Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg

File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 16:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Trindade and Martim Vaz archipelago, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Simone Marinho (edited by Webysther) - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Badly blown clouds, especially to right. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Very nice subject, colours and composition, but I think at the moment it is too noisy for FP and I found at least two dust spots in the sky. I would support the nomination if you could fix these two issues. If you have the RAW file, I could try to repair it for you. --Code (talk) 06:05, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Maybe you can repair from the first version. --Laitche (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• It's always better to work with the RAW. If it exists. --Code (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• Yeah, that's the best but seems difficult to contact him her, maybe... --Laitche (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Code and Laitche: But is only possible to improve the photo if the creator has the RAW file? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• I think that depends on the processing skill, anyway are you trying to contact the creator now? --Laitche (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
• @ArionEstar: We should give it a try. --Code (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Webysther: Please Webysther, SOS. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• @ArionEstar: I uploaded the edited version made from the first version, I think that edit is not the best but rather better. If you'd like to nominate that as an alternative, please do so. But if you get the RAW file, I guess Code's work would be better than mine. --Laitche (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Laitche:  Done a new alternative nominated. And thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Waiting for changes to be made. --Tremonist (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @ArionEstar: I uploaded the new version to this file(the original). If you'd like to revert, please do so. Editing detail is below. --Laitche (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Info New version uploaded, +1EV, Fixed the tilte, NR, Removed dust spots, Removed CAs. --Laitche (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  @Laitche: This version is nice, but it's a little bit underexposed. Look the rocks on water and the water down. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  Maybe but in my opinion for this dynamic range +1EV is limit so I think it's better to waiting for what others would say. --Laitche (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  Or maybe the source image is overprocessing but I don't have the RAW so it's a limit which I could. --Laitche (talk) 21:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  @ArionEstar: I uploaded the new version as your ordered. Maybe rather better. --Laitche (talk) 23:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

  Yes now… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @King of Hearts: This photo is reverted to the first image, so please re-review it, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Laitche: I changed this version to the file below. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

  @ArionEstar: OK, That might be better. --Laitche (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Info Reverted to the first image. --Laitche (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Edited version of the photo, by Laitche. @Webysther, Daniel Case, Code, and Tremonist: Now? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I support the new version of the original nomination. --Laitche (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Much better. Thank you, Laitche. --Code (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Looks much nicer now, thanks a lot. --Tremonist (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. -- Pofka (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 15:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support Just enough to make it featurable but it still seems slightly overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Much better than the version above, but still a lot of information lost in blown highlights. There is also a significant amount of CA on the left side. — Julian H.^✈ 16:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • and due to NR, Already the source image has CAs, Yes it's not the best edit and don't have the RAW. Seems it doesn't reach your FP bar, it's OK. + If you want to make an other edit, I don't mind. Thanks Julian. --Laitche (talk) 17:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm sure I couldn't do anything that you didn't try already. Without the RAW, this is probably as good as it gets, and it's a very nice photo now. Just not quite FP in my opinion, as mentioned. — Julian H.^✈ 17:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment New version uploaded, a bit remove CAs, -EV a little. --Laitche (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, this is not a FPC, look the top of the mountains guys, looks like vanished. I like the composition, but the colours, and the amount of details is not enough. -- RTA 19:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @RTA Simply, you mean it's a bad editing, right? --Laitche (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Laitche, sort of, the shoot was taken in not good camera setup, 1/800 sec, creating a too dark image, and some other small issues, but she could reverted a great part of that in the raw file, this image that you created, with all of the best intentions, is not a FP. Sorry. -- RTA 20:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Info The new version is uploaded. --Laitche (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @ArionEstar: The colors of this version are not natural and just a little bit oversaturated that's why I uploaded that version. But if you like this one, I don't mind. --Laitche (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

@Laitche: In the other version, the cloud at the center of the sky is green. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Those are CAs, still a lot CAs in this image, but that's impossible to remove all CAs, imo. And that is one of the reason I need the RAW file. --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08 edited.jpg