Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:FPC
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.
Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer
Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peu améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peu attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Le lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Contre}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (GA candidate.svg Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (BA candidate.svg Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles[edit]

Règles générales[edit]

  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant I withdraw my nomination.
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} (Symbol keep vote.svg Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire[edit]

Contents

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 07:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo

File:Berlin Hauptbahnhof Ostseite HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 05:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

East facade of Berlin Central Station as seen at early dawn from Alexanderufer.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info East facade of Berlin Central Station as seen at early dawn from Alexanderufer. The building is reflecting in the water of Humboldt harbour. The building was designed by Meinhard von Gerkan. HDR made of three exposures (f/11, ISO 100, exposure times 1/30, 1/60, 1/125).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Peter's Basilica at night HD.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 17:48:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Peter's Basilica at night

File:TheWave.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 11:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vermillion Cliffs Wilderness
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Post.eingang, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Vermillion Cliffs National Monument - Sandstone formation called "The Wave" because of its spectacular shape and colors.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak supoort Wow is magnificent, but the sky… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Judging by the shadows, the image was taken in the evening or morning (low sun), so the dark sky might be forgiven... Kleuske (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 12:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - wow. --Pugilist (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I was totally impressed, and was going to support, but then I saw File:Coyote_Buttes.jpg. It's still a nice photo. Just not quite .... --Abd (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A little dark perhaps? --King of ♠ 01:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of image quality, it is not very sharp and too dark --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20140125062438 - Balão boituva.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 10:52:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Balloon in Boituva, São Paulo state, Brazil.

File:Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 17.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 09:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the islets Sveti Đorđe (left) and Our Lady of the Rocks (right) off the coast of Perast in the Bay of Kotor, Montenegro. Sveti Đorđe (island of Saint George) is a natural island that hosts the Benedictine monastery of Saint George, from the 12th century, and the old graveyard for the old nobility from Perast and further from the whole Bay of Kotor. On the other side, Our Lady of the Rocks is an artificial island created by bulwark of rocks and by sinking old and seized ships loaded with rocks. The homonymous church, a Roman Catholic temple, dates from 1452.

File:Kršlenica 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kršlenica 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kowloon Panorama by Ryan Cheng 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kowloon Panorama
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ryan Cheng - uploaded by Lkiller123 - nominated by Julien1978 -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per this, one of the best banners at Wikivoyage. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small to see the detail for a panorama.(I presume downscaled to much.) --Laitche (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Plus gray bar on the top. --Laitche (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment there are stitching errors on the right side --93.144.76.191 23:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gray bar, stitching, low vertical resolution, editing pretty exaggerated. — Julian H. 09:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian, also horizon not level, buildings not straight vertically. This isn't "featured Wikivoyage banners". We have some standards. -- Colin (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Double vote. Yann (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice lighting but too small. --King of ♠ 01:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Columba livia - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:15:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Columba livia

File:2014 Baroña. Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 10:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hill fort of Baroña, Pre-Roman Galicia (Spain).

File:NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:46:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image

File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738 (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:10:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light traces of a ferris wheel, Viktorkirmes in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like the nice light pattern coming from the ferris wheel. Also the composition is imho quite pleasing. -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom. Nikhil (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose light ok, but too tight crop and weak sharpness, D kuba (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't mind the top crop but a little mind the bottom crop but agree with Tuxyso. --Laitche (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 06:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to Tuxyso for nominating the picture. (BTW: I just improved the resolution.) --XRay talk 09:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Sharpness could be better, but given the circumstances it is ok. I like the tight crop which gives the picture intensity and a feeling of actually being there. Nice work. --Pugilist (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 01:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera
This is not another sunset over the sea, this is a zoombie sunset before apocalipse :) --The Photographer (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bothriechis lateralis CR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 22:00:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bothriechis lateralis

File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd-frame crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 10:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesus image on church window

File:Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 09:36:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg

File:Reflexions of a mangrove.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 00:14:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't see an overall idea in the composition. --King of ♠ 00:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per KoH. Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts. --Laitche (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Withdraw my vote, neutral for now. --Laitche (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I find the composition very good and very interesting. I really don't understand the critics above. However, on the left side of the picture there's a lot of magenta CA at the tree. I would support the nomination if this issue was fixed. --Code (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • If that very interesting means reflection and symmetry, I've realized before your comment and guess others are same... --Laitche (talk) 10:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I couldn't shut my mouth called a critic. --Laitche (talk) 10:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. --Code (talk) 06:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral This is indeed very interesting with "reality" and reflection seamlessly blending without leaving any discernible water line. Makes my brain go nuts, which is meant in a positive way. I'd compare it to listening to one of the more obscure Zappa songs: complex music and strange lyrics (for a non-native speaker), so I have to listen to them actively and carefully multiple times for them to make sense, but after some time I usually start to like them. Most of those songs are not really danceable or radio-friendly, though, and I fear that this image may lack the FPC equivalents of these words (whatever they are) as well. --El Grafo (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) I sincerely hope this comment makes sense to anyone but me. If not, it's obviously a side effect of looking at the image for too long ;-)
  • Yes, that's what I meant. --Code (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I like this review, the analogy. If you look up mangrove photographs, 99% will be photographs from the outside looking at the edges of mangroves. Pictures from inside a mangrove are rare, and difficult because of the visual confusion, branches, reflections, light seeping in... The idea of this photograph is precisely that, to show the confusion, the visual confusion. The ripples of the water, the reflections make it hard even there to distinguish objects, until one just sits long enough and let the mangrove in. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Chamaeleo chamaeleon - Common Chameleon - Bukalemun.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 17:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 12:43:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fountain in Szczytna

File:Red Fuji southern wind clear morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 09:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Katsushika Hokusai, uploaded by Petrusbarbygere, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Famous painting by Katsushika Hokusai, mostly known as the author of The Great Wave off Kanagawa. Renomination. -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality reproduction. --Tremonist (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} Razorsharp, notable artist, great work. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Having second thoughts. Kleuske (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I nominated the alternative. This version was published circa 1930 and also the woodblock was made circa 1930. At least Hokusai had never seen this version then I'd like to support the alternative. When the last time I nominated this, I didn't realize that. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This version was published circa 1830 - 1831. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obviously. Yann (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Also good. --Tremonist (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better colors. Comparing the two versions, i find the above a bit overdone. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dull. -- Fotoriety (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I couldn't find a better one of the first publication or near first publication, I think 1930 version's detail is distinctly different from the first publication, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Duplicate- — Julian H. 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Please check what you vote on. I don't know if you have written a voting-bot or something like that, but it doesn't work very well. — Julian H. 15:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Windows April 2015-2a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 08:54:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows

File:Stairway Monsanto Castle April 2015-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 08:51:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Granite stairway in the Castle of Monsanto, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment At first view it appears as a zig-zag line rather than stairs, but it's really well-made. Is it possible to increase the stones' sharpness a bit? --Tremonist (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • This is a very high resolution photo, with more than 22Mp. In my opinion the stones of granite are as sharp as they can be. Any further sharpening would cause undesired artifacts. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the optical illusion created by those dark and harsh shadows. Well spotted and executed – Chapeau! Sharpness is perfectly fine for me. If you can find the stairs on a map, geocoding would be nice. --El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thank you @El Grafo:, it's good to know that some of our peers (one, at least!) perceive things the same way we do! Aussi, c'est bon d'être félicité en français! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent jeu d'ombres! At low resolution I have the impression that the stones are arranged in the wall and not that they are a stairs outside of this one. -- Christian Ferrer 08:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I suggested a very small crop. Could we have a better file name? --Kadellar (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --Kadellar (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice subject! Very good! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • @Kadellar: & @Slaunger: -- I tried to crop a bit on the top and doesn't work out imo. The bright part in the bottom stair was darkened because it was a bit distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 06:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great panorama with many, many details. --Tremonist (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 00:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice panorama though the colors look faded. --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I agree, I think there might be some problems with the processing. There is some inconsistency in the sky. I'm guessing that tone mapping or exposure fusion was used, the dull muddy sky is a common problem with that technique. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now, although I could be persuaded to support if reprocessed to fix the issues with the sky. The whole scene looks slightly too dark too. I appreciate that it might have been to preserve highlight detail, but a bit of bumping up shadow and mids might be useful. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am working on it but it is a hard job, please wait a few days. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Uploaded a better version with more light in the dark areas. And the sky is also better now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Improved. I still think the right side of the sky is a bit dull and not very blue and the transitions between the frames is not great (you can clearly see a difference in brightness), but the left side is improved. Overall, it's just good enough for a support, but if you still have some energy to improve the sky on the right, it would be another step in the right direction. Did you make sure that each frame had the same exposure and the same white balance? It seems like something isn't quite right. Diliff (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tate Modern, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 116-117 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 21:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors. All by me, Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great view, but rather dark overall, probably due to the lack of light inside (?) and the dark construction elements. --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    Tremonist: I uploaded a brigther version Poco2 19:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you, it looks much nicer now! --Tremonist (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done. The man ascending the stairs seems a bit "ghostly" - but that doesn't matter that much imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good picture, definitely QI, but not visually striking enough (due in no small part to the asymmetry of the subject) for FP IMO. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:59:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rissne metro station.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rissne metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The train is blurred "on purpose", it's greatly done! And on the left wall even the writing is readable. Good work! --Tremonist (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good, but note my suggested crop --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but note my suggested crop, too, it is a bit different --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support. Nicely taken, although it's not the most interesting view. Very minimalist, not a lot of visual interest. Diliff (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and the overall "crispness" of how you captured this specific moment. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Christian IXs Chapel Dome Interior 2015-03-31-4812.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neo-Byzantine Dome in Christian IX's Chapel, Roskilde Cathedral

File:A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 18:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP

File:Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresko Langhaus Mittelfeld.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 12:01:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Via triumphalis of St. Benedict
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ceiling fresko in Melk Abbey church: Via triumphalis of St. Benedict. Painted by Johann Michael Rottmayr (1722), all the rest by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:New College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 21:28:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New College Reredos


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Merton College Chapel Organ, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 21:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Merton College Organ


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5388.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 19:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gate of a house (an former grain mill) near Karthaus (Limbergen, Buldern, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany)
  • Already done.--XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What does that say in English? (What does the warning sign mean?) --Laitche (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • "Caution - Biting Dog" is the translation of the sign. --XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the composition and technical quality is good and so is the idea of simply framing the subject like this. The background is too busy with too uneven contrast for my taste though. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI but not an FP—no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find this sufficiently striking for FP, and as Slaunger says the background is too busy, as well. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 15:51:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self-portrait of a female Celebes crested macaque
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by a female Celebes crested macaque, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Qian.neewan -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 15:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support copyright issue of this picture makes it a featured picture to me, but it is great anyway. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but IMO not FP. It's special because it was made by a monkey, but it is only a snapshot. --XRay talk 19:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • It's a stolen image IMO. No matter what the stupid law says. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image was discussed extensively by a large number of reviewers at the earlier nomination: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg. However, the actual JPG offered here is much larger (11.74MP vs 1.63MP) so I guess a revisit is justified. -- Colin (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is not so bad seeing the condition how it was taken (good camera or artist monkey? ;oD) And now it is famous. Yann (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great selfportrait... Kleuske (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There is enough doubt about the copyright status of this image to make featuring it unwise. Voting to promote it to FP status just as the (human) photographer has said in yesterday's edition of Amateur Photographer that he is ‘working to pursue infringers in the UK’ feels too much like an unethical exercise in photographer-baiting. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Michael, this is the wrong place to discuss the copyright status of this picture, which already have been discussed ad nauseam and settled. David Slater is not the photographer (that's the point), and he sent a DMCA notice to the WMF and it was rejected. BTW his arguments are complete bullshit. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • See m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Transparency_Report/Requests_for_Content_Alteration_&_Takedown#Monkey_Selfie. -- KTC (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Yann, while I agree the copyright issue has been discussed ad nauseam and settled in the US, the image still strongly divides opinion on the ethics (enshrined in law or otherwise) of treating this image as free. A featured picture is supposed to be one "of the finest on Commons" and if some feel it is not ethical to host/promote such works then their opinion is a valid aspect that judgement of "our finest", even if some disagree. While threats of legal action continue in the UK, it would probably be unwise for any UK-based person to re-use this image [other than "fair use" for commentary, which seems to be 99% of its usage anyway], which surely affects its status as being among our best free works. -- Colin (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
        • Colin, the copyright status has been reviewed by several legal experts, including from WMF and the US government. I don't think there is any doubt that it is in the public domain in the USA and most countries. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I know and I agree it seems pretty settled wrt copyright law. Doesn't mean that the ethics are settled (they clearly aren't, especially outside of Commons) or that the continued threat of legal action in the UK can be completely ignored. These two issues exist, regardless of whether one agrees with them or not. -- Colin (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • Yann, I understand that you don't see any ethical problem here. I do. The copyright situation in the UK is by no means as clear as it is in the US, and if it were to be adjudicated by a UK court the decision could go either way. That, and the perception that Commons is featuring the image out of spite is very relevant, in my view. The comment by Daniel Case, below, exemplifies the type of hostile and unpleasant view that I find most regrettable. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
            • Sorry to say, but talking about ethics here is a big hypocrisy. I am pretty sure than the camera owner, now being known as "the man who helped creating the monkey selfie", is a much better commercial position than being a photographer of an ordinary picture of an ordinary monkey. Beside, we promoted pictures of much worse ethics than this without anyone raising an eyebrow about it. And we will certainly do it again in the future. That's not an issue in itself, Commons being not a project for promoting ethics. I would be happy to discuss this in a RFC about "ethics and Commons", this nomination is not the right place to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just another selfie. Saffron Blaze 22:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't want to be too formal but per XRay plus it was taken accidentally. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support because it's now a picture with historic value in and of itself, it was pretty good to begin with, and David Slater can go stick his long lens where the sun don't shine. Daniel Case (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ... and another case in point as to why I don't contribute images to Wikimedia Commons anymore. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bastial, animal, but not FP. A "snapsot" taken from an animal can't be featured. It is simply a random image, a snapshot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Who or what created the image is not a criterion for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: sorry, but what will be featured on this absolute and real/true random snapshot??? Can you please explain it me? That was neither wanted nor intended. It is comparable to a game of roulette or lotterie ... a simply chance from an interesting animal! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand. Dode boom, belangrijke voedselbron in evenwichtig biotoop 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 06:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Dead tree, important food source in a balanced ecosystem. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: sorry I do not know what you mean. Are the English language is not powerful. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality and the composition are not outstanding, the blue sky can be seen among the trees ruins the wet-ish atmosphere, Sorry. --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me; it is too busy for my taste. Lightning is too dark and dull as well. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea and the subject, but I'm not fully convinced by the composition - it's quite busy. Just some ideas that came to my head: 1) A lower angle could have enabled you to keep the branches at the top left corner out of the frame. Maybe concentrating on one of the two sections of the dead tree would have helped too. 2) The whole image is quite dark, but not dark enough to make this look like an intentional choice by the photographer (could potentially work very well with this subject). 3) The white balance seems to be a little bit too yellow (you won't have much living green things this time of the year of course, but still …). 4) I've got a suspicion that this subject might work quite well in black & white. --El Grafo (talk) 07:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am also unconvinced by the composition. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Seems left side trees leaning to the left and right side trees leaning to the right. Is that actually leaning or cause by the distortion with the wide angle lens(18mm)? --Laitche (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: I have automatically corrected lens with lightroom 5.7. Can also manually correct. For your information: it is hilly spot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction WB and verticals.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better with the correction. For me, wow is limited, but the quality is very good. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the composition is much better but about the quality(especially the colour range) seems rather difficult with EF-M for this photo, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Note: in my humble opinion is in early April not much color in a dark forest. It was important for me to bring the decay of dead tree good picture and that life in the vicinity of the tree has benefited. And I succeeded in my opinion. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small light correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 19:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

13 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No better example of oriel windows on Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Yann ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My eyes are surprisingly drawn to that picture every time I scroll through the huge FPC page. Simple, but striking picture to me. I don't think the lighting can get better than that for the subject : it emphasizes the textures quite well. - Benh (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only when I look this at 1280px, a head of statue and a cable at the right side appear, Here. Why? --Laitche (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    This is the previous version of this photo, I do not know why this is happening, at a resolution of 1280x881 it should be visible the last version. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • hmm, That's a mysterious. Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me a QI with good lightening. But something is wrong with the proportions. The window on the right extends noticably further in the vertical direction, than the one to the left. I get the impression that the vantage point was not right in the middle but has been atempted postcorrected by a perspective correction. It pretends to be symmetric, but is not quite so. It gives an unbalanced composition IMO.-- Slaunger (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't mind the tight crop for this but the lighting is not appropriate for the subject, the left window's shadow is cutting off and the right window's shadow is reaching the left window, that's the reason why this doesn't look excellent, in my opinion. --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Plus, I guess this photo was taken by low-angle notwithstanding it's showing just as if taken by level-angle, so I feel it strange. --Laitche (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Slaunger, he explained very well my own feeling.--Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Slaunger, Laitche & Jebulon - Capture a photo directly ahead is impossible, because there is a tree. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I know it's impossible but that way(getting strange feeling) doesn't work for me in this case. --Laitche (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
But I don't mind change my vote to neutral. --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Crocodylus acutus aka American crocodyle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 03:40:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Webysther 20131026172834 - Rocha com algas e ouriço-do-mar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 20:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock with sea urchin, red algae, green and yellow at beach in Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Webysther -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very beautiful, but unfortunately blurred and the water on the right is overexposed. --King of ♠ 02:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    @King of Hearts, Webysther: It's fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    Overexposed is simple to fix, if the data is in raw, give me one day to see this. About blurred i do no, because the long exp. cause this, water move the plants. -- Webysther (talk) 10:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Overexposed fixed. -- Webysther (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Webysther: A exposição não ficou boa. O melhor seria que a água à direita voltasse ao normal assim: [1]. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @ArionEstar: Applied over the raw the fixed, the quality is really better. -- Webysther (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    Color is better but unsharpness remains. --King of ♠ 04:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness is acceptable for a difficult moment for shooting, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's kinda good idea but not the wow idea, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good idea, but has technical problems. --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good for IQ, not the wow idea, IMO. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me it lacks some interesting focal point that the eye can rest on. The moss is not of sufficient interest in itself to fulfil that role. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tiradentes escuartejado (Tiradentes supliciado) by Pedro Américo 1893.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 16:10:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiradentes quatered, by Pedro Américo.

File:Singapore Supertree-Grove-in-The-Gardens-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2015 at 18:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Supertree Grove in Singapore
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 18:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very interesting subject, but unfortunately too tight on the sides, especially the right which is cut off. --King of ♠ 03:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is just a part of the much bigger Supertree Grove in Singapore. The trees are standing in a circle and you will always have some of them cut when viewing from ground level. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    Change to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral in light of the difficulty in obtaining a good composition. --King of ♠ 02:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support is a beautiful structure, the quality is excellent. The cut is not the best but the image is very pleasant.--LivioAndronico talk 12:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Definitely capable of being photographed at an FP level, but in this case the crops, even if they're unavoidable, and the washed-out sky don't work for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case. --Laitche (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Interesting for sure. --Tremonist (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Also per Daniel Case. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wall April 2015-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2015 at 15:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Minimalism: detail of wall and window in the Belém Cultural Centre, Lisboa, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see a little bit of barrel distortion. --King of ♠ 21:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the centered composition.--Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, that is a real possibility and it may deserve an alternative version. But what if the !votes split between the two?... What the hell, tht's go for it! Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like these minimalistic compositions a lot! It could benefit from a geocode. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Here it is: the exact object location, so you can go there and do a better job! By the way, I appreciate your deferred (and displaced) comments! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Both Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral but prefer this one. --Laitche (talk) 21:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I am struggling with the notion of minimalism in FPC. I don't mean this as an attack on anybody, but I personally feel that this is a kind of get-out-of-jail concept that makes an image untouchable to a set of expectations we would otherwise have, such as having a lot of EV, being an appealing and accurate representation of the motive, having nice light etc. When I look at the image, I feel that it is a good supporting photo for an article, giving people a better understanding of the facade details, but this is not something that gives me a wow effect or makes me think that the image is outstanding. Such photos might appeal to many, but I am not sure whether this is just because they are unusual and obviously different from boring standard images many creators now think should be FP. I am not denying that my oppose might be based on personal preference (I usually feel that images of entire works of architecture are superior), but at the end of the day, such preferences make our votes. BTW: The WB also looks too cold to me. --DXR (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for bringing this issue to the discussion, DXR. It is a matter of fact that the so-called "artsy images" were never concensually regarded as truly useful for the project (except the reproductions of notable artists) and have usually a hard time in FPC. However we should keep in mind that Commons repository is intended to much more than just illustrating Wikipedia articles. While WP:FPC is focused on the encyclopaedic use and value of the pictures in Wikipedia, that is not the case with Commons, as our FP are used to many purposes outside Wikimedia. I always said, and that is written in my profile of Meet our Photographers (here), that I consider Photography as a means to interpret reality and to transmit such interpretation to others. That is precisely what I'm doing here with the photos of the Centro Cultural de Belém, to which a minimalistic view seems to apply perfectly. Are these images useful, besides being beautiful (for me)? I believe so. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Alvesgaspar for your measured response. I think that the point I was trying to make is slightly different, though. I do not want to challenge the value of images like this one, in fact I do think it has EV. I just think that it is quite difficult to assess whether it is outstanding or "the best of commons", because there is little material to measure it against here. In this way, the vote becomes more of a "like vs. don't like" than I personally would like to see in this forum. I agree that WP:FP is more EV-driven, but at the same time COM:FP still is very much biased in the direction of EV on a spectrum between pure documentation and abstract art, at least if we look at what is presented here most of the time. --DXR (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Photographing a detail of a building, particularly one of architectural merit, is as important as photographing the whole facade or interior. Having looked at other images of this building, I see it lends itself to a minimalist approach. Here we can concentrate on the coloured bricks, the little dark squares and the squares-within-squares window. No other distractions. And symmetry. I can certainly see this photo appearing in a book that discusses the building or its architect, so for me it is plenty enough educational-value (as opposed to encyclopaedic value, where it is unlikely such small details would merit inclusion). -- Colin (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wall April 2015-2a.jpg[edit]

SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alternative version special to @Jebulon: (and also for myself) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's so funny, I've nerver seen the special alternative for an individual :) --Laitche (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one too. It is an improvement that the lower grey 'bar' is not included in this crop. I think it improves the composition. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes !--Jebulon (talk) 21:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but for me the off-center composition distracts from the minimalism. --King of ♠ 23:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me a perfect composition, everything centered might be wrong.--Hubertl (talk) 05:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. I also think that the original composition is better. --DXR (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's really a subjective issue, but I fail to get how moving the square to a rule of third point makes it more interesting on such an abstract picture. - Benh (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not inspiring to me, sorry Poco2 08:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't find this arrangement as satisfying as the first. -- Colin (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Voting ended on April 21. — Julian H. 15:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)


Contestations en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 07:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo

File:Berlin Hauptbahnhof Ostseite HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 05:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

East facade of Berlin Central Station as seen at early dawn from Alexanderufer.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info East facade of Berlin Central Station as seen at early dawn from Alexanderufer. The building is reflecting in the water of Humboldt harbour. The building was designed by Meinhard von Gerkan. HDR made of three exposures (f/11, ISO 100, exposure times 1/30, 1/60, 1/125).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Peter's Basilica at night HD.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 17:48:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Peter's Basilica at night

File:TheWave.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 11:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vermillion Cliffs Wilderness
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Post.eingang, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Vermillion Cliffs National Monument - Sandstone formation called "The Wave" because of its spectacular shape and colors.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak supoort Wow is magnificent, but the sky… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Judging by the shadows, the image was taken in the evening or morning (low sun), so the dark sky might be forgiven... Kleuske (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 12:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - wow. --Pugilist (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I was totally impressed, and was going to support, but then I saw File:Coyote_Buttes.jpg. It's still a nice photo. Just not quite .... --Abd (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A little dark perhaps? --King of ♠ 01:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of image quality, it is not very sharp and too dark --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20140125062438 - Balão boituva.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 10:52:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Balloon in Boituva, São Paulo state, Brazil.

File:Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 17.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 09:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the islets Sveti Đorđe (left) and Our Lady of the Rocks (right) off the coast of Perast in the Bay of Kotor, Montenegro. Sveti Đorđe (island of Saint George) is a natural island that hosts the Benedictine monastery of Saint George, from the 12th century, and the old graveyard for the old nobility from Perast and further from the whole Bay of Kotor. On the other side, Our Lady of the Rocks is an artificial island created by bulwark of rocks and by sinking old and seized ships loaded with rocks. The homonymous church, a Roman Catholic temple, dates from 1452.

File:Kršlenica 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kršlenica 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kowloon Panorama by Ryan Cheng 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kowloon Panorama
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ryan Cheng - uploaded by Lkiller123 - nominated by Julien1978 -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per this, one of the best banners at Wikivoyage. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small to see the detail for a panorama.(I presume downscaled to much.) --Laitche (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Plus gray bar on the top. --Laitche (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment there are stitching errors on the right side --93.144.76.191 23:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gray bar, stitching, low vertical resolution, editing pretty exaggerated. — Julian H. 09:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian, also horizon not level, buildings not straight vertically. This isn't "featured Wikivoyage banners". We have some standards. -- Colin (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Double vote. Yann (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice lighting but too small. --King of ♠ 01:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Columba livia - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:15:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Columba livia

File:2014 Baroña. Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 10:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hill fort of Baroña, Pre-Roman Galicia (Spain).

File:NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:46:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image

File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738 (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:10:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light traces of a ferris wheel, Viktorkirmes in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like the nice light pattern coming from the ferris wheel. Also the composition is imho quite pleasing. -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom. Nikhil (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose light ok, but too tight crop and weak sharpness, D kuba (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't mind the top crop but a little mind the bottom crop but agree with Tuxyso. --Laitche (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 06:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to Tuxyso for nominating the picture. (BTW: I just improved the resolution.) --XRay talk 09:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Sharpness could be better, but given the circumstances it is ok. I like the tight crop which gives the picture intensity and a feeling of actually being there. Nice work. --Pugilist (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 01:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera
This is not another sunset over the sea, this is a zoombie sunset before apocalipse :) --The Photographer (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bothriechis lateralis CR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 22:00:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bothriechis lateralis

File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd-frame crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 10:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesus image on church window

File:Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 09:36:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg

File:Reflexions of a mangrove.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 00:14:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't see an overall idea in the composition. --King of ♠ 00:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per KoH. Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts. --Laitche (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Withdraw my vote, neutral for now. --Laitche (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I find the composition very good and very interesting. I really don't understand the critics above. However, on the left side of the picture there's a lot of magenta CA at the tree. I would support the nomination if this issue was fixed. --Code (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • If that very interesting means reflection and symmetry, I've realized before your comment and guess others are same... --Laitche (talk) 10:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I couldn't shut my mouth called a critic. --Laitche (talk) 10:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. --Code (talk) 06:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral This is indeed very interesting with "reality" and reflection seamlessly blending without leaving any discernible water line. Makes my brain go nuts, which is meant in a positive way. I'd compare it to listening to one of the more obscure Zappa songs: complex music and strange lyrics (for a non-native speaker), so I have to listen to them actively and carefully multiple times for them to make sense, but after some time I usually start to like them. Most of those songs are not really danceable or radio-friendly, though, and I fear that this image may lack the FPC equivalents of these words (whatever they are) as well. --El Grafo (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) I sincerely hope this comment makes sense to anyone but me. If not, it's obviously a side effect of looking at the image for too long ;-)
  • Yes, that's what I meant. --Code (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I like this review, the analogy. If you look up mangrove photographs, 99% will be photographs from the outside looking at the edges of mangroves. Pictures from inside a mangrove are rare, and difficult because of the visual confusion, branches, reflections, light seeping in... The idea of this photograph is precisely that, to show the confusion, the visual confusion. The ripples of the water, the reflections make it hard even there to distinguish objects, until one just sits long enough and let the mangrove in. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Chamaeleo chamaeleon - Common Chameleon - Bukalemun.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 17:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 12:43:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fountain in Szczytna

File:Red Fuji southern wind clear morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 09:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Katsushika Hokusai, uploaded by Petrusbarbygere, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Famous painting by Katsushika Hokusai, mostly known as the author of The Great Wave off Kanagawa. Renomination. -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality reproduction. --Tremonist (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} Razorsharp, notable artist, great work. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Having second thoughts. Kleuske (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I nominated the alternative. This version was published circa 1930 and also the woodblock was made circa 1930. At least Hokusai had never seen this version then I'd like to support the alternative. When the last time I nominated this, I didn't realize that. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This version was published circa 1830 - 1831. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obviously. Yann (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Also good. --Tremonist (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better colors. Comparing the two versions, i find the above a bit overdone. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dull. -- Fotoriety (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I couldn't find a better one of the first publication or near first publication, I think 1930 version's detail is distinctly different from the first publication, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Duplicate- — Julian H. 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Please check what you vote on. I don't know if you have written a voting-bot or something like that, but it doesn't work very well. — Julian H. 15:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Windows April 2015-2a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 08:54:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows

File:Stairway Monsanto Castle April 2015-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 08:51:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Granite stairway in the Castle of Monsanto, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment At first view it appears as a zig-zag line rather than stairs, but it's really well-made. Is it possible to increase the stones' sharpness a bit? --Tremonist (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • This is a very high resolution photo, with more than 22Mp. In my opinion the stones of granite are as sharp as they can be. Any further sharpening would cause undesired artifacts. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the optical illusion created by those dark and harsh shadows. Well spotted and executed – Chapeau! Sharpness is perfectly fine for me. If you can find the stairs on a map, geocoding would be nice. --El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thank you @El Grafo:, it's good to know that some of our peers (one, at least!) perceive things the same way we do! Aussi, c'est bon d'être félicité en français! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent jeu d'ombres! At low resolution I have the impression that the stones are arranged in the wall and not that they are a stairs outside of this one. -- Christian Ferrer 08:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I suggested a very small crop. Could we have a better file name? --Kadellar (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --Kadellar (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice subject! Very good! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • @Kadellar: & @Slaunger: -- I tried to crop a bit on the top and doesn't work out imo. The bright part in the bottom stair was darkened because it was a bit distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 06:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great panorama with many, many details. --Tremonist (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 00:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice panorama though the colors look faded. --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I agree, I think there might be some problems with the processing. There is some inconsistency in the sky. I'm guessing that tone mapping or exposure fusion was used, the dull muddy sky is a common problem with that technique. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now, although I could be persuaded to support if reprocessed to fix the issues with the sky. The whole scene looks slightly too dark too. I appreciate that it might have been to preserve highlight detail, but a bit of bumping up shadow and mids might be useful. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am working on it but it is a hard job, please wait a few days. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Uploaded a better version with more light in the dark areas. And the sky is also better now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Improved. I still think the right side of the sky is a bit dull and not very blue and the transitions between the frames is not great (you can clearly see a difference in brightness), but the left side is improved. Overall, it's just good enough for a support, but if you still have some energy to improve the sky on the right, it would be another step in the right direction. Did you make sure that each frame had the same exposure and the same white balance? It seems like something isn't quite right. Diliff (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tate Modern, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 116-117 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 21:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors. All by me, Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great view, but rather dark overall, probably due to the lack of light inside (?) and the dark construction elements. --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    Tremonist: I uploaded a brigther version Poco2 19:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you, it looks much nicer now! --Tremonist (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done. The man ascending the stairs seems a bit "ghostly" - but that doesn't matter that much imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good picture, definitely QI, but not visually striking enough (due in no small part to the asymmetry of the subject) for FP IMO. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:59:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rissne metro station.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rissne metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The train is blurred "on purpose", it's greatly done! And on the left wall even the writing is readable. Good work! --Tremonist (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good, but note my suggested crop --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but note my suggested crop, too, it is a bit different --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support. Nicely taken, although it's not the most interesting view. Very minimalist, not a lot of visual interest. Diliff (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and the overall "crispness" of how you captured this specific moment. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Christian IXs Chapel Dome Interior 2015-03-31-4812.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neo-Byzantine Dome in Christian IX's Chapel, Roskilde Cathedral

File:A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 18:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP

File:Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresko Langhaus Mittelfeld.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 12:01:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Via triumphalis of St. Benedict
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ceiling fresko in Melk Abbey church: Via triumphalis of St. Benedict. Painted by Johann Michael Rottmayr (1722), all the rest by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:New College Chapel Interior 2, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 21:28:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New College Reredos


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Merton College Chapel Organ, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 21:23:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Merton College Organ


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5388.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 19:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gate of a house (an former grain mill) near Karthaus (Limbergen, Buldern, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany)
  • Already done.--XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What does that say in English? (What does the warning sign mean?) --Laitche (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • "Caution - Biting Dog" is the translation of the sign. --XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the composition and technical quality is good and so is the idea of simply framing the subject like this. The background is too busy with too uneven contrast for my taste though. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI but not an FP—no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find this sufficiently striking for FP, and as Slaunger says the background is too busy, as well. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 15:51:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self-portrait of a female Celebes crested macaque
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by a female Celebes crested macaque, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Qian.neewan -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 15:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support copyright issue of this picture makes it a featured picture to me, but it is great anyway. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but IMO not FP. It's special because it was made by a monkey, but it is only a snapshot. --XRay talk 19:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • It's a stolen image IMO. No matter what the stupid law says. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image was discussed extensively by a large number of reviewers at the earlier nomination: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg. However, the actual JPG offered here is much larger (11.74MP vs 1.63MP) so I guess a revisit is justified. -- Colin (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is not so bad seeing the condition how it was taken (good camera or artist monkey? ;oD) And now it is famous. Yann (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great selfportrait... Kleuske (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There is enough doubt about the copyright status of this image to make featuring it unwise. Voting to promote it to FP status just as the (human) photographer has said in yesterday's edition of Amateur Photographer that he is ‘working to pursue infringers in the UK’ feels too much like an unethical exercise in photographer-baiting. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Michael, this is the wrong place to discuss the copyright status of this picture, which already have been discussed ad nauseam and settled. David Slater is not the photographer (that's the point), and he sent a DMCA notice to the WMF and it was rejected. BTW his arguments are complete bullshit. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • See m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Transparency_Report/Requests_for_Content_Alteration_&_Takedown#Monkey_Selfie. -- KTC (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Yann, while I agree the copyright issue has been discussed ad nauseam and settled in the US, the image still strongly divides opinion on the ethics (enshrined in law or otherwise) of treating this image as free. A featured picture is supposed to be one "of the finest on Commons" and if some feel it is not ethical to host/promote such works then their opinion is a valid aspect that judgement of "our finest", even if some disagree. While threats of legal action continue in the UK, it would probably be unwise for any UK-based person to re-use this image [other than "fair use" for commentary, which seems to be 99% of its usage anyway], which surely affects its status as being among our best free works. -- Colin (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
        • Colin, the copyright status has been reviewed by several legal experts, including from WMF and the US government. I don't think there is any doubt that it is in the public domain in the USA and most countries. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I know and I agree it seems pretty settled wrt copyright law. Doesn't mean that the ethics are settled (they clearly aren't, especially outside of Commons) or that the continued threat of legal action in the UK can be completely ignored. These two issues exist, regardless of whether one agrees with them or not. -- Colin (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • Yann, I understand that you don't see any ethical problem here. I do. The copyright situation in the UK is by no means as clear as it is in the US, and if it were to be adjudicated by a UK court the decision could go either way. That, and the perception that Commons is featuring the image out of spite is very relevant, in my view. The comment by Daniel Case, below, exemplifies the type of hostile and unpleasant view that I find most regrettable. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
            • Sorry to say, but talking about ethics here is a big hypocrisy. I am pretty sure than the camera owner, now being known as "the man who helped creating the monkey selfie", is a much better commercial position than being a photographer of an ordinary picture of an ordinary monkey. Beside, we promoted pictures of much worse ethics than this without anyone raising an eyebrow about it. And we will certainly do it again in the future. That's not an issue in itself, Commons being not a project for promoting ethics. I would be happy to discuss this in a RFC about "ethics and Commons", this nomination is not the right place to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just another selfie. Saffron Blaze 22:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't want to be too formal but per XRay plus it was taken accidentally. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support because it's now a picture with historic value in and of itself, it was pretty good to begin with, and David Slater can go stick his long lens where the sun don't shine. Daniel Case (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ... and another case in point as to why I don't contribute images to Wikimedia Commons anymore. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bastial, animal, but not FP. A "snapsot" taken from an animal can't be featured. It is simply a random image, a snapshot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Who or what created the image is not a criterion for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: sorry, but what will be featured on this absolute and real/true random snapshot??? Can you please explain it me? That was neither wanted nor intended. It is comparable to a game of roulette or lotterie ... a simply chance from an interesting animal! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand. Dode boom, belangrijke voedselbron in evenwichtig biotoop 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 06:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Dead tree, important food source in a balanced ecosystem. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: sorry I do not know what you mean. Are the English language is not powerful. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality and the composition are not outstanding, the blue sky can be seen among the trees ruins the wet-ish atmosphere, Sorry. --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me; it is too busy for my taste. Lightning is too dark and dull as well. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea and the subject, but I'm not fully convinced by the composition - it's quite busy. Just some ideas that came to my head: 1) A lower angle could have enabled you to keep the branches at the top left corner out of the frame. Maybe concentrating on one of the two sections of the dead tree would have helped too. 2) The whole image is quite dark, but not dark enough to make this look like an intentional choice by the photographer (could potentially work very well with this subject). 3) The white balance seems to be a little bit too yellow (you won't have much living green things this time of the year of course, but still …). 4) I've got a suspicion that this subject might work quite well in black & white. --El Grafo (talk) 07:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am also unconvinced by the composition. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Seems left side trees leaning to the left and right side trees leaning to the right. Is that actually leaning or cause by the distortion with the wide angle lens(18mm)? --Laitche (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: I have automatically corrected lens with lightroom 5.7. Can also manually correct. For your information: it is hilly spot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction WB and verticals.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better with the correction. For me, wow is limited, but the quality is very good. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the composition is much better but about the quality(especially the colour range) seems rather difficult with EF-M for this photo, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Note: in my humble opinion is in early April not much color in a dark forest. It was important for me to bring the decay of dead tree good picture and that life in the vicinity of the tree has benefited. And I succeeded in my opinion. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small light correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 19:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

13 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No better example of oriel windows on Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Yann ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My eyes are surprisingly drawn to that picture every time I scroll through the huge FPC page. Simple, but striking picture to me. I don't think the lighting can get better than that for the subject : it emphasizes the textures quite well. - Benh (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only when I look this at 1280px, a head of statue and a cable at the right side appear, Here. Why? --Laitche (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    This is the previous version of this photo, I do not know why this is happening, at a resolution of 1280x881 it should be visible the last version. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • hmm, That's a mysterious. Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me a QI with good lightening. But something is wrong with the proportions. The window on the right extends noticably further in the vertical direction, than the one to the left. I get the impression that the vantage point was not right in the middle but has been atempted postcorrected by a perspective correction. It pretends to be symmetric, but is not quite so. It gives an unbalanced composition IMO.-- Slaunger (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't mind the tight crop for this but the lighting is not appropriate for the subject, the left window's shadow is cutting off and the right window's shadow is reaching the left window, that's the reason why this doesn't look excellent, in my opinion. --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Plus, I guess this photo was taken by low-angle notwithstanding it's showing just as if taken by level-angle, so I feel it strange. --Laitche (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Slaunger, he explained very well my own feeling.--Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Slaunger, Laitche & Jebulon - Capture a photo directly ahead is impossible, because there is a tree. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I know it's impossible but that way(getting strange feeling) doesn't work for me in this case. --Laitche (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
But I don't mind change my vote to neutral. --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Crocodylus acutus aka American crocodyle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 03:40:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Webysther 20131026172834 - Rocha com algas e ouriço-do-mar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 20:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock with sea urchin, red algae, green and yellow at beach in Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Webysther -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very beautiful, but unfortunately blurred and the water on the right is overexposed. --King of ♠ 02:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    @King of Hearts, Webysther: It's fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    Overexposed is simple to fix, if the data is in raw, give me one day to see this. About blurred i do no, because the long exp. cause this, water move the plants. -- Webysther (talk) 10:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Overexposed fixed. -- Webysther (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Webysther: A exposição não ficou boa. O melhor seria que a água à direita voltasse ao normal assim: [2]. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @ArionEstar: Applied over the raw the fixed, the quality is really better. -- Webysther (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    Color is better but unsharpness remains. --King of ♠ 04:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness is acceptable for a difficult moment for shooting, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's kinda good idea but not the wow idea, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good idea, but has technical problems. --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good for IQ, not the wow idea, IMO. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me it lacks some interesting focal point that the eye can rest on. The moss is not of sufficient interest in itself to fulfil that role. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tiradentes escuartejado (Tiradentes supliciado) by Pedro Américo 1893.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 16:10:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiradentes quatered, by Pedro Américo.

File:Singapore Supertree-Grove-in-The-Gardens-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2015 at 18:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Supertree Grove in Singapore
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 18:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very interesting subject, but unfortunately too tight on the sides, especially the right which is cut off. --King of ♠ 03:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is just a part of the much bigger Supertree Grove in Singapore. The trees are standing in a circle and you will always have some of them cut when viewing from ground level. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    Change to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral in light of the difficulty in obtaining a good composition. --King of ♠ 02:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support is a beautiful structure, the quality is excellent. The cut is not the best but the image is very pleasant.--LivioAndronico talk 12:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Definitely capable of being photographed at an FP level, but in this case the crops, even if they're unavoidable, and the washed-out sky don't work for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case. --Laitche (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Interesting for sure. --Tremonist (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Also per Daniel Case. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wall April 2015-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2015 at 15:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Minimalism: detail of wall and window in the Belém Cultural Centre, Lisboa, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see a little bit of barrel distortion. --King of ♠ 21:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the centered composition.--Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, that is a real possibility and it may deserve an alternative version. But what if the !votes split between the two?... What the hell, tht's go for it! Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like these minimalistic compositions a lot! It could benefit from a geocode. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Here it is: the exact object location, so you can go there and do a better job! By the way, I appreciate your deferred (and displaced) comments! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Both Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral but prefer this one. --Laitche (talk) 21:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I am struggling with the notion of minimalism in FPC. I don't mean this as an attack on anybody, but I personally feel that this is a kind of get-out-of-jail concept that makes an image untouchable to a set of expectations we would otherwise have, such as having a lot of EV, being an appealing and accurate representation of the motive, having nice light etc. When I look at the image, I feel that it is a good supporting photo for an article, giving people a better understanding of the facade details, but this is not something that gives me a wow effect or makes me think that the image is outstanding. Such photos might appeal to many, but I am not sure whether this is just because they are unusual and obviously different from boring standard images many creators now think should be FP. I am not denying that my oppose might be based on personal preference (I usually feel that images of entire works of architecture are superior), but at the end of the day, such preferences make our votes. BTW: The WB also looks too cold to me. --DXR (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for bringing this issue to the discussion, DXR. It is a matter of fact that the so-called "artsy images" were never concensually regarded as truly useful for the project (except the reproductions of notable artists) and have usually a hard time in FPC. However we should keep in mind that Commons repository is intended to much more than just illustrating Wikipedia articles. While WP:FPC is focused on the encyclopaedic use and value of the pictures in Wikipedia, that is not the case with Commons, as our FP are used to many purposes outside Wikimedia. I always said, and that is written in my profile of Meet our Photographers (here), that I consider Photography as a means to interpret reality and to transmit such interpretation to others. That is precisely what I'm doing here with the photos of the Centro Cultural de Belém, to which a minimalistic view seems to apply perfectly. Are these images useful, besides being beautiful (for me)? I believe so. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Alvesgaspar for your measured response. I think that the point I was trying to make is slightly different, though. I do not want to challenge the value of images like this one, in fact I do think it has EV. I just think that it is quite difficult to assess whether it is outstanding or "the best of commons", because there is little material to measure it against here. In this way, the vote becomes more of a "like vs. don't like" than I personally would like to see in this forum. I agree that WP:FP is more EV-driven, but at the same time COM:FP still is very much biased in the direction of EV on a spectrum between pure documentation and abstract art, at least if we look at what is presented here most of the time. --DXR (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 12:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Photographing a detail of a building, particularly one of architectural merit, is as important as photographing the whole facade or interior. Having looked at other images of this building, I see it lends itself to a minimalist approach. Here we can concentrate on the coloured bricks, the little dark squares and the squares-within-squares window. No other distractions. And symmetry. I can certainly see this photo appearing in a book that discusses the building or its architect, so for me it is plenty enough educational-value (as opposed to encyclopaedic value, where it is unlikely such small details would merit inclusion). -- Colin (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wall April 2015-2a.jpg[edit]

SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alternative version special to @Jebulon: (and also for myself) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's so funny, I've nerver seen the special alternative for an individual :) --Laitche (talk) 20:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one too. It is an improvement that the lower grey 'bar' is not included in this crop. I think it improves the composition. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes !--Jebulon (talk) 21:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but for me the off-center composition distracts from the minimalism. --King of ♠ 23:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me a perfect composition, everything centered might be wrong.--Hubertl (talk) 05:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. I also think that the original composition is better. --DXR (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's really a subjective issue, but I fail to get how moving the square to a rule of third point makes it more interesting on such an abstract picture. - Benh (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not inspiring to me, sorry Poco2 08:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't find this arrangement as satisfying as the first. -- Colin (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Voting ended on April 21. — Julian H. 15:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)


Planning (9e jour après proposition)[edit]

Sat 18 Apr → Mon 27 Apr
Sun 19 Apr → Tue 28 Apr
Mon 20 Apr → Wed 29 Apr
Tue 21 Apr → Thu 30 Apr
Wed 22 Apr → Fri 1 May
Thu 23 Apr → Sat 2 May
Fri 24 Apr → Sun 3 May
Sat 25 Apr → Mon 4 May
Sun 26 Apr → Tue 5 May
Mon 27 Apr → Wed 6 May