Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2005
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
[edit] Image:WaterLily-BlackPrincess.JPG, not featured
- self-nomination --Yongxinge 08:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Greudin
Oppose Very nice, but low resolution. --Mateusza 12:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)- Support--Shizhao 03:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice, low resolution. David.Monniaux 06:36, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Low resolution Yann 13:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Peregrine981 08:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
Oppose too low resolution --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)Uploaded the origin version of photo. --Yongxinge 03:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
Support now it's better! thanks! --Mateusza 22:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC)Support :-) --Malene Thyssen 06:48, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 3 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MontreGousset001.jpg, Not featured
Nominate and Support --ZA 17 May 2005Oppose shadow norro 13:01, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Oppose (shadow/resolution) --Avatar 16:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Support - Nice -- Fabien1309 22:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)Oppose WεFt 15:45, 21 May 2005 (UTC)Support --Malene Thyssen 19:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)Oppose - nice watch, but photo not optimal (resolution, contrast) - Rex 00:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Already was featured on 2005-05-25 Helix84 01:10, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- I think you're getting confused between featured pictures and picture of the day -- Joolz 07:45, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oh... so it seems. correct me please. Helix84 11:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support. I'd like to have a wallpaper like this but always showing the real time...Pabix &; 12:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 4 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Iris germanica 001.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support -- Za 11:25, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 16:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose too dark; can't really identify the shape of the object norro 18:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose bad perspective --Yongxinge 02:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose dark, bad perspective; can't really see shape David.Monniaux 06:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too dark -- Fabien1309 22:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - way out of focus - Arpingstone 09:03, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 Support, 7 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Iris germanica 002.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support -- Za 11:27, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 16:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose too dark; bad perspective norro 18:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose bad perspective --Yongxinge 02:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose David.Monniaux 06:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Bad view (angle) --Fabien1309 22:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
-
- angle at purpose to see the inside part of the Iris -- Za 25 May 2005
- Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - focus is poor - Arpingstone 09:03, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 Support, 7 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:13, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Beihai-flower.JPG, not featured
- Nominate and Support --Shizhao 14:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Yongxinge 14:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 16:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - Nice but not FP for me -- Fabien1309 22:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 19:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - composition not optimal - Rex 00:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 Support, 3 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Tomato je.jpg, featured
- Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 18:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 21:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Pensiero 00:37, 18 May 2005 (CEST)
- Support Yongxinge 02:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support David.Monniaux 06:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support but I wouldn't eat those ones, I think they don't taste.Pabix &; 05:55, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support very cute --Ananda 15:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Aoineko
- Support --Malene Thyssen 19:51, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Atamari 23:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 11 Support, 0 Oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Plasma-lamp.jpg, featured
- Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support norro 17:13, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 21:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Perfect! Pensiero 00:37, 18 May 2005 (CEST)
- Support. James F. (talk) 22:50, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Yongxinge 02:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Yann 13:08, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Support. Note that I cropped the black border down just now. Dbenbenn 22:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Why did you do that? There were only supports for the original version. norro 23:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- I was being bold. Do you think one should refrain from improving a picture when it is a featured picture candidate? How about once it becomes a featured picture? Dbenbenn 13:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- I strongly prefer the original version (which I voted for). --Avatar 00:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- I think, it's better to upload a second version, if the picture is a candidate. Improving is always a matter of taste. Kind regards, norro 09:42, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- I reverted the cropping. Yann 11:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Do you think the use in w:Plasma lamp was improved by having a wide black border? Oh well; I uploaded the cropped version as Image:Plasma-lamp 2.jpg Dbenbenn 15:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think, that's the better way. Kind regards, norro 16:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Do you think the use in w:Plasma lamp was improved by having a wide black border? Oh well; I uploaded the cropped version as Image:Plasma-lamp 2.jpg Dbenbenn 15:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- I reverted the cropping. Yann 11:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- I was being bold. Do you think one should refrain from improving a picture when it is a featured picture candidate? How about once it becomes a featured picture? Dbenbenn 13:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Pabix &; 05:56, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 19:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 9 Support, 0 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 04:16, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Kaloe.jpg, featured
- Nominate and Support Peregrine981
- Oppose LoopZilla 22:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose--Shizhao 19:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Resolution is too low, and the author put his name in the lower right corner. Dbenbenn 21:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)Oppose -- Nice but the name at the bottom-right is annoying ...Support for the new one -- Fabien1309 12:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)- Support Cool, the signature can be ignored --Yongxinge 01:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. I would support with a better resolution,Support, it's really nice -- FoeNyx 10:46, 19 May 2005 (UTC)- After request from FoeNyx I have uploadet a new version of this photo with better resolution and without the signature. (Be the way - author is female ;-) Regards Malene Thyssen 19:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour 07:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Mateusza 08:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Aoineko
- Support. villy ♦ ✎ 18:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support (my own photo :-) --Malene Thyssen 19:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 Support, 2 Oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Stadtbahn Nancy.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 22:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Quasipalm 02:59, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose It's okay, but not featured--Jcornelius 08:37, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose not bad but nothing special David.Monniaux 05:07, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose--Urban 06:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 Support, 6 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Vadso Norwegen Februar 2004.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 22:28, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Tbc 23:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose not as good as some other sunsets that are FP 1 2 3 4 --Quasipalm 02:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose--Shizhao 07:06, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Always had a thing for snow. James F. (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support. villy ♦ ✎ 18:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 11:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - not my favorite composition - Rex 00:45, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Countryandcitydaegu.jpg, featured
- Nominate and Support LoopZilla 16:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support I'm a sucker for panoramas :-P --Quasipalm 03:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. The background is smoky. villy ♦ ✎ 18:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 19:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too much contrast between foreground and background (like Villy)Pabix &; 10:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
Support norro 12:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)- Support --Avatar 11:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 13:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- ADSR6581 17:22, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose => featured norro 10:40, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Lady of the Lightbulbs.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support -- Quistnix 19:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Mateusza 08:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Yann 11:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 19:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose.--Shizhao 08:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 11:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - should be cropped a little bit - Rex 00:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Cropped or uncropped, I like the lady --wpopp 10:08, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atamari 23:30, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -Didactohedron 19:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 13:59, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose => not featured (result by norro, corrected by: Joolz 22:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC))
[edit] Image:Lens_Nikkor_50mm.jpg, featured
- Nominate norro 12:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support norro 12:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)
- Pro --Malene Thyssen 19:44, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro --Heidas 19:46, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro --David.Monniaux 05:49, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro -- Luc Viatour 06:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro --Shizhao 08:07, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro James F. (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Pro --Avatar 11:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - good - Rex 00:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- +. --Hautala 17:04, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Fabien1309 23:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Atamari 23:31, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Kyllä --Janne Karaste 18:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Suport. Good picture. Good lens, too. --MarkSweep 08:29, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 10:23, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Empirestate.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support LoopZilla 08:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Malene Thyssen 09:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 07:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 11:30, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:49, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Urban 06:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, cluttered with ships, don't like the bridge --Janne Karaste 18:39, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose --Quasipalm 16:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)- -. --Hautala 14:00, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atamari 21:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 10:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rooster04.jpg, (newer version) featured
- Support. Self Nom --fir0002 08:46, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. There is something blurry in front of the roosters eye. If you can remove that I'll support.- Support norro 09:30, 23 May 2005 (UTC) (please don't modify my vote)
- Support LoopZilla 12:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose.--Shizhao 07:42, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 11:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Agree with Malene. Basic flaw takes away from otherwise great picture. Peregrine981 03:05, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - I also agree - Rex 00:50, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose => not featured norro 18:42, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I have removed the blur as best I could:
- Naturally, I Support this version. Should I submit it at the bottom of the page? -Didactohedron 23:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- I Support the new version - a great picture :-) --Malene Thyssen 09:23, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support norro 15:48, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Congratulations on the new image, you did a great job. I had a shot but I couldn't get the detail in the face to stay - maybe I was using too soft a brush. --fir0002 22:13, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:33, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support Peregrine981 11:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Quasipalm 16:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:42, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Westminster_from_London_Eye_night.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support LoopZilla 07:40, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 08:39, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 11:30, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Yann 11:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- tak (yes) - tsca ✉ 15:13, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Luc Viatour 10:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support James F. (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - but what a pity you didn't pull the tower of Big Ben upright, it only takes a few seconds in Photoshop - Arpingstone 09:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Quasipalm 16:01, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. You can't see the time on Big Ben. --Hautala 14:02, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- - -- Too much colour noise for my liking ADSR6581 07:24, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 18:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Vagur, Faroe Islands, in the winter, sunlight on slope.JPG, not featured
- Nominate Peregrine981 14:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Peregrine981 14:29, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Mateusza 22:47, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose resolution --Avatar 05:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 07:00, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Quasipalm 23:02, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:52, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Why should every featured picture have a wallpaper minimum size ?Pabix &; 12:33, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- "Wallpaper size" - Where is it defined? Hm, I reduced the photo, when I got it. A mistake? Try to find the original one between all that 1000's of photos here. For me, it was "Wiki size" after all experiences in the real thing :-( Arne List 15:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose norro 11:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose The pole in the middle is disturbing. Yann 10:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 14:04, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 18:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ArcticFoxSummer.jpg, featured
- Selfnomination Andreas Tille 20:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- I just adjusted the darkness in the direction suggested by Quasipalm. My version is not as bright as the suggestion and I also did not cropped the image because I wanted to leave some space to look at for the fox. Please tell me whether you like this change or if I should change more in the "Quasipalm"-direction. Andreas Tille 20:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- One more change: On a secon thought I agree with Quasipalm about the cropping. I now cropped the original PNG at the exact same place as Quasipalm and left my imporeesion of the lightning (it was a cloudy day and thus I regard this version as realistic). Please update your browser cache. Andreas Tille 13:55, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- tak (yes) / tsca ✉ 21:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- support, but fox is too dark --Mateusza 22:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 05:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Malene Thyssen 06:59, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
Oppose good, but too dark for me --Quasipalm 22:37, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
-
- I support this updated image. --Quasipalm 19:26, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Peregrine981 07:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ArcticFoxSummer Adjusted.jpg, not featured
I edited the levels and framing a little bit. I support this version:
Support --Quasipalm 22:44, 25 May 2005 (UTC)- Thanks for your engagement. I'm sitting now behind my laptop which has a more flat display and I see what you mean. The colors seemed natural to me on my CRT desktop screen. I think I should try to adjust the colors from the original PNG file to reduce compression loss. I'll do this today evening. Andreas Tille 09:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- The CRT can not handle fine vertical lines like the hairs on the fox. Try this test image on your monitors.
- Thanks for your engagement. I'm sitting now behind my laptop which has a more flat display and I see what you mean. The colors seemed natural to me on my CRT desktop screen. I think I should try to adjust the colors from the original PNG file to reduce compression loss. I'll do this today evening. Andreas Tille 09:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
AlbertCahalan 00:46, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I'm moving my support back to the first image -- now updated. I used auto-levels in PS for this one, and now I believe that the contrast was too high. I hope other voters can take in to account that the first image was updated and they should move their vote their if they wish. --Quasipalm 19:38, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Support James F. (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Helix84 13:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Chun-hian 16:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 15:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose norro 18:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose => not featured norro 18:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sunset_-_Ponzalla,_Italia_-_2004.jpg, not featured
- Self-Nomination and Support -- Joolz 00:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 06:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Rex 23:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- oppose - beautiful sunset but too banal for an encyclopaedia Luc Viatour 20:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, this is not an enzyclopaedia. These are the commons norro
- Support - Very nice sunset -- Fabien1309 23:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support. James F. (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose How many sunsets do we want to make featured? The foto is good but not brilliant as it would have to be to become a featured sunset image. Andreas Tille 05:58, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- We have 3 at the moment -- Joolz 23:32, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, agree with Andreas Tille. --Janne Karaste 18:43, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Quasipalm 16:02, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 14:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured
[edit] Image:Ambersweet oranges.jpg, featured
- Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 20:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Rex 23:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support norro 15:00, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Good colors and composition -- Fabien1309 23:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Joolz 11:11, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Get_It • 22:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Atamari 23:34, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Chun-hian 16:59, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Janne Karaste 18:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- +. --Hautala 12:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral - Don't feel anything special-- Deep750 13:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral >= featured norro 18:55, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:FrigateBird nuke.pg.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support ... for historical content as much as composition; i think a historical section of FPs would be great --Quasipalm 20:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 23:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - But if we're talking about historical sections, a date would be appreciated. --wpopp 10:12, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- I added more info on the page. "May 1962. Even now, the Frigate Bird test remains the only end-to-end system test of a strategic nuclear missile – from launch to detonation – ever carried out by either side during the Cold War." --71.35.103.4 18:24, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- LoopZilla 21:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support -- Get_It • 22:28, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Urban 06:06, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral --Avatar 12:49, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 12:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Urban 18:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Green parrot feather.jpg, not featured
- Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 20:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
Neutral - Rex 23:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)- Oppose not sharp norro 11:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Contre the lower part (fluffy stuff near stem) is not sharp, or is it me? David.Monniaux 06:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- +. --Hautala 12:50, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- - white part is out of focus --Smartneddy 06:50, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:21, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Monumentvalley.jpg, featured
Info: created by Moritz Zimmermann - uploaded by Moritz Zimmermann - nominated by Caaz 19:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)]]- Support --Caaz 19:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Luc Viatour 19:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- It would still be necessary to improve superposition assembly
- Support --> Snowwayout 20:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support —Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Support --Golbez 05:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)- Support nice -- Gorgo 12:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Pour. El Comandante
Hasta ∞ 18:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC) - Support -Quasipalm 21:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment I nominated this image about a year ago this month. If you'd like to see the comments on why it didn't make it, look here. -Quasipalm 21:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Interesting, I voted differently this time, I less better looked at! --Luc Viatour 04:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Ggonnell 10:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --FoeNyx 13:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Overlord 14:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Urban 15:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- A favor --New Painter 15:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --DTA 15:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -Artist 16:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support City Slicker 16:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Quickstep 18:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support if this aint FP then nothing could be --Go West 19:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -nice... but where is John Wayne? --DiTaeg 09:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --- gildemax 21:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Concordo Perfect. --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Uwe Hermann 16:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Ceridwen 00:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral - nice when downscaled, less in full res. Stitching problems, looks artificially sharpened by a „cheap sharpen filter“ --Wikimol 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Voting ended on 19:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid
Result: 22
[edit] Image:Lorenz system r28 s10 b2-6666.png, not featured
- Nominate and Support a nice one for the Science category of FP, imo --Quasipalm 20:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Rex 23:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Luc Viatour 05:28, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - LoopZilla 09:05, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Marshaü 09:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think, that's the most excellent way to illustrate this. But i like it norro 11:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:47, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose--Shizhao 15:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Andreas Tille 08:34, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atamari 16:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 10:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Araneus diadematus (aka).jpg, featured
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg)
- Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 10:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Luc Viatour 20:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:47, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Yann 10:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Shizhao 15:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:22, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- + / tsca ✉ 12:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- +. --Hautala 16:26, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- +. --Deep750 13:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured James F. (talk) 11:24, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Contrail with jet (aka).jpg, not featured
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg)
- Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 10:52, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose not sharp norro 11:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Peregrine981 02:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:23, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 10:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Uno-karten.jpg, not featured
- Nominate, no vote Pabix &; 20:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose bad light, bad composition norro 23:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Contre bad angle David.Monniaux 06:38, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:23, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose, agree with norro. --Janne Karaste 18:47, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 10:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Atamari 21:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Helsingborg_port.jpg, not featured
- Nominate, no vote Michal.pise 21:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Quasipalm 00:32, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Peregrine981 02:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Avatar 12:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Rex 00:24, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose --Janne Karaste 18:48, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- -. --Hautala 16:26, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured James F. (talk) 11:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jakarta old football.jpg, not featured
- Info: created by Jonathan McIntosh - uploaded by Jonathan McIntosh - nominated by AngMoKio --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This picture was nominated in 2005 by norro but didn't get promoted. I really can't understand why - that's why i try it again now. This picture says more than thousand words. Great composition and quality. In my opinion it is really about time to get it into the FPs. --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio 21:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose If it were more crisp, I'd be OK with the cut off head, but as it is it's more distracting. Also, I don't like the way the sun is falling on his face. Dori - Talk 02:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose it is too cropped for my taste Tbc 16:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with the previous opposers. /Daniel78 23:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate crop, overexpose sky. Lycaon 04:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Agree with AngMoKio. I think the crop is very appropriate here and does focus our attention to the ball. Benh 06:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- I also agree with you :) A cropped upper part of a head is nothing unusual...a often used composition element. Normally I don't like centered main objects but here it really fits. It somehow represents to me "Look! This is how it is here." --AngMoKio 20:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support The theme is captured in an impressive way, while not being depicted as a cliché. I don't mind the cropped head, the focus is on the ball. --Tsui 19:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- The ball is cropped too. Tbc 14:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)