Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2005

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.


Contents

Image:Comet-Hale-Bopp-29-03-1997_hires_adj.jpg, featured[edit]

Hale-Bopp Comet above a tree, higher resolution, adjusted
  • Nominate LoopZilla 17:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + LoopZilla 17:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- ADSR6581 19:15, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Astrograph 05:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 21:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Spundun 23:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + \ Pabix &; 10:59, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose norro 19:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thuresson 01:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 12:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Janne Karaste 09:23, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:37, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 11:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 15:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. --Erin (talk) 13:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:53, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Terrific image. --Tysto 21:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:48 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 1 July 2005 14:44 (UTC)

Image:Goteborg_2005.jpg, not featured[edit]

Swedish East India Company
  • Nominate and Symbol support vote.svg Support Swedish East India Company --Deep750 13:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + arntkaare 17:59, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) (This was IP 84.234.183.195) norro 21:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 19:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 23:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:55, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Janne Karaste 09:23, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Shaded frames, why? --Hautala 11:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose confusing picture. --PedroPVZ 20:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 13:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Odd angles; lifeless color. --Tysto 21:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 1 July 2005 14:59 (UTC)

Image:NL_BurgersZoo_4589.JPG, not featured[edit]

Burgers Ocean at Burgers Zoo, Arnhem, The Netherlands
  • Nominate LoopZilla 13:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + LoopZilla 13:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sure this is illustrative of anything for me... --24.18.46.58 23:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (that was me, sorry --Quasipalm 23:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC))
  • + Nuno Sequeira André 13:24, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting theme and nice colours, but the composition is lacking. --CSamulili 23:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:55, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 11:55, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 16:08, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 12:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral it doesnt look that bad to have so many "oppositions", but there's something that it isnt very attractive, while the colours are remarkably beautiful. But I wouldnt mind if it was a featured picture...--PedroPVZ 18:45, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is actually a beautiful photo; I just wish there was a big fish in it or something. --Tysto 21:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Quasipalm and CSamulili --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:33 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral >= not featured norro 1 July 2005 14:59 (UTC)

Image:Matterhorn Riffelsee 2005-06-11.jpg, featured[edit]

Matterhorn mirrored in Lake Riffelsee, adjusted
  • Nominate LoopZilla 07:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + LoopZilla 07:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • An adjusted levels version -- I (Quasipalm 22:09, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)) support this image:
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - this one is OK, too. James F. (talk) 11:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- Adjusetd one is better -Chun-hian 15:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like this one too, and better than non-adjusted RHorning
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This one is better. ADSR6581 17:57, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Janne Karaste 09:26, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Hautala 11:55, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Erin (talk) 12:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- I don't find it very remarkable, like i do with the Image:Calanques.jpg. I don't know why... Maybe its the composition. Nice colours though.--PedroPVZ 18:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tysto 21:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:30 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 1 neutral => featured norro 1 July 2005 14:59 (UTC)

Image:Matterhorn Riffelsee 2005-06-11.jpg, not featured[edit]

[1]

*+ -- Could be a little sharper, but I like the composition -- ADSR6581 15:57, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Support adjusted ver. ADSR6581 13:56, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 21:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Spundun 23:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Isn't there a roller coaster in that mountain?  ;) --24.18.46.58 23:45, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (that was me, sorry --Quasipalm 23:51, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC))
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with ADSR6581 --Chun-hian 13:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 11:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --PedroPVZ 18:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Prefer adjusted version. --Erin (talk) 12:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Supported the adjusted version. --Tysto 21:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:50 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 1 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)

Image:Erithacus rubecula (Marek Szczepanek).jpg, not featured[edit]

Erithacus rubecula (European Robin)
  • Nominate and Symbol support vote.svg Support Civvi 16:33, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 21:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Let me be the first person to complain about the low resolution! :) Really nice pic though. Spundun 23:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I second that that complaint!  ;-) Great pic -- but too small for me. --24.18.46.58 23:44, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) (that was me, sorry --Quasipalm 23:50, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC))
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Great picture, shame about the low resolution -- ADSR6581 08:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Update, I've just asked the "uploader" if he has got a copy with higher resolution. Let's hope so, I think this picture deserves to become a featured picture :-D --Civvi 10:17, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Pressing the uploader for the hires version is fine, but either way I would like to see this be featured, and if the hires version gets blurry then skrew hires... this pic is so great it doesnt deserve to lose its sharpness. I hope I am making sense. --Spundun 16:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 23:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution --Hautala 11:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PedroPVZ 00:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I think the resolution is good enough for such a small subject. --Erin (talk) 12:55, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Didactohedron 02:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice, but the resolution is too low--Pjotr 17:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Weak support because it's much too small to make my desktop background. --Tysto 22:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:28 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 1 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)

Image:Lightmatter wild cow.jpg, featured[edit]

Wild cow
  • Nominate WεFt 13:54, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WεFt 13:54, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 19:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +Pabix &; 11:03, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution --Hautala 11:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Probably the most beautiful cow I've ever seen. --Erin (talk) 12:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nothing special - Rex 17:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:48, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice colours. -PedroPVZ 18:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I love cattle as much as the next guy, but there's nothing really special here. --Tysto 22:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very very nice lighting and composition! Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:26 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 2 July 2005 11:56 (UTC)

Image:Cherry plums.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cherry plums
  • Nominate, + -Didactohedron 20:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +Pabix &; 11:04, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 11:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 11:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 22:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - not very interesting - Rex 23:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yum Chamaeleon 17:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose norro 26 June 2005 17:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose well: why I'm against, when I look at it I didnt knew if it was a cherry (the fruit) or a cherry tomato (very small tomatoes). Both look very different in the real word, not in the pic. And, the word "plum" doesn't say much to me... ?:/ The image didn't instruct me either... normally cherries go with a little thing, a very small "stick"... I don't know how to name it. :S -PedroPVZ 26 June 2005 23:34 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 2 July 2005 11:57 (UTC)

Image:Walnuts.jpg, not featured[edit]

Walnuts
  • Nominate, + -Didactohedron 20:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- ADSR6581 22:05, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +Pabix &; 11:06, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 11:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Something is wrong with the white balance, the parts that are supposed to be white are yellow. --Malene Thyssen 12:08, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support norro 15:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 10:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 12:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it isnt full of walnuts, to many white spaces. -PedroPVZ 18:58, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Skilled but not interesting. --Tysto 22:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 2 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)

Image:Kiwi_aka.jpg featured[edit]

A kiwi
  • Nominate, + -Didactohedron 20:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- ADSR6581 22:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportTbc 10:38, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 11:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +Pabix &; 11:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 15:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 12:11, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fir0002 11:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support mnham (same as above :S)--PedroPVZ 17:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Hautala 10:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Erin (talk) 12:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:46, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not really a fan of "catalog" photography, but this is nice. --Tysto 22:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nuno Tavares PT 23:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yum Chamaeleon 17:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I can smell it ... -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:12 (UTC)
17 Support - 1 Neutral -> featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:35 (UTC)

Image:Salami_aka.jpg not featured[edit]

A salami
  • Nominate, + -Didactohedron 20:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- ADSR6581 22:04, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +Pabix &; 11:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 23:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Disturbing, mostly because its meat. --Spundun 07:14, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Be serious this isnt a kindergarden pleeeeeeeeeeeeaseeeee --PedroPVZ 17:39, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice lighting, sharpness and composition --Malene Thyssen 12:10, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Hautala 13:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support norro 15:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yack! --PedroPVZ 17:33, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 16:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Too clinical, would like to see a photo of different salami hanging in rows. --Erin (talk) 12:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Skilled (and delicious) but not interesting. --Tysto 22:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yuk. Chamaeleon 17:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I agree with Malene - good picture! - , but it's not an interesting shot. --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca 2005-07-04 08:32:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not a big fan of meat. This is a nice photo, but without any context it's a bit boring. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:14 (UTC)
10 Support - 1 Neutral - 6 Oppose : not featured - Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:34 (UTC)

Image:Fresh water fountain.jpg featured[edit]

Fresh water fountain in a Swiss village
  • User:Juhanson tried adding this image to FPC, but did not create the actual template, so I'm doing it for him. No vote from me. -Didactohedron 23:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + LoopZilla 07:32, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- Very nice. -- ADSR6581 08:19, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:50, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 11:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- John
    • Invalidated for now. This user was not loggued in.Chun-hian 16:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 21:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 15:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. This is a truly wonderful photograph --Zantastik 22:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 12:14, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fir0002 11:31, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Hautala 10:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Great quality. --Erin (talk) 12:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support feels fresh. --PedroPVZ 18:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A nice photo that rewards the viewer for looking closer. --Tysto 22:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. Chamaeleon 17:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Would be even better if it was accompanied by a photo that shows the entire object. (What does the thick pole look like in total?) --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fresh ! -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:16 (UTC)
19 Support - 1 Oppose : featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:43 (UTC)

Image:Port_wine.jpg featured[edit]

A glass of port wine
  • Nominate, + -Didactohedron 20:49, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + LoopZilla 21:04, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + -- ADSR6581 22:01, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 08:52, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 11:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • = disturbed by the uncomplete shadow ; very nice though. ♣ Pabix &; 11:17, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    Is it not « Porto wine » ? Pabix &; 05:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    In English, it's called simply "Port". James F. (talk) 19:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Thuresson 01:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice backgrond with the wood --Malene Thyssen 12:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fir0002 11:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support my fav drink. :S (I think food and drink should not be listed here! it is cruel.) --PedroPVZ 17:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Shadows. --Hautala 10:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Captures the subject perfectly. --Erin (talk) 12:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:45, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too artsy; not illustrative enough. --Tysto 22:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with Tysto - Rex 23:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nuno Tavares PT 23:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pass the port please! Chamaeleon 17:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:54 (UTC)
15 Support - 1 Neutral - 3 Oppose : featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:41 (UTC)

Image:Oslo palace1.jpg not featured[edit]

King's castle in Oslo (Norway)
  • Nominate --Li-sung 16:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Li-sung 16:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose foreground norro 19:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 07:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not well enough lit (a sort of dull, brown-yellow), the foreground and the subject is not as crisply clear as I would like. Not a bad shot, but standards for featured pictures are (and must remain) very high. --Zantastik 22:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with norro and Zantastik --Malene Thyssen 12:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose proeminent foreground Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 00:44, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it isn't art --PedroPVZ 17:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 20:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 16:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Bad composition. --Erin (talk) 12:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Needs some tone adjustment and cropping. --Tysto 23:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Shadows, Colors-- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:42 (UTC)
2 Support - 16 Oppose -> Not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:57 (UTC)

Image:Marguerite 1.jpg not featured[edit]

Marguerite
  • Nominate (self-nomination) El Comandante 00:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: You wrote this nomination right into FPC; I fixed it for you, but please don't do it again. When nominating pictures in the future, create a separate template. -Didactohedron 01:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Didactohedron 01:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Largely the same reason as the mercedece. The translparant white background maked it lose its depth. maybe try playing with the background colors? --Spundun 07:20, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 09:45, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportFoeNyx 21:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • SupportÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 00:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Li-sung 20:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing wrong technically though, I just dont like the flower presented this way - sorry. --Malene Thyssen 12:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I like this picture, but some of the edges need softening, especially one area in the top left. ADSR6581 20:34, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 12:57, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with Malene - Rex 00:42, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Andreas Tille 06:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Petals which are supposed to be white look far to grey with no background to conteract the pure white of the web page. --fir0002 11:31, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:28, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Joolz 19:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Erin (talk) 12:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Agree with Fir0002. --Erin (talk) 18:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Avatar 13:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the white levels are quite natural (altho I might give it just a touch of contrast enhancement); highly illustrative. --Tysto 22:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. Chamaeleon 17:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Impossible to judge the size of the petal. Needs some perspective or annotation (the picture's description lacks any information on the picture's origin btw). --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:40 (UTC)
15 Support - 8 Oppose -> not featured (65 % pro) --Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:56 (UTC)

Image:Calanques.jpg not featured[edit]

Calanques de Marseille (Sugiton vu du Belvédère)
  • Nominate - El Comandante (and edits by LoopZilla 08:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC))
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 08:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nuno Sequeira André 09:12, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Visible JPEG artifacts. If the resolution was lowered slightly say 1280px, plus a despeckle filter, it would reduce its effects substantially. ADSR6581 20:42, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I don't understand... There's a lot of pictures not supported because of their too low resolution (I don't understand to which use the resolution of the pictures MUST be very high)... and for this one the resolution should be lowered? El Comandante 01:18, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Your picture has a high resolution 1536x2048, so reducing it to, for example 1280x1708 won't make much difference. When we oppose a picture with low resolution, we are talking less than 800 pixels wide (or thereabouts). Was the picture straight from your camera, or did you save it with a low JPEG compression setting in your graphics program? If the original is of higher quality, then you can re-upload it. The maximum file size for any picture is 2 megabytes. It is a great picture, if it wasn't for the annoying artifacting. ADSR6581 10:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Trés bien!!!! --PedroPVZ 17:29, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I think it might look better if the bottom was cropped -- Joolz 19:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Erin (talk) 12:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) I agree that the compression is too high, but I would never give up resolution; I'd like to see the original. --Tysto 22:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose norro 1 July 2005 22:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 4 July 2005 12:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:26 (UTC)
6 Support - 2 Neutral - 5 Oppose -> Not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:53 (UTC)

Image:Igel_adj.JPG not featured[edit]

A young hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus)
  • Nominate LoopZilla 12:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 12:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +. Commentary: modify it a bit with Gimp and color white, it will be a hoary hedgehog, perfect for a splash screen for Ubuntu (« splashy » package)Pabix &; 12:47, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 21:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + Nice.El Comandante 21:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I can't say bad things about it technically but the environment (I know, you didn't do that) depresses the picture. --CSamulili 23:33, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • + Didactohedron 01:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 15:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The hedgehog is cut. --Malene Thyssen 12:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Malene. The picture would have been fine if the hedgehog was centered. ADSR6581 20:46, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Hedgehog in his natural environment. -- Joolz 19:48, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:05, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 10:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Love it. --Erin (talk) 12:47, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Me too, very nice: the background (true envirnment of the animal) and the (how you you call it?!?!) hedgehog (wierd name it has in English) looks perfect to me. The pic also shows that the animal is very shy, and that is typical of the hedgehog, it is a very charming animal. I've saved one once! -PedroPVZ 18:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Weak support due to levels problem at top (altho it's an improvement over the original); highly illustrative tho. --Tysto 22:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:55 (UTC)
11 Support - 7 Oppose -> Not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 15:51 (UTC)

Image:Red army soldiers raising the soviet flag on the roof of the reichstag berlin germany.jpg featured[edit]

  • Nominate Thuresson 01:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support <- don_t forget to sign (Did you forget to sign, Thuresson? norro)
  • +. villy 06:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • +. Didactohedron 06:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 07:40, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Li-sung 15:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 01:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 05:34, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • -. Poor resolution. --Hautala 13:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, the resolution could be igher and the compression is IMHO to high. A better scan would be very nice (or is it a photo? You can see the borders). But the picture is just great norro 21:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 00:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Should have been higher res. Nah just kidding! --fir0002 11:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I bet there is a higher resolution version. We just can't find it... WB 11:17, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support what the communists do best: destroying. -PedroPVZ 13:06, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 16:01, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very interesting, but could the border at the top and top left be cropped off? --Erin (talk) 12:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support no question Avatar 13:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (weak) One of the great photos of WW2, but it is small and has artifacts, and the edges are sloppy. --Tysto 23:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)
17 Support - 2 Oppose -> featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:01 (UTC)

Image:Templo de Diana.jpg not featured[edit]

Diana's Temple
  • Nominate <- Roman Temple in (Évora,Portugal) Nuno Sequeira André 23:02, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 00:50, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 19:07, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • support -PedroPVZ 20:37, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ee97056 22:02, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Malene Thyssen 08:10, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 14:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Doesn't do justice to the subject. --Erin (talk) 12:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange exposure--Pjotr 17:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • changed to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I agree with Erin... makes it look just being a few columns and small. Although I like the surrounding of Evora... the temple is still the centre of the city after 2000 yrs and the pic shows that. -PedroPVZ 19:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good, but not great. --Tysto 23:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:21 (UTC)
1 Support - 2 Neutral - 10 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:11 (UTC)

Image:Londres.jpg not featured[edit]

London by night (including view of the Palace of Westminster)
  • Nominate - Ee97056 14:09, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (hey, guess what? - you can tell the time on the Clock Face, not that that makes the picture any better), but the reflexion irritates me - perhaps crop to remove? James F. (talk) 19:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like this picture, a little noisy, but that is to be expected in dark conditions. It looks much better after a despeckle filter is applied to it. (Try it out if you have Photoshop.) ADSR6581 20:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice clock :) Greudin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 17:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice --Alexan (reclamations here) 18:56, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the saturation, the light, the mood norro 21:51, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 00:47, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I regard Image:Westminster_from_London_Eye_night.jpg much better which was not accepted for strange reasons like "can't read the time" etc. If the previous image was not accepted this one should not be accepted as well. Andreas Tille 07:03, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great photo but too grainy. --fir0002 11:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- WB 23:48, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 20:49, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 14:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 15:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. I'd support a version with less sky. --Erin (talk) 12:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a great photo; a little clarify filter and cloning out the reflection would be nice, tho. --Tysto 23:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'd prefer "London" to "Londres". Chamaeleon 17:45, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • What that has to do with the picture itself? This is commons isn't it? Londres is Portuguese for London. -PedroPVZ 23:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Sim, mas Londres não fica em Portugal ;) Chamaeleon 00:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • mas quem tirou a foto é. ;) -PedroPVZ 28 June 2005 19:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Far too much sky. --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support villy 1 July 2005 19:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too blury, bad proportions (less sky would be better) -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 21:35 (UTC)
10 Support - 2 Neutral - 7 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:10 (UTC)

Image:Compass in a wooden frame.jpg not featured[edit]

300px|Compass in a wooden box
  • Nominate --Hautala 13:06, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hautala 13:06, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Object is cut, I could live with the top cut off, but not the bottom as well. ADSR6581 14:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it norro 09:04, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 00:46, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --fir0002 11:32, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 19:09, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- WB 23:43, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 20:50, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with ADSR -PedroPVZ 20:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - might be better if the bottom wasn't cut off but it's stille good. --CSamulili 17:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I think the composition could be better. --Erin (talk) 12:38, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Avatar 13:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) --Tysto 23:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice pic. Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 06:58 (UTC)
7 Support - 2 Neutral - 8 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:08 (UTC)

Image:Lavendelveld_adj.jpg not featured[edit]

Field of lavender, Vaucluse, France
  • Nominate LoopZilla 19:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 19:59, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The composition and debt in this pic are great! The blurry feel makes me think of a painting of Van Gogh. --Malene Thyssen 20:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Lavender fields are beautiful, but this picture is too fuzzy. My camera, an ultracompact sometimes takes fuzzy distance photos but good closeups, so I can relate to this problem. --Zantastik 22:15, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very nice, but blurred norro 08:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Blurry. --Hautala 13:18, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Agree, too blurred. ADSR6581 14:05, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry Greudin
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but too much blur -- Fabien1309 15:13, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:40, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 20:50, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very good. --Erin (talk) 12:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the color adjustment (what did you use?), but it's still rather gray. --Tysto 23:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose artificial. The levender field continues being nice though. -PedroPVZ 00:27, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ka-em-zwei-ein
4 Support - 1 Neutral - 10 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:07 (UTC)

Image:Ljvfhsdljfjdsloiewoir.jpg not featured[edit]

PHILIPS Microphone
  • Nominate LoopZilla 19:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 19:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zantastik 22:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 01:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too chaotical, the plug is below the cable, en:chromatic aberration in the whole photo, strange image name. -- aka 10:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with aka. --Malene Thyssen 12:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack. aka norro 12:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 13:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Cable is messy, which is too distracting. ADSR6581 14:07, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Shadows look a wierd bluey color --fir0002 11:32, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Rex 23:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 20:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 16:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Great quality, but the subject doesn't grab me. --Erin (talk) 12:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with aka.-PedroPVZ 19:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Skillful, but I just don't much like "catalog" photos. --Tysto 23:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FML IconSP.jpg hi 4 July 2005 05:57 (UTC)
4 Support - 2 Neutral - 12 Oppose -> Not featured - Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:06 (UTC)

Image:Sunset with funnel clouds.jpg not featured[edit]

Sunset with funnel clouds.jpg
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 07:56, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 18:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Avatar 13:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I prefer the one above - Rex 17:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not very informative. --PedroPVZ 18:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Picturesque, but not very illustrative. --Tysto 23:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Tysto. --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-01 08:44:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:29 (UTC)
4 Support - 7 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:19 (UTC)

Image:Rolls-Royce Spirit of Ecstasy.jpg not featured[edit]

The Rolls-Royce badge and "Spirit of Ecstasy" on the front of a 1971 Silver Shadow

Self-nom: very sharp, eye-catching, informative. — Dan | Talk 00:28, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I think so -- Fabien1309 15:50, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, given that I suggested nomination. :-) James F. (talk) 18:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 23:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much noise in the background and see debate on en. BrokenSegue 02:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 16:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (Where can one see debate?) --CSamulili 17:33, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support La classe! El Comandante 20:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • bricks reflection... -PedroPVZ 20:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Erin (talk) 12:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral bricks Avatar 13:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose norro 21:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the perspective and the color. The reflection of the bricks is leading my thoughts to castles - I can almost se the car parked in front of one :-) Malene Thyssen 07:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • that's a nice way to see it... changed to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -PedroPVZ 15:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange perspective--Pjotr 17:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support do you see the crane reflecting on the hood, unfortunately my thoughts don't go to castles anymore Nuno Sequeira André 23:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 23:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't jump, lady! --Tysto 23:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The perspective doesn't illustrate the figure well. --Martinroell 1 July 2005 08:22 (UTC)
8 Support - 1 Neutral - 6 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:18 (UTC)

Image:Bentley badge and hood ornament.jpg not featured[edit]

Bentley's winged "B" badge and hood ornament

Self-nom: very sharp, eye-catching, informative. — Dan | Talk 00:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, given that I suggested nomination. :-) James F. (talk) 18:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too confusing image. I can even see buildings and the shooter. -PedroPVZ 20:45, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - you can see too much in the reflection Tbc 20:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 23:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 15:19, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - reflection makes it too confusing. -- Get_It 15:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Too messy with reflections - people mostly. --Erin (talk) 12:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose reflections Avatar 13:18, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it--Pjotr 17:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) The reflections of people are unfortunate, but it's a very nice photo. --Tysto 23:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:53 (UTC)
4 Support - 7 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:17 (UTC)

Image:WhiteRose.jpg not featured[edit]

  • Nominate Thuresson 21:35, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thuresson 21:35, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:43, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Didactohedron 18:37, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support YolanC 21:49, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad cut in the right, I can see someone else's hear o.O -PedroPVZ 12:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 15:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Poor resolution. Something's in the way in the lower right-hand corner. --Hautala 10:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very interesting, great expressions. --Erin (talk) 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution Avatar 13:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 07:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good picture, and with historical value Nuno Sequeira André 22:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Historically interesting but not a great photo. --Tysto 23:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- aka 20:31, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Erin and Nuno --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Tysto. Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:22 (UTC)
10 Support - 8 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:15 (UTC)

Image:CambridgeSunset.jpg featured[edit]

Sunset over the River Cam in Cambridge
  • Nominate and Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 18:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support almost neutral, the trees should be a little more visible (sharped). But it is art. :) -PedroPVZ 20:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 23:15, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose better resolution would be nice -- also, this seems artificially saturated and contrasty --Quasipalm 14:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 15:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 17:39, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Wow. --Erin (talk) 12:30, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral because of resolution Avatar 13:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 11:07, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) Very dramatic but could use a fill flash. (This has already been pic of the day?) --Tysto 23:45, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ADSR6581 13:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Florenco 27 June 2005 15:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Yet another sunset, but I guess it's OK. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I guess I had better support ;-) The colours are pretty much as they came out of the camera. Although it is actually a montage of two exposures, with the lower, river portion coming from a bracketed exposure, ~1 f-stop brighter, to try and bring out more detail in the boats and trees and strengthen the reflected cloud. -- Solipsist 30 June 2005 20:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)
13 Support - 1 Neutral - 3 Oppose -> featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:33 (UTC)

Image:Arrabida.jpg not featured[edit]

Arrabida
  • Nominate <- Nuno Sequeira André 22:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 08:09, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Too dull and grey. --Erin (talk) 12:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose — Nice viewpoint. Photo could have been better —Juhanson 14:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It doesnt makes justice to downtown Porto. this photo should have been in a cloudless day or in a cloudless night (in which the city looks very beautiful).-PedroPVZ 18:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 22:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)
2 Support - 2 Neutral - 5 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:45 (UTC)

Image:Capela dos ossos cornija.jpg not featured[edit]

Capela dos Ossos
  • Nominate <- Nuno Sequeira André 22:26, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad composition, bad angle norro 08:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -PedroPVZ 17:59, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it, very interesting. --Erin (talk) 12:25, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 15:28, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good photo; I don't think the angle is awkward. It's illustrative and rewards the viewer for looking closer. (Well, that's a nice example of ancient archi... holy carp!) --Tysto 00:03, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with norro -- ADSR6581 14:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
3 Support - 6 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)

Image:Capela dos ossos parede.jpg not featured[edit]

Capela dos ossos parede
  • Nominate <- Nuno Sequeira André 22:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad composition, bad light norro 08:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good light. -PedroPVZ 12:33, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad light ;-) --Quasipalm 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull. --Erin (talk) 12:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Fascinating subject, but weak as a photo. --Tysto 00:04, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with norro ADSR6581 14:01, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
1 Support - 8 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:43 (UTC)

Image:Ribeira do Porto.jpg not featured[edit]

Ribeira do Porto
  • Nominate - Ee97056 22:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support one of the nicest places of Porto, especially for students. -PedroPVZ 12:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 14:31, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not enough focus on the buildings, too much sky and water. --Erin (talk) 12:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I think that makes it artistical: the sky and the water, and the city rising in the middle. I think it is a very nice pic. -PedroPVZ 19:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I agree that the composition is good in the sense that it's balanced, but the buildings are too hard to see, and they are a very important factor. --Erin (talk) 01:04, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) Very nice, but clarify/contrast and a little straightening would help it. --Tysto 23:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ADSR6581 14:00, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell1 July 2005 08:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 4 July 2005 12:58 (UTC)
3 Support - 7 Oppose -> not featured -- Fabien1309 8 July 2005 16:41 (UTC)

Image:Dracaena_draco_adj.jpg, not featured[edit]

Dragon Tree, probably 650 years old: adjusted colours
  • Nominate LoopZilla 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background Avatar 13:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose artificial. -PedroPVZ 13:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose artificial--Pjotr 17:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose => not featured norro 8 July 2005 18:54 (UTC)

Image:Dracaena_draco.jpg, not featured[edit]

Dragon Tree, probably 650 years old
  • Nominate LoopZilla 15:27, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 15:27, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 15:55, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 17:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 19:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice tree, but i would wish it to be more outstanding against the background norro 21:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • that's not a nice tree, that's a beautiful tree. I think the background is good, makes it look big. -PedroPVZ 01:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Yes a beautiful tree but I dont like the almost white sky - If the photo is cropped, so the sky is removed, I would support it. Nice by the way with the person in the background - its a really BIG tree :-) Ups forgot to sign - that was me :-) Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. But I would prefer it if some brightness could be added. --Erin (talk) 12:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background Avatar 13:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 17:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background, white clouds--Pjotr 17:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice tree, but the picture itself is nothing special -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 21:41 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 8 July 2005 18:56 (UTC)

Image:Eurasian.coot.london.arp.jpg, not featured[edit]

Eurasian Coot in St James Park, London, England
  • Nominate LoopZilla 15:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 15:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I dont like the iron net behind the bird. -PedroPVZ 17:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but you can't really see the head in a proper way norro 19:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice and sharp, but to much light for the white parts. I don't like the yellow thing growing out of the birds head. --Malene Thyssen 08:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. For all of the above. --Erin (talk) 12:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Avatar 13:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 22:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Best picture of a Eurasian coot I've seen all week, but.... --Tysto 00:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Background -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:24 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 8 July 2005 18:57 (UTC)

Image:Siberian Tiger by Malene Th.jpg, featured[edit]

Siberian tiger
  • Nominate (self-nomination -> no vote) --Malene Thyssen 20:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 21:16, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course :) norro 21:25, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, lovely. James F. (talk) 22:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Perfect. --Erin (talk) 12:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - too obviously in a zoo with that ugly wall behind. Now, if it had been in the wild . . . MPF 12:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Are you suggesting that I change the background? I would like to try that, if I can find a suitable background to "steal" :-). Regards Malene Thyssen 14:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Avatar 13:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent detail --fir0002 05:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 11:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral In a natural environment would be one of the world's nicest animal pictures. --PedroPVZ 15:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with MPF - Rex 17:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 17:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 22:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image; highly illustrative. --Tysto 00:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Outstanding! —Juhanson 09:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support until the misspelt name is corrected (should be "Siberian tiger" or Panthera tigris altaica). As for the issue of the unnatural background, try Image:Cute tiger cub.jpg. Chamaeleon 17:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Ok since tree voters would like a different background I'll have a look at it tonight :-) And I will of cause change the file name to Siberian tiger Panthera tigris altaica. or maybe to sibirisk tiger (in danish). Regards 80.162.84.242 26 June 2005 12:44 (UTC) (that was me Malene Thyssen)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not as good as editted one. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Didactohedron 8 July 2005 18:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:27 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured Malene Thyssen 11:39, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Panthera tigris altaica (Amurtiger straekker sig).jpg, not featured[edit]

Siberian tiger

Right - I changed the file name according to the instructions. And I tried to change the background to something looking a bit more natural...I'm not quite sure it works? If this version gets a lot of votes so both pics could be featured, I think only the most popular one should become a featured picture (being optimistic :-) Regards Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 21:56 (UTC)

  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral norro 26 June 2005 22:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks nice and funny. -PedroPVZ 26 June 2005 23:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yep. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - background clearly artificial, nice try though - Rex 27 June 2005 23:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nicely done. But what is that thing appearing in the black part of the stump? --fir0002 3 July 2005 11:03 (UTC)
    • A tiger. ;) Chamaeleon 3 July 2005 11:08 (UTC)
      • Ha ha - great comment Chamaeleon :-D ehm I'm not quite sure which thing you mean fir0002? The stumb is not clear cut so maybe Its just shadows from that? Regards Malene Thyssen 6 July 2005 21:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Hautala 4 July 2005 13:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice edit. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The edit isn't bad technically, but the choice of background leaves something to be desired. - Didactohedron 8 July 2005 18:04 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Malene Thyssen 11:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lota da Povoa de Varzim em 1960 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

'Azulejo' with the fishing market in the seaport of Povoa de Varzim in the 1960s and Povoa's family signs (runes).
  • Nominate 'Azulejo' (Portuguese blue tile art) with the fishing market in the seaport of Povoa de Varzim, Portugal in the 1960s and Povoa's family signs (runes). new version--PedroPVZ 15:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:49 (UTC)

Adjusted version.

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I like it, but not the nominated version. I have made some adjustments and support the adjusted version. --Erin (talk) 13:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad quality, overdriven colors norro 14:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 17:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 17:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Better, but still not great. --Tysto 00:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:49 (UTC)
Result (adjusted): 1 support, 6 oppose => not featured
Result (original): 1 support, 2 oppose => not featured Joolz 17:54, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wil_Altstadt_8375.jpg, featured[edit]

Wil, Altstadt
  • Nominate LoopZilla 22:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 22:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 01:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I really like the background and the smooth feel of the mist. Malene Thyssen 06:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nice feel. --Erin (talk) 09:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 11:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wonderful! Chun-hian 15:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice! Muito bom! --PedroPVZ 15:21, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 15:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange foreground--Pjotr 17:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 22:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - foreground - Rex 23:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 13:17, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nichalp June 27, 2005 12:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. A bit grainy. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support annoying foreground, tight but still support -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 21:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Overall nice. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:16 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 18:17, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Uhu-muc.jpg, not featured[edit]

Eurasian Eagle Owl
  • Nominate norro 13:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support norro 13:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too distractive background —Juhanson 14:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- background. --PedroPVZ 15:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like the background Nuno Sequeira André 16:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - clearly domesticated, subject not centered, even not completely on the photo - Rex 16:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it --Pjotr 17:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 20:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 22:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition. --Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 19:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the green perch --Quasipalm 27 June 2005 19:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-30 10:25:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Animal is great, but the green thing at the bottom is disturbing. --Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:47 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 18:37, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Street motorbyke ice.jpg, not featured[edit]

Animal transport as used in Vietnam
  • Nominate 15:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose motion blur. bad quality. --PedroPVZ 15:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad composition. --Chun-hian 15:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disturbing person in the foreground - Rex 16:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too blurry--Pjotr 17:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 20:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Subject matter is very sharp LoopZilla 20:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Agree with Loopzilla Nuno Sequeira André 22:29, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Chun-hian and Rex --Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 19:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's amazing --fir0002 30 June 2005 08:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --This is a great photo. The subject is in sharp focus and motion blur appropriately obscures everything else. I suggest a little fill flash filter to lighten the subject's face and color correction to reduce the blue tint. I've posted a rendition here. --Tysto 1 July 2005 03:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The motion blur helps make this panning shot, giving visual weight to the central motorbike. The foreground guy is a bit of a problem, but the arrangement of geese on the bike more than makes up for it. -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 08:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, due to the boy in the foreground on the left side. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:46 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 18:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Alqueva_panorama_29_5_5.jpg, not featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate - Alqueva dam in Alentejo, this dam made the biggest artificial lake in Europe Nuno Sequeira André 21:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice photo on engineering subjects. Looks nice. -PedroPVZ 21:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 22:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 23:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. Interesting. --Erin (talk) 10:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Quite breathtaking --CSamulili 11:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately on this photo you can't understand the sense of this construction norro 26 June 2005 09:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice but its a bit too light and the pic could be cropped to remove some of the sky and to fokus on the fundamental objects that tells us the story (I would make the dam and the splashing water stand more out). --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 07:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like it, but would like to actually see the damn also, but it's cut off --Quasipalm 27 June 2005 19:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The photo does not illustrate the dam well. It only shows parts of it from which it is hard to grasp a sense of the whole structure. --Martinroell 30 June 2005 00:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --I find it a bit confusing. --Tysto 1 July 2005 03:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:46 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 18:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Feeding a Bearded Dragon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Feeding a bearded dragon
  • Nominate norro 13:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support norro 13:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral disgusting but informative, somewhat funny. The Dragon should be in a natural environment. -PedroPVZ 15:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • The dragon usually does not sit on the blue sofa, but this was the only way to keep the grasshopper from hiding behind plants and stones and so on. He probably does not like to get eaten. -- aka 16:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • ok. but in the middle of the grass and a stone near it... would be perfect.--PedroPVZ 19:14, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - no photo of the actual catch, not in natural environment - Rex
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very cool--Pjotr 17:26, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The sequence should be presented as 6 individual pictures, and stuck together with a table. Aren't the originals more than 325 pixels wide? dbenbenn | talk 19:04, 24 June 2005
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. That lizard is sooo cute, but I'll oppose these pics on the sofa. --Erin (talk) 20:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 21:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 22:16, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - doch, auch wenn der Grashüpfer das nicht gerne mochte ;-) -- Farbenfreude 29 June 2005 22:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I really like this. It perfectly illustrates not a bearded dragon but a bearded dragon feeding. I especially like his cheerful smile at the end. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support; the last panel really sells this one. :) -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice last panel! --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Didactohedron 16:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I like it, but I think the blue is overwelming -- Joolz 18:21, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - could possibly be improved by changing background color.--Eloquence 22:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 01:29, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lisboa-rua.jpg, not featured[edit]

Alley in Costa do Castelo, Lisbon
  • Nominate -- Get_It 22:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it :) -- Get_It 22:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - resolution, mediocre quality - Rex 23:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • STRONG Symbol support vote.svg Support I honestely love it... It was love at first sight when I first saw this picture. I would like a picture of it in my living room, so romantic... the light... the alley... the colours... everything for me is perfect. --PedroPVZ 00:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Living in a very simillar looking town, I know there can be better shots than this. It is also too blurry and low res. --Erin (talk) 10:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I don't agree with you, especially on the "better shots" thing. In my city there are also similar places, but will not work as good as this did. --PedroPVZ 01:03, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • I've seen more than a few better pictures of such streets. But that's just my opinion. --Erin (talk) 30 June 2005 09:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lighting, but very nice norro 26 June 2005 09:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 19:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose great pic / pitifully low resolution -- printed at 300dpi this thing would be a postage stamp --Quasipalm 27 June 2005 19:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Small and short focus. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing motif. Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good idea, but not good enough quality image. Try again but with better camera. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:09 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 01:29, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Phoenicopterus ruber.jpg, featured[edit]

Rosy flamingo: adjusted for contrast
  • Nominate Image:Lightmatter flamingohead.jpg is currently featured, and I find that Image:Phoenicopterus ruber.jpg is slightly better. If you agree, then vote support. If you like both pics, also vote support. Chamaeleon 19:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Chamaeleon 19:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Very nice picture. But I think it gets even better when you increase contrast a bit. —Juhanson 20:44, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I think this flamingo is better than the Featured one. --Erin (talk) 21:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral There is no need, to unfeature the Image:Lightmatter flamingohead.jpg, because there is no problem with having to featured pictures of a flamingo. norro 22:28, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    Ah OK. I just thought that nobody would support this one without un-featuring the other one. Feel free to vote for this one, and we'll vote separately on the question of what to do with the other. Chamaeleon 22:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    There is no need to do so. The other one is featured. This vote is not dependent on that. If you think, the other flamingo photo should not be featured, you can think ob starting a deselection, but i think it's still an excellent shot. I would suggest, to remove your de-list statement at the beginning of this vote, because in my opinion it's capable of being misunderstood. Regards, norro 26 June 2005 09:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose featured picture looks way better. -PedroPVZ 01:24, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, just so long as we don't de-list the current one. James F. (talk) 01:42, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Copyright notice? LoopZilla 26 June 2005 21:17 (UTC)
    • What about it? It's effectively CC-BY. Nowt wrong with that... James F. (talk) 27 June 2005 03:03 (UTC)
      • Effectively or precisely? LoopZilla 27 June 2005 07:53 (UTC)
        • It is under a freer licence than the GFDL. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 08:47 (UTC)
          • I'm not sure this is correct. 1) The GFDL doesn't require you notify the copyright holder. 2) The GFDL cannot be revoked once applied. If you retain the copyright of your image, you theoretically could. I've asked this question here: Commons_talk:Licensing#Notify --Quasipalm 27 June 2005 19:46 (UTC)
            • 1) Did I say there were no conditions? 2) You retain the copyright of your image under the GFDL. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 20:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, due to license. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:44 (UTC)
    • OK, I'll vote oppose on all GDFL photos on that basis! Chamaeleon 6 July 2005 10:02 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral => featured -- Joolz 01:40, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Capela_dos_ossos.jpg, not featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate <- Bone Chapel in Évora Nuno Sequeira André 22:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - not sharp - Rex 23:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - enquadramento (please translate) -- Nuno Tavares PT 23:36, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • enquadramento = composition Nuno Sequeira André
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice horror scenery. :S and very nice composition. But you would have to pay me to enter in that place. -PedroPVZ 23:59, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurred norro 08:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Blurry. Good composition though. --Erin (talk) 10:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 07:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bllllury --Quasipalm 27 June 2005 19:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - somewhat blurry, yes. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:25 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 01:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Castle Arenberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.jpg, featured[edit]

Castle Arenberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Nominate Castle Arenberg in the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven --Juhanson 18:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the large version has a very bad image quality -- Pjotr 20:42, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral strange image.--PedroPVZ 23:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like it. James F. (talk) 01:43, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • It's up to you to decide, but I like my original photo more than adjusted. It gets too dark. And morning mist get boring colour... Please, take closer look! Juhanson 30 June 2005 12:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca 2005-07-04 08:24:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Andreas Tille 07:54, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support (incl. nominator), 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 01:52, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Castle Arenberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven_adj.jpg, featured[edit]

Castle Arenberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Nominate LoopZilla 26 June 2005 20:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 26 June 2005 20:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 22:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 13:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 27 June 2005 23:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this version, too. James F. (talk) 29 June 2005 12:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca 2005-07-04 08:24:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, I like the other version better. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nicely done -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 21:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 17:44, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 01:52, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jersey-city-new-jersy-night.jpg, not featured[edit]

Jersey-city-new-jersy-night
  • Nominate -- Pjotr 20:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pjotr 20:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support looks good. --PedroPVZ 23:07, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 01:40, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • strong Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this picture is overexposed (pure white in the lower left part), it is very noisy, unsharp and has a lot of chromatic aberration arround the ligths. Please see the full size version of this image. Regarding the unsharpness, it is too large and should be resized. Uploading original resolution images made with such cheap cameras is usually not a good idea, because the sensor resolution is much higher than the optical resolution. -- aka
    • No, there is no such thing as "too large" for Commons. Please do not spread such disinformation. James F. (talk) 26 June 2005 10:56 (UTC)
      • It is too large, because it can be half the size without losing any information due to the bad lens used. You are right - the resolution should be as high as useful possible. But not higher. -- aka 26 June 2005 14:32 (UTC)
        • One should always upload the original. Then you can upload a tweaked version on top; but it's important to give the original first. In fact, since Tysto was good enough to put up the original, now anyone can do the resizing you suggest. dbenbenn | talk 27 June 2005 16:09 (UTC)
          • Yes, I think the best thing to do would have been to upload the original, and immediately reupload an improved version. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:16 (UTC)
          • If the tweaked version does not contain less information (important!) than the original one, then the original version is useless. Thats all I talked about ;) BTW, thanks for improving this image @ Chamaeleon. -- aka 27 June 2005 20:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurred, bad composition norro 26 June 2005 11:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I've reduced the size and therefore the blur. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose odd composition, looks somehow cut off at the boddom -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't quite do it for me. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Don't like composition and colors Andreas Tille 07:40, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 01:56, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Liberty-statue-from-below.jpg, not featured[edit]

Liberty-statue-from-below.jpg
  • Nominate -- Pjotr 20:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pjotr 20:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- bad composition, but nice in the rest. -PedroPVZ 23:06, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • What do mean by composition? It's a statue and a sky. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:47 (UTC)
    • enquadramento. I think the statue shouldn't be cut. -PedroPVZ 2 July 2005 02:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - composition - Rex 23:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - composition is striking, but I don't like it all the same. James F. (talk) 01:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -composition. --Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 19:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It's OK. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought about it several times and now i think, i like the composition most. You can't really see the flame, there is shadow on the face, but the statue seems momentous from worms eye in front of the sky. The resolution and sharpness is great. norro 27 June 2005 20:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. There are better pictures of the statue. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Urban 4 July 2005 07:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special, just the statue of liberty from below badly cut -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 21:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Chun-hian 17:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 01:56, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Pomegranate.jpg, not featured[edit]

Image:Pomegranate.jpg
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom.--fir0002 02:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadows, background norro 26 June 2005 11:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I really like the lighting and the colours in this image! The wooden background is perfect - but the plastic-basket is ruining the image. Because of that I don't support this beautiful image. Malene Thyssen 26 June 2005 19:17 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The plastic basket ruins it for me. Chamaeleon June 26, 2005 20:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I also don't like the plastic basket :( the rest is perfect. I love romãs (pomegranate?! LOL. That's its English name?)--PedroPVZ 26 June 2005 23:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I don't mind the plastic basket at all. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (just because I love the second much more :) --FoeNyx 7 July 2005 19:05 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 02:02, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Pomegranate02_edit.jpg, featured[edit]

Image:Pomegranate02_edit.jpg

I don't think this one is better, but I'll see what you guys think. --fir0002 27 June 2005 05:04 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll go for that. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support mnham... seems tasty now. --PedroPVZ 27 June 2005 18:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm glad to be able to support this nice pic - good work with the manipulation :-) Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I don't like the new background (and I didn't like the one above either) Rex 27 June 2005 23:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx June 28, 2005 12:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 29 June 2005 12:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is ugly. The outside of the fruit is not visible. --Martinroell 30 June 2005 00:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! --Ricadito 1 July 2005 23:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, clearly artificial. The background is too blurry and too bright. - Didactohedron 20:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thuresson 11:15, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose => featured -- Joolz 02:02, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Frühlingslandschft Aaretal Schweiz.jpg, featured[edit]

Spring in the Swiss mountains
  • Nominate Thuresson 26 June 2005 22:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thuresson 26 June 2005 22:45 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. The photographer could have done a better composition. The tree isn't well placed in the picture. You couldn't move the tree but you could move yourself. But nice pic though. -PedroPVZ 26 June 2005 23:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Agree with PedroPVZ. If there had been some more of the field in the right side I would have supported. -Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 07:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-27 11:27:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice photo Nichalp June 27, 2005 12:38 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 27 June 2005 13:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurred, can't see something special norro 27 June 2005 15:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Pretty, but not outstanding. Not an interesting subject. Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 27 June 2005 18:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Technically very nice picture. And I like the subject. Composition is doubtfull. In which article could it be used? Juhanson 27 June 2005 21:02 (UTC)
    • spring, or in an article about that type of tree or about the town itself. I think. I've tried in my desktop. Everything is so nice. But the tree could really be better placed. -PedroPVZ 30 June 2005 23:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 27 June 2005 23:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Shivanayak 28 June 2005 08:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Stahlkocher 3 July 2005 12:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- aka 4 July 2005 09:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- sunny impression :-) -- Farbenfreude 6 July 2005 04:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chun-hian 17:56, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral => featured -- Joolz 02:11, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Storskarv skansen juni 2005.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cormorant
  • Nominate Bird in natural environment. Some slight over exposure in places, but I don't think detracts sigificantly. Zeimusu 27 June 2005 14:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Zeimusu 27 June 2005 14:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very informative. -PedroPVZ 27 June 2005 14:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-27 16:31:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disagree about the lighting --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 19:38 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 27 June 2005 23:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose over exposure is distracting --Pjotr 28 June 2005 17:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Erin (talk) 28 June 2005 19:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed. --Martinroell 30 June 2005 00:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - a shy species, not easy to get a good photo of in the wild - MPF 4 July 2005 23:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Franz Xaver 5 July 2005 18:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - should be bigger. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:40 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 02:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightning animation.gif, not featured[edit]

Lightning in Duisburg
  • Nominate Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meteor2017 27 June 2005 12:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose window frame in the foreground norro 27 June 2005 15:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Couldn't the windowframe be cropped out? Chamaeleon June 27, 2005 18:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it isn't beautiful. problems: composition, colours, only marginally informative. -PedroPVZ 27 June 2005 18:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-27 21:52:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - for the reasons given above - Rex 27 June 2005 23:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Poor resolution. --Hautala 28 June 2005 11:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with PedroPVZ --Pjotr 28 June 2005 17:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 8 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 02:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:PotsdamSanssouciChineseHouse.jpg, featured[edit]

Chinese House, Sanssouci, Potsdam
  • Selfnomination. This image was formerly put on the FPC list but caused at least two enhancements which drifted away. So I stopped the voting for the image and tried to bring in all suggestions in the new version now. For those who just voted: You might have a look at your old vote at Template:Featured_pictures_candidates/Image:PotsdamSanssouciChineseHouse.jpg (but remind that the image above is just the new one). Andreas Tille June 27, 2005 14:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support :-) --Malene Thyssen 27 June 2005 15:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the trees, the water,... seems the paradise to me. It's in China? It seems very European.... -PedroPVZ 27 June 2005 15:04 (UTC)
It's in Potsdam (near Berlin) Andreas Tille June 27, 2005 16:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-27 16:29:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still don't like it. Everything is cut norro 28 June 2005 07:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx June 28, 2005 12:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 29 June 2005 12:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Stahlkocher 3 July 2005 12:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - good, but not great. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - impressive --ka-em-zwei-ein 6 July 2005 22:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 7 July 2005 22:05 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose => featured -- Joolz 12:16, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Raspberries (Rubus Idaeus).jpg, featured[edit]

Raspberries (Rubus Idaeus)
  • Nominate There were no good raspberry pictures so far :) --Juhanson 27 June 2005 20:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - not perfect: raspberry on the front is not sharp, medium resolution - Rex 27 June 2005 23:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support not bad at all... Rex maybe because it is becoming rotten... -PedroPVZ 28 June 2005 19:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very nice, great colours. --Erin (talk) 28 June 2005 19:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-28 21:51:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 29 June 2005 10:42 (UTC)
    • it looks great in my desktop (I don't change my desktop image for ages, thx). Hey Juhanson, it is a pitty that one of the raspberries is becoming rotten. Still it looks gr8 ;) -PedroPVZ 29 June 2005 18:51 (UTC)
    • I am pleased, that you like it :) But where did you find a rotten berry? It's just ripe, tell you for sure. I tried it myself when the photo was taken :) Juhanson 29 June 2005 20:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral So-so. If it's featured, it should be de-listed if we get a better raspberry pic. Chamaeleon June 29, 2005 23:29 (UTC)
    • that's not how featured pictures work, it is not the best picture of something we could get right now, it should be one of the best pictures you could think of. And that doesn't become outdated by definition. -- Gorgo 15:14, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jordgubbe 1 July 2005 01:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - a good pic as it shows the foliage as well as the fruit, which makes it more useful for the encyclopedia page - MPF 3 July 2005 14:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, although the blur on the front raspberry is unfortunate. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose little bit blurry, the raspberries are too messy, good encyclopedian value though ;) -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thuresson 11:16, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yum. Nice colors, sharp. That's what good raspberries look like. Blueroan3 12:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 12:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Street_bike.jpg, not featured[edit]

dangerous situation on the street
  • Selfnomination. Same street, different situation - see Street motorbyke ice.jpg. In my humble opinion there is a major difference between e.g. raspberry pictures und picture taken on a busy street. Motion blur is sometimes importent to accentuate main subject (thanks to LoopZilla and Nuno Sequeira André). Hope, in this picture there is better image definition ;). Regards Kordian Kassner June 29, 2005 14:35 (UTC)
    • You are 100% right. Pictures of raspberries, flowers, babies, etc, which many people would consider "beautiful" are much easier to take, then e.g. street photos or a good portret. And still it doesn't mean, that every street picture is good, only because it was difficult to take it. On the other hand for the really good street photo you would get more respect from professionals and the ones who understand.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose — I like the idea of your photo, but realization could have been better. Overlapping cycle and bike make a mess. I'm sure you can take one more photo of this street and I believe, you will catch the right moment! —Juhanson 29 June 2005 20:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't know how are the laws in your country. But in Portugal you can't take pictures of people as the "main target" and made them public without their explicit authorization. I wouldnt like a pic of mine in a website... although there is because of a disco, but anything like this. I think you also wouldn't like. Portugal has very restrictive laws in personal data and image for nationals. I believe in that country there is anything like that. so I support. --PedroPVZ 29 June 2005 18:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - mediocre quality pictures shouldn't be featured for the reason that it's difficult to make a good one. Rex 29 June 2005 23:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - agree with Johanson. The overlap of the two cycles is ugly. --Martinroell 30 June 2005 00:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not bad, but strange colors --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:05 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:20, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Rectangle_to_square_difference2.gif, not featured[edit]

Rectangle to square: animated gif
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-06-28 13:25:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-28 13:25:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The resulting rectangle is not a square norro 28 June 2005 15:13 (UTC)
    This (tottering, size chaning) is due to an old rescale bug of the MediaWiki software. Please click on the animation and view it in the original size. --Pjotr 28 June 2005 17:05 (UTC)
    Yes, you are right. Thanks. I updated my vote norro 28 June 2005 18:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too simple, even after viewing it ten times I don't know what this animation would like to say. -- Pjotr 28 June 2005 17:05 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strongly agree with Pjotr. -PedroPVZ 28 June 2005 19:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose confusing Chamaeleon June 29, 2005 23:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:38 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 16:20, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Frog_india.JPG, not featured[edit]

Frog india
  • Nominate Shivu 28 June 2005 08:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Shivu 28 June 2005 08:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-28 09:12:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx June 28, 2005 12:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose — Distracting background, "front side" is not visible. Top view is not the best for such objects. Juhanson 28 June 2005 14:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree to Juhanson. Bad angle norro 28 June 2005 15:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Norro --Pjotr 28 June 2005 17:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Pjotr. eheh -PedroPVZ 28 June 2005 19:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral not too bad. Chamaeleon June 29, 2005 23:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 29 June 2005 23:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Juhanson. --Martinroell 30 June 2005 00:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, not too bad, but not that great, either. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:38 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:20, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Butterfly at Fjärilshuset Solna Sweden 2005-06-28 small.jpg, not featured[edit]

Butterfly of unknown species
  • Nominate Jordgubbe 30 June 2005 23:01 (UTC). I think it is a Idea Leucone.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jordgubbe 30 June 2005 23:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Very small. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Small resolution, unknown species, disturbing surrounding norro 1 July 2005 14:37 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support because of small resolution. the surronding for me looks great. I like it. -PedroPVZ 1 July 2005 15:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much plants. villy 1 July 2005 19:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with norro —Juhanson 3 July 2005 10:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, due to small size. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low resolution, too much stuff arround --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:02 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sun behind the Heel Stone.jpg, featured[edit]

The sun rising behind the Heel Stone of Stonehenge on the summer solstice.
  • Nominate - Self-nomination. I've got some other pictures which better illustrate the alignment of the sunrise at Stonehenge on the summer solstice, but this one gets the atmosphere nicely. Solipsist 30 June 2005 19:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Solipsist 30 June 2005 19:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nuno Sequeira André 30 June 2005 20:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - LoopZilla 2005-06-30 22:30:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 30 June 2005 23:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - bad composition (because of the lower part of the photo, the upper seems very nice), people that you can't see right, or shouldnt be there, etc. etc. I can't see nothing in detail. -PedroPVZ 30 June 2005 23:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fir0002 30 June 2005 23:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wonderful photo. I suggest a bit of fill flash filter to bring out the people. --Tysto 1 July 2005 03:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 1 July 2005 22:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 3 July 2005 01:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good atmosphere ! -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose awesome pic! resolution is a bit low for me tho --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Marjikins 9 July 2005 19:17 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with PedroPVZ, without the description I had no idea what this was - apart from a nice sunrise. --Malene Thyssen 18:46, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 16:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Opium_poppy.jpg, not featured[edit]

Opium poppy (Papaver somniferum)
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-06-30 09:51:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-06-30 09:51:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose — The background is not convincing. —Juhanson 30 June 2005 12:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice garden,, but I agree with Juhanson. --PedroPVZ 30 June 2005 23:17 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good but not great. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange background, strange (no) crop --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:04 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hautes-Fagnes.jpg, not featured[edit]

Landscape at Hautes-Fagnes

Nominate Found this photo by accident. The scene shows a typical landscape of the Hautes-Fagnes, in East-Belgium; brilliant mood, nice arrangement, perfect colours. -- Farbenfreude 29 June 2005 22:13 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Farbenfreude 29 June 2005 22:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice, but doesn't depict anything special. Chamaeleon June 29, 2005 23:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, it illustrates typical wilderness. It's a feature-able image of that, at the very least. James F. (talk) 29 June 2005 23:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nothing special - Rex 29 June 2005 23:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Strange pic. I don't know that kind of landscape... but I would like a little more of the tree in the front, to see how it is like. And the weather looks terrible, should be taken in a sunny day. Why everything has that brown-like colour? is it because of snow (vegetation typical of that kind of climate) or lack of sun in the winter? -PedroPVZ 30 June 2005 23:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Nice for what it is, but doesn't seem special. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 3 July 2005 01:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - very nice atmospheric pic of natural bogland vegetation on a frosty winter morning with no human intrusion - MPF 3 July 2005 13:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very grainy and I'm not sure I like the composition - very nice colours and light though. --Malene Thyssen 18:49, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Thuresson 11:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Elgaard 02:34:16, 2005-07-14 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 4 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:MotoX racing_edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Moto X rider
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 30 June 2005 23:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically wonderful but not especially beautiful. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-01 08:27:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special. -PedroPVZ 1 July 2005 15:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but common. villy 1 July 2005 19:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great action! Great colours, sharpness and composition. Nice that you got both drivers on the photo, it tells the story about racing well. --Malene Thyssen 3 July 2005 09:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - You see the competition beetween the two drivers -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 16:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:MotoX racing04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Moto X rider
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 30 June 2005 23:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bingo. --Tysto 1 July 2005 03:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-01 08:41:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition norro 1 July 2005 14:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree with norro -PedroPVZ 1 July 2005 15:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support villy 1 July 2005 19:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one more than others. There is feeling of competition. —Juhanson 3 July 2005 10:38 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 7 July 2005 22:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 16:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:MotoX racing03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Moto X rider
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 30 June 2005 23:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Technically terrific, but not especially beautiful. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-01 08:41:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -PedroPVZ 1 July 2005 15:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral villy 1 July 2005 19:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like it ! -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:02 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:MotoX racing02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Moto X rider
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 30 June 2005 23:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Technically terrific, but not especially beautiful. --Tysto 1 July 2005 02:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-01 08:42:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice action Chamaeleon July 1, 2005 09:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support i like it. --PedroPVZ 1 July 2005 15:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral villy 1 July 2005 19:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Technically good, but not very special. -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support i like this one more than the others --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 7 July 2005 22:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:02 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 16:30, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Betula Pendula at Stockholm University 2005-07-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Betula pendula, Birch tree.
  • Nominate Jordgubbe 1 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)
  • 日本語: (missing text)
    Jordgubbe 1 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special, tree tops aren't even focused villy 1 July 2005 19:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I can't see the trees in detail :S. Já?! Mas é que já... a seguir!!!... LOL -PedroPVZ 2 July 2005 02:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ordinary picture —Juhanson 3 July 2005 10:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not very special -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not bad, but nothing special -- aka 4 July 2005 08:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 16:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:PalaceOfWestminsterAtNight.jpg, featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate Third time lucky: if you can't support two previous pictures of the Palace of Westminster, perhaps this one will do the trick. Or maybe it needs a daytime picture. On this one you can also see the time, but I should warn you it only tells the right time twice a day. Self-nomination. -- Solipsist 2 July 2005 22:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 2 July 2005 22:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LoopZilla 2005-07-02 22:59:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 3 July 2005 01:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Hautala 3 July 2005 15:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This one is THE one :) --Fabien1309 3 July 2005 20:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great lighting --fir0002 4 July 2005 07:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good. -- aka 4 July 2005 08:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great norro 4 July 2005 09:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 4 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Farbenfreude 6 July 2005 05:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:17 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:55, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice as a desktop wallpaper. Do you also have a 1280x1024 Version? --SehLax 10:57, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose => featured -- Joolz 15:48, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hilbert_transform.png, not featured[edit]

Hilbert transform of a square wave
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-02 19:50:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-02 19:50:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a very usual graph. Nothing special, not even any captions norro 2 July 2005 23:00 (UTC)
    What captions should it have? - Omegatron 4 July 2005 15:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I love the math, but this is kinda mundane for me --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is clearly taken in a zoo: this southeast European species doesn't occur naturally together with (South American) Ringed Teal (represented by the blue squiggle). --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:55 (UTC)
    (cf. MPF re: Image:Aythya_nyroca16.jpg) --Tysto 7 July 2005 17:07 (UTC)
    Huh?? - Omegatron 7 July 2005 18:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose hmm?-PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Omegatron 7 July 2005 18:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Taichi 09:54, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 15:48, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Aubrey_Beardsley_1.jpg, not featured[edit]

  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-02 12:08:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-02 12:08:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose grainy, jpeg compression artifacts --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Evocative, but not quite what I'd hope for a featured pic. --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose better but not yet FP worthy. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just not a pretty picture. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose them all, that I do! Foolip 13:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:49, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:AubreyBeardsley.png, not featured[edit]

300px|Aubrey Beardsley photographed by Frederick Evans
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-02 21:02:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-02 21:02:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose grainy, jpeg compression artifacts --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:50 (UTC)
This version is a PNG (hence no loss in compression) LoopZilla 2005-07-06 13:54:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with quasipalm -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose them all, that I do! Foolip 13:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:49, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Helicopter rescue sancy takeoff.jpg featured[edit]

Helicopter
  • Self-Nomination - French Gendarmerie (Police) Helicopter flying over Sancy mountains. No vote -- Fabien1309 3 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-04 09:45:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 4 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 20:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Omegatron 4 July 2005 21:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Technically remarkable and especially nice that it's not at an airport. --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 6 July 2005 21:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -PedroPVZ 8 July 2005 00:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:56, 12 July 2005 (UTC): Awesome!!
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Doesn't look that spectacular to me. Foolip 13:22, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good pilot, but the picture is IMHO a lucky snapshot - sorry --Herrick 10:57, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
15 Support - 1 Neutral - 1 Oppose -> Featured -- Fabien1309 15:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:90 mile beach02.jpg, not featured[edit]

90 mile beach
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 4 July 2005 07:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-04 09:54:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadows norro 4 July 2005 13:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 4 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 15:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now this i like, but could we remove the half-child in the far right? Once I saw that, it was all i could look at ;-) --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:47 (UTC)
Fixed --fir0002 5 July 2005 00:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (weak) --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, it's the shadows I guess. CSamulili 6 July 2005 09:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice colous, nice pic, but a small problem: not informative enough. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special--Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special Andreas Tille 08:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like the lighting -- Gorgo 18:01, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --.:Ajvol:. 08:39, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Herrick 11:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
9 support, 7 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured

Image:New York-NLT Landsat7.jpg, not featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 08:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-04 09:48:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. It's ugly. —RadRafe 4 July 2005 13:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Gotta agree with RadRafe. And it isn't even taken by a Wikipedian (which I think should be a criterion for being a featured pic) - MPF 4 July 2005 15:30 (UTC)
Many featured pics aren't taken by wikipedians but are just in the Public Domain.  :)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I've seen better resolution images of nyc, like google maps for example; this is just ok --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose where can I get PD space pics of around the world??? -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 9 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 13:00, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:90 mile beach.jpg, not featured[edit]

90 mile beach
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 4 July 2005 07:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's just a perfect, classical beach. Nice and great composition norro 4 July 2005 09:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-04 09:55:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 4 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nicely free of human intrusion, not even any obvious footprints. - MPF 4 July 2005 15:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a bit too over saturated and artificially contrasty for me --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nice, but not special. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutely terrific. --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pwetty. CSamulili 6 July 2005 09:03 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because the beach of my city is very similar, the sand looks like artificial. While the sea is very nice coloured!!!! So real. Should be taken in a day with better weather. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 7 July 2005 22:03 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice colors, but not quite special enough for FP --Malene Thyssen 18:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special Andreas Tille 08:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Taichi 09:52, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing remarkable about that picture. It is not bad, but simply too ordinary. -- Gorgo 15:03, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special. The length of the beach and height of the waves is hard to judge. --Martinroell 11:17, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --.:Ajvol:. 08:38, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- looks good to me. -- Joolz 15:57, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The division of the photo into thirds is great -- Mlm42 18:53, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 13 support, 10 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 13:00, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Weighting_curves.png, not featured[edit]

Acoustic weighting curves A, B, C, and D: used in acoustic measurements to approximate the human hearing response.
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-04 11:10:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-04 11:10:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose usual graph + the fact, that the axes are of logarithmic scale is not really clear in this drawing, but that's important for this issue norro 4 July 2005 13:22 (UTC)
    What do you mean? The x axis is logarithmic (10, 100, 1000), and the y axis is linear (0, 10, 20). The y axis is also logarithmic in a sense, though, since the dB unit is logarithmic. - Omegatron 4 July 2005 15:11 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's ok... --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, not really special. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --fir0002 6 July 2005 05:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing that is FP worthy. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Omegatron 7 July 2005 18:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 13:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Misty morning03.jpg, featured[edit]

Misty Morning
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 4 July 2005 11:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 19:17 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LoopZilla 2005-07-05 08:10:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:45 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tysto 6 July 2005 01:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support well done -- Farbenfreude 6 July 2005 03:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support so beautiful, althoug not very informative. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 6 July 2005 21:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:51, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - wow -- Joolz 16:42, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Foolip 13:21, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 17 support => featured -- Joolz 13:09, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Chatsworth_House_Fountain.jpg, not featured[edit]

Chatsworth House Fountain (fed by water pressure alone)
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-04 14:17:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-04 14:17:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FML IconSP.jpg hi 5 July 2005 06:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I like the image, but it looks like there are a lot of blocky jpeg artifacts in the borders of the spray. -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, ditto Solipsist -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nicely dramatic. I don't see artifacts until I blow it up beyond 100%. At 100% and below, they're just water droplets. --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, lovely. James F. (talk) 8 July 2005 11:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose artefacts, blurred, looks like a usual fountain norro 9 July 2005 15:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Marjikins 9 July 2005 19:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't know if its artifacts or strange water, but the photo's nothing special. Foolip 13:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:12, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- 13:19, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:City lights in motion.jpg, not featured[edit]

The city lights of Prince George, British Columbia, motion-blurred
  • Self-nominationRadRafe 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRadRafe 4 July 2005 12:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice picture, but not really any information in it norro 4 July 2005 13:23 (UTC)
Well, it does serve as an example of motion blur. —RadRafe 4 July 2005 13:54 (UTC)
Hmmm, i didn't think about that... norro 4 July 2005 14:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-04 14:32:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 15:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice example of motion blur. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 5 July 2005 15:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, unintelligible -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - abstract, but nice. -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, not really a good example of motion blur. ed g2stalk 6 July 2005 01:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a bad example of motion light. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:20 (UTC)
Ed, Pedro, I'd like to hear your suggestions for a better one. —RadRafe 15:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
[2] if this had more moving cars it would be a nice example. BTW, it's my city. --PedroPVZ 05:38, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose move the object, not wave the camera. Kind of funny... Darkone (¿!) 21:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
I don't think there's enough late-night traffic in Prince George. —RadRafe 11:56, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:11, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 13:18, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Australian cart.jpg, featured[edit]

Australian cart
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 4 July 2005 12:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRadRafe 4 July 2005 13:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 4 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby\no na 4 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good -- aka 4 July 2005 18:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 20:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 4 July 2005 23:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Greudin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-05 13:51:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. It's a bit too artsy and doesn't illustrate anything. --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it illustrates this article, of course - a brilliant photo -- Farbenfreude 6 July 2005 03:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral not very informative.I would prefer to see the cart in a more informative position. But very nice. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 9 July 2005 02:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 18:38, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 18:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 16 support,2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 13:19, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Aythya_nyroca16.jpg, not featured[edit]

Ferruginous Duck (Aythya nyroca)
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-04 21:22:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-04 21:22:10 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - while it is a nice pic, it is clearly taken in a zoo: this southeast European species doesn't occur naturally together with (South American) Ringed Teal (bird at back right of photo), and is also not in its usual habitat (swamps, not mown grass) so the whole photo looks un-natural - MPF 4 July 2005 23:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose what MPF said --Quasipalm 5 July 2005 16:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, as per MPF -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:37 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Artificial. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:00 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Agree with MPF -Chun-hian 17:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --PedroPVZ 03:49, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:13, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 13:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightning cloud to cloud (aka).jpg, featured[edit]

Storm
  • Nominate -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 4 July 2005 18:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 4 July 2005 20:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRadRafe 5 July 2005 01:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-05 08:08:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Meteor2017 5 July 2005 21:03 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 6 July 2005 00:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tysto 6 July 2005 01:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 6 July 2005 21:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support cool -PedroPVZ 8 July 2005 00:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:58 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support norro 9 July 2005 15:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 12:23, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:50, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --FML IconSP.jpg hi 23:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC) show
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yay! Foolip 13:14, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 19 support => featured -- Joolz 13:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lance-Armstrong-TdF2004.jpg, not featured[edit]

Lance Armstrong, Tour de France 2004
  • Nominate --Patrick-br msg 5 July 2005 18:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Patrick-br msg 5 July 2005 18:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not only is Lance Armstrong an excellent cyclist, its a good photo. Shame about the low resoloution, any chance of a higher res version? --Cyr 5 July 2005 18:59 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 5 July 2005 21:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (weak) Good photo for cycling or Tour de France or Lance article, but not quite featured photo quality. --Tysto 6 July 2005 01:07 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too small, and although the photographer has tried to keep up with Mr. Armstrong, he's still too blurred. ed g2stalk 6 July 2005 01:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Komencanto 8 July 2005 14:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too blurred --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 15:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Deep Impact approach 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

View from Deep Impact's flyby showing the impactor colliding with comet Tempel 1
  • Nominate: Taichi 5 July 2005 09:14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: --Taichi 5 July 2005 09:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Poor resolution, to begin with something. --Hautala 5 July 2005 11:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-05 11:57:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. But perhaps better version will become available once they've had a chance to process the data. -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:38 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose extremely interresting subject (Just thinking in it, amazes me), uninterresting picture though. I've seen MUCH MORE interresting astronomy pictures. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 23:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Foolip 13:11, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:14, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 15:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tree_hadrian's_wall.jpg, featured[edit]

A tree on Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland, UK
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-05 08:14:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-05 08:14:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 5 July 2005 18:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 5 July 2005 21:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Hey, I know that tree! Seen it many a time :-) Not sure I like the monochrome and overdone cloud effects, though. BTW the tree is an Acer pseudoplatanus. - MPF 5 July 2005 22:08 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Am I a bad person for preferring the original? --Tysto 6 July 2005 01:14 (UTC)
    • Have to admit I prefer the original too - MPF 6 July 2005 09:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:43 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the sky has a lot of problems and it is too big, and it destroys the picture. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 23:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - art - Rex 7 July 2005 22:03 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FML IconSP.jpg hi 8 July 2005 04:52 (UTC) I like this. :)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:36 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much sky --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with MPF --Malene Thyssen 18:36, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell 11:14, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Joolz 16:43, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it! Foolip 13:12, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it for the clouds vs. tree action, but Hadrian's wall is far from centre stage.. -- Mlm42 18:49, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
It is a coincidence that Hadrian's wall was there. I simply thought "tree.jpg" was a little unimaginative -- Tomhab 23:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great, would be nice as a poster. Maybe you could upload a version that doesn't has such an extreme contrast increasing. The original in SW and with contrast +15% would be enough IMHO -- SehLax 20:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
That is actually all I did (and reduce the brightness by 15% or so) - image Image:Tree hadrian's wall (original).JPG shows the original. The rest was just photography :) -- Tomhab 23:18, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral => featured -- Joolz 15:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:AubreyBeardsley_uncompressed.png, not featured[edit]

300px|Aubrey Beardsley photographed by Frederick Evans
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-05 14:29:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-05 14:29:49 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:34 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tysto 6 July 2005 00:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the pic quality didnt change a lot. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:03 (UTC)
This version is a PNG (hence no loss in compression) LoopZilla 07:50:30, 2005-07-12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 22:47, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose them all, that I do! Foolip 13:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:European-parliament-strasbourg.jpg - featured[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Stunter - uploaded by Stunter (this time in high-res!) - nominated by Stunter 23:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stunter 23:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Solipsist 09:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gread image. High resolution. Akriesch 13:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - a daytime pic would look nicer - MPF 21:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I also have loads of daytime pics of the same building and they don't look that good, according to me and quite many people I asked for their opinion - The building's other side looks indeed better during daytime --Stunter 15:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -LadyofHats 07:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 15:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support So great !--Hi-tacks 16:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 22:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Good work. Snowwayout 01:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res, not usable on printouts. Lightening, colors and composition perfect except slightly cut on the right. --Ikiwaner 21:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I don't get it. How can you like a picture much and oppose for a reason that is in my mind disconnected from quality features. Wiki does not mention anything about minimum size. Maybe, they should? SVGA is by far enough to print out, except if you wanna print a poster...
No it's not. FP should at least be usable as a destop wallpaper on a larger screen without upsizing or printable on a standard 11x15 cm printout. --Ikiwaner 18:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice but just a bit small. Beautiful colors Ceridwen 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ditto to MPF and Ikiwaner norro 15:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jonathunder 01:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca @ 13:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
11 support, 3 oppose → featured Roger McLassus 10:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Tresco_-_aerial_photo6.jpg, featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate Self nominated - I like this one, plus it is the UK so it's very rare that it is not raining --Cyr 5 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cyr 5 July 2005 19:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - fascinating photo - MPF 5 July 2005 22:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-05 22:38:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Schnee 5 July 2005 23:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Aerial photography! Woo hoo! I wish I flew over beautiful islands instead of Indiana. Tysto's aerial photography project. --Tysto 6 July 2005 01:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support fine one -- Farbenfreude 6 July 2005 03:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral too less color --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:55 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose cut on the left norro 9 July 2005 15:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with norro --Malene Thyssen 18:34, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Prefer this version --Elgaard 00:55:39, 2005-07-15 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell 11:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Mlm42 18:43, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kernow bys vykken. Very nice. QuartierLatin1968 21:28, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
    • Meur ras, I took quite a few pics coming back on the helicopter, have a look [3] --Cyr 14:53, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral => featured -- Joolz 16:03, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Traineira_afundada.jpg, not featured[edit]

Traineira
  • Nominate - Partially sunk fishing boat, we can see Afurada on the background (Vila Nova de Gaia,Portugal) - Nuno Sequeira André 6 July 2005 11:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose LoopZilla 2005-07-07 07:15:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yawn --fir0002 7 July 2005 08:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 7 July 2005 18:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ó Nuno que foto feia. :S -PedroPVZ 05:42, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Novgorod_Russia-v1-p98.jpg, not featured[edit]

Novgorod, from Rambaud's Russia, Volume 1 (1898)
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-06 08:31:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-06 08:31:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not signed: User:Komencanto
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 21:16, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bush in fog.jpg, not featured[edit]

Bush plunged into fog
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Self Nom. --fir0002 6 July 2005 04:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-06 08:34:42 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love it. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 13:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ka-em-zwei-ein 6 July 2005 22:20 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose fog + forest ... nothing special about that picture -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:35 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 7 July 2005 22:02 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose doesn't sit right with me --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not 'special' enough --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Gorgo and Avatar --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:54 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --FML IconSP.jpg hi 19:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- --Ygrek 23:01, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell 11:11, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- Mlm42 18:41, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 15:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tresco_-_aerial_photo6_edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Edited by Fir0002
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fir0002 6 July 2005 05:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support much better. The reflection that the original pic had it is solved, nice colours, although the main island (if it is an island) is cut in the left. It shouldnt. -PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 11:26 (UTC)
    • True, it would have been better to see the whole island, but the damn tail of the helicopter was in the way! The colours look more artificial, but that might just be me.--Cyr 6 July 2005 14:21 (UTC)
  • Yes, but the above image has poor colours, it is like in my pics :(. it also has a reflection made by the window of the airplane (this hasn't, and I cant see any problem in the pic. It almost seems a tropical island with barrier reefs. LOLOL. I cant believe that in the UK. Does it really rain a lot as you complain? almost everyday? In here rain is not that common, and we maybe get one day of rain in 30. The pic looks artificial if you see a thumb of it, but in full screen, I compared it with the original and, honestly, it didnt seem that artificial. although I think the green should be a little more darker. --PedroPVZ 6 July 2005 23:15 (UTC)
    • Yep, it's really the UK, http://www.tresco.co.uk is the "official" site of the island. The weather is very changeable in the South West UK, one day it can be 30°C blue skies and sunshine and the next misty with rain. Although it never really drops below 5°C even in the winter.
I treated it like a tropical island --fir0002 7 July 2005 08:32 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-06 14:00:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 6 July 2005 16:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice, a little bit artificial colors though -- Gorgo 6 July 2005 22:30 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Lurid. The original was far better! - MPF 7 July 2005 14:24 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much. --Tysto 7 July 2005 17:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral too much color --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:33 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tooooooo much color --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:56 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colors norro 9 July 2005 15:21 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the colors look very artificial --Franz Xaver 16:31, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Colors -- Fabien1309 11:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Mlm42 18:44, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much color --Atamari 21:15, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 15:51, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:London-07.07.2005-trapped_underground.jpg, not featured[edit]

Trapped Underground, London, July 7th, 2005
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-07 21:29:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-07 21:29:54 (UTC)
Post vote comment: see also [4] LoopZilla 20:19:17, 2005-07-25 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bah! --PedroPVZ 8 July 2005 00:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --FML IconSP.jpg hi 8 July 2005 04:49 (UTC) I like, but I see this image in the newspapper. It's free?
    Yes, it is. It's licensed unter Creative Commons License. norro 21:30, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Surely there are better pictures than this one of that event? --Komencanto 8 July 2005 13:51 (UTC)
    Well considering this one was making the front pages, apparently not. ed g2stalk 19:43, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:26 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - A man, a hand and blurry darkness? Thuresson 8 July 2005 17:09 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ack Thuresson norro 9 July 2005 15:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - for what it represents, an attempt to capture a possibly life-threatening situation by a regular citizen, enabled by unbiquitous technology. Knowing the full story of the London events gives this photo life, and I believe that this makes it in some ways more valuable than professional photography because it allows the viewer to feel that "It could have been me taking that photo". Historically valuable.--Eloquence 23:16, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Elgaard 02:26:57, 2005-07-14 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --SylwiaS 21:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose definitely no featured picture -- Gorgo 17:55, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --.:Ajvol:. 08:36, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I doesn't need to be featured just because its got historical value. very low quality. Foolip 13:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --TarmoK 12:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 10 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 17:10, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:World_C_4Jul2005at1945UTC.jpg, not featured[edit]

Weather map: temperatures of cities across the world, 4th July, 2005
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-07 07:33:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-07 07:33:28 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ? -- Fabien1309 7 July 2005 15:50 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose spam? --Gorgo 7 July 2005 15:57 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Loopzilla, you a'ight? ;-) --Quasipalm 7 July 2005 18:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo yo Loopzila. You must be kidding... -PedroPVZ 8 July 2005 00:12 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ? --Atamari 8 July 2005 10:19 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Nuno Sequeira André 8 July 2005 15:41 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose well... --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Loopzilla, cut it out. --Hautala 16:41, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Duh. Foolip 13:09, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 11 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 17:10, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Metronomes_101.jpg, not featured[edit]

Metronomes - modern and classical
  • Nominate LoopZilla 2005-07-08 08:58:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-08 08:58:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I wonder how a metronom comes onto a lawn? Andreas Tille 8 July 2005 11:13 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What a bizzaire photo. You can't vote to support your own photos LoopZilla. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 13:46 (UTC)
    It's allowed to vote for your pictures --FoeNyx 16:58, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 8 July 2005 13:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Nuno Sequeira André 8 July 2005 15:40 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Haha, I love this photo... so random, thanks loopz.  :-) (just not for FP) --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:47 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange .. --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Hautala 17:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Malene Thyssen 18:28, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atamari 22:46, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose o.O -PedroPVZ 05:46, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Grass? Foolip 13:06, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 12 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 17:17, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sunset in South African national park.jpg, not featured[edit]

A sunset in Africa.
  • Nominate A personal photo of a sunset in Kruger National Park in South Africa. --Komencanto 8 July 2005 01:01 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-08 12:24:04 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not voting for any more sunsets unless they are just completely amazing or illustrative of something special. Category:Sunset is going to be massive in a year or two. --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:25 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:52 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Same as Quasipalm; perhaps some kind of review of featured pictures with a period of one year might make sense. Andreas Tille 07:15, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Malene Thyssen 18:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Me too: yet another sunset. --Hautala 16:39, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral could be a little better. --PedroPVZ 05:45, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Martinroell 11:11, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 17:17, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Aerogel nasa.jpg, featured[edit]

Aerogel cube & Peter Tsou, JPL Scientist
  • Nominate --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:16 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:05 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LoopZilla 16:23:28, 2005-07-11 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perfect set, interresting material. -PedroPVZ 05:50, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Elgaard 02:36:58, 2005-07-14 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --FML IconSP.jpg hi 08:46, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mlm42 18:38, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 17:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Aerogelbrick.jpg, featured[edit]

A 2.5 kg brick is supported on top of a piece of aerogel weighing only 2 grams
  • Nominate --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support if this isn't cool, nothing else is :-) --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:23 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:46 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 2005-07-08 20:52:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Komencanto 8 July 2005 23:54 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:05 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 9 July 2005 17:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx FoeNyx 23:52, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 18:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 18:48, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose interresting. but I can barelly see any detail. My desktop didn't like it. -PedroPVZ 05:49, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lighting (nearly pure white in the upper right part), the object of interest is in an unfavourable position in front of the horizon norro 19:49, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
    imho the position front of horizon line stresses the fact the gel is translucent. --FoeNyx 11:21, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - El Comandante 20:54, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose => featured -- Joolz 17:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Empis tesselata male (aka).jpg, featured[edit]

Empis tesselata male
  • Nominate Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Great Andreas Tille 07:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 18:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 18:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 21:17, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • strong Symbol support vote.svg Support --PedroPVZ 05:55, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beny Shlevich 06:19, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice! Foolip 13:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 21:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support ♦ Pabix  08:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour 18:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 support => featured -- Joolz 18:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Metellina mengei (aka).jpg, featured[edit]

Metellina mengei
  • Nominate Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pjotr 8 July 2005 17:22 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:05 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 18:26, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Chun-hian 18:57, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Rex 21:16, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support so real. -PedroPVZ 05:52, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cyr 16:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari 21:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pabix &; 08:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour 18:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 17:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Roman aqueduct in Segovia (side view).jpg, featured[edit]

A photo from the side of the Roman aqueduct and the main plaza in Segovia, Spain.
  • Nominate Originally I had one of my photos like this but I changed it to this guy's one because it is better. A photo from the side of the Roman aqueduct and the main plaza in Segovia, Spain. I like the framing of this photo, I hope you do to! --Komencanto 7 July 2005 15:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support James F. (talk) 8 July 2005 11:29 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quasipalm 8 July 2005 15:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avatar 8 July 2005 16:27 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 8 July 2005 16:51 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pixeltoo 8 July 2005 19:44 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 8 July 2005 23:18 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx FoeNyx 23:52, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support much better. --PedroPVZ 05:43, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wicked. QuartierLatin1968 21:24, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pabix &; 08:32, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gaf.arq 14:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Atamari 23:50, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I was about to feature this, but there's a big discrepency, the image in the title is not the image in the thumbnail. Which one is supposed to be featured and which was voted on? -- Joolz 17:08, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
    • It seems that a different photo was originally nominated (that of the title), I think all these votes apply to the new image, rather than the old. -- Joolz 17:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 14 (inc. nominator), 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 17:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hurricane_Dennis_on_July_7_2005_1550_UTC.jpg, featured[edit]

Hurricane Dennis on July 7 2005
  • Nominate --Avatar 9 July 2005 12:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What about a weather picture? --Avatar 9 July 2005 12:39 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 9 July 2005 17:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx FoeNyx 23:52, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 18:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, amazing resolution norro 21:13, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atomo64 01:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 07:41:49, 2005-07-12 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pjotr 15:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cyr 16:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral love the pic, but the borderlines (or what's that?) are disturbing me. Could sb. deactivate or erase them?

--SehLax 19:53, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 1 neutral => featured -- Joolz 18:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tamul(mexico)_waterfall.jpg, not featured[edit]

Tamul Waterfall
  • Nominate Atomo64 9 July 2005 02:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Atomo64 9 July 2005 02:31 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It 9 July 2005 14:06 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. James F. (talk) 9 July 2005 17:53 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx FoeNyx 23:52, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — --Ygrek 16:03, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not sharp, a little bit to bright for my taste, shutter speed should be either shorter or much longer Andreas Tille 07:01, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Andreas Tille, but the composition is just great so I vote pro anyway. --Malene Thyssen 18:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I also agree with Andres. Rex 21:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Andreas Tille + don't like the composition norro 21:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - bland composition. CSamulili 13:32, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Taichi 09:48, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Norro, overexposed --Pjotr 15:14, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull colours —Juhanson 21:23, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --SylwiaS 21:29, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not sharp, colours... --PedroPVZ 04:05, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 7 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 18:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Image:Eastern_Water_Dragon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Description
  • Nominate unknown
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support LoopZilla 11:08:54, 2005-07-10 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadows norro 21:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Rex 21:17, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It 22:51, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Atomo64 01:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)