Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2006

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.


Contents

Image:America noviter delineata.jpg, featured[edit]

America noviter delineata; map of the Americas ca. 1640.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Digitized by the U.S. Library of Congress - uploaded by Delirium - nominated by Delirium 08:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Delirium 08:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support high quality reproduction norro 09:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 11:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent quality. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ajvol 20:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fascinating! QuartierLatin1968 20:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC) (currently somewhere between Baye Françoise and Tontoneac)

Voting ended on 08:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 7 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:UrnesChurchRelief.jpg, featured[edit]

Short description

Voting ended on 12:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Adamantios 08:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Olei 21:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 12 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 2 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Banksia menziesii 1 gnangarra.jpg, not featured[edit]

Banksia menziesii

(Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose framing -Quasipalm 21:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Cobh waterfront.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cobh, County Cork, Ireland

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment added author, uploader and nominator Lycaon 17:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cward 12:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but would be much better with a larger file --Tarawneh 03:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportCary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res -- Gorgo 12:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose falling church --Wikimol 00:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Wikimol --Rodge 16:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res -Quasipalm 21:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:PeanutButter.jpg, not featured[edit]

description courte

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by PiccoloNamek - uploaded by Gene.arboit - nominated by 62.35.127.20 14:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --62.35.127.20 14:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC) anonym votes don't count, sorry. Lycaon 06:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nothing special; left cut, depth of field too shallow - MPF 17:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Nothing special. Snowwayout 08:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition, lighting, DOF norro 11:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 03:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 10:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Overlord 14:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose --- gildemax 21:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 0 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:UNIQA-Tower-Fassade-01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Facade of the UNIQA-Tower in Vienna, Austria

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:priwo - uploaded by User:priwo - nominated by Priwo 19:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Priwo 19:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 195.69.192.12 08:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC) anonym votes don't count, sorry. Lycaon 14:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Can't identify the shape of this building from this perspektive. Not aesthetical enough to countervail this norro 11:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- ack norro -- YolanC 00:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 03:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Beautiful picture, but only esthetic (see reasons given by norro). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good example of corporate architecture, and good idea. I like the puzzle. I dont think every photograph has to give you straightforward answer. This could arouse curiosity. --Wikimol 10:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Wikimol--Thermos 15:59, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 19:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it very much exactly because it is sort of puzzle. And there is aesthetic quality in the shape as well as in the overall blue tint. --wg 22:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:PonteVecchioMorning.jpg, not featured[edit]

PonteVecchioMorning.jpg

Pictogram voting info.svg Info uploaded by User:Thermos created by Thermos - nominated by Thermos 14:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thermos 14:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — nice colour and reflection Gnangarra 05:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 14:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Tarawneh 03:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support my beautiful city.. --ßøuñçêY2K 06:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose needed less sky/more river and correction of the converging verticals to do full justice to this beautiful location --Rodge 16:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ajvol 20:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong supportCary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Rodge --che 03:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Main subject not complete. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Main subject not complete. --Ggonnell 10:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 8 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mirador1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Gang im Mirador del Rio, Lanzarote

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by RvM uploaded by RvM - nominated by RvM 19:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --RvM 19:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful light and colours, but bad centring. What a pity! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 14:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ditto. Snowwayout 23:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lovely glowing light, but the image depends on symmetry, which isn't accurate. Also much dust/pixel dropouts at high res. --Rodge 14:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gewitter01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cloudwall in Germany

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by RvM uploaded by RvM - nominated by RvM 19:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --RvM 19:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Great cloud, average photo. Snowwayout 08:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The ground doesn't look very exciting, I also don't see any reason to hightlight the flowers in foreground by flash. --che 23:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Quasipalm 21:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --New Painter 15:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Snowwayout MGo 09:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Khimaz.JPG, not featured[edit]

Relisting it, as the objections were mainly against the noise, which was reduced in filtered version. --Wikimol 20:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Filtered version 1[edit]

  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Wikimol 19:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Filtered version 2[edit]

  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Wikimol 19:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Original version[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sasa Stefanovic (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice shot. --Joonasl 06:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 07:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although there is noise and it is a bit blur i give it a pro because the pic is still very impressive; good composition--AngMoKio 10:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I randomly happened upon this pic on enwiki yesterday, and thought it was quite nice. --Golbez 17:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 18:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, very nice. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Olegivvit 10:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - particularly as being from an area we don't have many decent pics of - MPF 18:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very noticeable noise at full resolution --Artefacto 19:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 20:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Tarawneh 21:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - good composition --Filip (§) 11:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 13:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 15:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the image works well with the article, but noise and lack of sharpness shouldn't make it a FP --Rodge 20:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose-- Lycaon 10:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose-- The quality is far below the standard for FP status. —Pixel8 10:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition. Freedom to share 15:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Pixel8. Snowwayout 20:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support if it is still possible to vote --Ggonnell 10:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC) sorry, too late Lycaon 08:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 14 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. --Lycaon 23:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Panoramic view of the Sierra de Guadarrama (Spain), not featured[edit]

Panoramic view of the Sierra de Guadarrama (Spain)

Result: 0 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 2 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Regional Park of Madrid (Spain), not featured[edit]

Regional Park of Madrid (Spain)

Result: 0 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Egretta novaehollandiae 03 gnangarra.jpg, not featured[edit]

White faced Heron

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gnangarra - uploaded by Gnangarra - nominated by Gnangarra
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 16:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -too messy. // Liftarn
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Shadow on heron, messy, dull colour. Snowwayout 20:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Quasipalm 21:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment have a look at the high resolution version, notice what the bird has caught. Gnangarra
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Monumentvalley.jpg, featured[edit]

Panorama picture of the Monumet Valley. This picture was already proposed for featured pixture but was reacted due to stiching mistakes which are corrected now

It would still be necessary to improve superposition assembly
  • Interesting, I voted differently this time, I less better looked at! --Luc Viatour 04:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 10:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FoeNyx 13:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Overlord 14:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Urban 15:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --New Painter 15:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DTA 15:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -Artist 16:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support City Slicker 16:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --Quickstep 18:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support if this aint FP then nothing could be --Go West 19:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -nice... but where is John Wayne? --DiTaeg 09:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree Perfect. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uwe Hermann 16:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ceridwen 00:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - nice when downscaled, less in full res. Stitching problems, looks artificially sharpened by a „cheap sharpen filter“ --Wikimol 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 19:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with wikimol about sharpening and stitching Coldfingers 00:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 22 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Desert Lop Nur 89.00E, 40.30N between Kuruktagh and Astintagh.jpg, not featured[edit]

Desert Lop Nur 89.00E, 40.30N between Kuruktagh and Astintagh

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Michael Gäbler23:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Satellite picture of the Desert of Lop with the Basin of the formerly sea Lop Nur (ear-shaped). Color adjusting by Michael Gäbler of [1] using Adobe Photoshop 6.0. --Michael Gäbler 12:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nomination tidied up by Snowwayout
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 23:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Michael Gäbler
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --> Not my cup of tea. Snowwayout 01:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, I don't see anything special --che 03:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeGnangarra 07:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - black line on the right - YolanC 15:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --New Painter 15:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 

Image:Erythemis simplicicollis (Eastern Pondhawk).jpg, not featured[edit]

Eastern Pondhawk dragonfly, taken at Loxahatchee Preserve,  2006/06/17.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Eastern Pondhawk Dragonfly Made, uploaded and nominated by User Bastique. Of the pictures I took I also found this one particularly appealing. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg SupportCary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, because there's too much FPC of bugs. I'll support only exceptionnal ones, and this one isn't (centring & background). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 13:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Since this image was captured in the dragonfly's natural habitat, this is the natural background. I thought image usefulness was important for featured images? Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 14:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
    • And while it's not centered, I did crop it to balance the photo. I could crop to something less than 4:3, but would rather not do that on an image that might be considered useful. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 14:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
      • Natural background or not, it must not distract from the main subject, it has to be completely out of focus or almost self-couloured. And if it's important that the image must be useful, for being a FP it's not enough. It must have a real emotional and/or esthetical strenght. In my opinion, it isn't the case here (bad light on the main subject, for example). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 14:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
        • (Edited version) It's really better but I still don't like the bug posture, and the problem of centring remains. Sorry. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the background --Ggonnell 10:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Celithemis eponina (Halloween Pennant).jpg, not featured[edit]

Halloween Pennant dragonfly, taken at Loxahatchee Preserve,  2006/06/17.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Halloween Pennant Dragonfly, Made, uploaded and nominated by User Bastique. Of the pictures I took I found this one particularly appealing. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I corrected picture with Gimp (right), perhaps more chance to be nominated? --Luc Viatour 07:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Thank you! I'll vote for it now.  :) Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, because there's too much FPC of bugs. I'll support only exceptional ones, and this one isn't (background). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 13:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
    • What's wrong with the background? It's the animal's natural habitat! What could be more exceptional than that? Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
      • Natural background or not, it must not distract from the main subject, it has to be completely out of focus or almost self-couloured. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 14:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the bg--Ggonnell 10:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dawn vignetting effect - swifts creek.jpg, not featured[edit]

Dawn Pano
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoI like how the vignetting works out in this pic. Created by Fir0002 - uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by Fir0002 www 09:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 09:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Beautiful atmosphere. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 23:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like the vignetting personally --Rodge 16:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pink rose albury botanical gardens.jpg, not featured[edit]

Rose
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Fir0002 - uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by Fir0002 www 09:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 09:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, because there's too much photos of flowers. I'll support only exceptional ones, and this one isn't (focus). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 13:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very difficult to have a good returned with the pinks rose --Luc Viatour 14:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as El Comandante said --Ggonnell 10:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral You were in a botanical garden and you still didn't pick the species? Too many unidentified flowers at Commons... pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree Pfctdayelise --Rodge 16:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dragonfly-(Elliotgoodrich).jpg, not featured[edit]

A dragonfly stationed on an umbrella

Sympetrum flaveolum - side (aka).jpg
--Luc Viatour 13:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Difficult to do better than the user User:Aka --Luc Viatour 14:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurry and unnatural background norro 15:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the unnatural background Tbc 13:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I prefer the FP shown by Luc Viatour. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Coldfingers 00:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ritzelpaket 01 KMJ.jpg, featured[edit]

multiple sprockets of a Derailleur gear

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by KMJ - uploaded by Chris 73 - nominated by Thgoiter 13:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent, wow --Thgoiter 13:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Unusual. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Technically and esthetically, it's a really good photo but, for my taste, the subject is not strong enough (a common object can have an important evocative strength if it recalls essential feelings, and this one doesn't for me). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 13:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ßøuñçêY2K 17:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Teme 08:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 09:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral ditto El Comandante and res is quite low --Rodge 16:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral can the name on it be photoshoped out.--Tarawneh 14:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - why? The name of the manufacturer is important to the item. We would not remove the manufacturer's mark from e.g. a photo of a car - MPF
Sorry, why is the name of the manufacturer is important to the item. This is a Featured Picture candidate. Having a manufacturer name in such photo is free advertisement in my opinion, same product is manufactured by others. Cars are different, you don't need to read the name on the car to know the manufacturer, at least for most of people. There is a hidden massage in such a photo; Products labeled with SRAM are good. --Tarawneh 02:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 13:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 11 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 2 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 3 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lower_antelope_1_md.jpg, featured[edit]

A view of Lower Antelope Canyon near the entrance

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Moondigger nominated by 70.28.187.93 19:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It's like a lower-quality version of already-featured Image:Bild 478.jpg. Jon Harald Søby 22:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Actually, I like this composition more than the one of Bild 478, which is also kind of unsharp and noisy. If there would be a version of this with a little higher resolution and less agressive sharpening, I'd opt for featuring this a taking down the other. --che 23:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose — too cluttered compared to the featured image which also has better lighting conditions, resolution of 800px by 600px is too small for non historical images Gnangarra 06:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- This is not the same location as the featured image -- Lower Antelope Canyon is a different place than Upper Antelope Canyon, with a different character. Also, this image is 1231x821, not 800x600. -- moondigger 11:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Look, if this isn't promoted that's fine with me - I didn't nominate it. But I do want to be clear about something. There is no existing FP of Lower Antelope Canyon. The existing FP was taken in Upper Antelope Canyon. They are two different places, kilometers apart. As far as I can tell, there are no other images from Lower Antelope Canyon here other than mine. -- moondigger 16:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think that's very important. It's the same kind of natural place, and not very far at all! I think there's no reason to have various FP of so similar places, if they haven't really different qualities or atmosphere. So...
  • What makes you think they're similar? Have you been there? The only similarity is that they're both slot canyons, and are both called "Antelope." Is there a rule stating Commons can only have one featured image of a slot canyon? -- moondigger 00:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • No. I haven't been there; but I don't need to just for comparing two pictures. No, there's no rule about similar featured pictures, but must we accept a hundred sunshines or a hundred ochre slot canyons as FP? OK, it's only the second one but as I said it before, I think there are so many things to photograph and show in Commons, that too similar pictures, with a same atmosphere, and with a subject that will be always a good one, aren't exceptional enough to be all featured. I prefer chose only one, and I prefer the other one. It's not a rule, but it's my vision of FP. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good but the existing FP even better --Rodge 16:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support better composition than the existing one --Ggonnell 10:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Love it love it love it. Totally agree with Ggonnell , the composition is much better. I just printed it. --Tarawneh 14:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo 20:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Overlord 14:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --City Slicker 16:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Go West 22:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Lycaon 00:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- I like it, better composition than the other one, but the colours/light are not super Michiel1972 22:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- yes, it is dark; and yes, the bis stone in the lower left corner is distracting, but other than that: WOW!! great and unusual composition! -- Boereck 08:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition. The fact that there's another featured picture with a similar landform from a nearby area diminishes nothing from this one. QuartierLatin1968 20:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ceridwen 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sigfrid 12:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Urban 03:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Darz Mol 22:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose norro 10:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res -- Gorgo 20:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support--Vircabutar 00:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautiful colors Coldfingers 00:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support: I registered just so I could vote for this picture. I have been to Upper and Lower Antelope Canyon many times, but never was able to take a picture as beautiful as this one. -- TFerris 01:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 19:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Olei 21:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 06:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 17 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 3 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Colony of aptenodytes patagonicus.jpg, featured[edit]

Colony of King Penguins

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Pismire - nominated by Wasja 01:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great perspective, nice composition with true/natural colors. A very impressive shot of King Penguins with high scarcity value. --Wasja 01:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support... wow, reminds me of computer generated armies in Lord of the Rings --che 03:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose "...not close enough" quoting Robert Capa --Rodge 16:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not a common situation, good composition. Amazing! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Ggonnell 10:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ACK che pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Tarawneh 13:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - rarity value of pic more than makes up for slight blurryness - MPF 22:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gordo 07:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Rodge, boring composition norro 21:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Holy crud the penguins are going to take over the world. Quickly promote it to FP as to not offend our future overlords! Sasquatch 03:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I assume it is a true image and no photoshop-enhanced pic... the reason for my comment: it looks unreal! I cannot believe all those penguins in one place! that is just amazing!! not so amazing is the quality of the shot lacking focus, focus and focus ;-) -- Boereck 08:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The hardest is to go there, not to take the picture (penguins don't fly away !), so we could have expected a better image with foreground birds bigger and full from top to toe. Better pictures on this topic will surely follow. B.navez 05:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ACK Sasquatch. Who ever said South Georgia had no permanent residents? Now we have proof to the contrary. QuartierLatin1968 20:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose apart from the huge numbers of penguins it's a quite ordinary shot -- Gorgo 12:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 01:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 12 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rain to clear skies panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Rain panorama
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — thumb nail doesnt do the image justice needs to viewed at full res Gnangarra 06:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Teme 08:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good, but not Fir0002 at his best. Freedom to share 17:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support dreamy, inspiring --Tarawneh 13:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - sorry, but the lost horizon in the middle spoils it for me - MPF 22:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Agree with MPF. Snowwayout 00:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --for me it lacks a motive! I find it boring and nothing more. Sorry! -- Boereck 08:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Storm clouds over swifts creek.jpg, not featured[edit]

Storm
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment image size to 300px same as all noms Gnangarra 06:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Teme 08:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Some areas are just too dark, sorry. Would support if those areas would be corrected through image editing software such as The GIMP. Freedom to share 18:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Grey clouds are boring to look at... pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - horribly ominous, unnerving just to look at - MPF 22:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- nice ..but boring Michiel1972 22:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I agree that this is the better shot, but stil... -- Boereck 08:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Solar eclipse in France 1999, featured[edit]

Solar eclipse in France 1999 new version scan

new scan high resolution starting from the originals

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 10:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gordo 12:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rodge 16:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wow! Saw this one life near Amiens, but never those details! Lycaon 18:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Golbez 19:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Great! Very rare phenomenon, high encyclopedic value. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg SupportGnangarra 02:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Snowwayout 03:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support fantastic picture --RvM 07:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 10:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support same goes to Solar eclips 1999 6.jpg, can the "e" be added to the name. --Tarawneh 13:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes sorry,Solar_eclips_1999_4.jpg is used on 74 pages in 31 projects, difficult to change the name now --Luc Viatour 14:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - stunning! - MPF 22:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jastrow 13:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Overlord 14:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MartinD 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --New Painter 15:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Artist 16:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice! --City Slicker 18:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Very nice indeed! Sasquatch 03:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportB.navez 06:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uwe Hermann 16:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support wow! Coldfingers 00:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 10:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(Henningklevjer 20:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)) Lycaon 07:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Broc 19:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 22:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 24 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 22:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 

Image:Musee-historique-lausanne-img 0054.jpg, not featured[edit]

God makes Eve from Adam's body

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info God making Eve from Adam's body. Bas-relief, Middle Ages, Lausanne (another view). Created, uploaded and nominated (I confess, mainly to gather technical advices, so thanks to those who oppose :) ) by Rama 14:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rama 14:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --VIGNERON 14:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- it's ok... --Quasipalm 21:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- focus is not on the face of that statue. --AngMoKio 07:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - not enough depth of field - MPF 22:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --gildemax 21:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree. Very expressive. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:ny_koerbe05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Strandkörbe auf Norderney

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rolf van Melis - uploaded by Rolf van Melis - nominated by RvM 07:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --RvM 07:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral like the idea, but maybe sky needed graduated filtering and crop on left is problem --Rodge 16:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - err, what is it? A dump for retired pinball machines, or something?? Needs context adding to image description - MPF 22:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
check out: Beach Chair -- Boereck 08:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral i agree with Rodge. I also like the idea and the photo has a good quality...only the that the left one is cut off spoils the pic a bit....maybe it is possible to cut off the left one completly? --AngMoKio 15:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like original pics like this Michiel1972 21:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- I strongly agree with AngMoKio -- Boereck 08:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 2 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 4 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:ny_giftbude.jpg, not featured[edit]

Panorama "Giftbude" at Norderney, Germany

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rolf van Melis - uploaded by Rolf van Melis - nominated by RvM 07:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --RvM 07:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as I don't like the distortion --Ggonnell 10:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the curvature, but I am not sure about hotel name appearing --Tarawneh 13:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose falling hotel --Rodge 16:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a very notable scene - MPF 22:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Flood03.jpg, not featured[edit]

1998 floods in Swifts Creek
Same location but taken 8 years later


Combination


  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nominated by Fir0002 (self nom). Not a conventional nomination, but I thought it more usefull to have the pix seperate so that you can easily (assuming you use firefox} flip between tabs and compare. I can easily put them together as a single image if it makes it easier for promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 10:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Which one are you nominating? Both? A composite we haven't seen yet? I'm not going to vote on something you haven't created yet. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both. I dont think it should be composed to one big jpeg. IMO suitable compostite would be of the two images in layers of one file, which is currently impossible, but may be in the future...--Wikimol 19:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support . Both. --Yearofthedragon 19:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both (tho' I hope it didn't take 8 years for the flood to recede!!) - MPF 22:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I don't understand what the interest of only one of these two pictures. I'd rather vote for a montage like for the FP Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 01:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Useful record no doubt, but not outstanding images in their own right --Rodge 12:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Uploaded a combined version --Fir0002 www 12:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Great idea, but poor photo quality(Cluttered, dull light etc) Snowwayout 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Darz Mol 22:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 6 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:pond-covered-with-leaves.jpg[edit]

Pond covered with leaves.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created , uploaded and nominated by Adamantios 10:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC). Copy of negative with flatbed scanner.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Adamantios 10:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 10:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose artificial colors --Luc Viatour 10:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support colors are so amazing --Tarawneh 13:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Very blury. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Overlord 14:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Michiel1972 22:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose --gildemax 21:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Felicidade A very happy boy.jpg, featured[edit]

Short description

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Ggonnell 10:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 10:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 10:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 13:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prevert(talk) 17:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - did the subject give consent to the licensing of the photo? (can a child of this age give informed consent?!?) - MPF 22:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC).
I'm the father of the boy and the photo is three years ago. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 20:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Has he read http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/es/deed.en ? ;-) YolanC 00:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FoeNyx 13:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nice, but I want more -- YolanC 18:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Rodge 12:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Rocastelo(talk) 14:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice -- Gorgo 16:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice photo, nice boy :) Rama 09:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 22:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bubo bubo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Short description Bubo bubo-e.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Adam Kumiszcza - nominated by pfctdayelise (translate?)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 13:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support well done--AngMoKio 14:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support edited version. In the edited version I adjusted levels and cleaned the eyes. Olegivvit 18:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - zoo pic - MPF 22:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nearly there. Grey on grey means the image doesn't stand out -- Tomhab 22:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support edited version --FoeNyx 13:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pelz 17:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Teme 06:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral ;-) --Bubo bubo 22:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose might work cropped square to remove most of the messy bg. --Rodge 12:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 11:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 7 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Closed wet tulip.jpg, not featured[edit]

Closed wet tulip.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by John on Flickr - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by pfctdayelise (translate?)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but if the is a higher res. then Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support the preceding unsigned comment is by Tarawneh (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, res is low, bg color doesn't harmonise well, no id (assuming tulips have them?) the preceding unsigned comment is by Rodge500 (talk • contribs) sorry! --Rodge 18:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Ack Tarawneh. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - colour clash with background, lack of cultivar identity - MPF 22:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Res. Also, I feel about flowers the way others feel about sunsets. Snowwayout 23:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    • I actually agree, but this one is just so luscious. And yeah, the res, but unfortunately I can't fix that... pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res -- Gorgo 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 12:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 4 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Frithia pulchra 1002.jpg, featured[edit]

Frithia pulchra 1002.jpg

Voting ended on 18:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 22:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gustav Klimt 046.jpg, not featured[edit]

Gustav Klimt 046.jpg

  • It's just the more expensive painting of the world... Not very attractive, for sure! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 01:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
exactly.. why anyone would pay $135 million dollars for an "unattractive" painting is very strange :-) Gryffindor 07:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Different people have different perceptions, likes and dislikes. I don't see why I should be forced to like it, just because a different (and grotesquely rich) person does - MPF 13:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gordo 07:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Artist 14:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --New Painter 15:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The subject of the image is ugly as hell (and whoever bought it for $ 135 million should be admitted to a psychiatric hospital), but the picture itself is of good quality, so there's no reason it shouldn't be featured. Jon Harald Søby 11:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose I don't care about how much someone paid for it. And I don't agree that the photo itself is of good quality - looks smudged. And if not for the gold, I would not put this in my own house. This is definitely not one of the best or more useful pictures on Wikicommons--Konstable 12:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The work is indeed important and it's not really my business to judge whether it "should" be considered as valued a piece of art as it apparently is. However this is not a particularly good reproduction, IMO; it looks smudged/blurry, and the colors don't really come out well. --Delirium 22:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If there's any smudging, you'd have to really be looking for it. At any normal zoom, this reproduction looks great. QuartierLatin1968 19:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I for one absolutely admire this painting. It is gorgeous and indescribably stunning, as I have seen the painting with my own two eyes in a Gustav Klimt exhibition. Aside from my personal comment, however, I think the image is excellent in normal zoom (maybe it could be downsized a bit and it could be brightened up a bit)...other than that it's perfectly fine--Vircabutar 00:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 17:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 18:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 07:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wolin-Topomap.png, not featured[edit]

Wolin-Topomap.png

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Aotearoa) - uploaded by Aotearoa - nominated by Aotearoa
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aotearoa 18:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 11:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose just a map norro 21:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Teme 09:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • {[strongly oppose}} --Broc 19:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC) strongly too late -- Lycaon 22:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Danaus chrysippus - afrikanischer Monarch.jpg? not featured[edit]

Danaus chrysippus - afrikanischer Monarch.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by ArtMechanic 21:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 01:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Chrizz 04:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- unsufficient focus, unnatural background, Lycaon 08:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - agree with Lycaon - MPF 13:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice Michiel1972 21:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DiTaeg 09:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Lycaon norro 21:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Background. Snowwayout 07:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very low deep sharpness, noisy (compression artefacts?). --Olei 21:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: ' Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and é Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Canada Square Canary Wharf Eastwards.JPG? not featured[edit]

Canada Square Canary Wharf Eastwards.JPG

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tomhab
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomhab 22:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 01:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - poor angle --Golbez 06:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gordo 07:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ditto to Golbez - MPF 13:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tbc 13:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective or angle--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Lmbuga : building's angle on the right is annoying -- Ithilsul 13:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 22:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, ! Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anvil shaped cumulus panorama.jpg, edited version featured[edit]

Anvil clouds

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - sorry, a rather obvious jpg compression/stitching fault below the cloud just left of centre - MPF 13:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --FoeNyx 13:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the exact name of this cloud is Cumulonimbus capillatus incus. --Mglanznig 19:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment I've uploaded a restitched image --Fir0002 www 03:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Edited version
Anvil clouds
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FiP 13:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support edited version - MPF 17:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support edited version --- gildemax 21:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 16:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QuartierLatin1968 19:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rüdiger Wölk 22:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ceridwen 00:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This image was a rather difficult decision. I know it was great with a fantastic resolution, yet the tree at the left side very much annoyed me. At the beginning I did consider it quite distracting there. The subject at first was not very clear either. I see two clouds there, which one should I focus on, the on ein the foreground or the one in the background. Yet gradually they merge together in the eyes of the viewer, producing somewhat an optical illusion. What I really love about this image that made me support it was the feeling of perspective, which was highlighted by the huge resolution. This makes up for an error in the composition, which placed the annoying tree on the left and a viewing point or something on the right. Yet I still consider it a great effort! Freedom to share 15:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 03:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Romary 19:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 08:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hi-tacks 07:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 08:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Isabel Larroyd 22:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 08:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => edited version featured. -- Lycaon 22:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sunset hdr.jpg, featured[edit]

Sunset
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Chrizz 13:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very beautiful, I quickly will study technique HDR! --Luc Viatour 18:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The point of FP's is to encourage people to take more photos/do more pictures. Although this shot is beautiful and not very informative, it would still go under valuable in this context. It just says to people - look, if a sixteen-year old can do this, so can you! It encourages them to take their camera and do something amazing, something that anyone seeing it will vote for it as an FP. Everyone is capable of that. They just do not know it. Now, finally, for the resolution, it is a tough one. It is too low to show that many details. Yet we must not forget - Fir0002 wrote on his userpage he does not have the right facilities to upload such high resolution pictures. Once he does, we just put in a new and delist the old one. This is my view of how Wikimedia Commons works, therefore I have nothing else to say other than declare my support for this fantastic photograph. Freedom to share 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I beleive that what we see in this picture is far from what it was in reality. This picture is an improper combination of several shots. Olegivvit 09:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I tested the HDR in my office (this morning). It is right techic nothing to lose image, but nothing is invented!

Exemple:over-exposed,under-exposed,HDR (really as in truth) --Luc Viatour 11:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

over-exposed under-exposed HDR (really as in truth)
  • Yea.. HDR should bring out the true range of brightness as opposed to the opposite. See en:High dynamic range imaging. I think it's great. I don't get your whole "improper combination" theory. Sasquatch 03:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Fir0002, could you give here one of the shots composed to make this image (with medium exposition)?
OK, have a look at Image:Sunset hdr normal exposure.jpg --Fir0002 www 11:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Now I can explain my point of view better. We have here two fragments of normal and composed images. What we see in the center of the first one? Deep sky. What is in the center of the other one? Black cloud! Is it real? No. The same thing is for all other black thin clouds on the background of blue sky. In addition, usual clouds look like pained with black. There is no such a problem with the normal image. Exactly those features make the composed picture special, at the same time they are artificial.
Normal Composed
Result: 8 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 1 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 08:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nectarines summer 2006.jpg, not featured[edit]

NectarinesNectarines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 03:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Olegivvit 09:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support B.navez 06:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 21:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Konstable 02:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The light seems a bit flat and the chewed leaf detracts a lot. --Rodge 14:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition. Seems to have a red stitch norro 16:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support with or without chew marks. 19:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)the preceding unsigned comment is by QuartierLatin1968 (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition (fruits are too much covered with leaves) --MRB 14:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK MRB pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I also agree with MRB Tbc 19:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 5 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 08:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Grotta di nettuno sardinien.jpg, not featured[edit]

Grotta di nettuno sardinien.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dionysos - uploaded by Dionysos - nominated by Wing-Chi
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wing-Chi 03:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 04:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --City Slicker 16:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Beautiful, but a bit blury and would have been better without tourists on the left (quibbler mood). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 20:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --> Beautiful (and the people provide scale, without spoiling the photo). Snowwayout 00:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 19:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose support for 0.5s exposure looks inadequate; also auto white-balance --Rodge 14:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ceridwen 00:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lot of noise, white ballance, blown out highlihts, tourists in the left. --Wikimol 11:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Wikimol -- Ithilsul 13:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tbc 19:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 03:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Calauer 08:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Lycaon 08:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 08:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Caspar David Friedrich - Wanderer above the sea of fog.jpg

Pyrrhosoma nymphula, featured[edit]

Pyrrhosoma nymphula

Picture of the day for Saint Valentine's Day (on February 14)?

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong supportwhat else? :)--AngMoKio 08:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 10:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jastrow 13:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support--Konstable 14:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Artist 16:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice! --City Slicker 18:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support That IS an exceptional picture! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 21:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Go West 23:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 11:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tbc 13:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 19:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DiTaeg 09:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support - how can I use any other tag? --Golbez 17:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 :-) --Luc Viatour 19:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support amazing photo Coldfingers 00:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice work, amazing situation, great colors - Ithilsul 12:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 06:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Broc 19:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautiful:) --Eirissa 22:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 20 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 10:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Paris RER.svg and Image:Paris RER.png, not featured[edit]

SVG - Direct SVG download. Direct PNG download (3.7 MB).

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by Pabix.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --  Pabix  11:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- MediaWiki indicates transparency with a checkerboard; Since this file was made with Inkscape, you would better use this software to appreciate it fully.  Pabix  11:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    Note:Opera browser supports SVG fully! I just discovered it.  Pabix  15:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DTA 15:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose. A high resolution file of this picture must be excellent and FP, but this one is unreadable, so unuseful! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 15:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    Comment : this is a SVG file, hence this is not a traditional picture file, you can select your zoom level how you want, up to 3600 times. But you should view it with inkscape. I could make a PNG file, but it would not be such a good idea I think.  Pabix  16:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    I don't know how SVG files work, but if it can be used in Wikimedia projects, directly read in the navigator, I don't think it has its place in Commons, or at least in the list of FP. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    It can be used in Wikimedia projects since several months due to a Mediawiki new feature, but it won't be well-rendered without software. Your comments are strange, since many people here want absolutely to have vector graphics for schemas.  Pabix  05:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
    I've said that it is really a good work that must be a FP if it can be read directly into the navigator, because as it is now, I can't use it without an external software like Inkscape, and I think FP must can be read directly into the Wiki interface. Why would a PNG version be a bad idea? El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 17:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
    PNG is not nearly as scalable as SVG. When you resize a PNG, bad things can happen while a SVG would retain all it's properties. And MediaWiki supports SVG now, FP never specifies what format to use although it should be easy to make a copy without the transparency... Sasquatch 03:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
    You have a PNG version here  Pabix  06:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no matter which way I try to zoom the picture, I still can't read the station names. --Boivie 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    Did you use Inkscape? The used font is Bitstream Vera Sans, and I think Arial should be used in replacement if needed to.  Pabix  04:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 20:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great. Jon Harald Søby 11:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think I need a bigger screen Michiel1972 21:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 04:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --DiTaeg 09:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
    Some suggestions to improve the file?  Pabix  10:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My browser (Opera) can easily zoom right in so I can see all the details just fine. If you have decent SVG software something like this is definitely useful (though I'm not in Paris), and it's well presented.--Konstable 12:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nomination of PNG version too, but the file is too big to be thumbnailed by MediaWiki, just click on the link.  Pabix  06:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment. Why didn't you change the framing? The left and right sides are unuseful, and reduce the quality of the thumbnail. If it's changed, I will support your great work. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 16:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
    In fact, SVG enables you to define the page contours. So the thumbnail seems to be cropped. In fact, when you open the file it is complete. I put the entire image into the PNG file in order not to lose anything (region's contours, it could be used again for other cards for instance).  Pabix  06:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support Very nice work! FiP 13:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Yet to see an oppose that will be listened to, come promotion time. Well done. James F. (talk) 08:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 20:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
    Some suggestions to improve the file?  Pabix  10:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I'm graduated in cartography and had to make different kinds of maps using professional software, let me make some comments about the finishing touch that makes the difference between a good map and an excellent, or for my part featured, map.
    Vectors that show lines or arcs that are connected in the real world should also be connected in the map: see for example the lines between Chantilly-Gouvieux - Orry-La-Ville-Coye, Vincennes - Fontenay-sous-Bois, Brétigny - Marolles-en-Hurepoix and numerous other examples. Not only does that look not finished, it also might be confusing about the connectivity of the railroads there. It is also generally agreed that, if a label is to be placed above another object that has a same kind of color (same darkness for example), that it should be "masked" (a small white space around the characters) to increase readability. This has not happened for example with Nogent Les-Perreux, where the 't' is practically not readable. Lines that indicate municipalities are also not always connected as they should be: for example near aéroport C.de Gaulle. Before I'd vote support, and I'm sure other cartographers would agree with me, all these inaccuracies should be resolved. Nice work nonetheless, it just isn't finished. Tbc 10:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
    Thanks for your comments. I updated SVG version. Will update PNG soon.  Pabix  22:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    Some suggestions to improve the file?  Pabix  10:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
    Some suggestions to improve the file?  Pabix  10:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Untidy lines (like those around Achères Grand Cormier for example). However, keep up the good work. Snowwayout 22:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
    ✓ Done  Pabix  15:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 11:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --> Good clean up job. Snowwayout 02:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We need more great SVGs like this! — Erin (talk) 08:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose --Broc 19:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We can zoom now :)--Hi-tacks 09:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I updated the version with new parameters in SVG file. PNG version has been updated too.  Pabix  11:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
    Untidy lines have been corrected, colors have been improved for rivers (less dark).  Pabix 
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info If you have an old computer, PNG file could be too big to view it (sorry)  Pabix  10:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Med 10:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 7 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kurofuneya.JPG, not featured[edit]

Short description

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Yumeji Takehisa - uploaded by Ss45 - nominated by 168.126.28.25 13:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - looks blurred. Seen better repros of Japanese paintings. - MPF 22:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with MPF --Luc Viatour 13:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 20:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral bit soft, low res --Rodge 12:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the painting, but the file is too bad quality and resolution CyrilB 16:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low resolution and bad quality MGo 09:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Maassluis kerkeiland.jpg, not featured[edit]

Maassluis kerkeiland.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Michiel1972 nominated by Michiel1972
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michiel1972 21:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (please add a caption !) B.navez 06:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MartinD 13:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Image is very soft —Pixel8 14:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 20:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry or out of focus and not too good composition. norro 23:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- not focussed, or camera shake. --Rodge 12:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose out of focus --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Broc 19:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Cigale france2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cigale france2.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jodelet - uploaded by Jodelet - nominated by Jodelet
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 22:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 23:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not the “Cigale”,its empty moult! To see here --Luc Viatour 04:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Or here ;) The filename isn't perfect, you're right, but precisions are given in the description. --Jod-let 12:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry,I have write too quickly! --Luc Viatour 19:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 20:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose clear focus, but that's not sufficient to be featured. Bad angle and composition. Furthermore i agree with Lviatour and think, that this is an empty moult, not a cigale (look at the empty eyes and the empty carapace) norro 23:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Of course, this is an empty moult. This is not a cigale. I knew that..., and explained it (cf description (ok, I will add a translation ;)...--Jod-let 09:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, i misunderstood your reply. norro 10:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:GiottoBelltowerDuomo-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

GiottoBelltowerDuomo-01.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Thermos) - uploaded by Thermos - nominated by Thermos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thermos 10:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective--Luc Viatour 10:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose same reason --che 00:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find the composition interresting - CyrilB 16:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 17:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose can't see any creative justification for all this distortion of perspective. --Rodge 10:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective - Ithilsul 12:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 10:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Tomascastelazo 13:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective and the composition don't make the photo good enough --Eirissa 22:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Asilidae1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Asilidae1.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jodelet - uploaded by Jodelet - nominated by Jodelet
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 17:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very good encyclopaedic but not really beautiful document --Luc Viatour 09:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mjem
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support"not really beautiful document" i don't understand this point of view, we can't change the nature. This fly is not really attractive, i must admit, but it's a good picture, an interesting subject and we can't blame the photograph just because this animal is not as beautiful as a butterfly! no, really, good picture.--Lelote 09:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 17:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:XN Sus domesticus Animal husbandry 00.jpg, not featured[edit]

Two lovely resting pigs

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XN - uploaded by XN - nominated by XN 19:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 19:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 20:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition. I don't see the species-appropriate husbandry, just two backsides of sleeping pigs. norro 23:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The backside is the important part :) Species-appropriate husbandry left pigs the curly tail. --XN 08:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not exceptionnal --Luc Viatour 09:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- MartinD 07:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Not exceptional as a picture of pigs, but perhaps suitable as a picture of soccer supporters.;)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It does not seem to me interesting--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Makes me smile, but that's probably not what a Featured Picture is supposed to do - Ithilsul 12:40, 3 July 2006
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anax imperator female.jpg, not featured[edit]

Emperor Dragonfly (Anax imperator), female laying eggs

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and nominated by Tbc 19:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tbc 19:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Luc Viatour 19:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 22:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed, messy background. Not every close-up of a dragon fly should be featured. norro 23:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg NeutralSymbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is definitively too present CyrilB 16:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
it is not a background but the place of the laying the dragonfly lays in water! It is one magic moment! --Luc Viatour 18:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
OK! I didn't notice that. It makes me consider the image differently, but I still find the water a bit too present (or should I say, a bit too much of the color of the subject!). changed my vote to neutralCyrilB 21:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I was standing quite deep in the water chasing this big dragonfly when suddenly the lady posed nicely and laid her eggs Tbc 21:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Screw metal.jpg, not featured[edit]

Screw metal.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Uwe Hermann - uploaded by Uwe Hermann - nominated by Uwe Hermann
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uwe Hermann 16:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I like the texture of the screw, but the background is dirty, destroying the purity of the picture. Maybe some post-processing would be enough?CyrilB 16:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
    Can/should I overwrite the original version with a post-processed one? Do you mean applying something like "unsharp mask" or something else? --Uwe Hermann 09:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
    I uploaded a slightly post-processed version which should be a bit sharper. --Uwe Hermann 16:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
    I uploaded a modified version: I cropped part of the image to get the screw in a better place on the picture, and removed some of the stains (but I realise now that my work is far from perfect). Sadly, I also realise that the picture is... too empty. The texture on the screw and the metal plate is not really good (not really sharp, the top of the screw is overexposed...), so I maintain my oppose vote. Please feel free to revert my edit to the image if you want.- CyrilB 20:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support creative composition --Luc Viatour 09:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not sharp --che 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose- for wonderfull i find the composition and interesting the idea. i must admit that the image has no encyclopedic and or historic value. LadyofHats 11:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    From above: "Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a depository for wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.". If you agree that it matches all other criteria, I'd say this is a support vote... GeeJo 21:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK che norro 16:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cherry 23:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is this a Posidrive screw head or a Phillips screw head? Gordo 11:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:r001-009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Maiden tower Baku 20060624.jpg

Result: 0 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pont.JPG, not featured[edit]

description courte

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Mjem - uploaded by User:Mjem - nominated by Mjem 13:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mjem 13:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose light makes it seem like the bridge is only decoration for the sky --che 14:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Siebrand 18:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't feel anything special with this image. CyrilB 20:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 21:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not enough contrast between the colors - Ithilsul 12:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like it, but not enough contrast between the colors --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Samothraki-river-platanus.jpg[edit]

Samothraki-river-platanus.jpg

Image:Convento san agustin 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Convento san agustin 2.jpg

Edited version

Convento san agustin edit0.jpg Convento san agustin edit1.jpg

  • Comment - the second edit has also colors corected to standard sRGB space (the original is in Adobe RGB, Wikimedia software does not hadle such images correctly) --Wikimol 12:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> I agree with Lviatour. Snowwayout 01:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral-a lot of elements on the picture anoy me. i wonder if there could be a better angle to take the pictureLadyofHats 11:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective, angle --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Detalle templo yuriria 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Detalle templo yuriria 2.jpg Detalle templo yuriria 2 cor.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the corrected version --Luc Viatour 04:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
    • The original image is in Adobe RGB space. Wikimedia software does not handle such images correctly. When properly converted to sRGB, colors are more vivid. --Wikimol 12:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - focus. (eg her right hand is out of focus, while the wall behind it is sharp) --Wikimol 11:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC) changing to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, given the explained difficulty of shooting the subject. However, the focus issue is still there, and in principle could be solved. As the subject is static, it can be shooted with any time, which means theoretically unlimited aperture, which means theoreticaly unlimited depth of focus. (Or, two images with differen focus can be combined, or...). --Wikimol 18:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I hate to defend an image, but I do want to comment. This is a very dark sixteen century church. Pic taken with existing very low light and a telephoto. This church has seen an independence war, a foreign invasion, two religious wars, a revolution and who knows what else. So add it all together, it is a miracle in itself that the statue remains. This pic was taken under adverse conditions, so add years, degradation and low light, etc., the colors just are not there...--Tomascastelazo 14:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
ok, I propose a correction of the image, perhaps more chance? --Luc Viatour 18:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I would propose to just save it in sRGB, and strongly opppose the edit. The photographer was there, we were not. Aside from realism, given the history of the church, the warm christmas colors are IMO not apropriate for the message of the image.
I can do the conversion to sRGB, but I'm affraid the resaving would not be lossless... Tomascastelazo, if you shoot to raw, could you please export the image in sRGB profile? The same problem seems to be with many of your images. See sRGB, Adobe RGB and RGB color space for more disscussion of the topic. --Wikimol 18:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I truly appreciate the comments... these are comments that lead to better images. On the color space... well, so many points of view. I follow camera manufacturer recommendations and shoot in Adobe RGB, and have more or less calibrated my processes to print in that space, but I also understand that some programs do not handle it well, for wiki I will do a save as in sRGB... no problem. On the edit itself, I have no problem with the resulting interpretation. In fact, I like it. It is a warmer image. But lets not forget that the camera itself has a color bias, the light coming in was not white light, the reflecting light was definitely not light. So the true color is out to lunch someplace. The image has to be interpreted in some color.... no rules there, just a cualitative judgement call. On the DOF, well, I usually leave something out of focus, by design, to guide the view to critical areas of the image. In this case, I focused in the eyes, which in faces, most of the time is the most important, and let DOF fall off from there. DOF falls one third in front, two in back, hence sharp background. Some people like it, some do not. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn´t. Again, thanks for the comments. --Tomascastelazo 12:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Tomas, just a quick comment about color space. You should use the right color space for the purpose at hand. The camera manufacturer recommends Adobe RGB because it is a wider color space than sRGB, and it's always better to start with a wide color space, and tailor the results to whatever purpose you wish to employ later. For web use, you should convert the image to the sRGB color space, since most web browsers can't understand color space tags and will display your work in the sRGB color space no matter what. When you display an Adobe RGB image in a web browser that can't understand the colorspace tag, the colors are not accurate. So keep your originals in the AdobeRGB color space, but the JPG files you upload to commons should be converted to sRGB. -- moondigger 13:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support either image, Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support the one on the right with the stronger colours Gnangarra 14:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose easy, not exceptionnal --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 1 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral less than 5 pro-votes => not featured. -- Lycaon 10:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Triskel1.png - Image:Triskel2.png - Image:Triskel3.png, none featured[edit]

Triskel1.png
not featured
Triskel2.png
Triskel3.png

Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by /\/\π

Image:Triskel1.png (image on left)[edit]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info green-blue version

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /\/\π 08:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Triskel2.png (image on center)[edit]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info cyan-dark green version

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /\/\π 08:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Triskel3.png (image on right)[edit]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info grained black version

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /\/\π 08:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

All of them[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /\/\π 08:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose they are all nice and clear, but i don't see the reason for exactly this shape and these textures norro 09:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
it's the digital reconstruction of an original triskel with that shape. i worked on multiple textures to choose which one mostly matches with the shape. /\/\π 09:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, but can you cite the source of this original trsikel? Is it of historical value or otherwise known? norro 15:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
this is a Celtic triskel. Triskel was perhaps the most important and sacred symbol in Celtic religion, and was depicted using many different shapes in Celtic art. this shape is one of them. this is its historical value; unfortunately I can't find the source of the image at the moment... --/\/\π 12:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - i dont know about the historical or cultural background of this triskel but in my opinion your three versions are all a bit too colorful - maybe a more neutral version would be better and wouldn't distract from the shape (which seems to be the main point here).--AngMoKio 21:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

for the historical / cultural value of the symbol, see my sentence just above. for the colors, well, I may agree with your opinion... the colors are fictionals, since the original triskel was colorless. i could prepare another version using less "artistic" colors..... :-P --/\/\π 12:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> I dont see the reasoning behind the choice of colours/texture/patterns. Also, why so many candidates? Why not select the best image and nominate it? Snowwayout 01:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
well, I actually don't know which of the 3 images is the best one. I thought the community would choose one (or more) through multiple nomination.. that's all. if I committed a mistake... sorry!! :-) --/\/\π 12:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 11:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Scheveningen2005 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Scheveningen2005 3.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (AngMoKio) - uploaded by AngMoKio - nominated by AngMoKio
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --AngMoKio 18:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautiful luminosity --Luc Viatour 18:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support prefer this cropped version --Rodge 19:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Which cropped version? - MPF 21:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
this is the cropped version - the uncropped is linked in this pics summary--AngMoKio 21:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support} Michiel1972 21:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC) nice
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MRB 19:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wikimol 19:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Coldfingers 00:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 12:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 13:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  Pabix  12:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the symmetry and the order in the photo, the lighting is great --Eirissa 22:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 18:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support Calauer 08:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 11 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 11:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Coccinella septempunctata, featured[edit]

Coccinella septempunctata

Edit by Tomascastelazo. Not a candidate yet
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by Luc Viatour
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 18:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. The sharpness and the colors are really good, even at full scale. Bravo! CyrilB 19:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • edit: I support the original version. I like this green, the image is very dynamic, and I can't help seeing a skull (the head of the insect) on the cropped version. I agree it is also on the original version, but the small size of the subject mades it less obvious CyrilB 21:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support well done norro 21:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - not really sure I see the value of it. At full scale, you have to scroll all over the place to find the insect; at screen size it is too tiny to be useful. - MPF 21:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great composition. great quality --AngMoKio 21:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 08:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC) - needs cropping, subject too small. Just crop off the out of focus parts.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a graphic image, the main element is color. The "out of focus" or DOF works nice, as it leads the view into the main subject and falls off behind. The lady bug in point of interest. I support the cropped version. --Tomascastelazo 14:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Rodge 16:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --> I support the cropped version. Snowwayout 01:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the original version. Nice composition and colors! --MRB 06:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the cropped version even with for my taste i would have removed even more of the leave-LadyofHats 11:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uwe Hermann 12:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition and nice colors. Christer Johansson 13:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The edit by Tomascastelazo. I think that it makes this good picture even better. --Thermos 00:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose subject too small. out of focus --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the original version. Very nice colors. Dark green missing in the edit : other colors are less attractive - Ithilsul 14:11, 03 July 2006 (UTC+2)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the original.--Konstable 08:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The edit by Tomascastelazo. --Doruk Salancı 11:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perfect focus, but target ist too small. --Olei 22:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Broc 19:17, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose center composition doen't fit subject very well, it's also kind of lost in the picture --che 23:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both. Cant decide, in the edit the placement of the insect is more pleasing, in the original I like the dark greens. --Wikimol 08:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose causes are mentioned above. --Olei 12:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 18:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Calauer 08:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 17 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 11:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Plastique-jouets.jpg, not featured[edit]

description courte

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by FrenchByte - uploaded by Greudin - nominated by Cherry 19:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cherry 19:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support original, colors --Luc Viatour 20:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - messy, nothing special - MPF 20:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK MPF. Composition is too flat and it's overexposed norro 21:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Michiel1972 21:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC) too much for me
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Rodge 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the composition is quite mesy and i dont see a lot of educative or encyclopedic value on it -LadyofHats 11:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 13:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral  Pabix  12:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 11:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rock-snow-wood-and-vines.jpg[edit]

Rock-snow-wood-and-vines.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Adamantios) - uploaded by Adamantios - nominated by Adamantios
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Adamantios 08:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral like the atmosphere, but some technical limitations, tonal range, crop... --Rodge 16:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposeit has no encyclopedic value.-LadyofHats 11:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral ACK Rodge. Note: Commons serves more than encyclopedias, so there is no "encyclopedic value" for Commons FPs. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nothing special (and I also regard encyclopedic value as a very valid criterion) - MPF 23:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Evening sky from a plane.jpg, not featured[edit]

Evening sky (about 8 pm, near Denmark, in summer) shot from a plane.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mutatis mutandis - uploaded by Mutatis mutandis - nominated by Mutatis mutandis 10:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mutatis mutandis 10:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I quite like the picture, yet when it is zoomed in a noise-like distortion is becoming slowly visible. If I have time tomorrow, I shall fix this using The GIMP. Now I have to oppose it. Freedom to share 15:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree with you. It is a great picture, but the quality is not convincing. I'd support it without the noise. MGo 09:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, but for the oposite reason: I love the texture of the picture, but to enjoy it, you have to see it on full screen. I find the thumbnail (or the whole image) too dark. CyrilB 21:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your commentaries ! I've seen a lot of votes where people had just wroten Opposite or Pro, and nothing else... It's pleasant :) Mutatis mutandis 08:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNice image, but i find it too dark. where is is taken from?-LadyofHats 11:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
From a Ryanair plane, with a bad, bad, bad camera, so quality isn't there (noise)... Dark, I can do nothing, taking the plane from Toulouse to Denmark just to shot one photo is a little expensive, even with Ryanair :) Mutatis mutandis 11:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's like a painting... pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree with Pfctdayelise --AngMoKio 20:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral a very attractive image: both color and form, but I feel the noise stops it being FP. --Rodge 21:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Noise. Snowwayout 03:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - noise can be reduce by procesing --Wikimol 12:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral a very attractive image: both color and form, but I feel the noise stops it being FP. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 11:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Straat in Oud Plovdiv 1.jpeg, not featured[edit]

Straat in Oud Plovdiv 1.jpeg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jeroen Kransen - uploaded by Jeroen Kransen - nominated by Martyr
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martyr 12:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special to see, bad quality (e.g the diffusion under the left roof), and bad resolution CyrilB 21:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with CyrilB-LadyofHats 11:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - interesting view of some historical buildings. The diffusion under the left roof is a little annoying but can presumably be edited out fairly easily? - MPF 23:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like these City scenes, but the size of the picture is about half of the requirement for a FP. Perhaps a bigger file can be provided? unsigned by Thermos 01:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 11:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lyristes plebejus3.jpg, featured[edit]

Lyristes plebejus3.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Jodelet) - uploaded by Jodelet - nominated by Jod-let En espérant que vous n'en ayiez pas ras-le-bol des cigales...
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a shame the other version available has this green background, I found it more dynamic . Anyway, the picture is cleat, demonstrative, ... enclyclopedic! CyrilB 21:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-LadyofHats 11:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 12:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christer Johansson 13:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 23:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zombi 20:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --> Good work. Snowwayout 03:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 11:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not bad, really! But very dark areas. --Olei 22:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Broc 19:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support--Lelote 09:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  Pabix  12:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 16:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree that the other picture pointed out by CyrilB is outstanding but that can be nominated later. William Avery 20:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 14 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 1 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 11:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Calanca Alp de Cascinarsa.jpg, not featured[edit]

Calanca Alp de Cascinarsa.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MRB - uploaded by MRB - nominated by MRB
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MRB 19:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is harsh, and there is a slight mist in front of the mountains - CyrilB 21:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no mist in front of the mountains (though wouldn't regard that as something to oppose, either). - MPF 00:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
That's not exactly mist, but at least a lack of contrast on the mountains. CyrilB 08:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Just a mountain, nothing special. Snowwayout 01:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    • I think you do not live in the Netherlands: we would find such a mountain over here very special!;) MartinD 08:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -maybe is my personal opinion, or maybe the mist but i find all a bit out of focus. plus i do not see any encyclopedic(informative) value on it.LadyofHats 11:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
The picture shows a typical landscape of southern Swiss Alps (imho this is the informative value of the picture). Anyway, an encyclopedic value isn't necessary as we're at Commons and not at Wikipedia. --MRB 15:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's nice and all, but not too exceptional -- Gorgo 20:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGnangarra 07:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lacks of priorities --Calauer 08:23, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 11:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Haeckel Anthomedusae.jpg? not featured[edit]

Haeckel Anthomedusae.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoThe 46th plate from Ernst Haeckel's Kunstformen der Natur (1904), depicting organisms classified as Anthomedusae. - uploaded by Ragesoss - nominated by Fernando S. Aldado
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fernando S. Aldado 22:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral-even when it is a great picture, the image is rather dirty, and in increasing the contrast someone has "burn" the white areas. were you scaning it?LadyofHats 11:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I scanned it, and can upload the original scan (which I did some amateur fix-up on to create this version) if someone wants to create a better version. Leave me a note on my userpage, if so--Ragesoss 15:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral less than 5 supporting votes => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ferrofluid in magnetic field.jpg, featured[edit]

Ferrofluid in magnetic field.jpg
Ferrofluid in magnetic field original.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A superparamagnetic fluid, otherwise known as a ferrofluid, in a dish over a neodymium magnet. Image created by Steve Jurvetson - uploaded by GeeJo - nominated by GeeJo
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GeeJo 02:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good example of physic phenomena ! Mutatis mutandis 08:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- wow that looks stiky and quite educative -LadyofHats 11:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support funky pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support rare! --XN 12:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, although I support all opinions above, encyclopedic value is not an issue here. The quality (and the resolution) of the image are not FP. Lycaon 13:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ... definitely not good enough quality! Adamantios 19:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The original version. Makes you want to eat it with a spoon. Adamantios 09:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Although the quality is far from perfect, the subject is really interesting.CyrilB 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support the second version even more! a bit of cropping could bring the subject in a better position though, but this is not a big issueCyrilB 09:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - so weird - MPF 23:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I kind of like it, but unfortunately the resolution is something like half the guideline for FP. However, perhaps a bigger file can be provided. In addition, I would prefer not to have right side of picture cut off. Also, if some "breathing space" around the subject could be provided, that would be better. And finally, it appears that there are burned highlights, which should be corrected. the preceding unsigned comment is by Thermos (talk • 

contribs)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better crop and exposure than the first one uploaded. Informative. Support the new crop and version. --Thermos 14:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 02:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would probably support it with better and not overexposed background. Perhaps one can try to edit this? norro 08:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
    Quick notice, I've just gotten a mail back from the creator of the image, and he still has a higher resolution, uncropped version on his hard drive. I'll post the link when I've received it. GeeJo 21:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
    Ok, added now. I'm not very good when it comes to manipulating images, so if anyone wants to take a shot at cleaning it up, feel free :) GeeJo (t)(c) • 23:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support interesting to look at and think about Coldfingers 00:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would support it on the Wikipedia but not on Wikimedia Commons. Freedom to share 15:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 11:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oppose both - no scale references in one picture, and the other has little impact. Gordo 11:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 19:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Broc 19:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I thought the overall quality was poor, so I created several new ones... I see someone has nominated one towards the top of this page. --Gmaxwell 04:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support two - YolanC 11:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: version 1 -> 14 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Washington DC from Arlington.JPG, not featured[edit]

Washington DC from Arlington.JPG

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (smccue) - uploaded by smccue - nominated by Smccue
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Smccue 04:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tilted, doesn't show very much --che 16:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tilted, lack of sharpness, would be better a bit cropped and without the branches in the foreground CyrilB 22:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Che - MPF 23:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> As above Snowwayout 05:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ak Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke und Frankfurter Skyline unter der Flößerbrücke bei Nacht.jpg, not featured[edit]

Ak Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke und Frankfurter Skyline unter der Flößerbrücke bei Nacht.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Andrew [?] - uploaded by Andrew [?] - nominated by Andrew [?]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrew [?] 16:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can't move my eyes away from this big white spot on the right. CyrilB 22:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - lurid; ditto to CyrilB - MPF 23:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral There is certainly a potential for a "shot", but however, perhaps some technical issues should be considered. Per comments above, I would prefer if there were no burned highlights. In addition, the pictue appears to be a bit soft/mushy. Perhaps it could be reshoot with tripod and smaller ISO?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Overexposure. This could have been a very good photo. Snowwayout 03:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral there is not much subject in the picture, but the overexposure seems right to me in this case. The light is so bright that you cannot focus both the background and the lamp with your eyes without several seconds of adaption time. Therefore this overexposure makes sense. --Ikiwaner 19:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 01:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Very useful without a comment. --84.177.126.86 16:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:St marys - bairnsdale02.jpg, not featured[edit]

St marys - bairnsdale02.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Fir0002) - uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by Fir0002 www
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fir0002 www 08:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose red colors not realistic in hdr --Luc Viatour 18:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shadow/highlights look over-processed. Converging verticals needed correction. --Rodge 18:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ack Rodge, looks like a painting. --Ikiwaner 19:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rodge may have a good point... and I should know more about what is natural/not over processed. If those issues can be fixed please do. --gren 06:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 13:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose extremely overprocessed -- Calauer 08:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:guanajuato acueducto.jpg, not featured[edit]

Short description

Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Eumaeus atalaPCCA20040418-1454A.jpg, not featured[edit]

Eumaeus atalaPCCA20040418-1454A.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Cotinis) - uploaded by Cotinis - nominated by Cotinis
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is my own photo, and I think it came out well, with good color saturation, and focus. Plus, it shows a bit of the life-history of the butterfly --Cotinis 13:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lycaon 23:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background norro 19:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's hard to get a picture of a subject this small with an interesting background. I like the fact that it is laying eggs. (Cabin Tom 20:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC))
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Sensor dirt should be removed. Dark areas could be a little bit brighter. --Olei 22:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 13:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Formosan sika deer.jpg, not featured[edit]

Formosan sika deer.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Robek) - uploaded by Robek - nominated by 80.46.119.41
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Robek 17:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral bambi! ;), nice picture, but composition could be improved (it's centered right now, maybe the left and lower side should be cropped a bit) -- Gorgo 18:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition, angle norro 19:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have the impression that this picture was taken really close to the animal. This, plus the fact that it looks directly towards the camera gives me a bad feeling: isn't it supposed to be a wild animal? I'm not sure this is a reason to oppose a picture, but that is the reason why I don't really like it CyrilB 21:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Quote from the "Sika Deer" article on the English Wikipedia: "Dybowski's sika deer (Cervus nippon dybowskii) and Formosan sika deer (Cervus nippon taioanus) are highly endangered and possibly already extinct in the wild." well, I really would prefer to take this shot in the wild... Robek
      • Well... you got that point! I still maintain my vote, for the centered composition and the fact that the animal is looking directly towards the camera, but I understand now the conditions of the shoot. CyrilB 20:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - zoo pic - MPF 00:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - sharp, acceptable resolution (deliberately cropped to match, I guess), with an interesting subject. A shame that a picture in the wild is impossible nowadays. GeeJo (t)(c) • 14:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 14:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tbc 18:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC) agree with MPF
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jon Harald Søby 19:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the look and the square crop, maybe it could work as a CD cover ;-) --che 23:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 17:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support So adorable that I have to say yes. — Erin (talk) 11:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Neutrality 03:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FML IconSP.jpg hi 14:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ßøuñçêY2K 12:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ayacop 16:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose using a wide angle lens for this picture makes it unnatural Andreas Tille 12:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposePir6mon 20:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 5 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

This isn't a siki deer, its an axis deer!

Image:Torbole Panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Torbole Panorama.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info photography by Thgoiter, panorama created by Saman from German wikipedia - uploaded by Thgoiter - nominated by Thgoiter
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thgoiter 18:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background quite blurry/hazy, composition not that great (city squeezed in the lower part of the image) -- Gorgo 18:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> Ditto. Snowwayout 22:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 18:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 20:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Jokulsarlon lake, Iceland.jpg, featured[edit]

Jokulsarlon lake, Iceland.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by (Kenny Muir) - uploaded by TheBernFiles - nominated by CyrilB
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --CyrilB 22:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose reflection too bright, looks unnatural. Coldfingers 00:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose to turbolent to give this idyll feeling norro 20:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - stunning - MPF 00:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - great moment captured --AngMoKio 11:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - wonderful view, the browns compliment the blues and whites, and the geological layering in the mountain adds an interesting component. SFC9394 23:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - FoeNyx 11:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 19:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MartinD 13:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziga 15:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 08:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Broc 19:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Voter 789 00:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much mid-eighty pink effect -- Calauer 08:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 12:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 22:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I would have loved to have been there. --Ali K 14:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Roger McLassus 09:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support FML IconSP.jpg hi 14:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - nice Andreas.Didion 22:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too dark, depressive, like that beach cave image earlier -- Ayacop 16:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great. Make sure to visit this place in Winter Andreas Tille 12:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. Thought I had already seen this one featured. -- Solipsist 19:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 13 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Interior convento 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Interior convento 3.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tomás Castelazo - uploaded by User:Tomascastelazo - nominated by User:Tomascastelazo
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ----Tomascastelazo 00:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice Coldfingers 00:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice picture --Luc Viatour 04:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thermos 05:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - do the columns really lean over like that? --Rodge 15:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I had some doubts, but I made my mind. --Adamantios 16:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a version with vertical columns.CyrilB 18:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Ooooops! I played with the gimp and I replaced the original version with another with corrected perspective. I planed to upload it as a new picture, I swear! anyway, please feel free to revert my change if you prefer. Sorry for this unvolontary boldnessCyrilB 18:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • No problem --Tomascastelazo 00:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 00:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Konstable 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Doruk Salancı 11:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --gren 06:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --> Snowwayout 02:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Broc 19:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 13:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Romary 19:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - empty. Put a bright red ball in the middle foreground, a running cat or something, and it's a great picture. by Wikipeder 01:21, 14 July 2006
    • Please use ~~~~ to sign your vote, thanks. Snowwayout 06:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Olei 19:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 12:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 00:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obvious peeling paint and the uneven bricks add to this image a great deal. --Ali K 14:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Neutrality 03:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 16 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Apis mellifera, featured[edit]

Apis mellifera

Edit by Tomascastelazo. I propose this crop --Tomascastelazo 14:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by --Luc Viatour - uploaded by --Luc Viatour - nominated by Luc Viatour
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 08:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background. Freedom to share 15:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautiful. Good quality norro 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jod-let 20:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 00:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --> Great quality, but needs a good cropping I feel Snowwayout 10:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC).
Symbol support vote.svg Support --> the edit by Tomascastelazo. Snowwayout 07:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is getting stupid, but support the edit by Tomascastelazo (same thing as below). unsigned by Thermos 16:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC) (as usual ;-))
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support original -- Lycaon 16:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tbc 18:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC) both versions
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Broc 19:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 08:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Andreas.Didion 15:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ayacop 16:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: original -> 7 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 20:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Freedom-of-the-Seas--in-Hamburg.jpg, not featured[edit]

Freedom-of-the-Seas--in-Hamburg.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:TheBo - uploaded by TheBo - nominated by Ggonnell
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 13:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) not featured
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not better resolution? --Luc Viatour 13:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Foreground too dark. Freedom to share 15:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rodge 16:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great composition. Nice lighting norro 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The ship looks stuck on top of the building CyrilB 18:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sigfrid 19:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. --Jod-let 20:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to CyrilB - MPF 00:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --> A very nice photo of the ship (great lighting), sadly hidden behind a gloomy photo of a building, cars, several street lamps and a news-stand. Snowwayout 01:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The picture is great. A great composition especially bcs of the building in front of it. That building gives an idea of how big this ship is and furthermore fits perfect into the pic (golden section). The only drawback is the quite low resolution. --AngMoKio 06:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 05:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 18:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC) I'd like to see more water and the building doesn't flatter the size of the ship because it is much closer
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think it was much better to wait and make a shot when the ship was right of the tower. -- Rüdiger Wölk 04:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support great picture, very good composition and nice opposition between old and modern style!--Lelote 09:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting. Olegivvit 09:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive. The building could be a bit lighter, though. --Wikipeder 00:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - great picture but: Not enough water; the ship is partly hidden --M.L 00:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 13:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The first thing I saw was the building. Nice ship, not so nice building. --Ali K 14:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition Andreas Tille 12:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 8 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral =>. -- Lycaon 21:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Parcul Carol I 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Parcul Carol I 1.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Joe Mabel - uploaded by Joe Mabel - nominated by en:Jmabel | talk
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support BTW, I think this looks considerably better larger than this. --en:Jmabel | talk 03:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low quality Lycaon 16:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very noisy Tbc 18:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very noisy --Luc Viatour 19:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - where's that {oppose sunset} template, I want to make an {oppose city-by-streetlight} template - MPF 00:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose where's the quality? --Broc 19:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral aperture time over 2 seconds, I think this is volunteer artistic effect which I like, but not featured.  Pabix  15:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Hi-tacks 16:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Voting ended on 03:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid

Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 21:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Cypraea-Radiogram'01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Cypraea-Radiogram'01.jpg

  • Unfortunately, long side=800 pixels is the best I can do. :-( --Doruk Salancı 18:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose interesting image, though far to low resolution. Lycaon 16:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Low res. Try to rescan it with a more powerful scanner allowing a higher resolution. Freedom to share 16:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'd love to see this picture on real B&W paper, with its graphic aspect, but I don't think a low-res version on a computer screen destroys all the magic... CyrilB 20:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)