Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Sulpice, Paris, Interior View 140515 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Saint-Sulpice, Paris, Interior View 140515 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2014 at 10:28:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by DXR - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)- Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 06:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Thanks Tomer for the nomination. I am very new to church panoramas, do please all feel free to comment and make suggestions! --DXR (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Not perfect (choir windows are clearly overexposed), but very good. In general view the lacks didn't carry weight compared to that amazing panoramic view of the nave. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolf im Wald 08:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support. I would have used rectilinear projection though, cylindrical projection isn't needed for a panorama of this angle of view IMO. Diliff (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Per Diliff. Overexpo of the choir window (the correction is not convincing). And the distortions of Pigalle's stoups is really to much.--Jebulon (talk) 20:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment -- This is a great and dramatic picture which impressed me the first time I looked at it. Yes, there are image quality issues but they are probably inevitable given the conditions. What I don't like, like "Master Diliff", is the type of distortion. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. I have the source files to do a HDR, my laptop just cannot handle it. Getting nominated tends to make cases like this a bit tough, but I will redevelop it in the next weeks on my desktop and renominate it if, after using your advice, the image is good enough. Thanks for your participation! --DXR (talk) 21:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
