Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Arlanda, July 1972.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2011 at 13:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Stockholm Arlanda Airport in 1972
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lars Söderström - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This photo never fails to amaze me everytime I look at it. For a photo which is now nearly 40 years old, the quality is absolutely AMAZING! It has often been said that it looks like a computer generated image, but low and behold, it is absolutely real, and is quite probably the most amazing photo of this vintage Soviet aircraft that I have seen -- russavia (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- It is a nice and historically interesting photo . But I see nothing special justitying the FP status, either in the subject or in the image quality. The tight crop and cut-off tail is a strong minus in the framing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Something I don't understand with Commons, is if one looks at airliners.net the overwhelming majority of photos are tightly cropped, because the subject is the actual aircraft, not the tarmac it is on, nor the buildings around it, but the aircraft. I don't understand why Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles and Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods, etc are full of tightly-cropped photos, whilst aircraft are supposed to be so wide in nature, that the actual subject is lost. As to the right horizontal stabiliser (tailplane), the crop on that is so minimal that it is almost unnoticeable and does not detract from the amazing quality and historical significance of such a photo. russavia (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Just to show an example. If this photo was cropped as tight, it wouldn't be suitable, because one wants to see what is in the background, and it is cropped enough that both the subject isn't lost, nor is the background (this photo isn't featured, but is one I am going to get a larger size of to bring thru the process). This photo is also cropped about right, because the subject is the aircraft beginning its take-off run (another photo I will try to get larger for FP). This photo is also cropped right, because the subject is the contrails left by the aircraft, and also the expanse of the sky above the actual aircraft. But the subject of this photo, is more akin to a lizard sitting on a rock, or an insect on a flower or branch - the actual subject of this is the aircraft - the sleek lines, the jet engines, the glazed navigators nose -- in other words the actual aircraft, not what it is doing. And the quality, I must say, is absolutely flawless, hence why it is FP quality. russavia (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the crop is perceived as "too tight" because the tailplane is cut off. Lupo 12:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment And the tip of the plane is within about 2% of the image edge. That's not the case in any of the reptiles I can see. Head shots are a totally different type of photo. --99of9 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent picture. Lazyhawk (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar + the crop is too tight. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree that is an interesting picture, but the crop really hurts. --ELEKHHT 05:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Cut off tail, and cropped too tight at right. --Avenue (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. As you all know, I support tight cropping of airplane photos, but having part of the image cropped off like that is a total no-no. One can crop off a significant part of the wings or rotor (in helicopters) so as to emphasise the fuselage, and that's OK, but this is not. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Shihan.jpg[edit]

Shihan Toratau, Bashkortostan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by aptup - uploaded by Fgdcvd - nominated by Fgdcvd
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Low resolution, tilted, blurry, JPEG artifacts as well as invalid nomination AzaToth 18:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Squirrell.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 19:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Squirrel
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by kevenlaw - uploaded by AA - nominated by AA -- AHURA♠ 19:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AHURA♠ 19:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Steven Walling • talk 20:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose While the framing is nice, I feel it's too blurry on the subject and chromatic noise mixed with jpeg artifacts are somewhat visible in the background. AzaToth 20:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Cute, but blurry and noisy. Image quality is too poor for FP. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:12, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Si-o-se-Pol.jpg, not delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 22:46:32
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Too poor image quality: blown highlights, little detail. Please compare with these two other night FPs: File:Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin Mosque 02.jpg and File:Arc Triomphe.jpg. I never nominate pictures for delisting but this time I believe it was an obvious judgement mistake. (Original nomination here)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep the other two examples are not night shots.. but evening shots. this image is not so bad IMO. Ggia (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep and there is no change in the circumstances. Tomer T (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep good FP for me, 2011 promotion -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Not bad. --Karelj (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --sfu (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 delist, 4 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Blick auf den Grimselsee und den Raeterichsbodensee 0981.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2011 at 22:47:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama view of the Lake Grimsel and Räterichsbodensee in Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

ein besonderer Ort *Symbol support vote.svg Support--Böhringer (talk) 10:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cecil (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info a new version is uploaded with eliminated errors: posterisation. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pretty good actually. Perhaps higher resolution; You still got 70MB left to go :), Regarding the red dots, I think now that they actually is part of the scenery, but I can't still understand what they are for. AzaToth 15:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info The "red dots" are ballons at the "overhead power lines". --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Saluting the Flag.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 21:06:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

w:en:IDF officers from the Kfir infantry brigade saluting the Israeli flag in a military ceremony, 2011
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Israel Defense Forces decide to this week to release all of their pictures in CC-BY-SA license.
    created by Israel Defense Forces - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by Itzike -- Itzike (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Itzike (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Srtong photo. Itzuvit (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Itzuvit wrote Hanay (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice, but: "saluting the Flag". I'm missing the Flag! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amirki (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both non neutral subject and national canvassing. + quality of the picture not outstanding. --Jebulon (talk) 20:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If you lack the flag, let's just call it saluting. Smile Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Alchemist. --Karelj (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong photo, but the background lights seem too overpowering. It makes me want to squint. The blue light spots in the foreground are also distracting. --Avenue (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In parts of the image the back-lighting is very striking, but in other parts (particularly to the left) I agree with Avenue, the lights overpower some of the subjects. --99of9 (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Gießen neue Uniklinik01 2011-08-22.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 08:53:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

University hospital in Giessen
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. Loved the vivid colors Itzuvit (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Correct quality (probably a QI) and composition. But nothing extraordinary justifying the FP status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition could be more interesting if less central and there was more emphasis on the entrance. --ELEKHHT 00:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Panurus biarmicus male portrait 01 (MK).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 16:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bearded Reedling (Panurus biarmicus)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My first try with birds. This one shows a portrait of a Bearded Reedling (Panurus biarmicus). c/u/n by me mathias K 16:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- mathias K 16:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wow. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 04:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MyCanon (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avenue (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question How did you get so close so as to be able to portrait such a small bird with a 90mm ? - Benh (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Bird in hand? --Muhammad (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Hi Benh, I was waiting for that question and Muhammad already gave the right answer. :) The picture was taken during a bird ringing event. So it is a wild bird hold in hand by a ornithologists. Regards mathias K 07:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support omg --Wilfredor (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:24, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gorgeous. --99of9 (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:TYTANE P.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 13:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

After image, concentrate 30 s on the white dot and close your eyes 10s.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dimitri Parant, uploaded and nominated by Falcom -- FALCOM (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- FALCOM (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Australian Magpie closed eyes.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile Australian Magpie portrait with its eyes closed.


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Dhow Indian Ocean.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 16:12:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Dhow in the Indian Ocean near Zanzibar
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Muhammad Mahdi Karim - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose image has too low resolution and it feels over-processed. The ship should be more centered as well. AzaToth 21:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
    • There is no resolution problem, according to the guidelines. Tomer T (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The resolution is fine and centring the boat would, IMO, spoil the composition. --Jovian Eye storm 22:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
      • Here I personally feel that the image should have had higher resolution, it's not the minimum regulations I cited. AzaToth 22:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Composition and framing are very good, imo. But not the lighting (the subject is underexposed) and the detail. Yes, it looks like the result of an agressive de-noising process. Those are probably the reasons for Muhammad not having nominated the picture himself... Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks Tomer --Muhammad (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small for me. พ.s. 22:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support could be larger but composition is great --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Mont Blanc 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

From atop Mont Blanc, Italy-France.


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Yellow Bellied Slider Basking.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 10:14:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yellow Bellied Slider
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- Jovian Eye storm 10:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jovian Eye storm 10:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit noisy, but an awesome picture nonetheless. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good quality of a nice subject, but the leaf on his/her neck is a bit annoying, and the white sky reflection across the shell also detracts from the subject. --99of9 (talk) 13:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MyCanon (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support per 99of9. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Reptiles

File:2011-09-03 10-11-49-fort-lomont.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 18:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the fort du Lomont, Chamesol, France.


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-09-18 16-05-35-fort-arches.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 18:44:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the fort d'Arches, Pouxeux, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the placidness of the scene, but it's a bit noisy and a lot of CA. Thus, I am on the fence. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the theme and framing, but am not sure about picture quality (to greenish, dark?). Also on the fence.--Celia Ascenso (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can't see much noise at all. This image has a great mood, and I think the greenish colour is probably correct given the vegetation. --99of9 (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--FALCOM (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jovian Eye storm 11:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This has grown on me. --Avenue (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kalta Minor.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 17:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by TwoWings - uploaded by TwoWings - nominated by TwoWings -- TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Can I support my own picture ? I suppose not... -- TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The building on the right cuts o the subject in a bad way, also the subject is getting a bit blurry on the top. AzaToth 15:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    I accept your POV but I just want to comment something : if you knew that place, you'll know that it's quite impossible to take a picture of Kalta Minor from that street without the building on the right cutting off the bottom of Kalta Minor. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pardalotus punctatus male with nesting material - Risdon Brook.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 18:44:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Patrouille de France Radom 3 1.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 14:50:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Patrouille de France


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 22:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Berlin Landwehrkanal Houseboats 20080429.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

channel in Berlin/Germany


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deva statue in Wat Phra Kaew, Bangkok, Thailand.jpg

File:Cervus elaphus Luc Viatour 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 16:11:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brame du cerf (Cervus elaphus)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} ( Pro),--KarleHorn (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Does capture the attention of the viewer quite well. --ELEKHHT 02:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Very visually captivating, but it is a bit noisy and a little too tightly cropped on the left and right IMO. --The High Fin Sperm Whale
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gomada (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Egretta novaehollandiae - Austins Ferry.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 20:33:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Kronborg night.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kronborg Slot at night
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by DanNav - uploaded by DanNav - nominated by DanNav -- DanNav (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- DanNav (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the right side is unfortunately overexposed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} ( Support)--KarleHorn (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposure, sorry. --99of9 (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Portrait de l'artiste avec un ami, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2011 at 15:10:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self-portrait with a friend
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Raffaello Sanzio - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --99of9 (talk) 00:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Spitfire Formation.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 20:34:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Formation flypast of three Supermarine Spitfires during the Yorkshire Air Show.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it is below the minimum size set by the rules (2MPx). Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:San Pietro 2011-09-20.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 12:47:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vista dal mare della chiesa di S. Pietro.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} -- inquieto (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose massive perspective distortion is unappealing, right side blurred and relatively low resolution for landscape. --ELEKHHT 02:06, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Elekhh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni .JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 10:09:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gonepteryx rhamni


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Pha That Luang Vientiane Laos Wikimedia Commons.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 15:06:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Pha That Luang in Vientiane, Laos.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Benh - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent picture--FALCOM (talk) 15:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --sfu (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- why not?? RohG ??· 11:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support not without flaws, but until someone comes up with a better one of Laos and Vientiane (and thanks for the nomination) - Benh (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As it was nominated as QI candidate, I recognized "the" style when checking, before seeing the signature. Souvent imité, jamais égalé !--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much of these red road stones --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Berthold Werner. พ.s. 06:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:MiG-29 2547.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 11:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slovakian MiG-29
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info everything by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Technically good, clean image, from a good angle, with just the right amount of space :). What is the bright white patch on the side just behind the nose cone? --99of9 (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    • This might be a sun glare in one of the glass elements covering some antenna. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Freedom to share (talk) 19:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Good image, quite difficult to capture correctly as well.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Basik07 (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Aeroflot Airbus A330 Kustov.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 13:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aeroflot Airbus A330-200 climbing out of Sheremetyevo Airport
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sergey Kustov (User:bushman787) - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- russavia (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Should definitely be cropped top and bottom to balance the frame. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
      • It is unbalanced, but I think the cloud gives it more charm than being suspended in blank blueness. --Avenue (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
      • I agree, which is why I nominated it. The cloud takes away the "blue screen" effect, the photo would otherwise have. Charming, nice word for such a photo. russavia (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    • Moreover, Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. You should probably withdraw this nomination and re-nominate in a few days. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • FPD - Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)}}
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator. I give my limit of nominations to this picture. Nice photo, let this is my nomination -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think the crop is well chosen. Not only because of the lack of headroom, but also because for such a high aspect ratio object, the aspect ratio of the picture is fairly square. E.g. why include the half-cloud? --99of9 (talk) 01:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    • I will provide my opinio on your question. The actual subject of the photo is the aircraft, not the cloud. A more detailed view would provide either much more fluffy white cloud and/or empty blue space. By including the fluff of cloud it is an actual visual reminder that the aircraft is inflight, and is in such ratio that the aircraft, and not the empty space around it, is the core subject of the photo. If the cloud was say the top of a building, I would agree with you, as it would be clear from such a view that it is the aircraft AND the buildings which are the subject of the photo, and such a view should be of the panoramo of the city and the aircraft flying over top. This is obviously not the case here. russavia (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support because I still don't like the crop. But otherwise the photo is flawless. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 06:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • My proposal is to retouch the clouds away to have a unitary blue background. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Alexi Laiho - Ilosaarirock 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 18:56:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexi Laiho of band Children of Bodom at Ilosaarirock
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tuomas Vitikainen - uploaded by Tuomas Vitikainen - nominated by Cecil -- Cecil (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cecil (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overprocessed and JPEG artifacts AzaToth 19:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality and good expression, it's a pity that his mouth is hidden. --Vassil (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Odontoptera carrenoi MHNT global.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2011 at 09:35:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Odontoptera carrenoi - Museum specimen
It wanted. The scale is low visibility so as not to interfere with the subject.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- I don't like the proportions of this image. An obvious improvement would be a crop on the left but I would prefer the two smaller pictures to the rotated 90 degress. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
I tried this solution. In fact the side view is inabituelle for entomology. But here she brings a infomations on the "nose" very special, of this species. I put the two images, wings closed, effectively 90 ° as is usual. But I found that the profile was more natural if I put it horizontal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Qantas Boeing 747-400 VH-OJU over Starbeyevo Kustov.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 10:46:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Qantas Boeing 747-400 on a flight from Asia to Europe, captured from the ground at Starbeyevo, Moscow, whilst the aircraft is at 11,000metres
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sergey Kustov (User:bushman787) - uploaded by Russavia| - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- russavia (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Lazyhawk (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Zooro-Patriot (talk) 11:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support AzaToth 11:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment Sergey will be viewing this request, and others I am doing for his photos, and will be available to address any reasonable concerns and the like. I will also encourage him to sign up on Commons. russavia (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unneccessary colour modifications that detract from it's educational value. --99of9 (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Apart from the curiosity of being taken from a long distance, I see nothing featurable in this image. Extreme crop, underexposed and not sharp enough. It would be nice to have the Exif information. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
    • My friend, most humbly on my knee I beg you not to call this crop extreme. According to the most up to date standards this crop is quite acceptable, a bit too tight perhaps, but far from extreme. Many aviation photographers would call this crop too loose/wide, although the Commons population seems to favor such compositions. I have no problem with that, I simply believe that some of us are being too harsh on the issue of empty space when in comes to airplanes. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
      • I agree, tighter crop is possible, so this one is not the most extreme. Nevertheless Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as aeroplane caged within a too tight framing, according to my (non-aviation, but simply aesthetic) standards, sorry. --ELEKHHT 11:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    • I disagree entirely. It is the fact that it is taken whilst flying overhead at 11,000 metres and the aircraft is in perfect view, along with one of the features one sees when an aircraft is flying at altitude; the contrails. One would not the contrails when flying at low altitude; at least not this visible. russavia (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as Elekhh. พ.s. 06:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Basik07 (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Richmond Parkkk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 14:04:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Richmond Park
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by kevenlaw - uploaded by AA - nominated by AA -- AHURA♠ 14:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AHURA♠ 14:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Quan (talk) 12:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not a fan of the lighting changes sorry. --99of9 (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too overexposed areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above. -- -donald- (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 16:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Benjamin Couprie - uploaded by JdH - nominated by Ladsgroup -- Amir (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High encyclopedic value -- Amir (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--AHURA♠ 16:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the quality and resolution. I think it's a better candidate for "Valued Images" --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
It's a historical image and I think we can make exception for historical images. resolution of image is satisfying. 17 people of this image are noble laureates Amir (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Well that's why we also have "Valued Images" : for those historical images that are indeed of great value but that are (objectively) not of great photographic quality. Nominate it as Valued Image and I'll support it. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks but I don't think so because this or this are featured but they (and major of these images) have not "quality and resolution"Amir (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The technical quality is not the only criterium for a FP. It may be. Old images, even with a non perfect quality, can be promotted as FP. We have many examples. FPC are not to be technically better than QI. VI was not created for historical images. Even if it may concern historical images. Please read the guidelines (both for QI, VI and FP) carefully.--Jebulon (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    I wasn't meaning that VI was created for historical pictures. I meant that its purpose was (partly) to award some label to pictures that could be of great value without being of great photographic quality. I agree that some historical pictures can be FP even with not so great quality or resolution (especially because we have to consider the technology of that time). But for that particular picture I think FP is a bit too much for two main reasons : 1) I think we can expect a better resolution and focus for that period (and that 1925 picture is an example of what I mean - you can actually see that the photographic conditions were not as good as the 1927 Sovay one, which makes the latter, by comparison, not so good) ; 2) I don't think the composition is of great quality (at least not enough for FP). So yes, I understand the guidelines and yes I stay with my opinion. Sorry. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
    • No need to be sorry, I think we agree together regarding your first part. Anyway, discussion is always interesting.--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    If "especially considering the technology of that time" the very analogue image used for digitisation provides more detail and contrast than many modern high end DSLR images could provide. It's the scanning that limits the quality you get displayed in the digital file. Resolution of a digital file is not connected to the period of an alogue image. It's the original image's size and the scanning method used to digitise the image that determine the resolution you can see. The only thing that is "not so good" is the idea of comparing two digitised analogue images from the same period without any technical intel. We don't have any information on the cameras, lenses, photographic film and paper nor any intel on the darkroom processing. The beauty and quality of the 1925 may be higher - yet your argumentation falls short for the aforementioned reasons. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support outstanding historic value and uniqueness. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment PD for 70 years after publication does not comply with Belgian copyright law. Unless Benjamin Couprie is dead for 70 years (i.e. complies with PD for 70 years pma), or the image is provided by his legal successors, this image is still under copyright. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    hmm. Do you know when Benjamin Couprie died? I think he must died before 1941 because he was in the 1911 conference [1]. I googled his name but I can't find his date deathAmir (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    As Here he has been died since 1933 thus this image PDAmir (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
    That says he died after 1933 (and was born before 1911), which we know because of pictures he took at the First and Seventh Solvay Conferences, in 1911 and 1933 respectively. This doesn't seem like very conclusive evidence that he died by 1940 (as required for it to be PD in Belgium under the 70 years pma rule). --Avenue (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
    Anyway, regardless of whether this is currently PD in Belgium, it doesn't seem to be PD in the US because it was published after 1922 and was not PD in Belgium on 1 January 1996 (see w:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for why that date is important). It was created by someone still alive in 1926, and Belgium had the 70 year pma rule in 1996 (their current law was passed in 1994). I hope I'm missing something, but I think all his photos post-1922 are unfortunately still under copyright in the U.S., and so should be deleted. --Avenue (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Outstanding value and uniqueness, I agree. No need to be a specialist of physics to understand that the meeting on a same picture (even if not technically perfect) of so world famous scientists is absolutely extraordinary. Typical for FP in my poor opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor quality. พ.s. 22:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, still under copyright. --Avenue (talk) 13:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question--Jebulon (talk) 09:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support considering the age of the photo Ggia (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Imehling (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As Avenue wrote it, there could be a problem with Benjamin Couprie's photographs. I'm trying to find some informations about his date of death but I haven't found anything yet. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Historical

File:Volcán Chimborazo, "El Taita Chimborazo".jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 03:55:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chimborazo volcano, the closest point to the sun. Riobamba - Ecuador
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dabit100 - uploaded by Dabit100 - nominated by Dabit100 -- Dabit100 (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dabit100 (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose blown highlight, bad pixels, lack of focus, boring colors, generally low quality, possible chromatic aberration. AzaToth 15:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition, too much sky. --Karelj (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support David C. S. Coat of Arms of Quito.jpg Coat of arms of Ecuador.svg 18:55 30 sep 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
{{Support}} --Minishow (talk) 03:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Mediocre picture with bad composition and part of votestacking and campaigning on es.WP. For those not speaking spanish: David C. S. has posted to several people asking them to support the image, including explaining which template to use when doing it. The nominator is all for it. -- Cecil (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ask ComputerHotline his opinion is more important than yours considering the experience that he has. I did not ask him or anybody to vote for my picture, and if you think my picture is mediocre is just your opinion, I think you are impolite and disrespectful with my work Cecil --Dabit100 (talk) 01:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, if you are so sure about your work then why did you participate in cheating? You could have stopped David or at least expressed your disagreement with his behaviour. Instead you voted for the other two pictures (one of them tilted, the other one missing a part on the left side). And I am obviously not the only one who thinks that this picture here is not FP-material (which for me equals mediocre). Oh, and Karelj is here pretty much as long as ComputerHotline. Only he does not list up all his achievements for this project. -- Cecil (talk) 05:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, maybe I made a mistake voting for those pictures, but I'm here just to colaborate not to argue, and for respect to my picture I will not going to continue with this argument, I respect your opinion and I will continue working, I'm not a professional but I like taking pictures and I really thought that this picture could be a good FP. At least I had ComputerHotline support that for me is great considering his experience --Dabit100 (talk) 11:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • The campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Además sabía que este es el lugar mas cercano al espacio exterior, en ningún lugar en el mundo va a poder ver lo mismo. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture. David C. S. Coat of Arms of Quito.jpg Coat of arms of Ecuador.svg


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Zwiefalten 28 04 2011 Angels 04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 22:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Angel in Zwiefalten Church
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Vassil - uploaded by Vassil - nominated by Vassil -- Vassil (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the crop on the right cuts of the sword. AzaToth 15:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Penélope Cruz - Huile.jpg

File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Israeli Apache helicopter overlooks the Greek hills.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 11:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An Israeli Air Force Apache helicopter lands across from a Greek mountain range during a joint Israel-Greece exercise with the Hellenic Air Force. These types of exercises are a central aspect of the Israel-Greece military cooperation.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Israel Defense Forces - nominated by Marokwitz -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice, but to much vignetting and to low dimensions --Slick (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because while the photo per se is great, the resolution is too small (the required resolution is 2MPx). Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Heliport Ferry Finnmaid Baltic Sea 20100917.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:42:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heliport at Baltic Sea Ferry
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sir James - uploaded by Sir James - nominated by Sir James -- Sir James (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ; now rotated. Sir James (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request the sea horizon need a correction: it is tilted, otherwise nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice blue. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not bad at all and like the non-centred composition, but the big white cloud in the middle is a bad background for the white parts of the ship. --ELEKHHT 02:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support real blue --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The horizon is not straight (barrell distortion IMO), little CAs, but I like the "blue" composition--Miguel Bugallo 13:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Imehling (talk) 20:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Iglesia de San Juan Bautista.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 13:31:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church Iglesia de San Juan Bautista (Church of St. John the Baptist) in Telde, Gran Canaria.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and nominated by me, reworked by User:Saibo -- Felix König 13:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Felix König 13:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the perspective seems to be off as the left tower grows higher than the right one. AzaToth 15:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
    • How do you know that it is a perspectival and not a constructional problem? I surely know that I stood exactly in the center, and if you look at the retouched versions with "corrected" perspective, you will see that it looks unnatural. -- Felix König 16:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • perpective is good IMO but the image is noisy --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Lycogala epidendrum 2011 G1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 18:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wolf's milk slime mould
corrected? wb Przykuta[edit] 18:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Same lines is visible on the original unprocessed photo. Possibly, it is a trace left by an axe or a knife. It is an old trace when the tree wasn't rotten. See another trace (annotated by me). -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think we're looking at the same thing. What I am looking at is a ring around the slime mold that I annotated. It looks like everything outside the ring is blurred. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ah, yes, I see that too. It looks like a region boundary used for some kind of post-processing. --99of9 (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral wb: too blue - look on the small "drops" Przykuta[edit] 18:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Golden retriever welpe meer.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 15:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Retriever Welpe/Junghund in der Nordsee
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by vorderstrasse - uploaded by vorderstrasse - nominated by vorderstrasse -- Dirk Vorderstraße (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dirk Vorderstraße (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm getting a bit suspect about this way even resolution of 3000x2000, smells re-sampled. There's a log of image grain, but at least it's not chromatic noise. AzaToth 16:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Maybe to the "all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing" should be added that all pets are cute. --ELEKHHT 08:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Şahlûr.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 20:18:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European bee-eater from Kurdistan
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because A realy nice image, but the resolution is to small, it must be minimum 2MP. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
    • FYI, I think this is a European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster). JJ Harrison (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
      • Yes, it is European bee-eater, but the photo was taken in a kurdish village. Btw , what should i do now? i should delete it from list of candidates? --Gomada (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
        • Hello Gomada, if possible then upload please a higher resolution of your photo. Otherwise you don't need to do something. Regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Fuchsia (guharok).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 11:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fuchsia from Czech republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gomada - uploaded by Gomada - nominated by Gomada -- Gomada (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gomada (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The blown light is distracting, also way too tight crop on the left. As well no perfect focus and highly visible noise decreases the overall value sadly. AzaToth 13:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice flowers, but wrong light --Slick (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Thunderbirds 05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2011 at 05:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

USAF Thunderbirds in Denmark
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} ( Support)--KarleHorn (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • As in the case of one of the nominations below: too much empty space top and bottom. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Now cropped a little. --DanNav (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'd like to support it, but I find it cropped a little to tightly. I preferred the second version. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Extreme crop -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I tried different crops - i guess I like this one best my self. --DanNav (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like the crop now but see my anotation. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
    • For some reason the anotator box is gone, but there is a smudge or something on the middle left of the picture. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:GKN pano2 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 18:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neckarwestheim Nuclear Power Plant, panoramic image
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and nominated by me, stitched and reworked by Alchemist-hp -- Felix König 18:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Felix König 18:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice image but lacking sharpness or artefacts --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unsharp image, block details including JPEG artifacts in complex areas. AzaToth 13:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination This nomination can be withdrawn. -- Felix König 20:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Colvin Run Mill.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2011 at 23:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colvin Run Mill


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Engloch 249 Alberschwende Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 10:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bregenzerwälderhof
Denkmalschutz-AT.svg Austria Bundesadler.svg This media shows the protected monument with the number 21634 in Austria. CHM/21634(other)

One major and one minor stitch error should be fixed, Symbol support vote.svg Support if fixed. AzaToth 13:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Stitch error ✓ Done --Böhringer (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Harrison49 (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Die rechte Hauskante kippt nach links. Kann man das noch fixen? -- -donald- (talk) 09:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
das wäre dann verzerrt; perspektivisch ist die Kante so richtig --Böhringer (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX  talk 01:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very nice. There's something weird with the perspective in the house's walls though. Verticality seems a bit off. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wonderful --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Yeading Brook - Ruislip Gardens.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 20:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Yeading Brook flowing through Ruislip Gardens
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Harrison49 - uploaded by Harrison49 - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chaotic composition. --Citron (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too busy. Gamaliel (talk) 22:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per user Citron and user Gamaliel. Also plenty of overexposed spots. --JRff (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-10-02 15-39-22-fort-mt-bart.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 05:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Powder room in the fort du Mont Bart


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cervus elaphus Luc Viatour 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 10:36:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cervus elaphus family
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 06:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice scene --mathias K 11:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo 14:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent family composition. --ELEKHHT 19:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd like to know what he tells his wife... --Schnobby (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful! -- SteveStrummer (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support J'imagine que c'est la période du brame du cerf. J'aimerai me procurer un télé et faire ça aussi une fois ! - Benh (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:F-16 Demo Team 2722.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 07:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dutch F-16
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Out of all the photos I took this summer, this one is my favourite. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vassil (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Capt. Tobias "Hitec" Schutte is probably very happy ! And the heraldic lion of Orange-Nassau is fantastic !--Jebulon (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Basik07 (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice livery! --Jovian Eye storm 01:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 06:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quan (talk) 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --mathias K 10:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo 16:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's many planes, but I'm always impressed. I like the deco pattern and the "don't know how to call them" flows of air on the sides - Benh (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Sunset Palm Tree, DSM, TZ.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 18:42:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Cliché Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:2011 - El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G07.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 01:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green lake, Charco de los Clicos, El Golfo, Lanzarote, the Canary Islands, Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 01:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Miguel Bugallo 01:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 18:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slick (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have been there a few years ago and I like both - the Golfo and the photo --Schnobby (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JRff (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:FregataMagnificens-Couple.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 20:28:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magnificent frigate birds (Fregata magnificens) in processions of conquest
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dabit100 (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - wb: rocks are too blue. Przykuta[edit] 17:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alfonfin (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Bad composition: one of the birds has part of his wing cut off, the other one is not sharp, and a third one is partly visible. -- Cecil (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: part of votestacking and campaigning on es.WP by the nominator. For those not speaking spanish: the nominator has posted to several people asking them to support the image, including explaining which template to use when doing it. -- Cecil (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoThe campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Also know that this is a unique place in the world, for nowhere will be able to do the same. Galapagos is endemic fauna and flora, is the First World Heritage Site by UNESCO. I think a place like this deserves a prominent image. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture.David C. S. Coat of Arms of Quito.jpg Coat of arms of Ecuador.svg
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as Cecil. พ.s. 06:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cecil. --Cayambe (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}}--Guerrero de la Noche (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)¡Viva el Ecuador! Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Lighting doesn`t look like one of a FP. Framing is weird, there're disturbing objects in the way. Weird WB. In my opinion, overall really not FP, sorry. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:St Petersburg, Mariinskiy Palace 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 01:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of the from of Mariinsky Palace in Saint Petersburg
It is better, but not good. On the left side there are still double parts, like the rail on the roof and the lamps. Adjust your stitching software or use another one. -- -donald- (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
There was 1 blurred photo :( There no problems with stitching software. May be crop slightly from left and right ? --DmitriyGuryanov (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image tilts to the right. It is not fully centered. Blurry sides. The resolution is a bit low for a stitched panorama imo. AzaToth 00:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Timoleague Friary.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2011 at 10:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Timoleague Friary


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Virgen de Quito.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 20:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View the Historical Center of Quito, First Cultural Patrimony of Humanity
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} --DeSanJose (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
*{{Support}}--Guerrero de la Noche (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Coat of arms of Ecuador.svgFlag of Ecuador.svg¡Viva el Ecuador! Y felicitaciones por la iniciativa Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I was unsure about what the actual target of this picture was: the somehow tilted hill, a overview of the city or something else. Somehow nothing really stands out. I could not see anything to support it. It looked like a rather mediocre picture of a city where the photographer was not sure what to actually fotograph (=> no special composition). Then I noticed that with this pictures it is quite often used on discussion pages on es.WP. Babel-pic? No. Votestacking and Campaigning ([2]). And not only for this but two other mediocre pictures currently up for discussion which explains why they have a rather unusually high amount of FPXvotes and share the same 5 users. If you would have put up your message on a few boards and portals, this would have been more ok, but by picking a few es.Users this is partisan-canvassing. And that you actually explained to them how to support (but not how to oppose) makes it even worse. This is non-neutral advertisement. So I decided not to refrain from voting as originally intended. -- Cecil (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg InfoThe campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Also elsewhere you will see such a place as Histrórico Center of Quito, the largest and best preserved in Latin America by the UNESCO. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture.David C. S. Coat of Arms of Quito.jpg Coat of arms of Ecuador.svg
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment David, mediocre is not an insult. It doesn´t matter which country you are from. Others user cannot know everything about every culture in the world. That's why we have to use english as a universal language. But anyways, look up for the word mediocre in a dictionary (even in spanish), and you'll find out it does apply perfectly to a picture that does not stand out for a user's opinion. You should not take it personally. This is a page where you put your pictures out to the public eye and get opinions. If you do not like negative opinions, this is not the place for you. You surely are already getting annoyed by this comment, I know. But remember we have to be as neutral as we can. I do think that voting campaigning is really unethic and wrong. Why should you get your selected pictures to be featured and not another guy that may have spent 3 days to take a perfect shot of a spot, only because you told some users to vote you positively? You may say it is totally allowed, but take a while to ask yourself if you truly think you are doing the right thing. I think you maybe acting out of proud and patriotism. (I think... maybe I'm wrong). This is a big and a really serious community, we have to be the best persons we can, and be "muy responsables". Buena suerte hermano. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cecil. No actual composition, and by the way totally unleveled. abf «Cabale!» 22:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view big.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 19:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° view of Loggia dei Lanza in a very high resolution. The point of view was choosen to display at least a part of all statues, the David in front of the Palazzo Vecchio and the Uffzi. There are also smaller versions of this image.


360° View in 360° panoramic viewer
If you map an 360° view in a plane it must have distortion, I've added a panoramic viewer for the small version, so you can have a more natural view to look around. MatthiasKabel (talk) 07:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice work. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Supportinteresting perspective--Imehling (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Barca afundida no Carril- Vilagarcía de Arousa- Galicia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 08:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jebulon (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Would be great for the cover of some horror novel. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice one :) AzaToth 18:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it.  ■ MMXX  talk 21:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice mysterious picture. I think the image has a dust spot, see image note. --Jovian Eye storm 01:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. In the evening, I will upload a new version, now I cannot--Miguel Bugallo 08:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC) ✓ Done--Miguel Bugallo 13:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Miguel Bugallo 13:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simply beautiful. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, what a find! :) --Ximonic (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Superb quality. --Cayambe (talk) 08:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Place de la Concorde à Paris 8e.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 13:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place de la Concorde at Paris, France


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Snowy Åreskutan Ski lift.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 00:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Snowy Ski lift on top of Åreskutan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Anders Carlsson - uploaded by AzaToth - nominated by AzaToth -- AzaToth 00:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- AzaToth 00:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- like it, but missing something (dont know) --Slick (talk) 06:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the new idea and the quality!--Llorenzi (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose WB seems to be off (way too yellow imo) --mathias K 10:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Could be because the sun is shining down onto the clouds bellow. I can see later if an normalized image looks better. AzaToth 14:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
      • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral after the rework. Thanks for that. --mathias K 19:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Original subject -- Olivier Jaulent (talk) 12:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment uploaded new version with whitepoint adjusted. AzaToth 20:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice shot:) The clouds in the background give the image a mystic atmosphere. --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Man, I wish we had scenes like this in Australia. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Up, up and away... --Schnobby (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Does not seem too yellow to me, atleast not now. In the north the light is usually somewhat different than for example in the mountains of Central Europe, especially during winter. --Ximonic (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just when you thought there was no new way to represent "winter" in one image. Makes me shiver just looking at it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo 08:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - very interesting look. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Natural phenomena

File:Mexican graves.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 17:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support พ.s. 06:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not special with average quality --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Wladyslaw. --Karelj (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do like it, but the perspective distortion on the left makes it look like falling to the right. --ELEKHHT 08:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Just like Elekhh. Tomer T (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Clitoria Ternatea Front and back sides.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 11:06:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Ranemanoj, nominated by 61.16.182.2 11:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 61.16.182.2 11:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Please log in to vote. Yann (talk) 13:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It appears fairly soft: not in focus? Also, the white balance might be somewhat off. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Flower images demands extra high level of quality, this image lacks focus and good framing which will make it impossible for the image to gain FP status Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Fulgoraria rupestris 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 09:36:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fulgoraria rupestris, Asian Flame Volute , Length 10,5 cm; Originating from the China Seas


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals

File:Gulfstream G550 flight deck in 2011.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 09:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A closer view to the cockpit of a Gulfstream G550. Absolute clean aircraft and a great blue sky.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because very low resolution, overexposure, poor description (location, date).--ELEKHHT 11:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Tic-tac-toe.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 19:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tic Tac Toe
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Wanwa (talk) 19:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wanwa (talk) 19:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Sorry, this is clearly not one of our most valuable images. --99of9 (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Calanque du Petit Canereit-Massif de l'Esterel.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 21:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calanque du Petit Canereit/Saint-Raphael, Massif de l'Esterel, Côte d'Azur


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 01:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jefferson Memorial At Dusk
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This was taken on a weekday to minimize people. Crowds can get as large as this or this. --Jovian Eye storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jovian Eye storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice lighting and the people provide a reference of scale. --ELEKHHT 18:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JRff (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- SteveStrummer (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --99of9 (talk) 11:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am closing this manually since more than 5 days have passed. The bot is not closing this because of my own neutral vote below --Jovian Eye storm 14:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 2.jpg

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This shot has even fewer people but the lighting is quite different. --Jovian Eye storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Jovian Eye storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye storm 14:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture
The chosen alternative is: File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg

File:Ickenham Hall - April 2011.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 20:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ickenham Hall, the old manor house for the manor of Ickenham
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because high JPEG compression ratio with blurry details; building cropped off on right side. AzaToth 20:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:2011-10-02 15-49-37-fort-mt-bart.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 05:57:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Double caponnier inside the fort du Mont Bart, Bavans, France.


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Příbram, Bytíz, pohled z haldy na sever.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 19:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

English: The village of Dubenec, surrounding countryside and I/4 road seen from the top of the slag heap near Příbram, Central Bohemian Region, CZ
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aktron -- Aktron (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Aktron (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Some frames are really blurry including shows stitch errors. AzaToth 20:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Saint Eustache.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 15:02:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Eustache church, in Paris
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Benh - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though the modern buildings in the left background are ugly :) AzaToth
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Quan (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice picture indeed. But I know this church very well, and it does not look so in real. We miss here, due to the bushes, all the lower part (ie: something like the first floor) of the building, therefore, as parisian, I cannot support and have to oppose, even if I feel very sorry for that.--Jebulon (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special here, really. And per above. - Benh (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Postcard style composition, with lost encyclopaedic value. --ELEKHHT 08:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Basik07 (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:20110102 Ice House (exterior) Meybod Iran.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 18:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ice house in Meybod, Yazd province, Iran
this is the interior - dome of that building (in case of curiosity - that you want to know how it looks like inside) Ggia (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it is an Ice house building in Meybod, Iran. -- Ggia (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong CA. พ.s. 14:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:20110106 Vank Cathedral Isfahan Iran Panoramic View.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 19:46:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vank Cathedral, Armenian quarter, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Vank Cathedral (Armenian church) in Isfahan, Iran. -- Ggia (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose There are some distracting dust spots in the sky, and a strange artifact on one wall that looks like a burn mark. AzaToth 19:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I cleaned the dust spots - the image is updated. Ggia (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support *like* --Don-kun (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ara ararauna 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 08:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Blue-and-yellow Macaw, Ara ararauna
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Razvan Socol (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Just out of curiosity: what is that yellow background? A yellow painted wall? Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This bird lives in the court of the Casa de Colón and is not in a cage. While the photo was taken, it was sitting in front of a wall of uniform yellow colour. --Llez (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
      • Comment: I presume that this parrot is put in a cage or aviary overnight to protect it. Snowmanradio (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What a nice coindicence! --Schnobby (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dabit100 (talk) 03:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jovian Eye storm 02:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very striking image. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Calanque des Pierres-Tombées-Cassis.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 22:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calanque des Pierres-Tombées
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tobi 87 --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support -- This image is quite unsharp, imo. The badly cropped tree is kind of disturbing too. It is also just a bit oversaturated. But the view, colors and lighting are very nice. It also looks like there was no spot to take the picture without the tree being in the way. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I find the lighting somewhat harsh; the cliff on the left seems to have lost texture and details. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The rock in front looks overexposed. --Karelj (talk) 21:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Vicuña - Chimborazo, Ecuador.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 20:07:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vicuña - Chimborazo, Ecuador.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dabit100 - uploaded by Dabit100 - nominated by Dabit100 -- Dabit100 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dabit100 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely image! --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- David C. S.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JJ Harrison (talk) 22:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support -- Looks too saturated too me. There's noticeable halo around the edges of the top of the mountain. It also looks more sharp at the bottom than at the front (animal is unsharp). IMO it should be the otherwise. Besides that, very nice image. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JRff (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Dabit100 (talk) 04:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

=

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. --Dabit100 (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Putbus Park 5.jpg, delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 16:39:58
Horse-chestnut avenue in the City Park of Putbus, Germany

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Resolution of 1,289 × 966 is sadly way below current standards (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- AzaToth 16:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Agreed. --99of9 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It also lacks contrast and is kind of misty I think. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Per above. And I don't understand what was featured here...--Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -218.152.129.186 00:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC) - Unsigned vote -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Not so good image quality and very small file size. --Cayambe (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I generell simply don't like removal processes. That image was FP in 2006 not today! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist I like the pic, but rules are rules. Tomer T (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist kallerna 15:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kujaku Myoo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 00:22:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kujaku Myoo (Mahamayuri)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown - uploaded by bamse - nominated by bamse -- bamse (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- bamse (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Superb quality and interesting scroll. AzaToth 00:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad scan work: the image need a curve correction! Please take a look at the image histogram. The original artwork can be featured, but not the scan. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I still don't understand your argument. This is a scan of the original. How could the original be featured here, if commons only allows to upload "png, gif, jpg, jpeg, xcf, mid, ogg, ogv, svg, djvu, tiff, tif, oga" and not hanging scrolls? Also, could you be more specific of what you mean by curve correction? bamse (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
It is simple the scan work is bad. I think the scanner wasn't calibrated. The colors are not right for me, too yellowish. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Did you see the original? bamse (talk) 22:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
No, but I think can read a histogram. The RGB chanels can't be real. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
I think the white balance is also a problem. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
With all due respect, if you haven't seen the original, you can't claim that it is too yellow or that the WB is off IMHO. bamse (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Of course he can, or what do you think a thing like a histogram is made for?! Regards mathias K 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
So, if you look at a histogram of a picture of a yellow wall, you will also claim that it is too yellow? bamse (talk) 00:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
No, why should I? But I could say that the type of yellow is correct or not. --mathias K 08:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Without having seen the wall in real? bamse (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I definitely could say if there's any colour cast. And thats the case in your candidate. The rest is nitpicking imo. --mathias K 17:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I am looking and looking at the histogram, but can't see anything. Could you tell me what to look for? bamse (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Dit you compare your candidate and the alternate? I think there should be a difference between them when you're looking at the histogram. --mathias K 13:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes I did. The ALT-version has a bit wider peaks (=higher contrast) which is fine with me. The ALT-version also has the peaks of all colors coincide (=highlights are white) while in the original version, the peaks of the red and green channels are to the right of the blue channel peak (=slight yellow cast, which I believe is inherent in the artwork). Anything else I should have noticed? I believe that the original is closer to what the piece actually looks due to aging. The ALT version is probably more pleasing to the eye, but neither represents todayy's state of the artwork nor the state when it was painted in the 12th century. In my opinion, with reproductions of artwork it is important to be as close to what the artwork looks in reality and that's why I prefer the original version. bamse (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Should this house be white?
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unsurprising if the color is wrong, it's aged. It's still a good scan of what the thing probably looks like now Alchemist, do you think you could digitally restore the color? -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alchemist --mathias K 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Kujaku Myoo edit.jpg


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media
The chosen alternative is: File:Kujaku Myoo edit.jpg

File:Moers, Christoph 9, 2011-09 CN-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 13:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christoph 9
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. An Eurocopter EC-135 T2i as the German rescue helicopter «Christoph 9» starts in Moers (North Rhine-Westphalia). As some competition for Airwolf ;-)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain (for now) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The shadow at the bottom is a bit harsh, but otherwise I really like it. <joke>Take 25 more, and you'll be proper competition. Smile </joke> Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, IMO it would be better if you crop a little from the bottom though.  ■ MMXX  talk 21:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like the crop. (Abstain for now? Sorry but this is pretty embarrassing imo.) --mathias K 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 1. how I vote is only my decision. 2. cropping shouldn't be a problem, but I don't like both suggestions, because they are really too tight - please let the poor thing breathe I remember some famous quote here. But I think I will try something by myself. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • please let the poor thing breathe. Thats the point! I breathe in the area around my head, your crop goes exactly in the other direction. If you know what I mean... --mathias K 16:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I understand what you mean. I uploaded a new version in the file history. Your opinion? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, thats the right direction, but I would crop it even more at the bottom and the left right side. Now it is still too centered for my taste. --mathias K 09:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Nun ist schnibbeln angesagt :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:MDH-Hughes 369 E.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 20:25:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

MDH Hughes 369E
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice quality. The bottom part of the heli looks a bit dark, but this could be cause its black... ;-) --mathias K 10:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Rathaus Saalfelden 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 19:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König 19:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Felix König 19:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Umnik (talk) 17:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the framing is not FP. If the subject is the square than I would like to see more of the pavement and the church, if the subject is the town hall, I would like to see the entry. --ELEKHHT 19:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop church tower is disturbing. Yann (talk) 05:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Fachwerkhaus, Gelsdorf, Bonner Strasse 23.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 11:57:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Timber framing house in Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate‎

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are much prettier half-timbered houses in Franconia, for example --Schnobby (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 18:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Roman Baths (Thermae) of Bath Spa, England
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Diliff - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Despite the distortions at the left: really excellent image, and of great encyclopedic value -- MJJR (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vassil (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good foto --Mile (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:St. Petersburg, Saint Isaac's Cathedral.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 13:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cruceiro en Padrón. Galiza.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 18:44:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wayside cross in Padrón, Galicia (Spain)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 18:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Miguel Bugallo 18:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Cool looking statue, but the lack of distinguishable sky in the background makes it a bit dull to look at sadly. AzaToth 19:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination OK --Miguel Bugallo 23:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Running reindeer in Jämtland.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 19:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reindeer running over wet mountain terrain in Jämtland Sweden

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination AzaToth 22:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:360° Schesaplana Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 21:25:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° Schesaplana Panorama
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Schesaplana is the highest mountain in the Rätikon mountain range at the border between Vorarlberg, Austria and Graubuenden, Switzerland. It has an elevation of 2,964.3 m (9,725 ft). c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The lighting is great (in my opinion of course) but I wonder if it's necessary to have it 360°. Maybe a proper crop, focusing more on the left part, would be better, but I'm not sure... - Benh (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
You're right, maybe I'll nominate one FP to the neck, which you have proposed. Here I think is well documented how easy it is to climb this mountain is high and why so many people make a pilgrimage here. Sorry for my English :-) Google --Böhringer (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Royal Air Force Recruitment Poster 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 20:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Royal Air Force - uploaded by Alexzabbey| - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just propaganda. Poor image quality, low encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dirty scan, with crease marks on left edge (by the wing) and a fold mark under nose of plane. Techtri (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Saluzzo a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 16:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Alessandro Molin Brosa - uploaded by Massimocicc - nominated by Yann (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lack of details (too high compression settings perhaps), the sky shows clear artifacts of compression. AzaToth 17:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 11:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama from castle tower
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Nice view, but the picture is very shadowy. Besides that, if this was a stitched panorama (there's no metadata), Wikimedia standards are very high. This picture is only 3,64 Mb.Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
    and so what that only 3,64? this is not a determinant --Pudelek (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
    It might be too compressed.--G Furtado (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With 4MP, 3.64 MB is not too small in general, if only file size is considered. But in this case user G Furtado is right: Details are washed out by noise reduction artifacts and compression, even at the obviously downscaled resolution of 4 MP. --JRff (talk) 12:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is just my advice for you, don't take it the wrong way... but answering "so what? This is not determinant" to a users comment is not going to get you many positive votes. That doesn't sound too kind. There're other ways to discuss opinions. Good luck with that. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark for me. --Karelj (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Capri Centre Belvedere.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 04:28:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from Capri Centre Belvedere, on Capri Island, Italy.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic image. Second nomination. Last time it was quickly withdrawn because of geotag problems, now solved. All by --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 10:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful! Jujutacular (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the detail. Great picture. --Colin (talk) 22:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why the warning on top "Downsampled image!|This image has been downsampled, and is not eligible for Featured Picture status" ? -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
    • There used to be a rule downsampled images were not eligible for FP, since everyone would try to use Commons to upload mid or low-sized images and then try to sell high-res versions or something like that. Only full-size versions should be nominated for FP. This one has the tag because the robot recognizes it as a downsampled image, since it is a stitched panorama and has been cropped and resized while stitching. I think the tag is not taken into consideration anymore, but I'm not sure. --Paolo Costa (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Knossos in Black and White.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 14:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Minoan Palace Knossos
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Danbu14 - uploaded by Danbu14 - nominated by Danbu14 -- Danbu14 (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danbu14 (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much overblown areas. -- -donald- (talk) 10:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with -donald-, also I don't care for the black and white. Tiptoety talk 03:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It is nice, but black and white is not appropriate for this picture. -- Scottthezzombie (talk) 10:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Krefeld, St. Matthias, 2011-08 CN-04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 21:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. Panoramic view of the Catholic Church St. Matthias in Krefeld (North Rhine-Westphalia). It's a vestige of the former municipality Hohenbudberg, which is ousted by a huge and still growing chemical park. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo 00:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMZaplotnik (my contribs) 12:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 08:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

Image:2011-08-28 Basteibrücke.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 17:33:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basteibrücke(Saxony) at sunrise.
Out of date clock icon.svg
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. AzaToth 17:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:2011-09-24 Schloss Wackerbarth.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 17:18:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schloss Wackerbarth, Radebeul bei Dresden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Je-str - uploaded by Je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very sharp and lively. Unfortunately tilted counter-clockwise. Could use a recrop, imho (for instance, why not trim the tree shadows at the bottom, as well as some of the sky ?) --MAURILBERT (discuter) 02:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 15:33:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mozart Engel
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Serigraphy Mozart Engel by Adi Holzer 2006 in the size 500 x 500 mm. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Question: The top of the picture appears cropped (the top of the triangle and head). Is this in the original or have we lost a few mm? Colin (talk) 06:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Answer: Thanks for your interest. Adi Holzer made this crop in his original serigraphy. He gave me the OK in his E-mail from Friday, September 30, 2011 11:37 AM: Lieber Herr Gäbler, danke für die exzellente Wiedergabe des Mozart Engels in Wikipedia! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is there a set of guidelines for judging photos of artworks for FP? The copyright folk regard this as "slavish copying" that "lacks originality". The artwork appears to be well photographed, though I've no idea if the original is that vivid. I guess I'm concerned someone could knock out a dozen FPs in an afternoon given the right setup and a supply of artworks to snap. Or is that concern not important if the result is a good image? Colin (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support though I am slightly concerned for the cropped out part. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 20:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMZaplotnik (my contribs) 12:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —- George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Sayornis phoebe -Owen Conservation Park, Madison, Wisconsin, USA-8.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 21:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Eastern Phoebe at Owen Conservation Park, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 09:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jovian Eye storm 09:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Probably the towers are not bent in reality. Can you correct for barrel distortion? --JRff (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Distortion of -2 was applied for focal length of 24mm. Vertical perspective also has been corrected with the vertical lines near the door as reference. The outer walls of this church are not perpendicular to the ground. See here. --Jovian Eye storm 12:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The page you linked to talks about pincushion distortion at 24 mm, but I see barrel distortion. So the correction was probably too strong? And the other photograph on that web site has probably uncorrected perspective. So I cannot actually see how the building looks like in reality. I can only say that statics would be difficult for the architect if the top were really that slanted ... I will stay neutral. --JRff (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment After doing some web searching about the architecture and design I was unable to find any thing about the tilt. I guess, I was wrong about that. I have uploaded a corrected version. --Jovian Eye storm 02:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
          • Symbol support vote.svg Support The corrected version is very good. --JRff (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:West coast Ellenbogen, Sylt, Germany.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 15:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Image:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 23:24:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self portrait of Tracy Caldwell Dyson in the Cupola module
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tracy Caldwell Dyson - uploaded by Colds7ream - nominated by Ras67 (talk) 23:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ras67 (talk) 23:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, I wish I could take a picture like this. --Lošmi (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've got the whole world, in my hands... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 20:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMZaplotnik (my contribs) 12:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support many people would like to be in your place on this pic, Tracy. Thanks for this --Tyrael 28 (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Normaly I look for naturepics but I saw this one and think: What for a fantastic composition--H. Krisp (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Space exploration

File:Hallig Hooge, Ockenswarft.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 13:19:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape of Hallig Hooge, a holm in the North Sea in Northern Germany,


Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Krma-winter.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 20:16:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Krma-winter.jpg

Krma Valley, Slovenia


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:LaDefense pl.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2011 at 06:42:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Matism - uploaded by Matism - nominated by Claus
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus (talk) 06:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A vertical resolution of 1500 pixels for a 180° panorama over a city is too low as you can't make out any practical details. As well as the river is cropped out due to the limited vertical field of view demands an oppose from my side. AzaToth 11:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm ok with the level of detail for a panorama, but I am not fully convinced of the bottom crop. I would have liked to see the continuity of the river. --ELEKHHT 14:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support gute Arbeit --Böhringer (talk) 21:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I know it is a "panorama", but it does not show how it is. The curve of the Seine river is exactly the contrary in real.--Jebulon (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Maybe this needn't be this wide. Noticeable CA, some stitching errors right in the middle, and overall little wow (but I'm biased here since I've seen this hundreds times). - Benh (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agree with Benh regarding the stitching errors and the noticeable CA. + some perspective distortions. --Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
    <