Commons:Kandydatury do wartościowych grafik

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Przejdź do nominacji obrazu Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

Crystal Clear mimetype txt2.png Trwa tłumaczenie tej strony z jej angielskiej wersji .

Valued image seal.svg

Tu znajdują się kandydatury do miana wartościowej grafiki. Należy pamiętać, że wartościowa grafika to nie to samo co grafika na medal czy grafika wysokiej jakości. Jeśli potrzebujesz więcej informacji, uzyskasz je na stronie krytyka ~ocena~ grafiki.

Pojedyncza grafika zgłaszana jest do statusu wartościowa grafika (WG) , natomiast seria grafik do statusu zestaw wartościowej grafiki (ZWG) . Kandydatura musi być zgłoszona jako najcenniejsza grafika w określonej kategorii spośród wszystkich w Commons' . Oceny należy dokonać zgodnie z valued image criteria ~kryteriami wartościowej grafiki~.

Procedura rewizji wartościowej grafiki (RWG) zostaje otwarta w sytuacji, gdy dwie lub więcej grafik konkuruje o miano WG lub ZWG w tej samej kategorii.

Zasady zgłaszania kandydatur można znależć na stronie Commons:Valued image candidates/Zasady zgłaszania.

Niezakwalifikowana ~odrzucona/nieprzyjęta~ grafika może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w tej samej kategorii, gdy wszystkie wobec niej zastrzeżenia zostaną skorygowane. Grafika, która została sklasyfikowana jako "undecided" może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w każdej chwili. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
12549 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
10418 (83%) 
Undecided
  
804 (6.4%) 
Declined
  
1327 (10.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Jielbeaumadier bouquet dor ascq 2014.jpeg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Bouquet d'Or factory, France, E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier heron parc 1 vda 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Heron Parc shopping mall, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier la croisee des chemins vda 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:18 (UTC)
Scope:
La Croisée des Chemins church, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, N-E view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Copyright problem, the architect died in 2008. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier golf du sart vda 2010.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Sart's golf course, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A caption in English is required. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier larosedesvents 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-16 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Théâtre La Rose des Vents, E view

Copyright problem, and no caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Added... Jiel (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-17 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. -- Jiel (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-17 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, View from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including slightly different view direction) too narrow for a not too exceptional building. --Hagman (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Oriental-Themed Cocktail Set.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
ПростоУчастник (talk) on 2014-09-17 20:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Cocktail shakers

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You must define a scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, thank you! --ПростоУчастник (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image is not the best to illustrate the Cocktail shakers. But it would be meaningless if we add the name of the owner in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:52 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from NE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:55 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from E
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul.Kościelna 5 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 11:58 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from N
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. -- Hagman (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier pavillon de chasse 2007.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 19:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Jagschloss, Parc du Héron, Villeneuve d'Ascq, S view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please add an English description ("Jagdschloss" is not a English word...) --Halavar (talk) 18:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

"Jagdschloss" is a German word used in English for this kind of building : cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagdschloss -- Jiel (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jielbeaumadier lac heron vda 2010.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 20:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Heron Lake, Villeneuve d'Ascq, S-W view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 23:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Jielbeaumadier mairie 11e arr paris 2006.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jiel (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Paris XIe arrondissement at night, S view
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info VI for buildings should be daylight. -- Hagman (talk) 02:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No opposition for night pictures in VI. We must adapt the scope to the event. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1, 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-18 21:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Conium maculatum MHNT.BOT.2005.0.956 graines.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-19 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Conium maculatum (Poison Hemlock), fruits.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Phébade de Venerque Monument aux Morts.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-19 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Phébade, Venereque. Monument to the dead of the first world war.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 09:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Stary Jerzy 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 09:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, Old Jerzy, view from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 10:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-19 10:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, New Jerzy, view from NE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a building with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Champagné-St-Hilaire 86 Église chevet&clocher 2014.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-19 12:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Flat apse and clock tower, church of Champagné-St-Hilaire, Vienne, France, view from E-SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 13:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Tour du Doubs 2014 - Pontarlier - Jérémy Leveau.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Aga (d) on 2014-09-19 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Jérémy Leveau in 2014

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Plutonia lamarckii 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-20 03:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Plutonia lamarckii, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 06:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 10:39 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Kłodzka Street in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 10:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 11:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from W
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-09-20 11:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, view from SW
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scope (i.e. including view direction) too narrow for a simple building. --Hagman (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is not a "simple building", it is a church with an own (large) category; direction of view is usually given in buildings. --Llez (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Oops, sorry. I made my first reviews here today and was unaware of local customs – all I had thoroughly read was merely the documented guidelines. This church looks a lot smaller than a cathedral to me, but certainly has relevance beyond local, justifying a scope of its own. Directional scopes look to me like something that should be justified by the fourth bullet point exceptionally if something remarkable is particularly worth of iunterest – I didn't really see that apply here. It may not be relevant to the point, but one may note that the category is large only because a single photographer spent a day or two there and adding view direction as restriction is close to turning "most valuable" into "only matching".--Hagman (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Château-Garnier 86 Autel détail 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-20 17:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Entombment on altar frontal, church of Château-Garnier, Vienne, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Udayagiri Caves - Hathi Gumpha.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-20 18:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Hathi Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 17:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Udayagiri Caves - Rani Gumpha 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-20 18:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Rani Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Gasa Dzong.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Cfynn (talk) on 2014-09-20 20:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Gasa Dzong, NE view
Used in:
w:en:Gasa Dzong, w:es:Bután, w:ru:Гаса-дзонг, w:ruГаса

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : the scope must be linked to a category and, on this page, we usually complete scopes with "NE (or SW) view". Can you correct and add, please ? --JLPC (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Done. -- Cfynn (talk) 05:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kamsum Yul-le Namgyal Choten.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Cfynn (talk) on 2014-09-20 19:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Kamsum Yul-le Namgyal Choten, NE view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : the scope must be linked to a category and, on this page, we usually complete scopes with "NE (or SW) view". Can you correct and complete, please ? --JLPC (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Done. -- Cfynn (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Friedhof Dottendorf (11).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Hagman (talk) on 2014-09-21 01:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Cemetry of Dottendorf (Bonn)
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler im Bonner Ortsteil Dottendorf

Good imo, but can you add "NW (or SW) view" as we usually do on this page for places and monuments ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 18:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nassarius gregarius 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-21 04:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Nassarius gregarius, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Stiftskirche Melk Kuppelfresko 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2014-09-21 17:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Dome of Melk Abbey, interior view
Used in:
de:Stift Melk

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope imo (I slightly modified your scope so as to hide the word "Category"). --JLPC (talk) 18:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chancelade 24 Logis de l'abbé 2014.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-21 19:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Former house of the abbot, abbey of Chancelade, Dordogne, France SE view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Alcazaba 1, Almeria, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-09-21 20:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Alcazaba of Almería, exterior, from San Cristobál hill. Andalusia, Spain
Reason:
The best in scope IMO. Is going to succeed in FPC. Shows the place very well. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Episcopal palace, Almeria, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-09-21 20:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Episcopal palace, facade, Almería, Spain.
Reason:
Best in scope IMO. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Tour de l'Hommage, Alcazaba, Almeria, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-09-21 21:04 (UTC)
Scope:
"Torre del Homenaje", Alcazaba of Almeria, facade. Andalusia, Spain.
Reason:
The "Homage Tower" was part of the fortress built by the Catholic Monarchs over the remains of the arab fortress (Alcazaba) after the fall of the Almeria arab kingdom in the 15th-century CE. Best in scope IMO. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lecce santa chiara face.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Velvet (talk) on 2014-09-21 22:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Santa Chiara Church in Lecce (facade)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Port, from Alcazaba, Almeria, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-09-21 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Port of Almería, Andalusia, Spain
Reason:
I think it is the best in scope, but there is another good competitor. This current candidate is geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Udayagiri Caves - Ganesha Gumpha 04.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-21 23:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Ganesha Gumpha, Udayagiri Caves, Odisha, India South view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Multa'.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-09-22 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Multa' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Limone - Chiesa San Rocco - Sanctuary ceiling.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-22 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa San Rocco, Limone sul Garda, ceiling of the sanctuary

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Corizus hyoscyami MHNT Profil.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-22 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Corizus hyoscyami ( Scentless Plant Bugs) profil

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Canal de Brienne.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-22 05:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Canal de Brienne in Toulouse. Northwest exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Piazza dei Signori e Palazzo dei Trecento.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-22 05:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo dei Trecento of Treviso. Southern exposure.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Richard the first.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ham (talk) on 2014-09-21 07:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Equestrian statue of Richard I Coeur de Lion outside the Palace of Westminster, NE view
Used in:
en:Richard Coeur de Lion (statue) and several others

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : A few problems : -the sword is not entirely visible (loss of information); -the scope must be linked to a category; -it would be useful to add "NW(or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do here. Can you correct ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I've made the suggested changes to the scope, but there's nothing I can do about the sword, I'm afraid. Ham (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Kaki FR 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-22 12:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Diospyros kaki (Kaki), Autumn leaves
Reason:
(Private garden : no geocode) -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Parasuramesvara Temple.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-22 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Parasuramesvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India (exterior) SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gampe (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC) on 2014-09-22 18:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Image of an important monument of Czech rondocubism period by Otakar Novotný (built in 1923-1924)
Used in:
Otakar Novotný, List of works by architect Otakar Novorný in progress

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting but the scope must be linked to a category and, at first, the picture must be categorized so as to be nominated here. I suggest to create "Works by Otakar Novotný" as a category and then to use a scope like : "N° X..., Y... street, Prague, Czech Republic, NW (or SW... view)". I hope this will help you. --JLPC (talk) 20:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC) (

Open for review.
Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gampe (talk) 18:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC) on 2014-09-22 18:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Image of an important monument of Czech rondocubism period by Otakar Novotný (built in 1923-1924)
Used in:
List of works by architect Otakar Novorný in progress

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : unfortunate crop at the bottom imo. --JLPC (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Siddeshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-22 19:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Siddeshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. __JLPC (talk) 20:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2012 Kościół św. Marka we Frysztacie (Karwina) 07.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-22 20:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Mark in Fryštát, Karviná, Czech Republic. View from S-E.

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pionoconus magus f. rollandi 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-23 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Conus magus forma rollandi, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Macrodontia cervicornis MHNT.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-23 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Macrodontia cervicornis prepared in the Beauchene technique

Symbol support vote.svg Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église Notre-Dame de la Dalbade (Interieur) Fonts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-23 05:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Notre-Dame de la Dalbade in Toulouse. Baptismal font.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 10:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Giorgio degli Schiavoni campanile a vela.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-09-23 05:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa di San Giorgio degli Schiavoni – Venice - Bell Gable.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 10:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2013 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Gutach 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2014-09-23 10:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Corpus Christi church in Guty, Třinec, Czech Republic. South elevation.
Used in:
cs:Guty, cs:Kostel Božího Těla (Guty), pl:Guty (Trzyniec), pl:Kościół Bożego Ciała w Gutach

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bioussac 16 Église façade 2014.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-09-23 13:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Bioussac, Charente, France, facade, WNW view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good, but I think the term "WNW view" is not necessary, "facade" is sufficient, because facade could be only one. --Halavar (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cascata Varone - gorge.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-09-23 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Grotte delle Cascate del Varone, upper gorge
Open for review.
Blumauerhaus Steyr DSC 2743w.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) 20:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC) on 2014-09-23 20:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Blumauerhaus (Steyr), NNE view
Open for review.
Mukteshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2014-09-23 23:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Mukteshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar, India SW view
Open for review.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%B2_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F&action=edit