Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Abwahl-Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Abwahl-Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,93 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es, exzellent zu sein) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht, exzellent zu sein).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Contents

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Zuzana Smatanova-2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2014 at 19:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slovak singer Zuzana Smatanová
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bojars - uploaded by Bojars - nominated by Bojars -- Bojars (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bojars (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it is pretty decent concert photo, but the artist appears for me lack the kind of concentration/charisma/expression, which I expect for it to reach FP level, like these two recent concert FPs, for example. --Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Drnholec (Dürnholz) - wayside cross.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2014 at 17:21:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drnholec (Dürnholz), Moravia - old wayside cross

File:A Aranha-de-prata (Argiope argentata) se alimenta, antero-dorsal recorte.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2014 at 16:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@Lauro Sirgado: It's fixable? User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@ArionEstar:I like that. I respect the Kreuzschnabel opinion (Hi Kreuzschnabel), but I have my own. The choice of point of view was just to give the impression that the spider touched the riparian forest to an observer far from the picture in the original format. This species is well distributed (even in cities) and the photo was taken to show it in its wild habitat, remove the motif of picture and replace the background ruin the motivation of the photographer to choose the composition. Anyway add a background leave the unnatural picture, due to details of the spider would be an insane work, to stay so I took it as a good job. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 22:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentTo achieve that effect, the spider and forest should be nearly equally sharp. The unsharpness of the forest gives too much depth into the image to generate the intended deception. That idea just didn’t come to my mind. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Kreuzschnabel: Please take this (and the previous) for information only, I do not want to defend a position, just explained, the image would be in a frame a few steps away from the observer, the lure disappear on approach, revealing the motif. The background should be blurred in this case. Each composition(and person) requires a different way of looking, and yes(so even), I understand and respect your point of view. Ty -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 19:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not "FP enough" for me as I said earlier. (This is another Argiope taken by me which is also below the FP bar.) Jee 03:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. I appreciate the explanation by Lauro Sirgado, but I did not get the compositional idea when seeing the image, and it does not work for me. --Slaunger (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kranj - Grad Kieselstein 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2014 at 14:30:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Kieselstein Castle in Kranj, Slovenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mihael Grmek - uploaded by Mihael Grmek - nominated by Meho29 -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition! However, central building looks tilted CCW, entire image looks oversharpened to me (bright fringe along edges), bright areas slightly overexposed. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too harsh light and too high contrast to shadows on right hand side. Propose trying earlier in the morning or an hour or two before sunset (depending on how the shadows fall) to get more soft light. --Slaunger (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Raspberry Pi B+ illustration.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2014 at 09:52:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vector illustration of a Raspberry Pi B+, a portable Linux computer used in education and private electronics projects.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lucasbosch - uploaded by Lucasbosch - nominated by Lucasbosch -- Lucasbosch (talk) 09:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lucasbosch (talk) 09:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No "wow". --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I appreciate the Raspberry Pi topic as such, but the illustration gives me a zero readings on my wow-o-meter. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Aalto-Theater-Abends-02-2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2014 at 05:25:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aalto Theatre in evening light
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lower part too dark, the container ruins the composition, it's a pity because this image is made good and the object is interessting --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I understand your argument with the container (could not move it), for me it is not very distracting. What do you mean with "lower part"? The lower part of the building or the lower part of the complete photo? Take a look on Suncalc: The only way to photograph the building with nice light is in summer about 1h before sunset (north facade). The consequence is that only the building is well lid, other parts are in shadow. For me no shortage, in contrary: a special quality of this photo. Nonetheless there are still a lot of details in the shadows - no 100% black. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
      • The lower part of the image (=1/3 of the complete image) is rapt in strong shadow. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the info. I will take a further look on it in the evening. Some moderate brighening should be no big deal here because all shadow details are still visible. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
          • all shadow details are still visible Sorry, but this is definitely not the case. Behind the pillars the building structure is deeply dark. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
            • ✓ Done, new version uploaded, completely new development and stitching from RAW. Taxiarchos228, please take another look. IMHO the stitching is not that bad. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
              • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral much more better than the original, the container is still disturbing, therefore I don't support the image, but I see no reason for oppose any more --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
                • Thanks for re-considering your vote. I look forward to further comments. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Vista de Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 51-53 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 20:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High dynamic range night shot of Benidorm, turistic capital of the Costa Blanca (literally White Coast) in Land of Valencia, Spain. The shot was taken from the Cross of Benidorm, located on the summit of the Sierra Helada. Benidorm, is a town with 73,000 inhabitants throughout the year but with a peak of over half a million in the summer season. It's the third town with the most concentration of tall buildings in Europe, after London and Milan, whereas in Spain, Benidorm is positioned third, behind Barcelona and Madrid in the total number of skyscrapers. Nevertheless, Benidorm has the most high-rise buildings per capita in the world.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info High dynamic range night shot of Benidorm, turistic capital of the Costa Blanca (literally White Coast) in Land of Valencia, Spain. The shot was taken from the Cross of Benidorm, located on the summit of the Sierra Helada. Benidorm, is a town with 73,000 inhabitants throughout the year but with a peak of over half a million in the summer season. It's the third town with the most concentration of tall buildings in Europe, after London and Milan, whereas in Spain, Benidorm is positioned third, behind Barcelona and Madrid in the total number of skyscrapers. Nevertheless, Benidorm has the most high-rise buildings per capita in the world. All by me, Poco2 20:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 20:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too many parts of the image are absoutley dark (for me it's the wrong time to make such pictures, better is the blue hour), over all not so sharp and good like similar cityscape panoramas we already have as FP. it's good, but not a FP--Wladyslaw (talk) 07:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    I don't believe that this kind of shots can only be taken in the blue hour (actually, I have some for this cityscape, but prefer this version). Poco2 08:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • depends on the scenery. A scenery with much water which becomes deeply dark and takes a dominant position in the composition is not beneficial IMO. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

High dynamic range night shot of Benidorm, turistic capital of the Costa Blanca (literally White Coast) in Land of Valencia, Spain. The shot was taken from the Cross of Benidorm, located on the summit of the Sierra Helada. Benidorm, is a town with 73,000 inhabitants throughout the year but with a peak of over half a million in the summer season. It's the third town with the most concentration of tall buildings in Europe, after London and Milan, whereas in Spain, Benidorm is positioned third, behind Barcelona and Madrid in the total number of skyscrapers. Nevertheless, Benidorm has the most high-rise buildings per capita in the world.

File:Bananaquits.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 19:55:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two bananaquits on a branch
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Leon-bojarczuk - uploaded by Tom-b - nominated by Arion -- User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FP in English Wikipedia -- User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment With its 2.25 Mpixels, just barely scrapes over the 2 Mpixel minimal resolution requirement. The file page could benefit from a proper {{Information}} template and a geolocation. I think the photo as such is very good, with a good timing. Focus is soft on one of the birds, but I think excuseable. Some concerns were raised about the authenticity of this photo in its EN:WP nomination back in 2009. It appears they were not completely resolved. I am in doubt if this gets over the bar for FPs of birds nowadays. --Slaunger (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Partial✓ Done@Slaunger.Added description and location -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 14:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Partial✓ Done@Slaunger.Indicated the probable author page(is not a Commons page) of the photography, see note on talk page -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 17:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info@Slaunger.I loaded a new image with larger size, based on the original as the quality of the original photo is good was possible to recover details and not just make a large copy devoid of value, please rate, if you disagree I revert the image. Please understand this issue as good faith, not dominate commons rules, do not know if I break something. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 19:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Lauro Sirgado:See Commons:Overwriting existing files. It is very good that you have uploaded a photo of higher resolution, and it is certainly uncontroversial for this nomination as no-one has actually voted yet. It is a bit more controversial because the same file is promoted to featured status on both the English and Turkish wikipedias. However, as I see it it is clearly an improvement in this case and thus should not cause any problems with regard to the previous promotions. Overwriting an image with one of larger resolution is also mentioned explicitly as allowed, although one is cautioned when it comes to images with assessments that not other alterations are done at the same time. --Slaunger (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Since the creator is available for questioning: In the nomination at the English Wikipedia, an editor raised a concern/question if this was actually a staged shot? He also mentioned that the background appeared artificial. Could a little more details be revealed about the conditions of the shot on the file page (if this is still recallable, it has been some years :-) ) to shed some light on this? --Slaunger (talk) 20:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Slaunger:Do not know the author, and do not feel comfortable doing any inquiry, although we are geographically close. In the original I noticed a discontinuous and undefined boundary between the background and the motif, but does not progress on areas of detail of the barb of feathers, can be the result of image compression, but that's just a guess. -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 21:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral OK, thanks for all your hard work. I like the photo, but I am not fully convinced regarding the technical quality. --Slaunger (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The colour of the fake green background is too big a contrast to the birds I think. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Taiwanese Monk at the Salar of Uyuni, Bolivia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 18:58:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taiwanese Monk at the Salar of Uyuni
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jee 03:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 06:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Yann (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Magic lighting and setting. Hopefully this picture won't get deleted. And yes, taiwanese people take pictures every 5 minutes ;) (no offense intended, just a reference to people I know). - Benh (talk) 11:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support magic mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Only fault I can find is the horizon goes through his head rather than, say, further down. But the lighting, scene and subject are all great. -- Colin (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am willing to accept that this photographer has sufficient consent for hosting this on Commons and having it featured. Re-use would be a different issue. I think the personality rights template addresses those consent and re-use issues well enough for our mandate. Particulalry given this is such a lovely picture. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is fake --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 23:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure to understand in what this link to my blog is meant to support your statement, so... I guess this is a joke, right? :) -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 00:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Neottia nidus-avis - Pruunikas pesajuur Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 18:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neottia nidus-avis
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bird's-nest Orchid (Neottia nidus-avis). Created, uploaded and nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral High detail level. Plant sharp. Quite good bokeh and light. Composition and wow does not quite reach FP level IMO (not that I can tell what could be done better for the particular plant). For such a relatively common orchid species, I expect a little more for FP. Had it been a rare orchid, I would have supported. --Slaunger (talk) 18:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Reflection on the Salar de Uyuni, bolivia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 18:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise over the Salar de Uyuni
  • Unfortunately I don't have any idea and I can't find any hint in the photos that I have, sorry. -- Christopher Crouzet (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I am confident that some other editor less ignorant about cars than you and me will pass by and help out with the model at least Smile. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Urmia lake drought.webm[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 14:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Monfie - uploaded by Monfie - nominated by مانفی -- Monfie (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Monfie (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question and Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is it correct that this movie has been created solely from the information in the three still images linked to from the file page? If so, I am impressed by how realistic the "interpolation" appears in the short video sequence. Anyway, I think it would be helpful and interesting to put quite some more details in the file page about how this video has been generated from the sources. --Slaunger (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes. It has been created using this 3 images only. They are mixed using cross dissolve transition in adobe-premiere.--Monfie (talk) 06:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 08:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support well done! --El Grafo (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question would it be possible to upload the 3 aligned base images as separate image files? That way, one could load them into an image viewer and step forth and back as one wishes. (It's always nice to have the raw data.) --El Grafo (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ DoneYou can check "other versions". Now you can also see how much "color correction" has done, to equalize them.Monfie (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Reeth Swing Bridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 12:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reeth Swing Bridge in late evening light
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Reeth Swing Bridge is a suspension footbridge, erected 2002, allowing several rights of way to cross the Swale river. Yes, the image has been edited to please the eye and to render the real impression of that moment. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but too dark over all (underexposed) --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I’ve had this issue rising on QIC as well. I like this image exactly for the contrast of deep shadow versus the sunlit pasture beyond. Brightening the shadows would spoil the atmosphere. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 08:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Шаан-Кая в облаках.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2014 at 12:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mount Shaan-Kaya in Clouds

Image:WikiGif.gif[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 20:01:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wiki Puzzle

-- Gustavo Girardelli (talk) 20:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Girardelli G.EAA.pngEscucho! 20:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Creative gif. User:ArionEstarArionEstar (talk) 20:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What shall be featurable here? Where is the encyclopedic usefulness, or at least the wow effect? Btw, you forgot (or didn't know) that the WP logo is protected; I've corrected the licensing now. --A.Savin 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice idea. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC) P.S.: we are here on Commons, not in a Wiki.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but not FP - like A.Savin --XRay talk 07:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 10:46, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Far below the minimum size of 2 MPix. Nice idea, but by no means an FP. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment this is not a free image.--Monfie (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 08:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The size 600x600 (=360,000) is far below the required minimum of 2,000,000! And I don't see the idea of a logo "building" up and down, up and down, up and down... And by the way, animations can be very educational (e.g. File:CtVRvascRed.gif), but this one just looks stupid I think. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:David - The Death of Socrates.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 12:24:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Death of Socrates
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jacques-Louis David - uploaded by Harpsichord246 - nominated by Nikhil (talk) 12:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nikhil (talk) 12:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 12:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice painting, but I cannot really see the individual contribution of the photographer. Another problem: There is a lot of dust on the painting, most visibly on the darker areas. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tuxyso: Huh? There doesn't need to be spectacular photography for a painting to be featured. It is sufficient for the photography to be an accurate, detailed rendering of what the painting actually looks like, with all its quirks and blemishes. --King of ♠ 17:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Botijo y pucheros de Extremadura.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 11:12:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pottery in Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by doalex - uploaded by doalex - nominated by [[User:{{subst:doalex}}|]] -- Doalex (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Doalex (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea. But an important part of the pitcher at right is in dark shadow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cayambe (talk • contribs) 12:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
    • It's the problem when the natural light comes from left.--Doalex (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the idea is good, bud the technical quality is low: sharpness, DOF, color noise. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per user Cayambe's comment above. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Gran Palacio, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 09:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yaksha (mysthical demon) "lifting" the southern of the Two Golden Phra Chedis (or pagodas) located on the Phaithee terrace in the Wat Phra Kaew (or Temple of the Emerald Buddha) in Bangkok, Thailand. The chedis were constructed by order of King Rama I in honor of his father (southern pagoda) and mother (northern pagoda) at the end of the 18th century. The structures are entirely covered with copper sheets, painted with lacquer and covered with gold leaf. The 20 demons and monkeys around the base were added later, at the end of the 19th century, by order of King Rama V.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yaksha (mysthical demon) "lifting" the southern of the Two Golden Phra Chedis (or pagodas) located on the Phaithee terrace in the Wat Phra Kaew (or Temple of the Emerald Buddha) in Bangkok, Thailand. The chedis were constructed by order of King Rama I in honor of his father (southern pagoda) and mother (northern pagoda) at the end of the 18th century. The structures are entirely covered with copper sheets, painted with lacquer and covered with gold leaf. The 20 demons and monkeys around the base were added later, at the end of the 19th century, by order of King Rama V. All by me, Poco2 09:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 09:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 14:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Minor cloning wouldn't hurt (notes added). --Ivar (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done, thanks, Poco2 22:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Digitally removing items makes the picture fake I think. You can crop a photo but "cloning" out things to make the picture look more beautiful gives a picture that doesn't show how it looks in real life. I like the earlier version of the picture but not the currect one. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Presqu'île du Rouens, Clermont-l'Hérault 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 08:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Presqu'île du Rouens, Lac du Salagou, Clermont-l'Hérault, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much uninteresting foreground, too bluish, and no wow. A simply not featured shoot for me. Sorry Christian, but I'm missing the special. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version less bluish. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:San paolo ,basilica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2014 at 21:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Livioandronico2013 - uploaded by Livioandronico2013 - nominated by Livioandronico2013 -- Livioandronico2013 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Livioandronico2013 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment At least someone writes me a comment? positive or not, maybe I learn something. Thanks :)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's a nice photo, but I don't think it has a wow factor. Perhaps the image is a bit soft, but that's not a big issue. Overall, I don't think it is outstanding, for example the background is not chosen very well, imo (the statues are cut). Also the lamp in the background at the right bottom is a bit distracting --DXR (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for your suggestions --LivioAndronico talk 19:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the columns and the statue are fighting for attention. And by the way, maybe you would write a better description of the photo on File:San paolo ,basilica.jpg instead of just "San paolo ,basilica". --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Vranov nad Dyjí (Frain) - panorama.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2014 at 13:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vranov nad Dyjí (Frain), Moravia

Alternative[edit]

Vranov nad Dyjí (Frain) - panorama crop.JPG

File:James Waterston.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2014 at 07:02:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

James Waterston in the play Private Lives in 2012
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info James Waterston in the play Private Lives in 2012 - created by Paul Marotta - uploaded and nominated by Dman41689 (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dman41689 (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose where ist he looking? Distractig background. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Richard Skuse.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2014 at 06:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Richard Skuse during a rugby match
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Richard Skuse during a rugby match in 2010 - created by Chris Brown - uploaded by and nominated by Dman41689 (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dman41689 (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot, but sharpness is not on the head. Main motive (football player) could be slightly brighter. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Toronto - ON - Humber Bay Arch Bridge2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 20:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toronto: Humber Bay Arch Bridge
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the perspective and the overall framing of the topic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the white arc is overexposed because the parapet wires are invisible before it. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
maybe you're right, i'll proof it soon. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:44, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The graffiti ruins it. Gidip (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It needs perspective correction on the left and is too bright and too unsharp in the middle. Sorry. --XRay talk 07:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Tulipa agenensis sharonensis 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 18:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Allium rothii 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 16:44:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Allium rothii 1.jpg

File:Corpus Christi College New Court, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 14:12:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New Court of Corpus Christi College at the University of Cambridge, England.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 16:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 02:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only thing disturbing me is the barrel-distorted look of the foreground while the sides are perfectly straight. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
    • It's not barrel distortion, it's vedutismo/panini projection. The image has a very wide angle of view and this helps to control it, but does give the slightly curved look in the grass. Diliff (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 06:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would have been even better if the right side of the building wasn't in shadow.Fotoriety (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's a bit tilted on right -- Christian Ferrer Talk 02:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice subject and execution. I think it's a good idea to add actual FOV + projection used in description page, so one fully gets the reasons behind the distorsions. - Benh (talk) 06:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
    • That's true, I just take so many of these that I can't be bothered explaining all of them! ;-) I've uploaded about 100 panoramas in the last month and I often can't even remember all the technical details by the time I've uploaded the image. Diliff (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 17:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico talk 16:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 17:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kräuselscharbe Phalacrocorax melanoleucos 01 2014.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2014 at 08:24:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head shot of Little pied cormorant (Phalacrocorax melanoleucos)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:De fem søstre i århus perspetiv korrekt.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 18:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I had noticed this photo as well and thought it was very good. --Slaunger (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Nice sunset but unfortunately the main subject is in shadow. --King of ♠ 06:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is not a sunset the time is 21. nov 2008, 14:43 and the sun is behind the photografer behind a cloud, so the main subject is not in shade but in diffused light. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The top part of the sky looks massively oversharpened. I would suggest to apply masked sharpening (exclude the sky) and apply some selective noise reduction on the sky. There are also dust spots (see note). Composition is good. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thx for the reviews. I have removed the two dustspots and done a noise reduction on the sky. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
      • It's remarkably better, but for my personal taste still too much sharpening artefacts / noise on the sky (also on the lower parts). --Tuxyso (talk) 07:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great detail and atmosphere. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 08:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

De fem søstre Alternative.jpg

File:Lijiang Yunnan China-Naxi-people-carrying-baskets-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 10:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Naxi people carrying the typical baskets of the region; scene from a public perfomance in Jade Dragon Snow Mountain Open Air Theatre.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lijiang, Yunnan, China: Naxi people carrying the typical baskets of the region. Created and uploaded by CEphoto, Uwe Aranas - nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition and moment. -- Kadellar (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, but I would add a bit more sky. Yann (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In my opinion a special recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Qwertz1894 (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, with <50 edits. --A.Savin 19:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Kadellar. --Ivar (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool shot Poco2 17:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yup -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Refreshing topic, very interesting and good composition, and good light and colors too. --Slaunger (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Slaunger. --El Grafo (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Maire (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Colors and composition are outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful composition, although the tight crop on the mountains is a little disappointing. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 01:30, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am morally opposed to empty baskets humorless people. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm surprised that morally opinions are part of a FP review. Might it be, that you just love to attract attention? For a photographer, a critics about technique or composition is acceptable, but this kind of opposition is kind of hurting, to tell you the truth. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
It was meant as a joke. I thought a position as absurd as being morally opposed to empty baskets was transparent enough. Apparently not. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Saffron Blaze, in a multilingual project such as Commons, it may not be evident for all non-native English speaking users, or users with other cultural backgrounds, what is intended to be a joke. In honesty, I was in doubt too, if you were joking or not. I think, that if it was meant to be a joke it would have been more reasonable to add it as a comment instead of an oppose vote. Due to your single joke-oppose, the FPC cannot be speedy closed after five days, but now have to stay open the full period. The 5-day rule for no-brainer FPs is intended for cleaning up clutter on the FPC page and let reviewers focus on the images, which actually need more attention from reviewers. Thus, I think the criticism raised by Cccefalon is justified. In addition getting a "clean sheet" promotion is kinda like an extra acknowledgement. Something I have never achieved myself, but which I have great respect for when happens - when it is justified as in this caseSmile. --Slaunger (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I took it as a joke too but remember your "joke" keeps this nomination from swift featuring. Put as comment it would have been funny but an oppose (which will be counted as serious by the bot) is ridiculous. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0202.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2014 at 07:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve "Am Enteborn" in Dülmen, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 07:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 07:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but low value. --Slaunger (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have been trying to take this picture myself for quite some time. And for once it's a country other than Estonia that is showing off its natural beauty this way Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 06:05, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but not outstanding. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gidip (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Barn Owl flying.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 05:48:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn Owl flying
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kristina Servant - uploaded by User:dman41689 - nominated by Dman41689 -- Dman41689 (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dman41689 (talk) 05:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Soft and noisy, but a great capture otherwise. Diliff (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Soft and noisy, perhaps. But an absolutely breathtaking photo, and just the kind of image that will make people say, "Look at what's on Commons!" I love it! KDS444 (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
    • They'll say "Look at what's on Commons!" and then they'll view it full screen and feel cheated by Commons. It's clearly out of focus. It's an unfortunate almost-caught-it moment. Diliff (talk) 21:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very tempted to support per KD above, but in the end technical considerations prevail. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose truely breathtaking as a thumbnail, can't argue with that. It breaks my heart to reject this, but it's really very soft and noisy at higher resolutions. --El Grafo (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, plus overexposure on the white parts of the face. Pity, it’s a nice shot. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. –Makele-90 (talk) 18:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kongress und Theaterhaus Bad Ischl DSC 3295w.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 21:11:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Congress and theater building at Bad Ischl, Upper Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Congress and theater building at Bad Ischl, Upper Austria / created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P e z i (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support maybe it need a very little sharpening and a little brightening of the shadows (especially at right), however well done and wow -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done thanks for voting (also to all other voters) und for the hint. I've tried to slightly brighten the shadows. For sharpening I don't dare; I'm afraid it could ruin more than help ... --P e z i (talk) 19:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Heppenheim BW 2014-05-13 14-32-16.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 19:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Coat of Many Colours (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a photo from a tourist's photo album. If this photo was professionally made, the photo would have been taken on a sunshiny day and the photographer would have waited until the people at left were gone. Good photo but not featured I think. I need a wauw effect. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not bothered by the people so much as the white balance, which seems off. Daniel Case (talk) 23:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The statue right in front of the house is a poor choice. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Borgund Stave Chuch in Lærdalen, 2013 June.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2014 at 14:22:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SBorgund Stave Church in Lærdalen in Lærdal municipality, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway in 2013 June.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Nikhil
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nikhil (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 16:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kleuske (talk) 11:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Clear and crisp all around. Daniel Case (talk) 23:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I would prefer to see more to the left of the church and less to the right of it - it seems more interesting and can add nice perspective. Gidip (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a boring simply composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 19:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg

File:Kievitsbloem (Fritillaria meleagris) 05.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 15:14:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Fritillaria meleagris. Very rare and legally protected in the Netherlands bulb. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the composition is very good and beautiful.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately there are one or two insects on the plant. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Due to missing light the structure of the plant is imho not brought out well. As ArildV said composition is nice. But Nobelpeopleuploader an insect on a plant is not a serious reason for your oppose, is it? Tell me it's just a joke. Insects are not very seldom despite you go into a greenhouse. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

  • No, my vote is not a joke. A shadow is also a natural thing, and natural things can be reasons for opposing, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:City Palace detail 01 - Berlin.jpg. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 19:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Hehe, I think your comparison is misleading. The structure of shadow has much to do with light and can be controlled by the photographer due to intelligent flash light usage and shooting time. An insect on a plant is a natural component you usually find in the field. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
      • I gree on your comment that "An insect on a plant is a natural component you usually find in the field" so let me repeat what I have written before: "A shadow is also a natural thing, and natural things can be reasons for opposing, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:City Palace detail 01 - Berlin.jpg". And by the way, people in museums are also natural "components" you usually find in museums, but you don't see persons on many pictures of museum artifacts. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 06:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kickxia floribunda 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 08:54:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Kickxia floribunda 1.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not entirely convinced by the choice of DOF here.--ArildV (talk) 11:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not like the composition and the frontal light is too harsh IMO. --Slaunger (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the light. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mallorca - Leuchtturm am Kap Formentor6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 06:23:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lighthouse at Cap Formentor, Mallorca (Spain)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - High quality. Nice crop and composition. Tiptoety talk 20:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a remarkable variation of sharpness in this stitching. I've marked two unsharp parts (one at 2/3, the other one at the right border). Surely, you have border unsharpness with wide angle shots, but with stichtings it is avoidable. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think the blurred areas are caused by lens corner (lack of) sharpness, but maybe by a dirty lens. It's repeated on the horizontal axis at regular intervals. There are a few stitching error as well (with some "duplicated lines" on low mid left area). Like two other previous noms of same place, light comes from above and is harsh, and makes for a very flat subject. But composition is nicer here. Consider my oppose void if the stitching issues are fixed. - Benh (talk) 13:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Brantôme 24 Reposoir XVIe 2014.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2014 at 08:37:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brantôme, Reposoir XVIe, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral DoF is a bit shallow (right edge is unsharp) but the cut-by-the-frame tree on the right is what really keeps me from supporting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically very good (sharp, light colors, framing). The background is a little distracting, but this is, I believe, inevitable. Wow is low for me though. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 23:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support with special thanks to Christian Ferrer. --JLPC (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Slaunger. No wow, and don't see what separates this picture from a QI : Well taken, but I don't like the composition and I don't wonder "how", "when", "what a timing" ... - Benh (talk) 06:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Slaunger + per Benh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Butter-Tubs-Pass-2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2014 at 05:34:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alternative view on the Butter Tubs Pass
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alternative view on the Butter Tubs Pass from a different point of view, showing the road not that dominant in the foreground. Light has changed a bit during those few minutes, not for the worst I think. Hopefully, the sheepfold in the lower right is interesting enough a detail. Oh yes, and this one is cropped to 3:2 ratio as well for those who don’t like µFT’s native ratio :-) On support, I will withdraw the other nomination.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support much better composition than the other nomination. The reading of the image is much more pleasant here. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 09:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Better but some vegetation in the foreground would make it FP. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is no more vegetation up there in the moorlands than shown in the image. Grass, bracken, heather, that’s all. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Flowers in foreground, looks weird, see annotation. --Slaunger (talk) 16:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, they’re unsharp, so the stems melt into the background grass. I don’t think cloning them all out would improve the image. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
      • OK. Thanks for the explanation. --Slaunger (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Still, one request, have a look to the top. It looks a bit blueish to me versus the bottom area. Poco2 12:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good,very good --Livioandronico2013 (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 17:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mønsted kalkgruber exposure fused 2014-07-18.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2014 at 23:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mønsted limestone mines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An illuminated path in the largest limestone mine in the world, Mønsted limestone mine in Denmark. The limestone mine has been excavated over a period of almost 1000 years from the early 11th century untill 1978, mainly by using pickaxes or other handheld tools. The mine has over 60 km paths of which 2 km are illuminated. Some paths are like huge halls, others not passageable by a grown man. In the path shown here is clearly seen how thick layers of limestone alternate with thin layers of flint. The photo itself is an exposure fusion between three bracketed exposures with exposure times of 6, 15 and 30 seconds using CA corrected raw files as input into PTgui. In hindsight, I should have had an even shorther exposure time on the most underexposed photo as the point light sources are slightly burnt in even the 6 sec exposure. Done with an aperture of f/10 and ISO 200 (if i go higher I begin to introduce notieable noise with my camera). I have spend a great deal of time playing around with the exposure fusion to highlight the layered structure, which is not quite as evident when you are in the mines, as well as make the representation faithful. It appears lighter than it really is, as the light sources are weak. A ghost is seen in the long time exposure shot wearing a handheld lamp leaving a light trail. Almost unavoidable due to many guests in the mines.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 20:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 06:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The encyclopedic value of such a shot is undoubtedly high, your explanation is very interesting and one can guess that the shooting conditions were challenging.. But from a pure photographic viewpoint I cannot see FP aspects here: I cannot get a compositional idea, the motive is visually not interesting (no interesting stone formations, no interesting colors), the bright lights distracts from the structure of the mine which should be the main motive. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
    • @Tuxyso: Thanks for taking your time to review the photo and provide a detailed explanation. A photo of a limestone mine will of course be rather limestone colored all over with no particularly interesting stones. I think the layer formation between limestone and flint is quite notable in the photo formed in a surprisingly complicated process. But of course, taste differs, and I respect you do not think it has it. --Slaunger (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. I share a few concerns with Tuxyso, namely the lack of interesting colours or rock formations, although I am still wowed enough by the image to support. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)



Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Fri 25 Jul → Wed 30 Jul
Sat 26 Jul → Thu 31 Jul
Sun 27 Jul → Fri 01 Aug
Mon 28 Jul → Sat 02 Aug
Tue 29 Jul → Sun 03 Aug
Wed 30 Jul → Mon 04 Aug

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Sun 20 Jul → Wed 30 Jul
Mon 21 Jul → Thu 31 Jul
Tue 22 Jul → Fri 01 Aug
Wed 23 Jul → Sat 02 Aug
Thu 24 Jul → Sun 03 Aug
Fri 25 Jul → Mon 04 Aug
Sat 26 Jul → Tue 05 Aug
Sun 27 Jul → Wed 06 Aug
Mon 28 Jul → Thu 07 Aug
Tue 29 Jul → Fri 08 Aug
Wed 30 Jul → Sat 09 Aug