Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,93 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Contents

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Red Weaver Ant, Oecophylla smaragdina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Beria.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

User Beria

File:Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 23:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The vale 'Mont dal Ega' in the Dolomites

File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yurts. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia.

File:Vendôme (Loir-et-Cher).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA PALM TREE 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unidentified Phoenix palms, Palm Row, San Jose, California
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael - uploaded by Sanjosecalifornia - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice image. I prefer a perspective correction.--XRay talk 06:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Stomorhina lunata on Centranthus ruber.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 20:10:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stomorhina lunata on Centranthus ruber
No thanks, I keep it as this. -- ChristianFerrer 07:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Päiksetõus rabas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 20:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise at Kõnnu Suursoo in Estonia

File:The pope at the windows in St. Peter.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 19:43:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Pope Francis facing during the Angelus from the Apostolic Palace All by Livioandronico2013 -- LivioAndronico talk 19:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico talk 19:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Does this house really have this blueshaded stone? My remembrance says, its more yellow-grey. --Hubertl (talk) 22:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • The picture reproduces colors accurately (though it was recently renovated) but if you tell me where would these blue stones I check, thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 23:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo Arqueológico de Palencia - 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 17:55:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It has something that recalls the scale of the Vatican Museums, then the mosaic is adorable in the center.Gran trabajo. --LivioAndronico talk 19:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 20:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very good. Great perspective and great control of light too --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 11:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pre-Roman Hill fort of Baroña, Porto do Son, Galicia, Spain.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 14:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice and good as always however the mid-day harch light don't help for to make pleasant colors. -- ChristianFerrer 20:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-Sonnenobservatorium-Goseck.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 06:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goseck solar observatory
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Goseck solar observatory is by now the oldest known solar observation circle in the world, having been discovered and restored just recently. I came along in the warm morning light of a grand day and so had the chance to take some nice shots of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hm, I see only a wooden fence, missing the solar observatory! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps it would be better to write "entrance" of the observatory Face-grin.svg --LivioAndronico talk 14:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have had a look at the thing (online) and I guess that I would not have a much better idea for photographing it. Yet, I feel that the image is not featurable if the commenters above think that the motive is just some random fence, not the instrument itself. Perhaps a view from an elevated position would be good or perhaps trying to offer a look through one of the openings, but obviously an ideal image is hard to get here. --DXR (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I often say, I can see what you were thinking. But perhaps you should try a different time of day. The high contrast between the sides is very jarring to the eye and isn't necessary for understanding the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Todi panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 21:03:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Todi is a town and comune (municipality) of the province of Perugia (region of Umbria) in central Italy. It is perched on a tall two-crested hill overlooking the east bank of the river Tiber, commanding distant views in every direction.

In the 1990s, Richard S. Levine, a professor of architecture at the University of Kentucky, chose Todi as the model sustainable city, because of its scale and its ability to reinvent itself over time. After that, the Italian press reported on Todi as the world's most livable city. All by Livioandronico2013 -- LivioAndronico talk 21:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your comment Martin Falbisoner. Anyway I don't think,also beacuse is a quality and valued image. I think that the others could tell me me this. --LivioAndronico talk 10:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Agree with Martin. If this is getting direct sunlight, it's a bit underexposed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok Martin and Crisco I increased the brightness, now what do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 14:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Better now. Maybe it could further help to increase saturation a bit?
  • Hey Martin You haven't signed the edit Face-tongue.svg...anyway more saturation. What do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 19:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Gobi, kompleks Szambala (26).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 20:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stupas in Shambhala complex. Gobi Desert, Dornogovi Province, Mongolia.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Halavar (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed, oversharpened, clouds posterizing (visible even in the preview!), white areas blown --Kreuzschnabel 05:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. I can see what you were thinking (perhaps with that dead space on the left cropped out somewhat?) but the technical flaws do not require looking at the full-size version to see. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Gjirokastёr (by Pudelek).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:44:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gjirokastёr, Albania

File:Ma'aleh Akrabim.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by אילן ארד - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the interesting feature here, also compositionally, is the road. But due to the very flat light, it's not a strong motive. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see also a lot of dust spots and vignetting on the image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering -- 2014 -- 5492.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 11:57:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Burg Vischering in Lüdinghausen, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit soft for only 7 mpix but lighting & composition make up for that. --Kreuzschnabel 05:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry. Forgotten. An image with a better resolution (with more than 11 mpix) is uploading.--XRay talk 06:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the quality is absolutely sufficient and the light is great. The crop on both sides though, although I know it's often hard to get wide enough in such a photo, is just too close to the building in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the crop is a bit tight, as mentioned before, but still awesome mood and colors --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very nice. A little bit more space would have been nice, but it's good as is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 09:38:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Anne church in Zieleniec
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It looks too plain for me, because of the light. There are almost no shadows on the building and I can't really get a sense of depth and volume (see the corners, for example, both sides of them are lit just the same). The almost squared composition is very encyclopaedic for this church, but it's not so appealing here, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment White balance seems off to me, colours being very much on the cold side. --Kreuzschnabel 05:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Cabaña subterránea en la región de Búðahraun, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 046.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 02:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland. All by me, Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, it's good (and even necessary) to see the surroundings; nice mood. --Kadellar (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting somewhat dull to me, and I’d prefer to see the background mountains sharper. Lacks wow. --Kreuzschnabel 05:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Faro de Malarrif, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 055-057 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 02:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Malarrif lighthouse is located in the Southwest shore of Snæfellsnes Peninsula, in the Snæfellsnes National Park, Iceland. The 79-meter-high lighthouse was established in 1917 and is operational.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Malarrif lighthouse is located in the Southwest shore of Snæfellsnes Peninsula, in the Snæfellsnes National Park, Iceland. The 79-meter-high lighthouse was established in 1917 and is operational. All by me, Poco2 02:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 02:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Upper part of the lighthouse is distorted and we already have excellent FP by Richard Bartz from the same place. --Ivar (talk) 08:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ivar. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ivar --Kreuzschnabel 13:10, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
    Ivar, Alchemist-hp, Kreuzschnabel: just ✓ uploaded a new version with a correction of the perspective problems (and slight increase of brightness). Poco2 14:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Still doesn’t catch up with the existing FP for me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 05:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Ivar -- Ram-Man 03:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bennu's Journey.webm[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 23:22:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA's Goddard Space Flight/Center Conceptual Image Lab - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Animated movie about the asteroid Bennu and the formation of our solar system.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Breathtaking! -- Ras67 (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Turn685 (talk) 01:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing!!! Thanks a lot. --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 09:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 20:30:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia) in Weltvogelpark Walsrode
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • nice stork, but bad contrast on left side --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • The stork is in nice morning sun light. Due to the dark background the animal comes out quite well. IMHO a dark background is the best choice for a white stork. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Generally yes, but not for its dark side. --Kreuzschnabel 05:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
the black background on the left is a bit problematic, but overall quality is just too good not to support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ Done, Wladyslaw, Kreuzschnabel and Martin: I've selectively brightened the background. Please take another look. An improvement? --Tuxyso (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, aber er ist halt ein armes, trauriges Viecherl. Wie bestellt und nicht abgeholt... --Hubertl (talk) 22:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Hubertl, es war noch recht früh und kalt (10:30 Uhr), vielleicht war der Herr (oder Frau) Storch noch müde :) Auf mich wirkten die Tiere im Weltvogelpark Walsrode nicht unglücklich - im Gegenteil. Die Pfleger haben die Tiere mit großem Respekt behandelt, was man z.B. gut bei der Flugshow schon sehen konnte. English: The birds seemed to me not unlucky - in contrary. The stork was photographed in the cold morning and was probably still tired. My impression from the very nice Weltvogelpark Walsrode was that the animals were treated very respectfully by the zookeeper as one could easily observe during the great flight show. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
      • No misinterpretation please, I remember the disput you have about pictures from the zoo. I am pretty relaxed with modern zoos.--Hubertl (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kasteel Schoonselhof Antwerpen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 19:26:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Schoonselhof on domain Schoonselhof, now part of a well known Antwerp cemetry

File:Kruja Castle (by Pudelek).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 16:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kruja Castle, Albania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically well done (although maybe something could be done about that darker area of sky in the top center—stitching problem perhaps?) but compositionally wanting, as too cluttered. QI definitely but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The cut-off house on the right as well as the partly obstructed building make it look a random shot. Crop suggestion added. --Kreuzschnabel 05:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The sky has some colour banding. --Ivar (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Kruja Castle (by Pudelek) - crop.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Photo with crop --Pudelek (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl Ernst Papf - Children - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 15:32:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment maybe this version could have more details --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 18:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 13:07:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A train of the S-Bahn Berlin arriving at Hauptbahnhof
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A train of the S-Bahn Berlin arriving at Hauptbahnhof. All by -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow --LivioAndronico talk 14:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 15:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent, and even more so when one has been there and can personally vouch for this being a good, representative image of the place. Daniel Case (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --· Favalli ⟡ 01:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ArildV (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -A bit of oversharpening on the text on the sign.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • hmm, I don't know, I've applied a very moderate sharpening. Decreasing it again might turn out problematic for corner and border sharpness. So I better leave it as it is. It's always a compromise... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
      • What if you applied a localized blur tool? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:St Albans Wallingford Screen 2, Hertfordshire, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 08:47:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Albans Wallingford Screen
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 15:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another superior Diliff CIP. Daniel Case (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pity that the mic cable hangs exactly in front of Jesus Christ... obviously not your fault... --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 08:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Can't wait for my panoramic head to come in... this is wow, right here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lincoln Cathedral Rood Screen, Lincolnshire, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 07:36:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lincoln Cathedral Rood Screen
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful but I would put the center better, see columns 2 on the right and 3 on the left...--LivioAndronico talk 09:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • It is centred properly, the problem is that the building itself is not symmetrical. The columns on the left are physically nearer to the centre of the screen and organ than the columns on the right. You can see it clearly, the doorway on the left behind the column is partially obscured by the column, but the doorway on the right is not. The nave (where the photo was taken from) is laterally shifted compared to the rood screen and the choir behind it. You can also see the shift in this image. Diliff (talk) 13:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 15:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ArildV (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Christus carthusian.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 08:16:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Carthusian
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Petrus Christus - uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 --  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • A strong scan of an important painting. (Yes, that fly is supposed to be there; very nice example of trompe l'oeil).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support there is a kind of spider cocoon at the bottom near the frame. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • (The painted-on frame, eh?) Not sure what that is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Exactly, yes... --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 01:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Kongensbro gravel pit 2014-09-17.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 22:16:36
Original with pseudo HDR 'tonemapping' in PTGui ProRestitch by Diliff

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This upper image was promoted with overwhelming support (19/0/0) a little over a month ago: (Original nomination) However, meanwhile, Diliff has restitched the image from the original raws (lower image), using only non-destruvitve editing in Lightroom. This has resulted in higher image fidelity, more faithful colors and better tonality in the sky. Moreover, by using content-aware fill, he has been capable of extending the sky, thus managing to produce an image with a less extreme aspect ratio. The process is described in detail at the English Wikipedia FPC process. I am very, very gratefull for and impressed by this edit, as the raws do not appear promising at first sight.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Since we do not have replace-and-delist nominations very often, just a reminder, that the only allowed templates are {{keep}} and {{Delistandreplace}}. (I had to look it up). -- Slaunger (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Slaunger (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Strong delist and replace Per FPC talk --DXR (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace As promised in FPC talk. It is the good solution, don't worry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace per Slaunger. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Speedy! -- Ram-Man 00:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace I liked the more colorful sunset, but the newer one is more realistic. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace - Per EN Wiki. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace but keep the annotations --Kreuzschnabel 05:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Thanks Slaunger, you've been very gracious throughout the process. I'm just glad we ended up with a better image that all parties could be satisfied with. Diliff (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • And I am grateful for you being willing to invest your time in these piles of gravel in Denmark and spare the time to explain your superior workflow.Smile -- Slaunger (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
      • "Very gracious", Slaunger ? Oh yes, he is. I think we are lucky with such a guy among us.--Jebulon (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 09:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I find the image notes/annotations of the old version very interesting. Would it be possible to copy them to the new file? --El Grafo (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --El Grafo (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Yann (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 19:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Butterfly Weed Asclepias tuberosa Umbel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 20:23:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by uploaded by Ram-Man - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The license for this image is not compatible with FPC. If it is acceptable, I'll relicense it to the CC-BY-SA 4.0 if the image is featured. I think that will meet with the standards? -- Ram-Man 21:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ram-Man 12:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Turn685 (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vilivalla kalmistu Harjumaal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 15:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vilivalla cemetary in Harju County, Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by MinuHiiumaa - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this. Lighting is nice, composition is fun, colors are pleasant. That said, it does appear to be either a slightly overdone HDR or very strange natural lighting (i.e. the center of the photo). -- Ram-Man 04:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really nice but geocoding and English description should be added. Sky indeed looks strange in the center. --Kreuzschnabel 05:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and ✓ Done for geocoding and English description. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 18:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If promoted add {{Wallpaper}}. Aspect ratio (almost) 8:5 aka 16:10 (0.618). Josve05a (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Depricated, my bad. Josve05a (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:NeXT Pizzabox-IMG 7227.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 15:18:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NeXTstation workstation.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info NeXTstation workstation. Created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 15:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Artifacts around all whites on the keyboard, and what bothers me more is the strange circular posterization in the screen. --Kreuzschnabel 18:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Assuming the edges of the base are vertical, it needs a lot of counter-clockwise rotation. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kalvarienberg Frauenkirchen DSC 4847w.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 09:26:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calvary, Frauenkichen, Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 09:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Calvary was built in 1685 and the Crucifixion Scene was added in 1759. It was recently refurbished (2009-2012) and is one of the most important baroque monuments in Austria.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P e z i (talk) 09:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. What bothers me a bit is that the three chapels on the right partially hide each other. Maybe a photo taken from another position would be better. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for review and voting. For your comment: You are right, but ... standing more to the right would hide the Crucifixion Scene; more to the left makes things even worse as can be seen here. The only reasonable improvement would be a higher point of view. --P e z i (talk) 14:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice e beautiful composition --LivioAndronico talk 16:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality and lighting, distinct composition. --Kreuzschnabel 18:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 18:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 05:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)-- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2014 (UTC) its excellent, but not extraordinary wow.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, fontanna przy pijalni wód mineralnych.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 22:46:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fountain in Kłodzko
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why the color differences between versions? Was the color manipulated artificially? -- Ram-Man 04:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great image generally, but there's Ram-Man's question above and the posterization on the lights to consider. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could live with the blown lights if only they wouldn’t have been so severely overprocessed (posterizsation, oversharpening). Really nice scene though. --Kreuzschnabel 05:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Agree with above, the processing and the way the blown highlights are dealt with is unaesthetic. Diliff (talk) 09:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    @Ram-Man, Daniel Case, Kreuzschnabel, Diliff (talk) - I restored the previous version of photo. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Much better, but the beams of the lights still just don’t look fine. Great atmosphere though. Not decided yet to support. --Kreuzschnabel 15:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Jean Cocteau b Meurisse 1923.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 16:11:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jean Cocteau (1889-1963), French writer, artist and filmmaker, in 1923.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse in 1923 - uploaded and nominated by -- JLPC (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JLPC (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 05:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! Yann (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work, worth a FP star! --Halavar (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting document, nice portrait of a master filmmaker --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Berat (by Pudelek).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 12:03:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Berat, Albania

File:Caminandes - Gran Dillama - Blender Foundation's new Open Movie.webm[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 02:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pablo Vazquez, Beorn Leonard, and Francesco Siddi. Music and Sound by Jan Morgenstern - uploaded and nominated by ProfesorFavalli -- · Favalli ⟡ 02:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- · Favalli ⟡ 02:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cute! And very well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support—absolutely love this short film!!! 😍😍😍 I didn’t know we had a copy on commons—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good short film. Well done! Nikhil (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kreuz - Monte Piana 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2014 at 17:58:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cross on the monte piana.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by User:Steinsplitter -- Steinsplitter (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Steinsplitter (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please make sure that the picture in full resolution is shown in upright position - currently its tilted by 90 degrees. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral After looking at the context (this image), I find the composition lacking. It looks nice, but a FP? I feel that a different angle or frame would have been superior, but I can't put my finger on it. Also the image description is quite sparse, it is only in one category and it's not used in any articles. It could use some help to increase its value. I really like the lighting and mood. -- Ram-Man 04:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kardoen (Cynara cardunculus), Locatie De Kruidhof 05.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2014 at 15:57:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kardoen (Cynara cardunculus)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cardoon (Cynara cardunculus). Maturing seeds of .Cynara cardunculus at different stages. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support I really wish there was more depth of field, but (at 60mm, f/11) I'm not willing to require focus stacking for a FP and I like the composition. -- Ram-Man 04:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Tenancingo market in mexico.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2014 at 06:21:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tenancingo market in Mexico
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tomascastelazo -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. I love this, but I just want more depth of field, especially in the foreground. It looks fabulous as a large thumbnail at least. -- Ram-Man 04:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Leopard Tree AdF.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 18:21:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female leopard elegantly descending from its favourite tree, where she spent the warmest hours of the day.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Isn´t it a little too much yellow? This is not just the only problem, it´s partly extreme over- and underexposed (You have the RAW?). With the JPG, there is no chance to fix it! --Hubertl (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a very good shot in the wilderness! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks a lot Hubertl, you are absolutely right. I have updated the file, after substantially reducing the overexposed areas. Now it look a bit dark but this makes sense given the thick vegetation. --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, but it is a very special shot! --Hubertl (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 17:54:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tampa, Florida
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tampa, Florida. View to downtown during the morning (subtract 4 hours from Exif time). Compare with this picture, taken just after sunrise and already featured. I believe the present version also deserves the star. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Based on a similar rationale as above. It's good to disclose the existence of the other FP, but I think that here the wow is missing a bit. Quality is of course great, but without the evening light, the towers are quite plain. Reminds me a bit of my own experience with this and that. --DXR (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In contrast to the view expressed by DXR, I think that the lighting (not during dawn/dusk) is a positive aspect of this picture and doesn't detract from the "wow factor". The evening lighting is slightly distracting from the subject--the Tampa skyline. This image doesn't add a false yellowish tone to the buildings like the sunset photo does (compare the white buildings in this photo vs that appear light brown/tan in the sunset one). There's also less glare off the buildings that are more reflective. It does have a "wow factor" if you look at it from the perspective of focusing on the subject—the Tampa skyline—in that it is a great quality image which manages to show most of the subject in an accurate way (no false color from dawn/dusk). The only possible improvement would be mid-day lighting in summer to eliminate the shadows. I don't support de-listing the sunset image, but if others find it necessary to only feature one, this is the one to feature (just a suggestion, but again I don't support doing that). -- AHeneen (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Isn't there a slight blue or green cast? Check WB, please. I also think it is a bit plain, not because of the light, but because of such a clear sky. --Kadellar (talk) 17:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
    • I made several experiences because I also had the feeling that the picture was a bit greenish. In the end the adjustements were minimal as I realized that many of the buildings had in fact a green cast. The obvious exception is the white parking below Sun Trust. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 11:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Maslenitsa kustodiev.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 16:56:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
"Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy...
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject."
I don't know much about art, so I can't say with certainty the artist is a "major artist" but Boris Kustodiev has a Wikipedia article, which is noteworthy and suggest he is an important Russian artist. Otherwise, I think this certainly meets the second criteria above. -- AHeneen (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saw this before, very picturesque, lively. --Mile (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is above the size limit, but image is still rather small. Wouldn't it be practical to require more than mere 2 Mpx from a photo, that is taken from a static object, like a painting? Kruusamägi (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Fliegenpilz fly agaric Amanita muscaria.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 16:34:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Citron (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good quality, pity it’s just 6 mpix. If you could just retouch the flashlight reflection (see note). --Kreuzschnabel 18:28, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Remove flash reflection--H. Krisp (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Whale Shark AdF.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2014 at 21:46:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

an 8-mtr Whale Shark filter-feeding at night, in Maldives
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Like most underwater images of large animals, the resolution is not the best, but I think the drama and the uniqueness of the image more than compensates. This image was taken at 1am, when the whale shark came close to our boat to filter-feed on a cloud of plankton. Strobes are not allowed with whale sharks (and would be useless, given their size) so the only ilumination was coming from the floodlight of the boat. all by me -- Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 21:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 21:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice pic but I don’t particularly like 1: the blue/yellow fringing (visible at the mouth, and at one small fish near the bottom edge) and 2: the crop (too tight at the bottom, nearly cutting the fin). --Kreuzschnabel 06:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thanks Kreuzschnabel for your comments, I agree, the image is far from perfect from a technical point of view, given it was taken in the middle of the night, with only one source of zenithal light. However, the situation is so rare and unique - face portrait of whale shark feeding with open mouth etc - that I thought it would more than compensate the technical shortcomings. But if others think like you do, I am happy to withdraw nomination... --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That’s why I didn’t oppose. I am indifferent about this image as yet, and I don’t know enough about underwater photography to judge if the colour fringes are avoidable. --Kreuzschnabel 11:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What for a effect! I like this picture --H. Krisp (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The value of this picture is so high that I can accept technical issues. Is there a chance to solve any of them, especially the fringing? --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as above. Yann (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If the CA can be removed, it would be great. --Kadellar (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I have tried to remove the blue fringing, I think it looks fine. If you don't like it, please revert. --Kadellar (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Eristalinus June 2014-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2014 at 15:27:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Male hoverfly on flower (Eristalinus taeniops). Porto Covo, Portugal. Notice the red ocelli and the holoptic eyes, characteristic of male shirphid flies. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would it be acceptable,in my opinion, if at least the flower was full, but .... --LivioAndronico talk 19:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good image of the insect. --Kreuzschnabel 20:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 13:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both versions --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Uoaei1 --Hubertl (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unless I'm mistaken, isn't the main subject (the hoverfly) supposed to be identified for a featured picture? -- Ram-Man 18:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Eristalinus taeniops is the hoverfly. --Kadellar (talk) 19:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Haha, how did I miss that? Alright, the flower is unidentified. I can live with that. -- Ram-Man 20:12, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative[edit]

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alternative version with the whole flower, special for @Livioandronico2013:! I prefer the first because the flower is too unfocused and somehow overexposed on the right. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this,the subject is very very clear,the rest isn't important fo me is the subject is good,but i don't like when background (in this case the flower) is cut. Very Nice.Good job. --LivioAndronico talk 16:12, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both versions --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I dislike the overexposure. The yellows should look like this. I'd also like the genus or species of the flower, since it is more prominent. -- Ram-Man 18:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Spire of St Walburge Preston.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2014 at 14:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spire of St Walburge's, Preston
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A vertical panorama of the spire of St Walburge's Church, Preston. It is the third tallest spire in the UK, after those of Salisbury and Norwich cathedrals, and yet, despite its grandeur and size, somewhat of a hidden gem. 4 frames, stitched in Hugin. All by me -- Baresi F (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Baresi F (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sunny side looks overexposed to me. Very good detail though. --Kreuzschnabel 14:56, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Kreuzschnabel, you're right about the overexposure. I've gone back and completely reworked it from RAW - do you think this looks any better? --Baresi F (talk) 23:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Better. Don’t think its FP though because I don’t see anything special in it. It’s a good picture of the tower, but that’s all, no wow. --Kreuzschnabel 17:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a second look. --Baresi F (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Very good work, but it looks a bit reddish. Should be easy correctable. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback Wladyslaw, I've reduced the red slightly. --Baresi F (talk) 20:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support now --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Something new. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Basel - Hohenfirstenhof.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2014 at 19:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basel: Hohenfirstenhof
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw. This building belongs to the list of cultural properties of national significance in Switzerland. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Feels really tight. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Great, because it is tight. That's how historic centers in European citys are build. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Crisco 1492 ????? --Hubertl (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes? It feels really tight, and there's definitely a reason why I'm the only one who's commented in over a week. A limit of the environment, but that doesn't make for wow. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Maybe the others are just tired of endless arguments with the nominator following each oppose. --Kreuzschnabel 05:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Maybe you say s.th. meaningful for this image or you keep silent if not. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
You’re right, I apologize for being childish. The image: I don’t have the slightest idea what’s supposed to be special about it. It’s a well-done pic of a nice house crammed between some others in a narrow lane. I don’t see any fancy compositional idea, any special perspective or lighting about it. --Kreuzschnabel 11:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Feel free to think so. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Maker unknown, India - Krishna and Radha - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2014 at 14:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Krishna and Radha, circa 1750. Opaque watercolor and gold on cotton.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info unknown author, uploaded by Moogsi, nominated by Yann (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A high resolution and good quality reproduction of this art style from India. -- Yann (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Superb, but the cropped feather prevents me for a support, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The intimacy in an intense relation is very brilliantly portrayed. Even I, as a cultural ignorant can appreciate that! Excellent technical quality and notable subject. The cropped feather Jebulon mentions is a bit annoying, agreed. When seeing the source material linked to the file page, it becomes evident than a wooden frame begins right where the feather ends. So it is not a bad crop as such, but as crop a crop as it can be given the frame, thus acceptable for me. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Slaunger. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeVery nice, except crop. --AntonTalk 13:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
    • I cropped it a bit on left and right to remove the dark borders. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 11:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Zbislav (Zhoř) Okres Písek 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2014 at 13:37:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Richenza - uploaded by Richenza - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like the colours of black&white&yellow and the composition. Cool image for me :) -- Chmee2 (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment --Very nice, but there is a lot of purple, what makes me wonder if the colors are somewhat overworked. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Jules Grandgagnage - Thanks for comment. To be honest, I do not know. I tried to WB the original image, so it might be true that I overdid it, but I am not really skilled in post-processing so is there some possibility to fix this? And if yes, how? Or the image is wasted without a chance? :) Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Jules Grandgagnage. --AntonTalk 16:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Large areas of snow blown. I know it’s hard not to overexpose snow but must be performed well for FP. --Kreuzschnabel 18:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a rather good composition, although I think it could be improved further by cropping of a bit below such the black road/snow line such intersects the lower left corner. I like the co-existance of green vegetation of sizeable height and snow. It is unusual. The technical quality is not quite good for enough for FP these days though in my opinion. Focus is soft and texture of plants look artificial as a if a little too aggressive noise reduction has been applied. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Pensive Bodhisattva 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 23:55:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation is a gilt-bronze statue of what is believed to be the Maitreya, the future Buddha, in a semi-seated contemplative pose. It is commonly referred to as the Contemplative Bodhisattva or Gilt-Bronze Seated Maitreya in English. It is the National Treasure of Korea No. 83. The statue is widely acknowledged to be one of the finest Buddhist sculptures ever produced and is a masterpiece of Korean art. It is now housed at the National Museum of Korea and is one of the most popular exhibits there.(en:Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 83)) created by 국립중앙박물관(National Museum of Korea) - uploaded by Lawinc82 - nominated by Lawinc82 -- Lawinc82 (talk) 23:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lawinc82 (talk) 23:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  revimsg 01:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Are we suppose to support both? Personally I support at least the front view. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If possible, voting for both as FP, if not, let's take the side one :) Nice shot, thanks for it --Chmee2 (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I oppose here for formal reasons, because set nominations are currently disallowed. So this are in fact two separate nominations (your 2nd and 3rd active nomination). --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I didn't realize it. So I modifed a page. --Lawinc82 (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support I would have preferred the other picture, but this one is great either. --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:West Antarctic ice sheet.svg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 23:22:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

West Antarctic ice sheet 2.svg
West Antarctic ice sheet 3.svg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Kelvinsong
  • I have waited like five months to nominate these three diagrams as a set, bc it makes literally no sense to nominate them in series (especially since there’s an odd number, so the third one whould have to stand FPC in isolation). Technically set nominations are disabled (as a…half-year-long “stopgap”, when new rules were supposed to be adopted within one month) but I can already see that as it stands that’s going to be forever basically so I’m just going to be bold and offer these antarctica diagrams as a set anyway. Since they constitute a sort of frame animation, and portray the same thing at different times, I do not believe they’re in the gray area that led to FPCS shutdown last June, and it’d probably attract more hate to nominate them separately than as a set. If you really must follow a should-be-expired-by-now ban, feel free to think of the three cutaways as a single collage—Love, Kelvinsong talk 23:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportLove, Kelvinsong talk 23:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 👍 I like it. It has educational value. 😉 ArionEstar (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and yes. A sensible use of ignore all rules. -- Ram-Man 15:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe that a more darkened blue ocean's color for more contrast with the ice would not be bad and will make a more hard-hitting image. And of more, in the reality, the ocean's color is (often) darker. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 08:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice diagram --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--H. Krisp (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Béria L. Rodríguez msg 14:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC))

File:WLM14ES - Molinos La Mancha - Hugo Díaz-Regañón.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 17:31:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windmills of Consuegra, Castilla La Mancha, Spain.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Windmills of Consuegra, Castilla La Mancha, Spain. Created by Hugo Díaz-Regañón, uploaded by Superzerocool, nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a beautiful scene, but I don't like how the two or three structures on the right intrude on each other. Hurts the composition. Even were it impossible to get the shot from a different angle, I don't think that's enough of a mitigating factor for me. -- Ram-Man 18:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Of course different angles are possible !--Jebulon (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
      • I think this composition is nice because it compresses the windmills in the image, so they don't appear too loose. The obscured windmill is so obscured that there almost seems to be six instead of seven, so it's not a problem for me. --Kadellar (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Would be even nicer if the mills on the right would not obstruct each other, but lots of whow and still a very great and perfectly done shot. --Kreuzschnabel 18:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Beautiful scene. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 21:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment PD is very obvious, or they are built so ? Otherwise very nice image. --Mile (talk) 22:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Sorry, what do you mean by "PD" ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perspective distortion. Some windmills are leaning. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Ah ok. Thanks for explanation. As I remember, they are not leaning in real (see above)--Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I havent see upper link, windmills are leaning. And there already is FP of it. Wouldnt mind to plus it, just some corrections. --Mile (talk) 08:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done Hi, Mile, I have uploaded a new version with the perspective issue corrected. I hope it's fine now, I couldn't do it before. --Kadellar (talk) 13:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better now, and year 2009 shot. Nice ligth, simbioze of cold tones in air and on the ground. --Mile (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 12:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and 7 for 9 minutes Clin --LivioAndronico talk 17:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Wow!!! Thrilling ending!! Thank you all very much for your support and comments. I'll tell the author that it's been featured. --Kadellar (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Evgenia Kanaeva RUS Olympiasiegerin.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 17:05:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Evgenia Kanaeva, Olympic individual gold medalist
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Grand Prix Rhythmic Gymnastics in Austria (Hard) 2012. Jewgenija Kanajewa Olympic individual gold medalist. -- Bauken77 (talk) 17:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bauken77 (talk) 17:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The figure is nice and the timing good IMO, however it is a bit noisy and the size already small don't allow a downsampling. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 18:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fantastic action shot! Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 22:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 👍👏 ArionEstar (talk) 00:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 08:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nice and very good. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:15, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose RG is a beautiful, underappreciated sport and by rights we should have a dozen FPs of it. So I'd very much like to support a picture this well composed. However, as noted above, it is noisy and I also find the gymnast's lower legs to be unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case. Really nice shot but too noisy and unsharp – I’d excuse this on a 24 mpix image but this is less than 3 mpix! Not an FP to me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 05:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:San Juan Valley.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 15:13:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Juan Valley
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support San Juan Bautista Valley is located on Isla Margarita on the hillside Copey (La Sierra) at a height of 1,000 meters above sea level. Because of its mild climate and its quiet mountain town has the slogan Silence laborious and evergreen .All by -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great work! --Hubertl (talk) 16:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little unsharp along the ridgeline at the far right, but I'll chalk that one up to the mist. Overall an ideal image to put on the desktop in the winter months in temperate latitudes. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is there a haze in the background? Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
It had rained a few hours before, I am inclined to think that this is Drizzle. Formerly back hills were full of clouds, however, for some climatic effect clouds have disappeared to make way for this Drizzle and foggy, five years to the present --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:NLA, Lausanne HC vs. Rapperswil-Jona Lakers, 11th November 2014 03.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 13:53:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pascal Caminada, goalkeeper of the LHC, facing the puck during a game against Rapperswil-Jona

This is a picture of Pascal Caminada, goalkeeper of the Lausanne HC, facing the puck during a LNA game against Rapperswil-Jona -- Pleclown (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the tension of this picture -- Pleclown (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very good shot. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:14, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Fabienp (talk) 16:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better and difficult than the gymnastics one here in FPC, why one gets support and the other one doesn't remains a mystery. --Kadellar (talk) 17:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 05:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow with a strong EV. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Metalmania 2007 TYR Terji Skibenas 001.jpg (delist), not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2014 at 19:08:13
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Image by Lilly M. I rarely start delisting nominations, but I think this one doesn't meet the criteria to be FP. Imo, too noisy (and not the best settings, 1/50 is imho too much), poor composition (hands cut, for example; too much space at the top), bad lighting (that's not photographer's fault, but good light is necessary to make it impressive in some way). (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Kadellar (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist No doubt. -- Ram-Man 02:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Mile (talk) 08:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --El Grafo (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light source at the top balances the composition. Adding a HDR effect may make the picture look brighter, but the noise will be more visible. Enough good photo. Abrimaal (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Not a bad shot but noisy, noisy, noisy. --Kreuzschnabel 18:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Don't be afraid of a seeing little noise in the dark Kreuz. Only be afraid when hearing noises in the dark. :) Peter Chiapperino (talk) 01:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree in part with Abrimaal. The noise isn't that bad and does not disturb me. I would have left out the light spot for a more pleasing color balance though. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist The shutter speed is slow causing motion blur. Peter Chiapperino (talk) 01:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Jules Grandgagnage & Abrimaal - as far as keeping the light in there; it has more to do with composition then making the picture look brighter- its a dark picture, and thats okay. If I were to take this shot, I too would have kept the light in there, however, I would have gotten the entire guitar as well. That's what's missing in this shot. Peter Chiapperino (talk) 01:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)



Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Tue 18 Nov → Sun 23 Nov
Wed 19 Nov → Mon 24 Nov
Thu 20 Nov → Tue 25 Nov
Fri 21 Nov → Wed 26 Nov
Sat 22 Nov → Thu 27 Nov
Sun 23 Nov → Fri 28 Nov

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Thu 13 Nov → Sun 23 Nov
Fri 14 Nov → Mon 24 Nov
Sat 15 Nov → Tue 25 Nov
Sun 16 Nov → Wed 26 Nov
Mon 17 Nov → Thu 27 Nov
Tue 18 Nov → Fri 28 Nov
Wed 19 Nov → Sat 29 Nov
Thu 20 Nov → Sun 30 Nov
Fri 21 Nov → Mon 01 Dec
Sat 22 Nov → Tue 02 Dec
Sun 23 Nov → Wed 03 Dec