Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ossuary in Sedlec.JPG

File:Ossuary in Sedlec.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2014 at 19:23:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ossuary in Sedlec.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ossuary in Sedlec.JPG

•  Info created & uploaded by Jan Kameníček - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support At least something different !--Jebulon (talk) 20:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Always useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Abstain or  Comment Good idea and well composed. I'd support if general sharpness were (much) better. But I guess I'm asking too much of a small point and shoot camera... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Baresi F (talk) 21:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. Would be a little nicer without the noise in the dark areas. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Striking support per Colin. I won't be opposing though. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ossuary certainly makes for an arresting image but I don't think this one rises above a well taken tourist photo. The technical quality and lighting is satisfactory rather than outstanding, and Sedlec Ossuary has lots of potential (see Google Images). -- Colin (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support —Clockery Fairfeld who, me? 11:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Colin. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose That place is just crazy and in my to-visit-list for some time. I agree with Colin that this shot is different but does not capture the potential of the place. Furthermore I think that this picture is too small and lacks detail, and probably needs a horizontal perspective correction (see border in the bottom). Poco² 09:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

   CommentI did some perspective correction. I am afraid there cannot be done more, because in reality the edge at the bottom was not very straight either. Jan Kameníček (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Colin. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I am the author of the picture and I must say that I was pleasantly surprised when I found out that it was nominated for FP (originally I uploaded it for the purpose of a Photo Challenge contest). I understand the opposing votes and their reasons, but I believe that the pluses, such as the composition and the whole idea, prevail. As for the technical quality, it may not be astounding, but the conditions in the ossuary (especially really bad light and no possibility to use a tripod) do not allow much more. Because I will not be online in the time of closure, I would like to thank all reviewers here for their votes and comments, both supporting and opposing, no matter of the final result of this nomination. Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks for uploading this photo to commons and Thank you very much for your comment, you sound like an educated person of good feelings --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects