Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:St-Etienne-du-Mont Interior 1, Paris, France - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2015 at 18:09:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff| - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Thanks for the nomination Paris 16. You always seem to notice my uploads before I have a chance to nominate them myself. ;-) This was one of my favourite churches in Paris, and kindly suggested by Jebulon. I hope you feel I've done it justice! It's a very wide angle view but there were too many details that I didn't want to lose by cropping it. Diliff (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 19:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Fly on stump, Albury NSW.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2015 at 12:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fly on stump
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A fly on a stump after an understory bushfire, taken near the summit of Nail Can Hill, Albury, NSW, Australia. This is the original, unedited image. Created, uploaded and nominated by thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The high contrast of the background is quite distracting, especially with the small size of the main subject and no strong colour contrast between foreground and background. — Julian H. 13:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian. Background is really problematic here. -- Pofka (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Rochuskapelle, Mannersdorf an der March 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2015 at 12:24:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Rochus chapel

File:Rochuskapelle, Mannersdorf an der March 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2015 at 12:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Rochus chapel

File:Miners change room, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 20:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Miners' Change Room, Rammelsberg

File:Dehrn Lahnbrücke02circcropedit 2011-05-21.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 14:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lahn bridge in Dehrn
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a renomination, as this image failed in October 2012 with 6:0:0 votes.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator -- KlausFoehl (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice reflection, I like this composition. --Laitche (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but I think it would fit better among Quality Pictures. The picture really isn't extraordinary to be named as one of the best pictures in Commons. I fail to see this picture competing with something like this, this, this or this and so on. -- Pofka (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 18:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just a QI for me. Not one of our best bridge reflection pictures IMO; the lighting could be improved, and the crop on the two sides could be wider. --King of ♠ 00:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts, also tilted counter-clockwise. — Julian H. 13:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark, per King. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Faro de La Entallada.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 13:43:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faro de La Entallada, Tuineje, Fuerteventura, Canary Islands. Panoramic view from south east.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment a bit partially oversharpened? --Laitche (talk) 18:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • You're right. To get recangular (and not bended) lines in such panoramas, the left and right outer parts of the panorama must be stretched, whereas the center must be compressed (=reduced in size). So you have automatically some difference in sharpness, especially the central part is sharper than the left and right part (Diliff told me some time ago, that he has smilar problems in his stiched cathedral panoramas). I reduced the sharpness in the center a bit to correct this effect. I hope, it is better now. --Llez (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
      • It's even better but still I can see the partial sharp, I will not oppose this but also the composition dose not work for me so I cannot support this, imho. --Laitche (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Three Arch Bay Photo Taken by pilot D Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 03:08:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three Arch Bay Laguan Beach California
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & nominated by WPPilot
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- WPPilot (talk) 03:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great view, but pls tell the others that this is in OC. :) --Tremonist (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Would you please add a geocode ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is Three Arch Bay, in Laguna Beach, California - Latitude 33.489252 ° N 33 ° 29' 21.3" 33 ° 29.3551' Longitude -117.734136 ° W 117 ° 44' 2.9" -117 ° 44.0482' --WPPilot (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Taking in consideration hardness to achieve it one must take with reserve some objections. But its good. --Mile (talk) 19:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. Ordinary oblique aerophotography. --Kikos (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Palm Springs International Airport photo D Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2015 at 02:16:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palm Springs International Airport
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by WPPilot -- WPPilot (talk) 02:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- WPPilot (talk) 02:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition as aerial photograph? but the quality is not FP level and a pity top crop. --Laitche (talk) 07:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, it's a really nice view, but the photo lacks sharpness in various areas. --Tremonist (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral quality is actually not too bad considering the conditions (I've produced much worse), but I'm not sure if it's enough for FP. Framing is great though, and educational value is quite high. I've taken the liberty of nominating it for VI as well. --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support you can't destroy the cockpit to take a FP for Commons. --Ralf Roleček 15:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sharpness problems, especially visible around planes. -- Pofka (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @WPPilot: I nominated the alternative. If you mind then I will withdraw, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp patch at the first entry to the runway on the right. Also a large bright elliptical patch overlaid over the whole image (probably a reflection in the window), acting like a very strangely shaped vignette. — Julian H. 17:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think these patches are unavoidable problem unless they remove the window glasses from the airplane... --Laitche (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I disagree. It's possible to put something dark, like a black shirt, around the front of the lens to get rid of such reflections. It's also possible to get rid of the effect in post, although that's a little more tricky. — Julian H. 18:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
      • I wrote below. --Laitche (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That is not "blur" that you see in the window, it is the propeller. I was shooting at full speed (9fps) and selected a photo that framed the runway and was clear in showing the features a pilot would see on short final. The camera was covered, in that I had a black cloth over the camera to shield the light. The plane is a "Pilatus PC 12", it has a green tint in the windshield that creates a little color effect I tried to offset with some Magenta addition. --WPPilot (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I admit, the propeller is a lot harder to work around, especially a four-blade prop. Not sure if, with a shorter shutter speed, it would have been possible to get a clean image. I really think, if there is a RAW file, this is worth trying to fix through editing. A little brush work in Lightroom or Photoshop should be able to hide it at least reasonably well. — Julian H. 20:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @WPPilot: I can unwithdraw the alternative anytime if you want but I cannot work for this any more. --Laitche (talk) 21:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Palm Springs International Airport

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cloned the top, sharpened, denoised, saturation adjusted, downsized 90%. --Laitche (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw the alternative: Agree with Julian :) --Laitche (talk) 18:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 21:12:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue hour view of Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain. Nuévalos is a small village with 384 inhabitants, a touristic center in Aragón due to the neighbouring Monasterio de Piedra.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Blue hour view of Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain. Nuévalos is a small village with 384 inhabitants, a touristic center in Aragón due to the neighbouring Monasterio de Piedra. All by me, Poco2 21:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 21:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but for me the main subject is a bit small, and the background being (in many parts) a greyish blue-black blob doesn't really help. In a composition like this, I would either focus primarily on the subject, or have the background lead into the subject (yes, the clouds have this nice effect, but the mountains on the two sides distract from the center because of how light and hazy they are). From Google Street View, I see that you took the picture towards the southwest; in general, blue hour photos taken away from the sun have better clarity than photos taken into the sun. --King of ♠ 23:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good review KoH, but to me the whole thing works :) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support To me, just a nice combination of colors, shapes and light. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the picture does work indeed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Time info (14:53:03) is correct? It is blue hour view as above info. --Laitche (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, per King of Hearts (weak prescence of the subject in the photo). The amount of chroma noise reduction isn't ideal either, but that may be unavoidable (and the resolution is really good for such a shot). — Julian H. 12:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case and beautiful blue but the details and image quality are a bit unacceptable for FP (maybe per Julian), a pity. --Laitche (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That strange blue tide on the bottom is actually bigger than the main subject. This doesn't work for me. -- Pofka (talk) 16:16, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2014.08.09.-11-Durbach--Weingut Schloss Staufenberg.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 20:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#In_Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. Hockei -- Hockei (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like painting. Wow. -- Pofka (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Almost excellent, but the crop below is a pity...--Jebulon (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Are 20 minutes that I look at this picture and I do not understand the opposition of jebulon, the composition is excellent quality less but this does not discourage me from putting a positive vote. The quality is not that beautiful views of Christian Ferrer but the boy has a center for me.--LivioAndronico talk 20:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Please notice that the use of the {weak support} template is not allowed in FPC. Corrected.--Jebulon (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The crop is a bit pity not only the bottom but both right and the left sides, but still FP for me. --Laitche (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice and colorful landscape, but I think it would have benefited from a higher point of view. The land in this image can be thought of as having three parts: the vines in the foreground, the hill in the middle ground, and the fields in the background. Unfortunately, the foreground is a bit too dominant and squeezes out the middle ground IMO. --King of ♠ 00:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lots of wow. --Code (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nice -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support too bad clouds werent more soft, but very nice anyway. Well done. --Mile (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Too bad about the crop, but love the perspective and colors. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:1635 Blaeu Map Guiana, Venezuela, and El Dorado - Geographicus - Guiana-blaeu-1635.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 16:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This is G. Blaeu's remarkable c. 1635 map of the northwestern parts of South America , Lake Parima (Parime Lacus), and the route to El Dorado.

File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 14:29:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Thanks Jkadavoor, @Vengolis: Upload the RAW file to commonsarchive, and I will make a how-to. I invite you to read this guide about RAW files for your camera. You can read this guide about focus too. --The Photographer (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Basilica of San Vitale - Lamb of God mosaic.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 12:29:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamb of God mosaic in presbytery of Basilica of San Vitale (built A.D. 547) Ravenna, Italy. UNESCO World heritage site.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lamb of God mosaic in presbytery of Basilica of San Vitale (built A.D. 547) Ravenna, Italy. UNESCO World heritage site. All by --Mile (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great view. --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good, thanks for this picture.--Jebulon (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ...and 7 --LivioAndronico talk 20:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Oversharpened but not more than I can bear. --King of ♠ 00:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not too happy with the amount of sharpening because, due to the amount of sharpened edges, it changes the overall colours of the image and not only the 100% impression. — Julian H. 13:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I think we have a different idea of "no sharpening", but given the subject and resolution, I think it's ok now. Symbol support vote.svg SupportJulian H. 14:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sharpening issue: I was in doubt if to put any or leave it, photo is sharp enough in original, but at previous i put sharpening on 1 in scale of 7. Unsahrp mask set on 0. But, since there are two comments regarding it, i put it back, so no sharpening at all. --Mile (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality problem, however, the subject is too amazing --The Photographer (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wowed wow. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Jan 2006.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2015 at 05:04:01
Version 1 Version 2

File:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Jan 2006.jpg (left)[edit]

File:Lower Manhattan from Staten Island Ferry Corrected Jan 2006.jpg (right)[edit]

File:Esquisse d'une carte géologique d'Italie.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 21:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Geological map of Italy, 1844

File:Puerto de Cotefablo, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02-04 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 19:18:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The tunnel of Cotefablo is a public traffic tunnel located between Broto and Biescas, in Aragon, not far from the Pyrenees, Spain. The tunnel is 683 m long and was constructed in 1935. It was the scenario of a famous tragic accident during the 1989 Vuelta a España, causing that the brilliant 30-year-old german cyclist, Reimund Dietzen, retired from active sport due to the crash.

File:Admiralty Arch at Dusk, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 09:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Admiralty Arch at dusk

File:St Raphael's Interior 1, Kingston, Surrey, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 09:37:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Raphael's, Kingston

File:Hasht Behesht, Detail of the dome by Pascal Coste.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 09:15:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@Hubertl: Signature please. --Laitche (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Komargorod pond 2013 G3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 05:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dawn. A pond on the Tomashpilka river

File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2015 at 02:43:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lucy Evans Baylands Nature Interpretive Center
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♠ 02:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 02:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Nice time indeed, but rather boring landscape. No wow. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice light and composition. --Code (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Honestly composition don't enthusiastic me, but the quality is very good--LivioAndronico talk 08:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Please dont use this kind of template, it is not allowed by the guidelines (corrected). Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality is great, but the composition doesn't really satisfies me. There are lots of examples when imperfect objects looks great, but this one simply isn't one of these. -- Pofka (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment too much sky at least about 600px IMO -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both versions, as compositionally wanting. Might be a little better if cropped in on the building and reflection, but still not sure ... Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004 edit.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cropped per Christian Ferrer's suggestion. -- King of ♠ 05:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 05:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll cut some more (or add some water) to try to make an horizontal symmetry however the subject attracts more and enough attention for me, thanks -- Christian Ferrer 11:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Composition is not bad and nice light, nice reflection but almost half of the houses are in the dark shadows and the shadows of the pillars and reflection on the door glasses? are a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've changed my mind composition, light, reflection, colors deserve FP despite of tiny flaws. --Laitche (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The best. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Not outstanding, but the best of the 3. Yann (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, King. Same boring landscape. No wow. Per Yann "Not outstanding, but the best of the 3" - is rather reason for oppose IMO --George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 18:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Alt 2[edit]

Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 006.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My idea for the original composition was to have the power lines form a visual line and for the distant poles to help frame the subject. Clearly, that idea hasn't been very popular so far; perhaps it is just wasted space in your eyes. So I'm adding a shot of just the building itself (note that this is a different exposure, not merely a crop). -- King of ♠ 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The first alternative has some creativity, which is lost here. Yann (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Baltyk-1-8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 20:25:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rewal beach during sunset. Special Area of Conservation "Trzebiatowsko-Kołobrzeski Pas Nadmorski".
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by TomLight Police - nominated by Yarl -- Yarl 20:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yarl 20:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversaturated. --King of ♠ 00:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment dust spot (see note). Photo look nice but color curve is set a bit too far. --Mile (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 05:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now - per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice colors and nice mood but overprocessed. --Laitche (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. The sea looks like a fog. -- Pofka (talk) 10:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great idea but overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel..jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 20:20:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in Pärnu river

There is nothing that refers to tilt. It is not tilted. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel (edited).jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tilt fixed. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @PetarM, Laitche, Tremonist: I uploaded a new version with the tilt fixed. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I suggest You just overwrite older file, no need for Alternative, its corrected image. --Mile (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think Mile may be right but some creators don't like the overwrite so before then you can ask the creator or you can revert anytime, I don't care which but in this case overwrite might be better. And did you upscale this image after rotation? If so upscaling is not allowed here(FPC). --Laitche (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Additional comment:@ArionEstar: If you upscaled the image size, you should revert the size, after that I would support this :) --Laitche (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • The coastline doesn't have to be horizontal. Don't be fooled. It's just the composition that leaves the impression that it is tilted. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Well luckily, there is a water reflection in the photo, so you can check if the reflection is vertically aligned with the corresponding object. That being said, I think it's more important that it looks right, at least in this case. — Julian H. 21:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJulian H. 21:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @ArionEstar: I reverted (processed from the original image not downscaled yours) the original size. --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question This original nominator is Kruusamägi but alternative nomination is ArionEstar, in this case alternative nomination is counted as nominator then this one is ArionEstar's third nomination so it's FPD. Is that OK?, Or if others nominator's alternative is not counted as nomination, it's no problem. Does someone about know that? --Laitche (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't know, but if that becomes a problem, I'd gladly adopt the nomination. We could just ignore it, too. It's not like you can reasonably bombard FPC with countless alternative nominations. — Julian H. 07:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
      • @Julian: Yes, that's right. @ArionEstar: Currently you have two active nominations this and this. This nomination is an alternative but the third nomination of yours if we accept this because of the alternative then that becomes we have to accept countless alternative nominations as Julian mentioned. I think this nomination will expire soon by rules of the 5th day unless get an oppose vote, so would you please postpone (withdraw) this nomination till then and you can reopen (unwithdraw) this nomination, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but I would prefer overwriting the original, as this is really just a very slight rotation. --El Grafo (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2012 Olbrachcice, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 20:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saints Peter and Paul. Albrechtice, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic.
✓ Done New, better version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. Look at the upper left. Looks grey. There is undersaturation too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Halavar (talk) 23:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. Better, but no much wow and quality isn't the best. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Impressive sky -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Church tower still not straigth, maybe crop from left - some person there. --Mile (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Bot things fixed. Please take a look again. --Halavar (talk) 09:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but per ArionEstar. --Laitche (talk) 09:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per ArionEstar. --Tremonist (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While it has been improved, it has not been improved enough. I still see some unnatural tones in the sky and clouds. The church could also stand to be perspective-corrected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Long hesitation... Pro: Sharpness, light, eye appealing. Contra:Per Daniel Case, composition a bit trivial and flat, if I may say, and lack of "wow" for the subject. But weak oppose.--Jebulon (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Conference 2015 photo by Pine - 12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 19:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior courtyard of a palace in Germany

File:Wessel Couzijn (1980).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 15:44:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wessel Couzijn (1980)

File:Santa Maria in Monticelli (Rome) - interior.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 12:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa Maria in Monticelli (Rome) - interior

Santa Maria in Monticelli. A church was founded at the site in the 12th century and reconsecrated by Innocent II in 1143. It was known as Sancta Maria in Monticellis Arenulae de Urbe, in a bull by Urban IV in 1264. Little remains of the medieval church, except for the bell-tower. The church was entirely reconstructed in 1716 by Matteo Sassi, on a commission by Clement XI, and in 1860 by Francesco Azzurri. The church is the home to the Curia Generalizia dei Padri Dottrinari.All by -- LivioAndronico talk 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:경주 구황동 금제여래좌상.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 13:11:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seated Golden Buddha from Guhwang-dong, Gyeongju
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by National Museum of Korea, uploaded by Eggmoon, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent quality. --King of ♠ 00:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Technical quality is great. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Many dust spots and dusts, better to remove. --Laitche (talk) 09:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support Yes, there are dust spots but I've seen a lot worse, God knows, in my own images; I trust the uploader can remove them. In any event they do not detract enough from the image for me to oppose it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment New version uploaded, some dust spots removed. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I was just commenting... but thanks. --Laitche (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support D kuba (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Bromo-Tengger-Semeru-National-Park Indonesia Horses-02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 08:59:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Java Pony (Equus ferus caballus) at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, East Java, Indonesia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A Java Pony (Equus ferus caballus) at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, East Java, Indonesia. The Java pony is a breed of pony developed on the island of Java. It is a descendant from wild forebears of Mongolian Wild Horse ancestry.
    All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is the background fog? --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it is fog. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition --The Photographer (talk) 11:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tigth crop. --Mile (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Background too greyish. --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for some foreground haziness (which could easily be fixed, I think, in post) and the aforementioned tight crop on the right. Still a useful, high-quality depiction of the subject. — Julian H. 20:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 06:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cable-car: Karrenseilbahn in Dornbirn, Austria. Restaurant in the mountain station. c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice blue hour lighting and very detailed. However, I find the composition a bit unsettling; the dining room is cropped at an awkward place at the top right, and as for the fence below, I feel like it should serve more of a compositional purpose or should be omitted altogether. --King of ♠ 06:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you, you're right, but without a fence, the restaurant would be too much press. Thus, the image has a frame and acts more balanced. --Böhringer (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support totally works for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support Totally per Martin Falbisoner. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 09:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dark but pleasantly looking. -- Pofka (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My critical comment: the bottom of the restaurant is almost in line with the horizon. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {o} Sorry to disagree about the fence. I find it too disturbing, and not helping to the composition at all. A no go for me, I'm afraid--Jebulon (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support After thinking again, and re-review, I have to change my vote, my first review was not careful enough. I support now. "Il n'y a que les imbéciles qui ne changent pas d'avis".--Jebulon (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
@Jebulon: You removed others votes... --Laitche (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Its something original, good IQ, but compo could be better, without the fence. --Mile (talk) 12:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't think the fence is disturbing the pictures composition at all. Also I can follow Böhringer's explanation regarding this topic above. --Plani (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice creative photo but agree with negative opinions of the fence, I am not happy with crop the bottom part but I want just without the fence composition... --Laitche (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. It's slightly off symmetrical which is the most significant compositional issue for me. I agree the fence isn't ideal, but I don't think cropping it is a better solution. Diliff (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These should be all the votes Jebulon removed. Laitche, would you please check? --Tremonist (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
@Tremonist: I think it's reverted. --Laitche (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thank you! --Tremonist (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
My mistake, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Slussen Stan May 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 05:14:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from Slussen.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info South view from Slussen towards Riddarholmen, Stockholm. Created by ArildV (additional editing by User:MagentaGreen), uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Everything comes together so nicely in this picture. Normally I would complain about rule of thirds, but somehow the composition works here. --King of ♠ 06:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition doesnt work for me, i would crop some from above. Choped bus in bottom and bus which turns left dont help much. --Mile (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the special light lasted only a few minutes before it started raining again, it was no time to run home and pick up a tripod and no opportunity to come back another day. I was lucky that I had the camera in my bag. I used a railing as tripod and was unable to include more of the foreground (pointing the camera down had also given more distortion, its taken with extreme wide angle). I like the triangular shaped composition with Riddarholmen and the historic Riddarholm Church in the center. I think the sky is to beutiful to crop.--ArildV (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question I dont get it, why tripod, is this a stitch ? --Mile (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • No, but long exposure 1/5 sec.--ArildV (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well 1/6 - 1/5 could be handheld shot, depend on f. You could put ISO to 800 not losing anything, benefiting in compostion. Camera is good FF. --Mile (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Higher ISO would affect the quality, even with the D600. Especially if you consider that this image has large contrasts between light and dark areas. It requires post-processing of the dark areas (shadows), a higher ISO had given a lot more noise in the dark areas. The lens has not particularly good corner sharpness at larger aperture, therefore f/8.--ArildV (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Furthermore, I believe that it would have been a bad idea to pointing the camera down more. It would disturb other parts of the composition and provide more distortion, and the bus is not an essential part of the composition.--ArildV (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Maybe you are rigth, lens are often a problem, i dont know which you used, i checked now sky, it gave you banding and posterization (see notes). --Mile (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Even when I stare at the images in full resolution (22 MP uncompressed wide-angle) its very difficult to see, I'm not even sure I can even see what you're talking about. Anyway, I do not think it is a big problem and the overall quality (especially if one takes into account the resolution) is above average for wide-angle-FP.--ArildV (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per King. --LB 16:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 16:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Even in 1280px I can see the posterizations in the sky otherwise it is a excellent shot. --Laitche (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Fine capture of a beautiful sunset at 8pm between Stockholm showers. --Pugilist (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 21:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support I don't mind the posterization since it's not the worst ever, far from it. But it does tend to point out how this might be better with more of the top cropped off. Stunning image otherwise. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 04:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. I agree with Mile, the composition doesn't work for me. Although the sky is pretty, there's too much of it and it unbalances the composition. Better to use the rule of thirds I think. Diliff (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Parelstuifzwam (Lycoperdon perlatum). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 05:03:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lycoperdon perlatum
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/ Fungi
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lycoperdon perlatum (Lycoperdon perlatum). Location, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a great image, probably valuable for WikiSpecies. --Tremonist (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me, great quality though. --LB 16:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great quality --LivioAndronico talk 19:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 21:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI for sure, but it's lacking something special to make me go WOW. The cut grass at the bottom and the little mushroom at the left are a bit distracting from the main subject. I suspect that a lower camera position might have worked better for me. --El Grafo (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per El Grafo. --Laitche (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per El Grafo. — Julian H. 19:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks everyone for the comments. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 21:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Mountains (Sudetes), Poland, exposure from Borówkowa
@Jacek Halicki: Double vote? or something wrong with your pc? --Laitche (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
It's my mistake. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Uoaei1 --Karelj (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Church of Santi Nereo e Achilleo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 18:29:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Santi Nereo e Achilleo
King of : The current Cardinal Priest of the Titulus Ss. Nerei et Achillei is Theodore Edgar McCarrick that came from your zone --LivioAndronico talk 19:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but strong magenta flare around the right pillar of the baldachin, close to the altar. Even visible at thumbnail. Not correctible I'm afraid--Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Nice correction, I strike my oppose, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too soft in focus for me in the background at the top. I think you should have set the exposure time to 30 sec, and have chosen a suitable smaller aperture to get more DOF. Does not reach the current very high church interior bar. Do you have the new version 6 of Lightroom? I can recommend it as it has a builtin HDR merge, from which you can combine several exposures and get a "super-raw" with much more dynamic range (you can find a few of these in my recent uploads). I think it works very well and convenient with single frames (I still use PTGui for HDR panos) and would be suitable for these kinds of church interiors to get better results. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:42, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • With HDR of Photoshop or Lightroom is a disgusting, also do not have time, because you see these empty churches are full of tourists and also expect also two hours to find the time that there isn't people, and are usually a few moments --LivioAndronico talk 20:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Araucárias ao fundo Parque Nacional da Serra da Bocaina..jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 18:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Serra da Bocaina National Park
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good! --Ralf Roleček 20:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Amazing light! Excellent mood but too noisy, so pity! --Laitche (talk) 23:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • ArionEstar: I am supporting that one before this, this photo's noise is too heavy... --Laitche (talk) 00:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Horses make it. --Mile (talk) 12:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am guessing when you removed vignetting worked with wrong color space since this image's color space is uncalibrated so I've changed the color space to sRGB with derivative work (alternative). --Laitche (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @ArionEstar: I guess there are several causes that occurs as vignetting so I'm not sure. You maybe ask the photographer :) --Laitche (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Serra da Bocaina National Park

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Denoised, reverted decreased saturation, removed dust spots. Processed from the first version. --Laitche (talk) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Laitche: Yes, it's better, but vignette at the right and left uppers. It's necessary to zoom much for see it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Fixed --Laitche (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I Symbol support vote.svg Support now. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Roosa hommikuudu Tolkuse rabas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 17:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tolkuse bog in Estonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by MKose - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Kruusamägi: Wow! Nice time! Almost like here. S2 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 17:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English description please. --Laitche (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Kruusamägi (talk) 22:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question @Kruusamägi: Natural place or Natural phenomena? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's a morning fog + sunrise and therefor it could just as well be classified as natural phenomena. I don't know what is more suitable category. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    • If you like crepuscular rays, I think natural phenomena is suitable. (but not sure) --Laitche (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
      • If the subject of the photo is the bog, then it's better in Natural places, but if it's the sunrise, then it's better in Natural phenomena. As the subject of my photo above is the national park, it's better in Natural places. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico talk 18:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ślimaczek (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 17:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock's tree peony (Paeonia rockii)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is the flower revealing from a bud. The middle is still hidden partially by petals. The nature lives not according to a drawings for the sake of symmetry. I wanted to show freshness and awakening of this flower. This plant blossoms only few days, so new photos will be at next year. Anyway, thanks for the review. Smile -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but no wow and busy background, many flowers show the best timing a few days in a year thus that is not the featured factor, imho. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, no wow. --LB 16:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically well done and probably a good candidate for VI as well, but it doesn't really stand out against all the other high-quality close-ups of flowers we have. --El Grafo (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Harbour snowy mountains Rethymno Crete Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 16:54:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sunny mediterranean harbour and snowy mountains in Rethymno, Crete, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Underexposed --The Photographer (talk) 17:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not too impressed with the lighting, and in terms of composition, I think the pier on the right is awkwardly placed. --King of ♠ 17:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per King of Hearts. --Tremonist (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI definitely, but no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Seal of Florida.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 13:19:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seal of Florida

File:Neue Wache, Unter den Linden, Berlin-Mitte, Nacht (HDR).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 13:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neue Wache (New Guardhouse) in Berlin-Mitte at night.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Neue Wache (New Guardhouse) in Berlin-Mitte at night. It was built from 1816 and 1818 according to plans of Karl Friedrich Schinkel. It is one of the main works of German classicism. HDR made of three exposures (1s; 2s; 4s; 8s; 15s at f/7,1 and ISO 250). As some of you know I'm obsessed with this building. I made hundreds of photographs of it and uploaded some of them to Commons. Now I think this one could be FP. What do you think? All by -- Code (talk) 13:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 13:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 13:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the WB might be a little too blue. --King of ♠ 17:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @King of Hearts: Thank you, I adjusted the white balance a little bit. --Code (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 19:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit fuzzy all over the image and this is HDR so it's a strange comment but too high dynamic range then I get kind of artificial feeling. --Laitche (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @Laitche: Do you really think it looks artificial? I worked on this for hours to get a natural look, but maybe I looked at it for too long. You should come here and visit Berlin to see what it really looks like ;-) --Code (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @Code: Yeah, I have never been Berlin, it's a night view but when I see around the bikes on the right side and the benches on the left side, it's just like the daytime of a sunny day. They say "More than enough is too much." but I won't oppose this :) --Laitche (talk) 11:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @Laitche: It's not that I want to convince you but the brightness behind the building on the right side comes from some very bright street lamps and from the illumination of the other building on the right ("Zeughaus"). Thanks to HDR I could reduce the brightness there to an acceptable level, normally this part would have been completely blown. --Code (talk) 11:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I am understanding it's a normal because of HDR but I want (and I hope) HDR should be like a this kind of light :) --Laitche (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's getting better and better. ;oD --Yann (talk) 20:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 20:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FP imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 11:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A tasteful use of HDR. Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support just a second, there was something.. Oh, I forgot.. ;-)--Hubertl (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Heldervue Somerset West.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 08:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heldervue (meaning "clear view") is suburb in Somerset West which is a town in the Western Cape, South Africa. It is situated in the Helderberg area (formerly called Hottentots Holland), about 50 kilometres east of Cape Town central city area, and 10 kilometres from Strand. The town is overlooked by the Helderberg (meaning "clear mountain").
Thanks for pointing that out, mistakenly put the phenomena cat instead of the places one. Still not 100% sure which cat would be best. Cityscapes or mountains?--Discott (talk) 11:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Cityscapes is IMO ok, D kuba (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Oversaturated. --Kadellar (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice view but oversaturated, overexposed or over-processing. Sorry. --Laitche (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose übersättigt, zu stark bearbeitet. --Ralf Roleček 20:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @SkyPixels: Could you see if you can reprocess the file with less saturation, and add it as an alt below? --King of ♠ 21:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overprocessed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @ King of Hearts - I have added the original, before any post edit. is it better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkyPixels (talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 May 2015‎ (UTC)
    Better. But see Daniel's comment below - if you shot this in raw, you might be able to recover the highlights. --King of ♠ 00:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Striking composition, but overprocessing left blown highlights not only on clouds but houses below. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 18:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Strand Beach Road at Dusk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 08:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Strand Beach Road, Cape Town at Dusk, is a popular beach front walking area in the northern part of Cape Town.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by SkyPixels - uploaded by SkyPixels - nominated by Discott -- Discott (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Discott (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I love the view in this one and actually was planning to support this nomination at first. Though, I doubt if the quality is high enough. Pixels are visible even on the closest buildings. Picture captured by Christian Ferrer (below this nomination) has MUCH better quality with similar cityscape. -- Pofka (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Pofka. --Tremonist (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 18:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Sète from Mount Saint-Clair by night 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2015 at 06:17:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sète from Mount Saint-Clair, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 12:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 17:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice time! Clin 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very detailed nice view. --Laitche (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 20:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Scenery isn't that striking. But it was captured in fine detail from front to back with very minimal light posterization. Most of us know how difficult this can be with even larger, more photographically inviting night cityscapes. So the technical accomplishment more than makes up the difference. Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good tribute to this city.--Jebulon (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 18:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Kodak BW 2015-02-18 20-07-15.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 15:00:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The shadow goes inwards (bad positioned ligth ?), also camera could be tunred little bit to recth, to see front plane better. --Mile (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kodak of 1902.....good quality....for me is good. The shadow is not disturb for me --LivioAndronico talk 19:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the Shadow is ok. Maybe, right a bit crop? And a little bit more light? But its good for FP to me. --Ralf Roleček 21:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm missing an extra main front light, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment [Edit conflict: per Kadellar, pretty much] I really think the front could be a little brighter, this should be relatively simple to correct. It's your choice of course. — Julian H. 11:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as a consequence. — Julian H. 06:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Front is too dark for me. Supporting surface could be better cleaned. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lightning issues. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, lighting arrangement leaves room for improvement. Also, standing on the edge like that, the camera somehow seems to defy gravity – maybe a plain white background without shadows would've worked better in this case? --El Grafo (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Klensmedjan Horndal May 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 07:43:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horndal iron works.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The blacksmith shop ("klensmedja") of Horndals bruk, Avesta Municipality, Sweden. Tools used in the Lancashire forge of Horndals bruk or the foundry were probably repaired in this workshop. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 12:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Seems there is danger at the camera location. Your life is more important than FP! --Laitche (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is true but it is not a big house, it is possible to shoot from the doorpost.--ArildV (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting subject and very well done. --Code (talk) 13:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 19:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral In thumb I was pretty convinced it would end out with an oppose from me as I find the crop vertically unbalanced (too little below, too much above) and it seemed too dark. However, in full view it is a rather well done photo with many details, good light despite the many dark areas of an usual subject recalling us that "valuable is not always beautiful". -- Slaunger (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 10:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This composition is too smart for this subject. I hope you to get what this comment means. --Laitche (talk) 23:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Destruction never looked so good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good, but could be more symmetrical. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Xian China Cultural-Performance-02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 05:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Xian, China: Cultural show
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 05:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 05:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bojars (talk) 06:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment WB is really off. --Mile (talk) 06:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I get the same impression. They must have used some really yellow stage lights. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Maire (talk) 09:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMHO it needs a WB correction. It's to me so yellowish, that it gets disturbing Poco2 12:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose White balance is off. It should have been corrected before nomination in FPC.--Jebulon (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    Jebulon, you forgot to sign Poco2 17:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    Indeed, thank you. Done now.--Jebulon (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon, I'm aware the lighting was probably colored and it helps to preserve a bit of it but this is still too much. --King of ♠ 20:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I commented on the coloured light on my talk page --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I don't think anyone's looking for their white shirts to be pure white. But if the yellows were a little less overwhelming... — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I read explanation for ligths and WB, but i have my opinion. There is no camera which would handle WB correct at such "extreme" temperature. Especially when set on Auto white balance. Unless you made calibration with color cards (which doeasnt look like). This and choped hands of woman in rigth. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC) P.S. I did try to lower T and it looks little better, i think from RAW could be even better.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, regarding the white balance. It doesn't have to be perfectly neutral in such a case, but too much of the actual variation in colour seems to have been lost here. — Julian H. 11:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The colours are too strange. --Tremonist (talk) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Colours and WB are not a problem for me. Good photo! --Halavar (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not your fault, but too yellow. Cut face at left and arm at right do not help. Yann (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Texelgruppe Hohe Wilde 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2015 at 21:20:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View on Hochwilde (3480m), a mountain of the Ötztal Alps photographed from a trail near Lazinser Alm inside the Texelgruppe Nature Park
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View on Hochwilde (3480m), a mountain of the Ötztal Alps photographed from a trail near Lazinser Alm inside the Texelgruppe Nature Park
    all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good composition, though lighting could be better. --King of ♠ 21:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question What had been better light for you here, King of Hearts? The creek and mountain are in sunlight, the trees at the left are partly in shadow which is imho a good contrast to the bright and snowy mountain. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
      • It's a bit flat, an unavoidable consequence of shooting at noon. Granted, it might be the best possible light for this scene (as sunrise/sunset could create unwanted shadows) which is why I still supported, but not particularly inspiring in an absolute sense. The composition and contrasting colors are what I like about this image. --King of ♠ 05:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great! --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As already mentioned, the flat lighting. Personally, the image doesn't bring any wow for me, it's a pretty common sight. Sorry, but I can't see this as FP in any way. --LB 08:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment LB, I tried to capture the beauty of that place. I like the place and think I've chosen I good composition to transport that beauty. For me it is far from being a "common sight". I cannot say if a different shooting time had been better but the valley is quite narrow thus I think you will have distracting shadows, as King of Hearts has mentioned. BTW: A comment "does not bringing any wow for me" is not really appreciating. You should keep in mind that most of us spend a lot of time to produce nice photos. IMHO it is better to stay factual rather emphasizing two times that you cannot imagine why this [bad photo] should be an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Tuxyso, what do you regard as a "factual" review? Dust spots and chroma noise pixel peeping? FP requires an emotional response to an image, "wow", and a failure to deliver that to a reviewer is just important a flaw as any other subjective opinion on composition or lighting. I think "I can't see this as FP in any way" is too strong/rude considering this is far from being FPX. -- Colin (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
        • Colin, I can say what is imho no deliberative (better word) review: Writing two times that an photo is no FP in any manner as LC did. It is absolutely OK to write: The images has no wow for me. Assessing FPCs is always subjective and not fully factual. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Tuxyso: I apologise for saying that I can't see this as FP in any way, I didn't mean to sound rude and I agree that it was too much. I do, however, stand to the statement that the image doesn't appeal to me. I do appreciate your work. --LB 11:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks, LB for the clarification. Everything is fine - the statement (mentioned once) is completely OK. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}}} Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral as I said during the QI process. For me not good enough with sharpness, therefore not FP-quality. --Hubertl (talk) 10:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hubertl - you've reviewed a different image :) For me the photo is sharp enough - a lot of details are visible on the trees, wood in the foreground and on the mountain itself. --10:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You are right, I am really sorry for my mistake. This one is better, even when I am not absolutely convinced for FP. Sorry. So I go to neutral. --Hubertl (talk) 10:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 12:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive composition. --Laitche (talk) 19:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another picture I wish I could say I had taken. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm also not comfortable with the light. The very bright snow opposing the very dark shadows leave very little range for everything in-between, and the colours are very muted as a result. — Julian H. 11:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian--LivioAndronico talk 16:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me it has wow and I think a reasonable tradeoff has been made regarding the light, presence of shadows and time of day. I almost feel I can sense the fresh air and hear the stream of fresh water coming down. It is a little soft in focus in the upper right corner, but OK for me. I like the diagonal coming down from that corner. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The lighting is not the best, but acceptable in my opinion. The main issue I see here is the composition. The cropped fence is a minus and the square format is IMHO not helping to get into the picture. A protrait format from a bit further to the right (without fence) and closer to the river, could have worked better (not sure, because I don't know the spot). I mean something like this. Poco2 13:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Hehe, Poco_a_poco, photos are a very subjective matter. The composition is the aspect I like most (and most of the supporters) with this photo and was for me besides the beauty of the place the reason for nomination. Every element (also the cropped fence) is there on purpose. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I usually don't like this aspect ratio but I can feel the depth in this composition especially the combination of a creek and a path with this angle are excellent, seems very narrow valley so this sky is acceptable as well. --Laitche (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Mount Ida chain Messara plain from Phaistos Crete Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2015 at 15:54:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mount Ida chain and Messara plain from Phaistos
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The Messara plain and the Mount Ida Chain, where Zeus was born, as seen from the archaeological site of Phaistos, Crete, Greece, february 2015.-- Jebulon (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support The kind of landscape I'm always hoping to be able to take and upload myself. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 06:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry very parts unsharps and don't understand what is the subject--LivioAndronico talk 09:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • The subject is a landscape. Sharp enough for me.--Jebulon (talk) 10:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For me the composition is unbalanced; some of the sky at the top can be cropped off. --King of ♠ 10:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Great, thanks. --King of ♠ 14:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 12:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice landscape and very nice clouds, a bit hazy but acceptable for me. --Laitche (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The landscape obviously has a lot of three-dimensional variation and depth, but the flat light hides all of that. There are still a few nice patterns, but I personally don't see a fp-level landscape, sorry. — Julian H. 10:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think it is sharp. Many other landscape and monument pictures get support here being much softer. I have suggested a crop, per King of Hearts. --Kadellar (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nice -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Kadellar:, @King of Hearts:, I've followed your suggestion, and cropped out a part of the sky. I hope other voters will agree, I don't think it is an "alternative". Everybody disagreeing,(or agreeing now) can change their vote, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 06:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is indeed a nice view and those fields of aligned trees really do have potential to draw the eye ideally to the nice mountains in the back, but they don't. Colors and light are nice but as said the composition is not balanced IMHO and the detail is not the best, either, sorry Jebulon. Poco2 13:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    • No need to be sorry neither hypocrite, Poco.--Jebulon (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks for presuming bad faith Jebulon, ...I used to have a good opinion of yours. Poco2 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is fine for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful landscape! --Halavar (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (03).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2015 at 13:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral in Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just a QI for me, sorry. --King of ♠ 10:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For a "clean" exterior building shot, I would expect (probably per King) either great light or some other feature like unusually high resolution or a special composition to make it more than a good QI. — Julian H. 10:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Julian. --Laitche (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Just QP. -- Pofka (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Krause Glucke Sparassis crispa.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2015 at 10:55:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fungi Sparassis crispa, Family: Sparassidaceae, Location: Germany, Erbach

File:Viborg_Katedralskole_Symmetrical.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2015 at 06:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Morning panorama of the Eastern facade of Viborg Katedralskole, Viborg, Denmark
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Slaunger - uploaded by Slaunger - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent work, beautiful light. I like the silence of the photo - everything seems to be at the right place and rests in itself. -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The sky is too diffused. And what are the shadows in front? --Tremonist (talk) 12:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your review, Tremonist. The shadows in the front are from recently pruned trees in the low hanging morning sun, similar to what you see in the background at the sides. The school is surrounded with such trees. Personally, I think they help guide the eye towards the main subject, but that is of course a matter of taste. I do not quite understand your comment about the diffuse sky, I am afraid. I think it is rather visually attractive. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Thank you for your comment and for the explanation. There are too many pixels visible in the clouds I think. --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for this nomination, Tuxyso! -- Slaunger (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the goemetry does it -- KlausFoehl (talk) 18:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Both sides are leaning in Poco2 19:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Poco a poco: Well spotted! I also noticed some dust spots, which are best removed from the source images in Lightroom prior to export to PTGui. I think I will rework the whole thing, and add some vertical control lines. Hold on, processing... -- Slaunger (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done. Poco a poco: Perspective corrected, dust spot removed. Tremonist: Look again: I have remorked the sky a bit. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
        • Thanks, Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 12:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
          • Thanks, too! Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Splendid --LivioAndronico talk 09:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. I spotted a little moire, that should be simple to remove with your brush. -- Colin (talk) 10:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Colin: ✓ Done Well spotted and thanks for the advice. I have never tried to fix Moiré patterns before with the adjustment brush in Lightroom, but that worked like a charm. -- Slaunger (talk) 07:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose These black lines on the grass are way too distracting. The quality and resolution is great. But not the timing of the shot. Sorry. -- Pofka (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A little too dark for me. --King of ♠ 19:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Pofka. Could be improved with a crop. Yann (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Yann:: I actually do not think this picture can be improved by a crop below; it will become unbalanced. It is very carefully and deliberately cropped exactly as shown here. The time-of-day could be chosen slightly better though such that the shadows of the pruned trees would not protrude as far into the frame while still having only minor parts of the visible building facades in shadow and not having too harsh light. I come by this place quite often and found that this particular morning the light was good. But of course one can always do better Smile.-- Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am using dual monitor, when I look at this with DELL U2412M the colors are good, but when I look at this with DELL U2413 (which is available sRGB 100%) the colors are faded. --Laitche (talk) 13:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Laitche:: Hmm, I think that is very strange. As far as I know those are quite good monitors. I have used an sRGB workflow in the entire process in camera, Lightroom and PTGui, and I also note that sRGB is indicated as color space in the EXIF. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
      • @Slaunger: How is your monitor setting(mode)? I did wrong setting with U2413 two years ago. --Laitche (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
        • Laitche My monitor is currently my weakest spot in my image process. It is not calibrated, it is resonably good though, and much better than the ones I have at my office. A Dell Ultrasharp is on my wishlist. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
          • Slaunger Umm, Colin did not say anything about the colors above so maybe my over-thinking. --Laitche (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
            • @Laitche:, The exif tool warns that although the file is tagged sRGB it lacks a colour profile. Slaugner, could you ensure Lightroom saves this profile data too. It usually does this just fine, and generally I only see out-of-camera JPGs lacking profiles (or if someone uses GIMP or Paint). Contact me if you like -- I recommend Jeffrey Friedl's Lightroom plugins such as the CC and MetadataWrangler to adjust what is saved. Without a profile, even though the image is correctly tagged, all browsers are pretty dumb about handling the mapping from image colour space to monitor colour space. But in a dual monitor setup, Laitche, if you have one monitor that is wide gamut and one that is standard sRGB gamut, then you are going to see colour saturation differences no matter what people do. The only software that I'm aware of that handles different monitor profiles is Lightroom/Photoshop. No browser handles it -- it just uses the profile for your primary monitor. I've got a calibrated wide-gamut monitor. The grass isn't very saturated, I must admit, but perhaps that's how it was, and the rest looks ok. Perhaps it does look nicer with a saturation boost? Contact me on my talk page to discuss your setup more if you like. -- Colin (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
              • @Colin: I didn't see the exif tool since color space of EXIF is sRGB, thank you always. @Slaunger: I agree with Colin, maybe saturation boost would be nicer for this image. --Laitche (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I didn't say it would look nicer with saturation boost, I just speculated. Other than the grass, I'm not sure that increasing the saturation would improve the image, as the roof and sky are just fine. The grass isn't really the subject. -- Colin (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I misunderstood because of my bad English skill, but also the sky looks a kind of under-saturation (when only see with U2413 which must show correct color now) for me... --Laitche (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Rotring Technical Pens by Lucasbosch[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 May 2015 at 16:53:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Disassembled Rotring Isograph and Rapidograph technical pens, vector drawing.

Rotring Isograph 0.35mm technical pen
Rotring Rapidograph 0.35mm technical pen
ISO line widths and color codes, illustrated with Rotring Rapidograph technical pens

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is a set nomination consisting of four SVG vector image files. The first one shows the technical pens disassembled, image 2 and 3 show them being assembled and the last one shows the full range of line widths available, and their standardized color codes. The two pen versions shown (Isograph and Rapidograph) are the two main product lines by the Rotring brand. All by LB -- LB 16:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LB 16:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Don't you have a version with more resolution? Poco2 18:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Poco It's a SVG, a vector graphic :) --Laitche (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC) should not open it as PNG. --Laitche (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
    Oops, you are right. Actually I thought that it was for real! you got my Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 19:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too small for me --LivioAndronico talk 19:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment LivioAndronico just open it normaly and press CTRL + how much you want to...it wont lose resolution since vector graphic. --Mile (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • CTRL + how much you want to works with every image,anyway i delete my oppose,but i'm not very sure --LivioAndronico talk 20:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The difference is, that with a vector graphic like this you can enlarge it infinitely without negative effects. The default display size really doesn't matter here. --El Grafo (talk) 07:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Infinitely? isn't true.--LivioAndronico talk 10:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
That infinitely means you can see the more details in larger images (loss details) but those are not smooth because you can see kinda path (like this) of vector graphics and Bézier curve in larger images, but it's actually infinite at times, that depends on the way of making. --Laitche (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
@LB If my comment is wrong, please remark. --Laitche (talk) 09:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow, that looks extremely realistic to me. --El Grafo (talk) 07:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 20:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't understand the composition. Is it a set ? a picture ? Why the series ? Why individuals ? It lacks of clarification to me.--Jebulon (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Jebulon: It's a set nomination consisting of four SVG vector image files (your comment reads as if you think it's all one file). The first one shows the technical pens disassembled, image 2 and 3 show them being assembled and the last one shows the full range of line widths available, and their standardized color codes. The two pen versions shown (Isograph and Rapidograph) are the two main product lines by the Rotring brand. I hope you will reconsider your vote. --LB 20:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks for pinging me. I know and understand what I see, my concern is about the "set" nomination. It is a very impressive work, by the way. --Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
        • @Jebulon: Set nominations are okay by the FP nomination rules, and this set can be seen as a "group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object." (see set nomination rules, category 4). The class of object is technical pens currently sold under the Rotring brand, all possible variations are both Rapidograph and Isograph pens and the extra images showing them disassembled and the color codes (and different nib sizes) are for illustrative purposes. --LB 21:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This clear explanation makes sense, I strike my oppose, and I think that such a quality job deserves a support. btw, I'm the proud owner of two FP sets...Smile--Jebulon (talk) 21:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice work. — Julian H. 10:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really a great (and very nice) work! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks nice work for me. --Laitche (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is stretching the "set" definition a bit more than I'd like, but very good work nonetheless. --King of ♠ 00:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)