serious accessibility issues? My box is from 2003 and I use FreeBSD and Firefox... I dont know if there can be a more weird installment... --84.141.81.74 16:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

That is not what accessibility is about: Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, checkpoint 6.1: "Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document. [Priority 1]" Anyway, we can't decide to delete the templates and I'm not seriously suggesting that we discuss that here. But we can and we should keep the images. Samulili 17:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. There are more projects than Wikipedia and InstantCommons in the future. No reason for deletion. --Siebrand 13:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Trastevere - sant'Onofrio 00673.JPG

I think a printed description of the church is, as a norm, copyrighted by the writer and/or the printer. I ask the uploader whether in this case the text has entered the PD (which I doubt, but is not impossbile, should the writer having been dead for at least 70 years). --User:G.dallorto 10:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Derivative work. --Siebrand 13:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coup_pied.png

un manque de sécuriter question de mon pseudo de connection au ftp Rem73 13:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. No reason for deletion. --Siebrand 13:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Orchid Botanica Logo.jpg

We get a lot of logos with GFDL-self or PD-self when that in fact isn't case. This could be one of those images, but in this case I would be ready to the take the uploader's word. However, I have another concern: if this image is a logo for Tan Tock Seng Hospital I would imagine that they have ordered the exclusive rights for image. In that case the author would be forbidden by his contract to release the image to public domain. All in all, more information seems to be necessary. Samulili 14:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, yes i agree with your concern over the hospital having rights over the logo. However, the logo is an unofficial design of the garden and can be used. i have checked this out already. In fact, the design is an innovation of balinese-style art which is extremely common and is used in many illustrations. All in all, I will respect your decisions and if you deem it necessary for the logo to be scrapped, then please do so (though I feel that the logo's existence is appropriate.) Jarrod

Thank you for you reply. It seems to me that we can

Keep the image. Samulili 08:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Per above discussion. --Siebrand 13:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:S&H_stamps_and_book.jpg

Possible coypvio? This image does not differ from the original (the S&H Green Stamps sheet) for it to qualify as an original work. Night Ranger 20:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted. Derivative work. --Siebrand 13:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Map_of_Australia_and_New_Zealand.png

This is a derivative of Image:AustraliaNZ-blank.png, which is {{GFDL}}-licensed. The derivative has been licensed as {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Derivative works of GFDL-licensed works must not be published under any other license than GFDL without explicit permission from the author. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment What about just changing the license to GFDL? --ARTE 23:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- If the uploader (who holds the copyright to the modifications and therefore is the only one who can issue a license for those modifications) would do that, we could keep the image. If the uploader doesn't want to do that, he or she has no legal right to publish the image. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete I see --ARTE 08:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep, since I fail to see why these two map images qualify for a protection under copyright laws. There's not much creativity nor art skills required to reduce a map of the continent to a grey area. In my opinion both map images qualify for Template:PD-ineligible. --32X 23:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. Just changed the license... --Siebrand 13:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Isl Krone.JPG

Ég hafði samband við Seðlabanka Íslands og íslenskir peningar falla undir sanngjarna notkun --Steinninninn 29 May 2007)

I guess that Steinninninn is saying that he had a discussion with the Bank of Iceland and that Icelandic bank notes are protected by copyright. Samulili 15:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hm... Is "sanngjarna notkun" the Icelandic equivalent of "fair use?" If so, Steinninninn says that Icelandic money falls under fair use. --Kjetil r 02:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

This is what he said: "I contacted the Central Bank of Iceland and Icelandic money falls under fair use" Haukurth 21:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Haukur is right. Icelandic money is fair use, but maybe someone want's to contact them again to confirm. The email I sent wasn't very specific http://www.sedlabanki.is/ --Steinninn 21:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

This page has some information: [35] Haukurth 21:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I interprete these statements by the Central Bank of Iceland to mean that banknotes are not copyrighted. Otherwise they would have just said so. Of course the Central bank is the only institution authorized to issue real banknotes. But that's got nothing to with copyright. Their mention of "derogatory reproductions" is a reference to the moral rights of the artists (right to the integrity of the work); it's in no way special. Such restrictions exist for other works, too. Just make sure that the images do not show the banknotes at their true sizes. Lupo 08:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

As no additional discussion since the above 2 months ago, I am closing this as a keep per above. -- Infrogmation 01:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Kept -- Infrogmation 01:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:Evstafiev Mikhail

please provide an explicit permission (OTRS) to use the files from the website under the given license. “Note that User:Evstafiev has contributed further images under the same licence” isn’t a permission to visit his homepage and use all the files here – it’s an assumption. I’d be glad to remove this request as soon as possible. (I also contacted User:Evstafiev)--Polarlys 15:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment The template is used on about 40 files. Deadstar 07:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Not to mention a Featured Picture! --Digon3 ^talk 17:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I have informed the creator of the template today. So wait 7 days before the eventual deletion of the template. --ALE! ¿…? 14:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

You should contact User:Evstafiev, it'd be far more efficient. Rama 14:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Looking at all his images. I have actually strong doubts that the uploader is the author of all these photos. --ALE! ¿…? 12:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ale, no need for concern in this case. I am a professional photographer and I have wrote and edited many wiki stories both in Russian and English for the last several years. I have also contributed some of my photos to wiki. I will update the licence shortly. If you have any further questions, you might want to email me, as I do not visit commons that often. Evstafiev 12:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Kept, explicitly releases under usable free licenses. -- Infrogmation 01:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 13

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:JaimeMink.jpg

Personal picture, not newsworthy and don't want pics of my young kids on internet anymore... Pkmink 11:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, but only because it was not used. Please realise that legally you had given a free license to the image. Siebrand 11:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, will be more careful in the future. Pkmink 13:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:JaimeMink13mnd.jpg

Personal picture, I don't want pics of my young children on internet anymore.... Pkmink 11:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, but only because it was not used. Please realise that legally you had given a free license to the image. Siebrand 11:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Spice_Girls_Reunion_In_London.jpg

unlikely GFDL candidate - appears to be a professional publicity shot Jimmy Joe 18:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete and uploader should be sanctioned for edit warring and violating copyright on multiple wikis. -N 20:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete Uploaded by the same user on English wikipedia with fair use rationale, then uploaded here rather than contesting deletion there. William Avery 20:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
see also Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sugababes in Glasgow at a concert backstage.jpg. -N 20:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio, user blocked for a week. --Polarlys 21:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sugababes in Glasgow at a concert backstage.jpg

Identical to[36] which has a fair use rationale and was uploaded there by User:Stealthusa who has copyright problems here and on en.wikipedia. Apparently transwikied by someone who didn't know any better. ---N 20:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio --Polarlys 21:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2007/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Contents

[edit] July 1

[edit] Image:Dartelaar.jpg

[edit] Image:RataBlanca2.jpg

[edit] Image:Inauguración_Copa_América_2007.jpg

[edit] Image:P4040007.JPG

[edit] Image:Gedaechtniskirche_Lesepult_Gernot_Stumpf.jpg

[edit] Image:Malvernia.pdf

[edit] Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg

[edit] Please don't delete Image:Mandelbrot_island.jpg

[edit] Category:Somerville to Category:Somerville, Massachusetts

[edit] Flag of Lewis

[edit] Image:Derry.Shield.png

[edit] Image:299044324_2dcb1e3392.jpg

[edit] Image:Terretory_given_away_after_Brest-Litovsk.jpg

[edit] All files under Category:Triangle Factory fire

[edit] Image:Marcador_cierre_Teletón_2006.jpg

[edit] July 2

[edit] Image:Rue Saint-Paul edit.jpg

[edit] Image:Screenshot frau.jpg

[edit] Image:Wedekind-Haus_im_Bau_070629_.jpg

[edit] Image:StandHuileAix.JPG

[edit] Image:Mirador_de_la_code.jpg

[edit] Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf

[edit] Image:ANA_espinosa_biografia.pdf

[edit] Image:Butxy´s_life.gif

[edit] Image:DSC 0048.JPG

[edit] Image:Atomium vue générale.jpg

[edit] Image:Atomium gros plan.jpg

[edit] Image:BEA 2007 084 John Ringo.jpg

[edit] Image:Ringelnatter.jpg

[edit] Image:Rraf-logo.svg

[edit] Image:SNCF 031-130.png

[edit] Image:Rogerio.jpg

[edit] Image:Ribeirasacra.jpg

[edit] Image:Ritalin photo.jpg

[edit] Image:Roma-parco decimamalafede03.jpg

[edit] Image:RudbeckiaFulgida.jpg

[edit] Image:SDK API Review Flow-MaHu-20061107.jpg

[edit] Image:SMDFplan.gif

[edit] Image:San Sebastian Escudo.jpg

[edit] Image:Oscillographe LC.JPG

[edit] Image:RLC entretenu.JPG

[edit] Image:RLC entretenu équivalent.JPG

[edit] Image:Johnny_Marr.jpg

[edit] Image:Rick Mercer cc.jpg

[edit] Image:Samsett-bolungarvik-bolafjall2.jpg

[edit] Image:Dantsu Flame 20061229P1.jpg

[edit] Image:Radio Euskadi feria 1.JPG

[edit] Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others

[edit] Image:RmB.PNG

[edit] All images from user 倶楽部オータム

[edit] July 3

[edit] Image:Reflexion totale interne.svg

[edit] Image:Chris Cornell c.jpg

[edit] Image:LogoHTNGmini.png

[edit] Image:SibeliusMonument.jpg

[edit] Image:SibeliusMonumentDetail.jpg

[edit] Image:Silverado.Squatters.Henly.jpg

[edit] Image:ProfRossa.JPG

[edit] Image:Logo copei.GIF

[edit] Image:Santaelenadeu.gif

[edit] Image:Sciano Federico 02.jpg

[edit] Image:Sello de Fernán González.jpg

[edit] Image:Silzer Wappen.JPG

[edit] Image:Simongallup002.jpg

[edit] Image:Shilinmark.JPG

[edit] Image:Rees_Stephens.jpg

[edit] Image:Anpanman-inflatable.JPG

[edit] Image:Retract resistor check valve application .png

[edit] Category:Jaguar XK8

[edit] Image:Thyra_von_Danemark.jpg

[edit] Image:Charles_Napoleon.jpg

[edit] Image:Renesansa-skladatelji.JPG

[edit] Image:Provincias Unidas de Sud América -1816.png

[edit] Image:Slovakia Liptov 800px.gif

[edit] Image:RepublicFleet1.jpg

[edit] Image:SantaClaraCountyFlag.gif