Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Abwahl-Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Abwahl-Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,93 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es, exzellent zu sein) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht, exzellent zu sein).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Contents

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Paris Palais du Luxembourg façade s printemps 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2014 at 20:34:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are two FPs of the Palais du Luxembourg, but this one is very beautiful too. The sky, the fontaine, the people, the trees gives a nice atmosphere.-- Paris 16 (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Norbert Kiss - GP Camión de España 2013 - 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2014 at 19:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Truck pilot Norbert Kiss at the Spain Truck GP 2013.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Truck pilot Norbert Kiss at the Spain Truck GP 2013 (panning shot). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Munich subway station Westfriedhof.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2014 at 16:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Munich subway station Westfriedhof
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Munich subway station Westfriedhof- all by --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and a suggestion. What if you crop the lower part until you get 1:2 ratio? I feel that if the black line on the floor ends closer to the corner of the image it will look nicer. --Kadellar (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • I made the same suggestion (perhaps 16:9) earlier today (see note). Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 20:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow ! And per Kadellar.--Jebulon (talk) 21:00, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive --Jamez42 (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Rumex pictus 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2014 at 14:54:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rumex pictus
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch für das Deutsche Reich.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2014 at 12:42:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cover of old book

File:Shepherds Bow - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2014 at 22:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Ukrainian religious painting, from an iconostasis, showing the Adoration of the Shepherds. Tempera on wood, between 1650 and 1700.

File:2014.03.29.-08-Mannheim Neckarau Waldpark-Wiesen-Schaumkraut.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2014 at 20:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Photo is oversaturated imo. It looks very unnatural, especially the grasses behind. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 03:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2014 at 09:29:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok

File:St Etheldreda's Church 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2014 at 22:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:St Etheldreda's Church 1, London, UK - Diliff.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Diliff - uploaded by User:Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Underexposed Symbol support vote.svg Support Colin and you are right, we need this exposure to see the windows --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    • It's supposed to be dark like that to keep the original atmosphere of the interior. It wasn't accidental underexposure. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice for me --Pudelek (talk) 09:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree about the light levels -- dark oak should be dark, not HDR mid-tan. The contrast with File:St Stephen Walbrook Church Interior 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg is strong -- this is an old dark church. One suggestion, though, is to nominate this and the File:St Etheldreda's Church 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg west view as a set. -- Colin (talk) 10:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • That's true. Is it possible to change a single nomination into a set without introducing all kinds of confusion? There's so much code in Commons FPC that I'm a bit unsure about how to do it properly. Diliff (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Colin --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Could you please consider an horizontal perspective correction ? The shoals should be horizontal, IMO (see note). Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't think it's as simple as that. I'm not sure why they are not horizontal image but it could even be that they are not not actually physically aligned perfectly with the aisle (unlikely, but possible). Usually when the verticals are corrected and the centre of the panorama is defined accurately (which it is, I think), then any horizontal lines which are parallel with the plane of the camera remain straight and horizontal. If they do not, I usually suspect there is actually a genuine reason for it. Also, I made a panorama looking towards the back of the church and the pews lean in exactly the same way for that panorama too. Yes, it's possible that I made a mistake in my technique somewhere, but I don't think so. I've made many similar panoramas without any such issues, and I don't think that my equipment could be the cause of an issue. I'm using a quality 35mm lens with virtually no distortion (and what distortion it does have, I correct in Lightroom), and I'm using a panoramic head so there should not be any stitching or alignment errors that could introduce a lean. In any case, I don't think it's possible to 'correct' them without introducing distortion or leaning elsewhere in the image. Diliff (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Thank you for quick and detailed answer. I'm sorry if I'm not convinced by your explanation. I have to look at this more carefuly, but I've never seen shoals like this before, so far from the altar. No logical reason.--Jebulon (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
      • Well, regardless of whether you are convinced, I don't see that it is an easy correction to make without affecting other parts of the image. Changing the tilt of the seating will affect other true horizontal lines. Also, what exactly do you mean by shoal? See the typical English use here, which doesn't have much relevance to a church. ;-) Diliff (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
        • lol ! Shame to Google translator ! Sorrysorrysorry ! The "collective seats" are named "bancs", in french. You link me to another meaning of "bancs", and I made the mistake ! Thanks for correction.--Jebulon (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 21:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:St Stephen Walbrook Church Interior 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2014 at 22:29:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:St Stephen Walbrook Church Interior 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Diliff - uploaded by User:Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition is cut down --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    • What does 'cut down' mean? If you mean cropped, then yes, I carefully cropped the image to get the framing I wanted. But what specifically about the composition makes you oppose? Diliff (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes, the seats are cut, that's what I mean --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Capturing the whole of an interior like this is not easy. The wide angle-of-view can lead to all sorts of stretched and distorted forms, and features such as columns and chandeliers can look awful. This image shows a good control of these problems and has a strong three-dimensional feel. The level of detail is great, as one would expect from Diliff, and the bright natural lighting is handled well. -- Colin (talk) 10:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question We have one round oculus (close right to the pulpit) , and several oval oculi. Is it normal, or is it a perspective deformation ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • It is normal. Only the 'central' oculus is round, the rest are genuinely oval-shaped. I think they are progressively more oval shaped, but I'm not sure and did not pay enough attention at the time. There may be some perspective distortions at the periphery but nothing that would make a circle look so oval-shaped. 14:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • OK, convinced. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and following Wilfredo's complaints, I feel that if we could see a bit more of the bench, it would be better, but it's FP for me anyway. --Kadellar (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2014 at 07:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harris Hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus) in Wildpark Johannismühle, Brandenburg, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by A.Savin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 07:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great, but maybe a portrait crop would be even better. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 08:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much in shadow and want a more detailed image from a captive bird at FP. -- Colin (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Notable chromatic noise under the wings and on the breast. Not sharp enough, sorry. No offense Colin, but I don't see why it should be more detailed because captive: anyway, the bird is as mobile as in the nature, no ? It is not a stuffed specimen...--Jebulon (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    Not less sharp than some of building photographs getting promoted here (and also supported by you sometimes); yes, quite mobile birdy which does not stand still for more than some seconds; and - yes, some noise but certainly not chromatic (=colour) one. --A.Savin 19:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    Don't be angry ! I know what "chromatic" means, I learnt ancient greek when I was young, and the word is the same in French. So, there is chromatic noise, as I said. And I find the bird, especialy the face, not sharp enough, sorry. And yes, I've probably made mistakes in my votes. Didn't you ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    Actually, I think A.Savin is right, there is noise but it's not chromatic. Chromatic noise would be a mixture of red, blue and green blotches. There's very little of that in the image. It's just luminance noise. Diliff (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    I don't buy the "we have promoted images that are worse than this" argument you've raised here and in another photo. That some weak images get through isn't an reason to promote another weak image. If that argument held, we'd be on a downward spiral towards mediocrity. Perhaps we are :-(. I'd be very surprised if any 10MP unsharp building image got promoted these days. Comparing building and animal photography is pretty silly anyway. Jebulon, a captive bird can be trained to land and stay quite close to people. So it it would be possible to get as close as one desired and the keeper/circumstances allow. With a wild bird, one would be happy to even get the bird to fill the frame of a huge zoom lens. We have lots of highly-detailed head-portraits of captive birds of prey, for example. -- Colin (talk) 21:35, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition, nice moment, nice pose. Well done --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IMHO not sharp enough for a bird FP. The level of detail is relatively poor - even at the sharper areas. Also f/5 at 130mm could be a problem - the claws a very unsharp. Light is not really good, the background is bumpy. --Tuxyso (talk) 05:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 08:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I just don't see this as one of our finest works, particularly in the bird category. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 21:00, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Trompe l oeil Emperor's Courtyard Residenz Munich.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 15:59:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trompe l'Oeil in Residenz, Munich.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This facade is flat, round windows are fakes, it is just a trompe l'oeil painting, as a restoration work. Emperor's Courtyard of the Residenz, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.-- Jebulon (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. And the man in the archway is perfectly posed. Or is he fake too? :-) -- Colin (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, what a good idea ! I'll think of it next time ! --Jebulon (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition with harmony feels :) --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 07:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking shot. --Baresi F (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 08:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great! I should have had this idea myself and already a long time ago. Yet I didn't. Good work, Jebulon! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Thanks Martin Falbisoner. That's because I was a tourist, with a "new eye". I'm fan of pictures of Paris by non Parisians: they see some things I've never seen before ! Anyway: Es lebe München !--Jebulon (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 21:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not the quality I'd wish for a building photo. Missing sharpness; artefacts. Not very much wow for me, so I'd have abstained if it at least was a real QI. --A.Savin 21:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment See discussion regarding the picture just above in order to understand what this vote means in real ...--Jebulon (talk) 21:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
      • Your assumption is wrong. This picture is really unsharp, if examined at 100 percent. If it wasn't unsharp, I'd have not voted here at all; because this picture is not that interesting to me to take time to review (matter of taste; therefore it would be unfair to oppose just because of this). Believe me or not, but I find "revenge votes" sort of kindergarten behaviour and I don't practice them. Maybe you do; but nonetheless please do not judge others by your own standards. --A.Savin 21:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
        • "believe me or not" ? I don't believe you, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 22:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
          • Which also means that these are indeed your own standards. Well, OK, thanks for the info, I'll acknowledge. --A.Savin 05:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
            •  ?!! I don't understand the philosophical correlation, but...no matter, in fact.--Jebulon (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
      • I agree the image isn't as sharp as we might want and we have lots of megapixel stitched architecture images that show greater detail than this. But unlike QI, FP is judged for wow and artistic qualities which can mitigate against technical issues. When I saw this picture I went wow, both for the effect of the subject itself and also the pose of the man in the archway. It makes a great picture overall. This is the heart of FP, not pixel peeping. But everyone sets their thresholds and balances at different levels so I can accept some think the technical deficiencies (whether sharpness or noise) are too much. -- Colin (talk) 10:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
        • About sharpness: please remember this is not "architecture", but "painting". What you see is a flat wall, one cannot compare with any other facade. The painted lines are not as "pin" if it was a real relief (on purpose IMO).--Jebulon (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
          • I appreciate that, and studied the real bits too. There is some grain/noise that removes sharpness -- not sure if due to processing like Tuxyo suggests. But ultimately I guess we are looking a raw captured pixels rather than a downsized image, and it is rarely perfect at that level. Maybe you should try your hand at stitched panorama! -- Colin (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
          • I don't think I'm able ! Actually I don't know how to do. But since a few day, I work with some collaborators who know how to do, and I'll ask them (they make professional interactive panorama pictures ! You point at a spot, and you have a close-up !). I'll see what kind of softwares they use.--Jebulon (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I added a comment about that in FP talk --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Please Wilfredo, don't involve yourself in this farce. A.Savin wrote: "I'd have abstained if it at least was a real QI". Right ? Now, have a big laugh when looking at the candidacy of this picture in QIC. Funny, isn't it ? --Jebulon (talk) 23:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (weak) I also like the innovative composition as said by other reviews. But imho the problem of the photo is the bad light. It looks for me as if you extremely pushed the shadow parts of the building which lead to some unfavorable noise at the facade. Probably you just excluded the sky because it had been burnt out due to back light. For a photo with a strong accentuation on the structure of the facade it is not crisp enough. --Tuxyso (talk) 04:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    • "excluded the sky because it had been burnt out due to back light": well possible; see this small burnt area behind the arch. --A.Savin 05:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
      • Nothing is burnt, see histogram.--Jebulon (talk) 09:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 21:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow imo. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 03:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Not sure some people actually know what Trompe-l'œil means Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 02 Panorama.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2014 at 07:19:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fog over Erlauf river, seen from Blassenstein mountain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Also see the original nomination. Created by User:Uoaei1 - uploaded by User:Uoaei1 - nominated by Uoaei1 -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Baresi F (talk) 08:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 08:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better. Yann (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Caecilius Mauß (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I still think cropping along the top of the dark clouds makes a much more dramatic picture -- the shaft of light from the left then forces the eye into the clouds in the middle of the picture and the dark clouds then frame the picture rather than having a distracting bright part in the top left or blue part in the top right. If you don't want as extreme as 3:1 then keeping the bottom but cropping the top is still better imo. -- Colin (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! --King of ♠ 18:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 04:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 08:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 21:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Am I the only one who feels it is slightly tilted? I added a note. --Kadellar (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Alternative Crop[edit]

Fog over Erlauf river, seen from Blassenstein mountain

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Uoaei1 - uploaded by Uoaei1 - nominated by Uoaei1 -- Uoaei1 (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is a very nice scene but the crop isn't good. Too much sky (and vapour trail) and the nearby rocks are distracting. A 6000x2000 crop as indicated would imo make a great panorama. So I suggest that as an alternative. -- Colin (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thanks for your valuable proposal! I'd rather take a 2:1 crop instead of 3:1, which well-preserves the rule of thirds and some of the details in the foreground (trees disappearing in the fog). What is your opinion about this? --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral While I do love the one area of the trees, I am having a hard time understanding the level of support for this scene (see above). An oppose at this point would be rather arrogant if not petulant. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't understand the logic of this new suggestion. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps because it is the original nomination not a new one. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Summer fields near Rosehearty, Aberdeenshire, Scotland - pomprint.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 06:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summer fields near Rosehearty, Aberdeenshire, Scotland - pomprint.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Steve Allen - uploaded by TeleComNasSprVen - nominated by TeleComNasSprVen -- TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In thumbnail view, oversatured, white balance... --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree the green is a bit vivid but don't see any white balance issue. I've suggested a 2.4:1 crop that I think is much stronger. -- Colin (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Sure, but would it be more appropriate to upload a crop as a separate file derivative work? I wouldn't want to touch the original, to keep the loss minimal and other concerns, but if you decide to make a cropped version we can link it here and vote on that. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Of course yes, you could upload in another version in this nomination --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 03:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Because strong oppose doesn't get more weight. This looks like a cartoon due to colours. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I'm new to the FP process, but why is looking like a "cartoon" a problem for an image? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
The colours are oversaturated. While I am here... not fond of the crop/composition either... image is split in half. Saffron Blaze (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Beat Zberg TdF2006.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 05:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Beat Zberg during the prologue of the Tour de France 2006

File:Saturn diagram.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 02:24:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diagram of the planet Saturn
  • Hmm...not sure who's fault is it. Could it be the brightness of your screen? I usually adjust mine to the optimal level for FP or QI voting, and on my screen the colours of the 3 Saturns you've given still look darker than the Saturn in your diagram. :/ --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 00:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • They look pretty similar to me but there's no good way to compare them & my diagram bc the lighting's different in each one. Is this really such a sticking point for you??—Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Please don't forget my spanish version. Thanks --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
@Wilfredor: ✓ DoneFile:Diagrama de Saturno.svgLove, Kelvinsong talk 17:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Smiley.svg Thank you --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
nppp!!!—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa)-3 new.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 00:47:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative[edit]

Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa).jpg

File:16 wood samples.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2014 at 20:23:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

16 types of wood

File:Stadthalle Mülheim Panorama Blaue Stunde 02 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2014 at 19:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Town Event Hall ("Stadthalle") of Mülheim an der Ruhr at blue hour
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, too dark. Yann (talk) 07:41, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
    • IMHO it is not that bad, even dark structures are still visible. Yann, have you looked on the correct version? Yesterday I've uploaded a brighter version, probably you've seen an old version in the cache. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too dark. Trust us on this one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Daniel it is not the question if I trust you and Yann or not. If it is the perception of you then I take it seriously. Nonetheless a few questions: What is the best brightness for such a shot? As you can see it is not a classical cityscape - you have only lights which brighten the main building and few lights at the left part of the bridge - the dark parts are trees. In short: Longer exposure with HDR or earlier shot? I've exposed in a way that the bright parts of the building are barely not burnt. Additionaly the sun sets behind the right part of the building thus you have at the beginning of the blue hour a strong brightness gradient on the sky. Another possibility had been to take the shot early in the morning before sunrise (sun behind me), but I do not know if the nice lighting of the building is there at that time. What would you suggest? --Tuxyso (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, the darkness is correct. It is night, and this emphasizes the situation. A night shot, in which can be seen more than is lit, I think is unrealistic. This composition with the lights reflected in the water and the rest of the twilight hour I find a good balance.--XRay talk 08:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
There's no EV in this one because we can't really see the shape of the building behind the lights. Therefore the darkness is not correct. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Yann, Daniel, XRay and others: I am always surprised about the dynamic range of my D7000. I've created an alternative version with shadow and brightness correction. IMHO noise stays at an acceptable level:
    Stadthalle Mülheim Panorama Blaue Stunde 02 2014 Alternative.jpg. Do you think that version is better and could have a chance here? --Tuxyso (talk) 08:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Town Event Hall ("Stadthalle") of Mülheim an der Ruhr at blue hour

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Alternative nomination, with improved shadow details. After certain consideration I also think that this one is better than the previous nom. I look forward to your comments. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 18:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support So ... much ... better! I love the eight-point flares around the street lamps and the reflections in the river! Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically sound but monotonous due to the one colour of light. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Hôtel des Invalides, North View, Paris 7e 140402 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2014 at 10:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by DXR - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 10:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice but needs a 0.3° rotation to make the horizontals level. -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 19:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks again, Tomer. I personally like this image, but I was slightly worried about the fences. Colin, I have followed your suggestion and removed the tilt. --DXR (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 21:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 05:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't remember that using a tripod was possible here (cars...) Nice symmetry. --Kadellar (talk) 21:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Redningsbåden køres gennem klitterne (high resolution).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2014 at 10:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Lifeboat is Taken through the Dunes by Michael Ancher

File:The flower of a Trichosanthes cucumerina in hand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2014 at 07:44:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The flower of a Trichosanthes cucumerina in hand

File:An ocean of motion about Spanish commotions or the windy explosion of pot-hous oration LCCN2003681692.tiff[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2014 at 15:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cartoon of British views on the war against Spain, Pyne 1790-1810.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William Pyne, scanned by the Library of Congress - uploaded by
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator; see this jpeg version if you prefer to use the Commons ZoomViewer. This is a difficult document to digitize due to size (45 inches or 1.14 metres wide) and this is part of the reason for nominating it as an exemplar of the excellent work of the archivists at the Library of Congress in releasing the British Cartoon Prints Collection. Pyne was notable for establishing the Royal Watercolour Society. This cartoon is historically significant as it was made at the time of the Anglo-Spanish War (1796–1808) showing stereotypes of the Spanish as expressed by different classes of the British population. It is a rare example of William Pyne's humorous cartoons (the only political cartoon of his that I can find on Commons), the majority of his published work being palace illustrations and British costumes. The digitization shows detail of costumes and characters, sufficient for each to be taken as a separate detailed illustration. The full size image shows natural foxing due to age, and creases from being folded up, which it was designed to do, but these do not detract from the impact or quality of the etchings. The main humour of the text is to poke fun at the Spanish, with the cobbler calling them "fish-eating rascals" and the journalists for the Spanish Gazette having nothing to report (on the left) while the British cryers (on the right) are exhausted from having ten years worth of incidents to report in one day. I would hope that a consequence of bringing attention to this cartoon would be to help improve Wikipedia articles about Pyne, at the moment the article about his life exists only in English and is a stub. -- (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Remember add a short description in image hint look up .tiff|600x300px|SHORT DESCRIPTION]] --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Missed that, added one now. -- (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Capilla de Lourdes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2014 at 15:01:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Capilla de Lourdes
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice scene but overprocessed and soft at 6MP. Why are the colours so different in File:Lourdes Chapel.jpg which appears to be the same photo but without the bird removed. The trees in the nomination photo have a white outline against the sky, compared to the other photo. The sloping white faces of the church are near white in the second photo but considerably darker in this nomination, suggesting the highlights are lowered too much -- a white surface facing the sun would be expected to be white. This makes the tonal range compressed. The scene could be fantastic at a slightly better time of year when the trees are less bare. -- Colin (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The other version is a pratice test with CaptureNX2 without real colors and with a fake bird. You can download the NEF file and try by yourself develope the jpg, if you want (you can find the link in file description) --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not particularly impressed that this is the second fake you've uploaded to Commons. At least File:Lourdes Chapel.jpg now admits this, but wouldn't it be better to request its deletion. -- Colin (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This nomination is not a fake. Why delete File:Lourdes Chapel.jpg? If you consider that in commons should not be altered images, please also nominates all pictures in Photomontages of animals and Photomontages, You are free to nominate it to deletion. ;). By the way, it's a good idea to focus on this nomination. A hug --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Crown Queens Bavaria Schatzkammer Residenz Munich.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2014 at 14:33:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crown of the Queens of Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Biennais, Nitot and Leblond - Photographied, uploaded and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support New in "Commons", a masterpiece of the french 19th-century jewelry, made in Paris for Queens of Bavaria in 1806-1807 (altered in 1867), when the bavarian electorate was erected as a kingdom, allied of Napoleon. In use until 1918. Gold, silver, pearls, diamonds and other gems. On display (behind a glass...) at the "Schatzkammer", in the Residenz of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.-- Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. IMO it would better with the full base (at the bottom).--XRay talk 16:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Frankly, such a reason for oppose to this kind of image leaves me speechless...--Jebulon (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
      • Ups. Sorry. It's a good picture, but IMO it looks incomplete with a significant part of the base.--XRay talk 17:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you elaborate a bit on the shooting conditions? I obviously have no business with this sort of photography and will therefore not make a vote, but the exif leaves me a bit wondering. Did you hand-hold it for 0.2s or could you push it against something stable? It looks a bit soft (in the sense of denoised) to me for a ISO 400 image. --DXR (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Speechless again... Lack of base of the cushion, and questions about Exif Data, that's only what suggests this picture ? I took this image hand hold (or maybe I used the glass as stable surface, I don't remember). I post processed with Lightroom5, and after that with GIMP. I used luminance and color denoising with Lightroom5, adjusted sharpness a very little, and the white balance too. After that, with GIMP, I used the selective blur tool in order to correct the noise of some pearls, one after the other. I removed some disturbing elements in background by cloning out, and corrected the perspective a very little bit. This image was taken without tripod nor flash in a museum full of tourists, behind a glass, it is as difficult as it is interesting, a real challenge.--Jebulon (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
      • I'm not looking to get into an argument here, but I'm not sure you should be "speechless" that an image of a crown, even if it's admittedly a beautiful one, will not blow everyone of his feet if nominated as a commons FP. As I said, I will refrain from voting, but I think my question regarding the quality was legitimate and your comments help assess the quality of your work here in a postive way. --DXR (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The fact that it was challenging to capture this picture does not add any value to the photo. Photographers often mistakenly think it does but I'm afraid it doesn't. Some get rewarded because they were lucky, some work hard and and the outcome is slightly above the average. That's life.. --85.253.101.104 21:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    Nonsense imo. Of course it makes a difference, but IP commenters have usually presented themselves to be fairly stubborn in their opinions, so what's the point of debating here... --DXR (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    • As for me, I just asked for assessments, nothing else. I gave explanations because I was asked for. I don't think long discussions make a photo better (I tend to think the contrary). Shall I suppress Exif Data next time ? That's the question... Something like "Love it, or leave it"--Jebulon (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For once I'm not bothered by the bottom crop ... because the base blends so well into the background that you might not notice unless it's pointed out. And, really, the crown captures so much attention you won't mind. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 10:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support given the circumstances quality is very decent. High EV! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The cropped base allows the attention to concentrate on the crown. Enough of the base is there to let the imagination (our brain) 'see' the missing part. Very good technical quality and high EV. --Cayambe (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Mallard duck and her 12 chicks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 20:42:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mallard duck and 12 chicks
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charles (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support Nice. It's really good, but it would be better to nominate this image as quality image first.--XRay talk 16:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose A whole lot of technical issues. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
    •  ? ? Did you smoke something forbidden ? Clin --Jebulon (talk) 10:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject about banal, photograph banal, nothing extraordinary nor outstanding. Could it really be "the best of "Commons" ? Not FP-worthy, sorry. A decent QI, nevertheless.--Jebulon (talk) 10:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Terrace of the Lions 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 17:06:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Terrace of the Lions in Delos, Greece
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bgag - uploaded by Bgag - nominated by Bgag -- Bgag (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bgag (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very well known place, but I find this perspective interesting, and I like this composition very much. Maybe a crop below would help ? FP anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 14:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurasian Bullfinch, Pyrrhula pyrrhula, female
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really very nice, well done. I remember being camouflaged for hours at the mercy of bloodsucking mosquitoes in the jungle of Margarita Island for a poor decision. Sometimes it is simply a matter of luck --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Wilfredo. It would be worth putting up with a lot to get a lucky shot like that :) --Baresi F (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
In certain circumstances, it is about making a burst of 100 pictures, and then do the big task of evaluating each photograph. Nice Shoot, you are welcome --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ArildV (talk) 11:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We have so many birds, that the bar is very high... I can only oppose when it has chromatic noise on the "shoulders" (see note)--Jebulon (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out Jebulon, as I'd definitely missed it. I've uploaded a new version with the chroma noise reduced - is it any better? comment of Baresi franco who forget sign
Yes, it is better, and I'm proud if my comment made the picture better, but I still see something... Anyway, I'm not a good judge anymore. I've seen a flaw once, and now I only see this part of your picture, sorry...--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Human nature. :) We may not see the flaws initially, but when we eventually spot it, we keep focusing on that. I've had this experience many time before. ;) --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Mosquito coil.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 05:49:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosquito coil.JPG

File:Vista de Teruel desde la torre de la iglesia del Salvador, España, 2014-01-10, DD 82.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2014 at 04:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Teruel at dusk from the tower of the Church of St. Salvador, Aragón, Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of Teruel at dusk from the tower of the Church of St. Salvador, Aragón, Spain. All by me, Poco2 04:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 04:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joydeep Talk 08:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 10:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you try a tighter crop ? (and maybe work on the perspective, as the window in front is not aligned) Pleclown (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
    I saw your point, I uploaded a new version with an improved perspective Poco2 20:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg SupportPleclown (talk) 12:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 2 dustspots (see notes) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Cleaned, thanks, Poco2 20:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good compo but I'm not a fan of the light. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:2013 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S (991) (9626546987).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2014 at 17:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

2013 Porsche 911 (Type 991) Carrera 4S coupe
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by David Villarreal Fernández - uploaded by AVIA BavARia - nominated by FAEP -- FAEP (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- FAEP (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bottom-up view is not the best possible shooting angle + distracting foreground as a result of the bottom-up view. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The angle ot the view is ok, the quality is ok, but the foreground is distracting and the licence plate is tilted. -- -donald- (talk) 07:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Outstanding --EveryPicture (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the angle, which makes the shot special. Also, the colors fit well overall. Great image! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the quality, the angle and the surroundings. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:51, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  ■ MMXX talk 21:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Cirque de Mourèze, Hérault 37.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2014 at 15:21:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dolomite rock
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A dolomite rock in a funny shape sculptured by the erosion. Mourèze, Hérault, France. Another try with this subject after that and that. All by Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 13 april 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 13 april 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joydeep Talk 08:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one has the best composition and lighting. --King of ♠ 10:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still NO WOW :( --Kikos (talk) 12:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As before. I don't see how sticking a slightly unusual rock on a rule-of-thirds line makes an FP. Nor how taking the same photograph a few steps closer has changed things dramatically since the previous nominations. What's so great about the composition and lighting? Or the subject? The world is full of funny shaped rocks. Some of them are notable. -- Colin (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great candidate for QI, but not FP. Nothing special about the shape of the rock and the rock doesn't resemble anything. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Frankly, I think that the negative comments here are too strong. It is not very fair to shout "NO WOW", and not very polite neither. This image is very good to me, very well composed, with good light and sharpness. The subject is interesting enough and has high geological value. As for me, it deserves the seal, like the tons of birds or landscapes or "blue hour" views we promote so often...--Jebulon (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, frankly, I think submitting more-or-less the same unexciting image to FP three times is "not very polite" and just gaming the system. What if everyone did this in the hope that one time the previous opposers might be on holiday or grow tired of opposing? This is a long way from the most impressive example of rock formations in the region (try Google). So are we to expect every funny looking rock in the region to get nominated here? I await Cirque de Mourèze, Hérault 3745.jpg. This is just a QI. The camera did its job. The purpose of FP is to select our finest images, not to pat Christian on the back because this attempt is slightly better than the last one. -- Colin (talk) 08:08, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 06:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I had seen photos with less wow factor get rubber-stamped on FPC, probably just due to the name of the photographer. In general: yes to a higher threshold, but then please for everyone. Still, this is a nice landscape and I had supported a similar version some time ago; so it's just consequent to support this one either. --A.Savin 14:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Caecilius Mauß (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, I don't see anything special in this one but a nice light. QI, but not FP. --Kadellar (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Front de Seine as seen from Pont Mirabeau 140412 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2014 at 12:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Paris 16
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oops, that's wow indeed. --A.Savin 12:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Colours look artificial. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks a lot to Paris 16 for the nomination! I agree that the colors were somewhat off, I adjusted the purple tint and reduced overall saturation slightly. Apart from that, I do not consider the colors artificial (obviously, the scene is a bit brighter than reality to better illustrate the scene, but I think I have the freedom to do that). From previous comments, I assume that Pierre might still disagree, but that's fine for me. --DXR (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose with Pierre Selim. I'm sorry for the following DR, but too many of these buildings are protected by copyright. There is no Freedom of Panorama in France. --Jebulon (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • no problem with copyright here, no prolems with colours, very nice view, good technical accomplishment, but I am not happy with some strong overexposed parts, especially the area of the Statue of Liberty and surrounding. The strong flashlight at top of the Eiffel Tower and some not very important illuminated advertising I`m willing to excuse. But the mentioned area is eye-catching and should be reprocessesed IMO. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Wladyslaw, I agree with you that it is not ideal, but you should keep in mind that bridge is extremely bright while the buildings are only illuminated by ambient light. I have already tried all what can be done with normal raw files and I think the result is borderline but just acceptable, although I understand other opinions here. In principle, HDRs could solve that, but that will probably cause a massive mess with the water, especially when stiched. Perhaps this conflict could be avoided by shooting earlier (I will certainly do this in the future), this was not possible on that day since a cruise ship was turning in the river, pretty much destroying the scene. --DXR (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Can you try partial HDR only in this mentioned areas? I know it's much work. I agree with you that HDR will destroy the water, this is here definitivly a highlight. So I thought about partial work. -- -donald- (talk) 07:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately I do not have the exact frame in different exposures, so HDR is not really an option here. The only possiblity would be cloning these areas from a slightly different frame. This would certainly take hours if done very well on my desktop with a fast processor and a good mouse, but unfortunately I cannot access this PC until the end of May since it is at my home in Germany. I have tried it on my slightly old laptop but the results are just not good enough in gimp since everything is just lagging and precise operations are very difficult when dealing with such large files. --DXR (talk) 12:05, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes of course, I thought about new pictures. -- -donald- (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
I will take more photos, but not sure whether they will make their way to commons given the issues with FoP. If they come out well, I'll probably upload them at the Wikipedias that are less restrictive... --DXR (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Copyright concerns alleviated by cityscape, making everything de minimis. Otherwise excellent. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Naqsh-e Jahan Square by Pascal Coste 1 Ver2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 15:45:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Naqsh-e Jahan Square by Pascal Coste 1 Ver2.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pascal Coste, Monfie - uploaded by Monfie - nominated by Monfie -- Monfie (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Monfie (talk) 15:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 15:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Problems with white balance and irreal sky color and tones, Remember upload color enhanced in another file version without overwrite the original version. Thanks --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 05:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Clockery Fairfeld who, me? 17:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Strongly Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, strongly per Wilfredor.--Jebulon (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Alborzagros (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • strong Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very hard to review, the new version have very different colours and the source link dosnt work for me. For a historical work of art, I expect that the reproduction is as faithful as possible. The image is also cropped!--ArildV (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
This is the the original version I got directly from source. I remind you: First of all This image is not cropped. Second, Even if you see images from original source, it is not faithful. This small water paint has been drawn on a piece of paper about 200 years ago. During the time paper color became dark yellow to brown (If you see unretouched black and white images of this book, you can see this effect much better). The paints color has been changed as well during time. Therefore after changing some tones, not 100% sure but I believe it is more likely to the original image at the time it has been drawn. You can see drawings, specially sky, is much more clear than before.Monfie (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Not cropped? The original version have more sky.--ArildV (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose modifications (crop and color changes) alter the original significantly and beyond what I think is reasonable. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

Naqsh-e Jahan Square by Pascal Coste 1 edited.jpg

File:Memorial J Kubitschek Brasilia 2009.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 13:18:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I am Brazilian. I like Brasilia (or Brasília, in Portuguese) and the works of the city, the federal capital of Brazil. ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 21:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- For sure..The Herald 16:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cayambe, I think the composition is good but I am missing sharpness, specially in the monument itself. Imo the other picture linked in the description is much better (and far sharper). --Kadellar (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Roque Agando, Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 13:15:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roque Agando (Agando rock) belongs to the Garajonay National Park (UNESCO World Heritage Site) and is not far from San Sebastián de la Gomera, capital of the island of La Gomera, Canary Islands, Spain. This 1251 m high volcanic plug is one of the landmarks of the island and has a prominence of 180 m (220 m from the south side).
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Roque Agando (Agando rock) belongs to the Garajonay National Park (UNESCO World Heritage Site) and is not far from San Sebastián de la Gomera, capital of the island of La Gomera, Canary Islands, Spain. This 1251 m high volcanic plug is one of the landmarks of the island and has a prominence of 180 m (220 m from the south side). All by me, Poco2 13:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi Poco, What about geolocation and altitude?. And could be nice too see interwikis in description. Thanks --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ There you go: altitude is already documented in the description here, I also copied it and translated in the file page. I added 16 iws in the file description, along with the geodata. Poco2 05:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose more environment/syntax please: to tide crop. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with the user above. A bit tight and awkward composition. WLMBP (talk) 10:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Invalid vote, User has less than 50 edits, sorry --DXR (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. The extra space at the left really made a difference. --King of ♠ 10:44, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but are the gray patches clouds? I think I have commented something similar in prior QIs or so. I looks a bit awkward imo (though not really disturbing). Just to check, are these things also visible in the unedited raw file? --DXR (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
    Hi DXR, I assume that that was a cloud but cannot 100% say it with certaincy. I will not be able to look up the RAW file until Sunday, sorry. Poco2 06:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
    Never mind, as I said, just a minor thing. --DXR (talk) 09:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ArildV (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Animales-aiguamolls l'emporda-2013 (8).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 08:38:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 04:11:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault, France.

File:Backlit Margarita Island Sunset in Las Guevaras, Venezuela.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 03:13:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blacklight Margarita Island Sunsat in Las Guevaras, Venezuela
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Stepping back to neutral after a review in QIC. The quality is just not at FP level, the lower part of he picture looks like painted. Poco2 17:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
This version is not in QIC :) --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer 15:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be the next Bliss. Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Beautiful, but technically just okay, imo. --DXR (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. Dull and not the best of sunsets or sunset pictures I've seen. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:13, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Joydeep Talk 08:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Quote: "almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others". A pretty picture, but that's it. Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With Kleuske, even if it is not forbidden to support a sunset picture !--Jebulon (talk) 20:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Grey highlight. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

CaptureNX version[edit]

Blacklight Margarita Island Sunsat in Las Guevaras, Venezuela CaptureNX
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Powered by DXR commentary, I developed the image again with CaptureNX2 and not Lightroom --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support better! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better! ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 19:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support also prefer this one! --DXR (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 16:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not retracting my !vote for the above image, but I do like this one too. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better. --King of ♠ 05:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great silhouette but the detail in the lower area is almost nonexistent. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice capture but the quality is just not at FP level, the lower part of he picture looks like painted. Poco2 17:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Much better. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better. --JLPC (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Tamme-Lauri_tamm_suvep%C3%A4eval.jpg

File:Erysimum 'Bowles Mauve' 01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2014 at 15:53:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Erysimum 'Bowles Mauve'

✓ Done Something lighter. --Famberhorst (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes ,but I was talking about the general lighting of the moment when you took the picture. Not fixable, sorry. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Kegon Taki.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2014 at 15:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Kegon Waterfall in Japan.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JordyMeow - uploaded by JordyMeow - nominated by JordyMeow -- Jordy Meow (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jordy Meow (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could you add geocoding please? Yann (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    • I have read about the location template but is there a way I can add this in the summary of the image? I am not sure how to do it. Maybe you could edit it to show me the way? The location is 36.738012, 139.502345. - Jordy Meow (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done; check for accuracy. Jee 03:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 07:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dark area in the background really annoying (you should have got rid of it with higher focal distance or getting closer to the waterfall), both sides are pretty blurry, too significant CA, sharpness overall not convincing. Furthermore, IMHO the view looks more spectacular from a higher POV (like here) Poco2 12:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the foreground is to dark, very pity + per Poco. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great color elsewhere is ruined by the foreground shadow. Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- -donald- (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 7.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2014 at 15:08:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cattle at Flumserberg (near Walensee, Switzerland)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Lausanne Sport vs FC Sion - Avril 2014 - Vincent Rüfli & Yoric Ravet.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2014 at 12:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:USO-CAB - 20131130 - Lucas Amorosino 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2014 at 11:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by Pleclown -- Pleclown (talk) 11:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lucas Amorosino is an Argentine rugby player, currently playing for the USO, a club of the french Top 14. This picture was taken during the match opposing USO to CA Brive, which was attended by two accredited photographers, thanks to Wikimedia CH. The ISO rating is quite high, due to the late hour (the sunset was at 16h52 in Oyonnax on this date) and to the necessity to freeze the action (ie. to have a shutter speed of 1/1,250 sec or more), but I think that this doesn't harm much. The player is going to try a coup de pied à suivre (kick for himself) in order to outrun the defensive players on his left. -- Pleclown (talk) 11:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great action shot. Yann (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good moment; but the framing failed. And I see many compelling frames there. Jee 12:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "the framing failed". And for the "many compelling frames", those pictures can be proposed for FP later, right ? :) Pleclown (talk) 12:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    It needs more lead room as the subjects are running to the right. You can crop the "cut" man on left; but difficult to add more space on right. Other picture by you I mentioned seems better in composition. But face of the man in red shirt is not sharp there. I withdrawn other choices as they seem poor in full resolution. Jee 13:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    I see. I will see tonight if I can do something (as the image is cropped). Pleclown (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    I would definetly support File:US Oyonnax vs. CA Brive, 30th November 2013 (7).jpg. The current nomination has no wow for me (just a matter of taste I believe). --PierreSelim (talk) 16:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    PierreSelim, but it is rather noisy and unsharp in full size. Any possibility to repair it? Jee 17:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Jee, I would do something like File:US Oyonnax vs. CA Brive, 30th November 2013 (7)-2.jpg: darken the dark tones, reduce a bit noise and sharpen a bit, however noise will still be there and details are a bit lost. However I believe we are generally too harsh on noise for sports photography, when professional photos are generally full of noise and downsized. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks for your re-work. It is an action pumped moment. :) Jee 17:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    I've thightened the crop. Pleclown (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Jee 02:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Baresi F (talk) 11:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good shot with lots of action. Ball is a little hard to find and highlights on sleeve are a bit blown, but those are trifles. This is one of the best rugby shots we've got ... should be used as a lede image in more articles. Daniel Case (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Sports

File:Chuck Sketch, a Wounded Warrior with the veteran swim team, swims laps during a practice session 120214-M-YO938-177.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2014 at 19:05:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Wounded Warrior in swimming practice before the annual competition
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mark Fayloga - uploaded by
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator. This was a technically challenging shot, taken from below into sunlight, apparently with a colour filter to reduce glare overwhelming the composition. The composition chosen emphasises that Sketch is swimming with no legs, both making this an immediate and slightly discomforting feature of the shot, while providing interesting contrasts of seeing the sky and clouds from underneath the disrupted and coloured water surface. In the people category for FPs, I do not believe there have been any disabled sportsmen or women featured yet, so if this does not pass, it may be worth reviewing the Paralympics and Wounded Warrior categories for other candidates. -- (talk) 19:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hard to judge the technical, but it is a very striking and emotive image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support on EV grounds. And yes; we featured disabled sportsmen earlier. Jee 02:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Thanks for pointing this out, good to know. I had only looked through the People category. -- (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 15:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Baresi F (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pleclown (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Emotive image and good resolution given the tricky conditions, on the other hand the composition, sharpness are not FP to me, sorry Poco2 12:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco. Emotional but not to be FP. Sorry, but author can't challenge this shot.--Kikos (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Clockery Fairfeld who, me? 17:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco and Kikos.--Jebulon (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot --EveryPicture (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco, sorry --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People


Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Wed 16 Apr → Mon 21 Apr
Thu 17 Apr → Tue 22 Apr
Fri 18 Apr → Wed 23 Apr
Sat 19 Apr → Thu 24 Apr
Sun 20 Apr → Fri 25 Apr
Mon 21 Apr → Sat 26 Apr

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Fri 11 Apr → Mon 21 Apr
Sat 12 Apr → Tue 22 Apr
Sun 13 Apr → Wed 23 Apr
Mon 14 Apr → Thu 24 Apr
Tue 15 Apr → Fri 25 Apr
Wed 16 Apr → Sat 26 Apr
Thu 17 Apr → Sun 27 Apr
Fri 18 Apr → Mon 28 Apr
Sat 19 Apr → Tue 29 Apr
Sun 20 Apr → Wed 30 Apr
Mon 21 Apr → Thu 01 May