Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-01.jpg

File:2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2012 at 17:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2010-04-29-tulpen-by-RalfR-01.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by Ralf Roletschek - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Joydeep (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Asymmetric composition, harsh shadows and lacking space to the left. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Asymmetric composition is actually a desired aesthetic principle in pictures, so this is quite an odd criticism. Gidip (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

That's true for all criticism. In the end it's a mere question of taste. A more extensive reply would have been: "I don't like the asymmetric composition and would have preferred if the vanishing point was centred." Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Support good compositon --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral a cute composition of this image, but the building on the left disturbing me. Some rows more right and the image would be fantastic! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Peter and partly unsharp (focus on earth?). --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support, I quite like the composition. The lighting is beautiful given how difficult it usually is to take pictures from under/alongside flowers. This type of thing doesn't strictly have to be symmetrical; at least, my eye doesn't seem to object to the current asymmetricality. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)