Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Agarplate redbloodcells edit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Agarplate redbloodcells edit.jpg, featured[edit]
Info Public domain image from cancer.gov.[1] Red blood cells on an agar plate are used to diagnose infection. The visible colonies on both plates come from the growth of bacteria that has infected the red blood cells. The two plates have blood cells infected with different types of bacteria. The plate on the left shows a positive staphyloccus infection. The plate on the right shows a positive streptococcus infection and with the halo effect shows specifically a beta-hemolytic group A. These infections can occur in patients on chemotherapy. Image taken 10/1985 by Bill Branson. AV-8510-3737 - original version uploaded by Quintote edited by Fir0002 - nominated by Durova. --Durova 11:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Support --Durova 11:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)- Support Like the contrast. Dori - Talk 18:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nice Speagles 05:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support RedCoat 23:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Question I think, there is to much information in the picture. What you wanted to say via thisone?--Juan de Vojníkov 01:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- The information came from a U.S. Government website. It's a set of petri dishes used to diagnose infections. I think the composition and colors are excellent. Durova 04:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Neutral OK. Than let me be neutral in this case. The picture itself is good, but I think its bringing to much informaion.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Too much information?? We like information here! The more, the better. :) Rocket000 22:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Who "we"? I thought Wikimedia Commons is a repository shared by other Wikimedia projects. So the information is usually there in written form. Thats why I am also a neutral in here.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sometimes one image gets used at four or five different articles. Different parts of a long description could be useful to each article. Durova 10:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Who "we"? I thought Wikimedia Commons is a repository shared by other Wikimedia projects. So the information is usually there in written form. Thats why I am also a neutral in here.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Too much information?? We like information here! The more, the better. :) Rocket000 22:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support I support information. Let's have more of it! Samsara 23:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Mywood 17:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
