Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates


FPCandiateicon.svg

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things[edit]

Nominating[edit]

Guidelines for nominators[edit]

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing - Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • ResolutionImages (with the exception of animations, videos, and SVGs) of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are 'strong mitigating reasons'. Note that a 1600 × 1200 image has 1.92 Mpx, just less than the 2 million level. A 1920 × 1080 image, commonly known as Full HD, has 2.07 Mpx, just more than the 2 million level.
Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and colour/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful colour adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Valueour main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.


Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolours, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution. For instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are none the less wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file hosting page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Digital cameras (or images) have a narrower latitude than film. Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of Thirds" is a good guideline for composition and is an inheritance from the painting school. The idea is to divide the image with two imaginary horizontal and two vertical lines, thus dividing the image into thirds horizontally and vertically. Centering the subject is often less interesting than placing the subject in one of the "interest points", the 4 intersection between these horizontal and vertical lines intersect. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. The upper or lower horizontal line is often a good choice. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, colour, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Colour is important. Over saturated colours are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or colour AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of colour brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Set nominations

Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set.

  • All images should be processed and presented in a similar manner to ensure consistency amongst the set.
  • All images should be linked to all others in the "Other Versions" section of the image summary.
  • If the set of subjects has a limited number of elements, then there should be a complete set of images. This may result in images in this kind of set with no "wow" factor, and perhaps little value on their own. Their value is closely bound to the value of having a complete set of these subjects. The decision to feature should be based on this overall value.
  • If the set of subjects is unlimited, the images should be chosen judiciously. Each image should be sufficiently different to the others to add a great deal of value to the overall set. The majority of images should be able to qualify for FP on their own.
  • All images should be of high technical quality.

Adding a new nomination[edit]

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2


Set nominations ONLY

Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.

Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify him/her using {{subst:FPC-notice}}.

Voting[edit]

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for his/her own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use following templates:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question),
  • {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as an FP.
{{Delistandreplace}} Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

Featured picture candidate policy[edit]

General rules[edit]

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{withdraw}} ~~~~
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5)
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have no support (apart from the nominator).
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.)
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules[edit]

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least 7 supporting votes
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, he/she should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between the bot has counted the votes and before they are finally closed by the bot, this manual review can be done by any user that are familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite[edit]

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken.

See also[edit]

Table of contents[edit]

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Contents

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Toronto - ON - Humber Bay Arch Bridge2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 20:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toronto: Humber Bay Arch Bridge

File:Tulipa agenensis sharonensis 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 18:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Allium rothii 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 16:44:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Allium rothii 1.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Corpus Christi College New Court, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 14:12:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New Court of Corpus Christi College at the University of Cambridge, England.

File:Kräuselscharbe Phalacrocorax melanoleucos 01 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 08:24:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head shot of Little pied cormorant (Phalacrocorax melanoleucos)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nearly perfect and featurable without doubt, just some small blown areas near the top of the bird’s head. Can you fix this (raw file)? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint (the parts were very tiny), should be fixed now. Please take another look. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Dampflokomotive 997243-1 der Harzer Schmalspurbahnen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 20:44:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

narrow-gauge steam locomotive 997243-1

File:De fem søstre i århus perspetiv korrekt.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 18:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I had noticed this photo as well and thought it was very good. --Slaunger (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Nice sunset but unfortunately the main subject is in shadow. --King of ♠ 06:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is not a sunset the time is 21. nov 2008, 14:43 and the sun is behind the photografer behind a cloud, so the main subject is not in shade but in diffused light. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The top part of the sky looks massively oversharpened. I would suggest to apply masked sharpening (exclude the sky) and apply some selective noise reduction on the sky. There are also dust spots (see note). Composition is good. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thx for the reviews. I have removed the two dustspots and done a noise reduction on the sky. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Agua azulada e limpida do Poco Azul.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 16:47:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Blue and limpid water of the Poço Azul (Blue well) rich in bicarbonates of calcium and magnesium - Chapada Diamantina
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Blue and limpid water of the Poço Azul (Blue well) rich in bicarbonates of calcium and magnesium - Chapada Diamantina. Created and uploaded by Lauro Sirgado - nominated by Arion -- User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArionEstar (talk) 16:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English description would be nice. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good idea, and it looks a very special place, but the rock is really overexposed. I think you need some HDR technique to cover the large dynamic range. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
    • The overexposure of the rock is justifiable (and fixable). Probably the rock is reflecting the light that shines in the cave. Regards, User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
    • @Yann. Thanks for the comments and it is a fact, but due to the short time without tourists (I held six for few minutes) and the instability of the access deck, I was not able to make more photos(only two) with other expositions. Unfortunately. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 23:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
      • @ArionEstar.Thanks for the nomination. I'm trying to improve the image, but it will only upload if I satisfied with the result. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 23:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Central area overexposed. Lighting is very difficult here I know, still that has to be properly dealt with for an FP. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Lijiang Yunnan China-Naxi-people-carrying-baskets-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 10:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Naxi people carrying the typical baskets of the region; scene from a public perfomance in Jade Dragon Snow Mountain Open Air Theatre.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Naxi people carrying the typical baskets of the region. Created and uploaded by CEphoto, Uwe Aranas - nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition and moment. -- Kadellar (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, but I would add a bit more sky. Yann (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In my opinion a special recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Qwertz1894 (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, with <50 edits. --A.Savin 19:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Kadellar. --Ivar (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool shot Poco2 17:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yup -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Refreshing topic, very interesting and good composition, and good light and colors too. --Slaunger (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Slaunger. --El Grafo (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Maire (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Coventry Cathedral Interior, West Midlands, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 09:09:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ionian Academy - Corfu.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 08:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Ionian Academy with the monument of Ioannis Kapodistrias, Corfu.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 08:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff 08:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not so good composition, colors are a little washed out, and the white statue with the white cloud in the background is unfortunate IMO. --Slaunger (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --MrPanyGoff 05:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0202.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 07:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve "Am Enteborn" in Dülmen, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 07:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 07:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but low value. --Slaunger (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have been trying to take this picture myself for quite some time. And for once it's a country other than Estonia that is showing off its natural beauty this way Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 06:05, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but not outstanding. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Barn Owl flying.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 05:48:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn Owl flying
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kristina Servant - uploaded by User:dman41689 - nominated by Dman41689 -- Dman41689 (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dman41689 (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Soft and noisy, but a great capture otherwise. Diliff (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Soft and noisy, perhaps. But an absolutely breathtaking photo, and just the kind of image that will make people say, "Look at what's on Commons!" I love it! KDS444 (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
    • They'll say "Look at what's on Commons!" and then they'll view it full screen and feel cheated by Commons. It's clearly out of focus. It's an unfortunate almost-caught-it moment. Diliff (talk) 21:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very tempted to support per KD above, but in the end technical considerations prevail. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose truely breathtaking as a thumbnail, can't argue with that. It breaks my heart to reject this, but it's really very soft and noisy at higher resolutions. --El Grafo (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, plus overexposure on the white parts of the face. Pity, it’s a nice shot. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Velejando nas nuvens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 21:57:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Roberto Pavezi Netto - nominated by Arion -- ArionEstar (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArionEstar (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice place and compo but size a bit small, oversatured and overcontrasted IMO -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The colors as rendered in this image appear overvivid-- too much of a good thing, I am afraid.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The colours look unnatural. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Clearly Symbol wtf vote.svg Overprocessed. What happens when you don't yet realize the Shadow/highlights slider has its limits, and more is not better. Daniel Case (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 21:11:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Congress and theater building at Bad Ischl, Upper Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Congress and theater building at Bad Ischl, Upper Austria / created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P e z i (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support maybe it need a very little sharpening and a little brightening of the shadows (especially at right), however well done and wow -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Heppenheim BW 2014-05-13 14-32-16.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 19:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Coat of Many Colours (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a photo from a tourists photo album. If this photo was professionally made, the photo would have been taken on a sunshiny day and the photographer would have waited until the people at left were gone. Good photo but not featured I think. I need a wauw effect. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not bothered by the people so much as the white balance, which seems off. Daniel Case (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The statue right in front of the house is a poor choice. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Borgund Stave Chuch in Lærdalen, 2013 June.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 14:22:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SBorgund Stave Church in Lærdalen in Lærdal municipality, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway in 2013 June.

File:Shirvan Domes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The mysterious 15th century Shirvan Dynasty mausoleum and graveyard in Shamakhi, Azerbaijan.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Walter Callens - uploaded by Azeri| - nominated by Azeri -- Azeri (talk) 14:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Azeri (talk) 14:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very interesting and valuable photograph. Composition is very good too but I'm not convinced of the technical quality and the small size. It also seems tilted to the right.--MrPanyGoff 15:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I think its the terrain or even the structure that is tilted, as you can see in the background the graveyard is located on hilly terrains. Azeri (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The mausoleum is tilting to the right side. The photo should be rotated I think. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 19:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg

File:Iglesia de San Pantaleón, Ohrid, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 35 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 19:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Saint Panteleimon monastery is situated on Plaošnik, an archaeological site and holy place in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia. It is attributed to Clement of Ohrid, a disciple of Saint Cyril and Saint Methodius at the request of Boris I of Bulgaria in the 9th century. Apart from the monastery's many reconstructions during the Ottoman empire, it has recently undergone extensive reconstruction and excavation. Reconstruction finished by August 10, 2002 and most of Saint Clement's relics were returned to the church.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Saint Panteleimon monastery is situated on Plaošnik, an archaeological site and holy place in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia. It is attributed to Clement of Ohrid, a disciple of Saint Cyril and Saint Methodius at the request of Boris I of Bulgaria in the 9th century. Apart from the monastery's many reconstructions during the Ottoman empire, it has recently undergone extensive reconstruction and excavation. Reconstruction finished by August 10, 2002 and most of Saint Clement's relics were returned to the church. All by me, Poco2 19:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 19:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI and good ev, but no wow.--ArildV (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per ArildV -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Interesting subject, good work with HDR. But I would crop the roof at right (what is it?): this modern construction spoils the nice atmosphere. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kievitsbloem (Fritillaria meleagris) 05.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 15:14:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Fritillaria meleagris. Very rare and legally protected in the Netherlands bulb. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the composition is very good and beautiful.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately there are one or two insects on the plant. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kickxia floribunda 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 08:54:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Kickxia floribunda 1.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not entirely convinced by the choice of DOF here.--ArildV (talk) 11:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not like the composition and the frontal light is too harsh IMO. --Slaunger (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the light. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mallorca - Leuchtturm am Kap Formentor6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 06:23:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lighthouse at Cap Formentor, Mallorca (Spain)

File:Brantôme 24 Reposoir XVIe 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2014 at 08:37:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brantôme, Reposoir XVIe, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral DoF is a bit shallow (right edge is unsharp) but the cut-by-the-frame tree on the right is what really keeps me from supporting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically very good (sharp, light colors, framing). The background is a little distracting, but this is, I believe, inevitable. Wow is low for me though. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Butter-Tubs-Pass-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2014 at 05:34:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alternative view on the Butter Tubs Pass
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alternative view on the Butter Tubs Pass from a different point of view, showing the road not that dominant in the foreground. Light has changed a bit during those few minutes, not for the worst I think. Hopefully, the sheepfold in the lower right is interesting enough a detail. Oh yes, and this one is cropped to 3:2 ratio as well for those who don’t like µFT’s native ratio :-) On support, I will withdraw the other nomination.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support much better composition than the other nomination. The reading of the image is much more pleasant here. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 09:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Better but some vegetation in the foreground would make it FP. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is no more vegetation up there in the moorlands than shown in the image. Grass, bracken, heather, that’s all. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Flowers in foreground, looks weird, see annotation. --Slaunger (talk) 16:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, they’re unsharp, so the stems melt into the background grass. I don’t think cloning them all out would improve the image. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
      • OK. Thanks for the explanation. --Slaunger (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mønsted kalkgruber exposure fused 2014-07-18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 23:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mønsted limestone mines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An illuminated path in the largest limestone mine in the world, Mønsted limestone mine in Denmark. The limestone mine has been excavated over a period of almost 1000 years from the early 11th century untill 1978, mainly by using pickaxes or other handheld tools. The mine has over 60 km paths of which 2 km are illuminated. Some paths are like huge halls, others not passageable by a grown man. In the path shown here is clearly seen how thick layers of limestone alternate with thin layers of flint. The photo itself is an exposure fusion between three bracketed exposures with exposure times of 6, 15 and 30 seconds using CA corrected raw files as input into PTgui. In hindsight, I should have had an even shorther exposure time on the most underexposed photo as the point light sources are slightly burnt in even the 6 sec exposure. Done with an aperture of f/10 and ISO 200 (if i go higher I begin to introduce notieable noise with my camera). I have spend a great deal of time playing around with the exposure fusion to highlight the layered structure, which is not quite as evident when you are in the mines, as well as make the representation faithful. It appears lighter than it really is, as the light sources are weak. A ghost is seen in the long time exposure shot wearing a handheld lamp leaving a light trail. Almost unavoidable due to many guests in the mines.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 20:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 06:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Fabienne Keller par Claude Truong-Ngoc avril 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 20:03:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fabienne Keller


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Korsö February 2013 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 12:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Korsö torn (tower), Korsö island, Stockholm archipelago.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Korsö torn (tower), Korsö island, Stockholm archipelago. Originally built as a lighthouse in the late 1700s, later used as a military observation tower. The images was taken from a chartered helicopter, as part of Wikimedia Sweden aerial photo project. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Nice pic. Perhaps a little boring centered composition. Weird. When I look at the cliffs in the foreground they appear duplicated or motion blurred. In theory it could be because the vantage point was changing during the shot, while you were focusing on the tower, but I would be surprised if this happened with 1/1000 s exposure unless the helicopter was moving very fast? It could also just be because of the f/4.5 aperture and the associated low DOF. --Slaunger (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Slaunger: even a pro lens as the 24-70 has weakness. The border sharpness at long distances is the weakness here. DOF should not be a problem here, because of the distance to the object (at least 200 meters altitude above the sea, and some distance from the tower and the island). There is no downsampling and almost no crop here, normally you do not see 24mp aerial images. Here is a 3 mp version of the same photo, looks very sharp.--ArildV (talk) 13:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
      • @ArildV: You are right. Thanks for explaining. As you know, I am often hit by the limits of my own mediocre lenses:) --Slaunger (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Menshikovsky Palace in Oranienbaum 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 11:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Menshikovsky Palace in Oranienbaum 01.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Main building of Grand Menshikovsky Palace in Oranienbaum. Built in 1711—1727 by Giovanni Maria Fontana.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 11:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Alex Florstein (talk) 11:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Very good light and very colorful. Tending to support. Seems a liitle overstaurated to me. How much has been done in postprocessing? Why only 10 Mpixels with a 16 Mpixel camera? How come the sky is so dark at 2 pm? --Slaunger (talk) 11:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
    • The picture was edited, cropped and resized a bit, of course. But anyway, I think 10-12 Mpixels is enough for most cases. Such tone of sky can often be seen in our latitudes. --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
      • OK, thanks for the explanation. How about the saturation. Has that been increased significantly? ---Slaunger (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
        • Basic colors and shades are not spoiled. Saturation was slightly adjusted after your first comment. --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it now with the slightly less aggressive color toning. --Slaunger (talk) 12:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too much sky and too much lawn. Choose a tighter crop, especially on top and bottom. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:39, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree, that a slight crop above and below could improve it a bit. But please, only a little such that you get 1/3 lawn, 1/3 building (up to beginning of tower), 1/3 sky (including tower and top of trees). --Slaunger (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Composition shall remain the same. --Alex Florstein (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Contrary to the image down, the 50mm make the proportion of the image more acceptable (IMO) and decrease the effect of pile of the perspectives -- Christian Ferrer Talk 21:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 23:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect image and lighting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK. May be too much green (gras). --XRay talk 05:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:City Palace detail 01 - Berlin.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 09:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Console detail from the Berlin City Palace
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 09:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff 09:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A no-brainer QI. Excellent light and colors, very low noise, very educational, crisp and clear. But sorry, the wow is just not there for me. --Slaunger (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The harsh shadow is a "no go" for me; otherwise good quality. --A.Savin 16:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with A.Savin. Too much shadow on the left part of the object and a big dominating shadow on the left of the object. The light is not good. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Honestly, I don't think complaining about the shadow is appropriate here. The light is very good, and with a strong side light which add relief to the sculpture, there needs to be a shadow on the side. Digitaly removing the shadow will certainly not improve the image. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
      • I do not think digitaly removing the shadow is good. Before taking the photo there should have been a lamp placed at left giving light in the left part of the photo. I know that would probably not have been possible for the photograher (a museum visitor I guess). --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
        • No, because it would remove the shadow on the sculpture, which would ruin the idea. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
          • Yann, I agree entirely with you regarding the lightning. The lightning is very good as it is. --Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
            • Then you can simply support ;) --MrPanyGoff 20:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I agree that an afterwards removal of the shadow wouldn't improve the image; a shadow is not necessarily an evil, but this one is simply too harsh for me, which is hardly avoidable with an object placed so close to the background. --A.Savin 21:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Guerrero a caballo, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 107.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 20:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Warrior on a Horse statue is one of the main symbols of the Skopje 2014 project and is located in the center of Macedonia Square in Skopje, capital of the Republic of Macedonia. Although it is not officially named for him, it is typically thought to depict Alexander the Great. The statue was sculpted by Valentina Stefanovska and completed on September 8, 2011 to commemorate 20 years of the independence of the Republic of Macedonia. The bronze sculpture is 14.5 m tall and it sits on a cylindrical column, which itself is 10 m in height. The column consists of three large ivory sections containing reliefs, each separated by a thinner bronze ring. Each section contains reliefs. The column stands in a fountain and at the base of the column there are 8 bronze soldiers, each 3 m tall and 8 bronze lions, each 2.5 m tall.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Warrior on a Horse statue is one of the main symbols of the Skopje 2014 project and is located in the center of Macedonia Square in Skopje, capital of the Republic of Macedonia. Although it is not officially named for him, it is typically thought to depict Alexander the Great. The statue was sculpted by Valentina Stefanovska and completed on September 8, 2011 to commemorate 20 years of the independence of the Republic of Macedonia. The bronze sculpture is 14.5 m tall and it sits on a cylindrical column, which itself is 10 m in height. The column consists of three large ivory sections containing reliefs, each separated by a thinner bronze ring. Each section contains reliefs. The column stands in a fountain and at the base of the column there are 8 bronze soldiers, each 3 m tall and 8 bronze lions, each 2.5 m tall.. All by me, Poco2 20:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine idea and nicely done. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brilliant exposure control, colors and composition. Large wow. --Slaunger (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very impressive, but the sculpture is too dark, and its face is hidden by its hand. --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
    I see your point but there was IMHO no better angle to photograph the monument. I have spent hours there and have uploaded multiple pictures. The sculpture is not lighted in the top, I cannot change that and for composition purposes it was important to achieve a certain symmetry in the fountain (with the lion in the middle). Furthermore from this angle there was the better composition in the background. Poco2 19:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's a pity, but per Uoaei1. --Ivar (talk) 05:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it's a pity for the hidden head however wow -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ArildV (talk) 11:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Tarfala valley panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 19:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tarfaladalen
  • You can see Sweden's tallest mountain, and several famous glaciers (notably Storglaciären, which has the world's longest data record). The phenomenon on the left is just a normal consequence of the panoramic projection and the fact that you don't have a straight horizon. Another thing is that the valley increases in altitude from left to right in the panorama. The picture also gives a overview of the research station's location. Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 07:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • The picture may show interesting items, still it is not outstanding itself IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I find it interesting, that it has a big contrast alternating very much between almost white and almost black. I am wondering if the contrast is a little too high? Does it really look so black and white? I seems some features are missing, especially in the dark areas, where I believe shadows could be highlighed more. The researh station buildings has very little colors. Are they really colorless or could the image simply use a little more saturation? --Slaunger (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • That's how the place looks like during summer - large albedo variation everywhere. Of course, if I did a vegetation-only shot, I would have used the Levels tool to tweak the photo, but doing something here would just create an unrealistic picture. If you want a closer look at the research station and the vegetation (the whole valley is above the tree line), see the Tarfala category that I made... Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. Thanks for the explanation. I just wanted to be sure. To better understand the geographical context, could you please add a geocode? --Slaunger (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting landscape. --Slaunger (talk) 22:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looking at the louds in the background on the left, this image seems to be tilted ccw. --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I saw that too now, and I have fixed it by following approximately the average tilt of the clouds for the re-aligning. Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 20:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have been there and I think the panorama capture the landscape very well.--ArildV (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gidip (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Gloriette Schönbrunn Wien (Zuschnitt).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 14:21:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gloriette in Vienna, Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. -- Wolf im Wald 14:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 22:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this version, because no reflection in the water seems better than the incomplete one. But I would also support the alternative. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO, the nominator has to chose first between alternatives when he nominates. Alternative versions is for improved pictures after comments. --Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't want to influence the voters and I didn't want to conceal the alternative! I prefer the first one because of the incomplete reflections of the alternative. :-) -- Wolf im Wald 22:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Mag der Autor sein eigenes Bild nicht? Wieso sollen es wir andere es denn mehr mögen? ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ich hasse das Bild :P! Im Ernst: Ich finde das Bild ohne Wasser mittlerweile cooler, weil die Reflexion - wegen der Rasen-Reflexion - so weit unten ist und sie zudem aus technischen Gründen unschön abgeschnitten ist. Daher habe ich ursprünglich nur das Bild ohne Wasser zur Wahl gestellt und schließlich das andere nachträglich ergänzt, weil es sowieso ergänzt worden wäre und ich es den Abstimmenden nicht vorenthalten wollte, damit ein authentisches Abstimmungsergebnis zustande kommt, welches nicht zustande kommen würde, wenn das andere Bild erst nach Tagen ergänzt werden würde und somit einen kürzeren Abstimmungszeitraum hat. -- Wolf im Wald 22:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support either (rather prefer the alternative) - Both fine images . Coat of Many Colours (talk) 00:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Extremely detailed. Good light. And I am wowed by symmetrical building like this. --Slaunger (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one is better. Yann (talk) 09:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll vote this version too. --Kadellar (talk) 09:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Diliff (talk) 23:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Gloriette in Vienna, Austria

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. -- Wolf im Wald 14:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Mag der Autor sein eigenes Bild nicht? Wieso sollen es wir andere es denn mehr mögen? ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Siehe oben. -- Wolf im Wald 22:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support any version. Nikhil (talk) 02:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer the alternative. Even with the reflection cropped, it makes a more balanced composition imo. --Kadellar (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do not like the partial reflection in the alternative. --Slaunger (talk) 12:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 05:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Diliff (talk) 14:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Accidentally voted for the wrong image, prefer the first. Diliff (talk) 23:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Französische Botschaft Wien.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 14:11:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

french embassy in Vienna, Austria
Old version
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please have a look to the annotation. Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately from the frontal perspective, you can't take a photo without the buliding on the left. -- Wolf im Wald 16:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Due to the weird tilt pointed out by Jebulon. --Slaunger (talk) 12:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
New version
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Far much better, very good correction !--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Corrected version is so much better I would overwrite as non controversial. Not even sure how you did that. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support alternative per Saffron Blaze. Nikhil (talk) 02:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks underexposed to me. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very high detail level, good colors and composition. Wow not quite as high for me as in your nomination above. The pole is a little distracting as well (yet unavoidable). The crop of the sky is also a little tight for me. --Slaunger (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer the edit, thanks to Paris 16! Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can I simply overwrite the original image, so that only this edit is nominated? I think that the edit is clearly better than the original image and nobody will think different. It would be better for the servers only to have one version and to delete the other one. -- Wolf im Wald 05:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Bitte überprüfe Weißabgleich und Belichtung. Irgendetwas scheint da noch nicht zu stimmen. Ansonsten: schönes Foto :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC) 
    Pictogram voting question.svg Question Hallo Frank, was meinst du genau? Ist vielleicht dein Bildschirm falsch eingestellt? Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 08:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
    Deutsch: Weißabgleich sieht für mich OK aus, aber mir kommt's unterbelichtet vor (siehe auch Kommentar von Kreuzschnabel oben).
    English: looks underexposed to me as well
    --El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Macaca sylvanus at the Ouzoud Waterfalls (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 13:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) at the Ouzoud Waterfalls, Morocco.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by M0tty (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- M0tty (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you please try to get rid of the overexposed background somehow, e.g. by cropping the left side etc. The face is very good, but the background is distracting. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment White balance seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 06:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done White balance corrected --M0tty (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  •  Not done It's not possible to get rid of the overexposed background, sorry. --M0tty (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can see every single damn hair on this monkey's head! This is an amazing photo! With this kind of detail? Lord, if it had fleas, you'd know by this image! Technical perfection, in my book, and plenty of elusive "WOW"! —Preceding unsigned comment added by KDS444 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Pilatus P3-03 P3-Flyers HB-RBP OTT 2013 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 12:40:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pilatus P3-03 of the P3-Flyers aerobatic team (built in 1958)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 12:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. I nominate this photo as one of my favourites from this occasion because I really like how the smoke from the previous display creates contrast for the prop and undercarriage and makes the silhouette stand out. I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on this. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 12:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry Julian H., and of course don't take it personaly, but I feel the exact opposite sensation: I find the smoke really disturbing (thumbnail, full size, before and after reading your explanation), even if your plane is very nicely taken and absolutely sharp. Just my opinion. (I've often noticed that a first negative vote prevents other votes, a fortiori support votes. Please to other reviewers here: don't be influenced by my "contra", and feel free to support: I'm interested too in hearing opinions !)--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Jebulon that the smoke does not do much good to it, but I think still think it has good wow, because it is taken in flight at low altitude, the light, colors and detail level are really good, and the aircraft model is interesting. I also like, that the wheel are being retracted(?). The file page is really good too. --Slaunger (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon however also per Slaunger :) -- Christian Ferrer Talk 09:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    And per Julian, after to have read his comment I think me too that the smoke is a more for the picture. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 09:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the smoke adds an interesting dimension to the picture, a hint of mystery that makes it stand out more than it might without the smoke. It makes me want to know more. Full support on that basis! KDS444 (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:POL-A1a-Bilet Skarbowy-5 Zlotych (1794 First Issue).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 10:53:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Anonymous creator, historical Polish official treasury note from the National Numismatic Collection at the Smithsonian Institution, scan by Godot13 - uploaded by Godot13 - nominated by Maire -- Maire (talk) 10:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Polish "Bilet Skarbowy" (treasury note) - 5-zloty, dated 8 June 1794. This note is from the first issue of banknotes by the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and was authorized by Tadeusz Kościuszko. The file is already a FP at en-wiki and a part of a valued set here. To anticipate certain doubts - the cut-off top is actually a feature. As an anti-counterfeiting measure, in those times the top margin was cut off and kept together with the serial number of the note, so that by comparing them later to the rest of the note it could be determined if the note was genuine or not.

File:Rana temporaria portrait 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 06:41:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common frog (Rana temporaria)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Uoaei1 -- Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Good image. Kleuske (talk) 08:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Good, but the description should be better (only the head).--XRay talk 05:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The blurred leaves at the bottom are distracting. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A large part of the picture is not in focus. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the blurred leaves are the result of a deliberately shallow depth of field-- the whole point is that the FROG's HEAD is in IMMACULATE focus! An image blurred at the edges like this has its own kind of built-in frame to help the viewer see the ah HA! And I do, and I did. You can even see the reflection of the photographer in the frog's left (our right) eye. KDS444 (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Yogapith, Mayapur.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 03:06:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chaitanya Mahaprabhu temple in Mayapur, West Bengal

File:Frans Hals - Portrait of Jacob Olycan - Mauritshuis 459.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 01:07:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jacob Olycan

File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model 1098, manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2014 at 00:44:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upright piano (model 1098) made in the United States

File:Torre Lúgano, Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 57.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2014 at 18:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Rubus ulmifolius, flowers and buds, Vias, Hérault 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2014 at 05:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rubus ulmifolius, flowers and buds.

File:Raymond Monvoisin - Retrato de Juan Manuel de Rosas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2014 at 23:07:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Raymond Monvoisin - Retrato de Juan Manuel de Rosas.
@Yann:The version linked to is not the one I used for restoration. I used the Argentine government's official image (see [1], which is linked in the description page of the image file). The one you link to, which is also the original upload, is very blue and has lost much of the coloring; the subject looks almost violet, almost as if he was choking (or holding his breath too long)! Best regards.--MarshalN20 (talk) 14:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
The colors here are also different, which prompt to oppose even more to your version. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Gaspare Fossati - Louis Haghe - Vue générale de la grande nef, en regardant l'occident (Hagia Sophia - Ayasofya Mosque nave).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2014 at 21:55:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ayasofya Mosque (Hagia Sophia)

File:Liverpool Anglican Cathedral West Window, Liverpool, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2014 at 18:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The western window of Liverpool Cathedral, England
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Because it's below your other picture, this one isn't "so" impressive, but FP anyway imo. --Kadellar (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 14:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The bottom crop is though improvable I believe Poco2 21:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Unbeatable Arcalino (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Znojmo a Dyje (Znaim und Thaya) - panorama.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2014 at 09:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Znojmo (Znaim), Moravia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kasir (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really like the left side with the river and dam but the right side is not really appealing, maybe a panorama with more of the violage would have been better Poco2 21:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gidip (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Curit - Shinkolobwe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2014 at 23:42:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Curite from Shinkolobwe
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by BLFrank - uploaded by BLFrank - nominated by Klaproth -- Klaproth (talk) 23:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well photographed idiomorphic curite needles -- Klaproth (talk) 23:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ack Klaproth -- Linksfuss (talk) 18:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support +1 to Klaproth, especially because it's really hard to get any good pictures with idiomorphic crystals of Curit. -- Ra'ike T C 16:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really the best photo of Curite crystals (where these actually are visible ;)) that we have. --LZ6387 (talk) 21:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sophisticated and beautiful picture of rare idiomorphic crystals of Curit. --Geolina163 (talk) 22:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very noisy, nothing really sharp, disturbing out of focus foreground elements. What are those lines of points all over the image??? Also because of possible canvassing. ---Kadellar (talk) 09:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have to join Kadellar here. When I look at the image in full scale, I see lots of mini-blurs and the vertical black drip (?) lines in several places that are clearly not part of the crystal structure but are some artifact of the photographic process. When I look at an image being considered for FP I should never find myself saying, "Huh??" But I did here. Which is a shame, because the crystals look like they are amazing! I just wanna seem them all "crystal clear" (ugh, sorry!). KDS444 (talk) 16:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per others. Yann (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring - Maurtishuis 670.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2014 at 17:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Dutch "Mona Lisa"
There is already a Featured Picture of this painting here at Johannes Vermeer (1632-1675) - The Girl With The Pearl Earring (1665).jpg, but this image has several serious issues in my opinion 1 unsourced and undocumented 2 revoltingly saturated, our poor little meisje in the last throes of terminal hepatitis, and 3 (astonishingly) cropped at the right. An attempt by me to overwrite it with the new Mauritshuis was met with resistance from City Hall, so I am following the letter of the guidelines and offering a new file and a fresh nomination. This enterprising legacy high resolution file File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring - WGA24666.jpg would also be worth attention were it not for the inauthentic rosy complexion, harbinger this time perhaps of the dreaded Plague so rampant in cities of the time not to mention the editor's personal preference in erm ... pink.
Current project (City Hall permitting) is to engage with others writing up the Mauritshuis collection for Commons and I may bring some others here depending on the progress of this nomination Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've requested a "rename" of the file and corrected once here, "Mauritshuis" instead of "Maurtishuis".--Jebulon (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Cheers. Thanks for that. My damn eyes and drinking too much I expect. Oh well. The Commons administratot will actually make the adjustment., It's really very difficult for me to cope with that kind of thing, so I would appreciate it if someone could make the adjustments for mew. I think stuff might have got lost here. 20:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Coat of Many Colours (talk)
The image has gone. I simply can't manage the small print. This is the link to the newly named file File:Johannes Vermeer -Girl with a Pearl Earring - Mauritshuis 670.jpg. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Wouldn't Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace be appropriate here? — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 21:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Typically I am against de-listing and replace, but in the case of painting I am not opposed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Much better than current FP. Yann (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Raymond Poincaré officiel.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2014 at 16:37:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Raymond Poincaré official portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Héliogravure Braun- uploaded, stitched, restored and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support New in "Commons". This is a photogravure (heliography) of the presidential portrait of Raymond Poincaré (1860 - 1934), which was the head of state of France during all the World War I (1913 - 1920). He had no real constitutional powers, but he managed very well several governments, and achieved in maintaining the unity of the country. In France, he is a symbol of tenacity during difficult moments. Restored by me. High size, quality, and value(s), IMO.-- Jebulon (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The black spot in his moustache looks weird. Yann (talk) 04:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for interest. Better now ? --Jebulon (talk) 08:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes. Yann (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support unpleasant person, very pleasant (and well done) restoration! ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)[edit]

Sat 19 Jul → Thu 24 Jul
Sun 20 Jul → Fri 25 Jul
Mon 21 Jul → Sat 26 Jul
Tue 22 Jul → Sun 27 Jul
Wed 23 Jul → Mon 28 Jul
Thu 24 Jul → Tue 29 Jul

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)[edit]

Tue 15 Jul → Thu 24 Jul
Wed 16 Jul → Fri 25 Jul
Thu 17 Jul → Sat 26 Jul
Fri 18 Jul → Sun 27 Jul
Sat 19 Jul → Mon 28 Jul
Sun 20 Jul → Tue 29 Jul
Mon 21 Jul → Wed 30 Jul
Tue 22 Jul → Thu 31 Jul
Wed 23 Jul → Fri 01 Aug
Thu 24 Jul → Sat 02 Aug

Closing a featured picture promotion request[edit]

The bot[edit]

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure[edit]

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|category=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate category of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to an appropriate subpage of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images.
    • Add the template {{Featured picture}} or {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessements template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==

{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.

  1. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2014), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request[edit]

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2014.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). Also, remove the image from all categories like Featured pictures of ....
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.