Commons:Kandidater till utvalda bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Det här är kandidater till att bli utvalda bilder.

För ett arkiv av tidigare nominerade se: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Det finns också en kronologisk lista av utvalda bilder.

Nominering[edit]

Om du tror att du har funnit eller skapat en bild som kan anses värdefull, lägg till den här nedan i sektionen för nomineringar, högst upp i listan, med hjälp av den här länken (Hjälp). För det behöver du inte ha en inloggning, även anonyma användare får nominera.

Men innan du nominerar, kolla upp så att bilden har lämplig bildbeskrivning och licens.

Omröstningsregler[edit]

  • Röstningen pågår i 9 dagar. På den 10:e dagen blir resultatet fastställt.
  • Om en bild efter 5 dagar inte fått någon mer positiv röst än från den som nominerade, så kan kandidaten tas bort ifrån sidan.
  • Nomineringar ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare är välkomna
  • Bidrag ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare till diskussionen är välkomna
  • Röstning från oinloggade bidragsgivare räknas inte
  • En nominering räknas inte som en röst, men den som nominerar får rösta
  • Den som nominerar en bild kan när som helst ta bort bilden ifrån omröstningen

En kandidat kommer att bli en utvald bild om följande krav uppfylls:

  • Lämplig licens (så klart)
  • Minst 5 stödjande röster
  • Förhållande mellan stödjande/motsättande röster på minst 2/1 (minst två tredjedels majoritet)
  • Två olika versioner av samma bild kan inte båda bli utvalda; endast den med högst antal stödjande röster blir utvald.

Röstning kan göras med "{{Support}}" (stöd) eller "{{Oppose}}" (ej stöd), neutralitet kan anges med "{{Neutral}}".

Kandidater[edit]

Contents

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 18:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Cesis castle in the spring.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 17:12:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Jesus in Palazzo Barberini.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 15:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesus in Palazzo Barberini
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Framework photographed in the private chapel of Pope Urban VIII Barberini. In Rome there is the saying "what wasn't done by the barbarians in Rome, was made by Barberini" (alluding to the fact that Pope Urban VIII had to disassemble the coliseum and other historical artifacts to build his palaces). The light of the framework is natural and built by Pietro da Cortona stand for Jesus and Mary. And there is no frame.All by LivioAndronico talk 15:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico talk 15:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Paul Gauguin - Fatata te Miti (By the Sea) - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 14:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paul Gauguin - Fatata te Miti (By the Sea)

File:Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 12:52:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave and organ of Göttweig Abbey Church, Lower Austria. Baroque case of the organ by Ignaz Gatto 1761.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nave and organ of Göttweig Abbey Church, Lower Austria. Baroque case of the organ by Ignaz Gatto 1761. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 15:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Avena sativa subsp. Nigra. (Zwarte haver) Locatie De Kruidhof 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 05:57:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avena sativa subsp. Nigra.

✓ Done New version. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support New version FP for me.--Hubertl (talk) 17:31, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Anciennes voies et vue sur le Bâtiment Voyageurs.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 04:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old tracks near Abbeville station (France)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NB80 - uploaded by NB80 - nominated by NB80 -- NB80 (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- NB80 (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because severe quality issues - I recommend to have images approved as Quality Image before you nominate them here - Uoaei1 (talk) 07:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, because it will be very difficult to take a photo with better quality. --NB80 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Canoe Dordogne.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 02:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, June 2013 (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 18:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, Canary Islands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Chmee2 (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 21:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, organy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 16:51:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Great work of organ-maker and photographer. Colours seem a bit cold to me though. --Kreuzschnabel 17:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me; the crop is also not the best, and noise is quite strong --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 10:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Keila-Joa mõisa peahoone õhust ida külg.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 12:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keila-Joa manor from east (aerial photo)

File:Gothic Tower - City Observatory of Edinburgh - 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 10:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gothic Tower of the City Observatory of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Gothic Tower of the City Observatory of Edinburgh (Scotland, UK) is the oldest part of the observatory and was designed by architect James Craig and built in the 18th century. It was the only gothic tower built of all that were planned because the project ran out of money. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ArionEstar (talk) 12:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, great job. --Chmee2 (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ibirapuera Park in São Paulo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 22:39:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 21:37:23
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Very small, not even sharp at this size (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Yann (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep not really unsharp, and the size is not a big issue IMO. -- ChristianFerrer 06:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per Yann. --Kadellar (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Pearl Jam --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist While it’s a nice shot the image itself isn’t FP for me. Besides the small size there are JPEG artifacts visible in the fur. --Kreuzschnabel 15:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Symbol and statues in St. Peter.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 21:03:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Symbol and statues in St. Peter
In my opinion the beauty is just the sky that in contrast to the statues of the saints seem to be in paradise --LivioAndronico talk 08:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --LivioAndronico talk 14:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church Ceiling, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 18:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Peter and St. Paul's Church Ceiling, Vilnius

File:Church of Saint Marie Interior 1, Palanga, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 18:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saint Marie, Palanga
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ArionEstar (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another nice one with that bit of light from the stained glass window on one buttress. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is it necessary that Diliff must go through this bureaucratic procedure?, maybe we could create a special attribute for this user to autocall a picture as prominent --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Haha, I don't know about that, but it would be nice to be able to nominate more than 2. I have quite a big backlog of potential images after a busy summer of photographing in Lithuania and the UK. Diliff (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
      • This was a joke logically, however, I believe that your images of architecture, are very good. You can publish only 2 nominations, but I could help nominate two more if you so desired. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Not a bad idea, Wilf! We ought to found a group called DING (Diliff Images Nomination Group), distributing 2 images to each member respectively to nominate. As Diliffs work usually passes through quick promotion (no opposes), 20 members could easily get nearly 3000 images featured per year (assuming they don’t interrupt the process by own nominations). --Kreuzschnabel 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Interior da Catedral de Amiens by Jules Victor Genisson, 1842.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 16:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Viborg Power Plant 2014-11-17-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 22:09:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viborg Power Plant at night
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Viborg power plant in Denmark is in my opinion an architectural gem, when it comes to modern industrial buildings (and we have FoP for architecture in Denmark). I live nearby and I have photographed it from different angles, in different seasons and different times of day over several years. This summer I tried to nominate an early evening photo with little success. I was recommended to get a prime lens. I have gotten that since. Now, I have tried again, this time using the exact same workflow and tools (but not an equally fancy camera) as a certain well-known church interior photographer here;-) And I have tried to do a night shot using PTGui Pro to make an tone-mapped 32-tiff from a 1×3 pano in four different exposures using my new Canon EF 40 mm f/2.8 STM prime lens. Then tone-mapped exclusively in Lightroom - with faithful colors. I have previously attempted that back in 2010, but with much worse image quality than here and a far from optimal workflow. I have used the nominated pcture as a desktop background the couple of days, and I appreciate it more and more. What is expecially challenging is the extreme difference in brightness of the neon sign to the left and the very weak light hitting the sides of the building. I actually have two further exposures at 8s and 30s to dig even more into the structures of the dark shadows, but it creates such a dominant bloom and glare from the purple-blue neon light, that it becomes very distracting, and so dominant that I cannot find a way to tone-map it, which makes it useful to look at. Thus I have discarded those exposures after several different attempts to find a best compromise. Created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good work, excellent result. Congrats. --Kreuzschnabel 05:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - but why did you add a "watermark" ;-) Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for your support, Villy Fink Isaksen. "Watermark", you say - with a Smile. Could you please enlighten me, what you are hinting at? I do not get it;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Okay - I think you got it, I my self thought that the lighting text was a watermark. (jeg måtte se nærmere på det for at finde ud af hvad "watermark"et var) --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Nåeh, nu fes den ind;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Have you corrected the perspectives, the vertical inside the power plants seems to leaning in, at least more than in this image where the verticals are also a bit leaning in. The image seems also a bit tilted on right. -- ChristianFerrer 06:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Christian Ferrer. Thanks for your comment/question. The center line around the chimney is vertical as far as I can tell. You are correct that the verticals inside the plant (the ones on the windows are the only ones seen) converge inwards as you go up a bit. I tried to make them absolutely vertical, but the vertical field of view is so large that it results in a disproportionate looking geometry. Regarding the apparent tilt, I had a look at this for a long time when I perspective-corrected the image. The base landscape in the foreground is not horizontal but falls off to the right. I think this gives a visual, but wrong impression of a tilt. The fact that the power plant, which has a vertical mirror plane is not centered in the composition (because I wanted to include the neon sign) also results in some "mind tricks". -- Slaunger (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree with Villy Fink Isaksen. --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hehe, the "watermark" is really funny, but image is cool with it. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 19:20:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saints Simon and Jude church in Szalejów Dolny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment good picture, FP for me after clearing dust problems! See notes! --Hubertl (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC) I like pictures like this one! --Hubertl (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice colours --LivioAndronico talk 09:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice light. --Kadellar (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice shot --Chmee2 (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice for sure, but the crop is a bit tight on top. Rule of thirds is not well observed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Goat killed for Christmas dinner.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 19:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goat killed for Christmas dinner
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Absolutely not .... poor beast. --LivioAndronico talk 20:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Are you vegetarian? --Hubertl (talk) 21:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      • No, but I can not conceive so bloody killings --LivioAndronico talk 21:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Sorry for bothering you again, but that’s not the point here. We judge images, we do neither judge the places nor activities shown in them. And I am pretty sure there’s no cruelty in this, the animal being killed very quickly. --Kreuzschnabel 05:20, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
          • We are here to judge images? by really? But please ..... who should be in favor of this kind of images for me has something wrong. Killed quickly? Cut your throat and see how you will be relieved of a quick death, a wonder so. Lothar Spurzem did a lot better than me. Quick and easy.--LivioAndronico talk 08:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
            • LivioAndronico and Spurzem: Everyday countless livestock animals are slaughtered to be used for food. Why do you think this goat is slaughtered particularly more cruel than all the other animals? And why the human projection as if the goat had the same sense of fear, consciousness, etc. as humans. And even if so, this is a documentary photo of how it is done in a particular location. Please take a moment to put aside you own cultural values for a moment and consider that. The nomination is valuable and encyclopedic and and to my knowledge, the image series by Wilfredor is the only we have of goat slaughtering and thus very unique. I see children participate in the process in the image series. I think it is good for them to see where food comes from. Remember: Valuable does not mean beautiful. We have FPs, which are orders of magnitude more disturbing than this nomination IMO, such as this or this. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't know Slaunger in which country outfits but in Italy (My country) are not slaughtered and waiting for their blood come out of my throat. This is a picture unnecessary and cruel. The photos that you posted have historical value and don't think that are useful for this discussion. --LivioAndronico talk 21:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
However Slaunger if you find seven people who will vote will be FP, I stand by my idea and you yours. The world is beautiful because it is varied --LivioAndronico talk 21:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question What about this image is supposed to be featurable? I see nothing special in, for instance, composition or lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 21:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per LivioAndronico and Hubertl --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Much more valuable than most nominations for me. And FPs do not have to be pleasant for all to look at - it depends a lot on cultural background and is not an absolute. Some technical objections though: The crop of the people surrounding the goat is not good, light is not good on main subject and some disturbing elements in the background. And for those thinking it is gross or cruel: I think the sudden death of the goat is much less cruel than feeding household pets to overweight, and let them live unnaturally long to the point where they have lost most senses and can barely move. Your nom reminds me of a seven years old failed nom of mine. One last comment: Although I find such topics featurable, I do not think they should appear as POTD. It would simply be poor editorial judgement (which is to be clearly separated from censorship by the way). -- Slaunger (talk) 22:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm with Slaunger on this. I don't see reasons to oppose just because of blood. That being said, the composition could be better --Muhammad (talk) 01:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see reasons to stay neutral just because of blood. Neither the composition nor the quality (noise, halos around men) deserve a support IMO. Regarding the subject I grew in a farm and this situation has nothing extraordinary. -- ChristianFerrer 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Haha, touche! But I didn't want to pile on an oppose, I like meat ;)--Muhammad (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very poor composition for me (without judging the theme of the image). Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:UK-2014-Oxford-Corpus Christi College 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 18:12:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pelican sundial in main quad, Corpus Christi College, Oxford
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Pelican sundial in main quad, Corpus Christi College, Oxford - created, uploaded, and nominated by Godot13 -- Godot13 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Godot13 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 16:26:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Not the best quality but I really like the composition. All by me -- Gidip (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can deal with the quality. Denifitely not among the worst either. Very nice situation! I also concidered a crop with wider aspect ratio. Might work as well. --Ximonic (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very good composition, beautiful colors, sharp and nice. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good idea and fine quality --Kreuzschnabel 05:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Ximonic, I think a more panoramic crop could do. Maybe 16:9 or 3:5, but it's ok now. --Kadellar (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The crop below is better. Why ISO 400? Yann (talk) 08:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine for me, good ratio! --Hubertl (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1a.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Wider aspect ratio. Gidip (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Street musician Handschoenmarkt Antwerp.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 15:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Street musician Handschoenmarkt Antwerp
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Jules Grandgagnage -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like this photo, but I the crop is a bit tight, and I also would like to see the face of the musician --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hi, thank you for nomination, but I have to vote against this image. As the technical quality seems to be OK for me, the composition is not good. I do not like that the face of musician is not visible (OK, I understand why is it so), but the crop seems to be to tiny to me. I'd expect that there will be more space around piano and the downer part will be not cut. Sorry for it. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Svjatogorsk, Lavra 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 23:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holy Mountains Monastery, Ukraine

File:Монастир над Латорицею.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 21:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Nicholas Monastery in Mukacheve, Ukraine.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Ahonc -- Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Saint Nicholas Monastery in Mukacheve, Ukraine.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- oversaturated or colours otherwise unnatural. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Saffron Blaze. If ever in my life, I see a sunset with those colors, I surely suffer a stroke of pleasure --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Saffron Blaze. The composition and mood is very good though. It also appears the light conditions were very good. If you still have the raw, I think a few featurable version could be developed, which is more faithful. For instance the green walls of the monastery look completely artificial in this edit. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The white balance seems to be too reddish or yellowish. --Ximonic (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose; looks like it was shot through a cup of tea. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Edited version[edit]

Монастир над Латорицею - 2.jpg

Colours are changed by author.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WB solved but now we have a QI criteria overexposed.svg Overexposed problem, however, its ok for me --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this one is really good. Previous seemed more like a background from a computer game, but this is much better. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Kruusamägi. Yann (talk) 08:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Kruusamägi too. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 10:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. Very good light and atmosphere! Building still seems unrealistically green, but I could be wrong... -- Slaunger (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Siena Cathedral - Coronation of the Virgin mosaic.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 19:39:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosaic of Coronation of the Virgin mosaic, Siena cathedral, Italy.
  • Mosaic of Coronation of the Virgin, Siena Cathedral. Photo of upper part of Cathedral facade, which can be seen in full here. All by -- Mile (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vista de Reikiavik desde Perlan, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 134-145 HDR PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 19:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

(Pseudo-)HDR (out of 3 frames) panoramic View (4 frames, 12 in total) of the city Reykjavik from the landmark Perlan (on the Öskjuhlíð hill), Capital Region, Iceland.

File:Parkhotel Schoenbrunn Ballsaal DSC 5115w.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 15:09:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parkhotel Shönbrunn, ballroom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is one of the few preserved classic ballrooms of Vienna, situated at Parkhotel Schönbrunn, 13th district. It's also used as a conference room.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P e z i (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and very nice --LivioAndronico talk 15:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great, although a bit noisy --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Are you sure it's noise and not the structure of fabric what you see? --P e z i (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Reindeer Ljungris October 2014 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 12:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reindeer at Ljungris.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panning shot of 2 reindeer running in the in the mountains in Ljungdalen, Sweden. The image is cropped (but no downsampling), reindeer are very vigilant (bear, wolf, wolverine and lynx are constant threats to the reindeer in the wild) and and difficult to get close to by foot. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Where is santa claus? Face-grin.svg Anyway very good and very nice --LivioAndronico talk 12:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Livio. ;oD Yann (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 16:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But I prefer this one. -- ChristianFerrer 16:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As impressive as those reindeer look, see my !vote below for my explanation of why this is better. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Kadellar (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Enthusiastic support As noted this sort of picture is difficult to get, so kudos to you, Arild. I don't usually go for animal pictures, even well-done ones, because it's so easy for a skilled enough photographer to get a very good one that we rarely see great ones. And this is great because of the high EV—we are not only seeing wild reindeer, scruffy, dumpy and not idealized Christmas creations; we are seeing them in their natural habitat, their motion telling us that they cannot take it easy here, and the light and the background explaining their coloration to us far better than any words in any language ever could. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Calliphora vicina, u, Face, DC 2014-04-24 -17.46.02 ZS PMax - USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 08:11:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calliphora vicina
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could be reflection. --Mile (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment First of all: wow!, otherwise, there is some stacking/stitching problems in the bottom middle left part (see note). Is there a way to fix that? Poco2 19:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes indeed there is problems and I don't know if it's fixable. Anyway IMO it can be FP in spite of these problems. -- ChristianFerrer 20:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Red Weaver Ant, Oecophylla smaragdina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Beria.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

User Beria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice expression, but... Background is overexposed; you can offset it a bit more, it would be better. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Light on her right side is too bright, and generally it’s an unfavourable portrait IMHO, not really a charming expression. The bright background doesn’t bother me though. --Kreuzschnabel 10:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Could you define what is a charming expression for you?, please --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentSorry, I cannot. It’s just a feeling. Maybe it’s the pursed lips. Anyway, while it might be "good", it’s still not a wow portrait for me. --Kreuzschnabel 21:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not a fan of the crop and of the light. -- ChristianFerrer 21:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even without the crops, being personally acquainted with the subject, this doesn't do her justice. Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 23:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The vale 'Mont dal Ega' in the Dolomites

File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yurts. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The place is charming --LivioAndronico talk 23:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The place is certainly charming but we are assessing images, not places. There’s severe chromatic aberration on this one (visible e.g. in the rocks on the left, or the dark ribbons on the yurts), and large parts of the roofs are blown. This is not sufficient on an 8 mpix FPC. Not even QI for me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 11:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Kreuzschnabel here isn't QI i see other,like a observatory and don't the door of the observatory is for me out of nomination...--LivioAndronico talk 14:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I am quite aware that this is not QI but I want to see a reasonable technical quality on an FPC as well, sorry. Anything technical flaws to mention on my part of an observatory? --Kreuzschnabel 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry Kreuzschnabel I am very sorry Face-sad.svg. I definitely wrong to express myself. I just wanted to make a comparison, to make you understand, about what I see as possible FP. I still I have not voted against at you Face-grin.svg.--LivioAndronico talk 16:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Feel free to oppose my nominations if you think they are not featurable. This is not a personal thing for me at all, like "I dont vote against you, so please do you not vote against me" – I judge images here, neither places, nominators or photographers. Whenever I think a nomination doesn’t meet FP standards, I oppose without regarding the author, nominator or other votes. --Kreuzschnabel 16:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vendôme (Loir-et-Cher).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by sybarite48 - uploaded by Magnus Manske - nominated by Blaue Max -- Blaue Max (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Blaue Max (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see several issues here, despite the nice view. The sky has blown parts, there is some perspective distortion and there's also CA. Not the best light neither, because the buildings are actually in shadow. --Kadellar (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kadellar. There's also that color banding in the sky. Nice skyline but those flaws will have to be fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA PALM TREE 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unidentified Phoenix palms, Palm Row, San Jose, California
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael - uploaded by Sanjosecalifornia - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice image. I prefer a perspective correction.--XRay talk 06:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose: What a pity! So nice a light and idea, but so poorly performed. Heavily oversharpened (showing bright red fringes on outer sides of tree trunks and lamps from sharpening of chromatic aberration), and there’s chroma noise all over the dark parts. The overprocessing kills it for me. Sorry. If the author still has kept the original, it may be reprocessed, eliminating the chromatic aberration before doing anything else. --Kreuzschnabel 11:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Päiksetõus rabas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 20:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise at Kõnnu Suursoo in Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Rutake - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry the light is too strong --LivioAndronico talk 20:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not too big in size, but atmosphere make it. --Mile (talk) 11:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another attempt to make me drop whatever I'm doing and go hiking in Estonia. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting light skilful handled. --Kreuzschnabel 21:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Any chance for higher resolution? --Ivar (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 05:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo Arqueológico de Palencia - 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 17:55:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It has something that recalls the scale of the Vatican Museums, then the mosaic is adorable in the center.Gran trabajo. --LivioAndronico talk 19:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 20:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very good. Great perspective and great control of light too --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 11:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pre-Roman Hill fort of Baroña, Porto do Son, Galicia, Spain.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 14:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice and good as always however the mid-day harch light don't help for to make pleasant colors. -- ChristianFerrer 20:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks, but image taken at 9:36 UTC because Spain are in the same time zone than Germany. See Time Zone Converter--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 09:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • In summer Spain have the same hour than France, I think. But the important is not the UTC hour but most the sun hour for the place where you are. In Spain or in Australia 11:36:47 is more near to the mid -day rather than the golden hour. -- ChristianFerrer 17:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-Sonnenobservatorium-Goseck.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 06:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goseck solar observatory
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Goseck solar observatory is by now the oldest known solar observation circle in the world, having been discovered and restored just recently. I came along in the warm morning light of a grand day and so had the chance to take some nice shots of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hm, I see only a wooden fence, missing the solar observatory! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps it would be better to write "entrance" of the observatory Face-grin.svg --LivioAndronico talk 14:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have had a look at the thing (online) and I guess that I would not have a much better idea for photographing it. Yet, I feel that the image is not featurable if the commenters above think that the motive is just some random fence, not the instrument itself. Perhaps a view from an elevated position would be good or perhaps trying to offer a look through one of the openings, but obviously an ideal image is hard to get here. --DXR (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I often say, I can see what you were thinking. But perhaps you should try a different time of day. The high contrast between the sides is very jarring to the eye and isn't necessary for understanding the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really nice and not bad however the composition is a bit unbalanced IMO, too much shadow, even if shadow is not an evil, on the left part. -- ChristianFerrer 08:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not good composition. Too dark. No Wow to me. Also, the things mentioned by DXR are justified. --Halavar (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Todi panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 21:03:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Todi is a town and comune (municipality) of the province of Perugia (region of Umbria) in central Italy. It is perched on a tall two-crested hill overlooking the east bank of the river Tiber, commanding distant views in every direction.

In the 1990s, Richard S. Levine, a professor of architecture at the University of Kentucky, chose Todi as the model sustainable city, because of its scale and its ability to reinvent itself over time. After that, the Italian press reported on Todi as the world's most livable city. All by Livioandronico2013 -- LivioAndronico talk 21:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your comment Martin Falbisoner. Anyway I don't think,also beacuse is a quality and valued image. I think that the others could tell me me this. --LivioAndronico talk 10:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Agree with Martin. If this is getting direct sunlight, it's a bit underexposed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok Martin and Crisco I increased the brightness, now what do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 14:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Better now. Maybe it could further help to increase saturation a bit? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hey Martin You haven't signed the edit Face-tongue.svg...anyway more saturation. What do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 19:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Crisco 1492 are you with us? Face-smile.svg --LivioAndronico talk 10:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment But it is possible that nobody votes??? It's possible that there are people here who put their photos but don't care to review each other ??? From now on, I will abstain from voting people who do not reciprocate by voting other people (of course I'm not saying they should vote favorably) that leave at least one comment or vote to photos of other users (and there are many). Thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 12:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I vote when I feel it, not because you wish it. This looks like racket, and is not the right attitude. Yann (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
For you Yann to be educated is a racket? Receive consideration from others and not caring to give it to others is a racket? How sad just sad. --LivioAndronico talk 13:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Yann a right attitude is not to say anything if you do not have something intelligent to say. --LivioAndronico talk 13:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses --Hubertl (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ciao, as you are insisting to request a vote, I do not hesitate to oppose your nomination because I truly believe that this photo is good in composition and the object is interesting but unfortunately the light and the sky are pretty flat and boring (pardon me for beeing sincere). That#s for the photo. In regard to voting, I strongly believe that nominations for FP are not supposed to be as reciprocal as nominations for QI, where it is expressly stated in the guidelines that you should review one image for every nomination. I personally do not feel to be able to judge most of the time if a picture is adequate for FP and I refrain from voting even if I have abut 40 FP. I, personally, do not feel very comfortable to judge FP candidates and I am more than happy to leave the burden to others. Please consider also that I have plenty of gratitude for your support and appreciation of my work. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you Wolfgang Moroder but i I don't require a vote for a vote, but at least a vote, comment or suggestion every 10, it isn't good to be ignored !!! At least for me.I prefer a negative vote that spurs me to improve myself that nothing and for that I thank you.And then if everyone did like you .... here we would do? --LivioAndronico talk 22:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nevertheless, with the last,slightly corrections, its a pro for me. Please, don´t try fishing for votes. This can turn against your interest! --Hubertl (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks Hubertl but i don't looking for votes but consideration.Danke. --LivioAndronico talk 22:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Beautiful. Very good lighting, good colors, very sharp and last but not least a good motif. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Much better now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Technically not perfect, but beautiful --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Gjirokastёr (by Pudelek).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:44:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gjirokastёr, Albania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 19:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please remove the white fringe on the bottom (from rotating I suppose). Otherwise nice. --Kreuzschnabel 05:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment corrected :) --Pudelek (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, but the problem pointed by Kreuzschnabel must be fixed. --Kadellar (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ma'aleh Akrabim.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by אילן ארד - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the interesting feature here, also compositionally, is the road. But due to the very flat light, it's not a strong motive. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see also a lot of dust spots and vignetting on the image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering -- 2014 -- 5492.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 11:57:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Burg Vischering in Lüdinghausen, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit soft for only 7 mpix but lighting & composition make up for that. --Kreuzschnabel 05:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry. Forgotten. An image with a better resolution (with more than 11 mpix) is uploading.--XRay talk 06:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the quality is absolutely sufficient and the light is great. The crop on both sides though, although I know it's often hard to get wide enough in such a photo, is just too close to the building in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the crop is a bit tight, as mentioned before, but still awesome mood and colors --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very nice. A little bit more space would have been nice, but it's good as is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Cabaña subterránea en la región de Búðahraun, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 046.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 02:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland. All by me, Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, it's good (and even necessary) to see the surroundings; nice mood. --Kadellar (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting somewhat dull to me, and I’d prefer to see the background mountains sharper. Lacks wow. --Kreuzschnabel 05:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the lighting fits that harsh environment very well. The scenery reminds me of how Jackson made Tolkien's Rohan look in the movies. --El Grafo (talk) 17:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Kadellar · Favalli ⟡ 03:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 05:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bennu's Journey.webm[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 23:22:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA's Goddard Space Flight/Center Conceptual Image Lab - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Animated movie about the asteroid Bennu and the formation of our solar system.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Breathtaking! -- Ras67 (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Turn685 (talk) 01:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing!!! Thanks a lot. --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 09:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I hate to poop the party here, this is a great video, but ... shouldn't it at least have subtitles? It wouldn't be too hard to write some in TimedText; someone who can't understand spoken English is going to be totally lost watching this video without at least subtitles (and once there's a set in English, they could easily be translated as desired). We really need to consider the systemic bias and accessibility issues here before we just wow ourselves with this one. Symbol support vote.svg SupportDaniel Case (talk) 03:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Have you miss the CC button? There are the english subtitles, albeit very long. If desired, i make it finer, this work remembers me on my BASIC time. I need the Renumber command! ;) --Ras67 (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Apologies. When I had first checked there weren't any. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 20:30:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White stork (Ciconia ciconia) in Weltvogelpark Walsrode
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • nice stork, but bad contrast on left side --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • The stork is in nice morning sun light. Due to the dark background the animal comes out quite well. IMHO a dark background is the best choice for a white stork. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Generally yes, but not for its dark side. --Kreuzschnabel 05:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weakSymbol support vote.svg Support the black background on the left is a bit problematic, but overall quality is just too good not to support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ Done, Wladyslaw, Kreuzschnabel and Martin: I've selectively brightened the background. Please take another look. An improvement? --Tuxyso (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
A bit better but the main problem isn`t eliminated. I´ll not oppose, but this is for sure not a FP compared with the other excellent birds images we already have. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, aber er ist halt ein armes, trauriges Viecherl. Wie bestellt und nicht abgeholt... --Hubertl (talk) 22:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Hubertl, es war noch recht früh und kalt (10:30 Uhr), vielleicht war der Herr (oder Frau) Storch noch müde :) Auf mich wirkten die Tiere im Weltvogelpark Walsrode nicht unglücklich - im Gegenteil. Die Pfleger haben die Tiere mit großem Respekt behandelt, was man z.B. gut bei der Flugshow schon sehen konnte. English: The birds seemed to me not unlucky - in contrary. The stork was photographed in the cold morning and was probably still tired. My impression from the very nice Weltvogelpark Walsrode was that the animals were treated very respectfully by the zookeeper as one could easily observe during the great flight show. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
      • No misinterpretation please, I remember the disput you have about pictures from the zoo. I am pretty relaxed with modern zoos.--Hubertl (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support for overall quality, however I still find the dark background on the left disturbing. Takes some effort to tell what’s bird and what isn’t. --Kreuzschnabel 06:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kasteel Schoonselhof Antwerpen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 19:26:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Schoonselhof on domain Schoonselhof, now part of a well known Antwerp cemetry

File:Kruja Castle (by Pudelek).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 16:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kruja Castle, Albania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically well done (although maybe something could be done about that darker area of sky in the top center—stitching problem perhaps?) but compositionally wanting, as too cluttered. QI definitely but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The cut-off house on the right as well as the partly obstructed building make it look a random shot. Crop suggestion added. --Kreuzschnabel 05:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The sky has some colour banding. --Ivar (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it as it is! I think, the uncropped version is better for the composition. --Hubertl (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Kruja Castle (by Pudelek) - crop.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Photo with crop --Pudelek (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Christus carthusian.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 08:16:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Carthusian
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Petrus Christus - uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 --  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • A strong scan of an important painting. (Yes, that fly is supposed to be there; very nice example of trompe l'oeil).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support there is a kind of spider cocoon at the bottom near the frame. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • (The painted-on frame, eh?) Not sure what that is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Exactly, yes... --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Potter working, Bangalore India.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 01:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Muhammad (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong Support This is very good. -- Ram-Man 04:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • still Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Excellent shot and composition, I just dislike the harsh lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 05:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 08:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Smial (talk) 11:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --· Favalli ⟡ 01:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (Day and month missing at the description) --XRay talk 06:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to spoil the party but I really think the harsh flashlight and the cast shadows caused by it don’t do a favour to the subject. It’s certainly an illustrative and good shot but not outstanding IMHO due to lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 11:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • No flash used --Muhammad (talk) 12:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Sorry for suggesting then :-) still the lighting is not really nice, looking like flashlight. --Kreuzschnabel 13:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      • To make it clear what I mean, please have a look at File:GR-naxos-damalas-toepfer-2.jpg – not featurable of course, but though flashlight has been used there obviously, it still shows a better light balance IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 16:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is good practice to ask instead of criticizing directly, it is best to assume expertise, hoping to demonstrate the contrary. It is the spirit of good faith and assertiveness. This comment is not for you, it's for everyone including me. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As for me, I should be very happy without reading, after some support votes, the first opposer beginning his explanation with :"Sorry to spoil the party"...as a mantra. Thank you !--Jebulon (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Done. I just feel some urge to apologize, being the only one to have a different opinion of an obviously otherwise highly appreciated nomination. --Kreuzschnabel 05:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel, too much contrast. --King of ♠ 05:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kongensbro gravel pit 2014-09-17.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 22:16:36
Original with pseudo HDR 'tonemapping' in PTGui ProRestitch by Diliff

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This upper image was promoted with overwhelming support (19/0/0) a little over a month ago: (Original nomination) However, meanwhile, Diliff has restitched the image from the original raws (lower image), using only non-destruvitve editing in Lightroom. This has resulted in higher image fidelity, more faithful colors and better tonality in the sky. Moreover, by using content-aware fill, he has been capable of extending the sky, thus managing to produce an image with a less extreme aspect ratio. The process is described in detail at the English Wikipedia FPC process. I am very, very gratefull for and impressed by this edit, as the raws do not appear promising at first sight.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Since we do not have replace-and-delist nominations very often, just a reminder, that the only allowed templates are {{keep}} and {{Delistandreplace}}. (I had to look it up). -- Slaunger (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Slaunger (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Strong delist and replace Per FPC talk --DXR (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace As promised in FPC talk. It is the good solution, don't worry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace per Slaunger. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Speedy! -- Ram-Man 00:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace I liked the more colorful sunset, but the newer one is more realistic. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace - Per EN Wiki. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace but keep the annotations --Kreuzschnabel 05:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Thanks Slaunger, you've been very gracious throughout the process. I'm just glad we ended up with a better image that all parties could be satisfied with. Diliff (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    • And I am grateful for you being willing to invest your time in these piles of gravel in Denmark and spare the time to explain your superior workflow.Smile -- Slaunger (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
      • "Very gracious", Slaunger ? Oh yes, he is. I think we are lucky with such a guy among us.--Jebulon (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 09:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I find the image notes/annotations of the old version very interesting. Would it be possible to copy them to the new file? --El Grafo (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --El Grafo (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Yann (talk) 10:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 19:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Butterfly Weed Asclepias tuberosa Umbel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 20:23:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by uploaded by Ram-Man - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The license for this image is not compatible with FPC. If it is acceptable, I'll relicense it to the CC-BY-SA 4.0 if the image is featured. I think that will meet with the standards? -- Ram-Man 21:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ram-Man 12:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Turn685 (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support even with the lack of DOF.--Hubertl (talk) 11:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vilivalla kalmistu Harjumaal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2014 at 15:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vilivalla cemetary in Harju County, Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by MinuHiiumaa - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this. Lighting is nice, composition is fun, colors are pleasant. That said, it does appear to be either a slightly overdone HDR or very strange natural lighting (i.e. the center of the photo). -- Ram-Man 04:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really nice but geocoding and English description should be added. Sky indeed looks strange in the center. --Kreuzschnabel 05:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and ✓ Done for geocoding and English description. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 18:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If promoted add {{Wallpaper}}. Aspect ratio (almost) 8:5 aka 16:10 (0.618). Josve05a (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Depricated, my bad. Josve05a (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Jean Cocteau b Meurisse 1923.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 16:11:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jean Cocteau (1889-1963), French writer, artist and filmmaker, in 1923.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse in 1923 - uploaded and nominated by -- JLPC (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JLPC (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 05:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! Yann (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work, worth a FP star! --Halavar (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting document, nice portrait of a master filmmaker --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Caminandes - Gran Dillama - Blender Foundation's new Open Movie.webm, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2014 at 02:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pablo Vazquez, Beorn Leonard, and Francesco Siddi. Music and Sound by Jan Morgenstern - uploaded and nominated by ProfesorFavalli -- · Favalli ⟡ 02:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- · Favalli ⟡ 02:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cute! And very well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support—absolutely love this short film!!! 😍😍😍 I didn’t know we had a copy on commons—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good short film. Well done! Nikhil (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kardoen (Cynara cardunculus), Locatie De Kruidhof 05.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2014 at 15:57:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kardoen (Cynara cardunculus)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cardoon (Cynara cardunculus). Maturing seeds of .Cynara cardunculus at different stages. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 16:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support I really wish there was more depth of field, but (at 60mm, f/11) I'm not willing to require focus stacking for a FP and I like the composition. -- Ram-Man 04:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Leopard Tree AdF.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 18:21:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female leopard elegantly descending from its favourite tree, where she spent the warmest hours of the day.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Isn´t it a little too much yellow? This is not just the only problem, it´s partly extreme over- and underexposed (You have the RAW?). With the JPG, there is no chance to fix it! --Hubertl (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a very good shot in the wilderness! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks a lot Hubertl, you are absolutely right. I have updated the file, after substantially reducing the overexposed areas. Now it look a bit dark but this makes sense given the thick vegetation. --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support, but it is a very special shot! --Hubertl (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nikhil (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good moment, and good to solve overexposed areas. --Mile (talk) 11:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ivar (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Maslenitsa kustodiev.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2014 at 16:56:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
"Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy...
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject."
I don't know much about art, so I can't say with certainty the artist is a "major artist" but Boris Kustodiev has a Wikipedia article, which is noteworthy and suggest he is an important Russian artist. Otherwise, I think this certainly meets the second criteria above. -- AHeneen (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saw this before, very picturesque, lively. --Mile (talk) 09:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is above the size limit, but image is still rather small. Wouldn't it be practical to require more than mere 2 Mpx from a photo, that is taken from a static object, like a painting? Kruusamägi (talk) 22:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


Ta bort utvald-status ifrån bilder[edit]

Efterhand kan standarden för utvalda bilder ändras. Bilder som tidigare var tillräckligt bra, kanske inte längre anses vara det. Här listas bilder som du tycker inte längre förtjänar att vara utvalda bilder. Då behövs 2/3 majoritet (och minst 5 röster) som håller med om att ta bort utvald-statusen ifrån bilden. Om inte 2/3 av de röstande håller med om att ta bort den, så är bilden fortsatt utvald. Här röstar man med {{Keep}} (bilden förtjänar att kvarstå som utvald) or {{Delist}} (bilden förtjänar inte att kvarstå som utvald). När du nominerar en bild här, ta med länken till den ursprungliga utvald-bild-nomineringen (den finns under Länkar på bildens beskrivningssida. Använd den här länken för att lägga till en borttags-kandidat.

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 18:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Cesis castle in the spring.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 17:12:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Jesus in Palazzo Barberini.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 15:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesus in Palazzo Barberini
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Framework photographed in the private chapel of Pope Urban VIII Barberini. In Rome there is the saying "what wasn't done by the barbarians in Rome, was made by Barberini" (alluding to the fact that Pope Urban VIII had to disassemble the coliseum and other historical artifacts to build his palaces). The light of the framework is natural and built by Pietro da Cortona stand for Jesus and Mary. And there is no frame.All by LivioAndronico talk 15:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico talk 15:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Paul Gauguin - Fatata te Miti (By the Sea) - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 14:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paul Gauguin - Fatata te Miti (By the Sea)

File:Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 12:52:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave and organ of Göttweig Abbey Church, Lower Austria. Baroque case of the organ by Ignaz Gatto 1761.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nave and organ of Göttweig Abbey Church, Lower Austria. Baroque case of the organ by Ignaz Gatto 1761. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 15:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Avena sativa subsp. Nigra. (Zwarte haver) Locatie De Kruidhof 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 05:57:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avena sativa subsp. Nigra.

✓ Done New version. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support New version FP for me.--Hubertl (talk) 17:31, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Anciennes voies et vue sur le Bâtiment Voyageurs.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 04:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old tracks near Abbeville station (France)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NB80 - uploaded by NB80 - nominated by NB80 -- NB80 (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- NB80 (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because severe quality issues - I recommend to have images approved as Quality Image before you nominate them here - Uoaei1 (talk) 07:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, because it will be very difficult to take a photo with better quality. --NB80 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Canoe Dordogne.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2014 at 02:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, June 2013 (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 18:01:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, Canary Islands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Chmee2 (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 21:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, organy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 16:51:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Great work of organ-maker and photographer. Colours seem a bit cold to me though. --Kreuzschnabel 17:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me; the crop is also not the best, and noise is quite strong --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 10:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Keila-Joa mõisa peahoone õhust ida külg.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 12:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keila-Joa manor from east (aerial photo)

File:Gothic Tower - City Observatory of Edinburgh - 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2014 at 10:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gothic Tower of the City Observatory of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Gothic Tower of the City Observatory of Edinburgh (Scotland, UK) is the oldest part of the observatory and was designed by architect James Craig and built in the 18th century. It was the only gothic tower built of all that were planned because the project ran out of money. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ArionEstar (talk) 12:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, great job. --Chmee2 (talk) 18:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ibirapuera Park in São Paulo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 22:39:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 21:37:23
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Very small, not even sharp at this size (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Yann (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep not really unsharp, and the size is not a big issue IMO. -- ChristianFerrer 06:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per Yann. --Kadellar (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Pearl Jam --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist While it’s a nice shot the image itself isn’t FP for me. Besides the small size there are JPEG artifacts visible in the fur. --Kreuzschnabel 15:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Symbol and statues in St. Peter.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 21:03:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Symbol and statues in St. Peter
In my opinion the beauty is just the sky that in contrast to the statues of the saints seem to be in paradise --LivioAndronico talk 08:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --LivioAndronico talk 14:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church Ceiling, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 18:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Peter and St. Paul's Church Ceiling, Vilnius

File:Church of Saint Marie Interior 1, Palanga, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 18:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saint Marie, Palanga
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ArionEstar (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another nice one with that bit of light from the stained glass window on one buttress. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is it necessary that Diliff must go through this bureaucratic procedure?, maybe we could create a special attribute for this user to autocall a picture as prominent --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Haha, I don't know about that, but it would be nice to be able to nominate more than 2. I have quite a big backlog of potential images after a busy summer of photographing in Lithuania and the UK. Diliff (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
      • This was a joke logically, however, I believe that your images of architecture, are very good. You can publish only 2 nominations, but I could help nominate two more if you so desired. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Not a bad idea, Wilf! We ought to found a group called DING (Diliff Images Nomination Group), distributing 2 images to each member respectively to nominate. As Diliffs work usually passes through quick promotion (no opposes), 20 members could easily get nearly 3000 images featured per year (assuming they don’t interrupt the process by own nominations). --Kreuzschnabel 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Interior da Catedral de Amiens by Jules Victor Genisson, 1842.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2014 at 16:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Viborg Power Plant 2014-11-17-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 22:09:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viborg Power Plant at night
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Viborg power plant in Denmark is in my opinion an architectural gem, when it comes to modern industrial buildings (and we have FoP for architecture in Denmark). I live nearby and I have photographed it from different angles, in different seasons and different times of day over several years. This summer I tried to nominate an early evening photo with little success. I was recommended to get a prime lens. I have gotten that since. Now, I have tried again, this time using the exact same workflow and tools (but not an equally fancy camera) as a certain well-known church interior photographer here;-) And I have tried to do a night shot using PTGui Pro to make an tone-mapped 32-tiff from a 1×3 pano in four different exposures using my new Canon EF 40 mm f/2.8 STM prime lens. Then tone-mapped exclusively in Lightroom - with faithful colors. I have previously attempted that back in 2010, but with much worse image quality than here and a far from optimal workflow. I have used the nominated pcture as a desktop background the couple of days, and I appreciate it more and more. What is expecially challenging is the extreme difference in brightness of the neon sign to the left and the very weak light hitting the sides of the building. I actually have two further exposures at 8s and 30s to dig even more into the structures of the dark shadows, but it creates such a dominant bloom and glare from the purple-blue neon light, that it becomes very distracting, and so dominant that I cannot find a way to tone-map it, which makes it useful to look at. Thus I have discarded those exposures after several different attempts to find a best compromise. Created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good work, excellent result. Congrats. --Kreuzschnabel 05:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - but why did you add a "watermark" ;-) Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for your support, Villy Fink Isaksen. "Watermark", you say - with a Smile. Could you please enlighten me, what you are hinting at? I do not get it;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Okay - I think you got it, I my self thought that the lighting text was a watermark. (jeg måtte se nærmere på det for at finde ud af hvad "watermark"et var) --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Nåeh, nu fes den ind;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Have you corrected the perspectives, the vertical inside the power plants seems to leaning in, at least more than in this image where the verticals are also a bit leaning in. The image seems also a bit tilted on right. -- ChristianFerrer 06:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Christian Ferrer. Thanks for your comment/question. The center line around the chimney is vertical as far as I can tell. You are correct that the verticals inside the plant (the ones on the windows are the only ones seen) converge inwards as you go up a bit. I tried to make them absolutely vertical, but the vertical field of view is so large that it results in a disproportionate looking geometry. Regarding the apparent tilt, I had a look at this for a long time when I perspective-corrected the image. The base landscape in the foreground is not horizontal but falls off to the right. I think this gives a visual, but wrong impression of a tilt. The fact that the power plant, which has a vertical mirror plane is not centered in the composition (because I wanted to include the neon sign) also results in some "mind tricks". -- Slaunger (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree with Villy Fink Isaksen. --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hehe, the "watermark" is really funny, but image is cool with it. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 19:20:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saints Simon and Jude church in Szalejów Dolny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment good picture, FP for me after clearing dust problems! See notes! --Hubertl (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC) I like pictures like this one! --Hubertl (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice colours --LivioAndronico talk 09:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice light. --Kadellar (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice shot --Chmee2 (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice for sure, but the crop is a bit tight on top. Rule of thirds is not well observed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Goat killed for Christmas dinner.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 19:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goat killed for Christmas dinner
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Absolutely not .... poor beast. --LivioAndronico talk 20:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Are you vegetarian? --Hubertl (talk) 21:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
      • No, but I can not conceive so bloody killings --LivioAndronico talk 21:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
        • Sorry for bothering you again, but that’s not the point here. We judge images, we do neither judge the places nor activities shown in them. And I am pretty sure there’s no cruelty in this, the animal being killed very quickly. --Kreuzschnabel 05:20, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
          • We are here to judge images? by really? But please ..... who should be in favor of this kind of images for me has something wrong. Killed quickly? Cut your throat and see how you will be relieved of a quick death, a wonder so. Lothar Spurzem did a lot better than me. Quick and easy.--LivioAndronico talk 08:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
            • LivioAndronico and Spurzem: Everyday countless livestock animals are slaughtered to be used for food. Why do you think this goat is slaughtered particularly more cruel than all the other animals? And why the human projection as if the goat had the same sense of fear, consciousness, etc. as humans. And even if so, this is a documentary photo of how it is done in a particular location. Please take a moment to put aside you own cultural values for a moment and consider that. The nomination is valuable and encyclopedic and and to my knowledge, the image series by Wilfredor is the only we have of goat slaughtering and thus very unique. I see children participate in the process in the image series. I think it is good for them to see where food comes from. Remember: Valuable does not mean beautiful. We have FPs, which are orders of magnitude more disturbing than this nomination IMO, such as this or this. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't know Slaunger in which country outfits but in Italy (My country) are not slaughtered and waiting for their blood come out of my throat. This is a picture unnecessary and cruel. The photos that you posted have historical value and don't think that are useful for this discussion. --LivioAndronico talk 21:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
However Slaunger if you find seven people who will vote will be FP, I stand by my idea and you yours. The world is beautiful because it is varied --LivioAndronico talk 21:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question What about this image is supposed to be featurable? I see nothing special in, for instance, composition or lighting. --Kreuzschnabel 21:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per LivioAndronico and Hubertl --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Much more valuable than most nominations for me. And FPs do not have to be pleasant for all to look at - it depends a lot on cultural background and is not an absolute. Some technical objections though: The crop of the people surrounding the goat is not good, light is not good on main subject and some disturbing elements in the background. And for those thinking it is gross or cruel: I think the sudden death of the goat is much less cruel than feeding household pets to overweight, and let them live unnaturally long to the point where they have lost most senses and can barely move. Your nom reminds me of a seven years old failed nom of mine. One last comment: Although I find such topics featurable, I do not think they should appear as POTD. It would simply be poor editorial judgement (which is to be clearly separated from censorship by the way). -- Slaunger (talk) 22:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm with Slaunger on this. I don't see reasons to oppose just because of blood. That being said, the composition could be better --Muhammad (talk) 01:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see reasons to stay neutral just because of blood. Neither the composition nor the quality (noise, halos around men) deserve a support IMO. Regarding the subject I grew in a farm and this situation has nothing extraordinary. -- ChristianFerrer 06:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Haha, touche! But I didn't want to pile on an oppose, I like meat ;)--Muhammad (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very poor composition for me (without judging the theme of the image). Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:UK-2014-Oxford-Corpus Christi College 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 18:12:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pelican sundial in main quad, Corpus Christi College, Oxford
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Pelican sundial in main quad, Corpus Christi College, Oxford - created, uploaded, and nominated by Godot13 -- Godot13 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Godot13 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 16:26:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Not the best quality but I really like the composition. All by me -- Gidip (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can deal with the quality. Denifitely not among the worst either. Very nice situation! I also concidered a crop with wider aspect ratio. Might work as well. --Ximonic (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very good composition, beautiful colors, sharp and nice. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good idea and fine quality --Kreuzschnabel 05:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Ximonic, I think a more panoramic crop could do. Maybe 16:9 or 3:5, but it's ok now. --Kadellar (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The crop below is better. Why ISO 400? Yann (talk) 08:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine for me, good ratio! --Hubertl (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

File:Onagers Negev Mountains 1a.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Wider aspect ratio. Gidip (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Street musician Handschoenmarkt Antwerp.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2014 at 15:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Street musician Handschoenmarkt Antwerp
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Jules Grandgagnage -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like this photo, but I the crop is a bit tight, and I also would like to see the face of the musician --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hi, thank you for nomination, but I have to vote against this image. As the technical quality seems to be OK for me, the composition is not good. I do not like that the face of musician is not visible (OK, I understand why is it so), but the crop seems to be to tiny to me. I'd expect that there will be more space around piano and the downer part will be not cut. Sorry for it. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Svjatogorsk, Lavra 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 23:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holy Mountains Monastery, Ukraine

File:Монастир над Латорицею.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 21:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Nicholas Monastery in Mukacheve, Ukraine.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Ahonc -- Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Saint Nicholas Monastery in Mukacheve, Ukraine.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anatoliy (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- oversaturated or colours otherwise unnatural. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Saffron Blaze. If ever in my life, I see a sunset with those colors, I surely suffer a stroke of pleasure --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Saffron Blaze. The composition and mood is very good though. It also appears the light conditions were very good. If you still have the raw, I think a few featurable version could be developed, which is more faithful. For instance the green walls of the monastery look completely artificial in this edit. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The white balance seems to be too reddish or yellowish. --Ximonic (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose; looks like it was shot through a cup of tea. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Edited version[edit]

Монастир над Латорицею - 2.jpg

Colours are changed by author.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WB solved but now we have a QI criteria overexposed.svg Overexposed problem, however, its ok for me --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this one is really good. Previous seemed more like a background from a computer game, but this is much better. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Kruusamägi. Yann (talk) 08:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Kruusamägi too. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 10:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. Very good light and atmosphere! Building still seems unrealistically green, but I could be wrong... -- Slaunger (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Siena Cathedral - Coronation of the Virgin mosaic.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 19:39:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosaic of Coronation of the Virgin mosaic, Siena cathedral, Italy.
  • Mosaic of Coronation of the Virgin, Siena Cathedral. Photo of upper part of Cathedral facade, which can be seen in full here. All by -- Mile (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vista de Reikiavik desde Perlan, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 134-145 HDR PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 19:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

(Pseudo-)HDR (out of 3 frames) panoramic View (4 frames, 12 in total) of the city Reykjavik from the landmark Perlan (on the Öskjuhlíð hill), Capital Region, Iceland.

File:Parkhotel Schoenbrunn Ballsaal DSC 5115w.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 15:09:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parkhotel Shönbrunn, ballroom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- P e z i (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is one of the few preserved classic ballrooms of Vienna, situated at Parkhotel Schönbrunn, 13th district. It's also used as a conference room.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P e z i (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and very nice --LivioAndronico talk 15:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great, although a bit noisy --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Are you sure it's noise and not the structure of fabric what you see? --P e z i (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Reindeer Ljungris October 2014 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 12:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reindeer at Ljungris.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panning shot of 2 reindeer running in the in the mountains in Ljungdalen, Sweden. The image is cropped (but no downsampling), reindeer are very vigilant (bear, wolf, wolverine and lynx are constant threats to the reindeer in the wild) and and difficult to get close to by foot. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Where is santa claus? Face-grin.svg Anyway very good and very nice --LivioAndronico talk 12:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Livio. ;oD Yann (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 16:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But I prefer this one. -- ChristianFerrer 16:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As impressive as those reindeer look, see my !vote below for my explanation of why this is better. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Kadellar (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Enthusiastic support As noted this sort of picture is difficult to get, so kudos to you, Arild. I don't usually go for animal pictures, even well-done ones, because it's so easy for a skilled enough photographer to get a very good one that we rarely see great ones. And this is great because of the high EV—we are not only seeing wild reindeer, scruffy, dumpy and not idealized Christmas creations; we are seeing them in their natural habitat, their motion telling us that they cannot take it easy here, and the light and the background explaining their coloration to us far better than any words in any language ever could. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 17:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Calliphora vicina, u, Face, DC 2014-04-24 -17.46.02 ZS PMax - USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 08:11:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calliphora vicina
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could be reflection. --Mile (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment First of all: wow!, otherwise, there is some stacking/stitching problems in the bottom middle left part (see note). Is there a way to fix that? Poco2 19:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes indeed there is problems and I don't know if it's fixable. Anyway IMO it can be FP in spite of these problems. -- ChristianFerrer 20:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Red Weaver Ant, Oecophylla smaragdina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Beria.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2014 at 00:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

User Beria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice expression, but... Background is overexposed; you can offset it a bit more, it would be better. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Light on her right side is too bright, and generally it’s an unfavourable portrait IMHO, not really a charming expression. The bright background doesn’t bother me though. --Kreuzschnabel 10:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Could you define what is a charming expression for you?, please --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentSorry, I cannot. It’s just a feeling. Maybe it’s the pursed lips. Anyway, while it might be "good", it’s still not a wow portrait for me. --Kreuzschnabel 21:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not a fan of the crop and of the light. -- ChristianFerrer 21:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even without the crops, being personally acquainted with the subject, this doesn't do her justice. Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Val Mont dal Ega y Ncisles.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 23:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The vale 'Mont dal Ega' in the Dolomites

File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yurts. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Halavar (talk) 22:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The place is charming --LivioAndronico talk 23:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The place is certainly charming but we are assessing images, not places. There’s severe chromatic aberration on this one (visible e.g. in the rocks on the left, or the dark ribbons on the yurts), and large parts of the roofs are blown. This is not sufficient on an 8 mpix FPC. Not even QI for me, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 11:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Kreuzschnabel here isn't QI i see other,like a observatory and don't the door of the observatory is for me out of nomination...--LivioAndronico talk 14:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I am quite aware that this is not QI but I want to see a reasonable technical quality on an FPC as well, sorry. Anything technical flaws to mention on my part of an observatory? --Kreuzschnabel 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry Kreuzschnabel I am very sorry Face-sad.svg. I definitely wrong to express myself. I just wanted to make a comparison, to make you understand, about what I see as possible FP. I still I have not voted against at you Face-grin.svg.--LivioAndronico talk 16:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Feel free to oppose my nominations if you think they are not featurable. This is not a personal thing for me at all, like "I dont vote against you, so please do you not vote against me" – I judge images here, neither places, nominators or photographers. Whenever I think a nomination doesn’t meet FP standards, I oppose without regarding the author, nominator or other votes. --Kreuzschnabel 16:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vendôme (Loir-et-Cher).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by sybarite48 - uploaded by Magnus Manske - nominated by Blaue Max -- Blaue Max (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Blaue Max (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see several issues here, despite the nice view. The sky has blown parts, there is some perspective distortion and there's also CA. Not the best light neither, because the buildings are actually in shadow. --Kadellar (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kadellar. There's also that color banding in the sky. Nice skyline but those flaws will have to be fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA PALM TREE 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 22:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Unidentified Phoenix palms, Palm Row, San Jose, California
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael - uploaded by Sanjosecalifornia - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice image. I prefer a perspective correction.--XRay talk 06:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose: What a pity! So nice a light and idea, but so poorly performed. Heavily oversharpened (showing bright red fringes on outer sides of tree trunks and lamps from sharpening of chromatic aberration), and there’s chroma noise all over the dark parts. The overprocessing kills it for me. Sorry. If the author still has kept the original, it may be reprocessed, eliminating the chromatic aberration before doing anything else. --Kreuzschnabel 11:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Päiksetõus rabas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 20:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise at Kõnnu Suursoo in Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Rutake - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry the light is too strong --LivioAndronico talk 20:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not too big in size, but atmosphere make it. --Mile (talk) 11:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another attempt to make me drop whatever I'm doing and go hiking in Estonia. Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting light skilful handled. --Kreuzschnabel 21:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Any chance for higher resolution? --Ivar (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 05:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Museo Arqueológico de Palencia - 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 17:55:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Archaeological Museum of Palencia, House of the Lace, Palencia, Castile and León, Spain. In the lower floor we can see the 4th-century Roman mosaic Ocean and Nereids, found in Dueñas in 1962. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It has something that recalls the scale of the Vatican Museums, then the mosaic is adorable in the center.Gran trabajo. --LivioAndronico talk 19:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 20:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very good. Great perspective and great control of light too --Arturo de Frias Marques (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 11:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pre-Roman Hill fort of Baroña, Porto do Son, Galicia, Spain.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 14:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice and good as always however the mid-day harch light don't help for to make pleasant colors. -- ChristianFerrer 20:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks, but image taken at 9:36 UTC because Spain are in the same time zone than Germany. See Time Zone Converter--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 09:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • In summer Spain have the same hour than France, I think. But the important is not the UTC hour but most the sun hour for the place where you are. In Spain or in Australia 11:36:47 is more near to the mid -day rather than the golden hour. -- ChristianFerrer 17:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-Sonnenobservatorium-Goseck.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2014 at 06:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goseck solar observatory
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Goseck solar observatory is by now the oldest known solar observation circle in the world, having been discovered and restored just recently. I came along in the warm morning light of a grand day and so had the chance to take some nice shots of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hm, I see only a wooden fence, missing the solar observatory! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Perhaps it would be better to write "entrance" of the observatory Face-grin.svg --LivioAndronico talk 14:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have had a look at the thing (online) and I guess that I would not have a much better idea for photographing it. Yet, I feel that the image is not featurable if the commenters above think that the motive is just some random fence, not the instrument itself. Perhaps a view from an elevated position would be good or perhaps trying to offer a look through one of the openings, but obviously an ideal image is hard to get here. --DXR (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I often say, I can see what you were thinking. But perhaps you should try a different time of day. The high contrast between the sides is very jarring to the eye and isn't necessary for understanding the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really nice and not bad however the composition is a bit unbalanced IMO, too much shadow, even if shadow is not an evil, on the left part. -- ChristianFerrer 08:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not good composition. Too dark. No Wow to me. Also, the things mentioned by DXR are justified. --Halavar (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Todi panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 21:03:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Todi is a town and comune (municipality) of the province of Perugia (region of Umbria) in central Italy. It is perched on a tall two-crested hill overlooking the east bank of the river Tiber, commanding distant views in every direction.

In the 1990s, Richard S. Levine, a professor of architecture at the University of Kentucky, chose Todi as the model sustainable city, because of its scale and its ability to reinvent itself over time. After that, the Italian press reported on Todi as the world's most livable city. All by Livioandronico2013 -- LivioAndronico talk 21:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your comment Martin Falbisoner. Anyway I don't think,also beacuse is a quality and valued image. I think that the others could tell me me this. --LivioAndronico talk 10:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Agree with Martin. If this is getting direct sunlight, it's a bit underexposed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok Martin and Crisco I increased the brightness, now what do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 14:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Better now. Maybe it could further help to increase saturation a bit? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hey Martin You haven't signed the edit Face-tongue.svg...anyway more saturation. What do you think? thanks --LivioAndronico talk 19:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Crisco 1492 are you with us? Face-smile.svg --LivioAndronico talk 10:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment But it is possible that nobody votes??? It's possible that there are people here who put their photos but don't care to review each other ??? From now on, I will abstain from voting people who do not reciprocate by voting other people (of course I'm not saying they should vote favorably) that leave at least one comment or vote to photos of other users (and there are many). Thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 12:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I vote when I feel it, not because you wish it. This looks like racket, and is not the right attitude. Yann (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
For you Yann to be educated is a racket? Receive consideration from others and not caring to give it to others is a racket? How sad just sad. --LivioAndronico talk 13:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Yann a right attitude is not to say anything if you do not have something intelligent to say. --LivioAndronico talk 13:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses --Hubertl (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ciao, as you are insisting to request a vote, I do not hesitate to oppose your nomination because I truly believe that this photo is good in composition and the object is interesting but unfortunately the light and the sky are pretty flat and boring (pardon me for beeing sincere). That#s for the photo. In regard to voting, I strongly believe that nominations for FP are not supposed to be as reciprocal as nominations for QI, where it is expressly stated in the guidelines that you should review one image for every nomination. I personally do not feel to be able to judge most of the time if a picture is adequate for FP and I refrain from voting even if I have abut 40 FP. I, personally, do not feel very comfortable to judge FP candidates and I am more than happy to leave the burden to others. Please consider also that I have plenty of gratitude for your support and appreciation of my work. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you Wolfgang Moroder but i I don't require a vote for a vote, but at least a vote, comment or suggestion every 10, it isn't good to be ignored !!! At least for me.I prefer a negative vote that spurs me to improve myself that nothing and for that I thank you.And then if everyone did like you .... here we would do? --LivioAndronico talk 22:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nevertheless, with the last,slightly corrections, its a pro for me. Please, don´t try fishing for votes. This can turn against your interest! --Hubertl (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks Hubertl but i don't looking for votes but consideration.Danke. --LivioAndronico talk 22:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Beautiful. Very good lighting, good colors, very sharp and last but not least a good motif. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Much better now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Technically not perfect, but beautiful --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Gjirokastёr (by Pudelek).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:44:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gjirokastёr, Albania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 19:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please remove the white fringe on the bottom (from rotating I suppose). Otherwise nice. --Kreuzschnabel 05:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment corrected :) --Pudelek (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, but the problem pointed by Kreuzschnabel must be fixed. --Kadellar (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ma'aleh Akrabim.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 13:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by אילן ארד - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the interesting feature here, also compositionally, is the road. But due to the very flat light, it's not a strong motive. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see also a lot of dust spots and vignetting on the image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering -- 2014 -- 5492.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 11:57:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Burg Vischering in Lüdinghausen, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 11:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit soft for only 7 mpix but lighting & composition make up for that. --Kreuzschnabel 05:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry. Forgotten. An image with a better resolution (with more than 11 mpix) is uploading.--XRay talk 06:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the quality is absolutely sufficient and the light is great. The crop on both sides though, although I know it's often hard to get wide enough in such a photo, is just too close to the building in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the crop is a bit tight, as mentioned before, but still awesome mood and colors --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very nice. A little bit more space would have been nice, but it's good as is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Cabaña subterránea en la región de Búðahraun, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 046.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2014 at 02:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Abandoned Icelandic turf house in the region of Búðahraun, Western Region, Iceland. All by me, Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, it's good (and even necessary) to see the surroundings; nice mood. --Kadellar (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico talk 21:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting somewhat dull to me, and I’d prefer to see the background mountains sharper. Lacks wow. --Kreuzschnabel 05:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the lighting fits that harsh environment very well. The scenery reminds me of how Jackson made Tolkien's Rohan look in the movies. --El Grafo (talk) 17:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Kadellar · Favalli ⟡ 03:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 05:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bennu's Journey.webm[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2014 at 23:22:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.