Commons:Featured picture candidates/Magnolia acuminata trunk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Magnolia acuminata trunk.JPG, not featured[edit]

Trunk of Magnolia acuminata

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Crusier - uploaded by Crusier - nominated by Crusier --Crusier (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Trunk of Magnolia acuminata in Marki, Poland
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Crusier (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the composition is not suitable for featuring. Lycaon (talk) 09:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
    I think you meant you don't like the composition?! --norro 16:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --norro 16:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special, common image, no reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition, lack of contrast, colours, common subject, lack of wow. The FPX should've just been left there. –Dilaudid 18:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Considering the general difficulty for FPCs to become FP, it becomes easy to determine the images who will obviously not make it to FP. The purpose of FPX is to quickly remove images that will accumulate 9 days of "Oppose". FPX should have been left there IMO, and "support" should not be used to make a point against FPX. I would like, norro, that you explain why you think this image should be recognized as "the best of the best of Commons" (currently: 1400 FP over 3400000 media files = 0.04%)? --S23678 (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Although I would like to express support for norro's right to support the image, I don't see anything very special. --che 14:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not oppose the right to support a FPC, but I would like to know the justifications of norro to support this image ;) --S23678 (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think only obvious technical flaws should be a reason to use FPX, that image is not that bad and there is nothing extremely wrong with it. And even if it stays here for 9 days and only gets opposing votes .. so what. Composition is quite a subjective matter and everybody thinks different about that, please use the FPX-template with care, as it might seem quite offensive to someone new here. -- Gorgo (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above. How do you turn this on (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's just a tree trunk and no wow. --Mr. Mario (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
result: 2 supports, 7 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)