Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2006

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.


Contents

Image:Kanakwomen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Kanak women in "mission dresses", New Caledonia

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bananaflo - uploaded by Petaholmes - nominated by nico@nc 06:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --nico@nc 06:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - the costumes are distinct, but the shopping mall / railway station background isn't, and spoils the pic - MPF 13:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Noumea domestic airport (no railways in New Caledonia)nico@nc 07:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 13:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Huebi 08:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Sebastianm 09:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Dti 16:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition --Luc Viatour 06:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bananaflo 23:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured. --nico@nc 02:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

image:Anna Stępniewska2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Anna Stępniewska - young polish jazz singer

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Made, uploaded and nominated by WarX 06:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --WarX 06:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special with an ugly background --Huebi 08:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 11:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 14:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC) - generally I like the picture, I find the subject very, very pretty, but I believe this is not the kind of picture which should be featured.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not especiallySebastianm 14:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not even remotely pretty MPF 15:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- a) what Huebi said, b) her left eye is red and c) I also agree with MPF -- Boereck 18:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose what is the point? --Tarawneh 15:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nice picture, but nothing for featured pictures candidates --- gildemax 12:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice mood, but far from FP quality as a whole. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DO NOT WANT Notwist 08:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Neat composition...luv the noisy background. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 12 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gateway Arch edit1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Gateway Arch reflected in pond

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Moof 06:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I know this picture has its faults, particularly the blur. I was wondering if anyone could improve upon it, or if the composition merits featured status alone. Thanks!  :) --Moof 06:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good photo of architecture. Sebastianm 14:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - the thing isn't going to go away, it should be easy to retake a sharper image on a better day - MPF 15:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good picture, Low res, blur-- Luc Viatour 16:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Shame about the blur, it would have been a good picture. —Pixel8 17:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- sorry, I need to strongly agree with the above: it is wiggly like a ride over cobblestone pavement. but the motive is well chosen! -- Boereck 18:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposesame as Boereck , --Tarawneh 15:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nice try, though. Look forward to seeing a better version of this on FPC soon. Howcheng 16:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like it. pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 7 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ponte San Michele.jpg, not featured[edit]

Ponte San Michele upon Retrone, in Vicenza

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Loox - uploaded by Loox - nominated by --Felyx 13:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Felyx 13:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 14:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC) - it should be taken daytime. No reason for nightshot.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad white balance in my opinion.Sebastianm 14:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- dramatic effect with the night shot, but to many significant dark areas Gnangarra 15:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I don't normally like night-time pics of buildings, but this one is very attractive - MPF 16:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour 16:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Why wasn't this shot with a long exposure? The noise is overwhelming at 100% —Pixel8 17:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Agree with pixal8. Snowwayout 07:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too dark , needs more exposure --Tarawneh 15:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although it is noisy. Colours and ammount of dark areas are great, IMO. Possibly, the color noise in the sky could be reduced by some clever noice reduction tools--Wikimol 10:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too dark --- gildemax 12:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- too noisy. Howcheng 16:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca @ 19:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 'Pertsa 15:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo 20:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 8 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:RedTulip.JPG, not featured[edit]

Tulip, taken in Beijing Yat-sen Park

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Me --Yongxinge 05:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like this technique and focusing being unequal.   Pabix  06:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Photography is of a high standard, but the subject in uninspiring. Snowwayout 07:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Shizhao 12:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose old idea, nothing new --Tarawneh 15:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- its nice but with the number of tulip photos taken, to obtain FP status it requires something really special Gnangarra 10:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Its nice in colour and composition, and even if there had been many smilar pictures, every picture should be valued by itself and not in comparison to others
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

image:Justin Gatlin cropped.JPG, not featured[edit]

Justin Gatlin in Helsinki, 07 08 2005, 10th IAAF World Championships in Athletics, after he won 100 Metres

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Teveten, modified byDake - uploaded by Teveten - nominated by Teveten 09:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Teveten 09:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition Rama 10:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Camera (?) on the left, microphone(?) on the right, feet cut off. --Huebi 11:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Shizhao 12:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 15:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Huebi - MPF 10:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Museum für Ostasiatische Kunst Dahlem Berlin Mai 2006 007.jpg, not featured[edit]

Short description Museum für Ostasiatische Kunst Dahlem Berlin Mai 2006 008.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gryffindor - uploaded by Gryffindor - nominated by Gryffindor 14:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Can't decide which one is better, therefore posting alternate picture of same statue as well, maybe that one is better (or not?)--Gryffindor 14:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Image on Left, not featured[edit]

Result: 0 votes => not featured Mglanznig 10:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image on Right, not featured[edit]

Result: 0 votes => not featured Mglanznig 10:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Both Images, not featured[edit]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose both too dark --Tarawneh 15:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I was not allowed to use any flash in the museum. Gryffindor 15:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - lighting, noise/artifacts @ full res. If the museum restrictions prevents taking quality photographs, unfortunately not much can be done about it. --Wikimol 10:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too much noise Gnangarra 11:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose both too dark --- gildemax 12:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I think the points above could be addressed. --Miljoshi 09:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose both too dark --Tarawneh 15:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Grand Palais Paris Mai 2006 002.jpg, not featured[edit]

Quadriga on top of the Grand Palais in Paris Grand Palais Paris Mai 2006 003.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gryffindor - uploaded by Gryffindor - nominated by Gryffindor 15:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nominate another version as well, don't know which one users would prefer? --Gryffindor 15:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would like to see it more from the front and without the cropped building norro 17:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
The building was undergoing renovation work and was all covered up, trust me you don't want to see that part. Check the category for further images of the quadriga, maybe you'll see something that you like better? Gryffindor 15:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Image on left, not featured[edit]

Result: 0 votes => not featured Mglanznig 10:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image on Right, not featured[edit]

Result: 0 votes => not featured Mglanznig 10:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Both Images, not featured[edit]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- To dark Gnangarra 10:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Shizhao 12:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - images are too dark --- gildemax 12:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Both too dark --Tarawneh 15:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- ditto. Howcheng 16:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Portrait of the Xiaosheng Empress Dowager.jpg, not featured[edit]

The Xiasheng Empress Dowager official portrait on her 60th birthday

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by anonymous - uploaded by Gryffindor - nominated by Gryffindor 15:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gryffindor 15:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour 08:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Can't see anything special about it --Pumbaa 12:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Pumbaa. We shouldn't feature every nice image just because it's nice. It should be special somehow norro 16:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    Is the featured picture candidate voting only for "special" images? Gryffindor 17:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    No, sorry. I didn't ment it like that. Every candidate is welcome. I just wanted to say, that candidates should stand out in some way to get my support. norro 23:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Miljoshi 09:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose} -- It's a nice portrait, but nothing stunning. It might just by the Chinese style, but she looks too much like a statue. Howcheng 16:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Too much like a statue? What do you want her to do, dance a jig? I don't understand this voting system, how does a grainy b&w photograph like Image:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg get votes, but this image not, how is this voting system based? Gryffindor 09:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
What I meant by that was that the painting doesn't seem to capture the personality of the empress dowager. She's just sitting there, looking straight ahead at the artist with a blank look on her face. I don't know if that happens to be characteristic of paintings of Chinese monarchs or what, but it just doesn't grab me. (You'll also note that I opposed the Stalin-Lenin picture too). Howcheng 22:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Lemon_ho
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Olegivvit 16:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Rex 22:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Amenbo_06b6787v.jpg, not featured[edit]

"Amenbo" (Gerris) birth in city park again and again.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cory 16:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cory 16:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose disturbing stuff in the water next to the water spider, low res -- Gorgo 18:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
    • There is no spider Roger McLassus 10:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Pond-skater is the name you want. Probably two different species in the photo, not adult and young as suggested - MPF
        • Thank you for comment. Sorry, I have no knowledge to identify about species positively. I entitled by an impression. But, these are not spider dropped on water, these are a kind of Water strider (called "Amenbo" in Japanese) that is a kind of an insect, walking on water by six legs is unique. And these are on a breeding season in Japan. --Cory
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral is it taken from under the water? :o pretty amazing! pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
    • No, floating on the water - MPF
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Low res -- Luc Viatour 08:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - a valuable pic for encyclopaedia use, but not really featurable quality - MPF 10:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 11:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I realize this might be difficult, but a horizontal shot would be a lot better. Howcheng 16:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Todoroki_yurikamome_karugamo_06x0026s.jpg, not featured[edit]

Karugamo (Anas poecilorhyncha) and Yuri-Kamome (Larus ridibundus) in city park without a coastline.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cory 16:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cory 16:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition, background, colors basically only grey, res -- Gorgo 18:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sussie 20:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special -- Luc Viatour 08:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 11:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tbc 20:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not a very interesting picture. Howcheng 16:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nico@nc 08:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:KujiBairin_Mejiro_06p2835hs.jpg, not featured[edit]

Mejiro (Zosterops japonica) loves nectar of Ume (Prunus mume), expect for spring!

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cory 16:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cory 16:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition (only backside of bird), extremely low res -- Gorgo 18:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Composition, Res. Snowwayout 20:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition -- Luc Viatour 08:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - only backside of bird --- gildemax 11:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Howcheng 16:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nico@nc 08:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 10:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kujibairin_mejiro_06p2689sv.jpg, not featured[edit]

Mejiro (Zosterops japonica) with Ume (Prunus mume), welcome to Japanese spring!

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cory 16:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cory 16:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res -- Gorgo 18:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Gorgo Sussie 18:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Res. Composition. Snowwayout 20:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support that is perfect! pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support excellent - MPF 10:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- the branch across the bird is too distracting Gnangarra 10:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 11:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Pumbaa 12:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tbc 20:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- this has a lot of potential, but the composition is lacking. Howcheng 16:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --che 15:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Rex 16:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- nico@nc 08:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 06:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 21:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 10:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Boelge stor.jpg, featured[edit]

Wave in the wake after a small ferry, Fanø, Denmark

Result: 22 support, 1 oppose => featured Mglanznig 10:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:746px-Hip replacement Image 3684-PH.jpg, featured[edit]

the patient’s right hip (on the left in the photograph) has been replaced, with the “ball” of this ball-and-socket joint replaced by a metal head that is set in the thighbone or femur and the socket replaced by a white plastic cup

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Infothe patient’s right hip (on the left in the photograph) has been replaced, with the “ball” of this ball-and-socket joint replaced by a metal head that is set in the thighbone or femur and the socket replaced by a white plastic cup Photographer: Unknown - uploaded by Teveten Hi resolution picture http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2f/Hip_replacement_Image_3684-PH.jpg also available - nominated by Teveten 10:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Teveten 10:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 11:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Tarawneh 22:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-- Luc Viatour 04:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Miljoshi 08:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I would support this on Wikipedia for its encyclopedic value, but not on Commons. Howcheng 16:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1. It's a low res-version of a >20 Megapixel photograph 2. There is no image description 3. I'm not sure, what is possible with X-ray today, but it's blurry and mottled. Perhaps a bad scan? norro 18:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
    What do you mean "There is no image description"?, see above. Hi definition picture is also available, see link above.--Teveten 07:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC) Ps. discription was missing on pictures page, sorry!
    I don't know any reason to feature a low res version of a high res picture. norro 09:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
    I uploaded the full-res version now -- Gorgo 17:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose doesn't seem like featured quality to me -- Gorgo 23:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ss181292 08:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Wikimol 10:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose => featured Mglanznig 12:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Victoria Memorial London April 2006 054.jpg, not featured[edit]

View of angel on Victorial Memorial in London Victoria Memorial London April 2006 049.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gryffindor - uploaded by Gryffindor - nominated by Gryffindor 10:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not sure which one users would prefer, adding another one as well. --Gryffindor 10:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Image on left, not featured[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Shizhao 11:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support => not featured Mglanznig 12:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image on right, not featured[edit]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ----Shizhao 11:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Result: 1 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 12:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Both Images, not featured[edit]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Gnangarra 10:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- In both images, you have blown-out highlights. The left image needs a greater depth of focus as the bottom is out of focus. The statue is also too dark in the right. Howcheng 16:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Fodder 00:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 12:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Victoria Memorial London April 2006 063.jpg, not featured[edit]

Victoria Memorial in London

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gryffindor - uploaded by Gryffindor - nominated by Gryffindor 10:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I personally find it spectacular, but would like to hear what others think. --Gryffindor 10:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Compostion / POV strong enough to over come softness and resolution Gnangarra 10:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 11:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dark Object--Tarawneh 15:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Good composition and I like the halo effect but the drawback to it is that the subject becomes too dark. You need fill-in flash or some reflectors to brighten up the statue. Howcheng 16:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --/\/\π 09:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 12:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:XN Nomada sp.jpg, not featured[edit]

Nomada sp. feeding on crataegus

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:XN - uploaded by User:XN - nominated by XN 20:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 20:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background is too bright for me --che 12:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Subject not entirely in focus. Howcheng 16:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 19:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 03:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --there are already a better insect pics (just not compareable)Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Background messy & too bright. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 13:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lego CAD Racecar.JPG, not featured[edit]

Lego CAD Racecar

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Reuvenk - uploaded by Reuvenk - nominated by Reuvenk 03:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Reuvenk 03:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wikimol 06:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 09:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC) -- nice rendering, but I don't see the point in featuring this kind of pictures. If it was a photograph, I would support it, but it is just a rendering. LEGO parts are not very difficult to model in computer program, model is not very complicated, light effects are not outstanding, surfaces are very simple and wheels are much below FP standards.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose see Ss181292 comments. The modeling is not that difficult, if You have 3dmax or other software. OK it take 40 to 90 minutes, but still nothing special --Tarawneh 15:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Howcheng 16:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 19:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Seems like it is only 256 colors. --Keeleysam 03:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 13:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Saint-Hippolyte_2006-8.JPG, not featured[edit]

impressions of Saint-Hippolyte (Haut-Rhin), Alsace, France

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info impressions of Saint-Hippolyte (Haut-Rhin), Alsace, France

created by gildemax - uploaded by gildemax - nominated by gildemax 22:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --gildemax 22:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Colors, Bad composition --Luc Viatour 06:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose-- Lower section out of focus --Tarawneh 09:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose looks like the buildings are falling --che 15:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment You can rotate the photo and adjust the perspective. Fg2 00:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose hopefully the houses will not not glide outside the picture --Huebi
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support God, you people are harsh. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 13:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Narzissen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Daffodils in Spring just before full bloom

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Deelkar (talk) - uploaded by Deelkar (talk) - nominated by Deelkar (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Deelkar (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Luc Viatour 06:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Tbc 15:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose fine picture, but the composition is not that great and the highlights are burned out in the red and especially in the green channel --che 15:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 15:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC) - nothing outstanding
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 13:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Scandinavia.TMO2003050.jpg, featured[edit]

Scandinavia in winter

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info source: NASA - taken feb 19. 2003 - nominated by Minto 02:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -I can almost see my own house, incredible ;) - Minto 02:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Definitely --XN 08:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 09:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Image a little small, but well... ;) Rama 12:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice, but there is quite a lot of nice satellite images --che 15:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support !!Sebastianm 16:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 18:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Agree with Che. The frontier lines spoil the picture because they aren't thick enough to be seen in the global view. El Comandante 20:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- AlMare 11:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 17:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Olegivvit 17:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nico@nc 08:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah, very nice. 'Pertsa 15:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It (Talk) 00:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, who says those billion-dollar satellites don't pay dividends? --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral => featured Mglanznig 13:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:NikkoCaparisonedHorse5423.jpg, not featured[edit]

Horse in Japan

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Horse in caparison at spring festival Procession of a Thousand Warriors of Toshogu in Nikko, Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. - nominated by Minto 01:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Minto 01:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- not sharp -- YolanC 14:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
    • maybe You should visit an eyespecialist it is sharp. --Feodora 18:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 18:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very pensive. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's very sharp, but I don't quite get what I'm looking at. --che 23:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice -- nico@nc 07:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral the idea was very good...but i think there is a lack in the composition. This orange thing hanging down should have been completly on the pic...maybe the impression would be better --AngMoKio 09:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 13:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Munich_subway_GBR.jpg, not featured[edit]

Munich subway station

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring - uploaded by FloSch - nominated by Minto 01:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Minto 01:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- not outstanding (IMO) -- YolanC 14:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 15:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 18:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 18:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 23:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 05:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like the 4:3 aspect ratio of this picture Barcex 23:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK YolanC norro 16:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support MartinD 08:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ordinary. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 13:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:NMMP dolphin with locator.jpeg, featured[edit]

Military bottlenose dolphin

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by the US Navy - uploaded by Johantheghost - nominated by — Omegatron 02:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportOmegatron 02:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice, we see the dolphin and his master ? -- YolanC 14:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 18:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 18:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support woow! Sebastianm 19:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose low res. --Tarawneh 23:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition not to good (guy cropped and dolphin needs a bit more of space at the top and right) + not that interesting subject norro 09:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 05:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to norro - MPF 17:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice photo! Kjetil_r 11:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thermos 14:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- ack norro, dolphin needs more space --che 23:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the subject is interesting but other than that, I agree with Norro's points. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 23:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ziga 22:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose => featured Mglanznig 13:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pelicans in flight.jpg, aborted[edit]

Pelicans in flight, Ensenada, Mexico

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tomas Castelazo - uploaded by Tomas Castelazo - nominated by Tomascastelazo 22:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo 22:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 23:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the animals are underexposed --Artefacto 02:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 06:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC) -- nothing special
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 11:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this picture is for no commercial use only, should change license or be deleted!! Barcex 11:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 12:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose license is not commons compliant. mus be deleted with this license tag. --Huebi 12:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 13:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 15:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
candidature aborted due to licensing problems. Clear licensing is one of the essential requirements for featured picture candidates. norro 16:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mime in guanajuato.jpg, aborted[edit]

Street mime and lady at the City of Guanajuato, Mexico

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tomas Castelazo - uploaded by Tomas Castelazo - nominated by Tomascastelazo 21:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo 21:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - nothing special - MPF 23:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Artefacto 02:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 06:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC) -- tourist photo, nothing special, ugly composition
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 09:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose see mpf --Huebi 12:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose noncommercial license Barcex 12:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose --- gildemax 13:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
candidature aborted due to licensing problems. Clear licensing is one of the essential requirements for featured picture candidates. norro 16:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Crocodylus acutus mexico 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Short description

Sorry, you should try Commons:Quality images candidates first! --Beyond silence 22.5px 19:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Indeed, beyond silence... way beyond... beyond beyond... must be very dark in there... :o)--Tomascastelazo 19:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am intrigued by the interference pattern of all the circular small water waves. Is this a wild-life shot? I suggest you add geodata to the photo. The photo is not thaat sharp, and all this water gives a subjective feeling of blurriness leaving the impression of a slightly messy composition. I cannot make up my mind on what to vote on it though. I would like to give an additional comment. I do not like sarcastic comments and personal attacks rearding other reviewers evaluations as above. There seems to an uprising of harsh sarcastic comments like that, which are not in the spirit of the guidelines stating that you should always be polite. I too do not always agree with other reviewers opinions and often shake my head. However, I propose either to ignore reviews you cannot approve of or give a more balanced reply. In the end single wrong evaluations does not normally influence the end result as normally quite a lot of users vote on FPC, which averages out anomalies. The rules state that any Commons user is entitled to vote on and have an opinion on the photos here. It is not stated that you should have qualified as a reviewer somehow. -- Slaunger 20:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
You get out what you put in, just my opinion. No robots here. --Richard Bartz 20:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Slaunger, It is a wildlife shot, hanging from a manglar, low light conditions. Sharpness? Well, that is an academic point… The picture was taken at 60th of a second, so there is motion blurr, and the subject itself was moving. The skin color and texture do mimic the environment, a good predator camouflage. Distance? 10 feet? Maybe less. But of course, the technical difficulties and the danger inherent in this type of situation in no way match the mortal danger incurred in close up lady bug photography. Next time I will take to the swamp lighting equipment, a make up artist, several crocs in order to take that “Feature Picture” with a 200 megapixel camera. Sarcasm? Yes. But what is sarcasm an answer from?--Tomascastelazo 21:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • BTW, the danger incurred is of course irrelevant: or you take the picture or you don't, and BTW you can make a 200 Mpix picture by stitching 40-odd 5Mpx (allow some overlap) snaps. Lycaon 21:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The circular patterns in the water are most probably produced by the croc vocalizing with infrasound underwater. Lycaon 21:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose if only for those patterns. But quality is really too low. Lycaon 21:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you for explaining the special circumstances. That is one of the reasons why I asked without coming to immediate conclusions first. I think the special circumstances overcompenstaes technical issues. Very nice. And no, I still do not approve of the sarcasm, I was just asking a question to learn more. -- Slaunger 21:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Slaunger: Sarcasm not directed at you and thanks for your vote!. Lycaon: Thanks! All: This is true for me: I am my own harshest critic, and when I critique someone else's work, I do it following well established photographing judging criteria. That it the least I owe to someone I critisize. Do I fall short? Probably, and due to my own ignorance. However, by acknowledging my own ignorance and shortcomings, and doing something about it, I lessen the damage bad judging can create.--Tomascastelazo 21:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think Lewis Carroll put it best: Calibas 22:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
How doth the little crocodile
Improve his shining tail,
And pour the waters of the Nile
On every golden scale!
How cheerfully he seems to grin
How neatly spreads his claws,
And welcomes little fishes in,
With gently smiling jaws!
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not so much on its technical merits - it is sharp enough and has sufficient light - but the subject is too much hidden in it's environment to generate an outstanding image, a wow factor. I understand that hiding is the predator's intend and yet as a photographer I have to have the patience and yes luck to find it in a situation where it stands out and presents itself in all its beauty (well here beauty is relative) to the viewer. Wwcsig 23:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose due to technical quality, and I hope people are not getting themselves in dangerous situations just to get FPs. Dori - Talk 17:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I said elsewhere that I was not going to be participating in these things, but this photograph is awesome! I know that the collection which is the Featured pictures is not necessarily mentioned in the guidelines but if you look at the collection; the photographs that are there and the photographs that are missing and judge photographs like you would how a teeter totter works where it is a total weight not just both sides being perfectly matched. As far as safety goes, the more crocodile photographs there are, the less of a need for them and that much more is understood about photographing them. I can see a day in the future when a photograph of a crocodile is not supported because the Featured pictures collection has 30 of them and 4 dead photographers as well. My support hopefully will move these photographers into a future like that. Thank you for not only giving this photograph to the commons collection but having the balls to show it here where the bug and flower people will try to hurt your feelings. -- carol 05:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This kind of so-called support vote is actually there to debase photographer who do an effort to sit still for hours trying to capture a high quality botanical or entomological picture. Sarcasm has become the rule in FP. It doesn't matter whether you make a picture of a fly in your garden with your 100€ digital camera or whether you are fortunate (as in having lots of money) enough to make that shot with your state-of-the-art camera on the top of the world. A good picture is a good picture. Every good syrphid picture gets my support, every bad Asian tsunami pic my oppose, and vice versa. If the only thing you are here for is to insinuate and spew sarcasm, it would be better if you stayed away. Criticize pictures not people, you can always start FPh (Featured Photographer) if you want to do that. I can very much appreciate critics (in al senses) from people who contribute and show they know what they are talking about but in your case it is as we say in Dutch "De beste stuurlui staan aan wal", Lycaon 06:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, sir or madam Lycaon, I love those Macro shots as well. I really do. Lord knows, they do not get the support they deserve around here and I will try to vote favorably for more of them. Thank you for correcting me. -- carol 07:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
By the way, do the Commons Photographers use a buddy system when getting photographs like this? I was wondering if there was a gallery of photographers being eaten by their subject yet or plans for one in the future? You know, things just happen and it would be nice to have a camera around when they do happen. -- carol 13:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh my, what happened there, Carol? Did a million neurons just zap instantaneously in your brain causing a spasm of arbitrary keyboard commands followed by a violent jerk unwillingly pressing you finger on the mouse button while having the pointer positioned over the Save page button? (This is not meant as sarcasm. This is meant as concern.)-- Slaunger 13:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Nope. And no offense is taken. I was imagining hanging from a tree getting photographs of a crocodile and thought it would be nice to have a photograph of this photographer taking that photograph -- regardless of the outcome. There was that bird photograph and Dori mentioned (or hinted) that the photographer had to be lying on his belly in the wet sand to get it. There is a joke somewhere within all of this about imagining imagery imaging but I can't make it work out correctly. I began all of this with the assumption that the photographer knew the equipment that was being used and was comfortable with it and was mostly safe the whole time.-- carol 14:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh, so that's what you meant? I got the impression from your previous comment that you suggesting feeding Commons photographers to wild animals while photographing it. I'm glad we settled that misundertsanding of mine. I think these thoughts about imagining imagery imaging (albeit interesting) are quite off-topic for the evaluation of this FPC though. -- Slaunger 14:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would love to support this. Could someone have a go at applying an unsharp mask, please? --MichaelMaggs 07:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
  • MichaelMaggs – I normally upload images that are mostly unprocessed, except perhaps histogram adjustments and minor color adjustments. The reason I do this is so if the image is used in print (or other media), it can be manipulated with freedom for any application, that is, from unsharp to sharp, from low to high contrast, to the measure required by the final output. Over processing may look a picture look nice on screen, but be usless for other applications. In fact, most of the time reduces the possibilities of the editor.
  • ALL: Well, I leave you all, and take my sarcasm away with me…. Have fun with the bees and the flowers!!! Love,

--Tomascastelazo 15:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - It is sharp enough all right, and if it has not enough wow factor, I don't know what has. Sometimes this evaluation process is a real farce. We accept very-very simple maps only because they are self-made, but very old and rare ones are rejected, because they are old...--Szilas 18:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
result: 5 supports, 4 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Cecil 22:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Salmonberry Blossom.jpg, not featured[edit]

Salmonberry flowe

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by en:User:David McMaste - nominated by — WεFt 18:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WεFt 18:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --- gildemax 18:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 23:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good picture but nothing exceptionnal or informative --Luc Viatour 16:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - very good, sharp pic showing both the flower and leaf very well - MPF 17:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

* Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 18:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Coenobita variabilis.jpg, not featured[edit]

land hermit crab

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Vanessa Pike-Russell - nominated by — WεFt 18:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WεFt 18:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 18:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Minto 23:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola emblem-favorite.svg, but Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Low res. --Tarawneh 23:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Low res --Luc Viatour 15:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Even if the resolution is "low" , this picture is excellent!!! Nuvola emblem-favorite.svg El Comandante 20:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - overexposed, particularly the background - MPF 17:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 18:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Astronotus ocellatus.jpg, featured[edit]

Freshwater fish from South America

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose => featured Mglanznig 18:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Pump-DSC 624111.jpg , not featured[edit]

Short description

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by SUZUKI Machiko - uploaded & nominated by Jnn 00:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
    same picture reframed
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jnn 00:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --- gildemax 11:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose why the hell is the main pbject so small? --Huebi 14:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose mystical??? --Luc Viatour 16:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral How about this reframing ? Teofilo 11:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 18:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:S205 Lynx-Heildelberg Zoo 2005.jpg, not featured[edit]

Lynx lynx, Zoo Heidelberg


  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Feodora 12:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The picture is taken in Heidelberg Zoo Germany, EOS 1000 F, Jan. 2005

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support what else... --Feodora 12:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colors are not so bright and ugly background --Huebi 14:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
The lynx is an animal which lives in a forest, so the background is typical! --Feodora 18:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
can You give a reason please --Feodora 18:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Colors,blur,not natural (zoo)--Luc Viatour 06:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 12:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC) -- distracting background
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - have to agree with Luc Viatour and Ss181292. Bad scanning artefact at right edge too. - MPF 17:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --- gildemax 21:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- reflection, bad scan, pale colours... sorry -- nico@nc 23:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Feodora, the lynx is an animal which indeed does live in forests. This one's from a zoo - like the title says. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 14:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGérard Janot 23:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 8 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 18:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dandelion sun.jpg, not featured[edit]

Dandelion and sun

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by avmaierfr - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by Fabien1309 15:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fabien1309 15:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- too bright -- YolanC 17:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I am very inclined to support but the composition is lacking. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 12:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC) -- some artistic value but wikimedia projects are not collections of art.
Why is that so and where does it say that? I haven't heard of a rule that requires pictures to be of a certain value/category/notion... correct me if I am wrong :-) -- Boereck 22:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Hm?? I just meant to point out that we already have collections of art...pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- I am not sure what to think. It is special and different on the one hand but a bit on the boring side on the other hand... so I went with the middle. -- Boereck 22:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes a commonplace thing seem quite uncommon. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 18:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sumway tunnel- copenhagen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Subway tunnel in Copenhagen.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Procsilas Moscas - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by Fabien1309 15:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fabien1309 15:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 16:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- not special (IMO) -- YolanC 17:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Pretty good, but I think we can find better. Colours are a bit grey and washed-out, boring. pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Minto 18:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 21:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 04:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nico@nc 07:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 18:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lion waiting in Nambia.jpg, featured[edit]

Lion waiting in Nambia

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by yaaaay - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by Fabien1309 15:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fabien1309 15:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 15:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rex 16:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice -- YolanC 17:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- El Comandante 20:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 05:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 17:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sebastianm 14:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose boring composition. I could imagine more interesting images of a lion norro 16:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- support, no doubt! :-) (even though the shadow under his tummy is a bit disturbing) -- Boereck 22:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Powerful image. Excellent expression. Fg2 01:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- whaow ! -- nico@nc 07:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support cool! 'Pertsa 15:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It (Talk) 00:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great --AngMoKio 09:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, excellent image. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - not a Commons original...source: Flickr. This is my opinion Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
    Hi. I think, this reason isn't fair. No image is a commons original in that every image is the work of its creator. The fact, if it was uploaded to flickr first or to the commons shouldn't take any effect on this candidature. We only vote if the candidates should be features as extra useful for wikimedia projects. norro 18:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 20:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 3 oppose => featured Mglanznig 18:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Seating - Seattle Public Library.jpg, not featured[edit]

Seattle Public Library.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jan Tik - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by Fabien1309 15:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fabien1309 15:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 16:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Dark and strange -- YolanC 17:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral the structure of the glassfront is cool but the front is disturbing --Feodora 18:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- The lower part of the picture is too confused, the shadows are too complex. El Comandante 20:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to El Comandante; it looks like there is a large puddle on the floor there, but it isn't clear - MPF 17:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 04:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 18:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Astylus atromaculatus elytra parted.jpg

Image:Flammulina velutipes.JPG, featured[edit]

Flammulina velutipes fungo invernale

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flammulina velutipes fungo invernale - created by Archenzo - nominated by Minto 17:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Minto 17:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice picture, rare to find that way --Feodora 18:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Clear, nice and informative. El Comandante 20:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- this is not bad! --Songloed 23:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 05:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ss181292 12:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - (though would like to know the identity of the tree it is growing on, too; it may be a Populus but I'm not certain on bark alone) - MPF 17:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

* Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 21:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- This image was selected picture of the day for December 15, 2004. In English, it was captioned "Flammulina velutipes". --gildemax 21:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • That's NOT an argument!!! El Comandante 20:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cut at the bottom and upper-right. Would like to see it slightly from the side norro 16:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oonagh 18:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 03:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca @ 19:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- good encyclopedic content -- nico@nc 07:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not see how this deserves to be featured. OK shot for sure and the colours are nice, but that's it. The resolution isn't exactly sky-high. And it should be when the subject and composition is what it is (OK I admit it's hard to get mushrooms to dance etc.) --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 23:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 15:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice pic. Ziga 22:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 20 support, 4 oppose => featured Mglanznig 18:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sandro Botticelli 046.jpg, featured[edit]

Botticelli - The Birth of Venus

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sandro Botticelli - uploaded by User:File Upload Bot (Eloquence) - nominated by Gryffindor 17:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --Gryffindor 17:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Teveten 19:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- We need pictures of famous paintings of this quality! El Comandante 20:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC) I hadn't seen that the painting is not complete... Sorry! El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 17:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Minto 01:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support--Keeleysam 03:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AlMare 11:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 12:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Don't care for this one. Can think of much nicer famous paintings to select for inclusion - MPF 17:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
    • But this is truly one of the nicest and most famous paintings ever made, along with "Mona Lisa", "Scream" and a few others.. and the quality is excellent.. what's your point? Minto 18:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --gildemax 21:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support have value for encyclopedia--Sebastianm 14:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prevert(talk) 23:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 20:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose => featured Mglanznig 08:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Waterval_Ova_Fedoz.jpg, not featured[edit]

Waterval Ova Fedoz

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Waterval Ova Fedoz - uploaded by Gerrit - nominated by Minto 17:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Minto 17:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You can really feel the waterfall and smell it...Nice done --Feodora 18:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I enjoy more this one, ok it is not the same subject but... YolanC 19:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
    You can't be serious comparing two pics that different.. the falls and landscapes can't be compared at all, i like both.. the dark looks like nordic mystery, it makes this pic very special .. Minto 19:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
    ok, they are different but I can't say they have the same quality/beauty (IMO). YolanC 20:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too dark and chaotic for me. El Comandante 20:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 04:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support That mist is perfect! pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support - very nice. Would like to see a bit more info on the location on the photo page - MPF 17:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support --gildemax 21:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --This image was selected picture of the day for November 6, 2004. In English, it was captioned "A waterfall in Ova da Fedoz". --gildemax 21:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Incredible!Sebastianm 14:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed sky, too dark foreground and not the best quality norro 16:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 03:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- sorry, I don't like it due to very dark foreground! without the stone it would have been at least twice as good! -- Boereck 22:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 07:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Rex 22:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose like it, but featered.... not SO good. 'Pertsa 15:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition. Freedom to share 15:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unbalanced lighting. --Dschwen 14:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful picture. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 13 support, 9 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 08:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hvalba.jpg, not featured[edit]

Village Hvalba on Faroe

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The village Hvalba in the Faroes (Faroes gallery) - created by Erik Christensen - nominated by Minto 18:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Minto 18:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Nothing really special about this picture. El Comandante 20:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really like this, its composition is good etc, but when I look more closely it seems like this pic has some kind of Photoshop error on the island in the background? don't think that's a featured quality. Minto 20:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
    • could it be a strange shadow? -Quasipalm 00:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
      • hmm, withdraw? Minto 02:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Quasipalm 00:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice pic. I think the dark patch on the island is a cliff in shadow - MPF 17:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose pls. not twice This image was selected picture of the day for November 16, 2004. In English, it was captioned "The village Hvalba in the Faroes.". --gildemax 21:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Can't see any thing special, OK nice pic, that's all --Tarawneh 04:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blur? --Luc Viatour 09:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I think it to be a cute pic. But that is it. Cute. -- Boereck 22:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca @ 19:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't know about the black hole either. It looks like a cave entrance to a hideout of an enemy of James Bond. But that aside, I dig this. Even the village name is cute. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 14:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful picture Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gérard Janot 23:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 08:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Red_Maple_Leaves_in_Yahiko.JPG, not featured[edit]

Red Maple Leaves

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Aney - nominated by Minto 18:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Minto 18:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- focus and sharpness -- YolanC 18:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bad composition (not enough contrast of the subject on the background). El Comandante 20:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- out of context! --Songloed 23:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special, Colors --Luc Viatour 06:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - no single, whole, complete uncropped leaf - MPF 16:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose pls. not twice This image was selected picture of the day for November 22, 2005. In English, it was captioned "Red Maple Leaves in Yahiko, Niigata Pref, Japan". --gildemax 21:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
    • ??? when did POTD became the same thing as a fetured pic? and if; why isn't this pic categorized as a FP? Minto 22:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
      • POTD is NOT the same as FP. POTD do not have to be featured and FPs don't have to be POTDs. They're not related concepts (yet), please don't confuse them --pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nico@nc 07:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposeno leaf is completly on the pic--AngMoKio 09:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 8 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 08:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Don Quixote 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Don Quixote 1.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A strong subject for a great illustrator...

Uploaded by Holger Thölking and nominated by El Comandante 21:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured Mglanznig 08:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Map_at_millstaetter_see.svg, featured[edit]

Map of Lake Millstatt (Austria) with surrounding towns

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Map of Lake Millstatt (Austria) with surrounding towns

created and uploaded by Mglanznig - self nomination 21:32, 21 May 2006

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- great work, I've made a few maps for wikimedia and know how much work is involved. kudos. --Quasipalm 00:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- great work.. Minto 02:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 04:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AlMare 11:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 16:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --gildemax 21:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Any suggestions for refinements? Thanks. --Mglanznig 07:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Greate graphic.Sebastianm 14:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think, this map is really outstanding. This is exactly what we need for wikipedia. Great job, Mglanznig. norro 16:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Exemplary graphics for maps. You should do some tutoring. --Bep 20:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Well done ! -- Fabien1309 10:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks fine enough but there's some techical fishiness - when you try to view it at full res, a horde of new, empty browser windows open. So that's superannoying and I have to oppose! --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 14:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I used Inkscape to create this map and haven't edited the SVG code directly. If you tell me what kind of browser (and version) you have used I could try to reproduce and fix this. Firefox seems to have no problems with the image, so maybe it's a bug in your browser's SVG implementation? --Mglanznig 19:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose => featured Mglanznig 08:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Athabasca Rail at Brule Lake.jpg, featured[edit]

The Athabasca River railroad track at the mouth of Brule Lake

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Anomity - uploaded by Anomity - nominated by Anomity
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anomity 21:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support just like a painting --che 21:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose grainy and boring, no real subject norro 21:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I came back three times to look at the image and I was torn... I LOVE the thumb but the bigger views reveal a somewhat lacking cut on the right hand side (by the way, I love the color of exactly that patch of the thumb image): I am talking about the very light spot on the far right. The contrasting colors are vivid and well done and the mist adds a little extra. As I said, I like it in thumb size. I am unsure about full size! :-) -- Boereck 22:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colors are quite weird, the mountains in the background are too blurry and the foreground is not that great to counter that -- Gorgo 23:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 07:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wikimol 10:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - baffled . . . "This photo was taken on January 6, 2006" . . . so why the trees in autumn colours, and lack of snow in a heavy-snowfall area? Definitely something odd here. I'd say October or early November. - MPF 16:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Interesting that you noticed. This photo was taken in January, but this year we had one of the most bizarre winters in Alberta I have ever seen. We didn't get any snow until early February. If you look at this picture you can see the river is a bit frozen over. Regarding the color of the trees, those are all evergreens. Anomity 19:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the extra info; I took the yellow trees in the middle distance to be Subalpine Larches in autumn colour. Voting Symbol support vote.svg Support for the pic - MPF 15:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Take photo in this place with train! Will be greate.--Sebastianm 18:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • That is what everyone keeps telling me, unfortunately it is a difficult place to get too and the tracks are not used very often. Anomity 19:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - too grainy --Pumbaa 20:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - the image itself is good but the uniqueness of the weather(lack of snow) is more interesting than the image. For this alone the image has the potential to become a significant artifact on climate change. Gnangarra 08:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support / tsca @ 18:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful, painterly photo Fg2 01:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great colors. --Bep 16:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured Anomity 17:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:100_2466.jpg, not featured[edit]

Woodpecker Watch

They call it food... Anjela White

  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nice but bad lightning and same as YolanC. -- nico@nc 11:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - unsharp, strange angle. Rex 21:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes strange angle-those woodpeckers get into the weirdest poses!

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Rex, bad image quality norro 22:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry -- Fabien1309 19:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry (tho' angle is OK for a woodpecker). Species is Melanerpes carolinus. - MPF 23:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad image quality --Luc Viatour 09:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Results: 0 Symbol support vote.svg Support and 11 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = not featured.

Image:Jakriborg, juni 2005 e.jpg, not featured[edit]

Jakriborg, Skåne

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Väsk - uploaded by Väsk - nominated by Grillo 18:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Grillo 18:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 19:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC) - walls should be vertical
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- it would be better with few people, sun and vertical walls... ;-) -- nico@nc 23:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I cannot add people neither sun but it's OK for the walls : see here ;) nico@nc 23:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Colors, nothing special, horizon --Luc Viatour 06:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose see nico --Huebi 07:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Aka Nico@nc -- Fabien1309 19:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 11 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Fin 121004 04.gif, not featured[edit]

Maple tree

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Klafui - uploaded by Maksim - nominated by Grillo 16:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Grillo 16:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Dti 16:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agneta 18:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC) Please log in to vote, thanks pfctdayelise (translate?) 17:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- not exceptionnal and the house with its streetlight in the right corner isn't very interesting... sorry -- nico@nc 23:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not exceptionnal, best color --Luc Viatour 06:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Ss181292 08:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC) -- 1. Resolution - only 454x567px, 2. It's GIF! So it is only 256 colours! It's been about 10 years since we had 256 colour graphic cards in our computers, 3. Nothing special about this photo anyway.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment See here for file types : Commons:File_types (I think it's best on this page but it's in French). The size is also very small...
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - GIF, not very interesting picture -- Fabien1309 19:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - 256 colours seems plenty enough to look good. But I don't like the building and street light in the bottom corner - MPF 23:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - intention of pic is not visible; not a good quality --AngMoKio 09:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a nice fall picture --- gildemax 12:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 11 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nouméa Ile des Pins Upi.JPG, not featured[edit]

Upi Bay, Pines Island, New Caledonia

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bruno.Menetrier - uploaded by Bruno.Menetrier - nominated by nico@nc 09:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nico@nc 09:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Huebi 13:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose noise, colors, error compression? --Luc Viatour 06:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
    • yes, you're right... so Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- nico@nc 11:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bananaflo 23:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - unique limestone erosion features. Very useful pic for the encyclopaedias - MPF 23:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose usefulness for the encyclopaedia does not mean "featured picture" Gérard Janot 12:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Plage ouvea.jpg, not featured[edit]

A beach in Ouvea Island, New Caledonia

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bananaflo - uploaded by Bananaflo - nominated by nico@nc 09:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- maybe a bit cloudy... ? -- nico@nc 09:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose just a beach --Huebi 13:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose clearly tilted norro 14:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Not at all ! Look at the trees... -- nico@nc 22:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
      Done. Looks clearly tilted to me. norro 15:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose horizon, low res --Luc Viatour 06:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bananaflo 23:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Yes, it is tilted, by about 2.5°. It would be a nice pic if straightened, though the flora here (Casuarina) is not one of New Caledonia's numerous weird endemics - MPF 23:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --ßøuñçêY2K 13:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sud NC.JPG, not featured[edit]

A typical landscape from the South of New Caledonia.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bananaflo - uploaded by Bananaflo - nominated by nico@nc 09:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nico@nc 09:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Huebi 13:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry. Especially motion blur in the leafs. Freaky colours though norro 14:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blurry --Luc Viatour 06:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- This picture is a scan of an argentic one, this is why you may find it blurry. Moreover, I do assure that the colors are genuine !! Bananaflo 23:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support just love the colours. pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - valuable encyclopaedic pic of phytotoxic nickel-rich serpentine soils unique to New Caledonia. We need more pics of this fascinating country and its strange flora! - MPF 23:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very nice photo, but too much saturation or something.... 'Pertsa 14:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I cannot believe the colours are for real. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose maybe useful, but ugly Gérard Janot 12:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 12:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Second_world_war_europe_animation_large_de.gif, not featured[edit]

animated map of the 2nd world war in europe in good resolution(including dates, german language) * Info animated map of the 2nd world war in europe with good resolution(including dates, german language), created by San Jose - uploaded by San Jose - nominated by Anatol

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love it cause I'm learning for my matura (~general qualification for university entrance in austria) and it helps me a lot to imaginate and remember, so I think it also has a high value for the encyclopedia - Anatol
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good work, although it is in German... - nico@nc 07:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  Pabix  07:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Sebastianm 09:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 11:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeSymbol neutral vote.svg NeutralGnangarra 15:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC) -- the animation doesn't work on my machine each change is placed so that each new layer is diagonally off that by the end of the cycle london has move to paris. Its the only animation that does this, the moon below is working fine Gnangarra 11:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
    Hi Gnangarra. This is an general issue with animated GIFs when scaled down. Look at it at full-size to see it working. Kindly norro 12:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thank for info, Only the high res version works properly Gnangarra 15:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
    • according to Commons:Help Desk its the size of the image that is causing the problem the more RAM your machine has that better it scales down. For this reason I have changed my vote back to oppose as the animation isnt useful if it cant be viewed by the majority of users Gnangarra 12:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It would be an excellent document if it could be used reduced, because like this, it's unusable on most of the screens. El Comandante 18:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
    Comment: This is a MediaWiki bug.  Pabix  16:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
    OK, but I'll vote for it only when the bug will be solved and the image usable, otherwise I think it doesn't mean anything. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 22:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 06:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, Picture is usable only in full resolution. --Teme 09:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, as per above --Artefacto 15:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- brilliant 82.138.217.145 18:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC) sorry, you need to login to vote Gnangarra 12:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - the full size is too large to see on-screen, the smaller size suffers from the weird bug (which the Canadian Provinces animated gif didn't; scroll down this page) - MPF 23:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 'Pertsa 14:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support amazing work -- technical problems aren't an issue with the image, it's an issue with the MediaWiki tech involved. -Quasipalm 19:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 19:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great work - Gwir 09:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose animation does not work Gérard Janot 12:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slovik 03:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:36, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--83.165.98.117 15:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose doesn't work correctly (Mozilla/Linux) --Wmeinhart 18:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 11 support, 10 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:201 au 28 -07-2004 553.jpg, not featured[edit]

"Baie des Tortues" (Turtles Bay), New Caledonia

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bananaflo - uploaded by Bananaflo - nominated by nico@nc 05:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --nico@nc 05:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 13:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 13:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 03:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Huebi 08:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose cliff is cut at the left, bad lighting, not a very interesting subject. For me just a technically not too good postcard shot norro 12:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Definitely an interesting subject - it is the only photo we have of the endangered species Araucaria luxurians - MPF 23:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Symbol support vote.svg Support low res, Interesting, very particular vegetation --Luc Viatour 06:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
    • A lot of featured pictures are 1024*768 (i.e: Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) and sometime smaller (i.e:Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). I hope you'll reconsider your decision. -- nico@nc 10:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
    • De nombreuses images de qualité sont en 1024*768 (ex : Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) voire même plus petit (ex : Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). J'espère donc que vous reconsidererez votre jugement. -- nico@nc 10:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Il est dommage de ne pas avoir une meilleure résolution, le plus intéressant dans cette image, c'est cette végétation particulière et elle n'est pas suffisamment détaillée. Si le nombre de votes n'est pas suffisant, je changerai mon vote! Par contre, par ma neutralité j'espère inciter l'auteur à faire un upload d'une version plus détaillée --Luc Viatour 14:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
        • I was running out of memory during the trip, and was forced to downgrade the rez setting of the camera.... I regret I couldn't post an higher quality shot !! Bananaflo 02:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
          • Ok, i change my vote --Luc Viatour 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
            • Good News !! (or maybe not !?) Uploaded a new version of the picture, took with another camera of mine, in hirez, available here : [[1]]. Unfortunately, the weather was not as shiny as the previous verson. Thus, i uploaded the new picture as another file, so you can judge by yourself the pros/cons of changing the actual picture. Please give feedback on my Wikipedia user page =) Please remember to reconsider your vote if the new picture tricks you ! Bananaflo 10:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bananaflo 23:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I appreciate the rarity of the vegetation in question, but we're voting on the quality of the photographs here. The cut cliff on the left bothers me. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 23:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 12:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose mal cadré Gérard Janot 22:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad centring and poor emotional strength. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 10:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Boereck 16:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ßøuñçêY2K 13:36, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Artefacto 14:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lunar libration with phase2.gif, featured[edit]

The moon's phases

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Made by Tomruen - uploaded by Saperaud - nominated by Jon Harald Søby 23:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jon Harald Søby 23:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support Ss181292 07:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC) -- very high encyclopedic value! Good resolution as for an animation.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes me wonder how the hell he did that... 172.200.154.175 12:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Anonymous users cannot vote, but I wonder that too and Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support the picture. Freedom to share 15:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support fascinating norro 12:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 13:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support El Comandante 22:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 03:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support interesting -- nico@nc 07:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Huebi 08:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Sebastianm 09:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Luc Viatour 06:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prevert(talk) 16:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice. (I'm in a verbose mood tonight) --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 19:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Quasipalm 19:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gordo 15:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Notwist 08:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It (Talk) 00:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - really great --AngMoKio 09:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 15:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 12:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support MGo 09:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support----Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wmeinhart 18:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel303xm 10:01, 11 Jun 2006 (UTC)
Result: 30 support, 1 oppose => featured Mglanznig 21:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lech Augsburg.jpg, not featured[edit]

River Lech in Augsburg, southern Germany

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Thgoiter - uploaded by Thgoiter - nominated by 84.155.81.230 19:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see anything special --che 00:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 13:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I am the author of this photography and I have to admit that there is nothing excellent in this picture even though it illustrates many articles. If there are no objections the candidate might be deleted. --Thgoiter 14:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Whoa, this is FPC, not deletion requests! :) It doesn't need to be deleted just because it's not feature material. pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
      • I did not mean that the image itself should be deleted. Only the poll over here. --Thgoiter 12:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice but nothing special nico@nc 07:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special with boaring foreground --Huebi 08:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Luc Viatour 06:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 16:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special -- Fabien1309 19:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose absolutely 'Pertsa 15:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 10 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Maple-oliv2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Maple leaves

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Olegivvit - uploaded by Olegivvit - nominated by Olegivvit 17:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Olegivvit 17:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good photo, and illustrative, but not exceptionnal in an aesthetic point of vue. El Comandante 18:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- even though one of the leaves is cut on the top of the pic, it is still exceptional. great work! -- Boereck 20:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- nice but nothing exceptionnal... -- nico@nc 23:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 16:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - been hesitating a while, but decided I like it, not least because the leaves and fruit show well enough for it to be readily identifiable. Species is Acer platanoides. - MPF 15:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ggonnell 00:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ßøuñçêY2K 13:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Artefacto 14:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Skreifiske.jpg, not featured[edit]

Picture from a veteran boat fishing after (Cod) in Lofoten, Norway

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Røeds father - uploaded by Røed - nominated by Røed 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Røed 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kjetil_r 17:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Ss181292 18:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC) --- Arrrrgh, another sunset!
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark, and agree with Ss181292. El Comandante 19:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- too dark -- YolanC 23:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose {{Oppose-sunset}} --che 01:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Shizhao 13:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special and another sunset! --Luc Viatour 06:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 16:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Golden Horn Istanbul.JPG Oppose sunset. Sunsets are nice. However, featured sunsets should IMO be either outstanding among all sunsets or have other strong theme than sunset. --Wikimol 21:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the centered position of the sun. Aditionally, the silhouette of the boat is uninteresting - just one big black area. The fish had potential, but they should never "merge". --Artefacto 14:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 11 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:PilierKomOmbo.jpg, not featured[edit]

KomOmbo Temple Hieroglyphs, Egypt

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gwir - uploaded by Gwir - nominated by Gwir 14:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gwir 14:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I love the subject and the photo is very good and informative, but I don't know... The centring, the composition? I don't feel it's an outstanding picture. Sorry, try again. El Comandante 19:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I put this picture for the colors and the detailed sculptures of the hieroglyphs. The centring gives volume to the pictures, but I know that the background is poor. Gwir 10:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 13:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Anatol 21:47, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- bad centring, a bit dark, sorry -- nico@nc 07:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I agree with El Comandante --Luc Viatour 06:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 16:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great picture for me :) -- Fabien1309 19:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 'Pertsa 15:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 22:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Malene Thyssen 21:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK El Comandante norro 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image: Circo y cima de Peñalara1.JPG, not featured[edit]

Cirque, peak and lake of Peñalara (Madrid, Spain)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Miguel303xm - uploaded by Miguel303xm - nominated by Miguel303xm 13:12, 26 may 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like the landscape and the reflect which is not perfect. -- YolanC 13:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Beautiful - MPF 15:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- the mirror effect is neat. but the horizon is slanted, the lighting is akward and the motive seems too busy and disturbing to me - sorry. -- Boereck 21:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Miguel: el horizonte está inclinado, y no me gustan las fotos 4:3 de paisajes. El efecto es bueno y simétrico, pero la foto vista en tamaño reducido es un poco confusa para mi gusto. Barcex 21:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice (maybe a bit dark on the front ?) -- nico@nc 07:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Boereck --Luc Viatour 06:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a bit dark --- gildemax 16:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not bad, but not outstanding -- Fabien1309 19:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice picture Gérard Janot 22:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Schwaznacht.jpg, not featured[edit]

Dieses Bild wurde im März vom Kolsassberg aus aufgenommen. Es zeigt eine Wunderschöne Ansicht der Stadt Schwaz und seinen Nachbarorten

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Know_Nothing - uploaded by User:Know_Nothing - nominated by Yoda]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schönes Panorama
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - nice picture Gnangarra 08:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- licence missing -- YolanC 13:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- licence missing --Luc Viatour 06:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- licence missing --- gildemax 16:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Gwir 08:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FML IconSP.jpg hi 02:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ßøuñçêY2K 13:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 21:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Canada provinces evolution.gif, featured[edit]

Canada provinces evolution

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Golbez - uploaded by Golbez - nominated by White Cat -- Cat ちぃ? 15:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cat ちぃ? 15:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very cool! JaGa 15:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a fantastic, useful and valuable animation. Good technical quality and a clear purpose and useability make it a definite featured picture. Freedom to share 15:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I find that it is a very good animation. But, is there a good explanation for selecting grey, pink and light brown as the main colours? In my opinon they do not look very good together. Admittedly, I do not have the perfect alternative suggestion readily available, but how a about using a pale red, pale blue and pale yellow or other more 'pure' colour combinations? But again, I like the animation, and it is good way to illustrate the timeline of the provinces in Canada. -- Slaunger 19:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Explanation: I started making locator maps using pale pink and bright red. Then when I had to include foreign areas, I started using brown. When I started doing this, I used brown for territories and decided to go with a neutral gray for foreign areas. I'm not justifying it, but you did ask for an explanation. ;) --Golbez 05:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Thank you for the explanation, it was an honest one ;-) I have thought about it, and I think the colours selection has to be improved to make it FP worthy. Sorry -- Slaunger 20:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. --Karelj 20:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -LadyofHats 15:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 17:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MichaelMaggs 21:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though I am with Slaunger on the colors. --Digon3 talk 15:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oh Canada. Doo-dle-doo 20:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poromiami 6:03 3 October 2007 (CEST)
result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 19:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tired-moose.jpg, not featured[edit]

A very tired moose (no, it's not dead)

  • Nominated by Liftarn 11:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Liftarn 11:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- very zooish.. Minto 11:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Minto - MPF 16:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 07:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I just like this one, looks like he had a great party! MartinD 08:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- looks dead -- nico@nc 07:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dti 16:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Artefacto 17:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Urban 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 16:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Notwist 08:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it - it's funny Gérard Janot 23:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lelote 16:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 9 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 20:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Caveja.png, not featured[edit]

Caveja Caveja (vector version)

The Caveja (read as: "Caveya") is a symbol of Romagna, a historical region of Italy. This Caveja is a scan from a very very old print that is typical of this region. Simple but very ancient, it is a recurring element in popular culture of Romagna.

Image on left (PNG version), not featured[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info scan, upload and nomination by /\/\π 10:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --/\/\π 10:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I support SVG --Shizhao 11:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- a fancy stickman. big: NO! -- Boereck 15:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Dti 16:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 09:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 20:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image on right (SVG version), not featured[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I've uploaded SVG version of this image. Ss181292 20:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support great!! thnx for the vector version. --/\/\π 21:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Dti 16:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 09:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 20:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Both Images, not featured[edit]

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 20:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Heron herdsman lake.jpg, not featured[edit]

Heron herdsman lake.jpg

  • Photo take by Gnangarra and nominated by Gnangarra 03:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 03:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice, natural environement, not yet this bird in Featured --Luc Viatour 04:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 07:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC) distracting foreground. Legs hidden. Foreground little blurry. Ss181292 07:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 11:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 14:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose To catch a heron in such a situation is not too rare, so ich think, it should be possible to do it in a better way. Less sticks in the foreground (better in the background) and heron not covered by them. And yes, it's a little bit blurry norro 16:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition (gras should be in the background and bird in the foreground, not the other way round) -- Gorgo 23:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - species is Egretta alba - MPF 16:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gordo 19:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - composition - Rex 21:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 00:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo 17:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 9 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 20:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Coal and Fire.JPG, not featured[edit]

coals and fire

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by snty-tact (Talk) - uploaded by snty-tact (Talk) - nominated by snty-tact (Talk) 14:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If you have a some improvement, please tell me.--snty-tact (Talk) 14:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not too bad, but cut at the bottom and very grainy even when not zoomed to fullsize norro 16:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad centring. El Comandante 17:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 09:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tarawneh 14:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very beautiful image, but too much grainy --/\/\π 12:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 20:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Giraffe.JPG, not featured[edit]

A Giraffe in Madrid

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Scambelo - uploaded by Scambelo - nominated by Scambelo 13:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Scambelo 13:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Ss181292 07:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC) distracting background
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Ss181292, particularly the blurred Giraffe neck appearing to hang from the near one's chin - MPF 16:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Same remark as MPF -- nico@nc 07:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 16:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Quite good, but the neck in the backgound is disturbing -- Fabien1309 10:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Unfortunately, the second giraffe creates a very disturbing effect. Bad luck with timing... Jastrow 18:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --ßøuñçêY2K 13:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured Mglanznig 20:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:DaChanBaoShaoChan.jpg, not featured[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Richy - uploaded by Shizhao - nominated by Shizhao 09:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Shizhao 09:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Huebi 13:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Luc Viatour 14:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose poor composition. Doesn't even look very tasty for me :) norro 16:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --- gildemax 09:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Tarawneh 15:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I try not to be bold, but this is poor. There is like NO special thing about this picture whatsoever. Sorry! -- Boereck 22:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- disgusting -- nico@nc 07:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose sorry ... ;-) --Dti 16:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It demonstrates the subject fairly well, and has a good composition. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 20:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 08:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 13 oppose => not featured --Mglanznig 20:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lotus2mq.jpg, featured[edit]

microscopic view on the lotus leaf surface. CG, Lotuseffect

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Willa - uploaded by Willa - nominated by Willa 09:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I hope it has a "high encyclopedic value" :-D Willa 09:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very cool Gryffindor 10:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Shizhao 11:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportSebastianm 14:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Luc Viatour 14:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Too low resolution for an only esthetic image. And I'm not quite sure Commons must be an art gallery of new works. My opinion is that its interest is much more in historical works. El Comandante 16:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • You're right, commons are no art gallery, but this work should illustrate the lotus effect [2], so not just an esthetic image. norro 17:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • OK. That information was important to know! Symbol support vote.svg Support El Comandante 18:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • See image description next time :) norro 19:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I've read the description, but WHO knows the Lotus effect? I didn't, and there is no link or explanation. El Comandante 19:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like it (even though the image is quite small) - very sharp, crisp and precise! Good work! -- Boereck 22:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
    There is a highRes Version mentioned at the bottom of the Image description. This is my first Image uploaded, I don't know all techniques... Willa
    • This nomination should be for the high-res version. The software automatically scales images, so you should always just upload the highest res you have. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Ok, thanks for the information. I overwrote the original file with a high resolution Version. Willa
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rodge500 19:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 10:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jastrow 17:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support BTW, there simply has to be link to the en:Lotus effect in the description (I added it now). --romanm (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 16 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 0 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and 0 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral (!) => featured. --nico@nc 02:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:YoungWomanWearingRosary.jpg, not featured[edit]

Young Woman Wearing a Rosary

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pacian - uploaded by Pacian - nominated by Rosarium Orans 04:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 04:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Luc Viatour 06:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Shizhao 12:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 12:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC) -- lacks in encyclopedic value
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 13:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose yukky - MPF 16:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --gildemax 21:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Sebastianm 14:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- maybe it is me, but I really don't get it :-) -- Boereck 22:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Anatol 22:07, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- nico@nc 07:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Quasipalm 19:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - i dont know what the intention of this pic is?!--AngMoKio 09:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Voting results: only 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 14 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = no, not featured. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 02:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rosary 2006-01-23.jpg, not featured[edit]

Catholic Rosary with a St. Benedict medal

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dti - uploaded by Dti - nominated by Rosarium Orans 04:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rosarium Orans 04:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special --Luc Viatour 06:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too shiny. Could just be my atheist values here, but I do not find rosaries inherently photogenic. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the picture, but I'm not convinced it's good enough for featuring... El Comandante 19:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --gildemax 21:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Tarawneh 04:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 06:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --/\/\π 09:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 172.212.168.22 15:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
    • no anonymous votes. -- nico@nc 07:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- nice composition, but... I don't know... -- nico@nc 07:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -Quasipalm 19:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The lighting could be perfected and the plane of sharp focus is a bit odd (too much focus on the bottom left bead). Jastrow 07:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Voting results: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral and 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = not featured.

Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after.jpg, withdrawn and Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg, featured[edit]

Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after.jpg Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nagasaki, Japan, before and after the atomic bombing of August 9, 1945. U.S. National Archive RG 77-MDH

Uploaded by Fastfission. Nominated by El Comandante 20:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC), for the high interest and emotion of this picture, even if the resolution isn't incredibly high.

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Comandante 20:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gryffindor 21:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Nice, but res.. Minto 01:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Resolution is too little. I'm sure there is a better version somewhere. --Keeleysam 02:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, but res --Luc Viatour 06:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support fantastic historical document, if we could find (or recreate) a higher-res version that would be awesome. pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Ss181292 16:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) I see no point in featuring such images. I believe, this picture is well known anyway... and I strongly oppose to recreating such picture -- to dropping another nuclear bomb anywhere.
    • If I'd have to chose only one interest in featuring this image, it would be to NOT FORGET what war can do, even (or especially?) made by occidental countries that autoproclaim themselves defenders of the Human Rights... El Comandante 17:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - agree with pfctdayelise - MPF 17:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Ss181292 --gildemax 21:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Featured pictures should be more than just pretty sunsets and cute animals. Gnangarra 06:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support an important thing to see --che 02:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and it's aa small bomb compare to the recent ones —Gwir 06:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 08:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prevert(talk) 23:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose there are some technical problems: pictures are not the same zoom-level/resolution, which is important if you want to compare two pictures (which is obviously the intention here), there are several numbers on it without any explanation (units) and it's low res (which would be ok given it's age). It has a good encyclopedic value though. --Gorgo 23:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I thought the same, but I didn't change the zoom of the first image to avoid decreasing the resolution or having a too grainy photo. And I don't think the information about the unit used must be included in the picture. El Comandante 19:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Urban 06:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose left one. ACK Gorgo Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral regarding to the edit. norro 09:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured (withdrawn) Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  • New proposition. I don't know what are the rules for featured pictures candidates, but I would like to propose this adjusted version, rotated and scaled (on the right). El Comandante 20:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatol 22:06, 27 May 2006
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jonathaneo 12:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Freedom to share 15:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --AngMoKio 09:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 support => featured Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Voting results: 15 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral and 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = featured. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 02:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Changed the result because first version was withdrawn by the nominator. --Mglanznig 21:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Vitruvian.jpg - not featured[edit]

Vitruvian

Result >> Nomination closed. Not featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Eugène Delacroix - La liberté guidant le peuple.jpg, featured[edit]

Eugène Delacroix - La liberté guidant le peuple.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by artcopy-munich.com - uploaded by Yann - nominated by El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A masterpiece of french art. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Get_It (Talk) 00:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportFoeNyx 14:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 18:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special Gérard Janot 20:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 22:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - a bit too fanciful for my liking - 82.39.130.135 00:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC) IPs can't vote. Sorry. Create you an account. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 07:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support support of course, anyone who knows anything about art knows this is a masterpiece. Gryffindor 16:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Konstable 08:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- On ACM is stated: "The site may not be duplicated, transmitted or made access to a whole network in another way without a permit from Artcopy Munich. All rights reserved." The painting in it self may be free to make public, but the reproduction is not. Who took the picture? Was it legally taken and uploaded by the photografer/reproducer or with aproval? To me is seems to be a copyright violation. Sorry. Xauxa 11:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 10 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => featured Mglanznig 15:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Death of Marat by David.jpg, not featured[edit]

Death of Marat by David.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by www.wga.hu - uploaded by Kelson - nominated by El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 20:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A masterpiece of french painting. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 20:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution. --Wikimol 14:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
    A 1001x1287 res is not enough? What kind of screen can show it complete? Moreover, a lot of featured pictures are 1024*768 (i.e: Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) and sometime smaller (i.e:Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). I hope you'll reconsider your decision.
    El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 15:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
    Let me first make one thing clear - I'm not voting about quality of Death of Marat, that's without question. In case of such reproductions I consider only technical quality (full uncropped picture, colors, and resolution). The origanl has 162 x 128 cm ... at 300dpi, that would be 20k x 15k pixels - that would be real digital reproduction, allowing to study also structure of the painting. 1287x768 means good print of postcard size... IMO that's not enoug to call a reproduction good. Where it was said Commons are media library for viewing on screen only? --Wikimol 15:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
    Where it was said Commons must be a media library for print? To my point of vue, it's a media library for all the other Wikiprojects. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 21:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
    Because other wikimedia projects may want to have printed edition. Or someone may just want to print specific article. Commons shoud aim at resolutions suitable for print. --Wikimol 22:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
    Yes, there are smaller FP, some of which should eventually be defeatured. Generally, the case of digital photography is IMO different, digital photohraph itself is the "original", usually in a way "creative" and "unique" work. Reproduction of David's painting is not (the painting is). --Wikimol 15:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gérard Janot 18:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 00:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--83.165.98.117 15:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC) IPs can't vote. Please create you an account if you want to vote. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Konstable 08:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 3 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hausrotschwanz Brutpflege 2006-05-24 212.jpg, not featured[edit]

The Nest of & a Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros)

Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hausrotschwanz Brutpflege 2006-05-24 211.jpg, featured[edit]

The Nest of & a Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Nest of a Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) --Stefan-Xp 13:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC) (cre- & Nominated)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gnangarra 14:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing! Brilliant! Gordo 15:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support OK, so this image has many strenghts:
    • Relatively high resolution
    • Very good moment of capture
    • Table is very useful
    • Great F number and exposure time
    • Fantastic composition
    • Good zoom
    • Great subject
  • Freedom to share 19:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Great, but I Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the white balance. The adult bird looks too blue. --che 20:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF 21:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - YolanC 00:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour 04:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the vantage point or the sky triangle on the left. -Quasipalm 14:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ss181292 08:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC) -- high encyclopedic value
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tarawneh 22:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A great snapshot but... pretty bad centring, ugly colours and not natural background (even if it's not been chosed by the photographer). El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 10:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 11 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 4 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => featured Mglanznig 15:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Valley of Fire Nevada1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Valley of Fire, Nevada

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Urban 05:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Urban 05:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose beautiful place, bad colors, weak definition --Luc Viatour 09:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 'Pertsa 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Huebi 16:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- the image just captivates me Gnangarra 05:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- this image is wonderful...I think it is a great vision of Nevada... no anon voting
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose resolution sucks. I'd support a larger version. -Quasipalm 14:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support -- the resolution might be lower than of some other featured pictures. yet despite what Luc said: I LOVE THE COLORS and the way I can tell, it is not even retouched in Photoshop? That is amazing! -- Boereck 16:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad colors weak definition. -- Get_It (Talk) 00:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ugly colours Gérard Janot 20:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a great image.--Konstable 06:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 18:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 7 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 6 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Chateau de murol auvergne.jpg, not featured[edit]

Murol Castle

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Fabien1309 19:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Please view full, the thumbnail is ugly :)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 19:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Well, it should work as a thumbnail, and it does not. --Bep 20:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Ss181292 21:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC) -- I think it require some cropping.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed, boring background and too small subject norro 22:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - lighting (makes the landscape flat), compositon (too small subject) --Wikimol 06:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 06:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose contrast and color, composition --Luc Viatour 09:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, shows the chateau and the surrounding area well. Just a bit pale. And also support to offset Bep's vote, as we cannot require all good pictures to look good when compressed. --Golbez 09:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose where is the chateau? --Huebi 16:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting. -- Get_It (Talk) 00:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gérard Janot 12:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 3 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured Mglanznig 15:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Agneau lac chambon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Lamb in the grass

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Fabien1309 19:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabien1309 19:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A tourist snapshot, nothing more. --Bep 20:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 20:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC) -- nothing special
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 06:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support best "tourist snapshot" ;-) --Luc Viatour 09:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeh, nice "tourist snapshot". 'Pertsa 14:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe a tourist snapshot, but an FP quality one.. Love the simplistic composition... Freedom to share 15:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support composition is excellent, foreground is sharp ... nice shot norro 22:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HM, not bad I guess. Would've liked to see more background on the sides. But still nicely done. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 23:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- is this mary's little lamb? 8) very nice composition Gnangarra 05:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a FP in my opinion --13:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC) --Rodge
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - tilted (needs rotating abot 2.5° or 3° clockwise; see line of trees on skyline which should have vertical trunks); also piece of blue litter (rope/string?) just above sheep is distracting - MPF 15:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
    I don't think the image need to be rotated : see the axis of the fence's stakes and the trunk of the tree in the center. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose dark spots on the animal --Artefacto 19:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good picture, much more than a tourist snapshot, but not outstanding either, in my opinion. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 19:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 00:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lelote 16:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Konstable 08:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 12 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 8 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, 2 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured Mglanznig 15:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Elias_Kirken_Copenhagen_font.jpg, not featured[edit]

Babtismal font in Elias Church, Copenhagen

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by IbRas 18:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IbRas 18:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - pedestal in the bottom and arc in the top are cropped. Colours of window washed out. --Wikimol 19:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK wikimol norro 22:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colors, Bad composition --Luc Viatour 09:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose never mind 'Pertsa 14:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gwir 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ggonnell 00:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: fala comigo 15:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 5 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:BKK-panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

180° view of Bangkok, from luxury hotels to rural villages.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by bep - uploaded by bep - nominated by Bep 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bep 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tilt, dull colours, jpeg artifacting in full res, ugly subject. --Wikimol 19:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, as to ugly subject: My point with this was to give a 180° view of Bangkok, from luxury hotels to rural villages. It ain't pretty, but it is real. --Bep 20:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - for the same reasons as above -- Fabien1309 19:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colors, jpg compression --Luc Viatour 09:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 'Pertsa 14:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- its a nice bit of editing to create the panorama but the tree on the balcony just doesn't add to the composition. Gnangarra 06:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, inconsistent (darker on left and lighter on right). --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --- gildemax 12:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 1 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 9 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, 1 Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral => not featured Mglanznig 15:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rooma 2006 065.jpg, not featured[edit]

The ceiling of Il Gesù church by Giambattista Gaulli

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Joonasl - uploaded by Joonasl - nominated by Joonasl 16:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I rotated the image slightly and adjusted brighness and contrast. --Joonasl 07:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though it's not balanced very well, I'm fascinated. The sunlight gives an accent to the relief. --XN 19:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The ceiling is stunning, the sunlight can create interesting effects, but for me it doesn't work here. Maybe too light. --Wikimol 19:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please categorize images - uncategorized images are hard to find, which means of little use for other Wikimedia projects. --Wikimol 19:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose that sunlight spoils the picture. Ss181292 20:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK wikimol norro 22:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting effort but for me, too, the sunlight is a drawback. Though, considering the name of the church (Gesù), maybe it's just his father interfering...? --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sunlight --Luc Viatour 09:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 'Pertsa 14:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Get_It (Talk) 00:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, not a fan of the sunlight coming in. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 11 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:XN Palomena prasina.jpg, not featured[edit]

Palomena prasina - Copulation

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:XN - uploaded by User:XN - nominated by XN 15:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)]]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XN 15:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 20:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC) - not every animal porno ;) is good enough to be featured. Too many elements out of focus.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Ss181292 and overdriven colours norro 22:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Ss181292, too much out of focus - MPF 00:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose focus and the respect with the intimacy ;-) --Luc Viatour 09:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --- gildemax 12:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose MGo 09:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 2 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bengal Cat (Fia).jpg, not featured[edit]

Bengal cat

Created and uploaded by User:SirBoo, Nominated by pfctdayelise (translate?)

  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support I love the colours here, and the framing is perfect. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joonasl 16:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bep 16:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Uninteresting backround Sussie 17:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Background too -- Fabien1309 19:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ss181292 20:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC) - distracting background, too short focal length (head is unproportionaly big).
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ACK Ss181292 norro 22:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Ss181292 - MPF 00:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose best colors but nothing exceptionnal or informative --Luc Viatour 09:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Excellent ears and whiskers, but distracting bg. --Rodge 19:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Artefacto 19:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- it is cute, funny and: CUTE. the quality is somewhat on the low side and the patch on the lower right that has gotten "slightly" more exposure to "some light source" is a bit disturbing. but the composition saves the day/pic... :-) -- Boereck 16:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wonderful subject & photo -- Tvpm 17:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ???? no interest Gérard Janot 20:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support --- gildemax 12:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --Ggonnell 00:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've to admit that I've grown to like this picture. It must've been the 12 612nd reload of this page or sth that did it. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 02:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuvola apps package favorite.pngSymbol support vote.svg Support Excellent shot. Nice composition, Great colours and has a nice mood to it.--Konstable 23:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Lycaon 17:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 11 Symbol support vote.svg Support, 11 Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Panthera tigris5.jpg, not featured[edit]

Tiger

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Raul654 - uploaded by Raul654 - nominated by Astrokey44 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Joonasl 16:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A plain zoo image. Nice, though. --Bep 20:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)