Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Butterfly 053.JPG

File:Butterfly 053.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2010 at 22:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Butterfly 053.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Butterfly 053.JPG

•  Info created by fa:User:سندباد - uploaded by Ladsgroup - nominated by Ladsgroup -- Amir (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amir (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Jafeluv (talk) 06:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Info see [[1]] (turbulent environment - broken wings) --Böhringer (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - I was on the fence with this one, given that it almost has too much going on, which kinda of distracts from the butterfly. But, I think the technical quality and the educational aspect are good enough to warrant a support. Tiptoety ^talk 18:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment At least the species of the butterfly should be named (should be easy since the picture was obviously taken in a zoo. Correct me if I'm wrong.) --79.249.249.125 20:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Next time please use a file name with jpg in the lower case; see Image titles and file names for more on using lower case file extensions on the wiki. Snowmanradio (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

  Just noting that the above is a local enwiki convention, and I've disputed its relevance for Commons on your talk page. Jafeluv (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

• The first steps guidelines on commons refers to language wikis for formatting guidelines; see Commons:First steps/Upload form, which directly links the en wiki to clearly show that the file extension should be in the lower case (jpg) there. I think that it is common sense and good practice that images candidates here should follow the guidelines in the biggest wiki, the en wiki. Snowmanradio (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

• I respectfully disagree. See your talk page. Jafeluv (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

• Commons recommends language wiki guidelines and specifically links to the en wiki guidelines. It says on commons in the fist steps guidelines (linked above); "You should use a descriptive name and follow the draft Commons language policy and/or the Wikipedia naming conventions for the language used, which give guidance on capitalisation, non-alphanumeric characters, etc." Snowmanradio (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose - no identity. Will reconsider if identified. - MPF (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 DoneAmir (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

• Only the subfamily was identified, and that's fairly broad. It seems to me like the Caligo genus would fit, maybe Caligo illioneus? (e.g. [2][3][4]) --Avenue (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice composition --Muhammad (talk) 03:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice butterfly. Rather distracting setting. Inadequate image documentation without location and species identification. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Butterfly not identified. --Avenue (talk) 01:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

 DoneAmir (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Fruits not identified.--Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

It's dragon fruitAmir (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

It was a joke ...--Jebulon (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

(((((: I hadn't seen79.132.207.51 09:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Nice mood. --99of9 (talk) 04:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods