Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG

File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2014 at 21:49:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG

Munich subway station Candidplatz

•  Info Now I'd also like to nominate the second of my two recent (imo and hopefully also in your eyes) FP-worthy images of Munich subway stations, with this one being the way more friendly and colorful candidate. All by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Please take a photo of the subway station Großhadern too (U 6); it shows painted stratums. --Schnobby (talk) 08:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support HDR technique for preserving the details of the hightlights had been a good choice here (e.g. at the clocks). Nonetheless a great shot. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support   • Richard • [®] • 14:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think, this one is too similar to the other subway station photo, which you nominated below and which is is likely to become a featured image based on the already given votes. One featured image of this kind/type is enough considering the FCP critera. Also the mirror image of the photographer on the glass plate in the front is a bit disturbing. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with Diliff, Colin and their arguments in the discussion above. As this is an image of a different station constructed with a totally different design, I think both images could get a promotion to FP. As far as the reflection is concerned, see below. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because of the reflection of the photographer and his tripod.--Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well, I've come to consider this as more a feature than a bug: A clandestine portrait of the artist as a young fool, going on a photo spree late on Christmas Eve, hoping everybody else would stay home... ;-) Honestly: Even a polarizer doesn't help here, and as for photoshopping the reflection: I simply don't feel competent enough to work on that, considering all the different lights and shadows besides my own. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 11:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharp. Exposition. Photographer on his own photo. --Andrey Di Silvassex (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. 10 days and 50 edits required. --A.Savin 11:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 11:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 12:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors