From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Diese Seite hier übersetzen
Dies sind die Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder. Beachte bitte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um die exzellenten Bilder handelt. Falls Du nur Kommentare zu eigenen Bildern erhalten möchtest ist die Seite Photography critiques der richtige Ort.
|
Contents
- 1 Hintergrund
- 2 Richtlinien
- 3 Nominations
- 3.1 December 01, 2008
- 3.2 November 30, 2008
- 3.3 November 29, 2008
- 3.4 November 28, 2008
- 3.5 November 27, 2008
- 3.6 November 26, 2008
- 3.7 November 25, 2008
- 3.8 November 24, 2008
- 3.9 November 22, 2008
- 3.10 November 18, 2008
- 4 Consensual review
|
[edit] Hintergrund
Der Zweck der Qualitätsbilder ist, die einzelnen Benutzer anzuregen einzigartige Bilder zur Verfügung zu stellen um diese Ansammlung zu erweitern. Während exzellente Bilder die absolut besten Bilder darstellen, sollen Qualitätsbilder dazu anregen selbst solche qualitativ hochwertigen Bilder zu erstellen. Außerdem sollen Qualitätsbilder dazu dienen anderen Benutzern die Methoden der Verbesserung eines Bildes zu erklären.
[edit] Richtlinien
Alle vorgeschlagenen Bilder sollten von Commons-Benutzern sein.
[edit] Für Vorschlagende von Qualitätsbildern
Unten werden die wichtigsten Richtlinien für Qualitätsbilder genannt, ausführliches steht unter Qualitätsbildrichtlinien.
[edit] Anforderung an die Bilder
- Copyrightstatus. Qualitätsbilder müssen unter verwendbarer Lizenz gehochladen werden. Alle Lizenzanforderungen sind unter COM:CT zu finden.
- Qualitätsbilder müssen kategorisiert sein, einen deutlichen Titel und Beschreibung haben. Bei Pflanzen und Tieren sollte der wissenschaftliche Name mit angegeben werden.
- In den Bildern soll keine Werbung oder Signatur enthalten sein. Die Copyright- und Autorhinweise sollen auf der Seite mit angegeben sein. Sie können auch in den Metadaten enthalten sein, sollen aber den Bildinhalt nicht behindern.
[edit] Technische Anforderungen
Ausführliche technische Anforderungen stehen unter Qualitätsbildrichtlinien.
[edit] Auflösung
Die Grafiken bei Commons werden nicht immer nur auf dem Bildschirm betrachtet und benutzt. Sie können auch für den Ausdruck oder für die Betrachtung auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen benutzt werden, so daß eine hohe Auflösung verlangt wird. Wir empfehlen, dass die lange Seite eines Bildes mindestens 1600 Pixel haben soll. (Das gilt natülich nicht für SVG-Grafiken.)
[edit] Bildqualität
Digitale Bilder sind verschiedenen Problemen beim Aufnehmen und beim Speichern ausgesetzt, wie z.B. Bildrauschen, Artefakte bei der JPEG-Kompression, abgesoffene Schatten- oder Spitzlichterbereiche oder falscher Weißabgleich. All diese Kriterien sollten berücksichtigt werden.
[edit] Bildaufbau und Beleuchtung
Die Anordnung des Hauptgegenstandes sollte zum Inhalt des Bildes beitragen. Der Vordergrund und Hintergrund des Bildes sollte nicht ablenken. Beleuchtung und Fokus tragen auch zum gesamten Resultat bei; der Hauptgegenstand sollte scharf sein.
Unser Hauptziel ist es Qualitätsbilder zu sammeln, die wertvoll für alle Wikimedia-Projekte sind.
[edit] Wie man ein Qualitätsbild vorschlägt
Einfach eine Zeile unter Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list im Abschnitt Nominations einfügen.
- Image:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination| Sehr kurze Beschreibung --~~~~ |}}
Die Beschreibung sollte sehr kurz gefasst sein und nur wenige Worte betragen.
[edit] Bilder bewerten
Jeder angemeldete Benutzer darf Bilder bewerten.
Wer Bilder bewertet, sollte die gleichen Richtlinien wie der Antragsteller berücksichtigen.
- Bilder die noch bewertet werden müssen sind blau umrandet.
- Bilder die ernannt wurden sind grün umrandet.
- Bilder die abgelehnt wurden sind rot umrandet.
[edit] Wie man bewertet
Betrachte aufmerksam das Bild, öffne es in voller Auflösung und überprüfe ob die Richtlinien eingehalten worden sind.
- Wenn Du der Meinung bist, dass Bild zu ernennen, ändere folgende Zeile von
- Image:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination| Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur |}}
- in
- Image:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Promotion| Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur |Warum Du dafür bist. --~~~~}}
In anderen Worten, ändere die Vorlage von /Nomination in /Promotion und gib einen kurzen Kommentar und deine Signatur ab.
- Wenn Du der Meinung bist das Bild abzulehnen, ändere folgende Zeile von
- Image:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination| Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur |}}
- in
- Image:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Decline| Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur |Warum Du dagegen bist. --~~~~}}
In anderen Worten, ändere die Vorlage von /Nomination in /Decline und gib einen Kommentar dazu ab, aus welchem Grund es nicht ernannt wurde (Du kannst die Überschriften der Richtlinien dazu verwenden). Den ausführlichen Kommentar kannst Du auf der Diskussionsseite des Benutzers hinterlassen, denke daran höflich zu bleiben.
Hinweis: Bitte zuerst die ältesten Bilder bewerten.
[edit] Schonfrist und Ernennung
Wenn es innerhalb von zwei Tagen (genau 48 Stunden) nach der Bewertung keinen Widerspruch gibt, ist das Bild entweder ernannt oder gescheitert. Wenn du Einwände hast, kannst du das Bild in den Status einvernehmliche Beurteilung (consensual review) verschieben.
[edit] Weitere Vorgehensweise
- Wenn ein Bild ernannt wurde,
- Füge das Bild in die Gruppe / Gruppen auf der Seite Qualitätsbilder ein. Das Bild muß auch in den entsprechenden Unterseiten eingefügt werden. Achte darauf dass nur 3-4 der neuesten Bilder auf der Hauptseite eingefügt werden.
- Füge den Text {{QualityImage}} ganz unten auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite ein.
- Verschiebe die Zeile mit der Nomination und Kommentar nach Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2008
- Schreibe die Vorlage {{QICpromoted|image:Bildname.jpg}} in die Diskussionsseite des Benutzers.
- Wenn Du der Meinung bist dass es sich um ein exzellentes Bild handelt, dann stelle es bei den Kandidaten für exzellenten Bildern ein.
[edit] Nicht beurteilte Bilder (blau umrandet)
Wenn vorgeschlagene Bilder nach 15 Tagen weder ernannt noch abgelehnt werden, soll man sie von dieser Seite ins Archiv verschieben und auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite Category:Unassessed QI candidates einfügen.
[edit] Einvernehmliche Beurteilung
Einvernehmliche Beurteilung (consensual review) wird immer dann eingesetzt, wenn der oben beschriebene Prozess nicht ausreicht und eine Diskussion erforderlich ist, um zu mehr Meinungen zu kommen.
[edit] Wie man um einvernehmliche Beurteilung bittet
Um eine einvernehmliche Beurteilung zu fordern, verschiebe die Zeile mit dem Bild von den Nominierungen in den Abschnitt #Consensual review und ändere sie zu
- [[Image:NameDesBildes.jpg|300px]]{{/Nomination| ganz kurze Beschreibung --~~~~ |}}
Wenn du das Bild dorthin verschiebst weil du mit der Entscheidung der Beurteilenden nicht übereinstimmst, versuche bitte zu erklären, warum das so ist.
Bilder neu laden: den Cache-Speicher der Seite löschen
[edit] Nominations
Due to changes in the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with --[[User:yourname|yourname]] 00:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] December 01, 2008
|
|
|
- Nomination Saint Catherine's Monastery in the Sinai, Egypt -- MJJR 21:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Blue Angels Digon3 20:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Blue Angels Digon3 20:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 17:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 17:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Replica of historical ship in Salem, Massachusetts --Fletcher6 17:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Autumnal, dry and colored leaves on Ringstraße in Vienna, Austria. --Florian Prischl 16:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination A toppled headstone on the Jewish Cemetery in Währing (Vienna), Austria. --Florian Prischl 16:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Eiffel Tower blue illuminated --Siren-Com 12:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Illuminations of the Eiffel Tower are, unfortunately, protected by copyright (and no FOP in France). --Eusebius 12:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination a new ship MS Sonnenkönigin --Böhringer 11:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice View, precious moment, nice reflexions on the Ship! --Stefan-Xp 16:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Window detail --Böhringer 10:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I like composition of this photo. --Lestath 21:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination The "Dreizinnenhütte" in the Dolomites --High Contrast 10:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Work, sharp and nice. Please add coordinates ;) --Stefan-Xp 16:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Entrace of a german Firebrigadehouse --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review Who made the statue, and when? Lupo 16:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I recently looked for it, but in the Web and at the website of the Firebrigade... lately i sent an e-mail to them, i hope they can resolve it ;-) --Stefan-Xp 17:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination German Firetruck --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination A german Firefigter is entering a Window by ladder --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination The Sylvesterchapell of Rietheim-Weilheim --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Two Fire-fighters wearing a SCBA during a Training Scenary --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion Great lighting, composition, very interesting image. Could benefit from some NR - but not if it reduces sharpness too much. --Fletcher6 21:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Great lighting, composition, very interesting image, but really too noisy for a QI stamp. Lycaon 22:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Spaetzle combined with Cheese and Onions --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination SQUBA Concept Car --Stefan-Xp 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
[edit] November 30, 2008
- Nomination Smoke in a French demonstration. --Romanceor 22:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Composition, light, atmosphere, quality are OK --B.navez 16:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination The Sinai desert in Egypt. (Remark: as this picture was taken from a riding car, exact geolocation is not possible). -- MJJR 21:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination The Sinai desert in Egypt. (Remark: as this picture was taken from a riding car, exact geolocation is not possible). -- MJJR 21:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Grand St Bernard seen from above. -- Lycaon 21:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Black-tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) --TimVickers 19:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Ancient synagogue in Capernaum (Kefar Nachem) --Berthold Werner 10:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination View on Geiranger and the Geirangerfjord, Norway --LC-de 11:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Find it very good, meeting the criteria --B.navez 14:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Seven Sisters Waterfall, Geirangerfjord, Norway --LC-de 10:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Find it very good, meeting the criteria --B.navez 14:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 09:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 09:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 09:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Peggy's Point Lighthouse. created by Taxiarchos228 --Mmxx 22:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
[edit] November 29, 2008
- Nomination Woolly-necked Stork (Ciconia episcopus) --LC-de 00:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 16:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Neo FreeRunner smartphone --Mex3 23:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion Strong product image --Fletcher6 17:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Too low DOF for a studio pic. Lycaon 22:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 19:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 19:33, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 02:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Tent rocks, National Monument, New Mexico, USA --JuliusR 19:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Mahout with young elephant --AlexanderKlink 17:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, good quality. TimVickers 21:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Aleja Najświętszej Maryi Panny - main street in Częstochowa by night --Pudelek 13:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Long Market in Gdańsk, Poland. --Sfu 12:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Wallace fountain detail. --Coyau 12:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review please provide informations about the location and a description in English --Mbdortmund 16:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Location is anecdotal for a standard piece of furniture. --Coyau 18:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Saski Garden in Warsaw, Poland. --Sfu 11:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Shadow on the left is very "strong", maybe there is too much contrast. I think there are slight CAs on the leaves (top right) and on the face/neck of the statue. --Eusebius 11:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Question: Who made the statue and when? Lupo 20:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Info: Fryderyk Karol Deybel (18th century) --Sfu 20:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Door of the Church of the Multiplcation --Berthold Werner 10:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
|
- Nomination Japanese garden. --Eusebius 08:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I'm not sure if this is a typical japanese garden. But the picture seems to be ok. --Berthold Werner 18:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] November 28, 2008
|
|
- Nomination Vulpes vulpes --Butko 17:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Partially overexposed, noisy background, fence not really nice. --Eusebius 11:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Cufut Qale kenassa --Butko 17:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Ruins of Chersones. Basilica in basilica --Butko 17:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review Please add proper description and fix CCW tilt. Lycaon 20:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Done --Butko 09:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination T-33 bulldozer of ChZPT --Butko 17:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)*
Comment Needs to be moved to a more descriptive title. TimVickers 17:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
[edit] November 27, 2008
- Nomination Town hall and statue of Józef Piłsudski in Częstochowa, Poland --Pudelek 19:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Crocodile --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 16:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Main topic to small. Lycaon 22:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
|
- Nomination The Train Station of Volgograd. Photo taken on August 13th, 2007 -- High Contrast 09:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Disturbing foreground makes subject difficult to see. --Coyau 00:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] November 26, 2008
- Nomination View on the lake Namtso (Nam-tso/Nam co) and the holy rock by User:Pvigier. --Dschwen 18:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I find the composition unbalanced and the crop too tight on the right. --Eusebius 11:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Archeological site in Banias, Israel --Berthold Werner 09:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
[edit] November 25, 2008
- Nomination 180° Panorama of the Bödmensteinstrasse in Bödmen (created by Böhringer) --D-Kuru 19:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice, but downsampled a bit too much. --Dschwen 19:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Maybe downsampled, but after all of very good quality. --LC-de 19:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Church over the house of Petrus, Kapernaum, Israel --Berthold Werner 07:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
[edit] November 24, 2008
- Nomination Church of St. Mary in Kraków. --Lestath 23:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
|
|
- Nomination Restoration of the Parthenon. --Eusebius 09:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review I really do not like this excessive amount of noise reduction. It does not improve the images, it just removes fine details. --Dschwen 20:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination The church of Brouage. Charente Maritime, France.--Berrucomons 21:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Someone's head is cut off, can't be easily cropped --Fletcher6 17:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] November 22, 2008
- Nomination Basilica of St. Francis in Katowice. --Lestath 18:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review
Comment There seems to be distortion (see the vertical lines of the central pillar). --Eusebius 09:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Place Royale fountain: Allegory of the Erdre river. --Eusebius 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 19:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Who was the sculptor, and when was it made? Lupo 16:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Info added on image pages. --Eusebius 17:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Place Royale fountain: Allegory of the Sèvre river. --Eusebius 11:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 19:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Who was the sculptor, and when was it made? Lupo 16:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Info added on image pages. --Eusebius 17:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Portal of the church of Saint Fiz de Solovio, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 02:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review What's between the virgin Mary and the head of the kneeling wise man? --Eusebius 09:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC) A phone? -- carol 17:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC) I think is a metallic piece to take the chain to touch the bells. --Lansbricae 19:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Anyway, it doesn't seem to be part of the sculpture and I find it distracting. I otherwise find the picture nice (although maybe a little bit noisy). --Eusebius 15:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] November 18, 2008
- Nomination Arbutus andrachne --Butko 08:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Review Rename please. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Image renamed --Butko 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
- Nomination Pesteil Castle, in Cantal. --Berrucomons 20:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 00:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Camera has a slight CA problem and the perspective should be corrected in this shot (as it is only slightly off). Did support then. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Done Berrucomons 19:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion it's ok for QI --Berthold Werner 19:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] Consensual review
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Or QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision - Promoted or Not promoted - will be registered at the end of the text and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
- Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the image will stay in Consensual Review for a maximum period of 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add
Oppose and
Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
[edit] Consensual Review
[edit] Image:Oklahoma State Capitol.jpg

- Nomination Oklahoma State Capitol --CPacker 15:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Perspective. - Till.niermann 12:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment I think that its perspective is good not bad--CPacker 00:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose A little overexposed (front of the building) --Pudelek 08:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Juvenile Humboldt Penguin (zoo de Vincennes).jpg

- Nomination Young Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) --Diti 19:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support nice --Pudelek 10:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I find it noisy. --Eusebius 10:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Info: ISO 1600 was obligatory if I wanted to take a good picture (due to really bad weather). The zoo of Vincennes is now closed and other photos of Humboldt Penguins here will be possible in 5 years minimum. Also, see my “info” comment right below. Diti 23:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Needs cropping. TimVickers 17:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Info: I uploaded the uncropped version, with less noise. Feel free to crop it so it suits to the QI needs (if possible). I have the RAW file if needed. Thanks. →Diti the penguin — 23:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Paulownia_tomentosa_à_Place_d'Italie.jpg

- Nomination Paulownia tomentosa on Place d'Italie, in Paris --Romanceor 17:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion Misidentified. This one seems to be Paulownia tomentosa. Change name please. --B.navez 18:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Info: Done. Thanks. --Romanceor 21:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Ab insect 065.JPG

- Nomination Vespiary of Polistes gallicus--Butko 17:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion Sadly not sufficiently identified. Lycaon 20:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
identified - Polistes gallicus --Butko 12:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Mya November 2008-1.jpg

- Nomination My name is Mya and I feel comfortable -- Alvesgaspar 23:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Strange and unclear composition. I don't even see the value of this snapshot for the Wiki-projects --LC-de 19:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Technically fine and large size. Lycaon 22:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Poor composition, most of the animal is not visible in the image. TimVickers 17:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Częstochowa - III Aleja.jpg

- Nomination Aleja Najświętszej Maryi Panny - main street in Częstochowa by night --Pudelek 13:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Too symmetrical, lack of sky, subject is too centred, try rule of thirds. --Coyau 13:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Support The thirds are vertical, for me, it is finally an image from this uploader which doesn't make me feel queasy (other QI) -- carol 18:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment Not really convinced: Tower is almost touching the top edge. --Coyau 21:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> (more votes?) -- Lycaon 23:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Nantes - château.jpg
|
- Nomination Nantes castle. --Eusebius 21:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support It's good for QI --Pudelek 20:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Almost everything is in the shadow. If taken later in the day, the sun would properly illuminate the scene. --Specious 19:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Support It's good for QI --Beyond silence 01:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose lighting --Mbdortmund 21:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> (more votes?) -- Lycaon 22:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
|
[edit] Image:Nantes - Duguesclin.jpg

- Nomination Statue of Du Guesclin in Nantes. --Eusebius 18:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion
Comment Looks like a bit too much noise reduction. --Dschwen 16:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please note that the stone has been eroded. Denoising has been applied here, but loss of detail on the sculpture is mostly due to the weather and the nature of the stone (no marble here...). --Eusebius 12:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Info: I've uploaded a non-denoised version over this one, and then reverted, so that you can compare both and decide whether there has been too much denoising. --Eusebius 14:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 |