Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Crematorium at Auschwitz I 2012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2012 at 14:36:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crematorium at Auschwitz I.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- sfu (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- sfu (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You guide me to the page which I never want to read again. -- JKadavoor Jee 15:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kleuske (talk) 16:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 17:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Idobi (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 18:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportSome flare at left, but good (and impressive).--Jebulon (talk) 10:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You made it, perfect atmosphere with that lighting (agree with Jebulon though on his comment, maybe you can apply a gradient filter to the left part and reduce exposure) Poco a poco (talk) 11:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 18:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Peter23 (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. - c. 1902.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2012 at 16:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Library of Congress, Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C.


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2012 at 11:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Palace of Communications, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Palace of Communications, Madrid, Spain. It was created and uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by Poco a poco -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 11:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support jaja ya te pillo... Thank you very much for the nomination! --Kadellar (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ---- Tuankiet65 (talk) 05:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:38, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive and FP, in spite of some noise in the dark parts.--Jebulon (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Peter23 (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 10:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There's some noise, but very well done anyway. - A.Savin 11:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Jebulon and A. Savin --Llez (talk) 11:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 12:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ArildV (talk) 16:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Following Poco a Poco's advise, I've corrected a slight CA I hadn't seen and I also applied some more noise reduction, but just a little bit, not to lose detail. Thank you all for your support. --Kadellar (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Alfeñiques and girl.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 13:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: too much noise, photo looks like its been taken at an unnecessary angle.Fotoriety (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question ... and what is precisely a necessary angle? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Taking this photo at an angle in no way improves the composition. Angles can be used, and in some instances improve a composition, but definitely not in this photo.Fotoriety (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Are you sure that this picture is tilted? I can't find a good reference point. While checking the hanging legs of the small doll in white skirts just left of the big yellow doll near the seller, I assume no tilt. JKadavoor Jee 05:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • One thing is "angle" and another is perspective. What we have in this image is perspective, not tilt. I almonst never, ever tilt images on the X axis. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes; and I think Fotoriety was confused by the perspective. JKadavoor Jee 06:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - DVIDSHUB - Operation Enduring Freedom (8).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 12:37:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Girl of Afghanistan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Operation Enduring Freedom - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slick (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad title, Propaganda. Kleuske (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kleuske. The file description makes the subject feel inferior. -- JKadavoor Jee 16:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Focus should have been on the eyes. Framing and postprocessing could be better. Reminds me of the w:File:Sharbat Gula.jpg shot. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above --Stas1995 (talk) 10:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A very stereotypical portrait of a poor child. A cliché. Kitsch. Sorry but I really dislike this image.--ArildV (talk) 16:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Graellsia isabellae MHNT male dos .jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 08:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spanish Moon Moth
  • It is the eternal debate between naturalized specimens and photos in vivo. The two are complementary. This is not the physiological position does not show the hind wings. This species is fully protected in France (eggs, larvae, pupae, adults, dead or alive). The butterfly is remarkable that in the typical male antennae, which are used to find the female, following pheromones.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the reply. So this positioning is to show the hind-wings otherwise hidden? -- JKadavoor Jee 09:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:RedSunrise2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2012 at 11:56:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Twilight in Nowshahr, Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mahdiz - uploaded by Mahdiz - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 11:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 11:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alborzagros (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -great and much EV. Peter23 (talk) 15:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
    • The EV escapes me, i must say. Kleuske (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but noisy. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just another sunset/rise. -- Colin (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not categorized, noise level still pretty high, many bright spots. --Ivar (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. --Cayambe (talk) 19:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality at the sides is too low (see sharpness of dark areas) Poco a poco (talk) 02:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurry (at the bottom), sorry --Stas1995 (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Soufresicile2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 08:25:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Rocks and Minerals

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FileSchildenstein, Blick in die Wolfsschlucht.jpg

File:Marco Rossi-Doria - Festa Unità Roma 2012.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 16:52:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marco Rossi-Doria, Italian undersecretary of state for education in the government of Mario Monti
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jaqen -- Jaqen (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jaqen (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Not sure about the unnatural orange-tinged lighting.Fotoriety (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Neuhardenberg Castle 04-12.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 20:43:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neuhardenberg Castle, Brandenburg State, Germany.


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

Image:Der Sorfjord.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2012 at 13:45:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sorfjord near Odda
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pater lukas - uploaded by Pater lukas - nominated by Pater lukas -- Pater lukas (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pater lukas (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a bit too dark, but really great composition of the clouds! Tomer T (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great atmosphere. Not too dark at all. This is Norway, not the Sonora-desert. Kleuske (talk) 08:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Kleuske. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose underexposed (but fixable) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Carschten; the mountain on foreground is too dark. -- JKadavoor Jee 09:14, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (removable). Per Carschten, especially at right.--Jebulon (talk) 09:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I know from experience how challenging these big all over surrounding vistas are to capture inside a picture. But I would have liked to see more of the foreground too. That's mostly what I'm missing in the composition in this case. The clouds make a nice mood but now I feel the weight is a bit unbalanced between the foreground and sky. I also wish it had a little more exposure because the foreground and the shadows are very dark indeed. --Ximonic (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info modified Exposure a bit --Pater lukas (talk) 08:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

Der Sorfjord edit.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info edited version by User:Carschten incl. crop, white balance adjustment and dust spot removing. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support alt. -- JKadavoor Jee 05:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Contributor and nominator can vote anyway. So 7-4; but no change in the result. :) JKadavoor Jee 16:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Progress M-17M spacecraft launches.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 23:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Progress M-17M spacecraft launches
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it is far less than 2 megapixels and very poor quality. - JDP90 (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Das Lächeln von Angkor.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 15:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Smile of Angkor


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Regenbogen am Sognefjord.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2012 at 13:52:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow over Sognefjord


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2012 at 07:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reading room of Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve in Paris
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created / uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The impressive reading room of Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve in Paris and its architecture with voutes and metallic structure.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although the light through the window made some distractions. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom -- Colin (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really nice. --Selbymay (talk) 20:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice view Poco a poco (talk) 12:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --This is a beautiful image. Almonroth (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sadly, way overexposed on the windows, which spoils this otherwise great view to me. HDR or a simple exposure blending would have helped, but so it is not the "very best" of Commons imo... - A.Savin 21:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
    • This pic results from the blending of 5 pics from +2 to -2 EV. The light from the windows was blinding to the eye; the dynamic range required not to blow out the highlights is far too great for a realistic picture. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
      • I support this comment. I thought the demand was unrealistic or would produce unrealistic results. I actually like the glare from the windows. Colin (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
        • Why unrealistic? Perhaps a different time of day (or different weather conditions) may provide a better result, even without blending. - A.Savin 16:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
          • I had a special authorisation to take this pic, thanks to the French chapter. The interior of the library is rather dark: I'm not sure the dynamic range can ever fit a sensor, even with HDR. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
          • As Jastrow says, I'd expect the interior to be relatively dark compared to daylight. These are huge shining bright windows designed to let the sunlight flood in as much as possible and to which the eye will react, as Jastrow notes, by being blinded by the glare. If the camera wasn't similarly blinded by glare, it would look unrealistic IMO. Yes, an evening shot might avoid that, but it would be a different shot and the huge windows wouldn't be as spectacular IMO. Colin (talk) 18:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A.Savin. -- King of ♠ 02:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A.Savin. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Even the picture is overexposed, I love this Tuankiet65 (talk) 05:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for the moment, tending to support (I need to think about a bit more). Very impressive to me (I know the place, but have never seen it like this -it is a compliment-) and nice, but in spite of the above comments I understand very well, the light through the windows prevents me from a support vote...(+ some magenta/violet CA in the upper left corner -metallic structure- to be corrected maybe)...--Jebulon (talk) 09:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't need to see out the windows, there is enough inside the room. --99of9 (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The cut table on the bottom bothers me a lot, otherwise FP --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Mauritia flexuosa MHNT.BOT.2005.0.974.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2012 at 10:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fruits of Moriche Palm.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alborzagros (talk) 11:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love it; especially the first view. -- JKadavoor Jee 16:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support When I was asked to make fruits and seeds, I was not excited. I know nothing about botany. But I recognize that from time to time there is an aesthetic emotion to see a fruit unknown. This is the case of the latter. thank you to kasir --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Go on with botany! There are thrilling shapes and beauties to discover. --Schnobby (talk) 07:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hellbus (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants

File:Obertilliach Pfarrkirche St Ulrich 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2012 at 07:37:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roman Catholic parish church Saint Ulrich in Obertilliach, East Tyrol (Osttirol).


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Atractomorpha lata, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 27 10 2012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 13:08:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Grasshopper Atractomorpha lata male. Taken at Burdwan, West Bengal, India. Created / uploaded / nominated by JDP90 (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Excellent. --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 18:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect demonstration of camouflage. -- King of ♠ 03:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 06:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful and highly competitive to this. And I think more real colours here. JKadavoor Jee 08:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gidip (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stu Phillips (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avenue (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 05:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Eta Carinae Nebula.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2012 at 18:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eta Carinae Nebula


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Astronomy

File:PL - Leżajsk - klasztor bernardynów - 2012-05-02--17-11-14-05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2012 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mascaron of the Bernardine Monastery Fountain in Leżajsk, Poland.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kroton (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC) - uploaded by Kroton (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC) - nominated by Kroton (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC) -- Kroton (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kroton (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness and perfect symmetry do it imo. - A.Savin 21:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no wow. Tomer T (talk) 06:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I think you mean no wonder/amazement; but it (Adbhutam) is only one emotion among the nine essential mental states. I think this picture well portrays Bībhatsam (Disgust, Aversion) and Bhayānakam (Horror, Terror). Smile -- JKadavoor Jee 04:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Tomer T. The Commons:Image guidelines do require a "wow" factor. A closer crop of just the head provides a bit more "terror" :-). Colin (talk) 13:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Do you expect Vātsalya (Parental love) from the face of an evil character? :) -- JKadavoor Jee 04:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow certainly there is! ;o) Yann (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! Terrific! I like the 3D feel. JKadavoor Jee 06:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good symmetry but I don't feel any 3D here. --Selbymay (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Alfeñiques or sugar fugures.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 03:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: not sharp enough, too much noise.Fotoriety (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-10-12 16-13-03-musee-histoire-belfort-denfert.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 07:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait du colonel Denfert-Rochereau, by Alexandre Monségur


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-10-12 16-22-28-musee-histoire-belfort-clairon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 07:11:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Étude d'uniforme, un clairon de l'infanterie de ligne, by Alphonse Deneuville


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Eiszitterpilz Pseudohydnum gelatinosum.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Fungi

File:Gumball machine, Wanfried, Deutschland IMGL0459 edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 10:01:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gumball machine in Wanfried, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, edited, uploaded and nominated by Peter Weis (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely old machine. --Llorenzi (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Llorenzi, I like the sticker at the top. Kleuske (talk) 12:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Heliconius sara sara MHNT.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Pikajärve mõisa peahoone2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2012 at 12:16:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pikajärve manor main building
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Ivar (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: Bad direction of tree shadow on building, bad composition (photo should have been taken from foot-path to lead the eye to the building), bad building shadows (especially on the right end right of entrance), needs cropping of sides, should have been taken under minimal human activity.Fotoriety (talk) 00:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice picture, but I prefer this one nevertheless. --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Technical note: Please do not use the {{weak support}} template, as this makes it hard for the bot to count votes. -- King of ♠ 18:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. The other one mentioned above is also nice, but is the back side of the building. -- -donald- (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vamps (talk) 10:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I support this picture because I think it deserves the label, but I support it more because my vote is the seventh "pro". Ivar was "class" enough to abstain as author, and I'm happy to give him my vote for that reason too.--Jebulon (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Revealing the secrets is not so good; do it silently. Smile JKadavoor Jee 06:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    • No "secrets" here, I just wanted to pay tribute to the author's behaviour and highlight it, it is rare enough I'm afraid...--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Lapide Acuedotto Acqua Vergine.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 19:48:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aqueduct Benedict XIV
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because this picture is far below the current standards of the "Featured Pictures" of "Commons". The quality is very low (it is unsharp), and the fence in foregrounds ruins the compostion, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:00031 6 cm grossular calcite augite skarn.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 20:21:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skarn - a rock type
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Siim Sepp - uploaded by Siim Sepp - nominated by Ivo Kruusamägi -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Not sharp enough.Fotoriety (talk) 00:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The specimen was unexceptional. The photographic point of view clipping is poor and many areas are blurred. There is not the origin of the specimen in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2012 at 07:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - uploaded by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - nominated by Achim Raschka (talk) -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Horizon is not straight. -- King of ♠ 07:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Minor tilt or perspective distortion, CA and lack of fine detail. --Vamps (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice but tilted. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)OK, no tilted. I removed my oppose. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is no tilt here, nor perspective distortion. The picture is perfectly straight. I know the place: the terrain is just sloping. -- MJJR (talk) 22:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Looking on the "cut" cross on left bottom and the flag pole, I can see a small CW tilt. JKadavoor Jee 04:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The tilt at the flag pole could be fixed. The lines are what make this picture special so the not straight view is not a problem at all to me. Basvb (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Chiesa di San Zaccaria Venezia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2012 at 15:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chiesa di San Zaccaria Venezia
  • And something wrong in the "info" too (created by, nominated by). :) -- JKadavoor Jee 16:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC) Now OK. -- JKadavoor Jee 04:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I fixed the frame. I corrected the perspective, I think it was actually false. But I must say that I came to correct perspectives on monuments veniciens, which in reality are twisted. Thank you to Peter23 and Ivar --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Crop is way too tight.Fotoriety (talk) 01:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • This is true but it is impossible to do otherwise on a single shot. In fact, it is necessary to assemble multiple images. As soon as I have a moment I would do this facade. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Colchicum hierosolymitanum 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 20:17:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colchicum hierosolymitanum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: poor composition, lighting and quality.Fotoriety (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Can you give a little more detail please? Gidip (talk) 19:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
What detail do you desire? Wasn't my comment straight-forward enough?Fotoriety (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
What is poor in the lighting? In the composition? In the quality? Gidip (talk) 04:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
1) Lighting: pretty straight-forward; look at the strong shadows. Such photos shouldn't display these harsh shadows. 2) Composition: you have left too much space on the left, too little on the right, the dirt then grass background is aesthetically displeasing, the 3 flowers themselves are not too pleasing in their positioning. 3) Quality: the photo is not sharp enough.Fotoriety (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments. The photo was taken at twilight to produce a soft light and a long shadow which bears the shape of the flowers and is part of the composition. Since the flowers are quite far apart from each other, DOF is almost as deep as it can be to catch both the back flowers and the snail shell in the front flower. The only thing I agree with is the dirt vs. grass. It seems that my criteria for judging plant photos are quite different from the majority here. I dislike the flat, perfectly symmetrical photos of flowers shot from above that are often promoted here, for instance. Gidip (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
"It seems that my criteria for judging plant photos are quite different from the majority here. I dislike the flat, perfectly symmetrical photos of flowers shot from above that are often promoted here, for instance." -You are not alone. I always prefer a side view over photos taken from above. This is quite applicable for other subjects like animals too. But a dorsal view also has some educational value; so I prefer them as a "secondary view". (The DOF may be a problem of your lens, as I commented earlier.) JKadavoor Jee 04:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Jee. Why a problem of the lens? Maybe it's because I don't use a tripod. On second thought, there are only 103 FP of flowers, much less than the number for arthropods, which are moving and therefore harder to capture. It seems to me that the community is very harsh on promoting flower FPs. Gidip (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Macro lens with small focal lengths have very shallow DOF; they are mainly for small subjects like a stamen of a flower. You need a long lens like a 150-200mm macro for an entire plant profile like this. I assume you are using a 85mm macro; not a normal lens with some closeup filter or ex. tube. Flowers are difficult to get appreciated here; I too take many photos, never got any FP so far. :( JKadavoor Jee 09:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
But entire plants are large subjects. I had to get away a few metres even with my lens, so a longer lens wouldn't be practical here. In smaller subjects it would help. Gidip (talk) 09:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
I mean this plant. Isn't it an entire view? JKadavoor Jee 10:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC) So the subject distance here is more than one meter? Increase in subject distance will improve DOF; but reduce details. So for such views a normal tele lens may ideal. JKadavoor Jee 10:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Requesting H. Krisp's advice may help you; His mushrooms are much like your plants. I think he is using a 55mm in most of his works. JKadavoor Jee 16:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Gidip (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Composition can be considered as balanced if we include the shadow as part of the subject. But not sharp enough. JKadavoor Jee 12:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Darwinius masillae PMO 214.214.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2012 at 06:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez (?) - uploaded by Llez (?) - nominated by Peter23 -- Peter23 (talk) 06:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Peter23 (talk) 06:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Per Ivar. Tomer T (talk) 16:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fabulous. Alborzagros (talk) 08:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice, but resolution is below 2 megapixels. --Ivar (talk) 08:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It is not by me. It is obviously a from a scientific publication of Franzen JL, Gingerich PD, Habersetzer J, Hurum JH, von Koenigswald W & Smith BH (2009); see [1] --Llez (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Considering the importance, the low file size is not a big issue for me . Can delist when better picture ever available. -- JKadavoor Jee 16:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per JKadavoor --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Resolution to low -- Oliver (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Resolution to low. We have our rule >= 2MP for an FP-image nomination! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alchemist-hp. There is no mitigating circumstances.--Jebulon (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Need 2Mpx (per above) --Stas1995 (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The size is 2.91 MB. Alborzagros (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the file size is unimportant! Only the image resolution is important: 1118*1712=1.914.016 are less than 2.000.000 MP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - ggallice - Monkey treefrog (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 18:37:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Frog in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Geoff Gallice - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slick (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support lovely picture. --Llorenzi (talk) 14:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Please put the binomial name in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I dont know it. Anybody else? --Slick (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
      • It is a White-lined leaf frog (Phyllomedusa vaillantii) as stated in "other version". But some places it spelled Sharp nose monkey tree frog (Phyllomedusa vaillanti); so I'm a bit confused. -- JKadavoor Jee 06:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now, the harsh light (due to the flash light ?) create a disturbing background. Please remove all the background. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Harsh lights; but this is a mid-night shot (23:01 from the EXIF). JKadavoor Jee 15:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What are you looking at? Albertus teolog (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The name is Phyllomedusa vaillanti The species is dedicated to the French Zoologist Léon Vaillant. Double i is a mistake. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Vely lovely frog! --Ximeg (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Amphibians

File:Grot pavilion in Tsarskoe Selo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 08:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grotto pavillion in Catherine park of Tsarskoe Selo town
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good image. The highlights are a bit bright but not overexposed. -- King of ♠ 09:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above, perhaps a little bit (!) sharpening would do the image good additionally. - A.Savin 10:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice perspective, good quality. -- Felix König 16:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 08:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per A. Savin --Llez (talk) 09:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Much better than the one above, the human presence gives a nice touch to the composition. But I would crop it a bit more. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition and angle. Agree with King of Hearts, expo just below the limit. Beware of the magenta chromatic aberration on the grid of the left window (acceptable)--Jebulon (talk) 13:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Parque Olímpico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 18.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 15:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Olympic Park, Munich, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Idobi (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JKadavoor Jee 05:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vamps (talk) 10:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 13:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also like it, indeed. Thanks for nominating Tomer! Poco a poco (talk) 22:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support King of ♠ 22:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Resolution + exposure good, but the composition is very boring. It looks like a snapshot to me. --Nikopol (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Composition is fine, simple but nice with nice colours. Basvb (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The reflections on the surface makes it truly magic! A snapshot, Nikopol? Very far from it, I would guess that the picture was very carefully composed and framed! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Obviously people seem to love it, but to me this composition seems cluttered and the motif uninteresting. I don´t like the branches going all over the picture, I don´t like the sides of the canal hitting the frame where they do, I don´t like this nearly central vanishing point. But that´s why pictures are judged by the community instead of individuals: in order to minimize the effect of individual preferences :)--Nikopol (talk) 23:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places

File:Porto Covo October 2012-3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 19:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The fortress and island of Pessegueiro (Peach tree) in a very quiet end of the day. View to south from Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: very poor & dull composition, poor lighting.Fotoriety (talk) 22:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Fotoriety. I feel this time of day has a lot of potential, which was not realized in this image. -- King of ♠ 07:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Pumpkin Spider seen on October 2012 in San Francsico.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 07:03:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pumpkin Spider seen during autumn in San Francisco


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Ristiämblik2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 20:20:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Araneus diadematus
Out of date clock icon.svg
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Ivar (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Streisand Estate.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 00:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Image is aerial photo taken as part of the California Coastal Records Project; it later spawned the Streisand effect (with background described on Wikisource.)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman, California Coastal Records Project. Image is aerial photo taken as part of the California Coastal Records Project; after an unsuccessful lawsuit to suppress the image by Barbra Streisand, it later spawned the Streisand effect. - uploaded by Cirt - nominated by Cirt -- -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting. -- King of ♠ 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • OpposeSymbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Sorry but the angle and the composition are bad, while the exposure of the objects is hindered because of their small size. However, the picture seems to bear some historical value, something that I didn't realize at first, and I, therefore, will switch my vote to neutral.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The technical quality might be mediocre, but it remains the image that caused the Streisand effect. Awesome to have it released under a free license. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 11:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Streisand effect in action. But it doesn't work on me. No wow, a mediocre image. Fine for an article, but not for FP. Kleuske (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - This may have considerable educational value regarding the "Streisand effect" but not enough, in my opinion, to overcome the fact that it's almost identical to countless other images up and down that coast. Indeed, that was part of the point of the whole fuss. Jonathunder (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An interesting story, but sorry, not one of our best photos. --Avenue (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Featured picture should strike for itself, even without any complicated story. Here we do not see anything extraordinary or beautiful; this image doesn't mean anything special for those, who didn't read an article in Wikipedia. However, it is good for the article illustration purposes. --Ximeg (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Toit salle Abencerrages Alhambra Espagne.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 16:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportTiled roofs of the Nasrid palaces in the Alhambra. In foreground, the roof of the hall of the Abencerrages, in background, the roof of the two Sisters hall, both built by King Yusuf I during the second third of 14th-century. Granada, Spain.-- Jebulon (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good lighting, interesting composition. --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I know you can't cut the tree in the middle before taking this photo. But I wish if you keep it on left (if possible). -- JKadavoor Jee 04:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Thank you for comment and care, but sorry no, it is part of my composition as it is.--Jebulon (talk) 12:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow, composition seems to be comprehensive, high contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

Image:Rpn006-3.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2012 at 20:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Industrielandschaft Essen


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Las muertes 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 02:52:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Las muertes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurred, personal familiar picture --Wilfredor (talk) 13:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Wilfredor, sorry --Stas1995 (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

File:The surf on La jolla beach California.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 17:33:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The surf on La Jolla beach in California
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by moroder - uploaded by moroder - nominated by moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: rock island and left swimming area too out of focus, unspectacular composition i.e. time of day and wave motion could have been captured spectacularly if timed well.Fotoriety (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Park zamkowy w Pszczynie 03promykjck.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 17:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pszczyna Park
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Jacek Cisło - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and unusual. - A.Savin 20:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- The blue hue doesn't look natural - but rather selective. This hasn't been excessively photo-shopped has it?Fotoriety (talk) 23:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
    • As you can see, I'm not the creator. Tomer T (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Is there any way of being able to find out?Fotoriety (talk) 06:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I can only assume that the blue lighting is a casual natural effect (why not). But I could be wrong. --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gidip (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is not the best but the nice atmosphere and composition compensates it by far Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximeg (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support When I saw it in QIC, I was saying to myself, I better see this on FPC... -- King of ♠ 04:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition and atmosphere. --JDP90 (talk) 05:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 05:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Poco. JKadavoor Jee 05:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautiful light --Wilfredor (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Good composition and mood, makes my magic bells ring. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support bardzo nieencyklopedyczne, ale za to jakie klimatyczne --Pudelek (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tamba52 (talk) 05:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bardzo udana fotka. --sfu (talk) 08:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Morning (talk) 08:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Haros (talk) 17:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Kürbis () 23:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kds11 (talk) 10:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Peter23 (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 22:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Castillo Trausnitz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 18.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 20:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trausnitz castle, Landshut, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Trausnitz castle, Landshut, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 05:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Good quality and carefully composed. It is a bit too tight for me though. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose obvious strong orange/magenta cast (no sky has such a colour, at least not in Germany), underexposed and shady (exposure and light not ideal). My first thought was: what a preposterous (don't know if it's the appropriate expression) and boring composition, but, per Alves, the composition is really good... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 17:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Berlin Cathedral during Berlin Festival of Lights 2012
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 17:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 17:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 18:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - fine ... but tilted to the left aprox 1 degree --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
    • Hi, the perspective was not 100% central (the fountain is exactly central in front of the cathedral), because there where many people and there was no space. Besides the central perspective would be seen from a footpath and my position was about 1m higher, so that I could better photograph above the annoying people. So I think the image is OK, because a correction would be a falsification. -- Wolf im Wald (de) 18:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
    • I agree that the angle from the side means the building won't be square-on and shouldn't be "corrected" to be so, but I think Villy Fink Isaksen was referring to an overall rotation of the image 1 degree anticlockwise. For example the communication tower in the distance is angled and becomes truly vertical if I rotate clockwise by 1 degree. -- Colin (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: no doubt the lighted building is beautiful & feature-worthy, but the photo in its entirety negates it being featured status. The tower in the background ruins the composition, as does the people and fountain in the foreground and the rather unsharp right tower. But i can understand that the unsharp right tower and people was due to a lower shutter speed to capture the light. Again, nice but not quite worthy.Fotoriety (talk) 00:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately the tower and the fountain are there and it is impossible to take a photo without them. The problem with the shutter is, that the projection an the cathedral facade changed very fast (maybe every 15 seconds). So it is also impossible to expose for example 30 seconds or more. Another problem was, that most people stood there motionless, what means, that I had to expose a few minutes. -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Big wow. Could you please correct the tilt noticed by Colin and Villy Fink Isaksen ? You could also clone out the man in front of the fountain, and some other disturbing details ( lighting screens of pocket cameras, etc...). But it is a FP to me anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective distortions, posterization, copyright problem, overall too dark (I prefer a brighter illumination, IMHO not the best of the series (but I'm not sure which is the best)). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- VolodymyrF 18:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Hdpe pipe installation.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 19:25:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Could you try a bit more saturation of the sky and some overall sharpening?Fotoriety (talk) 00:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Very good subject, we see a lot of images of objects, but very few of activities. The overall quality is however not quite up to standard for FP, sky is very washed out. --NJR_ZA (talk) 08:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
    Agree, very nice shot but with some quality flaws, sky and part of the truck are overexposed (could you try to darken those areas?), furthermore the horizont is not straight, the picture needs tilt / perspective correction (very obvious at the right side) Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, well, well.... This is a picture taken under existing light under real conditions of an activity. Regarding sky: if you observe, the apparent over exposure on the right is due to the existing haze and its proximity to the sun, so no amount of burning in will give us a saturated sky. The sky in general is hazy and that is the way it was in a natural manner. But again, this is not a picture of the sky, nor a landscape. The horizon is not tilted: it may look tilted, but that is the way it is. What you mistake as tilt is actually a slope (look at the cones), look at the man on the right, tilting the image would tilt the man, furthermore, look for a real visual reference, there are light poles and electricity lines hidden in the image with a nice vertical. There is a great dynamic range in this image, from dark to light, with detail in shadow areas and highlight areas, with minimum blocking on either side of the scale. If you take the time to look at the histogram you will see that yes, there will be overexposed areas on the truck, but what do you expect of a white subject lit by sunlight? Gray? The amount of over exposure is so minimal... It may not be the most exciting image in the world, but it is an illustrative image of construction. One thing are real quality issues and another imagined quality issues. Photographs must be evaluated according to real conditions, not about what is possible to do manipulating the image. I could make the pipe pink. My point is, read the photograph for its message, its content, the real conditions and the limitations of technology, not some imagined defects. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Firstly I think the composition is first class. I love the diagonal of the pipe and the opposing angle of the crane on the truck. The men are focusing on their work and the nearest man signalling gives some action. It is a dynamic image. But the contrast is far too high (and I'm looking at the image in a high-quality factory-calibrated monitor with Lightroom, so I don't think this is just my settings or poor equipment). I tried some simple adjustments on the JPG. I took the contrast down -60, the whites down -99 and added +15 clarity (which restores local contrast). Those numbers will be quite different for raw processing and different on Lightroom 3 vs 4. And I would expect a better job to be done on the raw than the JPG. Those simple changes opened up detail on the image that were lost. The truck bonnet now has a form (still blown whites in places but I'm totally ok with that for reasons Tomascastelazo gives). The cranes and hills in the distance are clearer. The sky is still bright but has a little colour and more pleasing (though a few sensor dust spots show up now, which can be easily fixed). Making a photograph doesn't stop when the shutter clicks. I don't think those adjustments change the reality of the photograph at all, and in fact, enable the viewer to appreciate the scene. I would support this if better processed. Colin (talk) 12:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Dear Colin, that is in my book constructive intervention. I´ll be happy to send you the original raw file for you to make the adjustments, and in the process I can really learn something. Email me with your address and I will send the raw file to you. Many thanks! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I uploaded a new version with corrections done by Colin. Thanks Colin for your help! I admit it, much, much better. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. JKadavoor Jee 05:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As I commented above, I think this is a great image, it has high educational value, and I'm pleased with the new processing (:-)). I did have a go at "fixing" the vertical perspective distortion (due to the camera being pointed down towards the pipe) which causes some distant objects to be angled. However, although these can be straightened, the transform results in significant vertical compression of the truck and vertical expansion of the pipe. Since those are the subject of the photograph, it is better that they are undistorted and the distant objects are less important. All projections are a compromise. -- Colin (talk) 09:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 15:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support And I would thank Tomascastelazo a lot for his undefatigable action in order to take and offer different pictures here in FP. Often he fails, and meets success very rarely these times, but he is a very "useful" contributor, even if we may disagree with some of his choices. I personaly apreciate very much his work here. Amen.--Jebulon (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support technical excellent, good composition and very educational --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better now Poco a poco (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Kikos (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Karhorn Gipfel Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 21:16:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Karhorn Gipfel Panorama
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info summit panorama in a northerly direction to the Karhorn 2.416m. The panorama shows including the border between Austria and Germany, and part of the ski area Warth. c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: Quite inappropriate in this scenario for the man to be looking into the camera, clouds don't really help in this composition and the sky looks too distorted from stitching.Fotoriety (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My tastes would call for a little more contrast. Also, careful with the sharpening, there are minor halos around the cross. -- King of ♠ 03:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 09:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 13:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sorry Böhringer, but I'm not a fan of this kind of extreme panoramas. They look somehow forced and unnatural to me. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximeg (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Light Painting 1 - Booyeembara Park.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 15:21:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light Painting in Booyeembara Park, Australia


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Maintower Frankfurt.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2012 at 17:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maintower in Frankfurt, Germany


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:PL - Łańcut - park zamkowy - 2012-05-02--11-00-45-05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 19:19:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The statue of Bacchus on the panther, Italian garden in castle park, Łańcut.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kroton - uploaded by Kroton - nominated by Kroton -- Kroton (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kroton (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad composition, hight contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 13:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Фортеця Єні-Кале 111.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 10:30:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yeni-Kale fortress in Kerch, Ukraine
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by PIRZKHGL - uploaded by PIRZKHGL - nominated by Lystopad -- Lystopad (talk) 10:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lystopad (talk) 10:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Chromatic aberrations in the telegraph pole and wires and the top left of the building, sky is too noisy.Fotoriety (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Alberta ielā 12 20120728-05.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 22:32:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Art Nouveau staircase in Alberta ielā 12. Building built 1903. Architects Konstantīns Pēkšēns and Eižens Laube
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Haros - uploaded by Haros - nominated by Haros -- Haros (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Haros (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question dust spot in upper right corner ? --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
    It is there in the next few pictures taken too, so yes you are right it is a dust spot. Haros (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
    I have uploaded a version where I have removed the dust spot. Haros (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support assuming the dust spot gets fixed. King of ♠ 10:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 13:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very high quality, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 13:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Beautiful. --Selbymay (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is the top left of the image (1/4 of the entire image) is in shadows/under exposed? JKadavoor Jee 16:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    There are windows on one side, over the top of the picture. All light are from those windows, no flash or lamps in use. (Possibly some light might come through the doors opposite the windows.) There are lamps, but not turned on. The light is strongest where the stairs go down, and the underside gets down to the level of the window. That is to the right. The left side similarly is further away from the window, and in a sort of shadow if you like. The relative lightness and darkness is thus a part of the scene, and although the picture might have been prettier with a uniform lighting, my intention has been to record to the best of my ability what was there at the time. Haros (talk) 17:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks. JKadavoor Jee 04:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Kürbis () 23:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 17:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Darvasa gas crater panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 06:00:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tormod Sandtorv on Flickr - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by Hellbus -- Hellbus (talk) 06:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality, definite "wow" factor. -- Hellbus (talk) 06:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Huge "wow," but sadly the overexposure is just too much. -- King of ♠ 07:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow. This is an evening shot looking directly at incandescent rocks and gas flames. I wouldn't expect any photograph to cope with that dynamic range. I'm sure it hurt the eyes. Looking on the internet for other images, I don't see anyone else doing better, and you can't take an HDR shot of moving flames. Colin (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support impressive --Stas1995 (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 12:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Colin --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Colin. JKadavoor Jee 14:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Very impressive but there are visible cloning problems in several areas on the right which must be corrected first. Sting (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good image, despite of the cloning problems rightly mentioned by Sting -- MJJR (talk) 21:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The cloning issues at the bottom of the image are the most obvious and could probably be remedied by a slight crop. A bit of cloning (irony?) could fix the middle area. I couldn't find the topmost one noted on this page when looking at the full size image. Hellbus (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 12:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cloning problems at the right side must be fixed! Specially the corner. --Kadellar (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cloning problems --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Visible cloning.--Jebulon (talk) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Alternative version[edit]

Darvasa gas crater panorama crop.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cropped bottom and right sides slightly, small amount of healing brush used on the right side. Open to further suggestions. Hellbus (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support only alternative version. --Kadellar (talk) 21:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support only alternative version. --Julian H. (talk/files) 16:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support only alternative version.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support only alternative version.--Jebulon (talk) 14:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 15:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JKadavoor Jee 16:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Frze --Frze (talk) 12:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- VolodymyrF 18:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Natural phenomena
The chosen alternative is: File:Darvasa gas crater panorama crop.jpg

File:Araneus Diadematus (Pumpkin Spider) seen during Autumn.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 07:37:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Araneus Diadematus (Pumpkin Spider) seen during Autumn in San Fransico
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by aarya0141 - uploaded by aarya0141 - nominated by aarya0141 -- Aarya0141 (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I uploaded a similar picture before, I think the focus is better in this one, however, it still may not qualify the standards of sharpness aarya0141 -- Aarya0141 (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Aarya0141 (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Unfocused, severely overexposed. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment uploaded new version aarya0141


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:An-2 plane spraying wheat crops.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2012 at 10:51:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flying low to the ground, an airplane sprays pesticide on wheat crops in the northern Iraqi province of Dahuk. The spraying was part of the Ministry of Agriculture's Operation Barnstormer.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by U.S. Army photo - uploaded by High Contrast - nominated by Frze -- Frze (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flying low to the ground, a soviet built biplane sprays pesticide on wheat crops in the northern Iraqi province of Dahuk. The spraying was part of the Ministry of Agriculture's Operation Barnstormer.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Frze (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Wow!! I was about to support, but then I opened the file page and saw that the file is way too small resolution-wise. It can't be FP (which should be at least 2MPX in resolution). Tomer T (talk) 11:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Much too small for FP. Yann (talk) 12:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Aerial View - Landschaft Markgräflerland1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 13:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of vineyards at Markgräflerland


Confirmed results:
Result: 31 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places

File:Arussaare õigeusu kirik.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 19:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arussaare orthodox church
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Ivar (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood. -- King of ♠ 19:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agree about the mood. Would look interesting under cloudier, darker conditions. Although, perhaps that's not the mood one wants to create around a church!Fotoriety (talk) 23:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great feel. I feel, I'm watching the church in moonlight. JKadavoor Jee 05:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 12:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really nice. --Selbymay (talk) 14:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Idobi (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Citron (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--77.191.188.204 23:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Forgot to log-in. --Kürbis () 23:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Monumento a los Descubrimientos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 10:56:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monument to the Discoveries in Belém (Lisbon), Portugal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Monument to the Discoveries in Belém (Lisbon), Portugal. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: very unremarkable composition.Fotoriety (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
    Do you refer to the version I upload 7 minutes before your stament or afterwards? Poco a poco (talk) 23:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Afterwards?! I'm slightly confused! Can i critique the future while in the present?!Fotoriety (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I modified the file at 11:41 and your statement came 7 minutes later, at 11:48, that's the reason why I was wondering if you refered to the new or to the old version Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh...sorry about that.Fotoriety (talk) 06:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
It will be nice if the contributors take a bit more time (at least a week after the upload) before making a nomination here. It will give enough time for a self review, and chances that they will get enough feedback from the QIC or VIC page if participated so they can make any improvements if necessary. It will improve the chances of a promotion here too. There is no such rules; only my humble opinion. JKadavoor Jee 06:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I could have presented it first in QIC, and I usually do, but my experience so far was not really fruitful, Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Not the best angle or composition. Lighting could be much better too. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar --Martin Kraft (talk) 13:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 02:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:PIA16239 High-Resolution Self-Portrait by Curiosity Rover Arm Camera.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 15:51:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

On Sol 84 (Oct. 31, 2012), NASA's Curiosity rover used the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) to capture this set of 55 high-resolution images, which were stitched together to create this full-color self-portrait. The mosaic shows the rover at "Rocknest," the spot in Gale Crater where the mission's first scoop sampling took place
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems - uploaded and nominated by Julian H. (talk/files) 15:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: There are minimal stitching errors, but given the scenario that this was created from 55 images, only using the camera on the rover itself, and with the limited possiblities of turning this camera, I think the result is both very good and with absolute certainty very rare. There has never been a photo comparable in quality of any rover on mars before. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 15:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Huge wow, very good quality. --Kadellar (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 15:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JKadavoor Jee 06:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Narcissistic !--Citron (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Space exploration

File:Panorama da Rodengo 05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 17:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A panorama view from the town of Rodengo-Rodenek in South Tyrol (italy)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice...--Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Cons: The foreground mountains are far too darkly contrasted, don't agree with the top dark cloud lining (unnecessarily constrains composition), composition doesn't feel right (i think a rule of thirds would be more appropriate).Fotoriety (talk) 23:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Sainte-Leocadie - Eglise (1).JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 09:34:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sainte-Léocadie church, a romanesque church in Pyrénées-Orientales - France. In the foreground, the graveyard. In the background, the snowy en:Pyrenees.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Selbymay - uploaded by Selbymay - nominated by El Caro -- El Caro (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sainte-Léocadie church, a romanesque church in Pyrénées-Orientales - France. In the foreground, the graveyard. In the background, the snowy en:Pyrenees. Lovely composition and winter light. -- El Caro (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: composition isn't too good and feels a bit too tight.Fotoriety (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for nominating :) --Selbymay (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Correct picture but no magic. A FP needs something extraordinary that we can't see here. Do I see some tendency to automatically stamp as FP all good quality images?. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
    • At least this picture has the magic bells :) Tomer T (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Boring composition IMO. --Avenue (talk) 03:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 23:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Sandro Botticelli - La nascita di Venere - Google Art Project - edited.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 07:23:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Botticelli's The Birth of Venus
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sandro Botticelli, Google Art Project - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Dcoetzee -- 565 megapixel (30,000 × 18,840) digitization of Botticelli's famous painting The Birth of Venus from the Google Art Project. "It depicts the goddess Venus, having emerged from the sea as a fully grown woman, arriving at the sea-shore." This has levels adjusted from the original Google Art Project work to use the complete value range and make the image more visible, and I've had someone who specializes in Italian art take a look at it to make sure it's not distorting the work (note: my first attempt was brighter than this one, but found to be too inaccurate). We have 13 different files of this complete work at Category:The Birth of Venus (Botticelli), but the other versions have a variety of issues: some have a blue tint, some are low-resolution and/or blurry, some are vertically compressed, some are cropped too tightly, and so on. This image is currently used on 501 pages across 101 projects, and the title is translated into 37 languages and linked to articles on the painting. Additionally, the full original 7.5 gigapixel (109,426 × 68,720) image is made available as a set of 12 tiles at Category:Tile set of The Birth of Venus, and has already been used to create a high-resolution detail at File:Botticelli, Sandro - Nascita di Venere, dettagli Flora.jpg.
Warning: this is a very large image and requires about 2.2 GB of memory to load into a typical application. If you aren't able to open it, try this 8.6 megapixel thumbnail. Dcoetzee (talk) 07:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Per above. Dcoetzee (talk) 07:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 08:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very good, very nice, very big, very detailed, very ... google. Does "Commons" need such pictures ? The answer is obviously yes. But must we "feature" a photograph taken by a bot ? Not so sure... Or, let's be consistant and promote all the Google Art Project in one time, as a whole... This kind of work does not need our little stars, I find this a bit ridiculous. To me, the magic bells (beloved by Alvesgaspar) are ringing because of the divine and genious Sandro, one among my favourite painters, but not because of this photograph. Furthermore, photography is not allowed in the Uffizzi Gallery, and as a recent visitor, I find this unfair for "Commons" users. My humble opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Occasionally we can feature a few of them; just my humble opinion. Besides photographers and illustrators, many other people are working for Commons. I would like to appreciate people like Dcoetzee and Crisco 1492 for spending much time to find, edit and transfer various public domain files to Commons. JKadavoor Jee 05:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I definitely do want to reward our contributors of original works, but I see the primary purpose of Featured Pictures as finding our best and most important works to display on the Main Page, and it's good to have a mix of historical and modern works. It's also helpful, when there are many digitizations of a work available as in this case, to identify one that we think is the best among those we have, as advice to projects choosing among them (it's great to get people who have laid eyes on the work like yourself to offer feedback on the authenticity of the digitization). I only nominate a small number of images from Google Art Project and similar sources, usually those that are visually striking, famous, and high-quality, high-resolution reproductions that are widely used on WMF projects. I'm also still experimenting with the gigapixel tile set uploads and want to see how those are received by the community. I do absolutely agree however, that the Uffizi's photography policy is most unfortunate, and represents the prioritization of licensing income over wide enjoyment of their works. Dcoetzee (talk) 07:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    • I agree (again) that "Commons" needs such pictures, and I thank you very much for uploading. But if you want the community to identify the best among the digitizations we have, please try the COM:VIC label, it is exactly on purpose !!--Jebulon (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I regard this work high quality and fits perfectly into the screening criteria for a featured picture. Many photos taken by NASA's robots are outstanding, the human is an additional element in the development of photography in the extent of the technology advances. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    • I'm consistant: I do not agree with featuring NASA or ESA pictures, and (almost) never support them for the same reasons...--Jebulon (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Nowadays photographers are much like robots behind those huge techie equipments, surrendering all their creative skills. :) JKadavoor Jee 16:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- the colour scheme of the file has been intensified in such a manner as to give a quality to the image that is not in keeping with the work itself--Thorvaldsson (talk) 14:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Could you please clarify? I'm trying to ensure this image is as authentic and representative as possible. In particular, is the original file File:Sandro Botticelli - La nascita di Venere - Google Art Project.jpg more representative of the painting, or are both inaccurate in the same way? Dcoetzee (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Thank you for your question. In terms of colour, the painting in question is not a bright one, even after its conservation in 1986-7; so, the GAP image is more representative of the painting.--Thorvaldsson (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media

File:Santa Maria in Portico in Campitelli.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2012 at 23:21:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa Maria in Portico in Campitelli, Roma
Thank you both for your review. I have uploaded the new version where the noise was filtered out. --Honza Beran (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded - noise reduction. --Honza Beran (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Initially it was noisy, and now I clearly see a result of denoising (which led to blurring) and strong artefacts caused by unsharp mask. May be I'm wrong with method of image processing, but I think they cannot improve this image. Never shoot at ISO 1600 with EOS 60D if you want to have a quality picture. Here you could use ISO800 and 1/15 sec exposure time, image stabilizer would help you. Second, image is slightly tilted. --Ximeg (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the review. I withdraw the nomination. --Honza Beran (talk) 20:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-11-06 09-57-49-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 19:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Access to the underground gunpowder room, in th Fort du Mont Bart, Bavans, France.


Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Cigaritis cilissa 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 14:59:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cigaritis cilissa


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Cobblestones, Père-Lachaise, November 2012.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 04:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Groume (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 04:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice photo and good quality but no wow-factor. Better nominate for QI. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 07:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks; but it not specified in his user page or his Flickr profile page (although the user name is same in both places). JKadavoor Jee 15:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not impressive --Stas1995 (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Day of the dead at mexican cemetery 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2012 at 23:19:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Dome of Rock, Temple Mount, Jerusalem.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 22:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by user:idobi. --Idobi (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Idobi (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Interesting, but the file size seems too small.Fotoriety (talk) 23:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, The file size is to small. 2MP needed. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I uploaded a bigger version. Idobi (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
OK, FPX is no longer valid. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice but not good enough for FP: to unsharp + to soft, visible CA, oversaturated. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Fibroblast (BPAE).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2012 at 20:21:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fibroblast in 3D
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Heiti Paves - uploaded by Heiti Paves - nominated by Ivo Kruusamägi -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 20:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice high-res biology image. Recommend adding an English description however. -- King of ♠ 22:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Three active nominations from Kruusamägi. -- JKadavoor Jee 05:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support now. JKadavoor Jee 08:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support English description added. --Ivar (talk) 07:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 12:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing. Can you add what image type it is (e.g. scanning electron microscope, or computer generated?)--Stu Phillips (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, really, spanish description could be nice --Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 13:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Natural phenomena

File:Grands Moulins de Pantin.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 04:42:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Benh - nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 04:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice. The WB is just a bit blue for my taste, though. -- King of ♠ 10:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. -- King of ♠ 18:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 12:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 13:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - it's a bit of a shame that the top of the buildings in the reflection are cropped out, but that is a very minor to me. --heb [T C E] 13:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Heb. Maybe King of Hearts is right about WB, but right now it's ok for me. --Kadellar (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 15:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Great. --Julian H. (talk/files) 21:15, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Blue hour + lights + sharpness = Hard to go wrong.Fotoriety (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JKadavoor Jee 04:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Peter23 (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yarl 18:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Moonik (talk) 12:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:14, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Jardim Botânico Funchal - Madeira - 01.jpg, not featured, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2012 at 20:55:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Funchal seen from the Jardim Botânico da Madeira
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: unattractive, badly composed foreground that overwhelms the subject matter, plenty of chromatic aberrations.Fotoriety (talk) 22:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I like this image. Nice colors, sharp focus. Foreground, middle part, background and sky (everything!) are full of details, as it should be in the landscape photography. --Ximeg (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 13:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Uninteresting composition, unfortunate foreground. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - as per Ximeg. --heb [T C E] 13:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 09:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Moscow 05-2012 StBasilCathedral.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 20:58:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Basil's Cathedral, Moscow, Russia. From Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.


  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by A.Savin. The image shows this Moscow's landmark from a less usual angle: from the Moskva River bridge rather than from the Red Square. The view isn't very different though, that's the very special feature of this building. - A.Savin 20:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 20:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Cons: crop feels too tight, unimpressive foreground.Fotoriety (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The street lights are disturbing. Not detailed as the existing FP. But I like this view as more interesting. JKadavoor Jee 11:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 14:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the perspective. -- Felix König 16:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don´t mind the crop, agree with Fotoriety on foreground. The cars must go... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Not sure if they really must: we'd have perhaps too tight crop below, and the wall is also part of the ensemble. - A.Savin 08:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Cropping off the cars would totally ruin the composition (I tested it) - in my opinion it is good at its current state. -- Felix König 18:01, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The cars are disturbing for me. But I like. --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well... I guess, this photo deserve to be FP anyway. --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I actually like the cars. Without them, I would have thought it was smaller than it actually is. -- King of ♠ 10:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Peter23 (talk) 10:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JDP90 (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Only because of the busy foreground with the cars, sorry. I disagree with King of Hearts: the scale is given by persons too.--Jebulon (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I think the cars can be easily cropped out (if required); but the lamp poles will remain. JKadavoor Jee 16:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Sorry Savin, it is a good picture but not special enough for promotion. I don't like the cars either but am not sure if a crop would work. I think we need a really special photograph of the subject, the existing FP (which is mine) no longer makes my bells ring... Did you try a panorama? I would like to go back to Moscow one day... Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I think the car brings perspective and a bit of context to it so no problem there. If anything the lamps are more of a distraction, but not to much for me. --heb [T C E] 13:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Fotoriety, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As for me, I don't see anything special in this photo. This building is photographed every day hundreds times, so the photo should have something really extraordinal to go in FP.
    As for the technical side, I noticed that the building is turned CCW a bit. Measurement in GiMP gave 0.8 degrees. And I think that the image need some contrast adjustment, since colors look pretty pale for me. I personally prefer something like this (see thumbnail, which I placed above to be near the original image). Still, the clouds are too blue. --Ximeg (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
    The alternative version has noise on the sky, so I wouldn't replace, otherwise OK to me. - A.Savin 13:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
    If you have RAW file, you can start from it and make the required adjustments in order to keep the quality. --Ximeg (talk) 00:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
  • (weak) Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose really not bad, impressive building, nice image, but I agree about the foreground and the image seems relatively soft and a little bit contrastless to me. IMHO, the present FP is just insignificant better than yours (the FP has also a bottom crop problem, yours has a better lighting). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There are cars in the picture --Kasir (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kasir--Claus (talk) 08:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosendals palace May 2012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 08:54:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosendal palace
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rosendal Palace is a Swedish royal pavilion located at the Djurgården, an island in central Stockholm. It was built between 1823 and 1827 for King Karl XIV Johan. The palace stands today largely as it did in Karl XIV Johan's lifetime. Created, uploaded and nominated -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice colors. -- King of ♠ 09:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice view & composition, good sharpness & lighting, FP to me. - A.Savin 10:44, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--JDP90 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great quality and composition Tomer T (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Selbymay (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish there wasn't a bush on the right, but we can't take it out! --Kadellar (talk) 13:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Good quality and detail (easy to make with today's cameras), no magic bells ringing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting and nice, nothing extraordinary, the busy family and the pole with the red "thing" in the middle are disturbing. Technically fine anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 13:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Стара фортеця.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2012 at 18:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kamianets-Podilskyi Castle
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by RBohdan - uploaded by RBohdan - nominated by Lystopad -- Lystopad (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lystopad (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like it, even if the ghosts are a bit disturbing Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As on QIC already. I find the blue hour atmosphere impressive, the image has good technical qualities. What we see on the bridge aren't ghosts, it's a motion blur (doesn't bother me, and not surprising with 13/1 s exposure). - A.Savin 20:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Don't really agree with the motion blur of the moving people. They become far too distracting from the castle - especially since the foot-path is there to lead the eye to the castle, but my eyes become too fixated on them instead. -- Fotoriety
    • Excuse me, but I really think that proverb "better to do you well, than to say well" works everywhere. Were is your contirbution to Commons? (There is no need to answer me) --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
      • "Seek and you will find", Mt 7-7.--Jebulon (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
We are on this page to critique images, not to critique individuals. Please stay relevant.Fotoriety (talk) 09:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
In this case I agree with Fotoriety, and will add that the image needs cropping in the foreground, up to the lamp on bottom right... that will take out a lot of the motion blurr and distracting elements, like the man on all fours at bottom left. The image is nice, but... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice mood --sfu (talk) 20:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:18, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (weak) Per Tomascatelazo.--Jebulon (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice mood, the crop is good IMO --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the mood and actually finds that the motion blur of the people adds to it. If anything the light next to the man on all fours (lower left) should be dampened, because they are a bit of a distraction, but not that much. --heb [T C E] 13:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- VolodymyrF 13:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stas1995 (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /King of ♠ 09:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

Image:Fuente de agua. Jardin El Monumental.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2012 at 15:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Rjcastillo (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Cons: very ordinary composition, needs more colour saturation.Fotoriety (talk) 23:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment like 500px.com? --Wilfredor (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Alai! Alai! (Wandergruppe gemütlich 1989).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2012 at 11:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Wandergruppe gemütlich - uploaded by Frze - nominated by Frze -- Frze (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Frze (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --NOT MUCH WOW Alborzagros (talk) 12:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The purpose of the image escapes me. I fail to see much beyond a nice holiday snapshot. Kleuske (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a nice snapshot, not more. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In 1989, we lived behind the Iron Curtain. We were citizens of East Germany and our travel options were limited to Eastern Europe. Travel to the USSR were only possible for officials. We achieved with many hurdles anyway our top of the world - the Pamir Mountains in Central Asia. The joy in our faces can only be understood in context. --Frze (talk) 11:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Congratulations. However, that's not apparant from the image, the title or the description provided. You can hardly expect the casual viewer to somehow "get" that. Kleuske (talk) 16:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Should be regarded as a person's face picture spam, I should not be recommended.Is this a spam picture?--New ombudsman (talk) 12:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Not enough edits to vote. --Ivar (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Antonow An-26 inside Dmitry Belov 1898.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2012 at 11:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Transportplane Antonov-26 cargobay
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dmitry Belov - uploaded by Frze - nominated by Frze -- Frze (talk) 11:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Frze (talk) 11:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special, overexposed parts. Tomer T (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Boat ride at Sunrise, on the Ganges, Varanasi.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 09:39:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise over Varanasi
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by orvalrochefort - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by Penyulap -- Penyulap 09:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Very poor image quality (see noise in the sky), tilted horizon. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Maybe a noise reduction tool like lightroom or gausian selective blur --Wilfredor (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rotated .82 degrees, no problem. However, the sky presents an artistic dilemma, certainly I could 'do it', but I have thought long and hard and even tested a few different blur filters, but it always comes back to my initial feelings before I began, which is, this is the morning sky over the Ganges, I don't feel a cartoon-clear sky is proper. I'm not saying there aren't clear skies over india, there are some very rare weather conditions that could feasibly create a remarkably clear sky. But I don't think it is in any way appropriate for this image, examination of the grain shows as much, to my eyes anyhow. The bird is just a bird and belongs. My desire to be accommodating does not win out over my heart today. I'm sorry, it's a dealbreaker. Penyulap 22:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

Sunrise over Varanasi, corrected for tilt
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support alt. Great composition and light. -- King of ♠ 07:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm of the school of thought that everything should have some slight imperfection, with the tilt gone, the perfect thirds, the warm morning sky over the ganges, all that is really left is the ferrymans position in the reflected morning rays. Seems to me he's a little in a hurry, a critique perhaps of the pace of commuters ? of life ? Cheeky, I love it now. Penyulap 13:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The image requires proper category and location info. JKadavoor Jee 16:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Quality and composition are fine to me, but no category and poor description make a no go. Yann (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
well I didn't appreciate the Jkadavoor's tone, so I'm not going to suggest he direct any similar remarks at the editor who requested for the work to be done in the first place. You'll all need to manage without me, I have more constructive things to do than play games. Penyulap 03:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC))

File:Dasht-e Kavir.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2012 at 12:35:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dasht-e Kavir in iran


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:France - Jujols (66) - Chapelle.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 13:19:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

France - Jujols (66) - Chapelle.jpg