Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004									09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

——————————————— Archive April 2008 ———————————————

1 April 1
- 1.1 Image:Orasmaa.jpg
- 1.2 Image:Margarita_Esther_Zavala.png
- 1.3 Image:RR_380.gif
- 1.4 Image:RR_200.gif
- 1.5 Image:RR_076.gif
- 1.6 Image:RR_062.png
- 1.7 Category:Rivers in Sisak
- 1.8 Image:Tom Chilton 2006 Vauxhall.jpg
- 1.9 Image:Starircasehouse.JPG
- 1.10 Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg
- 1.11 Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg
- 1.12 Image:Techconsult logo.jpg
- 1.13 Image:Alex Pato.jpg
- 1.14 Image:Kali cropped.jpg
- 1.15 Image:Kali (demon).jpg
- 1.16 Image:SeoulJinhwa.JPG
- 1.17 Image:BT_Passformpruefung_Mann_72_691.jpg
- 1.18 Image:Circle_game_at_beach_edit_rmb.jpg
- 1.19 Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg
- 1.20 Image:Johanna_Tukiainen.png
- 1.21 Image:Pilatus_PC-6_SkydiveLillo_JD18032008_edit.jpg
- 1.22 Image:Britannia 18 back.jpg
- 1.23 Image:07_bayly_3.jpg
- 1.24 Image:Raimon.jpg
- 1.25 Image:Euston tube station layout.png
- 1.26 Image:Buckelzikade_(Bocydium_globulare),Modell_-_Mutter_Erde_fec.jpg
- 1.27 Category:Blue porcelain
- 1.28 Image:Nkwd335.jpg
- 1.29 Image:HSK_Kormoran_(AWM_053867).jpg
- 1.30 Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg
- 1.31 Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg
- 1.32 Image:Zentai BDSM.jpg
2 April 2
- 2.1 Image:Ducks on Cam 2008-04-01.jpg
- 2.2 Template:Link FA
- 2.3 Image:125th_Street_Harlem2.jpg
- 2.4 Image:Alphonse_de_Lamartine_20061231.jpg
- 2.5 Image:Image-Amsterdam_Bloemenmarkt_4.JPG
- 2.6 Image:Absolute_Orangerie_01.jpg
- 2.7 Image:Tracés_des_ponts_de_Jargeau_Loiret_zoom_2.svg
- 2.8 Image:Mapa maquis.PNG
- 2.9 Image:Mapa maquis2.PNG
- 2.10 Image:Maqui map.png
- 2.11 Image:Fr-tabloid-alt002.jpg
- 2.12 Image:Tarjeta_jorge.jpg
- 2.13 Image:Tarjeta_george.jpg
- 2.14 Image:Bekaa_valley_bombing,_2006.jpg
- 2.15 Image:Ovechkin2007.jpg
- 2.16 Image:Peter_Forsberg_2007.jpg
- 2.17 Image:24 Uni Games (W) Beach Volleyball 210406 (1996134021).jpg
- 2.18 Image:United_Federation_of_Planets_flag.svg
- 2.19 Image:Uniform-Invoice_Taiwan.png
- 2.20 Image:1955-chevy-bel-air-chevrolet-archives.jpg
- 2.21 Category:Dohareubang talchum
- 2.22 Image:Beryl transparent cube Feisty.png
- 2.23 Image:Statue_of_Anne_of_Britanny_near_castle_in_Nantes_France.jpg
- 2.24 Image:Arenas.gif
- 2.25 Votingrightsact1 & 2
- 2.26 Duplicate images, orphaned or low res
- 2.27 Koalorka files
- 2.28 Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museum
3 Latest news
4 April 3
- 4.1 Image:IA_Sample.jpg
- 4.2 Image:AK_2008.jpg
- 4.3 Image:North_Carolina_license_plate.jpg
- 4.4 Image:Standardalplate.jpg
- 4.5 Image:Alabama_God_Bless_America_License_Plate.jpg
- 4.6 Image:AS_2004.jpg
- 4.7 Image:AZ_2007.jpg
- 4.8 Image:Arkansas_Plate_Sample.jpg
- 4.9 Image:3sam123.jpg
- 4.10 Image:United States Democratic Primary 2008 Results.png
- 4.11 Image:IMG_9806.jpg
- 4.12 Image:Bivouac1.jpg
- 4.13 Image:486px-Walter_Veltroni_2.jpg
- 4.14 Image:Image-Bronkhorst_4.JPG
- 4.15 Image:Gazi.jpg
- 4.16 Image:Hkif(enolam).png
- 4.17 Image:Berze_la_Ville_Chapelle_des_Moines.jpg
- 4.18 Image:Colonel_Sanders_with_his_Barnd.jpg
- 4.19 Image:2005.02_TED_094.jpg
- 4.20 Image:Graffiti_of_Íngrid_Betancourt.jpg
- 4.21 Image:PCLinuxOS_2007_CZ-logo2.svg
- 4.22 Image:Melanie_Betancourt_2007.jpg
- 4.23 Image:Republican_Primary_Results.png
- 4.24 Image:Europa_da_się_lubić_01.jpg
- 4.25 Image:Spongebob im moviepark.png
- 4.26 Image:Spongebob_im_moviepark.png
- 4.27 Image:Celine_Dion_headshot.jpg, Image:Celine Dion and Josh.jpg
5 April 4
- 5.1 Image:P3280042.JPG
- 5.2 Image:HMAS Sydney Sonar Image.jpg
- 5.3 Category:Gesäß
- 5.4 Category:Otter Klemperer
- 5.5 Category:Gartenstadt Crengeldanz
- 5.6 Category:EMD Diesel locomotives in Germany
- 5.7 Category:Fabelwesen
- 5.8 Image:CSD_2003_in_Rostock_17.jpg
- 5.9 Image:LolitaHazeMissExoticWorld2006.jpg
- 5.10 Image:Masturbating_woman.jpg
- 5.11 Image:Showtime!_(nude_photo_by_Peter_Klashorst).jpg
- 5.12 Image:Amy_with_dildo.jpg
- 5.13 Image:Horny_(nude_by_Peter_Klashorst).jpg
- 5.14 Image:Masturbating_man2.JPG
- 5.15 Image:Masturbating_man2.JPG
- 5.16 Image:Masturbating_man.jpg
- 5.17 Image:Vagina.JPG
- 5.18 Image:Vagina.JPG
- 5.19 Image:Vagina.JPG
- 5.20 Image:Vagina,Anus,Pereneum-Detail.jpg
- 5.21 Image:Vagina,Anus,Pereneum-Detail.jpg
- 5.22 Image:Black_genitalia_2.jpg
- 5.23 Image:Black_genitalia_2.jpg
- 5.24 Image:Black_genitalia.jpg
- 5.25 Image:Black_genitalia.jpg
- 5.26 Image:Front_view.jpg
- 5.27 Image:Front_view.jpg
- 5.28 Image:Playing_(nude).jpg
- 5.29 Image:Mons_pubis.jpg
- 5.30 Image:Foto076.jpg
- 5.31 Image:Female_genitalia.JPG
- 5.32 Image:Female_genitalia.JPG
- 5.33 Image:Vulva.jpg
- 5.34 Image:Vulva_crop.jpg
- 5.35 Image:Rear_view.jpg
- 5.36 Image:Vulva1.jpg
- 5.37 Image:A_vulva.jpeg
- 5.38 Image:Labia.jpg
- 5.39 Image:Genitaila-142736-52Y9s.jpg
- 5.40 Image:Greece linguistic minorities.svg
- 5.41 Image:Student_Rally195303211_3.png
- 5.42 Image:Dd_albertos_300.jpg
- 5.43 Image:Penrith Panthers home jersey 1978.svg
- 5.44 Image:VeneziaMestre-2008-1.gif
- 5.45 Image:Blowjob_in_the_wood.jpg
- 5.46 Image:Popups_que_hacen_prescindibles_las_categorías_1.JPG
- 5.47 Image:Popups_que_hacen_prescindibles_las_categorías.JPG
- 5.48 Image:Angelisa Singing.jpg
- 5.49 Image:NBC Nightly News with Ann Curry.jpg
- 5.50 Image:NBC Nightly News Set.jpg
- 5.51 Image:NBC Nightly News Broadcast.jpg
- 5.52 Image:Foto_528.jpg
- 5.53 Image:Picture_louai.jpg
- 5.54 Image:Lolicon_comicbooks_sold_in_Japan_001.jpg
- 5.55 Image:Nanotyrannus.gif
- 5.56 Image:Ernst_Fuchs_HYPNOSIA_mit_Mitra.jpg
- 5.57 Image:Stygimoloch.JPG
- 5.58 Image:Petrovaradinskatvrdjavamq3.jpg
6 April 5
- 6.1 Image:E9-Doc-14-16.pdf
- 6.2 Image:Right.JPG
- 6.3 Image:Left.jpg
- 6.4 Category:Buterfly
- 6.5 Image:Amalie_hessen.jpg
- 6.6 Image:FaybanWindmill-stamp.jpg
- 6.7 Image:Iriomote Cat Climbing.JPG
- 6.8 Image:560px-Pannonia01.png
- 6.9 Image:989_NDC0001.jpg
- 6.10 Image:1559_PLAIN0001.jpg
- 6.11 Image:5th_fleet.jpg
- 6.12 Image:Flat-Headed Cat Resting.JPG
- 6.13 Image:Ice_Art_competition_in_Fairbanks_2008_10.jpg
- 6.14 Image:Cablestreetmural_small.jpg
- 6.15 Image:Cristina Hernández.jpg
- 6.16 Image:Embryo 9 Wochen mit Groessenvergleich.JPG
- 6.17 Category:Jin class submarines
- 6.18 Image:Mamut_lanudo.jpg
- 6.19 Image:Grün - Selbstporträt.jpg
- 6.20 Image:Armia Czerwona,Wehrmacht 23.09.1939 wspólna parada.jpg
- 6.21 Image:Xalvashi.jpg
7 April 6
- 7.1 Image:Wikinews-logo.svg
- 7.2 Image:GerardPique.jpg
- 7.3 Image:Judd's_UCS.svg
- 7.4 Image:Auteur-jrp1c.png
- 7.5 Image:NREntrySign.jpg
- 7.6 Image:Inferred_Dinosaur_Behaviour.png
- 7.7 Image:Canadian_20_dollar_back_-1978.gif
- 7.8 Image:LOGO-BARRE-LEHNER.jpg
- 7.9 Image:Gamme-lehner.jpg
- 7.10 Image:29_Decarvalho.jpg
- 7.11 Image:Juan_Mariano_de_Goyeneche.jpg
- 7.12 Image:BrewsterSchoolhouseNR.JPG
- 7.13 Image:ThomasPaineFarmhouse.JPG
- 7.14 Image:StJohnsWilmotNR.JPG
- 7.15 Image:Reynaud.jpg
- 7.16 Image:BlakeJacksonsPortrait.jpg
- 7.17 Image:Foto_00.jpg
- 7.18 Image:HamangiaThinker.jpg
- 7.19 Image:Märklin_503_Elex.jpg
- 7.20 Image:Airbag_system.jpg
- 7.21 Image:SinisterGrafiti2_copy.jpg
- 7.22 Image:MNbedrock1.gif
- 7.23 Image:Back_cover-German_Memories_in_Asia.JPG
- 7.24 Image:Iman2.jpg
- 7.25 Image:画像_063.jpg
- 7.26 Image:Velociraptorprotoceratops.jpg
- 7.27 Image:Psp1.png
- 7.28 Image:NikosGoumasStadium-AEK.jpg
- 7.29 Image:Stanford_bunny.jpg
- 7.30 Image:Velosolex_in_Central_Park.JPG
- 7.31 Images of Pirat
  - 7.31.1 Copyright violations
  - 7.31.2 Low quality images
- 7.32 Images from ntemisnikolaidis
- 7.33 Category:Wonder Weapons
- 7.34 Parajanov statue
- 7.35 Image:BANNER-gamma-12b.jpg
- 7.36 Image:BANNER-gamma-12b.jpg
8 April 7
- 8.1 Image:Sexuality Barnstar.gif
- 8.2 Image:Fun_factory.jpg
- 8.3 Image:Lisa_Gerrard,_live_in_Melbourne.jpg
- 8.4 Image:Christian anarchist.jpg
- 8.5 Image:Christian_anarchist_clean.jpg
- 8.6 Image:Blur-1.jpg
- 8.7 Image:Pilzsporen_WJP.jpg
- 8.8 Image:Baja_California_hurricane_tracks.png
- 8.9 Image:Gwyneth_Paltrow_(2007).jpg
- 8.10 Image:Pilzsporen_WJP.jpg
- 8.11 Image:Yusuf_el-Qaradawi.jpg
- 8.12 Image:Miaicon.JPG
- 8.13 Image:Vestfold_vapen.png
- 8.14 Image:Wapen_doetinchem.png
- 8.15 Image:Altenburg_coa.png
- 8.16 Image:Wapenschild_Ronse.jpg
- 8.17 Image:Wapen_van_Barneveld.png
- 8.18 Image:WapenArnhem.jpg
- 8.19 Image:Wapen-Oost-Gelre.png
- 8.20 Image:Beemster_wapen.png
- 8.21 Image:Graft-De-Rijp_wapen.png
- 8.22 Image:Gemeentewapenhuizen.gif
- 8.23 Image:Zijpe_wapen.png
- 8.24 Image:Groenlo_wapen.png
- 8.25 Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Aa_en_Hunze.jpg
- 8.26 Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Aalburg.png
- 8.27 Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Aalten.gif
- 8.28 Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Achtkarspelen.jpg
- 8.29 Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Poortugaal.jpg
- 8.30 Image:2072251217a6746412241l.jpg
- 8.31 Image:Anne_Hathaway_(Get_Smart).jpg
- 8.32 Image:Anne_Hathaway_(Get_Smart2).jpg
- 8.33 Image:YeardlySmith.JPG
- 8.34 Image:Cindycraw00.jpg
- 8.35 Image:Smažená_kuřecí_prsa,_smažené_krevety_a_brambotová_kaše_(3).jpg
- 8.36 Image:O'Connor,_Renee.jpg
- 8.37 Image:Rossett_school_logo.jpg
- 8.38 Image:TellFecheriyeSyrien.jpg
- 8.39 Image:Winterswijk_coa.gif
- 8.40 Image:Enkhuizen_wapen.png
- 8.41 Image:Getting_the_latch....jpg
- 8.42 Image:Now_we_can_cry.jpg
- 8.43 Image:Breast_feeding_within_minutes.jpg
- 8.44 Image:Swedish_or_Irish_Blonde.jpg
- 8.45 Image:Simon_Callow_Nov_2007.jpg
- 8.46 Image:Hans_Adolf_Krebs_1953.jpg
- 8.47 Image:Putin24.jpg
- 8.48 Image:Delorean.JPG
- 8.49 Image:Sergio_leone.jpg
- 8.50 Image:Andrea_Parodi.jpg
- 8.51 Image:Colin_McRae_celebrate.jpg
- 8.52 Image:SST_Patch.JPG
- 8.53 Image:Velva.jpg
- 8.54 Image:Íngrid_Betancourt_Bordeaux.JPG
- 8.55 Image:Grand Central trial route map.JPG
- 8.56 Image:Berlusca_FacciaCattiva.jpg
- 8.57 Image:ChondromatoseCoudeCartilage2.jpg
- 8.58 Image:Tyranozaur.png
- 8.59 Image:Escudo_Agolada.jpg
- 8.60 Image:Frederick_Reines_-_neutrino.jpg
- 8.61 Image:Jerry_Friedman_-_quarks.jpg
- 8.62 Image:Richard_Taylor_-_quarks.jpg
- 8.63 Image:Leon_Lederman_-_muon_neutrino_-_b_quark.jpg
- 8.64 Image:Jack_Steinberger_-_muon_neutrino.jpg
- 8.65 Image:Mieszko.jpeg
- 8.66 Image:Großergott.ogg
- 8.67 Image:Siegfried_eiger.jpg
- 8.68 Photos of Finnish decorations uploaded by User:Kwasura
- 8.69 Images of E231
9 April 8
- 9.1 Image:Graybirdgrasshopper-Schistocerca- nitens.jpg.jpg
- 9.2 Image:Salle_de_séjour_circa_2000.jpg
- 9.3 Image:Fblogoshirt2.jpg
- 9.4 Image:Cine-Mende-4.JPG
- 9.5 Image:Cine-Mende-1.JPG
- 9.6 Category:Churches in Valladolid
- 9.7 Image:GIMP-GEGL-GTK+-hackfest.png
- 9.8 Image:JanetJackson.jpg
- 9.9 Image:Vlada1.jpg
- 9.10 Image:Sport-blue-front.jpg
- 9.11 Category:Rivers in Vorarlberg
- 9.12 Image:200832010514566440.jpg
- 9.13 Image:Illegitimacy_1of3.jpg
- 9.14 Image:Illegitimacy_2of3.jpg
- 9.15 Image:Illegitimacy_3of3.jpg
- 9.16 Image:Tiergaertnertor.JPG
- 9.17 Image:Underbelly_Website.jpg
- 9.18 Image:Emil_bartoschek_bild.jpg
- 9.19 Image:Emil_bartoschek_bild2.jpg
- 9.20 Image:Vestuario_artesanal_em_algodao_bordado.jpg
- 9.21 Image:AhGill_standalone2007_edit1.jpg
- 9.22 Image:Einsatzgruppen-Killingfull.jpg
- 9.23 Image:Zug_der_Erinnerung_20080407-DSCF0474.jpg
- 9.24 Image:Beautiful Redy.jpg
- 9.25 Image:Brassiere2007.jpg
- 9.26 Image:Onkel_August.jpg
- 9.27 Image:Bakterie swe 290507.png
- 9.28 Image:Beichte.JPG
- 9.29 Image:629056811_0147edf6ee.jpg
- 9.30 Image:Priesterweihe.JPG
- 9.31 Image:Burte-Tagbuech.jpg
- 9.32 Image:Die_Föhre.jpg
- 9.33 Image:Egmont_Schäfer_1998.jpg
- 9.34 Image:Scorepex.jpg
- 9.35 Images of Alfred Holler
10 April 9
- 10.1 Image:Lenry.JPG
- 10.2 Image:M-67handgrenade.jpg
- 10.3 Image:Hunt_seat_2.jpeg
- 10.4 Image:Thessaloniki_Surrender_1912.jpg
- 10.5 Image:Map of Amsterdam Metro.jpg
- 10.6 Image:DSC00307.JPG
- 10.7 Image:MalinaH.jpg
- 10.8 Image:GeoWashingtonstatue,_detroit.jpg
- 10.9 Image:Boy_Scout_Memorial-27527.jpg
- 10.10 Redux
- 10.11 Image:Symbol_of_Akitakata.png
- 10.12 Image:Spiderwog.jpg
- 10.13 Image:家扶中心感謝狀.JPG
- 10.14 Image:Masked_Rider_Statue_2.jpg
- 10.15 Image:Las_Bocas_Olmec_baby-face_figurine_(Bookgrrrl).jpg
- 10.16 Image:Edinburgh Trip April 2008 021.JPG
- 10.17 Image:Thessaloniki's_surrender_26_October_1912.jpg
- 10.18 Image:000_1549.jpg
- 10.19 Image:Merle_Terlesky_head.jpg
- 10.20 Image:Escudo_de_Ayerbe.png
- 10.21 Image:Kde Vnc 01.png
- 10.22 Image:Compiz Cube.jpg
11 April 10
- 11.1 Image:Prostituta88.jpg
- 11.2 Image:Prostituta87.jpg
- 11.3 My Chemical Romance
- 11.4 Image:Ngc2024_2mass.jpg
- 11.5 Image:Mirandaprueba.JPG
- 11.6 Image:Cissey_Nef.jpg
- 11.7 Category:Ukranian Navy patches
- 11.8 Image:Ground_Track_-_Unit_-_Combat_-_Anti-Armour_-_Unknown.svg
- 11.9 Image:JeanGenet-HansKoechler1983.jpg
- 11.10 Image:Birmingham Airport.PNG
- 11.11 Image:Powers_maya_police_station.jpg
- 11.12 Image:Jp498_20030517_DSC_0011.jpg
- 11.13 Image:Íj_(heraldika).PNG
- 11.14 Image:USA-Saratoga-Sanborn_Park-Agricultural_Machine-10.jpg
- 11.15 Image:Temahome_logo.jpg
- 11.16 Image:Rongorongo_V-a_Honolulu_3.png
- 11.17 Image:Rongorongo_U-a_Honolulu_2.png
- 11.18 Image:Rongorongo_T_Honolulu_1.png
- 11.19 Image:Rongorongo_Y_snuff_box_(color).jpg
- 11.20 Image:Rongorongo_Z_Poike.jpg
- 11.21 Image:Rongorongo_Q-r_Small_St_Petersburg.jpg
- 11.22 Image:Rongorongo_R-a_color.jpg
- 11.23 Image:Rongorongo_O_Boomerang.jpg
- 11.24 Image:Rongorongo_Q-v_small_St_Petersburg_color.jpg
- 11.25 Image:Rongorongo_K-r_Small_London_(color).jpg
- 11.26 Image:Rongorongo_L_Reimiro_2.jpg
- 11.27 Image:Rongorongo_J_Reimiro_1.jpg
- 11.28 Image:Rongorongo_T_Honolulu_1.png
- 11.29 Image:Anaokeke.jpg
- 11.30 Image:Rongorongo_A-b_Tahua_right.jpg
- 11.31 Image:Rongorongo_D-b_Échancrée_(natural).jpg
- 11.32 Image:Rongorongo_D-a_Échancrée_(natural).jpg
- 11.33 Image:Rongorongo_R-b_Atua-Mata-Riri.jpg
- 11.34 Image:Ortega_Daniel.jpg
- 11.35 Image:Ortega_Daniel.jpg
- 11.36 Image:Rongorongo_C-a_Mamari.jpg
- 11.37 Image:Rongorongo_G-v_Small_Santiago.jpg
- 11.38 Image:Rongorongo_H-v_Great_Santiago_(unretouched).jpg
- 11.39 Image:Rongorongo_H-r_Great_Santiago_color.jpg
- 11.40 Image:Rongorongo_G-r_Small_Santiago.jpg
- 11.41 Image:Rongorongo_C-b_Mamari_color.jpg
- 11.42 Image:Rongorongo_I8_Santiago_Staff_(color).jpg
- 11.43 Image:Rongorongo_E-r_Keiti.jpg
- 11.44 Image:Rongorongo_N-a_Small_Vienna_(color).jpg
- 11.45 Image:Rongorongo_E-r_Keiti_raw.jpg
- 11.46 Image:Rongorongo_E-v_Keiti.jpg
- 11.47 Image:Rongorongo_E-v_Keiti_raw.jpg
- 11.48 Image:Rongorongo_Qr3-7_color.jpg
- 11.49 Image:Maia_Pinto.jpg
- 11.50 Image:Steel19.png
- 11.51 Image:Horloge-republicaine1.jpg
- 11.52 Image:Ataturk-occupation_of_Istanbul_execution_of_prisoners.png
- 11.53 Image:2006_İsrael_Lebanon_Conflict2.jpg
- 11.54 Image:2_Prescott_Hill.JPG
- 11.55 Image:Hotchkiss_AM2.jpg
- 11.56 Image:1_Hotchkiss_AM80S.JPG
- 11.57 Image:Carlos_Alberto_Pagoada_Bustillo.jpg
- 11.58 Image:Mechanics_order_of_magnitude.svg
- 11.59 Image:NunoAlvaresPereira.jpg
12 April 11
- 12.1 Image:QueenCity.jpg
- 12.2 Image:Wykagylbusinessdistrict.jpg
- 12.3 Image:Kruckenkreuz.png
- 12.4 Image:Revues_professionnelles_et_promotionnelles.JPG
- 12.5 Image:Promo_exportateurs.JPG
- 12.6 Image:Promo_pour_public.JPG
- 12.7 Image:Promo_pour_journalistes.JPG
- 12.8 Image:Promo_pour_exploitants.jpg
- 12.9 Image:Leon_Urlich.jpg
- 12.10 Image:Davids_Island_3.jpg
- 12.11 Image:Davids_Island_2.jpg
- 12.12 Image:Davids_Island.jpg
- 12.13 Image:LuchtfotoAcademiegebouw.jpg
- 12.14 Image:DPRK2006 FanghaeBuk.png
- 12.15 Image:DPRK2006 FanghaeNam.png
- 12.16 Image:Surtsey.jpg
- 12.17 Image:Karte_Südamerika.jpg
- 12.18 Image:Nl-Computer-article.ogg
- 12.19 Image:Erected penis with Foreskin.jpg
- 12.20 Image:Anna_May_Wong-Thief_of_Bagdad.jpg
- 12.21 Image:Big machinery.jpg
- 12.22 Image:PremiumPoint_(1).jpg
- 12.23 Image:Lauren_Graham.jpg
- 12.24 Category:Bill McGee
- 12.25 Image:You_Forgot_Poland.svg
- 12.26 Image:Emblem bg.jpg
- 12.27 Image:Matmypic3.jpg
- 12.28 Image:Kataeb-miliita-crop.jpg
- 12.29 Image:Uluru_as_seen_by_the_Iconos_Satellite.jpg
- 12.30 Image:Aswan_High_Dam.jpg
- 12.31 Image:BamIran.IKONOS.2003dec27.jpg
- 12.32 Image:SanFrancisco_dtwn_IKONOS_28aug04.jpg
- 12.33 Image:Michael_Wittmann1.jpg
- 12.34 Image:Grape_Vine_Hotel.jpg
- 12.35 Jarle Vespestad
- 12.36 Image:Adenauer_Boccia.jpg
- 12.37 Category:Gryksbo kyrka
- 12.38 Category:Churches in diocese of Västerås
- 12.39 Image:I heart revolution wristband.JPG
- 12.40 Image:Pakt Ruzvelt.jpg
- 12.41 Image:Nehru Gandhi Roerich.jpg
- 12.42 Image:The_Ci-Xi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_(9).PNG
- 12.43 Image:The_Ci-Xi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_(9).PNG
- 12.44 SeaWIFS images
  - 12.44.1 At least 5 years old
- 12.45 Image:Interstate 95 (Maryland).svg
13 April 12
- 13.1 Image:Carol_Lupescu_1940.jpeg
- 13.2 Image:Map_of_Alabama_highlighting_Cullman_County.png
- 13.3 Image:272261169_72a18cc7cc_b.jpg
- 13.4 Image:Irisdehaas.jpg
- 13.5 Image:WW.jpg
- 13.6 Image:DPRK2006 Pyongnam-Kanso.PNG
- 13.7 Image:David_Tennant_Critics_Awards_For_Theatre_In_Scotland.jpg
- 13.8 Image:Netsukerat.jpg
- 13.9 Image:Ariel-SierraBoggess.jpg
- 13.10 Image:Plant17.jpg
- 13.11 Image:Book_of_Abraham_Facsimile_2.gif
- 13.12 Image:IrisdehaasWW.jpg
- 13.13 Image:F-15_noozle.jpg
- 13.14 Image:Zakk2.jpg
- 13.15 Image:Zakk Wylde.jpg
- 13.16 Image:DSC01952.JPG
- 13.17 Image:Angaturama_by_Luis_mini.JPG
- 13.18 Image:Malibufles.JPG
- 13.19 Image:Messina_Palace_Monte_di_pietà645645_.jpg
- 13.20 Image:Nokia_8800.png
- 13.21 Image:U2styleyoutube.png
- 13.22 Image:Book_of_Abraham_Facsimile_3.gif
- 13.23 Image:Mallampati Et Cormack-Lehane.gif
- 13.24 Image:RIC 1601-o.jpg
- 13.25 Image:Exclu_Dsign.JPG
- 13.26 Image:Regulaj_stelaj_plurlateroj.jpg
- 13.27 Image:Maria_vargas_llosa_signature.jpg
- 13.28 Image:Mohorosh_a1b.jpg
- 13.29 Image:Messina_Palazzo_Monte_di_Pietà_(Natale_Masuccio)4.jpg
- 13.30 Image:Membrane_Horizontal.JPG
- 13.31 Image:The_Crucifixion.JPG
- 13.32 Image:Pyramid.JPG
- 13.33 Image:Kalamkari.JPG
- 13.34 Photos from Sarah Lawrence College slideshow
- 13.35 Flickr images by Mr.Scholastic
- 13.36 Image:Campos-Bandeira.jpg
- 13.37 Image:Campos-Bandeira.jpg
14 April 13
- 14.1 Image:Polish_infantry.jpg
- 14.2 Image:PovertyPointLayout.jpg
- 14.3 Image:VoroninVisitingNATO.jpg
- 14.4 Image:Logo-highres.jpg
- 14.5 Image:Chateau_de_Ortenbourg1.jpg
- 14.6 Image:Chateau_de_Ortenbourg2.jpg
- 14.7 Image:1909951957 8ce59da289.jpg
- 14.8 Image:DHCP-Kommunikation.svg
- 14.9 Image:Fruit_machine.jpg
- 14.10 Image:Rondo.jpg
- 14.11 Image:Firefox-1.5-linux.png
- 14.12 Image:Frontstellung 1 Niebuhr.JPG
- 14.13 Image:Frontstellung 2 Niebuhr.JPG
- 14.14 Image:Dicraeosaurus_sk.jpg
- 14.15 Image:X-The_West_Dowager_Empress_Dressing_Herself_as_the_Goddess_of_Mercy_(2).PNG
- 14.16 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_with_Attendant.JPG
- 14.17 Image:Parc_de_Blossac_2.jpg
- 14.18 Image:Projekt_183.JPG
- 14.19 Image:MoldovaDoingBusiness2007.png
- 14.20 Image:Instalar_Opera_mediante_el_Administrador_de_Paquetes_de_Debian.png
- 14.21 Image:Oiseau20080412.jpg
- 14.22 Image:Oiseau20080412.jpg
- 14.23 Image:Omar_Khadr_-_child.jpg
15 April 14
- 15.1 Image:Zargwim.jpg
- 15.2 Image:Revision 3's control board.jpg
- 15.3 Image:AR 10.PNG
- 15.4 Image:Hugo_Vogel_Rudolf_Virchow.jpg
- 15.5 Image:ShearerStJames.png
- 15.6 Image:Turok-sign.jpg
- 15.7 Image:Sl_userbox.png
- 15.8 Image:Minefield_3.0a7pre.png
- 15.9 Image:Beylik.jpg
- 15.10 Image:Three_Horses_Beer_Madagascar.jpg
- 15.11 Image:FMR_Areal1.JPG
- 15.12 Image:Petrolina.jpg
- 15.13 Image:Bahrain World Trade Center.jpg
- 15.14 Image:JoseLuisLopez3.jpg
- 15.15 Image:Otto_Stern.jpg
- 15.16 Image:MyDog2005.jpg
- 15.17 Image:Ginger colored cat 2008.jpg
- 15.18 Image:Two dogs in B&W.jpg
- 15.19 Image:Sid_Wilson_Slipknot.jpg
- 15.20 Image:Chris_Fehn_and_Jim_Root_Slipknot.jpg
- 15.21 Image:Chris_Slipknot_1999.jpg
- 15.22 Image:Druivelaar1994.jpg
- 15.23 Image:Gov-Palin-2006.jpg
- 15.24 Image:Syrok_Druzhba.JPG
- 15.25 Image:France Preseren.jpg
- 15.26 Image:BobHopegettingOscar.jpg
- 15.27 Image:Exclusive_Economic_Zones_United_Kingdom.png
- 15.28 Some personality rights violations nominated by NoCultureIcons
- 15.29 Image:Oiseau20080412.jpg
- 15.30 Image:Oiseau20080412.jpg
- 15.31 Image:Kölner-Karneval-NS-Zeit-PC270043.JPG
16 April 15
- 16.1 Image:Munch_vampire.jpg
- 16.2 Template:PD-art-life-50
- 16.3 Image:Ansu_2007_Princess_Project.jpg
- 16.4 Image:Elritze.jpg
- 16.5 Image:Tigersalmer.jpg
- 16.6 Image:1_091.JPG
- 16.7 Image:Hecht(Esox Lucius).gif
- 16.8 Image:Hecht 01 resize.jpg
- 16.9 Image:Mono_Battery.jpg
- 16.10 Image:Lotrmus.jpg
- 16.11 Image:Georgia_Tech_cheerleaders_2006.jpg
- 16.12 Image:Bacha-i Saqqao.jpg
- 16.13 Image:連靜雯.jpg
- 16.14 Image:Pistolita.jpg
- 16.15 Image:Daxxis_portada.jpg
- 16.16 Image:Bonnie_SG.jpg
- 16.17 Image:Srpske izbeglice iz krajine.jpg
- 16.18 Image:Ben S.jpg
- 16.19 Image:Wappen-lovania.jpg
- 16.20 Image:After_election_in_Russia_(2007,_LDPR).JPG
- 16.21 Image:Warwick Vase Medaille.jpg
- 16.22 Image:Beardsley_Maupin.jpg
- 16.23 Image:Schio_busto_di_Arnaldo_Fusinato.jpg
- 16.24 Image:Goethe_Malcesine_BMK.JPG
- 16.25 Template:NaturalCompoundImage
- 16.26 Image:Assutdelor.jpg
- 16.27 Image:Boggs,_Jungle_Trail.jpg
- 16.28 some wallpapers
- 16.29 Some images by Boochan
- 16.30 Some Coats of Arms not from www.ngw.nl
17 April 16
- 17.1 Image:Interstate 95 (Maryland).svg
- 17.2 Image:Sandefjord Ballklubb logo.jpg
- 17.3 Image:Walcownia1.JPG
- 17.4 Image:1936_AT_gun_polish.jpg
- 17.5 Image:Badingue_lie_connaissance_avec_Marguerite_Bellanger.JPG
- 17.6 Image:Toni_Schoenecker_deska.jpg
- 17.7 Image:Winonaryder.jpg
- 17.8 Image:Élisabeth_II.jpg
- 17.9 Image:Scarlett_Johansson_in_São_Paulo.jpg
- 17.10 Image:Scarlett_Johansson_&_Natalie_Portman.jpg
- 17.11 Image:Natalie_Portman_2008.jpg
- 17.12 Image:Maria_Sharapova_Beautiful.jpg
- 17.13 Image:Quimbyinmoisant.jpg
- 17.14 Image:Zosterops_olivaceus.JPG
- 17.15 Image:EBermudez.jpg
- 17.16 Image:Battlestar_galactica.jpg
- 17.17 Image:Giacomo Gates.jpg
- 17.18 Image:00.PNG
- 17.19 Image:APauthors-collage.jpg
- 17.20 Image:Ben Shepherd.jpg
- 17.21 Image:Binbirdirek Cistern, Istanbul (2005).jpg
- 17.22 Image:Lil Wayne.jpg
- 17.23 Image:D178.gif
- 17.24 Image:Body_Shop_Yonge.jpg
- 17.25 Category:Military symbols (reversed)
- 17.26 Category:Coats of arms of Croatian municipalities
- 17.27 Image:1013970446 b18cb8944f.jpg
- 17.28 Image:Bertram cardinal.JPG
- 17.29 Image:Ali Hamza al Bahlul's boycott sign.jpg
- 17.30 Image:Justice_Robert_Marsden_Hope.jpg
- 17.31 Image:Thai_Garuda_emblem.png
- 17.32 Category:Military ranks of Socialist Yugoslavia
- 17.33 Image:Francesco_Benigno1.JPG
- 17.34 Image:Louvre_at_night_centered.jpg
- 17.35 Image:Amflamingo.jpg
- 17.36 Image:Edvard_Munch's_tomb.jpg
- 17.37 Image:Schiller_Wallenstein_1800.jpg
- 17.38 Image:Madarsko.jpg
- 17.39 Image:Acrocanthosaurus_ByUtah.jpg
- 17.40 Image:Url.jpeg
- 17.41 Image:Scott_2_750.jpg
- 17.42 Image:Blancheteed.jpg
- 17.43 Image:Tusks.jpg
- 17.44 Image:418px-Neta_kinner_field_1921_s.jpg
- 17.45 Image:Webhomepage2005_html_m497a77bd.jpg
- 17.46 Category:Air Force of former Yugoslavia
- 17.47 Image:Margarethe_of_Austria_Philibert_II_of_Savoy.jpeg
- 17.48 Image:Linus_Torvalds.jpeg
- 17.49 Image:LouvreEingang.jpg
- 17.50 Image:LeLouvrePyramidPalace.jpg
- 17.51 Image:Dsc07963.jpg
- 17.52 Image:LouvrePyramideinnen.jpg
- 17.53 Image:Paris.louvre.pyramid.250pix.jpg
- 17.54 Image:Biedaszyb na Górnym Śląsku l.20.jpg
- 17.55 Image:Belk postkarte.jpg
- 17.56 Image:Punishment_By_Mosquitoes.jpg
- 17.57 Image:025.svg
- 17.58 Image:075.svg
- 17.59 Image:20zl1939A.jpg
- 17.60 Image:20zl1939R.jpg
- 17.61 Image:Bandera molina de aragon.JPG
- 17.62 Image:Bandera de la Provincia de Sevilla.svg
- 17.63 Image:Afta.jpg
- 17.64 Image:Die Belagerung von 1793 a.pdf
- 17.65 Image:LasseMartenson.jpg
- 17.66 Image:V kauppila.jpg
- 17.67 Image:Ramsau-extra+F16.gif
- 17.68 Image:MAP0001-1.jpg
- 17.69 Image:Qmby-hq6-2-l.jpg
- 17.70 Image:EX5G1.jpg
- 17.71 Image:Bleriot_xia.jpg
- 17.72 Image:Salon de Diane-CYRUS ATTAQUE UN SANGLIER.jpg
- 17.73 Image:CIMG2490.JPG
- 17.74 Image:CIMG2490.JPG
- 17.75 Image:Picture19.png
- 17.76 Image:Picture19.png non deletion plee
- 17.77 Image:Picture19.png non deletion plee
- 17.78 Image:Dubai Creek 1964.jpg
- 17.79 We should not break the law
- 17.80 Unfree Qing Dynasty images
18 April 17
- 18.1 Image:Character_octavia.jpg
- 18.2 Image:Dr_who_christmas_07.jpg
- 18.3 Image:Kochan_025.JPG
- 18.4 Image:Badgernet_C_Harbour_1.JPG
- 18.5 Image:Poussins.jpg
- 18.6 Image:Mason_Neck_Satellite.JPG
- 18.7 Image:Desarrollo.jpg
- 18.8 Image:Down_Yonder.jpg
- 18.9 Image:2007WiMAXForumTaipeiShowcase ASUS R50A.jpg
- 18.10 Image:Mercosur.png
- 18.11 Image:Alec_Douglas-Home.jpg
- 18.12 Image:Branislav_Bane_Ivanovic.jpg
- 18.13 Image:Moradosis.pdf
- 18.14 Image:Samia_Smith.jpg
- 18.15 Image:OQO_Model_01.jpg
- 18.16 Image:PeterToshAndRobbieShakespeare1978.jpg
- 18.17 Image:PeterTosh_RobbieShakespeare1978.jpg
- 18.18 Category:Military of former Yugoslavia
- 18.19 Image:Salammbo Alphonse Mucha.jpg
- 18.20 Category:Musicians of former Yugoslavia
- 18.21 Image:Diego_Velázquez_-_Autorretrato_-_Óleo_sobre_lienzo_45_x_38_cm_-_Colección_Real_Academia_de_Bellas_Artes_de_San_Carlos_-_Museo_de_Bellas_Artes_de_Valencia.jpg
- 18.22 Image:Ham_Fish.jpg
- 18.23 Image:T-Centralen_Morgonrusning_20040810.jpg
- 18.24 Image:Yugo 2.jpg
- 18.25 Image:20050429-2230UTC.ogg
- 18.26 Image:Beyoglu_4639_01x.jpg
- 18.27 Image:Part Yugo template.jpg
- 18.28 Image:Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png
- 18.29 Image:Blonde_boy_and_girl.JPG
- 18.30 Image:Steinthaleben-Aufkleber-900-Jahre.jpg
- 18.31 Image:TTU_Helmet_Visor.png
- 18.32 Image:TTU Helmet Visor.png
- 18.33 Image:Liperi vaakuna.gif
- 18.34 shi-gua shot
- 18.35 Image:Tattiya and Air Force Amy.jpg
- 18.36 Image:Tattiya_and_Air_Force_Amy.jpg
- 18.37 Image:Werjae.jpg
- 18.38 Image:Visual_mongo_drongo.jpg
- 18.39 Image:Visual_mongo_drongo.jpg
19 April 18
- 19.1 Image:20th_Television_Logo.jpg
- 19.2 Image:Badgernet_C_Harbour_1.JPG
- 19.3 Image:PFCK.jpg
- 19.4 Image:P1020855.JPG
- 19.5 Image:Averbakh_in_the_50s.jpg
- 19.6 Image:RajReddy_CMU.gif
- 19.7 Image:Amaral2008.jpg
- 19.8 Image:Derrame_rock.jpg
- 19.9 Image:Elgin.JPG
- 19.10 Image:Yamaha900XJ.jpg
- 19.11 Image:Rivaldo175741.jpg
- 19.12 Image:Todos_estábamos_a_la_espera.jpg
- 19.13 Image:Cien_años_de_soledad.JPG
- 19.14 Image:11_abril_2008_020.jpg
- 19.15 Image:Alberto_Pumarejo.jpg
- 19.16 Image:Evaristo_Sourdis.jpg
- 19.17 Image:Categorización_Icfes_Colegios_Barranquilla.JPG
- 19.18 Image:Afrank92-93.jpg
- 19.19 Image:Дом с химерами Киев.jpg
- 19.20 Image:Броварской проспект.jpg
- 19.21 Image:Marcus_Aurelius.ogg
- 19.22 Image:Charlie_Parker.jpg
- 19.23 Image:Сью_Таунсенд.jpg
- 19.24 Image:Famousamospacket.JPG
- 19.25 Image:Ulyanovsk_under_construction_at_Nikolayev_Shipyard.jpg
- 19.26 Category:Marino Bazdaric
- 19.27 Category:Mario Stojic
- 19.28 Image:ChuckBrownOct012005a.jpg
- 19.29 Image:P-8_Poseidon_Diagram.jpg
- 19.30 Image:Check-Reference.png
- 19.31 Image:Kulturzeitschrift_Humboldt_Cover_Nr._145_blau.jpg
- 19.32 Image:Tattiya and Air Force Amy.jpg
- 19.33 Image:Tattiya_and_Air_Force_Amy.jpg
20 April 19
- 20.1 Image:Riekerpolder map.jpg
- 20.2 Image:Dog_sign_02_ies.jpg
- 20.3 Image:Davidcameron2.jpg
- 20.4 Image:Tuquindio-logo.gif
- 20.5 Image:IMGP1569.jpg
- 20.6 Image:IMGP2302.JPG
- 20.7 Image:Henrik Ibsen, Per Gynt - Den Nasjonale Scene.JPG
- 20.8 Image:Fucheungestate.JPG.jpg
- 20.9 Image:Billclintonokcb.jpg
- 20.10 Category:Grgur Ninski statue at Split
- 20.11 Image:Mindflow.jpg
- 20.12 Image:WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf
- 20.13 Image:Erkgazetasi-hujjat.JPG
- 20.14 Image:Tallinn - 17 July 1940 - 0-153447.jpg
- 20.15 Image:Glier.jpg
- 20.16 Template:Hurricane
- 20.17 Image:Eichmann2.jpg
- 20.18 Image:UbuntuBeryl.png
- 20.19 Image:CygwinX-3.JPG
- 20.20 Image:Bsod_w2k.png
- 20.21 Image:Seger_Ellis.gif
- 20.22 Images from Nazarians Guns Regonition Guide
- 20.23 Image:Okinawa_Intl_Univ.jpg
- 20.24 Image:Okinawa_Intl_Univ.jpg
21 April 20
- 21.1 Image:Diana_in_black.jpg
- 21.2 Image:Diana_in_black.jpg
- 21.3 Image:Cadillac_1903.jpg
- 21.4 Category:Kopacki rit
- 21.5 Image:Bilic.jpg
- 21.6 Image:Profil85.jpg
- 21.7 Image:SamMaleStripper.jpg
- 21.8 Image:Face-blush.svg
- 21.9 Image:SLR_McLaren-Mercedes_IAA2005_Matl09180156e.jpg
- 21.10 Image:Anisotropic_compare.png
- 21.11 Image:Female_anatomy.png
- 21.12 Image:Allerton & Garston. Pateley Bridge Cleobury Mortimer RJD 158.jpg
- 21.13 Image:AXbo_Schlafphasenwecker.jpg
- 21.14 Image:8.jpg
- 21.15 Image:Model_rescued_Vasa_ship.jpg
- 21.16 Image:Otakar_Švec.JPG
- 21.17 Image:Blaxsta_Vidal_Icewine_2005_label.jpg
- 21.18 Template:Media resources
- 21.19 Image:Animeproduction_it.svg
- 21.20 Image:Image-Qxz-ad139.gif
- 21.21 Image:Animeproduction_it2.svg
- 21.22 Image:Animeproduction_it1.svg
- 21.23 Image:Animeproduction_it3.svg
- 21.24 Image:Liverpool RJD 42.jpg
- 21.25 Image:Animeproduction_es.svg
- 21.26 Image:Pétrel des neiges - Snow Petrel.gif
- 21.27 Image:Baldurvonschirach.jpg
- 21.28 Image:05528.jpg
- 21.29 Image:Hourai_bridge.jpg
- 21.30 Image:Megalithic_Culture.PNG
- 21.31 Image:Statens_vegvesen.PNG
- 21.32 Image:Emil-schumacher-1959_hg.jpg
- 21.33 Image:Admiral of the Fleet of the Russian Federation rank insignia.jpg
- 21.34 Image:Bandera oficial de Vicar.jpg
- 21.35 Images by Alexamaral
- 21.36 License plates with images
- 21.37 Image:Winterhalter Elisabeth 3.jpg
- 21.38 Image:Winterhalter Elisabeth 2.jpg
- 21.39 Image:Winterhalter Elisabeth.jpg
- 21.40 Image:Sissi2.jpg
22 April 21
- 22.1 Category:Theaters in the Zwolle
- 22.2 Image:Chris McCandless.jpg
- 22.3 Image:Amsterdam SPOT 1011.jpg
- 22.4 Image:Giant_Green_Day.jpg
- 22.5 Image:Resp.jpg
- 22.6 Category:Ethnographic Museum, Split
- 22.7 Image:Plutarco_Calles.jpg
- 22.8 Image:Smilingbeagle.jpg
- 22.9 Image:Vlocityfp.png
- 22.10 Image:1st_cav.jpg
- 22.11 Image:Alexis_Arquette.jpg
- 22.12 Image:GulfMexTemps_2005Hurricanes.PNG
- 22.13 Image:StadiumToulouse1.JPG
- 22.14 Image:Low-fi_-_SuperMario_(Luigi)_(632495925).jpg
- 22.15 Image:Eight Dutch people.jpg
- 22.16 Template:AgenciaSenadoBr
- 22.17 Template:AgenciaCamaraBr
- 22.18 Image:Anne Frank Merwedeplein.jpg
- 22.19 Image:EmilyConnor.jpg
- 22.20 Image:Hcrane.jpg
- 22.21 Image:Promotion_neumann_1899.JPG
- 22.22 Category:Jewish people of Spain
- 22.23 All images of Special:Contributions/Ne8rd
23 April 22
- 23.1 Image:Couverture_pmetechnoguide.jpg
- 23.2 Image:Komlosi_1.jpg
- 23.3 Image:AdolfoRojasSilva.pdf
- 23.4 Image:Amsterdam SPOT 1011.jpg
- 23.5 Image:John_cowdery_kendrew.jpg
- 23.6 Image:Wien_GÃ¤nsehÃ¤ufel_Kabanen.jpg
- 23.7 Image:Chergrammy2.jpg
- 23.8 Image:Chergrammy1.jpg
- 23.9 Image:Bio Fernando Lafuente.pdf
- 23.10 Image:(manif.pdf
- 23.11 Image:Abstractv7.pdf
- 23.12 Image:Alairto.pdf
- 23.13 Image:Anmoreca.pdf
- 23.14 Image:Planification RPPST Garages V3.pdf
- 23.15 Image:Careware.pdf
- 23.16 Image:Carlos Ibarra El Renegado.pdf
- 23.17 Image:Darwin.pdf
- 23.18 Image:Department of Justice response brief (Hoffmann V US).pdf
- 23.19 Image:FleeingCellist.jpg
- 23.20 Image:Katholizismus und Sadomasochismus.jpg
- 23.21 Image:BotCon2006 Devastator.jpg
- 23.22 Image:Ricetto_di_Candelo-Fra_Dolcino-DSCF0251.JPG
- 23.23 Image:Ad_board_for_the_religios.jpg
- 23.24 Image:Paparizou-PortaGiaTonOurano.OGG
- 23.25 Image:Joe_Calzaghe_crop.png
- 23.26 Image:Descarrilamento_de_shinkansen_chuetsu_23-10-2004.JPG
- 23.27 Image:Cristiano_moraes_falcao.jpg
- 23.28 Image:Caligiuri Report.pdf
- 23.29 Image:ThomasPaineFarmhouse.jpg
- 23.30 Image:BrewsterSchoolhouse.jpg
- 23.31 Image:Aversa-Stemma.png
- 23.32 Image:Colossus survey report 2002.pdf
- 23.33 Image:UniversalFlag.jpg
- 23.34 Image:Belarus_1939_Greeting_Soviets.jpg
24 April 23
- 24.1 Image:Interstate 359 (Alabama).svg
- 24.2 Image:Interstate 676 (Pennsylvania).svg
- 24.3 Image:German-paratrooper.jpg
- 24.4 Image:Jutland Peninsula map.png
- 24.5 Image:Galereano.pdf
- 24.6 Image:Hiporexia.pdf
- 24.7 Image:Houfek.pdf
- 24.8 Image:Iaeste sweden.pdf
- 24.9 Image:Kal Foster.pdf
- 24.10 Image:Kijakamoto.pdf
- 24.11 Image:La propiedad intelectual2.pdf
- 24.12 Image:Liceo Francés.pdf
- 24.13 Image:Net.pdf
- 24.14 Image:R KF.pdf
- 24.15 Image:ResumeBLANK.pdf
- 24.16 Image:Roe.pdf
- 24.17 Image:RussoAndSteele-1.pdf
- 24.18 Image:Sentencia-farruquito.pdf
- 24.19 Image:MeganeuraScreenshot.jpg
- 24.20 Image:Martin Van Maele - La Grande Danse macabre des vifs - 04.jpg
- 24.21 Image:Aznar_20050711.jpg
- 24.22 Image:Santasusana.pdf
- 24.23 Image:Fellatio Educational Demonstration.ogg
- 24.24 Image:12yearoldgir048.JPG
- 24.25 Image:12yearoldgir090.JPG
- 24.26 Image:Matthuber.pdf
- 24.27 Image:Interstate 676 (Pennsylvania).svg
- 24.28 Image:Interstate 295 (North Carolina).svg
- 24.29 Image:Interstate 405 (Oregon).svg
- 24.30 Image:Richard_Heidrich.jpg
- 24.31 Image:German-paratrooper.jpg
- 24.32 Image:Jutland Peninsula map.png
- 24.33 Image:Television2.jpg
- 24.34 Image:Constantijn_der_Nederlanden.jpg
- 24.35 Image:Galereano.pdf
- 24.36 Image:Hiporexia.pdf
- 24.37 Image:Houfek.pdf
- 24.38 Image:Iaeste sweden.pdf
- 24.39 Image:Kal Foster.pdf
- 24.40 Image:Kijakamoto.pdf
- 24.41 Image:La propiedad intelectual2.pdf
- 24.42 Image:Liceo Francés.pdf
- 24.43 Image:Tdstart.jpg
- 24.44 Image:Box.jpg
- 24.45 Image:Matthuber.pdf
- 24.46 Image:Net.pdf
- 24.47 Image:R KF.pdf
- 24.48 Image:Talmon_Logo.JPG
- 24.49 Image:ResumeBLANK.pdf
- 24.50 Image:Roe.pdf
- 24.51 Image:Herbert_Binkert_and_Ferenc_Puskas.jpg
- 24.52 Image:RussoAndSteele-1.pdf
- 24.53 Image:Santasusana.pdf
- 24.54 Image:Sentencia-farruquito.pdf
- 24.55 Image:SpoonsSample.OGG
- 24.56 Image:FellatioSample.ogg
- 24.57 Image:Fellatio Educational Demonstration.ogg
- 24.58 Image:MeganeuraScreenshot.jpg
- 24.59 Image:Martin Van Maele - La Grande Danse macabre des vifs - 04.jpg
- 24.60 Image:Aznar_20050711.jpg
- 24.61 Image:12yearoldgir048.JPG
- 24.62 Image:12yearoldgir090.JPG
- 24.63 Image:Interstate 94 (Indiana).svg
- 24.64 Image:Champán_Para_Niños.jpg
- 24.65 Image:DSC07849_0278.jpg
- 24.66 Image:Bilibin_yaroslav.jpg
- 24.67 Image:Davids-kingdom.jpg
- 24.68 Image:Ripcordafteraction.pdf
- 24.69 Image:Plan Star 30 M.jpg
- 24.70 Image:Susu_La_Media_Luna.jpg
- 24.71 Image:Liste de piéces Star 30 M.jpg
- 24.72 Category:Gallery of the Yugoslavian decorations
- 24.73 Image:Spelterini_Buch.jpg
- 24.74 Image:MDSIContemptOrder.pdf
- 24.75 Image:NatWest Three David Bermingham Plea Agr.pdf
- 24.76 Image:Da Vinci Vitruve Luc Viatour.jpg
- 24.77 Image:Da_Vinci_Vitruve_Luc_Viatour.jpg
- 24.78 Image:Apple_Boot_Camp.jpg
- 24.79 Image:Apple_Boot_Camp.jpg
25 April 24
- 25.1 Image:Yoo.jpg
- 25.2 Image:Valach.jpg
- 25.3 Image:9MGsyx4T.gif
- 25.4 Image:Tibetian_timestick_detail.jpg
- 25.5 Image:Tibetian_timestick_.jpg
- 25.6 Image:Dezziunario.JPG
- 25.7 Image:Studearring.JPG
- 25.8 Image:Citadels_card_game.JPG
- 25.9 Image:King_James_Bible_1772_-_Title_page.jpg
- 25.10 Image:Mobile_phone_charm,_Pooh.jpg
- 25.11 Image:Emily_the_strange_is_dreaming.jpg
- 25.12 Image:Martin E. Dempsey 2.jpg
- 25.13 Image:HKD_Winnie_the_Pooh_by_Dave_Q.jpg
- 25.14 Image:GretchenOsgoodWarren.jpg
- 25.15 Image:Jam(Chloe).jpg
- 25.16 Image:Bandeira_Nova_Santa_Rita_RS.gif
- 25.17 Image:Brasao_Nova_Santa_Rita_RS.gif
- 25.18 Image:Canoasatual.JPG
- 25.19 Image:Canoas1990.JPG
- 25.20 All files by FloPoPeeps
- 25.21 Files by 36ophiuchi
26 April 25
- 26.1 Image:Septimabiosfera.pdf
- 26.2 Image:Tyism's.pdf
- 26.3 Image:Wamba Wiki.pdf
- 26.4 Image:ZannelWikiEntryJB2.pdf
- 26.5 Image:BIOGRAPHY OF FERY LORANT.pdf
- 26.6 Image:CVEN.pdf
- 26.7 Image:CVES.pdf
- 26.8 Image:CVMEHDI.pdf
- 26.9 Image:Mandyday4.jpg
- 26.10 Image:Terminator_3.jpg
- 26.11 Image:Octagon_delete_05.svg
- 26.12 Image:Furcshotee.JPG
- 26.13 Image:Barnstar-lightbulb3.png
- 26.14 Image:Alfonso_Mejía_Arias_y_el_Concetto_oppositorum.jpg
- 26.15 Image:Suskeenwiske1.JPG
- 26.16 Image:LosangeJB.jpg
- 26.17 Image:Reinhard_Tristan_Eugen_Heydrich.jpg
- 26.18 Image:Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich.jpg
- 26.19 Image:GODDESSY2008Calendar.jpg
- 26.20 Image:WikiNL Portaalbanner Suske en Wiske.jpg
- 26.21 Image:Hans_Ulrich_Rudel.jpg
- 26.22 User:Jonadab
- 26.23 Image:Ahmadinejad.jpg
- 26.24 Image:55cnc.jpg
- 26.25 Image:Terrorismo de estado y represión 21-04-2008.pdf
- 26.26 Image:Pavel_wonka.gif
- 26.27 Image:Otto_Adolf_Eichmann.jpg
- 26.28 Image:Josef_Mengele_Auschwitz_concentration_camp.jpg
- 26.29 Image:亜流負赤薔薇部留句.jpg
- 26.30 Image:くらうすばるびー.jpg
- 26.31 Image:Papadiamantis.jpg
- 26.32 Image:Pachycephalosauria_silhouette.png
- 26.33 Image:Stenbitmemo.pdf
- 26.34 Image:Www usda gov Acceptence Test for Digital.pdf
- 26.35 Image:XREA.pdf
- 26.36 Image:Israel_and_the_Disputed_Territories_map.png
- 26.37 Image:Josef_Mengele.jpg
- 26.38 Image:Josef_Mengele.jpg
- 26.39 Image:Langenzersdorf_01.jpg
- 26.40 All uploads by Dima-bilan (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log • upload log)
27 April 26
- 27.1 Image:VICTOR Imagefolder.JPG
- 27.2 Image talk:Hermann A Mayer.JPG
- 27.3 Image:Wmap.jpg
- 27.4 Image:Spanish ánimo animo animó.ogg
- 27.5 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_1st_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.6 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_2nd_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.7 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_3rd_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.8 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_4th_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.9 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_5th_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.10 Image:Ratana_Varabhorn_Order_of_Merit_6th_Class_ribbon.png
- 27.11 Image:Chirurgischer Knoten 01.JPG
- 27.12 Image:Anne.Frank.cover.B001.jpg
- 27.13 Image:Anne.Frank.title.B002.jpg
- 27.14 Image:Eigen foto.JPG
- 27.15 Image:JaneAusten_actionfigure.JPG
- 27.16 Image:Isaac-tradet.jpg
- 27.17 Image:GA04 GS59D.jpg
- 27.18 Image:Kenan evren1 (2).jpg
- 27.19 Image:Ilc_map_190.gif
- 27.20 Image:Portada-disc.jpg
- 27.21 Image:T-155_FIRTINA_155mm_Self-Propelled_Howitzer.jpg
- 27.22 Image:GonzaloGuerrero.jpg
- 27.23 Image:DSCF0492.JPG
- 27.24 Image:DSCF0491.JPG
- 27.25 Image:NestorBarron.jpg
- 27.26 Image:Grb-pula2.jpg
- 27.27 Image:Plaza_arganda_actual.jpg
- 27.28 Image:Experiment_in_chemistry.jpg
- 27.29 Image:Genie_Nuclear_Unguieded_Missile.jpg
- 27.30 Image:StepMania_4_Gameplay.png
- 27.31 Image:Nta_señora_virgen_de_la_soledad.jpg
- 27.32 Image:Carta_de_Felipe_II.jpg
- 27.33 Image:Isaac-lyftkranen_1.jpg
- 27.34 Image:Wrapping-paper.jpg
- 27.35 Image:DIAGRAMA_DE_LINUS_PAILING.JPG
- 27.36 Image:Modulos_finisterrae.jpg
- 27.37 Image:Tallinn - 17 July 1940 - 0-153449.jpg
- 27.38 Image:PLANO-YUSO-5.jpg
- 27.39 Image:1erapiedracancuncaribe.gif
- 27.40 Image:HN99CcarasC 4xCleanGrl.jpg
- 27.41 Image:HN99CcarasC_4xCleanGrl.jpg
- 27.42 Image:CollingwoodLogo.png
- 27.43 Image:Die_neue_linke_plakat.png
28 April 27
- 28.1 Image:Lisa_Left_Eye_Lopes.jpg
- 28.2 Image:Blasen.JPG
- 28.3 Image:Blowjob_sexy.JPG
- 28.4 Image:Deezer-Free.jpg
- 28.5 Image:Oecoflora.jpg
- 28.6 Image:Foto_del_tenor_y_actor_Pedro_pomares.GIF
- 28.7 Image:Dover_International_Speedway.jpg
- 28.8 Image:Radiocontact.jpg
- 28.9 Image:Lil_mama_5.jpg
- 28.10 Image:Aaliyah_live_2001.jpg
- 28.11 Image:2008_Training_Schedule.JPG
- 28.12 Image:Livros.JPG
- 28.13 Image:Abraham pandithar.pdf
- 28.14 Image:Alexis R .pdf
- 28.15 Image:CURRICULUM VITAE.pdf
- 28.16 Image:ClementLAMY.pdf
- 28.17 Image:Huracán.png
- 28.18 Image:Placedeartsmural.JPG
- 28.19 Image:Gamede Radar.gif
- 28.20 Image:Oosterweelverbinding01.jpg
- 28.21 Image:LangeWapper01.jpg
- 28.22 Image:BiografiaWW2-2-.pdf
- 28.23 Image:Sg1-LouisBertignac-BertilisteDotCom.gif
- 28.24 Image:Cy-Caerwedros_2.ogg
- 28.25 Image:Snæfellsnes04.JPG
- 28.26 Image:Bernardis_Memorial_Enns.jpg
- 28.27 Files by Chanelleke
- 28.28 Image:Infografía_Global_Ciclovía.jpg
- 28.29 Image:MBL.JPG
- 28.30 Image:Renofa2007.pdf
- 28.31 Image:GlenIslandFerry.JPG
29 April 28
- 29.1 Image:HelloKittysFlowerShop.png
- 29.2 Image:Pablocanovas.jpg
- 29.3 Image:Felix M.jpg
- 29.4 Image:Discipline1.jpg
- 29.5 Image:Mc crew.jpg
- 29.6 Image:A_Keeper's_Tale.jpg
- 29.7 Image:Pompidou_centre_paris_arp,jpg.jpg
- 29.8 Image:CiberneticoCampeon.jpg
- 29.9 Image:Compendiu_musicae2.svg
- 29.10 Image:Ermec.pdf
- 29.11 Image:Ugbvudehaut.jpg
- 29.12 Image:Hristo stoichkov.jpg
- 29.13 Image:DINO ROMEO.pdf
- 29.14 Image:DOCV.pdf
- 29.15 Image:Domenico Ummarino.pdf
- 29.16 Image:Flora Albaicin.pdf
- 29.17 Image:Burningman dragon.jpg
- 29.18 Image:Santos jose.jpg
- 29.19 Image:HillaryClinton from fr wiki.jpg
- 29.20 Image:Ruthless Logic.jpg
- 29.21 Image:Burningman 2354.jpg
- 29.22 Image:Sue'sBrain.jpg
- 29.23 Image:Loy's_ape.jpg
- 29.24 Image:JR ED79 Doraemon.jpg
- 29.25 Image:Entrance Doraemon World.JPG
- 29.26 Image:Carlos Ibarra.pdf
- 29.27 Image:10th_Guards_tank_division_monument_in_Kramnrints_(former_GDR).jpg
- 29.28 Image:14th_Army_troops_man-handle_anti-tank_artillery.jpg
- 29.29 Image:Cardemilyvalderrama.jpg
- 29.30 Image:Montjuic.jpg
- 29.31 Image:MG17onMe109E.jpg
- 29.32 Image:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_2007.jpg
- 29.33 Image:Allegoria_della_Sapienza.jpg
- 29.34 Image:Flag of Republic of Venice.svg
- 29.35 Image:Scablands_in_Eastern_Washington.jpg
- 29.36 Image:2008MTRB_221.jpg
- 29.37 Image:Matt_on_Mt._Lemmon.JPG
- 29.38 Template:No tag message
- 29.39 Image:Caligiuri Report.pdf
- 29.40 Image:Duluth complex4.JPG
- 29.41 Image:Vasa_model.jpg
- 29.42 Three passport covers
- 29.43 Image:Intarzie-Mařík-Mucha.jpg
30 April 29
- 30.1 Image:GCAmstutz.pdf
- 30.2 Image:Jam.pdf
- 30.3 Image:Resumocurricular.pdf
- 30.4 Image:Riyaj Masurekar Avaya APAC Manager- biography.pdf
- 30.5 Image:Rwb.pdf
- 30.6 Image:SoniSP.pdf
- 30.7 Image:JORGE NEBRA.pdf
- 30.8 Image:DSC000016.JPG
- 30.9 Image:Zwiebelkuchen Rezept.pdf
- 30.10 Image:Solitaire_by_Jane_Seymour.jpg
- 30.11 Image:Palomar, vista santa fe.jpg
- 30.12 Image:Zagrepcanka_4.JPG
- 30.13 Image:JvJlogo.png
- 30.14 Image:Mobile_Phone_Throwing_World_Championships_(1263954439).jpg
- 30.15 Image:Berckheyde - De bocht van de Herengracht.jpg
- 30.16 Image:F_8.jpg
- 30.17 Image:Profile_Kelly_Colb.jpg
- 30.18 Image:DSC00622.jpg
- 30.19 Image:Art_&_Airyn_Ruiz_Bell_wedding.jpg
- 30.20 Category:Police forces of Croatia
- 30.21 Image:DSC01447.jpg
- 30.22 Image:PICT4422.jpg
- 30.23 Image:GuessingGame01.jpg
- 30.24 Image:Fleshlight-300.jpg
- 30.25 Image:Donald_Jesse_Atwood_Jr.jpeg
- 30.26 Image:DSCN0629.JPG
- 30.27 Image:Art_&_Airyn_Ruiz_Bell.jpg
- 30.28 Image:Tomba di Roberto il Guiscardo.jpg
- 30.29 Template:Wikipediacat
- 30.30 Image:Ordonnanceaudreyrorivedanielferet.pdf
- 30.31 Image:Jugement feret pour faux.pdf
- 30.32 Image:SZDSZ.gif
- 30.33 Image:Thomas_Merton_Statue_Head.jpg
- 30.34 Image:Johannesburg1931.jpg
- 30.35 Image:Sonnenuntergang_am_Wattenmeer.jpg
- 30.36 Image:Alme_in_Büren.jpg
- 30.37 Image:Javichu_el_jefe_torre_de_Pisa.jpg
31 April 30

[edit] April 1

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Orasmaa.jpg

No indication for GFDL; author has many copyvios Patstuart (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove No vaild reason for GFDL stated. ...Forrester 15:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Agree that GFDL is incorrect here. Cirt 09:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Margarita_Esther_Zavala.png

Very low quality; this is probably not self-made. Taking into account the uploader's talk page, I doubt the licensing is legit. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove I thnik we need to have a closer look at all his images. ...Forrester 16:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

16:13, April 7, 2008 Rama (Talk | contribs | Block) deleted "Image:Margarita Esther Zavala.png" ‎ (copyvio) (restore)

– Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RR_380.gif

replaced w higher def Image:RR 380.png Kwamikagami 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Verified, but please use {{duplicate|Image:existing image.jpg}} next time. ...Forrester 20:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Dup image, subsumed by higher quality image. Cirt 09:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RR_200.gif

replaced by higher def RR 200.png Kwamikagami 09:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Verified, but please use {{duplicate|Image:existing image.jpg}} next time. ...Forrester 20:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Dup image, subsumed by higher quality image. Cirt 09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RR_076.gif

replaced w higher res RR 76.png Kwamikagami 09:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Verified, but please use {{duplicate|Image:existing image.jpg}} next time. ...Forrester 20:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Dup image, subsumed by higher quality image. Cirt 09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RR_062.png

replaced w higher res RR 62.png Kwamikagami 09:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Verified, but please use {{duplicate|Image:existing image.jpg}} next time. ...Forrester 20:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Dup image, subsumed by higher quality image. Cirt 09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Rivers in Sisak

empty --Veliki Kategorizator 10:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted per request; empty category. Durova 21:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tom Chilton 2006 Vauxhall.jpg

Duplicate image (of Image:Vauxhall astra brands hatch.jpg) uploaded in error ----Diniz 10:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Starircasehouse.JPG

Incorrect file name. Correct file now found at Image:Staircasehouse.JPG Polishname 11:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I'm new to the Commons and accidentally uploaded this picture with the wrong filename. The correct name should be Staircasehouse.JPG and is found at Image:Staircasehouse.JPG, which is in use on the English Wikipedia (en:Staircase House). Therefore, this image is without purpose and use should be deleted. Thanks. Polishname 11:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

Found it here: http://www.queenbritney.com/gallery/20070910/big_britney_spears_2007_mtv_video_music_awards_2.html But I don't know who is copying who. -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 11:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The guy who uploaded it to flickr calls himself "EuPaparazzi", which is why I presumed that he is a photographer so he could justifiably release his images under a CC-license on flickr. I don't think that an image on a fansite is very indicative of any copyright claim, since most fansites just copy images without caring about copyright at all. I did do a search of Getty images at the time, but did not find this image there. Jacoplane 17:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

What image are you talking about? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Repaired. The IP 190.20.49.122 had vandalized this page. Most suspicious.---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 07:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

This seems to be a screen cap uploaded by a FlickR user, who has at least one other screen cap, and one magazine cover on his FlickR page. Rarely are there free pics from a commercial brodcast TV show (during the show, on stage, not after). Rob 22:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - it is indeed a copyvio. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 22:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Techconsult logo.jpg

Reasons for deletion request --Marluc 12:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Marluc accidentally uploaded the wrong image version

Deleted. unlicensed logo deleted pr uploaders request Finn Rindahl 17:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alex Pato.jpg

uploaded as PD-self, but I don't think it's the right license, considering also other uploads from this user --Simo82 14:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted no metadata, history of copyvio uploads. Durova 21:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kali cropped.jpg

copy of Image:Kali.png, uploaded on 25 Jan, 08 --Redtigerxyz 14:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Please use {{dupe}} next time. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kali (demon).jpg

copy of Image:Kali.png --Redtigerxyz 14:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SeoulJinhwa.JPG

Most likely TV/game screenshot. EugeneZelenko 15:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BT_Passformpruefung_Mann_72_691.jpg

Incomatible license (noncommercial) in summary and license sections. EugeneZelenko 15:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Finn Rindahl 23:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Circle_game_at_beach_edit_rmb.jpg

cc-nc-sa. Most likely never tagged properly. Patstuart (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image is correctly tagged. Although the flickr source has changed its license, it is a crop of Image:Circle game at beach.jpg which was uploaded when the license was, in fact, CC-BY-SA. The proof of that is that Image:Circle game at beach.jpg was reviewed by the FlickreviewR bot. -Seidenstud 02:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept - that works. Patstuart (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg

my error - this is Larix decidua Pudelek 20:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted per request. Durova 21:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Johanna_Tukiainen.png

Copyvio, certainly not PD Harriv 20:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Taken from here: http://www.hymy.fi/tasta-puhutaan/dolls-johannan-salattu-tausta --Harriv 20:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Anna: Copyright violation: http://www.hymy.fi/

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pilatus_PC-6_SkydiveLillo_JD18032008_edit.jpg

exact duplicate of Pilatus_PC-6_SkydiveLillo_JD18032008.jpg JDrewes 22:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete -- Alvesgaspar 22:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 22:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Britannia 18 back.jpg

I originally tagged for speedy under "derivative work, breaks crown copyright" the uploader User:NobbiP removed the speedy and tagged for regular deletion with - why? - however the regular deletion was left uncompleted and I am completing it on his behalf. To the question "why?" British coins are subject to Crown copyright and do not become free until 50 years after their issue, since this coin is from 1994, images of this coin cannot be hosted until 2044. KTo288 22:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:07_bayly_3.jpg

Aparente violación de derechos de link Ferbr1 22:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Zirland: In category Copyright violations; no license

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Raimon.jpg

unaccurate naming, thumbnail, missing information. Llapissera -> talk 18:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This photo is token by myself and upload to wikipdia.It's one of the Japan famous place in Tokoy.Named Raimon.

As far as I can tell, the actual name is Kaminarimon and it has bigger and better pictures in its own category, which makes this one pretty useless; perhaps it should have been uploaded full-size under a proper name. --Llapissera -> talk 00:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Too poor resolution, and unused. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 19:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Poor resolution that makes it not suitable for using. A larger version of it should be uploaded and named more completelly if possible. "Raimon" seems quite ambiguous. --Lascorz (I'll read it) 16:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Finn Rindahl 22:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Euston tube station layout.png

Derviative of work still subject to Crown Copyright, thus invalid GFDL claim --62.56.82.35 20:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Buckelzikade_(Bocydium_globulare),Modell_-_Mutter_Erde_fec.jpg

Artist Alfred Keller died 1955. Much as I'd like to keep this, this is a realistic sculpture, and sculptures are subject to copyright. Lupo 06:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Also Image:Kornkäfer auf Weizenkorn - Mutter Erde fec.jpg. Lupo 06:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Ladies and gentlemen, according to Lupo, this pic might cause some troubles in the United States. Also according to Lupo (on his disc), he found no reason, why this image might cause problems in Germany. (Other countries were not prooved).

So, because this bizarre animal from Brazil is not yet described on any wikipedia including en and de, I give this pic (and the Kornkäfer too) as a donation to all national wikipedias. This pic might be a good reason to introduce this funny animal to YOUR wikipedia. On Lupo´s disc you will find some links, which describe, why this animal was able to survive some 10000 years. And if you want to introduce the artist, who sculpted this wonderful big model of originally 6mm Bocydium globulare, so click on de:Alfred Keller (Modellbauer). And sorry to the American people, but I am not responsible for your laws, but you might change them :-). Greetings to all, Mutter Erde 22:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

That's not what I said. I just said I hadn't found any German court cases relating to taxidermy. But sculptures are copyrighted in Germany, too. Lupo 06:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for this clarification. Do you think Raimund Keller (son of Alfred) is the right man to give an permission? Greetings Mutter Erde 08:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't know. Is it possible that the Naturkundemuseum owns the rights? Lupo 08:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment Valuable images...so just mail someone and see what he is telling you. But in the end I agree with Lupo: "sculptures are copyrighted in Germany, too."...Forrester 16:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 20:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Blue porcelain

wrong term --Applebee 14:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

What's the correct term then? --rimshot^talk 15:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. No progress for 1 1/2 months MichaelMaggs 19:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Nkwd335.jpg

License is wrong: {{PD-Russia}} is not beyond doubt. Patstuart (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Ack. ...Forrester 16:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Agree, incorrect license usage. Cirt 09:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, incorrect license. Kameraad Pjotr 18:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HSK_Kormoran_(AWM_053867).jpg

"allows only non-commercial purposes" - this image can't be used on mirrors like spiegel-wissen.de, those are commercial. 80.139.83.108 07:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

And I fear this means that all AWM-pictures are not free enough for wiki-purposes. -- 80.139.83.108 07:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

AWM actually cant place such restrictions on images that are PD in Australia. Gnan garra 12:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment it cant be PD-Aust as the license says Public domain This image was created in Australia and is now in the public domain because .... but this image was taken in KIEL, GERMANY during 1940-41 and would most likely be subject to the requirements German copyrights. Gnan garra 12:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Closed, not created in Australia; unfree for commercial use. Kameraad Pjotr 18:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg

Not pd-ineligible. -N 19:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Either PD-ineligible or FOP does apply. The author has added a valid license for his part of photographie. abf /talk to me/ 19:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg

Conflicting licenses. I doubt the FOP part, because it is not very likely that the text was on something permanently installed in a public place. I don't think it's ineligible because the (handwritten) text as well as the background show original authorship. rimshot^talk 11:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment Sorry for renominating so quickly, but I think that the original concern (not PD-ineligible) still applies. How can we be sure that FOP applies? It's not like the image being somewhat ineligible and somewhat FOP makes it completely free. --rimshot^talk 11:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep ineligible. Code·is·poetry 12:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Any reasoning? It's neither text in a general typeface nor simple geometric shapes. It's not plain handwriting either. --rimshot^talk 12:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. FOP does not apply to 2D artwork such as this, even if it were to have been photographed in a public place. Shows sufficient creativity for copyright. MichaelMaggs 06:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zentai BDSM.jpg

Breaches acceptable standards --62.56.82.35 20:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

How? It shows no bare skin nor anything else objectionable.--86.161.68.19 11:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. The subject is not identifiable and I would imagine that this image may well have encyclopaedic use. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keep - no Commons standard has been suggested that this picture might breach. Deletion request just seems a bit of gratuitous prudery. --Simonxag (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

keep the image. it is not in bad taste, and adds value to the article it is attached to. --FiveseveNx28

Keep Commons is not censored and the picture has encyclopedic value. 66.30.172.77 13:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

This image isn't offensive and has educational value.--Ultraviolins (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Clear consensus to keep. Kept. Note that this has been languishing unresolved for a while. ++Lar: t/c 23:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] April 2

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ducks on Cam 2008-04-01.jpg

Incorrectly named. I'll re-upload under correct name. --Timwi 03:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. When the image is reuploaded, use {{dupe}} – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 00:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:Link FA

Because we're not a Wikipedia. This template is completely pointless. A bot was suppose to be making use of it but I don't see that happening. It wouldn't work either as en.wp is a much better central interwiki update location right now. They always have the most iw links. --Rocket000 03:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. It seems to be used here. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Reopening. Yes, the template is currently used 8 times, but:

These uses can easily be removed, or if that's not possible it's also possible to tag the template with {{deprecated}} and delete it once all transclusions have been removed.
There are no equivalents for Featured articles on Commons. Featured galleries seem to have been planned once, but no one has really done anything there.
The template wouldn't even work anyway, since the code isn't in MediaWiki:Common.css or MediaWiki:Common.js.
We don't have any bot who regularly updates these templates like for example on de.wikipedia. Otherwise, the transclusions of this template will remain outdated.

Due to these reasons, I reopen this DR. --The Evil IP address (talk) 22:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:125th_Street_Harlem2.jpg

Flickr source is a totally different picture, plus images by that photographer all seem to be licensed as "All rights reservec, not creative commons Seidenstud 06:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Correct Flickr URL is http://www.flickr.com/photos/manamanah/79791066/ . It is marked "All rights reserved" there. It may have been okay a year ago, but because of the bad URL, Flickrreviewr didn't work, so we have no way to know.

Delete I guess. Carl Lindberg 06:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete We have no idea of the license. --Anonymous101 20:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alphonse_de_Lamartine_20061231.jpg

Albert Bouquillon died 1997; and there's no "freedom of panorama" in France. Lupo 06:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, derivative work, no FOP. --rimshot^talk 13:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copyvio if no FOP --Anonymous101 20:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Image-Amsterdam_Bloemenmarkt_4.JPG

Error in name whilst uploading - request made by initial uploader --VS ^talk 06:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

this "error" is not very important. No other reason to delete Julo 14:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep until image without error is uploaded --Anonymous101 20:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Dupe of Image:Amsterdam Bloemenmarkt 4.JPG – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Absolute_Orangerie_01.jpg

Sculptor Albert Schultz died 1953; no "freedom of panorama" in France. Lupo 08:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete copyvio if no FOP --Anonymous101 20:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 20:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tracés_des_ponts_de_Jargeau_Loiret_zoom_2.svg

copyvio: screenshot of copyrighted google maps data; wikimapia does use google maps, which is not free. LosHawlos 10:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

deleted Julo 14:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mapa maquis.PNG

There are a new better version of this file: Image:Mapa maquis3.png, I am the author in both cases. I tried to replace it with the same name, but I coludn't, I don't know why, sorry --Gurgut 15:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mapa maquis2.PNG

There are a new better version of this file: Image:Mapa maquis3.png, I am the author in both cases. I tried to replace it with the same name, but I coludn't, I don't know why, sorry --Gurgut 15:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC) --Gurgut 15:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Maqui map.png

There are a new better version of this file: Image:Mapa maquis3.png, I am the author in both cases. I tried to replace it with the same name, but I coludn't, I don't know why, sorry --Gurgut 15:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC) --Gurgut 15:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fr-tabloid-alt002.jpg

All pictures in the newspaper are most likely copyrighted 79.196.102.43 17:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

DeleteDerivative work —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Anonymous101 (talk • contribs)

Deleted, clear derivative; photo of copyrighted newspaper. -- Infrogmation 00:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tarjeta_jorge.jpg

Spam, not useful even as an example of a business card. -- Zanimum 17:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Zanimum 17:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Spam. --Dodo 13:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as spam. Cirt 09:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tarjeta_george.jpg

Spam, not useful even as an example of a business card. -- Zanimum 17:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Zanimum 17:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as spam. Cirt 09:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bekaa_valley_bombing,_2006.jpg

ahh, damn!--Orlovic (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as rights reserved, not free. Cirt 09:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ovechkin2007.jpg

Delete as rights reserved, not free. Cirt 09:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Peter_Forsberg_2007.jpg

Wrong license on flickr - uploader has been confused about flickr licenses in the past, and it seems likely this was never marked with the license given here. Patstuart (talk) 18:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as incompatible with Commons per flickr licensing. Cirt 09:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:24 Uni Games (W) Beach Volleyball 210406 (1996134021).jpg

The uploader claims that it is from Flickr with GNU license. But I see an address of a website in it. --Mrostam 00:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete CC-BY-NC-ND on flickr. --Anonymous101 20:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:United_Federation_of_Planets_flag.svg

contested speedy deletion - Star Trek flag - derivative violation of Paramount copyright - http://www.startrekdesktopwallpaper.com/StarTrek_UnitedFederationofPlanets_freedesktopwallpaper.shtml Patstuart (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as derivative of a copyrighted work owned by Paramount. This is a point that sometimes causes confusion so I'll explain in a little more detail. An image is still a derivative work if it's completely drawn from scratch, if it's obviously intended to duplicate the look and feel of an existing copyrighted work. That's what we're dealing with here. Durova 02:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Uniform-Invoice_Taiwan.png

I have doubts of this image's copyright. It is definitely not {{PD-self}}, and could be a possible copyright violation. —Dark ^talk 08:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I failed to see how this image could consist of any copyright violation when:

1. The form of the template is standard in Taiwan and thus is not copyrighted. Also, this item, even in its original form, is freely reproducible and not legal tender.

2. The registration is not a real number and is in fact presented as 000000

3. The company presented in the invoice is a fictitious "WIKI BOOKSTORE"

4. The items purchased are fictitious: 1 x WIKIPEDIA (1st Volume), 1 x How to post on Wikipedia, 1 x New Comer's guide.

5. Even the "Advertising Area" promotes "WIKI BOOKSTORE ANNIVERSARY SALES, 20% DISCOUNT".

With the above reasons, we can easily conclude that this document is indeed {{PD-self}} and specifically created for demonstration on Wikipedia. I feel that your blatant questioning of an artistic item created with care for the benefit of the intellectual community without proper understanding of the material inappropriate. It is also a disrespect to the original artist. Please duly retract the deletion notice.

Kept. Withdrawn. —Dark ^talk 04:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:1955-chevy-bel-air-chevrolet-archives.jpg

The image was recently deleted from enWiki per en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 March 10#Image:1955-chevy-bel-air-chevrolet-archives.jpg, basicaly the source website[1] does not menion free use with attribution, only that download is permited with attribution. The copyright notice reads: "Copyright © 2005 - 2007 Douglas Wilkinson. All rights reserved. We do grant permission to download our photos if you include a link back to www.RemarkableCars.com." --Sherool 19:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete I'm afraid that license isn't good enough for Commons. Does anyone feel like contacting the web site owner? They might be open to licensing the images differently, for example CC-by-SA or {{attribution}}. --rimshot^talk 14:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete copyvio --Anonymous101 20:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Dohareubang talchum

typo --Applebee 20:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Bad name for Category:Dolhareubang talchum, please use {{badname}} next time. rimshot^talk 14:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Beryl transparent cube Feisty.png

Ubuntu and Firefox logos are copyrighted (but the image can be edited to remove them). The real problem could be that the web page shown in Firefox has neither license nor source information. --FedericoMP 20:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Anonymous101 20:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Jodo 20:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as derivative work. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Statue_of_Anne_of_Britanny_near_castle_in_Nantes_France.jpg

Statue of sculptor en:Jean Fréour (born 1919; still alive).[2] No "freedom of panorama" in France. Lupo 08:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Why should the French law be applied in this case in fact? Wikipedia does not have any server in France and i do not live there. It is a genuine question to make my mind on this matter. Med 16:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Because a sculpture is not "published" when it erected, and for unpublished works, the country of origin is given by the author's nationality, unless it is a film (country of the residence/headquarter of the movie maker) or an architectural work (country where the work is placed)? See Berne Convention, article 5(4)(c). But you may have a point... we should clarify which country of origin we consider in the case of photos of copyrighted works. Only that of the photo? Only that of the work? Both? Lupo 09:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete - on Commons it must be free in both the US and the source country. ViperSnake151 15:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, yes. In the U.S., all images of copyrighted sculptures would be not ok, because the US has no "freedom of panorama" for sculptures. De facto the Commons makes an exception for this case (contrary to our policy!) and considers only the source country for such images. But which source country? That of the sculpture? That of the photo? Or both? Lupo 22:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

French sculptor Jean Fréour in his studio. Photo by Mikhail Evstafiev

This case is rather weird. Fréour was ordered to sculp a national French hero. He knew the - good - location of his work before, so that he could adapt his work on the surrounding buildings. Citizens and tourists are invited to marvel and photograph his work. If I would be the sculptor, my only interest would be, that my name is properly attributed. An encyclopedia as wp is the right place for all curious people, who want to know the artist`s name. Therefore: Keep (And thanks to Lupo, who found the sculptor´s name) Mutter Erde 10:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

If it is just a question of asking for Fréour's permission to use photos of his work, I will get in touch with him in May. Evstafiev 19:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello Evstafiev. In fact i had the intention the ask him an authorization sending him a request by the way of Wikimedia France. However if you get in touch with him directly perhaps it would be better in fact. Med 13:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

My wife visited Fréour a few weeks ago and explained the above issue. He said he had no objections to photos of his work being used for encyclopedia articles like Wikipedia. Evstafiev 11:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that is not a free license. Wikipedia-only is not good enough. Lupo 15:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. per Lupo MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Arenas.gif

Appears to be a logo for a Spanish soccer team, and thus presumably under copyright (unless the uploader provides evidence that he or she is the owner of the logo). --Powers 15:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it's a logo of a Spanish soccer team, Arenas de Alcabre. It's taken from the website of the team, and uploaded to this site with permission from the team, of which I am member. It's the same image we offer freely to other sites to make links to our site.

http://www.arenasdealcabre.es/enlaces.html

That's unusual, but assuming you have authority to so license the image, it appears to be correctly done now. Powers 23:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no permission. Please forward your permission to OTRS. Kameraad Pjotr 18:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Votingrightsact1 & 2

File:Votingrightsact1.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Votingrightsact2.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

Orphaned duplicates of this and this. The images linked are also cleaner (no white edges). diego_pmc 10:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Duplicate images, orphaned or low res

File:Alaska Purchase.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Patent for Cotton Gin (1794).jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Cottonginpatent.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

Duplicate images, orphaned or low res. Check each picture to see its higher res version. diego_pmc 11:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Alaska Purchase.jpg has had a higher-res image uploaded at that name recently, and also uploaded to Alaska Purchase (hi-res).jpg.

Patent for Cotton Gin (1794).jpg and Cottonginpatent.jpg have been low res identical images since 2005, both being copies of w:Image:Cottonginpatent.jpg, uploaded to en.wp on July 9, 2004. Of those two, the name "Patent for Cotton Gin (1794).jpg" is only used on ru:Коттон-джин, while "Cottonginpatent.jpg" is widely used. Patent for Cotton Gin (1794) - hi res.jpg is a recent upload.

My recommendation is that the closing admin reverts Cottonginpatent.jpg to the high res version timestamped "18:55, 1 April 2008", updates ru:Коттон-джин to use Cottonginpatent.jpg, and then deletes Alaska Purchase (hi-res).jpg, Patent for Cotton Gin (1794) - hi res.jpg and Patent for Cotton Gin (1794).jpg. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Those are orphaned - I was the one that attempted to renew the images, but though it said that the size is 3000x3000 (not actual example), when I tried to view the full image it showed me the old one. I waited some time (10 mins) and this still wasn't fixed, so I reverted my edit, and uploaded a new one. As for how much the pics are used: I replaced the old pics with the hi-res ones in all articles, so now they are orphaned. They still appear as if they are in the article, but they're not - check it yourself, and see that the hi-res image is there instead of the old one. In order words the images I nominated for deletion don't appear in any articles anymore. diego_pmc 13:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alaska Purchase.jpg does not appear to be the same image as Image:Alaska Purchase (hi-res).jpg. It doesn't seem to have a higher-res version, so no action is needed. Since Jayvdb's analysis, Image:Patent for Cotton Gin (1794) - hi res.jpg has become more used than Image:Cottonginpatent.jpg, and it's a better name, so I'm transferring usage to the better name and deleting the other versions. Quadell (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Koalorka files

With regard to the user's history, I doubt self-made.Code·is·poetry 16:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

These are my personal firearms photographed in a home-made light box arrangement. Do not touch these, thanks. Koalorka 06:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you provide higher-resoluton versions to proof your claim? Code·is·poetry 08:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

No I cannot. These are mine. Koalorka 14:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

If you really have made them yourself in an especially made box arrangement, then you have them in a better solution. No serious photographer does that kind of work and then uses the absolute minimum resolution a camera can provide. This pictures look much to professional to be really made in that resolution. And, suspiciously enough, the EXIF-data is missing, as it is typical when you just take a downsized picture from the webpage of someone else. So if you really have made this pictures, just proove it by either providing the picture in its original size or by delivering the EXIF-data. Until then

Delete, because when looking at the deletion log of this user and the reasons for the deletions, it is more than obvious that the user doesn'r respect copyright at all. -- Cecil 16:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

My first uploads upon joining were truly copyright violations, being new and unfamiliar with the licensing process. The other company-supplied images, I have PROVEN and attempted to obtain consent according to our policies, I am completely in compliance with the no non-free content policies. Now you threaten to remove MY images because you can't find a reason they're mine? That's ludicrous. The images were made in a crappy cardboard light box with a mediocre Canon G10 and then cropped down using IrfanView. That's all there is to it. I don't have the original size since when I cropped and saved the images I overwrote the existing filed with the edited image. I can't explain the lack of EXIF data, maybe IrfanView does not support that. No idea, don't care. Koalorka 19:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Additional nominations:

These files were taken from the official finnish military website, but they are not a part of a decision or statement. Code·is·poetry 08:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The PD-USGov is also not a official statement or a decision. I'm against the delition--Sanandros 09:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

PD-USGov is valid for every work an official made on duty, while in Suomi and many other lands this is not true. Code·is·poetry 09:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

According to our Suomi-speaking partner, this is exactly what the text clarifies. Koalorka 14:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This images from the finnish military website are not part of an official decision or statement. Thus that licence does not apply for the pictures and can't be used. It only can be used for exactly what the licence said, so while your finnish speaking partner is correct on the licence, the pictures are not useable for it. Delete. -- Cecil 16:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment: show some good faith. Nowadays thanks to forums such as strobist and others providing tutorials and DIY tips it's child's play to make nice 'professional'-looking studio shots with the help of off-camera flashguns, diffusers & softboxes and whatnot (at a cost of next to nothing). Perhaps the uploader is uncomfortable with the idea to give away high resolution shot and thus limits his/her uploads to typical better-than-average web resolutions (when I was active here once upon a time I limited my contributions to no longer than 1024 or 1200 pixels on the long side for that reason). Perhaps a re-upload containing EXIF would satisfy the curious? The FDF ones must probably go thanks to ~~zealots~~ copyright law experts such as rtc et al. Cheers, 88.148.193.92 15:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

If it would have been a user without a huge log of copyvio-contributions I wouldn't have that much a problem showing some good faith, even so at Commons it is a little bit difficult, because most contributors mean their best, but lack in knowledge of copyright laws. According to Koalorkas claim he overwrote the original files and the EXIF-data too, which is a little bit much to take in combination to his log. But some proposition: Koalorka should make one picture of all the 4 weapons together, with the same camera and without removing the exif-data. Doesn't need to be a good quality, just enough to see that it are the same. Since he claims that it are his personal firearms that should not be a problem. -- Cecil 17:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

No, I don't own all the guns anymore, the 686 and CS-1 are gone. This is pretty ridiculous. Since I have released MY images into the public domain for anyone on this planet to use, if you feel my explanation is insufficient because of my history, you can go ahead delete them and then re-upload them yourself. I don't need attribution. Will that make you feel better? Koalorka 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete No proof of claims --Anonymous101 20:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Having looked at the deleted uploads, the above are very similar. The history here plus a lack of exif data are highly suspicious. AGF is fine and dandy, but not in cases such as these. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Finn Rindahl 22:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museum

I have put the tag not because I necessarily want to delete the category but to draw attention to this issue. The English Wiki has a different name "Istanbul Archaeology Museum", there seem to be various possibilities as to the name of the museum in English. Any feedback is more than welcome. --Gryffindor 18:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The official page in Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism website reads "Istanbul Archaeology Museum", so does a related New York Times article. I googled them just to be sure. The resultant figures are: 14,500 hits for "Istanbul Archaeology Museum", and 7,430 hits for "Istanbul Archaeological Museum".

Nevertheless, I should also state that a related Lonely Planet article cites the name as "İstanbul Archaeological Museum", but used the phrase "the Archaeology Museum" within the first paragraph. --Chapultepec 22:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

(copy of the message left on Gryffindor's talk page) FWIW, I did a quick JSTOR search (same as a Google search, JSTOR is an academic journal archive) and found out "Istanbul Archaeology Museum" counts 12 hits, "Archaeological Museum of Istanbul" 41 hits and "Istanbul Archaeological Museum" 190 hits. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

(copy of the message left on Gryffindor's talk page) If it can help you, I have the official guide of the museum (written by its director) and its title is "Archaeological Museum of Istanbul". Μαρσύας ? 17:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

(copy of the message left on Gryffindor's talk page) I have just called the museum and talked to the officials. What they say is both of them goes. Namely, both "Istanbul Archaeological Museum" and "Archaeological Museum of Istanbul" is ok. Besides, I referred to "Blue Guide Turkey", and saw that it gives the name as "Istanbul Archaeological Museum". In this case, we can omit "Istanbul Archaeology Museum" and decide between the latter two. Thanks. --Chapultepec 11:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

(copy of the message left on Gryffindor's talk page) I have made a Google book search instead of just googling to eliminate the non-academic/unscientific sources. The resultant figures are as follows:

- 32 hits for "Istanbul Archaeology Museum",
- 177 hits for "Archaeological Museum of Istanbul",
- 438 hits for "Istanbul Archaeological Museum".

Under these circumstances, we would rather do the redirect at the English language Wikipedia. Thanks. --Chapultepec 11:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Right. So "Istanbul Archaeological Museum" or "Archaeological Museum of Istanbul" it is then? Gryffindor 12:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, "Istanbul Archaeological Museum" seems more suitable in this case, and it is still vacant at the English WP. --Chapultepec 12:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

ok, problem: I just found my entry ticket and the brochure to the museum, it says "Istanbul Archaeology Museums". Let me cite "Istanbul Archaeology Museums actually consists of three museums: Archaeology Museum, Museum of the Ancient Eastern Works and Tiled Pavilion Museum." In Turkish it's "Istanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri" which is plural I assume as opposed to "müze(si)". The Archaeology Museum is in the main building, Museum of the Ancient Eastern Works in the other building opposite to it, a former school, and the Tiled Pavilion. Probably best to create three subcategories for each of these museums. Gryffindor 23:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, in fact there are three sections, and in Turkish the official name is "Istanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri" which can be translated into English as "Istanbul Archaeology Museums". So, three subcategories under one main category will be reasonable here. But what about the other side? --Chapultepec 00:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I have a Byzantinist acquaintance, who is also a tour guide. Tomorrow I will have his idea as well. --Chapultepec 00:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Latest news

Today in the morning I referred to that Byzantinist guide I mentioned yesterday. He told me that the real name in English is "Istanbul Archaeological Museums". Just to be sure, I went to the museum, and saw that he was right. Here is what it reads at the entrance of the museum:

Istanbul Archaeological Museums
- Archaeological Museum
- Museum of the Ancient Orient
- Tiled Pavillion

Here is the result of a Google book search for the term "Istanbul Archaeological Museums" just for verification: 124 items

--Chapultepec 11:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate the efforts of Chapultepec and others in approaching a decision. --Nevit Dilmen 20:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Motion to administrator to close this debate and move this category to "Istanbul Archaeological Museums". Gryffindor (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

The category is now a category redirect to Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museums so I close thes deletion request. --MGA73 (talk) 09:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] April 3

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:IA_Sample.jpg

Unless User:Redneck Boy constitutes a licensing representative for Iowa, they may not self-license the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Derivative of copyrighted work --Anonymous101 20:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:AK_2008.jpg

Unless User:Quick Level constitutes a licensing representative for Alaska, they may not release the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Derivative of copyrighted work --Anonymous101 20:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:North_Carolina_license_plate.jpg

Unless User:Oobatz 08250 constitutes a licensing representative for North Carolina, they may not self-license the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Derivative of copyrighted work --Anonymous101 20:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Standardalplate.jpg

Unless User:Mongoliasouth constitutes a licensing representative for Alabama, they may not release the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Derivative of copyrighted work --Anonymous101 20:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alabama_God_Bless_America_License_Plate.jpg

Unless User:Oobatz 08250 constitutes a licensing representative for Alabama, they may not self-license the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:AS_2004.jpg

Unless User:Hideous Doppleganger constitutes a licensing representative for American Samoa, they may not self-license the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:AZ_2007.jpg

Unless User:Quick Level constitutes a licensing representative for Arizona, they may not release the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Arkansas_Plate_Sample.jpg

Image is the product of the state of Arkansas, not the US Federal Government; improperly licensed, not PD. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 10:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:3sam123.jpg

Unless User:Quick Level constitutes a licensing representative for California, they may not release the design and appearance of said government's license plate. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep PD-ineligible. No graphic artwork, and typefaces are not eligible for copyright in the U.S. Carl Lindberg 05:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The word "California" is written in an artistic manner. Probably not a typeface at all but a logo created by a graphic artist. --Simonxag 23:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Typefaces, even custom typefaces, are not copyrightable in the U.S. That looks more like handwriting, and (like signatures) would not be copyrightable either. Carl Lindberg 02:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted / Copyvio--Fanghong 03:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:United States Democratic Primary 2008 Results.png

Old Version of Image:Democratic Primary Results.png . 84.169.164.13 00:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC) --84.169.164.13 00:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted / Incompatible with present needs.--Fanghong 03:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:IMG_9806.jpg

watermarked image with clear copyright 208.57.189.121 06:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 23:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. pr nom Finn Rindahl 15:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bivouac1.jpg

I uploaded this image twice, the other upload has a licence so please do delete this image (Bivouac1.jpg) Carl Steinbeisser 08:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Done (there is Category:Duplicate for that type of speedy deletion), VIGNERON * ^discut. 11:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:486px-Walter_Veltroni_2.jpg

no source or author mentioned Michiel1972 09:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no source - Monobi (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Image-Bronkhorst_4.JPG

Uploaded under incorrect name - now re-uploaded under correct name - request by initial uploader --VS ^talk 11:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. You may use {{duplicate}} for this. Finn Rindahl 15:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gazi.jpg

This photo isn't in free use and look here http://fotogaleri.hurriyet.com.tr/GaleriDetay.aspx?cid=9905&p=2&rid=2. --Dsmurat 12:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

But this web pages does not include any copyright sign. --Errol tash 12:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyright violation - Monobi (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hkif(enolam).png

Webpage screen shot, no usage --158.182.31.247 12:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Berze_la_Ville_Chapelle_des_Moines.jpg

Image of a 3D cupola taken from sone website. See also de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Bilder_von_mittelalterlichen_Fresken. Lupo 15:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove Confirmed, possible copyvio. ...Forrester 15:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Pd-Art only applies to 2d art --Anonymous101 20:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - Monobi (talk) 02:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Colonel_Sanders_with_his_Barnd.jpg

No author named; PD-old is obviously wrong. Svens Welt 15:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

deleted, copyvio --Polarlys 16:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:2005.02_TED_094.jpg

I have uploaded this image (By wrong) on another name. Mine is better name and better cropping O sama K 05:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Done Deleted. --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 15:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Filnik: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:2005.02 TED 094.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Graffiti_of_Íngrid_Betancourt.jpg

Derivative work, no panorama freedom in France 88.65.123.237 20:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep, derivated work of what?. -Chien 19:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'll correct the reason. This graffito is copyrighted, no matter whether it was reproduced after a specific photograph or not. --88.65.95.238 21:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

A graffitto is ineligible for copyright, I guess, but I'm not sure. ---Chien 14:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment - Using common sense, here's what I think: This was made from a stencil, so it's a derivative work. On the other hand, the people in that campaign who made the stencil likely want it to be used freely (else they wouldn't give it away). But we have no permission. So I'm not quite sure what conclusion to draw from that line of reasoning... – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Per Commons:Image casebook#Graffiti. MichaelMaggs 20:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PCLinuxOS_2007_CZ-logo2.svg

It is a logo contest candidate that didn't win, the winner was Image:PCLinuxOS_2007_CZ-logo.svg 77.104.227.126 06:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep And what if someone wants to illustrate the version that didn't win? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept as per Mike. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Melanie_Betancourt_2007.jpg

Copyrighted photograph in the background which cannot be easily ignored. We have a cropped version of this picture showing only Melanie Betancourt here 88.65.123.237 20:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment - we could blur the background image successfully instead of deleting it, as television programs are akin to do when they worry about running afoul of copyrights. 64.178.96.168 21:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The image would have to blurred to such an extent that the person could no longer be recognised, so why bother? As I said, we already have a cropped version of the image. --88.65.90.0 00:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep, the image is part of the environment. -Chien 17:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, same as Chien. Gridge 17:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC).

The photo is certainly part of the environment, but that is not the point. The point is that it is an integral part of the image which cannot be ignored. --88.65.95.238 21:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

No, you miss the point. What you say is true, but irrelevant due to COM:FOP#France. While France has no FOP per se, there is a loophole when the element (the background picture) is an accessory to the subject (Melanie Betancourt).

Keep – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, that court decision applied to immobile architecture, and I do not know if it can be extended to any other, mobile works. I doubt that the photo in the background can be considered accessory or a "simple element" since it takes about 1/3 of the whole area. In my view it could equally well be the central motive and Melanie Betancourt an accessory element. --62.216.201.36 17:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I think you're confusing background and foreground. This is not a picture of that picture. It's a picture of Melanie Betancourt, right? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyright photo is too large to be incidental. And we have the cropped version of the main subject anyway. MichaelMaggs 21:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Republican_Primary_Results.png

Old Version of: Image:Republican GOP Primary Results.png 84.169.170.42 02:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, image could be useful for an article. Kameraad Pjotr 18:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Europa_da_się_lubić_01.jpg

TV screenshot copyvio Seidenstud 19:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure it is screenshot (no TV-artefacts, the frame is not accurately horizontal and rather did not come from professional TV camera); it might be a photo made in TV studio. "Europa da się lubić" program is recorded with participation of audience. Julo 09:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep We have permission on OTRS, also, like Julo said, it's not screenshot, for example cause proportions and resolution of image. Anyways it's Slawek's photo, i don't think he would make copyvio. Herr Kriss (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Kept, agree with Herr Kriss. Kameraad Pjotr 18:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Spongebob im moviepark.png

Was tagged for speedy deletion but is installed permanently in a public place (moviepark, oberhausen, germany) with consent of the copyright owner (moviepark is a licensee for showing spongebob installations). So the sculpture itself is not a copy-vio and as it is installed public, freedom of panorama holds true here. Imho deletion not justified. -- 80.139.35.148 12:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete ~~I don't think FOP is applicable for derivative works. Deadstar (msg) 11:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)~~

Also for images:

Deadstar (msg) 11:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep This is exactly where FOP applies. (@Deadstar: I'm not sure if you understand the idea of Freedom of Panorama? The FOP rule only exists because there is a restriction on derivative works!) --Fb78 12:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep OK with FOP in Germany! --Herbert Ortner 18:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment Forget I said anything. Deadstar (msg) 07:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Keep Photo of something at public palace and FoP in Germany. --Dezidor 20:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep OK because of FOP. ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 15:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep This photo is great1 Keep it dude!

kept, --Digon3 ^talk Because of FOP

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Spongebob_im_moviepark.png

There was some discussion at COM:UNDEL, and it suggests that this image may not fall under FOP due to the subject being permanently situated in a private amusement park. Private, in this context, means that visitors must pay to enter, and to fall under FOP, the amusement park must not have any entrance restrictions. 哦，是吗？(висчвын) 01:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, as the sculpture is not a public place. German FOP law requires works to be situated in a public place to be freely photographed. --rimshot^talk 14:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Adambro 15:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Doesn't fall under German FOP as it's not a "public place" properly defined. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Celine_Dion_headshot.jpg, Image:Celine Dion and Josh.jpg

I'm suspicious that this image is really copyrighted and not the Flickr uploaders to license. The reasons are the lack of camera details, the fact it says it was uploaded in 2003, but then says the image was taken in 2007. If you click on the date the image was taken on the flickr page you'll see that the uploader has taken screenshots of copyrighted TV/films and put free licenses on them. I believe the same is the case with this image Polly 04:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I considered this when I was examining the photo in the first place. At first I was worried about what appeared to be copyrighted screenshots, but if you go to those pages (e.g., [3] there's EXIF info on it, and that also matches that of photos that he presumably took -- compare [4] with [5] for example. That leads me to believe that the Dion/Groban photo in question is in fact legitimate despite the lack of EXIF info. As for the upload date discrepancy, it would appear to be a technical glitch, because that date is set by Flickr, not by the user. howcheng {chat} 16:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you're getting at. Yes, the images at [6] are definitely bad, although I'm wondering why [7] isn't showing up in there. howcheng {chat} 18:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes I noticed that the Celine Dion image is missing from that group, which does seem odd. Polly 19:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete.This is pretty likely to be a copyvio. Based on this youtube video of a television segment, the photo is of a rehearsal for the Grammy Awards in 1999. The angle of the video does match the photo. The concert photos the flickr account holder has actually taken have been from public concerts in Malaysia, were they are located. This photo is from a private rehearsal in Los Angeles, California. BlueAzure (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, agree with Polly. Kameraad Pjotr 18:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 4

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:P3280042.JPG

duplicate copy, mistake when I uploaded it Ljsummary 02:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. You may use {{duplicate}} for this Finn Rindahl 15:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HMAS Sydney Sonar Image.jpg

The copyright tag provided says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use it "for any purpose", yet a close examination of the legal information link provided shows that derivative works are not permitted (the image cannot be altered), which is apparently inconsistent with the Commons licensing policy. - Mark 04:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Gesäß

Redundant to Category:Buttocks. 10:45, 4. Apr. 2008 Túrelio

Redirect to Category:Buttocks. --GeorgHH • talk 14:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Otter Klemperer

Highly probably a misspelled doublette of Category:Otto Klemperer. 10:42, 4. Apr. 2008 Túrelio

Deleted wrong name. --GeorgHH • talk 14:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Gartenstadt Crengeldanz

There is already Category:Gartenstadt Crengeldanz (Witten). 10:10, 4. Apr. 2008 Túrelio

Redirect to Category:Gartenstadt Crengeldanz (Witten). --GeorgHH • talk 14:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:EMD Diesel locomotives in Germany

There is already Category:EMD Diesel locomotives of Germany. 10:06, 4. Apr. 2008 Túrelio

Redirect to Category:EMD Diesel locomotives of Germany. --GeorgHH • talk 15:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Fabelwesen

There is already Category:Legendary creatures; no need for a separate German language cat. 10:03, 4. Apr. 2008 Túrelio

Redirect to Category:Legendary creatures --GeorgHH • talk 14:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CSD_2003_in_Rostock_17.jpg

copyright 195.145.211.193 10:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as uploader request (author put a speedy tag on it) before the IP nominated it). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LolitaHazeMissExoticWorld2006.jpg

Ponrnographic and serves no purpose. 216.15.111.243 16:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is not pornographic but erotic. And there's nothing bad in illustrating erotic! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep Even if the image were pornographic this would not be sufficient reason from deletion. The image is of the Burlesque artist Lolita Haze's act at the awards ceremony for the world's best such performers. --Simonxag 18:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 15:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Masturbating_woman.jpg

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of female masturbation; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Showtime!_(nude_photo_by_Peter_Klashorst).jpg

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of cybersex; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Amy_with_dildo.jpg

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of female masturbation with dildo. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 15:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Horny_(nude_by_Peter_Klashorst).jpg

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of female masturbation; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Masturbating_man2.JPG

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC) This is only one mans opinion I for one prefer to see a photo of a man masturbating than to see a drawing you can learn more from a photo than a drawing anytime! DUKE!

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of male masturbation. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 15:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Masturbating_man2.JPG

pornography 68.6.139.133 19:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

We are in 2008, if it's an article on masturbation, this is a pic of masturbation, so keep it !

Keep-wikipedia is not censored --Aspiring chemist (talk) 00:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Keep pornography my a***! ;-) This is an encyclopedic valuable illustration of masturbation. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Kept, for pretty much the same reasons as last time: it has encyclopedic value. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Masturbating_man.jpg

This is pornographic and serves no purpose on here. 216.15.111.243 16:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of male masturbation. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 15:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vagina.JPG

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of vagina. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vagina.JPG

Not used for any pages, no purpose 216.15.111.243 21:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-admin close - abusive DR's --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 22:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vagina.JPG

No liscense --—Preceding unsigned comment added by SwirlBoy39 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep It is obvious they wanted CC-by-SA 2.0. I vote we keep and just retag it with the properly named template. --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 23:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, cc-sa is a valid license. It's deprecated by Creative Commons but it is a valid license. It imposes a sharealike requirement without attribution. Keep Image is appropriately licensed. -N 23:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Kept - valid license --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vagina,Anus,Pereneum-Detail.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of vagina. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vagina,Anus,Pereneum-Detail.jpg

Invalid source. The user who allegedly uploaded the file to the English Wikipedia does not exist nor did he ever exist (as you can tell from log files)--Lamilli 16:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

But he does exist. (here's a real link to his logs) He just doesn't have a user page. And when you make a DR for a image that's already had one, please leave the past discussions above the new request. Can I close this now? Rocket000 01:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I agree.--Lamilli 10:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept Yann (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Black_genitalia_2.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Black_genitalia_2.jpg

No purpose, not linked to any article. 216.15.111.243 21:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-admin close - abusive DR's --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 21:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Black_genitalia.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Black_genitalia.jpg

Not used in any article, serves no purpose 216.15.111.243 21:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-admin close - abusive DR's --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 22:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Front_view.jpg

No requirement for image 86.15.249.117 16:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of exhibitionism. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, no educational purpose--Avron 17:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Although Commons seems to have an overabundance of exhibitionism images, that is not bad. Abundance is good (hope nobody denies that), and if the theme of the picture were other I am confident nobody would think to delete the excess images. -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 18:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Well said! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per others. Avron's comments here and on other recent deletion requests clearly indicate he doesn't understand Commons. Multichill 19:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Keep. No reason for deletion.--Lamilli 17:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Front_view.jpg

This image is IMHO not useful for the project and therefore out of scope. 151.81.24.126 22:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete no consent from the subject of the photo, who is clearly identifiable. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per previous keep. So you think it's unreasonable to believe his wife knows nothing of his flickr archive of images? How do you know she's not a natural exhibitionist? -N 02:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
  - The previous deletion request did not address the permission issue, so "per previous" is irrelevant. Whether or not it's a reasonable thing to believe, if there is a reasonable doubt that she might not know her pictures are being used in this way, then we should insist on permission. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 10:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete consent is clearly needed per COM:PEOPLE. The original Flkr image has been deleted. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete need of coherence in Commons rules about nudity --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete We all know that if a photo is of an identifiable individual in a place where privacy is a reasonable expectation we need model consent. Period. Brynn_(talk) 23:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Keep. There is no indication that consent was not provided, and every reason to believe it was. Oven Fresh (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- No reason to believe that consent was given has been provided. Therefore there is every reason to believe that it may NOT have been. Or maybe it was. But we must err on the side of not assuming that it was given because we want it to have been given, NOT assuming a possible rights violation is OK... we can survive without this picture if it can't be shown to have been permitted. ++Lar: t/c 21:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Brynn. ++Lar: t/c 21:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment Original image seems to have been deleted at Flickr. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment No problem with Image:Rear view.jpg though? Same model, same Flickr user, also deleted there. --Dodo (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC) PS. Why cropping the face out is not an option?
Delete No evidence of consent; "Rear view" is a different issue, as the person is not identifiable.--Londoneye (talk) 11:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Dodo is right. Blur face and keep. Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons _es 15:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment "Feed me Seymour!" --21:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No licensing consent from identifiable model.MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Playing_(nude).jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic picture; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mons_pubis.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of mons pubis. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, no educational purpose--Avron 17:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

No educational? And how do you illustrate mons pubis without such pictures then? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

There are much better images in Category:Female genitalia when it comes to education. That is enough. --Avron 07:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you know what mons pubis (or mons venus) is? You can't illustrate mons pubis with any picture of genitalia. And that kind of angle might be the best for that. Thus we don't have many pictures with such a good angle: Image:Mons venus.jpg, Image:Brazilian Waxing.jpg or Image:Clit Hood Piercing.jpg. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Herby. Adambro 13:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per others. Avron's comments here and on other recent deletion requests clearly indicate he doesn't understand Commons. Multichill 19:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Foto076.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of cybersex genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Female_genitalia.JPG

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Female_genitalia.JPG

No purpose, not linked to any article. 216.15.111.243 21:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-admin close - abusive DR's --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 21:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vulva.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Would you please stop this nonsense deletion requests. The purpose of commons is not that the image as to be used in an article. It's an image repository. Besides that, this image IS used (not that it would matter). --Lamilli 17:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep immediately. Why delete? licence is ok, picture ist used! , picture is not pornographic, picture has quality, and picture is documentating. --Jom 19:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vulva_crop.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is 1) a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia; 2) a work by artist Peter Klashorst (and if one thinks we already have enough of Klashorst's work, I'd answer that this artist is famous enough so it would be non-neutral to determine which works we would keep and which we would delete). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rear_view.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia and exhibitionism. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vulva1.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- I actually would support going through and weeding out some of the pics which drunken guys have taken of themselves using cellphone-cams (see Template:Nopenis), but there's no obvious valid reason to delete this particular image... AnonMoos 08:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:A_vulva.jpeg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Labia.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Genitaila-142736-52Y9s.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Greece linguistic minorities.svg

Areas shown in this map are different then those in ethnologue.This map enalrged those areas http://www.ethnologue.com/show_map.asp?name=MK&seq=10 —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Akirav (talk • contribs) (fixed up by Grillo 18:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC))

Keep, the data for this map was thoroughly discussed at en:Talk:Minorities in Greece. The map is the result of compiling data from the best sources available, as is clearly documented in its image description. It currently has the consensus of all established editors on the en-wiki pages where it is used. This nomination is part of a campaign of nationalist anon IPs and throwaway sock accounts, most probably of a longtime banned user, to get rid of this image by any means. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep, deletion request seems to be a case of ethnic POV-pushing! -- Petri Krohn 01:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Map contains inaccuracies.I am not a 'Greek nationalist', but I still believe this map should be updated or deleted: 1) It shows Arvanitika spread in a far larger area than its actual extent (about 25% of the area shown on the map). 2) The solid colour of the linguistic minorities areas implies that Greek is completely replaced by other languages in these areas. Greek remains the predominant spoken language in most of these areas, with the exception of the Pomac and Turkish areas in north-eastern Greece. 3) The Slavic dialects spoken in northern Greece are different to the main dialect used by the Slav element of the population in FYROM and should not be labeled as 'Macedonian'. 4) Large pockets within the linguistic minorites areas where Greek remains the sole language are not shown. Michail0171 14:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

delete,even before 1919-23 there were many(hundred thousands) people who were speaking greek language(or both greeks and slavic dialects ) according to otthoman and greek census in macedonia.So coloured areas don't show the truth .map is inaccurate...moreover today after people exchanges 1919-1923 (for example treauty lausanne,treauty Neuilly etc) many thousands of slav people left the colourised areas and more than 1.500.000 greeks came from bulgaria and minor asia to (nowdays)greece,most of them stayed at the areas and houses turks and slavs left..

So nowdays there are more than 2.500.000 greek speaking people to Macedonia and only few thousands(30.000+)who speak slav dialects mainly in northern florina(but few of them don’t have greek identity(ouranio toxo a slavskopian party took only 3.000 votes in Macedonia) Also greeks with one or two arvanites parents are about 200.000 all over the Greece.BUT only 30 thousands of them speak a language that is not teached by greek schools,arvanitika(I am arvanitis btw)..most of them are old people. Moreover more than 5.000.000 greek speaking people live in attiki (green coloured area) and about 500.000 migrant workers(Albanians,pakistans,Russians. Etc) who came there after 1991. This map is accurate only for western thraca!and probably its information are taken of propagandist books that speaks-propagandize of so-called “great albania”-“great Macedonia”etc

Ps:The 1904 Ottoman census of Hilmi Pasha recorded 373,227 Greeks and 204,317 Bulgarians in the VILAYET(region) Selânik (Thessaloniki) alone, while it makes no mention of a Macedonian Slav ethnicity (which at the time was regarded as Bulgarian). According to the same census, Greeks were also dominant in the vilayet of Manastır (Bitola), counting 261,283 Greeks and 178,412 Bulgarians.So more than 500.000 were greek speaking people and about 100 thousands slav and vlach speaking with greek identity(as next census also shows)

census in 1925 (after balkan wars and before civil war between communists and anticommunists in which more than 35 thousands slavs (and thousands greeks )left greece and came to communistic yugoslavia and soviet union after defeat etc ) a census that shows the number of greek speaking natives of the area ,slav or vlach speaking people with greek or bulgarian ,romanian identity,greek speaking(that came from anatolia),jews etc http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/9766/ethnologicalcompositionqi2.jpg

Population Exchange in Greek Macedonia, Oxford, Elizabeth Kontogiorgi, 2006

i have to notice also that many slavs were nazi's allies ,during world war 2 and german occupation of greece, with nationalist dreams of an"indepedent macedonia" (a purpose that never changed even afterwhile they joined democratic army)

last but not least i dont see any data dealing with the map

Anyway ,sorry for my english.I hope you understood me :)

edit:i made some changes and corrections in order to be more specific.I hope my text makes more sense now :)..sorry again for my bad english.bye! :)

Kept. DR is not the graphics lab. If there are errors then fix them. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Student_Rally195303211_3.png

Duplicate of Image:Student_Rally_and_Monajat_21_Feb_1953.png Bellayet 17:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

speedy deleted Bad name/duplicate, unused. --GeorgHH • talk 10:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dd_albertos_300.jpg

Author complained here: [8] FunkMonk 07:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Penrith Panthers home jersey 1978.svg

The image didn't render properly, It may take me a long time to fix (seeing Im a newbie at svg files) and I don't want it to disrupt the integrity of Wikimedia Commons. --SpecialWindler 09:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Just upload over top of the bad version when you've fixed it. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:VeneziaMestre-2008-1.gif

Reasons for deletion request --Ivan'''furlanis''' 11:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC) duplicated file (see Image:VeneziaMestre-1-2008.gif)

Kept. Please use {{dupe}} next time. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Blowjob_in_the_wood.jpg

This image serves no purpose on here and is not used for any article. 216.15.111.243 17:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately. Oh come on! I'm sick of those DR! And I'm sick of anonymous IP coward requests! This picture is a non-pornographic illustration of fellatio. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons is not censored. We do have adequate pictures of this nature but we act as a repository for material across the Foundation. It is not pornographic even if it is "graphic" --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment If the name of the picture and the fact that it's 480x320 in resolution with video compression artifacts hasn't made you wonder if this was really made by the Flickr user, then go to the back of the class immediately. Will someone with a Flickr account check the rest of the pictures in their album to see if there are any obvious copyvios there? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

In fact I did wonder that just after I posted the message (I was just thinking about the "arguments" of the DR nominator) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept, well within Commons:Project Scope. Bad faith nomination. Commons is not censored. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Popups_que_hacen_prescindibles_las_categorías_1.JPG

error en el nombre Ferbr1 00:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Cecil: User request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Popups_que_hacen_prescindibles_las_categorías.JPG

error en el nombre Ferbr1 00:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Cecil: User request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Angelisa Singing.jpg

Reasons for deletion request --Mrigote 10:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC) It was a mistake of me

Deleted by ABF: In category Unknown as of 4 April 2008; no license

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NBC Nightly News with Ann Curry.jpg

Delete: request from the owner: he changed his mind

Keep - This Flickr file was reviewed and confirmed to be freely licensed under the terms of cc-by-2.0, regardless of its subsequent removal from Flickr. JGHowes 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I changed the reason. ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 13:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete: I am the owner of the photo and would like it removed. --Jeff Maurone

Keep - The licensing is irrevocable, and I see no other reason to remove such a useful image. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The licensing has been changed to copyrighted, so can it be deleted now? ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 19:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

No. Free licensing is irrevokable! – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 22:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NBC Nightly News Set.jpg

Delete: request from the owner: he changed his mind

Keep - This Flickr file was reviewed and confirmed to be freely licensed under the terms of cc-by-2.0, regardless of its subsequent removal from Flickr. JGHowes 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I changed the reason. ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 13:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - The licensing is irrevocable, and I see no other reason to remove such a useful image. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The licensing has been changed to copyrighted, so can it be deleted now? ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 19:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 22:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NBC Nightly News Broadcast.jpg

Delete: request from the owner: he changed his mind

Keep - This Flickr file was reviewed and confirmed to be freely licensed under the terms of cc-by-2.0, regardless of its subsequent removal from Flickr. JGHowes 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I changed the reason. ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 13:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep as since this has gone through the Flickr review process then we can be fairly confident that the licensing was correct and it isn't revocable so remains despite the image being made private on Flickr. Adambro 15:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - The licensing is irrevocable, and I see no other reason to remove such a useful image. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The licensing has been changed to copyrighted, so can it be deleted now? ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 19:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Nothing has changed, the image continues to be freely licensed as the licence is irrevocable despite the failure of Flickr to recognise this leaving users to play around with licences as they wish. Adambro 19:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't get that, do you mean once I set my photos as "CC-BY", and they were uploaded to Wikipedia, even then I change the licences to "Copyrighted", I can't request to remove those photos? ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 20:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

And please check the original source of this photo, the author has changed the "Additional Information" to copyrighted. ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 20:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Free licenses cannot be revoked by definition. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

So is there any way to delete it? Please help! ^{Talk to ►} Kevin 03:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 22:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Foto_528.jpg

Neither source nor author given. 84.167.61.138 17:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Picture_louai.jpg

Unknown person, image unused. GeorgHH • talk 14:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lolicon_comicbooks_sold_in_Japan_001.jpg

Contains pornographic images and serves no purpose. 216.15.111.243 16:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The fact that it contains porn drawing is not a good argument. BUT it is a copyvio (derivative image) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep images can hardly be recognized, it's not like it's a high-res image of a single book -- Gorgo 00:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Gorgo. TwoWings' claim is definitely a stretch here. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as per TwoWings (not the IP). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- I am not convinced if "derivative work" applies here. I have reopened this nomination giving discussion a chance. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 23:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as copyvio. It is a high-enough resolution image (3456x2304) that one can crop a 550x520 image of a single comic book cover from it, thereby creating a derivative that would be a copyvio. Therefore it should not be on Commons as a free license image. JGHowes 00:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Serves a purpose / potential purpose, and you can't exactly crop it and make it appear like a scan - because the images are not at right angles to the camera. Ingolfson (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Nanotyrannus.gif

Very dubious copyright info. FunkMonk 09:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No source. MichaelMaggs 19:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ernst_Fuchs_HYPNOSIA_mit_Mitra.jpg

Depicts a copyrighted work; not in a public place, so "freedom of panorama" does not apply. Would need permission of the artist. Lupo 09:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Stifle 10:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I took the picture - as well as the portrait of the artist (Image:Ernst Fuchs 2007.jpg) - and a few other images of sculptures (the Sphinxes you can find in Category:Ernst Fuchs (artist)) last October at the 'Lange Nacht der Museen' (Long Night of Museums) here in Vienna. Before taking pictures I did ask, whether this is allowed. The answer was an explicit yes.
You are asking for a permission by the artist. Can you give me a hint, how this is handled here at Commons? --Tsui 12:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

A museum does not usually hold the copyright to its exhibits, so the museum staff cannot give you permission to publish these images under a free license. Permissions are handled by COM:OTRS. What you need is a permission to distribute the images under a certain license, for example GFDL. A permission for wikimedia use is not sufficient. --rimshot^talk 13:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The museum where I took the pictures is not just a museum, it is the artists own villa ([9]), where he lives (not constantly but every now and then). It is managed by the Ernst Fuchs Foundation which, among other things, is responsible for the "conception of new publications, contribution to various publishing projects" ([10]) concerning his art. These are the people I asked for permission. The villa is open to the public regularly (that's why I was able to take a picture of him there - after asking him of course). Anyway. I plan to visit it again soon, because I want to take some more and better images. When I do so, I will discuss this with the people managing the museum.

I know that a permisson for Commons/Wikipedia only is not sufficient. COM:OTRS is what I was looking for. --Tsui 22:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedykeep (or however someone might call it: P.l.e.a.s.e do not force the artist to become a wikipedian, in order to be allowed to allow his work to be published here!!! --WeHaWoe (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, but has anything come out of the OTRS request? --rimshot^talk 21:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm: Maybe the artist would not care, nor should we (WP), more than R.E.A.L.L.Y required. But: I'm a man&human, not a lawyer. --WeHaWoe (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted per Lupo. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stygimoloch.JPG

Image was created for a Jurassic Park project, and was not created by the owner of the website. FunkMonk 09:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Kameraad Pjotr 18:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Petrovaradinskatvrdjavamq3.jpg

This image was listed on possibly unfree images at Wikipedia. The reason given was "No evidence of release under cc-by". --Stifle 10:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no permission. Kameraad Pjotr 18:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 5

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:E9-Doc-14-16.pdf

no attached file just the adobe symbol Kevmin 03:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep + Speedy Close - MediaWiki cannot generate thumbnails for PDF files, so this is an invalid reason for deletion. ViperSnake151 14:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

kept There's no thumbnail image for PDF files, and the pdf is working. Yuval Y § Chat § 14:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Right.JPG

Completely useless. Image of a women with an arrow. Avron 07:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep It'in use at japanese wiktionary. --GeorgHH • talk 10:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

It they want it, so they can host it there.--Avron 11:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep If its useful to a project, or potentially so, then it isn't "completely useless". All freely licensed images used on WMF should be here on Commons regardless of whether their potential for use beyond one project is likely to be limited. Avron seems to misunderstand the whole concept of Commons and the scope of the project. Adambro
Keep I guess this blond sign can be used on other places too... Yuval Y § Chat § 14:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per others. Avron's comments here and on other recent deletion requests clearly indicate he doesn't understand Commons. Multichill 19:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
KeepA photograph without problem can think.--El torero 04:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Left.jpg

Completely useless. Image of a women and arrow. Avron 07:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep It'in use at japanese wiktionary. --GeorgHH • talk 10:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
See: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Right.JPG --Avron 11:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep If its useful to a project, or potentially so, then it isn't "completely useless". All freely licensed images used on WMF should be here on Commons regardless of whether their potential for use beyond one project is likely to be limited. Avron seems to misunderstand the whole concept of Commons and the scope of the project. Adambro
Keep per others. Avron's comments here and on other recent deletion requests clearly indicate he doesn't understand Commons. Multichill 19:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you have a wrong understanding of commons scope. I don't see a rule which says commons has to keep images that are used somewhere when they are out of scope: Wikimedia Commons is not a web host for e.g. private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such. There are plenty of other projects in the Internet you can use for such a purpose, like Flickr and others.--Avron 10:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Buterfly

Very probably a unused, misspelled duplicate of Category:Butterfly. --Túrelio 08:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted wrong name,/typing error. --GeorgHH • talk 10:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Amalie_hessen.jpg

By request from user:Codeispoetry Yuval Y § Chat § 14:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Quoting from my user talk page... Yuval Y § Chat § 14:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amalie hessen.jpg

Dear Yuval, the image on this cover is PD-old, I assume PD-ineligible for text and composition. If you don‘t agree, please request normal deletion. Regards, Code·is·poetry 08:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The image is PD-old, the book is copyrighted. Please read Commons:Derivative works. Yuval Y § Chat § 19:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Which part of the cover is copyrighted? Code·is·poetry 20:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC) No crossposting, please

The cover itself..! Yuval Y § Chat § 21:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

As I said in my initial post: "I assume PD-ineligible for […] composition." Please try to argue related to my posts or just restore and nominate for deletion. Code·is·poetry 23:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment - I wish it was that easy to claim that if a certain image is PD, all it's derivatives are... Yuval Y § Chat § 18:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Does this DR serve any purpose? The image was deleted twice... Even if indeed the text and its arrangement would be PD-ineligible, what good is it to keep this image, given that we have Image:Amalie von Hessen-Darmstadt.png??? That one is better anyway, and the image is not blemished by some text. Lupo 18:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep The image is PD and the text is ineligible. The picture has to be kept if there is no copyvio --Historiograf 22:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Yuval Y bestätigt meine Auffassung über Commons-Admins auf das Deutlichste. Wo nehmt Ihr nur all diese urheberrechtlichen Nullen her? --ST ○ 23:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deutscher Text wird hier wohl leider ignoriert werden... Aber du hast schon recht, Steschke. Leute wie Yuval, die keine Ahnung von Bildrechten haben, sind für den Posten des Commons-Admins völlig ungeeignet.

Now in English: The text of this cover is not copyrighted. And the image on this cover is PD-old, so the whole cover is in the PD.

Keep. Chaddy 23:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing in that image that would detain that image from being public domain. There is some standard font (PD-ineligible) in it that was put over an obvious PD-old/PD-art image. There is nothing special in the ways the font was put over the image. So the deletion (especially a speedy one) was obviously wrong and should have never happened. That's the reason why I think that this DR is necessary. But since after the second speedy deletion I uploaded a new version without the font this version here is not really necessary anymore. So keep that image as obvious public domain image, but then delete it as inferior duplicate (she is a little bit icteric in this version). -- Cecil 23:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Historiograf's pic claims to be an old copy after Schröder, Cecil's pic seems to be the original. So let's keep them both. Mutter Erde 10:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Images is PD-old, text is ineligible. So, Image kept. ChristianBier 10:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:FaybanWindmill-stamp.jpg

US Postal Service stamps created after 1978 are copyrighted. Please see en:US_Postal_Service#Copyright_and_reproduction. --UserB 14:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Considering that the stamp is from 1980 (according to the text description), the case seems pretty clear. RN1970 00:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep If the image is copyright then a fair use rationale can be applied, and the relevant copyright tag applied. Mjroots 08:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Commons doesn't use images under a claim of fair use. This isn't Wikipedia. --UserB 15:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --Spiritia 21:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Iriomote Cat Climbing.JPG

Copyvio: Claimed as being "self-made", but actually just a distorted version of the famous photo taken by Makoto Yokotsuka - better version available on the IUCN Cat Specialist Group's page here --RN1970 16:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:560px-Pannonia01.png

Dupe, but not exact, apparently (Different hashes) – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Close enough Finn Rindahl 20:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as dupe by User:Rlevse rimshot^talk 14:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:989_NDC0001.jpg

Copyvio: cover of a book? movie? it's too small to tell. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

book cover http://www.paginasdelperu.com/eStore/product.php?productid=4647&cat=0&page=1 Anna 02:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio. rimshot^talk 14:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:1559_PLAIN0001.jpg

Copyvio: album cover, looks like. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

book cover http://www.paginasdelperu.com/eStore/product.php?productid=100641&cat=0&page=1 Anna 02:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio. rimshot^talk 14:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:5th_fleet.jpg

It's a poorer quality duplicate of a pic that already exists Griffiths911 19:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

(add) Image:US Aust UK warships Dec 02.jpg --Griffiths911 19:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. You may use {{Duplicate}} for cases like this. Finn Rindahl 19:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Flat-Headed Cat Resting.JPG

Copyvio: Claimed as being self-made, but actually just a scan of the famous photo @ to Art Wolfe (i.e. similar to other photo uploaded by the same user & nominated for deletion in wiki English). Another version with the copyright printed on it can be found here. RN1970 16:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Just a brief note in case a moderator checks the users page and fails to find a place where he was informed about this deletion proposal, (s)he deleted it together with a bunch of other notes ([11]). RN1970 01:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ice_Art_competition_in_Fairbanks_2008_10.jpg

Was tagged as a derivative work, but I think the threshold for originality wasn't met. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Derivative work. MichaelMaggs 21:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cablestreetmural_small.jpg

Image is a mural painted in the UK in the 1980s (see w:Battle of Cable Street) and is thus a copyrighted work by default. The uploader does not have the legal right to release it to the public domain. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 20:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cristina Hernández.jpg

It's a great quality image with no source information. Personally, I suspect copyvio --FedericoMP 04:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

And it's the uploaders only image. --Túrelio 09:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by MichaelMaggs: per Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Cristina_Hernández.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Embryo 9 Wochen mit Groessenvergleich.JPG

I made this combination of Pictures and now find it misleading while it is not clear in it self that the match ist not completely visible--WerWil 12:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete better image (by same user) is available -- Gorgo 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete I agree: The picture is misleading as it is not clear in it self that the match ist not completely visible. --ISBN 07:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. OK, not in use. MichaelMaggs 06:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Jin class submarines

no free photos of this top secret chinese submarines. Image:2 Type 094 submarines.jpg consists 2 Xia-class chinese submarines. --Alex Rave 05:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, empty category. Kameraad Pjotr 18:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mamut_lanudo.jpg

Looks like a derivative work. Adambro 12:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep It's an animal reconstruction, it's impossible to copyright the nature. Serg!o 22:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

If only that were true :P – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep, Canada does have freedom of panorama, and this is simply a sculpture in a Canadian museum. FunkMonk (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Kept, FOP does apply. Kameraad Pjotr 18:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Grün - Selbstporträt.jpg

Nonsense. This is Max Liebermann --Mutter Erde 13:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. ViperSnake151 14:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment :-). You want to keep an error, no cat, badname ? Even then Thyra reuploads that pic as portrait of Max Liebermann, he has no source, no painter, no date. Makes no sense. (btw.:there are already 8 pics of Liebermann in his gallery) Mutter Erde 14:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Löschen, war mein Fehler. Sorry. --Thyra 23:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, user request. Kameraad Pjotr 18:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Armia Czerwona,Wehrmacht 23.09.1939 wspólna parada.jpg

This license is obsolete because according the new Russian copyright law enforced in 2008, copyright extended to 70 years from the death of the author. Nxx's nomination was incomplete. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Works belonging to the former Soviet government or other Soviet legal entities published before January 1st, 1954, are public domain in Russia. This was published in 1939 by official Soviet Government Press Agency TASS. Keep Julo 22:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

This is obsolete now. Now from 1st January 2008 the term is 70 years. You can see the new template from Russian Wikipedia: [12]. The cutoff date is 1st January 1938 for the death of the author.--Nxx 22:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

According new rules, public domain is if: 1. Автор данного произведения умер в период с 1 января 1938 года до 22 июня 1941 года; или оно было опубликовано анонимно в этот период, и имя автора не стало известным до 1 января 1992 года. This work was published between 1.1.1938 and 22.6.1941 and is anonymous, author is unknown. Keep Julo 06:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

If it was published by TASS (as the image description says) then the author is of course kown: TASS did not publish anonymous photos. Is there any information where it was published first? I see no link here to support the claim that author is unknown.--Nxx 13:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I doubt if TASS ever cared about individual authors and copyrights (in the Soviet community there was no need of such capitalist ideas...) Deerhunter 23:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep per Julo.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Deerhunter 23:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per what Julo said. Zarbon 15:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep Just per Julo said - date of publishing is 1939, author unknown.

Andros64 (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Kept, per Julo. Kameraad Pjotr 18:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Xalvashi.jpg

pic from a Georgian website. Author is NOT Indrek Galetin --Mutter Erde 17:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence that the stated licence is valid. This would also mean having to delete the derivative Image:Georgians newrevision.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep I'm very sorry, i mixed by authors, I just reviewed the image info and its by George Kiknadze and the image is not copyrighted. I'm sorry, i just mixed up two images of the same person. Iberieli 04:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Who is George Kiknadze and where is the evidence that he released his work into the public domain? And if it's not copyrighted, how can it be published under a license that presupposes copyright protection? Please do not remove the notice regarding this discussion while the discussion is still open. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I contacted the author and he can answer all the questions himself. Iberieli 21:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, lacking permission. Kameraad Pjotr 16:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 6

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikinews-logo.svg

G 143.216.49.250 00:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. H Rocket000 05:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I... lol! Are we getting far with the alphabet here? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:GerardPique.jpg

this image is a blatant copyright violation (http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/10_02/GerardPique2_468x557.jpg) PeeJay 15:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Finn Rindahl 19:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Judd's_UCS.svg

Another SVG that does not work. My creation. Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 16:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike.lifeguard: User request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Auteur-jrp1c.png

unused, useless.. 86.210.171.214 22:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep is in use at nl:wiki Finn Rindahl 22:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept Patstuart (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NREntrySign.jpg

Image was supposedly verified within last 24 hours, but Flickr link indicates that file there is private (if there at all). Orlady 00:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The flickr account this came from is being used by a user from the English wikipedia to reinsert copyvio images into articles. BlueAzure 02:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:QueenCity.jpg. Patstuart (talk) 02:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image is available on Flick users/ image producers photo group. --69.86.92.251 22:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Finn Rindahl 11:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Inferred_Dinosaur_Behaviour.png

See my earlier nomination of the same image. FunkMonk 03:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. I can't find the earlier nomination. Please try again stating why this image should be deleted or at the very least a link to the old one. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Canadian_20_dollar_back_-1978.gif

a 1978 Canadian banknote cannot be PD because that is less than 50 years ago Movieevery 06:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Canadian money is copyrighted. --rimshot^talk 17:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LOGO-BARRE-LEHNER.jpg

error Gregoiredenis 21:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gamme-lehner.jpg

error Gregoiredenis 21:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:29_Decarvalho.jpg

Image:Marques_Pombal.JPG is not an exact duplicate, but is perhaps close enough. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 23:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

i am not the uploader, he is User talk:Green Ape. i just added some improvements to the original. anyway i think that the other image of Marquis of Pombal is much better and this one might be deleted if Green Ape agreed. tetraktys 14:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Juan_Mariano_de_Goyeneche.jpg

I doubt that it is really self-made (= self-drew). Where did you get it from and who is the author of that painting, (when) did he die? ...Forrester 09:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

the wikipedia article says it was painted by Daniel Hernández, a painter who died in 1932. 76 years ago, unless peruvian law says otherwise, it is public domain.---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 16:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by ABF: Deleted because "Was in Category:Unknown as of 13 April 2008; still missing essential information". using TW

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BrewsterSchoolhouseNR.JPG

Claim of being "self-made" in 2007 is not credible. Texture of the image suggests that it was scanned from a postcard, and vegetation is different from other recent images, such as http://www.newrochelleny.com/photo.asp?photo=26 Orlady 01:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The image is a photograph taken by myself which I scanned so that it could be used online. The scanner is not the best in the world. As per the vegetation being different, i live within close proximity of the schoolhouse and have taken pictures of the site at different times.--Smurfette143 04:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The uploader has used multiple accounts at the English wikipedia to upload numerous copyvios, that they claimed to been self-made, including postcards. BlueAzure 02:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image was said to have been scanned by user from a photograph taken by the user/producer. The vegetation differences between image vs others of the same subject matter has no relevance in proving the images' validity of ownership --69.86.92.251 23:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

See related discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PremiumPoint (1).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:NREntrySign.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:QueenCity.jpg. --Orlady 02:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Image:BrewsterSchoolhouse.jpg. Superm401 - Talk 22:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Bryan: : http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Attention&oldid=11422156

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ThomasPaineFarmhouse.JPG

Doubful claim that it was "self-made." Moire pattern on image suggests that it was scanned, perhaps from a postcard. Orlady 01:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The image is a photograph taken by myself which I scanned so that it could be used online.--Smurfette143 04:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The uploader has used multiple accounts at the English wikipedia to upload numerous copyvios, that they claimed to been self-made, including postcards. BlueAzure 02:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

See related discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PremiumPoint (1).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:NREntrySign.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:QueenCity.jpg. --Orlady 02:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:ThomasPaineFarmhouse.jpg -- same image uploaded by a different user account. --Orlady 00:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Bryan: : http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Attention&oldid=11422156

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:StJohnsWilmotNR.JPG

Claim of being self-made is questionable. Image has the appearance of a scanned postcard. Orlady 01:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The image is a photograph taken by myself which I scanned so that it could be used online.--Smurfette143 04:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The uploader has used multiple accounts at the English wikipedia to upload numerous copyvios, that they claimed to been self-made, including postcards. BlueAzure 02:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image was said to have been scanned from a photo by user/producer. --69.86.92.251 23:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This very same image has now also been posted at the "schmaberton" flickr account, which is an account that appears to be used as a vehicle to evade copyvio control processes here and at English Wikipedia. --Orlady 00:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

See related discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PremiumPoint (1).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:NREntrySign.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:QueenCity.jpg. --Orlady 02:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Bryan: : http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Attention&oldid=11422156

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reynaud.jpg

no author, therefore no proof author died over 70 years ago Movieevery 06:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Reynaud died in 1918 at the age of 74. Judging his face on this picture he was surely less than 50 at that time so the picture is anterior than 1894 - and I'd say even before, in the 1880's. I wouldn't think the photographer would have died after 1938.--TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. →Christian .И 09:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BlakeJacksonsPortrait.jpg

Derivative work. EugeneZelenko 15:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Foto_00.jpg

Given this user's uploading history, I have reason to suspect that this image of Francis Mallmann is a copyright violation. I deleted two of his other uploads as copyright violations, as well. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HamangiaThinker.jpg

Copyright violation/bad license tag. Both statues were discovered in 1956 so, even if the photograper died the same year, there are less than 70 years since then.--Alex:D 15:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC) --Alex:D 15:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete It seems you are going to ignore an obvious copyright violation. Or, everybody is on vacation. Maybe this will get your attention? --Alex:D 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete english log shows no indication why it should be PD-old. Moreover no author named. --Svens Welt 06:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No reason it would be PD. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Märklin_503_Elex.jpg

Derivative work. Or artwork should be blanked. EugeneZelenko 16:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Toy, not artwork (or crop the top of it) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No-one accepted the suggestion to make a crop. MichaelMaggs 21:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Airbag_system.jpg

Uploader stated that the image was without copyright restrictions at the upload date (2006). Image is not longer available at the given source Service Desk for Media & Journalists, which says Copyright © Autoliv Inc. 2006 All rights reserved. GeorgHH • talk 16:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The copyright tag, at the very bottom of each subpage on the Autoliv home page, is for the web page itself, not for the images. The text on the image data bank clearly states that they are available for download. The files and photographs do not have a copyright holder or a photographer stated. A phone call to the press officer at Autoliv, made by me at the time of the upload, confirmed the permission for Wikipedia to use the image. I have also e-mailed Autoliv to confirm the permission. Riggwelter 18:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Permission obtained from Autoliv AB, OTRS ticket number 2008040610010732. Kindly close this deletion request. Riggwelter 07:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. For roughly the ten trillionth time, "permission for Wikipedia" is not enough. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SinisterGrafiti2_copy.jpg

Derivative work. In which country photo was made? EugeneZelenko 16:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment are you sure graffitis are copyrighted?! They are mostly anonymous free works (and generally illegal actually!) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Why not? It involve authorship. Anonymous works are also protected by copyrights. I think copyrights status depends on Commons:Freedom of panorama. --EugeneZelenko 15:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
  - Well if it's anonymous how can we know whom we have to ask permission?! And how can we know when it will be in the public domain? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
    - I'm not sure that would be a legal explanation... but, there was a NYTimes article about this. So, even if anonymous graffiti was not copyrighted... how do we prove it was anonymous and not for a patron, etc.? —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Grenavitar (talk • contribs)
      - So it never can be in the public domain then? (since we'd never know when the author would die) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- My first inclination was to ask if this was derivative or just a drawing? I suppose it probably just has a boatload of post-processing. So, I think that means it's copyrighted and Delete. gren 11:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Seems OK per Commons:Image casebook#Graffiti. MichaelMaggs 19:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MNbedrock1.gif

replaced by a better image at [2]. nominator is original submitter; CheckUsage is negative.--Kablammo 23:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Please use {{dupe}} in the future. Where is the copy? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[13]. Not a duplicate, but a better and more specific revision of the base image. Kablammo 18:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - Not similar enough, though the images should be linked in |other_versions= – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. MichaelMaggs 19:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Back_cover-German_Memories_in_Asia.JPG

and Image:Rajkumar Kanagasingam.JPG, Image:Front Cover German Memories in Asia.JPG.

I think Commons:OTRS confirmation is necessary. EugeneZelenko 15:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I have sent the permission to Commons:OTRS to use the Back Cover under GFDL on Wikimedia Commons.Rajkumar Kanagasingam 05:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

On OTRS I can find permission for Image:Rajkumar Kanagasingam.JPG only. I have asked him to re-send permission for the other two. --MichaelMaggs 19:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. OTRS now received for all three images. MichaelMaggs 07:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Iman2.jpg

Screenshot of a Pakistani film titled Khuda Ke Liye Aksi great 17:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom.--Trixt 23:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

deleted, all contributions of this user Special:Contributions/EstelHope

best regards, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 01:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:画像_063.jpg

Derivative work. EugeneZelenko 15:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Very broad picture and significantly different... the banners are not even the focal point. Or is your argument that freedom of panorama doesn't apply? I can't say I'm 100% sure since until recently I thought all pictures of 3D objects were acceptable... gren 11:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The banners are too large to be accepted as de minimis, and this picture infringes their copyright MichaelMaggs 07:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Velociraptorprotoceratops.jpg

Sources say: (Illustration kindly provided by Raul Martin.) And does not mention the image having been released under the stated license (it is unlikely that it was). FunkMonk 02:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep "All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License." While maybe they didn't have a copyright agreement with the author and "kindly provided" means little, I think it would be very unwise of us to second guess their copyright and make assumptions about its status. Nothing was noted and PLoS is notable enough that we should trust their copyright claims unless we have proof that they are incorrect. gren 11:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep pr gren. Finn Rindahl 11:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, I'll try to email Raul Martin and see what he says. FunkMonk 12:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Kanonkas_(talk) 15:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Psp1.png

It contains trademarked logos and a copyrighted user interface making it impossible to generate a free version of this image --—Locke Cole • t • c 04:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep What's copyrighted? The wavy lines, monotone background, or the generic symbols? This is de minimis infringement of elements that are pd-ineligible. -N 14:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep You supplied a fair use rationale directly in your request. --Tweenk (talk) 00:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Keep Just a product photo, and furthermore the so called "copyrighted user interface" is blurred out. -Anonymous Coward 12:54, 03 Aug 2008 (GMT+2)

Deleted, fair use not allowed. Kameraad Pjotr 18:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:NikosGoumasStadium-AEK.jpg

Tagged GFDL, but according to this website the image is originally sourced to the official AEK website. --Muchness 05:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 18:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stanford_bunny.jpg

The 3D model looks complicated enough to be copyrighted 88.65.127.157 07:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep User says he generated the image himself, and the underlying data cannot be copyrighted by the researchers - they merely scanned (a 3D scan, but that presumably wouldn't have the necessary originality to be copyrighted) a ceramic figure. If anything we're infringing on the copyright of the original bunny sculpture, but considering this is widely used as a test data set I wouldn't worry about it. 140.247.241.21 05:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I was ideed referring to the original figure. Whether this figure is protected or not has nothing to do with whether 3D models made from it have become widespread. After all, there is a reason why we do not allow Lena on Commons, which can be found in dozens of standard textbooks. To me the bunny figure looks sufficiently complicated to merit copyright protection. --88.65.115.113 22:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, derivative work. Kameraad Pjotr 18:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Velosolex_in_Central_Park.JPG

Same image was uploaded twice to english wikipedia by different users, both self-claimed the image. No indication who is the real author. see en:Image:Velosolex in Central park.jpg and en:Image:Velosolex picture.jpg. GeorgHH • talk 10:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no indication who is the real author. Kameraad Pjotr 17:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Pirat

[edit] Copyright violations

File:Breasts001en.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Breasts003.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Breasts002.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Breasts001.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Circle and an Lady.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Happy Girl.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Beach Time.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Asian Lady2008.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Look Up Asian Lady.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Lady in bed.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Shower Time.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Shangri La.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Artistic Lady.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Woman into river.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Bed Time1.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Beatiful Asian Lady.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Beach Time.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Bikini ZoomUp.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Trip Season.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Breast Lang Ja.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Breach0401.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:AB Members in Prisons of States US MAP.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
Nudity - Collection page of most of those same images

[edit] Low quality images

File:F Seal.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Sammin.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Seymour Skinner.jpg‎‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Monty.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

I believe that User:Pirat's images are likely copyright violations. The image quality is too high for just any old user. They are either a really good amateur photographer with attractive friends who run around in the nude, or copyright violations. There are other images that are low resolution that look like they were created in microsoft paint.-Optigan13 02:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

These four Low quality images - self-made drawings - are typical Original Research and should be Delete d. Julo 06:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Please Keep Me! Is it all deletion? No kidding! Besides, there are two reasons.Because one of reasons is good.Because another reason is too clumsy.Though is interesting; the all deletion a little.I do not see the Internet, each other's faces here.More at first than doubting a person I will believe each other.--Pirat 16:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Is there a chance, that you will meet one of your friends again, for example reading a newspaper of next week. She must not show her breasts ;.) Mutter Erde 19:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfect idea! It would be proof and test of veracity. Julo 20:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

DeleteLooks like copyvio to me.--Lamilli 18:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment I forgot to properly tag the Nudity page with {{delete}} tag. I've only done that nowdiff. Not sure how that affects the deletion of that page. -Optigan13 23:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Some images may be things which himself really made. Low quality images....It be assumed that this does not matter.

Copyright violations. Some images may not need to delete it. For example that Breasts001en.jpg,Breasts003.jpg,Breasts002.jpg,Breasts001.jpg,Trip Season.jpg,Breast Lang Ja.jpg,Breach0401.jpg.These images resemble closely I do not understand whether an image without a face which photographed whom. Such a photograph is common.But had better others Delete.

Keep Breasts001en.jpg,Breasts003.jpg,Breasts002.jpg,Breasts001.jpg,Trip Season.jpg,Breast Lang Ja.jpg,Breach0401.jpg.AB Members in Prisons of States US MAP.jpg--El torero 04:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment I think this was quite a bad idea to start a mass deletion for all of those pictures. Some are clearly connected (the nude that might be copyvios) but some other files are concerned by different cases (maps, drawings...). I think we can delete all the nudes (some details of Image:Circle and an Lady.jpg are quite strange...) but we have to treat the rest separately. For instance there's no reason to delete the page nudity since it could become an interesting gallery. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

CommentThe connection was the uploader, all of the images were tagged as self-made, which I don't think is legitimate, especially with the image you noticed(Circle and an Lady) which appears to have a website name/watermark blurred out around the bottom. The drawings are legitimately self-made, but are derivative of copyrighted work(simpsons) and I doubt will ever be of any use on any wikimedia projects. Also I don't see what the Nudity page adds that Category:Nudity doesn't already sort out. The nudity page only appears to be a collection of female nudes based on personal preference. Especially since the intial header was "Hot Gallery"[14], and was moved to the main space under this user's name as Pirat's favorite pictures[15]. -Optigan13 00:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete I agree with the suggestion that most, if not all of these images are copyright violations and so, since we should err on the side of caution, all should be deleted unless the situation is clarified. Adambro 19:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep with caution I'm having a hard time believing that all of these are copyvio, but some of them probably are. throw the copyvio ones away and keep the rest.72.81.226.247 02:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete EXCEPT for Nudity which is valid (even if it must be changed)--and I if it is to be deleted should have its own deleition request since it's vastly different than the other requests and should not have been lumped in. Also, the 4 "Low quality images" should be deleted as out of scope original research rather than copyright violations. If Pirat can come up with some plausible explanation about why they are all different cops sizes and have no EXIF data then maybe this can be reversed. gren 11:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. except image:AB Members in Prisons of States US MAP.jpg and Nudity. Please file separate deletion requests for those if you think they should have been deleted to. Finn Rindahl 11:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images from ntemisnikolaidis

File:Zagorakis-04.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Nikolaidis-AEK-2002.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Mimis-Papaioannou.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

These images are sourced to Flickr user ntemisnikolaidis, who has tagged them cc-by-2.0. The images look like press/promotional photos, and they appear to have been collected from various websites ([16], [17], [18]) and uploaded to Flickr with questionable authorship claims. Muchness 04:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyright violations. Kameraad Pjotr 17:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Wonder Weapons

A highly subjective category. There is no agreement among experts which weapons belongs here.--Avron 08:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC) --Avron 08:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Technically perhaps, yes. But I think most historians would agree that Dreadnought, the A-bomb, the tank, Operation Ranch Hand represented what were hoped to be revolutionary war-winning weapons. I.e. wonder-weapons. There aren't actually many such examples in history - most weapons tend to be evolutionary. I think common sense indicates it should stay, as it hasn't been abused. Rod. Rcbutcher 15:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

That is a good story for wikipedia but not here for Commons. This category has been already abused. For example Big Bertha was neither revolutionary nor a war-winning weapon. Or Project Babylon, compleatly ridiculous. --Avron 17:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree - discussion of the weapon's importance or otherwise in history requires a properly referenced indepth article in Wikipeda. I suppose Commons is the repository of photos and audio-visual media relating to the weapons, not ideas about them. Rod Rcbutcher 11:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete I don't believe this is a useful category for Commons. Quadell (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 13:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Parajanov statue

Derivative work: No freedom of panorama (or rather: only noncommercial) in Georgia, no PD-old given. --Code·is·poetry 19:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, FOP does not apply. Kameraad Pjotr 17:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:BANNER-gamma-12b.jpg

error Gregoiredenis 21:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BANNER-gamma-12b.jpg

error Gregoiredenis 22:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 7

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sexuality Barnstar.gif

Ziijon's nom was incomplete --– Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedily deleted - please. ~ Riana ⁂ 03:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fun_factory.jpg

COM:SCOPE. Dodo 10:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm adding Image:Bertl.jpg and Image:ScreenShot4.jpg to this one, appears to have been uploaded as in a major misunderstanding of the scope of Commons (see users deletion log). Finn Rindahl 10:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

20:54, April 9, 2008 Bdk (Talk | contribs | Block) deleted "Image:Fun factory.jpg" ‎ (No source: Unknown as of 31 March 2008) (restore)

I Deleted the other – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lisa_Gerrard,_live_in_Melbourne.jpg

Image uploaded by person known for faking flickr licenses Patstuart (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

It is under the right licence, isn't it? If I can get unblocked, I'll uplaod it again.Thanks, Sonya. 134.241.227.161 19:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Sonya_the_photographer

No, do not continue to flickr wash. I cannot tell if you are being purposefully ignorant or you really have not read any of the messages we have given you; please stop uploading images you do not own. Patstuart (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 23:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Christian anarchist.jpg

This image created by me, Tim Harrist. JPEG did not load properly. PLEASE REMOVE!!! --139.62.133.102 16:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Dezidor 16:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Finn Rindahl 18:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Christian_anarchist_clean.jpg

I, Tim Harrist, placed this image, but the JPEG did not load properly. PLEASE DELETE!!! 139.62.133.102 16:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Delete should have been tagged {{speedydelete}}. --Simonxag 12:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Delete Use {{speedydelete}} for this sort of thing. --Simonxag 12:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Blur-1.jpg

obvious copyvio on flickr Patstuart (talk) 18:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pilzsporen_WJP.jpg

Image with zero value, no reasonable explanation, no connection to any article, low quality. Karelj 18:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC) * Keep Used in de:Spore, close up illustration. Finn Rindahl 19:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Kept. (after fixing the information template) Finn Rindahl 19:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image with zero value, no reasonable explanation, no connection to any article, low quality. Karelj 21:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - 1. I don´t like reasons like "out of scope". 2. It is used in many articles. --Dezidor 22:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's a pattern of spores from a lamella mushroom which was left on a pice of paper overnight. --Simonxag 12:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This one is already Kept (see above). Within scope, described and categorised, used in other projects, source and licence ok. Please do not repeat nomination unless there's a different reason why we should consider deletion.Finn Rindahl 13:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Baja_California_hurricane_tracks.png

check image description 202.156.226.110 19:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism of image description removed. Finn Rindahl 19:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Finn Rindahl 19:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gwyneth_Paltrow_(2007).jpg

projector shot; not owned by photo taker Patstuart (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --Dodo 06:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Pilzsporen_WJP.jpg

Image with zero value, no reasonable explanation, no connection to any article, low quality. Karelj 18:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC) * Keep Used in de:Spore, close up illustration. Finn Rindahl 19:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Kept. (after fixing the information template) Finn Rindahl 19:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image with zero value, no reasonable explanation, no connection to any article, low quality. Karelj 21:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - 1. I don´t like reasons like "out of scope". 2. It is used in many articles. --Dezidor 22:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's a pattern of spores from a lamella mushroom which was left on a pice of paper overnight. --Simonxag 12:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This one is already Kept (see above). Within scope, described and categorised, used in other projects, source and licence ok. Please do not repeat nomination unless there's a different reason why we should consider deletion.Finn Rindahl 13:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yusuf_el-Qaradawi.jpg

copyvio. copyrighted image from a copyrighted website 74.85.13.52 01:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Miaicon.JPG

Non-free logo. Kelly 05:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 18:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vestfold_vapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - {NGW} not applicable - GijsvdL 16:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - Image was uploaded on 7 March 2005, i.e. at a time before the non-commercial clause. Egil 05:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wapen_doetinchem.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether NGW can legally make that call, since, I quote:

The depiction of a municipal seal is allowed: the municipality holds no rights of creation of the seal. There is also no objection against the use of a municipal seal for localising objects that are traded or that are being advertised, just as long it is ensured that no impression of municipal involvement or responsibility is created.

In view of Dutch legislation this image is regarded as being in the public domain, as are reproductions of this seal.

(text rendered bold by me)

The quote is taken from:

{{PD-NL-gemeentewapen}}

Thor NL 14:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploades prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 16:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Altenburg_coa.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploades prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 16:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wapenschild_Ronse.jpg

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - NGW not applicable - GijsvdL 16:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

therefore no source and no author -> DeleteKnorrepoes 11:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wapen_van_Barneveld.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether NGW can legally make that call, since, I quote:

The depiction of a municipal seal is allowed: the municipality holds no rights of creation of the seal. There is also no objection against the use of a municipal seal for localising objects that are traded or that are being advertised, just as long it is ensured that no impression of municipal involvement or responsibility is created.

In view of Dutch legislation this image is regarded as being in the public domain, as are reproductions of this seal.

(text rendered bold by me)

The quote is taken from:

Thor NL 14:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 16:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:WapenArnhem.jpg

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether NGW can legally make that call, since, I quote:

The depiction of a municipal seal is allowed: the municipality holds no rights of creation of the seal. There is also no objection against the use of a municipal seal for localising objects that are traded or that are being advertised, just as long it is ensured that no impression of municipal involvement or responsibility is created.

In view of Dutch legislation this image is regarded as being in the public domain, as are reproductions of this seal.

(text rendered bold by me)

The quote is taken from:

{{PD-NL-gemeentewapen}}

Thor NL 14:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 16:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wapen-Oost-Gelre.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - NGW was not applicable - GijsvdL 12:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Beemster_wapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Graft-De-Rijp_wapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gemeentewapenhuizen.gif

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zijpe_wapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Groenlo_wapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Aa_en_Hunze.jpg

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 10:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Aalburg.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 14:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Aalten.gif

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 14:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Achtkarspelen.jpg

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 14:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Coat_of_arms_of_Poortugaal.jpg

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 14:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:2072251217a6746412241l.jpg

I'm not seeing that this image is free. Patstuart (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom, out of project scope. --Herrick 13:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Anne_Hathaway_(Get_Smart).jpg

projector image; thus not self-created Patstuart (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Anne_Hathaway_(Get_Smart2).jpg

projector image; thus not self-created Patstuart (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:YeardlySmith.JPG

photo of a projector shot; not self-copyrighted Patstuart (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cindycraw00.jpg

Appear to be a copyright violation of http://www.askmen.com/women/models/9_cindy_crawford.html Addhoc 18:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Not only that, it's spooky looking. Surely someone can do better than this. 24.118.114.55 04:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I just nominated this too – the uploader at en, en:User:Lwuser2060, has since been indefinitely blocked for his persistent additions of copyrighted images – he goes to celebrity photo sites and picks out images to upload. This is one of them. KrakatoaKatie 20:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Smažená_kuřecí_prsa,_smažené_krevety_a_brambotová_kaše_(3).jpg

Image with no connestiont to article and very similar to:Image:Smažená kuřecí prsa, smažené krevety a brambotová kaše.jpg Karelj 21:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Any good reason for deletion. --Dezidor 21:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep No reason for deletion. --ŠJů 01:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Np--El torero 04:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:O'Connor,_Renee.jpg

Please check: On Flickr O'Connor URV-pics were given a free licence several times... Here again? Michael Reschke 22:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete We have many free photos of celebrities like this, taken by fans at conventions. But this Flickr user uploaded many images under a CC-by license that are clearly copyright violations, like this and other promo images. Doesn't seem like a trustworthy Flickr account. --88.134.141.133 11:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete = d*@&$!. We just indef banned the user from flickr (several times) for precisely this reason. Patstuart (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rossett_school_logo.jpg

The stated source website is copyrighted. No proof is shown that "the copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose." Rockfang 23:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

speedy delete and look at user's other uploads. --Simonxag 12:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 19:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TellFecheriyeSyrien.jpg

same image available: Image:TellFecheriyeSyria.jpg --Nopira 05:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Please use {{dupe}} next time. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 11:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Winterswijk_coa.gif

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether NGW can legally make that call, since, I quote:

The depiction of a municipal seal is allowed: the municipality holds no rights of creation of the seal. There is also no objection against the use of a municipal seal for localising objects that are traded or that are being advertised, just as long it is ensured that no impression of municipal involvement or responsibility is created.

In view of Dutch legislation this image is regarded as being in the public domain, as are reproductions of this seal.

(text rendered bold by me)

The quote is taken from:

This image depicts a coat of arms of a (former) Dutch governmental jurisdiction, municipality, province, water board (Dutch "Waterschap") or diocese. These coats of arms have been registered with the Hoge Raad van Adel [19], and are/were being used by the organisation to which the coat of arms was granted by Royal Decree (Dutch : Koninklijk Besluit). Every person is allowed to use the image of the arms, with some restrictions, see fragment below of the Ministerial Notice memo MinBiZa (Dutch).

Fragment from the memo: The depiction of a municipal coat of arms is allowed: the municipality holds no rights of creation of the coat of arms. There is also no objection against the use of a municipal coat of arms al for localising objects that are traded or that are being advertised, just as long it is ensured that no impression of municipal involvement or responsibility is created.

In view of Dutch legislation the use of the arms or reproductions thereof is regarded as being in the public domain. Everybody is allowed to make a drawing of the arms (on paper or electronically) in his/her own style based on the Royal Decree and claim it to be the arms of the municipality and uses it within the restrictions shown above. But there is copyright on each individual representation of the arms. This copyright lies with the artist that made that specific drawing based on the Royal Decree, not by the municipality.

English | Nederlands | +/−

Thor NL 14:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 16:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Enkhuizen_wapen.png

According to {{NGW}} non-commercial permitted only. GijsvdL 09:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I do not think that that tag applies. As can be seen on the web pages of the municipality itself [20], this coat of arms was not drawn by User:Knorrepoes himself, but rather was copied form another document, as is the picture on the municipality web site. Hence Knorrepoes holds no copyright whatsoever to this work. There remains the problem of what the real source then is, and whether its authors hold copyright to this particular drawing of the coat of arms. It is clear that the coat of arms as such is not copyrighted, since it is hundreds of years old (its present form was established in 1816), and this image clearly is a derivative work of that original coat of arms. Whether there is enough "originality" in the work for it to be copyrighted on its own, I do not know (IANAL and all that). Until that matter is cleared up, I would advise to

Delete this picture, not because of the NGW template, but because the actual source is unspecified. However, any Wikimedian wanting to redraw this coat of arms themselves can just upload that, I suppose. Pbech 12:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

If necessary, I have uploaded a makeshift alternative that is PD as it comes from a 1652 map (but it is not exactly the same as the present coat of arms): Image:Wapenvanenkhuizen.png. Pbech 12:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - uploaded prior to 2008-2-26 - GijsvdL 17:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I strongly disagree. This image is *not* the work of Knorrepoes, and no other source is specified. I have argued above that the template is in my opinion not applicable to this particular image. Pbech 08:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deferred - there is a mass deletion request covering this image here. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Getting_the_latch....jpg

Irrelevant, personal; Bad filename. Mintz l 08:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Just to point out the obvious for this one and the two following also by Mintz from the same source:

No, breast feeding (immediately following birth, or otherwise) is not irrelevant.
No, photographs put up on flickr for all the world to see (and redistribute) are not personal
No, the filenames are not bad

¦ Reisio 12:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep could be used in post-pregnancy articles, etc. Without evidence of someone abusing the Commons for hosting I see no reason to delete. gren 12:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Now_we_can_cry.jpg

Irrelevant, personal; Bad filename. Mintz l 09:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep could be used in post-pregnancy articles, etc. Without evidence of someone abusing the Commons for hosting I see no reason to delete. gren 11:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept per Reisio – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Breast_feeding_within_minutes.jpg

Irrelevant, personal; Bad filename. Mintz l 09:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Illustration of breastfeeding. Why would it be irrelevant? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep could be used in post-pregnancy articles, etc. Without evidence of someone abusing the Commons for hosting I see no reason to delete. gren 11:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept per Reisio – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Swedish_or_Irish_Blonde.jpg

no model release, the person was most likely photographed without her consent Polarlys 15:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment using {{personality rights}} wouldn't be enough? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

No. This template is no carte blanche to breach the personality rights of others. --Polarlys 20:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah you must be right...

Delete --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

OK! I agree on the reason for the deletion request. --Jacopo Werther 13:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep. According to the Commons:Photographs of identifiable people guideline "In the United States (where the Commons servers are located), assent is not as a rule required to photograph people in public places....the Commons community does not normally require that the subject of a photograph taken in a public place has consented to the image being taken or uploaded." This person is outside, so I'd say it's a public place, probably on a street. So as far as I can see it is irrelevant that she did not consent. Alun 17:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Change to delete as per Carl Lindberg. Image has no obvious utility for Wikimedia projects. Although the "no consent" argument is still irrelevant. Alun 05:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

In the European Union this is not “irrelevant”. --Polarlys 12:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

There's no EU harmonisation of privacy laws in place, so in some parts of the Union, it is irrelevant, and in others, it's not. To the best of my knowledge (I'm a Swede but not a lawyer), it's generally perfectly fine according to Swedish laws to publish a photograph of a person taken in a public place without their consent. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Personality rights and lack of model release would mean you could not use this photo for advertising, etc., but that is what the mentioned template is for. I'm not sure what the Swedish standards for privacy are though... apparently this was taken in Stockholm. It would not be a privacy issue in the U.S. though, as mentioned (I think the standard there is "expectation of privacy", where obviously there is none when walking on a public street). However... how could wikimedia projects use this photo, without knowing anything about the person? I say Delete due to Commons:Project scope. Carl Lindberg 13:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --Herrick 13:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted / The uploader also agrees. ----ßøuñçê Y2K 00:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Simon_Callow_Nov_2007.jpg

Release could not be granted by photographer, another image to be supplied in a day or two AshleyVH 10:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Zirland: In category Copyright violations; no license

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hans_Adolf_Krebs_1953.jpg

no indication for PD, not every content from this source is in the PD Polarlys 15:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I added complete source --Jacopo Werther 17:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I agree that it is really doubtful whether the image is PD. And note there are many more images from that source marked as PD. For instance, Image:Stanley Cohen-Biochemist.jpg or Image:Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins.jpg (see also e.g. Special:Linksearch/wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov) --Mormegil 10:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

My apologies! It is really not PD image. See http://wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov/copy.html. All images in Special:Linksearch/wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov are not PD and most probably are to be delete! --Jacopo Werther 12:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

From http://wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov/copy.html "Since the NLM does not own the copyright to the images, it is the responsibility of anyone using the database, or ordering reproductions based on information in it, to ensure that use of this material is in compliance with the U. S. Copyright law (Title 17, United States Code)." Compliance and freedom to use were not ensured. --Jacopo Werther 13:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry! I made another mistake! Many images in Special:Linksearch/wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov are in the public domain because its copyright has expired, but some have a bad template. --Jacopo Werther 18:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Zirland: In category Other speedy deletions; no license

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Putin24.jpg

Most likely derivative work. EugeneZelenko 15:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I made it a long time ago, and decided to upload it. —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Wil101 (talk • contribs)

The question is: did you take the picture yourself of did you just add some details on it? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I vote both —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Wil101 (talk • contribs)

??? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete The image looks to be useless and is not used on any Wikimedia project. --Kimse 23:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete --Александр Мотин 19:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete derivative work. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. →Christian .И 08:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Delorean.JPG

COM:SCOPE. Dodo 06:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sergio_leone.jpg

A lot of stuff from this flickr author is a copyvio - no indication this is PD Patstuart (talk) 18:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete indeed it's impossible to know when we can trust this Flickr user and when we can't. On the other hand artifacts seem to show it's a scan of a non-digital photo so it may be an old photo this user took. But how could we check that? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete If we know we can't trust a Flickr uploader's claims then the picture is effectively unlicensed. --Simonxag 12:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Andrea_Parodi.jpg

much stuff from this flickr author is a copyvio Patstuart (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete then the image must go. --Simonxag 12:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, dubious flickr uploader. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Colin_McRae_celebrate.jpg

flickr author with severe copyright issues Patstuart (talk) 18:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete as likely copy vio. Adambro 16:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SST_Patch.JPG

The “permission” states it clearly: “Non-free television screenshot”. The only reason why this could be kept, would be, if the patch is public domain in Japan, because of some Japanese law, or something. (In that case, this should be probably redrawn in SVG.) Mormegil 20:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

P.S. The same image (by the same uploader) has already been deleted as it had no license specified: Image:SST.JPG. --Mormegil 20:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Velva.jpg

Couldn't find the original image, but the watermark states it is copyrighted by Chanan. Maybe copied from http://www.chanan.com/. Fschoenm 22:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Íngrid_Betancourt_Bordeaux.JPG

Copyrighted photograph 88.65.95.238 22:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep, the image is part of the environment. Jean-Louis Lascoux 07:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

It's the central motive and there is no panorama freedom in France. --88.65.75.168 15:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

c'est quoi ce charlot de seervice [21] ?

Delete Here the subject of the photo is the poster, so the loophole to "no FOP in France" cannot apply. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Grand Central trial route map.JPG

I have uploaded a newer version at Image:Grand Central trial route map.png. I am also the author of the original image. --Simply south 13:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete For some reason this DR got "lost". I brought it back. Delete as superseded. --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 08:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 16:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Berlusca_FacciaCattiva.jpg

Flickr author appears to have a history of copyvios Patstuart (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

OK! I agree on the reason for the deletion request. --Jacopo Werther 12:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ChondromatoseCoudeCartilage2.jpg

No valid permission stated ...Forrester 12:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No permission from copyright holder. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tyranozaur.png

Copyright violation (tracing) of this artwork made for Jurassic Park: [22]

Can also be seen here:[23]

See also this scaled down version, which is likewise a copyright violation: [24] FunkMonk 08:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 19:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Escudo_Agolada.jpg

Scanned coat. It seems a copyvio to me. Dodo 07:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, unless Spain has something like {{PD-NL-gemeentewapen}}, it's a copyvio. Kameraad Pjotr 17:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Frederick_Reines_-_neutrino.jpg

no indication for PD Polarlys 15:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This appears on a Fermilab website, but there is no indication of PD status as we have no idea who took the photo. It cannot be assumed that all images appearing on this website are, simply by that fact, PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Jerry_Friedman_-_quarks.jpg

no indication for PD Polarlys 15:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This appears on a Fermilab website, but there is no indication of PD status as we have no idea who took the photo. It cannot be assumed that all images appearing on this website are, simply by that fact, PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Richard_Taylor_-_quarks.jpg

no indication for PD, not every content from this source is in the PD Polarlys 15:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This appears on a Fermilab website, but there is no indication of PD status as we have no idea who took the photo. It cannot be assumed that all images appearing on this website are, simply by that fact, PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Leon_Lederman_-_muon_neutrino_-_b_quark.jpg

no indication for PD, not every content from this source is in the PD Polarlys 15:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This appears on a Fermilab website, but there is no indication of PD status as we have no idea who took the photo. It cannot be assumed that all images appearing on this website are, simply by that fact, PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC) MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Jack_Steinberger_-_muon_neutrino.jpg

no indication for PD, not every content from this source is in the PD Polarlys 15:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This appears on a Fermilab website, but there is no indication of PD status as we have no idea who took the photo. It cannot be assumed that all images appearing on this website are, simply by that fact, PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mieszko.jpeg

this image was taken from my site www.poczet.com without my permission! Original picture of S. Wyspianski has different colours, borders etc. - this picture is remake made by me! 83.238.236.179 21:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Jeśli tak to przepraszam. Nie wiedziałem, że to było zmienianie. Czy można znaleźć prawdziwy obraz w internecie ??? --Mareczko 18:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted / A.J. (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Großergott.ogg

No source specified. No evidence for the uploader's claim that he's the copyright holder. --kh80 17:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Siegfried_eiger.jpg

PD-old not assured.Code·is·poetry 19:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Image is from 1930. Probably not PD. --Simonxag 12:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Please keep this Image. It´s a work of the swiss federal ministry from 1930. 217.246.108.83 21:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that anonymous information, but we do need some source or other evidence that this is so. --Simonxag 14:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

You can read it on this pages: fr:Carte Siegfried or de:Siegfriedkarte. 217.246.111.50 12:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I scanned it direcly from the original map, published in 1930. It was published by the Swiss Federal Office of Topography and isn't attributed to an author, therefore, the 70 year time limit has expired. --Zumbo 16:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Is there a special clause for pseudonymous works in US? Code·is·poetry 18:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Since it wasn't first published in the US, it doesn't matter. The US considers it PD if (and only if) Switzerland considered in PD in 1996. Quadell (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep According to Commons:Licensing#Switzerland, "If authorship is unknown, copyright lasts for 70 years after the first publication." The fact that a Swiss Government Agency published it without attribution strongly indicates that the author is unknown. Quadell (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep Really seems to work since a swiss governement office should give us valid information... Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment And what's that text in the bottom right of this image of the full 1:50'000 map? And, Quadell, the first publication of this sheet dates to 1930. The earliest version of this sheet is from 1870, though. So, what applies? Lupo 14:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment Actually, they do give the authors: Aufnahme: Jacky, Schnyder, Anselmier ; Lith. R. Leuzinger. Anselmier is Jules Anselmier (1815-1895), Jacky is Wilhelm August Gottlieb Jacky-Tayler (1833–1915, active already 1858), Schnyder is one Fr. Schnyder (active already 1859), and R. Leuzinger is Rudolf Leuzinger (1826 - 1896). It appears these author indications all apply to the original 1870 publication. Anyway, Leuzinger was the one who drew this map, the others were the people doing the survey. Subsequent changes in Leuzinger's map since 1870 were minor. Lupo 15:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Quadell (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Photos of Finnish decorations uploaded by User:Kwasura

Kwasura has downloaded a number of photos from the webpages of Finnish Orders of merit. Part of these, the photos of the decorations of the Order of Cross of Freedom, were deleted. This request covers the rest of the photos.

In this case, the rationale for deletion is the same as previously: the photographs themselves are copyrighted and the owner of the copyrights, the Orders of the White Rose of Finland and the Lion of Finland, has not released the photos under suitable licence. The objects of the photos are, however, PD, but unfortunately, this does not make the photo non-copyrightable. Thus, the file should be deleted as soon as possible. This request encompasses the following files

*Image:Popup SVR SR ketju.jpg

--MPorciusCato 12:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Correcting myself: File:Popup SVR SR ketju.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel) is not a photo but a drawing. As a faithful reproduction, it entails no creativity, and does not merit copyright in itself according to Finnish law. (It is also likely that the Order does not currently have the chain depicted in the image for a photograph, as this decoration is only carried by heads of state. Thus, the file is in PD, and I remove it from the deletion request. --MPorciusCato 12:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyright violations. Kameraad Pjotr 17:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of E231

Right of publicity vios.

Image:CIMG0605.JPG - ja:Image:CIMG09605.JPG was the same image as this.
Image:CIMG0606.JPG - ja:Image:CIMG09606.JPG was the same image as this.
Image:CIMG0611.JPG - ja:Image:CIMG09611.JPG was the same image as this.

Copyright vio.

Image:CIMG0187.JPG - ja:Image:CIMG09187.JPG was the same image.

The same images as these on jawp was deleted by deletion requests on ja ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/E231-800による駅構内画像. Probably commons:User:南保晃佑 (talk · contributions) (he/she is writing to the column of Author as E231) and ja:User:E231-800 (image contribs) are the persons same. --Vantey 15:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

What does "Right of publicity vios" mean - are you talking about {{personality rights}}? — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 15:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Yea. --Vantey (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep Okay, Image:CIMG0605.JPG, Image:CIMG0606.JPG, and Image:CIMG0611.JPG are not the same image. They are images of locations, with many people visible (but blurry) in the shot. I don't believe the people are individually identifiable, and I don't think there are "personality rights" issues here. Quadell (talk) 12:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment About CIMG0605, CIMG0606, and CIMG0611, I have said, "They are the same as the images deleted in ja", not "these 3 are same". Although it seems that you do not have the admin authority of jawp, do you have the authority to brouse the contents deleted in jawp?
  In ja, since "Individuals can specify when they indicate by full size, and they infringed on portrait rights" was judged, these were deleted. --Vantey (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Character of the images won't change if you remove a person. I don't see a creative effort in listing undergroundstations and connecting them with a line. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep People photographed as a crowd in a public place, I don't see the argument that this is covered by personality rights. TimVickers (talk) 02:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Kept. OK per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. Image:CIMG0187.JPG is a very simple design. --22:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)MichaelMaggs (talk)

[edit] April 8

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Graybirdgrasshopper-Schistocerca- nitens.jpg.jpg

Fuzzy little cell pic replaced by Image:Graybirdgrasshoppervertical.JPG and Image:Graybirdgrasshopperhorizontal.JPG --Jengod 18:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. giggy _(:O) 09:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Salle_de_séjour_circa_2000.jpg

Author requested deletion on my talk page; no real use for project, and it seems the sensible and polite thing to do. Patstuart (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 21:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fblogoshirt2.jpg

Using a camera and taking close-up photo of a registered logo does not make it free I guess. 78.163.244.6 09:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete as per nominator.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 10:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cine-Mende-4.JPG

Derivative work TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete And no FOP in France. --Simonxag 12:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cine-Mende-1.JPG

Derivative work TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete pre nom. No FOP in France. --Simonxag 12:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Or we could blur the poster since the goal of this picture is to show the advertising equipment. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)--TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you make it ? I could make it, but i'm not a pro in the photo industry ... Stef48 11:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm doing it : Image:Cine-Mende-1bis.jpg, is-it ok ? Stef48 12:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Churches in Valladolid

Unused "duplicate" of Category:Churches of Valladolid. --Túrelio 10:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, agree with Túrelio (talk • contribs), empty unused cat. Cirt 12:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:GIMP-GEGL-GTK+-hackfest.png

the flickr image used as example is cc-by-nc-sa. But possibly doesnt apply here. -- -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 10:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete CC-BY-SA-NC does apply here and makes the screenshot non-free, see Commons:Screenshots. Furthermore: GIMP is GPL, not GFDL so all license tags are pretty wrong. --Matt 06:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

A note though, if the screenshot had not been documented there is a good chance that it would not have ended up here under review. I had a deletion suggestion in which a .org web site had claimed that an image was PD-USGov; it is tempting to consider recreating this situation but without the honest documentation and use a .org site to validate its license in a similar situation. Review mechanisms are quite hacked I think and it seems that only the honest get the scrutiny. -- (and you are welcome for anything I did to keep it easy for you) carol 07:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Carol. This is only rarely about personal criticism and your honesty and work is appreciated! I've uploaded a few copyright violations (with the help of Flickr and the Wikipedia PD-US tag) so I know people who spot problems are only helping. --Simonxag 14:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

No personal criticism was taken! The point is that this image will be gone and the other image(s) persist -- making this voting for breech of license seem (to me -- and I might very well be wrong here) like well, I don't know what it is like but it doesn't seem to be effective at the real accomplishment of goals. And no personal criticism was intentionally delivered in this 'seems like to me' summary of mine. Also, is there a suggested image to use to display the new software that is featured in the screenshot? Perhaps Dave Neary, as he is actively campaigning to get funding for their next meeting and they write hateful things about him on their web site. I have images also.... -- carol 02:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 17:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:JanetJackson.jpg

doubtful that flickr user took this image - it's web-resolution, with a border, and the user's flickr stream is questionable and includes things like screen/promo shots of harrison ford as indiana jones 151.199.31.179 11:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete the user adds pictures from random websites to his flickr set.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 17:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete - bad licenses: see [25] and [26].

Also - all images listed at [27] Patstuart (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Agree with Fernando Estel (talk • contribs). Cirt 12:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted again as File:Janet Jackson 20090117.jpg which was uploaded soley for the en.wiki mainpage today. If someone knows how to close or relicense this flickr account do so, he already causes so much work here. --Martin H. (talk) 17:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vlada1.jpg

Source is nonsense --Veliki Kategorizator 12:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Not the uploader's own work. MichaelMaggs 21:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sport-blue-front.jpg

There is no credible permission to use images from Go-Ped® Media under GFDL. Their Trademark, Copyright, Patent Information states clearly: “These materials may not be copied for commercial use or distribution, nor may these materials be modified or reposted to other sites.” Mormegil 12:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Delete per Mormegil (talk • contribs), agree w/ nom, quoted statement is unambiguous. Cirt 12:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Obvious derative work. abf /talk to me/ 14:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Rivers in Vorarlberg

Unused "duplicate" of Category:Rivers of Vorarlberg. --Túrelio 13:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete, agree with Túrelio (talk • contribs), empty unused cat. Cirt 12:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:200832010514566440.jpg

This picture is not under CC-BY but copyrighted according to the source. --Applebee 13:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 19:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Illegitimacy_1of3.jpg

This image does not go according to our policies due to an inappropriate subject of the image and a violation of personality rights. Svens Welt 14:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deleted as an attack image. It is also unacceptable under Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. --MichaelMaggs 17:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by MichaelMaggs Finn Rindahl 17:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Illegitimacy_2of3.jpg

This image does not work according to our policies due to an inappropriate subject of the image and a violation of personality rights. Svens Welt 14:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deleted as an attack image. It is also unacceptable under Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. --MichaelMaggs 17:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Illegitimacy_3of3.jpg

This image does not work according to our policies due to an inappropriate subject of the image and a violation of personality rights. Svens Welt 14:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Due to the seriousness of personality rights violation in this case, I put a speedydeletion tag on the image. -- Túrelio 15:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deleted as an attack image. It is also unacceptable under Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. --MichaelMaggs 17:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. by user:MichaelMaggs Finn Rindahl 17:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tiergaertnertor.JPG

not to use 78.51.129.146 14:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Extremely poor quality and wrong filename: It does not show the Tiergärtnertor, but the Neutor --Gnu1742 15:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

deleted Julo 17:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Underbelly_Website.jpg

This image is clearly a screenshot of a copyrighted web site, and includes a copyrighted program logo and screenshot. The fact that it was wrongly uploaded to Flickr is beside the point. Mark 15:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Emil_bartoschek_bild.jpg

Emil Bartoschek died in 1969, his works are still copyrighted 88.65.115.113 18:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete --GeorgHH • talk 17:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Emil_bartoschek_bild2.jpg

Emil Bartoschek died in 1969, his works are still copyrighted 88.65.115.113 18:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete --GeorgHH • talk 17:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vestuario_artesanal_em_algodao_bordado.jpg

Copyvio from http://www.douropreto.com/PT/Blazers_Camisetes_Bordados_mao_Hand_embroidery.html (this image is one that repeatedly appears in a box towards the top of the page) MichaelMaggs 21:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Plain copyfraud. -N 00:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Agree w/ N (talk • contribs), blatant copyvio. Cirt 12:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 14:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:AhGill_standalone2007_edit1.jpg

And also for: Image:AhSa standalone2007 edit1.jpg

I could not find it in the set, but all the images by that user are by-nc-sa, NOT valid -- -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 09:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 12:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep both images have been sourced under "alternate versions" and were uploaded and the bot clearly showed they were properly licensed. It would be best to mark them {{flickr-change-of-license}}. Patstuart (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

You are right. I didn't notice that link. Please, Close request & Keep. -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 21:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The result was keep. Patstuart (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

To prevent any real or perceived COI issues, I endorse this closure. giggy _(:O) 01:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Einsatzgruppen-Killingfull.jpg

Of course this picture should be kept. Who is the nazi using copyright excuses to take it off? Is it the owner of the picture? --67.68.235.178

keep this picture the us has its own camp and is torturing people there , prehaps this photo is the future of those in cuba or abu graib

USHMM does not have authority to release Nazi photos as public domain. Library of Congress page states, "Rights status not evaluated." Possibly may be PD-US, but doesn't belong on Commons. howcheng {chat} 20:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

this is nitpicking to the extreme. I object to this deletion. Who's rights are we defending here? 80.230.38.55 12:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This is not a private Nazi photo, but the photo of a murdered man's last breath, a Jewish man, "the last Jew in Vinnitsa." Though the photo may have been captured by a Nazi photographer, it is a world event, a tragedy, an image that belongs to the archives of humanity.

Thus, I vehemently object to the deletion of this photo which would be the removal of evidence of this man's murder and the the extermination of his community. What if it was your face or your father's face captured drawing his last breath as he perches above the grave of his family and community? Having brought this crime to light, it must remain in the light to remind us all of Holocaust... lest it be repeated yet again. On behalf on this man and his murdered community, and for our children, let this reminder remain! - 21:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Theres no GOOD reason for this picture to be deleted. People are complaining over 'Copyright" laws and etc., but is it safe to say that this is the real reason? Delete this picture and you're blocking another piece of history to be shown on one of the most popular Internet Encyclopedias on the Web. And while you're at it, you might as well knock down the statue of liberty. - SPR. 9:54 PM, 2 May 2008 (UC)

Has been used extensively throughout various forms of media without objection. Nevermind the vast historical value.

In fact I would like that this request be speedily removed. Why scroll down the page on its page on Wikipedia. It is claimed under a creative commons liscense

Delete per en:Image:Einsatzgruppen Killing.jpg and its talk page there. Lupo 22:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Please avoid copyright paranoia. This image is universally published, and it is indispensable for the understanding of the activities of the German Einsatzgruppen. Torvindus 04:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Its value is not in question, only its status. to be hosted on Commons, it must be PD in both the US and its home country (or country of first publication). There is no information on its publication status, so for the time being we'll have to assume the home country is Germany (being as that it's a Nazi photo). Germany has a 70 year pma rule, so there's no way it qualifies there. howcheng {chat} 16:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep should not be deleted, as mentioned. This picture is at least PD-Russia.--Pelex 12:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Torvindus. 169.237.10.220 01:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep As per previous. 212.139.111.122 15:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion why ??? This is an historic picture. What are they affraid of ?? Please read Primo Levi and the memory of the camps. We must educated our children for no more events like this. To hell with the negacionists !!!!!!

Keep No one claims copyright on this picture. Baronnet 17:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Prove it. Show me some evidence that says this is public domain in Germany. howcheng {chat} 16:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep These photos should not be deleted! it is the proof, the evidence of something as horrid as the holocaust. "For the dead and the living we must bare witness". There is no evidence showing these pictures to be of Nazy ownership, these photos should be used to cause awareness, to show the younger generations, so that it will never happen again. It is crucial!!!(UTC)
- Please understand Commons policies. The image is not being deleted from all of Wikimedia's servers. It is public domain in the United States and still lives on the English Wikipedia. However, due to Commons policy of requiring free status in both the US and the work's home country, regretfully it can't stay here. howcheng {chat} 23:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep To quote Copyright Attorney from Commons:Deletion requests/US holocaust memorial museum images: "Per the Berne Convention and the World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty, these images are in the public domain, because as a matter of law a copyright can only be asserted when the creator is identified. Courts in both Europe and the United States have repeatedly held that anonymous Holocaust images like this are not subject to copyright and are therefore in the public domain. For a very specific and detailed discussion of this issue, see Photographing the Holocaust: Interpretations of the Evidence, by Janina Struk, wherein she explains, in lay terms, how anonymous Holocaust images of this sort are in the public domain. As well, international law has, for more than sixty years, voided all copyrights to photographs made by the Axis powers in the 1933-1945 period." --Jarekt 02:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Copyright Attorney apparently is not aware of the Copyright Act of 1976 which explicitly creates copyrights for anonymous works. Yes, this is U.S. law but are you going to tell me that other countries don't have something similar? howcheng {chat} 04:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I think all Copyright Attorney was saying is that "anonymous Holocaust images" were considered PD by courts of most countries, he was not talking about anonymous images in general. However I feel like I should look up the book he mention to read this analysis first-handed. --Jarekt 12:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Keep it. Nobody should censor history, unless they are planning to repeat it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DocJ (talk • contribs) 10:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC) (UTC)
- We have principles or we don't. We do not ignore our basic mission for the sake of any work, no matter how valuable it is. howcheng {chat} 04:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Its wrong to delete things like this, we can't just shuffle things like this under the rug, to fully accept the past i belive we nned to see things like this and let it sink in. KEEP IT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.187.124 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC) (UTC)

Keep nobody has claimed copyright. This image is by no means uncommon, appearing, for example, in many published textbooks. 69.6.102.196 21:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Its on en.WP. Commons:Licensing#Interaction_of_United_States_copyright_law_and_foreign_copyright_law Specifically states: Uploads of non-U.S. works are allowed only if the work is covered by a free license valid in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work, or if it is in the public domain in both countries. Unless someone can prove this image has been PD'd in Germany - we must assume that is still copyright under THEIR laws. --ShakataGaNai 04:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Info: In case of anonymous photographers the country of origin is the country where the photo was first published. See Berne Covention Art. 5. [28] "The country of origin shall be considered to be: (a) in the case of works first published in a country of the Union, that country". I have no idea who published this photograph first but likely it was not Germany. --Jarekt 12:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep The desire to delete this photo is a bit strange. First of all, if someone in Germany does hold the copyright, which is rather doubtful, it is 100% certain that they would never prosecute over a photo like this or even have the chance of being successful if they tried. Secondly, Germany would never challenge the USHMM's claim that it's on the public domain for political reasons. There is absolutely no fear of a lawsuit, which is the purpose of these regulations, so if it's not on the public domain de jure, it most certainly is de facto. I know that the commons has standards, but I feel that this is an important exception given the practical legal situation as regards this case. Djlayton4 23:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

And as Jarekt mentions, it is highly doubtful that this photo was published in Germany, and it was known to be taken in the Ukraine. Djlayton4 23:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

No, the reason for this is NOT a cover-our-asses against lawsuits thing, but the basic mission of Wikimedia Commons. We don't make exceptions! howcheng {chat} 23:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep There is nothing strange about some people's (i call them nazis and nazi sympathisers) desire to delete this photo and many like it which testify to the true barbarism of nazi Germany. it speaks of a hidden agenda in them to have the world forget the murders done by German citizens during WWII. keep this photo if just to irritate these nazis among us! there is no legal reason to delete it, there is only the desire in them to repeat the murders all over again. never again.

This last comment by 208.127.166.210 is totally out of line here. The deletion request and votes are not made by "nazis" or "nazi sympathizers" but about fellow users concerned about legal status of those photos. Wiki Commons has its rules and we need to work within those rules and we need people ensuring that we do. What we do not need is anonymous accusations and name calling. In general, I find most of the arguments, explaining their "keep" votes by desire to keep this highly emotional photo, not very productive. It would be much more useful if those users did some research of this photo or related laws. --Jarekt 13:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep This is actually public domain in Germany and thus, by extension, internationally under the Berne Convention. According to § 5 Abs. 1 of the German Copyright statutes, all works of the government are considered to be public domain and, since the Federal Republic is the copyright successor of the "Third Reich", this photograph is explicitly in the public domain in Germany. This is irrespective of whether the Library of Congress or Holocaust Memorial Museum considers it to be public domain. It is also certainly in the public interest for historical purposes to be kept. --NicholasTurnbull 21:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- You are incorrect. According to {{PD-GermanGov}}, § 5 Abs.1 UrhG only puts items that are part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German federal or state authority or court into the public domain. howcheng {chat} 16:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Although moral principles are not what is to be disputed here but rather copyright law and what denotes legal usage, it certainly illustrates the graphic nature of the Einsatzgruppen. It would also appear that the referenced laws for the photograph outweigh the ones against it. Twohundredtwenty 08:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Question: Can someone find external support for NicholasTurnbull's argument: This is actually public domain in Germany and thus, by extension, internationally under the Berne Convention. According to § 5 Abs. 1 of the German Copyright statutes, all works of the government are considered to be public domain and, since the Federal Republic is the copyright successor of the "Third Reich", this photograph is explicitly in the public domain in Germany. This is irrespective of whether the Library of Congress or Holocaust Memorial Museum considers it to be public domain. --Anthony5429 15:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- See explanation above. howcheng {chat} 16:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Anthony5429, you can just google it. Website http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/UrhG.htm#5 contains:

Article 5: Official Works

(1) Laws, ordinances, official decrees and notices as also decisions and official grounds of decisions shall not enjoy copyright protection.

(2) The same shall apply to other official works published in the official interest for public information, with the condition that the provisions of Article 62(1) to (3) and Article 63(1) and (2) concerning prohibited alterations and acknowledgment of sources shall apply mutatis mutandis.

As I read it, howcheng is right: {{PD-GermanGov}} does not apply to this image. --Jarekt 17:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete as per replies to my question directly above this. I am no antisemitic Nazi; I certainly respect the educational value of this photograph and wish we could keep it on the Commons. Unfortunately, that violates the Commons' rules. It should be noted, thankfully, that the image can stay on the English Wikipedia. --Anthony5429 11:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This may appear to be a completely counter-consensual action, if you call a zerg rush of meaningless arguments "consensus". But it's not. Although other sensible commentators have made these observations, here's a response to the comments in favour of keeping it:

"nobody has claimed copyright", also known as "it is 100% certain that they would never prosecute over a photo like this or even have the chance of being successful if they tried": Wrong. There's no reason the descendants of the photographer would not prosecute over this if they were found. There's also no reason they would not win in court. Stranger things have happened. But this isn't the point. We're a repository of freely-licensed media, not of "images you can probably get away with using".
"There is nothing strange about some people's (i call them nazis and nazi sympathisers) desire to delete this photo and many like it": I am not a Nazi sympathiser by any means. I'm also not (say) a Jessica Alba hater because I'd delete any copyvio photos of her that showed up.
"all works of the [German] government are considered to be public domain": Not so. Only works that are part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment are.
"Please avoid copyright paranoia": A way of saying "let's ignore copyright when we want something bad enough". Bollocks to that.
"Delete this picture and you're blocking another piece of history" and related arguments: Mostly the same as the above. Yes, this picture has huge historical value. Yes, it would be a huge shame if every copy in the world were eliminated. This isn't going to happen; it won't even disappear from Wikimedia, because you can certainly make a fair-use claim on the English Wikipedia.

The reason for deletion is simple and irrefutable: It's still under copyright in the country of origin. Wanting the image on Commons badly enough will not change that, and it won't change our policies on the matter, which are very clear. If you don't like our policies, get them changed. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zug_der_Erinnerung_20080407-DSCF0474.jpg

contains non-free content dvdb 18:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Who claims that? -- Arne List 20:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The picture is copyrighted and not from the photographer --Jodo 15:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The picture is a document of the Holocaust. This girl was killed by the Nazis -- Arne List 17:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Historical documents are also copyrighted. --Jodo 14:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Are you talking about the picture itself, or the text and the image of the girl on the picture? --Church of emacs 08:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The reproduction "picture itself" is ok, the text is no problem too, because it can not be read. But the picture of the girl is a problem from my point of view. --Jodo 11:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio of the text underneath the image, at the very least (which of course can be read), and possibly also the image itself. MichaelMaggs 20:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Beautiful Redy.jpg

Likely copyright violation by suspect user. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Pirat --Optigan13 23:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately.A deletion reason is too unsuitable! Oneself photographed this, and it is a complete original work. I want you to post reliable evidence that I copyvio!--Pirat 14:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Too many concerns about this user (see previous deletions) MichaelMaggs 19:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Brassiere2007.jpg

Likely copyright violation by suspect user. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Pirat --Optigan13 23:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep immediately.A deletion reason is too unsuitable! Oneself photographed this, and it is a complete original work. I want you to post clear evidence that I violate!--Pirat 14:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Too many concerns about this user (see previous deletions) MichaelMaggs 19:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Onkel_August.jpg

August Oppenberg died in 1971, his works are still protected. There is no evidence that the user Vonveen represents his heirs or has a right to release the image into the public domain. 88.65.115.113 18:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This would need evidence, supplied to OTRS, that the copyright in the image passed to the uploader after his death, eg in his will. It's not enough simply to say this is a family picture. MichaelMaggs 07:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bakterie swe 290507.png

Inaccurate (the mesosome is not real but a result of fixation, and there is a wierd red layer)--81.235.186.15 21:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Commons does not adjudicate on content if an image is in use. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Beichte.JPG

Karl Clobes' works are copyrighted and there is no panorama freedom inside buildings in Germany 88.65.115.113 18:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by MichaelMaggs: per Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Beichte.JPG

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:629056811_0147edf6ee.jpg

According to the original uploader (Elred on the English Wikipedia), the copyright owner changed his mind about sharing this image. See my Wikipedia talk page for more information. —Wordbuilder 20:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep - If the owner released it, then it's fair game. You cannot recall it once it's been released. 64.71.125.49 07:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment. It's a bit shaky, though. The owner agreed to let Elred use it but changed his mind before ever officially documenting the release with either Wikipedia or Commons. So, if anyone challenges, there's no proof of the release in OTRS. →Wordbuilder 15:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Since there's no OTRS evidence or otherwise. The image isn't used anywhere and replaceable. Badseed ^talk 06:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Priesterweihe.JPG

Karl Clobes' works are copyrighted and there is no panorama freedom inside buildings in Germany 88.65.115.113 18:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Badseed ^talk 02:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Burte-Tagbuech.jpg

Hermann Burte died in 1960, his texts are still copyrighted 88.65.115.113 18:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The copyright-holder of the works of Hermann Burte is the Hermann-Burte-Gesellschaft. User Albärt (= Harald Noth) has been allowed in 26. 10. 2007 by Hermann-Burte-Gesellschaft to publish this image under GNU-FDL. --Albärt 12:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Has the permission been filed with COM:OTRS? --rimshot^talk 12:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Permission is not documented. (nothing at OTRS) Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 17:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Die_Föhre.jpg

Copyrighted artwork by Eitel Klein, who died in 1990 88.65.115.113 18:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ich habe dieses Bild bei der Übergabe des Gedenksteines von Eitel Klein am 6. Augsut 2006 selbst fotografiert. Die Tochter des Malers Eitel Klein, Susanne Klein, hatte dieses Bild bei der Übergabe dabei und präsentierte es in einer kleinen öffentlichen Ausstellung. Es ist also eine selbstgefertigte Fotografie des Originalbildes. Wenn meine Fotografie auf Grund des Urheberrechts gelöscht werden muss - ich kann es dann nicht ändern..... --Mef.ellingen 16:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Derivative work. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Egmont_Schäfer_1998.jpg

"Die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung in Wikipedia liegt vor" - License was only given for use in Wikipedia 88.65.115.113 18:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ich habe heute ein neues Bild, in Farbe, mit Einvesrtändnis der Fotografin eingestellt. Dieses kann gelöscht werden. Wer hilft mir dabei ? -- SpreeTom 10:33, 27. Apr. 2008 (CEST)

Deleted. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Scorepex.jpg

a guy who tried to get some attention in de:Wikipedia, not even a glimpse of possible relevance for any wiki project, very poor quality too... -- Andy king50 20:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ich verwende das Foto aber jetzt auch nur mehr für die Spielwiese! Ist das nicht erlaubt? -- Scorepex 23:58, 8 April 2008

Deleted. Outside of scope, page deleted at german wikipedia for the same reason. Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 18:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Alfred Holler

File:Alfred Holler Kronenburg.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Holler Eupen Kettenis.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Alfred Holler Cable.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Alfred Holler Cable1.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

Alfred Holler died in 1954, his works are still protected by copyright 88.65.115.113 17:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

True, Deleted. Badseed ^talk 06:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 9

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lenry.JPG

Vandalism Addhoc 00:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

out of scope, deleted Julo 07:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:M-67handgrenade.jpg

Image:M-67handgrenade.jpg is a duplicata of Image:M-67Grenade.jpg.
Tachymètre ✉ 10:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Please use {{dupe}} next time. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hunt_seat_2.jpeg

the original flickr source is unavailable, so we cant check the licence. But all the pictures by that user are all rights reserved. Unlikely that one was different. -- -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 17:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

06:33, April 11, 2008 ABF (Talk | contribs | Block) deleted "Image:Hunt seat 2.jpeg" ‎ (Deleted because "Was in Category:Unknown as of 1 April 2008; still missing essential information". using TW) (restore)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Thessaloniki_Surrender_1912.jpg

Copyvio. This is a lithography by Sotirios Christidis (1858 – 1940), signature is visible at down-right corner and publication data on down-left corner. Geraki ^T_L^G 01:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Map of Amsterdam Metro.jpg

I made this map first on JPG-type. But now i see, i must use PNG. So i set the PNG type and upload the .png image here on Commons. Now it is double with this old .jpg version. Delete please Map of Amsterdam Metro.jpg. (Sorry for my bad English, i speak more Dutch then English) TahR78 08:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Unused duplicate of Image:Map of Amsterdam Metro.png, some jpg compression artifacts, too. rimshot^talk 14:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DSC00307.JPG

Not usable for any project: bad name, no description, poor quality, unused. GeorgHH • talk 10:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Out of scope. --rimshot^talk 14:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, not useful. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MalinaH.jpg

no license given --Ricky81682 (talk) 06:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry. It is possible to delete the picture. Nmate

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:GeoWashingtonstatue,_detroit.jpg

This seems to be a statue by Donald De Lue (died 1988) in the US. There is no Freedom of panorama for artworks in this country. Patrícia ^msg 14:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep The site is a National Historic Site. I'd like to know who commissioned the statue. If it was the federal government the statue would be PD. Evrik 20:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The inscription reads:

George Washington - The Father of this country
First President Of The United States
First In War
First In Peace
First In The Hearts Of His Countrymen

Keep (without discussion, please) Mutter Erde 20:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. This is a statue on private property, by a recently-living sculptor. "National Historic Site" designation does not mean something is U.S. government property. Comment on above: "I'd like to know who commissioned the statue. If it was the federal government the statue would be PD." Not necessarily, the U.S. federal government can own copyrights that are transfered to it, but it cannot create copywrited works so it would depend on exactly how it was commissioned. However, there is no indication of federal involvement at all in this case. Rmhermen 01:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The government may own the physical statue but no evidence has been presented that the artistic copyright has been assigned by the artist. Copyright would in the normal course of things remain with the sculpter, whoever commissioned it, and it's not enough to assume that just because the government is involved that it will have acquired the copyright. MichaelMaggs 21:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Boy_Scout_Memorial-27527.jpg

This seems to be a statue by Donald De Lue (died 1988) in the US. There is no Freedom of panorama for artworks in this country. Patrícia ^msg 14:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't consider pedantic debates of vague, incoherent, contradictory, and badly-written copyright laws to be a productive use of the time I have available for contributing to Commons - and I'm not particularly attached to the photo in any way, so if you wish to delete it, please feel free to do so without any strong objections from me. In fact, the only reason I uploaded that image in the first place was to replace a much lower-quality image of the same subject that had been used to illustrate three specific Wikipedia articles for two years. However, the deletion warning on my talk page specifically requested my opinion, so I would say that the artist sold the work and all relevant rights to the US federal government in 1963, that the sculpture in question is the solely-owned property of the US federal government, that it sits on land owned and managed by the US National Park Service, and therefore is presumed to be public domain unless proven otherwise. - Ken Thomas 15:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

It is not up to us to judge whether the laws that exist are pedantic, incoherent or badly-written. They are, nevertheless, sometimes vague, I agree with that. They do exist however, and I followed their rationale in proposing the picture for deletion. You may wish to upload it at en.wikipedia under a fair use rationale; or explain that part of "the artist sold the work and all relevant rights to the US federal government in 1963", making it public domain. I am unaware of this, and your explanation about that point in particular can help us avoiding future deletion requests of the same image, for the same reasons. Patrícia ^msg 17:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I didn't mean

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Contents

[edit] April 1

[edit] Image:Orasmaa.jpg

[edit] Image:Margarita_Esther_Zavala.png

[edit] Image:RR_380.gif

[edit] Image:RR_200.gif

[edit] Image:RR_076.gif

[edit] Image:RR_062.png

[edit] Category:Rivers in Sisak

[edit] Image:Tom Chilton 2006 Vauxhall.jpg

[edit] Image:Starircasehouse.JPG

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

[edit] Image:Techconsult logo.jpg

[edit] Image:Alex Pato.jpg

[edit] Image:Kali cropped.jpg

[edit] Image:Kali (demon).jpg

[edit] Image:SeoulJinhwa.JPG

[edit] Image:BT_Passformpruefung_Mann_72_691.jpg

[edit] Image:Circle_game_at_beach_edit_rmb.jpg

[edit] Image:Larix_polonica_-_cone.jpg

[edit] Image:Johanna_Tukiainen.png

[edit] Image:Pilatus_PC-6_SkydiveLillo_JD18032008_edit.jpg

[edit] Image:Britannia 18 back.jpg

[edit] Image:07_bayly_3.jpg

[edit] Image:Raimon.jpg

[edit] Image:Euston tube station layout.png

[edit] Image:Buckelzikade_(Bocydium_globulare),Modell_-_Mutter_Erde_fec.jpg

[edit] Category:Blue porcelain

[edit] Image:Nkwd335.jpg

[edit] Image:HSK_Kormoran_(AWM_053867).jpg

[edit] Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg

[edit] Image:2007-12-08_Selbstgemachtes.jpg

[edit] Image:Zentai BDSM.jpg

[edit] April 2

[edit] Image:Ducks on Cam 2008-04-01.jpg

[edit] Template:Link FA

[edit] Image:125th_Street_Harlem2.jpg

[edit] Image:Alphonse_de_Lamartine_20061231.jpg

[edit] Image:Image-Amsterdam_Bloemenmarkt_4.JPG

[edit] Image:Absolute_Orangerie_01.jpg

[edit] Image:Tracés_des_ponts_de_Jargeau_Loiret_zoom_2.svg

[edit] Image:Mapa maquis.PNG

[edit] Image:Mapa maquis2.PNG

[edit] Image:Maqui map.png

[edit] Image:Fr-tabloid-alt002.jpg

[edit] Image:Tarjeta_jorge.jpg

[edit] Image:Tarjeta_george.jpg

[edit] Image:Bekaa_valley_bombing,_2006.jpg

[edit] Image:Ovechkin2007.jpg

[edit] Image:Peter_Forsberg_2007.jpg

[edit] Image:24 Uni Games (W) Beach Volleyball 210406 (1996134021).jpg

[edit] Image:United_Federation_of_Planets_flag.svg

[edit] Image:Uniform-Invoice_Taiwan.png

[edit] Image:1955-chevy-bel-air-chevrolet-archives.jpg

[edit] Category:Dohareubang talchum

[edit] Image:Beryl transparent cube Feisty.png

[edit] Image:Statue_of_Anne_of_Britanny_near_castle_in_Nantes_France.jpg

[edit] Image:Arenas.gif

[edit] Votingrightsact1 & 2

[edit] Duplicate images, orphaned or low res

[edit] Koalorka files

[edit] Category:Istanbul Archaeological Museum

[edit] Latest news

[edit] April 3

[edit] Image:IA_Sample.jpg

[edit] Image:AK_2008.jpg

[edit] Image:North_Carolina_license_plate.jpg

[edit] Image:Standardalplate.jpg

[edit] Image:Alabama_God_Bless_America_License_Plate.jpg

[edit] Image:AS_2004.jpg

[edit] Image:AZ_2007.jpg

[edit] Image:Arkansas_Plate_Sample.jpg

[edit] Image:3sam123.jpg

[edit] Image:United States Democratic Primary 2008 Results.png

[edit] Image:IMG_9806.jpg

[edit] Image:Bivouac1.jpg

[edit] Image:486px-Walter_Veltroni_2.jpg