Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2005

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Image:My_Son.jpg, not featured

One of the temples at the My Son complex, Vietnam
  • Self-nomination, no vote. - Ravn 11:35, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 11:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. villy ♦ ✎ 08:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 23:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose norro 08:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Peregrine981 12:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Pixeltoo 14:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Result: 3 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 16:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Strasbourg-RemiLeblond-BateauMouche.jpg, not featured

Strasbourg - Bateau mouche
  • Self-nomination - Rémi
  • Oppose LoopZilla 20:50, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Mboverload 07:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. villy ♦ ✎ 08:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - colors, composition. IMHO, the bateau is too large to be blurred. - Ravn 10:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - it could be one more of your really great pictures of Strassbourg which are in very impressive light if the boat would not be this disturbing. It feels just to unreal. I think I would give a support if the river would be empty and silent but if you want to show a boat it seems faster shutter speed is necessary. Andreas Tille 06:47, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:04, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose the blur is too much for me --Quasipalm 18:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Result: 0 Support, 7 Oppose => not featured norro 17:05, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - At the Edge of the Brook (1875).jpg, featured

At the Edge of the Brook by William-Adolphe Bouguereau
  • Nominate and Support: Thuresson 21:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support —FoeNyx 23:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 05:28, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. villy ♦ ✎ 08:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support good nomination. Ravn 08:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - Great ! -- Fabien1309 12:30, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Thomas G. Graf 18:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Wery nice colours. // Solkoll 14:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Quasipalm 18:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose -- Pixeltoo 13:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Fanghong 02:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Result: 10 Support, 1 Oppose => featured norro 17:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Strasbourg_River_Ill.jpg, not featured

Strasbourg, River Ill
  • Self-nomination, no vote. I'd just like to jump on the Strasbourg bandwagon. ;) -- Ravn 09:03, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 09:23, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 13:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 23:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose -- Too blurry for my taste, though it's a good pano. Dori | Talk 04:02, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack Dori. norro 08:30, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack Dori + backlight -- Bernd Untiedt 16:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose is this a tourist photo? that person on the right with a big grin looking at the camera struck me as odd ;-) --Quasipalm 18:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yes, that part of the photo is.. ;) I've got another one without people on it, but the resulting pano was not that good. -- Ravn 08:28, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support nice evening shot; good sense of place Fg2 04:42, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 12:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dlr_emu_at_tower_gateway.jpg, not featured

DLR Train at Tower Gateway Station, London, UK
  • Nominate LoopZilla 09:18, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose dull colors, not sharp Ravn 10:42, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose not sharp, not "impressive" scene, saturated white background David.Monniaux 18:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose focus, lighting, and background are not right -- Quistnix 06:29, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose -- Bernd Untiedt 16:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro

[edit] Image:Agalychnis callidryas.jpg, featured

Agalychnis callidryas.jpg

Agalychnis callidryas (red-eyed treefrog) in Barro Colorado Island, Panama by Christian R. Linder.

  • Support —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 09:22, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - too dark Weak Support - I just noticed that it looks better on a different screen. I'd like to have it a little lighter nonetheless. -- Ravn 10:43, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support AtelierJoly 11:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Dori | Talk 13:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 18:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 19:21, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 20:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support // Solkoll 14:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Quasipalm 18:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Fanghong 02:08, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Ulenspiegel 10:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --fir0002 12:04, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 14:44, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:M1-A1 Abrams Fire.jpg, not featured

M1-A1 Abrams
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 13:00, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Dori | Talk 13:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 18:43, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Don't think, it's special. norro 08:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 11:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Groucho 16:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose somehow, it looks incomplete -- Quistnix 20:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - not particularly interesting angle. People don't see tanks firing every day, but that doesn't mean its an interesting photo as a photo. Peregrine981 10:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Urban 04:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Fanghong 02:09, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 7 Oppose => not featured norro 14:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Red Panda.JPG, featured

Red Panda
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 13:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Dori | Talk 13:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 14:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Ravn 14:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support could we get more resolution please? David.Monniaux 18:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 19:20, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 20:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support —FoeNyx 21:17, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support - tsca 13:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Thomas G. Graf 12:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support higer resolution would be great --Quasipalm 18:35, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support James F. (talk) 18:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 14:49, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Copenhagen new operahouse interior.jpg, not featured

New Opera House, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Nominate Quistnix 00:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) (self-nomination)
    • Note: at first glance, it didn't even look good enough for uploading to Commons. However, this picture somehow looks better each time I look at it - which is unusual.
  • Oppose I don't really like the viewpoint. Dori | Talk 03:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose bad composition David.Monniaux 06:16, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack. - Ravn 08:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack. --Thomas G. Graf 12:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support GerardM 23:30, 7 May 2005 (UTC) If this were an artist impression this is where the persons would have been placed. It would as much try to show how nice/modern this operahouse is..
Result: 1 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 12:39, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Musiktheater im Revier.jpg, featured

Musiktheater im Revier, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
  • Nominate AndreasPraefcke 07:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Note: I like this picture (that I found on de.wikipedia when transferring images of theatre buildings to the Commons for the gallery Theatre buildings) because it shows that otherwise (in daylight) rather bland building (see [1]) in an interesting way, also highlighting the interior very nicely.
  • support - tsca 13:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 16:05, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support a bit surreal/artsy, but still good. Dori | Talk 23:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Rémi
  • Support Very good - but a little bit small -- Bernd Untiedt 16:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Pixeltoo 14:05, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Ulenspiegel 10:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support great dusk shot. Wish the sign on the right weren't there but the shot is worthwhile even with it, and the photographer chose a sky that matches the sign nicely. Fg2 04:45, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 17:37, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 9 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 12:42, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:VWbubblafront 1949.jpg, not featured

VWbubblafront 1949.
Image by w:sv:Användare:Hasse A

I love this image, not just because it is technically a good picture, (it is intended as an illustration of the frontpart of the car, this is why it only shows that). But also because the reflextions in the paintjob, the windows and the chrome. It's a image of two worlds: the normal and the morphed mirror world. See the page about VW created by Hasse: w:sv:VW, (and the some 50 sub-pages, also by Hasse, a former employe of V.A.G.) and get impressed =)

  • Nominate & support // Solkoll 13:46, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - this picture is neither in color or in b&w -- Quistnix 14:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support Greudin
  • Support David.Monniaux 16:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I'd rather see the entire car, and I think the reflections detract from the image a bit, rather than enhance it. Dori | Talk 22:47, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:01, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ravn 20:21, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 14:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:44, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro 15:08, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Les Cressonnières.JPG, not featured

Les cressonnières (named after watercress pools)
  • Nominate and Support David.Monniaux 19:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Something doesn't look right (don't know if it's not sharp enough, colors are wrong, or overexposed?). Dori | Talk 22:50, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose In my opinion a nice postcard shot norro 22:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support It's a bit more than just that -- Quistnix 05:12, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Almost... Somehow the composition is a bit off. Sky a bit overexposed. Peregrine981 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Looks like there is a color cast in parts of the image. --Ulenspiegel 10:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:44, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 15:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Flaming cocktails.jpg, featured

Flaming cocktails
  • Nominate and Support norro 14:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 14:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Fabien1309 15:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Dori | Talk 15:21, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support clear and striking - Jersyko 16:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support AtelierJoly 09:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Already FP on en, by the way. --MarkSweep 19:08, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support JennaMarie83 15:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support James F. (talk) 18:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Terrific pic and wonderful illustration of the subject. --Tysto 04:59, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 12:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 15:29, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lightmatter lion catnap.jpg, not featured

Lion
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I'd like to see the entire lion, plus more resolution Dori | Talk 15:23, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack Dori Ravn 20:17, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Mbube ;-) -- Quistnix 20:17, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support Greudin
  • Support an interesting view of the lion, less cliché than many of our animal shots Peregrine981 12:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Terrific, but needs to be hi-res. Seems too closely cropped. --Tysto 04:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result 4 Support, 3 Oppose => not featured norro 22:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lightmatter wild squirrel.jpg, not featured

Squirrel
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
no vote - badly needs more resolution! - Jersyko 16:04, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose norro 16:23, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose resolution Ravn 20:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral very good photo, low resolution -- Quistnix 08:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support Greudin
Result 2 Support, 3 Oppose => not featured norro 22:18, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lightmatter seal.jpg, not featured

Seal
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Only a glimpse of the seal norro 16:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack norro -- Quistnix 20:05, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack Ravn 20:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:32, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Very illustrative, but low res. --Tysto 04:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result 1 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro 22:20, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lightmatter panda.jpg, not featured

Panda
  • Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I don't really like the tree in the foreground norro 16:28, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose resolution, composition Ravn 20:19, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose great pic but low resolution --Quasipalm 18:32, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support Greudin
  • Oppose Unremarkable composition; not hi-res. Nice panda, tho. He looks delicious... if I were, you know, gonna eat a panda. --Tysto 04:52, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 22:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Borough_of_Newham.jpg, not featured

The London Borough of Newham logo at sunset
  • Nominate and Support LoopZilla 12:53, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose artsy for the sake of being artsy, can't see anything due to the dark. Dori | Talk 23:47, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose ack -- Quistnix 05:04, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 13:36, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Sorry. No spark. --Tysto 04:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 22:23, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Herblay.jpg, not featured

Herblay in France, near Paris
  • Nominate and Support LoopZilla 21:33, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose The JPEG artifacts have ruined the image, do you have an uncompressed/not as compressed version? Dori | Talk 23:49, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose The top of the building in the centre of the photo is just outside the picture -- Quistnix 05:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => not featured norro 22:24, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Common_snail.jpg, featured

Common snail
  • Nominate and Support --Civvi 22:28, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support good image, but a higher resolution would be much better. Dori | Talk 23:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 13:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --FoeNyx 15:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 13:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 16:17, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Pixeltoo 20:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- tsca 13:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Very illustrative, but not especially artful. Not hi-res enough. --Tysto 04:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:21, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Breslau Ring Ostseite (1890-1900).jpg, featured

Wrocław
  • Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 22:34, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. I like this picture a lot. It has very nice colors. Ben 02:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support Greudin
  • support Ausir 19:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support WεFt 13:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Fabien1309 13:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 18:27, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Polydactyly 01 Lhand AP.jpg, featured

Description
  • Nominate and Support I can't explain why --Quasipalm 22:38, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support can't explain either Dori | Talk 23:51, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support who needs an explanation? -- Quistnix 05:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Greudin
  • Support --FoeNyx 15:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support JennaMarie83 15:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support tsca 10:22, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Is this outstanding against other radiographies aside from this one finger? It's an interesting object, but in my opinion no brilliant picture. norro 16:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Thomas G. Graf 17:29, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Fanghong 02:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support This is a beautiful radiograph and stunningly illustrative of its subject. The detail of the fingernails is fascinating. --Tysto 04:42, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support —Christiaan 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support David.Monniaux 12:31, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 10:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose => featured norro 18:31, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Herblay5.jpg, not featured

Herblay in France, near Paris
  • Nominate (alternative, less compression) LoopZilla 07:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support mais ça fout le cafard Greudin
  • Oppose the top of the building in the centre is just outside the picture -- Quistnix 08:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support WεFt 13:35, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Altho I'm a little bothered by the chopping of the center building, I find this strangely compelling. And I love the DOUCHES sign. --Tysto 04:38, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose norro 08:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
Result 3 support, 2 oppose >= not featured norro 17:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sea lions.jpg, not featured

Sea lions
  • Nominate and support JennaMarie83 15:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Laineypaige 15:40, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Can't really identify the single bodies, buoy is cut norro 15:50, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 13:31, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Kind of a cute pic, but nothing really special. --Tysto 04:33, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support chance is one in a thousand.--Smartneddy 07:06, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
Result 3 support, 3 oppose => not featured norro 17:01, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Landschaft Zug.jpg, not featured

Landscape Zug
  • self-nomination, just curious. --Baikonur 22:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Too dark to see the trees, which are a dull subject anyway. Dori | Talk 00:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 12:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose cf Dori's comment WεFt 13:31, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack. Dori norro 15:10, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose lacks brightness and an interesting subject -- Quistnix 16:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nice atmospheric pic. Peregrine981 10:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Pixeltoo 14:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral A little fill flash and clarify filter seems to help. Landschaft_Zug --Tysto 04:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 17:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Condoleezza_capoeira.jpg, not featured

  • Nominate and Support LoopZilla 12:38, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - nothing special -- Quistnix 16:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack. Quistnix norro 16:15, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Pixeltoo 20:57, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Fanghong 02:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Tysto 04:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 17:11, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sailing.jpg, featured

Image:Sailing.jpg
  • Nominate and Support I think it is superb.
    Pabix &; 18:02, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - So do I -- Fabien1309 18:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Lovely juxtaposition, but the water's color is all weird due to the compression I think. Dori | Talk 22:55, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 01:01, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral A great pic I stumbled upon before. But Dori is right - in full resolution, the quality is not very good. Perhaps it will be better, resampling it. --Avatar 11:08, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Why is the water violet?
  • Oppose norro 20:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Fanghong 02:19, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --FoeNyx 14:05, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose pretty, but a bit bland. Peregrine981 03:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral => featured

[edit] Image:Downtown Chicago Illinois Nov05 img 2648.jpg, not featured

  • Self nomination Maybe it's just that I'm easy to amuse, but I found this weird combination funny enough to take its picture (p.s. first self-nom so felt like going with something unusual). Dori | Talk 02:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Little bit weird, but in my opinion not something special. --Avatar 11:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Irony--Fanghong 02:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose A little too on-the-nose. Would be a good illustration for irony tho (instead of Hitler). --Tysto 04:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Seem conscious. There must be aspects that let others think unconscious. --Ananda 15:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Fabien1309 17:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support I like -- even if it was intentional --Quasipalm 04:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 10:58, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Holland Batavia at shipyard.jpg, not featured

The Batavia replica at the Batavia shipyard
  • Nominate Quistnix 06:03, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) (self-nomination)
  • Oppose but very nice. norro 16:44, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral wish I could see more of the ship, but the detail is good. Dori | Talk 03:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Nice but awkwardly framed. --Tysto 03:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
    • I was already leaning over the edge of the pier for as much as I could ;) There was a modern type of stairs just a little below the edge of the picture -- Quistnix 16:27, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support grand ship:)--Smartneddy 07:10, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
  • support--Shizhao 20:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose framing doesn't do it for me --Quasipalm 04:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 10:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chateau Laurier at night.jpg, not featured

Château Laurier in Ottawa, Canada.
  • Nominate Peregrine981 10:10, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) (not a self nomination, pic fetched from english wikipedia)
  • Oppose Too much action, blur --Avatar 11:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack. avatar norro 16:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Beautiful shot, but the building needs to be sharper. As for the traffic: the more blur the better in this kind of image. --Tysto 03:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:47, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 11:01, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Christmas_Decoration.jpg, featured

  • Nominate and Support even if it is the wrong time of year :-) --Avatar 10:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I don't like the lighting. Dori | Talk 02:55, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose too many items in the photo; it makes me restless -- Quistnix 04:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Very nice, altho in a Halmark-card kind of way. --Tysto 03:43, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nice atmosphere and composition. Peregrine981 08:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nice --fir0002 12:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 09:47, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support for the right part, Oppose for the left ... → Neutral :p FoeNyx 14:59, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - Nice light -- Fabien1309 17:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)~
  • Support getting in a christmas mood Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Shizhao 20:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Quasipalm 04:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 11:03, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Maulringschluessel.jpg, featured

Image:Maulringschluessel.jpg
  • Nominate and Support clean, nice, informative --Avatar 10:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 16:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 21:50, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nice and clean, hard to do with tools. Dori | Talk 02:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support—FoeNyx 11:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Fabien1309 13:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. James F. (talk) 19:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Really beautiful and illustrative of the subject at the same time. --Tysto 03:39, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support —Christiaan 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --fir0002 12:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Just for info: there is also Image:Maulringschluessel-1.jpg, but I think one of them as featured picture candidate is enough. --Avatar 13:02, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • oppose very clear,but black background is better.--Smartneddy 07:11, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
  • Support--Shizhao 20:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support "Maulringschluessel" sure is a mouth full for wrentch ;-) --Quasipalm 04:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 11:07, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:FirenzePonteVecchioDetail.jpg, not featured

Detail of Ponte Vecchio, Florence, Italy
  • Nominate and Support I know it's not perfect but i like it :-) --Civvi 21:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose maybe it would look better in sunlight, but like this it's too bland. Dori | Talk 02:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I tried to make a shot of it, too. It's really hard norro 12:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Nice pic, but I recommend some contrast and clarity enhancement. --Tysto 03:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose i agree with Tysto, Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 11:10, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wild rabbit US 2.jpg, not featured

A rabbit in the wild
  • Shameless self nomination (one thing I could find wrong with it is with the earth patch, but I'd like to see how others feel). Dori | Talk 03:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I would like to see the rabbit more close. Andreas Tille 05:40, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack. Andreas Tille norro 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    Have you seen the high res? I could crop it I suppose if it would help. Dori | Talk 13:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I would definitely crop it drastically in any case but then the resolution would be to low for a featured picture. For this you should be able to see single hairs. Andreas Tille 12:52, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral For kicks, I cloned some more grass for the wascally wabbit. Wild_rabbit_US.jpg --Tysto 03:26, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Fabien1309 17:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Tbc 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Shizhao 20:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 11:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Henry Vilas Zoo IMG 2407.jpg, not featured

Parrots in my local zoo
  • Another shameless self nomination (I really like these birds' colors) Dori | Talk 03:08, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Either the pair more closely or a "complete" group of three. Andreas Tille 05:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Ack. Andreas Tille norro 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral For kicks, I PSed out the oddball and racheted up the contrast and saturation. Henry_Vilas_Zoo_parrots.jpg --Tysto 03:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Shizhao 20:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 11:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lichtenstein.jpg, featured

Castle Lichtenstein
  • Selfnomination - It was nominated by sombody else at English WikiPedia so why not nominating it here? Andreas Tille 05:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 09:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support —FoeNyx 11:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support -- Quistnix 11:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Yes, why not nominating it here. It's really excellent! norro 12:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • support - tsca 13:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support here too. James F. (talk) 19:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Uwe Hermann 20:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Fanghong 02:25, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral high res looks blurred, out of focus (Do people look at the real image, I'm getting the feeling that just the thumb is looked at?) Dori | Talk 02:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Very nice image indeed. There seems to be a problem with cromatic aberration (look at the edges. Not the Autor is to blame for this, it is a problem of the used lens. --Ulenspiegel 10:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak support Beautiful shot; a little unsharp filter would help this nicely. --Tysto 03:03, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Because I've seen the Castle a couple of times in real life and it never looked this good --Flammdingo 16:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support (perhaps indeed some sharpness issues on top for instance) David.Monniaux 06:46, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Lviatour 11:06, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => featured norro 11:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Yft.jpg, not featured

Description

Yuquan hill pagoda in Beijing, China

  • Nominate and Support--Fanghong 03:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Nice pic, but not very high resolution. --Tysto 02:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose kind of washed out. Peregrine981 04:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose maybe it would look better if the sky were clear and with better visibility. Bogdan 17:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support grey sky is natural--Smartneddy 07:14, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Shizhao 20:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose, colors, composition --Thomas G. Graf 18:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
  • weak support. Nice pic. Unfortunately it's a bit grey...
    Pabix &; 15:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
Description

Modified photo, is it better? --Yongxinge 08:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 13:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dongfeng.jpg, not featured

Description
  • Nominate and Support--Fanghong 03:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Nice, but quite low resolution. --Tysto 02:58, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose too low res --Avatar 13:36, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose norro 16:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Smartneddy 07:16, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
  • Support--Shizhao 20:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose too small for featured pic imho --Quasipalm 03:59, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose, low resolution --Thomas G. Graf 18:13, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 13:34, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cincinnati-roebling-suspension-bridge.jpg, featured

Roebling Suspension Bridge in Cincinnati, night.
  • Nominate and Support --Tysto 02:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support I like it. -guety 03:09, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Slight blurring to the lower-right, but I think that that adds to the effect. James F. (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. Beautiful image and at the same time an excellent illustration. Fg2 13:28, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support LoopZilla 09:00, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Cool --fir0002 12:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support very nice lighting --Avatar 13:37, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support FoeNyx 15:03, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Lviatour 11:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Tbc 20:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose >= featured

[edit] Image:Pilgrim Father Central Park NYC.jpg, not featured

Central Park, New York City
  • Nominate and Support --Urban 06:38, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral/Support. Very nice pic. The monument itself (head) has no optimal lighting. --Avatar 13:40, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose The monument, which should be the central theme, is just an ornament. Lighting and viewpoint are putting it into the background -- Quistnix 16:17, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose The statue isn't in the centre of the pic. I also don't like the lighting. Bogdan 17:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Yann 21:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose framing bothers me... nice though --Quasipalm 03:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose composition --Thomas G. Graf 18:14, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 15:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Feeding_time.jpg, not featured

Various birds being fed at Rickmansworth Aquadrome, UK
  • Nominate LoopZilla 21:40, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose --Quasipalm 19:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support many species in the photo:)--Smartneddy 07:17, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
  • Oppose Tbc 20:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Yann 21:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose Richardfabi 11:37, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 15:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AsimovOnThrone.png, featured

Asimov on the Throne
  • Nominate and Support LoopZilla 10:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support! --Avatar 13:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 16:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose I don't like that there is a signature (Rowena), and it's sloping to the right enough to bother me. Dori | Talk 17:07, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Bogdan 17:18, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral The license has a contradiction, that should be settled. Thuresson 23:14, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Thuresson 07:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support FoeNyx 15:01, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Quasipalm 03:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 15:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lavigerie overview.jpg, not featured

Lavigerie (Cantal)
  • Self-Nomination : no vote - Fabien1309 11:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose norro 16:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The fence on the right is distracting; also the visibility for distant objects isn't great. Bogdan 17:17, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose nothing special WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - really nice, but not special enough --Thomas G. Graf 18:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose - nice but not FP for me Yongxinge 02:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 14:26, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Common blue damselfly02.jpg, featured

Common Blue Damselfly in Australia
  • Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 11:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak support. Can we get more resolution please? David.Monniaux 13:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support norro 22:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak support Really great shot, but higher res would be better still. --Tysto 00:57, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately that is as high resolution as I have, as it was taken with a cheap little kodak. --fir0002 08:40, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support - tsca ✉ 20:45, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
  • support Peregrine981 03:42, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support --Fabien1309 17:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--Fanghong 09:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Support Yongxinge 02:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 14:32, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bourbon Coffee.jpg, not featured

Yellow Bourbon Coffee, a variety of COFFEA ARABICA ; Brazil