Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Steinadler Aquila chrysaetos closeup2 Richard Bartz.jpg

Image:Steinadler Aquila chrysaetos closeup2 Richard Bartz.jpg, featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Richard Bartz 20:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Info The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos is one of the best known birds of prey in the Northern Hemisphere
•  Support Powerful! --Richard Bartz 20:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --Acarpentier 20:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Needs some location info though. Lycaon 20:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

• D.o.n.e :) --22:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Support --Luc Viatour 22:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support freili --Simonizer 23:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good detail, good composition. Dori - Talk 02:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Changed my mind due to the beak issues mentioned below. Dori - Talk 14:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose The beak isn't sharp, and glowing (may it can be improved). I think your other photo is much better (mainly the composition) : (Image:Steinadler Aquila chrysaetos closeup1 Richard Bartz.jpg) --Beyond silence 07:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Support Fixed.--Beyond silence 08:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lack of sharpness on beak - sorry. Otherwise a very good image. --MichaelMaggs 08:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Now fixed, so  Support --MichaelMaggs 15:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
• Peanuts :)
•  Comment No smoothing artefact, this is a kind of aberation, the problem is that its white so i have no clue to adjust it. Also its not that drastic that it strikes, so i would say dont be too picky. :) This picture has more to offer. --Richard Bartz 18:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support The beak is not perfectly sharp indeed, but in general the quality is very good. -- MJJR 19:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unless the glow can be fixed, should be easy if you have another similar image w/o aberation. Benjamint 23:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Wow!! --Urby2004 09:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Info re-uploaded a fixed version --Richard Bartz 12:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral I love the way the fixed version no longer has a softened BG, when a smoothing filter wasn't the cause of the problem :) Benjamint 14:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

• I smooth partial areas, where the area around the beak wasnt a part of it in the old version .. I retouched the beak now --Richard Bartz 14:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Support FP! --LucaG 21:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --che 00:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose –-For the file name : unnecessary auto promotion, the description page should be clear enough to credit the author. Sting 20:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think your reason for opposing is over the top, see my comment to your similar oppose vote below. -- Slaunger 23:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
    • See my answer there. Sting 02:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Stephane8888 07:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lestat 17:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support too late, sorry. Lycaon 09:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC) --Digitaldreamer 19:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured -- Lycaon 09:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)