Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Colosseo di Roma panoramic.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2011 at 19:15:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

10x2 Colosseum of Rome panoramic, taken with a Nikon d90, Zoom Nikkor 18-105
  • For now, while I improve my knowleadge on the subject... Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
What makes you believe that this is a "circular structure"??? bamse (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Not a question of believe. There are plenty of aereal photos of the Coliseum on the Internet. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
The Flavian Amphitheatre is not circular. It's elliptical. As this picture clearly demonstrates. Therefore: Symbol support vote.svg Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 15:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I honestly cannot see a better way to demonstrate the complete view on a 2D display. --Jovian Eye storm 03:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it has also high EV. Ggia (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, it is oval but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose anywway, as the geometric distortions are too large and the photo doesn't depict an accurate image of the structure. Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Onno Zweers (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Great detail. Colin (talk) 18:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Atamari (talk) 23:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vassil (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 16:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 09:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye storm 00:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Toronto - ON - Brookfield Place.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2011 at 19:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toronto: TD Canada Trust Tower
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Correct picture, nothing extraordinary justitfying the status. A bit on the soft side. Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Alvesgaspar. --Karelj (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Jovian Eye storm 00:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Catrinas 2011.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 05:52:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 07:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I like it and I can support it, but, to me, "Own work" means that you are the author of the figures, are you the author? Who is the creator?--Miguel Bugallo 16:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Photography is a medium, a window, a go between... Just about nothing that a photographer photographs is his "own work" in the strict sense of being the creator of the object photographed and the photographer of the object at the same time. While this combination is possible, statistically speaking is a rarity. A photographer captures reality according to his vision, constructs the image from several elements most likely created by someone else, man, nature, God or whatever. He does this by choosing the spatial arrangements of the objects photographed, uses technique to enhance, diminish the importance of objects, to create proportion or relationship, to isolate from the environment or to integrate to other dissimilar elements, etc., etc. In a few words, a photograph is constructed with elements, and it is the result of certain cualitative and cuantitavive values. Cuantitative values are the technical aspects, exposure, depth of field, movement control. Cualitative values are a different animal altogether, for they are culturally given, as aesthetics for example, and certain traits like color, texture, volume etc., have an appeal of different degree to different people, and are part of the cualitative aspects that influence the perception of the image. So, in this particular case, and 99.9999999999999999% of my photography, I am just a medium that chooses how much or how little to show, and my success or failure depends on my decision with regards to technique and my own perception of aesthetis, and my own cultural capital, and or knowledge or ignorance of the subject matter, which incidetally also plays a part to the observer of the image when it comes to deciding whether the image works or not. Taste is also the product of cultural capital. So, in this particular case, the objects photographed are an extraction of a larger context and reality and no, they are not my own work. My own work is a set of desicions that brings the collection of objects to the two dimensional plane called photography.--Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, too much english (I can't understand). Are you the author of the figures? Aren't you?. If you are the author, I can promove it--Miguel Bugallo 18:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
No. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose
Español: (missing text)
Lo siento, es una cuestión de principios. Los mismos principios que hacen que mis fotos estén en el dominio público son los que provocan que rechace sus fotos. No puedo, por principios, por convicciones, aprobar esta imagen, aunque la imagen me gusta. Es una postura personal, posiblemente exclusivamente mía, pero no tengo la obligación de ser igual, lo siento. Lo siento, si la próxima imagen tiene otro motivo, podré votar a favor, no es una cuestión personal, son creencias que están por encima hasta de las votaciones de Commons, aunque basadas en la legislación española, que es la legislación que conozco. Debo votar en contra de lo que parece un copyvio por el mismo motivo por el que mis fotos están en el dominio público. Aún saltándome normas de la comunidad, lo seguiré haciendo. Es una postura personal que entiendo consecuente, no es nada personal, lo haré siempre: Entienda que es algo así como parte de mi identidad, lo siento --Miguel Bugallo 22:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Por cierto, creo que voy a arriesgarme a ser bloqueado y a componer alguna imagen a partir de alguna foto suya. Expondré proximamente en su página de discusión cual es la foto. No podrá pedir usted el borrado de la misma sin solicitar el borrado de la imagen original. No me gusta el cinismo--Miguel Bugallo 22:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31215974@N00/6274120699/in/photostream--Miguel Bugallo 00:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
@Lmbuga i.e. making a photograph of a building (respecting the freedom of panorama) and nominating as a FPC it does not mean that you have to be the architect of that building. Making a photograph of a monument and proposing it as a FPC it is meaning that the monument is build by you.. If Tomascastelazo or anybody of us makes an image that is not violates copyright issues (ie FOP) can present the photo here.. For me the most important is the image to has some EV.. Ggia (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, Ggia, I think that with a translator I will can understand you. I don't understand nothing.--Miguel Bugallo 03:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Miguel Bugalo: I find your reasons to oppose rather "curious." Opposing on principle of what? This is a technical, informative and aesthetic issue, not a moral one. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jebulon (talk) 22:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 22:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unless we get additional info about the copyright of the depicted figures, I think this is a clear {{derivative}}. However, this issue is a recurring one with Tomascastelazo which I have discussed with him several times, so I won't vote against this nomination nor propose the deletion. Regards. --Dodo (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This argument is transcending the ridiculous and the old, to say the least. There are thousands and thousands and thousands of images in Wikipedia Commons that have to do with artcrafts. Ceramics, clothing, decorative items, bread, wedding cakes, easter eggs, etc., etc., that could under the logic presented here for deletion, be candidates for deletion. Seldom does a photographer is the creator of the subject matter of his photographs. Photography records many aspects of life and culture. What does an encyclopedia study? Life, things, culture! Photography in this case is a tool that enhances the value of information! To photograph these items is to bring culture into the eyes and minds of people that would otherwise not be in contact with such items... I´ve never been to Egypt, but I have an idea of what Egypt is like through photography! If someone has never heard of Catrinas in Mexico, well, guess what, through this image they just found out! Support or oppose the image based on its cultural value, its technical execution or its aesthetic value. If someone wants to nominate for deletion under whatever reasons fancies them, do it. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Commons:Derivative works. Colin (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC) I've decided to strike that reason for I think it is no longer as clear as I first thought. Compare this with the earlier featured File:Catrinas 2.jpg. That picture had a high-quality subject and was an excellent photograph. The subjects in this photograph aren't nearly as well made (indeed, their lack of artistic originality may deny them copyright and so save the image from deletion). The actual photograph is ok, a QI, but not feature level. The flash has over exposed the whitest faces, the white paper in the hats and that the bride is carrying, leading to a loss of detail. I don't mind the busy crowd of the image, though the blue next to the wedding dress is distracting. Overall, there's nothing saying "wow" that makes me think this rises above a QI. Colin (talk) 09:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As interesting as the image is, as the figures were not made by the photographer, I have no choice but to oppose on the grounds that this image is, IMO, a derivative. Should the copyright holder of the figure give permission for this particular photograph to be licensed appropriately, I would change my vote. Nice photo, Tomascastelazo. Earthsound (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I believe that these votes should not be considered valid. Here we vote for the photograph. If the photograph is violating copyright issues it should be proposed for delete.. not voting against here. When you opposing an image you give a review to the photographer to make it better as it is mentioned in the FPC rules:
"A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above."
Ggia (talk) 08:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Ggia, you are entitled to your opinion but please do not strike out other people's comments. Colin (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
These comments violate the FPC rules. By the way, it is not my image, I didn't vote anything for this image. Ggia (talk) 11:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Ggia, stop striking through other people's comments. We take your opinion that you regard those comments as irrelevant or somehow breaking some FPC rule, but you must not change other people's text in any way. Colin (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is bewildering! The precedent that this would establish is that every single item, buildings, artcraft, ceramic, stained glass, sculptures, easter eggs, wedding cakes, textiles, etc., etc., etc., and just about any particular form of cultural expression that finds its way into any type of object would not be elegible for FP!!! 99.999% of photographs depict items or things that were not created by the photographer who took and uploaded the pictures. And one more thing, if anyone believes that this is derivative work, then nominate for deletion! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Tomascastelazo, FPC is not the place to demonstrate about how unfair copyright law is. Go read Commons:Derivative works and if you are not happy with what it says, discuss that on the guideline talk page, not here. Colin (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Where are the rules that an image cannot be nominated when it is a derivative work? If you want to apply a rule like that you can propose a new rule. Not using opposing vote to other's images! Making an image of a building (repsecting FOP) and nominating here it is the same issue.. nobody complains that the photographer is not the architect of the building! Ggia (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
This image violates the artist's copyright and so is not free for us to use. It has now been nominated for deletion. Buildings do not have the same issue. Read Commons:Derivative works. Colin (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
If this image will be deleted after you speedy deletion requestion.. the image will be deleted and it will not be available here as FPC. In this cases opposing.. this candidate will not help the faster deletion of this image. I removed your votes. Don't use FPC with opposing, supporting deletion requests etc. Ggia (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Your behaviour and the issue of striking through other people's comments has now been reported to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Colin (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
If you like study a little bit the rules and see how FPC works. Ggia (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
And the rules remind us (should we need reminding) "Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images". This image is not free. It cannot become a FP and will be deleted. Colin (talk) 12:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perhaps it is time for the FPC criteria to explicitly state that the image must meet the content-related policies and guidelines. The featured-*** criteria on Wikipedia do this already. When articles are judged on Wikipedia's FAC, reviewers aren't just interested in the quality of the prose and comprehensiveness, etc., but also in whether the policies and guidelines are fully met. Whether this is stated explicitly in our criteria or is just completely obvious, we look like a bunch of fools if we promote to featured status an image that fails basic copyright checks. Colin (talk) 09:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ Colin: you look like a fool also when you state that the image is not free. You are passing judgement on something you evidently have not the most remote idea. Since you categorically state that the image is not free, then provide the evidence. Don´t "suspect" and then move on suspision. It violates the sound principle of innocent until proven guilty. I will not bother to argue in the DR page anymore on these stupid DR requests. Arguing against stupidity is useless.
    • @ Ggia, thanks! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info No user has the right to strike the vote of another user except in the specific cases identified in the rules: socks and users not untitled to vote. I have reverted Ggia edit, as it was a clear abuse. This has nothing to do with the matter under discussion and the argument that the image is a copyvio, which is ridiculous imo. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My edit clearly was not an abuse. These votes are not for the image itself.. but for copyright issues. What is this? If we want an image to be deleted we spam with opposing votes if this is nominated for FPC, QC etc? Ggia (talk) 15:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the composition spoiled by the back rows of figurines which are only just visible. (Regarding the copyright, I believe the best place to discuss that is in a DR. Suspected copyvio should not be the reason for an oppose vote. The vote will only matter if the DR is closed as a keep, and in that case, an oppose based on copyvio will look pretty silly. Nevertheless I don't think those votes should be struck by other users.) --99of9 (talk) 04:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Check this out: here is the oppose vote of Colin 18:19, 24 October 2011 [1] and the "speedy deletion" request which turned to DR is here 09:16, 26 October 2011 [2] (two days later). Colin proposed the image for deletion after my comment and my struck of the vote @ 08:01, 26 October 2011 [3]. My question is this one: can somebody oppose for copyvio reasons before proposing the image for Deletion? Is it here the appropriate place for opposing to an image because "may-be", "it is suspected" copyvio? Ggia (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm grown up enough to accept when I get things wrong. The copyright issue wasn't as straightforward as I assumed and there's a precedent with these characters Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Catrinas 2.jpg, which was only saved from deletion because the image page notes that they are on permanent display in a public place (where Mexican copyright law gives FOP rights, but the UK for example would not) -- that image was regarded as derivative of a copyrightable work. That previous image's deletion discussion was complicated by it already being a featured picture, which is why it is important to get these things right prior to featuring. IMO, where doubts were raised, the nomination should be suspended until deletion review takes place and I should have created the deletion request immediately. Colin (talk) 07:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment DR takes 7 days (or thereabouts), FPC takes 10, so I don't think we really need a suspension process, and it's not really a huge deal if something gets featured for a few days with a big DR tag on it. It's easier to just keep the two processes separate, by not letting votes in one affect votes in the other. --99of9 (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If you want my opinion.. When an image is violate copyright laws it should be deleted, nevertheless if it is FPC or whatever. If this image Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Catrinas 2.jpg violates laws.. it should be deleted.. When somebody see an image as a feature picture candidate.. and thinks that this image is "probably" copyvio should not oppose in FPC but direct request the deletion. Ggia (talk) 08:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 09:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

Image:Le sacre coeur (paris - france).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 13:09:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basilique du Sacré Cœur
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tonchino - uploaded by Tonchino - nominated by Tonchino -- Tonchino (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tonchino (talk) 13:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Quality is a little below the highest examples one may find on Commons. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Precisely. The small sensor of the camera is probably to blame. A pity that the Exif data are not shown. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why so dark with such a sunny day? Imo, underexposed, and blue looks oversaturated. Also, symmetric structures like this, should be shot from the middle, imo. This one was taken from the right. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportElmA (TalkMy files) 16:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ElmA: you cannot vote until you have 50 edits under your belt. You're almost halfway there. Earthsound (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lopsided, distorted and bad quality --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Kcynia - Kalwaria 6.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2011 at 09:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

fresco Eden (Calvary in Kcynia)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sorry but far too much chroma noise. Too much for a QI even, IMO. You need to buy a better camera. Colin (talk) 18:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I'm not convinced it's noise as opposed to simply the texture of the painting. If it is I'll consider changing my vote. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 18:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't think the painting's texture would produce those colour blotches, which are typical of high ISO chroma noise. This is a compact camera from 2006, taking an ISO 400 pic. Colin (talk) 09:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - 400? You might be right. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 22:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support faktycznie nieco zaszumione, ale ogólnie to robi dobre wrażenie --Pudelek (talk) 13:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Plan de Paris vers 1550 color.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 14:51:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Olivier Truschet et Germain Hoyau - uploaded by FA2010 - nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Monfie (talk) 23:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nice detail and very interesting illustration. -ELEKHHT 11:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- Magnifique! Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive --Llez (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:13, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great! --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 07:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Simone 21:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media/Maps

File:MS Tampa september 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2011 at 18:42:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

M/S Tampa in Norra Hammarbyhamnen, Stockholm. Tampa (former ST-742, ST=Small Tug) was built in 1944 by Tampa Marine Corporation i Florida. Solt to Finland 1949 and in Sweden since 1990s.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 16:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is way too distracting to give a clear picture of the ship :( --Kabelleger (talk) 22:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 09:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Little Malvern Hills panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2011 at 08:54:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panaorama of the Malvern Hills (AONB) with Little Malvern Priory.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- I doubt this is a panorama, given the size. If it is the image was strongly downsampled. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see distinct chromatic aberation, and I have a feeling that a HDR-type post-processing has been applied, leaving darkish (resp. whitish) halos around some elements. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 17:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Breitling Wingwalkers 0622.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 15:15:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Breitling Wingwalkers


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Car of the Future 1950.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2011 at 22:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

1950 Studebaker Concept
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Arthur C. Bade - uploaded by Swtpc6800 - nominated by Swtpc6800 -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 22:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info "Car of the Future" as conceived by Studebaker's Director of Styling, Raymond Loewy, in the August 1950 issue of Science and Mechanics.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Here is a 300 dpi JPG of the cover before restoration.-- Swtpc6800 (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 22:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeElmA (TalkMy files) 11:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Vote not valid, because no enough contributions in "Commons".--Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Could you please explain, in few words, why do you oppose? It is not a mandatory, but very appreciated, in the way to improve the quality next time. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 14:16, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
      • Old. Old style. Strange looking. –ElmA (TalkMy files) 16:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
        • Yes it is old and strange looking, that is the point. The comment below by Alvesgaspar is more informative and helpful. --Swtpc6800 (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sorry but I don't think the illustration is among the very best in its category. One of the things I deslike is the cropped car, at right; another is the too obvious printing dot pattern. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Porto Covo November 2010-3a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 18:16:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. View to north at the end of the day. Compare with this FP of the same place, taken at a different hour and time of the year. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Already one image of that place is featured. I don't find so exciting this landscape to support a new version of this landscape to be featured. Asthetically is not a well balanced image.. look the lower right corner - this part is not nice for the whole composition. Ggia (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Cheetah portrait Whipsnade Zoo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 06:30:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Anhäuser Mauer.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 10:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Anhäuser Mauer, wall from a former monastery.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Memorino - uploaded by Memorino - nominated by Basvb -- Basvb (talk) 10:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Reminds me of this picture, the winner of our first POTY contest. But neither the composition nor the image quality (light, sharpness, color) are comparable. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support definitely excellent composition and nice point of view, subdued light (not absolutely negative – better than the oversaturated one Alves mentioned). Maybe not superb quality, but I think it's one of the best images on Commons. Earned winner of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Germany. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with Alvesgaspar, the lighting seems rather dark. Tiptoety talk 00:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unexplainable for me how this picture could get winner of the Wiki Loves Monuments contest, the technic is below average, the composition is quite okay but not very special, sorry but there are much more better pictures in rearmost positions --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I guess WLM is not just about only FP's, there are other qualities juries might search for in a picture (the proffesional photographers view is very different, and technical quality is sometimes put as second important), see also the pictures that won in WLM 2010 (nl). Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I find the overall quality of the WLM known winners (here), from five contries, very disappointing and hope that the same does not happen with the remaining countries. That is of course the result of the extremely poor average quality of the uploaded pictures, many of them (not to say the majority) being close to trash. In my opinion the incentive made by the national organizers to upload as many pictures as possible is to blame. A shame, really. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:22, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • 10% more of the 60.000 monuments in the netherlands got an average picture, so now 60% of all monuments are covered. Some pictures are trash, but more then 90% is just acceptable quality. Not everything is a featured picture, or intented to be one. And as said before, some of the jury also look to other things then just technical quality. I think that saying most is trash just means you haven't looked good enough. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Good to know that the Netherlands may be an exception! Where are their results, btw? Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • The Dutch results are on my computer, you'll see them on 5 november, but we were talking about average quality, so the 50 best are not that interesting for that discussion. I don't think the dutch pictures are so much better then other countries on average. I've seen a lot of wonderfull pictures in for example Portugal and France as well. And in all that quantity in Germany there must be something wonderfull as well. Indeed quantity was an important aspect of the competion, you've to make it if you want to cover all those tens of thousands of monuments, but what if you would ask users to only upload good pictures? All that will happen is that you get less pictures, you wont get more good ones. I agree that it's hard to find the better ones between all the average ones (6 out of 10). I'll publish my selections of 1000, 250 and 100 best dutch pictures (IMO) after 5 nov. I would like some input after that, what others think about it, how many are suitable for for example FP or QI. I guess watching the short lists gives a much better impression on quality. I can link you to last years selections from me: User:Basvb/WLM (many of those QI), and User:Basvb/500 (everything catching the eye, also some bad quality here that's on purpose). And then I would like to ask you a list of monuments, to see how the pictures are used, because the thing is that they have to illustrate the monument, most of the pictures do not intent to be of the best quality (it's quite hard to make 60.000 very good quality images). The focus is still on getting good coverage. And people like me wont be able to upload those wonderfull perfect pictures, so then people like me can better focus on getting a lot of the monuments a picture. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, it would have been possible to increase the average quality without affecting the monument coverage, by limiting the number of photos per monument, per user. When browsing through the photos of my own country I realized that many users (especially those with an astronomical number of images) took several photos of the same monument, most of them substandard, as if they wished to break some kind of record. It is amazingly high the number of shots made with the camera pointing upward (most of times a compact camera with a small focal distance), from a short distance of the monument, suggesting that they were made "on the move", without the slightest concern for quality. I'm sure we need more inteligence (or just some common sense) in the way the contest is organized, and not only by limiting the number of images. For example, by agreeing on a didactic text, common to all countries, were some basic principles are stated and explained with examples. And, of course, a set of common requirements used for: (i) rapidly browsing through the whole sets and promptly eliminate the photos not respecting those principles; (ii) helping the jury to chose the best photos on the basis of some agreed critera: ev, image quality, artistic value, size, absence of obvious manipulations, etc., whatever it is considered relevant. It is my conviction that a great improvement on the quality of the contributions could be achieved by implementing very simple measures, like the ones I have suggested. Btw, why very few of the best Commons' photographers have participated in the contest? Maybe because they didn't consider the model serious enough! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Well myself I've made 100 pictures of some monuments (e.g a castle) from all different corners and every corner in the building. I think it gives a nice overview for the castle, and I think an extra picture isn't preventing another one from being uploaded, you can always choose not to use a picture on commons, but you can't choose to use a picture which is not on commons... I think a lot of rules and warnings for participants just makes the things (as usual) only more complicated, thus only resulting in less pictures, not in better ones. Part of the goal from the contest was to give new users an easy chance to contribute to Wikipedia. That people do not want to participate on forhand is their own choice, and I don't think it has much to do about what they think of the model, I think it has more to do with the fact that they don't find it nice to compete for prices, but prefer just to upload without competition and prices (they want to do real voluntairy work). Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Would be interesting to experience what "other things" was the basis for a image competition than image criteria. And it is undoubtful that there were a couple of pictures clearly reasonable for the 1. place than this picture is. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Hmm, well look to the picture which won in the Netherlands last year, that for sure wasn't the picture with the best technical quality, but it had character. Something happend there, it told a story. A lot of people said the winner was crap/shouldn't have won. But some proffesional photographers said as first response to the results: wow what a nice picture with a good story. (It's difficult for me to explain in English exactly. Other question: Wladyslaw, which pictures in the (german) top 100 do you think should have won (or are suitable for FP (then you'll see nominations :P)), or do you think the winners are not in the top-100? I can't ask you to watch 32.000 images :P, althought I must say I learned a lot of those hours I spend watching all the 13000 dutch pictures. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • It is not possible to identify those "other things" because no common evaluation criteria existed! Each country had complete autonomy and I very much doubt that such criteria were established in each of them, before the evaluation started! - Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I can explain these other things, but just in Dutch. Indeed each country had autonomy, althought there where some basic rules, I guess more rules would have ment worse coöperation between the countries, althought it could be considered. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good view! --Pudelek (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice composition but the technical quality isn't OK for a FP:image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Emily Osment 2010 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 10:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Emily Osment performing live at KISS concert in May 2010


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People

File:Hemikypta marginata MHNT vol perspective.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2011 at 13:27:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small treehopper, mounted specimen.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like a creature from hell! --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 00:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 00:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tnt1984 (talk) 09:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral While the subject looks really nice, there are some strange posterization in the background which makes no sense at all. It's like something in the picture is wrong. AzaToth 18:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • This specimen is small, pierced by a pin and the bottom of a box. I try to make him a background that emphasizes it without distorting it. I still have to work this.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 22:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 11:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 13:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Keri majakas.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 15:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keri lighthouse
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Andrus Uuetalu - uploaded by Andrus Uuetalu - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Excellent composition (I'm impressed), so-so image quality (some noise reduction could be applied to the sky). But I'm not allowed to support the panorama while the head of one of the characters is missing! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Fix the stitching problem I noted & I won't have a problem supporting this. Nice composition, btw. Earthsound (talk) 18:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Addendum: the missing head that Alvesgaspar mentioned & the water on the horizon doesn't meet well on the left side, close to the building. Earthsound (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Edited version[edit]

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I've tried to fix the problems by retouching the image.  ■ MMXX  talk 22:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You should replace the original with this file. Earthsound (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think it can be done because the picture is most probably part of the on-going internatoonal contest "Wiki loves monuments" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I guess that can just be done, also for WLM-images, they are just like all other files. ~If it's for some jury they might always decide to look to the old version. So just overload it I guess if you want to. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Also consider that for correcting this image I had to create something unreal, so it's preferred not to upload over the original file anyway.  ■ MMXX  talk 23:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • It may be a language barrier issue, but I'm not sure what you mean by "I had to create something unreal". My suggestion would be either replace the original FPC you submitted with this one or, if you don't want to replace it, withdraw your FPC submission and submit the edited version for FP consideration. It's a great image. Earthsound (talk) 05:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • What you suggested above was to replace the original file with this one. That can't be done due to the on-going contest. As to replacing the picture in the original nomination, that is not usually the best way because we never know to what version the vores apply. For me, submiting an alternative, like MMXX did is the correct procedure. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • @Earthsound: About "something unreal" I meant the part I removed the person and cloned some bushes to repair the barn's wall.  ■ MMXX  talk 00:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Per my comments in the original nomination. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --WikedKentaur (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Karachi - Pakistan-market.jpg, not delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 22:03:35
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Resolution 947 × 720, too small. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Paris 16 (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist I concur AzaToth 22:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep -- Still an amazing picture. No sense in delisting based on size. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist This is not small because technology has moved on, this is small because it was savagely downsampled. The camera shoots at 6.3 Mpx. --99of9 (talk) 04:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Alvesgaspar, technology has moved but not the impression what makes a featured picture --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Did you even read what 99of9 even said? AzaToth 12:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I did and I wounder why this point was subsidiary backwards and now should be main argument for removal. In general I am for conservation of the status quo. A removal should only be possible in very well founded cases and sorry for that: but "to few pixels" is not very founded. Apart from that: commons is a online side and not a advertising agency which needs high resolution for pre-press work. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Then you might want to take it up on Commons:Image guidelines to reduce the requirements. AzaToth 13:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The original candidate was before the guidelines was set up. New pictures have to fulfill this rules, older picture have not. This is by the way a legal principle in each every civilized system. That is what I meant with conservation of the status has to be respected. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The featured picture criteria changes, and as the text on COM:FPC says "Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture." AzaToth 14:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Everything is said already in this case. And I guess you are familiar with the difference between "it may be decided" or "it has to be decided". I see no automatism, that FP get one day to small so they have to be removed. EOD --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Although the question of Ex post facto law depends on you cultural background, the guideline remains clear on the subject, like Azatoth elaborated. Delisting is not about retroactively applying the current guidelines, it's about the personal believes concerning the consistent quality of the current cluster of featured pictures. From time to time this consistency ceases to exist from a subjective point of view. Hence, it remains an individual decision to delist an image for reasons such as downsampling. And so do I.

@Wladyslaw I'd be rather careful about defining civilized systems by their standing towards retroactive laws. Since you live in Germany, you might want to know that retroactive laws were applied twice in German history. Once at the Nuremberg trials and for the second time at the Wall-shooter's trial. Regarding your statement on the character of Commons: Commons:Project scope clearly defines that media files on the Commons are made available to all. That does include advertising agencies. It's not about either or, it's about making content available to all out there, and yes this includes advertising agencies. You might want to notice that advertising agencies are not the only ones re-using high resolution content. Closing the gap and being able to deliver content even to the professional media industry will help to accomplish the aim of a universal distribution of our media files to everyone. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep - most current nominations are paling compared to this image. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Dura lex sed lex --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per Alvesgaspar. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Nice image, as Alvesgaspar. --Karelj (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per 99of9 --Jovian Eye storm 23:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It really is a nice image with those colours and composition but, besides the fact that quality is very very low (it was taken a long time ago, technology changes bla bla bla whatever), I can see that focus is not on the guy. So it makes it even worse. Compare the blanket on the right side, nearest to the camera, well focused, with the same blanket, near the guy. The guy is out of focus. Lighting on his face is not very good either. Iso value is high at 400 (not determinant, I know), and f value is very low at 5,6. What 99of9 said is true too. Too many problems, not even geotagged; maybe valued image, but not FP, delist. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist The image very low size.. per 99of9. Ggia (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Palais du Luxembourg 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 14:50:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:The Garden of Dahlia, Fulda, Germany.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 13:58:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Garden of Dahlia


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Pruszkow Elektrownia cropped.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 11:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A power plant in Pruszków, Poland


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:20110725 Budha eyes closeup Bodhnath Stupa Kathmandu Nepal.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 15:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boudhanath stupa, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I trying to avoid having the subject in the center.. if you like look to the artcile Rule of thirds. And the image not dark according to my monitor settings. Ggia (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Butterflies (Costa Rica).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 16:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Butterflies
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Edwin Dalorzo - uploaded by ahura - nominated by ahura -- AHURA♠ 16:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AHURA♠ 16:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like the out-of-focus background but IMO the DOF is too shallow and unnecessarily so (at f1.8 85mm) -- could have increased the shutter speed (1/1600). The result is that that left butterfly isn't in focus and I suspect overall sharpness would have been improved by stopping down a little. But it is a nice picture so I'm torn. Colin (talk) 16:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a bad picture (I really like how the two eyes are combined to a single "face"), but the sharpness isn't convincing, the cut-off branch on the left site is disturbing, and the background is noisy. --Kabelleger (talk) 22:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 09:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many areas of focus. CA on the top edge of the branch. Contrast too pronounced. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Psdeepesh (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Sorry, new account (see rules) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Poor image quality: marginal dof, oversaturation, tight crop. What a strange exposure choice! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- no information about the species of butterfly. --Simone 21:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Eclectus roratus 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 07:26:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a male Eclectus Parrot, Eclectus roratus
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 07:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Despite some noise (probably due to ISO 400): an excellent picture! -- MJJR (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 05:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 17:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question If you used the flash, you could have used lower ISO with faster aperture isn't it? When I checked metadata, I noticed f/5.6 and t=1/60s, with flash on: it looks like you really had bad light, or at least you must have had to shoot from considerable distance. I am intrigued by these values in metadata. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It was a difficult natural light with shadow, the bird was very active and in some distance. I made a series of photos, this was the best I got --Llez (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 11:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 13:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 09:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Mycena-strobilicola .jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 10:36:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants

File:Glimmertintling-Coprinus-micaceus.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2011 at 15:21:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coprinus micaceus
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition problem: bad point of view with the overlapping mushrooms in foreground (the main motive) and those in the background. The latter are also cut off at top, so there the crop is too tight. I don't like the leaves, too, which are disturbing and don't suit in the composition IMHO. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 11:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--H. Krisp (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Vladikin Dvor - Bishop’s Palace - Vladichevski Dvor - Novi Sad - Serbia.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 14:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Bad crop; chromatic noise; stitch errors AzaToth 15:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Fuyu Persimmon (Diospyros Kaki).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 18:27:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fuyu Persimmon


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye storm 22:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Food and drink

File:Hot air balloon - Trakai, LTU.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 13:00:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hot air balloon in Trakai (Troki), Lithuania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like lightning and colors on this one. The one above is better, IMO (+ I like the detail with people in the basket). --Lošmi (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose My comment is the same like the other image above: I don't find something featurable here. If the image illustrates a hot air balloon.. another view can better demonstrate this object. Ggia (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Changuch with hut, Uttarakhand, India.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2011 at 11:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Changuch with hut, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Yann (with the help of Mmxx), uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is a nice pic, but, the lighting on the hut is very bad, which is disturbing. The crop isn't the best either with too much sky and little ground before the hut. Otherwise a very nice image. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes, the hut is in the shadow. Later in the day, it may be in the sun, but then the mountain is in the clouds. Yann (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Cucurbita 2011 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 18:20:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Squashes and pumpkins


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Food and drink

File:Fallow Deer (Dama dama).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 23:20:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fallow Deer
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request - The centered composition doesn't work so well here and the deer look boxed in. I kind of would like to see this pic a bit from an angle so we could see a bit of the side of a deer, less boring rectangles of grass and shrub, but of course this is kind of a lucky shot, even if they were in captivity. Is it possible to re-crop it so there's more background around the deer to the sides, top? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IdLoveOne (talk • contribs) 00:07, 30 October 2011 UTC (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 06:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Please tell us where the image was taken. --Cayambe (talk) 09:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Thank you, Cayambe, just I added the camera location.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per my comment above -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 03:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Platycercus caledonicus - Collinsvale.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 08:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green Rosella (Platycercus caledonicus), Collinsvale, Tasmania, Australia


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Appreciate America. Come On Gang. All Out for Uncle Sam (Mickey Mouse) NARA 513869.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2011 at 12:55:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Appreciate America Inc. and Walt Disney, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support War propaganda with the famous Walt Disney character. Historical document finally free of copyright. -- Yann (talk) 12:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Heissluftballon over Uetersen 3493 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 14:04:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

GEO hot air balon
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lošmi (talk) 23:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tamba52 (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find something featurable here. If the image illustrates a hot air balloon.. another view can better demonstrate this object. Ggia (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 09:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice light --Ritchyblack (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Schloss Pottenbrunn 1.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 19:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Pottenbrunn in St. Pölten/Lower Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by AleXXw -- AleXXw 19:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AleXXw 19:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You should definitely try a perspective correction. --Kabelleger (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
    Hi Kabelleger, I wrote on QIC on the same: 'The tower is ~20m high, because of trees I stood ~26m away. So the bottom front edge is ~26m away, the top of the spire ~40m. So for me it's natural to be titled, shall I "fake" the vertical lines? Sorry if I'm wrong ;)'. So, I still don't know how I should do that :) ---AleXXw 10:18, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Making the vertical lines parallel in your image; this can easily be done but I do not think it should be done in this case. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I know how to do it in Gimp, but I don't know how I should do it here. It would look completly wrong ;) --AleXXw 13:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I uploaded a new version with perspective correction. Yann (talk) 11:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but now it looks definitly wrong... It looks like the tower gets wider on top. --AleXXw 12:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as of the current image version. The new image version (with changed perspective) should not use the same file name, as one cannot show old and new version as alternatives. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Yann's edit

Pictogram voting info.svg Info On top is the original picture again, Yann's edit is on the right side. Greets --AleXXw 00:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose of this alternative, reason given above -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Struthio camelus portrait Whipsnade Zoo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2011 at 11:42:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ostrich (Struthio camelus)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Toronto - ON - Skyline10.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2011 at 13:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toronto: skyline at night
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Such a frequently photographed skyline demands a really good image for FP. It doesn't compare against detail of File:126 - Toronto - Panorama - Septembre 2009.JPG or the attractiveness of the already featured File:122 - Toronto - Septembre 2009.jpg. Colin (talk) 12:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Just because other good pictures were taken doesn't mean this one is bad. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 22:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good on it's own merits. Other FP's were taken in different angle, and in different time of the day. --Lošmi (talk) 23:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The picture is very nice and HQ no doubt, but I think is very important to get the reflections of this skyline on the lake. I was there recently too. A pity not to show them. And I also think that would have added more balance to the composition, which imo is too tightly cropped at the bottom. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 09:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Windows of Santa Ana 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2011 at 12:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Conspectus of the figured windows of the Cathedral Santa Ana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work! Yann (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wow, wonderful work! The presence of some chromatic noise is fully mitigated by the overall quality, beauty and value of the image. Congrats! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 17:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Are the surrounding that dark and are they positioned there in real life, or are they multiple images concatenated? Want to know before I cast my mostly important vote :) AzaToth 22:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info They are not positioned in this way. In the Cathedral Santa Ana exist only five figured medieval Windows, two in the northern transept, two in the southern transept and one, quite different (Mary with Jesus), in the central crossing. This picture is a conspectus of them (five single photos, on black backgound). --Llez (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 00:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great --Paolo Costa (talk) 06:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 11:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 13:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Manakamana Temple Nepal.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2011 at 07:59:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manakamana Temple in Manakamana, Gandaki, Nepal
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Many shortcomings : poor image quality, unfortunate lighting, random composition. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 17:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Tauraco erythrolophus -London Zoo, England-8a.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 06:13:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-crested Turaco (Tauraco erythrolophus)
  • Would a tighter crop help (see suggested crop)? —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • It isn't sharp enough for a portrait. Sorry. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for the feedback. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Commodore 2001 Series-IMG 0448b.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 16:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Commodore PET 2001 computer. On display at the Musée Bolo, EPFL, Lausanne.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 16:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Shame the display wasn't on. A very high quality and useful image. Colin (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- It is certainly useful and perhaps a Valued Image. But nothing extraordinary justifies here the FP seal and quality is on the lower side, due to poor lighting and unsharpness. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The floating I find unappealing, and the reflections on the screen are also a minus. --ELEKHHT
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 11:51, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar.--Claus (talk) 07:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-04-24-ouv-g-1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 12:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside an old NATO station.


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-07-22 14-29-55-ouv-g.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 12:25:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tunnel inside an old NATO station


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Arctocephalus galapagoensis2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 23:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galápagos Sea Lion (Zalophus wollebaeki)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Justiniana Prima, aeroimage.tif[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2011 at 11:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because jpg image created instead Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Arles anfiteatro panorama da più basso-2011-10-31.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 13:09:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arles Roman Amphitheatre
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by DonPaolo - uploaded by DonPaolo - nominated by DonPaolo -- DonPaolo (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- DonPaolo (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Toh, un altro Paolo, piacere!! allora, in quanto al panorama, devo dire che sono presenti aberrazioni cromatiche tipo cyan/magenta, ad esempio molto visibili nell'estremo sinistro. Secondo, dovresti provare una correzione di prospettiva in quanto si richiede che la linee verticali siano a 90º rispetto all'orizzonte lungo tutta l'immagine. Finalmente, il cielo è sovraesposto in alcuni punti e sono presenti "stitching errors", cioé errori nell'incollatura delle immagini. Tutte queste cose devono essere corrette per ottenere lo status di Featured Picture, qui la gente é molto esigente, la foto deve essere quasi perfetta e molte volte si richiede anche migliore illuminazione del sole. Ti consiglio di trovare il software di Lightroom, col quale puoi correggere facilmente tutti gli errori che ho evidenziato. Buona fortuna e saluti! --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Roanoke City (Virginia) from Mill Mountain Star at Dusk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2011 at 12:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roanoke City from Mill Mountain Star at Dusk


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Jovian Eye storm 20:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:86 ACPS Atlanta 1996 Swimming General Views.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 03:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paralympic swimmer post-race
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by John Sherwell - uploaded by Tony.naar - nominated by LauraHale -- LauraHale (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LauraHale (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good picture but poor quality (very noisy) --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Ernte in der Provénce.jpeg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 17:06:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photograph of Van Gogh's Harvest in Provénce (1888).


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media

File:Seagull at Sesimbra Church.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 22:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seagull in Sesimbra´s church roof
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by João Trindade - uploaded by JozeSlb - nominated by JozeSlb -- JozeSlb (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JozeSlb (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not very informative neither about the seagull nor even for the church. --Javier ME (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Javierme. Also: the structure at left is cropped. --Cayambe (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Shaggy inkcaps (Coprinus comatus).JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 04:28:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shaggy inkcaps (Coprinus comatus)

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the inkcaps has a big, dark, grainy and fluffy gloria around them that looks suspicious, almost like a cut-n-paste job. AzaToth 21:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

    • That was some bad noise removal. I uploaded a new version, hopefully I have fixed it. I also lightened it slightly. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better :) Sorry for nitpicking, but perfection rules imperfection! AzaToth 22:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportVery good--H. Krisp (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Darius Baužys talk 15:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants

File:Sympetrum sanguineum qtl13.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 13:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruddy darter
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A male Ruddy Darter (Sympetrum sanguineum) in obelisk posture for thermoregulation. Created, uploaded and nominated by Quartl (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quartl (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Technical Symbol support vote.svg Support for the quality, Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral regarding replacement for File:IMG 3140 odonata.jpg which is currently FP for Sympetrum sanguineum (per it's description). AzaToth 15:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't see why we can't have more than FP for one species (just take a look at Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals, especially when the two are different in some way. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    • The image guideline states "Normally there should never be two featured pictures that are just different versions of the same image, so if a better version exists the original version should be delisted". While it's not a must, it's still in the guideline (and while some sees the guideline merely as a paper to ignore, others see it as strict minimum rules) AzaToth 16:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
      • Same image and same species are different IMO. They have a different crop, different lighting, etc., as well as having different body colouring. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportVery nice--H. Krisp (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support still nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportVery nice--Miguel Bugallo 22:38, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Javier ME (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Darius Baužys talk 15:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg, delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 19:03:28
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Reason for delist: this version of same photo is featured now. (Original nomination).
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per George Chernilevsky. Ggia (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom --Jovian Eye storm 23:33, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist I agree, we have a much better version now. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Thanks for supporting quality. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 07:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist very good and useful documentary character, but both quality and the image itself (it's more a snapshot) are not outstanding --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Per others. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Per nom. --Lošmi (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Ascocoryne-sp.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2011 at 10:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 15:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Dama mesopotamica (Brooke 1875, endangered).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2011 at 00:40:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The "Persian fallow deer" is endangered. Only 340 "Persian fallow deer" are living worldwide. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sadly I have to oppose this one. The subject looks pretty fine, and the setting is nice. But the really bad clonejob on the left destroys the image (Why where is even needed?) AzaToth 02:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Good quality picture but not special enough for reaching the FP status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- upload a new version without the irritating cloning on the left, and I'll support. --Simone 16:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Hammamet-Sud beach R03.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 17:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hammamet-Sud (Tunisia): the beach
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by MJJR - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose highly visible chromatic noise and the scene aint that interesting. AzaToth 21:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose noisy and yellowish. More "beach" will be better too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Quito-San Francisco-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2011 at 21:38:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of San Francisco, Quito - Ecuador.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the image is too small -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Blackfriars Bridge dusk.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2011 at 05:28:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blackfriars Bridge at dusk, London

File:20110810 North Face of Everest Tibet China Panoramic.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2011 at 20:29:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mount Everest North Face as seen from the path to the base camp, Tibet.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 20:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Panoramic view of Mount Everest (from the everest base campe 5100m @ Tibet). -- Ggia (talk) 20:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
    • How did you like the trip? :) Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
    • I arrived to base camp @5100m by bus not by trekking. The most hard to go into Tibet is to get a visa and an organized tour guide due to the Chinese goverment rules. Ggia (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Congratulations! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 00:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd give you three positives for such an amazing shot, if it was possible. I actually envy you. What a nice trip, and good weather conditions at the time the picture was taken. Congrats. --Paolo Costa (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 10:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:37, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Although I thought that Mount Everest was higher than that ;-). odder (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely featurable to me, albeit lighting is a bit flat. That FP from Lucag better shows the relief of the subject. - Benh (talk) 09:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Wasserspeier am Stephansdom III.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2011 at 02:28:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gargoyle of St. Stephen's Cathedral, Vienna
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Haeferl - nominated by Haeferl -- Haeferl (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Haeferl (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose chromatic aberration AzaToth 03:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice lighting and well captured... but the CA (violet fringes) and the unsharpness of the head at full resolution do not make it suitable for FP status. --Cayambe (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cayambe. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Мечеть Санкт-Петербурга. Майолика портала.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2011 at 08:50:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Petersburg Mosque. Maiolica of portal.
please login first. Ggia (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lošmi (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNot sharp enough.--Jebulon (talk) 17:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not sharp enough considering the resolution, and tilted. Valued image, perhaps, featured picture, no. --Simone 16:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2011 at 11:48:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the courtyard of the Blue Mosque, in Istanbul, Turkey. The courtyard has a square shape, but the mercator projection necessary to squeeze all the field of view into the frame bends the horizontal lines. Panorama created with Hugin.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Benh - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 11:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- David C. S.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition, colors, symmetry, quality. Very good. --Paolo Costa (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A good picture, but some parts overexposed, CA e.g. at the left side on the lower part of the left minaret, and "ghosts", which should be removed. --Llez (talk) 09:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Hi, hope I don't sound like trying to influence (just trying to share, and maybe help some people who don't have experienced to realise). But when taking night shots, one is faced with the contrast challenge. It's very difficult not to have some burnt parts. Then I could go for multiple exposures blending trick, but this would extend the time I spent taking the sources picture. I can't do that in fast decreasing light like what happens at dusk or I would lose the lighting consistency between the pics. I shall say that I haven't found the trick, but if someone knows I'd be happy to know :). As for the ghosts, this is recurring issue, and again, it's hard not to have a few of these in a busy touristy place like this one. I've waited a moment to have a spot with this "few" people on it. - Benh (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent evening shot. -- MJJR (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lošmi (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quite good. I like it. --NorbertNagel (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kvnst (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A very good picture taken in difficult conditions. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all the criteria. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tnt1984 (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Albertus teolog (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Haapsalu raudteejaam kaugelt.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 08:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haapsalu railway station
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kadarpik - uploaded by Kadarpik - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- WikedKentaur (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Super. -- -donald- (talk) 10:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support minimal stitching errors, otherwise very good --Böhringer (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose A stitched panorama should have a superb quality, and the severe stitching errors in combination of the relative low JPEG quality (losts of ghosting, visible artifacts) is a no no to me. AzaToth 15:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Lines are not straight all along the image, there're stitching errors, 1 Mb size on a pano is kinda low imo, crop is too tight at the sides and top (cropped a part of the structure out), lighting is not ideal here either so... Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Stitch errors seen. It is a good composition and it might be possible to stitch the parts together again with a better result. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Frankly I consider the linear composition a bit boring, as well as the lighting and color. The building seems to be gliding to the right and the antenna (or flag pole) on top of the roof is cropped. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Jesus! No. Too many errors. Béria Lima msg 15:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Versailles view from Place d'armes.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 06:35:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Versailles gardens view from "Place d'Armes", in Paris, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Paolo Costa (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose while the scene is intresting, I feel it's badly cropped related to the fountain the the foreground. AzaToth 21:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support reminds me of Category:Photochrom pictures from the Library of Congress. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- David C. S.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus (talk) 07:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Washed-out colors due to poor lighting conditions. I don't like the crop of the fountain either. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose cropped badly with respect to the fountain. --Simone 17:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places

File:Бернардинський монастир. Ізяслав. 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2011 at 09:20:00
Bernardine Monastery, Iziaslav, Ukraine

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by --Bulka UA (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bulka UA (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Could almost be FPX'd, in my opinion. Unsharp overall, building is overexposed and blown-out. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Bulka UA (talk) 14:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Thun vs Lausanne-IMG 0177.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2011 at 23:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FC Thun vs FC Lausanne on 23 of October 2011: Dennis Hediger (17) showing it's not his fault if Jocelyn Roux (9) performs loopings during the match.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info FC Thun vs FC Lausanne on 23 of October 2011: Dennis Hediger (17) showing it's not his fault if Jocelyn Roux (9) performs loopings during the match. Created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice catch. A bit unsharp, but this is understandable. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose downsampled. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
    It can be also simply a crop!? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
    Rather unlikely if noticing the standard resolution of 5.616 pixel × 3.744 pixel and comparing it to the current resolution. Correct me if I'm wrong, Rama. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
    I know it from my own images: I use very often a crop! And 300mm can't be enough in a soccer stadium. I think that image is simply a crop for a better composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
    It is a crop. 300mm gives a wider field of view at that distance. -- Rama (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Thanks for pointing that out, Rama. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad background.--Claus (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:A-10 Thunderbolt 9875.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 14:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A-10 Thunderbolt


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:EgyptIsraelBorderEilat.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 14:12:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Egypt/Israel border
Done. Wilson44691 (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)--Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Lošmi (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Poor image quality. Come on guys! Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Again, what is the idea of that, please tell us, why this is "featurable". --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Justiniana Prima, aeroimage.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2011 at 12:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Martin Luther King press conference 01269u edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 12:07:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dr. Martin Luther King at a press conference in 1964
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Marion S. Trikosko - restored, uploaded and nominated by PETER WEIS TALK 12:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Any idea where it was taken, so that it could be geocoded? Yann (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoI doubt you can do it. You must know the exact coordinates for the speaker's desk he is leaning on. It was taken in the United States Capitol. Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King attended the Senate's debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Compare File:MLK and Malcolm X USNWR cropped.jpg. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:47, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
    • OK, I got the same info. ;o) That's enough to geocode it. Yann (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Inspiring --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad crop. --Claus (talk) 07:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 14:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Persepolis 24.11.2009 11-18-45.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2011 at 11:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Persepolis
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Hansueli Krapf - uploaded by Simisa - nominated by ahura21 -- AHURA♠ 11:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AHURA♠ 11:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose persepolis is one of my favorite archaeological places.. and this is a nice object from that archaeological place.. but the general composition is not featurable.. too much sky to the top part of the image.. the mountain is just behind the object etc.. A better composition of this object is possible. Ggia (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As per Ggia. --Javier ME (talk) 16:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The sheer quality is impressive to me... -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 02:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Unfortunate composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose Lovely colours, great quality, bad composition. Weak oppose, nevertheless oppose. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 20:59, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.Jacopo188 (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC) -- Too late. Voting period is over. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:(1) UNSW entrance a2.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2011 at 10:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sardaka - uploaded by Sardaka - nominated by Sardaka -- Sardaka (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sardaka (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too oversaturated, for "featurable" nothing special. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Ara ararauna qtl3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 13:51:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Blue-and-yellow Macaw
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Portrait of a Blue-and-yellow Macaw (Ara ararauna). Created, uploaded and nominated by Quartl (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quartl (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 14:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose File:Ara ararauna (Linnaeus 1758).jpg is allready featured picture, and I don't think this image has any higher quality than that one. AzaToth 16:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    Please ask a biologist. You see here a relaxed/chilled ara, the other image shows an excited ara. That is the difference. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vassil (talk) 06:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The DOF is excellent Gauravjuvekar (talk) 12:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Avenger TBM.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 08:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avenger TBM, Airshow "OTT" in Hahnweide, Germany


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Contra G.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 11:36:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trickfotografie
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Ritchyblack (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ritchyblack (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, ach nö! How it is made??? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    • It's described on the image page in autotranslated engrish. AzaToth 16:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose way too pixelized. AzaToth 16:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image! Good work! JozeSlb (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • same as AzaToth, but should be fixable --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice picture, but no encyclopedic value. InverseHypercube 22:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support I see it's used on some German articles, and the illusion alone gives it EV. InverseHypercube 22:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic work! :-) -- Ra'ike T C 00:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mmh - blue and orange, how nice! --Schnobby (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- David C. S.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp.--Claus (talk) 07:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it as the final result of the whole process you took to take a picture like this. --Lošmi (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Poor image quality: too obvious posterization and halos around subject. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - The water falling up I don't understand why? What do you want the image to tell? Beside that the technical issues raised above. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
What I want to tell. Vodka does not like lemon. This illusion is only possible through a trick.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alves--Citron (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose technical problems per Alvesgaspar. Not convinced the concept works, nor the EV of it (its use seems contrived). This is just a trick photo. Colin (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:L'Embarquement pour Cythere, by Antoine Watteau, from C2RMF retouched.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2011 at 08:18:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Antoine Watteau - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Vive la résolution! Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! Yann (talk) 11:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive resolution! --Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great. Tomer T (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - resolution so good that it initially crashed my browser =( --Simone 15:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At first I thought this painting was like a big room in size because of the resolution... But when I noticed the actual work was a bit less than 2 meters in length I got amused a little. =) Great resolution and quality. --Ximonic (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above sopport comments --Paolo Costa (talk) 21:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media

File:QC - Ufer Sankt Lorenzstrom bei Kamouraska.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 13:49:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waterside of Saint Lawrence River near Kamouraska
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Conditional Symbol support vote.svg Support if you remove the dust spot. AzaToth 16:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
removed --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hmmmm - tilted horizon. Hadn't noticed. Please correct it to get FP status. --Paolo Costa (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
      • you are right, corrected now. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. พ.s. 11:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
For sure no wow because no arthropod is visible here. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree. No wow. A riverbank. A nice day. There's nothing here that say "our finest" to me. And only 4MP. Colin (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
4 MP is below the requirement? --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The "requirement" is an absolute minimum. 4MP is pretty low, lower than any camera you can buy, and low considering the camera used takes 10MP. If it were a stunning pic, I'd say 4MP was ok but this is average in all ways and below average in MP. Colin (talk) 23:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The question is not if 4 MP is below average, the question is what is the benefit for this picture if it would with higher resolution. For pictures of buildings where details are important to see I would agree with you. But for a landscape picture the resolution is definitely secondary. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The MP is only one of many reasons why this isn't one of our "finest". True the LHS of the picture contains no detail but the RHS, if actually sharp, should show the detail of the layered sedimentary rock formations and the grass and trees. It is an unspectacular picture IMO. Colin (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it aesthetically, composition and colors, and image quality is good enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Belvedere Kondiaronk chalet du Mont Royal.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2011 at 05:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of Montreal from the "chalet du Monnt Royal"
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Paolo Costa -- Paolo Costa (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately I find the too prominent and unbalanced foreground spoils the composition. I also think this is where a panorama is suitable, as per this FP. - Benh (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, that is exactly the same spot. That is the chalet du Mont-Royal, you can check the geography of the place with the geotag, it's a pretty small place. That FP is cropped, but you can still see disturbing branches. You can also notice that picture was taken in winter: branches are still in the way, only they don't have leaves. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --10$$Dollar (talk) 10:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC) not eligible to vote. พ.s. 11:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. พ.s. 11:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. --Xijky (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the colors, exposure and overall technical quality (like noise level) is very good. The foreground is distracting though. Detail level could be better, cf. benhs review. --Slaunger (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I noticed about sharpness looking at the awesome panoramic mentioned by Benh. No wonder that picture is technically better, (also keeping in mind it is made by 15 pictures), but I think this is a cool one-shot optional version, from the same spot, but taken at night and in fall. So I found the RAW file, sharpened it and re-cropped it as suggested, only I don't know how to post the alterative version on the candidate list. Can anyone help me post it? This would be the alternative version: [4]. Thanks in advance.--Paolo Costa (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
      • You could add subsection to the current nom, but I believe it would be better to create a separate nom. As you can only have two actives noms, you may want to withdraw one first. Just in case u're interested, the alternative crop is much better in my opinion, but I'm afraid the comparison to the current FP will disfavor your picture. You may also want to look at the white balance, because I think it's very on the purple side (look aesthetic for sure, but is it true to what you saw ?). - Benh (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
        • Got it. I'm gonna withdraw this one, check on the WB and then we let voters decide whether it's worth to keep this view in our gallery or not, thanks.--Paolo Costa (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Paolo Costa (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Air France A380 F-HPJE.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2011 at 01:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Air France A380
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jovian Eye storm 01:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad light with a shadow nearly all over the airplane, sorry. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose subject mostly in shadow. --ELEKHHT 22:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While it hurts me to do so, I have to say no. And it's not so much about the shadow, the problem is that the shadow is strongly underlined by those small parts that are strongly lit. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination The subject has been reshot and renominated. Jovian Eye storm 04:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Bruxelles Cheval Tang 02 10 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 21:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horse head, Tang Dynasty.


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Grace Kelly - High Society.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 14:39:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (digitized by http://www.doctormacro.com/, apparently) - uploaded by Hispania - nominated by LtPowers -- Powers (talk) 14:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Powers (talk) 14:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Too strong compression used which has removed most of the fine details, which is not due to it being an old image, but someone wanted to save space. AzaToth 17:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In spite of the comment above, I am going to support this photo, because it is a very good portrait in its own right. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 07:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The Doctor Macro version is 1698x2200px and 598kB. This version has been cropped at the right, but is now only 190kB. Clearly the cropping alone doesn't explain the reduced file size. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Comparing the two, there are indeed very subtle variations. Should I upload the larger version from Doctor Macro? Powers (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
      • I'd support the original. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 06:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Nothing extraordinary here. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it isn't enough for FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Isn't enough what? Powers (talk) 15:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree. The image is too compressed or the scan has failed to pick up detail. Colin (talk) 20:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Sally Ride, America's first woman astronaut communitcates with ground controllers from the flight deck - NARA - 541940.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 20:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sally Ride, America's first woman astronaut communitcates with ground controllers from the flight deck.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by U.S. Information Agency, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kaldari (talk) 08:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 22:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Obvious historical value, already acknowledged with the VI seal, but too poor image quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Although I imagine is a crammed space and hard to take a good photo, I still would expect better composition. --ELEKHHT 22:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support high EV, historical image, good quality concerning it was shot by film.. I don't like the flash lighting but the image is featurable. Ggia (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar. It is just not a great photo. Colin (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose snapshot --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:28, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nominationYann (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Anthracoceros malayanus -London Zoo, England -juvenile-8a.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2011 at 06:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A juvenile Black Hornbill (Anthracoceros malayanus) eating fruit at London Zoo
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Snowmanradio - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Everything but the grape is noisy and usharp. Also, probably because of poor lighting conditions, the picture seems underexposed and colors are washed-out. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support considering the resolution of the image (2.752 × 2.391) the image is not so noisy - justifing that the subject is very nice (stong EV) and it is featurable. Ggia (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose to noisy and to unsharp. DOF to low. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The picture is indeed too noisy and the focus should rather be on the eye than on the fruit. --Quartl (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The ugly chroma noise is visible at screen-size on my laptop never mind pixel peeping. Sorry, that kind of noise has no charm. As for the focus/depth-of-focus, it is very slightly focused too far in front but I think that's just being picky. Colin (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for the feedback. —Bruce1eetalk 07:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-09-15 13-20-34-eglise-st-maimboeuf.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2011 at 19:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the church Saint-Maimbœuf of Montbéliard, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Béria Lima msg 14:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Simone 16:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Pictogram voting info.svg Info Member of the "top ten" winners of the WLM 2011/France.--Jebulon (talk) 10:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A beautiful picture of a nice church. Overall very good quality despite some minor flaws: a few burned whites (unavoidable) and a slight left/right assymetry that could be corrected. Good job. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Albertus teolog (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good picture with quality, low ISO, and correct in general. Only minor flaw: I would add some ground to the composition, it's a bit too "squary", but that's ok. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Drottningholm Palace - panorama september 2011.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2011 at 21:16:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drottningholm Palace
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image. Yann (talk) 21:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The panorama is a bit tilted to the left, and there is a slight yellowish tint over the whole image. The possible stitching errors could be my mind trying to fool me though. AzaToth 19:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Such tiny stitching errors are always worth forgiving! --Jovian Eye storm 23:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support // tsca (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jovian Eye storm 23:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- David C. S.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 22:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In full resolution I can see the errors but they are so minor that - in my opinion - don't destroy the FP potential of this picture -- Béria Lima msg 14:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.Jacopo188 (talk) 16:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Ensis ensis (Linnaeus 1758).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2011 at 14:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ensis ensis


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals

Image:Air France A380 F-HPJE.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2011 at 04:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Air France A380
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The subject has been reshot. --Jovian Eye storm 04:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jovian Eye storm 04:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination New version has different serial number so I will upload separately. --Jovian Eye storm 12:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:20110103 Jamed Kabir and Roknedin Mauseleum Yazd Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2011 at 20:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jamed Kabir Mosque and Roknedin Mauseleum, Yazd, Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 20:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is Jamed Kabir Mosque (left) and Roknedin Mauseleum (right), in Yazd, Iran. -- Ggia (talk) 20:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 17:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Raghith 06:37, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose My vote won't change anything, but I don't see what's so special here, and the minarets being restored (are they ?) is a killer - Benh (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wait a few months and try again. พ.s. 11:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment yes.. you are right.. and Iran is the most easy country to get a visa.. specially if you are american.. Ggia (talk) 11:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
yes.. you are right.. But it is the result that counts, not the circumstances. พ.s. 07:11, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJacopo188 (talk) 16:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I don't think the restoration of the minarets is really an issue from an objective point of view, although it would be great to have a picture with the minarets uncovered too. --Simone 17:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm not sure. There are some negatives: the scaffolding and various distortions resulting from the stitching perspectivse (e.g., the sides of the main dome are straight but the bands aren't in line horizontally). Also I think the colour balance is wrong resulting in very orange brickwork and an unwell sky. Perhaps that's the early morning sun but taking the temperature down e.g. -20 on Lightroom is better IMO. I can't help thinking that this isn't the best side of the building. However, the level of detail is great and so the EV is high. Colin (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:MiG-29 SK 2547.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2011 at 19:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slovakian MiG-29


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:(1) NIDA Kensington 5.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2011 at 10:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

National Institute of Dramatic Art, Sydney
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sardaka - uploaded by Sardaka - nominated by Sardaka -- Sardaka (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sardaka (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Neat, but not extraordinary enough to be promoted FP. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective distortion, bad crop, bad light. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective distortion, cropped inscription at left, unattractive lighting at right. --Cayambe (talk) 17:28, 10 Novem