Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg/3

File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2015 at 21:03:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg 2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg 2

•  Info created by Oleg Belyakov - uploaded by Ukravia - nominated by Michaeldsuarez -- Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support – A beautiful photo of helicopter with a stunning effect on the water beneath it. The uploader has good tastes. -- Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
• We've already just had a full discussion on this. -- KTC (talk) 21:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I didn't know about Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:State_Emergency_Service_of_Ukraine_(MChS)_Mil_Mi-8MTV_picking_up_water_near_Nezhin.jpg/2 at the time I created this page. I've renamed the page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Fair enough. -- KTC (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per KTC. Yann (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

@Yann: : May I please have an explanation? Commons:Featured_picture_candidates doesn't mention any rule against re-nominating a photo. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

I should also mention that during the previous nomination, many votes were cast before The_Photographer improved the photo, so having a fresh discussion (this one) is a good idea. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The problems are still remaining in this picture which were quite much talked about after the changed version. And this is the same changed version in question. Another version hasn't been done since the not-so-supportive consensus so I don't know what fresh can I/we say. --Ximonic (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Something's wrong with the archives, this picture is shown as "in use" on FPC log files in 2013 and 2014. It also affects other FPs. –Be..anyone (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Fixed: [1], [2], [3]. Thank you for discovering the problem. When Yann posted his message, I was concerned that this nomination was going to end up being a complete waste of time, but now people can see that it helped find and repair an issue with CommonsDelinker. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Re nomination is fine if the picture is imporoved after the last nomor it failed on the margins. Here I see no new edit; previous nom failed at 11-9. This is not a place to GAME the system. Jee 01:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The 2nd round was confused by a new version, and the 1st round was interrupted at 14:7 by an invalid "blank+protect" vote. On my box the old version is better, I can fix the saturation and still see the ropes. With the new version there's not much to fix, but the ropes didn't survive the processing. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

See; I'm always against "politics" affect positively or negatively a nom. If you can fix the "issues" better start a new nom after completing all the home works. The file was here in Commons for a long-while; as it was uploader by the same user person earlier without much attention. Now too much wow because of some "strange reasons" that I don't care. Here in FPC, there is no strict rule; but there is already a "best practice" to avoid renominations within one month. But as you are not much involved in this drama so far, I can COM:AGF in your attempts. :) Jee 02:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose as Jee and small main subject in a already small image. -- Christian Ferrer 11:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Tremonist (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: The image was not "improved", it was damaged and should be reverted. No more pointy nominations please. -- Colin (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.