Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 2/archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Vote - Vota - Voto - 投票[edit]

العربية: من فضلك أضف تصويتاتك الجديدة عند نهاية القائمة التالية.
Català: Si us plau, afegiu el vostre vot a la fi de la llista següent.
Čeština: Prosíme, přidejte své hlasy na konec seznamu.
Dansk: Stem venligst ved at tilføje din stemme nederst på den følgende liste.
Deutsch: Bitte neue Stimmen in der folgenden Liste unten anfügen.
English: Please add your new votes to the end of the following list.
Español: Por favor, inserta tu voto al final de la siguiente lista.
Français : Veuillez ajouter vos nouveaux votes à la fin de la liste suivante.
Galego: Por favor insira os seus votos no fin da lista.
Magyar: Kérünk, szavazatod a lista végén add le.
Italiano: Aggiungi il tuo voto alla fine della seguente lista.
日本語: 投票する場合は次のリストの一番最後に追加して下さい。
Nederlands: Voegt u alstublieft stemmen aan het eind van de volgende lijst toe.
Polski: Proszę dodawać nowe głosy na końcu tej strony.
Português: Por favor insira os seus votos no fim da lista.
Română: Vă rugăm să vă adaugaţi voturile la sfârşitul listei de dedesubt.
Русский: Чтобы проголосовать, пожалуйста, добавьте ваш голос в конец списка.
Shqip: Ju lutem shtoni votat tuaja në fund të listës së mëposhtëme.
Српски / srpski: Молимо додајте свој глас на крај списка гласова.
Slovenčina: Prosím, pridajte svoj hlas na koniec zoznamu.
Slovenščina: Prosimo, dodajte svoj glas na konec spodnjega seznama.
Suomi: Lisääthän äänesi seuraavan listan perään.
Svenska: Var god och skriv dina nya röster i slutet av följande lista.
Türkçe: Lütfen oylarınızı aşağıdaki listenin sonuna ekleyiniz.
中文(简体)‎: 请将您的投票加在投票名单的末尾
中文(繁體)‎: 請將您的投票加在投票名單的末尾

  • a - example vote by Commons user - MichaelMaggs 22:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • z - example vote by user without a Commons Userid - diff 85.139.196.32 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Archives[edit]

Votes (add to the BOTTOM)[edit]

  • 5 - Superb Aurora image 84.190.217.241 12:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no valid diff, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 EyOne 12:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 3 - Fantastic animation. I love 1 too, but my vote is for 3 as it is a superb work, considering the fact that it's original. --Nmadhubala 12:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ([2] on en.wikipedia) we need a valid diff from your other account where you assert to be the same as this Commons user, not the other way around. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 diff -- Steel en:Steel 13:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 Gugganij 13:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 --81.145.242.106 14:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no valid diff, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. {{{2}}}
  • 5 the nature --β16 - (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 Big fan of the animated moon. Remember 15:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 --Überraschungsbilder 15:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5, a beautiful picture. Olessi 15:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 --EugeneZelenko 15:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 3 68.248.159.134 15:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Amazing... Ajor933 16:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 diff--Ganchelkas 17:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 China Crisis 17:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 This picture is creepy... Yuval Y § Chat § 17:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 diff -- Tivedshambo 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 Changed my mind. diff -- Tivedshambo 17:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 definately best picture of the year! bestes foto des jahres! diff --213.196.229.85 17:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 These are all spectacular; my next choices would be 11 and 9; I love 1 and 5 but would prefer to use a wikiuser's image. diff Bikeable 18:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7diff They're all breath-taking, so I take n° 7, it's just too cute! --Escondites 18:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - exceptionnel !!! : très esthétique (magnifique oiseau dans ce décors de neige, le givre sur le bout du bec...), pédagogique : on voit avec précision l'organisation extérieur du plumage, des couleurs, la texture du bec, la concitution des pattes, on voit la rétine de l'oeil... ; elle témoigne de la spécificité de la force contributive de l'art photographique à la connaissance : impossible pour la plupart d'entre nous d'approcher d'aussi près et de façon statique un oiseau et pouvoir observer ainsi dans les détails son aspect extérieur ! Cette photo est une richesse exptionnelle pour le projet wikipédia ! - diff Alceste 18:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 - this is the best one! diff JP06035 18:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4--brilliant; in this case, a picture is worth a million words! diff 69.136.195.244 18:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7, excellent, exceptional, brilliant. Shyam (T/C) 18:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - Fruggo 18:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8, Beautiful Wikimedian's picture with good composition, quality and wikipedian interest - Ceridwen 18:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 3 clever composition, illustrates one of the basics of mechanics. Régis Lachaume 18:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 is interesting for me, diff --Ali1986 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 that's not a picture, that's a whole story Irmgard 19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 sent chills down my spine 140.180.24.127 19:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 Would love to see this in landscape style, to use as a desktop User:Darkson:Darkson no valid account?? pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 great work Alessio Damato 20:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 Mysid 21:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 ~~helix84 21:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 - Ratarsed 21:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 88.108.32.186 21:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Great pic, animations should be encourgaed. no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 Andrew Levine -- same reasons as Alceste above: So much precise detail in the plumage, the bit of frost on the beak, and the feet. Andrew Levine 21:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 - Who could not like the moo-oon? diff Wwwwolf 22:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 -Gadfium 22:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 -I have a duty to pick whichever one has airplanes in it. diff --SeanMD80 22:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 129.2.151.216 22:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 Evocatice. 89.138.37.240 23:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 Beautiful. diff -SocratesJedi 23:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • i can't vote :( but I think the best picture should be not based solely beauty but on value added to the wiki, so 5 -- no anon votes pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8 - diff. ---Bryson109 22:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - Barasoaindarra 23:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - Alexj2002 23:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 : Oxam Hartog 23:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 - Sad it's not by a wikipedian, but I am voting for it anyway. Morgan Leigh 23:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 - Rmhermen 23:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8 - great Bird, perfectly sharp - not number 5 for the same reasons it didn't reach the excellent state on de:WP:KEB... diff --Muellercrtp 23:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 Entten tentten teelikamentten... Lähes kaikki kuvat ovat niin loistavia että mahdoton valita. Tämä näyttää pikkukuvana parhaalta Tuohirulla 23:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 A picture that combines art and science. Wonderful! 24.30.251.242 23:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Beautiful composition and unusually good photo of aurora [3] diff] Betsythedevine 23:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 - A stunning comment on the relationship of our technological society with the rest of the planet. EnEdC 23:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 I love the detail in the feathers and ice on its beak, but they're all really good.--HereToHelp (talk) 23:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) note this edit was made by user:HereToHelp - [4] - although their sig only points to ENwp. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Which has more than 100 edits here. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 3 A really good animation, IMo the picture of the year. Manecke 00:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff. < 100 Commons edits, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11, but I was torn. 5, 7, and 11, props for superb technicality in completely different ways. The editing on the Aurora Borealis was excellent, I looked at it and thought I could see the green sky moving. The focus on the Blue Jay (and not of the branches) was superb, I stared at the feathers and the claws, and the dusting of snow for far too long. The photo of that match, that little perfect swirl of blue fire under the yellow burst is entrancing. I also really liked 1 and 2 (especially the upturned shoe). diff, Wikipedia Miss Mondegreen 00:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • none', these are decent images, but how do any of them pertain to the year 2006 in any sense? 65.29.137.10 00:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) They were recognised as FPs during 2006. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 is just about the most wonderful night photography picture I have seen on the Commons, and I have seen a lot. Also, to the user above, had you read the beginning of this page, you would know that we're voting for the best featured picture promoted in 2006, as well as how to vote. - 24.167.165.20 00:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 6 diff Rkitko 01:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Tough call! An embarrassment of riches, as the saying goes. 6, 7, 8, 9 also are wonderful. 75.162.27.112 01:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 diff educational and a large amount of preparation work. But all the others are great! Graeme Bartlett 01:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 Great pictures! 2, 5, and 11 are also awesome. Hometown of SF might have affected it... :) but they are all amazing. --Yarnalgo 01:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 11 - Beautiful capture, extraordinarily clear. --diffNarfil Palùrfalas 01:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - My favorite, using it as wallpaper. --Falcorian (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - Simply Amazing no anonymous votes pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 A fantastic image of the aurora 74.114.91.237 01:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 7 diff 24.90.165.192 02:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Crazy. Wish I could vote for them all. diff --Fbv65edel 02:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1, although 5 is nice too. NSLE-Chacor 02:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8, and my next choices would be 10 and 9. 5 has serious aesthetic issues in addition to not being by a Wikimedian--Ragesoss 02:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 User:Kidnimbus 21:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no user by this name here...pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 - Beautifully designed explanation of article content. 76.173.102.126 02:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 for PoTY as the most striking and powerful picture, although I would probably support 2 for "Societal image of the year" or something similar, reflecting its poignancy. (also on en.wiki [5]; see the links at the bottom of the page.) Flcelloguy 03:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 - Bright lights, Big city. no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - A beautiful picture of nature at its best. Purae You have to register an account, not just create a userpage. go to Special:Userlogin. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - Far above the rest. Beyond compare. Royalbroil T : C 03:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 - diffRP88 04:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 --Dual Freq 05:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 - Looks like a very difficult shot. diff24.55.132.198 05:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 - Zodiiak diff : I don't think people realize how powerful this picture is...there's just so much going on here, look at it for 1 minute and you'll just open up in so many ways invalid diff, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - Alekjds&diff 05:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) valid diff
  • 10 - Quite a unique picture! diff Robomojo 06:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 - Unflinching. 74.106.157.152 06:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff invalid diff, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 Miguel303xm 06:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 - Quite a fascinating picture. diff invalid diff, no signature here pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 - Love how the lights highlight the building and planes, and I love the layout of the airport. *9diff - 220.244.242.47 07:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) see 220.244.242.47's vote, 24.88.76.172's change pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 I confess that I was disposed reflexively to support 5, which surely more explicitly than 2 serves an illustrative encyclopedic purpose and is plainly preferred to 2 by a measure of value (as against, by a measure of artistic merit or technical quality), but I think the concerns regarding color raised at its FP candidacy are not insignificant; I break tie between the two, perhaps inappropriately, in favor, as Ragesoss, of the image created by a Wikimedian. diff Jahiegel 07:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2They're all great, but this one is about people.[6] invalid diff and sign, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8 --Aconcagua 09:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 diff Dgies 09:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6: You don't see something like that every day. Egs 09:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Husky 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 Itub 09:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 203.87.65.3 09:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff.
  • 7 - no visible artifacts and crystal clear! diff --WikiSlasher 09:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 - Amazingly skillful to be able to capture such a sharp image of this subject. 81.152.197.14 09:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, reread the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 - Elapied 10:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 - Motion picture! I've always wanted to see the moon in this aspect. diff diff (looks like it changed on me) 71.213.102.221 10:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 --Tschaensky 11:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - fantastic pic! 172.141.124.212 11:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 12:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 -- Erina 11:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 1 The most beautiful picture between all. Captainm 11:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 6 --Closedmouth 12:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 1 --Hu:Totya (talk!) 12:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 5 -- Wars 12:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 9 Chris93 12:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 12:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 3 Very good picture ([7]) --62.158.117.213 12:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 has to get my vote, since Wikinews used it here. Here's the diff for my account on Wikinews, I believe you'll find I've made enough edits. Any problem with my vote, please notify me on my Wikinews talk page. --Brianmc 12:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 --Eduardoferreira 12:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - GAD talk ð contributions 13:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Simple and beautiful...
  • 9 --Merlinme 13:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff
  • 2, amazing composition.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6129.215.196.17 13:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)yadevol no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 13:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8 --Rémih 13:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 - informative and simple. feydey (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 Nice, clean, sharp. [8] Abeg92 13:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5. ais523 (w:en:) 13:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC) (I have 100 edits on :w:en:)
  • 6 cool pic diff You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 I'd've been thrilled to vote for 11 or 7 too. w:en ×Meegs 15:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5. --Fang Aili talk 15:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6. With apologies to 1, which is a close second. Freshacconci 15:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 16:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4. --Daniel73480 16:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 16:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 --schlendrian •λ• 16:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 amazing. Fabienkhan 16:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 [9] --Muchness 16:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 4 Kersti 16:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 - I've always liked this pic - diff Roadmr 16:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 - tough call - diff Flex 16:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 - diff --MKay 16:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 8 --Spangineeren ws (háblame) 16:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. {{{2}}}
  • 1 - Spectacular diff 81.144.177.106 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) (that's me Dweller 17:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC))
  • 3 - Animating a woodcut-- that's cool. en:User:Skal You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 - All of these images are lovely, so I can be exremely picky: 1 is a very good shot, but the composition could be improved (the lights in the corners are particularly distracting). 2's composition is perfect, but the image uploaded is very low resolution, and has a currently hip ultrasharpened HDRish look to it that will look very 2000s in a decade or two. 3 is a great animation, but I suspect it will also not age well, and there's something uncomfortably discontinuous about the motion. 4 is an apropos and unintrusive use of animation, but the image quality is actually not that good (low resolution, aliased font, aliasing at edges of moon); I think it also misleadingly suggests that it is actual photographs of the moon. The long exposure of 5 makes it appear blurry at large sizes. The composition of 6 is awesome but the image quality and contrast are only "good". 7 is a perfectly great wildlife photo, but is sort of obvious. Similarly with 8, except that foreground branches are additionally a bit distracting. 9 is wonderful in every way, and would win my favorite photo of the group, but its usefulness in an encyclopedia is limited. 11 is a great encyclopedic capture of a difficult to photograph event; really nothing to criticize about it at all except that the subject is a little mundane. 10 is high quality, and outstanding in its capture of something encyclopedic that would otherwise be basically impossible to see, so it is my pick. Thumbs up all around! en User:Brighterorange
  • 9 [10] Doug Bell 17:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 11 --137.198.61.65 18:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 18:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 2 Herr Kriss 18:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 5 Tizio 18:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 7 diff Khardan 18:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC).
  • 9 - Just too damn pretty to be real. 134.198.64.84 18:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 6 - A haunting photo, looks like a raised Titanic! Rapotter
  • 4 Beautiful, informative, illuminating. It represents the values of wikipedia perfectly diff 86.129.53.151 19:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • 10 Unique, encyclopedic, and of wonderful quality. diff Basar 19:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)