Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/02

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Fogofatuo

out of project --Motopark 05:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete no source information. Durova 05:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

'Deleted by ABF: Page is out of project scope: content was: 'Image:fogofatuo.jpg {{delete|out of project}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Violão garganta

out of project --Motopark 05:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete no source information. Durova 05:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

'Deleted by ABF: Page is out of project scope: content was: 'Image:violaogarganta.jpg {{delete|out of project}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Garganta Furada

out of project --Motopark 05:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

'Deleted by Herbythyme: Vandalism/Test page: content was: 'Image:http://lh5.google.com/_V74eiInuEuU/R6JZ5ZYVzDI/AAAAAAAAACE/Sh4e2tp2eTQ/s400/Cópia de CAPA_FOG.JPG {{delete|out of project}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alexandre pato.jpg

Violation of copyright, see: http://passionerossonera.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/7732_big.jpg --Belb 00:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted Image said copyrighted by acmilan.com. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HuseyinCaglayan.jpg

sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen 05:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• I got it from en.wikipedia. I didn't give attention to the source website. It seems to be copyrighted. --Maderibeyza 09:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tsui Po Ko accident happened subway.jpg

The copyright of this photo is reserved by the Orientaldaily. Tksteven 11:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copyvio. --rimshot^talk 13:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, please tag obvious cases like this with {{copyvio}}.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Euc_cam01.jpg

undescribed work with an inapp. filename ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 12:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete unless we need images of a plank of wood? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Used in pl:Eukaliptus kamaldulski. Name is clearly short for "Eucalyptus camaldulensis"; description can be added without deleting. --dave pape 15:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept, as it's in use. DR is not the place to bring pictures to have their descriptions fixed. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Werka_Garland.jpg

Obvious copyright violation - "PD Polish" tag doesn't apply for paintings Pibwl 22:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you point me to the source of this claim? I can't find it. Honestly, I scanned this image as a test, waited a few months for any reaction, and I was just about to put much more Werka's work as illustrations here on the wiki... Thanks --EAJoe 23:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Polish copyright law of July 10, 1952. Copyright exclusion refered to photographs only. Pibwl 01:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, after request for speedy deletion from Pibwl. --Polarlys 12:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SamuElau.jpg

no license / no discription / no value for the project Kolossos 14:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete outside scope. Durova 19:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Out of scope. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TARDIS-trans.png

Uploader didn't own copyight, accordingly was in no position to release this image. To clarify, the image is a photoshopped version of a photo taken from inside a BBC building reception area. This isn't a public place, such as a park, so the image is non-free. Addhoc 15:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Obviously derivative. Durova 19:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Changing to neutral. Good arguments. Durova 03:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep It is a replica of a public object who's design preceded the inception of Doctor Who, and the BBC does not, and cannot hold or claim copyright over that design. The BBC does hold the trademark over the TARDIS (which is questionable in itself), but that aspect is not considered under non-free guidelines. Original image is here, and the photographer rightfully released the image under CC-BY-SA. — Edokter • Talk • 01:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I don't know that it's copyrightable. If its design is primarily utilitarian (ie, a hammer, television) as opposed to decorative (designer pillow, action figure) then it's not a creative work and not subject to copyright ... regardless of claims otherwise. I have a hard time being convinced that a glorified phone booth is copyrightable. --UserB 02:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I agree with UserB. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep This prop from the Dr Who series would normally be copyright protected. However, it is itself copied from an earlier public design of police box and it is doubtful that the copy has sufficient originality to acquire any new copyright. I think this is OK to keep. --MichaelMaggs 17:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep We actually have other images of "props" such as the De Lorean from Back to the Future, and there's an object that has been given some rather unique modifications when compared to the TARDIS. -- Ned Scott 08:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep It's not doing any harm, if anything, all these Doctor Who-related articles bearing the TARDIS are giving the BBC Publicity.

Kept. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 22:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Psittacosaurus-1.jpg

It is a derivative work. It is traced directly off a copyrighted image[1] which can be found in the "Ultimate Dinosaur book" by David Lambert, and the original photo is visible underneath. This image might have the same problem too: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Floresiensis.jpg FunkMonk 11:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete on both per nom. Durova 19:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Looks an obvious copyvio. Lycaon 01:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:$Tuki_no_Misaki2.jpg

very poor quality, unusable, no description, in this way unusable ChristianBier 18:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 19:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete --Excavator 15:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:OliverHardy.jpg

Why is it PD? GeorgHH • talk   18:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Appears to have been shot late in the actor's career. No reason to suppose it's PD. Durova 19:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Webkinz_dolls.jpg

Derivitive work (hope I spelled it right) Vipersnake151 20:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Almost, it's derivative ;) I agree with the nomination, Delete as derivative work. --rimshot^talk 12:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yarkand-tumbas-reyes-d01.jpg

derivative work of copyrighted sign Calliopejen 06:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hm, looks like a sign in China, from the description? There is freedom of panorama in China, and it looks like a permanent touristic sign of some sort, so I would lean towards Keep. Patrícia ^msg 15:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept per Patricia. There's freedom of panorama in China. — Dark ^(talk) 10:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yarkand-aman-is-khan-d01.jpg

derivative work of copyrighted sign Calliopejen 06:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept per COM:FOP. — Dark ^(talk) 10:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fedora7_gnome_desktop.jpg

Insufficient source and no author.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It's Linux it's open source, and besides who cares about the source or author? no one!

This is incorrectly tagged as a copyrighted screenshot. Fedora screenshots are free content. — Omegatron 22:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept The source and author information of each component are all readily accessible in the revision control system of the fedora project. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TerzoLivello_set2_5.jpg

no license / no author Kolossos 13:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as unlicensed image. — Dark ^(talk) 09:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Adrien-Marie Legendre.jpg

This is not Adrien Marie Legendre, this is Louis Legendre. Proove in this book (page 52) : http://books.google.fr/books?id=hoMGAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=iconographie+des+contemporains#PPT52,M1 Please delete this picture or rename it as Louis Legendre. Infofiltrage 21:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

 Comment The image you point to doesn't seem to say who it is either? (and regarding the links from wiki to the image: the image is used to illustrate both en:Louis Legendre and en:Adrien-Marie Legendre. They were born the same year.) -- Deadstar (msg) 14:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• The index says that it's Louis [2]. Image should be re-uploaded with proper name, rather than just deleted (as this copy is better than the one in the en:Louis Legendre article). --dave pape 15:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

 Comment You could find who's who at the end of the same book (bottom left page 210) :

http://books.google.fr/books?id=hoMGAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=iconographie+des+contemporains#PPT210,M1

Deleting the image without re-uploading it first under a new name is not an option. Once that is done, this can be deleted as a duplicate, but not before. You can put the {{rename}} template on the image page to indicate the issue though. Carl Lindberg 06:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept and tagged with {{Rename}} as it is definitely Louis Legendre. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Pages that use Template:iL

Unnecessary and pointless category. Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:iL can suffice. --Vipersnake151 00:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, as Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:iL only has 12 items, and doesn't keep count.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per my comment here. There is absolutely no purpose for this. The trivial task of tracking the template's use can be done by Whatlinkshere, like the nom said. (If they're subst'd the cat can be removed anyway.) →Rocket°°° 05:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per Rocket. Patstuart (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted totally pointless; WhatLinksHere is in the software for a reason. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vallee-ceillac-wiki.jpg

Permission = no? Seems not to be okay, IMHO. abf /talk to me/ 20:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It was uploaded with permission = no, so I think there was some kind of misunderstanding on the part of the uploader. The images are great, but why would someone upload them and at the time not give permission to use them. Someone who speaks French better than I do should ask Michelchavrot what the intended license is. --rimshot^talk 12:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Simple user error, I think. MichaelMaggs 08:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:0507_(13).jpg

Appears to be composed of derivative works, not copyright free. Patstuart (talk) 02:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete Derivative work of the picture seen here. --rimshot^talk 12:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HarryPotter2.JPG

Harry Potter fan art, see Commons:Deletion requests/Harry Potter Fan art --Trixt 04:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom., derivative work. --rimshot^talk 12:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Franci-petek-OI94.jpg

Violation of Copyright [see http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slika:Franci-petek-OI94.jpg] --Reinhardheydt 11:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deleted, clear copyright violation. -- Infrogmation 13:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Aaaa.jpg

No licensing or source information for this image. Information and category refers to a different image overwritten by this one. Probably non free image as this is a movie poster) --Barliner 12:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image was uploaded over another image of the same name. Reverted to earlier image, and copyright violation version deleted. -- Infrogmation 13:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Resolved -- Infrogmation 13:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Inkscape.logo.svg

This picture is a duplicate of Image:Inkscape logo 2.svg (both saved as SVG) Kaneiderdaniel 16:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not the same! (although it might be unnecessary anyway...)--Speck-Made 11:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Not really the same. Both can be used. Let's keep the choice for Wikimedia users. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept, not duplicate, both might be useful. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pasto.jpg

Most likely taken from website. Also contains logo. EugeneZelenko 16:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, taken from this page. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lonicera_periclymenum.jpg

exists twice Anna reg 19:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MPalermo.jpg

likely copyvio; uploader uploaded a different copyvio at one point Patstuart (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 23:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Leick.jpg

http://www.hudsonleickfan.com/ does not appear to be a site releasing images under GFDL. Most appear to be copyrighted. Patstuart (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, 23:37, 2 February 2008 Polarlys (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Leick.jpg" ‎ (copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:John_Gore_Picture.jpg

Fails COM:L - no commecial usage Patstuart (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete — {{noncommercial}} --Boricuæddie 23:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lanpher_Furs_Muskrat_Lining_1192.jpg

Double, wrong name, sorry (own work), thanks Kuerschner 20:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. You could speedy this, I believe. Durova 23:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would if I knew what it was a duplicate of... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The right version:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Lanpher_Furs_Title_of_a_Fur_Fashion_Catalog.jpg
(the file which shall be delated has a wrong description). Thanks from Germany.--Kuerschner 09:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as dupe. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SaraRamirez.jpg

driveby uploader also claimed to have taken several too-good-to-be-true images at WP, at least one of which is a confirmed copyvio: Image:Golden globes 2005 megan mullally.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cicero17&oldid=132739110 Calliopejen 22:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment just to confirm en:Image:Golden globes 2005 megan mullally.jpg was a copyvio ? Megapixie 00:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Imam_Ali_coin.jpg

Hoax image spammed all over the wiki projects Tarawneh 07:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

It is a fake. Not a silver derham. It is a golden dinar . It is not dated back to Imam Ali as claimed by the uploader. the image info is already found on the The Central Bank of Iraq website where it is clearly stated in the 1000 Dinar Note section that the coin is called a Dinar not a Dirham and it is made of gold not silver.

A gold dinar coin, used in this region until superseded by more modern coins and notes.

The above point has already been disused in ar.wiki. Still the uploader posted it on lots of other wikis, I removed them all manually. The current image info is also not true. The image it self might be a copyvio, as the uploader was never able to provide a higher res image, he later claimed (in ar.wik) that he requested the image to be sent to him from Iran. He also told me that : my religious tendency effect my use of my admin privileges. I had no idea what that meant so I decided to post it here. --Tarawneh 07:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

'Deleted per nom. -- Cecil 14:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Floresiensis.jpg

It is a derivative work. It is traced directly off a copyrighted image[3], and the original photo is visible underneath. Lycaon 01:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 01:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 16:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Posecondom.jpg

It is likely a copyright violation. Multiple users here (last two comments in that section) report seeing this image on the printed insert with a pack of condoms. Lyrl 04:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 19:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep You can find the original images in *vectorial* Corel Draw 3.0 format here : http://preservatif.maisonx.com/condom.zip. These images have been made in 1997. User:Béa 01:13, 9 February 2008.

Deleted. Made in 1997 means nothing. abf /talk to me/ 16:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dscn0081-2.jpg

We already have these coins here Image:Coin0101.jpg and here Image:Coin0099.jpg. The coins are from two different countries. Alfons Åberg 04:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. They're completely different images. One's a comparison and the other two are just individual coins. →Rocket°°° 08:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Efrosinia_Polotskaya.jpg

Most likely modern painting. Anyway athour information must be provided. EugeneZelenko 15:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted – No source — Dark ^(talk) 09:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Johnny_Weissmuller_JO_1928.jpg

I do not believe we can conclusively state that the author died before 1938 Patstuart (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 20:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted – There's no evidence that the author died before 1938. — Dark ^(talk) 10:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kobjakov_USSR002.jpg

not self-made; appears to still be in copyright Patstuart (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The book cover is still covered by copyright for the reasons stated in Template:PD-Soviet, so this is an unauthorised licensing of a {{derivative}} of a copyrighted, non-free work. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DSC05039.JPG

Uploaded Twice Msa07 18:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment - I think the nominator (and uploader) is referring to the fact that they uploaded the same file twice under the same filename, which isn't a problem. --Tom (talk - email) 00:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept, but it's missing a licence, so unless one is added, it will be deleted after seven days. Also, please give images better names. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Skaryna_monument_in_Minsk1.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Belarus. Monument was created in 2000s. EugeneZelenko 16:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --rimshot^talk 12:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. —Dark ^(talk) 08:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mitropoleos.jpg

PD under Greek law as it depicts a public building? is this true!!!!! a link is given to some chem. department in some uni. Tarawneh 04:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

 Oppose I had found that photo in Greek Wikipedia. There it was written, that it was public for depicting a public building. In Greece as in several European countries the division between church and state is not so perfect, that a church were a Christian clubhouse.--Ulamm 12:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you explain to me please the exact relation between the division between church and state and the copyrights law in Greece. And why would a public building photo be Public Domain? I have been in EU for about6 years now, never heard or seen any such thing, I can't even comprehend the idea you are trying to send. --Tarawneh 22:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

As have I told, I have found the photo in Greek wikipedia, with these specifications. Why should we doubt, that Greek laws are like that. If the photo is or has been possible in Greek wikipedia, under these conditions, it ought to be accepted in the Commons as well.

I'm not one of those people, who are afraid of Islam. But I am not sure about the question, if your deletion request for copyright or for islamism.--Ulamm 09:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Support The nomination is right. If the uploader doesn't claim the image is self-made, it's a replaceable non-free one lacking source information. As for the thing about allegedly free public buildings, the uploader may be thinking of "freedom of panorama" - but that only means the building is free to take photographs of, it doesn't mean any photograph made of it automatically becomes free. It still belongs to the photographer. Future Perfect at Sunrise 09:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

To withdraw the photo from the commons would now withdraw it from Greek wikipedia, too, from where I've transferred it.--Ulamm 09:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

 Comment Hello. It's not about "freedom of panorama". I think Ulamm uploaded the image in good faith based on an article of the greek copyright law that states: (Article 26:) Χρήση εικόνων με έργα σε δημόσιους χώρους

Επιτρέπεται, χωρίς την άδεια του δημιουργού και χωρίς αμοιβή, η περιστασιακή αναπαραγωγή και διάδοση με μέσα μαζικής επικοινωνίας εικόνων με έργα αρχιτεκτονικής, εικαστικών τεχνών, φωτογραφίας ή εφαρμοσμένων τεχνών, που βρίσκονται μονίμως σε δημόσιο χώρο.[4]

Transl.: Use of images depicting works in public spaces

It is allowed, without permission from the creator and without royalties, to occasionally reproduce and transmit through the mass media images of works of architecture, arts, photography or applied arts, which are permanently placed in a public place.

Everything would be fine if it wasn't for that occasionally which messes things up (there are several similar problems and dubious points throughout the greek copyright law). Note also that the law only allows reproduction and transmission, not free use of these images (e.g. modification). So, to be on the safe side, we should use only self-created images for greek buildings. Now, I have some recent photos of this, but as the metropolitan is undergoing a "facelift" for the past couple of years, the temple looks more like a construction site (i.e. scaffolds, construction materials...). We'll have to wait some time, or find someone who has an older photo, in case this gets deleted - Badseed 10:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: For all I can see, that paragraph is in fact the Greek version of "freedom of panorama". I'd be hugely surprised if "του δημιουργού" ('of the creator') was intended to refer to the creator of the photograph, rather than of the original public artwork. But the wording of the sentence is pretty ambiguous in that respect, I have to admit. Future Perfect at Sunrise 13:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Things are not clear. Most of the people get the idea that it's about the pictures/photos (reproduce etcetera), th writing is really dubious, and there are no court cases which would help us figure. However, it might well concern the works themselves. In which case, I wouldn't call it much of a "freedom"... Proper and official clarifying of the "dark corners" of the greek copyright law is one of the things we hope to do if and when we form a chapter- Badseed 02:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

No comment :) --Tarawneh 23:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete This file has no appropriate license. -N 23:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by ABF: Deleted because "Was in Category:Unknown as of 16 March 2008; still missing essential information". using TW

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kobjakov_Ceramica_Schultz008.jpg

Author appears to have died 1977: ru:Кобяков, Дмитрий Юрьевич Patstuart (talk) 03:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Even though the uploader just removed the deletion request and much later changed the information a little bit, he did not deliver the necessary permission by the author (which he can't since the author ist dead since 31 years) Otherwise go to COM:OTRS, they will restore it they get a valid permission. -- Cecil 11:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Inside_RAM.JPG

and Image:Rudana-Ind Master.jpg

Derivative work EugeneZelenko 16:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep I can't agree with you. The museal pictures are so small and dificult to recognize that in fact the main theme of the photos is a behaviour of the people who admire works in an museum... Electron 11:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. MichaelMaggs 16:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Laretta.jpg

probably copyright infringement 88.84.21.192 00:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete I'm not sure about copyright, but appears to be indoors. No model release. Durova 03:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Picture is of Lara Gut. It's also at [7]. -- User:Docu

Deleted. Last-Modified header of the link Docu gave predates the upload here by several months. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reloj_tintin.jpg

no copyright Walserio 04:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Obviously scanned from a printed illustration, probably copyrighted. Durova 18:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Georges Remi died in 1983. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Concord Seal White Background.jpg

Obviously not PD-USGov. --Geopgeop 11:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 18:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Har Meron

Wrong name, replaced by Category:Mount Meron. (Links from other Wikimedia Projects will be changed soon) --Netanel h 13:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. ChristianBier 13:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Redsun.gif

Blinking red and blue images. Continue to watch it for health damage.Tail furry 15:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete out of scope. Durova 18:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

AHHHHHHH MY EYES!!!. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SelecciónArgentina-Mundial2006-178534912.jpg

I, the uploader from Flickr, realized now that the picture was taken from Clarin (see "Description"), an Argentinean newspaper, so it's copyrighted. --Roblespepe 18:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 18:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:3Handbuch_Hanicke_36.jpg

same with <Handbuch Hanicke 36.jpg> Kuerschner 19:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as duplicate. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Handbuch_Hanisch_78.jpg

double with Handbuch Hanicke 78.jpg Kuerschner 19:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't see an image with the second filename you gave. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Oh, sorry, you are right. :-( But know, with the correct name. Thank you.--Kuerschner 06:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, also use {{badname}} next time. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bolduc_Model.jpg

This was uploaded under an improper name. A. Balet 19:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as dupe of Image:Poteaux-sur-Solle Model.jpg (please use {{badname}} next time). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Caspueñas1.JPG

porque si Jjaammss 21:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, uploader requested deletion less than an hour after it was uploaded. Why not. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Nuvola_apps_kcmdrkonqi.png

Abus d'emblème de la Croix-Rouge Moumine 20:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep irrelevant, a cross in a circle is not eligible for copyright (and the Red Cross logo doesn't look anything like this). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep We have a page of Red Cross emblems at International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement already. Those images that require notice of the special status of these symbols (such as Brassard neutralite.gif) use the {{IHL Symbol}} template to bring attention to the fact. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep abusive DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Flag_of_Nicaragua.svg

This image has to much originality to be ineligible for copyright possibly PD for other reasons though. Lokal_Profil 02:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

With this I specifically mean the Coat of Arms, therefore Image:Coat of arms of Nicaragua.svg is also included in this request. /Lokal_Profil 02:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment So that means we can't have the real flag of Nicaragua on Commons?! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Only if it is under a free License, the rules apply just like for every other image on Commons. /Lokal_Profil 21:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

    National flags are copyrighted? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

    AFAIK representations of flags are copyrightable as original works. Should be discussions linked to this on Template:PD-Flag (now obsolete). /Lokal_Profil 22:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. The articles from Wikipedias of all languages about Nicaragua without his respective flag are not funny any. Therefore, I give my positive and conservative vote so that the image of the flag keeps on existing forever. It is a symbol of public domain, established by the Nicaraguan law. --Deyvid Setti 17:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I know the National Constitution declares the flag to be a national symbol, but is there a copyright law I can look at for this country? User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, it's from OpenClipArt and OCA released it under PD. —Nightstallion (?) 12:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Nightstallion. yes your version comes from OpenClipArt and there is no problem with that version. VZB83's version on the other hand does not come from FOTW and the presidential homepage. Unless the current version is found to be PD for a good reason I vote revert to Nightstallion upload and tag with {{PD-OpenClipArt}}. /Lokal_Profil 13:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I reverted to Nightstallion's upload. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 18:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - this would create a dangerous precedent because it would mean we would have to delete 90% of all flags that are here on commons with pd-ineligible tag. --Avala 18:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Sorry but keep this copyvio because we have many other copyvios is not a convincing motivaion. /Lokal_Profil 22:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • It is not a copyvio. It is truly ineligible for copyright. You can not claim copyright on national symbols as they are defined by law (laws are not copyrighted) and therefore there is no space for creativity and original work. --Avala 16:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Firstly national symbols like Coat of Arms are (usually) defined by their blasoning leaving lots of space for creativity. Secondly even in a case where there is no space for creativity the original artist (this might be the a government) still owns the copyright. Actually you can just compare the two versions of the flag to se how differently the CoA can be interpreted. /Lokal_Profil 16:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Many countries have laws which define any material produced by state bodies (in this case the government) ineligible for copyright. I am not sure what is the case with Nicaraguan law because no one around here seems to be in possession of their law on this matter. Until we are sure that they have no law about this we can't delete the image presuming that the law does not exist. --Avala 20:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
        • I asked #wikipedia-es for the law at least once when this discussion started, I found none or they sent me none. [8] Could at least give us a government sanctioned image. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 21:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• According to Article 16 of the Copyright Law, national symbols are protected under copyright. Only laws and court decisions and their official translations are public domain automatically. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 21:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Both images should be fine, since it appears FOTW was only used for reference. (They don't have vectors.) They do not own the design of the flag obviously, so others can recreate it. I'm all for deleting the second revision anyway since the SVG's buggy (it doesn't show correctly for me). So I guess the question is: Is any image of the flag of Nicaragua allowed? →Rocket°°° 08:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Pretty much, the problem is that one of the reference sites used for the drawing of the image is the target of a deletion debate. All I had to do was revert to the last version and delete that diff. Well, it should be solved now. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 09:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I went ahead and deleted the old revision. Should this stay open or are we all satisfied? IMO, if there's issue with the flag itself, someplace like Commons talk:Licensing or the village pump would be more appropriate as that affects any image with the flag in it. →Rocket°°° 09:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. As per Rocket, more generic discussion belongs somewhere else, and it seems we're all happy with these particular images, hence both kept. giggy _(:O) 11:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Turks_and_Caicos_coa.gif

Source and license don't agree. Looks like a copyvio and is also used here Lokal_Profil 03:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment Source and license don't agree how? Also, this is irrelevant because the Last-Modified header post-dates the upload here by nearly a year. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. I'm also confused as to how they disagree... giggy _(:O) 11:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MaryAnderson.jpg

No information about author or publication date. Not necessarily PD-Old. Gestumblindi 05:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Mary Anderson was an American stage actress who lived from 1859-1940. This photograph was taken during her youth, so it's safe to say it's pre-1923 and valid PD-US. I've changed the license tag. Should be fine now. Durova 18:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep agree with Durova. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. giggy _(:O) 11:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images uploaded by user Tm77

• Image:=1990-93.jpg (unable to link properly)
• Image:=BLUEBOY.sized.jpg (unable to link properly)
• File:96transportse.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
• File:Pontiac Trans Sport 92-02-03.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
• File:Transsport01.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
• File:Transsport02.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
• File:3 8L.sized.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

The reason these should all be deleted is that they all appear to be scans or copies of General Motors publicity material or brochures for the Pontiac Trans Sport, uploaded under the claim that User talk:Tm77 himself produced them. The359 18:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted all of them as simple copyvios. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:2007 0908klklk0048.JPG

Bad name. New Version: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A1_Sydney_Harbour_Bridge.JPG. Note this photo is in use in quite a few different projects and will have to be replaced by the new image --Adam.J.W.C. 13:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I've listed it for replacement. --rimshot^talk 12:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Replacement doesn't seem to work at the moment. Someone should try again later. --rimshot^talk 13:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:A1 Sydney Harbour Bridge.JPG

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Metro_St_Petersburg.png

copyvio http://www.metro.spb.ru/data/files/MetroDevelop.doc sk 22:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• [10] Петербургский Метрополитен Все права защищены, 2007/Petersburg Metro, all rights reserved, 2007 --sk 23:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted copyvio. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Press_conference_ECSC_1953_Esch-sur-Alzette.jpg

The stated permission is for material on ec.europa.eu only. The image is from some other website. See also the discussion at the village pump. Lupo 09:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete As I said at the village pump I agree to delete it immediately and we'll restore it if I receive a positive mail from the EU Commission. Apart from that I know I didn't find this picture on the EC site but it's labelled EC so I thought it might be (or have been) somewhere in the EC site as well. Anyway I asked them about that too so I'll see what they'll answer (if they answer). Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. See TwoWings' comment if you wish to have the image restored. giggy _(:O) 11:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Carnevale_storico_persicetano.JPG

Why No copyright required.? What's about the original? GeorgHH • talk   09:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Durova 12:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 11:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ALCCTL_Example.jpg

Not ineligible for copyright, no permission by the author.Code·is·poetry 15:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. abf /talk to me/ 15:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep only simple design (geometric shapes and normal typo}}, so ineligible! ChristianBier 15:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Not a trace of creativity. Samulili 15:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. giggy _(:O) 11:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Island states.PNG

This image is factually incorrect since it lists Australia as an Island, there's a better map in the w:Island country article (this refers to Image:Island_nations.png) which should be used instead (tagged {{delete}} with this rationale on enwiki description page by w:User:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason) —Random832 15:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep It shows that geography is not that simple nor neutral. Believe me I study geography and some of my teachers at University would include Australia as an island country, other wouldn't because they'd consider it's a continent. I personally think it's both! Anyway both maps are useful because they show different POV... and since Wikimedia wants to be neutral it should show both opinions. BUT this file should be modified because I don't inderstand why UK, Ireland, Indonesia and Papua-New-Guinea are not red on this map!!! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Presumably UK, Ireland, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea are not denoted as island states on this map, as the map-maker doesn't consider states that have a land border with a neighbouring state as fitting their definition of an island state? Man vyi 16:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This would makes sense indeed. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I've added a description to explain the purpose of that map. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep If you do enough research you will realise there is NO consensus on what is a continent or an island. Kransky 11:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. When people can't agree, it's best to give them options. Further discussion of it's accuracy can take place on the image's talk page. →Rocket°°° 19:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ChineseArmyspecial1lg.jpg

Not PD, Chinese PLA Photo copyrighted by China GOV. see {{PD-China}} --Shizhao 06:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)}}

deleted, --Polarlys 23:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Caidosde250division.jpg

Questionable claim of authorship from a low edit count en author. Megapixie 13:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Agree with nom. Not certain on ownership, better safe than sorry IMO. giggy _(:O) 11:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I'm usually hesitant with images like these because the claim can be true, but it's still on en.WP, so delete before others pick it (right now there's only one use). →Rocket°°° 19:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 15:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HK_Chater_Garden_Sarah_Geronimo_In_Motion_Concert_Poster.JPG

and Image:HK Chater Garden Sarah Geronimo In Motion Concert 1.JPG, Image:HK Chater Garden Sarah Geronimo In Motion Concert 2.JPG, Image:HK Auction at Ritz-Carlton Hotel Hong Kong Poster.JPG,

Derivative work. Not permanently installed as required by Commons:Freedom of panorama#Hong Kong, EugeneZelenko 16:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete, per nom. --rimshot^talk 12:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 15:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bergengatan_tbana.jpg

Bad quality. Out of focus. EugeneZelenko 16:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep As long we have no better file of this object. --GeorgHH • talk   21:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for stupid question, but is this building have any importance and in any way different form thousands of similar ones? --EugeneZelenko 16:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per GeorgHH. I'd be willing to change this if a better file exists. Durova 01:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, extremely bad quality, no notable building. --Polarlys 15:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DE11wiki.jpg

This picture is just 70 years old with no known author, so not PD old schlendrian •λ• 19:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Wrong license, for PD-old the author must be given. --GeorgHH • talk   21:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, --Polarlys 15:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Woman Engaging In Oral Sex.jpg

I'm really doubtful that the uploader is the author.
IMPORTANT: that DR also concerns his other uploads for the copyright problem and only another one for the porn problems. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment I must agree. It looks like it's a copyrighted image from a porn site, but I'll see what the uploader has to say. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete indoors, no model release. Durova 01:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment from BestSummers All Of The Uploads were shot by me on my cameras. And the 3 model have given me permission to release my images. I have added this description underneath all my images: This(These) Model(s) has(have) given me permission to freely use this image as I wish. This includes uploading it to the internet. Hereby I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. --BestSummers

  If you want to prove that it's really your camera, you should upload a picture of something completely different taken by the same camera so we may be able to check it's the same camera (with metadata). We'd delete that picture after if it's useless. If you don't do that we might think you're lying. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC) it seels that metadata are not available on the files you uploaded so this won't work! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

  Yes it will, it's very usually very easy to tell if a photo came from the same camera... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

  Ok then it's your turn BestSummers! Prove your good faith! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

  Here's the problem: if we trust unconfirmed assurances about model consent in this regard, then sooner or later an angry ex-husband is going to lie. It makes no sense to run that risk; people who want to upload graphic sexual photographs should either frame the shots so the models are unidentifiable or file with OTRS. Surely a willing model would sign a release. Durova 20:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

  Comment If BestSummers is the author of the photos, and the model is willing than it should be no problem for him to take second picture of the model holding a copy of a release. Work out a form of words for BestSummers to write onto a piece of paper for the model to hold.KTo288 00:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Regardless of the camera, do we really need another one of these? giggy _(:O) 08:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

  Well we don't have any other photo of fellatio actually so I guess we do. But I don't know if we can keep such a picture! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Porn_again giggy _(:O) 08:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

  I redirected the other DR you created because in that one I said it also concerned other images by the uploader. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Licensing is questionable given indentifiability & lack of meta data (the other uploads of this user being the same) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• delete I think we should require whatsoever "hard proof" for correct licencing of such intimate pictures. The very promise of a new account isn't enough. Somehow it's possible to proof whether two pictures are from the same (digital) camera. A user at de-WP was able to identify sockpuppets comparing pictures of several accounts. Considering the lack of any metadata i'm very skeptic about these pcitures.--Wiggum 15:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment pornographic of course,but,I asking me how many wikiuser has been copied this image for your own purpose after it has been deleted? and other question is:If the penis has been substituted by a dildo, would this image continue being pornography?thank you. Vicond 15:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

To answer your second question I personally don't consider that picture pornographic. But I would if the dildo was inserted in her vagina or anus. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

deleted, no model release (person identifiable), doubtful statement on authorship --Polarlys 15:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Happy_pit_bull.jpg

Old Stock.xchng image (uploaded May 2005) without permission. See Commons:Stock.xchng images. GeorgHH • talk   21:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 18:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yuri_Romero_Picon_Dayana_Diaz_Tavera.jpg

COM:SCOPE. Dodo 18:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Well even if it isn't of great quality I think it's useful. It's an interesting aspect of weddings. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Sufficient context is apparent from the photo even without a description. Potentially useful. Durova 01:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept per above. Image may be useful. — Dark ^(talk) 09:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cary Grant, EDA Milano.JPG

Who is "EDA, Milan?" --User:G.dallorto 16:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Who knows. It's a pretty bad quality image but maybe there's a reason. :/ →Rocket°°° 19:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Not a photo by the uploader. MichaelMaggs 06:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dette_er_Varg_Vikernes.jpg

Copyvio of image at bottom of page http://circusofhorror.zip.net/ Night Ranger 03:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Polarlys: copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stewart-Globe and Mail-Bush.jpg

Derivateive work --Liftarn 10:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --rimshot^talk 12:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --Boricuæddie 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chirurgie.pdf

zip-file renamed pdf, includes splitted pdf that can't open --Motopark 16:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kimono.pdf

zip-file renamed pdf, includes splitted pdf that can't open --Motopark 16:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cryptologie.pdf

zip-file renamed pdf, includes splitted pdf that can't open --Motopark 16:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Neoplasma.pdf

zip-file renamed pdf, includes splitted pdf that can't open --Motopark 16:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Palacio_Buenavista.jpg

http://www.peru-travel.org/ is nto a free site Patstuart (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)