Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Caballera, Aniés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08-09 PAN.JPG

File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Caballera, Aniés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08-09 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2015 at 17:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Caballera, Aniés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08-09 PAN.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Caballera, Aniés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08-09 PAN.JPG

76

51

4014

532

7256

3800

 Overexposed

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Sunset view of the Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña (Hermitage of the Virgen of the Rock) with the village of Aniés in the front, province of Huesca, Spain. The oldest parts of the sanctuary are romanic and date from the middle edge (13th century). The hermitage is only accesible on foot through a steep path in the forest or caved in the mountain. All by me, Poco² 17:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 17:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning work, the lighting and mood is perfect. --93.133.137.42 18:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Please log in to vote. Yann (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Exquisite moment and atmosphere. Given sufficient “wow factor”. --Laitche (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 09:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. A great view, but shame about the horizon's overexposure though. This is a perfect candidate for HDR. Diliff (talk) 13:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment To my defense: taking this shot was tricky without getting in trouble. I was standing on a rock without any protection and shot a lot of times without looking through the viewfinder (no way to use a tripod and actually no fun to climb there with mine). I have uploaded actually a HDR version but to manage it I had to use a more conservative angle, with a portion of the building cropped. Anyhow, I am not convinced by the HDR result, either. Poco² 18:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Interesting to see the comparison though, but I agree, I'm not convinced by the HDR result or the conservative composition in that version. I know I keep saying it, but you would have more success if you changed your HDR processing. ;-) With Lightroom HDR, you have (almost) full control over it, so much more than Tufuse, which is mostly automatic. Diliff (talk) 23:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing view, excellent quality --The Photographer (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Love the sunset, but this would be a stunning photo even without it. Daniel Case (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support What a view! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support The top looks way too white. Though, overall it is great. -- Pofka (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 05:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings