Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg

File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 09:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
•  Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 09:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Probably the towers are not bent in reality. Can you correct for barrel distortion? --JRff (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Distortion of -2 was applied for focal length of 24mm. Vertical perspective also has been corrected with the vertical lines near the door as reference. The outer walls of this church are not perpendicular to the ground. See here. --Jovian Eye _storm 12:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment The page you linked to talks about pincushion distortion at 24 mm, but I see barrel distortion. So the correction was probably too strong? And the other photograph on that web site has probably uncorrected perspective. So I cannot actually see how the building looks like in reality. I can only say that statics would be difficult for the architect if the top were really that slanted ... I will stay neutral. --JRff (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
      •  Comment After doing some web searching about the architecture and design I was unable to find any thing about the tilt. I guess, I was wrong about that. I have uploaded a corrected version. --Jovian Eye _storm 02:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
        •  Support The corrected version is very good. --JRff (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)