Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008.jpg

Image:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008.jpg

Original	Edit 1	Edit 2
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2008 at 09:51:53	Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2008 at 14:10:00	Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2008 at 20:23:00

Original, not featured

•  Info created by Ra-smit - uploaded by Ra-smit - nominated by Ra-smit -- Ra-smit (talk) 09:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ra-smit (talk) 09:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Has potential, but needs substantial noise reduction first. Lycaon (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition...but sth is wrong with the colours. Here is a photo (Image:Schloss_Chenonceau.JPG) of that castle, which is FP on de:wp... But on this one the right part is unfortunately missing. I'd prefer the one in this nomination if the colours were not that strange. Too bad. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per AngMoKio. The manipulation of the colors of the sky makes the picture "false".--Caspian blue (talk) 12:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark and the edited version is not much better. --Aktron (talk) 16:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - either version.--Avala (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

result: 3 supports, 4 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured (waiting for results on other edit). Benh (talk) 19:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit 1, not featured

•  Info noise reduction: by --Luc Viatour (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support NR1 --Luc Viatour (talk) 12:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sky is still posterized -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose all versions. It has a good composition, but a very bad technical quality. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 19:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

  At that time of voting, there were only two images, so this vote is relocated in the correct place.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured (rule of the 5th day). Benh (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit 2, featured

•  Info I just spent 3 minutes correcting the color/tone of the original images which looks awkward. The image has a potential, but the first two are not in a good condition.--Caspian blue (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Info new image uploaded by Caspian blue --D-Kuru (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment very nice pic, but if the image gets changed the people and the crazy couler mix under the viduct. --D-Kuru (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Martin NH (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Not the best image quality at full size, but nice. ---donald- (talk) 07:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- DarkAp89  Commons 11:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- as nom.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality of the picture is just too bad. Too compressed, blurry sides, etc. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 22:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support not that bad. Mr. Mario (talk) 03:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise and various artifacts in the sky. --Dori - Talk 22:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)_{A few hours late... Mr. Mario (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)}

results: 5 Support, 1 Oppose -->featured --Mr. Mario (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)