Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004									09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

——————————————— Archive May 2008 ———————————————

1 May 1
- 1.1 Image talk:Bruxelles Arc Cinquantaire.jpg
- 1.2 Image:Huracán.png
- 1.3 Image:London_Mayoral_Election_postal.JPG
- 1.4 Image:Panoramic Hubble Image for 17th Launch Anniversary (NASA) (475130799).jpg
- 1.5 Image:Caratula-tomb-raider.jpg
- 1.6 Image:Onlybrocante.jpg
- 1.7 Image:Discoveryfieldofwork.jpg
- 1.8 Image:24DNTValt.svg
- 1.9 Image:Popmusic_portal_head.jpg
- 1.10 Image:Welttanznadel_Gold.jpg
- 1.11 Image:Welttanznadel_Bronze.jpg
- 1.12 Image:Welttanznadel_Silber.jpg
- 1.13 Image:Curriculum_resumido.pdf
- 1.14 Image:LCAnn.jpg
- 1.15 Image:Diana_in_black.jpg
- 1.16 Image:Diana_in_black.jpg
- 1.17 Image:Jan_Kobuszewski.png
- 1.18 Image:Res_599_es.gif
- 1.19 Image:DanielSJPark.JPG
- 1.20 Image:Kirchelubniany.jpg
- 1.21 Image:£ubniany - koœció³-3.jpg
- 1.22 Image:Marienandacht.jpg
- 1.23 Image:Lady.in.red.jpg
- 1.24 Image:Btiu_meeting.jpg
- 1.25 Image:Dagger.JPG
- 1.26 Image:Леда и лебедь.jpg
- 1.27 Image:Azienda_Trasporti_Provinciali.JPG
- 1.28 Image:Magimix R1 (kitchen utensil).jpg
- 1.29 Image:SaarbrueckenSchloss.jpg
- 1.30 Image:FernandoPessoa.JPG
- 1.31 Image:Museus_Campos_Gerais_escadaria.jpg
- 1.32 Image:Enfants d'Ouzbékistan (Khiva).JPG
- 1.33 Image:Speothos venaticus 001.jpg
- 1.34 Image:Speothos_venaticus_001.jpg
- 1.35 Image:Het1.jpg
- 1.36 Image:Het1.jpg
- 1.37 Image:Het1.jpg
- 1.38 Image:CE369.jpg
- 1.39 Image:CE369.jpg
- 1.40 Image:Z5300 moret.JPG
2 May 2
- 2.1 Image:Charlemagne et Louis le Pieux copy.jpg
- 2.2 Image:Tiesto collage2.jpg
- 2.3 Image:Tiesto collage.jpg
- 2.4 Image:Album cover link.png
- 2.5 Image:Metroid_Prime_3_-_Corruption_-_at_E3_-_cropped.jpg
- 2.6 Image:PraOct.pdf
- 2.7 Image:PraNov.pdf
- 2.8 Image:PraDec.pdf
- 2.9 Image:PraApr.pdf
- 2.10 Image:PraMar.pdf
- 2.11 Image:Prafeb.pdf
- 2.12 Image:Prajan.pdf
- 2.13 Image:Fulufjallet Road.jpg
- 2.14 Image:Bureau_du_patron.jpg
- 2.15 Image:Metallphtalein.svg
- 2.16 Image:Human_Imprint_logo.gif
- 2.17 Image:Blood_donation_at_Fleet_Week_USA.jpg
- 2.18 Image:Kyosaku_book.jpg
- 2.19 Image:Soilmec.jpg
- 2.20 Image:Viva_Zapata_movie_trailer_screenshot_(16).jpg
- 2.21 Image:1930_Chevrolet_AD.jpg
- 2.22 Image:Dumbledore.jpg
- 2.23 Image:MrKenDatvian.jpg
- 2.24 Image:Kd_lang_live_in_sydney_1997.JPG
- 2.25 Image:Kirsten_Dunst_San_Diego_Comic_Con_2006.jpg
- 2.26 Image:Maria-Kirjan.tórshavn.jpg
- 2.27 Image:1002840282_l.jpg
- 2.28 Image:Andrija_matijas_pauk.jpg
- 2.29 Image:Tencomm.JPG
- 2.30 Image:Tiesto elements of life interview.jpg
- 2.31 Image:Anna_Ayala.jpg
- 2.32 Image:Alfred_Keller.jpg
- 2.33 Image:Baskin-Robins's first flat faced sign.jpg
- 2.34 Image:White_Ipomoea_violacea_2.jpg
- 2.35 Image:White_Ipomoea_violacea.jpg
- 2.36 Image:Helmut_Newton,_Portrait_of_Laurel_Martyn,_1952.jpg
- 2.37 Image:Hannya Shingyo.pdf
- 2.38 B.Harry images
3 May 3
- 3.1 Image:Birmingham_City_FC_logo.png
- 3.2 Image:PIJ_emblem.png
- 3.3 Image:Preeta.jpg
- 3.4 Image:Vlag_ontbreekt.svg
- 3.5 Image:Daniela.jpg
- 3.6 Image:Golden temple.jpg
- 3.7 Image:Carved_stones_(150424524)_(1).jpg
- 3.8 Image:Iban.JPG
- 3.9 Image:Devon_(actriz_porno).jpg
- 3.10 Image:Monument to Rudolf Perisin.jpg
- 3.11 Image:Ananias_Maidana.jpg
- 3.12 Image:Semanario_el_pueblo.jpg
- 3.13 Image:Franco con miles de sus partidarios a suregreso del exilio en la primavera democratrica del 46 recorren las calles de Asunción en dirección -al Panteón Nacional.JPG
- 3.14 Image:Greece_National_Crest.jpg
- 3.15 Image:Rihanna_Tallinn.jpg
- 3.16 Image:Kamkamkam.jpg
- 3.17 Image:Commi(innen).JPG
- 3.18 Image:Wappen Schleswig.gif
- 3.19 Image:Hotel Titania.jpg
- 3.20 Image:Prom_37.jpg
- 3.21 Image:Against_the_world.JPG
- 3.22 Image:Fsm baltimore.jpg
- 3.23 Image:MARLAZ.jpg
- 3.24 Image:Postmeilensaeule_Zwoenitz.jpg
- 3.25 Image:Weissmann_Young_man.jpg
- 3.26 Image:46 chudy anyanwu.jpg
- 3.27 Image:Mudan_MD_6106.JPG
- 3.28 Image:USS_Virginia_SSN-774.jpg
- 3.29 Image:USS_Virginia.jpg
- 3.30 Image:Mudan.JPG
4 May 4
- 4.1 Image:Miranda_sp_zoo.png
- 4.2 Image:Molouisiana1.JPG
- 4.3 Template:Timeline Australian PM
- 4.4 Image:Lap second.svg
- 4.5 Image:Joshua Middleton.jpg
- 4.6 Image:Phobia-Breaking Benjamin album.jpg
- 4.7 Image:Lady_Di.jpg
- 4.8 Image:Wikipedia Commons Censorship.pdf
- 4.9 Image:Self-realization.pdf
- 4.10 Image:LL wikipedia.pdf
- 4.11 Image:Derecho comercial.pdf
- 4.12 Image:Ciudad Maldita.pdf
- 4.13 Image:DERECHO NOTARIAL.pdf
- 4.14 Image:El capital.pdf
- 4.15 Image:Derecho consuetudinario.pdf
- 4.16 Image:Ton Venhoeven.pdf
- 4.17 Image:Bruno Gómez.pdf
- 4.18 Image:355px-SciFi channel.svg
- 4.19 Image:The_coming.jpg
- 4.20 Image:Strong_City,_New_Mexico.svg
- 4.21 Template:De-LogoCopyright
- 4.22 Image:Instalaciones.gif
- 4.23 Image:TheWallflowersRedLetterDaysDetail.jpg
- 4.24 Image:Columbia a motory SRB.jpg
- 4.25 Image:Henderson, Alexander Lamont (1838-1907) - Napoli chiesa dei gesuiti 1880-1905.jpg
- 4.26 Image:Cat toast.JPG
- 4.27 Image:Schloss_aschhausen.jpg
- 4.28 Image:MyCreation.svg
- 4.29 Image:Museu_Fuer_Kommunikation.JPG
- 4.30 Image:2448219344_88d9843964_o.jpg
- 4.31 Image:Schloss_Aschhausen_2.jpg
- 4.32 Image:Leopoldo_Calvo-Sotelo.jpg
- 4.33 Image:774_Virginia_rollout.jpg
- 4.34 Image:Agolada.jpg
- 4.35 Image:Zarrentin_Kloster_außen_8524_20A.jpg
- 4.36 Image:Jumbos_clown_room-sign.jpg
- 4.37 Image:Peder Tuborgh 2005.jpg
- 4.38 Image:RGB_Layers.jpg
- 4.39 Image:Imagen_satelital_de_lagos,_nigeria.jpg
- 4.40 Image:U.wiki_pic_COCOpark.jpg
- 4.41 Image:CeliaCalle.jpeg
5 May 5
- 5.1 Image:TraffiordPark.jpg
- 5.2 Image:Egypt 1919 revolution flag.PNG
- 5.3 Image:MathiasWiench.jpg
- 5.4 Image:WikiBanner-13.gif
- 5.5 Image:Cola_bottle_and_vulva.jpg
- 5.6 Image:Yellow_scottish_fold.jpg
- 5.7 Image:CITEBarnstar.png
- 5.8 Image:Citrus_Bowl.jpg
- 5.9 Image:Trent_Reznor-FEB2008.jpg
- 5.10 Image:A1_2008.svg
- 5.11 Image:Killdeer with Eggs.JPG
- 5.12 Image:QPSK_timing_diagram.png
- 5.13 Image:Chris Playing the guitar.jpg
- 5.14 Image:Logo_Villas_c4.jpg
- 5.15 Image:Felix Wong.jpg
- 5.16 Image:Doron_sede_dov_tower.jpg
- 5.17 Image:Ubicacion_de_San_juan_de_la_Vega.JPG
- 5.18 Image:Luis_merlo.jpg
- 5.19 Image:Informacion y sociedad siglo XXI.pdf
- 5.20 Image:Project2.gif
- 5.21 Image:Walther_Wenck.jpg
- 5.22 Image:Rock larico.pdf
- 5.23 Image:Valuation.dictionary.pdf
- 5.24 Image:RHLE 5.pdf
- 5.25 Image:Minogue Quotations.pdf
- 5.26 Image:Gosse korte.pdf
- 5.27 Image:PEOPLE AGENCY.pdf
- 5.28 Image:Giuseppe_Brotzu.jpg
- 5.29 Image:Fredy_Mayer.jpg
- 5.30 Image:Assyrian1.JPG
- 5.31 Image:CRW 2734.jpg
- 5.32 Image:Ledesma.jpg
- 5.33 Image:--Category-pintura--plataruiz.pdf
- 5.34 Image:Alca_Members.PNG
- 5.35 Image:Herbert Bednorz.jpg
- 5.36 Image:Cygnus-X1.jpg
- 5.37 Image:Ja-Main Page.png
- 5.38 Image:Citrus_Bowl.JPG
- 5.39 Image:Profil_Viry.gif
- 5.40 Image:Napalmdeath2006.jpg
- 5.41 Image:Stefan_Banach.jpg
- 5.42 Image:Japanese_martyrs-web.jpg
- 5.43 Image:Kakab-journal.jpg
- 5.44 Image:Cesarzowasissi.jpg
- 5.45 Image:Eruv Issur.pdf
- 5.46 Image:C_o_a_Benedetto_XI.jpg
- 5.47 Crazy Horse Memorial
- 5.48 Image:Deepika_in_Saree.jpg
- 5.49 Images of Gandalf der Graue
6 May 6
- 6.1 Image:Erectpenis.JPG and Image:Typical Semi Flaccid Penis.JPG
- 6.2 Image:MasonStatue.JPG
- 6.3 Image:A77AQUE logo.png
- 6.4 Image:Kubuntu_logo.png
- 6.5 Image:Ddl_southparkdemon_smirk_thumb.jpg
- 6.6 Image:PopDeclineIrishFamine.PNG
- 6.7 Image:"amour_sous_cellophane"_couverture.jpg
- 6.8 Image:Ndp 2007 ad.jpg
- 6.9 Template:SVG size
- 6.10 Image:HMS Colossus (1910).jpg
- 6.11 Image:Cyndi Taipei 07.jpg
- 6.12 Image:Finnish 8.6 TKIV 2000 or Sako TRG-42 sniper rifle.jpg
- 6.13 Image:Sarah_Jessica_Parker_2.jpg
- 6.14 Image:Gordon_Brown_2005_IMF_close.jpg
- 6.15 Image:Radarpost_noord_koninklijke_luchtmacht.jpg
- 6.16 Image:Avatar pressfoto.jpg
- 6.17 Image:Waterford6869h.jpg
- 6.18 Template talk:Blumenlese aus den neuen Schweizerischen Dichtern 2
- 6.19 Image:41101561_friel_pa.jpg
- 6.20 Image:The_GamE.pdf
- 6.21 Image:Hh-quarter-blankenese.jpg
- 6.22 Image:CHARMED.jpg
- 6.23 Image:Bd.jpg
- 6.24 Image:Svět_počítačů.JPG
- 6.25 Image:Othnielia.jpg
- 6.26 Image:Mutiny bounty 2.jpg
- 6.27 Image:Palmse.jpg
- 6.28 Image:Omid_Tahvili.jpg
- 6.29 Image:Ajanta cave 1 outline.jpg
- 6.30 Image:INorden logo.png
- 6.31 Image:LogoBeijing2008.jpg
- 6.32 Image:LogoBeijing2008.jpg
- 6.33 Statues in the U.S.
- 6.34 Images of Fabelfroh 2008
  - 6.34.1 images
  - 6.34.2 Nomination
  - 6.34.3 Discussion
- 6.35 Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg
- 6.36 Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg
7 May 7
- 7.1 Image:Threatened_by_shadows_at_night_(187465667).jpg
- 7.2 Image:835_Market_St_(San_Francisco).JPG
- 7.3 Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg
- 7.4 Image:Xena.jpg
- 7.5 Image:Eastern Mediterranean 1450 tr.svg
- 7.6 Image:Joffer_van_Batinghe_Dwingel.jpg
- 7.7 Image:CAE.pdf
- 7.8 Image:Enya_red.jpg
- 7.9 Image:P1000551.JPG
- 7.10 Image:Hunter_x_map.jpg
- 7.11 Image:Lion amphitheatre.jpg
- 7.12 Image:Thswkmap.jpg
- 7.13 Image:Foto_Espejo.jpg
- 7.14 Image:Sca.svg
- 7.15 Josef Pröll
8 Apologies =
9 On request: once more, same stuff:
- 9.1 Category:Fossil Ichthyornis
- 9.2 Category:Fossil Ichthyornithidae
- 9.3 Category:Fossil Ichthyornithiformes
- 9.4 Image:JohnRogers_PicketGuard.jpg
- 9.5 Image:GRUPOS_SANGUINEAOS_Y_SU_FRECUENCIA.pdf
- 9.6 Image:Obraz 0568.jpg
- 9.7 Image:Male_pubic_hair.JPG
- 9.8 Image:Maria-Callas.jpg
- 9.9 Image:Lily Pons.jpg
- 9.10 File:Lily Pons.jpg
- 9.11 Image:Tyranozaur-icon.png
- 9.12 Image:Feyenoord Logo.jpg
- 9.13 Image:AjaxAmsterdamLogoOnShirt.jpg
- 9.14 Image:ShuuheiHisagi.JPG
- 9.15 Image:Wagermarke.jpg
- 9.16 Image:Trio_Venezuela_01.jpg
- 9.17 Images uploaded by Mazerf
- 9.18 Library and Archives Canada non-PD images
  - 9.18.1 A - E
  - 9.18.2 F - J
  - 9.18.3 K - Q
  - 9.18.4 R - W
  - 9.18.5 Deleted
  - 9.18.6 PD Images
  - 9.18.7 Discussion
  - 9.18.8 Dicussion - copyright
  - 9.18.9 PD Questions
- 9.19 WHO Are these PEOPLE
- 9.20 Image:Reinhard_Tristan_Eugen_Heydrich.jpg
- 9.21 Image:Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich.jpg
10 May 8
- 10.1 Image:Grails_grails_logo.jpg
- 10.2 Image:HPIM0098.JPG
- 10.3 Image:SubudSymbol.png
- 10.4 Image:T2000 maj.jpg
- 10.5 Image:Cameron_County_Brownsvile_Highlighted.svg
- 10.6 Image:Brad Renfro 2008.jpg
- 10.7 Image:Bebas.GIF
- 10.8 Image:Bebas.JPG
- 10.9 Image:Walter_Krupinski.jpg
- 10.10 Image:Nagasakibomb.jpg
- 10.11 Image:ANTONIO VASQUEZ HIDALGO.CURRICULUM VITAE 2008-1.pdf
- 10.12 Image:SOFTWARE PREPARATORIA.pdf
- 10.13 Image:Vicent Garces.pdf
- 10.14 Image:CV CES.pdf
- 10.15 Image:Kochrezepte teil6.pdf
- 10.16 Image:Kochrezepte teil5.pdf
- 10.17 Image:Kochrezepte teil4.pdf
- 10.18 Image:Kochrezepte teil3.pdf
- 10.19 Image:Kochrezepte teil2.pdf
- 10.20 Image:Kochrezepte teil1.pdf
- 10.21 Image:CheFaceCollage.jpg
- 10.22 Image:Chikis3.png
- 10.23 Image:ASOD Graduation 2008.jpg
- 10.24 Image:Greater_Antillean_Grackle.jpg
- 10.25 Image:Masiela Lusha.jpg
- 10.26 Image:Adrian_Carmack.jpg
- 10.27 Image:Montescaglioso.jpg
- 10.28 Files by Fermio
- 10.29 Files by NkL
- 10.30 Celebrities
- 10.31 Soviet Souyz crew photographs
- 10.32 Image:Divinecomedy longfellow 01 dante 64kb.ogg
- 10.33 Image:Divinecomedy longfellow 01 dante 64kb.ogg
- 10.34 First Lady Portraits
11 May 9
- 11.1 Image:Fursac_(vue_aérienne).jpg
- 11.2 Image:Tom Bombadil.jpg
- 11.3 Image:Schlacht_von_Fuentes_de_Oñoro.jpg
- 11.4 Image:Topless_Barcelona.jpg
- 11.5 Image:DSC00577.JPG
- 11.6 Image:DSC00487.JPG
- 11.7 Image:Rural.png
- 11.8 Image:Saimaa_seal.jpg
- 11.9 Image:Empress-Dowager-Cixi2.jpg
- 11.10 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Ci-Xi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_Photographed_on_Throne.PNG
- 11.11 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_On_Throne.PNG
- 11.12 Image:Harry_Williamson_on_Dog.jpg
- 11.13 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_On_Throne_6.PNG
- 11.14 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_Posing_inside_the_Summer_Palace.PNG
- 11.15 Image:LA_Skyline.jpg
- 11.16 Image:J-r-Riquelme.jpg
- 11.17 Image:Scourge_screenshot_r2315.png
- 11.18 Image:Kirachen.jpg
- 11.19 Image:WS000041.jpg
- 11.20 Image:Saint-Etienne-de-Fursac_Cassini.jpg
- 11.21 Image:DSC00873.JPG
- 11.22 Image:BurmABC.svg
- 11.23 Image:L'écuelle_du_prêtre.JPG
- 11.24 Image:Saint_Léobon_(vitrail).jpg
- 11.25 Image:St_Léobon_(statue).jpg
- 11.26 Image:Croix_de_la_Louve.JPG
- 11.27 Image:Croix_de_la_Louve.jpg
- 11.28 Image:Croix_St_Léobon.JPG
- 11.29 Image:Croix_St_Léobon_(détail).jpg
- 11.30 Image:Croix_St_Léobon_(dorures).jpg
- 11.31 Image:Robert HOSSEIN.jpg
- 11.32 Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg
- 11.33 Files by Darreldearth
- 11.34 Files by Benjamin112
- 11.35 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_On_Throne_6.PNG
- 11.36 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_On_Throne_6.PNG
- 11.37 Image:The_Qing_Dynasty_Cixi_Imperial_Dowager_Empress_of_China_On_Throne_6.PNG
- 11.38 Images by Jeffrey21300
- 11.39 Many images of Gaynewyorker
- 11.40 Image:Flag of Ljubljana.gif
- 11.41 Image:Aborigines-Flagge.jpg
12 May 10
- 12.1 Image:Yavapi County Route 15 AZ.svg
- 12.2 Image:Uppa wiki.pdf
- 12.3 Image:La Obesidad.pdf
- 12.4 Image:SACME-1-.pdf
- 12.5 Image:El Gall.pdf
- 12.6 Image:Jockers i2.pdf
- 12.7 Image:Jockers i.pdf
- 12.8 Image:通識教育論950827-一修-.pdf
- 12.9 Image:IMG 1840.pdf
- 12.10 Image:10factores.pdf
- 12.11 Image:Soloingles.jpg.pdf
- 12.12 Image:Larry Womack.pdf
- 12.13 Image:Contenido Wipidia.pdf
- 12.14 Image:Richard J.pdf
- 12.15 Image:Flash animation.pdf
- 12.16 Image:Real sabor.pdf
- 12.17 Image:Evelio Bello.pdf
- 12.18 Image:PHYSIA Heimp.pdf
- 12.19 Image:FOTOGRAFIA BIENVENIDA.pdf
- 12.20 Image:Prébas MdP.pdf
- 12.21 Image:Carson.wiki.pdf
- 12.22 Image:Klim Kamenko.pdf
- 12.23 Image:Massimo Pedrazzini.pdf
- 12.24 Image:CRM Facil.pdf
- 12.25 Image:AZKOYEN Wikipedia.pdf
- 12.26 Image:VENENUX GNU.pdf
- 12.27 Image:Michael Davitt.PDF
- 12.28 Image:Gonzalo Maldonado.pdf
- 12.29 Image:GA ARS HOL BRADLEY.jpg
- 12.30 Image:Concepts4communication.pdf
- 12.31 Image:Zinkin Prim.pdf
- 12.32 Image:Perfil ssnn.pdf
- 12.33 Image:Krishna story.pdf
- 12.34 Image:Literatura mexicana.pdf
- 12.35 Image:AGENTES SACARIFICANTES .pdf
- 12.36 Image:Cielo bíblico.pdf
- 12.37 Image:Aparato SOXLET.pdf
- 12.38 Image:Prado almeida.pdf
- 12.39 Image:Pakciarz(wikipedia).pdf
- 12.40 Image:Programa residente.pdf
- 12.41 Image:FUNDAÇÃO GALILEO.pdf
- 12.42 Image:Suicidegirlslogo.jpg
- 12.43 Image:Hector "El Father" (wallpaper).jpg
- 12.44 Image:IM000443.jpg
- 12.45 Image:Tarch.jpg
- 12.46 Image:Augustus.jpg
- 12.47 Image:Kloster Rathausen1.pdf
- 12.48 Image:Lagoa Nova.pdf
- 12.49 Image:Brochure Campunet.pdf
- 12.50 Image:FidelSmile.jpg
- 12.51 Image:Bell_Miner_boulumba.ogg
- 12.52 Image:White-winged_Fairy-wren_coolmunda.JPG
- 12.53 Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg
- 12.54 Image:PST-zemljevid.JPG
- 12.55 Deletion requests/Images of Cilit
- 12.56 Image:Dear_Mom_internado.jpg
13 May 11
- 13.1 Image:Cràter_Santiago.JPG
- 13.2 Image:ATgAAAC sAUJ7r8ZUGWSAW2MnymjBrPEiAM6TBzD3muRXnaSjerel1KgO7OjyufYmIUbu NARUui-wBEkjyt0EOutjiNAJtU9VDRfNROz5bmdcU4 RJsutzlN3b0ug.jpg
- 13.3 Image:Buni buni.pdf
- 13.4 Image:Muñeca Nancy.pdf
- 13.5 Image:Palestinian_refugees.jpg
- 13.6 Image:03_Curio-Haus_1981-0709.jpg
- 13.7 Image:Natalie Portman at Comic Con 2005.jpg
- 13.8 Image:M109a1.jpg
- 13.9 Image:Lantz.jpg
- 13.10 Image:MinogueBillboard.jpg
- 13.11 Image:Poster_Tollwood_2005.jpg
- 13.12 Image:Mount Pleasant Caldera.jpg
- 13.13 Image:Bridge_Construction_Set_-_bridge_collapsing.jpg
- 13.14 Image:Pontifex_game_-_normal_editing_mode.gif
- 13.15 Image:Bridge_Construction_Set_-_drawbridge,_test_mode.jpg
- 13.16 Category:Felix von Dobschütz
- 13.17 Image:256x368.jpg
- 13.18 Image:Ritchie-blackmore-3.jpg
- 13.19 Image:Ossastorium Kaune.jpg
- 13.20 Image:DSCD0011.JPG
- 13.21 Image:Banfield.gif
- 13.22 Image:Abdelaziz Kareem Salim al-Noofayee Summarized Detainee Unsworn Statement.pdf
- 13.23 Image:Abdullah Kamel Abdullah Kamel Al Kandari Summary of Evidence 19 February 2006.pdf
- 13.24 Image:Abdelaziz Kareem Salim al-Noofayee Summary o f Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal 1 November 2004.pdf
- 13.25 Image:Aranjuez-diana-fountain.JPG
- 13.26 Image:Alison Lapper Pregnant.jpg
- 13.27 Image:Philadelphia skyline August 2007.jpg
- 13.28 Image:PA078659.png
- 13.29 Image:Maria Cristina Giongo (feb. 2008).jpg
- 13.30 Image:82278 1145864996.jpg
- 13.31 Image:Nixon greets POW McCain.jpg
- 13.32 Image:P1080023.JPG
- 13.33 Images uploaded by user Gorthaur
- 13.34 Images with "source: spain2you.pl
- 13.35 Image:PA078615.png
- 13.36 Image:Seyyed AliMohammad Báb.jpg
14 May 12
- 14.1 Image:B_stock.jpg
- 14.2 Image:Ladysnowblood.jpg
- 14.3 Image:BBEdit.jpg
- 14.4 Image:BodirogaOAKA.jpg
- 14.5 Image:Meuble_héraldique_Merlu.svg
- 14.6 Image:Leoforos_Zaec.JPG
- 14.7 Image:Leoforos_Rocha.JPG
- 14.8 Image:Leoforos_Wachyha_Ajax_1996.JPG
- 14.9 Image:Bodiroga1010525.JPG
- 14.10 Image:Leoforos_Kyrastas_Liverpool_1985.JPG
- 14.11 Image:Conoid_(PSF).png
- 14.12 Image:Kirche Zapen.jpg
- 14.13 Image:2371403246_e88fd8dca5.jpg
- 14.14 Image:Leoforos_Panathinaikos_Webley_1971.JPG
- 14.15 Image:Leoforos_Linoxilakis.JPG
- 14.16 Image:0419_100642.jpg
- 14.17 Image:59139 bricout guy.jpg
- 14.18 Image:AjuntaXeraco.jpg
- 14.19 Image:LogoXeraco.jpg
- 14.20 Image:Leoforos_Panathinaikos_Ajax_1971.JPG
- 14.21 Image:The_general.JPG
- 14.22 Image:Metalurh Zaporizhzhya new logo.jpeg
- 14.23 Image:Aglomeracja Wrocławska.jpg
- 14.24 Image:Joelg.jpg
- 14.25 Image:Blason_Bernis_(de_pierre_de).gif
- 14.26 Image:Edlin.png
- 14.27 Image:Siegfried_awakens_Brunnhilde.jpg
- 14.28 Image:Russischer_T-90_Panzer.jpg
- 14.29 Image:Sigurd_kills_Fafnir_by_Rackham.jpg
- 14.30 Image:Granični_most_na_Rječini_1941.JPG
- 14.31 Image:Filozofija_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.JPG
- 14.32 Image:Vatroslav_Lisinski_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.jpg
- 14.33 Image:Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović_Ivo_Kerdić.JPG
- 14.34 Image:Lučonoša_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.JPG
- 14.35 Image:Justicija_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.JPG
- 14.36 Image:Theologia_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.JPG
- 14.37 Image:Medicina_Robert_Frangeš_Mihanović.JPG
- 14.38 Image:Dualshock3preto.jpg
- 14.39 Image:Dualshockbranco.jpg
- 14.40 Image:Scarlet_pimpernal_macro_1.JPG
- 14.41 Image:Sir_Michael_Gambon.png
- 14.42 Image:John_Baskerville.png
- 14.43 Image:Snow_Arar_Saudi.JPG
- 14.44 Image:Leslie_Ward01.jpg
- 14.45 Image:China (2008-05-12) 7.8 earthquake.gif
- 14.46 Image:Antichthon.jpg
- 14.47 Image:Lapin_Agile.jpg
- 14.48 Image:Dušan_Coronation.jpg
- 14.49 Image:Dušan_Wedding.jpg
- 14.50 Image:Bensaid-Art.jpg
- 14.51 Image:Restaurant_de_la_Mere_Catherine_Montmartre.jpg
- 14.52 Image:Most_preko_Rječine_1945.jpg
- 14.53 Image:Saint_Benedict.jpg
- 14.54 Image:Erciyes_Gazetesi_başlığı.jpg
- 14.55 Image:Japanese_Joint_Staff_Office_Staffs_Welcomes_Qatari_General.jpg
- 14.56 Image:060815_Grand_Rondeau_80_x_120.jpg
- 14.57 Image:Eric_Vasstrom_Helsinki.jpg
- 14.58 Image:Meyerholdyoung.jpg
- 14.59 Image:Bernis_(de_pierre_de).gif
- 14.60 Image:Duiven2.ogg
- 14.61 Image:TheKosovoMaiden.jpg
- 14.62 Image:TheKosovoMaiden.jpg
- 14.63 Image:BSicon utUKRZo1ABZgg.svg
- 14.64 Image:Ferdinand_Georg_Frobenius.jpg
- 14.65 Image:Foerster.jpg
15 May 13
- 15.1 Image:Inaugural_Air_NZ_flight_to_Vancouver.jpg
- 15.2 Image:Maurice_andre_4.jpg
- 15.3 Image:Maurice_andre_3.jpg
- 15.4 Image:Maurice_andre11.jpeg
- 15.5 Image:Image78.jpeg
- 15.6 Image:Rooney_and_Ronaldo_at_old_trafford.jpg
- 15.7 Image:Robert_Tucker_Abbott_.jpg
- 15.8 Image:MallorcaSpainB4x5.jpg
- 15.9 Image:Anatomy.jpg
- 15.10 Image:Samsung_electronics_mnemonic.ogg
- 15.11 Image:Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij.jpg
- 15.12 Image:Ti_si_Makedonija_campaign.JPG
- 15.13 Image:Cartelvosbsas.jpg
- 15.14 Image:Swamp Milkweed Asclepias incarnata Flowers Closeup 2800px.jpg
- 15.15 Image:ConcaFrancolí.svg
- 15.16 Image:Pacific_Baza_kobble08.JPG
- 15.17 Image:AutoWikiBrowser1.jpg
- 15.18 Image:Kathryn Harrison by David Shankbone.jpg
- 15.19 Image:Flagge Belgrad.PNG
- 15.20 Image:Henri_Pittier.jpg
- 15.21 Image:Pedro_Elias_Gutierrez.jpg
- 15.22 Image:Curtis_family.jpg
- 15.23 Image:Marcheprime1.jpg
- 15.24 Image:Marcheprime2.jpg
- 15.25 Image:Budgie.jpg
- 15.26 Image:FORD3.JPG
- 15.27 Image:Oregon_VBM_ballot_May_2008_1.jpg
- 15.28 Image:Ur2.jpg
- 15.29 Image:Karina Kuzumi 01.jpg
- 15.30 Panathinaikos mural
- 15.31 All Logos
- 15.32 Image:Hellenism_in_the_Near_East_1918.jpg
- 15.33 Image:Hellenism_in_the_Near_East_1918.jpg
- 15.34 Image:Reichstag-Abgeordnetenlobby.jpg
- 15.35 Image:Iskut-Unuk River volcanic center.jpg
- 15.36 Image:Hu_Jintao_Portrait.JPG
- 15.37 Image:Johan_Cruyff_Shirt.jpg
- 15.38 Image:Tiger_I_model.jpg
16 May 14
- 16.1 Image:Loeyche.jpg
- 16.2 Image:Aeolosaurus.jpg
- 16.3 Image:Conrad - Set of Six.djvu
- 16.4 Image:哈達鯊.jpg
- 16.5 Image:Burg_Sponeck.jpg
- 16.6 Image:Burg_Landeck_Emmendingen_01.jpg
- 16.7 Image:Burg_Landeck_Emmendingen_02.jpg
- 16.8 Image:Hochburg_01.jpg
- 16.9 Image:Burg_Landeck_Emmendingen_03.jpg
- 16.10 Image:Hochburg_02.jpg
- 16.11 Image:Hochburg_21.jpg
- 16.12 Image:Hochburg_20.jpg
- 16.13 Image:Hochburg_19.jpg
- 16.14 Image:Hochburg_18.jpg
- 16.15 Image:Hochburg_17.jpg
- 16.16 Image:Hochburg_16.jpg
- 16.17 Image:Hochburg_15.jpg
- 16.18 Image:Hochburg_14.jpg
- 16.19 Image:Hochburg_13.jpg
- 16.20 Image:Hochburg_12.jpg
- 16.21 Image:Hochburg_11.jpg
- 16.22 Image:Hochburg_10.jpg
- 16.23 Image:Hochburg_09.jpg
- 16.24 Image:Hochburg_08.jpg
- 16.25 Image:Hochburg_07.jpg
- 16.26 Image:Hochburg_06.jpg
- 16.27 Image:Hochburg_05.jpg
- 16.28 Image:Hochburg_04.jpg
- 16.29 Image:Hochburg_03.jpg
- 16.30 Image:Burg_Wildenberg01.jpg
- 16.31 Image:Boom.JPG
- 16.32 Image:Bekyně mniška - housenka.jpg
- 16.33 Image:ESCUDO_LAITIANO.jpg
- 16.34 Image:Flag_of_Saint-Martin_(local).svg
- 16.35 Image:Giannialemanno.jpg
- 16.36 Image:Silverthrone Mountain.jpg
- 16.37 Image:Young zebra finch.png
- 16.38 Image:La_Cueva_-_Armando_Reveron.jpg
- 16.39 Image:Main 1626.jpg
- 16.40 Image:Azariaspamalotcropped.jpg
- 16.41 Image:Alienss.jpg
- 16.42 Image:Pasillos_Del_Subsuelo_CNBA.jpg
- 16.43 Image:Arhtropleuracloseup.JPG
- 16.44 Image:Cafe_Lipstick.jpg
- 16.45 Image:Biografia de Apolinar.pdf
- 16.46 Image:Internia.jpg
- 16.47 Image:Aasgaardreien_peter_nicolai_arbo.jpg
- 16.48 Image:Aksel Johannessen - Munch mit dem Porträt von Jappe Nilssen big.jpg
- 16.49 Image:Operation_Spring.svg
- 16.50 Image:BusteCHWidor.jpg
- 16.51 Image:Pinsk_Northern-entrance.jpg
17 May 15
- 17.1 Image:Voegtoeaan2.jpg
- 17.2 Image:Ensayo de Novecento.pdf
- 17.3 Image:Novecento.pdf
- 17.4 Image:Calpryca1.pdf
- 17.5 Image:Mi_programa_favorito.jpg
- 17.6 Image:Maquinas vapor hiperclim vaporetas.pdf
- 17.7 Image:Mycutebrother.jpg
- 17.8 Image:MyBroComfortMofo.JPG
- 17.9 Image:GTA1_Liberty_City_map.png
- 17.10 Category:Internal use only
- 17.11 Image:MayaArch.jpg
- 17.12 Image:HMS_Snapper.jpg
- 17.13 Image:Dawnricharperformingintoledo.png
- 17.14 Image:Ian Curtis2.jpg
- 17.15 Image:Light eyes map 1.png
- 17.16 Image:Light eyes map .png
- 17.17 Image:Priscila perales.jpg
- 17.18 Image:Fordonpanorama2256546343.jpg
- 17.19 Image:NO city seal.gif
- 17.20 Image:Andropov1.jpg
- 17.21 Image:Schloss Rheydt North.jpg
- 17.22 Image:Uniforme Rayado.PNG
- 17.23 Image:CPAScreenshot.jpg
- 17.24 Image:CPALosungenScreenshot.jpg
- 17.25 Image:R2-D2_reservoir.jpg
- 17.26 Image:Marcelo Rios.jpg
- 17.27 Image:DSC01106.jpg
- 17.28 Image:Meccano No7 Instructions (front).jpg
- 17.29 Image:HL_Stencil.jpg
- 17.30 Image:Vista Upgrade Paths.svg
- 17.31 Image:Vista Upgrade Paths.svg
- 17.32 FDF press release photos
- 17.33 non two-dimensional work of art
- 17.34 Image:The_fam_right_before_being_sworn_in.jpg
- 17.35 Image:RussiaIrkutsk2008-01.png
- 17.36 Image:Voile_grec.jpg
- 17.37 Image:Bildo1.jpg
- 17.38 Image:Pohjanmaa.jpg
- 17.39 Image:Kotka depart.JPG
- 17.40 Image:Jämtlandskarta.jpg
18 May 16
- 18.1 Image:1999.svg
- 18.2 Image:Dotnetnuke-logo.gif
- 18.3 Image:MODATION.jpg
- 18.4 Image:Space_Shuttle_Colombia_Explosion.jpg
- 18.5 Image:Ehrenfels_Rhein1.jpg
- 18.6 Image:Sheriff of Oxford 2007.jpg
- 18.7 Image:Davesdaves.jpg
- 18.8 Image:Davesdaves.jpg
- 18.9 Image:Ah.jpg
- 18.10 Image:Ahha.jpg
- 18.11 Image:Amiami.jpg
- 18.12 Image:Diemandieman.jpg
- 18.13 Image:Davidg.jpg
- 18.14 Image:Gregkg.jpg
- 18.15 Image:Wwd.jpg
- 18.16 Image:Wwb.jpg
- 18.17 Image:GrapheCayley-S4-Plan.png
- 18.18 Image:HNK.jpg
- 18.19 Image:HNK1.jpg
- 18.20 Image:Tyrja_village_history_book.JPG
- 18.21 Image:Maxwell's_triangle.svg
- 18.22 Image:Samesex Map North America(fr).png
- 18.23 Image:Hymn - PAO.ogg
- 18.24 Image:MysłowiceSynagogue.jpg
- 18.25 Image:An-71_real1.jpg
- 18.26 Image:Gherman_Titov.jpg
- 18.27 Image:Maquina de vapor hiperclim vaporeta vaporetas.pdf
- 18.28 Image:100SEKdetail.JPG
- 18.29 Image:Chapman_Brothers._Death.jpg
- 18.30 Image:Décoration_voute.jpg
- 18.31 Image:ISR-HWY444.svg
- 18.32 Image:1999.jpg
- 18.33 Image:Portrait_of_William_III,_(1650-1702).jpg
- 18.34 Image:KING_GEORGE_II.jpg
- 18.35 Image:George_I_of_Great_Britain.JPG
- 18.36 Image:Baby-hitler.jpg
- 18.37 Image:TU_Dresden_Essen.jpg
- 18.38 Image:LicencseplateGNR.jpg
- 18.39 Image:Schriftzug_Kanal_Ratte.png
- 18.40 Image:Israel_and_the_Disputed_Territories_map.png
- 18.41 Image:Crucis_in_Babele.jpg
- 18.42 Image:Easy_Java_AWT_example.jpg
- 18.43 Image:TORRE DE PEMEX.jpg
- 18.44 Image:KMF_5_obv.JPG
- 18.45 Image:Shevchenko Scientific Society logo.jpeg
19 May 17
- 19.1 Image:PetulaClark2006.JPG
- 19.2 Image:Observatory of New Technologies.pdf
- 19.3 Image:Lcm June 06 new format 1 2 .pdf
- 19.4 Image:GustavSchroeder.jpg
- 19.5 Image:MefoArm.JPG
- 19.6 Image:Mebeingstupidashell.JPG
- 19.7 Image:Barrowparker.jpg
- 19.8 Image:A new Line.pdf
- 19.9 Image:1965-05-23_07b_John_Surtees,_Ferrari_330P2.jpg
- 19.10 Image:RecipeBook XML Example.svg
- 19.11 Image:92-94 Ford Tempo.jpg
- 19.12 Image:Se61am1.jpg
- 19.13 Image:Busca Chiesa Pietro Paolo 02.JPG
- 19.14 Image:BurjDubaiHeight (1).png
- 19.15 Image:Votivtafeln-1-neu.jpg
- 19.16 Image:Thalweg.jpg
- 19.17 Image:Tomohawk_engines.jpg
- 19.18 Image:!WMXXIVticket.JPG
- 19.19 Image:Francine_dee.jpg
- 19.20 Image:ENTRADA.jpg
- 19.21 Image:Osm on psp.jpg
- 19.22 Image:London_070.JPG
- 19.23 Image:Susan.jpg
- 19.24 Image:Susan.jpg
- 19.25 Image:Eric.Donfu.jpg
- 19.26 Image:Tanned.jpg
- 19.27 Image:UOE_equipo_op.jpg
- 19.28 Image:PEI2008.jpg
- 19.29 Image:Energie-public-600.gif
- 19.30 Image:Waterschappen-public-600.gif
- 19.31 Image:Ambulance-public-600.gif
- 19.32 Image:Justitie-public-600.gif
- 19.33 Image:Politie-public-600.gif
- 19.34 Image:Veiligheidsregio-public-600.gif
- 19.35 Image:Provincies-Gemeenten-public-600.gif
- 19.36 Image:Cacique_Junchar.jpg
- 19.37 Images of Perulero
- 19.38 Image:Jade_Kwan_001s_.jpg
  - 19.38.1 Permission
- 19.39 Image:Italian troops march past billboard of Mussilini during 1936 invasion.jpg
20 May 18
- 20.1 Image:Denix19_-_009.jpg
- 20.2 Image:Denix19_-_008.jpg
- 20.3 Image:City National Bank Building Miami.jpg
- 20.4 Image:Image_0008.jpg
- 20.5 Image:Teenbeat_Club_Postcard.jpg
- 20.6 Image:36999.jpg
- 20.7 Image:Busca Chiesa Pietro Paolo 01.JPG
- 20.8 Image:Busca Chiesa Pietro Paolo Affreschi XIII sec.JPG
- 20.9 Image:Busca Chiesa Pietro Paolo San Maurizio.JPG
- 20.10 Image:Seatttle, Washington, downtown core.jpg
- 20.11 Image:Image-Paris plan ligne T3 concis.svg
- 20.12 Image:Lovecraft_story.jpg
- 20.13 Image:GTAIII_Liberty_City_map.png
- 20.14 Image:Denix19_-_007.jpg
- 20.15 Image:Denix19_-_006.jpg
- 20.16 Image:Denix19_-_006.jpg
- 20.17 Image:Denix19_-_005.jpg
- 20.18 Image:Denix19_-_004.jpg
- 20.19 Image:Denix19_-_003.jpg
- 20.20 Image:Denix19_-_001.jpg
- 20.21 Image:Calle_da_Costa.JPG
- 20.22 Image:Interior_capilla_miou.jpg
- 20.23 Image:Fonte_de_otilia.jpg
- 20.24 Image:Miou_desde_louteiro.jpg
- 20.25 Image:IndianaJonesDecoder_wb.jpg
- 20.26 Image:Wroclaw_krasnal_Puszczajacy_Stateczki.JPG.JPG
- 20.27 Image:Michael_Jackson_1984(2).png
- 20.28 Image:Bill_Gates_in_Poland_cropped.jpg
- 20.29 Image:TheInterior.jpg
- 20.30 Image:Mike Doughty 7.jpg
- 20.31 Image:Stemmen kart.jpg
- 20.32 Image:Stemmen kart.jpg
- 20.33 Image:FIFA_World_Cup_(Gazzaniga).svg
- 20.34 Image:FIFA_World_Cup_(Rimet).svg
- 20.35 Image:Bellac2.jpg
- 20.36 Image:Bellac-bandeau3.jpg
- 20.37 Image:Atari_the_hamster.jpg
- 20.38 Image:GreatSeljuqEmpireFlag.svg
- 20.39 Image:Jetel_bílý_plazivý.jpg
- 20.40 Image:Caravaggio_MatthewAngel.jpg
- 20.41 Image:Caravaggio_incredulity.jpg
- 20.42 Image:Israel IDF Yom Kippur War postcard.jpg
- 20.43 Image:Žalvarinis.jpg
- 20.44 Image:Oyo_Empire.gif
- 20.45 Image:Peru161s-1995o.jpg
- 20.46 Image:Pozo_de_inselmo.JPG
- 20.47 Image:Dinosaur_collection_history_at_CMHN_-_03.JPG
- 20.48 Image:PEIarms.jpg
- 20.49 Category:Istori'a pentru inceputulu romaniloru in Daci'a
- 20.50 Old rongorongo photos
- 20.51 Image:Protest to go mosque.jpg
- 20.52 Image:CIMG0020.JPG
- 20.53 Image:CIMG0020.JPG
- 20.54 Image:Denix19_-_002.jpg
- 20.55 Image:Denix19 - 002.jpg
- 20.56 Image:Pozo_de_Inselmo.jpg
- 20.57 Image:Pozo_de_Inselmo.jpg
- 20.58 Image:Kisibejinja board.JPG
21 May 19
- 21.1 Image:Familiemagdat.jpg
- 21.2 Image:Dandels.jpg
- 21.3 Image:Record of Valkyrie Blue hills.jpg
- 21.4 Image:Escudo.gif
- 21.5 Image:WUS-complete.jpg
- 21.6 Image:Maria_Callas_1955.jpg
- 21.7 Image:Claire_Forlani.jpg
- 21.8 Image:Vivi Berens buttocks.jpg
- 21.9 Image:ATSF_1115.jpg
- 21.10 Image:Alex_K_Kyotofu_fusho.svg
- 21.11 Image:Mammoet-crane.jpg
- 21.12 Image:Pre-ejaculate-0111.jpg
- 21.13 Image:KCR_West_Rail_First_Class_Department.jpg
- 21.14 Image:Ja-watashi no neko o tabemashita.ogg
- 21.15 Image:Cunamo banda aceh4.jpg
- 21.16 Image:Boubín4.jpg
- 21.17 Image:Boubin1.jpg
- 21.18 Image:Boubin3.jpg
- 21.19 Image:Trane_drawing.jpg
- 21.20 Image:Trane drawing.jpg
- 21.21 Image:Eritreajkoloroj.jpg
- 21.22 Image:Philip Alexius de Laszlo-Princess Elizabeth of York, Currently Queen Elizabeth II of England,1933.jpg
- 21.23 Image:Abismo Macoĥa.jpg
- 21.24 Image:Prachatice2.jpg
- 21.25 Image:Copper.svg and other images from category SVG — Periodic table
22 May 20
- 22.1 Image:Batboycoverposter.jpg
- 22.2 Image:BatBoy.jpg
- 22.3 Category:Ancient Egyptian artefacts
- 22.4 Category:Ancient Egyptian artefact types
- 22.5 Category:Camouflage suits
- 22.6 Category:Catedral Salta
- 22.7 SANJIV LOCHAN
- 22.8 Image:Fahrenheit_el_videojuego_portada_grande.jpg
- 22.9 Image:Bartąska.jpg
- 22.10 Image:Tz.jpg
- 22.11 Image:Estructura Corporativa 1.pdf
- 22.12 Image:Logo-mdcu.jpg
- 22.13 Image:Begruessung.JPG
- 22.14 Image:Flammenmuehle.JPG
- 22.15 Image:Camera-photo.png
- 22.16 Image:Romero2008.jpg
- 22.17 Image:Cartina cammino.jpg
- 22.18 Category:Transportation in Seattle
- 22.19 Image:20080512_4f9c2ae81778dea2dd67YEU4Cf20WjcK.jpg
- 22.20 Image:83.JPG
- 22.21 Image:MarcelloMastroianni.jpg
- 22.22 Image:Myspaceap3photo.jpg
- 22.23 Image:Bismarck h69721.jpg
- 22.24 Image:Bismarck h69732.jpg
- 22.25 Image:Position_du_chevauchement.jpg
- 22.26 Image:Поза_на_коленях.jpg
- 22.27 Image:Missionarsstellung.jpg
- 22.28 Image:Portrait_of_holds_Lipstick_a_Japanese_Lady.jpg
- 22.29 Image:Woman_Breast_Under_A_Size.jpg
- 22.30 Image:Zeusmodus-terugdraaien-bijdragen.png
- 22.31 Image:Lisa3.jpg
- 22.32 Image:NoETA.JPG
- 22.33 Image:AcademiaMilitaraB.JPG
- 22.34 Image:Koskarol.jpg
- 22.35 Image:BH LMC.png
- 22.36 Image:John_William_Waterhouse_-_Ulysses_and_the_Sirens_(1891).jpg
- 22.37 Image:Henry_Segrave_n041938.jpg
23 May 21
- 23.1 Image:Neic_jjaw_small.gif
- 23.2 Image:Aubigné - Les Tragiques.djvu.djvu
- 23.3 Category:Ancient Kornithia
- 23.4 Category:Archdiocese München-Freising
- 23.5 Category:Arnoldas Lukosius
- 23.6 Category:Athletes from Uzbhekistan
- 23.7 Category:Athletes from Equador
- 23.8 Category:Artvin, Turkey
- 23.9 Category:Festos
- 23.10 Category:Floß
- 23.11 Category:Kildin classe destroyer
- 23.12 Image:JKWright.pdf
- 23.13 Image:Curr.pdf
- 23.14 Image:壽麓山傳奇.pdf
- 23.15 Image:Adderleydrawing.png
- 23.16 Image:Schemat_sieci_trolejbusowej.jpg
- 23.17 Image:Langseterfj_vinterskr.jpg
- 23.18 Image:Abuelas-dudas.png
- 23.19 Image:K800i-Google-My.Location.jpg
- 23.20 Image:Erdre-Canal_Saint-Félix-Nantes.jpg
- 23.21 Image:Populus alba (1).jpg
- 23.22 Image:The Rasmus.jpg
- 23.23 Image:Stadion_woudestein.jpg
- 23.24 Image:Talvisota_Finlands_sak_är_din.PNG
- 23.25 Image:0DE3.B658.7A94.C12F(magic-melencolia).jpg
- 23.26 Image:God Odin brown.PNG
- 23.27 Image:A-M-L 0258.JPG
- 23.28 Image:Lick_it_3_(nude_photograph_by_artist_Peter_Klashorst).jpg
- 23.29 Image:OA_vz._30_Slovak-Hungarian_War.png
- 23.30 Image:Yılmaz_Onay_50.Sanat_Yılı.jpg
- 23.31 Category:Alphabetic_list_of_painters
- 23.32 Image:Lithuania_Pact_of_defence_and_mutual_assistance.PNG
- 23.33 Image:050623_luttig_ex.jpg
- 23.34 Category:Templates using ParserFunctions
- 23.35 Image:Líderes_mundiales_2008.JPG
24 May 22
- 24.1 Category:Taken with Minox 35 GT
- 24.2 Image:Full_ercetion.JPG
- 24.3 Image:Pyrococcus.gif
- 24.4 Image:Pyrococcus.gif
- 24.5 Image:P5200011_Coburger_Designtage_2007_Bierkästen.jpg
- 24.6 Image:Juan Raposo Espinosa.pdf
- 24.7 Image:J&T-Wikipedia.pdf
- 24.8 Image:Bowling on Columbine.pdf
- 24.9 Image:Descripción Via Hard.pdf
- 24.10 Image:Despedida de BJ.pdf
- 24.11 Image:Dagoberto Paramo Morales.pdf
- 24.12 Image:A-26C_Smile.jpg
- 24.13 Image:CV Genaro Zarazua.pdf
- 24.14 Image:Picswiss_BE-90-14_Hotel_"Oeschinensee"_beim_Oeschinensee.jpg
- 24.15 Image:Vida.pdf
- 24.16 Image:Krampouezh.JPG
- 24.17 Image:Lijn4.4033.09052008.jpg
- 24.18 Image:Lijn9.3128.09052008.jpg
- 24.19 Image:Lijn16.3105.09052008.jpg
- 24.20 Image:Ssn711_8.jpg
- 24.21 Image:Ma_Ying-jeou_1.JPG
- 24.22 Image:An-jawazad.jpg
- 24.23 Image:Winlogo_own_work.png
- 24.24 Image:Thaiss.jpg
- 24.25 Images of Der Maddin
- 24.26 Uploads by Fazland (talk · contributions)
- 24.27 Image:Transport nach Ceylon.png
- 24.28 Image:Doorgaand_spoorviaduct_Bleiswijk.jpg
25 May 23
- 25.1 Image:Three_cell_growth_types-TR.svg
- 25.2 Image:Rs1.jpg
- 25.3 Image:Nasrallah Sfeir.jpg
- 25.4 Image:Manfred_Eicher_Gildas_Bocle.jpg
- 25.5 Image:Manfred_Eicher_Marek_Vogel.jpg
- 25.6 Image:Keith_Moon.jpg
- 25.7 Image:Flaauwewerk_okt2007.jpg
- 25.8 Image:05_Ukradena_slika.jpg
- 25.9 Image:BlacKBeast.png
- 25.10 Image:Tarras.jpg
- 25.11 Image:Curious_Necklace.jpg
- 25.12 Image:Black_machismo.jpg
- 25.13 Image:Phill_Niblock_Undated.jpg
- 25.14 Image:Muñequito.jpg
- 25.15 Image:Lipovljani.PNG
- 25.16 Image:Pétale_détaillé_de_ancolie_copie.jpg
- 25.17 Image:AlbertLebrun.jpg
- 25.18 Image:北九州市立大学北方キャンパス.JPG
- 25.19 Image:S-400 Centrum.jpg
- 25.20 Image:S-400 Radar 2.jpg
- 25.21 Image:S-400 Radar 1.jpg
- 25.22 Image:Book_Burning.jpg
- 25.23 Image:Kelme-s_revengga_jpg.jpg
- 25.24 Image:Totò.jpg
- 25.25 Image:VIATGE_A_GIRONA.jpg
- 25.26 Image:ViCTOR_CON_THE_HIEL_BAND.jpg
- 25.27 Image:Panoramica agbar2007.jpg
- 25.28 Image:Gillermanetch.jpg
- 25.29 Image:Gillermanetch.jpg
- 25.30 Image:Hatfield-rbw.jpg, Image:PottersBar-rbw.jpg
- 25.31 Image:Khojaly Monument.jpg
- 25.32 Image:Khojaly_Monument.jpg
- 25.33 Image:A Yool Carhenge1 02Sep03.jpg
- 25.34 Image:Víctor_Naranjo_como_cardenal_en_El_Papa_y_la_Bruja_de_Dario_Fo_y_Franca_Rame.jpg
26 May 24
- 26.1 Image:LeaContraceptivum.jpg
- 26.2 Image:Doris.jpg
- 26.3 Image:Kanimbla.jpg
- 26.4 Image:Gwanghwamun_Street_Building.jpg
- 26.5 Image:Raul_Bravo.jpg
- 26.6 Image:Peischinger_Landwehr.jpg
- 26.7 Image:Patrick_Allen_01.jpg
- 26.8 Image:Statue_MT.jpg
- 26.9 Image:Toda-erika.jpg
- 26.10 Image:Matsuda.jpg
- 26.11 Image:Lucio Bruno-Videla.pdf
- 26.12 Image:Perfil 5-1-.08.pdf
- 26.13 Image:Prentice.jpg
- 26.14 Image:T65_ROCA.jpg
- 26.15 Image:Wiki-nieuw.png
- 26.16 Image:Monografía Alberto Novoa.pdf
- 26.17 Image:Trastorno Afectivo Estacional.pdf
- 26.18 Image:Otalora2007Amines-Triatominae.pdf
- 26.19 Image:MIGUEL WONG GIRALDO.pdf
- 26.20 Image:San agustin guion.pdf
- 26.21 Image:EJEMPLOS DE SUBPERSONALIDADES.pdf
- 26.22 Image:Comunidad_Americana.jpg
- 26.23 Image:Succinic Staphylococcus Bacteria.pdf
- 26.24 Image:Romanzo XVIII secolo.pdf
- 26.25 Image:Hiatt Letter 10242007.pdf
- 26.26 Image:Las Viejas Final1.pdf
- 26.27 Image:Königliche Nekropolis von Tanis.jpg
- 26.28 Category:Song Dynasty (960-1279)
- 26.29 Image:Down_Under1.jpg
- 26.30 Image:Indian numerals 100AD.gif
- 26.31 Image:Chest CT scan with lung metastatis 3.jpg
- 26.32 Image:Chest CT scan with lung metastatis 2.jpg
- 26.33 Image:Chest CT scan with lung metastatis.png
- 26.34 Images by Ably Weathered
- 26.35 Images with recognisable people
  - 26.35.1 children
  - 26.35.2 adults
- 26.36 Image:Rocco Montana dischi CGD.jpg
- 26.37 Image:Drachenboot_action2.jpg
- 26.38 Image:Drachenboot_action.jpg
- 26.39 Image:Fischerstechen.jpg
- 26.40 Image:Optirennen.jpg
- 26.41 Image:Kanonenfeuer_mueritzsail.jpg
- 26.42 Image:Grasshoppermetasnodgrass.jpg
- 26.43 Image:Hemmaberg Modell.jpg
- 26.44 Image:Adonis_en_Afrodite_Jits_Bakker_Schiphol.JPG
- 26.45 Image:Europa_Jits_Bakker_Schiphol.JPG
- 26.46 Image:Miles_trompet_Jits_Bakker_Schiphol.JPG
- 26.47 Image:Goldenearringticket.jpg
- 26.48 Image:Golden Earring.png
- 26.49 Image:Map_of_America.jpg
- 26.50 Image:Absent_band.jpg
- 26.51 Image:Brain met.jpg
- 26.52 Image:March_1st_movement.jpg
- 26.53 Image:Mulaló_Museo_Historia_fuente_Alexandra_Pretel_Arango.JPG
- 26.54 Image:Leon_Theremin_Playing_Theremin.jpg
- 26.55 Image:Banderas_Americanas.jpg
- 26.56 Image:Coat_of_Arms_of_Iceland.svg
- 26.57 Uploads by Rickabbo (talk · contributions)
- 26.58 Candy, ice cream, etc packaging
- 26.59 Image:Bronsåldersbåt, tygmålning på Norrköpings stadsmuseums förhistoriska avdelning, den 5 april 2007.JPG
27 May 25
- 27.1 Image:4p179d3.jpg
- 27.2 Image:Manucho_36.jpg
- 27.3 Image:Veja_article_on_Wikipedia.jpg
- 27.4 Image:Authority_building_dawn.jpg
- 27.5 Image:Beach_(140107261).jpg
- 27.6 Image:Jummy.jpg
- 27.7 Image:Cork_Trees_Near_Ubrique.jpg
- 27.8 Image:GST.pdf
- 27.9 Image:AuCafe.pdf
- 27.10 Image:CVCES.pdf
- 27.11 Image:Planetderaffenzelda.pdf
- 27.12 Image:Quiro.pdf
- 27.13 Image:Brawl.pdf
- 27.14 Image:Dido.pdf
- 27.15 Image:Michael Jackson by San Sharma's.jpg
- 27.16 Image:Toricabio.pdf
- 27.17 Image:Anacos.pdf
- 27.18 Image:BitTyrant.pdf
- 27.19 Image:POLIGRAFO.pdf
- 27.20 Image:StRelProf1.pdf
- 27.21 Image:Tlq.pdf
- 27.22 Image:Musculaturaextrinseca.pdf
- 27.23 Image:Ximenasari.pdf
- 27.24 Image:James,_Jon,_Robert.jpg
- 27.25 Image:Blue_male_budgie.jpg
- 27.26 Image:Wupatki_National_Monument.jpg
- 27.27 Image:IdealheilligtdieMittel.pdf
28 May 26
29 May 27
30 May 28
31 May 29
32 May 30
33 May 31

[edit] May 1

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image talk:Bruxelles Arc Cinquantaire.jpg

Request for deletion from author. Bad name (typo). The author uploaded a file with correct name and better quality here: Image:Bruxelles Arc Cinquantenaire.jpg --85.177.177.10 06:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Image talk removed Julo 07:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Huracán.png

Copyrighted logo Anarkangel 22:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete This is a non-free image, and has been given a false license. Currently on English Wikipedia It's under "fair use" but it's not the "same image". I've found a image on commons I do not have the image page, only direct link to the image. Image isn't beeing used on any WMF projects either, except on the Hungarian Wikipedia --Kanonkas_(talk) 14:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Even if self-made, it's clearly the copyrighted logo. Rocket000 14:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:London_Mayoral_Election_postal.JPG

derivative of copyrighted work. (Not permanently there so FOP doesn't apply) Anonymous101 14:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Agree w/ nom. Cirt 15:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Adambro 15:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Per COM:DW --Kanonkas_(talk) 19:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Panoramic Hubble Image for 17th Launch Anniversary (NASA) (475130799).jpg

Other & better version already on Commons Image:Eta Carinae Nebula 1.jpg - Vol de nuit 14:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Eta Carinae Nebula 1.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by DRBot (talk • contribs) 11:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Caratula-tomb-raider.jpg

URV Michael Reschke 15:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Copyright violation: Game cover

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Onlybrocante.jpg

URV? More material for deletion by this user--Michael Reschke 16:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Michael Reschke 16:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Non free image --Kanonkas_(talk) 18:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, non-free screenshot. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Discoveryfieldofwork.jpg

The map is based on the Antarctic Digital Database (www.add.scar.org), and carries an acknowledgment on the NOAA page from which it is taken. Use of the ADD requires acknowledgment of the source, and this should be re-instated on the map. Note also that the map cannot be subject to Creative Commons licensing for the same reason; the ADD is copyright data. There is no problem with putting a map based on the ADD in non-commercial sites like Wikipedia, but acknowledgment of the source is a condition of free use.

Please do not assume that a map on a US web-site is necessarily free of usage restrictions.

--APRCooper (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC) (Manager of the Antarctic Digital Database) – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete To be clear, this is unfortunately a derivative work. No fault to the uploader (who couldn't be expected to realize this), though. If you see the original, the Antarctic Digital Database is credited there. The ADD's licensing terms specifically prohibit commercial usage. howcheng {chat} 18:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete although someone should recreate this image in SVG. The specific data on which the boundaries are formed is copyrighted, but similar data can be acquired for free. Bastique ^demandez 18:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to be difficult, but no, there is no equivalent "free" data for Antarctica. And I have no problem with the ADD being used, as long as it is properly acknowledged. I'd be quite happy if there was a note stating the ADD was the source of the topographic data, and stating that it is used by permission of the copyright holder (on whose behalf I manage the resource). If I knew how to do it, I'd vote against deletion; it's a nice map that tells the story well. Incidentally, the ADD web-site will provide a download in SVG format.--APRCooper 20:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not certain the topographic data is necessary for the image, just the coastlines, which can be acquired for free. Bastique ^demandez 22:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

If you are thinking of VMAP0, the quality of data for Antarctica is dire and highly inaccurate. I am afraid that the only good quality source is the ADD - and I don't make anything from saying that!--APRCooper 09:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:24DNTValt.svg

This was a test upload and I would like it to be deleted, thanks -- penubag (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure there is a different method for deleting images which are requested by the author for deletion, would someone be kind enough to tell me how I nominate for speedy deletion? -- penubag (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. You can use {{speedy}} for this sort of thing in future, if you like. Getting on IRC and asking us to do it is even faster. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Aw, my IRC client says I'm denied access. -- penubag (talk) 02:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Popmusic_portal_head.jpg

This collage uses Image:Thom_yorke_radiohead2.jpg, which was deleted as a copyvio. -- 88.134.141.54 13:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment An admin will have to check this. --Simonxag 13:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The portion in question came from here, which was originally licensed under an acceptable license (and later changed). But the Flickr page in question says "This photo is copyrighted, though I don't hold the copyright license to it. It was taken by a friend of a friend". Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Welttanznadel_Gold.jpg

wrong name, my mistake, sorry JMK4189 14:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. - duplicate/wrong name Leafnode 09:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Welttanznadel_Bronze.jpg

wrong name, my mistake, sorry JMK4189 14:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. duplicate/wrong name Leafnode 09:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Welttanznadel_Silber.jpg

wrong name, my mistake, sorry JMK4189 14:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. duplicate/wrong name Leafnode 09:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Curriculum_resumido.pdf

Protected document. Most likely text only (outside project scope). EugeneZelenko 15:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LCAnn.jpg

Game Cover => URV Michael Reschke 16:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

16:04, 1 May 2008 EugeneZelenko (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:LCAnn.jpg" ‎ (Image already removed) -- Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Diana_in_black.jpg

Copyvio -N 03:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike.lifeguard: : Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Diana_in_black.jpg

URV - Copyright Michael Reschke 15:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio - again – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Jan_Kobuszewski.png

Looks like poorly vectorized photo and next saved as PNG. We don't know anything about source. I can't believe that's own work without using somebody's photo. Herr Kriss 00:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Look at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Jerzy Dobrowolski.png. It that del req i found original photo and it's from same serie Arek's photos. I just can't find original of this, but if he once made dw it's very probably that he did it also here. Herr Kriss 00:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Res_599_es.gif

Seems likely to be a copyrighted logo Naerii 03:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Simple, but most likely copyrighted. No source or license or anything. Please use {{subst:nld}} or {{subst:nsd}} next time. Rocket000 00:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DanielSJPark.JPG

Out of project scope. Commons is not private photoalbum. EugeneZelenko 15:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Might be used to illustrate a sort of swing but is a photo of a young person in a private situation. Not used. --Simonxag 13:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kirchelubniany.jpg

Not my work, sorry. Can't put the image under any appropriate licence. Please delete. Kindest regards, --Mannemer91 18:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)" (Nicht mein Werk, tut mir leid. Kann das Bild unter keine geeignete Lizenz stellen. Bitte Löschen. Besten Dank, --Mannemer91 18:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)) --Drahreg01 18:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy delete Uploader says it's a copyvio. --Simonxag 13:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:£ubniany - koœció³-3.jpg

Not my work, sorry. Can't put the image under any appropriate licence. Please delete. Kindest regards, --Mannemer91 18:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)" (Nicht mein Werk, tut mir leid. Kann das Bild unter keine geeignete Lizenz stellen. Bitte Löschen. Besten Dank, --Mannemer91 18:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

Speedy delete Uploader says it's a copyvio. --Simonxag 13:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Marienandacht.jpg

Not my work, sorry. Can't put the image under any appropriate licence. Please delete. Kindest regards, --Mannemer91 18:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)" (Nicht mein Werk, tut mir leid. Kann das Bild unter keine geeignete Lizenz stellen. Bitte Löschen. Besten Dank, --Mannemer91 18:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)))

Speedy delete Uploader says it's a copyvio. --Simonxag 13:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lady.in.red.jpg

Most likely scan from magazine EugeneZelenko 15:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Btiu_meeting.jpg

Incorrect license. The article it is used in on wikipedia states BTIU/ATPC was established in the late 1980's. This picture could not have been taken in 1954. Rockfang 22:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, invalid license. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dagger.JPG

no author, no date, self-created artwork so not in scope Avron 15:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

PD-self implies the author, date's not important, but I agree it's out of scope. I would delete it but it's used (in a user's sandbox). Rocket000 00:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. out of scope Gnan garra 12:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Леда и лебедь.jpg

Inferior duplicate of Image:Leda and the Swan 1508-1515.jpg. --Gustav VH 18:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep I'm not an art expert so I don't know if it's inferior or not. Aesthetically, I find them both as pleasant. So I think it's best to let the local projects and re-users decide on which one to use. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for not being specific, this image has a yellow colour cast and is of low resolution compared to the other one. Gustav VH 10:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. as duplicate Gnan garra 12:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Azienda_Trasporti_Provinciali.JPG

I believe that this image is entirely a trademark, and it cannot be released under a free license, despite {{Trademarked}}. Trixt 21:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete, trademarks are irrelevant to us, but this logo design is very likely copyrighted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Gnan garra 12:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Magimix R1 (kitchen utensil).jpg

Copyvio, This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit. --guerreritoboy 22:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Given the uploader's other actions on the Wikipedia, I wouldn't be surprised if they worked for the company, however they haven't said they do so I suppose we should delete the image. --Simonxag 01:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Gnan garra 12:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SaarbrueckenSchloss.jpg

derivative work h-stt !? 11:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Model is copyrighted & seems to be in Germany in a place that may well not be completely public. That would require permission which it doesn't have. --Simonxag 12:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, it is on exhibition in the historical museum. If this is not allowed, delete it. I am not really certain about the legal status in this case.Ramessos 19:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:FernandoPessoa.JPG

un involutary mistake was made during uploading:Person in picture is not Fernando Pessoa, Is Jean Paul Sartre --78.3.69.214 12:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Is there a correctly named version somewhere? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep and rename to Jean-Paul Sartre. --Vriullop 16:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Tagged for renaming. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Museus_Campos_Gerais_escadaria.jpg

same image as http://www.plantaodacidade.com.br/Anteriores/quinta060308/uxiiI.htm 189.100.248.174 17:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

The user has made several copyright violations in pt.wiki. I suggest all his images should be controlled or even deleted right away. Dantadd✉ 14:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Eh. The image on the site is in much lower resolution than this one, and the Last-Modified header predates the upload here by only a day. Hm. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Considering this article seems to detail the end of a restauration or something, i think it might be likely that the museum released this image for press purposes or something. (google.......) Got it :D http://www.agenciadenoticias.pr.gov.br/modules/news/article.php?storyid=35684 and http://www.aenoticias.pr.gov.br/modules/xcgal/displayimage.php?pid=58446&album=12540&pos=0 seem to be the source. I'm not yet sure what that entails, cause I cannot translate it very accurately. TheDJ 13:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I see a copyright notice at the bottom of the page DJ found, so deleting as copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Enfants d'Ouzbékistan (Khiva).JPG

photo personnelle à remplacer pou non fonctionnement —Preceding unsigned comment added by ANGLO152 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC) (UTC)

was already done --ALE! ¿…? 21:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Speothos venaticus 001.jpg

unable to verify source --F3rn4nd0 09:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Keep The image appears to have been used on the English Wikipedia before this (although no url to the old image is given) and the site still lives at the web archive. -N 15:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

ok, so what is the license? copyvio?--F3rn4nd0 18:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- "As I have no interest in restricting the use of my pictures, all pics on this site are free to download, use and share with everybody. However, if you intend to use any of them on your own web site, please be sure to drop me a line , so that I can check out the all the new homes my pictures have found. I don't object to commercial use of my pictures but, if you intend to do so, please tell me about it." sounds like norightsreserved or PD to me. Use some reading comprehension and common sense. -N 19:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Keep Sounds completely free to me. (PD requires the author to explicitly state the dedication, so {{norightsreserved}} would be appropriate). Rocket000 03:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Shizhao 16:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Speothos_venaticus_001.jpg

Was deleted before per Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2007/03#Image:Bushdog002.jpg. Apparently, this was unknown in the recent debate. See here for the last version of the source web site. I still think this should go. Lupo 19:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete I am the uploader. And it's ok for me to delete this image. --Pixeltoo 20:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete According to the previous discussion the copyright status of the image is confused. --Simonxag 01:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

inappropriate; distasteful 66.191.161.74 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, biology is really distasteful … --Polarlys 18:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

kept, --ALE! ¿…? 21:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

pornographic with no use 70.178.187.98 20:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete It's a modern photo of explicit actual sexual activity. I think it might be seen as porn under US law. If that's the case, then we need legal documentation to show that the participants are not under age. That doesn't mean that such pictures wouldn't be useful if we could get the documents. --Simonxag 13:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Agreeing with the US law concern. Also, don't think that the utility of the image is really there. Currently it is only linked to from userspace on the English wikipedia, for instance. Darkspots 20:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Obviously mature sex organs. It might be useful to show the people the difference between this couple and an under age couple, but this might cause problems with US law. So the younger generation has just to believe this, sorry kids. Mutter Erde 09:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Pornographic? Why? Because of Nudity? Or an erection? No. Marcus Cyron 21:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep not pornographic; just normal sexual actions --91.128.173.49 20:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

delete I hate it, coz i am gay. --91.128.173.49 20:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Gnan garra 12:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Het1.jpg

Picture is apparently out of project scope (no serious chance to use it in an article) and not in use. Ra'ike T C 09:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Comment You should first close correctly the second deletion request before you start a third one.
btw.: commons is not only a repository for interwikis. Example: Nearly nobody on wikipedia would need 10 MB pics and bigger. They are stored for print media.(Source). Mutter Erde (talk) 09:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I closed it. I was thinking there was going to be some response so I left it open, but now we have this page. As a biased and involved party, I support deletion on the grounds that I can not honestly see this being used on any Wikimedia project (in their mainspaces, at least). Rocket000(talk) 10:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unnecessary to me. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Herbythyme (talk · contributions). Cirt (talk) 12:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Marcela (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Unless the description is changed, it should be deleted, as "heterosexual sex" is an obviously false description. Fossa_?! 22:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep, could be useful. Herby & Cirt: The Wikimedia Commons has many pictures that aren't necessary to me, but I nevertheless do not want to delete them. --Kjetil_r 14:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep per Kjetil r --Isderion (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Of course, this picture can be interesting for both biology and sexuality. Ajor933 (talk) 15:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Kept as per Kjetil r, Isderion, Ajor933, etc. Third DR.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CE369.jpg

I believe that this photo is not a work of the US federal government, but is a photo by Associated Press photographer w:Ike Algens. This image is under fair use on en.wiki (w:Image:Altgens mary ferrell.jpg) Trixt 01:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Altgens' image is indeed under fair use (see full version at w:Image:Altgens1.jpg), but please note what is written under the copy I uploaded (Image:CE369.jpg): "Commission Exhibit 369". This is a copy of the picture as cropped, reworked (see the arrow pointing at the supposed Oswald in the entrance of the TSBD) and published in the Warren Commission report (see here. This is thus a free picture. Bradipus 11:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

IMVHO I think that this image is only an evidence, not an original work by an officer or employee of the U.S. government (I don't think that put a simple arrow on a photo or make a simple cropping set it as new creative content). I believe that this is not a derivative work, so this image is copyrighted.--Trixt 01:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Whether or not it is a derivative work is not important, I mentionned the fact that it had been reworked only as an additionnal argument, but the fact is that once it has been published in a US Government public report, it is in public domain. See this discussion for instance. Bradipus 11:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I think that this statement is wrong (but this is only my idea, of course :). A "work of the United States Government" is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties. So, work must be prepared (it must be an original work or a derivative work), not only (re)published.--Trixt 20:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, think about it for a minute: what does mean "prepare"? If we were to follow your idea, nothing would be free in, for instance, a governmental report: each person's testimony for instance would be copyrighted by the person who testified. Look, all what is in that report is free, in public domain, period, nothing can be more free than that. Any further discussion beyond this would require the opinion of US copyright lawyers, but me think they would settle the issue in a second: public domain. Bradipus 22:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Please see en:WP:PD#Public records. Just because something is in the "public records" doesn't mean it couldn't be copyrighted. Lupo 23:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The Warren Commission Report is not a public record, it is a government report. Please consider en:WP:PD#U.S. government works instead, where the sole exception to the PD rule for governement reports is as follows: "Works produced under a commission from the U.S. government by a contractor are most likely copyrighted". Altgens was not a contractor of the Warren Commission, but a witness. On government reports in general: High-profile government reports can be uniquely lucrative for publishers because they are relatively cheap to produce. There are no acquisition costs, since the documents are in the public domain.

You know, this discussion is exactly why I virtually stopped contributing to Commons: people trying to have the works of others deleted based on vague legal notions. Even if it is done in good faith (do not take this personnally), it is extremely tiresome. Bradipus 23:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

It is a government report, which is a government record. Non-free photographs may appear in a report, the content of which may otherwise be ineligible for copyright protection, under fair use provisions. Republishing such a report would then constitute another instance of fair use. As far as I know, there's no principle whereby the government can expropriate the copyright of others simply by republishing their works. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete It's clearly not in the public domain, Commons_talk:Licensing#Warren_Commission_Report. Samulili 15:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I do not think it is that clear. The discussion is indeed there, as I thought appropriate to bring it in a broader forum although the discussion has apparently stopped there. Anyway, I finally found the credit page of the WC Report, which contains copyright notices for some reproduced stuff (such as this one), but no copyright notice (just "credit") for the full version of the Altgens picture for instance. What the impact is of "credit" vs "copyright notice", I am not sure, but in any case there is no notice at all for the reworked version of the Altgens pic I have uploaded. Other possible aspects of the issue are the absence of copyright notice in relation with this or with the exception applicable to stuff published "pre-1964". Some arguments in favour of the free status of the document, but to what extent they are convincing I do not know. I am a pre-90's european lawyer, these US technicalities are a bit unclear ;-) Bradipus 20:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I believe if it was first published in the USA before 1978 without notice of copyright it is public domain per US law anyway. Any info on first publication and if there was a copyright notice? -- Infrogmation 15:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

It was for sure published on November 22 or 23, 1963, but was it with or without copyright notice...But we can control that it was published in September 1964 in the WC report (full version, with a credit but no copyright notice) and in November 1964 (the reworked version, published in volume 16 of the exhibits, without credit or notice). Bradipus 20:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

It was published in the Warren Commission report without a copyright notice. But that was probably not when it was first published. Even if it was, that still doesn't make it a work of the US federal government. I'm thinking they could use an unpublished work under fair use just as they could a published one. I don't think this would count as the "first publication", even if it was never published before or since, and doing so would not make it a government work any more than me publishing your unpublished photos gives me the copyright to them. Or something. This is a headache. ;\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I have sources who say clearly it was published either on the day or the day after the assassination. Remember Altgens was working for United Press. As hinted hereabove, I think the solution may be the same as the one for Image:Moorman.jpg. Bradipus 12:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Considering the above, would it be better to replace the licence tag with Template:PD-US-not renewed? Bradipus 19:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. There is no evidence that the work is not copyrighted. Patrícia ^msg 22:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CE369.jpg

I believe that this photo is not a work of the US federal government, but is a photo by Associated Press photographer w:Ike Algens. This image is under fair use on en.wiki (w:Image:Altgens mary ferrell.jpg) Trixt 01:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Altgens' image is indeed under fair use (see full version at w:Image:Altgens1.jpg), but please note what is written under the copy I uploaded (Image:CE369.jpg): "Commission Exhibit 369". This is a copy of the picture as cropped, reworked (see the arrow pointing at the supposed Oswald in the entrance of the TSBD) and published in the Warren Commission report (see here. This is thus a free picture. Bradipus 11:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

IMVHO I think that this image is only an evidence, not an original work by an officer or employee of the U.S. government (I don't think that put a simple arrow on a photo or make a simple cropping set it as new creative content). I believe that this is not a derivative work, so this image is copyrighted.--Trixt 01:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Whether or not it is a derivative work is not important, I mentionned the fact that it had been reworked only as an additionnal argument, but the fact is that once it has been published in a US Government public report, it is in public domain. See this discussion for instance. Bradipus 11:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I think that this statement is wrong (but this is only my idea, of course :). A "work of the United States Government" is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties. So, work must be prepared (it must be an original work or a derivative work), not only (re)published.--Trixt 20:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, think about it for a minute: what does mean "prepare"? If we were to follow your idea, nothing would be free in, for instance, a governmental report: each person's testimony for instance would be copyrighted by the person who testified. Look, all what is in that report is free, in public domain, period, nothing can be more free than that. Any further discussion beyond this would require the opinion of US copyright lawyers, but me think they would settle the issue in a second: public domain. Bradipus 22:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Please see en:WP:PD#Public records. Just because something is in the "public records" doesn't mean it couldn't be copyrighted. Lupo 23:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The Warren Commission Report is not a public record, it is a government report. Please consider en:WP:PD#U.S. government works instead, where the sole exception to the PD rule for governement reports is as follows: "Works produced under a commission from the U.S. government by a contractor are most likely copyrighted". Altgens was not a contractor of the Warren Commission, but a witness. On government reports in general: High-profile government reports can be uniquely lucrative for publishers because they are relatively cheap to produce. There are no acquisition costs, since the documents are in the public domain.

You know, this discussion is exactly why I virtually stopped contributing to Commons: people trying to have the works of others deleted based on vague legal notions. Even if it is done in good faith (do not take this personnally), it is extremely tiresome. Bradipus 23:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

It is a government report, which is a government record. Non-free photographs may appear in a report, the content of which may otherwise be ineligible for copyright protection, under fair use provisions. Republishing such a report would then constitute another instance of fair use. As far as I know, there's no principle whereby the government can expropriate the copyright of others simply by republishing their works. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete It's clearly not in the public domain, Commons_talk:Licensing#Warren_Commission_Report. Samulili 15:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I do not think it is that clear. The discussion is indeed there, as I thought appropriate to bring it in a broader forum although the discussion has apparently stopped there. Anyway, I finally found the credit page of the WC Report, which contains copyright notices for some reproduced stuff (such as this one), but no copyright notice (just "credit") for the full version of the Altgens picture for instance. What the impact is of "credit" vs "copyright notice", I am not sure, but in any case there is no notice at all for the reworked version of the Altgens pic I have uploaded. Other possible aspects of the issue are the absence of copyright notice in relation with this or with the exception applicable to stuff published "pre-1964". Some arguments in favour of the free status of the document, but to what extent they are convincing I do not know. I am a pre-90's european lawyer, these US technicalities are a bit unclear ;-) Bradipus 20:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I believe if it was first published in the USA before 1978 without notice of copyright it is public domain per US law anyway. Any info on first publication and if there was a copyright notice? -- Infrogmation 15:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

It was for sure published on November 22 or 23, 1963, but was it with or without copyright notice...But we can control that it was published in September 1964 in the WC report (full version, with a credit but no copyright notice) and in November 1964 (the reworked version, published in volume 16 of the exhibits, without credit or notice). Bradipus 20:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

It was published in the Warren Commission report without a copyright notice. But that was probably not when it was first published. Even if it was, that still doesn't make it a work of the US federal government. I'm thinking they could use an unpublished work under fair use just as they could a published one. I don't think this would count as the "first publication", even if it was never published before or since, and doing so would not make it a government work any more than me publishing your unpublished photos gives me the copyright to them. Or something. This is a headache. ;\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I have sources who say clearly it was published either on the day or the day after the assassination. Remember Altgens was working for United Press. As hinted hereabove, I think the solution may be the same as the one for Image:Moorman.jpg. Bradipus 12:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Considering the above, would it be better to replace the licence tag with Template:PD-US-not renewed? Bradipus 19:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. There is no evidence that the work is not copyrighted. Patrícia ^msg 22:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Z5300 moret.JPG

no licence --Tibidibtibo 12:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep I see no problem. Is there any evidence it is copied from elsewhere? Sv1xv (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment Uploader has to choose a valid license. Like PD or CC-by-sa-whatever :-) I will ask uploader. --MGA73 (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have already done so. Sv1xv (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  - Yeah you'r fast... Anyway so did a bot :-) And it seems to me, that it was the uploader, that wrote "no license" above our little chat here. --MGA73 (talk) 10:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

uploader provided a better version Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] May 2

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Charlemagne et Louis le Pieux copy.jpg

same picture on Commons : Image:Charlemagne et Louis le Pieux.jpg --Vol de nuit 01:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Charlemagne et Louis le Pieux.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tiesto collage2.jpg

Collage of copyrighted album covers. --Ilse@ 08:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. Again example = album cover. Addshore 20:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, blatant derivative work. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tiesto collage.jpg

Collage of copyrighted album covers. --Ilse@ 08:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. See album cover. Addshore 20:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copyrighted covers --Kanonkas_(talk) 20:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Album cover link.png

Portrait is a non-free photograph from album cover. --Ilse@ 08:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per nom. Also seen in Image:Tiesto collage.jpg and Image:Tiesto collage2.jpg. Addshore 20:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment These two have been deleted. Thanks. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete ASAP if someone will go and remove the references to it on es.wikipedia. Because of the way it's used (within an imagemap), it's not as easy as waiting for the de-linker (if es.* even have one) to do it... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted cover --Kanonkas_(talk) 20:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delinked and deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Metroid_Prime_3_-_Corruption_-_at_E3_-_cropped.jpg

See Category talk:Flickr images needing human review; concerns it could be a derivative copyvio; see Commons:Derivative works. giggy _(:O) 10:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete - seems to be in violation to me, contains image of game. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Agree.Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons _es 11:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
DeleteIt doesn't just contain the game image it is basically of the game image. --Simonxag 13:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Possible violation of COM:DW and/or a copvyio. --Kanonkas_(talk) 17:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, obvious derivative work. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PraOct.pdf

Password protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PraNov.pdf

Password Protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PraDec.pdf

Password Protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PraApr.pdf

Protected by Password pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PraMar.pdf

Password Protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Prafeb.pdf

Password Protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Prajan.pdf

Password Protected pdf Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 14:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fulufjallet Road.jpg

unintended duplicate upload by author Montebianco 15:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Delete per uploader/nominator - It's a duplicate --Kanonkas_(talk) 16:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bureau_du_patron.jpg

Software screenshot. Which software? EugeneZelenko 15:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Metallphtalein.svg

I have made this graphic, mistake in the name, better version can be found here: Image:Metallphthalein.svg Moebius1 18:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Next time use this "{{bad name}}" if you do anything wrong --Kanonkas_(talk) 19:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, also what Kanonkas said Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Human_Imprint_logo.gif

This image is a copyrighted logo, and goes under copvyio. Kanonkas_(talk) 17:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete copyvio abf /talk to me/ 17:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, {{copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Blood_donation_at_Fleet_Week_USA.jpg

copyright attribution is wrong 71.204.61.143 20:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I dont understand. Why is the copyright attribution wrong? --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 14:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Why not simply correcting what is (allegedly) wrong, instead of deleting? --Túrelio 20:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. No problem that I see. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kyosaku_book.jpg

Copyright image Mind meal 22:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This should be covered by the book cover license as it is a book cover.

Mettai.Cherry 17:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, we don't allow fair use here. See Commons:Licensing. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Soilmec.jpg

Kelly-Bohrrohr 217.184.84.211 16:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, nonsensical request. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Viva_Zapata_movie_trailer_screenshot_(16).jpg

Replaced by nearly identical Image:Viva Zapata movie trailer screenshot lighter.jpg Patstuart (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:1930_Chevrolet_AD.jpg

This is my personal car. I do not want it the web as it clearly shows my address therefore is a theft issue. 92.1.78.234 20:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I've edited out the number plate. The old version with the uncensored license plate has been deleted. Is it okay if we keep it like this? (P.S. if you're still seeing the old version, clear your browser cache.) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep issue has been dealt with. Morven 22:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I think editing out the number place is appropriate, perhaps we should also remove the plaque beside the car which gives the names of the owners/restorers. The car was in a public place (Parnell Rose Gardens, Auckland, NZ) at the time of the photo. Keep but take any reasonable steps to preserve the privacy of the owners.-Gadfium 06:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The owner's names have now been edited out. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, in lieu of any further objection from the owner. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Dumbledore.jpg

Derivative of a copyrighted work, textbook example stated in Commons:Derivative works --hbdragon88 23:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Was nominated for deletion before Commons:Deletion requests/Harry Potter Fan art but survived on the grounds that it was a generic picture of an old guy. If it's just a picture of an old guy, why is it called "Dumbledore" (and why does it look like Richard Harris in the movie)? Dumbledore is a copyrighted character, a picture of him without permission (and that's what this is) is a copyright violation. --Simonxag 22:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep and rename to Old wizard.jpg. This is a stock character in many fantasy stories - and so could be used in articles about Merlin, Gandalf and Dumbledore. Brisvegas 10:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. We'd have a hard time proving that this is a "generic wizard" when there's "Fan drawing of Albus Dumbledore" in the page history... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 14:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Rename. Vincentsc 09:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Delete as per Simonxag. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 14:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't see any resemblance. Move to Image:Old guy with beard and glasses. Zanaq 08:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- This image doesn't convince you? hbdragon88 17:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. This is Derivative works Kanonkas_(talk) 08:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MrKenDatvian.jpg

Another derivative projector image Patstuart (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kd_lang_live_in_sydney_1997.JPG

This is a screenshot from a live apperance in Sydney (search google for similar images). Not self made. Patstuart (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kirsten_Dunst_San_Diego_Comic_Con_2006.jpg

Yet another projector image. Patstuart (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 06:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Maria-Kirjan.tórshavn.jpg

no freedom of panorama and copyrighted window --Jodo 12:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:1002840282_l.jpg

Out of project scope. Commons is private photoalbum EugeneZelenko 15:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

i cannot figure out how to add a picture to an article. any help with this and i can move the picture.

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Andrija_matijas_pauk.jpg

General on the image died in 1995. No source is givesn. Unlikely to be GFDL. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 19:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tencomm.JPG

Derivative work of a recent sculpture. ALE! ¿…? 21:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I took the picture myself. The artist, Brian Andreas, knows it's being used and has no problems with that. (???)

Ben

We need permission then. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tiesto elements of life interview.jpg

Copyrighted logos ("tiësto" and "Elements of Life") used, status of photograph questionable. --Ilse@ 08:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, logos are certainly copyrighted. Kameraad Pjotr 19:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Anna_Ayala.jpg

The Las Vegas Police Department is not part of the U.S. Federal Government, so this is not public domain Rob 22:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no PD-USGov. Kameraad Pjotr 19:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alfred_Keller.jpg

This appears to be a WWII era photo of the general; I may be wrong, but I do not believe that qualifies it as public domain (does the German government allow free photos from this era?) 1941 appears to be an estimate on the part of the uploader. Would {{Anonymous-EU}} apply if we can prove somehow it's pre-1938? Patstuart (talk) 00:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I made the estimate based on the uniform, however, it is possible Keller had this rank in 1937. There is no restriction on publication of wartime photographs by the German Government that I know of, but it may have been recently introduced. I had been surprised by the Russian change in polity also.--1mrg3105 01:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Its protected by german Urheberrecht (author's rights) the same way as any other picture. That means PD 70 years after death of author. --Herbert Ortner 20:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unless someone can provide proof that the image is indeed in the PD. The author can't be dead for more than 70 years, and if the author remained anonymous, the photo would still be copyrighted for 70 years after first publication. --Kam Solusar (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

No PD. Kameraad Pjotr 16:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Baskin-Robins's first flat faced sign.jpg

There is no way PD-textlogo applies applies here. Besides the color and positioning, a half-circle is not a letter last time I checked. --Superm401 - Talk 10:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep There is nothing copyrightable in this sign. Nothing at all passing the threshold of originality. -N 01:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I strongly disagree. The U.S. has a very low standard of originality. There are several elements I think qualify, including the colors chosen, the stylized half-circle, the use of a border, the shape of the sign, and the shadows around the letters. Superm401 - Talk 00:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, agree with Superm401. Kameraad Pjotr 16:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:White_Ipomoea_violacea_2.jpg

It is Convolvulus arvensis (note stigma),not any type of Ipomoea 68.196.106.94 06:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Please request a rename, not deletion MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:White_Ipomoea_violacea.jpg

It is Convolvulus arvensis,not any type of Ipomoea 68.196.106.94 06:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Then surely what you need to request is a rename, not a delete. -- Korax1214 (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC) (who's been guilty of the same mistake)

Kept. Please request a rename, not deletion MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Helmut_Newton,_Portrait_of_Laurel_Martyn,_1952.jpg

this is most likely an artistic work by an artist who died just same years ago, no information on publication provided Polarlys 14:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

keep: As stated on the image description page, this work was produced in 1952 in Australia. Australian copyright law states that photographs (even artistic ones) taken prior to 1st January, 1955 are in the public domain, so there is no problem here. I have added a link to the image description page proving that the photograph was taken in 1952, by an Australian photographer, of an Australian dancer, and is held by the National library of Australia. I think it's fair to assume that the photograph was taken and first published in Australia. Therefore, the image is certainly in the public domain under Australian copyright law. Papa November 10:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it is copyrighted in the EU (life+70), and also in the U.S. because it was copyrighted in Australia on January 1, 1996... Lupo 22:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyrighted in the EU even though it was first published in Australia by an Australian national? Also, why is the EU relevant? (No comment on the US thing.) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Not strictly relevant for our policy (U.S. & source country). Only mentioned since that means that the image, even if it was ok in the U.S. (which it isn't), could be used basically only at en-WP and thus would better be hosted there. Lupo 07:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, I didn't realise that we needed material to be free in the US as well as the source country. Perhaps Template:PD-Australia should be modified to explain this. Papa November 23:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. {{PD-Australia}} is in line with many other similar templates and I don't know of a decision to get rid off all of such templates. Samulili (talk) 12:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hannya Shingyo.pdf

Pages 30 & 31 Book Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 22:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

There is an error in the way uploading the file by an unexperiens user. Be patient it will be replaced by the requested scans soon --Joergens.mi 07:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Error has been corrected. There are now the correct scans in --Joergens.mi 08:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, not out of project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 18:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] B.Harry images

All images owned by B.Harry - Licence incompatible with free use - Copyright owner requires notification before use (see here). This is impossible to comply with anyway since the copyright owner's email address has been suppressed.

Images include:

--Rlandmann 12:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I request two weeks time to contact Harry B and to get his permission. although Permission exists for the use of the images. Until that time please don't delete this.Thank you. Chanakyathegreat

Yes, permission exists - that's not under dispute. The problem, however, is that the permission has a condition attached ("But also notify [MAIL REMOVED] before usage as well") which is unacceptable (see here under "Acceptable licences") and, in this case, unable to be complied with anyway. I doubt even we've been adhering to B.Harry's terms; has he been informed every time one of these images has been used in a Wikipedia article? --Rlandmann 19:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete This requirement is unacceptable. Note the following log entry:

15:39, April 11, 2008 Zirland (Talk | contribs | Block) deleted "Image:Su-30MKI air show1.jpg" ‎ (Copyright violation: http:/ / www.acig.org/ artman/ uploads/ mki_move.jpg) (restore)

– Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep Permission exists--151.32.198.143 11:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Permission exists--Gaetano56 11:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Relisted for further discussion. Also

Delete unless we can get this requirement lifted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete unless restriction removed. Morven 22:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Further clarification here is needed. Is this a "request", or a "requirement". A request is not a problem, but it it is a requirement then

Delete. TheDJ 13:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Reads like a "requirement" to me, and ultimately we'll never know, because I don't see any way of getting in contact with the copyright holder :/ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete unless restriction removed. This is fairly obviously a non-allowable restriction. --MichaelMaggs 17:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Seems more like a request to me. There is a permission and the pictures are of great encyclopedic value. --IncMan 10:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The wording of the owner's conditions is "but also inform... before usage as well". How can that be construed to be anything other than a condition of use? The encyclopedic value of these images is not under dispute, but that doesn't make them free to use. The uploader of these images asked for two weeks to get clearance for these images, and that was nearly three months ago now, with no sign of any progress. --Rlandmann 00:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment It is very easy to fix this. Someone email the owner and let him know that his pictures are being used on "The Internet" as cc-by-sa states they will be linked back to commons (or where ever they came from). And call it a day. --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 08:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. More than 3 months has elapsed and the non-compliant condition has still not been removed. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 3

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Birmingham_City_FC_logo.png

copyrighted. check http://www.blues.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Home/0,,10412,00.html 74.85.13.60 02:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copyrighted logo --Kanonkas_(talk) 09:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. copyrighted logo Leafnode 10:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PIJ_emblem.png

copyrighted logo http://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=صورة:PIJ_emblem.png 74.85.13.60 03:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 09:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Preeta.jpg

copyvio, cf [1] Relata refero(disp.) 11:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Leafnode 11:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vlag_ontbreekt.svg

unneeeded 84.81.139.214 16:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep In use -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, in use. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Daniela.jpg

It's unlikely a commercial enterprise (Universal Music) would put a promotional image under a free license. We'd need some proof. Rob 06:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copvyio --Kanonkas_(talk) 08:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm all for a speedy on this if anyone else agrees. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure if I could tag this as a speedy because it listed "Universal Music" as the author, and so maybe that counts as a "source". But, I'm sure nobody would object to this being speedy deleted. --Rob 23:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete No source link, no OTRS -> delete --Leafnode 10:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Very well. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 14:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Golden temple.jpg

copyvio - flickr page does not mention GFDL --Time3000 12:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 22:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Carved_stones_(150424524)_(1).jpg

duplicate (sorry) Pieter Kuiper 13:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Duplicate Leafnode 07:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Iban.JPG

Out of project scope. EugeneZelenko 16:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 18:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Per COM:PS --Kanonkas_(talk) 19:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 22:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, okay then! Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Devon_(actriz_porno).jpg

and Image:Celia Blanco1.jpg, Image:Eva Angelina.jpg

Most likely copyvio on Flickr. EugeneZelenko 16:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete The original Flickr user is no longer on Flickr. Wonder why? --Simonxag 22:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Monument to Rudolf Perisin.jpg

Bad image. Almost the same exist as Image:Rudi mig spomenik.jpg --Veliki Kategorizator 20:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, also no proper source. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 14:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ananias_Maidana.jpg

license tag for this image is totally false Patstuart (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes it is. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Semanario_el_pueblo.jpg

Not pd-old Patstuart (talk) 00:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Franco con miles de sus partidarios a suregreso del exilio en la primavera democratrica del 46 recorren las calles de Asunción en dirección -al Panteón Nacional.JPG

I seriously doubt the uploader took this picture of Franco in the 1930s Patstuart (talk) 00:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete User seems to have made a number of problem uploads. --Simonxag 22:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Greece_National_Crest.jpg

seems Copyrighted . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greece_National_Crest.jpg 74.85.13.60 03:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete no proof of authorship and free license --Leafnode 10:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rihanna_Tallinn.jpg

also:

(There might be more)

That's the translation I got.Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^commons _es 12:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. There's also plenty more where that came from. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Note: 08:23, May 6, 2008 Flominator (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Rihanna Tallinn.jpg" ‎ (No permission: see User_talk:Flominator#Image:Rihanna_Tallinn.jpg for details) (restore) – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. However, it appears the source site in question *does* allow CC licenses, as Flickr does. It's also possible that they allow licenses to be changed, just as Flickr does, so this might not have been the fault of the uploader. Certainly, several of the uploads I checked out were indeed CC-licensed. Make of that what you will. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kamkamkam.jpg

Serious doubt about authorship of a photo used in this image. I've left a question about this issue on user talk page (per notification by Kanonkas) Leafnode 11:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Me too. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Commi(innen).JPG

no permission on de wikipedia --Jodo 22:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC) --MB-one 12:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Changed from Speedydelete. Permission was given: "Released under the GNU Free Documentation License." --MB-one 13:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Im sysop of the german wikipedia, so i can view in the deleted version. In the deleted versions there is no permisson. The image was now deleted on de because of failed "Dateiüberprüfung". Before it was marked as a wrong commons transfer by the commons admin Codeispoetry. So it is obvious and has to be deleted --Jodo 15:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete in light of previous contributor. --Simonxag 22:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yay, Deleted! Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wappen Schleswig.gif

Derived from a deleted image from vector-images.com completed deletion request --Svens Welt 20:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hotel Titania.jpg

it is an orphan file. i uploaded it --Dimorsitanos 14:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep It's not a valid reason to delete a file because it's unused. --GeorgHH • talk 18:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Zirland: Duplicated file

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Prom_37.jpg

Out of project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Dubious copyrights claim. EugeneZelenko 16:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete believe it or not, it's actually in use. But that's still a dubious copyright claim. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete as above --Leafnode 07:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 19:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Against_the_world.JPG

Is this encyclopedical, useful for any wiki project? Don't think so... GeorgHH • talk 17:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Without a description. Unused & useless. --Simonxag 22:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 17:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fsm baltimore.jpg

The character of the monster is not copyrighted, but the artwork that is photographed here will be. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the US. So this photo (a derivative work) needs permission, which its does not have. --Simonxag 21:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. no Freedom of Panorama in the US MichaelMaggs 17:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:MARLAZ.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:MARLAZ.jpg}}

[edit] Image:MARLAZ.jpg

copyvio, the image Include the Hebrew scouts logo Hidro 19:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I made this logo 4 years ago when I worked in the Israeli National Scouting Center. --Dor Posner 19:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

KEEP artistic license, artists own interpretation and also for above explination. WayneRay 17:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

Comment it seems to be a "missing permission" case. Yuval Y § Chat § 20:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by ABF: Deleted because "Was in Category:Unknown as of 5 May 2008 - still missing essential information about its legal status". using TW

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Postmeilensaeule Zwoenitz.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Postmeilensaeule Zwoenitz.jpg}}

[edit] Image:Postmeilensaeule_Zwoenitz.jpg

Author not given at original source.Code·is·poetry 20:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Surely it's own work of the original uploader. Keep Julo 19:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. It is. Code·is·poetry 10:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Weissmann_Young_man.jpg

derivative work, bad resolution, personality rights abf /talk to me/ 16:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear ABF, please explain. What do you mean with "personality rights"? Best --Weissmann 05:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Poor quality & possibly taken in a private setting (it's a bit hard to tell, the quality is so bad). --Simonxag 22:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete ack above - without parents' consent kept in OTRS we cannot keep it --Leafnode  22:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted / --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 13:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:46 chudy anyanwu.jpg

"You are welcome to use any images from our site that will help in any project that helps to raise awareness of these scams. All we ask is that you credit our site." Sounds not enough for the free use that is claimed at the bottom of the picture. Apperently the picture comes from a forum on the internet, no deeplink, so hard to retrace. --Ciell 14:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The image came from ShiverMeTimbers' website. I used to have the email from him giving me the permission to use the image, but I don't have it any more. I am not sure that I understand the problem. Did I use the wrong category? Thanks for notifying me Pjeichler 14:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep - Just a matter of comprehensive reading and common sense. --Baiter1950 18:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Indeed, and the way I read "any project that helps to raise awareness of these scams", is that re-use in ways that don't help raise awareness of these scams (use your imagination here) is forbidden. :/ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete due to the unclear licensing situation. Adambro 15:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment Admins, hold your horses, OTRS might be coming up.. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin)

Well, this has had enough time, and still no OTRS. So, deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mudan_MD_6106.JPG

Unclear information about author. See Image:Mudan.JPG. Who took the picture? Svens Welt 20:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Original upload log ([2]. Original uploader was ru:user:Знанибус): == Краткое описание == Городской автобус Mudan MD 6106 в Воронеже.2006 год. == Лицензия == {{PD-self}} {{Изображение |Описание = Изображение:Mudan MD 6106.JPG<br />Городской автобус Mudan MD 6106 в Воронеже.2006 год. |Автор = Андрей |Время создания = 27.07.2006 |Источник = Фото автора |Лицензия = {{PD-self}} }} [[Категория:Изображения:автобусы]]. This image was transfered by me. Where is problem?

Keep it. lvova 21:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The problem was that two authors claimed authorship according to the information template. This cannot be possible.

Keep this file and replace the other. --Svens Welt 11:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Mudan.JPG

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:USS_Virginia_SSN-774.jpg

According to http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=16777 this picture is by General Dynamics Electric Boat and thus not taken by a US-Gov employee schlendrian •λ• 20:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

anybody taking care? --schlendrian •λ• 15:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:USS_Virginia.jpg

According to http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=16778 this picture is by General Dynamics Electric Boat and thus not taken by a US-Gov employee schlendrian •λ• 20:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

There is no more usage of the picture, short of some userpages, and if you doubt the reason to be valid read en:Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Works_produced_by_contractors, which says: works produced by contractors under government contracts (or submitted in anticipation of such contracts) are protected and restricted under U.S. copyright law. --schlendrian •λ• 16:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Code·is·poetry 13:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mudan.JPG

Unclear information about author. See Image:Mudan MD 6106.JPG. Who took the picture? Svens Welt 20:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 4

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Miranda_sp_zoo.png

Possible copyright violation - there's no guarantee that this person is eligible to release this logo under free license. Logo source: http://www.miranda.pl/ Leafnode 10:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Deleted due to author's explanation that he redrew logo and because of that he claimed to be the author Leafnode 10:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Molouisiana1.JPG

The uploader has a history of uploading copyvio images, and apparently does not own a camera. More than likely, this image is copyvio as well. Ytoyoda 00:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:Timeline Australian PM

I originally made this on wikipedia, but it does not seem to be useful to store the timeline on commons, especially since the code here is broken.

Delete per my reasons above. Brisvegas 10:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Yeah, you can only put images from Commons on other Wikimedia sites, not templates. ViperSnake151 13:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete unreadable (at least in Firefox), not very useful here. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Might as well speedy this per author's request. I can't see much discussion is needed. Rocket000 14:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lap second.svg

REASON=misspelling --Wiktor 13:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

ACTION=deleted --Rocket000 20:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Joshua Middleton.jpg

As "cover art" this image is most likely under protection of at least copyright. As such it could only be used as either a fair use image or needs the artist to actually release it to public domain. The former is inapprpriate for the Commons, and the latter is not supported by the summary and licensing present. --J Greb 13:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, simple copyvio. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Phobia-Breaking Benjamin album.jpg

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 16:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lady_Di.jpg

Although the Flickr situation check out okay I am suspicious that the Flick user is acutally the copyright holder and as such I propose this image be deleted. Adambro 14:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Surely a press image. --GeorgHH • talk 18:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Definitely so. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 03:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wikipedia Commons Censorship.pdf

Deletion Rant and may not be in Commons Scope NB: Check file first) --WayneRay 16:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 20:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Self-realization.pdf

Essay that should be on Wikipedia Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 16:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 20:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LL wikipedia.pdf

Business ad article Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 16:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 20:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Derecho comercial.pdf

advertizing Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ciudad Maldita.pdf

List of radio programs Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:DERECHO NOTARIAL.pdf

Advertizing article Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:El capital.pdf

Article Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Derecho consuetudinario.pdf

Article Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ton Venhoeven.pdf

One paragraph Bio Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bruno Gómez.pdf

One paragraph Bio Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 17:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: Outside project scope.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:355px-SciFi channel.svg

embeded image in the svg, which is not shown, broken svg file, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 20:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no content apart from linked image. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The_coming.jpg

Copyrighted artwork from the Busta Rhymes album "The Coming" (or derivative work of such), see the watermark in the lower left corner ("All Rights Reserved") and compare en:Image:Busta-coming.jpg, [3]. High on a tree 23:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 03:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Strong_City,_New_Mexico.svg

SVG rendering didn't work accurately (Note:I created image) Anonymous101 07:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

You don't want to fix it? I can do it if you want. Rocket000 08:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

It would be great if you could fix it. I will try if I have time although my svg skills are poor. Anonymous101 14:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I withdraw my nomination

. I will fix it later Anonymous101 08:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:De-LogoCopyright

I'm not sure what this is trying to be. The icon and text suggest it's suppose to be Template:Trademarked/de. The name and the way it was categorized suggests it has something to do with copyrights and not trademarks. (It's definitely not a license.) And lastly, it categorizes tagged images into Category:Insignia! We could easily fix these things, but why? What's wrong with {{trademarked}}. Rocket000 08:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete German Wikipedia license tag that is not allowed at Commons -- Prince Kassad 18:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, not in use, not useful. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Instalaciones.gif

Looks like an animated advertising. Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, 8.96mb animated GIF? Nice. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TheWallflowersRedLetterDaysDetail.jpg

Album cover (Spanish: Portada de Album), and apparently that album was not published by NASA. High on a tree 22:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Columbia a motory SRB.jpg

This image is a clear fabrication derived from this image. There can be no use for this other than to deceive readers, and thus has virtually zero value to this or any related project. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 19:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I think the nominator means this image. And yeah, Delete. Obvious shoop. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think I was trying to do two things at once and pasted the wrong link :) Fixed. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 22:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 20:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Henderson, Alexander Lamont (1838-1907) - Napoli chiesa dei gesuiti 1880-1905.jpg

This image is specular! The correct view is the other (below)! only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 19:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete I am the uploader and I agree about the deletion of this version of the image, since the correct, flipped version was uploaded already. --User:G.dallorto 21:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Kay! Deleted! Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cat toast.JPG

Vague source, unknown author. --Otterathome 22:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I uploaded this image fron en:WP, but the image on en:wp has been deleted, and the licence of this image is unknown. I agree to delete this image.--Nopira 11:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The source image is here. The image there has no license, and if we apply the default license of Uncyclopedia, that'll still only be CC-BY-NC-SA. So as much as I think we can never, ever have enough cat pictures, it has to go. :/ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Schloss_aschhausen.jpg

Copyvio from http://www.vera-naumann.de/privat_schloss.htm Rosenzweig 11:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course you can delete this picture! I wasn't sure whether I should load it up and so I'm going to send an E-Mail to Mrs. Naumann to ask herfor permission. But until I've done that you can remove it from Commons.--Adrian Roßner 11:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 17:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MyCreation.svg

User art(?) Out of scope as it's not being used. Rocket000 14:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 18:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete user is indefinitely blocked here and on Wikipedia. I doubt it's going to be used again. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 03:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 17:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Museu_Fuer_Kommunikation.JPG

Work by Salvador Dali. I don't think FOP applies. Rocket000 19:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 17:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:2448219344 88d9843964 o.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:2448219344 88d9843964 o.jpg}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:2448219344_88d9843964_o.jpg

Most likely copyvio on Flickr EugeneZelenko 17:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

odd how do you place that? did you click over to the CLEARLY LINKED FLIKR PAGE? if you did you would notice the picture and its status as SHARE ALIKE.......or are you not seeing that? Hollywoodnorthreport 17:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unfortunately some of us have learned to be skeptical of Flickr licenses. The validity of the license relies on the Flickr user "syntheticentertainment" (which does happen to be the name of the band'd management company) having the right to upload this promo image. As they haven't uploaded anything else can't really tell. --Simonxag 18:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete and drop the attitude, Hollywoodnorthreport. Suspecting Flickr-washing here. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

-so I am confused here...whats so wrong with someone posting a picture to flikr? and if so should this not be flikr's responsibilty to weed out so called illegal images? again this all seems very odd to me.....what is the bands management company owns the picture and decided to release it for use around the world? is that really so RARE and WRONG?Hollywoodnorthreport 06:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Yes, it is Flickr's responsibility to weed out infringing images. But we also have a duty to our users as well, to not host anything that could be a copyright infringement. This looks like it. And yes, it is very rare that a band's management company releases material under licenses that are acceptable to us. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 11:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

-so what if the original photographer was also the band manager? I have emailed them and this is the case. So what now? Here we have a legally posted photo that is available for SHARE ALIKE and you are telling me thats not good enough? What hoops do I need to jump through next to satisfy you?Hollywoodnorthreport 23:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Forward the email in question (which confirms that the Flickr account in question does indeed belong to Synthetic Entertainment) to OTRS, at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. We have these "hoops" for a good reason. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

...hello? ;\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

-ok on this216.19.183.91 04:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

-ok on this..Hollywoodnorthreport 05:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Meaning, you forwarded the email to OTRS? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

yes sir the email has been send! let me know what to do next please. cheersHollywoodnorthreport 01:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Identity confirmed via OTRS. howcheng {chat} 18:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Schloss_Aschhausen_2.jpg

Copyvio from http://www.schloss-aschhausen.de/ (see "Rund ums Schloss") Rosenzweig 11:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course you can delete this picture! I wasn't sure whether I should load it up and so I'm going to send an E-Mail to Mr Zeppelin to ask him for permission. I've discussed it with his daughter already. But until I've done that you can remove it from Commons.--Adrian Roßner 11:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Gräfin Manuela von Zeppelin hat der Nutzung zugestimmt und wir in der nächsten Zeit die Lizenz schicken. --Adrian Roßner 13:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

There probably is a OTRS-permission coming very soon. --my name 22:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. A permission was sent to the OTRS-Team (#2008050710012647). my name 00:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Leopoldo_Calvo-Sotelo.jpg

This picture was not produced by "20 minutos", but only reproduced. Dantadd✉ 18:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Then, would it be a case of misatribution by 20 minutos? 20 minutos licenses publish their work under a by-sa CC license, unless its signed by another author, which this photo is not. Thus, it does not fall into any of the exceptions listed in http://www.20minutos.es/licencia_20_minutos/ . Obviously the picture was made before the founding of 20 minutos, not for them, so its either an already existing free work they use and license, or a previous private work the use without caring for providing authorship. --Javier ME 09:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

We cannot know if it's a case of misattribution unless we found the true source of the picture. Until then, the only thing we know is that the photo seems to be under the CC license stated in the website, since no other source (and in particular none of the CC-excluded sources) is cited. Thus, deletion should not proceed. Habbit 18:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. 20 minutos was founded in 2000, so they are certainly NOT the authors of this photo (it looks like an official shot to me, by the way). 20 minutos has published lots of older copyrighted photos without (proper) attribution. I do not understand the rationale of "if we cannot find the real source, preserve it": I always thought the uploader was the one who had to prove the photo is free. --Dodo 09:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:774_Virginia_rollout.jpg

This was uploaded by myself. On the given source there is no credit so I thought it to be PD, which is wrong, as I now see: http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=8846 lists the picture as Photo courtesy Electric Boat. Therefore it is not taken be a US gov employee and not PD --schlendrian •λ• 15:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC) schlendrian •λ• 15:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

anyone? --schlendrian •λ• 15:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

if you have doubts about whether or not the reason is valid, cf en:Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Works_produced_by_contractors --schlendrian •λ• 12:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Code·is·poetry 13:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Agolada.jpg

tiene copyright. Me equivoqué al subirlo sin licencia completed deletion request --Svens Welt 11:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete Copyvio & uploader removed license on day of upload. --Simonxag 18:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

done Julo 18:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: copyvio

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Zarrentin_Kloster_außen_8524_20A.jpg

missing permission of Author Niteshift 01:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Jumbos_clown_room-sign.jpg

Derivative work. EugeneZelenko 17:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom --Simonxag 22:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. →Christian .И 15:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Peder Tuborgh 2005.jpg

this picture is not free use, copyvio only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 14:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyvio. Kameraad Pjotr 19:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RGB_Layers.jpg

Permission for non-commercial use only. EugeneZelenko 16:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Uploader did add 2 fully free licenses, but also added the condition at the same time. --Simonxag 18:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Commons:Licensing#Multi-licensing allows non-commercial licensing as long another, free license is given. --GeorgHH • talk 18:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

True, but it's what the user said: I allow these images to be used for any personal use with no monetary gain or commercial project. Use in presentations is permitted so long there is absolutely no commercial gain. Rocket000 20:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Or you could read it another way: The uploader understood that the GFDL is inconvenient for presentations, and so gave additional permissions for that. Same for non-commercial re-use. I see it as a multi-license, not as an additional restriction. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, unfree for commercial use. Kameraad Pjotr 16:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Imagen_satelital_de_lagos,_nigeria.jpg

Geology.com claims copyright on this image. They also state that it is based on NASA data, so it might be PD. GFDL license is incorrect, in any case. rimshot^talk 09:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Status unclear enough for us to keep MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:U.wiki_pic_COCOpark.jpg

Because the image quality is not good, and I will upload a nother format for this photo (in PNG) U.point 10:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Don't upload a PNG, JPEG is best suited for this sort of thing Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 16:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment I can't see a difference between the png and the jpg version, but could you upload it withouth the watermark? --rimshot^talk 16:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Jpeg is a good format for this image. Samulili (talk) 12:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CeliaCalle.jpeg

The given source ("The English-speaking wikipedia, picture uploaded by Author, under the "GFDL" License") is not specific enough to be verifiable; most probably it refers to the image which was inserted recently into en:Celia Calle and was deleted a few hours ago because of "Lack of licensing or source information".

A previous upload by the same user at Image:CeliaCalle.jpg was deleted because of an unfree license. High on a tree 13:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

There is no need to delete this image. I have uploaded it with full free permission for public use and for the Artist on Wiki. I am the owner of this image (Author). I previously uploaded the same image, but accidentally placed it under unproper use.

Delete - in the absence of some proof that the uploader can validly license the image it should be deleted. The would probably require an OTRS email proving ownership. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Please feel free to email the author privately for any proof that this image is a valid license image of the Artist, and was given permission to use freely for the Artist (Email has been included here for this very purpose). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbcity (talk • contribs) 17:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

On the contrary the obligation is on your to prove valid licensing. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem. But how to I prove valid licensing??. Please kindly help me understand or let me know, I will do so immediately. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbcity (talk • contribs)

- Check out this page for the information that you need. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No permission on OTRS. Samulili (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 5

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:TraffiordPark.jpg

Typo in file name, now uploaded under correct name Malleus Fatuarum 00:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete next time use {{bad name}} if you do anything wrong --Kanonkas_(talk) 05:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Leafnode 09:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Egypt 1919 revolution flag.PNG

This is an image I have created myself in order for an .svg file to be created out of it. I consider the .svg version Image:Revolution_flag_of_Egypt_1919.svg superior and therefore request this file, my own work, to be deleted since it has served its purpose. only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 08:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Per nom. Leafnode 09:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MathiasWiench.jpg

Ich möchte, das diese Foto gelöscht wird, da ich mich nicht auf meiner Seite veröffentlichen möchte. Bitte schnelle löschung Mannemer91 19:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC) --Mannemer91 19:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Uploader's request, low-res headshot. Lupo 12:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:WikiBanner-13.gif

Animated banner with spelling errors Erik Baas 00:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

oppose - an error is a reason to fix the error, not a reason to delete the complete banner - GijsvdL 00:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

保留 in use, fix the errors rather than nuking it Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 11:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The author has been told about the errors (more than once, in this file as well as some 15 others just like this one !), but does obviously not want to (or is not able to) fix them. And I don't want to waste any time fixing useless (as well as annoying) things like animated banners... - Erik Baas 14:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't blame you, but it's still being used so it seems some don't mind a few spelling errors. Rocket000 16:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

"don't mind a few spelling errors" ? In an encyclopedia ? Brrr... :-( - Erik Baas 18:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep i agree with Lewis Collard. Multichill 10:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Fixing things is always preferable to spurious deletions. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cola_bottle_and_vulva.jpg

derivative work abf /talk to me/ 13:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete moreover out of project scope. --Svens Welt 14:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

KeepThe artwork (such as it is) on the Coca Cola bottle is only incidental. We have lots of pictures of things and these things (like cars) often have company logos on them. If the picture was of the artwork rather than just containing it. the situation would be different. I don't personally much like them, but some of Klashort's pictures are being used on the Wikipedia to illustrate sex-related articles. --Simonxag 00:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Vol de nuit 13:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Shows mainly the text part of the logo which is {{PD-US}} anyway. See Image:Coca-Cola logo.svg. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept per Bryan. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Yellow_scottish_fold.jpg

Will be goor idea to remove book cover. EugeneZelenko 15:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Done – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CITEBarnstar.png

I created this image, but it has too much text, so another one is being used. There is no reason for this image to exist. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep, in use Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Withdraw Oops, forgot to check that out *blush* J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept / J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Citrus_Bowl.jpg

No source, no author. Deleted on en.wikipedia for having no source, see [4]. Svens Welt 09:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: Dupe of Image:Citrus Bowl.JPG

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Trent_Reznor-FEB2008.jpg

Copyright Violation, The Description of Flickr says that this is a Press Image and thus the Image is probably copyrighted. All the Best --Mifter (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Mifter (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep This image is no copyright violation. If you follow the source link, you get to the image description page on flickr. There it says clearly that the picture is licensed as CC-BY-SA 2.0. Perhaps Mifter should act more diligently before slapping a deletion request on an image, especially check the flickr source page for the actual license. If this is just an oversight, I beg a pardon. Can happen to everyone. Of course the picture is copyrighted, also GPL licensed software or CC-licensed works are copyrighted - but they are licensed. Only old public domain works are not copyrighted anymore. Gorinin 19:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment I am so sorry about all of this, when I saw the description I misinterpreted the description as to mean that the Image had been made by someone else and copyrighted, and was posted to Flickr by someone else who was not the copyright holder and then incorrectly licensed as their own work, I did see that the page said CC-BY-SA 2.0. was the license but I thought that the Flickr User was not the actual copyright holder thus making the license in-valid and as a result I put it up for deletion. I truely apoligize for this, I simply thought that it had been made by a stock photo company which makes copyrighted Images for press use which are not allowed on Commons. Once again I apologize for all of this, --Mifter (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Leafnode 19:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:A1_2008.svg

This file was moved from nl: without my permission; it is just an experiment, and not ready to be used outside nl. Erik Baas 23:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep - image was released at NL under GFDL. Once released is always released. GijsvdL 23:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by request of author as this seems to be a temporary image for testing/tweaking purposes. Not used except for nl, where a local duplicate exists. NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 23:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Killdeer with Eggs.JPG

I uploaded this picture and don't know how to delete it. I cannot get the copyright information right. I tried to upload again and select copyright info but it keeps saying I havn't specified it. I give up, this is too difficult...

00:37, 5 May 2008 user:Brentf777

Comment email contact initiated, hold thy horses for now Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 10:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, problem resolved now. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 19:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:QPSK_timing_diagram.png

ergfgbgb 24.4.97.206 03:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, fkjyh89yt29yt1t. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 11:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chris Playing the guitar.jpg

This looks like a promotional image, and given the lack of resolution, it must be deleted. only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The blog that linked this picture is under some CC license (that I didn't check), but that was merely linking to a picture on a fan site, which didn't have a copyright statement (and without much regard for copyright at all, as far as I can tell). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Logo_Villas_c4.jpg

Even logo image has (R), so I don't think that it's GFDL Leafnode 10:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep and tag with {{PD-ineligible}} and {{Trademark}} instead of GFDL. --88.134.141.54 12:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep I agree with {{PD-ineligible}}. This is simple text and one shape. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Leafnode 05:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Felix Wong.jpg

A photo in a drama of the artist, unlikely owned by uploader. --Stewart~惡龍 12:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Also no source, so deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Doron_sede_dov_tower.jpg

Uploader states "wikipedia only use" Benherz 14:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. License is invalidated by extra condition. --Simonxag 23:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ubicacion_de_San_juan_de_la_Vega.JPG

Most likely commercial online maps screenshot. EugeneZelenko 15:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, Google Maps screenshot. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Luis_merlo.jpg

Source: Google and license pd-self Leafnode 17:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Blackwolf45: This is a wallpaper made by Antena 3 Television, and its avalible at their web page. I found it in Google, but the real source is Antena 3.
- Being available to download doesn't mean that it's in public domain --Leafnode 18:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Informacion y sociedad siglo XXI.pdf

6 page student essay Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Project2.gif

bad, erroneous animation made with a program in evaluation mode (see upper left corner of the image!), --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 18:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, out of scope. Also, people still pay for that stuff? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Walther_Wenck.jpg

No source given, only statement on en.wiki that image is released by owner into PD, which can't be verified Leafnode 18:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Rock larico.pdf

Spanish music band's history Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Valuation.dictionary.pdf

Hebrew glossary of land valuation terms Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:RHLE 5.pdf

Procedure to registry the same subscription Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 19:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Minogue Quotations.pdf

Quotations by Craig W.J. Minogue Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 19:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gosse korte.pdf

1 paragraph Bio Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 19:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PEOPLE AGENCY.pdf

Model Agency ad Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 19:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Julo: out of scope —Preceding unsigned comment added by DRBot (talk • contribs) 21:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Giuseppe_Brotzu.jpg

maybe copyvio, no correct licence to be found on that source. 80.135.213.48 20:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The photo was copied from http://www.regione.sardegna.it. The disclaimer for the site says cc-by-nc-sa. Even if we consider that the government of the autonomous region of Sardinia own the copyright for the photo, they won't allow any commercial use. delete. --Andibrunt 20:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Fredy_Mayer.jpg

This image looks like a promotional image from the Austrian Red Cross; no plausible reasoning is given to substantiate the claim that it is licensed under the GNU FDL 217.84.37.67 20:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Assyrian1.JPG

derived work, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} ∇ 20:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

TV screenshot, deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CRW 2734.jpg

Says clearly in the permission description that all rights are reserved by the school --Elipongo 22:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ledesma.jpg

Users images deleted from en as copyvios. More images at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Mo_j90 Rettetast 22:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted them all. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:--Category-pintura--plataruiz.pdf

Artists Bio 4 paragraph Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Although quit with that "images only" stuff. :P Some scanned source texts are useful to have around. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok I use a TypeItIn.org program and sentences and paragraphs are typed out in less than a second so I hadn't paid much attention to it. I was going by E.Z's comments to me earlier. I agree and have left many text based pdf files as they are linked to galleries and categories. Thanks and I will edit the button. WayneRay 17:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Alca_Members.PNG

The map is factually wrong. The ALCA does not exist yet, and many countries that reject it (like Bolivia and Venezuela) are marked as members. The map uses the criteria "Countries that the US would want to be members of the ALCA" Thialfi 02:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Non-notable fancruft. Er, I mean, it's used. There's nothing in our scope that says files must be factually true. And all I see is a map of world. The text you accompany it with on an encyclopedia is up to you. Rocket000 20:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

- Don't game the system. A map named "Alca members", with countries marked incorrectly as members of an international organization that does not exist, and some of them even reject to be a part of, has no use for an encyclopedia, no matter what "Scope" lists or does not list. And don't worry, we have plenty of other world maps to use Thialfi 20:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

COM:NOT. The file is used which means it is in our scope. That's it. Rocket000 07:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Used, therefore in scope; we exist to serve the local projects, and editorial decisions like this are not usually issues that we care for. (In before flaming my talk page with Wikipedia policy acronyms.) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Herbert Bednorz.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Herbert Bednorz.jpg}}

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Herbert Bednorz.jpg

No source, no author. Why GDFL? --Svens Welt 08:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC) --Svens Welt 08:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no indication of GFDL status. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Cygnus-X1.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cygnus-X1.jpg}}

[edit] Image:Cygnus-X1.jpg

Image has wrong name and description: it is actually an image of the core of the galaxy NGC 4261, depicted at Image:Ngc4261.jpg. Mike Peel 15:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep we have the "edit" button for a reason... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The edit button doesn't let me move the image to a new name. That means that the image would have to be re-uploaded then this one deleted. However, as the image does not have a link to the source of the image (it just gives nasa.gov), and we have the image in an alternative form at Image:Ngc4261.jpg, I don't think it's worth doing that. Mike Peel 20:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The cropped version is useful. Use {{rename}}. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept - use {{rename}} – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ja-Main Page.png

It is not used anywhere. only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 08:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Siebrand: : at request

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Citrus_Bowl.JPG

No source, no author. Deleted on en.wikipedia for having no source, see [5]. --Svens Welt 09:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Svens Welt 09:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
It looked like it might be from Google Maps, so I checked. Their image is different, but the scale is identical, so it was probably taken by a satellite at the same height with the same configuration, if not the same satellite, which most likely makes it a copyright violation. Delete based on that as well as the lack of a verifiable original source. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no verifiable source. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 08:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Profil_Viry.gif

Hockey club logo, no proof of free license Leafnode 10:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 07:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Napalmdeath2006.jpg

possibly copyvio; compare [6] --NoCultureIcons 02:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment It doesn't quite look like a commercial immage, more like something a fan took on meeting the band. --Simonxag 23:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep Checked deletion log on nl.wp. Was uploaded as PD-self. Looks OK to me. Siebrand 01:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, agree with Siebrand. Kameraad Pjotr 19:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Stefan_Banach.jpg

No proof of PD-old. Imported from pl.wiki, where it was imported from uk.wiki, and where also is no proof of PD-old :-) Leafnode 14:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, no proof of PD. Kameraad Pjotr 19:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Japanese_martyrs-web.jpg

Delete appears to be a copyrighted photo of 3D statutes, not a free photo of a 2D painting as marked Mangostar 17:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep image changed, along with source and attribution. It is now a crop of image:26 muchenykiv Yaponii 03..jpg. Evrik 21:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, this image is still not free (and nor is the image it's cropped from). This building was created in 1962 (w:Twenty-Six Martyrs Museum and Monument), which means the sculptures are still copyrighted (50 yrs after death of the creator, per Template:PD-Japan). According to COM:FOP#Japan, freedom of panorama in Japan only gets you the right for non-commercial reproduction of images of publicly displayed artwork. (Not enough for the commons.) Mangostar 23:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
This is a publicly displayed artowrk. You just made my point. Thanks. Evrik 20:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Mmm, what point? The non-commercial restriction makes it not free enough... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
  - Non-commercial? WHat are you talking about? This has a fee license. Evrik 14:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Can we move this along, this is now a free image. Evrik (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, FOP does not apply. Kameraad Pjotr 19:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kakab-journal.jpg

Copyrighted material, less than 70 years old (see word "1947"). only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 07:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Not sure copyrighted. In Morocco and other Arab states, PD is fifty years after author's dead. Maybe the only need to change the license: {{PD-old}} --> {{PD-Morocco}}
Julo 12:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment If there's any Arabic speakers in the house, see if this has any information about the death of the person that wrote it. Also tell me how you don't get a headache reading right to left. ;\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. If it is just a list of names (a list with no originality), and a photograph of a 2D object, then it's PD-ineligible. Samulili (talk) 12:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cesarzowasissi.jpg

This woman is said to be our Empress Elisabeth of Austria ???. I don´t believe that without a source. Regards --Mutter Erde 13:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No source (for PD-old nor for being of Empress Elisabeth of Austria). Samulili (talk) 12:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Eruv Issur.pdf

Manhattan Eruv Prohibition Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, unclear copyright status. Kameraad Pjotr 18:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:C_o_a_Benedetto_XI.jpg

I don't think that Pope's COA is under GFDL Leafnode 09:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete --Chech Explorer 11:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment Drawings of coats of arms have their authors, who have drawn them. They have their own copyrights and they can accept GFDL, if they want. The pattern of pope's personal coat of arms is not copyrighted, AFAIK. Julo 12:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Benedict XI lived in years 1303–1304. I don't think that they had GFDL then. I don't argue that it's not free. I only say that it's probably not GFDL. --Leafnode 12:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  - Do you think they did have computers in 14th century and did they know JPG-compression standard? I just say, that the person, who created this JPG, could use GFDL or any other license. And it is not reason for deleting the file. Julo 14:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
    - I think that person who 'created JPEG' has no rights to decide about license of this image. If you know what the license is - fix it and 'keep'. --Leafnode 15:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Image was first uploaded to it.wikipedia as it:Immagine:Stemma-Benedetto-XI.jpg. There, as here, a permission email is copied on the description page. It gives permission for usage. Under what licence it doesn't mention. On it.wiki, aforementioned Stemma-Benedetto-XI.jpg is tagged with the template it:Template:StemmiEcclesiastici which is mentioned on it:Wikipedia:Copyright_immagini#Autorizzate_solo_per_Wikipedia (use authorized only on it.wikipedia). So, Delete. NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 16:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- If that's true, everything here has similar situation. --Leafnode 16:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  - That would indeed be the case, yes. NielsF ^{? (en, nl, fr, it)} 17:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete and it is not the correct coat of arms (see http://www.araldicavaticana.com/pbenedetto11.htm). Odejea (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Cirt (talk) 15:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Crazy Horse Memorial

File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-d.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-e.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-h.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-g.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-b.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-c.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy-horse-memorial-2004-f.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy Horse model.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy Horse Memorial comparison.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazy Horse Memorial side.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Crazyhorseface.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:CHMem.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

I believe that ~~since~~ because the Crazy Horse Memorial is a private undertaking, not a government project, that images of it, and the various other models, replicas, and artworks at the memorial site are non-free derivative works. Kelly 17:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Nonsense. Keep them. The Crazy Horse Memorial Organization should be contacted at memorial@crazyhorse.org

Keep Nonsense. Have you not read all the discussions with people, who want to withdraw their donated pics from commons, with the argument: No, you can't change you licence later. It's the same in real life. This was a government work, now it's private. No reason to change the licence Mutter Erde 18:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I read the Wikipedia article and all the links from it that are still alive. I didn't see anything that indicated the monument was ever a work produced by an employee of the federal government or under a contract specifying the outcome would be a work for hire. I got the impression that it is and always has been a private non-profit endeavor. It would be helpful if you could provide the source of your claim that it was a government work.

Even if it were true that it was originally a government work, my understanding is that the monument is now being modified independently of the government (and please feel free to object if you think this assertion is false). If that's the case, then the work can definitely change from a public domain work to a copyrighted work, as a public domain work with copyrightable modifications is subject to the copyright of the persons making the modifications. (Photos of the work before such modifications would of course be unaffected.) —LX (talk, contribs) 18:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

It would be helpful if you could provide the source of your claim that it was a government work.... I have no idea: I'm only quoting the voter's for deletion argument, hoping he has made some thoughts (and some investigation), before he starts a deletion request. Otherwise: Do not disturb. Regards Mutter Erde 20:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I guess I don't understand your question - I said that the statue is private, not government. To my knowledge, the statue has never been a government work. Kelly 20:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I have read the "since" as "now it is a private property". In en I found this description: The monument has been in progress since 1948 and is still far from completion. If finished, it will be the world's largest sculpture... That looks to me like a Government work. In 1948 the Indians were very poor people. Mutter Erde 20:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The Lakota are not building the monument - in fact, many of the Lakota don't like the whole idea. It is a private enterprise. Kelly 21:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Question: is the monument located in an Indian reservation, and if so, what does that mean in terms of applicability of US copyright laws? —LX (talk, contribs) 18:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe it is part of a reservation...IIRC, South Dakota has 7 or 8 reservations, and the Black Hills isn't included. (Actually here is a map - no reservation.) In any event, this shouldn't affect copyright law. Indian reservations are technically lands administered by the Federal Government, and U.S. law extends there. When the reservations enjoy special privileges within the law, as in the case of gambling establishments, those privileges are generally established by Congress or the Federal courts. Kelly 20:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete No evidence that this was ever a government project. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Except the ones on Wikipedia, Image:Crazy Horse Memorial comparison.jpg, Image:Crazy Horse Memorial side.jpg, Image:CHMem.jpg and Image:Crazyhorseface.jpg which should be moved there and have their 3d fair use tag added. There is no FOP in the US. This causes a lot of frustration over photos of recently produced important monuments, but it remains a fact. --Simonxag 23:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Is there a note on the ticket as no cameras or photographs only for family purposes or something like that? Mutter Erde 10:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There doesn't need to be one. Whether they explicitly forbid photography or not is orthogonal to the issue of whether photos that were taken are derivative works or not. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment See Photography at Crazy Horse Memorial and Use of Website Contents JPH-FM 16:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I'm a little uneasy with the idea of forbidding photography of a mountain-- when someone does satellite mapping of the whole area do they have to ask permission? But what do I know, I'm not a lawyer. Marnanel 20:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, I have to admit it seems a little odd to me, too. This is, after all, the largest sculpure in the world. It makes me wonder - if the Great Pyramid at Giza were being built today, would it be copyrighted, or {{PD-ineligible}}? Kelly 20:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- They could presumably get away with a claim that the inclusion is de minimis, and there are also fair use provisions to consider for contexts other than ours. As for the pyramids... {{PD-shape}}? {{PD-freaking-huge-shape}}? ;-) Joking aside, no, copyright protection is not limited to works of certain sizes. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep: The photos have enough originality to qualify for copyright in their own right. This nomination is nonsensical and an example of copyright paranoia. IvoShandor 04:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep NO evidences for copyright violation. --Jacopo Werther 07:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - to the above two posters, please see the terms here regarding photos of the artworks. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the U.S. Kelly 14:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The facts of the issue are:

It is undoubtedly a sculpture. Yes, a freaking huge sculpture carved out of a mountain, but we can no more call this "a photo of a mountain" than we could call a photograph of the Mona Lisa "a photo of some canvas and some paint".
It is not, and never has been, a work of the United States Federal government (as one commenter has claimed).
United States law does not allow distribution of photographs of sculptures, when such sculptures are still under copyright. This one clearly is still under copyright; that it has (to quote one commentator) enough originality to qualify for copyright in their own right makes no difference -- indeed, this is actually a pretty good legal definition of what distinguishes a derivative work from a plain old copyright infringement.
The Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation, the copyright holders, are actively against people distributing photographs of the memorial.

With these things considered, and no thorough refutation of these facts being offered, I'm very surprised this has gone on so long. Therefore, all these photos have been deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Deepika_in_Saree.jpg

The original uploader on EN:W does not provide any requested information about the image. It seems that the image is pirated. Already in the category for speedy deletion on the Bulgarian Wikipedia. Chech Explorer 10:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Hm, however, when explicitly asked the user explicitly asserted that s/he was the author of the image. I think that unless the opposite is proved, we should assume good faith and consider the image okay. Spiritia 12:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep --DStoykov 20:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Generally we would not expect a professional image to go through picasa. In addition most people perceive me as human and as a result have a hard time directly lying to me.Geni 23:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Ownership validated through OTRS. howcheng {chat} 21:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Gandalf der Graue

File:Startseite sh.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Landkarte ausschnitt.gif (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:Balti.jpeg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:KingPope.jpeg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

User:Gandalf der Graue's images are of the online game Second Home. The author may be correctly stated, but on the game's website there is no mention of a free license.--141.84.69.20 21:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. There has been plenty of time for the uploader to respond; I suspected at first that he might be connected with the site in question. But in lieu of a response, these have been deleted as random screenshots (and therefore derivative works). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 6

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Erectpenis.JPG and Image:Typical Semi Flaccid Penis.JPG

There are alot of photos of penises, and these ones by user:BigBoris are unuseful and unused (and imho he just wanted to show is ugly penis, but this is not the point).--Ryan258 17:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete I agree WayneRay 19:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay
Delete poor quality. Plenty of penises already. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, not in use. Thuresson 04:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:MasonStatue.JPG

and Image:Art Rooney Statue.jpg

On freedom of panorama for statues in USA EugeneZelenko 15:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This statue is commonly used at George Mason for promotional purposes. Indeed, social organizations often take pictures of this statue and use it for their own purposes, with no objection from either the artist or the school.

See here: http://braddockheritage.org/history/present/

Here: http://www.examiner.com/a-728465~GMU_student_organization_wants_guns_to_be_allowed_on_campus.html

And here: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/28/sports/ncaabasketball/28mason.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Furthermore, popular statues located at University campuses are rife on Wikipedia, with no problems. For example, the Homer statue at UVA, and the War Memorial at Virginia Tech.

More examples: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:James_Madison_statue.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:JamesBlairStatue.JPG

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Statue_of_James_B_Duke.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laxmatt (talk • contribs) 2 May 2008 18:55 (UTC)

Comment "Everyone does it" isn't a defense... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Here is an interview with the artist in which she states, among other things, she views this as public statue, she likes to hear that people take pictures of it, and ultimately this statue is part of the George Mason Community, not a private work. I especially would like to draw attention to the scluptor's last statement, "I think that impluse is why I enjoy creating work in the public domain". http://gazette.gmu.edu/articles/9964/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laxmatt (talk • contribs) 16:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I'm not sure the artist was referring to "public domain" in a legal sense. Then again, it seems as if the artist doesn't mind photographs being taken of it. So I'm leaning towards Keep here. (Also, in future, please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC) (Comment revoked. I was wrong and wasn't thinking too hard. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

I realize I'm boring on about this but this is a great statue, part of the George Mason community, and should be part of any good wiki page about GMU. Here is an article about a panel of "Public Artists", including Wendy Ross, the sculptor of the George Mason statue. http://gazette.gmu.edu/articles/9787/ "Public Art' is a distinct and meaningful phrase, from the first line of the wiki page: "The term public art properly refers to works of art in any media that has been planned and executed with the specific intention of being sited or staged in the public domain, usually outside and accessible to all." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_art It is inconceivable that a professional artist like Wendy Ross would be unaware of what she is saying when she states: "I enjoy creating work in the public domain".Laxmatt 05:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

"Public domain" has a meaning outside of the context of copyright, so it is quite conceivable that she didn't think about the copyright meaning of the term when she said that. Wendy M. Ross has the copyrights on the statue unless she signed them over to someone else. She can't control people taking pictures of the statue, but she can potentially control people publishing images of the statue; at least any publication that wouldn't be fair use anyway. Why don't you just ask the sculptor for permission to license the image as either PD, CC-BY, CC_BY-SA, or GFDL? That's what was done with Image:Babe Ruth statue.jpg. (Warning: be prepared to explain precisely what these licenses and "releasing into the public domain" mean, and be prepared for a potentially lengthy e-mail exchange. If and when you do have the artist's permission to license the image under a free license, forward the whole e-mail exchange to permissions-commonswikimedia.org, stating clearly to which image that applies. Don't worry if the image gets deleted before you have the explicit permission, it can be restored. That happened to the Babe Ruth image, too.) Without explicit release by Wendy M. Ross: Delete Lupo 10:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

And besides, maybe it's better anyway to delete this image and go through the whole process for a new image of the statue that is includes the feet. Lupo 10:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, she doesn't have the rights to the statue: George Mason University does. I only point the quotes to illustrate that this statue was from the outset a work of public art. Also, given the educational and research nature of the wiki article on GMU, it seems evident that the picture indeed falls under fair use.Laxmatt 15:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, maybe it was a work made for hire for GMU. Then ask them. The point is, ask the owner of the copyrights. "Fair use" images are not allowed here. The problem with public art in the U.S. is that there are still copyrights on public artwork, and U.S. copyright law has no exception for images of public art. Such photos are just derivative works of the public artwork. Other countries' laws explicitly declare photos of public artwork not to be derivatives (or rather, they say that such photos may be published and sold without the consent of the owner of the copyrights on the public artwork). But sadly not so in the U.S. See COM:FOP. Lupo 21:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay then. Deleted. We're not "trolls": we care about copyright and the vast majority of other websites do not. As I said, "everyone does it" is not an excuse. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:A77AQUE logo.png

Design found at http://www.attaque77.com.ar/ . I doubt wether this is PD-Ineligible or not. --Chabacano 23:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep As I said in the description page, this image is a imitation of that logo, it is entirely my work, I used Adobe Photoshop CS3, using Image:Pentagram.svg as a base, number 77 made with Army font. Conclusion: it shouldn't be deleted. --Anarkangel 03:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you drew this diagram, but the design is from somebody else. I can not draw Mickey Mouse and say that I am the author holding all the rights. My doubt here is if the design is simple enough to be ineligible for copyright.Chabacano 14:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep PD-Ineligible. A star and 2 numbers. It's trademarked, not copyrighted. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 15:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, clearly not eligible for copyright. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kubuntu_logo.png

Copyright not clear: as I had written in the Talk Page, I have not found on the website any text saying that this image may be distributed under a CC-BY-SA-2.5 or any other licence, in fact I have not found any copyright information! So if not expressly permitted, it seems to be a copyvio...
The only information about the (k)ubuntu logos and other is the draft Trademark Policy. Even if Commons does not take the trademark law into account (only copyright), I should say that this expressly forbids any commercial use of the logos!!
François [Discussion] 13:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I have to admit that not only I am not familiar with the law nor those licenses, but I am also not familiarized with Wikimedia Commons policy. I only grabbed the image from Kubuntu-feisty.png (now deleted), and re-uploaded it with a proper name... So I can't really say if it can be used here... My opinion is that it should be OK, but again, it's just my opinion...SF007 17:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. It's copyrighted, as are all such things. There is no evidence that this has been released under a free license. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ddl_southparkdemon_smirk_thumb.jpg

Out of scope as it's not being used anywhere. Rocket000 05:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep technically out of scope, but then this person has made lots of really good contributions... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 11:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, but also has been inactive since 02:19, 2 September 2006 Rocket000 13:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Image is not beeing used on any wikimedia projects. This image should be deleted because it's out of our project scope --Kanonkas_(talk) 12:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Kanonkas.--Otterathome 18:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Very well, then. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 23:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:PopDeclineIrishFamine.PNG

Uploader admits this graph was entirely based on original research and accepts it will have to be deleted. --Guinnog 21:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Ahem, look at the diff link. The comment was made by Grahamzilch, not by the author of this picture. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- The comment was left by the original uploader if you look more closely. See here --Guinnog 14:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  - Oh, ignore me then. ;x And in that case.... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted! Entirely original research, and by that I'm figuring he majicked the figures for projected population out of nowhere. The author (who has exercised RTV) agrees with deletion. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:"amour_sous_cellophane"_couverture.jpg

Cover of a book used for a commercial purpose on French Wikipedia Pymouss44 Tchatcher - 01:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio of book cover. MichaelMaggs 17:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ndp 2007 ad.jpg

derivative work --Cumulus Clouds 03:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Misguided -- no cited law on derivative works in Singapore (the only operative law in this instance), be it in statute or in common law. Since you're asserting the contrary, the burden of proof is on you to show such a law exists. If there is no law to be breached, how can there be a breach? Chensiyuan 14:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

No, the burden of proof is upon you to show why the law in Singapore is different to that everywhere else in the world. Good luck. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

That is absurd. There is hardly a law that exists "everywhere else in the world" (even if there was, there are nuanced differences), at most laws that exist across a bunch of Commonwealth jurisdictions. It's very simple logic; if you assert I have breached a law, you must tell me what law I have breached, and the corollary of that is that law applies to me. Laws in many places are defined by exclusion or prohibition, and in the odd case, by exception. So to ask me to prove something does not exist is disingenuous. Where does it say that there is a prima facie assumption that the law of derivative works is universal? And where does it say that prima facie, US or UK law applies? You can't throw a simple rule of jurisdiction out of the window. The rules of other jurisdictions are inapplicable here because none of those jurisdictions would have any locus standi to assert rights against the subject matter in question -- that rule is certainly universal. The a fortiori maxim is only fortified on the jurisdictional point, not on the perceived lingering imperialism.

For the benefit of clarity, see section 7 of SG's C Act:

"artistic work" means —

(a) a painting, sculpture, drawing, engraving or photograph, whether the work is of artistic quality or not;

(b) a building or model of a building, whether the building or model is of artistic quality or not; or

(c) a work of artistic craftsmanship to which neither paragraph (a) nor (b) applies

Then see section 63 of the same Act:

63. —(1) This section shall apply to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of “artistic work” in section 7.

(2) The copyright in a work to which this section applies that is situated, otherwise than temporarily, in a public place, or in premises open to the public, is not infringed by the making of a painting, drawing, engraving or photograph of the work or by the inclusion of the work in a cinematograph film or in a television broadcast.

You might speculate that the work wasn't situated anything more than temporarily, but the poster was up for a year. You might also argue that the poster does not belong to (c) but (a) even though the poster was neither drawn nor painted, but the statute is silent and in fact (c) is residuary. Chensiyuan 23:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Battering people with Latin phrases when perfectly good English equivalents exist is not the same as making an argument: it makes you look silly, almost as much as tl;dr bluster and laughable claims of "perceived lingering imperialism" do (protip: I was born almost two decades after Singapore gained independence, and restoring the British Empire is not at the top of my list of priorities). I have never claimed that there is one, universal legal jurisdiction. Since I have read the Act in question, and assumed you had, and since it was so clear to me that this didn't fall under FOP (and assumed it would be for you too), I wondered if you had some strange definition about the definition of "derivative work" that contradicted the understanding of the concept pretty much everywhere in the world (i.e. that taking a photograph of something could, in no circumstances, create a derivative work).

Away from these meta-arguments, though. You may or may not be right about it not falling into the category of "a painting, sculpture, drawing, engraving or photograph". The courts will ultimately decide that if it ever comes up (although given that the advert itself is primarily photographic, there's a very good case to be made for you being wrong on this count). What is pretty clear to me, is that this doesn't fall under "works of artistic craftsmanship". This government page gives an example of "designer furniture that is not mass produced". Or to quote us, about the same term considered in another jurisdiction ("lingering imperialism" again? Nope, we're talking about the definition of an English phrase, and it matches up perfectly with the "designer furniture" example):

In Hensher -v- Restawhile, some examples were given of typical articles that might be considered works of artistic craftsmanship, including hand-painted tiles, stained glass, wrought iron gates, and the products of high-class printing, bookbinding, cutlery, needlework and cabinet-making. Copinger and Skoane James suggests that original jewellery is another candidate.

To me, it's obvious that an advert is not in the same category (and I don't even need the above example to make my point). What's more, even if you were right, you'll have a hard time making the case that it was, in fact, anything other than "temporarily" situated there, even if it has been there for a year (that, to my mind, is far from permanent.

Ergo (hell yeah, LATIN!!),

Delete. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 04:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Advertising poster placed only temporarily. Even if it was on display for more than a year, it even shows its expiry date. So it was displayed all along with the clear intention of being removed again at the very latest at the end of 2007. That's still temporary, not "permanent". Lupo 09:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Obvious copyvio, per Lewis Collard. Not permanently in a public place, either. MichaelMaggs 17:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template:SVG size

Do we need that? W!B: 04:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Probably not. It's used only one time.

Delete --Svens Welt 08:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete if the template author doesn't object, it's easy to adjust the nominal resolution of the SVG. Then again, couldn't this become a maintenance template to suggest an SVG have its nominal resolution increased? Hmm... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete I hope that is obvious to everyone by now. Rocket000 20:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HMS Colossus (1910).jpg

copy of non-free en:Image:HMS Colossus (Colossus class dreadnought).jpg only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 06:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cyndi Taipei 07.jpg

Image not fourd in source. and source not CC license --Shizhao 08:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete No evidence of free license -- Infrogmation 15:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Even if this was all wrong, it's not clear that the fansite would have the authority to CC-license it anyway. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Finnish 8.6 TKIV 2000 or Sako TRG-42 sniper rifle.jpg

Image is not used anymore. It has been replaced by the WikiCommons file: Image:FDF 8.6 TKIV 2000 or Sako TRG-42 sniper rifle.jpg) only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 14:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as duplicate. Still, is that other one really "a decision or a statement by an authority or a public body of Finland"? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sarah_Jessica_Parker_2.jpg

No EXIF, low resolution. Probably copyvio on Flickr. EugeneZelenko 15:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Low resolution indeed but the Flickr user have a lot of photos of celebrities arriving to the Ed Sullivan Theatre, as well as photos of herself together with celebrities in the NY area (example). Thuresson 21:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep The above image was low resolution too. Seems plausible that the Flickr user took this. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep - Thuresson convinced me. Gridge 11:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC).

Kept. giggy _(:O) 03:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Gordon_Brown_2005_IMF_close.jpg

It is not pd as only IMF images with a byline indicating they are PD are PD. This image has no such byline. Anonymous101 15:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. Baleeted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Radarpost_noord_koninklijke_luchtmacht.jpg

Bad quality: out of focus. EugeneZelenko 15:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep but the picture is in use, so the picture is within project scope. Multichill 21:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, if it's in use it's usually in scope. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Avatar pressfoto.jpg

Blatant copyright violation, the website says nothing about the images being free-use. Apologies if I am going about this request the wrong way, I am unfamiliar with Commons. --J Milburn 16:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Waterford6869h.jpg

Was OK as a Wikipedia (en) file, but unsuitable for Commons --86.135.168.56 18:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Template talk:Blumenlese aus den neuen Schweizerischen Dichtern 2

The template corresponding to this discussion page should be deleted, it does not seem to be used and is either highly specific or probably just nonsense. (Flowers collected by new swiss poets....) --Vigilius 18:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete, looks like a big bag of blah to me. I'll speedy it if there are no objections? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete unless User:Joergens.mi says he's still going to upload that book. It's not nonsense. "Blumenlese aus den neuen Schweizerischen Dichtern" was a two-volume book published by Heinrich Kurz in Zürich, Switzerland in 1860. The title means in modern English "A selection from modern Swiss poets". User:Joergens.mi evidently had planned to upload the pages from the digitized version at Google Books, but then didn't do so. He did upload the first volume. If the template is deleted, also delete Category:Blumenlese aus den neuen Schweizerischen Dichtern 2. Lupo 07:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Thanks Lupo for your information. I just have forgotten to upload the second volume of that book. --Joergens.mi 17:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Behold The problem is fixed the according book is loaded --Joergens.mi 19:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Rocket000 20:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:41101561_friel_pa.jpg

Smells like a copyvio. Low resolution photo of an actress from a movie premiere, from a point where most likely only professional photographers had access. Originally uploaded by en:User:QueenSupreme89 to the English Wikipedia with a PD-self tag only, no further information about date or location, no EXIF data. Most other uploads by this user were deleted for various reasons. -- Kam Solusar 18:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete speedy as copyvio (http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41101000/jpg/_41101561_friel_pa.jpg) ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 19:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete as user Elcobbola said. This image is a copvyio, and has been copied from BBC --Kanonkas_(talk) 19:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete A lot of images deleted in wiki.en. This one seems just another obvious copyvio. Lijealso 19:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, obvious copyvio. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:The_GamE.pdf

Text pdf. Looks like a game scription (?). Out of scope. Siebrand 20:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hh-quarter-blankenese.jpg

double to HH-blankenese-quarter.jpg Sebastian scha. 20:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by:

22:10, 6 May 2008 Rlevse (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Hh-quarter-blankenese.jpg" ‎ (Dupe of Image:HH-quarter-blankenese.jpg)

Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CHARMED.jpg

This picture does appear to include copyrighted images. --Hannibal 20:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Quite. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 20:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bd.jpg

So source, I don't belive, there's a permission given. Marcus Cyron 20:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sourced to unidentified 1997 magazine?

Delete -- Infrogmation 22:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Svět_počítačů.JPG

The cover of the magazine is also copyrighted and photo of it cannot be licensed under GFDL or CC without permission of copyright holder. Reaperman 21:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete unless uploader can show they are the author/copyright holder of the magazine and the magazine is published under GFDL. -- Infrogmation 00:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 02:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Othnielia.jpg

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Mutiny bounty 2.jpg

depicts copyrighted artwork (book cover) --Gustav VH 10:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom unless book cover artwork visible is shown to be PD. -- Infrogmation 15:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 07:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Palmse.jpg

1. It might be copyright violation. We have better images on Palmse manor than that. completed delrequest --Svens Welt 14:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. The uploader, who I know is interested in things from Estonia, has many similar 800 by 5XX pixel, low quality images which to me seem like scans of his own photos. Samulili (talk) 13:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Omid_Tahvili.jpg

the link from the image to source theres a FAQ link there that says What commercial uses of the "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives" are allowed? None. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. Descriptions and pictures of the "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives" are provided for the sole purpose of eliciting public assistance in tracking fugitives. [7], as all free licensing also permits commercial use the image cant be hosted on Commons. 75.156.52.162 11:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Omid Tahvili is not one of the "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives" of FBI. Can you provide a more specific link for this particular image? --BorgQueen 13:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, per BorgQueen. Kameraad Pjotr 18:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Ajanta cave 1 outline.jpg

Image:GrundrissAjantaHoehle1.jpg shows the same cave plan and is much better than Image:Ajanta cave 1 outline.jpg. I am the author of Image:Ajanta cave 1 outline.jpg and want to have it deleted. KWa 12:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC) --KWa 12:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Are you sure? The picture is not doing anyone any harm just sitting there, you could tag it as {{superseded}} you know... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, user request. Kameraad Pjotr 18:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:INorden logo.png

possible copyright infringement only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 14:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyvio. Kameraad Pjotr 18:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:LogoBeijing2008.jpg

Logo of the 2008 Summer Olympics, copyvio. see [8] --Shizhao 16:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

If this was taken in the People's Republic of China, then we should be able to

Keep this. "[C]opying, drawing, photographing, or video recording of an artistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place" is permitted, according to us. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 05:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, according to Flickr, it was taken in Beijing, so FOP does apply. Kameraad Pjotr 18:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LogoBeijing2008.jpg

No items on the image, but the copyrighted logo. O sama K 12:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I didn't note the old request. Anyways, I still suggest deleting.--O sama K 12:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep, the copyrighted logo is not an issue if FOP applies. (Does it? I have no idea of chinese copyright laws.) --Rotkraut (talk) 15:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Kept - COM:FOP. Anonymous101 ^talk 10:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Statues in the U.S.

Image:JMU APC Duke Dog.JPG, Image:James Madison statue.jpg, Image:James Madison statue 2.jpg, Image:James Madison statue 3.jpg (inaugurated 2002): all by Lee Leuning, living U.S. sculptor.
Image:JamesBlairStatue.JPG, Image:CopleySculpture.JPG (unveiled 2002): by Lewis Cohen, living U.S. sculptor.
Image:BNDuke.jpg, unveiled 1999, by Steven H. Smith, living U.S. sculptor.
Image:Women's Memorial.jpg, Image:Women's Memorial2.jpg: dedicated 1993, by Glenna Goodacre, living U.S. sculptor.

Unfortunately, even "public art" is copyrighted, and the U.S. does not have a "freedom of panorama" exception for sculptures. Lupo 07:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep That was not a good idea to mix the en:Vietnam Women's Memorial with the others. So let´s keep them all Mutter Erde 08:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- What is the difference with other sculptures? Delete unless you'll receive sculptor permission. --EugeneZelenko 14:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete, clear copyvios. --Kjetil_r 18:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Clear copyvios? According to the article en:Vietnam Veterans Memorial, version of May 2, the opposite is clear. Mutter Erde 19:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I see nothing in that article of relevance to the legal issues here. --MichaelMaggs 17:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. These all seem clear-cut examples of obvious copyvios, given that there is no freedom of panorama in the US. MichaelMaggs 17:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images of Fabelfroh 2008

[edit] images

Plus a lot more not listed here. See the user's gallery for the remaining images uploaded with the extra "restrictions". (His request, however, is for all his uploads from 2007 and 2008, a total of nearly 2000 high quality images.)

[edit] Nomination

I nominate the newer Pictures of User:Fabelfroh for mass deletion. Those pictures are licensed CC-BY-SA-NC-3.0 in their metadata. This is not a valid license. In the Infobox there is a CC-BY-SA-3.0 template, however with the restriction ... a commercial use of the image is only possible with the permission of the author. This is clearly against Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses which doesn't allow this restriction. Currently it looks like Fabelfroh is not willing to make his work commercially available anymore. Unfortunately. I still hope he changes his mind because his work is great! Ikiwaner 20:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Delete There is no option but to delete the relevant images with this non-commercial restriction if User:Fabelfroh isn't prepared to change this as seems to be the case. However, despite this user's request request to delete "ALL photos of 2007, 2008 and ALL moss photos too. And I mean ALL", only those photos with invalid licenses can and should be deleted. I'd like to leave this a few days though to see if any other solution can be found. I wouldn't like for us to have to delete all these images then find there is a way to keep them. Adambro 23:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion request is for those explicit NC-images only. About 250 of Fabelfrohs 1800 images are affected. I think the other images are OK since they are without further restrictions. Fabelfroh can't redraw a license he once gave. --Ikiwaner 04:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment In after enormous DR. It'd really suck to have to delete all these photos, but that's what we'll have to do. Delete in lieu of a change of heart. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Oh, we could technically keep them as I pointed out on his talk page. The license these are under makes it perfectly clear that that those additional restrictions don't apply or are completely optional. If the metadata and the license tag don't match, then it's dual-licensed and either one can be used. Anyone's allow to remove the NC part from the metadata (implying we choose the other). This isn't a licensing issue since these are CC-BY-SA-3.0 and nothing more. This is a "it right to hold the author to these terms against their will?" If the author wasn't a member of the community and this was some random website's material, it would be different. I still would prefer a better rationale for removing these from Commons but regardless I don't think people would feel comfortable keeping them. Rocket000 04:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment And there's a lot more discussion of the above-mentioned issue here, between the Rocket and I. I worried about informed consent, the Rocket made the good point that "it is the licensor's responsibility to understand the terms and conditions they are willfully agreeing to". But then, isn't there some responsibility on our part to make people know what they are consenting to? That a certain new user (who I dealt with today) who persistently uploaded materials as "all rights reserved, contact us if you want to us it" should trouble us enough, but here we're talking someone who has been uploading materials to Commons since 2005. How is this possible? If he really had no idea about this (and there's a case to be made for him being fully aware of it), are we stating our requirements explicitly and forcefully enough? And for goodness' sake, how did FP and QI reviewers miss this? Do they even understand the problem here?
These, I think, are serious issues that need to be discussed. Maybe we need to be more annoying about this at upload time. Or maybe he knew the deal around here and was just screwing with us all along, using Commons for self-promotion. Discuss. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment If the copyrights are indeed partly owned by the university (which I'm not sure about, as Germany doesn't have the same work for hire laws that the US has), then the CC license was not valid in the first place. In that case we can't do anything but delete all images affected by this, not only those with a NC statement. I am sure that the Urheberrecht (similar, but not equal to copyright) always belongs to the author and is non-tranferable. Usage rights, on the other hand are implicitly tranfered to the employer. The question is whether these can be transfered exclusively and whether they were transfered exclusively in this case. --rimshot^talk 06:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is my worry as well. Basically, if the user incorrectly specifies the usage rights he has on his own copyrighted works, would this be classified as what we call in the rest of the world: "a copyright violation" ? Are we supposed to subject to the entity that has the usage rights? I seems to be so. TheDJ 11:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep - I'm generally finding myself in agreement with Rocket's dual licensing comments. I do share Lewis' concerns re QI and FP, and I really don't know what to do about it at this stage. Reviewer education is needed. But I don't think deleting the images will help in that regard. giggy _(:O) 10:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Incidentally, if help is needed in closing this (if kept), I can use Giggabot; specifically approved for this sort of thing. Just give me a yell. giggy _(:O) 10:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  
  We can't keep these images, even if the uploader has violated the license by specifying additional conditions which aren't valid, it should be clear that he hasn't and doesn't agree to release these images under an allowed license. We can't just remove the additional conditions and keep them. It is very disappointing that as I understand it, some of these photos have gone through the FP and QI processes despite these issues and it highlights a lack of scrutiny which has to go beyond simply looking whether it is a good or interesting photo or whatever. I'm not very familiar with either of these processes but checking the licensing should be the first stage of both as it is the most important. It doesn't matter how great an image is if it shouldn't be on Commons. The only option I see available unless the uploads changes his position. Adambro 11:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete non-commercial is non-commercial. The intent of the author with these specific images is obvious once you read his license (basically an adaptation of cc-by-sa-3.0). This is not a revoke, but simply a license that is not allowed on Commons (If I add additional non-compatible requirements to the GPL license in my software, the FSF won't recognize it as GPL software either). Also there is the possibility of an incorrect interpretation of the usage rights that could be granted by this user (some usage rights possibly lay with the university as mentioned above by rimshot). As such the rights might not be HIS to grant, and as such there might be a partial copyright violation with all images uploaded, even those that do not have the -NC adaptation. The problem is how can we distinguish between his personal photo's and photo's that were taken as part of his University work? TheDJ 11:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- To clarify my difference with Rocket000 in this case, who asserts that due to: "There are no understandings, agreements or representations with respect to the Work not specified here. This License constitutes the entire agreement, Licensor shall not be bound by any additional provisions that may appear in any communication from" might technically enable us to remove this NC restriction from his images. I'm not so sure about this. I think that because of the way our licenses are made "visible", Fabelfroh effectively changed the license, instead of making such "additional provisions that may appear in any communication from You." I also therefore propose we move the attribution to a separate "section" (possibly just a simple <hr> beneath the CC-BY-SA license to make the difference more clear.
  - Fabelfroh didn't change the license. It stills says CC-BY-SA-3.0, right? You're arguing against what the actual legal document says, not me. Rocket000 14:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
    - No, what i assert is that he used a different license and put the CC-BY-SA-3.0 sticker on his own license. The assertion is that as soon as you change this license, you can no longer call that license by the same name, without violating the license. As such, he created a derivative of the license that misused the "moniker" CC-BY-SA-3.0 without actually being the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license, and that this is probably illegal. It does not necessarily mean that the works automatically are subject to this license (at least not in all countries in the world, especially if this was not the intent of the licensee). I understand what you are trying to say, but that is something that applies mostly to derivative works, where you have the issue of contamination ( a piece of a work forces a new work into a certain license) or with revoking licenses. TheDJ 19:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
    - Also note that this is an assertion. I'm not saying its true, but i'm saying that things like this can be very complicated. What you quote from the license is there more to protect the license itself, and possibly the licensor and the licensed work from 3rd party distribution. In practicality I think is not a given that it traps the licensor into a license once he has put the string "CC-BY-SA-3.0" on a work. In many courts throughout the world, the original intent of the copyright holder will be important and the question will be raised if the string "CC-BY-SA-3.0|withrestrictions" will be recognized as a separate/new license, that illegally carries the CC-BY-SA-3.0 moniker, as opposed to it being "CC-BY-SA-3.0 license with illegal and not relevant additions by the copyright holder". When you say "technically" you mean "to the letter of the license", but unfortunately copyright law is much more vague when you actually bring it into a court, even if you have licenses that are as well defined and relatively "clear" as those of CC seem to be. TheDJ 20:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
      - I can agree with that. It is a complicated issue. Rocket000 12:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment Those are great hard to replace photos that took a lot of labor to upload and organize. It seems like Kristian Peters name appears as author 4 times on each page and Fabelfroh few times too, but there is no mention of any university copyrights. I think the university restriction was probably invented afterwards to explain tinkering with the copyright templates. --Jarekt 12:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep Freely licensed and within our scope. ...and for the following reasons:

Fabelfroh has never made the claim he didn't know non-commercial licenses weren't allowed. Actually, all the evidence points to him knowing full well all along. The most obvious and compelling reason for this assertion is that he only included this little restriction in the metadata. Now obviously, if you don't want to allow commercial use, you're going make sure people know that! The common person doesn't check the metadata—I think I first pointed this out and I only check if because of the current discussion. This seems kinda deceiving to me.
As I said above, just because the license tag and the EXIF data don't match doesn't mean there's an issue. It just means it's dual licensed and since one is a free license, this is allowed on Commons.
So the license is fine. What about the additional statement: "Also a commercial use of the image is only possible with the permission of the author"? Well, according to the actual legal part of the license he willfully and publicly stated it was released under, this addition restriction is completely optional.
After being informed that additional restrictions can be safely ignored by anyone, he continued to license his images with the additional text. Again, the common person isn't going to know everything about the Creative Commons licenses (as some previous comments show). Whether or not it's intended, this is pretty misleading not unlike the metadata situation.
This isn't the first time Fabelfroh has added additional restrictions on top of licenses that don't allow it.[9][10][11]
- The issue with the GFDL addition is that is makes it completely incompatible with "real" GFDL licensed material. If it was even possible to add anything in the first place (which it's not, without calling it something else). The same goes for any share-alike license. You can't "share-alike" if everyone has their own customized copy-left license. This is staple of all copyleft licenses.
- Originally, I believe this was done as a honest misunderstanding of the license as the original beginning said "For clarity over section 4 of the GFDL license..." This was later changed to "In addition to and for clarity over section 4 of the GFDL license..." so he plainly knew he was making additions.
His knowledge of the GFDL (like clarifying Section 4 for us) suggests he's not as clueless about these licenses as it may seem.
There's a history here of trying to restrict the use of his photos while still being allowed to enjoy Commons with all his QIs, FPs, praise, and of course, exposure.

There's one issue left I didn't touch on... he now says he doesn't have full rights to these images. To put it bluntly, I simply don't believe this:

He never mentions this in the license. For someone so concerned^{1 2} with us following the letter of these licenses, you'd think he won't leave out a small detail like the copyright holder of his own license.
Usually, when there's kind of joint deal with photographers and their employers (I guess that's the relationship) the terms are layed-out beforehand and agreed upon. His ability to continuously change the license doesn't suggest this happened.
Even his metadata says he owns the copyright in so many words: He owns the original copyright. So what, that means he sold out on us? He owns the original copyright but "sold" part of it to some university? He's contradicting himself.
He originally stated that it was his intention to limit commercial use, not some third party: The idea behind the addition was to restrict commercial use to wiki(m|p)edia only. And that still is my intention.
Previous to this "university owns part of the copyright" claim, he said he couldn't change it due to some dubious compatibility issue with Flickr.

Some are amazed that this has gone unnoticed for so long. I'm not. He's been here since 2005. He's a well know user with what looks like a standard license (and it technically is). The NC part is hidden away where no one looks. And that extra condition was added in like it was just some additional attribution-specifying after thought. Who checks the license of well established users every time they view one of their images?

I said keep because I believe the user is the sole copyright holder and knew exactly what he was doing. When he couldn't get his way, he decided that he rather not let us have any of the images from the last two years (and the moss ones for some reason) regardless of the licenses attached to them. Should we really keep them... that's up to the community. Like I said I don't think many will feel comfortable keeping them, so the question is do we honor this user request and delete "ALL photos of 2007, 2008 and ALL moss photos too. And I mean ALL." or do we pick and choose and go with only the ones listed here? Or do we accuse the user of uploading things with false licenses he had no right to do and delete them all as copyvios? Rocket000 14:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I suggest we'd be better concentrating on the non-commercial issue and worry about his suggestion that he might not be the copyright holder of some of the images separately. As you note, for him to turn around and say this now is somewhat suspect. Adambro 16:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

"according to the actual legal part of the license he willfully and publicly stated it was released under, this addition restriction is completely optional", well, the license does say that. But then, are we really saying that the courts will interpret a license atomistically, as if it had some separate existence apart from the intent of the author? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I think we have different ideas about what his intentions were. Rocket000 19:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I do not understand how Rocket000 uses this as an argument for keeping the images: The idea behind the addition was to restrict commercial use to wiki(m|p)edia only. And that still is my intention. To me that's the sad reason why this is not a formalistic discussion but the lack of Fabelfrohs will to allow unlimited commercial use. Given the assumption that WikiM|Pedia is a non commercial project no commercial use is allowed at all. --Ikiwaner 17:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Because licenses are irrevocable. Rocket000 19:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment Wouldn't it be better if when you uploaded an image you _had_ to select a valid license and that would be listed on the image description page in a non-editable way so there was no way to write additions or other non-valid licenses ? The chosen license should also not be changable by the user itself after upload. /Daniel78 19:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the credit/acknowledgement line was used for this, which simply needs to be user editable. This is why I suggested we make a clearer separation in this CC-BY-SA license about what part deals with the actual license, and what part deals with the required credit line of this license. That would make cases like this easier to spot, and it would be harder to fool non-Commons people in this world. TheDJ 19:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  - Quick mock-up of how I think we should change the layout of this license template. TheDJ 19:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Even so, but it seems all people have to do is say they don't want to allow commercial use anymore and people disregard what the license says anyway. Rocket000 19:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Rocket000 arguments. --Jarekt 14:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep and scrub the invalid extra conditions. Fabelfroh has made his bed, now he gets to lie in it. First-time user, I can see giving them the benefit of the doubt, but Fabelfroh has been around a long time, and now has only the choices of accepting the free license or publicly admitting to dishonesty. Stan Shebs 09:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete In my opinion, if there is an apparent licensing conflict then we ought to accept the licensor's apparent intent at face value and act accordingly. It appears that Fabelfroh's intent from the beginning on these images was to include a restriction limiting commercial use. Yes, that is self-contradictory with the inclusion of the CC-BY-SA-3.0 tag. Either this contradiction is intentional (which I see no specific evidence of) or the contradiction is the result of a simple mistake. The people voting Keep here want to exploit that mistake by using only the CC-BY-SA portions of the license to determine that these works are in actuality free of commercial restrictions.
Personally, I do not consider that to be ethical. If it one assumes Fabelfroh never intended to forgo the commercial restrictions, then saying that Fabelfroh waived these provisions by error is essentially trying to exploit Fabelfroh's mistake to her detriment and our advantage. Beyond the mere question of ethics, it is not obvious whether simply removing the contradictory clauses would be legal either. Contract law establishes that an agreement may be void if the agreement contains a mistake and the non-mistaken party is aware of the mistake and attempts to exploit it to his advantage. It is possible, though probably not obvious, that attempting to exploit Fabelfroh's mistake in order to invalidate the commercial clauses and force Fabelfroh into a position she never intended would be sufficiently grievous to void the entire proceeding, and in essence generate the legal finding that CC-BY-SA was never appropriately agreed to in the first place. Hence, I think we have to be concerned that the contradictory clauses create a situation where, in essense, the accompanying CC-BY-SA statement has been tainted to such a degree as to be legally unenforcable.

In the face of complicated issues like this, I don't think it is really our place to assert to the rest of the world that these images are bona fide free content. If Fabelfroh won't agree to remove the restrictions herself, then I think the only appropriate course of action is to delete the images. If, as some apparently believe, Fabelfroh has been attempting to exploit our system for her own advantage by willfully including the questionable licenses, then I think that is all the more reason to remove the content and insist on only content that is unambiguously allowed. Dragons flight 02:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep for the moment. My reading of the extra terms is that they are intended to allow non CC-BY-SA usage, with the permission of the user. But I agree they need to be clarified one way or the other. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Instead of making a another even larger mass deletion request, let's also deal with Fabelfroh's request to delete all his images from 2007 and 2008 (plus some other non-specified images). If you're going on perceived intent here and not what the license says, we should remove all images he doesn't want to be free. Deleting only the ones uploaded after this change would still be going by the letter of the law in a way. He has requested these all be tagged for a deletion request, but I feel these can be dealt with together (and IMO, the fate of both should be the same). Rocket000 15:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I think we've got to make a distinction between images he uploaded and released under a free license and those that he didn't. I think it is important to note that he didn't upload the later images under an acceptable license and then wanted to delete them when it came to light that this would allow commercial use. It should be obvious that with the later images, he never agreed to release them under an accepted license. So whilst I think we should delete the later images because he never really agreed to release them freely, those earlier images without the additional restriction regarding commercial use were released under an acceptable license and so should be kept. There are no grounds to delete the earlier images since he can't withdraw the license and so any images before the December 2007 change should be kept, any after should be deleted. I'd therefore suggest that we concentrate on discussing these later images. Adambro 15:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

No, everything he uploaded is under a free license. CC-BY-SA-3.0 is indeed a free license (and he hasn't removed that after being informed extra restrictions are null and void, btw). It's the intent we are considering, which appears to be the same in both cases (the user himself doesn't make a distinction). Of course he can't withdraw the license in either case, but can we hold him to it? And if we can, should we? Rocket000 01:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

This issue isn't if can Fabelfroh withdraw consent. The issue is if Fabelfroh was able to give consent in the first place. Regards, Ben Aveling 23:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

We can't do that. If Fabelfroh didn't have permission to upload under a free license, we can't keep them. Regards, Ben Aveling 22:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. "CC-BY-SA, commercial use only with permission of the author" is not an acceptable license on Commons. --Carnildo 21:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. all image uploaded since [December 26, 2007 as they arent under a free licenses. Images upload prior to this were uploaded under a free license and relicensed, questions remain as to whether the uploader was able to release the images or not and whether the uploader understood the licensing. For the issue of clarity images these should be identified and renominated. I'll ask User:Giggy to do the mass deletion. Gnan garra 02:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Slowly working through it, any help is appreciated. giggy _(:O) 02:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Busy with some other stuff. Will get to it, but it may take a few days, unless anyone else wants to take it on board. giggy _(:O) 03:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

Found it here: http://www.queenbritney.com/gallery/20070910/big_britney_spears_2007_mtv_video_music_awards_2.html But I don't know who is copying who. -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 11:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The guy who uploaded it to flickr calls himself "EuPaparazzi", which is why I presumed that he is a photographer so he could justifiably release his images under a CC-license on flickr. I don't think that an image on a fansite is very indicative of any copyright claim, since most fansites just copy images without caring about copyright at all. I did do a search of Getty images at the time, but did not find this image there. Jacoplane 17:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

What image are you talking about? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Repaired. The IP 190.20.49.122 had vandalized this page. Most suspicious.---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 ^{(Talk: here- es- en)} 07:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Britney_Spears_2007_MTV_Video_Music_Awards.jpg

This seems to be a screen cap uploaded by a FlickR user, who has at least one other screen cap, and one magazine cover on his FlickR page. Rarely are there free pics from a commercial brodcast TV show (during the show, on stage, not after). Rob 22:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted - it is indeed a copyvio. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 22:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 7

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Threatened_by_shadows_at_night_(187465667).jpg

Image is unlikely to be the Flickr uploaders to license. I doubt they hold the copyright on this iconic photograph given that the Flickr uploader is only 28 years old and the photo was taken before they were even born. Polly 01:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Do ya think. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 02:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:835_Market_St_(San_Francisco).JPG

Bad filename. I'm uploading it again with a better name. Sanfranman59 05:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment use {{badname}} on the image, so their is no need for a deletion request to happend. --Kanonkas_(talk) 06:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted using normal dupe procedure. Siebrand 20:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg

This looks like a professionally made picture and not some snapshot. The user who uploaded it on english Wikipedia has no picture-uploads left because they all were deleted (no source, no source, no source, moved to Commons). In on of his uploads the user himself stated: Unknown source, found it in somebody's browser-cache. In case of this picture here his only comment was Demis Roussos, the singer, there was no mentioning that it's own work ore something like that. -- Cecil 14:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Xena.jpg

Yes it is. Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Eastern Mediterranean 1450 tr.svg

Author request--Kuara 10:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC) completed request --Svens Welt 18:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted per uploader request. Durova 00:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Joffer_van_Batinghe_Dwingel.jpg

Wrong name, replaced bij Image:Juffer van Batinghe Dwingeloo.jpg Gouwenaar 20:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted per uploader request. Durova 23:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CAE.pdf

One sentence 7 word Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 23:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 01:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Enya_red.jpg

Likely to be a copyvio (it is obviously a professional promo shot) and missing source (the image description page at scn: [12] does not name a source either, Request for source has been deleted without explanation). High on a tree 23:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted as copyvio. Durova 23:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:P1000551.JPG

I don't think that she gave the uploader the permission to upload this picture. Petar Marjanovic 19:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Private image, out of scope --85.183.209.105 05:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Uploader labeled image with "permission=no". -- Infrogmation 16:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. MichaelMaggs 17:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Hunter_x_map.jpg

Blatant copyvio Cuarto 20:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete It is a map from a manga called "Hunter x Hunter". I couldn't check whether it was a direct copy, but according to the Italian Wikipedia such a map does occur. So this map, having the same imaginary geography, must be seen as derived from that. --Simonxag 22:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

It's a screenshot from an episode of the anime. --Cuarto 16:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

If it's that simple you should have just added the Copyvio tag. --Simonxag 22:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lion amphitheatre.jpg

Dupe of Image:Amphitheater von Lyon.jpg wich was upload by a robot and with the right name of the town Lyon Otourly 20:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. by User:Siebrand. No need to nominate duplicates. Rocket000 02:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Thswkmap.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Thswkmap.jpg}}

[edit] Image:Thswkmap.jpg

derivative work completed only deletion request --Svens Welt 17:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Add {{delete|REASON(mandatory)}} on the image page
Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:Foto Espejo.jpg}} ~~~~
On the log, add :
{{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Foto Espejo.jpg}}

[edit] Image:Foto_Espejo.jpg

error Mariaapol 21:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Sca.svg

This is an official logo of an organization. As such, it cannot be released under a free license and a free variation cannot be created as it infringes the copyright of the original. This is a copyvio. Night Ranger 21:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Ahonc: In category Copyright violations; no permission

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Josef Pröll

An un-commented gallery consisting of two pictures which are already shown in same appropriate category looks all-too-much like spam. Although I'm one of the authors of the pictures, please delete ASAP. WeHaWoe 17:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC) --WeHaWoe 17:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Beloved seemingly francophone wikipedian,

it strongly infringes WP policies to remove a deletion request from an article, as you did here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Josef_Pr%C3%B6ll&diff=11524577&oldid=11495188
It is even worse to declare such changes, as you did, as "minor changes".
The subpage you created and seemingly want to "protect", has nothing but redundant information to the category and its picture descriptions.
I note that at 15:43 local time (13:43Z), the gallery "article" is still unused in any WP projects:
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php?w=_100000&i=Josef_Pr%C3%B6ll
The comment you recently added to the gallery page would be more appropriate to the "Category" page, anyways.
eod from my part (j'en ai mard. Fais n'importe-quoi si personne ne t'empêche). WeHaWoe 13:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom. While we're at it, perhaps delete User:Kelson as well, since this appears to be a vandalism-only account. -- Korax1214 19:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Upgrade to Speedy. I reckon my suggestion that User:Kelson be blocked from editing as well is a good one. Reasons:

- He keeps removing the deletion tag, apparently having difficulty understanding the "Do not remove this tag until the deletion request is closed".
- In his last removal, he gave the spurious reason that we "are not allowed to ask" for content to be deleted -- which is news to me, if so then why is there a deletion process in the first place?

To my mind, Kelson has no understanding of Wikimedia Commons, what it is, what it's for or how it works, and at this rate never will, so enough already. -- Korax1214 00:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

As long as I do not get any good justification : that means based on a rule elaborated by the community, I will not accept the suppression of this gallery. Currently, this gallery, is the best way to browse images of Josef Pröll. I would appreciate that people invest more time to upload/improve pictures than leading this outdated galery vs. category conflict. Thanks for your comprehension. Kelson 09:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

@Kelson: en:RTFM. WeHaWoe 21:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry... you are not at school, that's not an acceptable answer... give a link the corresponding policy. Kelson 09:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Added later, and for definite eod: I for myself am well aware that I'm not at school ;) -- I thought I was talking to a kid and did my best to assimilate and adapt my speech and thinking ;) -- therefore, in case you're an elderly person, as myself is (or even older), I'll put it this way: Please be as kind as to care about the rules of this place. They can be looked up 24/7. And now, dear K's, (both of them) let's stop this silly&time-consuming conversation. It is just waist of energy. WeHaWoe 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Kelson has attempted to sabotage the deletion process again, hence Upgrade done -- "this gallery is subject to an existing deletion debate, which the owner has repeatedly sabotaged by removing the delete tag, under the delusion that he has special privileges including immunity from the deletion process (see gallery's revision history). Enough is enough." And maybe it's about time all of Kelson's other "contributions" came under scrutiny as well, since from the above and other comments, he clearly doesn't understand Wikimeda Commons and never will. -- Korax1214 06:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I've just added a reply to Kelson's user page, in the (forlorn?) hope that he might actually make a good Wikimedian; I hope I've managed to stick to the points at hand, and not sink to personal attack (I was sorely tempted). -- Korax1214 07:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Oops, of course I meant his talk page. -- Korax1214 07:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I maybe do not clearly understand, but you are definitely not able to give the concrete rule on which your deletion request is based on... and you have to do it. Kelson 09:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Wishful thinking again. I clearly stated the very concrete reason on which my speedy was based, namely that you keep sabotaging the deletion process instead of trying to seek favourable closure (keep) the official way. -- Korax1214 10:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Your reason is not based on a policy~, at least you are not able to give it : that's all. Kelson 11:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

For anyone passing. I did delete this as it was tagged as speedy. However on reflection I decided I was wrong & restored it. However I have also protected it as Kelson appears to think it is ok to remove deletion tags while the debate is in progress. I have warned them against such actions in the future --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment. I don't understand the motive of this request. How exactly can this gallery be considered as spam? This gallery doesn't have any added value compared to the category, but as long as the gallery/template issue isn't closed, this is no reason to delete it. As it is, I would incline towards a speedy keep. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keep. Galleries holding the same content as a category are extremely common on Commons. This is no ground to request deletion.

Comment on behaviour:

WeHaWoe, your suggestion that this gallery is spam could be read as offensive ; your subsequent bossy attitude towards Kelson does nothing to alleviate the problem.
Kelson, you are not allowed to remove deletion request tags, as is clearly specified on them. Your command of English is sufficient for you to understand this.
Korax1214, statements like "perhaps delete User:Kelson as well, since this appears to be a vandalism-only account" are utterly unacceptable in any case. Kelson is a serous contributor on several Wikipedia projects, as can clearly be seen on his personal page.

Rama 12:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Apologies =

I recognize my error (deletion of the banner) and I apology for that. Kelson 12:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] On request: once more, same stuff:

The gallery is pretty useless=100%redundant to the content of that less-than-poorly equipped category (3 pics in Category, 2 in Gallery, no description in Cat until I did, and 2 of 3 pics are mine).

Infringing was that deletion requests were removed (obviously more than once according to talk -- I did not care about or look up that more than once) by Kelson, thereby declaring his removal as "minor"

This gallery seems to be of no interest to anybody but Kelson at this given time (no links perceptible), and, meanwhile, user:Rama ;) Therefore I supposed kind-of "Link- and Namespamming". I'm not especíally keen on that kind of "stuff", but did rather stumble over, having contributed to the category and just seen redundant stuff in it. I will probably not contribute to any Category-vs.-Gallery discussions any more. Best, WeHaWoe 13:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

@Rama, mainly, and all others: keep it or delete it -- both will do pretty much the same. That's what I tried to express by my edit 11:39, 4. Jun. 2008 (&eod, from my part, REALLY). WeHaWoe 13:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Again, I might have to clarify: before I added my 2 pics, there was ONE pic in the category and of-course-same pic (guess by whom?) in that "One-pic-Gallery". I'd have called such "kiddy-like", and that was the point where I brought in my del.request. -- no: it was a speedy first. WeHaWoe 13:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Fossil Ichthyornis

All Ichthyornis are fossils, so this is redundant to Category:Ichthyornis. --Hesperian 11:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 19:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Fossil Ichthyornithidae

All Ichthyornithidae are fossils, so this category is redundant to Category:Ichthyornithidae. --Hesperian 11:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 19:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Category:Fossil Ichthyornithiformes

All Ichthyornithiformes are fossils, so this category is redundant to Category:Ichthyornithiformes. --Hesperian 11:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Rocket000 19:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:JohnRogers_PicketGuard.jpg

Photo of a 3D sculpture. How old is the photo? The source site doesn't say. If they took these images, they would own the copyright on the photo. Lupo 12:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Copyright status is unknown, and the source site doesn't state any date when this picture/sculpture was made --Kanonkas_(talk) 13:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you look a bit further... en:John Rogers (sculptor), then we at least know the sculpture is more than 104 years old, and that according to the person who added the photo to wikipedia, the sculpture should be from 1862. TheDJ 13:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment but did the person who placed the image there give a reference to support that? He died when he was around 75 years if the content on en wiki is true, then the copyright status would have expired on 2007/2008. If it was taken in 1862 which we do not have a source to prove. --Kanonkas_(talk) 14:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The sculpture itself is fine (made in 1862, artist died 1904), it's the photo in question. Rocket000 16:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. This is not about the 3D object shown, it is about the photo itself. Lupo 07:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

It's perfectly OK to use this picture. It was taken from my website, johnrogers.info. The pictures of all of the Rogers statues on the website were taken from the book that my parents, Meta and Paul Bleier, and I wrote on John Rogers. Wikipedia has our permission to use this picture, particulary since the picture came from the archives at the New York Historical Society and is no longer copywrited and is in the public domain. Bruce Bleier (PS...I've never used Wikipedia before and I guess I'm doing this wrong. I'll have to spend some time and figure out how any of this works, but you can always contact me through the website noted above.)

Kept. THat's good enough for me. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:GRUPOS_SANGUINEAOS_Y_SU_FRECUENCIA.pdf

I think such information is more suitable for Wikibooks. EugeneZelenko 15:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep I have placed it in Cat: Education Pdf files along with other similar educational files and will better link them laterWayneRay 23:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

Delete after moving to eswikibooks, preferably as wikitext. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 16:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Even if the whole thing does get Wikibooked, it's good and useful to have the original material around for posterity's sake. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Obraz 0568.jpg

This graphic is low quality and have bad name, I make better with correct name: Image:Śrem - UAM.jpg completed only deletion request --Svens Welt 17:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Speedy keep used on the Wikipedia. --Simonxag 22:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept, in use = useful. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Male_pubic_hair.JPG

Yet another penis picture. This one appears to be orphaned on all WM projects as of today (according to Checkusage) Lucasbfr 23:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --Szczepan talk  11:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Maria-Callas.jpg

Suspect likely copyright violation. From record photo, no reason to think image is public domain nor that the uploader is image's copyright holder --Infrogmation 00:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

L'image a plus de cinquante ans (1954).--207.253.63.13 13:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

So, if the image is more than 50 years, it is in the public domain, or not? --190.10.169.38 19:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

No. For details of copyright laws of various countries, see Commons:Licensing. And some photographers have even been known to live more than 50 years. -- Infrogmation 00:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Rama: Copyright violation

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Lily Pons.jpg

Unsourced; previous uploader on en:Wikipedia made no claim that image was public domain nor to be author nor copyright holder. --Infrogmation 00:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This image is clearly older than 70 years and therefore in the public domain. Karl Stas 18:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The age of the photo is not so "clear" to me; Pons lived into the 1970s. In any case, mark on the photo seems to read "DeBelle" or "DeBells", "N[ew] Y[ork]", so it is a US work, and without other information about source and copyright cannot be assumed to be copyright expired unless it can be shown to date from 1922 or earlier. Per the en:Wikipedia article, she did not even make her operatic debut until 1928, and continued performing roles professionally to 1960. -- Infrogmation 22:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Uploader en:User:Karl Stas has not been able to provide source information. Thuresson (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by Thuresson: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lily Pons.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] File:Lily Pons.jpg

(Note: This is not the same image as an earlier image with the same name previously deleted.) Dubious license on Flickr. I strongly doubt the Flickr user is the actual photographer/copyright holder; their Flickr stream seems to be a collection of found images, dubiously tagged CC. --Infrogmation (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete Flickr page is made up of what seem to be scans and should not be trusted. J Milburn (talk) 13:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Deleted by Mbdortmund. –Tryphon ^☂ 09:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Tyranozaur-icon.png

See this http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Tyranozaur.png FunkMonk 04:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyvio. Kameraad Pjotr 19:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Feyenoord Logo.jpg

Logo and nothing but the logo; therefore this can be seen as a copyvio. This in no way matches the panorama fredom we know in NL. --Erik1980 09:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, FOP does not aplly. Kameraad Pjotr 19:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:AjaxAmsterdamLogoOnShirt.jpg

This is a logo and nothing but the logo; therefore it can be seen as a copyvio. This in no way matches the panorama freedom we know in NL. Not even suitable for fair use... --Erik1980 09:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, FOP does not apply. Kameraad Pjotr 19:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ShuuheiHisagi.JPG

it's from copyrighted anime only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 11:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, copyvio. Kameraad Pjotr 19:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Wagermarke.jpg

No postal stamp, copyright violation!--Schmelzle 14:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC) completed deletion request --Svens Welt 10:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Can't be GFDL-self. Samulili (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Trio_Venezuela_01.jpg

Out of project scope (private photo) or promo photo. EugeneZelenko 15:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This image has been uploaded with the solely purpose to appear on a Wikipedia article ("Trío Venezuela" in spanish Wikipedia) , It is a scanned picture of my father's musical band back in the 60's, so no promotion is intended. Javier7 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

KeepPromotion is perfectly OK, we're just worried that the license i genuine. The explanation seems fine to me. --Simonxag 22:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

There is a licensing issues which should be solved: although Javier7, a son of one of the men in this photo, own a copy of the work, I must doubt if he owns the copyright to the work. Samulili (talk) 13:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Since the uploaders father is depicted in the picture, it is obvious that he didn't make the image himself, so his son is just the heir of the image but not of the copyright. Unless the photographer has not only sold the image but also the copyright, the right stayed with him. Cecil (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Images uploaded by Mazerf

File:A89-St-Marcel-d'Urfe.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-Suchères.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-Thiers.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-17.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-13.JPG (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-15.jpg‎ (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-16.JPG (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A89-11.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)
File:A63biriatou.jpg (edit · last · + · history · watch · unwatch · check usage · find cats · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel)

All these images are copyrighted and come from the Sara websites :
Mazerf lies when he explains his photos are personal work. Just have a look at his discussion page. He has been trying to import the same images for months... Is it possible to block his account?--79.89.193.117 16:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Appears to be true - images state (C) JRL. Close as delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted all other user contributions as all were in same vein as these, and almost certainly similar copyvios. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Library and Archives Canada non-PD images

[edit] A - E

Image:Aerial view of whole Expo 67 site e000990829.jpg used on 4xwikipedias (4x on en.) (working)
Image:Barbados hostestes Expo 67 e000996037.jpg (used 1x on en:wiki) (rmv from en:wiki 20May)
Image:Ben Johnson Seoul 1988.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (repl on en:wiki 17May) (nfy 22xwiki/39xarticle 20May)
Image:Bing Crosby family Expo67.jpg used on 3xwikis, free image of Crosby availiable but not his family +added
Image:Bobby Hull of the Chicago Black Hawks hockey team.jpg (used on en:wiki, de:wiki, fi:wiki) (repl/w non-free on en: 13May) (waiting)
Image:BrianOrser1988Olympics.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (repl on en:wiki 20May) (waiting)
Image:Canadian Pavillion at Expo 67 e000990974.jpg (used on en:wiki)
Image:Canadian Supreme Court justices circa 1950.jpg (used on en,fr,he,ru:wiki)
Image:Castrotrudeau.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (repl on en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:Chretien1967.jpg (used on en,eo,fr:wiki)
Image:ChurchillStLaurent1954.jpg (used on en,pl,es,zh,no,hu:wikis)
Image:Expo 67 cubes in a room.jpg used on 4x wikipedias (working)

[edit] F - J

Image:Frank Mahovlich of the Toronto Maple Leafs hockey team.jpg (used on en,cs,de,fi,fr:wikis) (upld to en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:French actor Jean-Louis Barrault and french actress Madeleine Renaud at Expo 67.jpg used on 2 wikipedias, free images availiable for both subjects
Image:French Pavilion with minirail Expo 67 e000990875.jpg (used 1x on en:wiki)
Image:General Charles de Gaulle at Expo 67 e000996503.jpg used on 5 wikipedias (4x on en.w)
Image:Germany Pavilion Expo 67 - Montreal Quebec.jpg used on 3 wikipedias
Image:Glenn Gould 1974.jpg used on 21 wikipedias, multiple times (only other free images are a Yousef Karsh pic of him as a kid that probably also needs to deleted and a statue) (notified 22xwiki/28xarticle 13May)
Image:Glenn Gould 1959.jpg used on 10 wikipedias '(only other free imageaa are a Yousef Karsh pic of him as a kid that probably also needs to deleted and a statue)
Image:Gracekellycrop.jpg crop = vio (multi-wiki - need to find full photo & replace)
Image:Grace Kelly closeup Expo67.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (upld orig to en:wiki 14May) (waiting)
Image:Grace Kelly baby 1967.jpg (used only on commons) speedy
Image:Grace Kelly pressconf Expo67.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (upld to en:wiki 14May) (waiting)
Image:Grace Kelly daughter Expo67.jpg (used on 6x wikis)
Image:Grace Rainier Monaco Expo67.jpg used on 3 wikipedias, wikinews
Image:Grace Rainier Monaco minirail Expo67.jpg used on 3 wikipedias
Image:Grace Rainier Monaco minirail profiles Expo67.jpg used on 10 wikipedias
Image:Harry Belafonte Expo67.jpg used on 3 wikipedias, but free images availiable
Image:Hockey Player Tim Horton - Toronto Maple Leafs.jpg (used on en,de,fr:wikis) (upl to en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:Igor Gouzenko hooded small.jpg (used on multiple wikis) (upload to en:wiki 14May) (waiting)
Image:Israeli Pavilion at night Expo 67 e000990944.jpg (used on en:wiki) (repl/w non-free on en: 11May) (waiting)
Image:Jean Béliveau in 1963.jpg (used on de,fr:wikis)
Image:Jean Béliveau of the Montreal Canadiens hockey team.jpg (used on de,en,fi,fr:wikis) (upload to en:wiki 14May) (waiting)
Image:Jean Chretien head.jpg (used on en:wiki and fr:wiki)
Image:Jean Chretien.jpg (used on en,ca,cs,de,fr,ps,pt:wikis)
Image:JeanPaulLemieux.jpg (used on en:wiki, es:wiki and fr:wiki) (upl to en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:Joe Clark at Progressive Conservative Convention 1976.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:John Diefenbaker Inuvik 21 July 1961.jpg (used on en & es:wiki) (upl to en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:John Diefenbaker at the Flag Debate.jpg (used on en:wiki, es:wiki, fr:wiki)
Image:John Diefenbaker holding Canadian Bill of Rights.jpg (used on en,fr,nl,es,cs:wikis)
Image:John Diefenbaker with JFK 1961.jpg (upl to en: 20May) (waiting)
Image:Johndiefenbaker.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:John Turner head.jpg (used on en)
Image:John Napier Turner.jpg (used on en,de,fr,pl,pt,eo,cs)

[edit] K - Q

Image:Kim Campbell.jpg (crop-vio, living-person photo has no FUR, no free img found)
Image:Lennon Ono Trudeau 1969 b.jpg (used on multiple wikis - chk b vs bw vs orig img for mods)
Image:Lennon_Ono_Trudeau_1969_bw.jpg (used on ru:wiki)
Image:Man the Provider Pavilion at Expo 67 e000996018.jpg used on english wikipedia
Image:Marlene Dietrich 1967.jpg used on 67 projects, other free images availiable to replace
Image:Maurice Chevalier Helizapoppin Expo67.jpg used on 6 wikipedias, wikiquote (other images availiable but inferior)
Image:Maurice Chevalier Labyrinth Expo67.jpg used on 16 wikipedias, bs.wikiquote, (other images availiable but inferior)
Image:Mulroney.jpg (crop-vio) (working)
Image:MulroneyTrudeau.jpg (used on en,fr:wiki,en:wikinews + possible cropvios to come)
Image:Musical Ride Expo 67 Malak.jpg used on en. and nl. wikipedia
Image:Nancy Greene 1969.jpg (used on 7 wikis)
Image:Night view of American pavillion e001096692.jpg used on 7 wikipedias, 2 wikiquotes
Image:Ontario pavilion at Expo 67 colour.jpg used 3x on en.wikipedia
Image:Opening ceremony Expo 67 e001096646.jpg used 2x on en.wikipedia
Image:Opening day Expo 67 with leaders e000990917.jpg (used 1x on en:wiki in FU article)
Image:Ouellet approaches to sign the Constitution.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:PearsonPDphotoportrait.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:PearsonPeacePrize.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:Pearsonflag.jpg (used on en,de,fr,it:wikis)
Image:Pierre dupuy.jpg used 1x on en.wikipedia
Image:PierreTrudeau1980.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:Place des Nations flagpoles Expo 67 e000990934.jpg used 1x on fr.wikipedia
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase II - 4.jpg en.wp
Image:Princess Irene chatting at Expo 67.jpg (en.wp, de.wp)
Image:Princess Margatet Lord Snowden 2.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:Queen Elizabeth II Expo 67 1.jpg (used 2x on en:wiki)

[edit] R - W

Image:RCMP officer Expo 67.jpg (used on 20+ wikis, replaceable for RCMP articles but not Expo 67)
Image:Rene Levesque fording Korean stream with recorder.jpg (used on fr:wiki and sv:wiki)
Image:René Lévesque election night Oct 1973.jpg (used on multiple wikis)
Image:Robert_Wagner_Expo_67_1.jpg used on 10x wikipedias, 2 free screenshots availiable to replace +added
Image:Robert_Wagner,_Senta_Berger_and_friend_Expo_67.jpg used on 2 x wikipedias, is the original of cropped versions of Robert Wagner & Senter Berger +added
Image:RussJacksonRoughRiders.jpg (used 9x on en:, and on zh,pdc:wikis)
Image:Sauvé.jpg (de,en,fr,ps) +added
Image:Senta Berger Expo 67 1.jpg used on 5x wikipedias, no free image found yet +added
Image:Steel Pavilion at Expo 67 e000990899.jpg (en.wp)
Image:Superintendent Larsen RCMP.jpg (used on en, fr, pl, sv wps)
Image:Trudeau at the 1968 Liberal convention.jpg (used on 6x wikis)
Image:Trudeau crop from 1994 group shot.jpg (crop is vio) (working)
Image:TrudeauCommentsOnCrossRelease1970.jpg (used on en,ja:wikis)
Image:Trudeau-Turner-Campbell-Chretien-Clark.jpg
Image:US pavillion with minirail at Expo 67 e000990869.jpg (used on 6x wikis)
Image:USSR Pavilion Expo67 Aerial view.jpg (used on af:wiki, ru:wiki)
Image:USSR Pavilion Expo67 Day.jpg (used on en,he,ru:wiki)
Image:USSR Pavilion Expo67 Interieur.jpg (used on ru:wiki)
Image:USSR Pavilion Expo67.jpg (used on en,ru:wikis)
Image:Venezuela Pavilion at Expo 67 e000990936.jpg

Work on this issue is in progress at the en:wiki: status

[edit] Deleted

Image:Aerial view of Ottawa, The Ottawa River and Hull.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Aerial view of Canada & Quebec pavillions Expo 67 e000990837.jpg (used 4x on en:wiki) (repl/w non-free 12May) (unused in article space=delete)
Image:Building the Canadian Pavillion e000756920.jpg (used on en:/talk/archive == not used) +speedy
Image:Expo 67 hostesses in front of Parliament in Ottawa.jpg unused speedy
Image:FlorenceBird.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Grace Kelly visiting Expo67.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Grace Kelly crowd Expo67.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:John Diefenbaker Inuvik 21 July 1961 crop.jpg (cropped image is clear violation of granted rights - used only on commons) +speedy
Image:John Diefenbaker painting angled.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:John Diefenbaker with JFK 1961 crop.jpg (crop = vio) (chgd articles, waiting for db to catch up) +speedy
Image:NiagaraFallsFromSeagramTower.jpg (used only on commons) +speedy
Image:Pearsonatdesk.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - Interior view of Phase I and Phase II.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase I - 2.jpg not used speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase I.jpg not used speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase II - 2.jpg not used speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase II - 3.jpg not used speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase II - 5.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Interior of Phase II.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the exterior, Phase I.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior - 2.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior - 3.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior - 4.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior - Phase I and II - 2.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior - Phase I and II.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of the interior -1.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage, Phase I and II exterior view.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage, Phase I and II viewed from Parliament.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Place du Portage, Phase I and II, exterior view.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage, Phase I exterior view.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Place du Portage, Phase I viewed from Parliament.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Princess Irene chatting at Expo 67 crop.JPG crop is violation of LAC permission (chgd to uncropped - many languages will be cursing me now:)) +speedy
Image:Princess Irene examines a floorcase at Expo 67.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Princess Irene examines globes at Expo 67.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Princess Margaret Lord Snowden 1.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Princess Margaret Lord Snowden 3.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Princess Margaret Lord Snowden 4.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:Queen Street West store window display containing mannequins wearing fur coats and fur merchandise.jpg (not used) +speedy
Image:René Lévesque election night Oct 1973 (crop).JPG crop = vio +speedy
Image:View of the CNE in Toronto.jpg (not used / free-replaceable) +speedy
Image:Window of barbershop on College Street.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Expo 67 hostesses in front of Parliament in Ottawa.jpg unused speedy
Image:Harry Belafonte Expo67 b.jpg unused speedy
Image:Kim Campbell head.jpg (cropped image is vio, chgd on en:, upage only on fr:) speedy
Image:Leonard Cohen Toronto.jpg (used on fr,pt,hr:wikis) (rmv from en:, nfy 4xwiki 14May) long enough=delete
Image:Lester B Pearson at desk w pencil 1967.jpg (used on it,cs:wiki) (nfy 2xwiki 14May) long enough=delete
Image:Nancy Greene Expo67 b.jpg unused +speedy
Image:PearsonPeacePrizeA.jpg (unused on wp:article pgs 14May) speedy
Image:Place du Portage - View of Stained Glass - Interior of Phase I.jpg (not used) speedy
Image:Wagner,_Berger_survey_Expo_67.jpg unused speedy

[edit] PD Images

Image:Coronation of Elizabeth II 1.jpg (chg to PD, revoke notice to wikis 21May)
Image:Coronation of Elizabeth II 2.jpg (chg to PD, revoke notice to wikis 21May)
Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 3.jpg (chg to PD license 21May)
Image:Coronation_of_Queen_Elizabeth_II_4.jpg (chg to PD license 21May)
Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 5.jpg (chg to PD license 21May)
Image:Louisstlaurent.jpg (used on 10x wikis) image is PD

[edit] Discussion

These have all been tagged with "Copyrighted free use" due to text in the LAC catalogue of "restrictions on use: nil". However, this text refers the restrictions place on LAC by the original photographer, and is not a license. See an email from LAC and the copyright notice on the LAC website. My understanding of Canadian copyright law is that for photographs after 1949, life of creator + 70 years is required for PD, so I've nominated all the post-1949 images I found with a quick scan.

I know a lot of work has been put into uploading and cataloging these images, and we haven't received notice from LAC, but I think it's unfair to re-users to use images from Commons which they think are "free", but could ultimately land them a cease and desist notice from LAC. Some day these images will all be PD, and I suspect they will waiting for us in the LAC catalogue. --Padraic 14:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

All of these images were uploaded but a handful of users, so I left a catch-all notice on their userpages, instead of the standard single-image template. I hope that's alright. --Padraic 15:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete them all. Speedy, anyone? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Whoah, or not. What's this about "they also seem to be asserting control over those images which are now PD"? Are such images listed here (if so, delist them)? Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

No. As I said above, these are all post-1949 images, which mean they cannot be PD, as 70 years has not passed since the date of creation, never mind the death of the creator. I would hold off on the Speedy just in case any of the uploaders may have a reason to identify them as PD. --Padraic 18:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

And shouldn't that be 1939? *blinks* Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Not according to Template:PD-Canada. My understanding is there was a legal change which affected everything after January 1, 1949, which is the reason why the creator death date is irrelevant for pre-1949 photos. --Padraic 18:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Disregard me, I misunderstood your point, wasn't thinking very hard and was doing 2009 minus 70... Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 22:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Am I right that we can upload these images to individual projects with a FUR? For instance, Image:Ben Johnson Seoul 1988.jpg given that LAC permits their re-use with copyright attribution and there is no longer an opportunity to make a free image of the same subject? Franamax 20:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You could give a FUR, but I think it would be unrelated to the LAC permission, since one of their criteria is "You do not manipulate and/or modify the material reproduced". But yes, my main point is that these don't belong on Commons (although I am also generating a similiar list of mistagged images at en.wp - I'm sure some of them wil be saved by fair use). --Padraic 20:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I would suggest this nomination be ended, and the images relisted individually or in very small groups. Each image will have differing copyright/restriction statuses making a blanket nom unreasonable. i.e.: On Image:Trudeau-Turner-Campbell-Chretien-Clark.jpg, the copyright is held by the LOC itself, and it is clearly stated that no restrictions are placed on reproduction or use: [13]. Image:Hockey Player Tim Horton - Toronto Maple Leafs.jpg is a similar case: [14]. Resolute 20:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If you want to break them up into smaller groups, feel free. However, I think your example is flawed: the copyright notice I linked to above applies to the entire catalogue, and makes it clear that commercial use is prohibit. The "reproductions on use" is not intended for external re-users; rather it is the limits imposed by the original photographer on LAC itself. These two parts of the catalogue are contradictory -- which is why I emailed them in the first place. I think their response is clear. --Padraic 20:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

To quote from their email:

The terms of re-use of material which appears on your website,specifically granting permission to modify or create derivative products,does not meet our criteria to ensure that the authenticity of the originalmaterial which comes from our collections is retained. Additionally, the terms of re-use on your website state that the material can be copied and distributed directly from your website. Library and Archives Canada requires that we be contacted for any re-use of our original material and we supply the copies of the material to ensure that the authenticity is retained. This is achieved by licensing on a "one-time" use only. Any subsequent use or re-use of our material is subject to a separate license.

--Padraic 20:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I was just reading that email in response to your last message. My mistake, disregard my comments. Resolute 20:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Can we separate this list into images with no wikilinks, which can be speedied; and images used in projects, which we will need to look at individually to construct FUR's? Also, is there a method to notify the other projects that they will need to do this too? Also also, I'm not exactly clear on the process to put a non-free image onto en:wiki, will it get speedied because it duplicates a commons image (there are bots doing this)? Thanks! Franamax 21:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I think the best way to do that would be on the talk page of the articles where it is being used, e.g. "This article uses xxxx.jpg, which will deleted from Commons May X, 2008. Should you wish to use it on your project under a fair-use rationale, be sure to make a local copy before May X." --Padraic 21:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

OK thanks, I'm relatively sure I'll be doing those efforts on en:wiki, people tend to either let things go as they are or rail against the horribility of actually having to justify using other people's property. I'll try it myself and I might be able to get other people to help. Now my further question is: is there an interwiki bot available which could place those notices in the relevant languages on the xx:wikis? I could generate those notices in English, but I don't have a crosswiki-login at the moment and English doesn't seem to be an appropriate language to use for all the various wikis. BTW, I'm running through the images to find the usages, if that's pointless, please let me know, this is my first try at preserving images across multiple languages. Thanks! Franamax 00:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete the many unused images list above. They are copyvios and should be removed ASAP. Do they need to be tagged in order to be speedy deleted, or can an admin just do it? --Padraic 19:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Endorse speedy's for the unused images. Plea for time on the others as I am still assessing use, changing crop-vio's, and organizing a response to preserve the image use. Franamax 22:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I've completed (I think) the usage survey, changed/changing the crop-vio usage across various wikis, and the toolserver db needs some time to replicate now. I've asked for bot help on en:wiki and will shortly try to organize a mini-project to address these issues. I also plan to place speedy notations beside all the copyvios which can be removed at once. Thanks! Franamax 01:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your hard work. The ones that have been flagged for speedy deletion have been nuked. Keep going! Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 11:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks a lot for all your work, Franamax. I can't spend any more time on this right now, but I'm happy to know it's being dealt with. --Padraic 12:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, I made a list of en.wp-hosted LAC images at w:User:Padraic/LAC. Those will need to be FUR'd or deleted at some point. --Padraic 14:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, I've identified all images that can be speedy'd without loss to any of the projects. Now comes the hard part - local uploads and FUR's, notifications to other projects, I can hear the en:wiki patrollers and image-bots sharpening their knives in anticipation :) I've copied the salvageable list to this page and I will try to organize some help (next two days) and start plugging through it on my own, starting with the cropvio's, and update the progress here. I understand these are all commons-ineligible and should probably be nuked immediately, but I'll ask for forebearance as long as we are showing progress. Is it reasonable to set a two-to-three week timeframe to clear this up? One week to en:upload and work out the issues, another week to notify the other projects and let them sort it out (or ignore), the last week for closeout? Anyway, I'll keep working on it, thanks! Franamax 23:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Wow, you are dedicated. I was perfectly willing to let other wikis go back to the LAC catalogue themselves after these images were deleted from Commons, but you are certainly making this easier for everyone. Congrats on your spirit of co-operation. --Padraic 13:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

^^ I'm Lewis Collard, and I endorse this message. ;) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 15:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dicussion - copyright

Canada is actually life+50, eh? Wily D 17:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Usually, but looking at Padraic's flowchart link, if the copyright has been assigned to LAC, does it now have a corporate owner, thus PD at creation + 50? Curiouser and curiouser. Franamax 21:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

No, it's not Crown Copyright if the Queen gets her mitts on the ownership, nor does it switch if a corp buys it. If a corp creates it, or the Queen (or her agents) create it, then it's a straight 50 years. Some of the "official portraits" then would be 50 years straight up - an authorised parlimentary photograph (for instance, I put up one of Trudeau) would be Crown, and thus 50 years (assuming LAC isn't licencing it freely, which I'm not convinced of in all cases, anyways.) Wily D 18:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

For instance, Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 5.jpg should be crown copyright, and hence expired anyhow.

Oh curse the day I ever saw this page! :) Now if I'm seeing things right 1) the Trudeau pic you refer to is Image:PierreTrudeau1980.jpg which is on the delete list because it's not yet +50 (actually life+50, 'cause it is copyright by a person); 2) All the Coronation...QEII pics are PD now and I can change the tags to reflect that; 3) and I think I found another one for the list: Image:Her_Majesty_Queen_Elizabeth_II_with_Prime_Minister_The_Rt._Hon._Pierre_Elliott_Trudeau_signing_the_Constitution.jpg. Have I got all that right? Franamax 19:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Err, not sure about the context of that Trudeau pic, but it doesn't matter - it's always at least 50 years to PD'ing - but if it's an official portrait, it's likely Crown Copyright, which is a flat 50 years. The Coronation pics should've entered the public domain in Canada on January 1st, 2004 - bcopyright is 50 year post creation for photographs if the owner is a corporation (in this case, a crown corp, but fine ....), agree with the constitution signing to go on the list ... *sigh*. Wily D 20:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

It would be much simpler if we would all just run for Parliament in Canada and change the law... :) Franamax 22:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment I think these three expo 67 images of Robert Wagner also need to be deleted as well as this one Image:Senta Berger Expo 67 1.jpg. Gustav VH 18:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

There is actually a category for these images Category:Expo_1967 so presumably all of that needs to go (as well as some in the subcats). Gustav VH 18:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

There are some mis-licensed images on en:wiki also. Please list any problems you find in a sub-section above (preferably), or alternatively at my en:wiki user-page for progress on addressing this. Franamax 03:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Help - I've added two more Image:Glenn Gould 1974.jpg and Image:Glenn Gould 1959.jpg - can someone clarify for me: the subject of the photo is dead (so use can be claimed as fair-use for the image used on some wikis), however copyright is retained and usage restrictions still apply, so this is not allowed on commons. Have I got that right? Franamax 06:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are correct, yes. Only images that have no restrictions, at least in the U.S. can be placed on Commons. Gustav VH 10:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PD Questions

Question. I've uploaded a bunch of LAC images, but I'm pretty sure they all have "Copyright: Expired" on them. Am I affected?-Wafulz 16:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've just been looking into it and it seems to be a complete minefield. It depends on a number of factors; i.e. whether it was ever published, and if it was, where it was published and when- see here. I'm not sure how we are ever going to be able to work this out without a copyright lawyer :( Gustav VH 17:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  - I'm thinking that as long as all the images are in Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, they are open to LAC scrutiny and comment. We are being diligent here and they are aware of the issue - if they wish to challenge on the margins, we have to wait to see what the specific arguments are. Franamax 08:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
    - This flow chart is helpful. --Padraic 14:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I've written an incomplete set of instructions up at en:wiki, I'll finish it tomorrow and post to a noticeboard there asking for help. Scrutiny of my draft instructions is welcomed. Franamax 08:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Those instructions look good to me. --Padraic 21:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Several of these images are Public Domain. Notably, photographs whose first owner is a corporation have their copyright expire 50 years after production. [15] Crown Copyright is also 50 years.

Image:Canadian Supreme Court justices circa 1950.jpg Photograph whose first owner was a corporation, copyright expires 50 years after production - i.e. Jan 1, 2001
Image:ChurchillStLaurent1954.jpg Photograph whose first owner was a corporation, copyright expires 50 years after production - i.e. Jan 1, 2005
Image:Louisstlaurent.jpg expired Jan 1, 2001 - Note that LAC says "Copyright expired" NOT "Restrictions on use:nil"
Image:Coronation of Elizabeth II 1.jpg, Image:Coronation_of_Elizabeth_II_2.jpg, Image:Coronation_of_Queen_Elizabeth_II_3.jpg, Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 4.jpg and Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 5.jpg Taken by the National Film Board in 1953 = Public Domain'd January 1st, 2004.

These three are the only ones I've so identified, although one of Diefenbaker says "Circa 1958" - obviously we care whether it was '58+ or '57 or earlier, the latter meaning it would be PD. Wily D 18:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Great work! --Padraic 19:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't everything on commons need to be public domain in the United States? In that case don't we need to follow these rules? Gustav VH 18:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, right. I haven't come across a clear explanation of the rules on Canadian-American copyright on Commons -- maybe I'll write one. Based on that link, it looks like everything which was PD in Canada as of Jan 1, 1996 is fine, whereas everything else won't be PD untill 95 years after publication. Which means the above 4 images are no good (although if we ever start a Canadian Commons we can put them there). --Padraic 15:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't it also depend on whether the works were published or not? Quite how we would determine whether works were or were not published I have no idea... Gustav VH 15:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Do you mean "published", or "published in the US"? --Padraic 15:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I mean might some of this work come under the "Never Published, Never Registered Works" rules at the top? Gustav VH 14:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Wow, that could be a gigantic headache, since LAC hosts a lot of unpublished private collections (e.g. Category:Photographs by William James Topley, although that passes the 70 years pma test). Something to watch for. --Padraic 14:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The main point seems to be if a previously unpublished work created before 1978 was published between 1978-2002, in which case it is PD in life of author + 70 years or 31 December, 2047 (whichever is later). If created before 1978 but published in 2003 or after it is just life of author + 70 years. So how on earth can we check what has and what hasn't been published? Gustav VH 16:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I have no freaking clue. It sucks for re-users, but I think this ends up being one of those situations wher we just host it untill/unless we get a takedown notice. --Padraic 16:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I started a thread on commons-l on the idea of a repository for PD-Canada works which are ineligible for Commons. --Padraic 18:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

A point that has been overlooked. Image:Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II 5.jpg is a British, not Canadian, work. Presumably the photographer was working for "The Crown" which as it was in the UK would mean the UK government. The British and Canadian crown are embodied in the same person, but they are different legal entities. It makes no difference to the free/non-free status - just means it should be PD-UKGov instead of PD-Canada. (addition)Actually, I'm not even sure of that, as looks like it is a Canadian worker who took the pictures, but UK copyright law would also apply on images taken in London (so now 3 countries matter?). Without detailed author info, I don't see how we can know which Crown the photographer was working for - they may have been working for them all simultaneously even.--Nilfanion 22:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WHO Are these PEOPLE

Who are these people that have so much free time to delete everything on Wikipedia.

The Archives of Canada is a public organization, therefore all of their work is owned by the people of Canada. The archives of Canada is not going to be against not for profit redistribution of Canadian history.

Would you delete mongers get a freakin LIFE.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.243.90 (talk • contribs) 09:59, May 23, 2008 (UTC)

Everything on Commons has to be availiable for any use, including commercial use and free modification. Archives of Canada does not permit either of these. Gustav VH 14:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, if you think that LAC materials should be public domain, please write your MP! --Padraic 14:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I doubt that this particular anon user has the faintest idea what s/he's on about, or s/he wouldn't be using the words "get" and "life" in the same sentence. :-) From what I've heard, "get a life" was already a hoary old cliché, a substitute for debate rather than an aid to it, some 20 years ago. -- 217.171.129.74 00:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, except for a few which are, in fact, PD; we can't go on hosting copyright violations indefinitely. A curse against the kind of irresponsibility that leads to messes like this. :\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 09:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Having dealt with LAC and their copyright department, please note that the vast majority of photographs in their on-line digital library specific to Expo 67 have no restrictions on use regarding "non-commercial use." This is identified by the word "NIL". For example, "RESTRICTIONS ON USE: NIL." To use those images, LAC would appreciate you annotating that the image belongs to them underneath the photograph along with its the reference number. The reason for them not restricting the use (provided that you do not alter the photograph(s) in any way) of those Expo 67 photographs stems from the fact that they do not know who the photographer was who took them.

All images in the LAC database will indicate, where possible, who the owner of the photograph is and who holds the copyright. Having examined their on-line digital database, there aren't very many Expo 67 photographs that fall into that category.

Interestingly, some of LAC's older collections have now fallen into "public domain" category.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reinhard_Tristan_Eugen_Heydrich.jpg

Photo of a Nazi leader, no information why PD-Japan should apply for a German photo. -- 88.134.141.54 14:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Keepノンノン。これは日本では既に著作権切れなりよ。だから保持。--El torero 12:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep because the image is old, older than 70 years, circa 1935-1937. Zarbon 06:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Being older than 70 years does not necessarily mean that the image is PD. --88.134.141.54 19:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Kept. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich.jpg

New request because the old one (see above) is more than mysterious... Why PD-Japan? It´s a German foto. And don´t tell me, the image were PD because ist could be older than 70 years. That´s nonsense. Chaddy 15:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC) --Chaddy 15:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete I disagree with the previous keep. "Older than 70 years" is not "life + 70", and in lieu of evidence that it was done by an anonymous photographer, we can't have it here. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Even as the previous closer, I now see that the evidence here is compelling. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep because the image is rather old, older than PD, as ascribed. Zarbon 17:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

It would be in the PD, if the author were more than 70 years dead. But we don´t know the author and it´s improbable that he/she is more than 70 years dead, because the image must be from between 1933 and 1945. Chaddy 04:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

KeepThis image needed most for Wikipedia. --El torero 09:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

That´s not a reason. Many images are needed for Wikipedia, but we can´t keep them, if they are not free. Chaddy 12:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete per Chaddy and Lewis Collard. --Kam Solusar 03:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 07:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 8

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Grails_grails_logo.jpg

Not ineligible for copyright, fair use in english wikipedia.Code·is·poetry 05:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment cf. [16] ...Forrester 08:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 13:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:HPIM0098.JPG

nonsense, out of scope --85.177.191.189 05:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Out of scope, unused. --GeorgHH • talk 11:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Remove Out of scope. ...Forrester 08:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, not used or useful. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SubudSymbol.png

Image is copyright and/or trademarked according to the description page. Bjweeks 08:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:T2000 maj.jpg

Press license, see http://www.sporveien.no/Pressesenter/Bildearkiv/ --Svens Welt 11:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. pr nom. No free license. Finn Rindahl 22:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Cameron_County_Brownsvile_Highlighted.svg

error in spelling/new image at Cameron County Brownsville Highlighted.svg 25or6to4 13:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 06:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Brad Renfro 2008.jpg

from a news service only completed deletion request --Svens Welt 14:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 05:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bebas.GIF

Not as good as the JPG and PNG versions --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 17:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by User:Siebrand. Rocket000 02:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Bebas.JPG

There is PNG --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 17:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by User:Siebrand. Rocket000 02:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Walter_Krupinski.jpg

Possibly a fair use image per en:Image:Walter Krupinski.jpg BrokenSphere 17:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, not a fed.gov work, life + 70 isn't possible. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 12:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Nagasakibomb.jpg

it is horrifying and disturbs me in ways i cannot explain 198.236.0.23 19:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep as speedy. This is a featured picture. Personal feelings about the event depicted are not valid reasons for deletion. ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 20:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep as above WayneRay 21:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

It is horrifying. It should disturb you. That's the whole point: it is total war taken to its logical conclusion, it is man's inhumanity to man at its basest, it is a mirror of ourselves when we allow the better angels of our nature to be silenced. Deleting a picture won't make history go away, and certainly won't make such a thing less likely to happen again. Or some shit. Kept. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 00:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ANTONIO VASQUEZ HIDALGO.CURRICULUM VITAE 2008-1.pdf

Resume CV Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 20:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:SOFTWARE PREPARATORIA.pdf

Fuera del Commons:Alcance del proyecto. --WayneRay 21:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Vicent Garces.pdf

Fuera del Commons:Alcance del proyecto.Out of Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CV CES.pdf

Fuera del Commons:Alcance del proyecto.Out of Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. EugeneZelenko 15:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil6.pdf

Dragon Quest game Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, actually a disguised RAR file with dubious contents.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil5.pdf

Dragon Quest Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, actually a disguised RAR file with dubious contents.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil4.pdf

Dragon Quest Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, actually a disguised RAR file with dubious contents.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil3.pdf

Dragon Quest Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, actually a disguised RAR file with dubious contents.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil2.pdf

Dragon Quest Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, actually a disguised RAR file with dubious contents.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Kochrezepte teil1.pdf

Dragon Quest Text file not in Commons Scope --WayneRay 21:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted by User:Collard. EugeneZelenko 16:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:CheFaceCollage.jpg

Derivative of multiple non-free works. Kelly 22:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I believe that I have created a "new work" by compiling, and combining them into a new image of my own creation. I do not consider it derivative but original. Redthoreau 23:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy delete "Fair use" may apply under some countries' laws. That's not enough for the Commons. --Simonxag 23:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't consider it "fair use". I consider it my own creation now that I have gone through the work and effort of finding, cropping, compiling them into a collage. Redthoreau 00:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the UNFAIR use of the photograph during decades, "FairUse" seems somewhat "understated" to me, however correct within the rules of WP. Whether this community will be able to make an exception here, for good reason, I can't tell. KEEP! for the sake of the photographer, Korda, and the creator of the pic, Redthoreau. -- WeHaWoe 19:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. No COM:FAIRUSE. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Chikis3.png

Private image, unused. GeorgHH • talk 11:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 12:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:ASOD Graduation 2008.jpg

Not needed --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 17:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keep Usable image - no eason as yet given to delete it. --Simonxag 23:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Not speedy since this is a user request. It's not currently used, but doesn't appear useful. And it's definitely not speedy delete, nominator. Rocket000 02:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe not. Looks like a personal photo. Rocket000 02:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not useful, personal photo. User request. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete pr Bryan Finn Rindahl 22:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Per bryan + personality right issues abf /talk to me/ 12:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Greater_Antillean_Grackle.jpg

I uploaded and want to change the name Ujorge 18:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Please use {{badname}} or {{duplicate}} next time. --Panther 19:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Masiela Lusha.jpg

No Author. Status cannot be determined anymore. --Svens Welt 14:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC) --Svens Welt 14:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. per nom. Has never been revieved by a human user. abf /talk to me/ 12:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. →Christian .И 08:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Adrian_Carmack.jpg

"Permission granted to use in Wikipedia" is not enough. Other versions: Image:Adrian Carmack cropped.jpg, Image:Adrian Carmack cropped without watermark.jpg 88.65.96.98 17:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. The second image does not refer to Wikipedia only, but must be so limited as it is a derivative of the first. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Please, before deleting very important image like that, requested a new permission, author can easily agree if he already do it. ~ bayo or talk 12:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Image:Montescaglioso.jpg

Authorization incomplete, it exclude commercial uses. See OTRS 2008050710008214 --Jacopo 08:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted, #2008050710008214. Kameraad Pjotr 19:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Files by Fermio

Fermio (talk • contribs)

Private image gallery, out of scope --GeorgHH • talk 10:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Image:Egipcioegipcio.jpg is an obvious copyvio and the others are at best unused. --Simonxag 23:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Remove Out of scope. ...Forrester 08:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 12:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Files by NkL

NkL (talk • contribs)

Private image gallery, out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 11:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. abf /talk to me/ 12:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit] Celebrities

All uploaded at en-WP by