Commons:Merourien
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Merourien in other languages: |
Ar gwir da vezañ Merour (sysop) a vez roet da izili ar gumuniezh zo anavezet, dellezek da gaout fiziañs an holl, hag a oar mat eus ribouloù ha reolennoù Commons. Gwirioù teknikel ar Merour ne dalvezont ket e mod ebet un aotrouniezh bennak war politikerezh embann ar raktres.
| Administrators as of November 2008 [+/-] |
| Listing by language Listing by date |
|
Ar merour zo un implijer a c’haller fiziout ennañ hag a c’hall:
- prennañ ha dibrennañ pajennoù
- diverkañ hag adverkañ pajennoù
- diverkañ skeudennoù pe restroù enporzhiet
- stankañ pe distankañ implijerien
- kemm an etrefas hag ar pajennoù prennet
Contents |
[edit] Rekizoù emginnig
Ma klot ho saviad gant ar reolennoù da heul e c’hallit en em lakaat war ar renk evit bezañ Merour war Commons:
- N'oc’h ket nevez deuet war-dro raktresoù Wikimedia. Kemer a rit perzh abaoe daou viz da nebeutañ, kompren a rit ha tuiñ a rit gant palioù ar raktres.
- Ur bajenn implijer zo ganeoc’h war Commons ha pourchaset hoc’h eus da nebeutañ 100 degasadenn war Commons (testennoù pe enporzhiadennoù).
- A-du oc’h evit heuliañ ar reolennoù bet embannet hag evit doujañ d'ar c’henemglev a ren etre implijerien Commons.
[edit] Doare da vezañ anvet
Digor e chom ar prantad emginnig, burutellañ, ha votiñ e-pad 7 devezh. Roet e vo ar statud Merour ma vez tizhet ur muianiver a 75% a-du gant peder mouezh da nebeutañ. A-benn neuze e tleo ar goulenn bezañ kaset betek ur penn-bras evit ma c’hallo ar gwirioù merañ bezañ deroet da vat.
[edit] Merourien dizoberiant
A-du gant ar reolennoù e talvoud war Meta, e c’hall ar verourien koll o statud. Hervez ar reolennoù-se, kement merour bet dizoberiant ur bloavezh-pad war Commons a c’hall e anv bezañ tennet a-ziwar roll ar verourien. Graet e vez "Dizoberiant" eus unan n'en defe degaset netra er c’hwec’h miz kent ha nebeutoc’h eget 50 degasadenn er bloaz tremenet. Posupl eo d'ar verourien dizoberiant en em ginnig en-dro oc’h heuliañ an doare emginnig boas.
[edit] Requests for adminship
Create a subpage Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username with the following text:
==[[User:Username|Username]]==
{{custom edit|Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username|text='''Vote'''}}
Reasons why you think you should be an admin. ~~~~
===Votes===
and list it on Administrators/Requests and votes.
[edit] Requests for Adminship
[edit] AFBorchert
Links for AFBorchert: AFBorchert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · blocklog)
AFBorchert has accumulated over 3000 edits and has proven to be cool-headed and reasoned. He tends to weigh in in areas where he is an expert in what he is talking about and/or has done some research, leading to excellent constructive remarks. He warned me that he "will never be able to turn into a heavy-duty admin like Herbythyme or Siebrand", but I believe that Commons has everything to win by having him as an admin; I trust that he will take very valuable decisions in his areas of expertise and that he has the character to make a great admin. Pruneautalk 11:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, Pruneau, for the kind nomination which I accept. Commons is one of the two wikis I feel at home, de-wp being the other one. So far, I was mainly uploading images, working on the category system, and participating in a couple of discussions about licensing issues and deletion requests. I could start helping out with some of the backlogs. So far, I wasn't nominated for adminship on any of the Wikimedia projects. Because of this, I would start slowly and hopefully more constructively over time. Being at Commons since 2005, I think that I have gained some familiarity with this projects and its policies. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Votes
Support as nominator. Pruneautalk 11:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose, regretfully. AFB is barely active. His last 50 edits go back to 12 October. I'm not sure it would be a good idea to promote inactive people to admin. I'll happily support in a month or so with more steady active. Best wishes, How do you turn this on (talk) 22:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Support We always need admins, even if they're not super active. Take a look at Category:Duplicate. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
-
- A good argument for not promoting inactive users is that it's unlikely they will be doing a lot of work. I want to see evidence of steady work as of late. I don't see it. BTW, your link is red. How do you turn this on (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Notably thoughtful user, knows the project very well, and makes well thought out and useful contributions in a variety of areas where help is badly needed, especially copyright issues and DRs. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Thoughtful and international community sense. --Foroa (talk) 06:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
For seen good interactions from this user. Not so quite active but we need more admins. This is a user which I believe we can just bend our strict criteria a little ;) Good luck! --Kanonkas(talk) 13:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Support Excellent work, at least while active, so he/she deserves the tools. —Ceran (speak) 14:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose per "How do you turn this on". Please become more active again first. abf /talk to me/ 15:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Support per User:MichaelMaggs. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose [1]; [2]; because admins should be some kind of role model; despite of that I think he's doing good work; a super-active admin is nice to have, but if he's doing some work it should be ok --Isderion (talk) 17:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- What's so worrying about those two diffs? Is it because on one of the pages AFBorchert wrote "This template includes legal information which is used by hundreds of my uploaded photographs. Nobody is allowed to change these legal terms except me". Please correct me if I am wrong. --Kanonkas(talk) 23:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- As you can see, this is a user template (which is used by a lot of pictures). This is in contrary to the suggestions made on COM:USER#Templates: AFB's template doesn't use the Template:Information as basis. He also doesn't subst his template as suggested. My experience is that such user templates cause harm (e.g. [3] or confusion (see [4] for example: under which licence was the image original uploaded?) Admins are some kind of role model (Vorbild) and I don't want other users doing the same. --Isderion (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Support - Per nom by Pruneau (talk • contribs), also agree with comments by Rlevse (talk • contribs) and MichaelMaggs (talk • contribs) and others above. Cirt (talk) 21:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Support, uses sound judgment, demonstrates clear understanding of policy, and actions to date have been above reproach — what more is needed? JGHowes talk - 23:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comments
[edit] Request for removal of rights
- You can request removal of your rights at m:Steward requests/Permissions.
[edit] Requests for Bureaucratship
- None currently
[edit] Requests for CheckUser
Please note that for a request to succeed in this section a minimum of 25 support votes and an 80% positive vote are required in accordance with Meta policy. Note also that in accordance with recent practice, requests for CheckUser will run for 2 weeks.
- None currently
[edit] Request for Oversight Rights
Page revisions can be Oversighted, so that they no longer appear in page history, and can only be restored by developers, although they can be seen in source form by those with the oversight permission while they remain in the oversight log. The right is used to remove material that may give rise to legal challenges or to remove offensive or attack based material from view, especially when concerning a person's real life identity, full name, address, telephone number etc. Note: As with Checkuser, a wiki must have at least 2 "Oversighters" for accountability and to serve as checks and balances. 25 votes in support, and at least 80% positive votes overall are required to grant the right. Note also that in accordance with recent practice, requests for Oversight will run for 2 weeks.
- None currently
[edit] Requests for Bot Flags
[edit] 555.bot
To prevent new floods of uploads on my main user account, I would like to get a bot flag in this account. It's only purpose is to mass upload .png public domain book scans taken from various sources (Google Book Search, National Library of Brazil, National Library of Portugal etc) in order to play within ProofreadPage extension on Wikisource.
Q/A:
- What are your past uploads floods?
- Category:Noções Elementares de Archeologia → s:pt:Noções Elementares de Archeologia/I (still needing categorization by subject and incomplete on Wikisource :( ): 300 files
- Category:Carta a el-rei D. Manuel sobre o achamento do Brasil: 28 files
- Category:Os Lusíadas: 376 files
- Category:Peregrinaçam: 46 files (the category have 48 files, but two aren't uploaded by me due to some obscure bugs)
- Why not single uploading in one .djvu file?
-
- Sometimes I need to split a larger file into small djvu files due to the 20Mb issue, like I've done at Category:Peregrinaçam: instead of uploading one ~130Mb .djvu converted from the 42Mb PDF, I uploaded the files using the splitted PDF files converted in djvu;
- .djvu conversion is lossy. Books from Google Book Search downloaded as a .pdf and converted to .djvu generates a small and low-quality file. But using the Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional I get a few dozens of high-quality (600 dpi) .png files. It will be useful to crop images from the texts sets.
-
I will be using the commonist to mass upload the files. Lugusto • ※ 20:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Could you please make a test run? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Done: I've uploaded the first 30 pages from a book of 148 pages (but MediaWiki don't render then =( ). Lugusto • ※ 02:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- The categories are incorrect, please fix it. Multichill (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nuked the .pngs, replacing by .jpgs files (I hope that MediaWiki now supports it). Please re-check.
- @Multichill: the category is the name of the book. This is done like as in Category:Scanned English texts (the fully categorization is done only at the category that have the book name). Please let me known if you have any suggestions of different category schemas.
- Lugusto • ※ 19:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Category:Os Sambaquis de São Paulo is just fine (the first uploads contained a non-existant category). It would be nice if you included a {{BookNaviBar}}. Multichill (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Archive
Links to old Requests and votes are archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

