Commons:Kandydatury do grafik na medal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Prezentacja grafik kandydatów w innych językach:

Shortcut: COM:FPC Na tej stronie prezentowani są kandydaci do wyróżnionych grafik (na polskiej Wikipedii "Grafika na medal"). Zwróć uwagę, że nie jest to samo co Grafika dnia, która jest inną forma wyróżnienia.

Aby obejrzeć archiwum poprzednio nominowanych grafik, przejdź na stronę: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.

Istnieje także chronologiczna lista wyróżnionych grafik. Zobacz także: Kandydatów do grafik wysokiej jakości oraz Okiem fotografów.

Skocz do kandydatur do przyznania medalu

Skocz do kandydatur do odebrania medalu

[edit] Formalności

[edit] Nominacja

Jeżeli uważasz, że znalazłeś/aś zdjęcie lub stworzyłeś/aś grafikę, która może być uważana jako wartościowa, z odpowiednim opisem i licencją, skopiuj nazwę grafiki w to pole (zawierającą prefiks File:), po tym jak tekst będzie już w polu:

Potem musisz ręcznie wprowadzić link do stworzonej strony na górze Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

[edit] Głosowanie

Aby wyrazić swoje poparcie, możesz użyć następujących szablonów:

{{Support}} ( Support),

lub aby wyrazić swoją dezaprobatę:

{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),

Możesz także użyć:

Neutralny: {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
Komentarz: {{Comment}} ( Comment),
Informacja: {{Info}} ( Info).
Pytanie: {{Question}} ( Question),
Prośba: {{Request}} ( Request).

Proszę, postaraj się napisać kilka słów, dlaczego podoba Ci się (lub nie podoba) dane zdjęcie - szczególnie, gdy głosujesz przeciw. Pamiętaj również, aby złożyć swój podpis (~~~~).

[edit] Zasady prezentacji grafik kandydatów

[edit] Zasady główne

Po zakończeniu okresu głosowania wynik będzie ogłoszony 15. dnia po nominacji (tak jak jest to pokazane w tabelce czasowej poniżej). A więc okres głosowania to dwa tygodnie (plus godziny do końca 14. dnia). Głosy dodane 15. dnia i później nie są liczone.
Nominacje zgłaszane przez anonimowych uczestników są mile widziane.
Wkład do dyskusji przez anonimowych uczestników jest również mile widziany.
Głosy oddane przez anonimowych uczestników nie są liczone.
Nominacje nie liczą się jako głosy. Poparcie musi być wyraźnie określone.
Nominowani mogą wycofać swoje nominowane zdjęcia w każdej chwili - pisząc: "I withdraw my nomination" lub dodając tekst {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
Pamiętaj, że celem projektu Wikimedia Commons jest zapewnienie centralnego repozytorium dla grafik używanych przez wszystkie projekty Wikimedia, łącznie z możliwymi przyszłymi projektami. To nie jest po prostu depozyt dla grafik Wikipedii, więc grafiki nie powinny być tutaj oceniane na podstawie ich przydatności dla tego projektu.
Zdjęcia mogą być usuwane z listy, jeżeli nie mają żadnego poparcia (nie licząc nominujących) w 5. dniu (dzień nominacji + 5).
Zdjęcie oznaczone szablonem {{FPX}} może zostać usunięte z listy po 24 godzinach od zastosowania tego znacznika, pod warunkiem że nie ma ono głosów popierających poza nominującym.

[edit] Zasady publikacji grafik

Grafika kandydata zostanie umieszczona, jeżeli będzie spełniać następujące warunki:

Odpowiednia licencja (co jest oczywiste)
Grafika musi mieć przynajmniej 7 głosów poparcia
Podział głosów popierających/przeciwnych musi mieścić się przynajmniej w stosunku 2/1 (większość dwóch - trzecich)
Nie mogą być wybrane dwie różne wersje tej samej grafiki - wybrana zostanie wersja z większą liczbą oddanych głosów.

Zobacz jak postępować ze starymi nominacjami: Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#Co zrobić kiedy głosowanie się zakończy.

[edit] Usuwanie zdjęć prezentowanych kandydatów

Nadgodzinowa zamiana standardów zamieszczonej grafiki. Może się tak zdarzyć, że dla niektórych grafik formalne wystarczająco dobre nie jest już aktualne. To jest dla listy zdjęć, które wierzysz, że nie zasługują dłużej by być prezentowaną grafiką. To wymaga 2/3 głosów większości (i minimum 5 głosów) zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy prezentowanych zdjęć. Jeżeli nie ma 2/3 głosów zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy, nominacja zostaje jako prezentowana grafika. Dla nich głosuj "Zachowaj" Keep (to zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką) lub "Usuń z listy" Delist (to nie zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką). Proszę zapewnij link do oryginalnej FP nominacji (to pojawi się pod Links na stronie opisu grafiki). Inaczej te same zasady jak te powyżej wchodzą w życie. Proszę użyj tego linku this link aby dodać nowego możliwego do usunięcia kandydata.

[edit] Wskazówki dla nominujących

Poniżej możesz znaleźć niektóre ”informacje” na temat zasad, które zdjęcia powinny spełniać:

Rozdzielczość – Grafiki zlokalizowane na Commons mogą być używane nie tylko do oglądania na ekranie. Mogą zostać również użyte do drukowania lub oglądania na monitorach o bardzo wysokiej rozdzielczości. Nie możemy także przewidzieć, jakie urządzenia zostaną użyte w przyszłości, a więc ważne jest, aby zdjęcia, które są nominowane, miały tak dużą rozdzielczość jak tylko jest to możliwe. Rozdzielczość powinna być przynajmniej na poziomie 2 mln pikseli (np. 2000x1000), co wydaje się rozsądne na obecną chwilę.
Ostrość – każdy ważny przedmiot na grafice powinien być odpowiednio ostry (nie rozmyty).
Pierwszy plan i drugi plan – obiekty pierwszoplanowe i drugoplanowe mogą przeszkadzać i odwracać uwagę od głównej zawartości grafiki. Powinieneś/aś sprawdzić czy obiekt z przodu nie zasłania innych ważnych elementów i czy coś na drugim planie nie rozprasza kompozycji (np. gdy światło latarni nie świeci nad czyjąś głową).
Głównie Jakość – grafiki nominowane powinny mieć dobrą techniczną jakość.
Wartość – naszym głównym celem jest prezentowanie najbardziej wartościowych grafik ze wszystkich dostępnych. Zdjęcia powinny być na swój sposób wyjątkowe, więc bądź tego świadomy/a:
- prawie wszystkie wschody słońca są ładne i większość takich zdjęć nie jest inna w swojej esencji od innych,
- zdjęcia nocy są ładne, ale zasadniczo więcej detali można zobaczyć na zdjęciach zrobionych w czasie dnia.
- piękne nie zawsze musi znaczyć wartościowe.

Nie każda zasada musi być dopasowana, np. grafika może mieć niewielką rozdzielczość, ponieważ wyższa rozdzielczość nie może już być zrobiona (temat zdjęcia już nie żyje lub nie istnieje) lub wydarzenie już nigdy więcej się nie powtórzy.

[edit] Wskazówki do oceniania grafik

Istnieje kilka kryteriów dla oceniania grafik.

Z technicznej strony mamy ekspozycję, kompozycję, kontrolę ruchu i głębokość pola.

Ekspozycja odnosi się do zamkniętego diagramu kombinacji, który wykonuje grafikę z stonowaną krzywą, która jest idealnie zdolna do reprezentacji szczegółów cieni i punktów szczytowych w grafice. To nazywamy poziomem. Grafiki mogą być na niskiej stronie stonowanej krzywej (niski zasięg), środkowej (środkowy zasięg) lub wysokiej stronie (wysoki zasięg). Kamery cyfrowe (lub grafiki) mają bardziej skurczony poziom niż film. Brak detalu cienia nie jest koniecznie charakterystyczny dla negatywu. Faktycznie może to być część zaplanowanego efektu. Wypalone szczytowe punkty w dużych częściach rozpraszają element.
Kompozycja odnosi się do uzgodnienia elementów w grafice. ”Zasada Trzecich” jest dobrą wskazówką dla kompozycji i jest odziedziczona ze szkoły malarstwa. Ideą tą jest rozdzielenie grafiki z dwiema poziomymi i dwiema pionowymi liniami, w ten sposób dzieląc grafikę w trzecie poziomo i pionowo. Centrowanie tematu jest zawsze uważane za złą praktykę. Tematy zainteresowania są zawsze umieszczone w jednym z ‘’punktów zainteresowania’’, gdzie poziome i pionowe linie przecinają się (cztery takie punkty przecięcia są stworzone). Poziomy nie są nigdy umieszczone w środku, bo ‘’przecinają’’ grafikę na połowę. Są umieszczone albo w górnej lub dolnej poziomej linii. Główną ideą jest nie umieszczanie tematu w centrum.
Kontrola ruchu odnosi się do sposobu, w jaki emocja jest odwzorowana w Grafice. Emocja może być zamrożona lub rozmazana. Przy czym jedna w cale nie jest lepsza od drugiej. To intencja odwzorowania jest ważna. Ruch jest ustosunkowany w obiektach na Grafice. Np. Fotografując samochód wyścigowy, który pojawia się zamrożony w relacji do tła, nie daje nam poczucia prędkości ruchu, a więc technika dyktuje reprezentacje samochodu w zamrożony sposób, ale z zamazanym tłem, aby stworzyć poczucie ruchu, ta technika to ‘’panoramowanie’’. Z drugiej strony zaprezentowanie koszykarza w skoku nie wymaga użycia tej techniki w związku z jego nienaturalną pozycją, co automatycznie sprawia że zdjęcie jest prawidłowe.
Głębia ostrości (DOF – Depth Of Field) odnosi się do części ostrości z przodu i za głównym tematem. Głębia ostrości jest wybrana odnośnie do specyficznych potrzeb każdego zdjęcia. Duża lub mała głębia ostrości może zwiększyć lub podważyć jakość grafiki. Niska głębia ostrości może być użyta dla przyciągnięcia uwagi do głównego tematu, oddzielając go od otoczenia. Wysoka głębia ostrości może być użyta do uwydatnienia przestrzeni. Soczewki krótkoogniskowe (szerokokątne) zapewniają większą głębię ostrości, i odwrotnie, soczewki o długich ogniskowych (teleobiektywy) mają małą głębię ostrości. Najmniejsze przesłony (zasunięte) powiększają głębię i odwrotnie, otwarte zmniejszają ją.

Na elementach graficznych mamy kształt, objętość, kolor, teksturę, perspektywę, równowagę, proporcję itd.

Kształt odnosi się do konturów głównych tematów.
Objętość odnosi się do trójwymiarowej jakości tematu. Jest to osiągane używając światła ze strony (z boku). Przeciwnie do generalnego poglądu, przednie światło nie jest najlepszym światłem. Ono dąży do spłaszczenia tematu. Najlepszym światło dzienne jest wczesnym rankiem lub późnym popołudniem.
Kolor jest ważny. Przesycenie kolorami nie jest dobre.
Tekstura odnosi się do jakości powierzchni tematu. Jest ona wzmagana przez boczne światło… to jest ”wyczucie” dotyku…
Perspektywa odnosi się do ”kąta” towarzyszącego przez linie, które znikają w znikającym punkcie, który może, lecz nie musi być wewnątrz grafiki.
Równowaga odnosi się do porozumienia tematów w grafice, które mogą dać albo równą wagę lub wydawać się cięższe z jednej strony.
Proporcja odnosi się do relacji wielkości tematów w zdjęciu. Generalnie dążymy do reprezentowania małych obiektów, małych w relacjach do innych, ale dobrą techniką jest reprezentowanie małych obiektów przeciwieństw do naturalnych rozmiarów wzajemnego stosunku. Na przykład, mały kwiat skupia większe zastanowienie niż wielka góra…. Nazywamy to odwróceniem skali.

Nie wszystkie elementy muszą być obecne. Niektóre fotografie mogą być osądzone na postawie indywidualnych charakterystyk, np. grafika może być o kolorze lub teksturze, lub kolorze i teksturze, itd.

Symboliczne znaczenie lub powiązanie…. Tu właśnie zaczyna się wojna na opinie…. Złe zdjęcie bardzo trudnego tematu jest lepsze niż zdjęcie dobre zwyczajnego tematu. Dobre zdjęcie trudnego tematu jest nadzwyczajną fotografią.

Grafiki mogą być zrobione kulturowo stronniczo przez fotografującego i/lub obserwatora. Znaczenie grafiki powinno być ocenione zgodnie z kulturalnym kontekstem grafiki, nie przez kulturalny kontekst obserwatora. Grafika „przemawia" do ludzi i ma siłę, aby wywoływać emocje takie jak wrażliwość, wściekłość, odrzucenie, radość, smutek itp. Dobre fotografie nie są ograniczone do wywoływania przyjemnych wrażeń….

[edit] Ponad Wszystko bądź kulturalny

Proszę nie zapomnij, że grafika, którą oceniasz, jest czyjąś pracą. Unikaj używania fraz takich jak „to wygląda strasznie” i „nienawidzę tego”. Jeżeli musisz być przeciw - rób to z rozwagą. Pamiętaj także, że twoja znajomość języka może nie być taka sama jak kogoś innego. Dobieraj swoje słowa z uwagą.

Miłego oceniania… i pamiętaj…. wszystkie zasady mogą być złamane.

[edit] Spis treści

[edit] Kandydatury do przyznania medalu

Odśwież stronę: purge this page cache

[edit] Featured picture candidates

[edit] File:Beautiful autumn day.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 16:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photos public domain - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose unsharp and oversaturated. Take a look to the sky: you see chromatic noise. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Glass of red wine.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 15:39:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photos Public Domain - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose tilted and dictracting background. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Too much noise, not sharp and what is the encyclopaedic value? --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Metropolitan opera 1937.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 10:32:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by U.S. Information Agency - uploaded by Darwinek and AndreasPraefcke - nominated by Fanoftheworld -- Fanoftheworld (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Fanoftheworld (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:F1 2012 Jerez test - Force India 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 01:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gil Abrantes (flickr), uploaded and nominated by Sasha Krotov -- Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment considering that the photo was taken from far away and the car is moving at high speed picture turned out good --Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --David საქართველო 06:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose the composition and cut isn't OK for me: to much unatractive foreground, lo less car, not enough place in front of the car. And the main: the car ist unsharp. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Khost children in 2010.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2012 at 11:34:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Staff Sgt. Andrew Smith (U.S armed forces), nominated by 122.169.50.222
Support --Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- I like the composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support very nice image--David საქართველო 06:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per Bruce1ee. Tomer T (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice propaganda from the US military, but well... Yann (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
OpposePer Yann, except the "but well...". Parent's consents ? Personal rights warning ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Per Yann and Jebulon. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Per Jebulon. / Achird (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Eilean Donan Castle Panorama..jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2012 at 06:09:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by -- Ritchyblack (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Ritchyblack (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Very nice view and panorama. The only thing I am not totally happy with is the colour or saturation in the sky, but that's a minor problem. / Achird (talk) 10:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Super. -- -donald- (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support very nice, though two people are on the bridge centre section in the reflection on the water.... Gnan garra 11:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Very good of you observed, and I have retouched badly! --Ritchyblack (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment very nice, I would support a better crop (the tree on the right is cut). PierreSelim (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment Per Pierre-Selim. Two cm less at left, and two cm more at right...
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't understand why the two people were erased in the first place. Thierry Caro (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Because I like the photo without people prefer. I had been waiting a very long time that the two go on. But now came the next travel group already on the bridge. I'm standing with the feet in the water and the flood was rising. These are only temporary objects that I have removed --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Support I like this photo--David საქართველო 06:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
SupportNice.-- Raghith 10:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Great picture!!! --Meho29 11:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Automeris caterpillar.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2012 at 17:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Geoff Gallice - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 17:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 17:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. --Aleks G (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose dark details of caterpillar and branch eliminated by the black background. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Karelj (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Bold image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per Carschten. Bad black colored background work. Otherwise nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Per Alchemist-hp, oppose only due to the "bad" black background.--Jebulon (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose dark image--David საქართველო 06:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Russia. Moscow Region. Winter pine wood, lake Kratovskoe area.JPG

{Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2012 at 21:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Aleks G - uploaded by Aleks G - nominated by Aleks G -- Aleks G (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Impo, this is not sufficent for a featurable picture (nothing special, just trees). --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per above--David საქართველო 20:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support the image is really technically good, its interesting it shows the detail it let the viewer experience what snow looks like. Gnan garra 01:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Better viewed as an artwork rather than a picture of trees. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per Gnangarra. --Cayambe (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per other supporters.--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice atmosphere! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — Raghith 10:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Culicivora caudacuta.png

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2012 at 17:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A specimen of Culicivora caudacuta, Brazilian bird considered vulnerable in the Red List; created by Sávio Freire Bruno, uploaded and nominated by Denis Conrado.
Oppose distracting background. Tomer T (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose ... and the tip of the tail is out of focus. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:20081206 Alexandros Grigoropoulos december 2008 riots Sina Street Athens Greece.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2012 at 12:46:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Ggia - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support This B&W picture appears timeless ; the grain and stark contrast from the film, along with the make of the car (a Jeep...), had me wonder wether it was truly from 2008. It also has an eerie feeling, as if the burned down and turned over body of the car was floating above the ground. Truly worth being featured, according to me. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Conrado (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC). Impressive, a tribute.
Support !!! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Request @Ggia: maybe you could add some infos about your used camera and the settings of the image? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Weak supportAt full size it's very noisy and I get the feeling the jeep could be more focused. Anyways, I am not opposing since I am aware of the difficulty of all the conditions and It still is a wonderful pic, with a huge wow (the light just above the car is perfect).--Paolo Costa (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Dr.Haus (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer finds another nuggest of gold. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Here is a Contact sheet of the whole set of images shot here. I just uploaded it. Ggia (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Info I am really impressed that you like this image since it is an image from film, having some grain - and noise-grainy images are usually rejected for being FPC ;-). According to my negative notes it is shot by FM2 Nikon, Kodak Tri-X 400ASA (Shot at 400ASA), D76 developer 1 (stock) + 1 (water), 11 minutes @ 20Celsius. Shoting during the night (without flash) and with 400ASA film you need to have open diafragm and the depth of field is quite limited (you can see it at the image). I uploaded this image on December 2011 remembering the December 2008 riots without thinking that this can be a FPC. Ggia (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per Paolo Costa Cathy Richards (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — Raghith 10:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:ST-UBB - Clément Poitrenaud (essai).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 22:34:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by PierreSelim - uploaded by PierreSelim - nominated by Berru -- Berru (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support A very nice and sharp high speed sport shot. -- Berru (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Face down... not recognisable. Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Three players have parts of their bodies cut off, which spoils the image, sorry..
Comment Thank you for the nomination, however I'm really not sure it's a feature picture material (referee and sound man beheaded, and Yves Donguy has lost his left leg and arm). PierreSelim (talk) 15:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Diomedea exulans in flight - SE Tasmania.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 21:49:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by JJ Harrison -- JJ Harrison (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- JJ Harrison (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, well executed. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Gnan garra 01:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--Sasha Krotov (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — Raghith 10:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hallstaviks kyrka January 2011d.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 19:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by ArildV -- ArildV (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Wow! / Achird (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2012

(UTC)

Oppose No wow at all. It is simply a well executed picture of a church. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As Saffron Blaze. --Karelj (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Ice cream van, Helsinki (Helsingfors).JPG

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 12:42:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Babboon says Phhhbt Mysore07.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 06:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by VasuVR -- VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Now this can be used wherever you would like to say :P.

Support -- VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose The noise and the sharpness foil the funny motif. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per Yikrazuul. Tomer T (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per Yikrazuul. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mergus octosetaceus 2.png

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2012 at 00:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A male specimen of Mergus octosetaceus, Brazilian bird considered critically endangered. It is estimated that only 250 individuals remaining in the wild; created by Sávio Freire Bruno, uploaded and nominated by Denis Conrado.
Support Conrado (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC). And now, actually more than 2 mpx.
Oppose Unsharp. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, upper crop too tight. --Cayambe (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose per above. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05 edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 23:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Prolineserver - uploaded by Prolineserver - nominated by Katarighe -- Katarighe (Talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Katarighe (Talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I think it is not the good file to be nominated. The better should be, perhaps, this one.--Jebulon (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The picture is replaced. --Katarighe (Talk) 00:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Also if you don't mind, I added image notes to illustrate the photo. You can undo my action if it feels not good to the picture. --Katarighe (Talk) 16:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Support Conrado (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC). The maternal grandmother of the Princess was Brazilian! That's cool!
Support good image--David საქართველო 18:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Info - I think this one - currently the lead image in the wedding article - is the best one. A pity his hand is slightly over his face, but considering that this is a one-time-only event, I think it's a great photo and I decide to nominate here as a FP yesterday. --Katarighe (Talk) 22:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Everyone can use a bit of bright and cheery. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Well, I hope that wasn't meant as an argument for making it a FP. As someone who was forced to pay for this wedding I don't find it cheery in any way, but like your comment that has nothing to do with the quality of the picture. / Achird (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  - Comment No, bright and cheery was a statement of fact. Other facts include high EV, well executed and a bit of wow. As to the cost... surely outweighed by short and longer term economic benefits. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

The photo is actually featured on the English Wikipedia proof. The photo is selected to as POTY for June 19th, 2012 on en.wiki. --Katarighe (Talk) 22:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Support. — Raghith 10:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Chateau Versailles Galerie des Glaces.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 19:06:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Great composition and quality, lots of wow too. --LC-de (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per above. --VasuVR (talk, contribs) 02:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support The lighting doesn't convince me 100%... but I was there and I can say this picture reproduces very well the atmosphere of the chateau. EV is high, quality ok for me, and there is wow factor - the place itself is a huge wow.--Paolo Costa (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per LC-de --David საქართველო 19:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support as author. Thank you for this nomination! --Myrabella (talk) 21:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support as supporter/fan beside the author, I was there this nice day. Great shot indeed, Myrabella! Happy to be the seventh !--Jebulon (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Lots of visual drama and well executed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Support. — Raghith 10:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Crocus tommasinianus LC0031.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 09:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Tommasini's crocus (Crocus tommasinianus); created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support good enough for me. Use of DOF, composition, sharpness. Direct sunlight might be a minus in some cases, yet here I think it is a plus. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Gratulon pro la momento! Conrado (talk) 13:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Beautiful pic. Identified sp., has EV, nice atmosphere, good composition. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose It's just not clicking with me. I find the ground and background distracting. Gamaliel (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As Gambliel, nothing special. --Karelj (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose The composition is too cluttered, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Šmarjetna gora 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 08:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Meho29 - uploaded by Meho29 - nominated by Meho29 -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment What is the subject/what would the educational value be? --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Lošmi (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Support. -- Raghith 10:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Chris Rea 03 AB.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 06:37:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by / uploaded by / nominated by -- Chepry (talk) 06:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Info Chris Rea during the Santo Spirito Tour; concert at Sala Kongresowa, Warsaw, Poland on February 5, 2012
Support -- Chepry (talk) 06:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose For me it is too dark and noisy. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose I share Yikrazuul's feeling that it is too dark. But the main problem is that the image is not nitid at all. I can see too much motion blur in the guitar . --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose focus problems, unsharp Cathy Richards (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Bonaparte premier Consul Gérard Chantilly.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2012 at 01:50:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by François Gérard - uploaded & nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Napoléon Bonaparte, as First Consul of the French Republic, Feb. 1803. On display at Musée Condé of Château de Chantilly, France. Photo taken by the nominator.-- Jebulon (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--Paolo Costa (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 10:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Support. -- Raghith 10:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Titanacris picticrus picticrus MHNT.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 22:47:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Citron (talk) 22:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Superbe !--Jebulon (talk) 01:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support per Jebulon. --Cayambe (talk) 09:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Impressive --Llez (talk) 09:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --99of9 (talk) 11:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--Paolo Costa (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Amazing image! --AlphaEta (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support It would make a great POTD. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Aleks G (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support vorbildlich --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Support. -- Raghith 10:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Borboletas em Mini-Dálias.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 18:33:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Five butterflies in five Dahlia flowers; created, uploaded and nominated by Denis Conrado. Conrado (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Conrado (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice and beautiful, for the first time i saw all 4 butterflies on the flowers in the same picture.Trongphu (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 22:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Noisy and blurry, the flowers as well as the butterflies --Llez (talk) 09:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Quality just not enough for FP. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Better don't zoom in...--Yikrazuul (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special, no wow. --Karelj (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jerusalem Dominus flevit BW 2010-09-20 07-01-11.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 16:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Info File:Jerusalem Dominus flevit BW 1.JPG is already featured, but I think this one is better. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support i like this one better too.Trongphu (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 22:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Better indeed. If promoted, maybe should we delist the previous one ?--Jebulon (talk) 02:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- if promoted: yes. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice frame --Schnobby (talk) 11:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support this one, remove the other one. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:29, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Not bad! --Karelj (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Exocoetus volitans.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 15:01:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gervais & Boulart - uploaded & nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Citron (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support cool looking fish, it seems like a drawing picture to me.Trongphu (talk) 22:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- It is...--Jebulon (talk) 09:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Poor colors, no wow at all for me, would like it more sharpened. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Goddess Bhadrakali Worshipped by the Gods- from a tantric Devi series - Google Art Project.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 12:52:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by 17th century Basholi artist, Google Art Project - latest version uploaded by Redtigerxyz - nominated by Redtigerxyz -- Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Very good. Yann (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice art work.Trongphu (talk) 22:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kukoboy temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2012 at 08:56:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ivengo(RUS) - uploaded by Ivengo(RUS) - nominated by Ivengo(RUS) -- Ivengo(RUS) (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Ivengo(RUS) (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Info it's tilted counterclockwise. --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
~~Oppose~~ Even if a nice temple, the sky is blown. --201.208.169.81 12:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- You need to log in to vote. Yann (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice temple --Katarighe (Talk) 16:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment This is a silicate brick 100 years of age? The site of the village said that the white and blue bricks for lining taken from Finland. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support I like it!Trongphu (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting building but image has poor lighting and lacks sharpness. --ELEKHH^T 05:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As Elekhh. --Karelj (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Africa from low orbiting satellite Suomi NPP.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2012 at 06:54:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA/NOAA - uploaded and nominated by Techman224 -- Techman224^Talk 06:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Techman224^Talk 06:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose too prominent artifacts in the image. The earth hasn't these bright stripes in reality. --LC-de (talk) 08:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Info As for those four vertical lines: That’s the reflection of sunlight off the ocean, or “glint,” that VIIRS captured as it orbited the globe.
- Yes, I know. And there are four stripes, because this image is a composition of several pictures taken by the satellite at various places, normally there would be only one area. So it's artificial and not even useful to explain the "glint". Btw. explaining the flaw doesn't improve the image. --LC-de (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - I like the atypical angle. The description of the lines being sunlight reflection makes sense to me. Royal broil 22:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose, not the real photo, no stars.Sasha Krotov (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

No star doesn't mean it's not real lol. You know with our technology today, we can easily take out the background if we want to.Trongphu (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Oppose Very impressive techinique in stiching. Although sun reflection from four visible passes of the satellite over the Planet makes the picture looking odd and unnatural. The fact that it's a stich is not a problem for me, but parts of pictures with sun reflection in the oceans should be avoided (I don't know it that was possible though). Also I'm not very sure if everything went fully correct while calculating the resulting image. When looking at the famous blue marble picture form Apollo (which didn't required stiching as it was taken far enough from the Earth) we can see that there is a big part of Antarctica visible. I suppose the purpose of the author was to create a picture of Earth as seen form a similar point as the one Apollo 17 was in 1972. In 2012 picture we can see only some coast on Antarctica, while in Apollo's quite a large part, including South Pole. In other words South Pole should be visible in a picure taken from very high above a point on the Earth south of the equator and it doesn't seem to be here (at least far enough from the horizon). --sfu (talk) 11:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support I like the techniques. It doesn't look like a normal Earth doesn't mean it is not beauty. After all it is still our home, the best place in the world so far.Trongphu (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Palace of tsar Alexey Mihajlovicha in Kolomenskoe-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2012 at 10:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Aleks G - uploaded by Aleks G - nominated by Aleks G -- Aleks G (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. "Турки строят муляжи Святой Руси за полчаса..." Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC).
Oppose Main object of picture (as per the name of picture) seems to one side and rest is distracting. Nothing special. --VasuVR (talk, contribs) 05:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Tipula oleracea female (Linnaeus 1758).jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2012 at 00:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Question Could you please add some scale to better understand the dimensions? --Paolo Costa (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, Paolo Costa. The body length by the Tipula oleracea female is 26 mm. I have no possibility to add some scala. Maybe somebody can help me. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support,Sasha Krotov (talk) 05:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment. I added a note, can crop the top?--Sasha Krotov (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Please add notes on the nomination page, not here... It is impossible to click to open the file in the zone you delimitated--Jebulon (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Shadows too dark. Indirect light would be better. The sharpness is perfect. --Ritchyblack (talk) 10:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support not perfect but in my opinion feature pictures don't need to be perfect. After all nothing is perfect in this world.Trongphu (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Shadows too dark and I don't like the detail, I don't like the quality of the sharpness--Miguel Bugallo 01:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Shadow too strong, disturbing IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Pileated Woodpecker Ash RWD2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2012 at 15:47:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:DickDaniels - uploaded by User:DickDaniels - nominated by User:DickDaniels -- DickDaniels (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- DickDaniels (talk) 15:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Conrado (talk) 16:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC). The real Woodpecker!
Oppose sorry, this bird is unsharp, false focus. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose It's a real pity, but Alchemist is right. The bird is clearly out of focus. Otherwise it is a very nice picture --LC-de (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As others. --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As others. –Makele-90 (talk) 13:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Tallinn - Town Hall Square (Raekoja plats).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2012 at 14:09:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture but, too much distortion and the left side is too dark for me. To much contrast. --Ritchyblack (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Ładne i wartościowe. Albertus teolog (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose too noisy, and i don't like this many people in the picture, unbalance. I don't like the left side either.Trongphu (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

too noisy? where?? --Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Painted Stork in Flight 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2012 at 06:27:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:VasuVR - uploaded by User:VasuVR - nominated by User:VasuVR -- VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose I like the photo, I know how dfficult it is to get birds in flight but its not FP, this is dull and the bird isnt in focus especially the head Gnan garra 08:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Head not in focus. --ELEKHH^T 20:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose As above. –Makele-90 (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Temple Square, Salt Lake City, 1899 retouched.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2012 at 01:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by William Henry Jackson - retouched by Tom dl - nominated by Mmxx -- ■ MMXX ^talk 01:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- ■ MMXX ^talk 01:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment link to source doesnt work Gnangarra 01:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed ■ MMXX ^talk 01:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Gnan garra 04:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Bad composition: tight framing on the bottom, 1:1 sky-earth ratio. --ELEKHH^T 20:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Guys, come on, this is 113 years old! Yann (talk) 01:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Orderinchaos (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - Excellent quality for its age. Royal broil 22:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support nice one!Trongphu (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
weak Oppose per Elekhh: I don't like composition and crop. It's an old image, but it's not the only one. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Peasant Woman Cooking by a Fireplace.jpeg

Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2012 at 22:19:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Vincent van Gogh - uploaded by Claritas - nominated by Claritas -- Claritas (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Claritas (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Not one of his best works in my opinion... but this is still a good reproduction of a Van Gogh, with high EV and quality. --Paolo Costa (talk) 11:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Why not? Trongphu (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 17:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Support EV in peasant series and resolution --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Light painting gnangarra-1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2012 at 17:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by Gnangarra -- Gnan garra 17:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Gnan garra 17:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Neutral Nice but noise.--Claus (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment If it's to be useful for an encyclopedia, you should explain how you produced the picture. --Paolo Costa (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

see w:Light Painting for the encyclopaedic information. Gnan garra 03:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment I've denoised the sky. Feel free to revert if you don't like it Gnangarra. --99of9 (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

thanks,it looks fine to me Gnan garra 03:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Support Yann (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Support Nice to see you around again. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Support –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 07:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Weak support good lighting Cathy Richards (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Orderinchaos (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - Textbook example of light painting. Royal broil 22:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Useful.Trongphu (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support Quite nice, illustrates the end result of light painting very well. Lankiveil (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC).
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 10:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support I've been thinking about this for a while, and I think it's up there. --99of9 (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. /FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Kandydatury do odebrania medalu

[edit] Delisting candidates

[edit] Tabela czasu

Thu 26 Jan → Fri 10 Feb
Fri 27 Jan → Sat 11 Feb
Sat 28 Jan → Sun 12 Feb
Sun 29 Jan → Mon 13 Feb
Mon 30 Jan → Tue 14 Feb
Tue 31 Jan → Wed 15 Feb
Wed 1 Feb → Thu 16 Feb
Thu 2 Feb → Fri 17 Feb
Fri 3 Feb → Sat 18 Feb
Sat 4 Feb → Sun 19 Feb
Sun 5 Feb → Mon 20 Feb
Mon 6 Feb → Tue 21 Feb
Tue 7 Feb → Wed 22 Feb
Wed 8 Feb → Thu 23 Feb
Thu 9 Feb → Fri 24 Feb
Fri 10 Feb → Sat 25 Feb