Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sambar deer Cervus unicolor.jpg

File:Sambar deer Cervus unicolor.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2010 at 14:41:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sambar deer Cervus unicolor.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sambar deer Cervus unicolor.jpg

•  Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Muhammad (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:19, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF (talk) 23:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Not good lighting --Llorenzi (talk) 07:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose lighting, too deep DoF --Leafnode✉ 09:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Too deep DOF? Lol, sometimes I should nominate images just for the comical responses :-) --Muhammad (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes, too deep. Ever heard that in portraits (well, even if it's a portrait of a deer) main object should stand out of the background, also by the means of DoF making it blurred? But I agree that in full view it looks better. --Leafnode✉ 08:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
      • But portraits are taken in studios not in the wild and there is no use in showing the extra features in a human's face but there is educational value in showing the environment in which the animal lives --13:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose lighting... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tomascastelazo. Could be a good QI though. --Cephas (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support sharp and interesting photo --Maurice van Bruggen (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tomascastelazo - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 16:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)